Blog

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 12 July 2024.

Deputy Ambassador Deirdre Brown voices UK support for the OSCE Centre’s work in Turkmenistan, especially on border management, environment, gender, and cybercrime.

Ambassador MacGregor, welcome back to the Permanent Council. I am struck again by the positive work you and your team have led.

As you know, the UK appreciates the work of the Centre in Ashgabat, engages closely with the Centre, and values our deepening partnership with Turkmenistan. This year, our former Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron visited Ashgabat and met Foreign Minister Meredov and President Berdimuhamedov, demonstrating UK-Turkmenistan cooperation. We look forward to this developing further, with a dialogue based on trust and partnership.

The UK welcomes the centre’s diverse and balanced portfolio of projects, with excellent cooperation with the host government. I would like to highlight four areas of the Centre’s work.

Firstly, work to promote gender equality and support those affected by domestic violence. The UK and the Centre have coordinated closely on this issue in recent years, and we hope that the Centre’s work developing understanding of gender-based violence continues in Turkmenistan. Women’s rights are a high priority for the UK and we particularly encourage work on transparent access to driving testing and licences for women.

Secondly, on border security and capability. The UK is committed to working with Turkmenistan, its neighbours and the OSCE to mitigate the challenges arising from Afghanistan.

Third, waste management legislation; environmental auditing; and promoting the UN Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context. We note that President Berdimuhamedov committed Turkmenistan to the Global Methane Pledge. We encourage the Centre to look at how they could support the government’s implementation of the Pledge.

Finally, I would like to welcome the work of the Centre in addressing issues of cybercrime and terrorist financing. Adherence to international standards and improving our understanding of cybercrime is a key challenge.

On corporate issues, we were pleased to see for ourselves from your video that the renovated premises are now fully functional and we thank the Government of Turkmenistan for providing them. But it is important to underline again the negative impact the continued non-agreement of the Unified Budget is having on the work of OSCE field operations, as highlighted in this Report. It is vital that field missions are adequately financed.

Ambassador MacGregor, thank you again for presenting your report today.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 12 July 2024.

UK and 37 other countries invoke the OSCE Vienna Mechanism in respect of serious human rights concerns in Belarus, including torture, physical or sexual violence, lack of basic medical care and privacy, lack of a fair trial, psychological pressure and discrimination.

I am delivering this statement on behalf of the following participating States, who are members of the informal Group of Friends of Democratic Belarus: Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the United States, and my own country, Slovenia.

The following participating States are also joining this statement: Albania, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Liechtenstein, Moldova, North Macedonia, Switzerland and Ukraine.

In the 1991 Moscow Document, OSCE participating States declared that commitments undertaken in the field of the human dimension are matters of direct and legitimate concern to all participating States and do not belong exclusively to the internal affairs of the State concerned.

In keeping with this commitment, we wish to express our deep concern regarding the severe human rights violations and abuses occurring in Belarus. These were documented by rapporteur Professor Hervé Ascensio after 38 participating States invoked the Moscow Mechanism on 23 March 2023. His report, introduced to the Permanent Council on 11 May 2023, described repression designed to hinder any form of opposition, which led to waves of arrests on political grounds, targeting demonstrators, journalists, other media workers, human rights defenders, representatives of trade unions, lawyers, political opponents, and those expressing their opposition to the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, among others. The report recommended the release of all political prisoners and the reform of existing laws in Belarus to bring national criminal legislation and the code of administrative offences in full compliance with international norms and standards.

Regrettably, Belarus has followed neither these recommendations nor a similar call for the release of all the political prisoners issued by 17 UN experts. Other reports from various UN bodies and NGOs have confirmed that the human rights situation in Belarus, in particular the situation of political prisoners, has continued to deteriorate.

To date, six of these individuals have died in detention: Vitold Ashurak, Mikhaïl Klimovich, Ales Pushkin, Vadzim Khrasko, Ihar Lednik and Aliaksandr Kulinich. Many others are being held incommunicado.

Experts have documented that the estimated 1400 political prisoners currently in detention in Belarus experience torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, acts of physical or sexual violence, lack of basic medical care and privacy, lack of a fair trial, psychological pressure and discrimination, with their cells and clothing marked with yellow tags.

While we take note of the recent release of several political prisoners, we consider unsatisfactory the Belarusian authorities’ response to the Moscow Mechanism report of 11 May 2023 and, given our ongoing concerns about developments over the past 12 months, our countries are now invoking the Vienna Mechanism, along with the requirements of Belarus under that Mechanism.

The full text of the letter of invocation, including the names of several persons whose situation is particularly critical, will be circulated to all participating States. But I would like to read the questions it contains.

Since the release of the Moscow Mechanism report on Belarus, on 11 May 2023:

1. What steps have Belarusian authorities taken to ensure that persons deprived of liberty on politically motivated grounds are treated with humanity and respect for their inherent dignity?
2. What steps have Belarusian authorities taken to release political prisoners on humanitarian grounds, including those with serious health issues or chronic conditions, people with disabilities, minors, older persons, people with children or single parents? What update can be provided on the prisoners mentioned in the letter?
3. What steps have Belarusian authorities taken to ensure that specific needs of female detainees, including psychological and medical needs, are taken into account?
4. What steps have been taken to ensure that all detainees have access to necessary and appropriate medication and medical care?
5. What steps have been taken to ensure decent conditions of detention for all prisoners? Do authorities in charge of detention facilities provide all prisoners, without exception, with blankets, mattresses, and sanitary articles? Which measures have been taken against overcrowding?
6. In the light of documented cases of ill-treatment which may in some instances amount to torture, including sleep deprivation, what steps have Belarusian authorities taken to investigate all allegations and to prevent such treatment in the future?
7. What criteria govern the use of solitary confinement, punishment cells and cell-like premises? As these have been identified as potentially inhumane conditions of detention, what steps have been taken to reduce their use?
8. What steps have been taken to ensure that every prisoner has access to legal counsel of their own choosing, to effective remedies and a fair trial? What steps have been taken to ensure that prisoners are able to maintain contact with family members?
9. Will Belarusian authorities refrain from implementing the procedure of deprivation of citizenship of Belarusian nationals living abroad as a sanction for so called “participation in extremist activity or infliction of grievous harm to the interests of the Republic of Belarus”?
10. Will Belarus end repressive measures taken against family members in order to exert pressure on defendants and political prisoners?
11. As a measure of transparency, would Belarus allow visits to detention facilities by representatives of international organizations, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, and foreign States in detention facilities?

We expect to receive information in response to these serious concerns in writing within ten days, in accordance with the Vienna Mechanism.

I request this statement and the corresponding invocation letter be attached to the journal of the day.