Tag: Liz Kendall

  • Liz Kendall – 2026 Statement on Children and Social Media

    Liz Kendall – 2026 Statement on Children and Social Media

    The statement made by Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology on 15 June 2026.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, today marks a defining moment for our children, and future generations.

    As we lay the foundations for a new settlement for the online world.

    To ensure children have the best start in life.

    To give them freedom to be children again.

    And so we put power back into parents’ hands.

    Up and down the country parents are grappling with social media.

    What their children are seeing. How much screen time they should have. Who they are communicating with. And if they are safe.

    Many children love connecting and interacting on social media. But others struggle with their mental health, concentration and self-esteem.

    And the police, children’s charities and far too many tragically bereaved families have seen for themselves the serious risks and harm social media brings.

    While these concerns are widely shared, there are different, often strongly held views about the best way forward.

    That is why we launched our consultation on growing up in the online world, to make sure everyone’s voices were heard.

    The response has been overwhelming.

    We’ve had 116,000 replies. Including 54,000 from parents and 14,000 from children.

    We’ve heard from charities, teachers’ organisations, the police and medical professionals.

    And from countless members of Parliament too.

    Not only the Science and Technology and Education Select Committees, but individual Members including the Hon Members for Plymouth Moor View, Croydon East, Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy, Dunfermline and Dollar and so, so many more besides.

    The progress report we publish today sets out lots of different perspectives.

    But overwhelmingly our consultation showed parents and children are concerned about what they’re being exposed to online.

    Harmful content. Content that is completely inappropriate for their age. Abuse and exploitation. They are worried about the impact on sleep, school, children’s physical health, and their emotional wellbeing too. 

    Above all, parents are crying out for change.

    9 out of 10 who responded to the consultation told us they want an outright ban on social media.

    As did three quarters in our large-scale representative survey and 113,000 parents who signed Daisy and Joe’s Smartphone Free Childhood petition.

    Keeping children safe online has been my top priority since day one in this job.

    I’ve listened to calls, especially from bereaved families, that we need to act as quickly as possible.

    So today I can announce our first steps, with more to come next month.

    And I can confirm, we will ban social media companies providing their services to under 16s.

    And we are doing this to give greater protections to children.

    Greater clarity for parents and carers.

    And to set a new social norm for future generations.

    My intention is to lay regulations on a ban, and have a vote on it, by the end of this year.

    With the ban coming into effect early 2027.

    We plan to use the same model as Australia, covering:

    User-to-user platforms that allow users to post material, alongside algorithms.

    So our ban will include platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and X.

    Because we want to make sure we don’t include educational services, e-commerce platforms or music streaming, there will be a narrowly defined list of exemptions. Which we will of course keep under review.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, I have also listened to parents to civil society and to many MPs in this House, including the Members for Putney, Lowestoft, Congleton, and Newcastle upon Tyne about the need to go further.

    So I can today announce our first steps in restricting a wider range of features and functions that create risks for young people.

    Because it can open the door to vile child abuse, we will ban livestreaming for under 16s across all platforms.

    And we will ban communication with strangers, including in gaming, to stop paedophiles meeting and grooming children.

    And Madam Deputy Speaker we are not stopping there.

    AI chatbots are a top concern of parents who responded to our consultation, particularly those that mimic intimate relationships and exploit vulnerabilities.

    The Children’s Commissioner, and my Hon Friends the Members for Aylesbury and Milton Keynes Central, have also raised this issue.

    So today Britain is becoming the first country in the world to ban chatbots that offer sexualised content to under 18s.

    And we will restrict this functionality on general purpose chatbots too.

    We know there are also really serious concerns about other AI chatbots, like therapy apps.

    But I recognise that some of these may have benefits, so I am working closely with the Department of Health, and others, to assess the evidence.

    And I will come back to the House on this issue – and wider measures on AI chatbots – in a further statement next month.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, we also want to address concerns about a “cliff edge” when you turn 16 – an age when many young people should be especially focused on their futures, and on exams.

    So I can today announce live streaming, and stranger communication including in gaming, will be switched off by default for 16- and 17-year-olds.

    I am also strongly minded to bring in default overnight curfews and breaks in infinite scrolling for 16- and 17-year-olds.

    And I will set out further details once our pilot schemes are finished in my next statement in July.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, I know that not everybody supports a ban.

    I have listened carefully to these concerns and want to take each in turn.

    First, we’ve seen in Australia that many children will try and succeed in getting around a ban. That is inevitable when social media has been such an integral part of their lives.

    So we will introduce more highly effective age assurance measures to better support compliance, and I have asked Ofcom to share proposals on these within months.

    However, I want to be clear to parents, and to members of this House, that our ban is as much about helping future generations and resetting social norms in future, as it is about young people today.

    Second, people worry that a ban would push children onto riskier, less regulated sites.

    This is something I really take extremely seriously.

    So I have had a long conversation with and written to Ofcom and the new chair to stress, once again, that enforcement of both the Online Safety Act and our new ban must be a top priority.

    That they must focus rigorously on this, including riskier sites.

    And to ask for an urgent review of whether Ofcom has the right capabilities in place.

    I have also asked them to publish a clear enforcement strategy and an annual report to Parliament on how this strategy is progressing.

    Third, we must prepare children for the online world, which will inevitably be part of their lives.

    Now many schools are already doing this.

    But from September this year, every pupil across England will learn about social media in the classroom, including about AI and how to spot deepfakes.

    My department has also produced new advice for parents on how to talk to children about the online world called “you won’t know if you don’t ask”.  So schools and parents together, preparing children for the future.

    And last but by no means least, the NSPCC – and the Hon Members for Kettering, Hertford and Stortford and North West Cambridgeshire – have rightly raised the importance of ensuring all young people can access information, trusted support and exciting activities, especially if they’re no longer spending so much time online.

    And we are delivering on this too.

    The Education Secretary and Culture Secretary are expanding what’s on offer in every school and beyond the classroom, including in after school clubs, in the holidays and at weekends by support for a wide range of enrichment activities like art, music, sport, cooking, camping and museum visits.

    Things that were once only available for those who could afford them. Now for every pupil in England.

    And in stark contrast to Members opposite, who cut youth services by 75% we are investing £500m in our National Youth Strategy – “Youth Matters” – so children from all walks of life, wherever they live, can access youth services, sport and the arts.

    Madam Deputy speaker, my driving force, the reason I came into politics, has always been, and will always be, to give every child, from every background, the best possible start in life.

    Because that’s how they and our country succeed.

    Today we take a decisive step towards creating a safer, healthier life for our children and future generations.

    Giving children their childhood back.

    I am clear eyed about all the challenges social media brings – for adults as well as for children – and that technology constantly changes.

    So today’s announcement is not “one and done”, or the end of the story.

    There is still much more to do.

    But this is a landmark day.

    A day when we stand with parents, charities, bereaved families and all those who have campaigned for change.

    This is your moment.

    It is a day when we take power away from the tech giants – who have had countless opportunities to keep children safe and put it in back in parents’ hands.

    A day when we give our children the freedom to be children again.

    So they have the best possible start in life.

    And I commend this statement to the House.

  • Liz Kendall – 2026 Comments on Social Media Ban for Children

    Liz Kendall – 2026 Comments on Social Media Ban for Children

    The comments made by Liz Kendall, the Technology Secretary, on 15 June 2026.

    Today we take a bold and significant step, towards creating a safer, healthier life online, for our children and future generations. 

    Tech companies have had countless opportunities to keep children safe, yet they have failed to act. That is why we are a taking power away from the tech giants and putting it back in parents’ hands. 

    My driving force has always been to give every child, from every background, the best possible start in life. That is what these regulations will deliver.

  • Liz Kendall – 2026 Speech to London Tech Week

    Liz Kendall – 2026 Speech to London Tech Week

    The speech made by Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology on 9 June 2026.

    I want to talk about a great British success story.  

    It’s a story of British talent, British ingenuity, British enterprise, and ambition.  

    A story with one central theme: that this country is uniquely placed to thrive and prosper in the age of AI, to seize the incredible opportunities, and face the challenges that this powerful technology brings. 

    And today, together, we are writing Britain’s next chapter on winning the race for our future.  

    Winning for Britain and the British people.

    With the talent in this room and with a Labour Government that knows our best days lie ahead. 

    I don’t need to tell you about the huge opportunities AI brings. 

    Faster research, new treatments, and even cures for diseases. A transformation in our productivity, breakthroughs in clean energy, and so much more besides.  

    And the speed of change is dizzying. 

    In the last seven years AI models have gone from completing tasks toddlers can do to surpassing PhD level intelligence, with some model capabilities now doubling every four months.

    The potential for discovery, innovation and wealth creation can be intoxicating. But we also know AI brings real challenges and risks.  

    For our defence and national security, for people’s jobs and livelihoods, and inequality. 

    And, through the power of social media and the spread of mis- and disinformation, risks for our democracy too. 

    Dealing with these risks can seem daunting, even overwhelming, leading to some to say: enough – pull up the drawbridge. Stop AI. 

    But my view – from my time in politics and the lessons we learn from history – is that we are not powerless in the face of technological change.  

    We have agency.  We can act.  After all, that is what politics and government are for. 

    We cannot – and must not – retreat from progress as other political parties and politicians argue. 

    Doing so would be a betrayal of British talent, and British interests.  

    And it wouldn’t work even if we tried. 

    Because the choice isn’t between having AI or not.  

    The choice is between shaping AI according to our interests and values, so it works for everyone in this country, or being left at its mercy and whim.     

    This government’s choice is clear.   

    We will seize the opportunities and tackle the challenges AI inevitably brings, so we shape this powerful technology to work for all.  

    I believe Britain is in a better position than almost any other country to reap the rewards of AI and make it work for our people. 

    Because our huge strengths give us vital skin in the game.  

    Our universities are the envy of the world.  We have won more Nobel prizes per capita than any other major economy. A superb talent pool – much of which is right here in this room today. 

    An amazing, thriving tech ecosystem. 

    Our pragmatic, not dogmatic, approach to regulation.    

    A deep well of high-quality data, and our world-leading organisations like the AI Security Institute.  

    All of these alongside Britain’s long-held strengths – the world’s language, the rule of law, our stability and unwavering belief in Parliamentary democracy.   

    I’m clearly not the only one who sees this incredible potential. 

    Last year, Britain attracted more venture capital than France, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland combined.   

    And already this year, almost half of all VC funding in Europe has been invested in Britain – a 16-year high.  

    Just look at the incredible companies backing Britain and growing in Britain.   

    DeepMind, Anthropic, Open AI – all expanding or opening offices here. Isomorphic Labs: using AI to completely reshape medical research, cutting years off the development of new drugs – bringing hope to families everywhere.  

    Ineffable: the new AI superintelligence company, founded by David Silver, which has just raised $1.1 billion in funding – the largest seed round in European history.   

    And Wayve: a home-grown British success story that, in under a decade, has gone from two PhD students, driving around Cambridge with a camera on the roof, to a global tech titan, valued at £6.6 billion.  

    Well done, Mr Kendall. 

    And our strengths aren’t just here in London. Far from it.  

    They’re in Liverpool, where I visited last week to see how AI is transforming materials chemistry; taking months off testing times for new consumer products used in millions of homes across the country.   

    Newcastle – the home of Sage, one of the largest tech firms in the country. 

    In Cardiff, where Space Forge is revolutionising in-space manufacturing. 

    Edinburgh – home of one of the UK’s largest semiconductor clusters and the Edinburgh Parallel Computer Centre. 

    And they are in Bristol, home of semiconductor innovator Graphcore and our Isambard supercomputer. 

    Great British AI enterprise and skill, driving innovation and growth right across the land. 

    Britmaxxing AI industrial policy.

    But I’m not resting on our laurels. And I bet you aren’t either. 

    The white heat of fierce AI competition combined with the lightning speed of change means we must go further and faster to turbo charge our existing strengths and reap the benefits throughout our economy. 

    Yesterday, at our AI adoption summit, I set out the government’s plans to make Britain the fastest AI adopting country in the G7 through a partnership with businesses and workers, backed by an initial government investment of over £200m. 

    Today I want to talk about how we double down on our AI strengths and win the race for Britain, with the next generation of Brit boosting, Brit maxxing, modern industrial policy. 

    When I describe this government’s approach, I often make the comparison with the Olympics.  

    For those of you old enough to remember, we went from a shameful 36th place in the medals table in Atlanta, in 1992, to second, behind only the US, two decades later. 

    We took what some call a ‘no compromise’ approach. Giving the most resources to our best performing sports, building the best teams, backing our best chances.  

    I think there is a lot we can learn from this for UK innovation. 

    If we want gold medal AI, we have to be strategic and lean into our priorities where we have a competitive edge.   

    That’s why earlier this year, I announced we will make a decisive shift towards backing more British AI companies, especially in the areas where we have real strengths – like life sciences, AI hardware and new approaches to foundational models.  

    This shift is critical for two main reasons. 

    First, we must reap more of the economic benefits AI brings right here in the UK.   

    So we demonstrate AI isn’t just for a powerful few but brings real, tangible improvements for British jobs, livelihoods and opportunities. 

    And second, when AI is the engine of economic power and hard power, and when 70% of global AI compute is now controlled by just 5 companies, we must gain greater sovereign control over this increasingly powerful technology. 

    For Britain, AI sovereignty isn’t about isolationism or attempting to go it alone.  

    It’s about building the best as well as using the best.   

    So we increase Britain’s leverage by being a keystone in the global tech architecture. An indispensable partner.  

    At the heart of our plans is Sovereign AI, which we launched in April – a major step which I believe will be one of the single most important things this government does to build a better future for our country. 

    SovAI is different from anything government has done before: harnessing the speed of venture, backed by the weight of the nation. 

    It will invest £500m in British AI companies to start up, scale up and win globally 

    And – crucially – it will offer the key to unlocking much wider government support where it can make a real difference. 

    Providing fully funded access to the UK’s largest super computers, fast tracking global talent, with super priority visa decisions and free visas for R&D.

    Working seamlessly with the British Business Bank and its £2bn annual investment to take companies to the next stage. 

    And mobilising the huge power and potential of government procurement to back the best of Britain.  

    The interest in SovAI has been overwhelming and they’ve already made direct investments in brilliant companies like Callosum, Ineffable and Isomophic labs.  

    I want to thank James, Suzanne, Josephine and the entire team for all their amazing work. I have no doubt this is just the start of what they will achieve – and they’ll have my full backing every step of the way. 

    And we are not stopping there. 

    Yesterday we published our new AI Hardware Plan – which I promised just a month ago. 

    One of the areas where we have a genuine advantage on the world stage is in semiconductors, and chip design.   

    Right now the global AI chips market is growing at an annual rate of 30% and expected to reach $1 trillion in the early 2030s.   

    If Britain could secure just 5% of this market it would bring $50 billion in revenue to the UK with tens of thousands of high paid jobs in tech.   

    There are those who say this race is already lost. That it is too late to challenge the dominance of the established players.   

    I don’t know if it’s due to my inherent competitiveness, but I do not accept such defeatism.   

    We have a rich history of excelling at hardware.   

    The first programmable computer. The first electronic memory.  

    The first commercial computer, first parallel computer and the first widely used chip IP model all happened right here in the UK.   

    Today, a single British company – Arm – is behind the most widely used processor design on Earth.   

    In almost every smartphone, tablet and in more and more AI servers all over the world.    

    It has also just become the UK’s most valuable company, by market cap.  

    And AI compute is rapidly diversifying, with different hardware needed for different tasks.  

    This shift provides real openings for new entrants and specialist hardware that couldn’t have been predicted, even a few years ago.   

    And it is already happening. 

    Just weeks ago, British chip company Fractile announced their latest $220 million dollar funding round.   

    Following Olix – another brilliant UK chip start-up – with their own $220 million dollar round. 

    That’s nearly half a billion dollars flowing into UK chip companies in the space of just a few months.  

    The next generation of AI hardware is being built here in Britain.    

    So yes, this a competitive market. But we are a competitive nation.   

    And winning this race is what our new hardware plan is all about.   

     The plan brings together £1.1 billion of government support for companies in four key areas.  

    First: invention and early-stage chip development.  

    That is why our new £120m AI Hardware Innovation Programme, delivered by UKRI, will back teams at every stage – helping them move from initial concept to a full, validated prototype, and then on to contracts.  

    This includes an additional £20m for our Scaling Inference Lab, near Cambridge, run by ARIA and Common AI, so companies can test new chip designs in a real‑world setting. That’s £70m in total. 

    Just yesterday, Oriole – a brilliant British AI company – announced it is working with the lab to deploy pioneering photonics technology to supercharge the speed of AI data centres, together with one of the largest chip companies in the world – AMD.  

    A fantastic project. And proof of why this matters. 

    Second, we are investing £80m in the skills the semiconductor industry needs including more funding for PhD-level studies and bursaries for students in fields like electronic engineering and materials science.      

    We’re funding 300 this year, rising to 400 next year and 500 the year after, to give our top companies the talent pipeline they need.   

    Third, our new plan on procurement. 

    We will build a £750m mixed chip supercomputer.  

    Over half of this funding will be earmarked for inference chips. 

    £150m in an expanded Advanced Market Commitment to give start-ups the confidence they will have a buyer, with the government acting as a “first customer”.  

    A further £250 million will buy additional novel inference chips once the most successful versions have reached the market. 

    A total of £400m for the chip champions of tomorrow: a fantastic opportunity for all the brilliant AI hardware companies right here in the UK.  

    And last, but by no means least, I’m absolutely delighted that one of the best AI hardware investors in the world – Playground Global – is launching a new fund that will invest in British AI hardware companies. 

    And that the British Business Bank is contributing £150m – the biggest commitment it has ever made.    

    The team at Playground are setting up a new office here in the UK – their first outside the US.   

    Pat Gelsinger – one of their partners, the former CEO of Intel, and author of the US government’s CHIPS ACT – knows a thing or two about hardware investing … and his backing is further testament to the incredible talent and potential in the UK.       

    This is what we mean by winning for Britain on AI. 

    Capitalising on our strengths. Backing the best of Britain. 

    Combining the talent, innovation and ambition in this room with the power of an active, more muscular state. 

    I want to finish by saying this. 

    Back in the 70s, when Britain’s old industrial base was crumbling, the Callaghan government invested £50m in a high risk semi conductor start-up, Inmos.  

    Headquartered in Bristol, and manufactured in Newport, South Wales.  

    That bold move sparked not just a company but an industry, and it has led to many of our strengths today. To Graphcore and Isambard in Bristol, to Wales’s amazing semiconductor cluster.  

    And lest we forget, one team of Inmos alumni went on to help build what is now Britain’s most valuable company … ARM. 

    So for the all the doubters, doom-mongers and naysayers out there … let me say this loud and clear.  

    Labour governments have done this before and we will do it again. 

    We will seize the opportunities and tackle the challenges AI inevitably brings. 

    By shaping the future, not retreating from it. 

    And by securing the benefits of AI for all, not just a powerful few. 

    This is the story of national success we can and will write together.    

    Building a modern Britain for a modern age.    

    And a future that works for all.    

    Thank you.

  • Liz Kendall – 2026 Statement on Grok’s Image Generation

    Liz Kendall – 2026 Statement on Grok’s Image Generation

    The statement made by Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology on 9 January 2026.

    Sexually manipulating images of women and children is despicable and abhorrent. It is an insult and totally unacceptable for Grok to still allow this if you’re willing to pay for it. I expect Ofcom to use the full legal powers Parliament has given them.

    I, and more importantly the public – would expect to see Ofcom update on next steps in days not weeks.

    I would remind xAI that the Online Safety Act Includes the power to block services from being accessed in the UK, if they refuse to comply with UK law. If Ofcom decide to use those powers they will have our full support.

    We will be banning nudification apps in the Crime and Policing Bill which is in parliament now.

    We are in the coming weeks bringing in to force powers to criminalise the creation of intimate images without consent.

    I expect all platforms to abide by Ofcom’s new Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) guidance and if they do not, I am prepared to go further.

    We are as determined to ensure women and girls are safe online as we are to ensure they are safe in the real world. No excuses.

  • Liz Kendall – 2025 Speech to the IPPR

    Liz Kendall – 2025 Speech to the IPPR

    The speech made by Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, at the IPPR on 21 May 2025.

    I’m very grateful to my former employer IPPR for hosting us today.

    And to all of you for taking the time to come along.

    I’m especially grateful to Dominic for sharing his experiences, and I thought that was really important for us to hear today – about the benefits that work brings to you, the struggles you have faced and your ambitions and hopes for the future.

    I want to talk about the Government’s welfare reforms.

    How they will help transform people’s lives, as part of our Plan for Change.

    How they follow in the footsteps of the great reforming Labour governments of the past; rooted in our enduring values of fairness, equality and opportunity.

    How these reforms will help ensure our welfare state is sustainable for the future.

    And how I believe they are crucial to fighting the rise in populist politics, which offers easy but empty solutions to the people we came into politics to serve.

    Getting Britain Working is central to the Government’s Plan for Change.

    It is vital to delivering higher living standards in every part of Britain.

    And it is vital to achieving the number one mission of this Government, which is growing the economy.

    But Getting Britain Working is about so much more than this.

    It is about giving people the dignity and self-respect that we know good work brings.

    The purpose and belonging that Dominic spoke about so powerfully.

    It’s about improving the health of the nation, because we know good work is good for people’s mental and physical health – and can help reduce pressure on the NHS.

    And Getting Britain Working is critical to driving down child poverty and ensuring every child starts school ready to learn – perhaps the single most important step to transforming equality and opportunity in this country.

    And the scale and urgency of our task is there for all to see.

    Nearly 1 in 10 people of working age are now on at least one sickness or disability benefit.

    A near record 2.8 million people are out of work due to long-term sickness.

    1 million young people are not in education, employment or training – that’s more than 1 in 8 of our young people – with all the long-term consequences this brings for their future health, job prospects and earnings potential.

    And 300,000 people with health conditions are falling out of work every single year, piling up even greater problems for the future.

    And the result is millions of people who could work written off and denied the chance to build a better life, with all these challenges far worse in parts of the Midlands and the North, whose economies were decimated in the 1980s and 1990s when whole industries closed, and who have never been given the investment, support and opportunity they need to recover.

    And taxpayers have been left paying billions more on the cost of Conservative failure, with the benefits bill for sickness and disability up £20 billion since the pandemic and set to rise by a further £18 billion by the end of this Parliament, unless we change course.

    And the truth is, it doesn’t have to be this way.

    We are the only economy in the G7 whose employment rate still hasn’t returned to pre-pandemic levels.

    And spending on sickness and disability benefits in most other comparable countries is either stable or falling since the pandemic, yet ours continues to inexorably rise.

    There is nothing Labour about accepting the cost of this economic but, above all, social crisis, paid for in people’s life chances and living standards.

    And there is nothing inevitable about Britain’s future path, if we have the courage and conviction to act.

    We must start shifting so much spending on the costs of failure to investing in the jobs, skills and public services that people need to build a better life.

    And this requires leadership and it requires reform.

    Now the truth is welfare reform is never easy. And it is rarely popular.

    Perhaps especially for Labour governments.

    But no responsible Labour government can resile from taking decisions because they are too difficult.

    Because this is not good enough for the people we came into politics to serve.

    So we will reform the welfare state.

    Just as great reforming Labour governments have done in the past.

    Changing it to meet the social and demographic challenges of today and tomorrow, and delivering the fairness, equality and opportunity people need and deserve.

    Now we know change is possible, because we have done it before.

    Take the fight for women’s equality in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s.

    It was Labour women MPs and trade unionists who campaigned for and then legislated to transform opportunities for women.

    We changed the world of work – with rights to maternity pay.

    We invested in childcare – with the first ever national childcare strategy and thousands of Sure Start Children’s Centres.

    We delivered active employment support – with the groundbreaking New Deal for Lone Parents.

    Transforming women’s participation in the workforce, and their equality, independence and freedom through work.

    We must now bring the same focus, energy and commitment to doing the same for sick and disabled people.

    Reforming the welfare state to offer them the same rights and chances to work as anybody else.

    When the welfare state was created, average life expectancy was 65, and the most common cause of illness and death was infectious diseases and accidents.

    Now, average life expectancy is around 80. And 1 in 7 babies born today is likely to live to 100.

    Back then, disability was the exception. Now, 1 in 4 of us self-reports as disabled. And 1 in 3 of us will have a long-term health condition.

    But the welfare state has simply not kept pace with these changes.

    Our benefits system in particular forces too many sick and disabled people into a binary choice of can or can’t work – when we know many people’s physical and mental health conditions fluctuate, and many sick and disabled people want to, and need to, work.

    The system then writes people off, and traps them, without offering any help or support.

    The number of people on the health top up of Universal Credit is set to rise by 50 per cent to 3 million by the end of the decade.

    And the number of people on Personal Independence Payments is set to more than double to 4.3 million.

    There are now 1,000 new PIP awards every single day.

    That’s the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year.

    This is not sustainable or fair – for the people who need support and for taxpayers.

    So unless we reform the system to help those who can work to do so.

    Unless we get social security spending on a more sustainable footing.

    And unless we ensure public money is focused on those with the greatest need and is spent in ways that have the best chance of improving people’s lives.

    The risk is the welfare state won’t be there for people who really need it in future.

    That is why we are grasping the nettle of reform.

    Not for the sake of it, but to ensure the welfare state lasts for generations to come.

    Now we have already made huge strides in getting Britain working and growing again.

    We are improving the quality of work and making work pay, with our landmark employment rights bill.

    We are creating more good jobs in every part of the country – from clean energy to construction and through our modern industrial strategy.

    And we are investing an additional £26 billion this year to drive down waiting lists, because getting people back to health is crucial to getting them back to work.

    But we also need big changes in our system of social security and employment support to deliver greater fairness and opportunity.

    Our plans are based on three clear objectives.

    First, overhauling the system to help those who can work, get into work and stay in work.

    Last autumn, our Get Britain Working white paper kicked off the biggest reforms to employment support in a generation, backed by an additional £240 million.

    Overhauling our job centres to create a new national jobs and careers service, and shift the focus away from benefit administration alone.

    Investing in 16 new trailblazing programmes across the country – led by mayors and local areas – to join up work, health and skills support, ensure every young person is earning or learning and to tackle the scar of economic inactivity.

    This spring, we announced a further £1 billion a year in our new Pathways to Work offer.

    Along with programmes like Work Well, Connect to Work – which is being rolled out to the whole of England and Wales by December – and freeing up 1,000 work coaches to support sick and disabled people.

    Pathways to Work will guarantee a comprehensive offer of health, work and skills support for anyone who needs it, rolling out from next April when our benefit changes start to come in.

    The biggest ever packages of support for sick and disabled people.

    To underpin these changes in employment support, we are also creating a more proactive, pro-work system.

    We are consulting on a new Unemployment Insurance to provide a higher rate of time-limited income protection for people who lose their job but have paid into the system.

    We are scrapping the failed Work Capability Assessment – and the Conservatives discredited WCA plans – to help end the binary can/can’t work divide.

    We are reforming Universal Credit to encourage people to find work and not stay on benefits, reducing the health top up for new claims from April 2026, alongside active help to find work.

    And bringing in a sustained above inflation increase to the standard allowance in Universal Credit for the first time ever, delivering a cash increase of £725 a year by the end of the Parliament.

    We’re introducing a new ‘right to try work’ by legislating to guarantee that work in and of itself will never lead to someone being called in for a benefit assessment, to give people the confidence to take the plunge and try work.

    To underpin our Youth Guarantee, we are consulting on delaying access to the health top up in Universal Credit until someone is aged 22, with the savings reinvested into work support and training opportunities.

    And we will help employers to recruit and retain more disabled people with health conditions through our Keep Britain Working review, led by the former boss of John Lewis, Sir Charlie Mayfield.

    The second objective of our plans is to protect those who cannot work.

    Those with the most severe, life-long conditions that will never improve and who can never work will have their Universal Credit protected – including young people aged under 22.

    And we will guarantee they will never be reassessed in future, removing totally unnecessary stress, anxiety and uncertainty.

    To improve trust, we will also fundamentally overhaul our safeguarding approach to ensure all our processes and training are of the highest possible quality and to protect and support vulnerable people.

    Our third objective is to focus Personal Independence Payments on those with higher needs and to review the PIP assessment to ensure it is fair and fit for purpose.

    I know the concerns that have been raised about our proposals.

    I am listening carefully to all the points people raise.

    But 9 out of 10 people claiming PIP at the point when the changes come into force in November 2026 will not be affected by the end of the Parliament.

    And even with the changes we are making, there will still be 750,000 more people receiving PIP by the end of this Parliament than there were at the start.

    And spending will be £8 billion higher than it is now: rising faster than GDP, and faster than spending on public services.

    In making our changes we are preserving PIP as a vital cash benefit that makes a contribution towards the extra cost of living with a disability – not means testing it and not replacing it with vouchers as the Tories proposed.

    We are consulting on how best to support those who will no longer be eligible, including so their health and care needs are met.

    We will improve the experience of those going through the PIP assessment, switching back to more face-to-face assessments and recording them as standard.

    And we have begun the first review of the PIP assessment in more than a decade – including the descriptors, and in consultation with disabled people and the organisations that represent them – to ensure it is fair and fit for purpose.

    Taken together, our measures will reform the system to support those who can work, to protect those who cannot and to help ensure our welfare state lasts for generations to come.

    I want to finish by saying this.

    When I travel around the country, I know the places with the highest levels of economic inactivity and the largest number of people on sickness and disability benefits, are the same places with the worst health, lowest life expectancy and fewest opportunities.

    The villages, towns and cities, especially in parts of the Midlands and the North whose economies have still not recovered from the 80s and 90s, where economic demand remains weakest.

    Places that are full of talent and ambition, but which need the investment – in jobs, infrastructure, skills, and public services – to build a better life for themselves and their communities.

    People in this country rightly demand change.

    But populist politics – the politics of division and easy but empty solutions – won’t deliver the change people are crying out for.

    They need real hope built on real solutions.

    And that is what this Labour Government is doing.

    Tackling problems that have been ducked or ignored for too long, because the failure to do so is precisely why people think politics doesn’t matter and that politicians are all the same.

    Change of this scale isn’t easy, but it is possible, and we know because we have done it before.

    Labour’s mission is to give people hope tomorrow will be better than today.

    That we will create the jobs, opportunities and public services people want and deserve.

    Because a future dependent on benefits alone is not good enough for people in Blackpool, Birkenhead or Blaenau Gwent.

    I am confident we will deliver.

    Because all the evidence shows hundreds of thousands of sick and disabled people want to work.

    That when they have a government that is on their side and provides the right support, they can get work.

    And that this can transform their lives.

    Our task is urgent.

    Not just because we have only four more years of this Parliament, which is no time at all – although this is true.

    Not just because we must deliver real change to fight the rise in support for populists – although we must.

    But because the people who we came into politics to serve cannot and should not wait any longer for a chance to build a decent life, because they have waited far too long already.

    This is why we fought for 14 long hard years in opposition – for the chance to change our country.

    So now let’s get on with the job.

    Thank you.

  • Liz Kendall – 2024 Speech on Getting Britain Working

    Liz Kendall – 2024 Speech on Getting Britain Working

    The speech made by Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, in Barnsley on 23 July 2024.

    INTRODUCTION

    It really is brilliant to be here in Barnsley as you launch your pioneering report on “Pathways to work”.

    You identify tackling economic inactivity as a critical challenge and opportunity, for your town and our country.

    You call for a national ambition

    …. to build a more inclusive economy

    … where people have a right to work

    … and the expectation they’ll be helped to do so.

    You say achieving this will require a radically new approach

    .. not only across Government but by employers, the NHS, Mayors, councils, charities, colleges, communities, and by citizens themselves.

    I am here today to say loudly and clearly.

    That’s precisely what this Government will deliver.

    GETTING BRITAIN WORKING AND GROWING

    In the first two weeks in Government, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and the Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, have taken immediate action to get our economy growing again.

    Overhauling the planning system.

    Launching the National Wealth Fund.

    Creating Skills England.

    And, with the support of my department, unlocking pension investment too.

    Growth is the number one priority of this Government.

    Because it is the only sustainable way that we will improve people’s living standards and rebuild our vital public services.

    Our plan to Get Britain Working is central to this goal.

    DWP is the HR department of the Government’s growth mission.

    But in order to realise that, we need fundamental reform.

    So a department for welfare becomes a genuine department for work.

    Driven by the liberating potential of good work for individuals.

    And by the pursuit of full and fulfilling employment in every corner of our land.

    MY BELIEF IN WORK

    But before I say more about our reforms, I want to say something more personal.

    I have always believed the benefits of work go far beyond a pay slip.

    Having a job and providing for yourself and your family gives millions of people across Britain dignity and self-respect.

    Work can bring pride. Fulfilment. Relationships and connections.

    A sense of purpose. Value. And control.

    Good work is good for mental health.

    And – for millions of women – work can bring freedom, equality and independence too.

    Many of us have to take time away from work. Sometimes because we want to, often because we have to.

    To study, bring up a family or care for a loved one. Or because of ill health, or disability.

    Valuable contributions to our society come in many different shapes and forms.

    People have been denied the chance and the right to participate in the world of work.

    They’ve been excluded.

    Then labelled, and blamed for the position they’re in.

    If this is what has happened to you, my message today is:

    We hear you.

    We are on your side.

    And we will work day and night to put this right.

    BRITAIN ISN’T WORKING

    Employment is down, unemployment is up, and our workforce is shrinking.

    Britain isn’t working, in three damaging ways.

    First, we’ve seen record numbers of people – 2.8 million of our fellow citizens – excluded from the workforce due to long-term sickness.

    A similar number are actually in work with health problems, often at risk of falling out.

    The last Parliament saw the biggest increase in economic inactivity in 40 years.

    Many of these ‘hidden unemployed’ are over 50, struggling with bad hips, knees and joints – something I have experienced myself. The majority are women, often caring for elderly or disabled relatives at the same time.

    Spiralling economic inactivity is bad for individuals, many of whom want to work – as your report clearly shows.

    It’s bad for employers, who are desperate to recruit.

    And it is bad for our public finances too.

    The OBR says spending on sickness and disability benefits is set to increase by £30 billion over the forecast period.

    Imagine what a fraction of that money could do instead.

    The second problem we face is that far too many people are stuck in low paid, poor quality work.

    Only 1 in 6 low paid workers only ever fully escapes into better paid work. Many are in insecure jobs, with unpredictable working patterns.

    The result is too many people are in poverty despite being in work. Too many people lack power or control over their lives. And it leads to stagnant productivity, which is holding our economy back.

    The third major problem is that nearly 1 million young people – a staggering 1 in 8 – are now not in education, employment or training.

    That is up 90,000 in over the last year alone.

    Young people struggling with poor mental health and lacking basic qualifications face the greatest disadvantages.

    Each and every one should have their whole future ahead of them.

    Now these three challenges are all far worse in parts of the Midlands and the North.

    And they show the scale of the challenge this new Government must now confront.

    WHY BRITAIN ISNT WORKING

    So why have we ended up here?

    The causes of the problems we face are complex. In part they reflect the impact of economic, social and demographic forces affecting our country.

    But I am convinced that the [previous] approach has harmed people’s capacity to cope and thrive in the face of the challenges we have in future.

    The fundamental problem is that the current system – of DWP, Jobcentres and other employment support – is almost entirely designed to address the problems of yesterday, not today, tomorrow and beyond.

    We must – and we will – do everything to keep unemployment low.

    But the most urgent challenges today are different.

    They are about how we deal with spiralling inactivity, driven by the fact we are an older, sicker nation.

    They’re about how to ensure all young people get the education, skills and job opportunities they need to kick start their careers.

    And they are about how we enable people – whatever their age – to have decent pay and the chance to build a career. And to benefit from good work that gives them the chance to thrive.

    DWP was focused almost entirely on the benefits system. And specifically on implementing Universal Credit.

    JobcentrePlus a benefit monitoring service, not a public employment service – which was its original aim.

    Nowhere near enough attention to the wider issues – like health, skills, childcare, transport – that play such a huge role in determining whether you get work, stay in work and get on in your work.

    The result is a system that is too siloed and too centralised.

    Which fails to properly join-up health, work and skills.

    And we aren’t rooted in local economies or driven by local needs.

    As today’s report rightly concludes: “People who are economically inactive are not one single group. There will be a few who may act fraudulently. Others who say they cannot work, who could … but the vast majority … face a complex range of barriers … which stop them from getting what both they and policy makers want: a pathway into paid employment.”

    Now I believe in personal responsibility. Under this Government there will be obligations to engage with support, look for work and to take jobs when they are offered.

    As there have been since the original Beveridge report was put in practice.

    But I am in politics to solve problems. Not score cheap points or grab empty headlines that do nothing to tackle the real problems in people’s lives.

    OUR PLAN

    This new Government will be driven by the evidence and by the facts.

    As our new Prime Minister says…

    No more politics by performance.

    No more sticking plaster solutions.

    But a serious Government with a serious plan for a decade of national renewal.

    This starts with a new focus and fundamental reform of the DWP.

    Put simply, under my political leadership the DWP will shift from being a department for welfare to being the department for work.

    And to make this real, let me set out the actions and reforms I am setting in train.

    NEW GOALS

    First, new goals.

    As Keir Starmer said during the election campaign, this Government has a bold, long-term ambition to get an 80% employment rate.

    Currently, that would mean over 2 million more people in work.

    Growth boosted by tens of billions of pounds a year.

    And a multi-billion a year boost to the public finances too.

    We will pursue this ambition alongside our wider economic goals to raise productivity and living standards and to improve the quality of work – as part of the Government’s growth mission.

    And our employment support system will change the outcomes we seek to achieve – higher engagement, higher employment, and higher earnings too.

    My Department will support local areas to make a success of this new approach, starting by devolving new powers over employment support to catalyse action and change.

    Because the man – or even woman – in Whitehall will never know what’s best for Barnsley, Blackpool, or Birmingham.

    DELIVERING THE GOVERNMENT’S GROWTH MISSION

    To drive these changes forward and deliver on our manifesto commitments, we will produce a White Paper to Get Britain Working Soon.

    This will support the other steps we are taking across Government.

    Creating more good jobs in clean energy and through our Modern Industrial Strategy.

    Making work pay and improving the quality of work, through the New Deal for Working People.

    NEW REFORMS

    Alongside these new goals there will be fundamental reform…in three connected parts:

    First, a major overhaul of our Jobcentres.

    Only 1 in 5 people who are looking for work say they use a Jobcentre, and as Alan said only 1 in 6 employers who need staff use them to recruit.

    This actually drops to 1 in 10 for SMEs – the lifeblood of our economy.

    This must change.

    So we will create a new jobs and careers service, bringing together Jobcentre Plus and the National Careers Service focusing on helping people.

    This service will be focused on helping people get into work and get on at work, not only on monitoring and managing benefit claims.

    It will mobilise the potential for new technologies and AI to better help people who are looking for work, or wanting to develop their careers.

    And it will enhance and improve support for employers too which your report says is critical.

    Second we will establish a new youth guarantee to offer training, an apprenticeship, or help to find work for all young people aged 18 to 21.

    And today, I can confirm that we will empower Mayors and local areas to take the lead in driving down economic inactivity and driving up economic opportunity – taking inspiration from the brilliant report we are here to launch today.

    Devolving powers from central Government is key to enabling areas to deliver ambitious new Local Growth Plans. And as part of this we will give local places the responsibility and resources to design a joined-up health, work and skills offer that’s right for local people.

    Our aim is nothing less than a fundamental shift in the balance of power and resources to local areas  … so that our Mayors, local councils, the NHS, businesses, colleges and the voluntary sector can work together to deliver real employment opportunities for local people.

    To drive these changes forward and deliver on our manifesto commitments, we will produce a White Paper to Get Britain Working soon.

    This will support the other steps we are taking across Government.

    Creating more good jobs in clean energy and through our Modern Industrial Strategy.

    Making work pay and improving the quality of work, through the New Deal for Working People.

    Cutting NHS waiting times, improving mental health support particularly for young people, and transforming skills and childcare  … so we tackle the root causes of worklessness and fix the foundations of work, not simply paper over the cracks.

    And we are committed to working across Whitehall to tackle these complex problems, which is what our new mission-driven government is all about.

    NEW ROLE FOR DWP

    Now let us be honest, these new goals and reforms I have set out will require the department I lead to make a different contribution in the years ahead.

    Under my leadership, the DWP will continue to be a major provider of employment support, through the national jobs and careers service.

    But we will also need to be:

    …a driver of innovation, experimentation, and learning, to develop new solutions to complex problems and build the evidence base, just as your pilot seeks to achieve.

    …a capacity builder, working alongside local areas to create the conditions for success, such as – and this is essential –  sharing and unlocking data.

    …and a guardian and champion of quality, outcomes, and user voice and value for money.

    This is hugely challenging but exciting agenda for radical public service reform.

    And to help drive our work, I can announce today that I will be establishing a new Labour Market Advisory Board.

    A group of leading labour market experts to provide me and the department with insight, ideas, and challenges as we deliver a fundamentally new approach.

    I am absolutely delighted that Professor Paul Gregg, former Director of the Centre for Analysis of Social Policy at the University of Bath has agreed to lead this new Advisory Board and we will be announcing further members shortly.

    CONCLUSION

    I am under no illusions about how big a change this will be.

    It can’t happen overnight.

    But we can and we will roll up our sleeves and make a start.

    So if you’re a young person with a mental health problem, or lacking basic skills, we will help you reach your potential.

    If you are disabled and want to work, you will get the respect and support you need.

    If you’re a mum, or caring for an elderly relative, we will be  there with practical help  so you can balance your work and family life.

    If you’re an employer who needs to recruit, or wants help to keep staff in work, we will support you and we will back you to find your next star employee.

    Together, that is what we will deliver.

    To get Britain growing again.

    Get Britain building again.

    And to get Britain working again.

    Thank you.

  • Liz Kendall – 2023 Speech on World Down Syndrome Day

    Liz Kendall – 2023 Speech on World Down Syndrome Day

    The speech made by Liz Kendall, the Labour MP for Leicester West, in the House of Commons on 23 March 2023.

    I echo other Members in congratulating the right hon. Member for North Somerset (Dr Fox) on securing this important debate. We all know what a passionate and—most importantly—effective campaigner he has been in supporting people with Down syndrome and their families. His Down Syndrome Act, which Opposition Members were proud to support, represents an important opportunity for us to make progress on delivering the support that people with Down syndrome deserve, so that they can lead as full and equal a life as everyone else.

    Let me say as an aside that I think what the right hon. Gentleman is trying to do has important implications for wider public sector reform. There are many issues and problems that people have talked about for years; the question is, how do we make change? The right hon. Gentleman’s mechanism in this instance is to use a specific Act providing for named individuals who are held accountable, and for guidance that actually secures change. However, there are other methods of securing changes in public services—for instance, through legal rights—and I am a strong champion of direct payments and personal budgets, which give people and their families the power to change those services. We need to focus on making a difference and putting the users of services and their families at the heart of the system, making them equal partners in care. We will never get healthcare, education and work support right unless we do it in partnership with people.

    I am a long-standing champion of the vision pioneered by the group Social Care Future, which consists of people who use services and their families: that we all want to live in the place we call home with the people and things we love, in communities where we look out for one another and where we can contribute, doing the things that matter the most to us—not what somebody else tells us we want to do or should do, but what we ourselves want to do. That is the vision that Opposition Members are championing. In the 21st century, and in what, despite all our problems, is still one of the richest countries in the world, it should not be seen as extraordinary, but the truth is, I am afraid, that for too many of the 47,000 people in the UK living with Down syndrome, it remains far from reality.

    Members have rightly spoken of the progress that has been made, but I think it is also important to use this debate to demonstrate how much further there is to go. The first issue I want to raise is that of health and health inequalities, to which many Members have referred. We know that people with Down syndrome are more likely to experience problems with their hearts, bowels, hearing and vision, and have an increased risk of infections. I think it disgraceful that so often the outcomes are so poor for people with Down syndrome because of what is known as diagnostic overshadowing, when symptoms are ignored and put down to Down syndrome rather than being diagnosed properly and addressed.

    There are two issues on which I think we should focus. The first is the need to ensure that children with Down syndrome have the regular check-ups they need with paediatricians and GPs. We know that too many families find those services too hard to access, and the current number of vacancies in the NHS—133,000—as well as all the other problems that people are experiencing when trying to see GPs and other doctors are having an impact on that. When she responds to the debate, will the Minister tell us when we will finally see the Government’s workforce plan for the NHS? May I also cheekily ask her once again whether she will adopt Labour’s plan to bring about the biggest expansion of the NHS workforce in its history, which we would pay for by scrapping the non-dom tax status? Members will understand that I want to put forward practical solutions today and to be realistic about the challenges, and that is what I intend to do.

    Dr Fox

    Does the hon. Lady accept that it is a question of not just the size of the workforce but their understanding of the problems? If in health, as in education and social care, the professionals are not aware of the difficulties faced by the population with Down syndrome, no number of extra professionals or services will make a real difference.

    Liz Kendall

    The right hon. Gentleman must have read the next line in my speech. Of course, it is not only an issue of staff shortages and vacancies. I think that the real issue, which the right hon. Gentleman mentioned earlier, is training. If people are not trained to understand an issue and to understand its manifestations, they will not be able to put it right. In some other areas, I have seen medical schools and universities pioneering new forms of training, in which those who have a condition and their families become part of the training module to explain what the implications are. I hope that the Minister will tell us what action the Government are taking in this regard, and whether the guidance that will be issued will involve changes within medical schools or for nurses and other healthcare professionals.

    The second area in which progress is needed is social care. It is, I believe, the biggest area in which the right support for people with Down syndrome is too often lacking. Whatever Conservative Members may say, I think it is important to understand the context in which the Down Syndrome Act will be working, and to take into account the difficult situation relating to social care. Just last week, research from the learning disability charity HfT revealed that nearly half the social care providers in England have been forced to close part of their organisations or hand back contracts to councils as a result of cost pressures in the last year. More than half a million people are awaiting a social care assessment, a review, or the start of a service or direct payment, and a survey conducted by the Down’s Syndrome Association found that 43% of family carers said their adult child was in need of an assessment, with some waiting as long as two years for that basic service.

    What all this means, of course, is that families tend to be left to pick up the slack, often having to leave their own jobs or reduce their hours because they cannot obtain the help that they need to look after their loved ones. The fact that there are 165,000 vacancies in the social care workforce is having an impact on the support that is available to families with Down syndrome. We need to address both the issue of the care workforce and wider reforms.

    Last week, the Health Service Journal reported that there are due to be cuts in the money announced for social care reform in the 2021 White Paper. A sum of £500 million was set aside to improve the training and career progression of the care workforce, but the Health Service Journal said that that is going to be cut by half. It also said that the £300 million to better integrate housing, health and care is set to be cut, with cuts to the budgets for unpaid carers and the use of technology.

    This is really important, because unless we join up services and support, people with Down syndrome will not be able to live the lives they choose. The issue of housing is critical. Just 28% of people with learning disabilities live in supported housing, yet we know that 70% of people with a learning disability want to change their current housing arrangements to give them greater independence. Will the Minister confirm whether those reports are true? Are the Government going to cut £250 million for improving the training of the social care workforce and £300 million from the budget to better integrate health, care and housing? [Interruption.] It is not a disrespectful question; it is a question that has a direct impact on the lives—

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Maria Caulfield)

    I said it was disappointing.

    Liz Kendall

    It is not disappointing; it is my job to hold the Government to account. I would like the Minister to answer that question.

    The hon. Member for Southend West (Anna Firth) mentioned help to work, which I am passionate about. Work gives purpose, independence and dignity, but only 5.5% of adults with a learning disability in England were in paid employment as of 2020, yet 65% of people with learning disabilities say they want to go out and work. The hon. Member asked about what was happening in her constituency. I recently visited the Leicester Royal Infirmary, which is doing pioneering work with Ellesmere College, a college for students with special educational needs, to give them the skills and experience they need to get to work, with pioneering apprenticeships. I visited a young woman who was working in the hospital café. I asked her what she thought, and she said that her ambition now was to set up her own café and employ others. I think that shows that if people are given the chance and the support, real progress can be made.

    The Down Syndrome Act presents a real opportunity for change. It creates a duty on the Secretary of State to issue guidance to relevant authorities on how to meet the specific needs of people with Down syndrome. That will cover many of the issues I have outlined, and I hope the Minister will update us on when it will start to make an impact on the ground. I understand that the call for evidence on the Act closed in November. When will we see the Government’s response? We need to act quickly to make real progress to transform the lives of people with Down syndrome and ensure they can live the life they choose.

    I would argue that wider action is needed to support the NHS and social care so that we have the investment and reform we need to improve lives, but I hope the Minister will address in detail my questions about the reports. I understand that the Government will produce an update on social care, possibly next week. Will the Minister answer my question and say whether the funds the Government promised will be available?

  • Liz Kendall – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    Liz Kendall – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Liz Kendall on 2015-11-25.

    To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, how many people of each gender have worked in the Government Equalities Office in each year from 2010-11 to 2014-15.

    Edward Timpson

    The information is not readily available and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.

  • Liz Kendall – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Liz Kendall – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Liz Kendall on 2016-01-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many people of each gender work in her Department.

    Nick Gibb

    As at 31 December 2015, there were 1468 men and 2026 women working in the Department for Education.

  • Liz Kendall – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Liz Kendall – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Liz Kendall on 2016-07-06.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people with learning disabilities are on the waiting list for a Care and Treatment Review.

    Alistair Burt

    Data on waiting lists for Care and Treatment Reviews (CTRs) is not collected centrally.

    The number of CTRs completed was added to the Health and Social Care Information Centre‘s Assuring Transformation Collection and data has been collected since January 2016. Between January 2016 and May 2016, 625 CTRs have been completed.