The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chris Ruane on 2014-03-31.
To ask the hon. Member for South West Devon, representing the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission, pursuant to the Answer of 3 December 2013, Official Report, columns 611-2W, on electoral registration officers, which local authorities failed to meet performance standard 1 on using local government databases, in each year for which information is available.
Mr Gary Streeter
The Electoral Commission informs me that the Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) who did not meet performance standard 1 in each year from 2008 to 2010 are shown in the table below. No EROs have been assessed as not meeting this standard in 2011, 2012 and 2013.
Table: EROs not meeting Performance Standard 1
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
|
Barnsley
|
Bradford
|
Barnsley
|
|
Berwick-upon-Tweed
|
Nottingham
|
Nottingham
|
|
Blaby
|
Sefton
|
|
|
Blackburn with Darwen
|
|
|
|
Brentwood
|
|
|
|
Chester-le-street*
|
|
|
|
Durham*
|
|
|
|
Harborough
|
|
|
|
Ipswich
|
|
|
|
North East Derbyshire
|
|
|
|
North Lanarkshire**
|
|
|
|
Nottingham
|
|
|
|
Sutton
|
|
|
|
South Lanarkshire**
|
|
|
|
Three Rivers
|
|
|
|
Windsor and Maidenhead
|
|
|
|
Weymouth and Portland
|
|
|
|
Walsall
|
|
|
*Chester-le Street and Durham are now part of County Durham unitary authority.
**North and South Lanarkshire are covered by one ERO
The Electoral Commission also informs me that it published its report, titled ‘Readiness for the transition to Individual Electoral Registration’, which included its assessment of ERO performance in 2013, on 31 March, and wrote to the honourable member with a copy of the report. The report explains that all EROs reported that they were meeting or exceeding standard 1 in 2013, and that the Commission is in the process of conducting a detailed analysis of EROs’ electoral registration data from the 2013 canvass, following which it will publish its final assessment of EROs’ performance.
