Tag: Speeches

  • King Charles III – 2026 Speech at Congress in Washington

    King Charles III – 2026 Speech at Congress in Washington

    The speech made by King Charles III in Washington on 28 April 2026.

    Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, Members of Congress, representatives of the American People across all states, territories, cities and communities.

    I would like to take this opportunity to express my particular gratitude to you all for the great honour of addressing this Joint Meeting of Congress and, on behalf of The Queen and myself, to thank the American people for welcoming us to the United States to mark this semi-quincentennial year of the Declaration of Independence.

    And for all of that time, our destinies as Nations have been interlinked. As Oscar Wilde said, “We have really everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language!”

    Ladies and gentlemen, we meet in times of great uncertainty; in times of conflict from Europe to the Middle East which pose immense challenges for the international community and whose impact is felt in communities the length and breadth of our own countries.

    We meet, too, in the aftermath of the incident not far from this great building that sought to harm the leadership of your Nation and to foment wider fear and discord. Let me say with unshakeable resolve: such acts of violence will never succeed. Whatever our differences, whatever disagreements we may have, we stand united in our commitment to uphold democracy, to protect all our people from harm, and to salute the courage of those who daily risk their lives in the service of our countries.

    Standing here today, it is hard not to feel the weight of history on my shoulder – because the modern relationship between our two Nations and our own peoples spans not merely 250 years, but over four centuries. It is extraordinary to think that I am the nineteenth in our line of Sovereigns to study, with daily attention, the affairs of America. So, I come here today with the highest respect for the United States Congress; this citadel of democracy created to represent the voice of all American people to advance sacred rights and freedoms. Speaking in this renowned chamber of debate and deliberation, I cannot help but think of my late mother, Queen Elizabeth, who, in 1991, was also afforded this signal honour and similarly spoke under the watchful eye of the Statue of Freedom above us. Today, I am here on this great occasion in the life of our Nations to express the highest regard and friendship of the British people to the people of the United States.

    As you may know, when I address my own Parliament at Westminster, we still follow an age-old tradition and take a member of Parliament ‘hostage’, holding him or her at Buckingham Palace until I am safely returned. These days, we look after our ‘guest’ rather well – to the point that they often do not want to leave! I don’t know,

    Mr Speaker, if there were any volunteers for that role here today…?

    As I look back across the centuries, Mr Speaker, there emerge certain patterns; certain self-evident truths from which we can learn and draw mutual strength. With the Spirit of 1776 in our minds, we can perhaps agree that we do not always agree – at least in the first instance! Indeed, the very principle on which your Congress was founded – no taxation without representation – was at once a fundamental disagreement between us, and at the same time a shared democratic value which you inherited from us. Ours is a partnership born out of dispute, but no less strong for it… So perhaps, in this example, we can discern that our Nations are in fact instinctively like-minded – a product of the common democratic, legal and social traditions in which our governance is rooted to this day. Drawing on these values and traditions, time and again, our two countries have always found ways to come together. And by Jove, Mr. Speaker, when we have found that way to agree, what great change is brought about – not just for the benefit of our peoples, but of all peoples.

    This, I believe, is the Special ingredient in our Relationship. As President Trump himself observed during his State Visit to Britain last Autumn, ‘The bond of kinship and identity between America and the United Kingdom is priceless and eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable.’

    This is by no means my first visit to Washington, D.C. – the capital of this great Republic. It is in fact my 20th visit to the United States, and my first as King and Head of the Commonwealth. This is a city which symbolises a period in our shared history, or what Charles Dickens might have called ‘A Tale of Two Georges’: the first President, George Washington, and my five-times Great Grandfather, King George III. King George never set foot in America and, please rest assured, I am not here as part of some cunning rearguard action!

    The Founding Fathers were bold and imaginative rebels with a cause. 250 years ago (or, as we say in the United Kingdom, just the other day….) they declared Independence. By balancing contending forces and drawing strength in diversity, they united thirteen disparate colonies to forge a Nation on the revolutionary idea of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’. They carried with them, and carried forward, the great inheritance of the British Enlightenment – as well as the ideals which had an even deeper history in English Common Law and Magna Carta.

    These roots run deep, and they are still vital. Our Declaration of Rights of 1689 was not only the foundation of our constitutional Monarchy, but also provided the source of so many of the principles reiterated – often verbatim – in the American Bill of Rights of 1791. And those roots go even further back in our history: the U.S. Supreme Court Historical Society has calculated that Magna Carta is cited in at least 160 Supreme Court cases since 1789, not least as the foundation of the principle that executive power is subject to checks and balances. This is the reason why there stands a stone, by the River Thames at Runnymede where Magna Carta was signed in the year 1215. This stone records that an acre of that ancient and historic site was given to the U.S.A. by the people of the United Kingdom, to symbolise our shared resolve in support of liberty, and in memory of President John F. Kennedy.

    Distinguished members of the 119th Congress, it is here in these very halls that this spirit of liberty and the promise of America’s Founders is present in every session and every vote cast.

    Not by the will of one, but by the deliberation of many, representing the living mosaic of the United States. In both of our countries, it is the very fact of our vibrant, diverse and free societies that gives us our collective strength, including to support victims of some of the ills that, so tragically, exist in both our societies today.

    And, Mr. Speaker, for many here – and for myself – the Christian faith is a firm anchor and daily inspiration that guides us not only personally, but together as members of our community. Having devoted a large part of my life to interfaith relationships and greater understanding, it is that faith in the triumph of light over darkness which I have found confirmed countless times. Through it I am inspired by the profound respect that develops as people of different faiths grow in their understanding of each other. It is why it is my hope – my prayer – that, in these turbulent times, working together and with our international partners, we can stem the beating of ploughshares into swords…

    I am mindful that we are still in the season of Easter, the season that most strengthens my hope. It is why I believe, with all my heart, that the essence of our two Nations is a generosity of spirit and a duty to foster compassion, to promote peace, to deepen mutual understanding and to value all people, of all faiths, and of none.

    The Alliance that our two Nations have built over the centuries – and for which we are profoundly grateful to the American people – is truly unique. And that Alliance is part of what Henry Kissinger described as Kennedy’s ‘soaring vision’ of an Atlantic Partnership based on twin pillars: Europe and America. That Partnership, I believe Mr. Speaker, is more important today than it has ever been.

    The first reigning British Sovereign to set foot in America was my Grandfather, King George VI. He visited in 1939 with my beloved Grandmother, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother. The forces of Fascism in Europe were on the march, and some time before the United States had joined us in the defence of freedom. Our shared values prevailed.

    Today, we find ourselves in a new era, but those values remain.

    It is an era that is, in many ways, more volatile and more dangerous than the world to which my late Mother spoke, in this Chamber, in 1991.

    The challenges we face are too great for any one Nation to bear alone. But in this unpredictable environment, our Alliance cannot rest on past achievements, or assume that foundational principles simply endure. As my Prime Minister said last month: ‘ours is an indispensable partnership. We must not disregard everything that has sustained us for the last eighty years. Instead, we must build on it’.

    Renewal today starts with security. The United Kingdom recognizes that the threats we face demand a transformation in British defence. That is why our country, in order to be fit for the future, has committed to the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War – during part of which, over fifty years ago, I served with immense pride in the Royal Navy, following in the Naval footsteps of my Father, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh; my Grandfather, King George VI; my Great-Uncle, Lord Mountbatten; and my Great-Grandfather, King George V.

    This year, of course, also marks the 25th anniversary of 9/11. This atrocity was a defining moment for America and your pain and shock were felt around the whole world. During my visit to New York, my wife and I will again pay our respects to the victims, the families, and the bravery shown in the face of terrible loss. We stood with you then. And we stand with you now in solemn remembrance of a day that shall never be forgotten.

    In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time, and the United Nations Security Council was united in the face of terror, we answered the call together – as our people have done so for more than a century, shoulder to shoulder, through two World Wars, the Cold War, Afghanistan and moments that have defined our shared security.

    Today, Mr. Speaker, that same, unyielding resolve is needed for the defence of Ukraine and her most courageous people – it is needed in order to secure a truly just and lasting peace. From the depths of the Atlantic to the disastrously melting ice-caps of the Arctic, the commitment and expertise of the United States Armed Forces and its allies lie at the heart of NATO, pledged to each other’s defence, protecting our citizens and interests, keeping North Americans and Europeans safe from our common adversaries.

    Our defence, intelligence and security ties are hardwired together through relationships measured not in years, but in decades.

    Today, thousands of U.S. service personnel, defence officials and their families are stationed in the United Kingdom, as British personnel serve with equal pride across thirty American States. We are building F-35s together. And we have agreed the most ambitious submarine programme in history – AUKUS – in partnership with Australia, a country of which I am also immensely proud to serve as Sovereign.

    We do not embark on these remarkable endeavours together out of sentiment. We do so because they build greater shared resilience for the future, so making our citizens safer for generations to come.

    Our common ideals were not only crucial for liberty and equality, they are also the foundation of our shared prosperity. The Rule of Law: the certainty of stable and accessible rules, an independent judiciary resolving disputes and delivering impartial justice. These features created the conditions for centuries of unmatched economic growth in our two countries. This is why our governments are concluding new economic and technology agreements – to write the next chapter of our joint prosperity and ensure that British and American ingenuity continues to lead the world.

    Our nations are combining talent and resources in the technologies of tomorrow: our new partnerships in nuclear fusion and quantum computing, and in A.I. and drug discovery, holding the promise of saving countless lives.

    More broadly, we celebrate the $430 billion in annual trade that continues to grow; the $1.7 trillion in mutual investment that fuels that innovation; and the millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic supported across both economies. These are strong foundations on which to continue to build, for generations yet unborn.

    Our ties in education, research, and cultural exchange empower citizens and future leaders of both countries.

    The Marshall Scholarship, named after the great General George Marshall, and the Association of which I am so proud to be Patron, are emblematic of the connection between our two nations. Since its founding, more than 2,300 scholarships have been awarded, opening doors for Americans from all walks of life to study at the UnitedKingdom’s leading universities.

    So as we look toward the next 250 years, we must also reflect on our shared responsibility to safeguard Nature, our most precious and irreplaceable asset.

    Millennia before our Nations existed, before any border drawn, the mountains of Scotland and Appalachia were one; a single, continuous range, forged in the ancient collision of continents.

    The natural wonders of the United States of America are indeed a unique asset, and generations of Americans have risen to this calling: indigenous, political and civic leaders, people in rural communities and cities alike, have all helped to protect and nurture what President Theodore Roosevelt called ‘the glorious heritage’ of thisland’s extraordinary natural splendour, on which so much of its prosperity has always depended.

    Yet even as we celebrate the beauty that surrounds us, our generation must decide how to address the collapse of critical natural systems, which threatens far more than the harmony and essential diversity of Nature. We ignore at our peril the fact that these natural systems – in other words, Nature’s own economy – provide the foundation for our prosperity and our national security.

    The story of the United Kingdom and the United States is, at its heart, a story of reconciliation, renewal and remarkable partnership.

    From the bitter divisions of 250 years ago, we forged a friendship that has grown into one of the most consequential Alliances in human history.

    I pray with all my heart that our Alliance will continue to defend our shared values, with our partners in Europe and the Commonwealth, and across the world, and that we ignore the clarion calls to become ever more inward-looking.

    Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice-President, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, America’s words carry weight and meaning, as they have since Independence. The actions of this great Nation matter even more. President Lincoln understood this so well, with his reflection in the magisterial Gettysburg Address that the world may little note what we say, but will never forget what we do. And so, to the United States of America, on your 250th birthday, let our two countries rededicate ourselves to each other in the selfless service of our peoples and of all the peoples of the world.

    God bless the United States and God bless the United Kingdom.

  • Keir Starmer – 2026 Comments on the Golders Green Attack

    Keir Starmer – 2026 Comments on the Golders Green Attack

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, at Downing Street on 30 April 2026.

    Yesterday, Britain’s Jewish community suffered yet another vile terrorist attack. Two men stabbed in broad daylight on the streets of Golders Green because they were Jews. I’ve just come back from Golders Green where I expressed my sadness and solidarity with that community but also my determination to act because the truth is this attack is not a one-off.

    There have been a series of attacks including an arson attack in Hendon, an attack on the Jewish Ambulance Service Hatzola, the fireball at Kenton United Synagogue which I visited last week and on top of all this Heaton Park in Manchester last October where two Jewish men were killed in a vile Islamist attack on their synagogue. And so people are scared, scared to show who they are in their community, scared to go to synagogue and practise their religion, scared to go to university as a Jew, to send their children to school as a Jew, to tell their colleagues that they are Jewish, even to use our NHS. Nobody should live like that in Britain but Jews do.

    And so yesterday this anxiety that is always there went to another place, to terror frankly. That is the right word. I want to thank the Jewish Security Services who wrestle with this every day and who alongside the police prevented a much greater tragedy yesterday.

    I met some of the first responders today and on behalf of the country I thanked them for their bravery. We will strengthen the visible police presence in our Jewish communities. We will increase our investment in those Jewish Security Services. We will introduce much stronger powers to shut down charities that promote antisemitic extremism. We will prevent hate preachers from entering our country, bar them from our campuses, our streets, our communities. Work with our justice system to speed up sentences on antisemitic attacks so there is a stronger deterrence factor as we do with riots.

    And we need stronger powers to tackle the malign threat posed by states like Iran because we know for a fact that they want to harm British Jews which is why we will fast-track the necessary legislation. And yet the truth is while we can and we will bring the full power of the state to bear on this, this is about society every bit as much as it is about security. At moments like this we often say this is not Britain, that these attacks are an afront to British values, to British tolerance, British decency but they keep happening. 

    And so today instead I will simply say that our values are not a gift handed down generation to generation. They are something we earn each day through action. They come from us.

    Antisemitism is an old, old hatred. History shows that the roots are deep and if you turn away it grows back. Yet far too many people in this country diminish it.

    They either don’t see it or they don’t want to see it. Take the marches that happen regularly across Britain. Of course we protect freedom of speech and peaceful protests in this country but if you are marching with people wearing pictures of paragliders without calling it out you are venerating the murder of Jews.

    If you stand alongside people who say globalise the intifada, you are calling for terrorism against Jews and people who use that phrase should be prosecuted. It is racism, extremely racism and it has left a minority community in this country scared, intimidated, wondering if they belong. So, I say again this government will do everything in our power to stamp this hatred out.

    We will strengthen our security and protect our Jewish community, but I also call on everyone decent in this country to open their eyes to Jewish pain, Jewish suffering and Jewish fear. I call on everyone to come together and fight antisemitism and I call on everyone to fight for the decent, respectful, tolerant Britain that I and millions of people love so that our freedom and our values can still speak loud and true to a community that can no longer take it on faith. Thank you.

  • Wes Streeting – 2026 Speech to the Royal College of Emergency Medicine’s (RCEM) Annual Conference

    Wes Streeting – 2026 Speech to the Royal College of Emergency Medicine’s (RCEM) Annual Conference

    The speech made by Wes Streeting, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 30 April 2026. We have been unable to acquire a version which hasn’t been redacted.

    It’s good to be with you today, and it’s really good to follow a session on high performance.

    Let me start by echoing Ian’s words in his opening remarks on Tuesday, when he encouraged you to be ‘loud and proud’ of what you do.

    At a time when more and more people have lost faith that things can get better…

    When a general sense of pessimism and cynicism risks slipping into fatalism…

    And when the very existence of the NHS is being contested like never before…

    You are helping to prove the doubters and doomsters wrong.

    So I want to say a simple but heartfelt thank you to all of you for all your energy, stamina, creativity, and the huge amount of hard graft over the past year, not just all of you in this room, you and all of your colleagues across the country, because you – the whole team – are achieving something we’ve not seen for a long time, an NHS that is improving.

    This government set you ambitious targets last year. And despite resident doctors’ strikes and record demand, you rose to the challenge.

    Best 4-hour performance in A&E in 5 years.

    Today, almost 4 in 5 patients are seen within 4 hours and 500,000 more people than last year are being seen on time.

    Ambulances are arriving faster than for half a decade.

    For suspected heart attacks and stroke patients, we’re reaching them five minutes faster than last year, when you and I both know that every second matters.

    We have been repeatedly told that the NHS recovery won’t happen, it can’t happen. But you are delivering it.

    And in doing so, you have landed one in the eye to every commentator, who was preparing the headline [political content removed], or ‘the NHS falls short’ depending on which of us they dislike most that day.

    You’ve delivered a blow to think tank orthodoxy, which says that the NHS will never be able to cut waiting lists, A&E, and ambulance waiting times all at once.

    And to those who argue that the results are just a March sprint, just wait until you see April’s performance data.

    This is a marathon, not a sprint. And there’s a long track ahead of us. But some of the frontrunners are already approaching the finishing line.

    North East and West Midlands ambulance services are within reach of the constitutional standard of 18-minute response times.

    At Sheffield children’s A&E, 98% of kids are seen within 4 hours – above the constitutional standard. West Herts, Northumbria, and George Eliot are all above 90%.

    George Eliot, in particular, has made incredible strides, going from 66% to 91% in just this past year.

    They are showing what’s possible when UEC is made a priority.

    The trust introduced round-the-clock assessments to speed up triage; seven-day ward rounds in the Acute Medical Unit to get patients home on time; and doctors working the discharge lounge to make sure patients had the medication they needed to send them home.

    Those simple steps have transformed the experience and the safety of their patients. They have proven that we can do it.

    Ambulance recovery isn’t happening by accident, if you excuse the pun.

    It is happening because the ambulance service is embracing change.

    Where paramedics would once provide extraordinary care on the scene, then take their patient to hospital, now they’re using their skills to act as coordinators of care.

    Providing the same world class urgent, on-the-spot care they always have, then deciding the best place for follow-up treatment, which isn’t always a hospital.

    The result is improved turnaround and handover times, and fewer people ending up in A&E.

    You in emergency medicine understand better than most that the NHS is not just a service, it’s a system.

    And when part of the system has broken down, people end up at your door.

    It’s why A&E had gone from Accident & Emergency to Anything & Everything.

    When people can’t see a GP, they end up in A&E, which is worse for them, worse for you, and more expensive for the taxpayer.

    When people can’t get the mental health support they need, they reach crisis point, which is worse for them, worse for you, and more expensive for the taxpayer.

    And when people can’t get the social or community care they need, they’re left in hospital, which is worse for them, worse for you, and more expensive for the taxpayer.

    And so a lot of the answers to cutting ambulance and A&E response times lie outside the doors of the emergency department.

    It’s why the health think tanks are so wrong to argue that the government ought to prioritise certain sections of the NHS over others.

    That we should focus on social care or emergency care first and do electives or GPs later.

    The way we will get the NHS out of the hole it had been left in is by week by week, year on year, across the board improvement. A rising tide that lifts all ships.

    The NHS has been the standout winner from this government. Record £26 billion a year investment at a time when the public finances are under big and growing pressures, with increased instability and uncertainty around the world.

    It shows what this government’s priority is.

    But you and I know that the additional funding alone cannot buy our way to recovery. It has to be accompanied by change and modernisation.

    A narrative emerged during the years of [political content removed] that the NHS just needs more inputs into the same model. More staff, more beds, more money in hospitals.

    Investment is part of the solution.

    But unless we change how the NHS works, those will only be sticking plasters, storing up the same problems for later down the line.

    There will still be ever-increasing numbers of patients walking through your doors and ever-increasing numbers stuck in beds waiting to go home.

    With the war in Iran and its consequences for the global economy, I’m afraid I can’t play the Oliver Twist of the Cabinet, pleading for more from the Treasury.

    Not because the Chancellor is Scrooge – to invoke another Dickens character – but because there isn’t any.

    So we’re having to mop up the consequences of austerity, Brexit, [political content removed], the pandemic, and the war in Ukraine, as well as dealing with the Iran crisis and making sure that as we do so we’re beating a path to a better future, not just seeking to scramble back to a broken status quo.

    So the new investment needs to be matched with change and modernisation to help that investment go further and to make sure we get to where we want to be.

    You in emergency medicine are leading the way and showing that change is possible.

    Ambulance services are providing more paramedic-led care at the scene.

    Urgent community response services in Dorset and Kirklees cared for patients, directed them to appropriate services, with 80% never needing to step foot in a hospital.

    Hear and Treat is freeing up ambulance crews to reach the most urgent patients faster, and get other patients the right care, in the right place, at the right time.

    We set what was an ambitious 45-minute target for ambulance handovers and today average handover times are down to just shy of 30 minutes.

    That’s more patients off ambulances and into EDs more quickly.

    And it’s only been possible because of the combined efforts of ambulance services and ED teams – and we are grateful for it.

    My department and the NHS worked with RCEM to pull together our model ED guidance.

    It identifies the most successful methods of streamlining emergency care from across the country, taking the best of the NHS to the rest of the NHS.

    This is the first chapter of the new book we are writing together, and I look forward to working with RCEM on the model discharge guidance, which is coming soon.

    The government is putting our money where our mouth is.

    We’re investing £300 million in 55 new or improved same day emergency care and urgent treatment centres.

    We’re spending almost an extra half a billion pounds on mental health facilities, including up to 85 Mental Health EDs – providing patients with rapid assessment, urgent treatment, and safe discharge with referral for longer term support.

    All of this will help to unclog emergency departments, and make sure patients are seen where they should be, when they should be, by who they should be.

    Much of the change you are leading is about delivering the left shift from within emergency medicine.

    And the government is leading the left shift outside of emergency departments.

    Our 10 Year Plan for Health set the NHS on course to become as much a Neighbourhood Health Service as a National Health Service.

    A key measure of its success will be A&E admissions – specifically the 1 in 5 patients who turn up to A&E who do not need urgent and emergency care.

    They have been failed upstream.

    Our modernisation agenda is all about catching patients earlier, treating them faster, and preventing them falling ill in the first place.

    That work has already begun.

    We’ve recruited 2,000 more GPs and patients can now request appointments online.

    We’re delivering millions more dental appointments.

    We’ve invested £600 million more in community pharmacy and given them greater powers to monitor and manage patients with ongoing conditions.

    We’re investing £4.6 billion in social care.

    We’ve legislated for the first ever fair pay agreement for care workers, backed by half a billion pounds.

    We’ve given carers the biggest increase in carer’s allowance since the 1970s and increased the disabled facilities grant, which will help to speed up discharge, reduce admissions, and most importantly of all, give people dignity, freedom, quality of life and comfort in their own homes.

    And the first report from the Casey Commission is coming later this year, forging the national consensus we need to build a National Care Service.

    New neighbourhood health services will bring together healthcare professionals to deliver proactive and personalised care, out of hospital, in the community.

    We’ve set them a target of reducing avoidable hospital admissions by 10% for the most vulnerable patients, backed by new financial incentives.

    I know that the most difficult cases you see are patients in the midst of a mental health crisis. Failed by a lack of early support, in A&E through desperation, often the very worst place for them to be.

    So, we are intervening earlier.

    This government promised to recruit 8,500 more mental health workers by the end of the Parliament.

    And today I can announce that we have kept that promise… three years early.

    We have recruited 8,500 more therapists, psychiatrists, and mental health nurses. They are delivering more care, earlier, and closer to home.

    Another 900,000 children can also now see a mental health support team in their own school, thanks to action we have already taken.

    Promises made, promises kept.

    Change has begun. And the best is still to come.

    One of the bigger balancing acts I face as a political leader is giving the public confidence that the NHS is improving and hope for the future, at the same time as acknowledging that we know that things still aren’t good enough.

    Corridor care is the most visible, most distressing symptom of the pressures in our NHS.

    And since emergency departments are the frontline of the NHS and most people’s first impression of a hospital, you’re in the full glare of the public spotlight – and often used as the barometer for how the service is doing overall.

    I know this will be a test the government is judged against.

    When we came into office, NHS England didn’t measure corridor care, let alone have a plan to address it.

    Corridors were officially referred to as ‘temporary escalation spaces’.

    And as corridor care became normalised, you, the teams working in those conditions, suffered the moral injury of having to treat your patients in circumstances so undignified that you wouldn’t wish them on your worst enemy, never mind your closest loved one.

    I have walked past many of those trolleys. I cannot imagine walking past lines of trolleys every day, desperately wishing you could do something about it, but being held back.

    And I want to thank the Royal College, alongside the Royal College of Nursing and others, for never accepting this practice, for sounding the alarm, and for keeping the pressure on me and others to act.

    I am clear: corridor care is not normal, it is not acceptable, it should never be tolerated, and I am determined to end it.

    We’re calling it what it is; we’ve defined it; we’re measuring it; and with your help, we’re finally getting on top of it.

    Once again, change is being led from below.

    Blackpool are using data to predict the busiest periods and clearing beds in advance.

    The main corridor [political content removed] was cleared when the Medical Director and Chief Nurse took over discharge decisions.

    And take [political content removed], as seen on TV, because when its corridors were full of trolleys this winter, the broadcasters understandably chose the hospital of [political content removed] to exemplify the national crisis.

    I was back there the other month, no cameras in sight, apart from the one on my phone, walking the same corridors I did in January, but this time they were empty. Demand hadn’t changed, the level of funding hadn’t changed, but the model of care had.

    They put the senior consultant on the front door of the A&E to make swift triaging decisions – sending frail elderly people who needed care, but not A&E, into the frailty same day emergency care centre. And they worked with the Ambulance Service and community teams to get people the right care at home.

    As a result, 12-hour waits are down, 10,000 corridor hours were saved in February alone, and the corridors were empty aside from one chap who was about to be wheeled in for a scan.

    That is amazing progress, a real credit to the staff of Queen’s, and they are sustaining that progress.

    It’s not always easy, but it is important that we recognise improvement and we celebrate success.

    I said as much publicly, and then received a text message after an interview on BBC Breakfast, and that message said, ‘Glad to see this can be done. I had the opposite experience with my dad this weekend.’

    Her elderly father, who has Parkinson’s, had been left on a bed in a corridor by a vending machine, with a small bleed on the brain, with no water, no buzzer, and no dignity.

    That is the contradiction of where the NHS is today.

    There has been marked improvement.

    Incredible progress has been made against predictions and expectations.

    But too many patients are still being failed.

    What we have shown together in just under two years that this government has been in office, is that the NHS can change and things can get better.

    Success has come when we’ve moved as a pack, working together, driven by a simple but powerful conviction that we will not accept the status quo anymore.

    It’s not easy. We are having to rebuild the plane mid-flight. There are times when it is a bumpy ride.

    If we’re getting things wrong, I want to hear about it. If something’s not working, we need to know.

    But we must never forget that we are one team of 1.5 million people in the National Health Service, working alongside another 1.5 million in social care.

    Resident doctors say I need to do more for them. So does general practice. So do consultants. And so does every specialty.

    Take Advice & Guidance. If patients should be on waiting lists for elective care, that’s where I want them to be.

    But if they can be treated faster and better in the community, that is better for everyone.

    Yet even on that simple principle, we have encountered opposition.

    We can’t do everything, for everyone, everywhere, all at once. And if everyone just advocates for their part of the service, the NHS is going to end up like an overloaded shopping trolley with the wheels all pointing in different directions.

    Every part of the service has been under real pressure and has been through extended crises over the past decade.

    It isn’t just your corner of the NHS that feels like that.

    The model of care was broken across the whole service.

    So, the NHS has to change to survive. And it’s going to take a concerted effort from everyone.

    That’s why I wanted to speak to you all today.

    You and your colleagues are stepping up. You are proving the pessimists wrong and showing that change is possible. In doing so, you are charting the course to a brighter future.

    So, I need you to keep at it.

    To keep showing the innovation, drive, and leadership that is taking the NHS from the worst crisis in its history, getting it back on its feet, and making it fit for the future.

    We can do it.

    All of us.

    Together.

    And what a legacy that would be for our country.

    Thank you very much.

  • Keir Starmer – 2026 Speech at USDAW Conference

    Keir Starmer – 2026 Speech at USDAW Conference

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, on 27 April 2026.

    Thank you…

    Thank you, Jane.

    Thank you Joanne.

    It is great to be here for your annual delegate meeting as General Secretary.

    And I’ve heard that yesterday and today that this is going really well here.

    So it’s fantastic to be invited to be with you, and it’s always great to be here in this room, in this environment at your conference.

    I was here two years ago and I was here several years before that.

    But last time I was here as Leader of the Opposition. This time I am here as Prime Minister working with you to deliver the change that we need across our country.

    But I want to start by sharing something with you…

    It’s from a shopworker called Finnola…

    Who is here with us today…

    She’s an USDAW rep…

    She’s worked in a supermarket for eleven years…

    And last year, at the TUC Congress reception…

    Finnola found me and just gave me a letter for me to read.

    I want to share it with you because this is the letter. She said:

    “A few years ago, I was verbally abused by a customer when I asked if he needed assistance.

    “He started shouting racist remarks at me. And he threatened to go after my children.”

    She said: “I felt so scared, my legs were shaking.”

    Finnola then said in her letter to me: “The next day I wanted to stay at home. My mental health was in a terrible place.

    “But as a single parent, reliant on Statutory Sick Pay, I couldn’t afford to lose a day of pay.”

    And the reason why Finnola had given me the letter – and she went on to say:

    “This is why the Employment Rights Bill is so important.

    “ It will increase the responsibility for employers to protect workers like me from harassment.

    “And it will mean all workers will have access to sick pay from day one.”

    Finnola thank you – I think you are in Region C. Would you mind standing up so we can give you a round of applause?

    Finnola – thank you for handing that letter to me.

    What you went through was really awful.

    But the really important thing is – we heard you… 

    We passed that Bill…

    We stood firm on the side of working people.

    And it is now, Finnola, the law of this land…

    For you and every single person in this country…

    To finally enjoy the protections you deserve at work.

    Sick pay – from day one…

    Paternity leave – from day one…

    Fire and rehire – scrapped…

    Protection for whistle-blowers…

    No more gagging orders on sexual harassment…

    No more exploitative zero-hour contracts…

    Stronger collective consultation rights – and I know how important that is for shopworkers…

    And, underpinning all of that…

    A proper living wage…

    The embodiment of the simple demand…

    That has always guided the labour movement…

    A fair day’s pay – for a fair day’s work…

    That is what we have delivered, together.

    That is a Britain fair for all.

    And delegates – it’s more than just a change in the law.

    Because as Finnola said in another part of her letter…

    We faced huge resistance.

    I mean – we announced those proposals back in 2022 – nearly four years ago now. 

    And from day one…

    Some people wanted to stop it at all costs. 

    It’s a reminder for all of us that everything in politics…

    Everything that the labour movement has achieved over the years…

    It’s always hard-won and hard-fought for…

    Everything.

    You have to stand firm…

    You have to stand together…

    You have to fight.

    But when we do that… 

    Then together – we send a message to every corner of our country…

    To the shop-workers…

    But also to the cleaners…

    The carers…

    The drivers…

    Technicians…

    Cooks…

    Bar tenders…

    The working people of this country…

    That whatever your job, whatever your background…

    You deserve security, respect and fair pay at work…

    That is the Britain we are building…

    A country – that is fair for all.

    And conference I’ll always fight for working people… 

    Because I know exactly whose side I’m on.

    Let me tell you about another worker…

    A carer. 

    Works long hour on low pay.

    Year after year after year.

    She was a care worker during the pandemic.

    Fourteen-hour shifts, often overnight.

    And do you know – in the pandemic, just like Finnola…

    Some care workers didn’t have sick pay…

    So if they were sick – they had to stay at home and simply not got paid at all.

    In the pandemic – as we were all clapping for them…

    Recognising what they were doing for our country.

    Well, delegates…

    That care-worker is my sister.

    And every day I ask myself – does Britain work for her?

    Does Britain work for people like my late brother?

    I’ve had a life touched by opportunity – I grew up working class and I’ve been lucky.

    But Nick, my brother… 

    He had difficulties learning and spent his entire adult life going from one job to the next.

    Does Britain work for people like him?

    Because there are millions of people like that.

    People who have been ignored by politics for years. 

    People who don’t get the dignity and respect that they deserve…

    And who don’t get the opportunity…

    To go as far as their talent and effort would take them.

    So yes – I know whose side I am on.

    I’m on the side of the young people, whose gifts lie in their hands…

    Who work hard – want their talents to be recognised…

    Just want an opportunity in their community.

    That’s why I’m boosting apprenticeships…

    Setting up new Technical Excellence Colleges…

    Investing in special needs education…

    And giving every young person in the country, struggling to find work…

    The guarantee of training, work support or an apprenticeship.

    I’m on the side of the children who during austerity had to go to school without breakfast.

    Cold, because they couldn’t afford to put their heating on…

    Tired, because the same thing happened yesterday and the day before that and the day before that.

    That’s why I’ve extended free school meals…

    Why I’m setting up free breakfast clubs in every primary school…

    And why I’ve ended the shameful two-child benefit limit…

    Lifting – nearly half a million children out of poverty and giving them the chance that they deserve in life.

    And I’m on the side of working people, just like my sister…

    The backbone of this country…

    People who work harder and harder…

    But see their pay getting them less and less…

    The people – who worry about the cost of living…

    They’re not asking for the world…

    They want a bit of security…

    Peace of mind…

    And a little bit of extra money…

    So they can treat their kids, every now and again.

    That’s who’s side I am on, delegates… 

    That is why I’ve frozen rail fares…

    Frozen prescription charges…

    Given renters more power…

    Capped ground rents…

    Raised the living wage by a record amount…

    And why – whatever happens in the Middle East…

    We have cut your energy bills…

    And we have capped them until July.

    Delegates…

    That is another thing I will always stand firm on.

    I will never let this country be dragged into a war that is not in our interest – never. 

    That is a lesson British politics should have learnt a long time ago, with Iraq.

    And yet – when the rush to war began on Iran…

    I was heavily criticised by others…

    Who had no thought for the consequences…

    For our country – for your family.

    But that is not how I operate.

    Because I have working people in my minds eye…

    For every decision.

    And yet, delegates…

    I have to level with you about Iran. 

    Because the truth is – the economic consequences could still be with us for some time.

    You don’t need to be a politician to know that…

    You can see it on every petrol forecourt across the country.

    I’ll repeat what I just said, because it’s important…

    In April – because of decisions we made at the budget…

    Your gas bills came down.

    And they will stay down until July – whatever happens in Iran.

    Fuel duty is also frozen until September.

    We’ve supported people who heat their homes using oil. 

    And we are monitoring this daily…

    So delegates for example – tomorrow…

    I am chairing a meeting in COBR on the impact…

    Bringing in people from the Bank of England…

    So you can be sure…

    We will stand by working people in this crisis.

    But look – just like with Iraq years ago, there is a deeper lesson here. 

    One that British politics has continually refused to learn.

    Because what Iran shows – is that once again…

    Events happening miles away from Britain…

    Have the capacity to hurt our living standards, our future, and our security.

    And so our response will define, not just this Government…

    But arguably – this generation.

    And so this time it must be different.

    We cannot respond to this moment…

    By thinking we just need to get back to the status quo…

    That is the mistake that was made after the 2008 financial crash, with austerity…

    It was made in Brexit…

    Covid…

    And the Ukraine war… 

    And we cannot add Iran to that list.

    Because the status quo manifestly failed working people…

    It kept your wages low…

    The economy stagnant…

    And your public services – decimated.

    In other words – the status quo…

    Made working people like you: pay the price.

    I would not go back to that – even if I could…

    And delegates – we can’t…

    Because the world has changed.

    It is more volatile and dangerous now than at any other point in my lifetime, and I’m sure in yours.

    It will test and test again, every element of our security…

    Our economic security…

    Our energy security…

    Our defence security. 

    That’s why we’ve had to confront such difficult decisions…

    We are working at pace to give Britain a stronger foundation…

    Trying to make us a more resilient country…

    So that we can weather, not just this storm…

    But all the storms that are going to be much more frequent in this dangerous world. 

    It’s about resilience.

    That’s what gives us security and control…

    Without it, we are constantly pushed off course by events beyond our borders.

    But with it, we have the power to act…

    We can strengthen our security…

    Take control of our future…

    And with that control… 

    We can deliver the fairer Britain that working people want to see.

    Now you can see this in everything we’ve done…

    Before and during the Middle East crisis.

    Yes – we capped your energy bills…

    But we’ve also invested in clean British energy…

    That’s the only way to free us from tyrants like Putin who can manipulate gas prices…

    And so we’ve backed British power…

    Taken control of our energy security.

    Yes – we’ve stayed out of the war…

    But we’ve also rebuilt our alliances in Europe…

    Boosted our defences with the biggest sustained investment since the Cold War…

    Backed British jobs…

    And taken control of our defence security.

    And yes – we have taken steps to push your wages up, as you deserve…

    But we’ve also launched an ambitious industrial strategy…

    Repaired the public finances…

    And given ordinary people, in places like Blackpool…

    The power to decide how we rebuild together…

    That’s our Pride in Place investment programme…

    We put those with skin in the game…

    In charge of their community… 

    To give you more control over what matters to you.

    And delegates – I know what matters to you, particularly in this room, and those that you represent…

    Is security in your workplace.

    Greater stability in the hours that you work…

    Regular hours – each week…

    So you can plan work around your family life.

    This is my point…

    Security isn’t something that is delivered by Government…

    It is something that has to be felt.

    And you should feel safe and secure in your workplace…

    That is fundamental.

    It is your right.

    Now, I started this by reading out Finnola’s letter…

    And when you do that with a letter, during a speech like this…

    You can give the impression, you know that…

    This example is extraordinary.

    But it’s not – is it?

    Finnola’s experience is the kind of thing happens every day, right across this country…

    Working people, grafters – go to work, do the right thing, keep our high streets thriving…

    And yet too often they are abused or assaulted by people who think they can get away with it…

    And just cheat the system.

    It’s disgraceful. 

    It is disgraceful – that people, just working in their shop, have to take abuse from customers.

    It is disgraceful – that people feel sick to the stomach thinking about how they are going to get through the day…

    And it is disgraceful – that people can have their lives and livelihoods ruined by persistent shop theft.

    So – first of all, I want you to know – that we see this…

    We’re not going to dismiss it…

    We’re not going to fob you off with half-measures.

    We are currently reforming the police across the country…

    So we can free up their time and their money…

    To focus more on street policing…

    Neighbourhood policing…

    Cracking down on anti-social behaviour…

    We’ve already got an extra 3000 neighbourhood police on the streets…

    And there’s more to come.

    We’ve scrapped the ridiculous regulation…

    Where stolen goods worth less than £200 would not be properly investigated…

    That was a shoplifters’ charter – and we’ve ended it. And not before time.

    And we’ve toughened up punishment too…

    We’re giving police stronger powers…

    Making the abuse and assault of retail workers a specific crime…

    Giving you the same protections as emergency workers. And you deserve it.

    And look – I’m not blind to how big this challenge is…

    But the number of people charged has gone up by 17% in the latest stats…

    Shop theft is down – it’s only slightly down…

    But the tide could be turning.

    There’s also the hope of technology…

    Because in some parts of the country…

    Police and retailers have been using technology that sends CCTV footage through to the police – immediately.

    So there’s no delay…

    No risk that the footage might be wiped before evidence can be collated…

    You’re all familiar with that.

    It all happens straight away, goes straight through…

    And in some of those areas where those trials are taking place…

    The police are solving double the number of shop thefts – double.

    So I want to see that rolled out across the country…

    Make a real difference…

    Because this Government has your back…

    We are calling time on the free-for-all…

    And we are standing firm, together…

    Against the disgraceful crime of shop theft. 

    (5)

    And you know – what is true of shoplifting…

    Is true of everything… 

    It is how we change this country…

    We change it – together. 

    I know times are tough – they’ve been tough for years…

    I’ve seen it through my own family.

    And so given everything that working people have been through because of politics… 

    I know it’s a bit rich for politicians to say – Britain needs you…

    I get that.

    But I’ve always believed in partnership.

    Those have always been my values when it comes to this movement…

    To business…

    To the whole country.

    Because I fundamentally believe…

    That the common bond of our country…

    The ground that we all share and love… .

    It is stronger than the grievance and division we see in so much of politics.

    And so – bottling the pride that you all feel…

    For your workplace…

    Your community…

    Your country…

    That is the key to changing Britain…

    And coming out of this period… 

    Stronger and fairer.

    And I tell you now…

    I will fight for that with every breath I have…

    I will fight for working people…

    Fight – for the tolerant, decent, respectful Britain that I know and I love…

    Because that is my politics and it is time…

    To strengthen our security…

    Take control of our future…

    And build a Britain that is fair for all.

    Thank you so much conference.

  • Ian Murray – 2026 Statement on UK Biobank Data

    Ian Murray – 2026 Statement on UK Biobank Data

    The statement made by Ian Murray, the Minister for Digital Government and Data, in the House of Commons on 23 April 2026.

    With permission, Madam Deputy Speaker, I will make a statement about the use of UK Biobank data.

    UK Biobank is a non-profit charity, independent of Government. The Biobank brings together data, kindly donated by its volunteer participants, that is shared with accredited researchers globally to make significant scientific discoveries that improve patient health. That includes discovering genes that affect the risk of heart disease or cancer, identifying new ways of predicting dementia, identifying early warning signs for cancers, understanding immunity to covid-19, and work towards earlier detection of Parkinson’s. It is one of the most successful and important studies of its type, and it continues to benefit patients in the UK and around the world. We are all grateful to those individuals who are part of this landmark study that is so important for all of our health.

    On Monday 20 April, the UK Biobank charity informed the Government that it had identified that its data had been advertised for sale by several sellers on Alibaba’s e-commerce platforms in China. Biobank told us that three listings that appeared to sell UK Biobank participation data had been identified. At least one of the three datasets appeared to contain data from all 500,000 UK Biobank volunteers. Additional listings offered support for applying for legitimate access to UK Biobank data or analytical support for researchers who already have access to the data. I want to reassure the House up front, however, that Biobank has advised that this data did not contain participants’ names, addresses, contact details or telephone numbers. The Government have spoken to the vendor today and they do not believe that there were any purchases from the three listings before they were taken down.

    Once the Government were made aware of the situation, we took immediate action to protect participants’ data. First, we worked with Biobank, the Chinese Government and the vendor to ensure that the three listings that UK Biobank informed us included participant data had been removed. I want to thank the Chinese Government for the speed and seriousness with which they worked with us to help remove the listings and the ongoing work to remove any further listings. Secondly, we ensured that the Biobank charity revoked access to the three research institutions identified as the source of the information. Thirdly, we have asked that the Biobank charity pauses further access to its data until it has put in place a technical solution to prevent data from its current platform from being downloaded in this way again. I can confirm to the House that this pause is now in place. UK Biobank has also referred itself to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

    We are still working with Biobank to ascertain from it the specific detail of what has happened. We have asked it to investigate how this data ended up for sale online as a priority, but I wanted to ensure that the House was aware of the incident and the action that the Government are taking.

    Officials have been in regular contact with UK Biobank since the Government were made aware of the issue on Monday. I personally spoke to the chief executive and chair last night, alongside the Minister of State for Science and the Minister for Health Innovation and Safety. We have received assurances that the charity will conduct a rapid board-level review of the safeguards in place for accessing its data.

    As I mentioned, in the short term, Biobank will suspend downloads from its platform. That is until a new system is brought in to control analysis downloads to approved researchers and will significantly enhance data access controls and safeguards. We have advised the chair and chief executive of Biobank to write to all participants as soon as possible to ensure that they are aware of what has happened.

    In summary, and to be clear to the House and to those people affected, the charity has assured us that the data did not contain anybody’s names, addresses or contact details. It includes only data of people who have explicitly opted in to be part of the Biobank. Those are people who have given their explicit consent that this data can be used, in the knowledge that it will be shared with researchers globally.

    Participants have done a great service to the people of this country, and human health globally, through their participation. For example, valuable research is being carried out at McGill University in Canada into chronic pain, which afflicts millions of people here in the UK. We expect UK Biobank to remain one of the leading health research resources.

    This has been an unacceptable abuse of the UK Biobank charity’s data, and an abuse of the trust that participants rightly expect when sharing their data for research purposes. The Government take the incident extremely seriously, which is why we have acted rapidly to support the UK Biobank charity in its response and why I wanted to update the House at the earliest opportunity.

    The Government will soon be issuing new guidance on control of data from research studies. I take this opportunity once again to urge all businesses and charities to ensure that that their systems and data-sharing processes are as secure as possible. We wrote to businesses last week about the cyber-security tools available to them—for free—from the Government and the steps they should take to maximise security. Ensuring the safe use of UK data is a priority for the Government. I commend this statement to the House.

  • Anna Turley – 2026 Comments on Jeremy Corbyn and Antisemitism

    Anna Turley – 2026 Comments on Jeremy Corbyn and Antisemitism

    The comments made by Anna Turley, the Labour Party chair, on 23 April 2026.

    Zack Polanski’s rewriting of history is beyond the pale. Not only is it downright offensive, but it is completely wrong.

    Labour has a proud tradition as an anti-racist party. But under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, we endured the most shameful period in our history and the equalities watchdog found that we had acted unlawfully in our discrimination and harassment of the Jewish community.

    For Polanski to dismiss that as ‘propaganda’ shows his own determination to court the worst of the worst into his own ranks.

    Keir Starmer booted the antisemites out of the Labour party when he became leader. The Greens have now opened their arms to them. The contrast could not be clearer.

  • Ed Davey – 2026 Speech on Security Vetting

    Ed Davey – 2026 Speech on Security Vetting

    The speech made by Ed Davey, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, in the House of Commons on 20 April 2026.

    It is 2022 all over again. Back then, when the Prime Minister was in opposition, and when it was Boris Johnson who was accused of misleading Parliament and scapegoating senior officials, the then Leader of the Opposition could not have been clearer; he said:

    “The public need to know that not all politicians are the same—that not all politicians put themselves above their country—and that honesty, integrity and accountability matter.”—[Official Report, 25 May 2022; Vol. 715, c. 298.]

    He promised “change”. He promised to

    “break this cycle and stop the chaos.”

    He promised a Government with

    “more focus on long-term strategy, not the short-term distractions that can animate Westminster.”

    I am afraid that the fact that he has even had to make a statement today shows how badly he has failed—how badly he has let down the millions of people across our country who are so desperate for change.

    The Prime Minister blames his officials. He says that he had “no idea”. He gives every impression of a Prime Minister in office, but not in power. The facts remain, even by his own account, that the Prime Minister appointed Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States even after he had been warned about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The Prime Minister announced the appointment before Mandelson had been vetted, despite the clear risk to national security of putting someone unsuitable in that role. One of his top officials, just three weeks into the job, clearly believed that the Prime Minister wanted Mandelson to be appointed regardless of what the vetting process turned up. The Prime Minister has relied on the vetting process to defend his decisions, so why did he ask so few questions personally about the vetting process?

    We all know the truth: the Prime Minister knew that appointing Mandelson was an enormous risk, but he decided that it was a risk worth taking—a catastrophic error of judgment. Now that has blown up in his face, the only decent thing to do is take responsibility. Back in 2022, the Prime Minister rightly accused Boris Johnson of expecting others to take the blame while he clung on. That was not acceptable then, and it is not acceptable now. I hope that the Prime Minister can at least tell the House this. We will be listening very carefully to his answer. Was he given advice by Simon Case, the then Cabinet Secretary, that the necessary security clearances should be acquired before he confirmed his choice for US ambassador? Did the Prime Minister follow that advice—yes or no?

    After years of chaos under the Conservatives, we needed a Government focused on the interests of the people—the cost of living crisis, the health and care crisis, and our national security. We needed a Government with honesty, integrity and accountability. Will the Prime Minister finally accept that the only way that he can help to deliver that is by resigning?

    The Prime Minister

    I set out in my statement the full facts. In September, when the Bloomberg emails came to light, I asked the then Cabinet Secretary to review the process. He told me that the process was as it should have been, and as soon as the information about the security vetting came to light last Tuesday, I asked for the facts to be established, so that I could update Parliament.

    The right hon. Gentleman asks me about the announcement before developed vetting. He has heard the evidence that I have given to the House from the former Cabinet Secretary and from the former permanent secretary. In relation to the advice from Simon Case, when I asked the former Cabinet Secretary to review the process after September 2025, he specifically addressed whether the process had been followed by referencing the Simon Case letter, and assured me that the process was the right process to have followed. In answer to his question, that was specifically looked at by Sir Chris Wormald in the review that was conducted in September last year.

  • Emily Thornberry – 2026 Speech on Security Vetting

    Emily Thornberry – 2026 Speech on Security Vetting

    The speech made by Emily Thornberry, the Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury, in the House of Commons on 20 April 2026.

    The truth is that my Committee did ask. We asked on the record, and we got a partial truth that could hardly be the whole truth. We are on record as asking the very questions that hecklers on the Opposition Benches say should have been asked. The answers are there, on the record; people can see what we got when we did ask.

    A month before Mandelson’s appointment was announced, the then Cabinet Secretary advised that the necessary security clearance should be acquired before a political appointment was confirmed. That does not seem to have been the usual practice. I am glad that it has changed, because the process was clearly abused. Someone—probably Peter Mandelson himself—leaked his appointment as US ambassador to the press, which effectively bounced the Government into confirming it. When the confirmation of his appointment came forward, neither the offer letter to Peter Mandelson nor the Government’s press release made it clear that the appointment was subject to vetting. Does it not look as though, for certain members of the Prime Minister’s team, getting Peter Mandelson the job was a priority that overrode everything else, and security considerations were very much second order?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my right hon. Friend for her question. Her Committee did ask relevant questions, and that is why I have indicated that it was unforgivable that the Foreign Secretary was asked to sign a statement in response to those very questions without being told about the recommendation. The questions were asked; the Foreign Secretary was advised and asked to sign a statement without being told the relevant information. That is unforgivable. As for the appointment before developed vetting, I have changed that process now, so that it can never happen again; my right hon. Friend the Committee Chair heard me quote the evidence of the former Cabinet Secretary and the former permanent secretary in relation to that.

    Let me deal with my right hon. Friend’s third point, which is that somehow Downing Street’s wish to appoint Peter Mandelson overrode security concerns—[Interruption.] No, Mr Speaker, let me be very clear: if I had been told that Peter Mandelson, or anybody else, had failed or not been given clearance on security vetting, I would not have appointed them. A deliberate decision was taken to withhold that material from me. This was not a lack of asking; this was not an oversight—[Interruption.] It was a decision taken not to share that information on repeated occasions.

  • Lindsay Hoyle – 2026 Statement on the Arrest of a Parliamentary Worker under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 Act

    Lindsay Hoyle – 2026 Statement on the Arrest of a Parliamentary Worker under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 Act

    The statement made by Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker of the House of Commons, on 20 April 2026.

    Before we start today’s business, I want to make a brief statement about a security matter. I have been informed by the police that a former parliamentary employee was arrested last week under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. The police investigation is ongoing. As the House knows, we do not discuss the details of such issues on the Floor of the House—it is an ongoing criminal investigation. I do not intend to take points of order on the matter, and I will update Members when I am in a position to share more information.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Speech on Security Vetting

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Speech on Security Vetting

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, in the House of Commons on 20 April 2026.

    I thank the Prime Minister for advance sight of his statement. His reputation is at stake, and everyone is watching, so it is finally time for the truth.

    Earlier today, Downing Street admitted that the Prime Minister inadvertently misled the House. The Prime Minister has chosen not to repeat that from the Dispatch Box. I remind him that, under the ministerial code, he has a duty to correct the record at the earliest opportunity. The Prime Minister says he only found out on Tuesday that Peter Mandelson failed the security vetting. The earliest opportunity to correct the record was Prime Minister’s questions on Wednesday, almost a week ago. This is a breach of the ministerial code. Under that code, he is bound to be as open as possible with Parliament and the public in answering questions today, so let me start with what we do know.

    We know the Prime Minister personally appointed Peter Mandelson to be our ambassador to the United States. We know that Mandelson had a close relationship with a convicted paedophile. We know that he had concerning links with Russia and China—links that had already raised red flags. We know that the Prime Minister announced the appointment before vetting was complete—an extraordinary and unprecedented step for the role of US ambassador.

    The Prime Minister says that it was “usual” because it was a political appointment, so I remind him, and the rest of the Labour Front Bench who are heckling, that Peter Mandelson was a politician who had been sacked twice from Government for lying. That meant he should have gone through the full security process. We also know that when Peter Mandelson failed the security vetting, he was allowed to continue in the role with access to top secret intelligence and security information. This goes beyond propriety and ethics; this is a matter of national security.

    Let me turn to what we do not know. We still do not know exactly why Peter Mandelson failed that vetting. We do not know what risks our country was exposed to. We do not know how it is possible that the Prime Minister said repeatedly that this was a failure of vetting, went on television and said things that were blatantly incorrect, and not a single adviser or official told him that what he was saying was not true. At every turn, with every explanation, the Government story has become murkier and more contradictory. It is time for the truth.

    There are too many questions to ask in the allotted time, so I will ask the Prime Minister just six. I have taken the unprecedented step of providing these questions to the Prime Minister in advance, so he has them in front of him. I have asked for these questions to be put online for the public. They and I expect him to answer.

    The Prime Minister appointed a national security risk to our most sensitive diplomatic post. Let us look at how this happened. The right hon. and learned Gentleman told me at PMQs in September 2025 that

    “full due process was followed”—[Official Report, 10 September 2025; Vol. 772, c. 859.]

    in this appointment. We now know that in November 2024, Lord Case, the then Cabinet Secretary, told him that this process required security vetting to be done before the appointment. He did not mention any of what Lord Case said in his statement earlier. First, does the Prime Minister accept that when he said on the Floor of the House that “full due process was followed”, that was not true?

    Secondly, on 11 September last year, journalists asked his director of communications if it was true that Mandelson had failed security vetting. These allegations were on the front page of a national newspaper, and yet No. 10 did not deny the story—why?

    Thirdly, will the Prime Minister repeat at the Dispatch Box his words from last week: that no one in No. 10 was aware before Tuesday that Mandelson had failed his vetting?

    Fourthly, the Prime Minister says he is furious that he was not told the recommendations of the vetting, yet on 16 September, a Foreign Office Minister told Parliament that

    “the national security vetting process is rightly independent of Ministers, who are not informed of any findings other than the final outcome.”—[Official Report, 16 September 2025; Vol. 772, c. 1387.]

    That was the Government’s stated process, so why is the Prime Minister so furious that it was followed?

    Fifthly, on 4 February 2026, the Prime Minister told me from the Dispatch Box that the security vetting that Mandelson had received had revealed his relationship with Epstein. How could the Prime Minister say that if he had not seen the security vetting?

    Finally, Sistema is a Russian defence company that is closely linked to the Kremlin and Vladimir Putin’s war machine. Was the Prime Minister aware before the appointment that Peter Mandelson had remained a director of that company long after Russia’s invasion of Crimea?

    Everyone makes mistakes. It is how a leader faces up to those mistakes that shows their character. Instead of taking responsibility for the decisions he made, the Prime Minister has thrown his staff and his officials under the bus. This is a man who once said,

    “I will carry the can for mistakes of any organisation I lead.”

    Instead, he has sacked his Cabinet Secretary, he has sacked his director of communications, he has sacked his chief of staff, and he has now sacked the permanent secretary of the Foreign Office. All those people were fired for a decision that he made.

    The right hon. and learned Gentleman’s defence is that he, a former Director of Public Prosecutions, is so lacking in curiosity that he chose to ask no questions about the vetting process, no questions about Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein and no questions about the security risk that Mandelson posed. Apparently, he did not even speak to Peter Mandelson before his appointment. It does not appear that he asked any questions at all. Why? Because he did not want to know. He had taken the risk and chosen his man, and Whitehall had to follow.

    It is the duty of the Prime Minister to ensure that he is telling the truth—or does the ministerial code not apply to him? I am only holding the Prime Minister to the same standard to which he held others. On 26 January 2022, he said from this Dispatch Box to a previous Prime Minister:

    “If he misled Parliament, he must resign.”—[Official Report, 26 January 2022; Vol. 707, c. 994.]

    Does he stand by those words, or is there one rule for him and another for everyone else?