Tag: Foreign Office

Dear colleagues, on behalf of the Core Group comprising Germany, Norway, the United States and the United Kingdom, I have the honour to introduce draft resolution S-36 L1 as orally revised, which has been tabled with the Secretariat and is available to all on e-delegate.

During today’s session we have heard the High Commissioner for Human Rights speak of the parties “trampling international humanitarian law” and of the need for human rights and accountability to lie at the core of any future political agreement between the parties to the conflict in Sudan.

We have listened to states from all regions call for an immediate end to violence and for the respect of the rights of people in Sudan.

And we have been informed, in the clearest possible terms, by civil society colleagues about the scale of violations and abuses which have already occurred in Sudan and heard their calls that this Council must act now – today – to prevent a catastrophe from spiralling further out of control.

Mr President, I think our first thoughts are with the people of Sudan, the victims of this unnecessary conflict. We must show them that the Council stands with them.

The purpose of the draft resolution before us is to offer a proportionate, timely response by this Council to the crisis in Sudan. It seeks to reflect the alarming deterioration in Sudan since 15 April, to express this Council’s concern, and to build on the existing tools that we have already established to ensure that the situation in Sudan receives the attention it requires.

In 2021 this Council created a new type of mandate – an expert designated by the UN High Commissioner to help improve human rights in the country. We are grateful for the work done first by Mr Dieng and more recently by Mr Nouicer.

But we must recognise that the tragic situation which has unfolded since 15 April is a very different one to the one that prevailed prior to that.

It is therefore only appropriate that we look to increase the capacity for the Expert to do his crucial work. To do otherwise would be to ignore the reality of what has been, and is still, taking place in the Sudan.

Mr President, dear colleagues, we have sought to engage all colleagues in an open and transparent manner on this draft text. We wish to thank all those delegations who have provided comments. We have made revisions to the text, reflected in the draft resolution now before us, in order to try and accommodate the views of as many delegations as possible.

We therefore call on the members of this Council to adopt this draft resolution, as orally revised, without a vote. Should a vote be called, we invite our fellow members of this Council to vote in favour of the draft resolution.

Thank you.

Mr. Chair,

I am delivering this statement on behalf of the informal Group of Friends on Safety of Journalists, which consists of the following participating States: Austria, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

We welcome the Representative on Freedom of the Media (RFoM) Ms Teresa Ribeiro to the Permanent Council and thank her for her analytical report calling for action to defend freedom of expression, media freedom and our shared OSCE commitments in the face of many challenges.

As is clear from the Representative’s statement – and as we stressed in our statement marking World Press Freedom Day last week – the issue of safety of journalists is more pressing than ever. Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has imperilled journalists throughout the region. It has led directly to the deaths of journalists, who are working to expose the brutal realities, including atrocities, of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. Just this week, French AFP journalist Arman Soldin was tragically killed while covering the battle near Bakhmut.

The internal repression and clampdown on media freedom in Russia and Belarus is an attempt to silence all independent voices and impartial reporting. As the RFoM rightly points out, this has in both States led “to media and information spaces that are almost completely controlled by the governments”. Journalists and other media actors are harassed, detained, prosecuted, sentenced, and forced into exile. We echo the RFoM’s call for the release of all journalists who are serving prison sentences or are being held in pre-trial detention for their journalistic work by Russia and Belarus and by other OSCE participating States.

We commend the RFoM’s continued work on the Safety of Journalists, including through providing participating States with advice on how to improve the implementation of their commitments from the 2018 Milan Ministerial Council decision. We look forward to the launch of the toolbox in November. It will provide practical advice to all participating States on how to improve the safety of journalists, online and offline. In this context, we very much appreciated the first meeting of National Focal Points in March which provided concrete input to the coming toolbox.

We also look forward to the Safety of Female Journalists Online Monitoring Guidelines that will be presented shortly with advice to participating States on how to monitor online violence to prevent offline attacks.

We once again thank you, Representative Ribeiro, for your work – and the work of your entire dedicated team – as well as for your commitment to your mandate which is more relevant than ever.

Thank you, Mr Chair. The UK fully subscribes to the statement delivered by Ambassador Grønbech-Jensen on behalf of the 38 invoking States and would like to add some points in our national capacity. I want to thank Professor Ascensio and his team for this credible and important report and commend those who shared their testimonies with him.

Mr. Chair, the Moscow Mechanism report from November 2020 noted “massive and systematic” violations of fundamental freedoms by the Belarusian authorities. It is deeply concerning that this trend has not only continued but in fact further intensified:

• A large part of civil society has been destroyed by the State.
• Peaceful demonstrations are routinely and brutally repressed.
• One quarter of all civil society groups have now been forced to close, including children’s rights groups and organisations working to support other vulnerable members of society.

The extent of repression and the number of political prisoners is staggering. The report concludes that “Belarus is implementing a broad policy of arbitrary arrest and detention”. Belarus is holding almost 1,500 of its citizens as political prisoners. Many prisoners are subject to torture and cruel and degrading treatment.

I would like to take this opportunity as my colleagues did to raise one such case; that of former presidential candidate Viktar Babaryka. Mr Babaryka has been hospitalised in unclear circumstances amid reports of brutal treatment in prison.

We call upon the Belarusian authorities to ensure his safety and provide him with immediate and proper medical care. Moreover, we urge them to release Viktar Babaryka and all other political prisoners immediately and unconditionally.

The report also highlights the recent legislative and constitutional changes in Belarus which have “facilitated the operation of an authoritarian regime”. These include amendments to undermine freedom of speech and association, restrict political rights, and extend the death penalty. The amendments further demonstrate the disregard and contempt of the Lukashenko regime for basic democratic freedoms and the rule of law.

As Professor Ascensio notes, the Belarusian government has even violated its own constitution to support Putin’s war of aggression in Ukraine. They have used this illegal war as a means of justifying their own illegal repression, violently supressing peaceful anti-war protests and arresting those who disagree with the war.

The UK is committed to ensuring that all those responsible for these human rights violations are held accountable. We welcome the ongoing work of the International Accountability Platform for Belarus and UN OHCHR in documenting and preserving evidence. As Ambassador Grønbech-Jensen stated, impunity is not an option.

We deeply regret and condemn the lack of cooperation by the Belarusian authorities throughout this process. We urge Belarus to immediately cease ongoing human rights violations, including the systematic repression of civil society, independent media, opposition groups, and trade unionists. And once again we urge the Belarusian authorities to respond to this report and fully implement their international obligations and OSCE commitments.

Thank you, Mr Chair.

Thank you, Mr Vice President,

First let me warmly welcome the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the other members of the Liechtenstein delegation.

The United Kingdom commends Liechtenstein’s human rights record and we look forward to its Presidency of the Council of Europe later this year.

Liechtenstein has made significant progress in furthering LGBT+ rights, including its recent decision allowing adoption by same-sex couples. We strongly encourage Liechtenstein to go further and enact legislation to grant the LGBT+ community the right to marry.

We recommend Liechtenstein:

1. Continues its work to strengthen rights and protections afforded to the LGBT+ community, including through enacting legislation to allow the marriage of same-sex couples.
2. Takes effective measures to systematically fight discrimination and xenophobia towards religious minorities.
3. Continues to pursue efforts to achieve de facto gender equality, especially in politics and in senior managerial positions, as women in Liechtenstein continue to be underrepresented.

Thank you, Mr President.

Mr. Chair, I am delivering this statement on behalf of the following 38 delegations who on 23 March 2023 invoked the Moscow Mechanism as a response to the alarming human rights situation in Belarus: Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

On behalf of the invoking States, I wish to thank Professor Hervé Ascensio for his work as Rapporteur under the OSCE’s Moscow Mechanism. We are most grateful for your professional and independent approach to your mandate and for the thorough and well-documented report that you have produced. We regret that the Belarusian authorities refused to cooperate. The fact that you were met by victims of repression who seemingly had lost faith in positive changes, and who reported that fellow victims were terrified and intimidated from providing evidence, is a stark reminder of the severity of the situation.

I sincerely hope that all 57 OSCE participating States will do justice to your report by considering carefully your findings and recommendations, which are addressed, not only to Belarus, but also to OSCE participating States and the wider International Community.

Mr. Chair, we invoked the Moscow Mechanism to underscore our concerns about the continued deterioration of the internal human rights situation in Belarus and to explore the more recent development of serious abuses linked to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

For more than two years, we have continuously called upon the Belarusian authorities to put an end to repression and violence. To protect the victims and to ensure the safety of all individuals, without discrimination. To address the recommendations of the 2020 Moscow Mechanism Report. To live up to OSCE and other international commitments and principles. To abide by international law. And to end impunity for human rights violations. But the delegation of Belarus and the Belarusian authorities have – again and again – ignored our legitimate concerns and requests.

The independent report by Professor Ascensio has fully confirmed how Belarusian authorities are continuing their brutal and unprecedented crackdown on opposing voices. The report concludes that “so far, the Government of Belarus has not taken any steps to put an end to this situation, nor to provide effective remedies for the victims. On the contrary, the repressive policy has been steadily increasing over the past two years”.

Legislative amendments have been introduced with the aim of providing the Belarusian authorities with “a full arsenal of legislation designed to hinder any form of opposition”. These amendments include the extension of the death penalty, increased liability for vaguely defined acts, restriction of political rights for Belarusians in exile, and limitations to the freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

Moreover, the report clearly confirms how, after the outbreak of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine on 24 February 2022, repression has been “particularly directed at those expressing their opposition to the war or their support for the Ukrainian people”. Once again, we see how internal repression is linked to external aggression.

Mr. Chair, the number of political prisoners in Belarus now exceeds 1,486 with activists arguing the real number could be significantly higher. For almost three years, peaceful protesters have been met with brutal force from Belarusian authorities. People have been arbitrarily arrested and detained on politically motivated charges. People have been deprived of their right to a fair trial. Lawyers have been intimidated to stay away from defending those charged on political grounds. At least 100,000 Belarusians have been, and continue to be, forced to flee the country – to leave their homes. And independent media, journalists, and other media workers have been under sustained attack.

The report confirms the excessive violence used by the Belarusian authorities to carry out the repression. The mission found that “torture or inhuman or degrading treatment are occurring on a regular and organised basis in places of detention and are particularly targeted at those perceived as political opponents”. Further, the report gives evidence of the practice of mass arrests in people’s homes and the use of violence to gain access to personal data, which is later used against individuals.

Meanwhile, Belarusian authorities continue to enjoy impunity.

Mr. Chair, the UN OHCHR in its latest report on the human rights situation in Belarus presented to the UN Human Rights Council on 22 March concluded that some of the violations committed in Belarus may amount to crimes against humanity.

We appreciate the efforts of the International Accountability Platform for Belarus (IAPB) and other international investigative mechanisms, including under the UN OHCHR, to collect and preserve evidence of the human rights violations in Belarus. Impunity is not an option.

Mr. Chair, the first steps toward security and stability for the people of Belarus remains for the Belarusian authorities to release all those unjustly imprisoned, to end the campaign of violence against peaceful protesters, and to hold perpetrators to account.

As the report concludes, “without accountability and justice [in Belarus], there can be no security and stability in the long run on the European Continent”.

Against this background, and based on the recommendations in Professor Ascencio’s report, we ask the Belarus delegation:

• When will the Belarusian authorities cease their brutal repression and release and rehabilitate all political prisoners?
• When will the Belarusian authorities bring criminal charges against those responsible for human rights violations and abuses, including Belarusian security officials?
• When will the Belarusian authorities ensure respect for the Belarusian constitution according to which “(t)he republic of Belarus shall exclude acts of military aggression against other states from its territory”?

Mr. Chair, we thank Professor Ascensio again for the thorough report, and we remain committed to ensuring that the report – and its recommendations – are followed up.

Thank you.