Tag: Foreign Office

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 20 September 2024.

Statement by Australia, the UK and the US to the International Atomic Energy Agency General Conference on IAEA safeguards and AUKUS.

Thank you, President.

I have the honour of speaking on behalf of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

President,

I refer colleagues to the General Conference document 68/19 circulated on 11 September which reiterated our concerns regarding the addition of this political agenda item by one Member State. Australia, the United Kingdom and United States do not support the inclusion of this agenda item. We understand from our extensive consultations that the majority of IAEA Member States are of a similar view.

Under this agenda item, both here and at the Board of Governors, we continue to hear statements casting doubt on the Agency’s mandate and the established legal framework – statements targeted specifically at the Agency’s bilateral engagement with Australia. While the tone has varied, the substance has remained the same. Attempts have been made to call into question the Secretariat’s technical mandate, the established legal framework, and the Director General’s clear statements on the topic. This is regrettable.

President,

We recognise that there are genuine questions among Member States regarding naval nuclear propulsion in Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement states. That is why we have engaged in good faith with all Member States, consistent with our commitment to openness and transparency. In this regard, Australia provided an update through its national statement on our program to acquire naval nuclear propulsion technology at this Conference during the General Debate – as we did last year and the year before that. We have also provided updates at each regular Board meeting since the AUKUS partnership was first announced in September 2021.

As AUKUS partners have previously said, Australia is working with the IAEA to develop a safeguards and verification approach for its program that sets the highest non‑proliferation standard, including an Article 14 arrangement under Australia’s Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. This will not involve a template, or a prescriptive ‘one size fits all’ approach. Given state specific variations between naval nuclear propulsion programs, such an approach would not be effective. We are committed to an approach that will enable the Agency to meet its technical safeguards objectives for Australia at all times. This is important technical work that is entirely within the Agency’s mandate – as the Director General has confirmed.

It will clearly take time to develop this approach, and detailed technical discussions in the Board would be premature at this stage. But the Director General has been clear that, in due course, the Article 14 arrangement will come to the Board of Governors for appropriate action, and we fully support this approach. At that time, we expect, and intend, for the Board to consider it on its non-proliferation merits.

President,

I regret that we have heard disinformation from one country about the AUKUS Agreement for Cooperation Related to Naval Nuclear Propulsion, which was signed by our three countries on 5 August 2024 and has subsequently been submitted to our respective legislatures for consideration. The Agreement reaffirms the AUKUS partners’ respective non-proliferation obligations, including under the NPT and Australia’s obligations under the Treaty of Rarotonga, the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty, and its CSA and Additional Protocol. It obliges the parties to ensure that Australia can provide the Agency with information and access necessary to fulfil Australia’s safeguards obligations to the IAEA, while also ensuring protection of sensitive information. Importantly, under the Agreement the US and the UK cannot transfer any nuclear material to Australia for use in naval nuclear propulsion prior to Australia having an Article 14 arrangement in place with the IAEA.

Our time here is valuable and so this is not the appropriate forum to rebut all the disinformation we have heard point by point. I instead refer delegations to the Agreement’s publicly available text, the statement made by the Director General on 15 August which notes the key non-proliferation relevant features of the Agreement, and to the AUKUS update I provided to the Board of Governors last week under Any Other Business.

President,

The Director General has made it clear that he will continue to keep Member States informed on developments in his engagement on naval nuclear propulsion programs. He did so in June 2023, in reports to the Board of Governors on the two countries with naval nuclear propulsion programs currently underway. He also did so in the Safeguards Implementation Report for 2023. And he has made clear he will provide further reporting, when appropriate.

As AUKUS partners have made clear, we welcome the Director General’s reporting on Australia’s naval nuclear propulsion program and will continue to support the Director General’s judgement as to when to report on naval nuclear propulsion programs. Technically focussed discussions on such programs in the Board, under agenda items proposed by the Director General and guided by his assessments, accord with the Agency’s character as a technical organisation. It is this approach that will uphold the Agency’s independent, impartial and technical role in safeguards implementation. This is of great importance to every Member State, and something we should all strive to protect.

President,

Once again, I would like to express our regret for needing to intervene at this point, under this agenda item. But it is important that we express our views for the record.

Thank you, President.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 20 September 2024.

UK Statement for the Interactive Dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Development. Delivered at the 57th HRC in Geneva.

Thank you Mr President.

First let me thank the Special Rapporteur for his report. As we approach the Summit of the Future, the theme, on children and future generations, is timely.

The Right to Development places the focus on States to ensure individuals, including children, can enjoy human rights, have equal opportunity to fulfil their potential and participate in development processes. In our experience, children are willing and able to take ownership of issues that affect their rights. States must continue to encourage and foster this, ensuring that young voices are heard on issues that affect their future.

However, in response to some of the assertions in the Special Rapporteur’s report, the United Kingdom is firmly of the view that human rights are held by those individuals who are alive and these rights cannot be given to future generations or ‘organisms’.

The UK government has made efforts to involve young people as part of our international development efforts including by consulting with the Youth Council on Global Education, a youth board made up of young people aged 16-25 representing civil society organisations to ensure our programming includes a youth perspective.

Do you have any examples of best practice in ensuring active and meaningful participation of children in policymaking?

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 20 September 2024.

Statement by Ambassador James Kariuki, UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, at the UN Security Council meeting on the situation in the Middle East.

President, I thank USG DiCarlo and High Commissioner Türk for their briefing today. This past year has seen continuous and devastating violence across the region. Civilians have suffered on a dreadful scale on both sides of the Blue Line.

The explosions in Lebanon this week and Israel’s strike in southern Beirut today are the latest in a deadly cycle of violence, and we are deeply concerned by civilian casualties resulting from those incidents. That children were among them is particularly distressing. Our condolences go to the families of the civilians killed.

My Foreign Secretary made our view clear last night: we need an immediate ceasefire on both sides. We are working in lockstep with our allies to de-escalate tensions and end this destructive cycle.

We want to see the implementation of a political plan, based on UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which allows both Israeli and Lebanese civilians to return to their homes and live in peace and security. We are ready to play our role in a diplomatic process to achieve that.

President, let us be clear: Hizballah launched an unprovoked attack on Israel on 8 October 2023. Since then, Israel has faced a near-daily barrage of Hizballah rockets.

We are resolute in our support for Israel’s right to defend its citizens against such threats. However, in doing so, international humanitarian law must be fully respected, and all possible steps taken to avoid civilian casualties.

Lebanese Hizballah’s aggression has been fuelled by Iran and its continued destabilisation of the Middle East, including through its support to partners and proxies. Iran supplies advanced weaponry in contravention of multiple Security Council Resolutions, only prolonging the suffering of the Lebanese people.

While Hizballah and Iran continue to undermine Lebanon’s future, the UK is providing practical support to bolster its stability and security.

This includes funding and training to both the Lebanese Armed Forces and Internal Security Forces, as well as humanitarian assistance to vulnerable communities, including in the south of Lebanon.

President, now is the time for calm heads and an urgent focus on an immediate ceasefire to create the space for negotiations.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 20 September 2024.

Interactive Dialogue with the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Venezuela. Delivered by the UK’s Ambassador to the WTO and UN, Simon Manley.

Thank you, Mr. President.

The playwright Tom Stoppard wrote that: “It’s not the voting that’s democracy, it’s the counting.” Just last week, we stood with 48 other nations in New York to call for the Venezuelan authorities to respect the people’s choice in the 28 July elections.

In the eight weeks since those elections, which the UN Panel of Experts stated “could not be considered democratic” we have seen thousands arbitrarily detained (including minors), the passports of human rights defenders annulled, the approval of the NGO law threatening civic space, and the persecution of the opposition candidate Edmundo González, who appears to have won the most votes in those elections by a significant margin.

We commend the continuing important and necessary work of the Fact-Finding Mission and the OHCHR, we strongly support the renewal of these critical mandates, and call on Venezuelan authorities to cooperate fully with both by granting them immediate, full and unfettered access to the country.

We stand in solidarity with the people of Venezuela and reaffirm our commitment to working towards a peaceful solution that respects each and every vote cast on 28 July.

Ms. Valiñas,

What more can be done to end the ongoing repression in Venezuela?

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 19 September 2024.

Statement by UK Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Barbara Woodward, at the UN Security Council meeting on the situation in the Middle East.

The death toll in Gaza has reached over forty thousand. Water, sanitation and health infrastructure has been almost completely destroyed. Disease and the risk of famine pose further deadly threats.

And Israel continues to reckon with the appalling toll of October 7th with 101 hostages still held captive in Gaza, subject to unimaginable horror.

Elsewhere in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and across the region, tensions are escalating.

We need to see three things:

First, an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, and ramping up of aid in Gaza. A deal is the best way to get the hostages home. Force will not provide a sustainable solution to the conflict. The ceasefire and hostage deal, driven by the commendable efforts of the US, Qatar and Egypt, has to be finalised as a matter of urgency.

We call upon Hamas and Israel to agree the deal, and in the meantime for Hamas to grant the ICRC humanitarian access to the hostages whose ordeal continues. Our message to Hamas: let them go.

With winter fast approaching, we call on Israel to take swift action to allow the UN and humanitarian actors to do their job. By making de-confliction work, re-opening land routes for aid, and supporting preparations for winter by allowing a rapid increase in the volume of items for shelter and infrastructure repair.

Second, we must address the deteriorating situation in the West Bank. Expansion of settlements, in clear violation of international law, undermines prospects for peace and must cease immediately.

We have witnessed, with grave concern, how an increasing number of Israeli settlers have systemically used harassment, intimidation and violence to pressure Palestinian communities to leave their land. We call on Israel to hold those responsible to account.

We reiterate our clear position that any attempt to alter the geographic or demographic make-up of the Occupied Palestinian Territories through the use of force and outside of a negotiated solution is wholly unacceptable and illegal.

We also call for an end to the divisive and inflammatory rhetoric we have seen from some Israeli Ministers, which serve to fuel aggression towards Palestinians and humanitarian workers.

Finally, we need to galvanise a political process towards a two-state solution. As the ICJ has advised, Israel should bring an end to its presence in the Occupied Territories as rapidly as possible.

The UK is clear: this must be done through a negotiated solution, with reunification of Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, in line with 1967 borders and under the effective control of the Palestinian Authority. Peace must be premised upon a safe and secure Israel alongside a safe and secure Palestinian state.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 19 September 2024.

Ambassador Holland thanks Minister Valtonen from Finland for presenting priorities as incoming 2025 OSCE Chair-in-Office, and gives full UK support.

Thank you, Chair. Minister Valtonen, on behalf of the UK, a warm welcome to the Permanent Council. Thank you for outlining the priorities for Finland’s time as OSCE Chair-in-Office. Please be assured of the UK’s full support for the very focused agenda you have set out.

I’d like to pick up specifically on the three guiding principles you have outlined today. The first is to welcome your commitment to keeping support for Ukraine at the heart of the OSCE’s work. Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally shifted the landscape of European security and global stability. And it is becoming more complex, as Russia increases the intensity of its malign and reckless activities across many of the States in our region.

Each participating State of the OSCE has an equal right to security, and each day, Ukrainians are risking their lives to stand up for this right – not just for their own country, but for every one of us. Your commitment to focusing the OSCE’s work on Ukraine, as well as the security of all our citizens and our resilience to evolving threats, is therefore very welcome.

Secondly, as you have reminded us, next year will mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act: an important and symbolic milestone. That landmark agreement forms the bedrock of the OSCE, upon which we have built a unique institution through subsequent commitments and agreed principles. These commitments and principles have never been more important than they are today. They provide this institution with the tools it needs to pursue peace and security for our region. The OSCE continues to demonstrate its value every day. And those decades of experience supporting States to manage and resolve conflicts through the toolbox, Missions and instruments are of value to our entire region, and importantly, are already helping Ukraine with its current rebuilding and recovery efforts. We therefore welcome your ambition to make full use of the OSCE’s toolkit.

Lastly, in order to carry out its role effectively, we need an Organisation that is well-equipped. In the immediate term, this means we must get behind the Chair and agree new senior leadership appointments urgently. And more broadly, we welcome your commitment to prioritise inclusivity and strengthen the OSCE’s working methods and functionality, including through innovation. This simply cannot be done effectively without adequate funding. And we share your position that it is essential for the OSCE to have an agreed Unified Budget. We urge those obstructing agreement – to the Unified Budget itself as well as other important Draft Decisions on the organisation’s finances – to look beyond a narrow national focus, support the Chair-in-Office in good faith, and ensure all parts of the OSCE have the funding they need to effectively fulfil their mandates.

Your Excellency, we thank you for your open and consultative approach as you prepare for the task ahead of you. It will be challenging. You can rely on the strong support of the UK. We look forward to working with you and your dedicated team in Vienna, and wish you the best for your Chairpersonship.

Thank you.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 19 September 2024.

European Commission Executive Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič, Spanish Minister for Foreign Affairs José Manuel Albares and UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, together with the Chief Minister of Gibraltar Fabian Picardo, met in Brussels on Thursday 19 September.

This was the third meeting at political level and the first one in this format under the new UK government.

Building on significant progress of 12 April and 16 May, today’s discussions were constructive and productive, resulting in further progress on the complex issues of negotiations, namely in the area of people and goods.

The meeting reaffirmed their shared commitment to concluding an EU-UK Agreement to bring confidence, legal certainty, and stability to the people of the whole region, while safeguarding all parties’ legal positions.

They all agreed to remain in constant contact, with teams to work closely and intensely on outstanding areas.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 19 September 2024.

Ambassador Holland condemns the transfer of Iranian ballistic missiles to Russia, which will be used to wreak further misery on Ukrainian civilians as part of its illegal war.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Last week the Russian Federation called one of its more hypocritical UN Security Council meetings, this time on ‘western weapons transfers to Ukraine’.  This was the cynical use of the Council to criticise support for a sovereign state to exercise its legitimate and legal right to defend itself against Russia’s illegal war of aggression.

But in making these accusations, Russia succeeded only in highlighting its own double standards and disinformation – the hallmarks of its malign actions on our continent and beyond.  Because just days before the meeting, we learned that Russia had taken delivery of Iranian ballistic missiles.  This transfer poses a direct threat to European security just like those Russia received from DPRK, which took place in violation of UN Security Council Resolutions.

There is a critical difference between the two situations, which Russia neglects to acknowledge. In one, weapons are being supplied to a sovereign State, Ukraine, to give it the means to defend itself in accordance with international law.  In another, weapons are being sent to a state, Russia, which is aggressively waging war against its neighbour which violates the UN Charter and the Helsinki Final Act.  And what is more, these weapons are being used to wreak misery on Ukrainian civilians.

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has reported nearly 12,000 deaths and close to 25,000 injuries among civilians since Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion began.  The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine has reported a spike in civilian deaths and injuries over the last two months, making them the deadliest months so far of 2024.

Madam chair, we condemn in the strongest terms the shelling of a frontline aid distribution site on 12 September that resulted in the deaths of three members of staff from the International Committee of the Red Cross.  It is essential that International Humanitarian Law is respected and that aid workers can do their jobs, providing help to the most vulnerable.

The UK also condemns the Russian strike on a civilian cargo ship carrying Ukrainian grain in the Black Sea on 11 September.  Such attacks pose a genuine threat to global food security.

Madam Chair, as my Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary made clear last week, the UK’s ironclad support for Ukraine’s right to self-defence will not waver in the face of Russian threats and hypocrisy.  Russia started this war by illegally invading Ukraine.  It could end it immediately by withdrawing.  Thank you.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 18 September 2024.

Statement by Ambassador James Kariuki, UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, at the UN Security Council meeting on Sudan.

The UK requested this Council meeting following alarming reports of escalation around El Fasher. I would like to make three points.

First, we strongly condemn the Rapid Support Forces’ assault on El Fasher. We call on the RSF to halt its siege of the area and for an immediate end to the fighting. Aerial bombardments, shelling and other combat activity by the warring parties have resulted in yet further displacement and destruction of critical infrastructure.

We also call on states to refrain from enhancing either side’s fighting capability. All Member States have a responsibility to uphold the arms embargo which this Council renewed just last week.

Second, it is imperative that the warring parties uphold their obligations under international law and that there is accountability for violations. The escalation around El Fasher clearly contravenes resolution 2736 agreed by this Council in June.

We must continue to send a clear message to the warring parties that we are watching closely. We also note the work underway by the Secretary-General to produce recommendations for the protection of civilians. Events in El Fasher emphasise the importance of this work.

Third, President, we underscore our concern at the humanitarian impact of the violence across Sudan and its destabilising effect on the region. Over 10 million people have already been displaced. A new wave of violence, as we’ve heard, will exacerbate this even further.

The recent re-opening of the Adre border crossing is an important step, but humanitarian access still desperately needs to be scaled up – both cross-border and across conflict lines.

We must also ensure that access is not slowed down by bureaucratic impediments. President, we once again call on both warring parties to return to negotiations in good faith and to stop this senseless violence now.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 18 September 2024.

Explanation of vote by Ambassador Barbara Woodward, UK Permanent Representative to the UN, on the UN General Assembly resolution on the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories – Wednesday 18 September 2024.

The United Kingdom has abstained on today’s resolution.

The United Kingdom has done so not because we do not support the central findings of the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion but rather because the resolution does not provide sufficient clarity to effectively advance our shared aim of a peace premised on a negotiated two-state solution: a safe and secure Israel alongside a safe and secure Palestinian state.

As a state committed to the international rule of law, we respect the Court and call for states to unite around renewed efforts towards a negotiated settlement, in accordance with international law and the relevant resolutions of the Security Council. We stand ready to work with other Member States on future resolutions before the General Assembly and in the Security Council, seeking to fashion a broad consensus on the way forward, with re-energised determination to accelerate the path to peace.

While our abstention reflects our unwavering determination to focus on efforts to bring about a peaceful and negotiated two-state solution, the United Kingdom aims, by this statement, to indicate our clear view that Israel should bring an end to its presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories as rapidly as possible. And every effort must be made to create the conditions for negotiations which provide for a sovereign, viable and free Palestine, alongside a safe, secure and free Israel, recognising the security concerns and right to self-defence of each one. We must also work towards the reunification of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza in line with 1967 borders and under the effective control of the Palestinian Authority, as a fundamental step towards a two-state solution.

Turning now to address settlements in particular, the United Kingdom is gravely concerned by Israel’s continued actions which undermine prospects for peace. Expansion of settlements, in clear violation of international law, must cease immediately. There have been unprecedented levels of violence by extremist settlers over the past year.

We have witnessed with grave concern how an increasing number of residents of illegal Israeli settlements and outposts have systematically used harassment, intimidation and violence to put pressure on Palestinian communities to leave their land. We call on Israel to hold those responsible to account.

Alongside our partners, the UK has imposed sanctions on individuals and entities responsible for these acts. We continue to track closely these acts of violence and where appropriate the UK will seek to extend sanctions. We are clear. Any efforts to change the geographic or demographic make-up of the Occupied Palestinian Territories through force and outside a negotiated settlement are illegal.

President, the situation in Gaza continues to subject Palestinian civilians to horrendous suffering, and over 100 hostages remain held by Hamas in abhorrent conditions. We need to see an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the release of the hostages.

We will continue to work urgently to help bring peace and galvanise a political process towards a two-state solution which provides long-term peace and security for both Israelis and Palestinians alike. I thank you.