Tag: Baroness Kramer

  • Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2016-03-22.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many (1) poster boards, (2) bus advertisements, (3) television advertisements, (4) magazine or print advertisements, and (5) other forms of advertising, they are using to promote the Married Couple’s Allowance; and what is the cost of each form of advertising.

    Lord O’Neill of Gatley

    As of March 24 2016, 585,487 couples had successfully applied for Marriage Allowance, including apporoximately 181,00 who applied in March.

    The campaign ran until 31 March and final figures are not yet available.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2016-04-11.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many people paid capital gains tax on personal possessions in each of the last five years, and what was the total amount of tax paid.

    Lord O’Neill of Gatley

    Information is not available on the number of people paying Capital Gains Tax on specific types of possession, or the total amount of tax paid on gains of specific type of possession. Capital Gains Tax payments are not separated into personal possessions. However, the Government publishes information about total amount of Capital Gains Tax paid each year and the total numbers of individuals accruing liabilities.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2016-04-11.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of a vote to leave the EU on UK gilt auctions.

    Lord O’Neill of Gatley

    The average amount bid by wholesale Gilt-edged Market Makers (GEMMs) at gilt auctions between 14 May 2015 and 7 April 2016 was £202.17 million per GEMM per auction.

    As the Prime Minister and the Chancellor have said, the civil service is working to support the Government’s position that Britain is stronger, safer and better off remaining in a reformed EU. Gilt auctions are expected to proceed as normal in the build up to the EU referendum, in line with UK Debt Management Office (DMO) plans published on 31 March 2016.

    As customary, the DMO will publish precise details of gilt auctions for July-September 2016 one month before the start of the quarter on 31 May 2016.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2016-04-11.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of speculation around the EU referendum on UK gilt auctions.

    Lord O’Neill of Gatley

    The average amount bid by wholesale Gilt-edged Market Makers (GEMMs) at gilt auctions between 14 May 2015 and 7 April 2016 was £202.17 million per GEMM per auction.

    As the Prime Minister and the Chancellor have said, the civil service is working to support the Government’s position that Britain is stronger, safer and better off remaining in a reformed EU. Gilt auctions are expected to proceed as normal in the build up to the EU referendum, in line with UK Debt Management Office (DMO) plans published on 31 March 2016.

    As customary, the DMO will publish precise details of gilt auctions for July-September 2016 one month before the start of the quarter on 31 May 2016.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2016-04-11.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the average bid made by banks with official trader status in each gilt auction since May 2015.

    Lord O’Neill of Gatley

    The average amount bid by wholesale Gilt-edged Market Makers (GEMMs) at gilt auctions between 14 May 2015 and 7 April 2016 was £202.17 million per GEMM per auction.

    As the Prime Minister and the Chancellor have said, the civil service is working to support the Government’s position that Britain is stronger, safer and better off remaining in a reformed EU. Gilt auctions are expected to proceed as normal in the build up to the EU referendum, in line with UK Debt Management Office (DMO) plans published on 31 March 2016.

    As customary, the DMO will publish precise details of gilt auctions for July-September 2016 one month before the start of the quarter on 31 May 2016.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Baroness Kramer – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2016-04-13.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord O’Neill of Gatley on 7 April (HL7284), what was the initial budget agreed for the advertising campaign for the Married Couple’s Allowance.

    Lord O’Neill of Gatley

    HM Revenue and Customs’ plans for advertising Marriage Allowance evolved over time.

    HMRC does not hold data on the number of customers that have applied for Marriage Allowance by Local Authority or Parliamentary Constituency.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Baroness Kramer – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2015-10-05.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much has been paid to external research and polling companies by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills in each month since October 2014, and to which companies payments were made.

    Baroness Neville-Rolfe

    Details of research commissioned by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), is not readily available and can only be obtained at disproportionate cost. BIS has published its research strategy and details of the monitoring and evaluation of its programmes. Details can be found at the ‘BIS evaluation strategy’ and ‘BIS research strategy’ sections of the GOV.UK website, which are attached.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Baroness Kramer – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2015-10-05.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government what research they have commissioned from external research and polling companies on small business policies in each month since May.

    Baroness Neville-Rolfe

    Details of research commissioned by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), is not readily available and can only be obtained at disproportionate cost. BIS has published its research strategy and details of the monitoring and evaluation of its programmes. Details can be found at the ‘BIS evaluation strategy’ and ‘BIS research strategy’ sections of the GOV.UK website, which are attached.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Baroness Kramer – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Baroness Kramer on 2015-10-05.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many meetings (1) the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, (2) ministers within the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and (3) civil servants at the level of private secretary or above in the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, have had with companies employing fewer than 50 employees since May.

    Baroness Neville-Rolfe

    This information is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate costs.

  • Baroness Kramer – 2014 Speech on Passenger Focus Bus Survey Results

    Below is the text of the speech made by Baroness Kramer in London on 25th March 2014.

    Thank you for that introduction.

    It’s a pleasure to be here today.

    And I’d like to congratulate Passenger Focus for delivering this new bus passenger survey.

    As transport stories go, the survey is unlikely to knock high speed rail or airport expansion off the front pages.

    But frankly, the subject it deals with is no less important.

    Buses form the backbone of UK transport, accounting for almost two thirds of public transport journeys.

    They keep people linked with the workplace, and businesses linked with the marketplace.

    For many young, old and disabled people – and those who live in rural areas – their local bus service is the only option to get from A to B.

    So buses keep Britain moving.

    And that’s why it’s crucial that passengers feel they are getting a good service.

    Today’s survey shows that customer satisfaction has improved in most areas.

    Including value for money, punctuality, journey time, and reducing anti-social behaviour.

    Overall satisfaction is 88%, an increase from 84% last year.

    These are very positive results.

    We want local authorities and bus operators to work together to bring about improvements, so it’s encouraging to see partnerships like that between Centro and local operators delivering for passengers.

    I also congratulate Reading Buses for achieving the highest overall satisfaction rating at 94% – an improvement even on last year’s impressive performance.

    These results don’t merely show that most passengers are happy with their bus services.

    They also demonstrate the value of the bus passenger survey in helping operators and local authorities identify passenger concerns, and take action to address them.

    We’ve been through 5 extremely tough years.

    And we’ve all had to tighten our belts – and learn how to deliver more for less.

    But make no mistake, the government is still backing buses.

    We are working with the industry to invest £1 billion a year providing older and disabled people with free off-peak travel.

    We’ve channelled around £350 million into buses through the Bus Service Operators Grant (BSOG), and we’re protecting bus spending up to 2015 to 2016.

    We have provided £70 million through the Better Bus Area fund for improvements in 24 local authorities.

    £20 million has been invested to support community transport.

    And £87 million has been spent through the Green Bus Fund to boost environmental performance.

    Where the market can support it, we’re improving competition for bus passengers by implementing the Competition Commission’s recommendations.

    And £15 million of DfT funding is helping roll out smart ticketing technology across England’s bus fleets.

    All of these measures demonstrate our commitment to buses.

    They also illustrate the increasingly pivotal role of local government in delivering our bus strategy.

    As I’ve outlined, substantial funding has been made available.

    From the start of January, some BSOG funding has been paid directly to local authorities.

    This funding has been ringfenced until 2017 to encourage more partnership working between bus operators and local authorities

    Many authorities also received a share of the government’s £600 million Local Sustainable Transport Fund which included bus improvement schemes.

    And they’ve had more money to spend on road maintenance each year of this Parliament compared to the last.

    An important factor in bus punctuality.

    All these measures give communities more control over how money is spent.

    I do appreciate that with budgets under pressure, authorities have to make difficult choices about where they spend their money.

    But it’s absolutely paramount that they make the most of what’s available, to secure the best services and the best value for bus passengers.

    To help with this, we published guidance last October on procuring local bus services and other types of road passenger transport.

    While councils all over the country continue to innovate, I believe there is scope for further improvement.

    Particularly if authorities share best practice.

    We should always be seeking to improve what we do and learn from others.

    The Japanese have a word for it: “Kaizen” – or continuous improvement.

    That’s why the DfT is continuing to work on strategies to deliver better bus services cost effectively – including through community transport.

    And I urge local authorities to do the same.

    Making public transport accessible to everyone in the community is something that’s close to my heart.

    That’s why the concessionary fares scheme is so important.

    Feeling lonely and isolated can affect everyone.

    But the loss of friends and family, or losing mobility can make older and disabled people particularly vulnerable.

    For many, their local bus service is more than simply a mode of transport.

    It’s a lifeline.

    It connects them with essential services.

    But what’s just as important is that it gets them out of the house, and gives them confidence and a sense of independence.

    So I’m keen for the bus industry to invest in technologies which can help them.

    Many blind and partially sighted people find audio and visual announcements vital for travel.

    However, they don’t come cheap – particularly for smaller, local bus operators.

    The cost can rise to millions of pounds a year.

    So following an industry roundtable on transport accessibility, and discussions with Guide Dogs for the Blind and the RNIB, I am encouraging operators to work with manufacturers of audio/visual technology to gauge the potential for simpler and more affordable systems for buses.

    I want them to think creatively about what can be achieved.

    And I’m also looking into the possibility of research initiatives involving small businesses and academic institutions to encourage further innovation.

    But it’s not just about money and technology.

    What’s just as important is the attitude and awareness of staff – which has such a bearing on passengers’ confidence and willingness to travel.

    The DfT is currently reviewing the exemption of bus drivers from the mandatory EU disability awareness training requirement on passenger rights. This review will conclude at the end of this month.

    We want to establish if drivers are receiving adequate training under the current voluntary arrangement.

    I have also sought feedback from disability groups and charities.

    If the results show that progress is not being made on disability awareness training, we will examine options and propose a plan of action.

    So in summary, the evidence from the survey is encouraging.

    Bus companies are increasingly focused on the passenger experience.

    Many of them are working in partnership with local authorities.

    And passengers are responding positively.

    I’d like to thank everyone in the industry for their efforts.

    But make no mistake, the need for efficient, reliable, affordable, clean bus services is only going to rise.

    Britain’s population is growing, getting older, and travelling more.

    So absorbing the growth in demand while continuing to increase passenger satisfaction will therefore provide an enduring challenge to the industry.

    But it’s a challenge I’m sure it will meet.

    Particularly with the help of the bus passenger survey.

    Thanks to Passenger Focus, we know more today about bus passengers and their needs than we have ever known.

    And that means we’re well placed to attract more passengers back onto buses,

    Which in turn will give the bus industry a vital boost,

    While reducing road congestion,

    And cutting harmful traffic emissions.

    So I look forward to working with you over the next year, and to building on the achievements of 2013.

    Thank you.