Blog

  • PRESS RELEASE : Nick Gibb calls for more focus on primary school reading and writing

    PRESS RELEASE : Nick Gibb calls for more focus on primary school reading and writing

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 11 November 2010.

    Commenting on statistics showing Key Stage 1 attainment by pupil characteristics, Schools Minister Nick Gibb today stressed the need for a greater focus and emphasis on the teaching of reading and writing in primary schools.

    The results are available via the Department’s Research and statistics gateway.

    Nick Gibb said:

    Though there is a slight increase in the proportion of seven-year-olds reaching the expected level in reading, it is a real concern that almost a third of all Key Stage 1 children receiving free school meals are failing to achieve the standard in reading and writing. Additionally, over a third of boys receiving free school meals fail to make the grade in reading and writing.

    Getting the fundamentals right is crucial to a child’s success in secondary education and throughout their adult life, and the Government is committed to getting all children reading and writing to a high standard.

    That is why we are promoting the use of systematic synthetic phonics in primary schools and why we are introducing a short reading test for six-year-olds, so we can identify those who need extra help. We will also support the most disadvantaged children by introducing a pupil premium which will provide extra funding for those schools with the most challenging intakes.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Lord Bew appointed to chair external review of testing

    PRESS RELEASE : Lord Bew appointed to chair external review of testing

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 5 November 2010.

    Lord Bew will lead a small review panel consisting of two education experts, a number of primary headteachers and one secondary school head. The panel is due to launch a 12-week call for evidence, following which it will publish a progress report summarising the evidence gathered. The panel will publish its final report by June 2011.

    The review will look at a number of issues, including

    • how best to ensure schools are properly accountable to pupils, parents and the taxpayer for the achievement and progress of every child, on the basis of objective and accurate assessments
    • how to ensure parents have good-quality information on the progress of their children and the success of schools
    • how to avoid, as far as possible, the risk of perverse incentives, over-rehearsal and reduced focus on productive learning
    • how to ensure performance information is used and interpreted appropriately within the accountability system by other agencies, increasing transparency and preserving accountability to parents, pupils and the taxpayer while avoiding the risk of crude and narrow judgements being made.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove has acknowledged the current system can be improved to ensure concerns – such as children being ‘drilled’ at the expense of broad learning – are overcome while the information parents want is still provided.

    Michael Gove said:

    We know parents support clear, rigorous and transparent testing at the end of primary school, and the OECD has concluded that external accountability is a key driver of improvement in education and particularly important for the least advantaged. So we must continue to allow parents to know how their local primary schools are performing.

    Raising standards and narrowing gaps are the central goals of the Government’s education policy. It is not our intention that the accountability system should be punitive or unfair to schools working in difficult circumstances but it must be able to identify and tackle cases of sustained underperformance.

    Equally, I recognise concerns from heads and teachers about the current system. That is why I have ordered a review – to see whether there is a better way to give parents the information they want and hold schools to account, while overcoming the concerns.

    I am delighted that Lord Bew, a hugely experienced, cross-bench peer, has agreed to lead the review, and I look forward to considering the panel’s findings next year.

    The Education Secretary also announced today new arrangements for delivering National Curriculum tests and assessments following the abolition of the QCDA. Working within the Department, an executive agency will oversee statutory tests and assessments for children up to age 14. Its exact remit will be confirmed following consideration of the recommendations of Lord Bew’s review.

    Michael Gove said:

    It is essential that the statutory assessment arrangements put in place following our review are delivered in a timely and effective way. It is right that accountability for ensuring this rests with ministers, and that is why I am establishing an executive agency within my department that will be accountable to me for the secure delivery of its functions.

    As the independent regulator, Ofqual will continue to have an important role, as it does now, in keeping under review the agency’s functions relating to National Curriculum tests and assessments.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Michael Gove announces review of key stage 2 testing

    PRESS RELEASE : Michael Gove announces review of key stage 2 testing

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 5 November 2010.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove today appointed the cross-bench peer, Lord Bew, to chair the external review into Key Stage 2 testing, assessment and accountability.

    Lord Bew will lead a small review panel consisting of two education experts, a number of primary headteachers and one secondary school head. The panel is due to launch a 12-week call for evidence, following which it will publish a progress report summarising the evidence gathered. The panel will publish its final report by June 2011.

    The review will look at a number of issues, including:

    • how best to ensure schools are properly accountable to pupils, parents and the taxpayer for the achievement and progress of every child, on the basis of objective and accurate assessments
    • how to ensure parents have good-quality information on the progress of their children and the success of schools
    • how to avoid, as far as possible, the risk of perverse incentives, over-rehearsal and reduced focus on productive learning
    • how to ensure performance information is used and interpreted appropriately within the accountability system by other agencies, increasing transparency and preserving accountability to parents, pupils and the taxpayer while avoiding the risk of crude and narrow judgements being made.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove has acknowledged the current system can be improved to ensure concerns – such as children being ‘drilled’ at the expense of broad learning – are overcome while the information parents want is still provided.

    Michael Gove said:

    We know parents support clear, rigorous and transparent testing at the end of primary school, and the OECD has concluded that external accountability is a key driver of improvement in education and particularly important for the least advantaged. So we must continue to allow parents to know how their local primary schools are performing.

    Raising standards and narrowing gaps are the central goals of the Government’s education policy. It is not our intention that the accountability system should be punitive or unfair to schools working in difficult circumstances but it must be able to identify and tackle cases of sustained underperformance.

    Equally, I recognise concerns from heads and teachers about the current system. That is why I have ordered a review – to see whether there is a better way to give parents the information they want and hold schools to account, while overcoming the concerns.

    I am delighted that Lord Bew, a hugely experienced, cross-bench peer, has agreed to lead the review, and I look forward to considering the panel’s findings next year.

    The Education Secretary also announced today new arrangements for delivering National Curriculum tests and assessments following the abolition of the QCDA. Working within the Department, an executive agency will oversee statutory tests and assessments for children up to age 14. Its exact remit will be confirmed following consideration of the recommendations of Lord Bew’s review.

    Michael Gove said:

    It is essential that the statutory assessment arrangements put in place following our review are delivered in a timely and effective way. It is right that accountability for ensuring this rests with ministers, and that is why I am establishing an executive agency within my department that will be accountable to me for the secure delivery of its functions.

    As the independent regulator, Ofqual will continue to have an important role, as it does now, in keeping under review the agency’s functions relating to National Curriculum tests and assessments.

    Further information

    Lord Bew is a cross-bench peer, Professor of Irish Politics at Queen’s University in Belfast, and a Member of Royal Irish Academy (MRIA). He was a historical adviser to the Saville Inquiry from 1998 to 2001.

    Membership of the panel in full is:

    • Lord Bew – Chairman
    • Miriam Rosen – Former Executive Director, Ofsted
    • Ruth Miskin – Founder, Read-Write Inc. and former primary headteacher
    • Greg Wallace – Headteacher, Woodberry Down Community Primary School in Hackney
    • Helen Clegg – Headteacher, Shiremoor Primary School in North Tyneside
    • Kate Dethridge – Headteacher, Churchend Primary School in Reading
    • Lubna Khan – Headteacher, Berrymede Junior School in Ealing
    • Tim Sherriff – Headteacher, Westfield Community School in Wigan
    • Sally Coates – Principal, Burlington Danes Academy in West London

    Representatives of Ofsted and Ofqual will act as observers.

  • John Hayes – 2010 Speech to the New All-Age Careers Service

    John Hayes – 2010 Speech to the New All-Age Careers Service

    The speech made by John Hayes, the then Education Minister, on 4 November 2010.

    Good afternoon everyone.

    For anyone who feels as passionately as I do about the value of practical skills, it’s a pleasure to be here in Belfast. This is a city in which skill has always been honoured, whether it’s the skill needed to build a ship or to produce the perfect Ulster Fry.

    And it’s a city whose people are, in consequence, more vividly aware than most of how important it is for the young to gain the skills that will serve them well when they try to find their place in the local jobs market. So I congratulate the Institute warmly on their choice of venue for this year’s conference.

    Of course I’m fully aware that the different parts of the United Kingdom each have their own approaches to careers guidance. But no one has a monopoly of wisdom in this area and one of the reasons why this conference is so valuable is that it offers the chance for us to compare approaches and learn from each other.

    Differences only go so far. What I hope we all have in common is a recognition that even the best skills system in the world can’t deliver half its potential unless it is supported by a structure that helps prospective learners to take well informed decisions.

    Like me, many of you will no doubt recall the Everyman Library. The library’s still going strong after more than a century. But I guess most of us still know it best from the pocket-sized red hardbacks that can still be found in any second-hand bookshop.

    J M Dent’s original and very laudable aim in establishing the series was to make 1,000 of the classics of world literature available to ordinary working people at a shilling a time.

    There are those, no doubt, who would dismiss that aim as an example of Edwardian paternalism. But at a time when compulsory schooling ended at the age of twelve, there was nevertheless a great deal of truth in the epigraph that opened every volume:

    _Everyman, I will go with thee
    and be thy guide,
    In thy most need to go
    by thy side.
    _
    There’s certainly no doubt that, a hundred years ago, most adults needed guidance to help them progress down the road to self-improvement through self education. Just as it’s true that today, in the 21st century, many people need extra help to get onto the ladder that leads to success in life.

    I’m not speaking only of people from disadvantaged backgrounds, though it is for them that the stakes are perhaps highest. Because, if navigating the canon of world literature can be confusing, so can mapping a path through the seemingly inexhaustible range of career options and qualifications routes that are available in the modern world.

    Because we are determined to eradicate unfairness and disadvantage from our society, to create an environment in which the only limit on any person’s ability to go far is the extent of their own efforts. We must first identify and then overcome the barriers which currently hinder people from progressing.

    So what I want to say to you today is not just about careers guidance but about what good guidance can achieve. Careers guidance makes a difference. It’s in the engine room of social mobility; a vital part of the machinery of social justice.

    Good advice doesn’t just transform lives. It transforms our society by challenging the pre-conceived ideas about what each of us seeks. And what all of us can achieve.

    I take it that no one here would disagree that one of the biggest barriers that many people face today lies in the inability to match the right learning opportunities with the right employment choices to achieve their aspirations. Unless we inherit great wealth, this is an obstacle that virtually all of us have to face.

    And to face it successfully, there are few people who would not do better with good, professional advice of the right kind, at the right time. If we believe in fairness and if we believe in social justice, then we must also believe in the value of advice and guidance in helping people find the right path.

    The evidence clearly supports that conclusion.

    We know that young people who stay in education or training post-16 are more likely to find employment, and that guidance in the final year of compulsory schooling is an important factor in their decision to stay on. We know that many young people drop out of post-compulsory education or training because it does not meet their expectations, or because their chosen course was unsuitable.

    The right guidance is no less important to adults. 82 per cent of adults receiving careers guidance say that it is instrumental in their decision to learn or seek training. And over 20 per cent say that a lack of information is a significant barrier to learning.

    Guidance is also an important key in unlocking access to learning and progression for those facing disadvantage, helping them become socially mobile.

    Early career decisions can have the most important impacts on mobility through the course of people’s lives. Failing to progress can have a damaging effect on social confidence, which can hamper mobility. There is also evidence that guidance of insufficient quality can create barriers to learning for young people who face significant disadvantages.

    Guidance is also essential in helping people aim as high as they can. Alan Milburn recognised this in his report on access to the professions, noting that “guidance is crucial in helping young people to develop ambitious but achievable plans, which are more likely to lead to positive outcomes.”

    Sir Martin Harris’s report on widening access to Higher Education reinforces this picture, noting that students with similar qualifications from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to apply to and attend the most selective courses or institutions than their more advantaged peers. He also notes the impact of good quality advice on social confidence.

    And most recently, Lord Browne has made very clear recommendations in his review of Higher Education. In his view, “[careers guidance should] be delivered by certified professionals who are well-informed, benefit from continued training and professional development and whose status in schools is respected and valued.”

    So whether promoting social mobility, or helping people make educational and training choices, the importance of high quality careers guidance cannot be ignored.

    Alan Milburn’s report was titled “Unleashing Aspiration”, and that is exactly what I believe high quality careers guidance has the power to do, for young people and adults everywhere.

    There is also another important reason why we need to act.

    The impact of changing economic circumstances means that skills demands will increase at every level.

    As Leitch put it, better skills will be needed at higher levels “to drive leadership, management and innovation – the key drivers of productivity growth”, at intermediate levels to implement investment and innovation, and basic skills are “essential for people to be able to adapt to change”.

    The OECD stresses that as emerging economies start to deliver high skills at moderate cost, the OECD countries must themselves reform their skills policies. High quality advice and guidance is key to this development, but as Leitch pointed out “the current system in England is fragmented and fails to integrate advice on learning with careers advice”.

    We have to respond to these challenges.

    In whichever part of these islands we live, if we seek to promote social renewal by enabling more young people and adults to realise their aspirations of getting on in life; if we seek to support growth and productivity at every level; then effective, high-quality careers guidance is indispensible to our cause.

    At present, in England, we are falling short of that ideal far too often. We have not moved on far enough from the days when, to quote Disraeli, “To do nothing and get something formed a boy’s ideal of a manly career”.

    So let me outline what we propose to do about it.

    Of course, we must start from the position that the coalition Government inherited. And that’s by no means all bad.

    But while I recognise that there are examples of the Connexions service providing good careers guidance, the quality of careers advice for young people has not been consistently high. The universal aim of the Connexions service has meant, in practice, a dilution of its capacity to provide high quality, expert, impartial careers guidance.

    So I am clear that we need to restore a focus on specialist expertise in careers guidance for young people.

    Meanwhile, for adults, I appreciate that the Next Step service is an important achievement. But I want to go further still.

    Many of you know that I have long argued for the creation of a single, all-age careers service.

    A single, unified careers service would provide major benefits in terms of transparency and accessibility. And a single service with its own unique identity would have more credibility for people within it as well as users than the more fragmented arrangements that are currently in place.

    There are a range of other benefits, including the ability to support young people more effectively during their transition to adulthood. And that’s why creating an all-age service will be one of my and my Departments’ most important tasks over the coming months and years.

    As we go about this, it’s important to recognise that we’re not starting from scratch. On the contrary, we will build on Next Step, and on Connexions because we must not lose the best of either.

    In advocating this, I am certainly under no illusions about the Spending Review settlement. But if we are going to create the sort of comprehensive guidance service that I and many others think we need, then we will simply have to do more with less.

    That’s by no means an impossible task. Not if you approach it with pride in the importance of the task and with a willingness to use innovation and creativity where money is in short supply.

    So we will find new ways of providing face to face guidance that give young people, adults and communities what they need, and get the best from careers professionals

    Bringing careers advice for young people and adults together will help us to achieve some savings. But we will need to go further, and become much more imaginative in the way we make use of resources.

    We have a golden opportunity to build a service that will endure and the sector must rise to this challenge. There are always a hundred reasons to delay action until times change.

    There are doubters who will argue that we should wait until the financial situation is easier. Or until other reforms have bedded down. Or because it’s just less bother to let sleeping dogs lie.

    But I am a doer not a doubter, I believe that reform is needed now. Both to meet our national labour market needs better and to widen individual opportunities.

    We must build a path to a fairer and more open society.

    My vision for that future rests on two core principles:

    The first is that independent advice must be underpinned by professional expertise. That implies both strong leadership and a workforce of the highest calibre.

    Whatever good careers advisers achieve – and it’s a great deal – their public status too infrequently matches the importance of their job.

    So we will revitalise the professional status of careers guidance, looking to the Careers Profession Alliance to establish common professional standards and a code of ethics for careers professionals.

    We will implement the recommendations of the Careers Profession Task Force. In doing so, we will consider the Taskforce’s recommendation on levels of qualification, particularly the speed at which we could move towards establishing Level 6 – equivalent to an Honours degree – as the minimum standard for practising careers advisers within the service.

    We will also work with the Careers Profession Alliance and with awarding bodies to ensure that careers qualifications include an appropriate focus on the essentials of careers guidance.

    And we will insist that the all-age service meets demanding quality standards. Competition will be important in avoiding the complacency that can cause quality to slide.

    But most importantly, whether the public comes to recognise a culture of excellence amongst careers advisers depends mainly on you.

    On your ability to embrace the opportunities that reform offers. On your willingness to step up to the task of raising the status of your profession. On your determination to deliver the change we need to make individual dreams come true as they fulfil their potential.

    The second core principle of reform is independence.

    Young people and adults need impartial advice, which is independent of any organisation with a vested interest, and which is underpinned by objective and realistic information about careers, skills and the labour market.

    Just as I want to make sure that everyone has access to professional, independent advice, I also want to make sure that institutions know where that advice can be found.

    We will discuss with the sector how best to do that, perhaps by establishing a register of providers who meet the highest standards, and by a kite-mark, and by awards for excellence.

    I want all careers advisers to take pride in their profession, and to take their own professional development seriously. They must be seen to be the experts in their field and the most trusted source of advice.

    I want the professional organisations to lead the process of continuing to strengthen the status of advisers. That’s in their own interests, just as it’s in ours to empower them to play that role

    Because with greater independence comes greater responsibility.

    The rationale for change and the basic aims for reform are clear. So we need now to get on with the job.

    It is never too soon to fight the battle for social justice. We must not delay.

    So I can announce today that we will put in place as much as possible of the basis for an all-age careers service by September next year. And building on that, we will push ahead so that the all-age service is in place by April 2012.

    An indispensible part of that work will be gaining the confidence of educational institutions at all levels.

    Individual schools and colleges know their own learners and are better placed to assess their needs than anyone else. So it follows that on them must fall the responsibility for ensuring that all learners get the best advice and guidance possible.

    That should, of course, include information on vocational options like apprenticeships, as well as on academic options.

    I know that many schools do this very well already. They work effectively with their local Connexions service, and I have no doubt that they will continue to work effectively with the all-age careers service.

    But we ask too much of our teachers when we expect them to be excellent pedagogues and professional careers advisors. So too many schools are not equipped to provide young people with a full understanding of the options open to them. As a result, the ambitions of some are prematurely limited.

    That’s a waste that we just can’t afford.

    And that’s why I am clear that close partnerships – whereby schools work together with expert, independent advisers – must be at the heart of our new arrangements.

    I’m acutely aware that, with so much already expected of them, it would be asking too much to expect schools to keep up to date with all the latest developments in the labour market. So I want them to recognise the importance of independent, impartial, professional careers guidance, and to invest in it.

    I am confident that schools will want to secure the best for their students.

    For our part, we will provide them with the information and tools to secure independent and impartial guidance that empowers pupils make informed decisions about their future.

    With over 40 per cent of young people progressing to higher education these days, there’s an important role for universities too.

    Universities will continue to provide their own advice and guidance. But we will still encourage use of the all-age service and encourage its quality standards to be widely applied.

    I recognise that all this represents a significant shift for many within the careers sector, and, in particular, for local authorities, who are currently responsible for ensuring all young people receive careers guidance through the Connexions service.

    So let me make it clear that they will continue to have a vital role to play. Without them, we could not meet our target of achieving full participation by 2015.

    Local authorities in England will continue to be responsible for helping vulnerable youngsters to move forward in their lives and to participate in education, employment or training.

    They will need to maintain – as they do now – accurate data on young people’s participation in order to target support effectively on those who would otherwise suffer disadvantage.

    All this amounts to a serious programme of work. But my ambition, and that of the Coalition Government, does not stop there. Over time, I want to create an environment in which English careers guidance is recognised for the important public good it is, in which young people, adults, schools, colleges, universities and whole communities see its value, use it and invest in it.

    That’s a big task and it will require us to make some important changes. And I wanted this conference to be the first to hear them.

    I can confirm today that:

    First, we will ask the schools inspectorate to carry out a thematic review of careers education and other information, advice and guidance services for young people;

    Second, we will ask relevant national bodies to work with the careers sector to help schools, colleges and training organisations to learn from and share examples of good practice.

    Third, we will collate and publish clear evidence of the benefits and uses of careers guidance.

    Fourth, we will look at ways of recognising success and excellence, for example, developing awards for careers guidance professionals and those who have benefitted from it.

    And finally, we will consult you, the careers sector, on the scope for introducing a License to Practice for careers guidance, and the role it might play in securing quality.

    I will be asking the members of the Careers Profession Taskforce to monitor the progress we are making across this range of work, and intend to follow their recommendation to ask them to do so via two reports to the Government, one in March 2011 and one in March 2012.

    Careers guidance is often an important part of the journey for each individual. Very often when advice is bad, so are outcomes.

    But provided at the right time and in the right context, good advice from a trusted source can make the difference between sustained engagement in education, employment or training and a lifetime of disappointment,

    Engaging, inspiring, increasing social mobility – the job you do is the stuff of dreams.

    My plans aim to a radical and challenging programme of change. Delivering it successfully will require not just the efforts of those directly involved in providing careers guidance services, but of the wider education and training sector, too.

    Nevertheless, I know that the will for change, and a recognition of the benefits it can bring to millions of people’s lives, thrives here.

    And I know that the Institute will welcome the announcement of an all-age service for England.

    You called for it. We promised it in opposition. And we will deliver it in Government.

    In our hands lies the chance to change peoples prospects. What greater privilege, greater challenge can there be than the chance to change the future.

    I trust that you will have questions for me.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : New endowment fund to turn around weakest schools and raise standards for disadvantaged pupils

    PRESS RELEASE : New endowment fund to turn around weakest schools and raise standards for disadvantaged pupils

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 3 November 2010.

    The Secretary of State for Education has today allocated £110 million to establish an education endowment fund (EEF) designed to raise standards in underperforming schools.

    The EEF will distribute money to local authorities, academy sponsors, charities and other groups that bring forward innovative proposals to improve performance in our most challenging schools. Those bidding for funds from the EEF will have to outline how their proposals will raise attainment. Bidders must also demonstrate how they will be held accountable for the success of their proposals.

    The announcement comes as Mr Gove hosts a visit from Arne Duncan, US Secretary of Education. Mr Duncan is here to exchange ideas with the UK Government. On both sides of the Atlantic, reforming Governments are implementing ambitious plans to transform state education. Secretary Duncan has helped introduce charter schools, the equivalent of our Free Schools and academies, to help raise the attainment of disadvantaged students. He has also made funds available to improve teacher recruitment and training.

    The EEF draws on President Barack Obama and Secretary Duncan’s ‘Race to the Top’ programme, which invites states to apply for funding to trailblaze bold and innovative approaches in schools across the country.

    By inviting bids from those who wish to turn round our weakest schools, the Government is also building on the transformative potential of the new pupil premium. Our most challenging schools are overwhelmingly concentrated in our areas of greatest deprivation.

    The pupil premium will result in more money being allocated to support the education of all of our poorest children, adding £2.5 billion to school funding by the end of the CSR period. The EEF will allow many of the schools that educate our poorest children to do even more, and the innovative practice it encourages should drive improvement across the school system.

    The EEF will be administered at arm’s length from ministers. The team administering the fund will be appointed following an open competition.

    Funding for projects will come from returns on the EEF’s investment and fund managers will be able to draw down some of the capital from the total sum each year. The independent organisation that runs the EEF will also be expected to attract additional contributions from other organisations and philanthropists to add to the fund.

    This fund is being established from the money that was set aside when the Government took the decision not to increase the number of free school meals. The establishment of the fund fulfils the Government’s pledge to better use this money to improve the attainment of disadvantaged pupils.

    Secretary of State for Education, Michael Gove, said:

    The international evidence shows that we’re falling behind other countries educationally, and we have one of the most unequal school systems in the developed world. That’s why we need to press ahead with reforms which will raise standards for all children.

    This new fund builds on the success of President Obama’s ‘Race to the Top’ scheme. It will make schools and local authorities compete to help the poorest. Combined with our pupil premium, the expansion of the Academy programme, more rigorous exams and tough action to improve discipline, it adds up to a comprehensive package of school improvement.

    Each project will have to meet tough criteria in order to be awarded funding, and bidders must prove their innovative, bold and rigorous approaches will support school improvement. Projects can be run by schools, charities, teachers, local authorities, national leaders of education, or successful academy sponsors and principals.

    The EEF is just one part of the Government’s strategy for narrowing the attainment gap between the richest and poorest pupils and raising standards in underperforming schools. The Department’s detailed strategy for tackling the weakest schools will be laid out in the forthcoming schools white paper.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Education Secretary commits £110m to weakest schools

    PRESS RELEASE : Education Secretary commits £110m to weakest schools

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 3 November 2010.

    The Secretary of State for Education has today allocated £110 million to establish an education endowment fund (EEF) designed to raise standards in underperforming schools.

    The EEF will distribute money to local authorities, academy sponsors, charities and other groups that bring forward innovative proposals to improve performance in our most challenging schools. Those bidding for funds from the EEF will have to outline how their proposals will raise attainment.

    The announcement comes as Mr Gove hosts a visit from Arne Duncan, US Secretary of Education. Mr Duncan is here to exchange ideas with the UK Government.

    Secretary of State for Education, Michael Gove, said:

    The international evidence shows that we’re falling behind other countries educationally, and we have one of the most unequal school systems in the developed world. That’s why we need to press ahead with reforms which will raise standards for all children.

    This new fund builds on the success of President Obama’s ‘Race to the Top’ scheme. It will make schools and local authorities compete to help the poorest. Combined with our pupil premium, the expansion of the Academy programme, more rigorous exams and tough action to improve discipline, it adds up to a comprehensive package of school improvement.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Michael Gove responds to Chief Schools Adjudicator report

    PRESS RELEASE : Michael Gove responds to Chief Schools Adjudicator report

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 1 November 2010.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove said:

    I would like to thank Dr Ian Craig, the Chief Schools Adjudicator, for his annual report, which raises a number of important issues.

    It is absolutely right that every parent should want their child to go to an excellent school, so school admissions will continue to be a controversial and sensitive issue as long as there are too few good school places.

    I am committed to driving up educational standards so all parents have that choice of high-quality schools close to home, which is why we are encouraging providers to set up new schools and turning round under-performing schools. And so no child is disadvantaged because of their background, I am introducing the pupil premium.

    I also intend to make the school admissions framework, including the School Admissions Code, simpler and fairer, and I have asked my officials to start speaking with key stakeholders.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Russia deploys merciless warfare methods in Ukraine – UK statement to the OSCE

    PRESS RELEASE : Russia deploys merciless warfare methods in Ukraine – UK statement to the OSCE

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 1 September 2022.

    UK Ambassador Bush criticises the Russian government for the malign political and geopolitical tactics used in their illegal war against Ukraine.

    Thank you, Mr Chair. Over the last 6 months, Russia’s merciless warfare methods, including relentless targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure, have proved beyond our worst fears. In my statement today, I will focus on the malign political and geopolitical tactics employed by Russia, and their impact on people throughout the world.

    We are by now familiar with the Kremlin’s administrative playbook for trying to establishing control in the regions it temporarily controls: but it has proved ineffectual. Attempted ‘passportisation’ will never undermine Ukrainian national identity. And the international community will not recognise the results of staged referenda that have been pre-decided in Moscow. In particular, the UK condemns Russia’s plans to use their proxies to hold illegitimate “trials” of captured members of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in eastern Ukraine. Russia must comply with international law and treat these individuals in accordance with their status as Prisoners of War.

    We are also familiar with Russian tactics that are even more sinister. The second Moscow Mechanism report documented widespread ‘filtration camps’. Here at the OSCE, we have heard moving testimonies from both survivors of and families affected by the filtration process. We have seen credible evidence of civilians abused, physically and psychologically, and kept in unsanitary conditions with insufficient food and water. Survivors describe torture, humiliation and ill-treatment. According to the Moscow Mechanism report, those who fail filtration are “separated from others and often simply disappear”. The report also found evidence of other authoritarian practices, including large-scale deportations of people to Russia against their will, and cases of orphaned children brought to Russia, whose whereabouts are now unknown. We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of the darkest chapters of European history; not use them as a blueprint.

    Having failed to garner global support for his war, President Putin tried instead to hold the world to ransom – with food, energy and by deploying military personnel and weaponry to Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Global food security was already under threat from COVID-19 and climate change. The rest of the world saw the risk of famine as an urgent global challenge: President Putin saw it as an opportunity to weaponise food supply. 47 million of the world’s most vulnerable people are one step away from famine, and close to 1m are already experiencing famine-like conditions because of the Russian government’s conduct in Ukraine.

    The Russian government has applied the same tactics to energy, and again, the most vulnerable groups are being hit hardest. But attempting to coerce the world through energy exports will backfire. Russia has merely proved itself to be an unreliable supplier, and hastened diversification away from Russian energy.

    We are grateful to the UN and Turkiye for brokering a deal that enables grain shipments to leave Ukraine. We also welcome the news that Director-General Grossi’s and his team have managed to get to Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant today. But Russia should not be congratulated for solving problems it has itself created. The only way President Putin can truly alleviate the global crises he has created is by ending the war and withdrawing from Ukraine.

    To underpin the despicable tactics I have described today, the Russian state has generated extensive propaganda. Kremlin information operations seek to undermine Ukrainian sovereignty, create false pretexts for invasion, obscure the truth and hide war crimes. But the Russian government is losing the information war. We have exposed President Putin’s online troll factories. And independent organisations and institutions, including the OSCE, have amassed evidence that Russia is targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure. The Russian government knows this, which is why they are enforcing such draconian censorship throughout their own country. The Kremlin has legislated against references to ‘war’ or ‘invasion’, closed Russia’s independent press, prevented protests from taking place, stopped access to social media and arrested individuals for telling the truth. The Russian authorities fear facts; we will continue to use them to undermine the Kremlin’s strategy.

    I conclude today with the words of my Prime Minister during his visit to Kyiv last week, “What happens in Ukraine matters to us all….But the war is only going to end one way. Ukraine will win and Britain will be by your side.” Thank you, Mr Chair.

     

  • Boris Johnson – 2022 Speech on Energy

    Boris Johnson – 2022 Speech on Energy

    The speech made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 1 September 2022.

    Good afternoon everybody

    Thank you for coming today, thank you for coming everybody to Sizewell

    It’s wonderful to be here and to see this astonishing plant and to meet the staff and some of the young people who are going to be working here, already are working here..

    Now, when I was a child, I had a wonderful book – a much thumbed ladybird book called the story of nuclear power,

    It was published in 1972

    And I used to go through it again and again

    and I was enthralled to read how scientists split the atom here in the UK for the first time

    and they did it at the Cavendish laboratories in Cambridge

    and I noted that the world’s first civilian nuclear reactor, the first civilian nuclear power station was at Calder Hall in Cumbria, now of course Sellafield

    and I look back at the optimism in every page of that book and what has happened since
    and at the short-termism of successive British governments

    at their failure to do justice to our pioneering nuclear history
    their abject failure to think of the needs of future generations

    above all the families that are today struggling with the cost of energy in this country

    I feel like one of those beautifully drawn illustrations of what happens in a nuclear pile when the graphite rods are taken out at the wrong moment

    My blood starts to boil and steam comes out of my ears and I think I’m going to melt down

    And I asked myself the question: What happened to us?

    When Sizewell was opened in 1966 it was the eighth reactor that this country had built in just 7 years

    Why have we never got back to that kind of rhythm? Have we lost the gumption and the dynamism of our parents and grandparents

    but it gets worse

    When Sizewell B -fantastic white dome – was completed in 1995 it was the 5th reactor in 7 years

    1995 – an era that was technologically so primitive that people used things called carphones and went down to blockbusters to rent VHS videos

    Think of the colossal technical progress in other areas – and contrast the paralysis in nuclear energy

    how many new nuclear power stations have we built in the 27 years since?

    How many have been connected to the grid?

    How many slices of bread could we toast with the additional nuclear power we have created?

    how many washing machines could we power?

    How many families have been helped with extra nuclear energy?

    The answer is, none, zero, zilch

    The French, they have loads of nuclear power stations already, they’ve built four more since 1995– bringing their total reactor fleet up to about 56, the Indians have added about 12 and the Chinese have built more than 50 additional nuclear reactions since 1995!

    and you know why we have failed? It’s not even as though we have some cultural aversion to nuclear power

    I just met those nice protestors outside – it wasn’t some atomkraft nein danke – they seem to be objecting to the disruption to the roads, it’s pure nimbyism out there

    I will diagnose the problem

    It’s called myopia. It’s called short-termism

    It’s a chronic case of politicians not being able to see beyond the political cycle

    Tell that to British businesses and industries that are desperately short of affordable and reliable electricity

    tell that to the families struggling with the cost of heat and light this winter

    It is because of that kind of myopia that here in the country that first split the atom we have only 15 per cent of our electricity from nuclear – and it is falling

    whereas in France it is at 70 per cent

    and we ask ourselves why France is more self reliant than we are when it comes to energy

    why they have found it relatively easier to hold down their costs

    and yes nuclear always looks – when you begin, it always looks relatively expensive to build and to run

    but look at what is happening today, look at the results of Putin’s war

    it is certainly cheap by comparison with hydrocarbons today

    in fact if Hinkley Point C were already running already this year

    it’s been delayed for ages and ages of course

    it would be cutting fuel bills by £3 bn

    I’ll say that again – if Hinkley Point C were running now, it would be cutting fuel bills by £3 bn

    So you have to look ahead
    And you have to beware of the false economy

    If you have an old kettle that takes ages to boil, it may cost you £20 to replace it

    But if you get a new one you will save ten pounds a year every year on your electricity bill

    I remember when the government finally did the deal on Hinkley C– in fact by then I was already sitting in the cabinet

    and I remember some people protesting that the strike price of £92.50 per kilowatt hour was very, very expensive

    it doesn’t look so expensive today

    that is why we must pull our national finger out and get on with Sizewell C

    That is why we are putting up to £700 m into the deal

    Just part of the £1.7bn of Government funding available for developing a large-scale nuclear project to final investment stage in this Parliament,

    and in the course of the next few weeks I am absolutely confident that it will get over the line.

    and we will get it over the line because it would be madness not to

    This project will create tens of thousands of jobs, but it will also power 6m homes – that is roughly a fifth of all the homes in the UK

    So it will help to fix the energy needs not just of this generation but of the next

    a baby born this year will be getting energy from Sizewell C long, long after she retires

    and this new reactor is just a part of our Great British nuclear campaign

    we will build a reactor a year again

    we will build them across the country, at least eight of them, large ones and small modular reactors

    and of course they are not the entire solution to our energy needs – far from it

    yes we are increasing our own domestic hydrocarbons

    we’ve got more gas out of the north sea this year than last year, considerably more, 26% more

    we are putting a big bet on hydrogen and on carbon capture and storage

    and because of the activism of the government we are now racing to our target – and we will hit it – of 50 GW of offshore wind by 2030

    this is a huge amount, it’s probably half the electricity needs of the country from offshore wind

    I’ll tell everybody who thinks hydrocarbons are the only answer and we should get fracking and all that

    that offshore wind is now the cheapest form of electricity in this country
    offshore wind is nine times cheaper than gas because of the insanity of what Putin has done

    and that’s why it makes sense for us to become more self-reliant

    and of course it is entirely clean and green

    so renewables are not only helping us to defeat climate change

    they are also helping to keep bills lower than they would otherwise be in this crisis

    what Putin has done is to launch a kind of kamikaze attack on the world economy

    He doesn’t care how much pain Russia suffers

    He believes that ultimately we will flinch, that western politicians do not have the stomach for the fight

    He believes that we will give up on Ukraine, give in to his aggression and go back to mainlining his hydrocarbons

    And I have to tell you he is wrong

    He is wrong about his assumptions about the British people

    I think he is wrong about other European governments too by the way

    I talked to Olaf Sholz last night and it is absolutely clear that Germany is resolute in moving away from dependence on Russian

    And Putin in this strategy is going to fail

    So we are helping people now with the cost of living and of course there will be more cash to come in the months ahead

    Substantial sums – that’s absolutely clear

    But now even more important our British energy security strategy of Great British nuclear is rectifying the chronic mistakes of the past

    taking the long term decisions that this country needs
    and I would say frankly folks over the last 3 years this government has done some very difficult things

    we have done some of the hardest tasks that you can set politicians

    we fixed our relations with the European Union

    we settled that argument pretty conclusively

    we got brexit done and took back control of our law-making even though we knew it would not be easy

    we opened up our economy post covid faster than any other major country because of the speed of our vaccine rollout

    we led the whole of Europe in helping the Ukrainians and in standing up to Putin and seeing the wisdom from the start in arming them and assisting them

    and at every stage of the last three years – and I hope I can say this given this will be one of my last speeches in this office

    at every stage what we have tried to do is put in the things that this country will need for the long term

    to try to look at what future generations will need for their prosperity, their productivity and for their quality of life and to reduce the cost of living as well

    so whether that’s gigabit broadband gone up from 7% penetration to 70% of premises now

    three new high speed rail lines

    investing massively in this country’s ability to make its own vaccines

    fixing social care

    coming up with a solution for that problem

    I think it would be fair to say this government has not shirked the big decisions

    we have raised our eyes, we’ve looked to the horizon

    and I just say whoever follows me next week I know that they will do the same

    No more national myopia

    No more short termism

    let’s think about our future, let’s think about our kids and grandchildren, about the next generation

    with the prophetic candour and clarity of someone about to hand over the torch of office

    I say go nuclear and go large and go with Sizewell C.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Independent Member for the House of Lords Appointments Commission

    PRESS RELEASE : Independent Member for the House of Lords Appointments Commission

    The press release issued by Downing Street on 1 September 2022.

    The Prime Minister has today confirmed the appointment of Harry Mount as an Independent Member of the House of Lords Appointments Commission.

    Harry Mount has today been confirmed as the new Independent Member of the House of Lords Appointments Commission (HOLAC) from 11th September 2022.

    The appointment follows a recent open campaign.

    Harry Mount

    Mr. Mount is a journalist and writer. Editor of the Oldie magazine and contributor to the Financial Times, Daily Telegraph, Spectator, Daily Mail and New York Times. He was a former media and libel barrister at Middle Temple and investment analyst.

    Lord True, Minister of State at the Cabinet Office welcomed the new Member appointment, saying:

    I would like to congratulate Harry Mount on his appointment as an Independent Member to the House of Lords Appointments Commission. Harry Mount brings a wealth of experience from his career, and has much to offer House of Lords Appointments Commission and I wish him the best in his role

    Notes:

    HOLAC has two main functions:

    • to recommend individuals for appointment as non-party political life peers; and to vet nominations for life peers, including those nominated by the UK political parties, to ensure the highest standards of propriety.
    • Independent Members are appointed for five year non-renewable terms. More information about HOLAC can be found on their website.
    • The role was widely advertised, including on the Public Appointments website, from 8th June and closed on 12th July.