Blog

  • Arthur Scargill – 1984 NUM Conference Speech

    Below is the text of the speech made by Arthur Scargill, the then General Secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers, to the 1984 NUM Conference.

    Fellow members, this Presidential Address has been completed within the last 24 hours, and obviously I have tried to take account of all the factors which have taken place in what can only be described as the most memorable and certainly the most important period in the history of this Union. This Extraordinary Annual Conference takes place during the eighteenth week of the most bitter dispute seen in the mining industry since 1926 -a strike sparked off by the Coal Board’s announcement on March 6th that it intended to close 20 pits and destroy 20,000 jobs over the coming year alone, as part of what Ian MacGregor termed “bringing supply into line with demand”.

    It was obvious that this decision marked the beginning of the pit closure programme announced by the Coal Board Chairman at a Consultative Council meeting over a year ago. On June 14th, 1983 he declared it was the Board’s intention to take 25 million tonnes of capacity out of the industry with the advent of the Selby coalfield. Translated into flesh and blood terms, this meant over 70 pit closures and 70,000 job losses. By the time the Union presented its claim for wages in 1983, it had become clear that the Board’s intention was to run down the industry, getting rid of what it termed “uneconomic capacity”. This programme for butchering coal was strikingly similar to the industrial vandalism inflicted on the British steel industry, where Ian MacGregor wiped out over 100,000 jobs, and, earlier, at British Leyland, where (in collaboration with Sir Michael Edwardes) he destroyed a similar number of jobs.

    The policy now openly pursued by the National Coal Board utterly violates the Plan For Coal, agreed between Government, Coal Board and mining Unions in 1974, reaffirmed in 1977 and, more significantly, accepted by the present Government in 1979 and as recently as 1981. Delegates will not need reminding that our Union has consistently pledged itself to fight against pit closures and reductions in manpower levels, while at the same time demanding decent wages and conditions for British miners.

    We do not need reminding of what took place in the 1960s when, in an era of what can only be described as collaboration, the Union acquiesced to a policy of mass destruction of jobs, pits and mining communities. We vowed that never again would we stand by and witness such vandalism – never again would we sit back and watch our people turned into industrial gypsies, wandering from coalfield to coalfield, from pit to pit, searching for work: victims of the narrow, balance-sheet mentality of both Coal Board and Government.

    Today, the devastation threatening our communities is dramatically and tragically compounded by the destructive monetarist policies which this Government has unleashed. With over four-and-a-half million unemployed people, Britain’s industrial base crippled by lack of investment, and the nation’s social services network being torn to shreds, there is a climate of helplessness, hopelessness and outright despair. It is our responsibility as trade unionists to fight that despair and oppose the policies which created it.

    When I was elected President of this Union, by over 70 per cent of the votes cast, I was elected on a programme of total opposition to pit closures and reductions in manpower – a programme demanding better wages and conditions, aimed at restoring the wages of miners to at least the level approved by Parliament itself following the dispute in 1974. Against this background of the last few years, the Coal Board announcement on March 6th, and its decision to close Polmaise and Cortonwood as part of the programme, the Union decided to approve strike action in the coalfields under Rule 41. This decision, taken within the Rules and Constitution of our Union was in fact a reaffirmation of unanimous decisions taken by successive Annual Conferences, both on the issue of pit closures and on the demand for better wages and conditions.

    From the start of this dispute – in fact, from the day our overtime ban began last November-there has been a lot of talk, particularly from the media, about democracy. I have noted with interest that those who are most vociferous in attacking our Union, telling it what it should and should not do, are in fact the non-elected editors of newspapers, or non-elected judges. They include such public figures as Vice Chancellor Sir Robert Megarry, who is now openly trying to run the affairs of our organisation. I would hope that Conference rejects this blatant state interference in the affairs of an independent and democratic trade union. Indeed, what Sir Robert Megarry is trying to do is in violation of I.L.O. conventions, but his actions reveal clearly the level and weight of the state interference with miners in this dispute.

    Through the police, the judiciary, the social security system – whichever way seems possible, the full weight of the state is being brought to bear upon us in an attempt to try and break this strike. I would further remind all those super-democrats and others both inside and outside our Union, that in 1977, following a National Conference decision and an individual ballot vote which rejected an incentive bonus pay agreement, there were Areas (Areas which in the current situation have called for a ballot before taking strike action) which on that occasion deliberately ignored a national ballot result. They went ahead and introduced into the coalfields an Area-based scheme which has led to deep and damaging divisions within our Union: a scheme which has set man against man, pit against pit, Area against Area.

    Throughout the past eighteen weeks, with over 80 per cent of British miners out on strike fighting for the survival of our industry, our pits, jobs and communities, we have witnessed the sad sight of a small section of our members ignoring, or trying to ignore, the Union’s fight for the future. I want to say to all those men who are still at work: no matter what arguments you put forward, you cannot ignore the most important and precious trade union principle upon which the strength of our movement has been built. When workers are in dispute, you do not cross picket lines.

    During the course of this strike, well over 4,000 of our members have been arrested. Nearly 2,000 have been injured – many of them very seriously. Two miners have been killed fighting for the right to work. Each of these facts alone should have convinced any trade unionist to stop work immediately -and give their support to policies for which our members have been prepared to give their lives. Miners on strike and their families are suffering intense hardship in this dispute, and I can only applaud their incredible determination and courage. Not only have they faced deprivation and hunger – they have found themselves in the front line facing the most massive assault on civil liberties and human rights ever launched against trade unionists in this country. On the picket lines, riot police in full battle gear, on horseback and on foot, accompanied by police dogs, have been unleashed in violent attacks upon our members.

    We have seen in our communities and villages a level of police harassment and intimidation which organised British trade unionists have never before experienced. Preventing the right of people to move freely from one part of the country, or even county, to another; the calculated attacks upon striking miners in the streets of their villages; the oppressive conditions of bail under which it is hoped to silence, discourage and defeat us – all these tactics constitute outright violation of people’s basic rights. It may well be that we will have to go before the European Court of Human Rights to challenge these flagrant acts of injustice. Against such a background I say without equivocation that not one miner should be going to work.

    If the Nottinghamshire, South Derbyshire and Leicester Areas – regardless of whatever differences exist – had come out on strike along with their colleagues throughout the coalfields, this dispute would by now have been brought to a successful conclusion. I appeal to those who are still at work: search your conscience. No trade unionist can justify crossing an official picket line. No trade union official can condone or collude in such an action. Look instead at the reasons why your colleagues are out on strike. They are fighting for your future and that of your families as well as for their own.

    Through the magnificent solidarity of our membership, this Union has proved that the National Coal Board (despite the public statements of Ian MacGregor) can be brought back to the negotiating table. For the first time over the past two years, we are involved in negotiations at which the Board can no longer treat us with contempt. In the course of this strike, the Coal Board has this far lost 36 million tonnes of production, with a further ten million lost during our overtime ban – a production loss valued at £2,100 million. Add to this the £30 million per week paid by the C.E.G.B., which has increased its oil burn from five to 27 per cent in an effort to defeat the miners’ fight for jobs. On top of that is the enormous public cost of the police operations which have hi-jacked our people’s civil liberties and human rights. It can thus be seen that the taxpayers of Britain will have to bear the weight of more than £3,000 million for a dispute caused by Ian MacGregor and the National Coal Board.

    Mr. MacGregor’s appalling stewardship of our industry is even more incredible when we consider the costs of closing pits and making miners redundant. These costs are more than twice those required at present to keep pits open and communities intact. Negotiations with the Coal Board have over the past week alone involved the Union in a marathon 25 hours of talks aimed at seeking a solution which would maintain our industry and guarantee employment not only for our members today, but for our sons and daughters. Throughout this dispute, however, it has been clear that the Board’s negotiators are manipulated in every move by the Prime Minister, who seems obsessed with trying to defeat the National Union of Mineworkers. MacGregor is reported to have said that, rather than settle this bitter and costly dispute which has already savaged our nation’s economy, he would prefer to see the miners strike continue in order to try to defeat our Union. We will not be defeated.

    The magnificent courage and determination of our people will see us through to victory. And, at this point, I want yet again to pay special tribute to two elements within our ranks which have provided a unique inspiration in our fight for the future. Throughout the strike, we have seen our young miners out on the picket lines, demonstrating a commitment to principle, and to people, which makes me proud to be President of this Union. We have also seen, in every mining village around the country, the birth and growth of women’s support groups, displaying and inspiring a community solidarity the like of which we have never witnessed in any industry or any union, ever before. Their work and their campaigning has had its own special effect on the broader trade union movement, within which solid support for our strike grows day by day. Much of that support, of course, is historical and long-standing.

    I can only pay the highest tribute to our colleagues in A.S.L.E.F. and the National Union of Railwaymen, whose solidarity has been nothing short of fantastic. To the members of the National Union of Seamen, which has from the very beginning of our strike put into practice the basic principles of trade unionism, and blocked each coal shipment coming into Britain, our Union expresses its deepest appreciation. We will not forget their support. The Transport and General Workers’ Union has also been magnificent in backing us. The solidarity of the T.& G. shines triumphantly in the decision of the nation’s dockers to take action against Biritish Steel’s blatant disregard of trade union rights.

    In calling on all our colleagues throughout the trade union movement-including those working in steel, in the power stations and industry generally-to give physical support to our strike, I say: the best way to protect your own jobs and your families is to support the N.U.M.. By violating picket lines, you are supporting the management of British Steel and other key corporations which have combined with the Tory Government to destroy all our industries. They are the ones responsible for four-and-a-half million unemployed people. There can be no compromise in our Union’s principled opposition to the Coal Board’s pit closure programme. Ours is a supremely noble aim: to defend pits, jobs, communities and the right to work.

    We are now entering a crucial phase in our battle for the survival of this industry. For the first time since the strike began, even the pundits and the experts have started to admit that the pendulum is swinging in favour of the N.U.M.. Coal stocks have dropped dramatically; there are little more than 14 million tonnes at the power stations, and the situation in industry generally is becoming critical. As we move towards the autumn and the winter, even the most intransigent Tories must recognise that our negotiating position will improve, while that of the Coal Board, backed by the Government, will steadily deteriorate.

    When I was elected President of the N.U.M. at the end of 1981, I promised that I would never betray the decisions of this Conference, the rights of our members, nor the principles enshrined in the history of our Union. At the same time, I said I believed that the leadership had the right to demand from the rank-and-file the same loyalty and commitment that the leadership was prepared to give. Over the past eighteen weeks I have witnessed in our rank-and-file a degree of loyalty and commitment that is almost unbelievable, and a dedication to principle among British miners which has roused admiration around the world. I have always felt proud and privileged to be a member of this Union, but never more proud than at the present time.

    This Conference has the task of re-dedicating itself to the policies laid down to protect pits and jobs. We are fighting in defence of our communities for the right to work-and for our dignity and self-respect. The sacrifices and the hardships have forged a unique commitment among our members. They will ensure that the National Union of Mineworkers wins this most crucial battle in the history of our industry. Comrades, I salute you for your magnificent achievements and for your support – together, we cannot fail. I feel privileged to be your President.

  • Lord Sassoon – 2012 Speech to the Middle East Association

    Below is the text of a speech made by Lord Sassoon, the Commercial Secretary to the Treasury, on Thursday 25th October 2012. The speech was given at the Mansion House in London to the Middle East Association.

    Lord Mayor Locum Tenens, Your Excellency, ladies and gentlemen.

    Thank you for your warm and generous welcome and my thanks especially to Matthew Smith and the Middle East Association for organising today’s lunch.

    It is of course, Sir Robert [Finch], wonderful to be in the Mansion House and in this great Egyptian Hall.

    But even if this room is not strictly genuine, being more Roman than Egyptian, the hospitality certainly is. And I do think that the way that Lord Mayors so generously welcome business and other groups into this, their home is as close as it gets in the UK to a traditional Arab majlis.

    I am sorry that Liz Symons, Chairman of the Arab British Chamber of Commerce, is not here today but I am reminded of the time last year when we were both at one of the legendary majlis lunches of Sheikh Nahyan bin Mubarak al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi.

    It is great that these traditions of combining business and hospitality are alive both in the City of London and the Middle East.

    Now today is a day some of us have been focused on for a while – and not just for this lunch. It is encouraging to see the first estimate of third quarter GDP showing growth of one per cent.

    But this is only one quarter and the UK still faces very considerable challenges to get growth to where it should be.

    There is still a long way to go, but these figures show we are on the right track. This is another sign that the economy is healing.

    And there are other positive signs – particularly on the jobs front. There are now more people in work in the UK than ever before. Testament to the flexibility of the UK labour market.

    But also a reflection of strong export growth.  With non-EU exports up by over nine per cent in 2011.

    And that takes us to the heart of the challenge for the UK in the Middle East.

    With a GDP in excess of $1.2 trillion, the Gulf alone constitutes the UK’s 7th largest export market, larger than India, Russia and Mexico combined.

    But, for all our historic ties with the Middle East, exports last year to the Gulf rose not by nine per cent but by a paltry four per cent.

    By contrast, China and Korea’s exports to the Gulf are increasing by more than 30 per cent.

    So we have to do much more.

    As Treasury Ministers, we recognise that it is by building strong relationships with our partners in the Gulf that we will achieve more together.

    And to that end, we launched the Government’s Gulf initiative in Summer 2010 to reinvigorate the UK’s engagement with the Gulf states.

    There have been more than 80 British Ministerial visits to the region in the last year and 50 senior Gulf visits to the UK.

    More and more British investors are building enduring relationships with the Middle East to support our mutual prosperity. And the Government is supporting this wherever we can.

    And there have been notable successes in the past year. For example:

    • Ultra Electronic winning a £200 million contract to upgrade Oman’s airports;
    • Carillion’s involvement in the re-development of Doha to the tune of £300 million; and
    • In May Saudi Arabia agreed a £1.5bn deal with BAE Systems for Hawk aircraft, in addition to their partnership on Typhoon.

    But I hope to see many more British companies helping to realise the visions governments have for infrastructure across the Middle East.

    UK business is already the largest foreign investor in Egypt, with cumulative investments of £10bn including across oil, gas and telecoms.

    And Saudi Arabia alone has $400bn to spend on infrastructure by the end of 2013, with only 18 per cent of this spent so far.

    There may not always be a UK leads contractor bidding for a project – but when it comes to designing, engineering, managing and financing the smallest or largest projects, we have to get the world to understand that the depth and breadth of UK-based expertise is ahead of what any other country can offer.

    And we must have our SMEs as hungry and organised as German SMEs, if we are to meet our export targets.

    From what I see, UKTI are doing an excellent job.

    But we need all of you beating a path to my door and to Stephen Green’s door to tell us what more you need from us, from UKTI and from the Chambers to support you efforts – particularly for those of you who are SMEs.

    Meanwhile, the City of London remains the most international financial centre in the world.  And the City remains the largest Islamic Finance centre outside the Islamic world, with $19bn of sharia complaint assets.

    This has contributed to Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds’ investment into the UK.

    Whether it is the US$2.4 billion ijara financing for the redevelopment of Chelsea Barracks or the Islamic financial products supporting the construction of The Shard, the City has shown how it can facilitate Sovereign Wealth Fund investment.

    I have made it a personal priority to maintain close relationships with the Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds. The UK has benefitted hugely from their support over many years and we will continue to welcome them here.

    I hosted ADIA, the KIA and the QIA at the Global Investment Conference at the start of the Olympic Games. And I again welcomed ADIA to London in September for a roundtable on the UK Economy, to present in detail the UK’s plans to deliver growth and stability.

    And, as Sir Robert mentioned, we are looking forward to the Amir of Kuwait’s State visit at the end of November to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the KIO’s London office.

    Finally, The UK will chair the Deauville Partnership in 2013 – the international initiative through which the G8 and Gulf are helping support political and economic transitions taking shape in wake of the Arab Spring.

    The focus of our Presidency will be on promoting open economies and inclusive growth – including supporting economic stabilisation and reform, and increased trade and capital market development to enable private sector growth in Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Tunisia, Libya and Yemen.

    And the UK Government are working closely with the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development to host an Investment Conference in London next year which will bring together investors, business, and officials from across the G8 and Middle East to help deliver against these commitments to the region.

    So my message today is clear.  The UK and the Gulf are successfully looking beyond the recent global crisis and working together for a more prosperous future.

    The Amir of Qatar has said that he “cannot remember the relationship being in a better state.” That is a sentiment I hear widely echoed. We now have to turn that sentiment into more business wins.

    I have mentioned only a few of the very many opportunities for us to support each other’s endeavours.

    Government will be unrelenting in support of your efforts.  I will be making two more trips to the Middle East before the end of the year in support of British business. I will be lucky, though, if I am invited to a majlis as splendid as this one, whether in a genuine or a fake Egyptian Room.

    Thank you.

  • Lord Sassoon – 2011 Business Finance Taskforce Speech

    The below speech was made by Lord Sassoon in Sheffield on 15th March 2011, launching the Business Finance Taskforce regional event.

    As a Treasury Minister, I felt that I couldn’t possibly turn down the opportunity to speak at this afternoon’s event. More seriously I wanted to be here at the launch of what is a very significant initiative by the major British banks to reconnect with their SME business customers and to help British businesses obtain the finance they need – finance they need to grow their own businesses and to drive the growth of the economy.

    Much of the economic and political debate of the past three years has focused on the role of the banking sector in our society; the relationship that banks have with their customers; and how this feeds through to the rest of the economy.

    In the past few years this relationship has seen its fair share of ups and downs. And regrettably there seem to have been more downs than ups.

    Which is why this event – and similar ones being held up and down the UK – are so important.

    As today is all about how our largest banks are looking to reconnect with the rest of the economy.

    By this I mean providing the lending that viable businesses need to invest and expand.

    Supplying the capital to stimulate enterprise across the country.

    And ensuring that we a have financial sector that serves its customers, has their trust, as well as their best interests at heart.

    This is vital.

    Because if our financial sector doesn’t tick these boxes then we’ll have an economy that struggles to respond to today’s challenges; a country that doesn’t fulfil its potential; and a recovery that fails to gather momentum.

    It’s no exaggeration to say that private finance is the lifeblood of British business…

    …and that when our banking system is healthy, then so is our economy.

    But the current environment has thrown up particular challenges as banks have retrenched; weathered the financial storm; and looked to rebuild their balance sheets.

    I’m all too aware that SMEs in particular have been facing difficulties when on the hunt for affordable lending.

    So, as a Government, we’ve been working with the banks to try and get credit flowing again.

    Part of this is the recent Project Merlin announcement.

    Among other things, this agreement will ensure that, this year, the UK’s largest banks will make available up to £190 billion to creditworthy businesses… of which £76 billion has been earmarked specifically for small businesses.

    Which is an increase of almost 15 per cent on last year’s lending figures to small business.

    If demand exceeds this, the banks will lend more.

    I think we can all agree that this is an excellent starting point… but there’s still more that needs to be done…

    …and ultimately it will be the banks, not the Government, who will have to lead this work.

    Which is the focus of today’s event.

    I am not only pleased to see the financial sector is taking steps to restore business confidence, and renew the trust that’s been lost. But i also want to commend, not condemn, the BBA and the major banks for the intense effort they have put in over the past nine months in this task.

    Through the Business Finance Taskforce – made up of the British Banker’s Association and the UK’s six largest banks, the industry itself is taking forward a range of initiatives to help better serve its customers. And it has been working closely with Government to shape the Taskforce’s agenda.

    Collectively, these reforms – known as the ‘Better Business Finance’ package – will:

    improve the relationship that banks have with their businesses; ensure better access to finance; and provide better information to increase transparency. And it’s the first of these objectives that I want to concentrate on.

    There has been much debate surrounding whether what we’re currently seeing is either a supply or demand problem.

    Certainly, data continues to show that demand for credit from small businesses remains relatively weak, and this is set against a backdrop of lending levels that are on a downward trend.

    But from my conversations with business, I know it’s not that simple.

    A large part of demand is about confidence… and if businesses don’t have confidence in the banks then they’re unlikely to come asking for credit.

    That is why I see the task of rebuilding business-bank relationships as so important.

    Rightly or wrongly, businesses across Britain believe there’s been a decline in banking standards and a deliberate turning away from ‘relationship banking’ and personal service.

    Rightly or wrongly, many businesses also feel that when they do approach their local banks they’re not made to feel welcome – that they’re now considered too ‘high risk’ even when their businesses were never seen as risky before.

    Undoubtedly, following the crisis, things have changed.

    Banks are understandably more risk averse.

    But this perception may also be adding to the apparent suppressed demand for credit – maybe it’s not so much a lack of demand as discouraged demand that we’re seeing.

    I know that this message has been taken on board by the banks.

    It’s at the core of the various initiatives included as part of the ‘Better Business Finance’ project.

    It’s the focus of the new lending code and principles, which will set out the minimum standards that smaller enterprises can expect from banks… and gives details of the help and advice that banks are making available.

    And it has helped drive the new transparent appeals process, which will give businesses the chance to voice their concerns if they feel they’ve been unfairly refused credit.

    This appeals process will be independently reviewed to ensure that each bank has a fair and equitable process.

    I’m pleased to say that the banks will be launching the new Code and Principles, as well as the appeals process, next month.

    From May, they’ll also help coordinate a new national business mentoring network – using both mentors recruited from their own ranks and, in the first instance, mentors from the not-for-profit sector.

    The introduction of new, independent data on business finance supply and demand trends across the UK will also help to restore relationships. I look forward to seeing the first results from these new surveys in July and to tracking the story they tell thereafter.

    And our major banks have agreed to publish a regular independent survey of businesses’ experience when looking for access to finance.

    This will give a strong indication of how well the banks are doing in meeting the commitments they’ve made.

    Taken together, these various initiatives will make the decisions of financial institutions easier for everyone to understand, but also allow customers to hold their banks to account.

    That way, we all know where we stand.

    And we all know what we can expect.

    But what businesses really want is better access to the funds they need for day-to-day financing as well as investment and growth.

    Which is why the Government has welcomed the decision of the major UK banks to set up the Business Growth Fund.

    This will provide £2.5 billion in equity investment for established small businesses with growth potential over the next 10 years.

    And help equity financing again become more of a mainstream financing option.

    If a loan or an overdraft isn’t the most appropriate form of finance for a small business, then banks should say so.

    And help business find the type of finance that is right for them – whether this is an alternative banking product – like supply chain or invoice financing – or non-bank lending, including equity.

    That’s why today is so important.

    Because you can have the best policy in the world, but if no one knows it exists then it’ll never be a success.

    Which is why I want to tell you about the other website that is launched today: http://www.betterbusinessfinance.co.uk/. It is a website that may be even more important for the UK economy than the 2012 ticket website.

    So the work of the Business Finance Taskforce, and the ‘Better Business Finance’ initiatives, are important first steps in re-establishing confidence and trust in the financial sector.

    It’s this work that is helping the sector as a whole reconnect with the rest of the economy.

    And this can’t be overstated.

    As there’s no hiding from the fact that our banks bear some responsibility for what’s happened to the economy.

    But equally, they have an important role in getting us out of the mire.

    By providing the finance that’s essential for investment.

    The advice that helps businesses grow and succeed.

    And the confidence that underpins a flourishing economy.

    So I welcome the progress that the banks are making.

    I recognise that the Taskforce is taking is taking its job very seriously.

    And I’m happy to be part of this process.

    Where banks, businesses and the Government are working together to create a strong financial sector… one that serves the interests of its customers, has the confidence of investors, and helps deliver a strong and sustainable economy.

  • Viscount Samuel – 1939 House of Lords Address

    My Lords, I trust that your Lordships will agree with Lord Snell that it will be useful if from time to time this House discusses the great issues of these days and does not limit itself, as hitherto, merely to brief acknowledgments of the statements made periodically by His Majesty’s Government. I am sure that your Lordships will agree that Lord Snell himself to-day has initiated such discussion with his accustomed clarity, eloquence and force. Many of us will remember the well-known lines in the Gilbert and Sullivan opera: “The House of Lords throughout the war” “Did nothing in particular,” “And did it very well.” In this war I trust that the House of Lords will not be limited to that function but will be able to contribute in some degree both to the expression of public opinion and perhaps sometimes to its guidance.

    The general course of this country and Empire has been set, and it has been set with almost universal national agreement. The declaration of the Government yesterday shows that the policy is unchanged. Had it been otherwise, had the statement of yesterday been of a different character, I am sure that many of your Lordships would have been prompt to speak their minds. As it is, the discussion may perhaps be brief and limited. For my own part I desire, so far as international affairs are concerned, to refer only to some of the factors that have lately arisen. Without doubt the most important of them is the anxiety that is felt owing to the uncertainty of the attitude of Russia. I do not know whether it would be possible for the Foreign Secretary to say anything on what all of us must recognise to be a difficult and delicate matter. Hitherto, however, the Soviets have declared their neutrality, and it seems to the general public that there need be no reason to assume that that policy will change. The important point is that His Majesty’s Government declared in their statement of yesterday that, whether Russia does or does not change her policy, Britain and France will not depart from theirs but will pursue their declared purpose to the end.

    Consequent upon the recent course of action of Russia, there has been some concern on account of the negotiations that have taken place between Turkey and the Soviets. I trust, however, that the people of this country will view those negotiations with understanding. Turkey, from her geographical situation, has great interests in the Black Sea and in Asia which would lead her to cultivate friendship with the Soviets, as she has done in recent years; while at the same time she has great interests in the Mediterranean which would lead her to value the good will and, if necessary, the assistance of Britain and France. It should be, it would seem to many, our task to help the Turkish Government to avoid any clash between those two real interests, which might at times appear to be somewhat incompatible. We may recognise that Turkey is right in her own interests to cultivate friendship with all her neighbours, and we need not see unfriendliness to ourselves if she seeks to preserve those friendships while maintaining her engagements with France and with Britain.

    As to the division of Poland that has lately been proclaimed by Germany and Russia, we may well feel confident that that will not stand. That matter is not to be decided by those two Powers at the present time; the Peace Conference at the end of the war will deal with it. We may all of us recollect how in March, 1918, there was another treaty between Germany and Russia, signed after long negotiations at Brest-Litovsk, followed by a treaty on similar lines between Germany and Rumania – both of them very advantageous to a triumphant Germany; but events decided otherwise.

    One thing stands out quite clearly in the existing situation. There is one prospect which is utterly intolerable, and it is this. When the war is ended, whether it be late or soon, when the conference has been held and terms of peace have been agreed, and the smoke has cleared away, it would be intolerable if one fact were to remain in the eyes of the world and in the face of history—namely, that Herr Hitler should be found once more to have achieved by violence all, and more 1301 than all, that he had set out to obtain, that the Czech people had not been redeemed and that the Poles had been added as new victims, and that, by another resounding triumph, the Nazi régime had been fastened yet more firmly upon the necks of the German people and of Europe. That that should be the net result is a prospect not to be borne. That that should be the legacy which this generation of ours should leave to posterity, is a thought that would be unendurable. All of us, of course, would rejoice if the war could be ended in a month, but if the ending was such as to leave the situation no better than before, but worse, with the peoples subjected to the continuous strains that have marked the last few years, with international treaties made more worthless even than before, and with further wars ever impending, then the respite could be bought at far too high a price. I believe that the British nation, with a sound instinct, and the French nation as well, feel that now we are in it we must go on and finish it.

    These observations, I gather, meet with a considerable measure of approval from your Lordships. Perhaps what I have to say next, turning to questions of domestic affairs, may not quite be equally approved. A Chinese sage said of one of his disciples who used to accompany him in his wanderings, “So-and-so gives me no assistance at all; he admires immensely everything that I say.” Well, we on these Benches are not debarred in that way from rendering assistance to His Majesty’s Government. In the first place, I think that the country is disappointed with respect to the composition of the War Cabinet. That view has been expressed already this afternoon by the noble Viscounts, Lord Astor and Lord Elibank. Everyone welcomes a smaller War Cabinet, but neither the lines on which it has been constituted – its present numbers – nor its personnel really satisfy the wishes of the nation. I do not wish to pursue that further, because it would raise questions of too great delicacy. But one point stands out very clearly – that the present War Cabinet is weak on the financial and economic side. One does not see in that body a real grasp of all the great questions of that order on which the success of this contest will ultimately in very large measure depend. Many of your Lordships will, no doubt, have seen in The Times yesterday a most able article by Sir William Beveridge, dealing with these matters. He makes there many cogent criticisms and presents practical proposals, with which I would express my humble agreement, and which I trust will receive the close attention of the Government.

    The second ground on which the Government are subject to general criticism, I think, has been the delay in setting up the Ministry of Supply. Again and again in recent years many members of your Lordships’ House – some of those with the closest knowledge of the questions at issue – have urged upon the Government the immediate necessity of establishing such a Ministry, but until recently we had no more than the famous formula uttered by the noble Marquess, Lord Zetland – “sooner or later, perhaps.” When the noble Earl, Lord Baldwin, spoke in this House after the September crisis last year, he said: “I would mobilise our industries tomorrow.” Many wondered why they have not been mobilised before, but they have not been mobilised yet in all their fullness. The Ministry of Supply has very limited functions. It is perhaps not through its own fault, but it has not yet won the confidence of the nation. It has not been able, perhaps it has not got the power, to grasp the whole situation comprehensively, that is to say, the mobilisation of all the industry of Britain for the war effort and the proper planning of its output.

    Furthermore, still dealing with the economic side, the Commercial War Risks Insurance Scheme was received with general disapproval by the commercial community, but still it has not been changed in accordance with their desires. With regard to war damage compensation, the public are left altogether at a loss to know what action will be taken by the Government to carry out their declared policy of relieving the individual who suffers from any damage to his house or property resulting from war action, instead of leaving him to bear the whole burden of what should be a communal charge. As long ago as January 31 the Chancellor of the Exchequer declared that this was a matter which the Government ought to take up, that it was one which required legislation, and that legislation should be introduced as soon as possible. That was at the end of January, and still no steps have been taken. That this matter should not have been pressed on with before the war is cause for blame for the Government as a whole, and for the Treasury in particular.

    With regard to the Ministry of Information, that has been so fully discussed this afternoon that it is unnecessary to add a further word. The Government have recognised that the scheme prepared beforehand has proved completely unsuitable, and they have now abandoned it. But it is necessary to urge upon His Majesty’s Government – a view that has already been expressed by some noble Lords this afternoon – that adequate steps have not been taken to maintain the tone of the nation. The war drags slowly, perhaps inevitably. On land, on the Western Front, it has taken the tedious form of siege warfare. On the seas it is a matter of patrols and skirmishes. In the air, hitherto, it has been the same. These methods of warfare demand magnificent qualities from the individuals engaged, and have given opportunities for the display of heroism which must command the admiration of everyone, but to the public at large the war seems going slowly, and apparently the end can only be found, unless there are some striking changes in one direction or another, in the gradual process of the economic exhaustion of Germany.

    In 1914, before conscription was introduced, when we depended on voluntary recruitment, it was necessary for the Government and for all the leaders of Parties to go down to the people and hold great meetings in all the centres of population in order to explain the purposes of the war, to stimulate and maintain enthusiasm, and to recruit the great armies of millions that were then being raised. Now that is not necessary in the same way. The noble Lord, Lord Macmillan, speaking a little while ago, said it was proposed to mobilise all the means of publicity in the country, and he mentioned first the platform. Possibly some member of the Government may be able to tell us to what extent and in what way it is proposed to do that.

    Now there is a method that did not exist 25 years ago—broadcasting—which enables the leaders of the people to speak directly to every household, and there one cannot but endorse the complaints that have been made this afternoon by Lord Strabolgi, Lord Astor, and the noble and gallant Field Marshal Lord Birdwood, that the broadcasting programmes of the B.B.C. are inadequate to the times and to the promotion of the strenuous effort which is required from the nation. They are uninspired and uninspiring. As Meredith said, “England is a muffled drum.” That is characteristic of the broadcasting of to-day. That is why the whole people welcomed with so much enthusiasm the spirited and resonant speeches in Parliament and on the wireless of Mr. Winston Churchill. Lord Macmillan told us to-day that he had to devote himself hitherto to reforming the structure of his Ministry, and that it is only now that the Ministry is able to get on with its real work of disseminating information and carrying on legitimate propaganda. It is a sad thing that, during this critical month, time should have been wasted and, according to the Minister of Information himself, the Ministry should have been immobilised for its real purpose by the initial defects in its own constitution.

    There are many suggestions that might be made by members of this House and members of the other House which it is not expedient to make in open session. For my own part I desire to support the proposal which was initiated by the leader of the Liberal Party in the House of Commons, and has been supported here by Lord Ponsonby and Lord Noel-Buxton already, that there should be Secret Sessions of Parliament, if not now, then at no distant future. Members cannot criticise or comment freely on certain matters without doing harm. An example may be found in Mr. Lloyd George’s speech yesterday – a speech which, if made at this juncture, should have been made in Secret Session, and which appears to many to have been untimely. That is my view; others may think differently. During the last war there were Secret Sessions which I well remember, and it is true that they caused some disappointment among members of Parliament, because it was anticipated that the Government would be able to give information about the strategic situation and the state of national preparedness which, as a matter of fact, Ministers could not give. It would no doubt be the same to-day. If there is even a distant risk of information on any strategic or military matter leaking out and reaching the ears of General Staffs who are eagerly listening for every whisper, however distant that risk may be, it cannot be faced, and no Government charged with these great matters could face the danger of a breach of secrecy.

    But Ministers can give a great deal of information about home conditions which it might not be expedient to publish to the world, and it is not only a question of what the Government can tell members, but also a question of what members can tell the Government. It is very necessary that Ministers should be kept in touch with the movement of public opinion, particularly in days like these, when there are no by-elections to be held except what may be called freak elections such as the one pending in Scotland. It is true that it would hinder the successful conduct of the war if certain things were said in public, but it is also true that it may hinder the successful conduct of the war if these things are not said at all. They cart be said much more effectively in Parliament than privately by members to individual Ministers. It is, of course, a matter on which the House of Commons should take the initiative, but if Secret Sessions are held there as they were during the last war, no doubt here also they will take place as happened on that occasion.

    All these are comparatively minor points. After a month of war, the important salient fact is that the substantial unity of the nation is unshaken, and we all stand behind the Government to secure the successful waging of the war. We all see clearly that the essence of the matter is this. Czecho-Slovakia and Poland are only symptoms. There is a deep-seated disease in the centre of Europe, and it is a disease of the mind. This is a war of ideas. Ideas determine action. As a German philospher said, “Ideas have hands and feet.” They strike, they march, whether for good or for ill; and a nation which allows itself to fall subject to men who take a cynical view of life and of politics, who have no religion, who are not aware that such a thing as international morality exists, such a nation brings on itself certain disaster and on its neighbours great suffering. The Germans might have learned better from the uniform teaching of all history. They have not done so. They have to learn afresh in the school of hard experience. That seems to me the essence of the matter.

  • Alex Salmond – 2014 Speech to SNP Conference

    alexsalmond

    Below is the text of the speech made by Alex Salmond, the Scottish First Minister, in Aberdeen on 12th April 2014.

    We meet here in this conference centre in Aberdeen as ordinary members of the Scottish National Party.

    But also the most privileged members of the SNP in our 80 year history.

    For this generation has the opportunity our forebears could only dream about.

    But we are no longer just members of a political party.

    We are also now part of a greater movement.

    A movement of young and old, of women and men, of trade unionists and businesspeople, of writers and artists.

    A movement of glorious diversity, reflecting our country’s rich spirit.

    Dedicated to a common goal:

    To build a better Scotland.

    To create a fairer society.

    To become an independence country.

    Make no mistake – momentum is with this campaign.

    The people are coming towards us.

    Political public meetings are being revived.

    Halls have been crowded across Scotland as we discuss our nation’s future.

    The messages from these meetings of hundreds are amplified a hundred times through social media and the campaign momentum continues.

    Can the No campaign match this?

    Well not really. To do it you have to first organise meetings and then you have to have people wanting to turn up.

    Last month the BBC finally discovered this grassroots campaign and tried to cover both sides of the debate.

    Their problem was that the No campaign struggled to find them any grassroots group to film – or even a single grassroot.

    It is rather like what happened a few weeks back when the UK and Scottish cabinets met on the same day here in Aberdeen.

    What a contrast.

    We met in Portlethen church hall in a public meeting with hundreds of people.

    The London Cabinet met in private behind the security screen in the HQ of Shell Oil.

    Big oil meets big government with small ideas.

    So let me repeat my offer to David Cameron. Prime Minister we can drum up a crowd for you in Scotland.

    All you have to do is say ‘yes’ to a debate.

    I mean what can you possibly be frightened of. Just think how well your deputy did debating UKIP!

    And if the fourth and fifth parties in Scotland can have a TV debate then why not the First Minister and Prime Minister?

    So let us at last have that debate about the future of this country in a proper open and democratic way.

    And let us agree to do it now.

    Of course not everyone is feart on the no side.

    One man is still game.

    Alistair Carmichael is still fighting hard for the Westminster establishment.

    Last month Alistair was on home turf in Shetland – a safe distance, he must have felt from Nicola Sturgeon.

    Reading the Shetland News – which has the motto: “Great is the Truth and it will prevail,” I saw that Alistair had not lost his touch.

    After a debate with Mike Mackenzie MSP and local activist Danus Skene, the Shetland News reported:

    “A show of hands revealed that Mackenzie and Skene had succeeded in widening the gap between yes and no from a single vote to 22.”

    Great is the truth and it will prevail.

    The trouble for the No campaign is this:

    The more the people of Scotland hear the case for No, the more likely they are to vote Yes.

    And no wonder.

    They are the most miserable, negative, depressing and thoroughly boring campaign in modern political history.

    They are already out of touch with the people and are now losing touch with reality.

    Lord Robertson told a startled Washington that the “forces of darkness” are getting ready to celebrate a Yes vote.

    The “forces of darkness”!

    Darth Vader, Ming the Merciless, the Klingons and Lex Luthor must all be watching the campaign closely.

    The Daleks though are not so happy.

    Word has reached them that Dr Who is to be banned from an independent Scotland.

    That’s the no campaign – totally laughable and completely ludicrous.

    There is though this serious point.

    We are engaged in a consensual constitutional process which will be decided at the ballot box. Not a unique process – but rare in this world – and something which should be cherished.

    The referendum in Scotland is being held up to the world as an example of best practice. We should do everything in our power to keep it that way and each and every one of us carries that individual responsibility.

    A people exercising their right to self-determination in a lawful, agreed, respectful, democratic manner is not a threat but a noble thing.

    The Yes campaign is positive, uplifting, hopeful and must always stay that way.

    That is the basis on which we will win this referendum and our country’s independence.

    There was something else that caught my eye in the report of that Shetland debate.

    It was this passage:

    “Local architect Iain Malcolmson said he had never been an SNP voter but would vote yes in September.

    “Half his family are Geordies, and on a recent trip south for his grandmother’s 90th birthday he had asked for their views.”

    Their response: “Of course you should vote yes.”

    This touches on a fundamental truth.

    Many people who have never voted for our party will be voting Yes.

    This referendum is not about this Party, or this First Minister, or even the wider Yes campaign.

    It’s about putting Scotland’s future in Scotland’s hands.

    A Yes vote in September is not a vote for an SNP government in 2016.

    It’s a vote for a government in Scotland that the people of Scotland choose, pursuing policies the people of Scotland support.

    A government in control of tax, the economy, social security, employment, immigration, oil and gas revenues, European policy and a range of other areas currently under Westminster control.

    That may be the SNP. It may be Labour. It may be a coalition.

    I tell you what it won’t be.

    It won’t be a government led by a party with just a single MP in Scotland.

    A government dismantling our welfare state.

    Privatising public services.

    In an independent Scotland we can give this guarantee:

    The era of Tory Governments unelected by the people of Scotland handing out punishment to the poor and the disabled will be gone and gone for good.

    The Westminster establishment is fighting hard to maintain its grip on Scotland.

    David Cameron’s government has produced edict after edict opposing independence.

    Members of the House of Lords have given us their unelected, distilled, wisdom from beneath their ermine robes.

    All of it designed to tell Scots how impossibly difficult it would be to run our own country.

    Backed up all the way by a Labour Party leadership that has totally lost its way.

    That has lost touch with the values of Labour voters.

    That supports illegal wars, a cuts commission to roll back the gains of devolution and the Tory assault on social security.

    Independence will be good for Scottish Labour.

    The Labour Party, freed from Westminster control, will have the chance to return to its core values: many of which we in this party agree with and share.

    But there is something the Scottish National Party will never agree to – will never be a part of.

    Something we will campaign against with every fibre of our being.

    The leadership of the Labour Party are hand in glove with the Tories in a shameful attempt to run Scotland and its people down.

    Let us look at the reality.

    Scotland’s contribution to mankind has been immense.

    Great enlightenment philosophers.

    Our commitment to science and medical advancement.

    Innovators, industrialists, educators and inventors.

    I’m just back from Scotland Week in New York. There is enormous interest in Scotland – huge profile. It helped us gain over a thousand jobs this week alone.

    In the opinion of American historians, Scotland ”invented the modern world” – something we wouldn’t claim for ourselves but don’t mind repeating as often as possible!

    But still today in modern Scotland:

    More top universities, per head, than any other country.

    A hot bed of life sciences.

    Brilliance in creative industries.

    A world-class food and drink industry.

    Manufacturers exporting across the world.

    25 per cent of Europe’s off-shore wind and tidal potential.

    60 per cent of the EU’s oil reserves.

    A Government 100 per cent committed to building a better future.

    We will not let anyone tell the people of Scotland that we’re not good enough to run our own country.

    Friends,

    A short distance from this conference centre is a vibrant, busy harbour.

    It’s full of vessels servicing Scotland’s thriving oil and gas industry.

    They will be here for many decades to come.

    The oil – and the tax revenue – will continue to flow.

    What a shock this scene must be for the opponents of independence.

    In the 1970s they said No to self-government because they told us the oil would all be gone by now.

    In the 1980s they said No even though the Tories were laying waste to our steel industry, car industry and coal mines.

    In the 1990s the doom-sayers were still saying No because they said we weren’t capable of running our schools and hospitals.

    Delegates,

    Scotland’s has got what it takes.

    Our Parliament working together, introduced free personal care for the elderly.

    We’ve passed world-leading climate change legislation.

    And this party in government has restored free education.

    We’ve kept Scottish Water in public hands.

    And there is no better example of why decisions about Scotland are best taken in Scotland than the future of our National Health Service.

    At Westminster the NHS is being softened up for privatisation.

    The Tories are forcing through a costly, confusing and harmful top-down re-organisation.

    Nurses are being denied the pay rise they deserve.

    Scotland has gone down a better route.

    We reject the free market in health.

    We’ve abolished prescription charges.

    And nurses in Scotland are getting their recommended pay-rise.

    Let us be absolutely clear conference.

    It is because we have control of the health service we can give this pledge : Scotland’s NHS will never be up for sale.

    Scotland is a wealthy country. We more than pay our way.

    As an independent nation we would be the 14th richest country in the developed world.

    The UK are 18th.

    Is anyone seriously meant to believe that the 14th most prosperous country in the developed world cannot sustain itself as an independent country?

    Of course they don’t, which is why the ratings agency Standard & Poors – not known for their unbridled optimism on any country’s prospects – said in February:

    “Even excluding North Sea output……. Scotland would qualify for our highest economic assessment.”

    And so in September the people of this wealthy country will face a choice between two futures.

    One future is to put our faith in Westminster.

    In a system where the five richest families own more wealth than the poorest 12 and a half million people.

    Where charities are warning of a “poverty storm engulfing Scotland.”

    Where families with children need emergency food aid.

    Delegates,

    These aren’t reasons to put our faith in the Westminster system.

    These are reasons to get rid of the Westminster system.

    All of us campaigning for Yes know an independent Scotland won’t get every decision right.

    There will be choices to be made and challenges to face.

    The point is to be equipped with the powers we need to meet those challenges.

    Not to shrug our shoulders and accept Scotland as a region of a grossly unequal country.

    But to take responsibility.

    To build a more resilient economy.

    To create jobs and opportunities.

    We can do this by capturing a sense of shared national purpose, a shared national mission to build a fairer and more prosperous country.

    By giving our companies a competitive edge in taxation, by reindustrialising Scotland and by building a lasting social partnership.

    But more than anything: whether we succeed or fail in our ambition will be down to one factor: the talents and abilities of our people.

    So the days of wasting talent and denying opportunity must end.

    And yet charities tell us up to 100,000 more Scottish children are set to grow up in poverty because of the Westminster government’s actions.

    So we will stop the poverty-creating policies.

    The minimum wage will rise at least in line with inflation.

    And in the first year of an independent Scotland we will abolish the bedroom tax.

    To release potential of all of the people we must do more.

    That is why we will put into action our independence plan to transform childcare – a plan put to me first by the late Professor Ailsa McKay of Glasgow Caledonian University whose motto is “For the Common Weal” – and a woman who was passionate in her belief that independence could change Scotland for the better.

    We will start the process by transferring money from

    Westminster’s priorities to Scotland’s priorities.

    We will save £50 million a year because we won’t be paying for the House of Lords, sending MPs to the Commons or funding the Scotland Office.

    In a time of tight resources we do not believe it is right to go ahead with David Cameron’s married couples tax allowance: a policy that discriminates against widows, single parent families and which only benefits one-third of married couples.

    For us, childcare for all families is the priority: not tax breaks for a few.

    And we will have another priority.

    Spending £100 billion over a generation on a new generation of nuclear weapons is obscene.

    We give this cast iron guarantee.

    A Yes vote on September 18th is a vote to remove these weapons of mass destruction from Scotland once and for all.

    This then is what we mean by a choice between two futures.

    Westminster wants to renew a weapons system that can destroy the world.

    In an independent Scotland we will build a system of childcare that will be the envy of the world.

    Let me tell you why this is so important.

    It is about changing the destiny of Scotland’s poorest children.

    Early years’ education and childcare benefits the most – those families who have the least.

    For many parents, childcare costs can be crippling.

    These costs are a barrier to work, the real route out of poverty.

    With devolution we are investing more than a quarter of a billion pounds over the next two years to expand childcare.

    But to transform childcare, we need the powers of independence.

    Some people say that it could be done under devolution. But under devolution nearly 90 per cent of the tax generated on women’s employment earnings go straight to the Westminster Exchequer not to Scotland.

    In an independent Scotland, with control of our budget, our resources and taxation, we can invest far more in our children’s future.

    High quality universal childcare and early learning – for all of Scotland’s children, that’s the independence pledge.

    Delegates,

    Transforming childcare will open up opportunities for many more women in Scotland.

    But our ambitions must go further.

    An equal opportunity to join the workforce – and an equal opportunity within the workforce.

    In an independent Scotland we will want our companies to aspire to at least 40 per cent female participation on their boards.

    And we will have the power to enforce the Equal Pay Act.

    This issue of equality, of equal opportunities, is of the highest importance.

    Shona Robison is the minister in charge of equality in the Scottish Government so today I have asked Shona to join the Scottish Cabinet as a full member and to also take on a specific brief on pensioners’ rights.

    The Scotland we are seeking to build will be an equal Scotland.

    A Scotland where everyone has the opportunity to make the most of their talents.

    Youth unemployment is the single biggest challenge we face in meeting that goal.

    The Scottish Government is working hard to tackle this blight of joblessness among the young.

    25,000 Modern Apprenticeships, working with the voluntary sector, and the guarantee of work or training place for every 16-19 year old.

    Sir Ian Wood’s Commission is producing exciting proposals which will align our education and training systems ever closer to the work place.

    This work has been overseen by Angela Constance as the only Minister for Youth Employment in Europe.

    Today I have also asked Angela to become a full member of the Scottish Cabinet and to take full policy responsibility for work training and the implementation of the Wood Commission.

    These appointments underline our commitment to equality, to pensioners and to helping the young people of Scotland into the workplace.

    And, subject to Parliamentary approval, with these two outstanding ministers in the Scottish Cabinet, we practice what we preach.

    The Cabinet is our board as a country and women will make up 40% of the members of the Scottish Cabinet.

    In this speech I have stressed that an independent Scotland will be an inclusive Scotland.

    There are many different colours and threads woven in to the Scottish tartan and we celebrate them all.

    We need to mobilise all the talents and the potential of all of our people.

    And we have to reflect that in how we will proceed after September the 18th , in the approach we will take to bring Scotland together as we prepare to move forward.

    With a Yes vote on September 18, that work will begin.

    An all-party “Team Scotland” negotiating group, including non-SNP members will be convened.

    It will secure expertise from across the political spectrum and beyond and indeed from Scotland and beyond.

    That group will begin negotiations with Westminster before the end of September.

    The discussions will be held in accordance with the principles of the Edinburgh Agreement.

    That means with respect and in the interests of everyone in Scotland and indeed the rest of the UK.

    The campaigning rhetoric will be over. The real work will begin.

    And in March 2016 Scotland will become an independent country and join the international family of nations.

    Delegates,

    Last week as the great life of Margo MacDonald was celebrated, many pictures were posted showing Margo out campaigning for independence down the years.

    In one, which is on the cover of Holyrood Magazine, a young

    Margo was outside the old Royal High School in Edinburgh, holding a big poster of a loveheart with the words: “Yes, We Love you Scotland.”

    In this referendum debate we often hear that same sentiment.

    For some it will be a love of the astounding natural beauty of our country.

    The rich diversity of the life and the landscape.

    But our cause is about more than the landscape, the history and the legends, no matter how romantic or moving.

    The historian J D Mackie once wrote of Scotland’s significance and vitality as a human community.

    That’s what the campaign for Scottish independence is about.

    Our human community.

    I think that it what it was for Margo. She didn’t just love Scotland. She loved Scots. She loved people.

    And she held the unshakable conviction that we can do better for and by our people.

    And this referendum will be won when we, as a people, no longer feel the need to ask of others: “tell me what will happen to us.”

    It will be won when we, as the people of Scotland say: “ We are going to take our future into our own hands.”

    The eyes of the world will be on Scotland in September – watching, intently, to see how we will vote.

    When the polls are closed and the voting has been done, let’s resolve this.

    Let’s keep the eyes of the world on Scotland.

    Not to see how we are voting but to watch in admiration at what we will be building.

    Building a new and better Scotland.

    Let’s take all our ideals, all our talent, all our commitment and our energy.

    Let us build a nation that carries itself with pride and humility in equal measure.

    That looks to its own but which gives of itself to the world as much as it possibly can.

    Which yields to no one in compassion and to no-one in ambition.

    And that, come independence day, walks tall among the nations of the Earth – on that day, and on every day thereafter.

    This is our moment.

    To be a beacon of hope.

    A land of achievement.

    Our country, our Scotland.

    Our independence.

  • Alex Salmond – 2013 Speech to SNP Conference

    alexsalmond

    Below is the text of the speech made by the Scottish First Minister, Alex Salmond, to the 2013 SNP Spring Conference.

    A week is indeed a long time in politics.

    On Thursday we announced the date of the independence referendum – Scotland’s date with destiny.

    My advisers told me that within a few minutes of making the announcement, I was “trending” in Edinburgh and Glasgow.

    Delegates, I was so disappointed – at first I thought they said I was “trendy” in Edinburgh and Glasgow!

    Well friends. Meet cool Eck fae Buchan.

    On 18 September 2014 we will have the opportunity to ensure that decisions about Scotland are taken by the people who care most about Scotland – the people who live and work here.

    Few nations and very few generations are fortunate enough to make such an important decision – we are in every sense  the lucky ones.

    It’s a vote for the people of Scotland – every citizen aged 16 up – and rightly so.  But do not underestimate the positive lesson to the wider world of a nation deciding its future by debate and democracy.

    It was former President of Ireland, Mary McAleese, who last October described Scotland’s referendum as a “remarkable and wonderful phenomenon”.

    Whether you are Yes, No – or like many at this stage a Dinnae Ken – we can all be proud that our nation is embarked on such an exciting journey in an impeccably democratic way.

    The 18th September 2014 is the day when every one of us will be asked to take the future of our country into our hands.

    And for years to come people will be asked to say by friends, neighbours, children and grandchildren to say how they voted on that day.

    And when that question comes, as come it will, let us make sure that each one of us can proudly say YES.

    I was one of those who voted by majority for a new future for Scotland.

    Friends, this party has never wavered from our commitment to trust the people to decide the issue of independence.

    While the Westminster parties ganged up to block a referendum in the last parliament – when the SNP were a minority – we held fast to Scotland’s democratic rights.

    THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE SCOTTISH PEOPLE IS IN OUR DNA.

    This moment – Scotland’s moment – was the life-work of dedicated servants of Scotland such as the much-missed Jimmy Halliday.  When Jimmy led our party in the 1950s, a referendum to achieve an independent Scotland was just a dream  – but one he never wavered from.

    And the work of Jimmy and countless thousands others has made their dream our  reality – we thank them now, and will thank them best by achieving that Yes vote in the referendum.

    And because we have always trusted the people, I believe they will put their trust in the Yes campaign on the 18th of September next year – and vote with those of us who want to build a prosperous economy and a just society.

    Next year will be a huge year for Scotland not just for politics but for a range of events which will focus the attention of the planet on our country – the Commonwealth Games, the Ryder Cup, the second Homecoming Year.

    We will make sure that each of these events is a success for Scotland, but we also wish to see them as a catalyst for positive change.

    Exactly a year ago  I announced the establishment of a £10 million fund to help local communities bring sports facilities across Scotland into the 21st century.

    This year we are going further adding another £7 million to this initiative, meaning that over 80 projects across Scotland will be completed in good time for the Commonwealth Games.

    So whether its snowsports in Midlothian (for which there is plenty of raw material), Olympic swimming pools in Dundee and Aberdeen, 3G pitches in Dumfries and Galloway, or the outdoor community facility in Aviemore these facilities will provide real benefits.

    OUR AIM IS TO INSPIRE SCOTS YOUNG AND OLD TO SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITY PRESENTED BY THE COMMONWEALTH GAMES TO BECOME A BETTER NATION.  

    Friends – it is said that to govern is to choose but even more fundamental than that is to choose how you are governed.

    That choice – THE REAL CHOICE – becomes clearer by the day – the opportunity to use our vast resources and talent to build a better country, or to continue with a Westminster system that simply isn’t working for Scotland – a system which has not worked in the past, is not working now and will not work in the future..

    Take the big issues debated in the Scottish Parliament last week – they illustrate exactly why an independent Scotland is the right choice.

    It is ten years since the Scottish Parliament first debated the Iraq war – when a catalogue of deception by a Labour Prime Minister – a Labour Prime Minister – led the UK into an illegal conflict that came at enormous human cost.

    Almost 5,000 allied soldiers – 179 from the UK – and well over 100,000 Iraqi civilians lost their lives as a result of a foreign policy disaster which made Suez look like a picnic in the sun.

    Now when our brave service men and women are sent into danger, we have a duty to give them our full support – and we have an equal duty to discuss the reasons why.  The people who elected us to public office expect nothing less.

    However, the No campaign parties in the Scottish Parliament actually tried to gag us from debating Iraq – Labour even claimed it was not a real issue.

    Try telling the families who have lost a loved one to the war in Iraq that this is not a ‘real issue’.  Try telling them it should be airbrushed away.

    The reality of the situation is that our opponents want to avoid confronting their demons, because they know they backed an illegal war based on a lie – the myth of weapons of mass destruction.

    In the Scottish Parliament, there are still 8 of the Tory MSPs and 15 Labour MSPs who voted for the Iraq war – including their leader.

    11 of the Scottish Labour MPs who voted for the war are still in the House of Commons – including No campaigner in chief, Alistair Darling.

    Another 10 have even been ‘elevated’ – if that is the right word – to the House of Lords.

    Labour and the Tories, Tories and Labour – they were wrong together about the Iraq war 10 years ago.

    And they should apologise together now.

    Friends, the imposition of the Poll Tax by Margaret Thatcher persuaded the majority of people that we needed a parliament with the powers to stop such divisive social experiments being visited upon Scotland.

    Instead of being just a good idea, a parliament became necessary if we were to protect Scotland’s social fabric, and ensure that domestic policy reflected the will of the people.

    Tony Blair’s legacy is to demonstrate why Scotland needs to go further.  The catastrophe of Iraq shows why our parliament needs to have the powers of independence – so that never again can Scotland be dragged into an illegal war on false pretences.

    I’m certain that the lie that led to Iraq would not have been perpetrated by the government of an independent Scotland, of any political persuasion. But we have to be absolutely certain.

    Other countries – including Denmark, the Netherlands and Ireland – have constitutional guarantees that they will not go to war without a proper process of parliamentary approval, and a similar such undertaking could be written into the constitution of an independent Scotland.

    Friends, I believe it should be – indeed it has to be to demonstrate that our new Scotland is something worth voting for.

    That is part of the WHY of independence.

    The US/UK invasion of Iraq was about non-existent weapons of mass destruction.

    But delegates, there are real weapons of mass destruction. Weapons Inspectors  would have had no problem finding them in Scotland.

    Just one hundred and fifty miles from here the Trident missile system is based on the Clyde Estuary, just along the road from our most populous city, with an estimated cost for its renewal of up to one hundred billion pounds.

    Trident was conceived by the Tories, presided over by Labour just as Polaris before it was conceived by Labour and presided over by the Tories.

    The process of its renewal for another 50 years – another half century – is happening under a Tory/Lib Dem coalition supported by Labour.

    Trident is Westminster’s ultimate vanity obscenity but now is entirely dependent on next year’s vote.

    Because, delegates, it’s now clear that the only way, the only way, we can finally remove these weapons of mass destruction is with a Yes vote for independence.

    THAT IS ALSO PART OF THE WHY OF INDEPENDENCE.

    Friends, I’m proud to lead a Government that has made the Scottish Parliament work for our people.  That’s why the Scottish Social Attitudes survey showed that 71 per cent of people trust Holyrood to act in Scotland’s best interests – four-times more than trust Westminster.

    In the face of appalling financial pressures, we have have chosen a different path from Westminster – a path that reflects Scotland’s social democratic consensus, our shared progressive values, our priorities as a society.

    On all the key domestic issues Scotland trumps Westminster.

    Down south, the UK Government’s own figures reveal that England will see a 16,000 reduction in the number of police officers.  And to compound this, the starting wage of new officers has been reduced.

    South of the Border the thin blue line has just got a lot thinner.

    In contrast, the SNP government has delivered and protected 1,000 extra police officers on our streets.  A great achievement – and one that Labour said would take us 13 years!

    Just next week, Scotland’s new national police force comes into place, along with Scotland’s new national fire and rescue service.

    Friends this Government will always value the work of our emergency services – the people who have been mobilised all of last night helping our fellow citizens.

    It is our approach to front line policing which has delivered not only a 37-year low in recorded crime but also a fall in the fear of crime that causes such misery.

    That’s why Scotland’s Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill gets cheered to the rafters at the Police Federation conference.  And why his Tory counterpart at Westminster gets booed off the stage.

    On health, Scotland continues to protect frontline health spending, despite the Westminster cuts and the huge pressures on our budget.

    Prescription charges – the tax on the sick – have been abolished in Scotland, even as they rise to £7.85 in England.

    We have record patient satisfaction with our health service, the job our health professionals do, often in difficult circumstances.

    We have maintained a genuine National Health Service in Scotland – free at the point of need – even as the NHS is being fragmented and privatised south of the Border, first under Labour and then by the Tories.

    Professor Don Berwick is a world-renowned expert on patient safety, David Cameron’s new ‘health tsar’, and a former adviser to President Obama.  This is what he says about the strength of the Scottish system:

    “The Scottish Patient Safety Programme marks Scotland as a leader, second to no nation on earth, in its commitment to reducing harm to patients, dramatically and continually.”

    That must always be our goal, in every aspect of our health service and national life – ‘second to no nation on earth’.

    FOUR YEARS AGO AT OUR CONFERENCE WE ANNOUNCED THAT WE WOULD DRIVE OUT THE PRIVATISATION OF CLEANING SERVICES IN THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE.

    Since then healthcare acquired infections have dropped by 80 per cent.

    IS THERE ANY MORE VINDICATION NEEDED OF ALEX NEIL’S DETERMINATION TO HAVE A PUBLICLY RUN NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE FREE AT THE POINT OF NEED.

    The Scottish Parliament does not control the key economic levers but we do have economic powers. We have used them to deliver the best help for the small business sector – the backbone of our economy – available anywhere in these islands.

    We have used them to win more jobs from inward investment compared to any other part of these islands – including London.

    And we now have lower unemployment – including youth unemployment – than the UK as a whole.

    One year ago youth unemployment was almost 25 per cent as young people bore the brunt of the Labour/Tory recession.

    Then we appointed Scotland’s first Minister for Youth Employment, gathered together our stakeholders from the STUC and from business, almost doubled the number of apprenticeships, focussed college courses on full time preparation for employment, introduced the youth guarantee for 16-19 year olds.

    What has been the result?

    In one year youth unemployment has gone down by one third, from 103,000 to 68,000.  Still far too high, but a dramatic difference to the lives of thousands of youngsters.

    ON THIS WEEK’S FIGURES ALL OF THE UK FALL OF 34,000 OVER THE YEAR IN YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT TOOK PLACE IN SCOTLAND.

    FRIENDS  WHAT A DEMONSTRATION OF THE WORK OF ANGELA CONSTANCE AS SCOTLAND’S MINISTER FOR YOUTH EMPLOYMENT.

    We cannot allow these successes to be blown away in an eternal economic winter of Westminster austerity.

    This week’s Westminster Budget is following a familiar pattern, fizz on the day, a hangover the day after.

    Even the fizz only lasted until we found they had swiped another £50 million from the Scottish Budget for this coming year, without so much as a by your leave.

    But there is much more bad news in this Budget. Analysis by the Institute of Fiscal Studies shows that from 2016 the Westminster Budget means either £500 tax rises for every family or further cuts in public services which they describe as “eye watering”.

    That is the grim future for Scottish families under Westminster rule.

    And would there be a different prospectus from Labour? – not a chance.

    At Westminster they dance to the Tory tune. In Scotland they are preparing to rip up the social gains of devolution.

    This week was one of Labour abstention in votes in Holyrood and Westminster.

    They abstained on the war, they abstained on Trident, they abstained on bus passes, they even abstained on workfare at Westminster.

    LABOUR – THE GREAT ABSTAINERS ON EVERYTHING – EXCEPT MINIMUM PRICING FOR ALCOHOL WHICH THEY OPPOSED!

    The SNP offer a different future.

    At Holyrood we will defend the social gains – policies such as free personal care and bus passes for our older folk – who have paid their taxes, powered our economy, raised the children, and deserve something back from society.  That is what it means to be a society.

    AND THE ROCKS WILL MELT WITH THE SUN BEFORE WE ALLOW TORY OR LABOUR TO TAKE AWAY THE RIGHT TO FREE EDUCATION IN SCOTLAND.

    Delegates, the Yes campaign is predicated on the compelling truth that decisions about Scotland are best made by the people who live and work here. That was once a theory, but is now an indisputable fact.

    Since the restoration of our parliament in 1999, we have demonstrated that in law & order, health, education, business support, and the great social services of Scotland – our parliament delivers the policies that are right for Scotland, and reflect the views and votes of the people.

    That is the very prize and purpose of self-government.

    And if it is true in these devolved areas, it is equally true in all areas of public life.

    That is the prize and purpose of an independent Scotland.

    With each passing day it becomes clearer that the Westminster system is not fit for any purpose – it is further away than ever from Scotland’s values, and past its time.

    The iniquitous Bedroom Tax is the latest example – in a House of Commons debate led by the SNP and Plaid Cymru, over 90 per cent of Scottish MPs voted against it.

    We know from Scottish Government research that the extra costs the Bedroom Tax impose on the Scottish economy will outweigh any savings the UK Government makes – even before we factor in the wider social costs and the distress and disruption it will cause.

    But still it is imposed on Scotland.  And to add insult to injury, the architect of this  shambles – Iain Duncan Smith – has to be dragged kicking and screaming to deign to defend his policy to a committee of the Scottish Parliament.

    Friends this is an iniquitous, unfair, anti-family imposition conceived because of runaway rent levels in the south.

    WHY SHOULD PEOPLE WHO WOULD IMPOSE SUCH INIQUITY HAVE ANY POWER AND AUTHORITY OVER THE SCOTTISH PEOPLE.

    Friends we have acted to mitigate the worst impacts of welfare changes. Acting with COSLA we have sheltered hundreds of thousands of families from council tax rises, we have established loan funds, increased support for advice centres.

    And today I can announce that all SNP-led local authorities will follow the lead of Dundee in halting the threat of evictions from this disgraceful tax for those struggling to pay.

    However what Scotland needs is not mitigation but power, not just a defence against Westminster but a removal of Westminster authority over Scotland.

    Delegates last year I made a speech pointing out the opportunities to grow the Scottish economy with control over our taxation policy. No-one in this world owes Scotland a living, every policy we articulate needs to focus on our competitiveness as a country.

    That is part of the WHY of Independence.

    Today I want to illustrate why social change can also release the untapped potential of Scotland and make us not just a prosperous economy but a just society and why these concepts go hand in hand – a prosperous economy and a just society.

    Last week the unemployment figures showed Scots unemployment below the UK average. However look behind these figures and see a glaring inequality which holds the nation back.

    66% of women are in employment compared to 76% of men.

    Now that is not down to lack of talent. Women now make up 55 per cent of entrants into higher education and the number of Modern Apprenticeship starts for women has increased from 27 per cent to 43 per cent.

    But in terms of lower numbers of women in employment it really doesn’t have to be like that. Elsewhere in Europe the gender gap is much much less.

    If we closed the opportunity gap we would add to our national wealth and to our taxation base by mobilising the skills of women into our workforce.

    But there would be another change – a fundamental opportunity to improve the life chances of many of our children.

    We have long cherished the ambition to increase pre-school education.  In our first term, we moved it from 412 to 475 free nursery hours per annum, benefiting 100,000 children a year.

    And last year I announced a step further – a statutory guarantee of over 600 hours of free nursery education for every 3 and 4 year old, and for every looked after 2 year old in our land.

    This is a statement of faith and commitment to the future and it is being carried forward without the fears of lower standards now prevalent in the south of the border.

    Flexible in its delivery, using the wisdom of the Early Years Taskforce to help us, but definite in our intent.

    For every young mum and dad juggling work and parenthood, this SNP Government is here for you and your family.

    This is what we can achieve with a devolved Parliament.  But devolution can only take Scotland so far.  We don’t have the financial freedom to give us the biggest bang for our buck – to invest in areas where Scotland could make huge social and economic strides.

    So let us consider what more we could achieve in an independent Scotland.

    I HAVE ASKED THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS TO PRODUCE AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT ON SCOTLAND MOVING TO THE LEVELS OF SUPPORT FOR CHILDCARE COMMONPLACE ACROSS EUROPEAN COUNTRIES.

    Our ambitions for childcare are the hallmark of our approach to social and economic policy – we promote the measures we do because they advance both our economy and our society.

    Some argue there is a contradiction between the two, but the reality is that a progressive social policy boosts the economy, and a dynamic economy enables us to build the fairer society we want.  Each is the handmaiden of the other.

    It will not be done in a day, or a year, or even completed in the first term of an independent parliament.

    But I believe a transformational shift towards childcare should be one of the first tasks of an independent Scotland.

    That too is part of the why of independence.

    Friends ours is a noble cause because we are arguing for the rights and responsibilities, not of ourselves, but of our country.

    We are arguing for something bigger than any individual, any party, any campaign –the benefits of which will endure for generations to come.

    The biggest advantage of the Yes campaign is that we put no limits on the abilities of this nation to build prosperity and wellbeing for all the people.

    The biggest problem for the No campaign is their fear and scorn of a Scotland aspiring to equality of status among the nations of the world.

    Our opponents in the No campaign will say and do anything to keep Scotland where they think it should be.

    In terms of GDP per head, right now an independent Scotland would be the 8th wealthiest country in the league table of the world’s most developed nations.

    If the No campaign believe Scotland doesn’t have what it takes to be an independent country, they must think that only the 7 countries above Scotland can be independent – and the UK wouldn’t be one of them, because it trails at number 17 overtaken this year once again by Iceland!

    Delegates, our opponents often say we cannot afford to be independent.  I say Scotland can’t afford NOT to be independent.

    To listen to the No campaign, they’d have you believe that a new generation of Trident nuclear weapons on the Clyde was a fantastic asset – and having generations of oil and gas revenues to come was a big problem!

    That is the looking glass fantasy they want Scotland to believe.

    But the people aren’t daft – they know that Scottiish energy resources are the asset, Trident is the problem, and Westminster the liability.

    Combining the natural and human resources of Scotland is the way to fairness and prosperity.

    Our call for the 18th of September next year is one to optimism and progress.

    There was a referendum once when Scotland was cheated out of our right to self-government.

    Listen to just this one example – among the tirade of scare stories – used to frighten people into voting No to self-government in 1979.  It was a Daily Express editorial 10 days before the referendum:

    “How much of Scotland’s economy will be left intact if a Scottish Assembly gets the go-ahead on March 1?  Will our coal mines go gaily on?  Will Ravenscraig or Linwood thrive?  Will Bathgate flourish and Dounreay prosper?”

    No assembly came in 1979 – and every plant and facility listed by the Express closed under Westminster-rule – all gone, every one.

    We will not be conned again.

    We achieved a Parliament in 1997 – overcoming a welter of scaremongering in a referendum.  And we have never looked back.  The latest survey shows that only 6% of Scots want to turn the clock back to having no parliament.

    It will be exactly the same with independence.

    All of the things they say about independence now were said about devolution then.  And we know they were wrong, because as a nation we have proved them wrong together these past 14 years.

    We can now look back and say that thanks to having a parliament, Scotland has a National Health Service worthy of the name, free education for young Scots, and personal care for our older citizens.

    None of these things exist south of the Border, and none would exist in Scotland today without self-government.

    I believe in ten years time we will look back and say that thanks to independence we will have a thriving economy, a welfare state worthy of the name, the best childcare system anywhere in these islands, and the obscenity of Trident nuclear weapons on the Clyde will be but a distant memory.

    Friends, the referendum for an independent Scotland is a precious opportunity – one given to no previous generation.  We do not know if we will pass this way again.

    I believe Scotland will vote Yes next September – and give a renewed purpose to this old nation.

    A ‘new sang’ to sound a better Scotland.

  • Alex Salmond – 2013 New Year’s Speech

    alexsalmond

    Below is the text of the news release relating to the speech made by Alex Salmond to mark 2013.

    The First Minister’s New Year message highlighted the restoration of free higher education as an example of the kind of difference that could be made in areas such as social security and foreign affairs following the referendum in 2014.

    Following the abolition of graduate endowment fees in 2007, Scotland’s colleges and universities have seen record numbers of Scots, English and overseas students studying higher education, while the number of people accepted into Scottish universities has increased again this year.

    In his message, recorded at the University of Aberdeen’s ‘magnificent’ new Sir Duncan Rice Library, Mr Salmond recalled that one of the Scottish Government’s very first decisions, in 2007, was to restore Scotland’s “centuries-old tradition of free education” as he asked people across the country to consider the position if Scotland had had to follow the same route as the rest of the UK.

    He added: “The results of this are now plain to see. This year, people accepted into Scottish universities have increased. And we’ve record numbers of Scottish, English and overseas students studying higher education at our Scottish colleges and universities. In contrast, the prospect of sky-high tuition fees in England has seen acceptances for universities there sinking like a stone, with tens of thousands of youngsters being denied their life opportunity.

    “Now this contrast between what is happening here and what isn’t happening there has only been made possible because it is the Scottish Parliament which runs Scottish education. But let’s imagine what would happen if we didn’t control education or if, as some people suggest, we imposed English-style tuition fees. Numbers at our universities would collapse. We would be mortgaging our own country’s future.

    “And just as the Scottish Parliament has restored free education, so it offers security to our old people with free personal care and protects us all by keeping vital public services, like health and water, in public hands. It is what makes it worthwhile to have our own Parliament and it is why the Scottish Parliament is now trusted by almost four times the number of people who trust Westminster.”

    The First Minister invited Scots to consider how they might vote if the referendum in 2014 was for an independent Scotland to give up its independence and hand over powers in areas like welfare or foreign affairs to the Westminster Parliament in London. Those arguing for such a move would be pursuing “mission impossible” and would be “laughed at from Gretna Green to Dunnet Head,” Mr Salmond continued.

    “This New Year the joke’s on us – because that is exactly the position that we have in Scotland right now. But in 2014 we will all have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to do something about it.”

    “This Scottish Government has a positive vision of the future of this country. We can build a new independent nation. It is a vision of a country that earns its wealth and shares it more fairly. A country confident in itself and its place in the world. A country which makes the most of its natural resources. And a country where everyone gets a fair shout and a decent chance. In the meantime, as we work towards that future, let me wish each and everyone of you a happy and prosperous New Year.”

  • Alex Salmond – 2011 Speech on Scotland’s Future

    alexsalmond

    Below is the text of the speech made by Alex Salmond, the Scottish First Minister, on 22nd October 2011.

    Firstly Scotland has many friends internationally. People cheering us on and wanting us to do well.  That international reach is a great asset for this country.

    Secondly climate change is perhaps the greatest issue facing this planet. The responsibility of the Scottish Parliament for it is almost accidental. It wasn’t even on the agenda back in 1997 and therefore wasn’t specified as reserved in the Scotland Act. As a result it was devolved.

    So given that by international acclaim we have handled this mighty issue so well as a parliament, what possible argument could there be that the Scottish Parliament is not capable of discharging ALL of the issues facing the Scottish people.

    I also wanted to say a word about Scotland’s late national poet Eddie Morgan. A man whose modesty as an individual was matched by his brilliance as a poet. He didn’t wear his politics on  his sleeve but he has left this party a financial legacy which is transformational in its scope, and Angus Robertson will spell that out tomorrow..

    However his real legacy is to the world in his body of work.

    Eddie Morgan once told our Parliament:

    “We give you our deepest dearest wish to govern well, don’t say we have no mandate to be so bold.”

    Delegates by your applause let us salute our Makar Edwin Morgan.

    When I was cutting my teeth in politics in West Lothian the late Billy Wolfe once told me that the SNP stood for two things – independence for Scotland and home rule for Bo’ness!

    In reality the SNP does stand for two fundamental aims – and these are enshrined in our constitution – independence for Scotland and also the furtherance of all Scottish interests.

    These are our guiding lights and they are equally important because they reflect the reality that our politics are not just constitutional but also people based.

    I tried to reflect this on election night when these self same people, the community of the realm of Scotland presented to us the greatest ever mandate of the devolution era – an absolute majority in a PR system – a system specifically designed to prevent such a thing ever happening

    Mind you it was designed by the Labour Party so we should not be too surprised  that their cunning plan didn’t  work.

    “The best-laid schemes o’ mice an’ Lord George Robertson gang aft agley.”

    What I said on election night was that after almost 80 years we had lived up to the name of one of our founding parties – east, west , south and north.

    WE ARE NOW THE NATIONAL PARTY OF SCOTLAND

    It is a good phrase “the community of the realm”. It was developed in mediaeval Scotland to describe a concept of community identity which was beyond sectional interest.

    The best Scots term for it would be the common weal.

    It does not ignore the fact that sometimes as a Government we have to take sides within Scotland, as well as taking Scotland’s side.Particularly when times are tough we have to ask the rich to help the poor, the strong to help the weak, the powerful to help the powerless.

    But we do so in pursuit of the common weal, the community of the realm.

    We love Scotland but we don’t believe our country is perfect. We seek to make it better.

    We know that in building the new Scotland we must confront our demons from the past like sectarianism and our problems from the present like the abuse of alcohol.

    Some people say tackling these things is unpopular. But the election  told us that the people respect and understand that sometimes it takes guts to govern.

    But we shall always govern for that common weal..

    We govern – we have governed – wisely and will continue to do so.

    We have sheltered the community from the economic storms in so far as it is in our power to do so.

    Our people – our community – face a hugely difficult position – a squeeze between falling incomes and rising prices.

    To help family budgets we have frozen the council tax for FOUR years and will continue to freeze it through this coming parliament.

    Labour say we shouldn’t do this. Really!  And then we would have the same 60 per cent rises as when they were in power. A Council tax rise of £680  for a band D property.

    To help family budgets we have held down water rates.

    The Liberals say that we should privatise water. Really!  And then we would have been  as powerless to act on water bills as they are right now on energy bills.

    To help family budgets we have abolished prescription charges.

    The Tories say we shouldn’t  do this. Really! Tell that to the 600,000 Scots on incomes of only £16,000 who were forced to pay for their medicine.

    Every household bill which is under our influence, we have tried to control.

    Every household bill under UK influence is out of control.

    In Scotland we have a prices and incomes policy.

    In England the Tories control incomes – except of course in the boardroom- but not prices.

    None of these things- the freeze on the Council Tax, the ending of prescription charges, the stability of water bills, are easy.

    They are all difficult.

    BUT THE RECORD SHOWS THAT THE ONLY PARTY AND THE ONLY GOVERNMENT ATTEMPTING TO HOLD DOWN HOUSEHOLD BILLS IS THE SNP GOVERNMENT.

    The unionist parties have lost touch with the people.

    Labour and Tories are parties without a leader. The Liberals have a leader without a party.

    We govern well. They oppose badly.

    IN THE ELECTION THE PEOPLE DECIDED THAT LABOUR WERE NOT FIT FOR GOVERNMENT. RIGHT NOW THEY ARE NOT FIT FOR OPPOSITION.

    Governing well makes a real difference to real people.

    Back in 2007 we said we would put 1000 extra police on the streets and communities of Scotland. Labour said it couldn’t be done.

    But it has been done.

    And the result has been a 35 year low in recorded crime in Scotland. I’ll just repeat that.

    Recorded crime in Scotland is at its lowest since 1976 when Jimmy Carter was elected President of the United States and Jimmy Saville was presenting Top of The Pops.

    Earlier this week a poll showed that peoples FEAR of crime in Scotland was running at almost HALF of the level in the rest of the United Kingdom – 28 per cent against 48 per cent.

    Much of that success is down to the  extra police officers.

    We are the SNP. We believe in freedom.

    But the freedom of people from the fear of being mugged or robbed is a key objective of this Government and the 1000 extra police in the communities of Scotland is a substantial part of achieving that objective.

    LET THERE BE NO MISTAKE. OUR REFORM OF THE POLICE SERVICE IS ABOUT PROTECTING THE FRONT LINE SO THAT THE FRONT LINE CAN PROTECT THE PUBLIC.

    Right now our focus is on jobs and the economy.

    John Swinney and his team spend every waking minute seeking to encourage our own businesses to grow and to attract new companies to Scotland.

    We have the most competitive business tax regime in these islands.

    80,000 small businesses either pay no business rates or have a substantial discount.

    We know, as they do, that their success holds the key to job creation. We will continue to offer that crucial incentive throughout this Parliament.

    LET US BE CLEAR. THE SMALL BUSINESS BONUS STAYS IN SNP RUN SCOTLAND.

    In the last few months a procession of major international companies have chosen Scotland as the place to conduct their business.

    From Amazon, Mitsubishi, Doosan, Gamesa, Vion, Avaloq the message has been the same – Scotland has the people and the resources to allow them to conduct their international operations from a Scottish base.

    And what have the UK Government been concentrating on while we focus on jobs and investment?

    They have formed a Cabinet sub Committee to attack Scottish independence.

    Let’s get this right. Cameron, Clegg, Osborne and Alexander sit in a committee working out how to do down Scotland and they engage in this while the European Monetary system teeters on the brink of collapse, while the jobless total in England is at a 20 year high and inflation more than double its target.

    And these politicians wonder why they carry no confidence among the people of England never mind the people of Scotland.

    OUR MESSAGE TO THIS QUAD OF MINISTERS: STOP ATTACKING SCOTTISH ASPIRATIONS AND START SUPPORTING ECONOMIC RECOVERY.

    We need more capital investment not less, finance for companies and price and job security for the people.

    And what is their grand strategy to restore their flagging political fortunes?  To have more Ministerial day trips to Scotland.

    *CONFERENCE EVERY TORY MINISTER WHO COMES NORTH PUTS ANOTHER 1000 VOTES TOWARDS THE NATIONAL CAUSE.

    Of course these visits to Scotland are selective. Very selective.

    Last week the Prime Minister came to Scotland to hail the billions of investment in the new oil and gas fields off the western approaches.

    However there was no sign of a Prime Ministerial visit this week when his Government betrayed the future of Longannet.

    Over £13 billion from Scotland’s oil and gas in the course of this year but not even a tenth of that to secure the future of the clean coal industry in Scotland.

    Not even one tenth of one year of oil and gas revenues to secure a world lead in planet saving technology.

    MR CAMERON HOW LITTLE YOU UNDERSTAND SCOTLAND

    When he was making the BP announcement David Cameron claimed his geography teacher at Eton had told him that all the oil would be gone by the turn of the century.

    The Prime Minister’s memory is faulty. It wasn’t his geography teacher. It was successive Labour and Tory Governments.

    Like Margaret Thatcher’s Energy Minister who claimed oil was declining in 1980!

    Now the cat is well and truly out of the bag and we know that oil and gas will be extracted from the waters around Scotland for at least the next 40 years.

    Can I therefore put forward this simple proposition.

    After 40 years of oil and gas Westminster had coined in some £300 billion from Scottish water – around £60,000 for every man women and child in the country.

    The Tories’ own  Office of Budget Responsibility figures suggest another  £230 billion of oil revenues over the next 30 years – and that was before the latest announcements.

    LONDON HAS HAD ITS TURN OUT OF SCOTTISH OIL AND GAS.

    LET THE NEXT 40 YEARS BE FOR THE PEOPLE OF SCOTLAND.

    Scotland has the greatest array of energy resources in Europe. Oil, gas, hydro, wave, wind and tidal power and clean coal..

    On Thursday I went to Nigg to announce the redevelopment of that great fabrication site. Once again thousands of jobs can be developed there as marine engineering comes alive in the Highlands.

    Today I am announcing a further important development on our journey to lead the world in wave and tidal power.

    A new £18 million Fund to support marine energy commercialisation.

    This will support the deployment of the first commercial marine arrays and the scaling up of the devices currently on test in Scottish waters.

    And this is part of a £35 million investment over the next three years which will support testing, technology, infrastructure and deployment.

    TODAY SCOTLAND IS LEADING THE RACE TO DEVELOP OFFSHORE RENEWABLES.

    WITH THIS ANNOUNCEMENT, OUR NATION IS MOVING UP ANOTHER GEAR.

    THE MESSAGE IS CLEAR. IN MARINE ENERGY  SCOTLAND RULES THE WAVES.

    Conference, right now some two thirds of wave and tidal projects in Europe are in Scottish waters. That will soon be three-quarters. The announcement by Kawasaki Heavy Industries on Thursday of their intention to test in the Orkney Islands   underlines the international impact that Scotland is now making.

    And as we develop wave and tidal commercially in our waters then we will export that technology across the planet.

    Our objective in wave and tidal power is to have not just demonstration projects but hundreds of mega watts of electricity by 2020 -enough to power  half a million Scottish homes.

    The green re-industrialisation of the coastline of Scotland is central to our vision of the future.

    And the jobs impact will be felt from Machrihanish, to the Clyde, to Leith, to Methil to Dundee to Aberdeen and the North East ports to the Moray Firth, to Nigg and the Highlands, from Orkney waters to Arnish in the Western Isles.

    Onshore wind power has one serious drawback. And that is, only little of the fabrication is home based.

    Despite the fact that the first modern wind turbine was demonstrated in Marykirk Aberdeenshire  in 1887 the technology of the onshore industry was exported to Denmark and Germany more than a generation ago.

    However we can do something about our offshore renewable opportunity.

    Our objective is that Scotland will design, engineer, fabricate, install and maintain the great new machines which will dominate the energy provision of this coming century.

    THAT IS OUR VISION FOR SCOTLAND AND WE SHALL GET THERE.

    And in doing so we will create jobs and opportunity and hope for young people of Scotland.

    It is the inescapable responsibility of this Government and indeed of every adult Scot to help  tackle the scourge of youth unemployment.

    Employment among Scottish youngsters is almost five per cent higher than elsewhere in these islands. We have a near record of school leavers going on to positive destinations of a job, apprenticeship or full time education.

    However this is not enough. Youth unemployment is still far too high.

    So this is what we are doing and this is what we shall do.

    First apprenticeships. There will be 25,000 modern apprenticeships in Scotland – 60 per cent more than when we took office -not just this year but every year – and in Scotland remember every single youngster on a modern apprenticeship is in a job.

    Secondly every major contract or grant from Government will now have an apprenticeship or training plan attached to it. For example when Vion chose Broxburn as their centre of excellence for food production there were 50 modern apprenticeships among the new jobs.

    Thirdly every single youngster who is not in a job or full time education or an apprenticeship will be offered a training opportunity. That is every single 16-19 year old under Opportunities For All.

    Fourthly we shall ensure that university and college education remains free to Scottish students. We now have more world-class universities per head than any other nation on the face of this planet.

    AND THANKS TO THIS PARTY THAT OPPORTUNITY WILL REMAIN AVAILABLE TO YOUNG SCOTS ON THE BASIS OF THE ABILITY TO LEARN NOT THE ABILITY TO PAY.

    AND TODAY I AM ANNOUNCING A FURTHER MOVE. COMPANIES IN ENERGY SECTOR ARE REPORTING SKILL SHORTAGES. THEREFORE OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS WE ARE DELIVERING 2,000 MODERN APPRENTICESHIPS SPECIFICALLY FOR THE ENERGY INDUSTRIES.

    HOWEVER WE WILL ALSO NOW PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 FLEXIBLE TRAINING PLACES FOR ENERGY AND LOW CARBON.

    REAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR YOUNGSTERS IN THE SECTORS WHICH WILL SHAPE THE INDUSTRIAL FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY.

    We cannot wipe every tear from every cheek but we can try. And everything we do will reflect the common weal of Scotland.

    The best way to get people back into work is through capital investment. That is why John Swinney has diverted funds to sustain economic recovery.

    That is why we have created the Scottish Futures Trust to gain value for money. Major contracts sponsored by the Scottish Government are now delivered on time and on budget.

    And this gives me the opportunity to make a further announcement today.

    Two years ago we set out plans for a new school building programme in Scotland.

    Led by the Scottish Futures Trust, our investment was to deliver 55 new schools.

    Already 37 schools have been committed in the first two phases.

    Conference, the Scottish Futures Trust has levelled the playing field in public sector construction contracts. We have sunk the PFI and replaced it with value for money programmes.

    THAT ACTION HAS ALLOWED US TO DELIVER OVER 3O0 NEW OR REFURBISHED SCHOOLS IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS.

    AND THAT’S WHY TODAY I AM ABLE TO TELL YOU THAT THE NEXT PHASE OF OUR NEW SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAMME WILL BE ABLE TO DELIVER 30 NEW SCHOOLS ACROSS OUR NATION.

    A DOZEN MORE THAN PREVIOUSLY PLANNED.

    PROVIDING A FURTHER 15,000 PUPILS WITH 21ST CENTURY LEARNING FACILITIES

    DELEGATES IN THE FACE OF WESTMINSTER CUTBACKS THE £2.5 BILLION NON PROFIT DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMME IS CRUCIAL TO ECONOMIC RECOVERY.

    NONE OF THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE IF WE HAD ALLOWED THE PFI  RIP OFF TO CONTINUE.

    THAT IS WHAT GOOD GOVERNMENT IS ALL ABOUT.

    We face a winter in this energy rich country of ours where people will be frightened to turn on their heating.

    Fuel poverty amid energy plenty. What a miserable, disgraceful Wesminster legacy for our energy rich nation.

    Fuel poverty amid energy plenty. If there ever was an argument for taking control of our own resources then this must be it.

    The Prime Ministers fuel summit was little more than hot air. We don’t control the energy markets but we can and will do something to help.

    WE ALREADY HAVE THE BEST HEATING INITIATIVE IN THESE ISLANDS

    WE HAVE INVESTED ADDITIONAL FUNDS THIS YEAR TO MAKE WHAT IS GOOD, EVEN BETTER

    WE’VE EXPANDED OUR ENERGY ASSISTANCE PACKAGE TO INCLUDE THOUSANDS OF SCOTTISH CARERS.

    AND CONFERENCE, BY 2015 THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT WILL INCREASE OUR FUEL POVERTY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUDGET BY ONE THIRD.

    BECAUSE OF THIS INVESTMENT I AM ABLE TO MAKE A FURTHER ANNOUNCEMENT.

    A FEW MOMENTS AGO YOU HEARD PREMIER RANN OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA  PRAISING OUR OFFER OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES TO HALF A MILION SCOTTISH HOUSEHOLDS.

    I CAN NOW TELL YOU THAT BY APRIL OF NEXT YEAR THAT 500,000 WILL BECOME 700,000.

    ENSURING 200,000 MORE SCOTTISH FAMILIES GET THE HELP THEY NEED TO HEAT THEIR HOMES IN THIS ENERGY RICH COUNTRY.

    Delegates –

    On the way to Inverness I noticed an outdoor company called ‘naelimits’. No limits is a beautiful idea, and somehow it carries more punch in Scots.

    Nae limits to your ambition, your courage, your journey.

    Nae limits sums up the spirit of freedom which many of us take from our magnificent landscape, and which we wish for our society and politics.

    This same spirit was reflected in the words of  Charles Stewart Parnell:

    “No man has the right to fix the boundary of the march of a nation; no man has the right to say to his country, ‘Thus far shall thou go and no further’.”

    No politician, and certainly no London politician, will determine the future of the Scottish nation.

    Mr Cameron should hear this loud and clear.

    The people of Scotland – the sovereign people of Scotland – are now in the driving seat.

    Twenty years ago when Scotland faced a previous Tory Government a cross party group drew up a Claim of Right for Scotland. This is what it said.

    “We do hereby acknowledge the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of government best suited to their needs, and do hereby declare and pledge that in all our actions and deliberations their interests shall be paramount.”

    Twenty years ago we demonstrated for that right in front of an open topped bus in the Meadows in Edinburgh.

    But we had no Parliament then.

    But we have now, and next month I will ask Scotland’s Parliament to endorse anew Scotland’s Claim of Right.

    The point is a simple one.

    THE DAYS OF WESTMINSTER POLITICIANS TELLING SCOTLAND WHAT TO DO OR WHAT TO THINK ARE OVER. THE SCOTTISH PEOPLE WILL SET THE AGENDA FOR THE FUTURE.

    Robert Kennedy once said, ‘the future is not a gift, it is an achievement’.

    That is true for Scotland as for any nation. Our future will be what we make it.

    The Scotland Bill isn’t even enacted yet it lies in the past. Unloved, uninspiring, not even understood by its own proponents.

    The UK Government haven’t even gone through the motions of considering the views of the Scottish Government, the Scottish people, the last Scottish Parliament Committee, the current Scottish Parliament Committee -total negativity to even the most reasonable proposal to strengthen the Bill’s job creating  powers.

    THE RESPECT AGENDA LIES DEAD IN THEIR THROATS.

    This is Westminster’s agenda of disrespect – not of disrespect to the SNP but of fundamental disrespect for Scotland.

    The Tories and their Liberal frontmen have even taken to call themselves Scotland’s other Government. A Tory Scottish Government?

    If Murdo Fraser thought such a notion was conceivable then he would’t be trying to disband the Party!

    In contrast fiscal responsibility, financial freedom, real economic powers is a legitimate proposal. It could allow us to control our own resources, introduce competitive business tax, and fair personal taxation.

    All good, all necessary but not good enough.

    Delegates even with economic powers Trident nuclear missiles would still be on the River Clyde, we could still be forced to spill blood in illegal wars like Iraq, and Scotland would still be excluded from the Councils of Europe and the world.

    THESE THINGS ONLY INDEPENDENCE CAN BRING WHICH IS WHY THIS PARTY WILL CAMPAIGN FULL SQUARE FOR INDEPENDENCE IN THE COMING REFERENDUM

    We have the talent, resources and ingenuity . The only limitations are our imagination and our ambition. So give Scotland the tools, put the people of Scotland in charge and see our nation flourish as never before.

    Let us a build a nation that reflects the values of our people.

    With a social contract – and a social conscience – at the very heart of our success.

    The society, the country, that Scotland desires, that Scotland believes in – it is not a country or a future on offer from the Tory government down south.

    Even that one institution which really made Britain great – the National Health Service,  – is being dismantled in England.

    THE TORIES CALL IT A BIG SOCIETY

    I CALL IT NO SOCIETY AT ALL

    Remember the founding principles.

    We are committed to winning Independence for Scotland.

    And we are pledged to the furtherance of all Scottish interests.

    Both are in our DNA.

    It is who we are and what we are for.

    They are what makes us Scotland’s National Party.

    And it is more than a name – it is an attitude.

    Over these past three days, at this conference, I have seen that passion and belief in action.

    We are a party with a mission, because we know Scotland’s cause is great and we know Scotland’s need is great.

    Let us be strong.

    Let us have our own debate about our own  future on the timescale which was endorsed by the people in May.

    And let us decide it in a proper fashion.

    Our task is to work – to convince the people of this nation that we can do better.

    To work at building a society which is not simply better than today’s, but a beacon of justice and fairness to the world.

    All these things will come from hard work, from toil and from sweat.

    Look around you, look at where we stand.

    And tell me this was easy – it was not.

    This was eighty years of hard work.

    We stand where we do because of generations before us, because of party workers and campaigners who never saw this day.

    And we shall prevail – because we share a vision.

    A vision of a land without boundaries.

    Of a people unshackled from low ambition and poor chances.

    Of a society unlimited in its efforts to be fair and free.

    Of a Scotland unbound.

    Nae limits for Scotland.

  • Alex Salmond – 2011 Acceptance Speech to the Scottish Parliament

    alexsalmond

    Below is the text made by the Scottish First Minister, Alex Salmond, on 18th May 2011.

    When Donald Dewar addressed this parliament in 1999, he evoked Scotland’s diverse voices:

    The speak of the Mearns.

    The shout of the welder above the din of the Clyde shipyard.

    The battle cries of Bruce and Wallace.

    Now these voices of the past are joined in this chamber by the sound of 21st century Scotland.

    The lyrical Italian of Marco Biagi.

    The formal Urdu of Humza Yousaf.

    The sacred Arabic of Hanzala Malik.

    We are proud to have those languages spoken here alongside English, Gaelic, Scots and Doric.

    This land is their land, from the sparkling sands of the islands to the glittering granite of its cities.

    It belongs to all who choose to call it home.

    That includes new Scots who have escaped persecution or conflict in Africa or the Middle East.

    In means Scots whose forebears fled famine in Ireland and elsewhere.

    That is who belongs here but let us be clear also about what does not belong here.

    As the song tells us for Scotland to flourish then “Let us be rid of those bigots and fools. Who will not let Scotland, live and let live.”

    Our new Scotland is built on the old custom of hospitality.

    We offer a hand that is open to all, whether they hail from England, Ireland, Pakistan or Poland.

    Modern Scotland is also built on equality. We will not tolerate sectarianism as a parasite in our national game of football or anywhere else in this society.

    Scotland’s strength has always lain in its diversity. In the poem Scotland Small, Hugh MacDiarmid challenged those who would diminish us with stereotypes.

    Scotland small? he asked.

    Our multiform, our infinite Scotland, small?

    Only as a patch of hillside may be a cliche corner.

    To a fool who cries “Nothing but heather!

    The point is even the smallest patch of hillside contains enormous variation – of bluebells, blaeberries and mosses.

    “So to describe Scotland as nothing but heather is, said MacDiarmid.” Marvellously descriptive!

    “And totally incomplete!”

    To describe Scotland as small is similarly misleading.

    Scotland is not small.

    It is not small in imagination and it is not short in ambition.

    It is infinite in diversity and alive with possibility.

    Two weeks ago the voters of Scotland embraced that possibility.

    They like what their parliament has done within the devolved settlement negotiated by Donald Dewar.

    They like what the first, minority SNP government achieved.

    Now they want more.

    They want Scotland to have the economic levers to prosper in this century.

    They are excited by the opportunity to re-industrialise our country through marine renewable energy, offering skilled, satisfying work to our school leavers and graduates alike.

    But they also know we need the tools to do the job properly.

    This chamber understands that too.

    My message today is let us act as one and demand Scotland’s right. Let us build a better future for our young people by gaining the powers we need to speed recovery and create jobs.

    Let us wipe away past equivocation and ensure that the present Scotland Act is worthy of its name.

    There is actually a great deal on which we are agreed. The three economic changes I have already promoted to The Scotland Bill were chosen from our manifesto because they command support from other parties in this chamber.

    All sides of this parliament support the need for additional and immediate capital borrowing powers so we can invest in our infrastructure and grow our economy. I am very hopeful that this will be delivered.

    The Liberal Democrats, Greens and many in the Labour party agree that Crown Estate revenues should be repatriated to Scottish communities. We await Westminster’s reply.

    Our leading job creators back this Government’s call for control of corporation tax to be included in The Scotland Bill. The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland – a Conservative – supports the devolution of this tax – and the cross party committee of this last parliament agreed unanimously that if the principle was conceded in Northern Ireland then Scotland must have the same right.

    But these are not the only issues which carry support across this chamber. There are three more constitutional changes we might agree on.

    Why not give us control of our own excise duty. We have a mandate to implement a minimum price for alcohol. We intend to pursue that in this parliament come what may.

    However our Labour colleagues agree that it is correct to set a minimum price for alcohol, but they were concerned about where the revenues would go.

    Gaining control of excise would answer that question. It means we can tackle our country’s alcohol problem and invest any additional revenue in public services.

    So I ask Labour members to join with me in calling for control of alcohol taxes so that we together we can face down Scotland’s issue with booze.

    Another key aspect of our national life controlled by Westminster is broadcasting. All of Scotland is poorly served as a result.

    If we had some influence over this currently reserved area we could, for example, create a Scottish digital channel – something all the parties in this parliament supported as long ago as the 8 October 2008.

    We agree that such a platform would promote our artistic talent and hold up a mirror to the nation.

    How Scotland promotes itself to the world is important.

    How we talk to each other is also critical.

    These are exciting times for our country. We need more space for our cultural riches and for lively and intelligent discourse about the nation we are and the nation we aspire to be.

    Finally, many of us agree that, in this globalised era, Scotland needs more influence in the European Union and particularly in the Council of Ministers.

    At the moment that is in the gift of Westminster.

    Sometimes it is forthcoming, more often it is withheld.

    We in the Scottish National Party argue for full sovereignty – it will give us an equal, independent voice in the EU.

    However, short of that, the Scotland Bill could be changed to improve our position. When the first Scotland Act was debated in Westminster in 1998, there was a proposal, as I remember, from the Liberal Democrats, to include a mechanism to give Scotland more power to influence UK European policy. It was defeated then but why not revisit it now. Let Scotland have a guaranteed say in the forums where decisions are made that shape our industries and our laws.

    I have outlined six areas of potential common ground where there is agreement across the parliament to a greater or lesser extent: borrowing powers, corporation tax, the crown estate, excise duties, digital broadcasting and a stronger say in European policy.

    I think we should seize the moment and act together to bring these powers back home. Let this parliament move forward as one to make Scotland better.

    Norman MacCaig observed that when you swish your hand in a stream, the waters are muddied, but then they settle all the clearer.

    On May 5th the people of our country swished up the stream and now the way ahead is becoming clear.

    We see our nation emerge from the glaur of self-doubt and negativity.

    A change is coming, and the people are ready.

    They put ambition ahead of hesitation.

    The process is not about endings.

    It is about beginnings.

    Whatever changes take place in our constitution, we will remain close to our neighbours.

    We will continue to share a landmass, a language and a wealth of experience and history with the other peoples of these islands.

    My dearest wish is to see the countries of Scotland and England stand together as equals.

    There is a difference between partnership and subordination.

    The first encourages mutual respect. The second breeds resentment.

    So let me finish with the words of Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, who addressed this parliament in 1706, before it was adjourned for three hundred years.

    He observed that: “All nations are dependent; the one upon the many.” This much we know.

    But he warned that if “the greater must always swallow the lesser,” we are all diminished.

    His fears were realised in 1707.

    But the age of empires is over. Now we determine our own future based on our own needs. We know our worth and should take pride in it.

    So let us heed the words of Saltoun and:

    “Go forward into the community of nations to lend our own, independent weight to the world.”

  • Alex Salmond – 2005 SNP Conference Speech

    alexsalmond

    Below is the text of the speech made by the leader of the SNP, Alex Salmond, to the 2005 SNP Conference.

    Delegates, There are many reasons why I am going to miss having Winnie as our Party President but one of them is her introductions to my speeches at Conference. I never know quite what she is going to say. No, I never know at all what she is going to say. However, I am delighted that she is in the Chair today because it gives me the opportunity to pay tribute to the outstanding Scottish politician of her generation.

    Let us consider just two of the phrases which Winnie has carved into the lexicon of Scottish politics “Stop the world Scotland wants to get on” and “this Parliament adjourned in 1707 is hereby reconvened.” Winnie you changed Scotland’s world in 1967. And without you, there never would have been any Parliament of any kind to be reconvened.

    At this Conference, we pay you tribute and you have the thanks not just of every single delegate but of ever single person who cares about Scotland. And what does Winnie intend to do in her retirement? Well I happen to know that her first plans for her well earned relaxation – are a few days campaigning in Cathcart and Livingston. And I will be proud and happy to be campaigning along with her as I know every single one of us in this hall will do.

    Delegates the cat is out of the bag. I have been reading “A Spin Doctors Diary” by Lance Price. It lifts the veil on behind the scenes at Downing Street. It should have been called “Confessions of a Spin Doctor” – just like a blue movie. Some of it is absurd – sex on the sofa at No 10. Come on.

    However, apparently even the air turns blue in Downing Street. Our great Prime Minister re-acts to the prospect of defeat in Wales by swearing at the Welsh nation – just think what he might be saying about us come next Friday. It gives a blow-by-blow account of the backbiting, the tantrums and the squabbles at the heart of the Blair nexus.

    He is depicted not just at swearing at Wales but about Scotland’s late Cardinal, Thomas Winning – someone whose boots Mr Blair was not fit to lace, not to mention insulting Donald Dewar. The Prime Minister emerges from the account as a posturing popinjay – totally unfit for office.

    But let us take just one matter arising, which illustrates how dirty the game is played in Blair’s Britain. Lord Birt is now a personal special adviser to the Prime Minister – responsible would you believe for “Blue Sky Thinking.” These diaries reveal that when Director General of the BBC he plotted with Downing Street to stop the Scottish 6, to stop Scotland getting its own full-scale news bulletin.

    We know this to be true since Lord Birt was arrogant enough to put in his own memoirs. Therefore, the Director General of the BBC – that independent impartial national broadcaster – conspired with the Prime Minister’s office in an essentially political campaign. After which he gets ennobled and is now a special adviser to Mr Blair.

    Lord Birt should be pleased about his peerage. In Blair’s Britain, many other people have had to pay big money. Every single donor who has given Labour more than a million pounds has been given a knighthood or a peerage. 80p out of every pound donated by individuals to Labour comes from people who have been honoured.

    And this is the Government of the regular sort of guy who wanted to clean up politics?

    Now I know what Lord Birt’s successor thought about the story of the Scottish 6 because I asked him. Gregg Dyke told me he was “shocked” by this revelation. He went on to assure me that political manipulation of the public broadcaster would not happen in his term of office. I believe that to be true. That is why Greg Dyke is now an ex-Director General. The message is clear.

    In Blair’s Britain if you defend your journalists right to tell the truth about the war in Iraq then, you end up having to resign but if behave like Lord Birt then you get a peerage and a title as special adviser.

    There is something rotten in the state of Blair’s Britain. And can I just say how glad I am that this party will not be nominating any Scottish patriot to set on the ermine benches between Lord Archer and Lord Watson.

    However, the Lance Price book gives an insight into an even more important matter. Price claims that Blair “relished” sending forces into war. Or at least he did before No 10 censors forced him to amend that passage. We are eight years and five military actions into Blair’s premiership. The present action in Iraq has resulted in carnage – 95 British soldiers, 1907 American soldiers, tens of thousands of Iraqis and no end in sight.

    It is a war built on lies, which has fanned the flames of international terrorism. The consequences for this country have been murder and atrocity on the streets of London, essential liberties under serious threat and community relations under real pressure. Every member of the Government, Blair , Brown and the rest, every Member of Parliament who voted us into this sequence of disasters should hang their heads in shame.

    Bush and Blair should now be on their knees to the United Nations asking for a security force to be drawn from Islamic countries to replace American and British forces. What we need – and we need it right now – is a strategy and a timetable for withdrawal not more years of Blair’s blood price.

    Of course, the tales about Blair’s sofa style of Government are not the only revelations of late. Let’s talk about Scotland’s oil. We have released secret papers from the 1970s demonstrating the level of deceit from Tory and Labour administrations about the true nature of Scotland’s oil wealth. Gavin McCrone was the Scottish Office economic adviser. He wrote a paper on North Sea oil and the difference it could make to Scottish economy. No wonder they kept in secret.

    Labour say they did not lie. Really! Let’s make a few comparisons between what McCrone said to Labour and what Labour told Scotland. McCrone said that an independent Scotland would have title to 99 per cent of the oil revenues and that the only thing wrong with SNP estimates is that they were too low.

    Labour told Scots our figures were wildly exaggerated. McCrone compared Scotland’s economic prospects to Switzerland. Labour to Bangladesh. McCrone said that oil had overturned the economic arguments against Scottish nationalism. Labour said Scotland couldn’t manage. McCrone praised how Norway had dealt with the international companies and said that Britain had failed.

    Labour said that Scotland would be too small to deal with big oil. McCrone said that Scotland would be a welcome and influential member of the European Community. Labour said that we would be out in the cold.

    Every bottom of every political barrel was scraped to keep London’s grip on Scotland’s oil. And they are still at it today. This week Gordon Brown said that the price of oil was volatile – that you cannot rely on a single resource. The sub text is that it’s not really worth all that much. That is the myth. What is the reality?

    This Chancellor is getting £1 billion a month from Scotland’s wealth. Right now, it is the black black oil, which is filling Brown’s black hole. Gordon says that we cannot depend on one natural asset. Strange that his former adviser Ed Balls MP says that bulging North Sea revenues are “the main good news on the economic front ,” and remember when Balls speaks its Brown speaks its Balls.

    After 25 years of wasted opportunity, we don’t need lectures from any London Chancellor on how to handle our natural resources. We only have to look across the North Sea to see how to husband a capital asset. The Norwegian fund for future generations has now topped £100 billion and the interest and earnings from it are as great as this year’s Norwegian oil revenues. Norway celebrating 100 years of independence is also celebrating 25 years of oil.

    People ask, how long will oil last? For Scotland, the answer is between 30 and 50 years.

    For Norway, the answer is for all time. Why? Because the economic impact of their fund will last for all time.

    In contrast, thus far Scotland’s oil has disappeared down the gullet of the London Treasury. Therefore, what is the importance of these 30-year revelations for today and tomorrow? Firstly for the present. If Tory and Labour politicians were prepared to lie and cheat Scotland in the 1970s why should anyone believe a word they have to say about Scotland in 2005 or in 2007? Then for the future.

    There is as much oil and gas in the waters around Scotland as has been exploited thus far. – Another 30 plus billion barrels of oil, another £200 billion of revenues. We have a second chance to transform our economic prospects and we must seize it with both hands. Of course, I can understand London politicians who deprecate the ability of Scots to fully govern themselves.

    It is a tactic employed by Westminster towards many countries for generations, for centuries. However, how do we excuse the politicians from Scotland to whom it seems second nature to run down the ability and potential of their own country? The truth is out there because we have published it. Now we must never let them forget it – not now, not ever.

    It is still Scotland’s oil.

    As McCrone predicted and as Stewart Hosie has demonstrated this week the extent of oil and gas revenues would propel the Scottish economy into chronic surplus. We are launching an economic offensive. Our opponents are discredited – their past has caught up with them. The present demonstrates a strong financial platform for independence.

    But what really matters is the future. What matters is moving the Scottish economy onto a strong growth plane. The failure to grow the economy over these last 25 wasted British years. It is why we are loosing population. It is why we have not just blighted streets but blighted lives in Scotland.

    Off our East coast is independent Norway with oil growing at 3 per cent a year. Off our West coast is independent Ireland growing at 5 per cent a year. If we had grown at the rate of independent Norway over the last 20 years we would be £5,000 a head richer. If we had matched the growth rate of independent Ireland we would be £20,000 a head richer.

    What we need is the economic strategy to unlock that potential, to be among the most competitive countries in the world, to match the growth of the other small independent European nations. If we were to do that, it would mean an independence bonus of an additional 19 billion in the economy by 2015, or £4,000 per Scot.

    When Nicola and I stood for election a year ago, we put forward a proposal to reduce business rates to below the levels of England. I know it was influential. How do we know?

    Well one of Mr McConnell’s henchmen left his comments on our manifesto on a Scottish Parliament photocopier. “Should we pre-empt this?” the note said. Of course when he finally got round to doing something Mr McConnell’s main concern was to brief that this initiative was nothing whatsoever to do with his Liberal Deputy who was told nothing about it. Now Mr Stephen says it was all down to him.

    That’s their story and who needs Ballymory when we have McConnell and Stephen – the Scottish Executive? Actually it was nothing to do with either of them. Lacking ideas of their own the were just pinching SNP policy.

    Listen guys you don’t have to talk to each other. I don’t blame you. I wouldn’t want to talk you either. Just keep reading Nicola’s lips to get your ideas.

    In the General Election we published a plan to Let Scotland Flourish -how to give our economy a competitive edge in the modern world. It has seven key policies to lift the Scottish growth rate. We intend to develop that further over the next year and make it a centre piece of the campaign for 2007.

    One of our proposals is to give Scotland an edge not just in business rates but in corporate tax – to reverse the long process of loosing headquarters and decision making centres from Scotland.

    More than 20 years ago, I was a young economist working for the Royal Bank of Scotland. There were takeover bids for the Bank from Standard Charter and Hong Kong Shanghai. They were kicked into touch by the Monopolies Commission as being against the Scottish public interest.

    Last week I attended the opening of the new world headquarters of the Royal Bank now the 5th largest Bank on face of the planet. It will provide opportunities in Scotland for thousands of young people to pursue careers to the very top of their chosen profession, and yet if it had not been for that decision of 20 year ago, there would have been nothing to celebrate. Gogerburn would be but an empty field.

    In the next few weeks, bids will emerge for Scottish Power our largest industrial company headquartered in Scotland. If it disappears into the maw of a company, which already owns Power Gen south of the border, then its headquarters functions will also disappear.

    No one argues that it is possible in the modern world to protect every business from takeover. However, no normal country allows its key strategic companies to disappear without considering the public and competition interest. The Germans do not allow it and neither do the French. For Scotland, this is our biggest industrial company. Energy is our strategic resource.

    The Scottish Executive sit on their hands – helpless, hopeless and hapless – with as much control over things that really matter to Scotland as King Canute had over the tide. Scotland has now just a handful of world reach companies headquartered in Scotland.

    We pledge at this conference to fight them until we have the economic edge of independence which will bring many more to join them.

    In the general election, we gained our first seats from the Labour Party at a Westminster election since 1974. This year we have started to win by elections at local level across Scotland. Our aim for 2007 is to win seats across Scotland from Labour, the Liberals and the Tories. Some people say it can’t be done. I say yes it can.

    We have to gain 20 seats first passed the post and then others from the list. What we do will be determined by our own efforts. Mind you we will be greatly helped by our political opponents. Labour once had the longest suicide note in political history. Michael Howard is engaged in the longest resignation note in political history.

    Charles Kennedy wants to turn his party into a Tory Party although the delegates – in best tradition of the Liberals – are not sure. I have the solution for both parties. It is not too late for another entry into the Tory leadership contest. Kennedy is the remedy for the Tories.

    And we don’t even need a crystal ball to say what a Liberal / Tory coalition look like. Just ask the thousands of Council workers in Aberdeen who were sent letters telling them that their wages were to be cut by a Liberal/Tory Council.

    Delegates to win in 2007 we have to have confidence in three things – ourselves, our programme and our country. Firstly, in ourselves. This year we have rediscovered the will to win. Stewart Hosie in Dundee, Angus Brendan in the Western Isles, local government seats the length and breadth of the country. Remember there are more people in Scotland who would vote for this Party than any other. All we have to do is to demonstrate that we are worthy of that support.

    Secondly, confidence in our programme. We are a social democratic party. That means we match and marry economic efficiency with a social programme, which shapes the public purpose. Our economy can be the new Celtic tiger not the Caledonian pussycat. Our public services can be made to work efficiently and our ideas to do that are flowing through this Conference agenda.

    Our belief in social and international justice can find expression through our political institutions. We judge the temper of our people correctly – Scotland wants a party which uses both the head and the heart.

    Thirdly and most importantly importantly confidence in our country. Unionism depends on the notion that somehow our nation of Scotland is incapable of making the big decisions. – war and peace, taxation, international aid – issues like Iraq, tax credits, the betrayals since the G8.

    What exactly is it about Westminster’s handling of these issues that we are meant to admire? The truth is that Scotland is good enough, big enough, and talented enough to be independent.

    We are not going to allow our potential as a people to be measured by the mediocrity of the Scottish Executive. We are not going to allow our nation to be traduced and misrepresented by the mendacity of Westminster. And we are not going to allow our country to be a dumping ground for nuclear waste of the next generation of nuclear missiles.

    Our political strategy is clear – clear as crystal. We intend to win the elections of 2007. We intend to demonstrate to Scotland that we have the competence and credibility to run Scotland and run it well. We intend to offer the people of this country – within the first term of office – the opportunity to move forward to independence.

    We need the freedom for our country to match the generous heart of our people – the generous heart we saw after the Tsunami. We need the power to capture the opportunities of renewable energy power and the hydrogen economy. We need the ambition not just to march to make poverty history but to have a Government, which lives that dream.

    In the summer I paraded with the Sir William Wallace Free Colliers to the Wallacetown monument -they have marched every year since 1861. Back then when the miners were looking for a hero to symbolise their struggle for freedom from the serfdom of the coal owners they chose Wallace and they chose wisely. 700 years ago Scotland’s greatest hero gave his life for that freedom.

    We are not required to make that sacrifice – only invest our votes, our hopes and our time. But we are not an ordinary political party nor is our mission the ordinary stuff of politics. Our immediate aim is to rescue the politics of this country from the mediocrity of an Executive with – as someone said recently – the attention span of a goldfish.

    But our objective is to break the grip of the London parties over Scotland – not just the political grip but their unionist mindset of defeatism , can’t do and second best. Forget the old excuses about lack of confidence. We aspire to lead into a new age of responsibility for Scotland.

    Scotland needs Independence, self determination and self respect. And right now Scotland needs the SNP.