Blog

  • PRESS RELEASE : Tax treatment of predevelopment costs: update on consultation [April 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Tax treatment of predevelopment costs: update on consultation [April 2025]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 11 April 2025.

    Following the Court of Appeal judgement on 17 March on matters with significant readout across to this issue, the government is updating on the publication of the consultation on the tax treatment of predevelopment costs.

    At Autumn Budget 2024, the government committed to publishing a consultation on the tax treatment of predevelopment costs. On 17 March, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgement in the case of Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Limited and others v HMRC.

    Following the Court of Appeal judgement on 17 March on matters with significant readout across to this issue, the publication of the consultation on the tax treatment of predevelopment costs is being postponed. The government is considering the implications of the judgment for the consultation. To give stakeholders and government time to reflect on the judgement, the government will determine its next steps in respect to this consultation in due course.

    In the interim, the government welcomes views on what this judgement means for you or the businesses you represent. Do let us know via predevcosts@hmtreasury.gov.uk

  • NEWS STORY : Rishi Sunak’s Resignation Honours Spark Debate Over Political Patronage

    NEWS STORY : Rishi Sunak’s Resignation Honours Spark Debate Over Political Patronage

    STORY

    In his final act as Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak has awarded a series of peerages and honours to political allies and public figures, igniting a debate over the use of the honours system for political patronage. The list, published on 11 April 2025, includes the elevation of several former Conservative cabinet ministers to the House of Lords and the conferral of knighthoods to prominent figures.​

    Key Appointments to the House of Lords

    Among the most notable peerages is that of Michael Gove, the former Levelling Up Secretary and long-serving Conservative politician. Gove, who retired as an MP at the last general election, has held multiple cabinet positions under various prime ministers and remains an influential figure within the party.

    Other appointments to the House of Lords include:

    • Mark Harper, former Transport Secretary

    • Simon Hart, former Chief Whip

    • Alister Jack, former Scottish Secretary

    • Victoria Prentis, former Attorney General

    • Stephen Massey, former Conservative Party Chairman

    • Eleanor Shawcross, former No. 10 Policy Head

    Additionally, Amanda Spielman, former HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills, has been nominated for a life peerage, recognising her contributions to education and public service.

    Knighthoods and Other Honours

    The honours list also includes knighthoods for several senior politicians:

    • Jeremy Hunt, former Chancellor of the Exchequer

    • James Cleverly, former Foreign and Home Secretary

    • Grant Shapps, former Defence Secretary

    Notably, England cricket legend Jimmy Anderson and filmmaker Matthew Vaughn have also been knighted for their contributions to sports and the arts, respectively.

    Criticism and Calls for Reform

    The honours have drawn criticism from opposition parties and political commentators, who argue that the list rewards political loyalty over merit. Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper described the appointments as a “parade of political flunkies,” suggesting that the honours system is being used to benefit political allies rather than recognise genuine public service.

    Labour leader Keir Starmer has previously advocated for reforming the House of Lords, proposing measures such as introducing a retirement age and ending hereditary peerages to modernise the institution.

    The Honours System and Its Implications

    The British honours system allows outgoing prime ministers to recommend individuals for peerages and other honours, a tradition that has often been criticised for promoting political patronage. Life peerages grant individuals the right to sit in the House of Lords, contributing to the legislative process and influencing national policy.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Political Peerages Announced [April 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Political Peerages Announced [April 2025]

    The press release issued by 10 Downing Street on 11 April 2025.

    The King has been graciously pleased to signify His intention of conferring Peerages of the United Kingdom for Life.

    Nominations from the Leader of the Conservative Party:

    Amanda Spielman – Former HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills.

    Citation provided by the Leader of the Conservative Party

    Amanda Spielman has worked in the public, voluntary and private sectors. Her main interests are in education, children’s services and regulation, where she has worked for 20 years. She served two terms as His Majesty’s Chief Inspector at Ofsted, promoting substance and integrity in education for all children and young people, and also high-quality social care. She previously chaired the exam regulator Ofqual, overseeing the programme of qualification reform.

    She spent a decade with the ARK Schools academy trust, mainly as Research and Policy Director. She led a cross-government review of non-economic regulators. Her earlier career was in accounting, investment banking and private equity. She is now a trustee of the Victoria & Albert Museum and chair of the Academic Council at GEMS Education. She is also a Visiting Professor in Practice at LSE. She was born in London and brought up in Glasgow. She is married with two children.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 18 March 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 18 March 1925

    18 MARCH 1925

    Lord Carson’s Moneylenders Bill, which proposes that all proceedings with reference to moneylending transactions shall be taken in the County Court instead of the High Court, the prohibition of moneylenders’ circulars, and the restriction of interest on loans, was discussed on the motion for second reading in the House of Lords. The Bill was welcomed on behalf of the Government by Lord Desborough, who suggested that Lord Carson should agree to his Bill and a similar Bill before the Commons going to a Joint second reading was agreed to.

    The British Sugar (Subsidy) Bill passed Report Stage in the House of Commons. A Unionist private member’s motion on the undesirability of allowing unrestricted importation of foreign manufactured goods made under sweated or other conditions was carried by 240 to 137.

    Mr Austen Chamberlain has returned to London from the Continent. It is reported that a missile smashed the window of the compartment in the Paris-Calais express in which Mr Chamberlain was sitting. No one was injured.

    Rioting occurred during the Delhi municipal elections between Mohammedans and Hindus. One rioter died from his injuries, and twenty people were taken to hospital.

    The Parliamentary Labour party passed a resolution that this country should do everything in its power to obtain the acceptance of the principles of the Protocol and the holding of the Disarmament Conference.  

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 17 March 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 17 March 1925

    17 MARCH 1925

    Mr Austen Chamberlain discussed the security question with M. Herriot, the French Premier, in Paris.

    The chief topic discussed on the Army Estimates in the House of Commons was the obstacle raised to recruiting for the Supplementary Reserve by two large Trade Unions apprehensive of the use to which the Reserve might be put in the event of industrial disputes.

    The War Office announces that it has been decided to reintroduce forthwith Section A of the Army Reserve.

    The King and Queen are leaving London on Thursday morning for Genoa, where they will embark on the Royal yacht.

    It is officially announced that Prince George underwent an operation for enucleation of tonsils. The condition of His Royal Highness is satisfactory.

    Mr Cosgrave, in a St Patrick’s Day message to the Irish peoples in America, says the Government of the Irish Free State recently received from the people a further endorsement of their satisfaction with the terms of the Anglo-Irish Treaty.

  • NEWS STORY : OSCE States Condemn Georgia’s Human Rights Decline, Urge Democratic Reforms

    NEWS STORY : OSCE States Condemn Georgia’s Human Rights Decline, Urge Democratic Reforms

    STORY

    A coalition of 35 OSCE participating states, including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and the United States, has expressed deep concern over the deteriorating human rights situation in Georgia. In a joint statement delivered at the OSCE Permanent Council in Vienna, the group criticised the Georgian government’s recent actions that undermine democratic principles and civil liberties.

    The statement highlighted three primary areas of concern:

    • Legislative Restrictions on Civil Society: The introduction of the Foreign Agents Registration Act mandates that individuals and organisations receiving foreign funding register as “foreign agents,” imposing financial sanctions and criminal penalties for non-compliance. The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) has warned that this law could severely limit the activities of civil society organisations and human rights defenders.

    • Targeting of Independent Media: The Georgian government has been accused of suppressing independent media outlets, thereby restricting freedom of expression and access to unbiased information.

    • Lack of Accountability for Excessive Use of Force: Reports indicate that law enforcement agencies have employed excessive force against peaceful protesters, with instances of indiscriminate violence by unidentified groups. Concerns have also been raised about unnecessarily long pre-trial detention periods and the reported ill-treatment of detainees.

    The coalition called on the Georgian government to cease the use of repressive tactics, release individuals detained for peacefully exercising their rights, and hold accountable those responsible for unlawful use of force. They urged Georgia to engage in inclusive dialogue with political parties, civil society, and OSCE institutions to address these issues.  While reaffirming their support for Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, the OSCE states emphasised the importance of adhering to democratic values and human rights commitments. They encouraged Georgia to return to the path of European integration, reflecting the aspirations of the majority of its citizens.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Deteriorating Human Rights situation in Georgia – Joint Statement to the OSCE [April 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Deteriorating Human Rights situation in Georgia – Joint Statement to the OSCE [April 2025]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 11 April 2025.

    UK and other OSCE participating States express concern over the deteriorating human rights situation and call on Georgia to open an inclusive dialogue with political parties, civil society and the OSCE institutions.

    Thank you, Madam Chair,

    I am delivering this statement on behalf of  Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Montenegro, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Moldova, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Ukraine and my own country, Germany.

    As OSCE participating States, we have committed to upholding and defending fundamental human rights, democracy, and the rule of law—not only within our own borders, but across our shared OSCE region. This commitment carries a responsibility: to hold each other accountable when we witness signs of democratic backsliding.

    It is in this spirit that we express again our deep concern over the deteriorating human rights situation in Georgia. Since our last discussion in February, we have regretfully witnessed Georgian authorities taking further steps away from their democratic and human rights commitments.

    Madam Chair,

    Our main concerns are threefold: the legislative restriction of civic space, the targeting of independent media, and the continued lack of accountability for excessive use of force by police, the use of indiscriminate violence by unidentified groups against peaceful protesters as well as unnecessarily long pre-trial detention periods and the reported ill-treatment of those in pre-trial detention.

    The Foreign Agents Registration Act requires all individuals and organisations receiving foreign funding to register as so-called “Foreign Agents,” with financial sanctions and criminal penalties imposed on those who refuse. We share ODIHR’s concern that “this law, along with other recent legislative initiatives, could further curtail the activities of civil society organizations and human rights defenders by removing the safeguards needed for them to carry out their work”. This law lacks the legal safeguards that prevent civil society, media and private individuals from being branded as instruments of foreign influence based solely on funding sources, which strongly suggests that this law is not about transparency, but about suppressing dissent and tightening the grip on civil society. This is of particular concern in view of the upcoming local elections.

    We are also closely monitoring recent amendments to Georgia’s electoral legislation. It is essential that any changes to the electoral framework enhance transparency and public trust, and that reforms are developed through inclusive dialogue and in line with OSCE commitments. Relatedly, we are concerned about legislative amendments undermining freedom of peaceful assembly, including the amendments to the Criminal and Administrative Offences Codes and the Law on Assemblies and Manifestations. The amendments undermine the principle of equal suffrage and restrict freedom of assembly, as stated in relevant ODIHR’s and Venice Commission latest opinions. We urge the Georgian authorities to implement their recommendations.

    Madam Chair,

    We are alarmed by the escalating threats and intimidation faced by journalists in Georgia. The Public Defender’s 2024 Human Rights Report highlights a significant decline in media freedom, exacerbated by restrictive laws—such as the recent amendments to the Law on Broadcasting—and growing hostility toward journalists.

    Notably, there have been incidents where journalists were being targeted by police while covering protests, including physical assaults and equipment seizures. Furthermore, reports of targeting journalists in exile and negative rhetoric from high-ranking officials and politicians have further eroded media freedom and increased risks for journalists.

    We call for the immediate cessation of these practices and the immediate release of all arbitrarily detained journalists, including Mzia Amaghlobeli, who remains in detention on charges of up to 7 years in prison.

    Finally, we remain deeply troubled by the persistent lack of accountability for police violence. We have seen no evidence of credible efforts by the Georgian authorities to investigate reports of disproportionate use of force against peaceful protesters, arbitrary detentions, excessive over-reliance on long pre-trial detention periods, and mistreatment of detainees.

    We call on the Georgian authorities to take immediate action to protect the rights of those exercising their fundamental freedoms and to conduct a thorough investigation of the use of police force during peaceful protests since 28 November 2024 in order to hold those responsible for human rights violations to account. Failure to do so further undermines public trust in Georgia’s institutions.

    Madam Chair,

    Despite repeated statements by Georgia reaffirming their commitment to dialogue and the OSCE principles and commitments, we have yet to see any concrete and genuine steps toward meaningful engagement. Instead, recent actions by the Georgian authorities have moved Georgia further away from democracy. We call on the Georgian authorities to open an inclusive dialogue with all political parties and civil society organisations in order to find peaceful and democratic solutions to the ongoing crisis.

    We welcome recent statements by ODIHR and RFoM and strongly urge Georgia to continue to constructively engage with OSCE institutions and make use of their expertise. As fellow OSCE participating States, we will explore all available tools and mechanisms within the OSCE context going forward. In this spirit, we call on Georgian authorities to implement recommendations by ODIHR with regard to the upcoming elections.

    Our unwavering commitment to Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity remains unchanged. We stand steadfast in our support for the Georgian people and their pursuit of a democratic, stable and European future, and we remain ready to work with Georgia to ensure it upholds its international obligations and ensures that human rights and fundamental freedoms are fully respected.​

  • PRESS RELEASE : Challenges to media freedom in the OSCE region: UK statement to the OSCE [April 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Challenges to media freedom in the OSCE region: UK statement to the OSCE [April 2025]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 11 April 2025.

    Ambassador Neil Holland recalls the vital contribution of media freedom to security in the OSCE region, and calls on Russia, Belarus and others to live up to their OSCE commitments.

    Thank you Mr Chair. And welcome back to the Permanent Council in your new capacity, dear Jan.

    In this fiftieth anniversary year, I want to start with the Helsinki Final Act. In 1975 our predecessors accepted citizens’ right to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas.  Free, independent and pluralistic media should be at the heart of our societies and our shared security. Sadly we are still far from realising our predecessors’ ambition when it comes to media freedom and other fundamental freedoms in our region.

    We believe early warning sits at the core of your mandate. We welcome your public statements on recent cases of concern and, in particular, take this opportunity to express our concern about the case of Mzia Amaglobeli in Georgia and the so called “foreign agents” law in Republika Srpska.

    Since Russia’s full scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, many journalists and media workers have been killed. And over 100 Ukrainian and foreign journalists have been detained or taken hostage by Russian forces. Furthermore, state disinformation, information manipulation and censorship in Russia and Belarus have reached unprecedented levels. Systemic repression has led to the closure of almost all independent media organizations and a media space largely subject to the State apparatus.

    We call on both Russia and Belarus to release all political prisoners (including media actors) immediately and unconditionally, including those held by Russia in temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories.

    In order to realise the ambition of 1975, every participating State has work to do.  I am pleased that the Security Committee’s May 2025 meeting will focus on security implications of information manipulation and interference.

    And domestically, the UK looks forward to working with you on the safety of journalists, combatting foreign information manipulation and interference and global media freedom challenges.

    We launched our National Committee for the Safety of Journalists in 2020 and the UK’s National Action Plan for the Safety of Journalists was first launched in 2021. The Action Plan was refreshed in 2023 following delivery of many of its original commitments. Achievements under the 2023 Action Plan include updated Online Harassment Guidance for Journalists; the launch of a journalist safety tracker by the National Union of Journalists; and a Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Taskforce and workplan.

    The SLAPPs Taskforce has initiated new guidance on SLAPPs for journalists. The Solicitors Regulation Authority who are members of the Taskforce, launched a thematic review on SLAPPs in April 2024 and published an updated warning notice on SLAPPs in 2024, to help solicitors and law firms understand their obligations and how to comply.

    In 2025 the UK’s National Committee for Safety of Journalists will focus on three priority areas: enhancing the criminal justice response to crimes against journalists; supporting journalists and their employers to tackle online and offline harassment; and – with a non-legislative focus – tackling the risks posed by SLAPPs and other abusive legal threats against journalists.

    The National Committee – co-chaired by the Minister for Sports, Media, Civil Society and Youth and the Minister for Safeguarding and Violence against Women and Girls –  will also develop the next iteration of the UK National Action Plan later this year.

    The UK looks forward to continuing to discuss developments of concern across the wider OSCE region with you as well as our domestic policy framework.   And the UK remains a strong supporter of your office, your mandate and your team.  Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : £1.5 million fund to support Windrush compensation applicants [April 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : £1.5 million fund to support Windrush compensation applicants [April 2025]

    The press release issued by the Home Office on 11 April 2025.

    A dedicated community support will deliver justice for victims of the Windrush scandal, ensure they have their voices heard and receive deserved compensation.

    Victims of the Home Office Windrush scandal will receive crucial support to access the compensation they deserve under a £1.5 million fund launched by the government today.

    The Windrush Compensation Advocacy Support Fund (WCASF) will provide claimants with dedicated advocates from community organisations to work alongside them throughout the compensation application process.

    Many victims have reported that while this process is not legally complex, the emotional toll of revisiting traumatic experiences can make it difficult to navigate alone.

    Delivered over the next three years and offered alongside existing support for Windrush Compensation Scheme applicants, the WCASF will break down barriers to justice by ensuring victims’ voices are heard and their experiences fully documented.

    The fund delivers on the government’s manifesto commitment to provide additional support and work more closely with affected communities and forms part of the wider Plan for Change to deliver justice for Windrush victims.

    Minister for Migration and Citizenship, Seema Malhotra MP said:

    The Home Office Windrush scandal was an appalling injustice that should never have happened. People who had built their lives here and contributed so much to our country were wrongly treated as illegal immigrants in the place they called home.

    This £1.5 million fund is a decisive step in our mission to right these wrongs. By providing dedicated advocacy support, we’re breaking down barriers and ensuring victims have a voice through every step of the compensation process.

    We are determined that Windrush communities will finally receive the recognition and justice they deserve.

    Advocates will help applicants gather supporting evidence, provide signposting to additional services, and create a trusted environment so no victim has to face the system by themselves.

    The additional support will be of immense importance to victims. For many, the scandal resulted in loss of employment, denial of healthcare, threats of deportation, and in some cases, actual deportation from a country they had every right to call home. These experiences led to severe financial hardship, deteriorating mental health, broken families, and shattered trust in government institutions.

    The fund has been shaped by extensive consultation with more than 20 organisations, all serving different segments of the Windrush community.

    Advocates funded through this initiative will understand applicants’ cultural background and support them to articulate their stories in a safe environment. It aims to ensure applications fully capture the impact of the scandal on individuals’ lives, livelihoods, and wellbeing.

    Since coming into office, the government has re-established the Windrush Unit to oversee the department’s response to the scandal and embed permanent cultural change across the Home Office – keeping the voices of victims at the heart of all work undertaken to address the scandal.

    Recruitment is currently underway for the vital role of Windrush Commissioner, who will represent victims’ views at the highest levels of government and drive lasting change. The appointment is expected by summer 2025.

    Virtual information sessions for organisations interested in applying to the WCASF will be held on 14 and 15 April. To attend, you must register via email to WCSAdvocacySupportFund@homeoffice.gov.uk

    All applications must be submitted via the Find and Apply Grant portal by 5pm on 9 May 2025.

  • NEWS STORY : UK and Allies Condemn Russia and Belarus Over Media Crackdown at OSCE Meeting

    NEWS STORY : UK and Allies Condemn Russia and Belarus Over Media Crackdown at OSCE Meeting

    STORY

    The United Kingdom, alongside 14 other nations, issued a joint statement at the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Permanent Council, expressing deep concern over escalating threats to media freedom, particularly in Russia and Belarus. Delivered by Lithuanian Ambassador Vaidotas Verba on behalf of the informal Group of Friends on Safety of Journalists—which includes countries such as Canada, France, Germany, and the UK—the statement underscored the indispensable role of media freedom in ensuring genuine security. It highlighted the alarming conditions journalists face across the OSCE region, including physical and online violence, legal harassment, arbitrary detention, enforced disappearances, and even death.

    The coalition specifically condemned Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine, citing data from Reporters Without Borders that nearly 150 journalists have been victims of Russian abuses since the invasion began. This includes 13 journalists killed, 47 injured, and 19 Ukrainian journalists currently detained by Russian forces, many arrested in temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories. In Russia and Belarus, the statement noted a systematic crackdown on independent media, resulting in the closure of nearly all independent media organisations and creating an information space largely controlled by the state. The coalition called on both nations to release all detained journalists and to cease actions that suppress independent journalism. The group reaffirmed its support for the autonomous mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, emphasising the importance of monitoring media developments, providing early warnings on violations, and promoting compliance with OSCE commitments.