Tag: 2000

  • Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at First Tuesday

    Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at First Tuesday

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 7 March 2000.

    Introduction

    Thank you for inviting me to join you this evening.

    Let me just say at the outset that I’m excited about First Tuesday. I was in Silicon Valley last September and visited the MIT/Stanford Venture Lab which is also a public forum where entrepreneurs, managers and investors come to swap ideas and learn from each other. I impressed upon them on that occasion the opportunities for investment in the UK today, but the creative energy in that forum was unmistakable and I asked my officials what was happening here in the UK. They told me: First Tuesday. So I am delighted finally to be here.

    Just yesterday I visited Cambridge University Entrepreneurs, run by students, which has just announced the winners of its business plan competition. They had four times as many entries as they allowed for. The winners have already had individual mentoring from top industry figures, and now they are going to receive start up funding. There is a real sea change with a new enthusiasm for entrepreneurship, and tonight, I want to talk about our hopes for the knowledge economy. But first, let me put that in the context of our wider aims.

    A good way to explain what this Government is trying to do is that we want to build a new Britain which will be modern and decent – both of those things at the same time. A dynamic and enterprising economy, but one where every person has the chance to play their full part and nobody is left out.

    The first economic priority after the election was to achieve stability in the UK economy after decades of boom and bust. That has been achieved in a remarkable way, so our focus now is on locking in that hard won stability, and building on it for the future. New stability gives us the chance to express a new optimism about our future, and so Gordon Brown set out at the Pre-Budget Report in November four new ambitions for Britain in this coming decade which encapsulate our commitment to a modern and decent Britain:

    1. That we should be closing the gap with our competitors on productivity after years of slipping behind;

    2. That we should have a higher proportion of the workforce in employment, and keep it like that. Actually, we already have more people in work than ever in our history, but we want to achieve the highest proportion and do so on a durable basis;

    3. That for the first time over half of our school leavers should go on to study for a degree; and

    4. That we should halve the number of children living in poverty, on the way to the Prime Minister’s target of eradicating child poverty altogether within 20 years.

    Four ambitions for a modern and decent Britain. And, as the Chancellor spellt out in his speech about the Internet a couple of weeks ago, this industry has a vital role to play.

    Some say we have become obsessed with the knowledge economy and the Internet. But the truth is that immense strategic opportunities lie ahead of us in Britain. For example, we are leading the mobile Internet revolution. We are at the forefront of 3rd Generation Wireless development, as the current auction is demonstrating. It would be utter folly to let these opportunities pass us by and we are not going to do that.

    So this year we are focusing on putting in place three building blocks to create the most competitive, enterprising and fair knowledge economy in the world.

    Competition

    The first building block is the most pro-competition policy in the world because that is the sharpest spur to innovation, efficiency and improvement. We are reviewing every barrier to competition in the emerging e-commerce market and seeking to remove them:

    We are building on the decision to create a new independent competition authority with the Competition Act which came into force last week with its new powers to prohibit anti-competitive practices;

    For banking and financial services, the Financial Services Authority will now, for the first time, be required to facilitate competition – with a new scrutiny role for the competition authorities;

    And for the telecommunications industry, we are squarely behind OFTEL in its promotion of competition, to ensure the price of telephone calls is not a barrier to greater Internet use or to the future growth of UK e-commerce. Last month the Chancellor challenged the industry to get the cost of using the net down to US levels by end-2002. It is good to see the industry already taking up that challenge, in the recent announcements by Alta Vista and NTL.

    Finally, we are promoting a competitive environment for broadband access. BT is rolling out ADSL from the Spring, and OFTEL is ensuring that other operators can provide their own broadband services over BT’s local loop by July 2001 at the latest. In 1987, working for a start up company, I wrote a book about commercial broadband applications and its great to see these things starting to happen.
    Finally, we are looking to roll out rapidly fixed wireless technology, with the first licence available this summer.

    A more favourable tax environment

    For a higher degree of enterprise we need higher levels of investment and entrepreneurship. So our second building block is the best tax environment for investors in start-ups and high tech businesses, with improved rewards from enterprise and wealth creation.

    Corporation tax has been cut from 33 to 30 per cent. And to encourage and reward new business investment, we have cut the long-term rate of capital gains tax from 40p to 10p. We have proposed a cut in the taper so that those investing for five years will pay only 10p and for three years only 22p. Final decisions will be announced in the Budget in two weeks time;

    For the people with the skills and talent who are prepared to move from safe jobs to risk time, effort and savings to create wealth in a more challenging environment, we are also introducing a new targeted tax cut from next year. The Enterprise Management Incentive will enable growing enterprises to offer their key employees tax-advantaged options over shares up to £100,000. I know a number of start-ups have been thinking about using this scheme and I would encourage others to do so;

    We also recognise the significant role stock-options have to play here and we are currently looking at the role of employer NICs charges which we know is causing concern particularly in the entrepreneurial community.

    We want new encouragement for the venture capital industry and especially for the start up and early stage ventures, where equity is more appropriate than bank loans, but where there is insufficient encouragement to invest. Our new network of nine Government-backed regional venture capital funds, and our UK High Technology Fund which is a fund-of-funds, will both help early stage high-technology businesses.

    Making Britain the knowledge capital of the world

    The third building block for our knowledge economy open to all is to make Britain the knowledge capital of the world.

    Knowledge is the key to future business success and productivity. That puts a great premium on education and skills. I have visited a number of our universities in recent weeks – Cambridge, Oxford, Warwick, Newcastle, Durham, Sheffield – to have a look at what they are doing to commercialise the superb research which is being undertaken by them and I have been heartened by what I have seen.

    That premium on education and skills in the knowledge economy is exactly why we are pushing through huge educational reform, investing an extra £19 billion in education – so that everyone from our school children to the unemployed and low paid have the opportunity to master the skills and technologies of the new information age.

    That way we can make sure the opportunities of the new technologies are open to all, and that Britain has the size and sophistication of markets – and the quality of skills base – needed to succeed.

    Conclusion

    Our target is that within three years we want to become the world’s best environment for e-commerce. This is a huge challenge for everyone – government, business and individuals. But we are optimistic.

    We have started with a foundation of a new stability which we are determined to lock in. The building blocks we are putting in place now for a knowledge economy open for all – in competition, in investment and enterprise and in skills – those are the building blocks to help us make the most of the challenges ahead.

    Thank you for the contribution you are making and good luck for the future. Let’s work together to make this a success for all our people.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Lord Grabiner´s report on the informal economy [March 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Lord Grabiner´s report on the informal economy [March 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 9 March 2000.

    New measures to help people move from the hidden economy into legitimate work – and tough new powers to detect and punish offenders who refuse to do so – are the main recommendations of Lord Grabiner QC’s report on the informal economy published today.

    The report suggests that every year billions of pounds have been lost to the informal economy. The report estimates that 120,000 are working while ‘signing on’ at a cost of nearly half a billion pounds to the taxpayer.

    Chancellor Gordon Brown welcomed the report saying:

    “Lord Grabiner’s report suggests that for years billions of pounds have been lost to the informal economy every year, leaving honest, hard working taxpayers, who play by the rules, footing the bill for those who either don’t pay the taxes they owe or claim benefit while they are working.

    “His clear and comprehensive strategy, based on opportunities tied to new obligations is designed to tackle the informal economy with a package of new rights and new responsibilities. It proposes incentives to encourage people into legitimate work – and tough new penalties for those who fail to do so and continue to defraud the rest of us.

    “The government is delivering more opportunities than ever before to work. Vacancies are at record levels and step by step we are removing the barriers to employment. But just as there are more opportunities, so too we believe new obligations.

    “Defrauding the benefit system, means defrauding the poor and preventing us getting the resources to those in need. We would be failing in our obligation to those who need the benefits system if we allowed people to defraud it.

    “I welcome Lord Grabiner’s report and in the Budget will announce in detail how we will implement his recommendations.”

    The report, “The Informal Economy”, proposes new measures to tackle the hidden economy whilst at the same time making clear that some people get trapped in the informal economy because they are not aware of the legitimate opportunities that are available.

    Lord Grabiner concludes that the Government should introduce new ways to tackle for those who persist in the hidden economy: including:

    • new legislation to introduce a new statutory offence of fraudulently evading income tax, to be tried in the magistrates’ court;
    • subjecting people, suspected of working while signing on, to additional requirements by requiring them to sign on more frequently and at unpredictable times;
    • as in the USA, a ‘two strikes and you are out’ approach – for the first time, removing people’s right to claim benefit for a specified time if they have been convicted twice; and
    • giving investigators the power to trace suspects by making routine ‘reverse searches’ of the telephone directory.

    Among his other 17 recommendations, Lord Grabiner proposes incentives to encourage people into legitimate work including recommendations to:

    •  set up an anonymous, confidential telephone line to advise those in the hidden economy about how they can put their affairs in order, and how the tax and benefit rules apply to them;
    • build on the help that is given to people who start out in self-employment and extend recent changes to make it easier for people claiming means-tested benefits to leave benefit and take up legitimate jobs; and
    • launch a new advertising drive to publicise the incentives available for people to join the legitimate economy, including the Working Families Tax Credit, and the punishment they will face if they stay in the informal economy.
  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Stephen Timms opens first Annual Westminster Ethnic Minority Business Exhibition [March 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Stephen Timms opens first Annual Westminster Ethnic Minority Business Exhibition [March 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 8 March 2000.

    Financial Secretary to the Treasury Stephen Timms today opened Westminster’s first annual ethnic minority business exhibition.

    Mr Timms was visiting the Exhibition in London as part of pre-budget tour being carried out by Gordon Brown and his Treasury Ministers to take advice on the shape of the Government’s employment and enterprise initiatives for the years to come.

    Speaking at the Exhibition Mr Timms said:

    “We want to see not only the work ethic reinvigorated in every community of Britain but a dynamic business culture which encourages enterprise open to all. That is the message we want to spread – enterprise expanded to people and places too often forgotten in the past.

    “We know that more than one third of all unemployed people in London come from ethnic minorities. But we also know ethnic minority businesses already play a leading role in everyday business life across the country. Businesses from the ethnic minority communities contribute well over £8 billion each and every year to the British economy.

    “I have seen in other parts of London and across the country during my regional tours the contribution ethnic minority businesses are making. We know, for example, that the rate of business start-ups per head is higher in the ethnic minority communities than in the wider community. With more people in work today then ever before we now have a great opportunity to make sure the benefits of enterprise and rising prosperity and spread wider. That’s why this business exhibition is so important for Westminster.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith sets out benefits of Public Private Partnerships – Treasury paper projects extra £20 billion investment in public services [March 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith sets out benefits of Public Private Partnerships – Treasury paper projects extra £20 billion investment in public services [March 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 15 March 2000.

    A new Treasury paper published today by Chief Secretary Andrew Smith projects a £20 billion expansion of the Government’s Public Private Partnership (PPP) programme over the next three years.

    Mr Smith was launching “Public Private Partnerships : The Government’s Approach” – the Government’s strategy to increase investment in the public sector to provide better services and better value for money – during a visit to Lewisham Docklands Light Railway station in South East London.

    The paper sets out how the Government plans an expanded PPP programme which will add to the £12 billion deals already signed or re-structured deals by this Government, by securing:

    £8 billion to modernise the tube;
    an estimated £1 billion to modernise UK’s Air traffic control infrastructure;
    more than 60 new education projects nationally;
    25 new health projects nationally; and
    12 other new transport projects nationally;

    The document “Public Private Partnerships : The Government’s Approach” also sets out for the first time the Government’s objectives for PPPs and the underlying principles which are central to the way in which Government goes about developing new partnerships with the private sector.

    It shows how the Government has modernised the PPP system by eliminating the obstacles it inherited to deliver an expanded programme, better value for money for the taxpayer and a better deal for staff in the public sector.

    Mr Smith said that this capital investment would focus on the Government’s priority areas of health, education and transport and hailed it as a cornerstone of the Government’s modernisation programme.

    He said:

    “Public private partnerships are making a major contribution to the renewal and modernisation of Britain’s public services with better schools and hospitals, and huge investment in public transport.

    “Between 1992 and 1997 no PFI hospital deals were signed. Yet in this Government’s first two years we have signed 35 major hospital projects and, including deals in the pipeline there are a total of 100 health projects in the programme. This represents the largest investment in new hospital facilities since the NHS was established.

    “On average, privately financed projects are delivering savings of 17 per cent compared to public sector alternatives – this represents savings of £2 billion on a £12 billion programme.

    “That is why we want to build on our achievements to date. Over the next three years we expect to sign contracts for projects with an estimated capital value of a further £20 billion. That will bring to £32 billion the level of capital investment this Government has earmarked for PPPs since May 1997.

    “In launching this document today I am looking to the future and outlining a prospectus for partnerships. This will be seen as a blueprint to the opportunities and challenges associated with different types of partnership arrangements. Above all it demonstrates how PPPs will deliver real improvements to public services, for the benefit of customers, local communities and the country as a whole.”

    Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott said :

    “PPPs can harness the best of the private and the public sectors to modernise Britain – and ensure real improvements to our public services and infrastructure. This has been clear to me for many years.

    “With PPPs, we can build new hospitals and new schools and improve our transport system, ensuring the private sector achieves best value for the taxpayer. At the same time, they can safeguard the public interest and protect staff – providing better quality services and giving modern Britain the infrastructure it needs.”

    Public private partnerships help deliver the quality public services. By harnessing the disciplines, incentives, skills and expertise which private sector firms have developed in the course of their normal everyday business, they allow Government to deliver more services, to a higher standard, and more quickly than would be possible with the public sector alone.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith and Ian McCartney launch blueprint for IT Public Private Partnership Contracts [March 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith and Ian McCartney launch blueprint for IT Public Private Partnership Contracts [March 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 28 March 2000.

    A platform for spreading best practice amongst Public Private Partnership (PPP) practitioners involved in drawing up IT contracts was announced today by Chief Secretary Andrew Smith and Cabinet Office Minister Ian McCartney.

    This platform takes the form of new guidance for IT PPP deals which builds on the development and success of previous Treasury Taskforce standard contract guidance across all public services. The guidance is expected to further improve deal flow, reduce the costs of tendering and avoid the pitfalls of the past when poorly drafted contracts led to the demise of some IT projects. The guidance sets out recommendations not only for contract drafting, but also for improving the project management of IT PPP deals.

    Launching the guidance, Andrew Smith said:

    “This is an important step forward in ensuring that project and risk management for IT contracts is undertaken rigorously. The document emphasises the need for strong risk handling strategies and formalises the pre-contract risk review process which has been carried out to date by the Treasury Taskforce on significant projects.

    “I expect the adoption of the standard approach set out in the guidance to produce substantial savings and result in greater value for money for the public sector.”

    The publication of this specific guidance document for the IT Public Private Partnership sector is just one of the initiatives that the Government is currently undertaking to improve the strength of Government IT projects generally.

    Ian McCartney, Minister of State at the Cabinet Office who is sponsor for the Government’s current review of the handling of major IT projects, said of the guidance:

    “This Government is determined that our IT systems deliver first-class services and good value for money. Suppliers share responsibility for ensuring that projects deliver the promised service benefits and come in on time. A successful procurement process is fundamental to the success of these complex but vital projects. The guidance we are announcing today is just one part of a comprehensive package of measures to ensure that we implement systems successfully and maximise the benefits of IT to the public.”

    The Taskforce IT guidance has also received the full backing of the National Audit Office (NAO), the Government spending watchdog. Assistant Auditor General, Jeremy Colman, of the National Audit Office, said:

    “The new guidance perceptively reflects the key lessons learned from the first generation of PFI projects in the IT sector, many of which have been identified in our own reports. The onus is now on government departments and the IT industry to implement the guidance and improve the prospects of delivering projects to time, cost and functionality.”

    The guidance sets out how to manage the procurement and contract stages of IT deals and gives advice on the handling of risk. The guidance also gives recommendations for approaching major software developments. It has been prepared after an extensive consultation process with public and private sector managers of IT projects, as well as financiers.

    It is expected that the publication of the guidance will encourage more financiers to support IT PPP deals, as the document provides answers to some of the bankability problems posed to date in this sector.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Private sector appointments aid modernising of the Royal Mint [March 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Private sector appointments aid modernising of the Royal Mint [March 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 30 March 2000.

    A new shareholder panel of private sector managers and analysts, and the appointment of two new non-executive directors will bring greater private sector expertise into the running of the Royal Mint, Economic Secretary, Melanie Johnson, said today.

    Welcoming the announcement, Miss Johnson said:

    “These appointments are a key element in our programme of reform for the Royal Mint.

    “The new shareholder panel will inject greater private sector expertise into the Mint and provide a more rigorous shareholder discipline. The appointment of two new non-executive directors will enhance the commercial expertise on the Mint’s Board.

    “I am delighted to announce that John Dean, Hugh Beevor and Stephen Dawson have all agreed to become members of the new Royal Mint shareholder panel, and that Jan Smith and David Stark have agreed to become Royal Mint non-executive directors.

    “We are very fortunate that five such high quality individuals have agreed to work with us in taking forward our programme of reform at the Royal Mint.

    “The shareholder panel is an important innovation in the Government’s approach to managing public sector assets. We will be reviewing its operation after two years in part to see what lessons can be learned for other bodies in the public sector.”

    Shareholder Panel

    John Dean of Warburg Dillon Read – an investment analyst experienced in the smaller engineering companies sector. He was again ranked first in the 1999 Reuters survey of UK smaller engineering companies analysts. As part of his experience in the City, Mr Dean has considerable regional experience having worked as an engineering firms analyst in the traditional manufacturing areas of the North East and the West Midlands.

    Hugh Beevor, formerly of Blue Circle Industries PLC has extensive experience of managing the relationship between a parent company and its subsidiaries. He was a main board director at Blue Circle with responsibility for 12 building materials companies. He is currently a governor of the Institute of Development Studies.

    Stephen Dawson of ECI Ventures Ltd is managing director of a successful venture capital company, with over 20 years experience of investing in growth companies and turnarounds.

    Non-Executive Directors

    Jan Smith, formerly of the RAC, First Direct and Mazda Cars (UK) Ltd, now with her own consultancy has extensive business experience and a particular expertise in marketing. Her track record includes responsibility for the marketing launch of First Direct and the rebranding of the RAC where she was a member of the executive operating committee.

    David Stark – formerly of Tomkins PLC and now of Chairman of Glentay Ltd served on the Board of Tomkins for 11 years. He is a qualified engineer and at Tomkins was responsible for 29 of the group’s companies, including all their European engineering companies and associated worldwide distribution companies. He is a member of the Competition Commission.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK urges progress for the World´s poorest countries [April 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK urges progress for the World´s poorest countries [April 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 4 April 2000.

    Proposals to ensure that progress is made in getting debt relief to the world’s poorest countries were outlined today by the Chancellor Gordon Brown and International Development Secretary Clare Short.

    At a seminar at Downing Street this morning, UK Ministers told representatives of NGOs and religious faiths that they had written to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank suggesting that a Heavily Indebted Poor Countries – HIPC Review and Implementation Group is established.

    It is proposed that the Group be a joint World Bank/IMF body that provides co- ordinated focus to the initiative, ensures HIPC is implemented consistently, identifies and deals with any reasons for delay and provides a single point of contact for shareholders, aid donors and NGOs.

    The Chancellor said:

    “We want to see faster progress on getting debt relief to the poorest countries. We place great emphasis on countries coming forward at the earliest possible opportunity to receive interim debt relief because this is the money they need to spend on improving primary health care, providing primary education and basic sanitation.

    “We believe that the speedy, effective implementation of HIPC will be an acid test of the international financial institutions’ ability to help the poorest countries.”

    Clare Short said:

    “The agreement that debt relief and IMF programmes were focused on poverty was an enormous gain. We must find a way to ensure that this is driven forward.”

  • Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at the Economist’s Electronic Business Conference

    Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at the Economist’s Electronic Business Conference

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 4 April 2000.

    “The benefits and challenges of e-commerce”

    Introduction

    Thank you for inviting me to join you this morning.

    We are on the threshold of a new era for business. Across the country people are talking of the impact of Business to Consumer – or ‘B2C’ – e-commerce. But the growth of Business to Business – or B2B – e-commerce has the potential to be even more explosive and pervasive. I have seen US estimates suggesting B2B turnover on the net could amount to 4 trillion dollars in America alone by 2003, compared with less than 400 billion dollars of online sales to customers.

    That is a staggering amount of trade – with potentially staggering implications for our economies and our consumers, as well as business itself.

    So I am delighted to be able to join many of the world’s B2B experts here this morning.

    Budget aims

    Let me begin by putting our hopes for electronic commerce and the knowledge economy in the context of the Government’s wider aims.

    After the UK election in 1997, our first economic objective was stability. The Budget two weeks ago confirmed that in a remarkable way that has now been achieved. We are delivering a platform of stability and steady growth, with inflation low and the public finances under control.

    More people are now in work than ever before: unemployment is at its lowest for 20 years; youth unemployment is at its lowest for 25 years and there are one million vacancies on offer across all the regions of the UK.

    Inflation in Britain has also now been lower for longer than at any time for over 30 years. And today British inflation is lower than in any of our major competitors in the European Union.

    And we are also investing now a bigger share of our national wealth than our largest competitor countries in the European Union, and a bigger share even than in the US.

    The state of the public finances is sound as well.

    So things are in good shape as a consequence of the prudent measures the Chancellor has taken.

    But we have always said that our prudence is for a purpose.

    And the Budget took the next steps towards that purpose, of building a modern and decent Britain, towards the four ambitions that we set ourselves last November:

    • our prosperity ambition: that we should be bridging the productivity gap with our competitors;
    • the full employment ambition: that we should achieve employment opportunity for all, and a higher proportion of people actually in jobs than we have had before;
    • the education ambition: that for the first time at least half of our school leavers should go on to university by the end of the decade;
    • our antipoverty ambition: that we should halve the number of children living in poverty by 2010, on the way to the Prime Minister’s ambition of eradicating child poverty altogether within 20 years.

    Four ambitions which I think are now attainable and which encapsulate our commitment to a modern and decent Britain. Our best route for achieving this modern and decent Britain – for an enterprising society which is also a fair society – is success in the knowledge economy.

    First Tuesday report

    A few weeks ago, John Browning, a cofounder of First Tuesday – the global B2B start- up market and meeting place for entrepreneurs – gave an intriguing evidence to the House of Lords e-commerce sub-committee on the future of e-commerce in Europe. This evidence he gave was based on an e-mail survey of their members on what they wanted national and European governments to do.

    The overwhelming view was that government has a very limited role – that it does most good where it treads lightest. Well, that is our view too.

    The Internet and e-commerce world is moving at speeds difficult for anyone to keep up with. As Tony Blair says, the wind of economic change has never blown through our economies with such force as it is doing today.

    We know the market sets the pace of that change. And it always will do.

    But our role as a Government is an important one still. Not to dictate. Not to attempt to control. But to help to enable and to empower every business and individual to win from the changes, and to extend the new opportunities to all.

    That is why we have set ourselves two parallel targets to these challenges.

    First, to make the UK the best place in the world to trade electronically by 2002.

    And second, to aim for universal access by 2005.

    Those two goals are complementary. Making sure everyone has access to the Internet will both improve our competitiveness and reduce social exclusion. A very clear example of enterprise and fairness working together.

    And we are working very hard indeed in a number of areas to achieve these goals.

    Back to John Browning’s evidence to the Lords Committee: his statement consisted of a number of lessons First Tuesday had learnt in the course of their rapid growth. I want to spend a little time examining these lessons and what they mean for governments and for e-businesses as well.

    Lesson 1: Europeans are passionate entrepreneurs

    The first lesson learned by First Tuesday was that Europeans are passionate entrepreneurs. And, to quote him, ‘contrary to conventional pessimism, they are neither defeatist nor risk averse.’

    That, I think, is clear enough from the number of European companies we have here today.

    It is also clear from the signs that the technology gap between Europe and the US is narrowing. In some areas, of course, Europe already leads.

    The first wave of the Internet came through PCs. But the next wave will come through broadband mobile and digital television.

    In both, the United Kingdom in particular ­ and Europe more generally ­ have a pretty impressive lead.

    Last month we launched the world’s first auction for third generation mobile telephone spectrum. Thirteen bidders from all round the world have been taking part and all have put in significant bids to play a role in the future market.

    Third generation mobile will give businesses the Internet on the move. Everything we now get from our PCs, digital cameras and good old voice telephones – all on our mobile phones, our PDAs, our laptops and palmtops, and a host of new devices now emerging from the research labs.

    Digital TV – interactive TV ­ is also taking off. It’s only just begun. But some forecasters suggest that as much as 75 per cent of UK households will have DTV by 2008.

    Both of these – digital TV and third generation mobile – are technologies where the UK is a world leader.

    And both are creating extraordinary opportunities for new businesses in both B2C and B2B e-commerce, new applications, new services and new jobs.

    That is why we’re seeing venture capitalists, technology and telecoms companies, and individual entrepreneurs so active today in the UK, confirming our position as the single most popular destination for inward investment into Europe.

    European enthusiasm for the new economy was out for all to see as well at the Lisbon Summit on European economic reform two weeks ago. There, the Heads of Government of our European States set a new strategic goal for the next decade – to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy in the world.

    That is a huge change. And it is the beginning of a process with tremendous implications and opportunities for our economies and our workforces.

    Lesson 2: Scale is critical to entrepreneurial success

    The second lesson First Tuesday drew was that scale is critical to entrepreneurial success.

    As they said, only by expanding quickly can companies grasp the available opportunities.

    But companies can only expand to the extent that there is the sufficient size and sophistication of markets and the quality of skills base needed to be successful.

    You cannot build a knowledge driven economy without a knowledge driven society.

    So we have to make sure that the opportunities of the new technologies are shared by every business and every worker.

    That is why the Budget two weeks ago introduced a special tax reduction to encourage a million small companies to get on line. For the next three years any small business buying computers, or investing in e-commerce and new information technology, will be able immediately to write off against tax the full 100 per cent of the cost in the year of purchase.

    We are also legislating for other tax cuts – a 100 pounds tax cut for electronic filing of tax and vat returns, and a further 50 pounds tax cut for electronic filing for those paying the working families tax credit.

    And side by side with these incentives, the new Small Business Service – opening its doors this month – will offer consultancy, advice and planning to help small businesses get on line and become e-companies.

    Of course, while getting United Kingdom on line is vital, the big prize will come when we create a single European market for electronic commerce – a single market of 375 million people and potentially 100 million more.

    Lesson 3: Speed is just as critical

    That brings me to the third lesson from First Tuesday’s evidence that speed is just as critical as scale. ‘…because the Internet is evolving so fast, and because first-mover advantage is so powerful, Internet companies have to move very, very fast.’

    A key priority for governments must be to ensure the right dynamic market framework is in place to cope with this speed of change.

    At the Lisbon Summit, European Heads of Government recognised that the speed of technological change requires new and more flexible regulatory approaches in the future.

    That is why they called on the European Council along with the European Parliament, where appropriate, to adopt as rapidly as possible, this year, pending legislation on the legal framework for ecommerce, on copyright and related rights, on e-money, on distance selling of financial services, on jurisdiction and on the dualuse export control regime.

    We have already agreed a directive on electronic signatures that introduces their legal recognition throughout the EU and sets voluntary standards for certificate providers.

    These further steps will take Europe quickly into the new digital age, boosting consumer confidence and making it far easier for a business based in one country to sell on-line in the fourteen others.

    In the UK, we are currently also reviewing every barrier to competition in the emerging e-commerce market and seeking to remove them.

    In every area we are asking what we can do to enhance competition and opportunity:

    The new Competition Act makes our competition authority independent and for the first time prohibits all anti-competitive practices.

    We are driving competition further and faster into the leadingedge communication markets, to bring prices down and give consumers more choice.

    In the last few weeks we’ve seen four different companies offering new, unmetered Internet packages.

    As the new tariffs come into effect, it will almost certainly mean that for the average Internet user at home and in business, the UK will be cheaper than anywhere else in Europe.

    We are working as well on the legal framework.

    Our electronic communications bill will allow us to update decades, indeed centuries, of legislation that refer to paper and post.

    And we are helping employees in UK high growth Internet companies by tackling the issue of employer’s National Insurance Contributions on share options. I have been asked by the Chancellor to conduct a consultation on a technical solution to the tax treatment of share options in unapproved schemes, and I’m moving quickly to fulfil his request, and, I hope, to resolve quickly the serious technical problem that currently exists.

    Lesson 4: Governments themselves are slow in using the technology

    The fourth lesson First Tuesday learned from its European survey was that governments themselves generally are slow in using the technology.

    Businesses represented here and individuals are responding to the new technologies and the new challenges. And Government has to do the same.

    Last week, Tony Blair proposed a challenging target for Government – to offer all services online by 2005.

    We need to transform relationships between government and citizen by delivering services on-line. And we need to do it quickly.

    We also need to transform policy-making by managing government online.

    The first step is to develop a clear strategy. So Andrew Smith, my colleague as Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Patricia Hewitt, as our e-minister, are heading a crosscutting spending review to look at all aspects of Government and e-commerce.

    Our strategy for e-government will be shaped by our view of the new technologies. Yesterday, Ian McCartney, the Minister responsible for e-government, launched our Government’s e-government strategy.

    We want businesses and people to be able to access government anywhere and anytime.

    From a computer. A mobile device. A TV. A kiosk in a post office or a shopping centre.

    So the challenge to us is to make government-content, and government services, available across all our networks – wired and wireless – to all the devices.

    It’s exactly the same challenge that content-providers in the private sector are facing. Financial services information providers, for example, now integrating content, and delivering it real-time to market analysts and retail investors alike on the trading screen, the television screen and the mobile phone.

    But we also have to re-engineer government on the inside. Like every major global company, we have to move from vertical silos to horizontal processes. We have to move from inputs to outcomes. And we have to use ICT to enable all that to happen.

    Like everybody else, we have to contend with legacy systems. E-mail systems that don’t talk to each other. Different data standards.

    In the next few weeks, however, we will be publishing a single set of standards for inter-operability across government. We’re following the lead of business by adopting open, I/P based standards for all government systems. Making the browser the key interface for access and manipulation of all information. Adopting XML as the cornerstone for government data inter-operability and integration. And working with the global Govtalk consortium to create the infrastructure we need for implementation.

    Conclusion

    We are optimistic our British knowledge economy can match the best:

    With individuals alive to the opportunities, and businesses sufficiently ambitious, we can rise to the challenge – making Britain and Europe the best place in the world for e-commerce.

    Thank you for the contribution you are making ­ let’s work together to make this a success for all our people.

  • Andrew Smith – 2000 Speech to the IPPR New Economy Launch Event

    Andrew Smith – 2000 Speech to the IPPR New Economy Launch Event

    The speech made by Andrew Smith, the then Chief Secretary to the Treasury, in London on 4 April 2000.

    THE FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENTS

    Introduction

    Thank you for that kind introduction, and to Matthew Taylor and the IPPR for inviting me to speak today. I want first to set out our ideas about setting PSAs , and then I want to briefly cover how all this fits in with our ambition of modern, high-performing public services combining innovation and excellence.

    As many of you know, PSAs are a unique innovation. Colleagues from other countries in Europe and across the world are intrigued and, sometimes, frightened by our radical approach. Never before has a British Government set out so clearly the aim, objectives, resources, performance targets, and operations targets for every major government Department in one public document. Neither has any government publically committed itself to reporting annually against those targets.

    The 1998 Comprehensive Spending Review PSAs were a revolution in this respect. And for our departments, I think they were something of a revelation too. PSAs challenged them for the first time to think about what were the outcomes they really wanted in each policy area. They also challenged departments to think about how their success might best be measured. But most importantly they challenged them to commit publically to delivering the improvements we have targeted within the resources allocated to them in the CSR. Through the PSAs, the Government made clear that it was investing for reform. Reform for better public services and a step change in the way they were delivered.

    Not everyone sees it that way of course. PSAs have come in for their fair share of suspicion and criticism. According to Simon Jenkins in the Times, Gordon Brown and I sit at the heart of a “vast cobweb” of targets. In fact, according to Mr Jenkins, I am building a structure like Stalin’s Gosplan! Mr Jenkins even accuses my officials of being “music-loving, theatre-going liberals”. Those of you who have dealings with the Treasury will judge whether that’s and accurate description.

    The radical nature of PSAs, and their immediate impact on Departments inevitably led to some shortcomings in the new system the first time round. As John Garrett pointed out in the Guardian, our emphasis on the serious issue of sickness absence in the public sector looks unbalanced when we didn’t have comparable measures in other areas of people management. And some of our targets are simply not very good, because we were new to the business: setting targets to achieve 100% prompt payment of invoices looks good, but will often be unachievable for very sound reasons, if an invoice needs to be investigated.

    So the current spending review, is a big opportunity to improve the PSAs and learn from experience – both positive and negative – as we take them forward.

    Setting the SR2000 PSAs

    We are doing that in a number of ways.

    First we are focussing even harder on the things that really matter. PSAs are all about priorities. Openness and accountability about priorities should not be allowed to be fudged by too great a mass of targets.

    Second, we are making sure part of this focussing process involves separating out the key overall goals (the “what”), from targets for Departmental processes and operations (the “how”).

    Third, we are working harder than ever before on ensuring we target the right measures of success. Determining what it is you want to achieve is the first crucial step. But picking the right measure to avoid unwanted distortions in the system, is as important.

    Finally, we are sharpening up our targets, making them as transparent as possible. We should be clear in every case about what the terms of the targets mean, when we are committing to deliver the target, and how it will be measured.

    The way we are conducting the review means that we are tackling all of these issues head on.

    In the past few months, I have had a series of meetings with Ministerial colleagues to nail down their highest priorities. Everyone is determined to show Parliament and the public the things that really matter to us. Whereas some Departments had more than thirty policy targets after the CSR, most Whitehall Departments will have no more than ten high level PSA targets after SR2000.

    I am also making PSAs even clearer by ensuring they are short and sharp, containing only the aim, objectives, and top few political priority targets. New supporting documents, Service Delivery Agreements, will describe how these priorities will be delivered, and the management and operational changes Departments will be introducing to facilitate this.

    On measures, departments have been working together with the Treasury to ensure the measures to support the next round of targets are the best possible in the light of evidence. And in another first, the Treasury is leading work with other Departments, the National Audit Office, and the Audit Commission, to agree the basics about what makes for good performance measurement in Government.

    Delivering the new PSAs So that’s how we’re ensuring the targets are the most specific, measurable, outcome-focussed targets they could possibly be.

    We also want to make sure the right support and structures are in place to allow Departments to deliver public services fit for the 21st Century. I want to briefly examine three reforms here.

    First, we are determined to break down artificial barriers in policy-making and delivery, using the PSA process to make Departments jointly responsible for delivering some key policy objectives. It is important to get this right as government increasingly has to organise horizontally, with joint work across departments to deal with challenges which don’t organise themselves conveniently in line with the traditional vertical departmental silos. For this Spending Review we have launched fifteen cross-cutting studies of problems that cross Departmental boundaries.

    With subjects as diverse as crime reduction, new gateways to care for the elderly and conflict prevention in sub-Saharan Africa the studies have pulled together expertise from outside and inside Government to propose targets for cross-Departmental working. In some cases they will result in further full cross-cutting PSAs.

    Second, Departments are now more than ever drawing on outside expertise to raise their productivity and to produce the step change in our public services that we all want to see. This Government wants to listen and learn from the best practice available. The mantra is “what matters is what works”.

    This is why I am committed to the work of the Public Services Productivity Panel, which I chair. The Panel brings together high level experience of the public sector and the outside perspective of the private sector. It brings together people with deep knowledge of the public sector, such as Andrew Foster of the Audit Commission, and Sheila Masters with her NHS experience, and leaders from business like John Makinson from Pearson’s and John Dowdy from McKinsey.

    The Panel is an excellent resource for all Departments to draw upon. Each Panel member is assigned to detailed projects, supported by Departmental and Treasury staff. And some Panel members are also supported by their own company staff. This openness and joint working encourages innovative approaches, and puts an emphasis on the practical steps that will help us do things better.

    Already good examples of the fruits of this approach have been published. John Makinson wrote an excellent report with the big Government office networks on incentivising good team performance. Andrew Foster has highlighted both good practice and bad in customer service in the big DETR driving agencies, so that we challenge poor performance as well as praising the good.

    The reports are only a means to an end. And that end is delivering real changes in the effectiveness and customer focus of our public services. John Makinson’s report represents a bold and radical new approach to pay in the public sector. His proposals have the potential to lever up productivity in the Inland Revenue, Customs and Excise, Benefits Agency and Employment Service. Work is underway to implement new pay systems based on team incentives from 2001. These will deliver real improvements to taxpayers and users of services as well allowing staff to share in the benefits of better performance.

    The Makinson report is only one element of the Government’s strategy to empower public servants. For too long, public services have been allowed to stagnate because public servants have been undervalued, and have not been listened to. So the Government third reform is to turn this around, encouraging innovation by front-line staff and by local managers, and celebrating the success of our most outstanding managers and teams, as beacons to others in their sector.

    The reforms to the Civil Service inspired by the Prime Minister and being led by Sir Richard Wilson, offer the prospect of transforming our Civil Service – retaining the elements so prized abroad, such as its probity and professionalism, but encouraging more adventurous thinking, greater diversity, and a stronger sense of good management.

    Local autonomy versus central direction

    I want to touch on the important issue raised by Matthew [Taylor] an issue all major programmes of reform in any institution must face and tackle: that is, to what extent should the centre direct and impose change, and to what extent should local agents be allowed the flexibility to find their own strategies for delivery, shaped to local context and taking advantage of the available expertise.

    Some criticism of the Government’s modernisation programme has centred on the perception that it inevitably involves highly inflexible directives from the centre. I do not accept this, and would argue instead that Public Service Agreements and our programme of reform offer an important opportunity to local service deliverers to shape their own strategies within the framework we have set.

    We believe that local government and local services are a crucial source of good ideas about improving service delivery, and the vast majority of public servants take pride in the standard of service they deliver. We are determined to learn from good practice at local level, and to tackle unacceptable variations in performance where they exist.

    Only last week, I hosted a seminar at the Treasury bringing together experts from inside and outside Government to see how we might best raise the performance of the less good units to that of the best.

    The real challenge for the Government is not debating an artificial tension between local autonomy and central direction but in making sure that good practice from some of our most outstanding public services is successfully shared.

    This is not to say however, that there are not issues of balance which we need to work on. But I see this as a dynamic process. Different combinations of direction and autonomy will be appropriate for different services and between different units within services. This is a matter which I will be discussing with colleagues, particularly as we make progress on their Service Delivery Agreements, which will state clearly for the first time how they intend to cascade their high level commitment to local agents.

    Conclusion

    To conclude, I believe PSAs have been something of a revolution. Departments have recognised the real benefits for their own management of clear priorities and targets, and we will see further steps forward in the quality and clarity of the PSAs which come out of this spending review.

    But like the Productivity Panel, PSAs should not be about elegantly drafted glossy documents: they must be about driving change on the ground that the public can see. The Government has set out its vision. In PSAs we have published a ground-breaking set of commitments. In our modernisation and investment programme, we are giving public sector employees the tools to do the job. That has raised public expectations. So now they have to see the change we have promised.

    Thank you.

  • Gordon Brown – 2000 Speech to the British Chamber of Commerce National Conference

    Gordon Brown – 2000 Speech to the British Chamber of Commerce National Conference

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 5 April 2000.

    I am delighted to join you today at the National Conference of the British Chambers of Commerce. Let me start by paying tribute to the work you do, the contribution you make, and the service you as local and regional Chambers of Commerce give in every part of the country.

    Local Chambers of Commerce are not only voices for business and industry in every one of our country’s regions but you also represent the best of British values- our shared belief in hard work, in enterprise, in looking outwards to the world, and you speak up in particular for the hundreds of thousands of medium and small businesses of Britain that are the backbone of our economy.

    And it is because I share your ambition, a theme of this conference, that Britain has the best competitive environment for business in the years ahead, that I want to discuss with you today the challenges ahead – how we equip ourselves to meet and master ever more fierce global competition and ever faster change – and the prize for our country – a Britain which with opportunity open to all is enterprising and fair, a Britain where – with higher productivity from all – there is prosperity for all.

    Now our first two years as a government demanded that we establish the only sound platform for an enterprise culture in a global economy – economic stability.

    In a global marketplace with its increased insecurities and indeed often volatility and instability national economic stability is at a premium, the precondition for all we can achieve, and no nation can secure the high levels of sustainable investment it needs without both monetary and fiscal stability together.

    And it was to avoid the historic British problem – the violence of the repeated boom and bust cycles of the past – that we established the new monetary framework based on consistent rules – the symmetrical inflation target; settled well understood procedures – Bank independence; and openness and transparency. And side by side with it and as important, a new fiscal discipline with, again, clear and consistent rules – the golden rule for public spending; well understood procedures – our fiscal responsibility legislation; and a new openness and transparency.

    I saw – as you saw – what damage inconsistent and ever changing rules, short- termist and politicised decision making procedures and a lack of openness did most recently in the late eighties and early nineties – the one million jobs lost in manufacturing, the one million businesses that went under, the two million jobs in total that disappeared.

    I saw how difficult it was for businesses to plan ahead and make investments for the long term.

    And I never want to return to those days when interest rates were above 10 per cent for four years nor do you or I want ever to rerun that day in 1992 when interest rates were 10 per cent when we started work, 12 per cent by 11 am, and by 3pm set to be 15 per cent.

    So stability matters to me as it does to you. High inflation and instability hurts businesses as it hurts savers, those like the elderly on fixed and low incomes, and I understand what you understand, that a disciplined and prudent framework of stability is the indispensable foundation for economic success.

    Already we are seeing the rewards of creating Bank of England independence and tough fiscal rules.

    For the third year running inflation is in line with our target and inflation is at historically low levels. I can tell you that our target of 2.5 per cent will be met this year, next year and the year after that and our forecast is that the economy will grow steadily – by between 2.75 and 3.25 per cent this year, with growth forecast to be 2.25 – 2.75 per cent next year and the year after.

    Long term interest rates – once 2 per cent or more above Germany’s – are now at the level of Germany’s, showing that people have confidence in a low inflation future for Britain, a platform from which businesses can now plan for the longer term with greater confidence.

    But everybody knows it is not simply monetary stability that matters, but also fiscal stability.

    And having imposed new fiscal disciplines we have cut borrowing by £40 billion in our first three years. And we are on course to meet our two strict fiscal rules.

    It is because we sought to learn from the political mistakes of the last forty years that this government will maintain its prudent and tough approach. The figures I announced in the Budget mean that we will meet our fiscal rules over the cycle. Indeed that we will meet our fiscal rules even in the most cautious case, on the most cautious assumptions, including the most cautious view of trend growth at 2.25 per cent.

    And as I announced in the Budget, I have decided to lock in a greater fiscal tightening next year and the year after than we promised in last year’s Budget and Pre-Budget Report.

    We are therefore able to repay debt – last year 3 billion pounds, this year 12 billion pounds, next year 6 billion pounds, and the year after that 5 billion pounds.

    And it is from this platform of monetary and fiscal discipline that you have been able to create 100,000 more small businesses employing people, from 1.2 million to 1.3 million, and create in total 800,000 more jobs, with last year 6 billion pounds more in business investment and 13 billion pounds more inward investment into the United Kingdom.

    I can say that as a government we are determined to continue to back your efforts by maintaining our disciplined approach: in particular we must all be determined not to make the old British mistake of paying ourselves too much today at the cost of higher interest rates and fewer jobs tomorrow.

    Now I understand your worries about the Euro – Sterling exchange rate and the pound’s strength in relation to the weak euro and I welcome the positive response of manufacturing which has increased productivity by more than 5 per cent over the past year.

    By making investment allowances for business permanent, by introducing new allowances for any small and medium company adapting to new information technology by inaugurating this month a new R&D tax credit worth 150 million pounds, and by creating a one billion pound regional venture capital investment fund, this month’s Budget has sought to build upon Britain’s stability and Britain’s low corporation tax rates to support manufacturers and exporters. But the policies which I am sometimes asked by some to follow to bring the exchange rate down would risk the very outcome all of you want to avoid – a return to boom and bust.

    Indeed I can tell you I am determined to avoid a repeat of the economic instability caused by the succession of ever-changing money targets as we saw in the early 1980s and the dual exchange rate and inflation targets of the late 1980s and early 1990s – when the then government chose in succession £M3, M1, then M0, then when this failed shadowing the Deutschmark, then the Exchange Rate Mechanism, as the economy moved from boom to bust.

    The objective of British monetary policy today is clear and unambiguous – to meet a symmetric inflation target with inflation outcomes below target viewed just as seriously as outcomes above target. And it is this consistent long-term approach which is the foundation for stability and steady growth.

    There are some who criticise the Bank of England and say inflation can only be controlled at the cost of growth and jobs. And there are of course those who say we should grow by ignoring inflation. But far from choking off recovery, pre-emptive action has allowed us both to meet our inflation target and sustain growth. And because this is what I want us to continue to do, we will support our monetary authorities in the difficult decisions they have to take to ensure that we meet the inflation target and sustain high and stable levels of growth and employment.

    Employment opportunity for all

    So building on this platform, I believe Britain can now set a new economic ambition, indeed an economic mission, for the next decade: a faster rise in productivity than our main competitors, as we close the productivity gap.

    And for that to happen there is a second precondition – reinvigorating the work ethic in every community of our country.

    For too long too many people had become accustomed to not working and to a benefits system that failed to make work pay and led to the ‘why work’ syndrome at a cost to the work ethic. For too long historic British virtues – hard work and self improvement – had been drowned out. For too long opportunities in our economy had become detached from responsibilities to take them up.

    Now, because we expect everyone who can work to go to work and not sit at home on benefits, we are matching opportunity with responsibility. And with the help of your members who are signed up to the New Deal, youth unemployment is down 70 per cent and long term unemployment down 50 per cent. In the mid eighties as many as 500,000 young people were out of work. In 1997 the figure was 200,000. Now that we have reduced that figure to 50,000 we have a long way to go but already there are more people in work than ever before and unemployment is at its lowest for 20 years.

    As I said in the Budget, we will extend the opportunities and the obligations of the New Deal to the long term adult unemployed. And with one million vacancies in every region of the economy our agenda demanding responsibility in return for the extension of opportunity will intensify in the years to come.

    As we implement the report of Lord Grabiner QC, create new opportunities for the long term unemployed to work, take action to visit, telephone and coach long term unemployed men and women back into the jobs on offer and introduce tougher sanctions and penalties .

    Productivity

    And with stability, the renewed importance we attach to work is the precondition for the next stage of our agenda – to bridge the productivity gap with our competitors by opening enterprise to all.

    We have some of the greatest companies, some world class sectors, some global champions in whom we do and should take pride. But let us face facts. We have not enough of them and over the last 50 years, productivity growth in Britain has been just over two and a half per cent a year, compared to between three and a half per cent and four per cent among our main European competitors.

    I believe that when we look at changes in Britain’s relative economic position over the last century, one of the causes is that there has not been enough competition, dynamism and entrepreneurship in many areas of our economy – and over decades politicians and governments must take our share of the blame. We have to set aside the old sterile battles that posed enterprise against fairness, public against private, management against workforces and deprived us of the national economic purpose we need.

    Today we know that in a global economy greater competition at home is the key to greater competitiveness abroad. We know that it is the openness of the economy not its closed nature that is the driving force in productivity growth. And we know that it is the global reach of business, not protectionism, that is the key to dynamism and growth.

    Global competition challenges us to innovate, to be better managers, to perform more competitively on the world stage.

    So today I want to set out the next stage of our productivity push for the British economy -encouraging more competition, more innovation, more flexibility and more long term investment, sometimes by government getting out of the way.

    Sometimes by government positively improving the competitive environment.

    And meeting the productivity challenge – bridging the gap with our competitors – must be the priority over the next few years.

    Only with rising productivity can we meet people’s long-term expectations for rising standards of living without causing inflation or unemployment.

    There are of course those urging us to slow the pace of change or even to pause or turn back. But we cannot and must not slow the pace of economic reform.

    Increasingly every good and every service will be exposed to ever more fierce and relentless global competition.

    So we must work to remove all barriers to productivity in the economy – with a shared national effort to raise our game.

    I want us not only to give more people the chance to turn their ideas into profitable businesses but to be able to say to business in every part of the country this government will be on your side if you’re starting up, growing, hiring, investing, innovating, exporting, going public. At every stage, in every way, on your side as you move up the ladder of opportunity.

    In the last year we consulted widely with business and we set out in the Pre-Budget Report measures for radical reform in our capital labour and product markets to expand investment and productivity.

    Your views have helped shape policy to raise investment and productivity across the UK.

    The British Chamber of Commerce:

    • asked for permanent capital allowances – that give greater certainty to businesses wanting to plan ahead and invest;
    • proposed capital gains tax reform – removing the barriers to long term investment;
    • suggested improvements in corporate venturing tax incentive – helping the large companies that invest in the development of the small;
    • called for special help for small businesses as they invested for the future.

    The CBI joined you in calling for new permanent capital allowances, reform of capital gains tax and welcomed the introduction of our new R&D tax credit. They also proposed new incentives for employee share ownership – to help small firms recruit and retain the best people.

    The Federation of Small Business proposed new incentives to help small firms seize the opportunities of e-commerce and the Internet.

    And in the Budget we took positive action in every one of these areas.

    And we took action too on transport. Immediate new investment of 280 million pounds in transport, 250 million of it to a ring fenced fund for improving roads and public transport. And more important our 10 year plan to be published this summer which will set out our strategy for modernising transport infrastructure – building on our understanding that instead of the public sector fighting the private sector, public and private sectors can work together in the national interest.

    Let me explain my pro-business reforms – first capital gains tax reform. When we came into government and cut the long term rate of capital gains tax for business assets held for ten years or more, capital gains had been fixed at 40 per cent for almost ten years.

    Indeed the last government aligned the rate of capital gains tax with the top rate of tax.

    You could have excused me for leaving capital gains tax rates as they were. But I decided that an enterprise economy needed new and better rewards for enterprise.

    And so in the face of many other priorities – including the public services – I decided to devote substantial funds to radically cutting capital gains tax.

    From tomorrow the new capital gains rates for business assets are being cut from 40 per cent to 35 per cent after one year; to 30 per cent after two years; to 20 per cent after three years; and so while for a decade capital gains have been taxed at 40 per cent or above, for investments of four years or more they will now be taxed at 10 per cent.

    Having made these decisions I also looked at what I could do to recognize the importance of investors in small and medium sized businesses, and help business angels and I have redefined the help we will give to reward risk.

    Today business investors who own between 5 per cent and 25 per cent of a new and growing business do not benefit from the 10p rate. From tomorrow their rate will be 10 per cent for all investments above 5 per cent held for four or more years.

    I also wanted to recognize the importance we attach to the growing numbers of Britain’s unquoted companies. So for them all investments held for four years will benefit from the 10 per cent rate.

    So stage by stage we are removing the tax barriers to enterprise and creating in Britain the best tax environment for business investment.

    To encourage long term investment, the main rate of corporation tax cut has been cut from 33p to 30p, the lowest rate in the history of UK corporation tax, the lowest of all major industrialised countries.

    We have cut small business corporation tax from 23p to 20p and introduced a new starting rate of tax for small companies of 10p in the pound. Every company making profits of up to 50,000 pounds will benefit.

    Our new Enterprise Management Incentive scheme is tailor made for the new hi-tech companies. To motivate, recruit and reward Britain’s real risk takers, high tech firms recruiting essential personnel will be able to offer share option incentives of 100,000 pounds for up to 15 employees.

    We are consulting on a set of proposals to resolve the treatment of employer national insurance in share options.

    All of us recognised that innovation is the key to the future success of the new enterprise economy.

    Because it is well understood that two thirds of growth is the result of innovation we decided on special new incentives to encourage and reward the inventor and the innovator.

    Not only therefore have we allocated 150 million pounds to our new research and development tax credit, supporting nearly a quarter of new investment in small and medium-sized business research and development, but we are honouring the spirit of British invention, facilitating the exploitation of invention and encouraging the commercialisation of invention:

    • an extra £1.4 billion in basic scientific research;
    • from our University Challenge Fund seedcorn finance to commercialise inventions;
    • to transfer technology from the science lab to the marketplace, new Institutes of Enterprise in every region;
    • a new tax incentive to help the large companies sponsor the development of the small.

    I want to make Britain the best environment for e-commerce and catch up with America as swiftly as possible. You asked us to help e-commerce develop in small and medium sized businesses.

    We are introducing 100 per cent allowances for the next three years for any small business buying computers, or investing in e-commerce and new information technology.

    And to promote the use of the Internet we will legislate for other tax cuts – a 100 pounds tax cut for electronic filing of tax and VAT returns, and a further 50 pounds tax cut for electronic filing for those paying the Working Families Tax Credit.

    And of course the new Small Business Service – acting as a voice for small business at the heart of government; simplifying and improving government support for small businesses; and helping small businesses deal with regulation and ensuring small businesses’ interests are properly considered.

    So we are introducing measures to promote investment, enterprise, and innovation.

    The challenge for business is to take advantage of the new platform of stability and use these incentives to innovate, grow and expand – which will be particularly helpful to manufacturing and the regions.

    The challenge for government is to build on these reforms.

    Our productivity push will be stepped up in the coming year. So we will build on the measures we have already introduced with further reforms and incentives for the modernisation of our capital, product and labour markets, measures we will pursue in our constructive approach to Europe as well as in Britain. These will be set out in detail in this November’s Pre-Budget Report.

    First competition policy.

    Having made the Competition Authority independent and having accepted the main Cruickshank recommendations on banking we will now examine how we can further promote the best competitive environment.

    For the professions, the Office of Fair Trading has now set out a detailed remit to examine how best to ensure that the rules of professional bodies do not unnecessarily restrict or distort competition.

    I can report today that the remit is to look at:

    • rules which restrict entry to certain professions and legal restrictions on the ability of individuals who do not have specified qualifications from offering certain services;
    • rules on the conduct of regulated professionals such as restrictions or prohibitions on advertising or price competition;
    • and legal requirements which require third parties to use qualified professionals for certain transactions.

    For the regulatory system, the government will now consider how to scrutinize regulatory bodies and review existing and proposed regulations to ensure that they are promoting – not impeding – new entrants and competitive forces.

    For the planning system, we are not only introducing a series of changes in planning guidelines that will, for the first time, facilitate the formation of hi-tech clusters – helping to foster dynamic new businesses – but we are now ready to examine further necessary improvements.

    For the utilities, we will for the first time explicitly require the regulators to promote competition, so that we can continue to get the best deal for domestic and business consumers.

    And so we can ensure new entrants get the best deal and that small business is not pushed around by vested interests, the Office of Fair Trading is being given new investigative resources and trust-busting weapons, including the power to impose fines of up to 30 per cent of turnover.

    Second greater flexibility and adaptability in the labour market.

    Because we recognise that people will have to change jobs more often, that skills are at a premium, that reform has been needed from the 1980s onwards to create more flexibility, we will introduce further reforms to make our labour markets more dynamic and raise standards in education.

    Having put new grants for books equipment and staff directly in the hands of head teachers, David Blunkett has indicated that there will be new tests and targets for 12-14 year olds, and new measures to deal with failing schools.

    And to back up our extension of Educational Maintenance Allowances we now will encourage more young people from 14 to gain work experience and launch a staying on campaign.

    We are investing in new opportunities for small business employees to benefit from learning direct.

    Work permits will allow key workers in it areas to be employed in our country.

    And to make labour markets work better by giving employees more share in success, the all employee shareholding scheme -coming in this week – will offer the best incentives for employee shareholding we have seen.

    While our capital markets are among the best in the world. We must ensure there are no barriers to competition and innovation, that there are no closed circles, that there are no unnecessary constraints restricting investment decisions, and that investors have every opportunity and encouragement to back dynamic small and growing companies.

    Our proposed regional venture capital investment funds were unveiled this week by the head of the Small Business Service.

    Institutional investors have a vital role to play, controlling around 45 per cent of quoted equity investments. That is why I have asked Mr Paul Myners to head a review of institutional investment.

    I can report today that he will look at:

    • whether regulatory provisions have unintended effects on investment decision-making;
    • how pension funds make their investment decisions, and the role of professional advisers;
    • how institutional investors’ results and charges are reported;
    • and the incentive effects of the methods used to assess fund performance.

    He will report back to me in time for the next Budget.

    In sum, making for a Britain open to competition, and at the leading edge of change.

    Finally, we must work together in the months ahead to tackle the cultural barriers to enterprise.

    I want young people in every area of the country to see that enterprise is genuinely open to all.

    And I feel strongly that all of us have a role to play in building this new enterprise culture in every community.

    I am very pleased to see the British Chambers of Commerce forming a unique partnership with the CBI and Institute of Directors for the National Enterprise Campaign to be launched on 11 May.

    The business ambassadors ready to go into our schools, colleges and communities – 250 ambassadors initially and a target of 1000 by the end of 2001 – will become role models for a new generation of entrepreneurs.

    And the new nationwide campaign will build on the steps business and government are already taking to boost enterprise skills from school to adulthood:

    Let me tell you that we aim to double the number of pupils benefiting from enterprise courses in our schools;

    by improving the national network which introduces schools to businesses we will link all 30,000 schools to the world of business;

    and by ensuring pupils and teachers are given the opportunity for work experience and placements – with already six hundred thousand 14 to 16 year olds benefiting from work experience and thirty thousand teachers in work placement – we are now working with business and the world of education to build on this, improving the quality of placements and experience.

    New businesses need advice and mentoring. So working with the Prince’s Trust and others, we are building a national network of mentors to help businesses starting in the poorest areas. And we are offering new management scholarships – aimed specifically at entrepreneurs from high unemployment areas.

    And Stephen Byers and I will host a major UK-US conference later this year which will bring together leading US and UK entrepreneurs and representatives of leading companies and capital providers to look at further ways we can develop a more entrepreneurial and enterprise focussed economy in the UK.

    Stage by stage we are moving from the Britain where enterprise was often seen as a closed circle for the few, to a Britain where enterprise will be open to all.

    Opening enterprise to all means locking in the economic stability we are building and creating the most aggressively pro-competition policy in the world.

    Opening enterprise to all means being on the side of business as you grow, invest, and seek equity and it means – from school lessons in commerce to new encouragement for the over 50s – opening up every area in the country to enterprise, in some areas replacing the old dependency culture with a new enterprise culture.

    Conclusion

    So let me conclude.

    Now with the lowest corporate tax rates for businesses ever, the lowest ever capital gains tax rates for long term investors, the lowest basic income tax rate – at 22 pence – for 70 years, I believe we are making Britain the place for companies to start, to invest, to grow and to expand.

    But only with higher productivity, more enterprise and greater innovation can we meet all the challenges ahead.

    My vision is of a Britain where there is not stop go and boom bust but economic stability; a Britain which is business-friendly, and where there is enterprise, opportunity for all; a Britain which rewards the innovator and risk-taker and encourages a new generation of entrepreneurs, a Britain which because opportunity is open to all is enterprising and fair.

    And I believe we can achieve most by working not in isolation from each other but government, business leaders, and local communities working together, setting aside the old conflict, mobilising the great British qualities, our belief in hard work, enterprise creativity and fair play, and being open and outward looking to Europe and the world….the best and surest route to prosperity for all.