Tag: 2001

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Betting Tax to be Scrapped Early [July 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Betting Tax to be Scrapped Early [July 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 13 July 2001.

    The tax on punters will be abolished three months ahead of schedule on the first weekend in October, the Financial Secretary Paul Boateng announced today.

    Gordon Brown announced in his March Budget that by January 1, 2002, the current tax on betting stakes would be replaced with a tax on bookmakers’ gross profits, a radical reform which means Britain’s bookmakers will end the deductions they currently charge punters, and look to grow their domestic and international business from a UK base.

    Since the Budget announcement, rapid progress has been made both by the bookmakers in re-locating their off-shore operations to the UK and by Customs in preparing to switch to the new system. The Government has therefore decided to bring in the reforms to betting taxation a full three months early.

    The new system will now be introduced on Saturday, 6 October.

    Financial Secretary Paul Boateng said:

    “The old tax on punters has been in place almost unchanged since 1966. But we realised it was not going to work in the 21st century and would mean UK-based bookmakers losing out on the global betting market. Our reforms mean punters will get tax-free betting, bookmakers will see increased turnover, and both racing and Government revenues will share in the benefits.

    It’s a good deal all round. We’re therefore delighted to bring it in more than three months ahead of schedule. This demonstrates our ability to deliver real reforms with speed and efficiency – years ago, it would have been inconceivable to introduce these sorts of radical reforms, let alone push them through so quickly.”

    Today’s announcement received a huge welcome within the betting industry.

    John Brown, Chairman of William Hill, said:

    “The Government is to be congratulated on the speedy implementation of the Chancellor’s initiative. We will be ready on the day for every bet we take worldwide to come back the UK.”

    Bob Scott, Chief Executive of Coral Eurobet said:

    “This will be the biggest day in the history of betting. I would like to applaud the Government not only for having the vision to introduce this revolutionary tax but also for the speed with which they have acted. This represents a major investment by the Government in the betting industry, and one we will demonstrate has not been misplaced. For customers, bookmakers, the racing industry and the Government, this is a win-win-win-win situation.”

    Alan Ross, Managing Director of Ladbrokes, said:

    “Every betting customer should thank the Government and put the date of October 6th into their diary as this marks the beginning of a new era for the industry. The decision today is a real boost to the betting industry and means that the significant increases in turnover, employment and international reach promised by tax-free betting will happen even sooner than anticipated.”

    Tom Kelly, Director General of the Betting Office Licensees Association, said:

    “This announcement is excellent news for punters and the betting industry alike. We are looking forward to a new era of deduction-free betting and the British punter getting the best deal in the world.”

    Warwick Bartlett, Chairman of the British Betting Offices Association, said:

    “Today’s announcement means the British punter will be able to bet tax-free for the first time in 33 years. The onus is now on the betting industry to deliver and make the UK a centre for global gambling. We have already received enquiries from the US, Canada, Australia, Japan, the Netherlands and Sweden from bookmakers interested in coming to the UK as a result of the introduction of a gross profits tax.”

    The Gross Profits Tax

    In Budget 2001, the Government announced that – following extensive consultation and analysis – the current General Betting Duty of 6.75 per cent on total stakes would be replaced by 1 January 2002 with a 15 per cent tax on bookmakers’ gross profits, defined as the difference between the stakes laid with them and the winnings they pay out.

    This reformed tax structure makes it possible for bookmakers to absorb the tax and to end the 9 per cent ‘deduction’ that they currently charge punters. It therefore makes it possible for them to develop their domestic and international business from an onshore base, competing from a position of strength in the growing global market for telephone and internet betting.

    Since the Budget announcement, Customs have been working with the bookmakers to make the necessary systems changes needed to implement the reforms, and those UK-based bookmakers with off-shore operations have been relocating them to the UK. Thanks to the rapid progress made, it will be possible to introduce the system from Saturday, 6 October, 2001.

    Tax-free betting from October 6

    Among the sporting events taking place on the first weekend of tax-free betting are the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe at Longchamp, one of Europe’s premier horse races, always the subject of racing and betting interest from around the world, and England’s final World Cup Group match at home to Greece.

    The international interest in these events reinforces one of the key objectives of the reforms, which is to enable UK-based bookmakers to target an increased share of the growing global market for telephone and Internet betting.

    Customs will continue working with the betting industry to make the changes required prior to implementation. They will also shortly be conducting a series of seminars for bookmakers to explain how the new system will work.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Financial Services and Markets Act to come into force from midnight 30 November 2001 [July 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Financial Services and Markets Act to come into force from midnight 30 November 2001 [July 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 12 July 2001.

    Economic Secretary Ruth Kelly today announced that the Financial Services Authority (FSA) will become the statutory regulator under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) with effect from midnight 30 November 2001.

    Speaking at a business breakfast this morning with FSA Chairman Sir Howard Davies and key industry and consumer players Ruth Kelly said:

    “My predecessor made a commitment that N2 – the date for the commencement of the main provisions of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 – would be no later than the end of November 2001. I am delighted to honour that commitment today.

    “FSMA will, for the first time, unite a wide array of legislation and supervisory bodies under one statutory regulator. The FSA will be a single point of contact for firms. Alongside this will operate the Financial Ombudsman Service to deal with customer complaints. This will bring much needed clarity, certainty and transparency to the industry and consumers alike.”

    The Treasury will shortly be making the statutory instrument which allows firms? authority under old law to do financial services business to be “grandfathered” across into permissions to do equivalent business once FSMA commences. Ruth Kelly said:

    “FSA powers to consider applications from financial services firms to modify their grandfathered permissions; grant new permissions; and other matters including waivers from the new FSA rules, will commence on Monday 3 September.”

    Sir Howard Davies , welcoming these announcements, said:

    “N2 has been a long time coming.  But the advantage is that there has been time to prepare properly.  We will be ready to switch on the new regime at the end of November, thanks in large part to the invaluable co-operation and patience of firms, their trade associations and consumer groups.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Helping Enterprise in Disadvantaged Communities [July 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Helping Enterprise in Disadvantaged Communities [July 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 11 July 2001.

    Small businesses and other enterprises in disadvantaged communities will find it easier to attract funding from banks and individual investors following consultation on proposals to develop a Community Investment Tax Credit (CITC), Financial Secretary Paul Boateng said today.

    Commenting on the Government’s initial response to consultation on the CITC proposals announced in Budget 2001, Mr Boateng said :

    “Businesses developing in disadvantaged communities need to be able to draw on the widest possible range of suitable funding. The response to our consultation shows clear, widespread support for our proposals for a Community Investment Tax Credit as a means to encourage investment in these businesses. We are strongly minded to introduce CITC as planned to help them.

    We have listened carefully to the views of those involved and decided that it would be right to extend the benefit of our CITC proposals to help businesses to raise money from individuals and banks, and not restrict them to investment from corporate and equity investment sources.

    This will increase the options for the access to new capital vital to help reinvigorate some of our poorest communities.”

    The Budget CITC proposal aims to stimulate business activity in disadvantaged communities through a tax incentive to encourage private investment in both commercial and not-for-profit enterprises. It is proposed that qualifying investments, made through qualifying Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs), will attract tax credits worth 25%, spread evenly over five years. Today’s announcement in a speech by Mr Boateng to a CDFI conference in Birmingham, will extend the initial proposals by:

    – allowing individual investors to benefit from CITC.

    – allowing both debt and equity investments to attract CITC.

    These measures will encourage individuals to invest through either loans or taking shares in CDFIs rather than through equity alone, and enable CDFIs to raise loan capital for developing businesses in their areas from banks and other lenders as well as by issuing shares.

    Together they will give CDFIs greater flexibility in raising capital for enterprises in their communities.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Julius Report Aims to Give Bank Consumers a Better Deal [July 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Julius Report Aims to Give Bank Consumers a Better Deal [July 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 9 July 2001.

    Better consumer services in banking and other financial services are the focus of a Government commissioned report published today.

    Responding to the DeAnne Julius led review of banking services codes, Economic Secretary Ruth Kelly said:

    “The report contains a number of useful recommendations directed at significantly improving competition and increasing the levels of customer service in banking services.

    “We are therefore asking the bodies to whom the recommendations are directed to respond to these proposals.  We look forward to the industry responding positively to the challenges that have been set.”

    DeAnne Julius said:

    “While we found that there is much to commend about the current system of self-regulation through voluntary codes, we believe there are several areas where more should be done to help bank customers and sharpen competition.

    “Our Group developed its recommendations after an extensive consultation process.  We believe the recommendations would help the market for banking services work more effectively and thereby deliver greater consumer benefits.”

    The Banking Services Consumer Codes Review Group has set out twelve recommendations to improve the benefits to consumers from the industries’ voluntary codes of conduct.  The recommendations include:

    •  measures to make account switching easier
    •  improve information provided to customers
    •  strengthen the processes for drawing up codes
    •  more information on code compliance

    The Government is asking those to whom the recommendations are directed to respond to the report by 30 September.

  • Gordon Brown – 2001 Speech at the TGWU Conference

    Gordon Brown – 2001 Speech at the TGWU Conference

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 5 July 2001.

    I am delighted to be here today to address this conference.

    And as we thank you we give you this promise too: as a Government we will work every hour, every day, everywhere we can be, to justify the faith you and the British people have placed in us.

    And after four years of Government under Tony Blair’s excellent leadership, I believe that we are more determined than ever to implement in Government our values of justice and fairness.

    Since the time I went to school and grew up beside a mining community – since the first factory closure I remember being announced in my home town – and for a whole generation our lives have been dominated by unemployment: long term unemployment, youth unemployment, the fear of unemployment, the poverty and insecurity caused by unemployment.

    I remember when I first became an MP a young couple coming to see me, both in tears, who having lost their jobs, knew they would lose their homes too.

    I remember too the tragedy of the miners in my constituency, steel workers, dockyard workers, transport workers TGWU workers redundant in their forties who feared they would never work again.

    So I want communities where young children getting up and going to school each morning see a whole community going to work.

    And 20 years ago, 10 years ago, even 5 years ago young people tried as hard as now to find work – they were applying for jobs, they were training for jobs. Don’t tell me these generations of young people didn’t have talent or potential, couldn’t learn or hold down a job. What they needed was a government on their side.

    But for years in opposition we could do nothing about it. All we could do was protest. Together we marched for jobs, we rallied for the right to work, we petitioned for full employment. All of us, trade unionists, Labour party members, Labour MPs. But out of government we could not create jobs.

    So the day we came into Government we acted – with a windfall tax to pay for our New Deal.

    And I say it was right that five billions be transferred from the richest utility companies in our land to create jobs in the poorest and most deserving communities of our country.

    And every time a young person denied a job under the previous Government gets a job under this one we should be proud of the New Deal – that this is what can happen when we work together.

    And we took action too, to secure the essential precondition for full employment – economic stability not boom and bust.

    Remember all those who said we could never manage the economy.

    But it is because we rejected short-termist free for alls, the take-what-you-can, irresponsibility – and it is because we put faith in our values of economic responsibility – building from solid foundations, looking to the long term – that with Bank of England independence, tough decisions on inflation, new fiscal rules, hard public spending controls, we today in our country have had economic stability not boom and bust, the lowest inflation in Europe, long term interest rates and mortgage rates for homeowners lower than for thirty five years.

    And when we are told that low inflation, low interest rates and low borrowing are nothing to do with the decisions of this Government and are just a matter of good luck, let us ask them: if it was so easy to keep interest rates and inflation low, why did their policies give us 15 per cent interest rates, 11 per cent inflation, a £50 billion deficit and why did they repeatedly plunge Britain into boom and bust?

    It was not by lucky chance but by difficult choices that we now have a more stable economy. And it won’t be by a lucky chance but by hard choices in this Parliament – on extending competition, enterprise incentives – including our capital gains tax reforms – and reform – that we will build upon that stability a deeper and wider prosperity.

    Now I understand the concerns people have today in the high technology sectors because of the American downturn – and as a Government we will help people, on their side to cope with change – and I understand also the worries people have about the exchange rate and we will continue to do more to recognise the vital contribution of modern manufacturing to exports, innovation, and our great regions.

    But we know too that what manufacturers fear most is a return to the old boom and bust.

    So there will be no return to the short-term lurches in spending policy or tax policy that would put long-term stability and public services at risk.

    No inflationary or irresponsible pay rises, which put youth or other jobs at risk.

    No relaxing our fiscal disciplines as some would like.

    No change but consistency in our European policy – in principle in favour of the euro, in practice the five tests that have to be met.

    And no change in the drive that Bill, you and I are all engaged in – with more competition not less, more innovation not less, more investment not less, and more not less small business development – to make Britain the most enterprising, productive and therefore prosperous economy over the next decade.

    Our stability is for a purpose and I can report to you today that the full total of jobs we have together created since 1997 is 1 million 250 thousand jobs, more people in work today than at any time in the history of our country.

    Unemployment among men the lowest since 1979.

    Unemployment among women the lowest since 1976.

    Youth unemployment now the lowest since 1975.

    Long term unemployment now the lowest since the early 1970s. Unemployment among single parents and the disabled lower than ever.

    But as long as there is unemployment we will not be complacent.

    With 300 million a year we are extending the New Deal so that every one of the long term unemployed and their partners in all parts of the country can have new opportunities. And as we offer special coaching help for others hard to employ we will not hesitate to take additional measures, including greater sanctions, in those few instances where they are needed, to get people back to work and achieve full employment in this country.

    Unemployment in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the North, South West, and Midlands, the lowest for more than twenty years.

    But that is not good enough. With an additional 500 million pounds allocated to Regional Development Agencies in every area of Britain and our request for jobs plans for the regions, our aim is full employment not just in one region but in every region of the country.

    Unemployment among the over 50s is now falling and is at its lowest on record – half a million more over 50s in jobs since 1997. But we want to do more to end what has been a scandal in too many areas: age discrimination against the over 50s, hence we have a guaranteed minimum income of nearly 190 a week for the over 50s returning to full-time work after being unemployed for more than 6 months.

    And for men and women with disabilities who suffered most in the 80s and 90s and those able to do some work who for too long were denied their right to work, we are establishing new rights as well as new opportunities.

    So it is the right policy to offer regular interviews on a three yearly cycle as we invest £130m in a New Deal service for the disabled, offer a guaranteed minimum family income to disabled men and women of £246 a week for full time work; and invest in the advice, help, training and support that ensures there is work for those who can work as well as security for those who can’t. A Britain where now no one is excluded from opportunity.

    And because we believe a fair society is essential to a productive economy, just as there are new responsibilities at work, we are ensuring new rights:

    new rights of recognition for trades unionists;
    the right to four weeks paid holiday;
    and because never again do we want mothers or fathers refused time off to see their sick child through a hospital operation, the right to time off when a family member is ill. This is what a good family policy is all about, backed up by the first ever National Childcare Strategy.

    My belief is in equal opportunity for all.

    Yes the minimum wage was a start as was the Equal Pay Act and I salute all those in this Union and other Unions who had the courage to take pioneering action to establish the right to equal pay.

    But after 30 years of equal pay legislation it is now the right time to go further in ending discrimination to speed up procedures and ensure new rights for women so that no one will have – as in the past – to wait years for their right to equal pay to be realised.

    And for part-time workers the right to the same treatment as full-time workers – same hourly rate of pay, same access to company pension rights, same rights to annual leave and maternity leave.

    And because in no part of our society should there ever be discrimination – and in particular never racism tolerated – we will continue to remove barriers of prejudice, discrimination and racism.

    And we will extend women’s rights. Maternity pay which is 62 pounds will be increased in successive stages to 100 pounds a week – as big a rise in two years as in the previous forty. And from 2003, the statutory obligation to maternity pay will be raised from 18 weeks to 26 weeks. And we will introduce two weeks paid paternity leave, set at the same level of 100 pounds.

    And we will support every trades union as you work with employers for access to learning direct in every workplace and to advance training so that together – employees, employers and government – we can create the best trained workforce in the world.

    Under the previous Government more was spent on debt interest than on our schools. Next year we will spend £10 billion more on schools than on debt interest.

    The reason that we can invest in health and education is that we have managed to transfer resources from paying the bills of past failure to investing in future success.

    £9 billion cut from the typical costs of debt and unemployment before; £9 billion more each year for the NHS and education now.

    That is what we mean by putting schools and hospitals first.

    The reason I am concerned not just about nursery education and standards in the schools but higher staying on rates and wider access to college and university, is that I remember my school classes of the 1960s when it was for only a fraction of young people that a university place was available.

    It was a scandal of wasted potential.

    And I see today that there are still thousands of young people who have the ability and should have the chances that I – and others – were able to enjoy.

    It was a scandal of wasted potential then and it is still a scandal now.

    It is time to ensure that not just a minority have access to higher education but for the first time a majority by opening up recruitment and widening access so that our colleges and universities can draw on the widest possible pool of talent.

    And let us be clear about the choice in this Parliament on our great public services.

    It is between investment matched by reform under us and cuts leading to the run down of public services under the Opposition.

    Our choice is not to cut but to invest more.

    That is why in the Budget we announced a long-term assessment of the technological, demographic and medical trends over the next two decades that will affect the health service. This review, led by Derek Wanless will report to me in time for the start of the next spending review.

    Let me be clear about my commitment to the public services. Every opportunity I have had – the best schooling, the best of health care when ill, for many of us the best chances at university – every opportunity I have enjoyed owes its origin to the decisions of past Labour Governments, decisions we made as a party to open up opportunity, to create a welfare state that takes the shame out of need and to fund a National Health Service open to all.

    So under this Government the NHS will remain a National Health Service – a public service free at the point of use with decisions on care always made by doctors and nurses on the basis of clinical need.

    And we will never tolerate replacing the NHS by privatised medicine where poverty bars the hospital entrance, where they check your wallet before they check your pulse.

    And because we believe in nothing less than the vision of 1945 – an NHS free to everyone on the basis of their need not on the basis of their wealth – we will raise health service spending from 54 billion last year to 59 this year to 64 next year to 69 by 2003-04, an annual average increase over those years of 6.5% above inflation – the largest, sustained growth in NHS spending in the history of the health service.

    And let me say: it is because as Tony Blair said yesterday, we have expanded and reformed the private finance initiative – and will continue to implement the ten year NHS plan – that it has been possible to design and start 68 new hospital projects worth 7.6 billions since we came to power.

    In the public services we are employing more, investing more, and – in partnership with the private sector – building more. And will continue to do so.

    But let us also be clear: just as schools exist for school children the NHS exists for patients; public services exist not for the public servant but for the public who are served.

    And our aim must be that every classroom has the best teacher, every school the best staff, every operating theatre the best doctors and nurses, every hospital the best NHS staff.

    Our aim is that every public service has the best public servants.

    And those of us who believe passionately in the public services must modernise and reform so that public services can best serve the public.

    Those of us who believe in the public services must learn from both the public and the private sectors and revitalise our public services from the inside.

    And – as Bill Morris has said this week – we should aim for higher productivity in our public services, backing management as well as employee training. And can I tell you that we are supporting the National College of School Leadership and the Leadership Centre for the NHS, devoted to doing more to improving within the public services the quality of public service management.

    And we will invest in transport.

    For years this union has rightly told us of the social and economic importance of investing in transport.

    And you have led the campaigns for free concessionary travel for the elderly.

    And because of your and others representations we are now, over the next ten years, investing 180 billions in public transport – on our roads and in rail.

    It is the biggest public investment programme in transport history.

    Hundreds of new roads, 60 billions invested in rail and of course the proposals for investing in the London Underground which Steve Byers is going to be announcing today, proposals that I believe are the best ones for London and Britain.

    Under the previous Government the average public investment in London Underground was just 395m a year. In the next 15 years the average public investment will not be £395m but rise as high as 900m a year – investing at nearly three times the old rate – the biggest single investment in the underground in its history. More investment by the public sector in the next 15 years than we saw in the last hundred years

    And when billions of your money are being invested you would want us to ensure not only best value for money but the best possible public service.

    So to construct the new infrastructure that will increase the underground’s capacity to 1.3 billion travellers each year, the construction and engineering companies – like many of you work for – these private sector contractors will simply continue to do the work as they always have in digging the tunnels, building the infrastructure and replacing the track. But now for the first time they will have to take responsibility for what they deliver. So they will have to pay for the overruns, the delays, the faults in the construction and the mistakes that lead to extra maintenance.

    So that we do not have another Jubilee Line fiasco – 2 years late, massive overruns – which if repeated in the new Underground investment programme would cost us two billion pounds.

    And while the private sector directs its skills and expertise in risk and project management towards maintaining and improving the infrastructure, the public sector in the underground – and public sector staff – will operate the track, run and provide signalling, run trains and stations on every line, set service levels, set the standards and ensure safety, and be in charge of an integrated tube network from 5.00am to 1.00am.

    At all times safety paramount with the London Underground and the safety inspector the final decision-maker on what needs to be done.

    And we will do nothing unless we have the approval of the health and safety executive on the highest of safety standards.

    Our choice is clear. Not a return to the old ways, not the short-termism of the past, but an approach that makes sure that the billions we invest provide the best service for the public.

    Because of the work done by the TGWU, the retired members association whose conference I visited many years in the eighties and nineties, and in particular Jack Jones – the champion of justice for pensioners – we can now aim for the end of pensioner poverty in our generation.

    And let me promise today that in addition to free TV licenses for the over 75s, raising the basic state pension by £5 – and £8 for couples – this year, we plan to pay the winter allowance at 200 pounds this year and our new pension credit – introduced from 2003, for most rising higher than an inflation link or an earnings link – will reward rather than penalise modest occupational pensions and savings to ensure my aim: that every pensioner enjoys a share in the rising prosperity of our country.

    And as stage by stage we do more year on year to improve care of the elderly, so we must recognise we must do more to tackle child poverty which is, in my view, a scar on the soul of Britain.

    It was a matter of shame for Britain that when we came into power one child born in every three was being born poor and, having taken one million children out of poverty in our first term, our ambition, in what I believe is the best anti-vandalism, anti crime, anti delinquency, anti deprivation policy, is to take the next one million children out of poverty. And I urge you all to support our nationwide crusade so that no child is left behind.

    Why we can’t be cynical

    So let us affirm our commitment to full employment, ending child and pensioner poverty, and the best public services and action to end poverty.

    Let us reaffirm that giving every child the best start in life, every adult a job, every pensioner dignity in retirement, everyone decent public services are great causes worth working for, campaigning for and fighting for.

    And let us affirm that there are great causes not only at home but all across the world that are worth fighting for, campaigning for and voting for.

    We reject the idea that there are no great causes when there are one billion people in this world trapped in avoidable poverty, millions weighed down by the unnecessary burden of debt.

    On Saturday I go to the G7 meeting and then in September to the Children’s Summit, in October to meet the IMF and the World Bank – a campaign which Nelson Mandela and others are leading so that instead of one child in every seven in Africa dying before the age of five, calling on the pharmaceutical companies and all governments to join us in widening access to life saving drugs and health care and eradicating avoidable infant deaths.

    Instead of 120 million children denied education our objective is clear: every child in primary education.

    Instead of 1 billion condemned to poverty, our aim is to halve poverty by 2015.

    So let us answer the cynics by our actions, showing that when governments intervene to tackle injustice they are not violating rights, they are righting wrongs.

    And when I visit Asia and see children dying avoidable deaths in poorer countries, when I see in South Africa young men and women wanting to know that the right to vote will mean the right to work too, when I see in all continents needless, avoidable, remediable suffering and pain that is the result of a poverty that we can eradicate and an injustice we must fight, I know – as the founders of this union knew one hundred years ago – that we as a union and as a party exist not for ourselves but for a larger and noble purpose: that we are all men and women who feel, however distantly, the pain of others; who believe in something bigger than ourselves; who in Robert Kennedy’s words, see suffering and seek to heal it, see pain and seek to end it, see injustice and seek to overcome it, see prejudice and seek to triumph over it.

    Let us answer the cynics and tell the people that it is when politics fail and governments walk away that children are malnourished, that men and women go without jobs, that pensioners die in poverty, that public squalor exists alongside private affluence and potential is left unrealised.

    It is when politics succeeds and governments engage that all can begin to have opportunity and no one is left out; that all our people have the chance to make the most of themselves and no one and no area is excluded; and that justice can triumph.

    If by our actions we can lift one child out of poverty, give one young person a chance of training and a job, give one more person suffering from pain the chance of the treatment they deserve, give one more classroom the books and computers it needs, secure for one more pensioner a greater measure of dignity and decency in retirement, then we can be proud to have done something, not just for ourselves, but for our community and our country.

    But if we can help millions we can in Tom Paine’s words make the world anew. So let us be the generation that abolished child and pensioner poverty, built modern public services, created full employment, tackled world debt and poverty and took the next steps to prosperity for all – causes worth fighting for.

    Our task, our challenge, our manifesto commitment, a programme of change for a generation and working together this can be our achievement.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith welcomes Utility Regulators response to efficiency review [July 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith welcomes Utility Regulators response to efficiency review [July 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 2 July 2001.

    Gas and electricity, water, rail and telecommunications regulators have prepared individual action plans to implement the recommendations of an independent efficiency review published earlier this year. The key recommendations have been accepted, and each regulator has taken steps to implement priority recommendations. They will update industry and consumer representatives on further progress over the coming months.

    Chief Secretary Andrew Smith commented:

    “The independent report concluded that the UK Regulators are professionally run organizations. The regulators positive response to this report will led to further improvements in UK regulatory standards.

    Implementation of their action plans will increase transparency in budget setting, lead to better assessment of the costs and benefits of major projects, spread best practice, and help the regulators recruit and retain quality staff.”

    The key elements of the improvements are:

    • Increased transparency in budget setting;
    • more effective stakeholder involvement ahead of publication of draft annual plans;
    • draft annual plans to include more detailed cost information including identifying all projects over £250k;
    • policy and support costs identified separately wherever possible;
    • better impact assessment of costs and benefits of major projects;
    • annual publication of each regulator’s medium-term strategy. (Oftel which will review its medium term strategy as part of its preparatory work on Ofcom);
    • developing the most appropriate form of regulatory impact assessment;
    • post-implementation value for money reviews of major projects.

    Retaining skills and expertise:

    • regulators to pay more competitive rates to recruit and retain key staff; and, in return:
    • regulators will continue to look for efficiency savings particularly in consultancy and support services.

    Spreading best practice:

    • better profile for joint working initiatives;
    • more systematic identification and sharing of best practice;
    • regulators to agree a consistent set of support service activity indicators with the eventual aim of publication.
  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Independent Inquiry into Equitable Life [August 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Independent Inquiry into Equitable Life [August 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 31 August 2001.

    INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO EQUITABLE LIFE

    An independent inquiry into Equitable Life, to be headed by Lord Penrose, was announced today by Ruth Kelly, Economic Secretary to the Treasury.

    The Inquiry will examine the circumstances leading to the current situation at Equitable Life and identify any lessons to be learned for the conduct, administration and regulation of life assurance. The Inquiry will report to Treasury Ministers.

    Announcing the Inquiry, Ruth Kelly said

    “The Government has considered carefully the concerns of policyholders and representative bodies including the Select Committee of the House of Commons.  Equitable Life raises important issues which deserve consideration by a full independent inquiry. We are announcing today that we have asked Lord Penrose to conduct an independent inquiry into Equitable Life and to consider what lessons can be drawn for the conduct, administration and regulation of the life assurance business. It is important that lessons are learnt from what has happened – this Inquiry will allow us to do that.

    The Inquiry is being established on a non-statutory basis.  We hope everyone concerned will feel able to cooperate fully and frankly.  However, the Government will, if necessary, establish a statutory basis for the Inquiry.

    Equitable Life is currently preparing proposals for a compromise deal which we understand are likely to be put to policyholders in the coming weeks.  In announcing the Inquiry now, rather than waiting until Parliament resumes at a time when policyholders would be considering the compromise deal, the Government is keen to ensure that there is no confusion between the Inquiry and the compromise deal.

    The Inquiry will look into the circumstances leading to the current situation of the Equitable.  It will not comment or offer advice on the merits of any compromise deal proposed to Equitable Life policyholders; nor will it review past judicial decisions in relation to Equitable or pre-judge future decisions properly taken by the courts.

    A review is currently being carried out by the FSA into the FSA’s role in the period from 1 January 1999 until the Equitable closed to new business in December 2000.  The Government looks forward to receiving that review.  However, the Government believes it is now in the public interest to have a wider, independent review that can look back as far as is necessary.  The Government expects the FSA review to be an important input into the Lord Penrose Inquiry.  The Government has said that the FSA review will be published.  The actual timing will need to be considered in the light of the timetable for Lord Penrose’s inquiry.

    The Inquiry will take some time to complete and we want Lord Penrose to start work without unnecessary delay.”

    Lord Penrose said:

    “I am pleased to have been asked to lead this Inquiry. I believe it will cover some important and complex issues and I am looking forward to tackling the work ahead.”

    Letter from Ruth Kelly, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, to Lord Penrose

    Rt Hon Lord Penrose
    Equitable Life Inquiry
    Room 35a/G
    Government Offices
    Great George Street
    Parliament Street
    London SW1P 3AG

    31 August 2001

    Dear Lord Penrose

    I am grateful to you for agreeing to conduct an Inquiry into the circumstances giving rise to the current situation at the Equitable Life Assurance Society. You will be aware of the public concern about this. It is in light of this general concern that the Government has decided to launch this Inquiry at this time.

    The terms of reference for the Inquiry are:

    to enquire into the circumstances leading to the current situation of the Equitable Life Assurance Society, taking account of relevant life market background; to identify any lessons to be learnt for the conduct, administration and regulation of life assurance business; and to give a report thereon to Treasury Ministers.

    Within these terms of reference set out above, questions of how the Inquiry should be conducted, and what matters in particular should be examined, will be a matter for you.

    However, for the avoidance of doubt, I should make clear that we are not asking you to review the decisions taken by the courts in litigation relating to the Equitable Life’s situation, in particular the decision of the House of Lords in Equitable Life Assurance Society v Hyman. That would clearly be inappropriate. It would be equally inappropriate to seek to resolve issues which ought to be dealt with by the ordinary courts in the event of a dispute which cannot be resolved otherwise.

    Your Inquiry will look at circumstances which go back many years, even decades, up to today’s date.  Its purpose is to provide an authoritative account of the circumstances and to draw lessons for the future on the conduct, administration and regulation of life assurance business. It is important that these lessons are identified and learnt. The purpose of the Inquiry is not therefore, and could not be, to offer guidance to policy-holders of the Equitable Life on what course of action they might now pursue. In particular, it is not the function of your Inquiry to offer advice in relation to the Equitable’s arrangements with the Halifax plc, or on the scheme the Board of Equitable Life envisage consulting their members on shortly.  Particularly when looking at the recent past, I know you will be mindful of the fact that the Equitable is an ongoing business, which the Inquiry should not disrupt.

    The Inquiry is a non-statutory Inquiry, so you will not have powers to compel the production of information or require the attendance of witnesses. We hope that everyone concerned will feel able to co-operate fully and frankly. However, if it proves necessary we  will consider putting the Inquiry on a statutory basis.

    Much or all of the evidence will be private and confidential, some of which will be covered by restrictions on disclosure under UK and EC law. Because of this, we envisage that the Inquiry will generally be conducted in private, although you may consider it appropriate to hold some sessions in public.

    Once again, thank you for agreeing to conduct this inquiry on behalf of the Treasury. The Treasury will co-operate fully with your Inquiry, which will have appropriate support, and will ensure that you are enabled to carry it out without undue impediment.

    I look forward to reading your report.

    RUTH KELLY MP

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK recognises NASDAQ LIFFE, LLC futures exchange [August 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK recognises NASDAQ LIFFE, LLC futures exchange [August 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 22 August 2001.

    Ruth Kelly, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, today announced UK Government recognition of Nasdaq LIFFE, LLC Futures Exchange, which meets the criteria laid down in the Financial Services Act 1986.

    Welcoming the decision Ruth Kelly said:

    “I am pleased that Nasdaq LIFFE, LLC Futures Exchange has satisfied the criteria in the Financial Services Act and look forward to it opening for business in the UK. Today’s decision is further recognition of London’s status as a leading international financial centre.

    UK investors can now directly trade on the  US Exchange using screens based in London. The advantages include wider choice and greater convenience, and demonstrates that London is both a competitive and efficient place in which to do investment business.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Promise of Free Museums moves closer [August 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Promise of Free Museums moves closer [August 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 9 August 2001.

    PROMISE OF FREE MUSEUMS MOVES CLOSER

    The Government’s commitment to making Britain’s national museums and galleries free for everyone moved a step closer today as the Treasury published the list of bodies which will benefit from the VAT refund scheme announced in the March Budget.

    The museums and galleries featured on the list will receive VAT refunds when they allow the public free admission to their permanent collections, removing the VAT incentive for them to charge for entry. They include the British Museum, the National Gallery, the Natural History Museum, the Imperial War Museum, the National Portrait Gallery, Tate Britain, Tate Modern, the British Library, the Victoria & Albert Museum, the Royal Armouries, the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester, and the National Museums and Galleries of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

    Tessa Jowell, the Secretary of State for Culture, said:

    “Free access to our national museums and galleries is one of the 25 steps to a better Britain that the Government has promised to deliver. As part of our commitment to strengthen the role of the arts in our national life, we want everyone to be able to enjoy the great collections in our national museums and galleries for free.”

    Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Paul Boateng, said:

    “This much sought after VAT reform is central to making free entry a reality, and the undertakings received from the national museums and galleries concerned will deliver this no later than December 1st.”

    DETAIL

    1.      Organisations whose activities are undertaken for no charge are not considered to be ?in business? for VAT purposes, and any VAT they incur in relation to these activities cannot therefore be recovered. For many national museums and galleries, VAT has previously created an incentive for them to charge for admissions so that they can recover the VAT which they incur on the things that they buy.

    2.      Under the new scheme announced in the Budget and legislated for in the subsequent Finance Bill, all those main national museums and galleries that allow free admissions will be refunded the VAT they incur on their purchases, removing the incentive for them to charge.

    3.      Since the Budget, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, the Ministry of Defence and the Devolved Administrations have been in consultation with the national museums and galleries they sponsor to ensure that they take advantage of the new VAT scheme, and – where necessary – move over to free admission.

    4.      The Treasury has today laid before Parliament an Order listing the national museums and galleries which will be able to benefit from the scheme. This includes both those bodies which do not currently charge and those which plan to move to free admissions.

    5.         The scheme covers more than 24 different groups of museums and galleries, spread over more than 50 different sites, more than half of which are located outside London and the South East. The full list of eligible bodies is below.

    6.      Eligible museums and galleries which do not currently charge will be able to recover the VAT they have incurred from 1 April 2001 onwards. Other eligible museums and galleries will recover the VAT they incur from the date that they move to free admissions.

    7.      The Government’s pre-election manifesto, Ambitions for Britain, said it was “committed to reform the VAT system” to ensure that the main national museums and galleries were made “free for everyone from December”. “Free access to national museums and galleries” was also one of the “25 steps to a better Britain” promised in the manifesto.

    8.      The list of eligible groups of museums and galleries is below:

    The British Museum

    The Imperial War Museum (London and Manchester)

    The National Gallery

    The National Portrait Gallery

    The Natural History Museum

    The British Library (public exhibitions, etc.)

    The Wallace Collection

    The Manchester Museum of Science and Industry

    Sir John Soane’s Museum

    The Museum of London

    The Science Museum, including:

    The National Museum of Photography, Film and Television;

    The National Railway Museum; and

    The National Coal Mining Museum.

    The Tate Galleries (Tate Britain, Tate Modern and Tate Liverpool)

    The Victoria and Albert Museums, including:

    The Museum of Childhood; and

    The National Museum of Performing Arts

    The National Maritime Museum

    The National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside

    The Geffrye Museum

    The Horniman Museum

    The Royal Armouries

    The National Army Museum

    The Hendon Royal Air Force Museum

    The National Museums and Galleries of Northern Ireland

    The National Museums and Galleries of Wales

    The National Museums of Scotland

    The National Galleries of Scotland

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : OFT To Regulate Competition in Payment Services [September 2001]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : OFT To Regulate Competition in Payment Services [September 2001]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 3 August 2001.

    Banking payment services will become more competitive under proposals announced by the Treasury today. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) will become the regulator of the systems by which debit card, credit card, cheque and other payments are made.

    The Government believes that more competition between banks and others involved in making and receiving payments will lead to lower charges for consumers.  As well as ensuring clearer pricing, the OFT will be seeking better access to payment systems for banks and other financial services providers.  The Government also hopes the new regime will lead payment service providers to better manage and develop their systems.

    Announcing the publication of Competition in Payment Systems: A Response to Consultation, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Andrew Smith said:

    “In publishing our revised proposals for taking forward the Cruickshank report’s recommendations on payment systems, I can confirm that we intend to introduce a new competition regime for the payment systems industry.

    “Systems for delivering payment services such as credit cards, cheques and direct debits affect every user of the banking system, whether personal customers or businesses.  This Government is determined to put in place means to encourage competition in these services in the interests of all users.”