Blog

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nicholas Soames on 2014-04-28.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, who all the core participants in the Al-Sweady Inquiry were; and what the name and firm was of each of those participants’ legal representatives.

Mr Mark Francois

The following Iraqi nationals have been designated as core participants in the Al-Sweady Inquiry as they were either detained, or are related to those who died, during the engagements on 14 May 2004. All are represented by Public Interest Lawyers (PIL):

1. Hamzah Joudah Faraj ALMALJE
2. Mahdi Jasim Abdullah AL-BEHADILI
3. Ibrahim Gattan Hasan AL-ISMAEELI
4. Kadhim Abbas Lafta AL-BEHADILI
5. Abbas Abd Ali Abdulridha AL-HAMEEDAWI
6. Ahmed Jabbar Hammood AL-FURAIJI
7. Hussein Fadhil Abbas AL-BEHADILI
8. Atiyah Sayyid Abdulridha AL-BAIDHANI
9. Hussein Gubari Ali AL-LAMI
10. Kahz’al Jabratallah Khalad Mulla AL-HELFI
11. Hatar Moutashar Zeidan Shamekhy AL-LAMI
12. Khudhur Al-Swaiedi
13. Jasem Khalloufi Khreibet Al Alyawi AL-JAMINDARI
14. Ali Ati Raheemah AL-MOZANI
15. Rashak AL-AMSHANI
16. Sabrah Maryoosh HUSSEIN
17. Kamil Mowat Mohammed AL-MOZANI
18. Saad Radhi Khafeef AL-KEEMY
19. Yousef Ouda BADAY
20. Qassim Ghelan Neema Sahn AL-MAJIDI
21. Bareq Mohammed Hussein AL-KHALIFA
22. Ahmed Mshatat KAZEM
23. Karam Yaseen Laheet Sneshee AL-MOZANI
24. Zahra Resan MUHSIN
25. Abdelzahra Atti DAWOOD
26. Mahud Jihaijeh Dawood AL-MOZANI
27. Ali Jaseeb Ghazi AL-MUHAMMADAWI
28. Jabra Abdulah MOHSIN
29. Nasser Ali Husain AL-DOUGHAAN

The remaining Iraqi witnesses, most of whom are also represented by PIL, are considered by the Inquiry to be witnesses rather than core participants.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is also a core participant in the Inquiry as it is the Government Department that was responsible for the conduct of the British Servicemen who are the subject of allegations.

Although the Treasury Solicitor’s Department is not a core participant, the Inquiry Chairman has accorded them equivalent status in recognition of the very large number (over 500) of current and former service personnel that they represent in this Inquiry.

A smaller number of military witnesses were either unrepresented or represented by Kennedy’s and are considered witnesses, not core participants.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nicholas Soames on 2014-04-28.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library copies of his Department’s force structure cost model.

Mr Philip Hammond

I am withholding the information requested as its disclosure would be commercially sensitive and would prejudice the economic interests of the United Kingdom as well as the capability, effectiveness and security of the Armed Forces.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nicholas Soames on 2014-04-28.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library copies of his Department’s output maps.

Mr Philip Hammond

I regret that I must withhold the requested information as its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nicholas Soames on 2014-04-28.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library a copy of his Department’s cost of defence output categories taxonomy.

Mr Philip Hammond

The Ministry of Defence’s cost of defence taxonomy is as follows:

Frigates
Aircraft Carriers
Destroyers
Lynx Mk 3/8
Minehunters
Patrol vessels
Survey vessels and Ice Patrol
RW (SAR)
Test, Simulation
Landing Platform Dock
Landing Platform Helicopter
Landing Ship Dock
Sea King Mk 7 ASaC, Mk 5 SAR
Army Manning/Training Margin
Army phase 1 training
Army phase 2 training
Army phase 3 training
Defence CBRN Wing
Civilian Training
Light Brigades
Air Assault Brigade
Armoured Brigades
Attack Helicopters
Support Helicopters
Mech Brigades
RAF Force Protection
RAF Reserves
Royal Marines
RNR and RMR
Logistic Brigades
2 MED Brigade
Defence Medical Services
Artillery Regts
Engr Regts
Signals Regts
HQ Theatre Troops
Commitments staff
PJHQ, JFHQ, Theatre HQs
Battle-Space Command and Control Communications and Information Systems
IS and Communications Capability Projects
Deployed Ops supporting units
Deployable HQ
Maritime Warfare Centre
Joint Combat Aircraft
Tornado
Nuclear Deterrent
Nuclear Estate
Merlin
Ship Submarine Ballistic Nuclear
Ship Submarine Nuclear
Estate Disposals
MOD Estate
Regional Prime Contracts
Service Families Accommodation
Single Living Accommodation
Supporting infrastructure (utilities)
Sustainability (DE&S War Reserves / Op Stocks)
IS for Logistics
Permanent Joint Operating Bses
A400M
BAe125
BAe146
C17
Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft
Hercules
Tristar
VC10
Auxiliary Oiler
Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment
Royal Fleet Auxiliary
Forward Repair Ship
Joint Casualty Treatment Ship
Defence Intelligence Staff
ASTOR
E3-D
Rivet Joint
Ballistic Missile Early Warning System
Electronic Warfare
UK Air Surveillance and Control
Army Joint and Collective Training
Specialist Training
Defence Academy
RAF Joint and Collective Training
RN Joint and Collective Training
RAF Manning/Training Margin
RAF phase 1 training
RAF phase 2 training
RAF phase 3 training
Army Cadets
Army Recruiting
RAF Cadets
RAF Recruiting
RAF Aerobatic Team
RN Cadets
RN Recruiting
Regional Forces – Northern Ireland
Regional Forces – Germany
Regional Forces – GB
SIT Outputs
Army Reserves
RN Manning/Training Margin
RN phase 1 training
RN phase 2 training
RN phase 3 training
MOD Police and Guarding
Special Forces
Typhoon
Fleet Air Arm Fixed Wing

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nicholas Soames on 2014-04-28.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the costs of the (a) Baha Moussa inquiry and (b) Al-Sweady inquiry are classified by his Department as being operational and reclaimable from the Treasury Special Reserve.

Mr Mark Francois

The costs of the Baha Mousa and Al-Sweady inquiries were not deemed by the Department to be true net additional costs associated with activity to support specifically authorised operations and were not reclaimed from the Treasury Special Reserve.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nicholas Soames on 2014-04-28.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library copies of all invoices submitted by public interest lawyers for work undertaken in relation to Al-Sweady Inquiry.

Mr Mark Francois

The Al-Sweady Inquiry has cost the public purse £28.4 million to 31 March 2014. The potential cost of the Inquiry to its completion is £31.1 million.

The information requested is commercial in confidence and cannot be provided without a significant level of redaction of sensitive information.

However I am able to provide a summary of costs incurred by Public Interest Lawyers for work undertaken in relation to the Al-Sweady Inquiry up to 31 March 2014.

Summary of Payments made to Public Interest Lawyers
in relation to the Al-Sweady Inquiry.

Date of Payment Amount of Payment (£)

March 2010 6,921.60

August 2010 68,060.36

October 2010 45,752.15

February 2011 41,581.11

May 2011 94,154.64

June 2011 6,210.00

July 2011 33,828.33

September 2011 10,113.68

November 2011 6,445.34

December 2011 2,421.51

January 2012 68,343.35

February 2012 37,838.53

April 2012 21,775.17

May 2012 47,491.94

June 2012 16,328.20

July 2012 5,200.00

August 2012 220.60

September 2012 10,115.00

November 2012 100,587.10

December 2012 46,352.33

January 2013 99,208.41

February 2013 51,117.56

March 2013 74,356.24

May 2013 197,070.38

Junuary 2013 107,544.50

July 2013 164,335.64

August 2013 85,516.25

September 2013 33,091.25

October 2013 176,401.67

November 2013 187,376.83

January 2014 174,806.09

February 2014 36,133.25

March 2014 59,093.74

April 2014 301,909.00

Grand Total 2,417,701.75

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nicholas Soames on 2014-04-28.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he plans to extend the Duty Holder Concept Regulations to apply to (a) Ministers and (b) officials in his Department.

Anna Soubry

Under the policy introduced across Defence, a Duty Holder is an official (military or civilian) who owns, manages and is accountable for risks to life of people in his or her area of responsibility. Senior Duty Holders, who head the Department’s Top Level Budget areas and Trading Fund Agencies, are required by the Secretary of State’s Policy Statement on Health, Safety & Environmental Protection to refer to him any risks that they consider cannot be reduced as low as reasonably practicable.