Blog

  • Susan Elan Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    Susan Elan Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Susan Elan Jones on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what assessment he has made of the effect of Government subsidies for the generation of biomass power using domestic wood feed stocks on the UK’s wood panel industry; and if he will make a statement.

    Gregory Barker

    At the request of the wood panel industry, the Department carried out an analysis of domestic wood use by biomass generating stations, both through their returns on actual use under the sustainability reporting requirements of the renewables obligation and through the forecasts large scale generators provided to the Department as part of a voluntary exercise. Generators provided information on the amount of domestic and imported woody biomass that is likely to be used for electricity generation up to 2017. We published the aggregated results of last years’ analysis at:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/246006/UK_wood_and_biomass.pdf

    These data support the Department’s initial estimates of the amount of UK biomass that is expected to be used for electricity generation up to 2017 (of between 2.5 and 3.5 million oven dried tonnes (modt)). Use of UK biomass for electricity has remained stable over the 2009-12 period at between 2.3 and 2.5 modt (of which between 1.3 and 1.6 modt was wood).

    We intend to repeat this exercise this year.

  • Kate Green – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    Kate Green – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Kate Green on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, whether his Department expects to consult on the future of the Warm Home Discount.

    Gregory Barker

    Last year, we announced a new £320m spending commitment for the Warm Home Discount in 2014/15. We intend to consult on the future operation of the scheme in due course.

  • Alun Cairns – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    Alun Cairns – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Alun Cairns on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, to which geographical areas the roll-out programme for smart meters will extend; and when their programme will happen in each area.

    Gregory Barker

    In Great Britain, we are adopting a supplier-led approach to the roll-out of smart meters. Energy suppliers are required to take ‘all reasonable steps’ to install smart meters to all of their domestic and smaller non-domestic customers in Wales, England and Scotland by 2020.

    There is no centralised roll-out strategy and suppliers are free to plan the roll-out in a way that suits their business and the needs of their customers, subject to the requirement to complete the roll-out by 2020. They are considering a range of factors in developing their strategies for this, such as the geographical location of their customers, the age of the current meter stock, and the extent to which they wish to respond to customer demand.

  • Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Steve McCabe on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what guidance his Department gives teachers and those working in schools on responding to a violent student with special educational needs.

    Elizabeth Truss

    We have issued advice to schools on the use of reasonable force, which makes clear that teachers have a specific power to use reasonable force to prevent pupils from causing injury to themselves or others, causing damage to property or from causing disorder. While there is no requirement for schools to have a policy on the use of force, we say that it is good practice to do so. Our advice says that any school policy on the use of reasonable force should acknowledge their legal duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled children and children with special educational needs (SEN). Whether or not to physically intervene is down to the professional judgement of the staff member concerned and should always depend on individual circumstances and the needs of the individual pupil.

    Additionally, we have laid before Parliament a new 0-25 SEN and Disability Code of Practice. This makes it clear that schools should seek to identify whether there are any factors, such as undiagnosed special educational needs, that might underlie disruptive behaviour. We also issued advice on Behaviour and Mental Health in June 2014 to help teachers differentiate between pupils that are simply behaving badly, and behaviour – whether it is disruptive, withdrawn, anxious, depressed or otherwise – that may be related to an unmet mental health need. This advice also outlined how these children can be supported.

  • Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Steve McCabe on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what guidance his Department gives schools and teachers on online abuse from a student towards a teacher.

    Elizabeth Truss

    Guidance to schools about online abuse by pupils towards teachers is set out in our advice document, ‘Preventing and Tackling Bullying’. This guidance signposts schools to ‘Digizen.Org’ who offer a range of advice and support for school staff. Schools can also access a range of practical resources from the UK Safer Internet Centre.

  • Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Steve McCabe on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment he has made of the provision of advice for students with special educational needs.

    Mr Edward Timpson

    The Department for Education, in partnership with the Council for Disabled Children, has worked directly with a number of young people, including students, with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Their views have helped shape the reforms to the current SEND system to ensure it meets their needs – including how they would like to receive information and advice. Arrangements for providing information, advice and support for young people are set out in the SEND Code of Practice which was laid before Parliament on 11 June 2014.

    From this September, local authorities will be required to provide information and advice directly to children and young people with SEND as well as to parents. Staff working directly with children and young people should be trained to support and work in partnership with them. Local information and advice services should direct young people to specialist support to help them prepare for employment, independent living (including housing) and participation in society. It should also provide access to careers advice where needed.

  • Nick de Bois – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Nick de Bois – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Nick de Bois on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what capital funding has been made available to free schools in Enfield North constituency since May 2010.

    Mr Edward Timpson

    The Department for Education publishes the final capital costs for all free schools online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/capital-funding-for-open-free-schools

  • Graham Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Graham Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Graham Jones on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to ensure Ofsted is able to undertake the proposed increase in inspections of apprenticeship providers.

    Matthew Hancock

    Our apprenticeship reforms will improve quality by involving employers in defining the new standards and assessment and by controlling the funding of apprenticeships. Ofsted will continue to play an important role in ensuring the quality of teaching and learning in registered training providers. We are discussing the arrangements with Ofsted as part of the Trailblazer project.

  • Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Steve McCabe – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Steve McCabe on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what guidance he has issued to schools on the role of special educational needs coordinators in decisions on spending the pupil premium.

    Mr Edward Timpson

    The Department for Education has not issued guidance to schools on the role of the Special Educational Needs Co-ordinator (SENCO) in decisions on how to spend the Pupil Premium. We expect that schools will want to involve the SENCO in determining how to use the Pupil Premium to fund support for those pupils with special educational needs who are economically deprived, looked after by the local authority or who have left care via adoption or other routes.

    It should also be noted that the draft 0-25 Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Code of Practice states that the SENCO, headteacher and governing body or proprietor should consider their strategic approach to meeting special educational needs in the context of the total resources available to the school, including any resources targeted at particular groups, such as the Pupil Premium. The draft SEND Code of Practice was laid before Parliament on 11 June 2014 and must be approved by Parliament before it comes into force on 1 September 2014.

  • Emily Thornberry – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Emily Thornberry – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Emily Thornberry on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he could place in the Library a table showing, for each branch of the Armed Forces Police, the number of cases of (a) rape, (b) sexual assault and (c) domestic violence that were (i) reported, (ii) referred to a prosecutor, (iii) directed for trial, (iv) led to a conviction, (v) led to an acquittal and (vi) led to a custodial sentence in each year between 2009 to 2013.

    Anna Soubry

    All allegations of rape, sexual assault and domestic violence made by or against members of the Armed Forces are thoroughly investigated. An investigation may be conducted by either the civil or Service Police.

    The tables below show the number of alleged cases of rape and sexual assault (including assault by penetration) that were investigated by each branch of the Service police in each year from 2009 to 2013, the number referred to the Service Prosecuting Authority (SPA) and the result of those referrals. The SPA can receive formal referrals only from either Service Police or the Commanding Officer.

    It should be noted that the SPA may receive referrals in one year which relate to allegations and investigations made in previous years and that such cases may be directed, disposed and/or tried in following years. There is therefore no direct correlation between investigations and referrals and the number of cases brought in any one year.

    ROYAL NAVY POLICE (RNP) INVESTIGATIONS

    Rape

    Year

    Total Investigated by RNP

    Total Referred to SPA

    Directed

    For

    Trial

    Acquitted

    Convicted

    Custodial sentence

    2009

    (Figures in first column are from 1 Nov –figures in subsequent columns are for all of 2009)

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2010

    2

    1

    1

    1

    0

    0

    2011

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2012

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2013

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Sexual Assault (including assault by penetration)

    Year

    Total Investigated by RNP

    Total Referred to SPA

    Directed

    For

    Trial

    Acquitted

    Convicted

    Custodial sentence

    2009

    (Figures in first column are from 1 Nov –figures in subsequent columns are for all of 2009)

    3

    3

    1

    0

    1

    1

    2010

    1

    5

    2

    1

    1

    0

    2011

    10

    5

    4

    1

    3

    1

    2012

    3

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2013

    11

    6

    4

    2

    2

    1

    ROYAL MILITARY POLICE (RMP) INVESTIGATIONS

    Rape

    Year

    Total Investigated by RMP

    Total Referred to SPA

    Directed

    For

    Trial

    Acquitted

    Convicted

    Custodial sentence

    2009

    (Figures in first column are from 1 Nov –figures in subsequent columns are for all of 2009)

    3

    16

    10

    8

    2

    2

    2010

    19

    20

    8

    2

    5

    5

    2011

    18

    17

    6

    3

    3

    3

    2012

    22

    18

    9

    6

    3

    3

    2013

    23

    15

    7

    2

    2

    2

    2013 – DIRECTED FOR TRIAL – 3 cases yet to go to trial

    Sexual Assault (including assault by penetration)

    Year

    Total Investigated by RMP

    Total Referred to SPA

    Directed

    For

    Trial

    Acquitted

    Convicted

    Custodial sentence

    2009

    (Figures in first column are from 1 Nov –figures in subsequent columns are for all of 2009)

    9

    24

    9

    4

    5

    5

    2010

    64

    42

    24

    3

    21

    13

    2011

    48

    60

    28

    2

    25

    20

    2012

    36

    26*

    15

    9

    6

    4

    2013

    43

    34

    17

    6

    8

    7

    2013 – DIRECTED FOR TRIAL – 3 cases yet to go to trial

    * We previously advised this as being “28”, but on re-investigation realised we have included 2 other Service police referrals that were not for sexual assault.

    ROYAL AIR FORCE POLICE INVESTIGATIONS

    Rape

    Year

    Total Investigated by RAFP

    Total Referred to SPA

    Directed

    For

    Trial

    Acquitted

    Convicted

    Custodial sentence

    2009

    (Figures in first column are from 1 Nov –figures in subsequent columns are for all of 2009)

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2010

    3

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2011

    2

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2012

    2

    2

    1

    0

    1

    1

    2013

    2

    5

    3

    1

    0

    0

    2013 – DIRECTED FOR TRIAL – 2 cases yet to go to trial

    Sexual Assault (including assault by penetration)

    Year

    Total Investigated by RAFP

    Total Referred to SPA

    Directed

    For

    Trial

    Acquitted

    Convicted

    Custodial sentence

    2009

    (Figures in first column are from 1 Nov –figures in subsequent columns are for all of 2009)

    3

    4

    2

    0

    2

    1

    2010

    9

    4

    1

    0

    1

    0

    2011

    5

    5

    3

    0

    3

    2

    2012

    4

    5

    3

    0

    3

    1

    2013

    8

    5

    3

    1

    1

    1

    2013 – DIRECTED FOR TRIAL – 1 case yet to go to trial

    Domestic violence is not a crime classification, but may be recorded under the crime classification of violence, for example battery, assault or grievous bodily harm. For the Service Police to establish which offences are as a result of domestic violence would require an individual review of all cases, which could be undertaken only at disproportionate cost.

    I apologise for not replying sooner; it has taken some time to ensure the accuracy of the data.