Tag: Kirsty McNeill

  • Kirsty McNeill – 2026 Speech at the Institute of International and European Affairs

    Kirsty McNeill – 2026 Speech at the Institute of International and European Affairs

    The speech made by Kirsty McNeill, the Foreign Office Minister, in Dublin on 8 October 2026.

    Thank you Orlaigh and the IIEA for hosting us today.   

    I’d also like to thank the Irish Government, and the European Union, for inviting me to join today’s meeting of development ministers – the first time the UK has sat around that table since Brexit.   

    Before coming here, I met Neale Richmond and we reflected on the strength of the relationship between the UK and Ireland.  

    As nearest neighbours, we share common interests. But more importantly, we share common values – a belief in democracy, multilateralism, the rule of law, and standing up for those most in need.  

    Those values matter more than ever, because we are living through a period of profound uncertainty.  

    Conflict is driving humanitarian crises across the world. In Sudan, Gaza, Ukraine, too many places, the level of suffering is immense.  

    If you switch on the news today, you could be forgiven for thinking that the world is becoming a darker and darker place.  

    But being here in Ireland is a reminder that darker days need not lie ahead.  

    This country has a long history of refusing to accept that cruelty is inevitable.  

    I travelled here today from Scotland. More than thirteen hundred years ago, the Abbot of Iona made the same journey for a gathering he had convened on this island to establish the Cáin Adomnáin  – the Law of the Innocents.  

    Often described as Europe’s first human rights treaty, it sought to protect women, children and other non-combatants from violence. It reflected a shared belief that even in war there are rules, and that those not involved should be protected.  

    Of course, warfare has changed enormously since then.  

    Today’s conflicts are often more urban, more prolonged, and more complex.  

    Yet some things have remained the same. Women and children still too often bear the brunt. Human beings still find new ways to turn all our ingenuity into new ways to inflict harm on one another.  

    And yet it is also the case that we have never lost the capacity to come together and agree norms and rules to protect life.  

    Right from the days of the Law of the Innocents to the Geneva Conventions, the Mine Ban Treaty to the Arms Trade Treaty – each generation has tried to draw a line and say there are limits we will not cross.  

    That is a tradition we must all hold on to.   

    Because development, humanitarian action and conflict prevention all begin with the belief that every human life should be cherished.  

    And that brings me to my second point: we don’t just share a common humanity – we also share common challenges to that humanity.  

    Whether it is climate change, access to decent work, whether food is affordable and accessible – the issues facing the young people in the Global South and the Global North differ in degree and not nature.  

    That’s why I am determined that in how I do my job we will think of development not as something that happens ‘over there’ and not ‘over here’. But as the process of ensuring that more and more of us are safe and have enough – enough to live well, and with dignity.  

    That applies in Europe just as much as it does in Africa, Asia or anywhere else.  

    It’s one reason I was struck by what Taoiseach Micheál Martin said during a UN General Assembly event we were both at last month – when he talked about Ireland’s long-standing commitment to tackling hunger and malnutrition, rooted in its values and experience.  

    It reflected an understanding that solidarity begins by recognising ourselves in the experience of others.  

    That also helps explain why both Ireland and the UK continue to believe so strongly in international development – but also in doing development differently.  

    For the UK, that means adopting a modern approach to development grounded in investment, stronger systems and local leadership – and rooted in shared solidarity and mutual interest.  

    I’ll be thinking a lot about this as we prepare for the UK’s G20 Presidency next year.  

    And that same spirit of shared solidarity brings me to the future of Europe’s role in the world – and the UK’s place within it.  

    The UK Government is committed to building a closer, more ambitious relationship with our European partners because as the Prime Minister said at the Labour Party Conference, Brexit has done more harm than good.  

    So we are committed to reconnecting with our friends, allies and closest neighbours. My presence around the table of EU development ministers today is part of that.  

    As I said, this is the first time the UK has been invited to this format since we left the EU, and we want to build on the discussions today and do so quickly.  

    We’ve also restarted formal development discussions with the European Commission, our teams in Brussels are working together more closely, and we’re looking forward to the second UK-EU Summit later this year.   

    These are all important steps. But they are part of something bigger. A belief in solidarity across the continent we each call home and then onwards, ties of solidarity that tie the peoples of this continent to others around the world.  

    There is so much that the UK and EU agree on. Not least our resolve to tackle poverty and injustice, respond to humanitarian crises, reform the international system, and build more resilient communities.  

    At a moment when some are stepping back from international cooperation, we are stepping forward.  

    That is why I am pleased to be in Dublin today. And that is why today is just the start.

  • Kirsty McNeill – 2024 Speech on the Adequacy of the Scotland Act 1998

    Kirsty McNeill – 2024 Speech on the Adequacy of the Scotland Act 1998

    The speech made by Kirsty McNeill, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland, in the House of Commons on 18 July 2024.

    I thank the right hon. Member for warmly welcoming me to the Chamber and, indeed, for the work that we have done together in the past on promoting the values of humanitarianism. He will know not only that this is my first day speaking at the Dispatch Box but that my maiden speech, just a short while ago, was my very first contribution of any kind in this House. I hope that with nearly four decades of dedicated service in this place, he may still recall the trepidation of standing here to speak for the first time.

    Turning to the subject matter of the debate, I begin with a celebration of the Scotland Act 1998. It is 25 years since Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II opened the Scottish Parliament and the late, and much-missed, Donald Dewar was sworn in as First Minister. Donald Dewar, the father of devolution, described the Scottish Parliament as “not an end” but a “means to greater ends”—namely, greater social justice in Scotland. That is the driving imperative that still guides Labour, which is why ensuring support for both the Union and the devolved institutions should be seen as a precondition for, and not the sum total of, this Government’s ambitions.

    In the quarter century since the establishment of the Scottish Parliament, we have seen a deepening of devolution through the 2012 and 2016 Scotland Acts. Crucially, those reforms were based on cross-party consensus in Scotland. I am immensely proud that I will now have a role in the ongoing success of those Acts as they continue to deliver for people in Scotland.

    It is right that we continue to hear views from all sides on how constitutional frameworks should evolve. However, I believe that it is through relationships and collaboration that we will drive progress together and deliver for the people we were sent here to serve. As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland has made clear, we all need to work on resetting relationships. Indeed, the Prime Minister has already made this a priority, with his first official engagement being with the First Minister in Scotland. That has been mirrored by early engagement by Ministers throughout the UK Government, and I assure the House that it will continue.

    For my part, I am clear that improved and ongoing co-operation will depend on three main things. The first is the sincerity of our collective commitment to a deep and durable resetting of relationships. Like the 1998 Act itself, collaborative working must endure beyond specific Administrations and Ministers, and be about more than formal structures and machinery. That does not always mean that we will agree, but we must be more mature about those disagreements, and depolarise and detoxify the tone of debate in Scotland. That should be the nature of grown-up politics and it is what the people of Scotland, and of all four nations of the UK, rightly expect from us as their elected representatives.

    Secondly, we need a dynamic understanding of devolution as an ongoing process of redistributing power, which is already evidenced in our commitment to metro mayors in England and to further devolution within England, as set out in the King’s Speech, and in the establishment of the Council of the Nations and Regions. Thirdly, we must commit to a genuine era of people power, with communities, co-operatives, civil society and local government working with the Government at all levels to deliver the change Scotland needs. As I hope my maiden speech made clear, we all need to have an open-hearted approach to working together in the best interests of the people we serve.

    I turn now to the substance of today’s debate. I appreciate the deeply held concern of the right hon. Member. The Government are focused on rebuilding trust in politics across the whole of the UK. In our manifesto, we have been clear that it is not only here in Westminster where more must be done to uphold the standards we expect to see in public life. Scrutiny of the Scottish Government is a matter for the Scottish Parliament, and it could be raised there by the right hon. Member’s colleagues. Nevertheless, we have committed in our manifesto to ensuring that Members of devolved legislatures will have the same free speech protections enjoyed by MPs here at Westminster, to better ensure that elected representatives can hold those in power to account. I hope that the right hon. Member will welcome that commitment. It is important to emphasise that legal proceedings between Mr Salmond and the Scottish Government are ongoing.

    I appreciate that there will be many views on how the Scotland Act 1998 might be improved. That is only right, and I am sure that we will continue to hear those views both here and in the Scottish Parliament, but as I have said, the settlement has been remade over the course of 25 years on the basis of broad consensus. Delivery must now be our focus. As the King’s Speech set out yesterday, this Government are committed to delivering change for Scotland. From making Scotland the home of Great British Energy, which is central to our mission to make the UK a clean energy superpower, to the new national wealth fund and the new deal for working people, we will deliver a better outcome for people in Scotland, particularly those at the sharp end of inequality, which holds back too many people.

    While it is true that co-operation between Governments at a political level has not always been straightforward, nevertheless the Scotland Act has endured. I have often said that while Scots do not have to agree about everything, we do have to find ways to agree about more. Labour is the party of devolution and we will be a Government of collaboration, but above all we are going to deliver for the people of Scotland. There is so much to do. It is time to get started.

  • Kirsty McNeill – 2024 Speech on Foreign Affairs and Defence

    Kirsty McNeill – 2024 Speech on Foreign Affairs and Defence

    The speech made by Kirsty McNeill, the Labour MP for Midlothian, in the House of Commons on 18 July 2024.

    Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. Let me start by congratulating my hon. Friends the Members for Ealing Southall (Deirdre Costigan), for Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme (Lee Pitcher), and for Kensington and Bayswater (Joe Powell), and the hon. Members for Bristol Central (Carla Denyer) and for Tewkesbury (Cameron Thomas) on their maiden speeches. It was an honour to be in the Chamber to hear from our new Defence Secretary and the right hon. Member for Sutton Coldfield (Mr Mitchell), who I have worked with on the cause of internationalism for many years.

    I am conscious of the honour and privilege that being a Member of Parliament represents. Recent events in the United States of America remind us that we must never let violence or the threat of it undermine our politics. That I am speaking today in a Chamber bearing the coats of arms of Sir David Amess and our beloved friend Jo Cox is a reminder of the nobility and fragility of our democracy. I will always endeavour to fulfil my duties with the same open heart that they both displayed.

    Hon. Members will know that I have many distinguished predecessors as Midlothian’s representative, not least William Ewart Gladstone. His Midlothian campaign is remembered as the first truly modern political campaign. I hope that we continued that tradition somewhat in recent weeks, although I do not think that any of the Midlothian candidates could claim to have inspired the same hysteria at our public meetings; at his, people were passed over the heads of the crowd, as if dead, having fainted. The Midlothian campaign is also remembered as a moment when choices were made about the obligations of international solidarity. In Penicuik, we have a memorial to the prisoners of war who died there during the Napoleonic wars, bearing the inscription “All men are brethren”—something that I hope we can hold on to as we seek to make the UK a force for good in the world.

    It was only two weeks ago today that I was elected Member of Parliament for Midlothian. In that time, I have had cause to reflect deeply on the spirit of public service that animates the staff in Midlothian council who administered our election, the officials at the Scotland Office where I am now privileged to serve, and the parliamentary staff who have welcomed us with such professionalism. It was that spirit, too, that called my predecessor, Owen Thompson, to public life, first as a Midlothian councillor, then as our Member of Parliament, and latterly as a Privy Counsellor serving the whole nation. His support for constituents and for our many wonderful community groups will never be forgotten. I sincerely hope that I can be of assistance as he continues his work advocating for veterans and miners.

    It is impossible to be the Member of Parliament for Midlothian and fail to remind the House of that proud mining heritage. I hope that fellow trade unionists in this House will watch the inspiring footage of civil rights hero and actor Paul Robeson visiting Midlothian and singing “Joe Hill” for our miners. I hope, too, to welcome many fellow Members to Midlothian to visit our many mining memorials, including the newest one in Dalkeith, bearing the unforgettable description, “They spent their lives in the dark so that others might have light”. Mineworkers from Midlothian and across our coalfields powered this country. I am delighted that our Labour manifesto committed to ending the injustice of the mineworkers’ pension scheme and to a proper investigation of events at Orgreave.

    Some months ago I hosted an event in Midlothian, and I asked participants what had inspired their activism. One man, Bill, said that he was there because when he was growing up in Newtongrange they had a mine, and now they have a mining museum. This was said in a spirit of reflection, not nostalgia. People in Midlothian are looking to the future, seeking the industries and sectors that can play the progressive role in the next century that mining played in the last.

    In particular, let me commend all the world-leading scientists working in Midlothian at the Roslin Institute and associated organisations. I am sure that they would acknowledge, whatever their individual brilliance, that none of them would be where they are without the science teachers whose inspiration first lit a spark in their young mind. We are all of us products of the investments made in us as children. It is to Midlothian’s children and young people that I want to make my most solemn undertakings. If you have disabilities or additional needs, you are among my most precious constituents. If you are care-experienced, you will always have a friend and champion in me. If you find that your life chances are diminished by poverty or discrimination, then it is by my contribution to helping you realise your limitless potential that I wish my time as your MP to be judged.

    As colleagues may know, I have spent much of my time working with and advocating for children. I would often say that good and bad childhoods follow people around forever. I know this to be true because of my mother’s experiences of the care system, which inspired her adult commitment to the Children’s Panel and fierce advocacy for families in crisis. She taught me so much about fighting for fairness. More than anything, however, both she and my father taught me about disagreeing well. While we have been on different sides of the constitutional divide, our family, I humbly suggest, holds something of a lesson for Scotland as a whole. It is possible—indeed, it is necessary—to approach disagreement with a spirit of curiosity and care. The birthplace of the enlightenment deserves nothing less.