Blog

  • CONSTITUENCY RESULT : Chorley

    2019 GENERAL ELECTION

    SPEAKER GAIN FROM LABOUR

    Lindsay Hoyle (Speaker) 26,831 67.3% N/A
    Mark Brexit-Smith (Independent) 9,439 23.7% N/A
    James Melling (Green Party) 3,600 9.0% +8.1%

    MAJORITY: 17,392 43.6% +30.1%

     

    2017 GENERAL ELECTION

    LABOUR HOLD

    Lindsay Hoyle (Labour Party) 30,745 55.3% +10.2%
    Conservative Caroline Moon (Conservative Party) 23,233 41.8% +5.4%
    Liberal Democrats Stephen Fenn (Liberal Democrats) 1,126 2.0% −0.6%
    Peter Lageard (Green Party) 530 1.0% −1.2%

    MAJORITY: 7,512 13.5% +4.7%

  • CONSTITUENCY RESULT : Clacton

    2019 GENERAL ELECTION

    CONSERVATIVE HOLD

    Giles Watling (Conservative Party) 31,438 72.3% +11.0%
    Kevin Bonavia (Labour Party) 6,736 15.5% -9.9%
    Callum Robertson (Liberal Democrats) 2,541 5.8% +3.8%
    Chris Southall (Green Party) 1,225 2.8% +1.2%
    Andy Morgan (Independent) 1,099 2.5% +2.5%
    Colin Bennett (Independent) 243 0.6% +0.6%
    Just-John Sexton (Monster Raving Loony Party) 224 0.5% +0.5%

    MAJORITY: 24,702 56.8% +20.9%

     

    2019 GENERAL ELECTION

    CONSERVATIVE GAIN FROM UKIP

    Giles Watling (Conservative Party) 27,031 61.2% +24.5%
    Natasha Osben (Labour Party) 11,203 25.4% +11.0%
    Paul Oakley (UKIP) 3,357 7.6% -36.8%
    David Grace (Liberal Democrats) 887 2.0% +0.2%
    Chris Southall (Green Party) 719 1.6% -1.1%
    Caroline Shearer (Independent) 449 1.0% New
    Robin Tilbrook (English Democrat) 289 0.7% New
    Nick Martin (Independent) 210 0.5% New

    MAJORITY: 15,828 35.8% N/A

     

  • Ursula von der Leyen – 2020 Speech to the LSE

    Ursula von der Leyen – 2020 Speech to the LSE

    Below is the text of the speech made by Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, at the LSE in London on 8 January 2020.

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    It is a great pleasure to be back here at the London School of Economics – a place which brings back so many happy memories for me. The year I spent here taught me so much – both in and out of LSE. As anyone who knew me at the time will tell you, I spent more time in Soho bars and Camden record stores than I did reading books in Senate House Library. In order to spare my own blushes, I will spare you all the details!

    But what I can say is that the time I spent here opened my eyes. I got to know a warm, vibrant, colourful, multicultural society – the likes of which I had not really experienced before. I saw people from different walks of life going out together, enjoying life, breathing in freedom. I immersed myself in this melting pot of cultures, traditions and music. And I truly fell in love with this city and this country.

    This country, strong-willed, open-minded and big hearted. Proud and patriotic. Kind and generous in spirit. Full of traditions and contradictions.

    Of course, certain things took longer for me to learn. The sense of humour for example, or the subtle meanings hidden in every sentence. But this only deepened my fascination and my admiration for the UK which remains as strong today as it was back then.

    In the period just before and after the referendum, I thought a lot about my time here in London. I say this not just because of my love for this country. But also because of what the United Kingdom has brought to Europe and the European Union.

    In a very understated British way, we do not always talk enough about this. Before the ashes of the Second World War had even settled, it was Winston Churchill who made the best case for a united Europe. I read out passages from his 1946 Zurich speech the last time I was here – it is the most eloquent and powerful case for the European Union you could ever wish to read. And while the UK initially chose to be on the outside, it eventually took its place on the inside – making us both that much stronger. The relationship may not have always been smooth or perfect – what relationship ever is. But, in my opinion, the good far outweighs the difficult.

    As President of the European Commission, I want to pay tribute today to all those British people who contributed so much to the 45 plus years of EU membership. I think of the British pragmatism and leadership when it came to opening up our Union to members of our family who had been out in the cold for so long. The successive EU enlargements were historic steps for our continent and they bear the British hallmark. I think of those who helped to build our institutions.

    People like Commissioner Arthur Cockfield who was known as the ‘father of the Single Market’. Or Roy Jenkins, President of the European Commission while I was at LSE, who did so much to pave the way for our single currency. I think of the European civil servants of British nationality who devoted their lives and careers to Europe and have done so much to build our Union.

    They will always stay a part of our family.

    I think of the British servicemen and servicewomen who have helped to keep the peace from the Balkans to the Baltics. And I think of the millions of ordinary British people who have taken to the streets in pro-EU marches in the last few years.

    Of course, for them, and for many millions more, the result of the referendum was a bitter pill to swallow. But it is people who make politics. And the decision of the British people in June 2016 was clear.

    As much as we regretted it, the European Union has always fully respected that decision. You have seen this throughout the last three and a half years. Our negotiations were hard and long but the European Union negotiated in good faith, trying to find solutions that defend our own interests and respect the UK’s choices.

    It is an agreement that we negotiated with our people and the integrity of the European Union in mind. It is one that preserves the remarkable peace and progress on the island of Ireland in the last 20 years. I will not go into the ins and outs of the negotiations on the divorce. This is done and dusted as far as I am concerned.

    Before the end of the month, I expect both the British and European Parliaments to ratify the agreement. And so, in just over three weeks, on 31 January, the UK will spend its last day as a Member State.

    This will be a tough and emotional day.

    But when the sun rises again on 1 February, the EU and the UK will still be the best of friends and partners. The bonds between us will still be unbreakable. We will still contribute to each other’s societies, like so many Brits have done in the EU, and as so many EU citizens do here every day in the UK – whether as teachers, nurses, doctors or whether working as CEOs or in NGOs. We will still have a lot to learn from each other.

    The UK is home to thriving creative and cultural sectors, to cutting-edge digital innovation and scientific excellence in some of the world’s best universities with brilliant minds, many of them from all over Europe. We will still share the same challenges, from climate change to security. We will still be allies and like-minded partners in NATO, the United Nations and other international organisations. We will still share the same values and the belief that democracy, freedom and the rule of law must be the foundation of our societies. We still share the same history and geography. And whatever happens, our continent will still share the same destiny, too. So as one door will unfortunately close, another one will open.

    Now is the time for us to look forward together. It is time for the best and the oldest of friends to build a new future together. But as only true friends can, I want to be very honest about what lies ahead of us.

    During the Withdrawal Agreement negotiation, there was always the uncertainty around whether Brexit would happen. It was an uncertainty that made the negotiation inevitably tense. This fresh negotiation will take place against a backdrop of clarity and mutual interest in making it work. The European Union is ready to negotiate a truly ambitious and comprehensive new partnership with the United Kingdom. We will make as much of this as we can. We will go as far as we can.

    But the truth is that our partnership cannot and will not be the same as before. And it cannot and will not be as close as before – because with every choice comes a consequence. With every decision comes a trade-off. Without the free movement of people, you cannot have the free movement of capital, goods and services. Without a level playing field on environment, labour, taxation and state aid, you cannot have the highest quality access to the world’s largest single market.

    The more divergence there is, the more distant the partnership has to be. And without an extension of the transition period beyond 2020, you cannot expect to agree on every single aspect of our new partnership. We will have to prioritise. The European Union’s objectives in the negotiation are clear. We will work for solutions that uphold the integrity of the EU, its single market and its Customs Union. There can be no compromise on this.

    But we are ready to design a new partnership with zero tariffs, zero quotas, zero dumping. A partnership that goes well beyond trade and is unprecedented in scope. Everything from climate action to data protection, fisheries to energy, transport to space, financial services to security. And we are ready to work day and night to get as much of this done within the timeframe we have.

    None of this means it will be easy, but we start this negotiation from a position of certainty, goodwill, shared interests and purpose. And we should be optimistic. We need to be optimistic! We need to be optimistic for those young people leaving school in the next few years who want to study and learn abroad. We need to look at how British and EU researchers could work together to find solutions to our most pressing challenges or to develop the new technologies the world needs. And we must ensure that we continue to work together on upholding peace and security in Europe and around the world. We must build a new, comprehensive security partnership to fight cross-border threats, ranging from terrorism to cyber-security to counter-intelligence. Events in recent years in Salisbury, Manchester, London and right across Europe have underlined the need for us to work together on our mutual security.

    The threat of terrorism is real and we have to share the necessary information and intelligence between Europe and the UK to stop terrorists from crossing borders and attacking our way of life.

    The nature of today’s threats means that no one can deal with these challenges on its own. This is even more true for foreign policy. Even though Britain will be outside the European decision-making structures, there will be plenty of need for common responses to address foreign, security and development challenges near and far. Be it in our immediate neighbourhood in the East and South, or in the Horn of Africa, Sahel and Sub-Saharan Africa; Or be it in the wider Middle East or different parts of Latin America and Asia. The truth is that Brexit will not resolve any of the existing challenges for the EU nor the UK. Even being apart and not bound by the Treaties, it will require intensive cooperation on our foreign and security policies. That is essential, because we share so much experience and we stand for so many of the same values. We have to uphold these values, not only when it is easy, but above all when it is hard.

    Dear Friends,

    As we embark on this new partnership with the United Kingdom, the European Union must also continue to forge its own path in today’s world. One consequence of the Brexit vote has been to strengthen the unity and the faith in Europe as a project for the common good. The truth is that Brexit has highlighted the value of being together in today’s ever more unsettled world.

    It reaffirmed our collective belief that we can do more when we do it together. Individually, the nations of Europe are becoming smaller and less influential on the world scale.

    In 1950, before our Union was formed, the UK, Italy and Germany were among the ten most populous countries in the world. Today, only one of those is in the top 20. And while Europe’s population is set to decline by the end of the century, Africa’s alone will grow by more than 3 billion. At the same time, new economies are emerging and old partners are retreating back to their own paths.

    And we face change and a new set of challenges. Climate change, for example: If there is one area where the world needs our leadership, it is on protecting our climate. This is an existential issue for Europe – and for the world. Last month we launched the European Green Deal. The European Green Deal is not only about emissions. It is about boosting innovation. It is about clean technologies. It is about green financing. It is about quality food. It is about modern mobility. The European Green Deal is our new growth strategy. It will create new businesses all across Europe and new markets across the world. The novelty and difference is that we will and can foster a growth model that is not consuming or extracting – but one that gives back more to the planet than it takes away.

    Great Britain is as dedicated as the EU when it comes to addressing climate change and taking global leadership. A whole continent has to mobilise and the whole world needs to be part of the transformation. The European Green Deal will not happen overnight, and it will be demanding. No country can hope to handle climate change alone. But if it is the right thing to do – and if we do it together, we can lead that change.

    Dear students,

    Over the next month and years, we will have to loosen some of the threads, which have been carefully stitched together between the EU and the UK over five decades.

    And as we do so, we will have to work hard to weave together a new way forward.

    I say this because Brexit does not only mark the end of something. It also marks a new phase in an enduring partnership and friendship. It will be a partnership for your generation – and I count on you all to make a success of it.

    You can choose collaboration over isolation, you can shape your continent’s destiny, you can hold your governments accountable, you can refuse to be satisfied with the status quo and can turn things into how they should be.

    I know the last few years have been difficult and divisive. I hope that by being constructive and ambitious in the upcoming negotiations, we can all move forward together. There will be tough talks ahead and each side will do what is best for them. But I can assure you that the United Kingdom will always have a trusted friend and partner in the European Union.

    This is the story of old friends and new beginnings. In this good sense: Long live Europe!

  • CONSTITUENCY RESULT : Hartlepool

    2019 GENERAL ELECTION

    LABOUR HOLD

    Mike Hill (Labour Party) 15,464 37.7% -14.8%
    Stefan Houghton (Conservative Party) 11,869 28.9% -5.3%
    Richard Tice (Brexit Party) 10,603 25.8% N/A
    Andy Hagon (Liberal Democrats) 1,696 4.1% +2.3%
    Joe Bousfield (Independent) 911 2.2% N/A
    Kevin Cranney (Socialist Labour) 494 1.2% N/A

    MAJORITY: 3,595 58.8% -9.5%

     

    2017 GENERAL ELECTION

    LABOUR HOLD

    Mike Hill (Labour Party) 21,969 52.5% +16.9%
    Carl Jackson (Conservative Party) 14,319 34.2% +13.3%
    Phillip Broughton (UKIP) 4,801 11.5% -16.5%
    Andy Hagon (Liberal Democrats) 746 1.8% -0.1%

    MAJORITY: 7,650 18.3% +9.4%

  • CONSTITUENCY RESULT : Halifax

    2019 GENERAL ELECTION

    LABOUR HOLD

    Holly Lynch (Labour Party) 21,496 46.3% -6.4%
    Kashif Ali (Conservative Party) 18,927 40.7% -0.9%
    Sarah Wood (Brexit Party) 2,813 6.1% N/A
    James Baker (Liberal Democrats) 2,276 4.9% +2.7%
    Bella Jessop (Green Party) 946 2.0% N/A

    MAJORITY: 2,569 5.6% -5.5%

     

    2017 GENERAL ELECTION

    LABOUR HOLD

    Holly Lynch (Labour Party) 25,507 52.7% +12.7%
    Chris Pearson (Conservative Party) 20,131 41.6% +2.6%
    Mark Weedon (UKIP) 1,568 3.2% -9.6%
    James Baker (Liberal Democrats) 1,070 2.2% -1.5%

    MAJORITY: 5,376 11.1% +10.1%

  • CONSTITUENCY RESULT : Gosport

    2019 GENERAL ELECTION

    CONSERVATIVE HOLD

    Caroline Dinenage (Conservative Party) 32,226 66.5% +4.6%
    Tom Chatwin (Labour Party) 8,948 18.5% -8.7%
    Martin Pepper (Liberal Democrats) 5,473 11.3% +6.6%
    Zoe Aspinall (Green Party) 1,806 3.7% +1.7%

    MAJORITY: 23,278 48.0% +13.3%

     

    2017 GENERAL ELECTION

    CONSERVATIVE HOLD

    Caroline Dinenage (Conservative Party) 30,647 61.9% +6.6%
    Alan Durrant (Labour Party) 13,436 27.2% +12.6%
    Bruce Tennent (Liberal Democrats) 2,328 4.7% -2.2%
    Chloe Palmer (UKIP) 1,790 3.6% -15.8%
    Monica Cassidy (Green Party) 1,024 2.1% -1.5%
    Jeffrey Roberts (Independent) 256 0.5% +0.3%

    MAJORITY: 17,211 34.8% -1.1%

  • Foreign and Commonwealth Office – 2020 Press Release on Attack on Iraqi Military Bases

    Foreign and Commonwealth Office – 2020 Press Release on Attack on Iraqi Military Bases

    Below is a press release issued by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on 08/01/2020.

    The Foreign Secretary calls for urgent de-escalation following an attack on Iraqi military bases.

    Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said:

    “We condemn this attack on Iraqi military bases hosting Coalition – including British – forces.

    We are concerned by reports of casualties and use of ballistic missiles.

    We urge Iran not to repeat these reckless and dangerous attacks, and instead to pursue urgent de-escalation.

    A war in the Middle East would only benefit Daesh and other terrorist groups.”

  • Foreign and Commonwealth Office – 2020 Press Release on Housing in West Bank

    Foreign and Commonwealth Office – 2020 Press Release on Housing in West Bank

    Below is a press release issued by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on 07/01/2020.

    Minister for the Middle East and North Africa Dr Andrew Murrison calls on Israel to halt settlement expansion immediately.

    Commenting on Israel’s announcement of plans for new housing units across the West Bank, Dr Andrew Murrison, Minister for the Middle East and North Africa, said:

    “The UK condemns the Israeli government’s advancement of yet more plans for over 1,900 housing units across the West Bank.

    It is the UK’s longstanding position that settlements are illegal under international law and undermine the viability of the two-state solution.

    We call on Israel to halt settlement expansion immediately.”

  • Luke Hall – 2020 Speech at LGA Finance Conference

    Luke Hall – 2020 Speech at LGA Finance Conference

    Below is the text of the speech made by Luke Hall, the Local Government Minister, at the LGA Finance Conference on 7 January 2020.

    Introduction

    Thank you for your kind introduction and for inviting me to speak here today.

    Can I start by saying how grateful the government is for all of the excellent work the LGA does, supporting local authorities across the country on key issues throughout the year.

    We are particularly grateful for your collaboration on last year’s Spending Round. The strong arguments put forward by the sector helped me and the Secretary of State make a persuasive and successful case to Treasury ministers.

    The work that you do on political development, with I understand, over 1,000 councillors booked onto the LGA leadership programme this year.

    Your work on corporate peer reviews, with over 150 challenges this year.

    And the advice, sometimes very forthright advice, that you provide on the sector’s needs to ministers, is incredibly valuable. So we are incredibly grateful to you.

    And I would like to take this opportunity to thank everybody here who is working in local government and elected members for all your efforts to deliver high quality and efficient services.

    I know as a minister, a constituency MP and as someone who has been involved in my community in South Gloucestershire for many years the direct impact that well-run local authorities have on local residents’ lives.

    There are many people in this room who have made a big contribution to the sector over the past 12 months, but I would like to single out James Jamieson for his leadership over the last 6 months – it’s been a pleasure to work with you.

    And, whilst I didn’t have the opportunity to work with Lord Porter direct, I would also like to publicly acknowledge and thank him for his work as chair – we will continue to see the legacy of your work for years to come.

    Every New Year is an opportunity for us to reflect on the one that has just passed, and to look to the year ahead. I hope you will allow me to do that and reflect on our world of local government.

    2019

    One of the stand out events in 2019 was the rapid one-year Spending Round and the publication, some might say the very last-minute publication, of the provisional local government finance settlement for 2020 to 2021.

    And we believe that the proposals set out in the Spending Round and in our settlement consultation will give local authorities access to the largest year-on-year increase in spending power in a decade: 4.4% in real terms.

    The local government finance settlement delivers significant extra resources to the priority areas of adult and children’s social care: an extra £1 billion of grant across adult and children’s services, plus an additional £500 million from a 2% council tax adult social care precept.

    I am glad these resources have been welcomed by many for providing significant extra help for local authorities to support the most vulnerable.

    We also committed to ensuring that local authorities receive the certainty and stability they need to confirm their plans for next years’ service delivery. We did this in the Spending Round by providing protection for vital services by increasing core settlement resources in line with inflation.

    We also maintained key grants from 2019 to 2020 – including continuing all existing social care grants, such as the £2 billion improved Better Care Fund.

    There will be a new £900 million round of New Homes Bonus and a continuation of last year’s £81 million Rural Services Delivery Grant, which was the highest paid to-date.

    In our manifesto we committed to ensure that ‘local people will continue to have the final say on council tax.’

    We have proposed a package of council tax referendum principles which provide local authorities with the flexibility to address service pressures, while ensuring local residents have the final say on any excessive increases.

    If the package is approved by Parliament, the expected average council tax increase for 2020 to 2021 would be the lowest since 2016 to 2017.

    We have now also confirmed Dedicated Schools Grant allocations for 2020 to 2021, including an increase in high needs funding for schools and colleges of over £700 million. This extra money will enable local authorities to think carefully about where best to invest in provision so that they can establish a more sustainable system in future.

    Every school will get more money for every child – “levelling up” funding and helping to spread equality of opportunity for all. This government is determined to invest in the education and future of our young people and the dedicated teachers and staff who support them.

    At the same time, we also recognise that it is not just about the money and the cross-Whitehall SEND review that the Department for Education is leading will be looking carefully at what other aspects of the system need to be improved or changed

    There will also be an increase in Public Health Grant, to allow you to continue to invest in prevention and essential frontline health services.

    Additionally, the NHS’s contribution to the Better Care Fund will grow in line with the additional investment in the NHS in 2020 to 2021 – 3.4% in real terms.

    I would like to thank colleagues in local government for your responses to our settlement technical consultation last year.

    These allowed us to develop a set of proposals in this provisional consultation that we genuinely believe reflects the priorities of local government in this roll-forward year. Including extra resources where they are needed most and stability in other areas.

    I look forward to hearing your views on our proposals through the consultation, which is open until 17 January.

    2020

    Looking forward to the coming year, we have an exciting agenda in front of us.

    One of our first announcements this Parliament was the allocation of £263 million to local authorities to support their work to reduce homelessness and rough sleeping.

    In 2020 to 2021 we are providing a total £422 million to tackle homelessness and rough sleeping. This is £54 million more funding than in the previous year – a 13% real terms increase.

    In 2018, rough sleeping fell nationally by 2%, the first reduction in a decade. As the Minister for Homelessness I will work tirelessly to build on progress and see these reductions go further – to end rough sleeping by the end of this Parliament.

    Looking to the Troubled Families Programme, over the weekend we announced £165 million of new funding for 2020 to 2021 which will provide intensive support for some of the most vulnerable families and place the programme on a stable footing for the future.

    We have been clear that we will build on the success of the programme; the latest evaluation results show that the Programme is reducing the proportion of children going into care, of adults going to prison and of juvenile convictions, and helping people back into work.

    I am always struck by the extraordinary skills of the family key workers in building trust and gaining a true understanding of the issues confronting the whole family so they can support them in moving forward with their lives.

    This new funding will enable local authorities across the country to achieve even more in the year to come.

    There will be a longer-term Spending Review, alongside reviews of the allocation and distribution of those resources, and a review and upcoming revaluation of the business rates tax.

    We will set out our plans to fix the social care system once and for all, to give everyone the dignity and security that they deserve. We will work with political parties from all sides of the House of Commons to seek consensus around the very best solutions.

    And we will publish an ‘English devolution white paper’, aiming for full devolution, so that every part of the country has the power to shape its own future.

    The Spending Review will not just settle the amount of resources available to local government over the period and the approach to distributing these, but also important related questions including:

    which programmes are the most effective in delivering outcomes for local communities?

    how do we balance resources for mainstream programmes with much-needed investment in prevention?

    what is the best approach to incentivising local housing supply and economic growth? For which we have already committed to reform of the New Homes Bonus

    how do we provide the certainty to support investment in improving services?

    and how do we best support local authorities to improve; helping you become more efficient and transform services around the needs of local people? I want to have a wider look at how we can do this more effectively, and will make an announcement soon on next steps.

    Fair Funding Review

    As you know, the review of relative needs and resources is progressing – finding ways to ensure authorities receive the right allocations to meet their needs.

    This is a large and complex project – and expectations are high on all sides. We are making good progress and will continue to try to build consensus – or at least the recognition and confidence that everything has been thoroughly tested – as we start to take decisions to narrow the range of options for the future of local authority funding.

    But successful delivery of the Fair Funding Review will require everyone to recognise the need for trade-offs which will be necessary in order to deliver the review as planned.

    Compromise will be needed to ensure that the formula works for everyone.

    The direction of the review has been welcomed by many, but we must deliver a sustainable formula that works for the whole sector.

    This is a time when a well-argued sector position with a clear consensus would be helpful, not only in delivering the Fair Funding Review, but also in building a strong position going into the Spending Review.

    And we will be consulting on further detail of the proposed reforms as soon as we can, allowing time for your feedback before final decisions are made; and we aim to release some exemplifications in advance of this, to allow dialogue on technical issues.

    Business rates retention

    We also know that business rates retention has been a popular part of the local government finance system, with many councils benefitting from keeping additional business rates growth.

    But we also know there are questions about some aspects of the way the system operates – like the volatility caused by business rates appeals; like whether all councils benefit from the same opportunity for reward; and whether there could be stronger incentives for councils to work together across their areas.

    We have been examining these issues alongside local government and are still genuinely welcoming views on the best way forward.

    Business rates tax

    Everybody here will appreciate how important it is that the system of local government finance works well if we want to deliver top flight public services.

    Which is why we have committed to carrying out a fundamental review of the business rates tax.

    It is therefore vital that we are hearing the perspectives of those who are administering the system in this review.

    It is also important that we consider alongside you how business rates income is used, and how well that meets councils’ funding needs, whilst we consider the future direction of reforms.

    Conclusion

    We have a bold and ambitious agenda for change, and a working majority in Parliament now gives us the ability to achieve this.

    But we will not be able to succeed in this without working in close collaboration with local government. We need your help to achieve these bold and ambitious objectives. I am looking forward to doing just that in the year ahead.

    Thank you so much.

  • Foreign and Commonwealth Office – 2019 Press Release on Resolution 1325

    Foreign and Commonwealth Office – 2019 Press Release on Resolution 1325

    Below is a press release issued by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on 29/10/2019.

    Statement by Ambassador Karen Pierce, UK Permanent Representative to the UN, at the Security Council briefing on Women, Peace and Security.

    Well, thank you very much indeed, Madam President, and thank you for coming here today. And thank you, particularly along with the German Minister, for creating an environment where over two thirds of the people sitting around this table are women. So that is fantastic, a taste of things to come, and I hope you will visit us often.

    I also wanted to congratulate you for the fantastic record of South Africa with that 30 percent figure that you gave us and your military colleagues sitting in the chamber. That’s incredibly impressive. Thank you for your commitment to carry on producing women for these peace support, peacekeeping operations. The United Kingdom joins you in that commitment. Sadly, we’re only at 17 percent so you have a march on us, Madam President, but I think nevertheless, there is all more that all of us can do in that regard.

    As other speakers have said, this is a timely debate a year ahead of the 20th anniversary of Resolution 1325. It’s a good opportunity for us to reflect on the achievements and challenges in fully implementing that resolution. But as we’ve heard from all the fantastic briefers today and as the Executive Director of UN Women eloquently made clear, we must raise our ambition. We must commit to even more radical change and we need to ask ourselves, 20 years and 10 resolutions later, why is there still such a stark implementation gap when all the evidence suggests that incorporating gender perspective helps achieve sustainable peace and security?

    So I think, again, as the Executive Director of UN Women said, that’s a question we need to ask ourselves all the time as we design any peace process or any international mechanism, project, programme; how can we make sure that we’re living up to the full implementation of 1325? And this obviously means putting a particular focus on designing inclusive processes from the outset. Arms and territory shouldn’t be the only reason that negotiators get a seat at the table. That’s not right morally, it’s not sensible economically, and it’s not sensible and feasible if you want a just and a lasting peace settlement.

    Madam Chairman, this year the UK funded the Gender Action for Peace and Security to deliver consultations with civil society in our nine National Action Plan focus countries and we did this because we wanted to better understand how we can identify and therefore, overcome those gaps. So we are taking concrete steps to promote and protect women peace builders and human rights defenders. We are providing sustainable multi-year funding and we’re ensuring that we practice what we preach in terms of representation and policy.

    As I look ahead to 2020, I hope we can have an effort right the way across the United Nations, not just in New York, but right across the whole UN system in the field and in the other headquarters buildings to focus efforts on full implementation of 1325. For our part, we will be particularly working on increasing women’s meaningful participation in peace processes, notably in Afghanistan, South Sudan and Yemen and the German Minister explained very eloquently what was happening in Afghanistan so I won’t repeat that. In Yemen, the United Kingdom is funding a Gender Advisor and other senior inclusion positions within the US Special Envoy’s Office so that we can build on his work to take forward women’s participation in the peace process. In South Sudan, ahead of November’s deadline for a transitional government, we are continuing to work with local women’s groups to advocate for an inclusive process. And of course, with my very good friend and colleague, the Afghanistan PR, we have set up a women’s group in New York, of which the US Ambassador is also part of, to take forward the participation of women in that very important peace process.

    If I can turn to the UN, and again a number of our speakers mentioned the UN, the UN obviously has a huge role to play in implementing 1325. On the 19th anniversary, so with a year to go to do something about it, the United Kingdom would like to invite the UN to make progress in three particular areas. Firstly, to establish a strong formal working relationship with the Global Alliance of Women Mediators. This will ensure women mediators have access to key peace actors and are systematically considered for deployment as negotiators, mediators and advisors. Secondly, UN processes need to set the gold standard for inclusion and UN Special Envoy should be held to account on their commitments to implement 1325. And finally, ensuring UN-led peace processes are closely supported by gender experts to guarantee gender perspectives and this needs to be integrated throughout the mission. This is not a desirable, it’s not a nice to have, it’s an intrinsic part of any successful peace process.

    In conclusion, Madam President, 2020 is not just about 1325. Next year marks the 25th anniversary of the Beijing platform, the 70th anniversary of the UN, the fifth anniversary of youth peace and security, and ten years until the deadline to reach the Sustainable Development Goals. We cannot let this moment slip through our fingers. Now is the time to make progress on WPS in gender equality and the UN and the member states have a responsibility to deliver all of this next year.

    Thank you.