Blog

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 7 October 2022.

Ambassador Simon Manley explained the UK’s position on the resolution entitled ‘Technical assistance and capacity building to address the human rights implications of the nuclear legacy in the Marshall Islands’.

Thank you, Mr President.

Let me start by thanking the core group for presenting the resolution before us to this Council. We commend the core group and particularly the Republic of the Marshall Islands itself, for the constructive approach they have taken during the negotiations on this text. I am sure all of us in this room were moved by what the Chargé d’Affairs from the Marshall Islands said just a moment ago. And I am sure we are not alone in expressing our condolences to him and his Permanent Representative for her loss.

Mr President,

The UK would like to stress that we fully recognise the seriousness of the challenges that the Republic of the Marshall Islands has faced following nuclear testing between 1946 and 1958. We commend the efforts made by both the Government of the Marshall Islands and the Government of the United States to address these challenges and welcome the ongoing bilateral discussions between the two governments on these issues.

It is with deep regret, however, that the UK must disassociate itself from Operative Paragraphs 4, 5 and 11 of this Draft Resolution. As set out in our Explanation of Vote in respect of Human Rights Council Resolution 48/13 last year, and our Explanation of Vote in respect of UN General Assembly Resolution A/76/L.75 this year, we don’t consider that there is international consensus on the legal basis of the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. By extension, we do not accept the connection made in the Resolution before us to the testing of nuclear weapons and its impact on such a right. Joining consensus on this text should therefore not be misinterpreted as the UK agreeing to any expansion of the recognition of this right. Furthermore, we are not persuaded that the OHCHR is the appropriate body to advise the National Nuclear Commission on these matters, as set out in Operative Paragraph 11 of this resolution.

Notwithstanding those concerns, we do however join consensus on this initiative.

Thank you.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 7 October 2022.

UK Human Rights Ambassador, Rita French, delivered a statement ahead of the vote on the resolution ‘From rhetoric to reality: a global call for concrete action against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance’.

Mr. President, we remain resolute in our commitment to combating all forms of racism, racial discrimination and xenophobia and related intolerance whether that be at home or abroad. Discrimination of any kind has no place in society, and we will continue to treat all forms of discrimination with equal seriousness.

Nonetheless, we have a number of concerns with this text. We do not agree with the multiple references to the Durban Conference, given the historic concerns over antisemitism. And we cannot accept the references to the Durban Review Conference or the positive language regarding last year’s commemorative event in New York and its political declaration.

We do not agree with claims made in this resolution that states are required to make reparations for the slave trade and colonialism, which caused great suffering to many but were not, at that time, violations of international law. Moreover, these claims divert focus from the pressing challenges of tackling contemporary racism and global inequality – which are global challenges affecting all regions. We believe that the most effective way for us all today to respond to the cruelty of the past is to ensure that current and future generations do not forget what happened.

Mr. President, we stressed last year that the importance of the fight against racism requires that we move forward together on a common path. For that to happen, we must come together to find a new approach, one that focuses on what we are all individually and collectively going to do to combat the scourge that is modern-day racism. This draft resolution, however, does not offer the sort of new approach around which we can achieve consensus and for that reason we will vote against it.

We are committed to continuing a dialogue with the sponsors of this resolution and hope that we might be able to reach a different outcome in the future.

Thank you Mr. President.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 7 October 2022.

Ambassador Simon Manley delivered a general remark after a vote on the situation of human rights in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China.

Thank you, Mr President

Permit me to make a few remarks after the vote in relation to the Draft Decision to hold a debate on the Human Rights Situation in Xinjiang.

Members of the core group that proposed the Decision align themselves with this statement.

Let me begin by thanking every member of this Council who voted in favour of the Draft Decision, as well as every nation which co-sponsored the draft. We welcome the support of each and every one of you.

Our aim in proposing this Draft Decision was to bring before the Council an issue, which clearly warrants this Council’s attention. No state should be free to avoid scrutiny over allegations of possible crimes against humanity, whatever their region, whatever their size, or whatever their influence. And to be clear, that includes the UK.

It has been clear from talking to colleagues over recent weeks, that almost everybody in this room acknowledges that there are serious concerns about the human rights situation in Xinjiang. The recent OHCHR assessment confirms these concerns with meticulous rigour, drawing extensively on first-hand testimonies and information published by Chinese authorities.

While the Decision was not adopted, the many discussions around the draft decision in Geneva and in Human Rights Council member capitals, have served to highlight the scale, and the nature, of the terrible violations being faced by Uyghur and other Muslims in Xinjiang.

It was therefore correct for the Core Group to seek a debate at the Council. To have done otherwise would have been to ignore the plight of those subjected to arbitrary detention, torture or ill-treatment, forced labour, sexual and gender-based violence, forced sterilisations and enforced disappearance. It would have been to disregard the testimony of those who have experienced these violations first hand and helped to bring them to light, despite huge personal risk. It would have been to look the other way, when faced with allegations of possible crimes against humanity, committed against huge numbers of people from minority groups based on their ethnicity and religion.

Mr President, dear colleagues,

Problems don’t go away by ignoring them. So, we will continue to raise our concerns about the human rights situation in Xinjiang, in international fora. We will continue to urge China to change course, and to cease the practices which the OHCHR assessment has described to us, in such clear and disturbing detail. And we will not forget the plight of the Uyghurs in China.

Thank you.

The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 7 October 2022.

Ambassador Simon Manley, Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, delivered an explanation of vote on the resolution to renew the mandate of the Fact-Finding Mission and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on Venezuela.

Thank you, Mr President,

Let me thank, first of all, the core group for presenting this draft resolution. We fully support the renewal of the mandate of the Fact-Finding Mission and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Both have done a remarkable job in revealing the extent of human rights violations committed in Venezuela and providing recommendations for the steps that need to be taken.

The Fact-Finding Mission’s findings show why it is so important that it should continue its work. These include evidence of grave human rights violations taking place as part of a widespread and systematic attack by the authorities on the civilian population. In the absence of official data from Venezuela, the Fact-Finding Mission’s independent and evidence-based reports provide crucial documentation of events that deserve the attention of all of us on this Council.

We also welcome the renewal of OHCHR’s mandate. Its presence and the protection services it offers have been critical for victims and detainees. The Office plays a key role in indicating the extent of cooperation from the Venezuelan authorities and in tracking developments in the human rights situation in the country. We are in no doubt that its work in Venezuela greatly helps all of us in the international community to monitor continuing violations as well as positive developments.

We do urge Venezuela to comply with the OHCHR’s previous recommendations in full; to continue technical cooperation in good faith; and to provide the OHCHR with unfettered access to the whole country.

Mr President, we call on this Council to stand up for freedom and in solidarity with the people of Venezuela. Renewal of the Fact-Finding Mission and the Office of the High Commissioner’s mandates will provide continuity, scrutiny and accountability, and a path towards a freer future for the people of Venezuela.

We will therefore vote in favour of the draft resolution before this Council and we urge our fellow members of this Council to do the same.