Blog

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : We Want to Build the Savings Culture – Alistair Darling [December 2022]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : We Want to Build the Savings Culture – Alistair Darling [December 2022]

    The press release issued by the Treasury on 3 December 1997.

    “We want to encourage people to save and invest. We want to build the savings culture. That is good for individuals. It is good for businesses and it is therefore good for the country as a whole,” the Chief Secretary Alistair Darling said at the Proshare Annual Awards dinner in London tonight.

    Highlighting the new Individual Savings Account he said:

    “Everyone should have the opportunity to provide for themselves – whether they are saving for their future, for their retirement or simply for a rainy day.

    ISAs are aimed at encouraging everyone to save. They will be simple, flexible and accessible – something everyone wants and will get.

    Our objective is to develop a tax system for savings which benefits the many and not just the few. Half the adult population don’t save. So everyone should have the opportunity to save in a tax-favoured environment, however small the amounts they are able to put aside.

    As we promised in our manifesto the ISA builds on the experience of PEPs and TESSAs. That is why investments in ISAs will be tax-free.

    We spend 1.3 billion Pounds on tax relief under the present system – rising to 1.7 billion Pounds in 2001-02. Much of this goes to those who can already afford to save significant amounts and to tie their savings up for long periods of time. That isn’t an efficient use of public money. Our objective is to bring in new savers.

    Far better and fairer to use the existing provision to bring the benefits of ISAs to a much wider population of savers – possibly encouraging 6 million new savers. That is right in principle and it is fair.”

    On investment, he added:

    “We must expand our economic capacity and create the right climate for high levels of investment. That is why we have reformed the corporation tax system, removing the distortions that hinder long term, high quality investment. In the last Budget we cut
    corporation tax to the lowest level ever. And we intend to cut the main rate again when ACT is abolished in 1999. This further enhances our position as the country with the lowest rate of corporation tax of any major industrialised country and one of the lowest tax burdens on business.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK Backs Korea IMF Programme [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK Backs Korea IMF Programme [December 1997]

    The press release issued by the Treasury on 3 December 1997.

    The UK Government fully supports the programme of economic and financial reform announced today by Korea in agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Chancellor Gordon Brown said today.

    The Chancellor said :

    “The UK Government fully supports the IMF programme which has been agreed by  Korea. This programme will involve approximately $21 billion of IMF finance, along with financing from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

    “In addition, the UK, together with a number of other countries, has agreed to consider the provision of further financial support for Korea.  This will be made available only  if unanticipated circumstances create the need to supplement resources provided by the International Financial Institutions, while Korea remains in compliance with the IMF arrangements. The UK is willing to consider a contribution of up to $1.25 billion.

    “Agreement with the IMF on Korea’s programme of reform marks an important step in restoring confidence in Asia, and in helping safeguard the stability of the world financial system.

    “As a major IMF shareholder, the UK believes that acting with the support of the IMF is the right way for the Korean authorities to have handled their financial situation. And as a major World Bank shareholder we support its crucial role in restructuring the
    financial sector of the Korean economy.

    “As an open economy, the UK benefits from substantial trade and investment flows with Asia and the rest of the world. Global financial stability is crucial if we are to deliver sustained economic prosperity and job creation at home.

    “We have a strong national interest in working with our international partners and the IMF to help Korea reform its economy and overcome its present financial difficulties. I welcome today’s announcement.”

  • Gordon Brown – 1997 Speech at the Centrepoint Annual General Meeting

    Gordon Brown – 1997 Speech at the Centrepoint Annual General Meeting

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, at the Centrepoint Annual General Meeting on 2 December 1997.

    Let me say what a privilege it is to be at this annual general meeting, to be here to discuss with you some of the great social and economic challenges we face together in Britain today.

    And I want to start by congratulating you, the staff and supporters of centrepoint, on this the twenty eighth anniversary of centrepoint – on all the work you do, the service you offer, the time and hours you give up and the dedication and commitment you show.

    If ever there was a confirmation that community involvement and social commitment is alive and well and thriving in London and in Britain, it is the work of centrepoint and all its sister projects to combat not only homelessness, but hopelessness.

    This year, tragically, centrepoint has lost a loved, respected and deeply committed patron – Diana, Princess of Wales.

    And I want to assure you that the committee to commemorate and continue her work that we are setting in being today and the charity advisory group that will be announced later will have a membership that reflects her life and her work as the people’s Princess.

    And our task will not only be to provide a lasting memorial to her work. It will also be to look at how, in very practical ways, we can help the work that she started continue and flourish.

    And I want to assure you at centrepoint also of the support of thousands of people, of all political persuasions and none, right across the social and political spectrum for your work. And I want to pay tribute to your sponsors who through their generosity, enable you to improve the lives of so many of our young people – their continuing support is vital, and I would encourage others too, to make a difference by giving their support.

    And in particular I want to congratulate you on the expansion of the work of entrepoint over the years

    The scale of your work is now such that with centrepoint’s 500 bed spaces, you help 3000 young people a year, half of them from ethnic minorities, a third of them under eighteen, and nearly half who have slept rough.

    the refuge for runaway children under sixteen;
    the emergency direct access shelter for teenagers;
    off the streets shelters for young rough sleepers;
    the young women’s hostels, one helping pregnant women and children;
    the intake house;
    Baffy house;
    Centrepoint kings cross;
    streets ahead, the recruitment agency linking the homeless to employers;

    And I would like to wish Centrepoint every success in running the admiralty arch winter shelter which will provide 60 bed spaces for young people.

    From work to provide immediate relief and emergency help to tackling the multiple causes of homeless and poverty

    And of course the network of foyers, starting in London, linking training to housing provision, now flourishing round the country – soon to provide 4,000 places, with a target of 16,000 by 2001-2002.

    And I am delighted to meet again young people here today from Centrepoint Camberwell foyer some of which I met back in may .

    You find unemployment homelessness and poverty an offence against standards of decency. So do I. And we must together tackle the problem

    What people remember of the in the 1930s is unemployed men Standing on street corners.

    What people identify with the eighties are youngsters begging and sleeping rough in our city streets.

    If the 1980s are remembered for social exclusion I want the 90s to be remembered for inclusion – when individuals, the voluntary sector, and government worked together with shared purpose for a common endeavour.

    Your aim is to tackle the causes of homelessness, worklessness and poverty, a blight on every community in the country and on a society that calls itself civilised .

    Homelessness and poverty not only means deprivation and isolation, it means: hopes crushed, aspirations stifled, potential wasted, indignities and miseries visited upon the poor.

    For 28 years you have been working as a voluntary group mobilising support.

    I can tell you today that tackling homelessness and poverty is no longer solely the ambition of voluntary organisations like you.

    It is now the ambition of the country’s government .

    And your values – to support the vulnerable and build a society in which everyone has a contribution to make – are now the values shared by this government.

    And let me say what that change means at a personal level.

    For years as a labour opposition, I and my colleagues were angered by the injustices we saw, but we were powerless to take the action in government that we knew was needed.

    Now we can take action and we recognise the responsibility that places upon us. But we will only achieve success if we work together.

    So I want today to discuss with you how our economic approach in government ties in with the work you are doing, and to explain how the common theme of empowering individuals through providing opportunity lies not only at the heart of your approach to tackling homelessness, but our analysis of the economic challenge our country faces.

    Of course our energies must ensure relief where there is suffering. But our ambition is not limited to bricks and mortar; it is to enable young men and women bridge the gap between what they are and what they have it in themselves to become. So we must
    not only deal with the consequences of poverty, we must tackle its causes.

    So I want to discuss with you how the government’s economic approach, for which I have responsibility, is aimed at tackling the root causes of homelessness and poverty in our country, and our shared task in doing so.

    Let me start with what I believe is common ground.

    Poverty diminishes not only an individual but the society which tolerates it. We are indeed our brothers and sisters keeper, and we must not walk by on the other side.

    So we start from the recognition that everybody needs decent and affordable accommodation and that no young person should have to sleep rough in Britain. Something close to the heart of centrepoint’s aim it is to ensure that no young person is at risk because they do not have a safe place to stay.

    that is why we have made a start with the phased release of capital receipts from council house sales: an additional 900 million pounds – over the next two years – which will increase the stock of housing for rent. And we encourage the foyer movement to seek assistance from local authorities which have access to more funds via the capital receipts initiative.

    and we have refocused the rough sleepers initiative to provide 20 million pounds for 13 rough sleeper projects outside central London. With 1 million pounds of pump priming funding over the next 18 months to support new rough sleeping strategies in six other areas. And 8.1 million pounds in the spring, specially targeted at single homelessness, particularly amongst the young;

    and we want to encourage more partnerships to help tackle homelessness and follow the example of crash – the construction industry group which encourages firms to provide materials for winter shelters provided through the rough sleepers initiative.

    But this is not enough. Only by tackling the cause of homelessness and poverty – in unemployment, the lack of opportunity and skills for employment – can we build a better future for the long term.

    So our anti-poverty strategy for this country, starts from the importance of providing opportunities for work.

    Its founding principle is that we must tackle the causes of poverty, not simply deal with its consequences.

    It is built around a new deal programme that offers new opportunities directly to young people.

    It rests on rights and responsibilities going hand in hand – rights to work: responsibilities to work – rights and responsibilities of government and people together, so that together we tackle the problems we face.

    So work is central to our anti-poverty strategy.

    And last night, in downing street, I met teenagers from Newham to hear from them what they thought had to be done to improve prospects for young people. They said jobs.

    The true scale of poverty, published in the last few days by the treasury, is a terrible indictment of the past and a call to action for the future. Despite an official rate of under 6 per cent unemployment 3 1/2 million households in Britain have no one in work.

    And in Britain today there are nearly 400,000 young people out of work – where there really should be no young person wasting their talent, doing nothing.

    And our strategy is built on recognising that poverty is caused from the workplace outwards – lack of job opportunities, inadequate skills, inadequate income to make proper provision for accidents, retirement and sickness. And the measures we propose include not just benefits reform, but tax changes, new learning and education measures and the introduction of a national minimum wage.

    In this way a new anti-poverty strategy for Britain is now being implemented.

    So what are our proposals?

    First everyone in need of work should have the opportunity to work – young people, lone parents, and disabled men and women who want to work.

    And for young people we are creating a new deal – four options:

    a job with an employer;
    work with a voluntary organisation;
    work on the environmental task force;
    and, for those without basic qualifications, full time education or training.

    From January these options will be available in 12 pathfinder areas to young people who have been unemployed over six months. And from April, the programme will go nationwide – available in every community in Britain.

    Our new deal recognises that some young people will require more intensive support to ensure that they are able to take up one of the four options on the programme and have a chance of benefiting fully from it.

    And I am very glad that foyers, who are already doing excellent work with young people throughout the country, are bidding for provision of elements of the new deal gateway. And I would also like to encourage foyers to bid as providers for the education and training element of the new deal.

    So we want to work in conjunction with Centrepoint, the foyers and other organisations to maximise the help given to our young people.

    And I am very pleased that the Camberwell foyer has been closely involved in designing the gateway to the new deal programme in the Lambeth pathfinder area, and I expect them to be heavily involved in delivering the programme too.

    So I believe it was right to tax the privatised utilities to raise the 5 billion pounds to help a generation of people – today excluded from the chance of prosperity – to have new opportunities.

    And I am pleased that some of the country’s best known businesses are now agreeing to take part in the new deal project:

    Allied Domecq, who have said they will offer at least a 1000 opportunities;

    Tescos, who have guaranteed an interview for all new deal clients who apply to work in their new stores.

    Ford, who have agreed to raise substantially the number of training places they provide for unskilled young people;

    Nat West, who have agreed that their small business advisers will promote the new deal to employers.

    And other companies are coming up with ways they can support the new deal – BAA, Radisson Hotel Group, Lloyds-TSB, Dixons, Marks and Spencer, Sainsbury’s, Unipart, Amersham International, Northern Foods, Grand Metropolitan, GEC, Rover, Jaguar, Peugeot, The Prudential, Tarmac – along with many others.

    But I want to emphasise that the new deal is just the first part of this government’s mission to create a more just and fair society – starting with jobs and the chance to gain work skills – but continuing by modernising a welfare state that too often stifles talent and denies opportunities to men and women.

    Our goal is not just to take people off the streets for a few months, but to make the unemployed fully employable and to rebuild the welfare state around the work ethic.

    So second we must ensure work is worthwhile and it pays.

    650,000 people in Britain face a poverty trap where the lion’s share of every extra pound earned goes in tax.

    So there is no solution to poverty that does not involve a fundamental restructuring of the tax and benefit system.

    That is why our pre-Budget statement proposed an integrated tax and benefit plan involving action at every level.

    To maximise the rewards from work, a 10p starting rate of tax and a reform of benefit tapers will be introduced when it is prudent to do so.

    To ensure that work pays for families with children, we propose a working families tax credit, backed up by affordable child care.

    And to ensure the rewards of these reforms flow directly to the employee, we are committed to a statutory national minimum wage.

    To improve rewards from work, to simplify administrative burdens on employers, and to encourage them to take on more people, we are considering the scope for bringing the national insurance structure for the low paid more closely into line with income tax.

    And to ensure parents can work, our national childcare strategy.

    But everyone who seeks to advance through employment and education must be able to make the most of their talents and potential. We will also create a new ladder of opportunity that will allow the many, by their own efforts, to benefit from opportunities once open only to a few.

    The relationship between skills, employment and wages is clear – half the unemployed under 35 have no qualifications worth their name, 75 per cent of those unemployed for five years or more have no skills.

    That is why we need to invest in our poorest communities with resources for education. It is why we put an emphasis on nursery education early on. It is why we want more young people to stay at school and more to go to college and university. It is why we place emphasis on lifelong learning with every employee entitled to an individual learning account and a university of industry which uses modern communications, satellite, cable and interactive technologies. To give educational opportunities to men and women in their homes and workplace.

    That is why in the pre-budget report we also announced our skills initiative – pilot projects nationwide under which any employer who takes on and trains a young or long-term unemployed person and keeps them on, can now receive up-front three quarters of their new deal allocation thus giving immediate help with training costs – in the case of young people about 1700 pounds and for the long-term unemployed, 1500 pounds.

    So we tackle homelessness, but we also tackle the causes of homelessness – and offer new opportunities in education, for jobs and for making work pay. Full employment is not, for us, a slogan; it is about providing employment opportunity for all.

    It will take time to right the wrongs. But let me say: not only have we made a start by working together, but we will do more year on year.

    But with 3 1/2 million households out of work, we do not deny the scale of the task we face, and the circumstances in which we came to power. I know more than anyone the cost the country has had to pay for 18 years of avoiding the problems, so I wont pretend solutions will be instant it will take time and none of our decisions will be easy.

    We have had to and will continue to have to make hard decisions about where our resources are to go. Our priority is to put the money that we have available into new job training and child care opportunities for lone parents rather than just on benefit. While we could have given even more tax relief to those who have already accumulated considerable savings, our priority is to put some of the 1 1/2 billion pounds resources we are spending on encouraging savings to do more to help those who do not at the moment save – up to 6 million new savers. Our priority is to encourage more people to attend college and university by sharing the costs of higher education, rather than continue to limit higher education to an elite of the country’s young people. And our priority is to put money into the new deal for the young through the cash we raised from a windfall tax on the privatised utilities.

    Difficult choices, but necessary choices. For we are starting out on a long journey with a route map and a clear destination – to make Britain a country where everyone, no matter their circumstances today, from wherever they come or whatever they have done, whoever they are – everyone has opportunity to make the most of their potential. That is my aim. And I believe that working together that can be our achievement: a new Britain where everyone has a contribution to make.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Membership of Diana, Princess of Wales, Memorial Committee [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Membership of Diana, Princess of Wales, Memorial Committee [December 1997]

    The press release issued by the Treasury on 3 December 1997.

    The membership and terms of reference of the committee which will consider possible memorials to Diana, Princess of Wales, was announced today by the Chancellor, Gordon Brown.

    The Chancellor, who is to chair the Committee, said:

    “Diana, Princess of Wales was greatly loved, and I consider it an honour to have been asked by the Prime Minister to chair this important committee. The  public have responded magnificently to my request for proposals for commemorating the work of the  Princess of Wales.  Every one of the 7,000 proposals so far has been carefully read and every one will be taken into account.”

    NOTES FOR EDITORS

    The Prime Minister asked the Chancellor to chair a committee To consider possible memorials to Diana, Princess of Wales.   The Chancellor’s new committee is to be made up of:

    • the Lord Chamberlain, Lord Airlie, representing the
      Royal Household;
    • Lady Sarah McCorquodale, representing Earl Spencer
      (who will also attend meetings when he is in the
      country) and the Princess’s family;
    • Lord Attenborough;
    • Mr Paul Burrell;
    • Baroness Chalker;
    • Diane Louise Jordan;
    • Mr Anthony Julius;
    • The Hon Rosa Monckton;
    • Jane Tewson.

    Its terms of reference are:

    “To advise HM Government as to how the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, can best be commemorated, complementing the work of the Diana, Princess of Wales, Memorial  Fund. In taking forward this work, the Committee will take into account the views of   members of the public, and have regard to the charities and causes which the Princess supported.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Treasury and Bank of England Open Up the Books [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Treasury and Bank of England Open Up the Books [December 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 2 December 1997.

    The first edition of a new quarterly report providing greater detail of the UK’s holdings of foreign currency and gold was published jointly today by the Treasury and the Bank of England.

    The report shows for the first time the size of the UK’s forward foreign exchange position and the currency composition of the UK’s foreign currency assets.

    On publication of the report the Economic Secretary, Helen Liddell said:

    “This report is another key step in the Government’s drive towards greater transparency in economic policy making.

    “Greater openness improves the quality of economic decisions, strengthens their legitimacy and credibility, and reduces the likelihood of unpredictable and counterproductive reactions in financial markets.”

    The report shows that the level of the Government’s reserves, including the forward book was $42.3 billion at end-September, an underlying increase of $50 million on end-June. Net forward holdings of foreign currency were $1.24 billion at end-September.

    The level of the Bank of England’s holdings of foreign currency and gold was $1.98 billion at end-September.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2022 Comments on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    Dan Jarvis – 2022 Comments on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    The comments made by Dan Jarvis, the Labour MP for Barnsley Central, in the House of Commons on 15 December 2022.

    Dan Jarvis (Barnsley Central) (Lab)

    May I declare an interest as a former company commander with the special forces support group who served in Afghanistan? As such, I know that the overwhelming number of people who serve in our armed forces, and particularly in the UKSF, do so with huge distinction and extraordinary courage. As the Minister said, we can be very proud of their service. They rightly aspire to maintain the very highest of professional standards and adherence to the rule of law. After all, it is that which differentiates us from our opponents. As the Minister said, it is therefore necessary that, when serious allegations are made, they are investigated, but that needs to be done thoroughly and independently, so I welcome the statement that the Minister has made today.

    Clearly, none of us would want to prejudge the inquiry, but, looking slightly to the longer term, has the Minister or the Department given any consideration to the potential merits of tasking the Intelligence and Security Committee to provide oversight of UKSF?

    Dr Murrison

    I rise again with a sense of trepidation, Madam Deputy Speaker, acknowledging the hon. Gentleman’s service in Afghanistan. The point that he has made has been made before. I think it was made when we covered some of this ground back in July. He will know the way that this part of our armed forces operates and the difficulties and constraints under which they operate. We are going through this process now with a statutory inquiry. That is a big deal. I expect Lord Justice Haddon-Cave to go everywhere he needs to go to discover the truth and make public all of it—so far as he can within the constrictions of national security.

    With all due respect, I do not agree with the hon. Gentleman on having a further mechanism of auditing the operations of parts of our armed forces. It is probably right that we assure ourselves that all parts of our armed forces operate within the rule of law and that their rules of engagement are legal. He will be aware of the extraordinary lengths that defence takes, particularly now and in recent years, to ensure that everything it does is lawful. Personally, I am comfortable with that; I am confident that we do that. Although I acknowledge the hon. Gentleman’s suggestion—we keep everything under consideration, and it will be interesting to see what Lord Justice Haddon-Cave comes up with—I am not minded, at this point in time, to accept it.

  • Martin Docherty-Hughes – 2022 Speech on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    Martin Docherty-Hughes – 2022 Speech on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    The speech made by Martin Docherty-Hughes, the SNP Defence Spokesperson, in the House of Commons on 15 December 2022.

    I am grateful to the Minister for advance sight of the statement. I declare a personal interest, given that my brother served two tours of duty in Afghanistan, but not in the special forces.

    I welcome the fact that the Minister said there is a credible requirement for the investigation. Although SNP Members might not agree with the hon. Member for Harrow East (Bob Blackman) about the overseas operations Act, I am glad the Minister, the Department and the Secretary of State for Defence at least believe that this inquiry needs to take place. However, I have a bit of a concern, which I am sure the Minister will seek to clarify. As a former member of the Defence Committee, and having sat on the previous Armed Forces Bill Committee, both of which, critically, discussed the treatment of women in the armed forces, I know there is grave concern that, when there is any type of investigation—especially if it is credible—the justice system does not view it properly.

    I therefore seek reassurances from the Minister that the right hon. Lord Justice Haddon-Cave recognises the complexity of the case and understands the lived experience not only of those making the accusations, but—the Minister is probably right about this—those in the armed forces as well. Lord Justice Haddon-Cave must understand the overall complexity of the issues being investigated and take on board the entirety of them in any conclusions, because previous investigations—notably around the treatment of women in the armed forces—give me grave cause for concern.

    I also want to put on record my commitment and that of my party to members of the armed forces, who play their role and put their lives on the line daily. On a personal note, I recognised that when my brother served two tours of duty in Afghanistan and one in Iraq. He and his comrades in arms put their best foot forward and did the duty they were asked to, but even they recognise that, sometimes, people make mistakes. If mistakes have been made, they need to be properly investigated, and the full weight of the law needs to be brought to bear.

    Dr Murrison

    I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, and I pay tribute to his brother for his service. Justice Haddon-Cave is no ordinary judge; he is one of the most senior members of our judiciary, and he has been selected by the Lord Chief Justice for this task because of that. It therefore follows that he is perfectly capable of appreciating the complexity of this issue. I hope that that gives the hon. Gentleman the reassurance he seeks.

    As for the further conduct of the inquiry, that will now be a matter for Lord Justice Haddon-Cave; it certainly will not be a matter for me. I underscore that this is an independent inquiry, and it would be entirely improper for me, from this point, to comment further on its conduct. As I understand it, Lord Justice Haddon-Cave intends to issue a statement of his own shortly.

  • John Healey – 2022 Speech on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    John Healey – 2022 Speech on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    The speech made by John Healey, the Shadow Defence Minister, in the House of Commons on 15 December 2022.

    I thank the Minister for advance sight of his statement and the terms of reference for Lord Justice Haddon-Cave. We welcome the special inquiry, the Minister’s confirmation that its work will start early in 2023 and his commitment to provide full legal and pastoral support. We recognise the bravery of all those who served in Afghanistan and the dangers we asked them to face—none more than our special forces, who carry out the most extraordinary missions with extreme risks to defend us and our allies.

    Our British armed forces have a proud tradition of upholding the highest standards of military ethics, professionalism and international law. That is fundamental to a disciplined military force and to Britain’s standing and moral authority as one of the world’s leading democracies, so allegations of unlawful killings and cover-ups could not be more serious. This inquiry is essential to protect the reputation of our British special forces, to guarantee the integrity of military investigations, and to secure justice for those affected. The question is: will it do the job? Is it set up to succeed? Is the MOD—military, civilian and political—fully committed to making it succeed? Too often, it responds with denial and delay.

    Over the last five years, Defence Secretaries have had three reports with more than 148 recommendations on how to fix failings in military investigations, yet one essential recommendation—the Defence serious crime unit—was launched only last week. When confronted with the BBC “Panorama” reports about these allegations in July, the MOD immediately dismissed them as “irresponsible, incorrect” and jumping to “unjustified conclusions”. When pushed by all parties, as well as senior ex-military figures, journalists and the judiciary, the Defence Secretary signalled this independent inquiry two weeks later.

    On the terms of reference, can the Minister confirm that the inquiry will investigate to substantiate any allegations, not just investigate how the allegations were handled? Will the inquiry cover the full chain of command—military, civil service and ministerial? How can the inquiry’s independence be assured when it is housed within the MOD? On the declaration that the Secretary of State expects maximum co-operation from MOD personnel, will the head of the Army issue a similar statement or command to forces personnel?

    The Minister knows but does not mention that similar allegations were made from the same period against Australian special forces in Afghanistan. They were investigated thoroughly via a special inquiry commissioned not by Ministers, but by the head of the Australian army, because getting to the truth should matter most to military leaders. Has the Minister or any other Defence Minister met Justice Brereton to understand his inquiry? If not, why not? If so, why are key features of his successful inquiry missing from this one?

    In the Brereton inquiry, the judge had senior military not just judicial experience; he had legal immunities to get beyond the culture of silence; and he had legal powers to require documents and summon witnesses. If Judge Haddon-Cave considers that changes to his powers or terms of reference are required during the inquiry, will Ministers agree? This inquiry must succeed and we in the Opposition will do all we can to ensure that it does.

    Dr Murrison

    I am extremely grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for his comments. It is important to say that the inquiry is set up under the Inquiries Act 2005, which means that it will be a statutory inquiry under the control of Lord Justice Haddon-Cave. He will summon whichever witnesses he thinks fit and potentially compel them to give evidence under oath, as required by legislation.

    The right hon. Gentleman asks whether the inquiry will involve the full chain of command, the answer to which is yes. He also asks whether the inquiry being housed in the Ministry of Defence is an issue, to which I would say no. Lord Justice Haddon-Cave requested that his team be based in the MOD so that he can have full access to IT systems, some of which are at a high level of classification. However, it is important that only he has access to the accommodation that has been set aside for this purpose, to maintain the appearance and actuality of complete independence from the MOD, about which I can give the right hon. Gentleman full assurances.

    The right hon. Gentleman asked about Australia. The Australian investigations made it clear that there are no British persons of interest as a result of that inquiry. It is also important to say clearly that allegations made to a television production company are not the same as allegations made in court or, indeed, to a statutory inquiry. In the light of the “Panorama” report to which the right hon. Gentleman referred, service police, as I understand it, have contacted the BBC to ask for evidence. I am not aware of any new evidence having been provided beyond that which has already been investigated.

    It is important to underscore the fact that Lord Justice Haddon-Cave has been selected by the Lord Chief Justice because he is the most senior of judicial figures. With that, of course, comes the full knowledge and understanding that he is acting independently. I have no doubt that he will go wherever the evidence takes him, and that is the reason that such a senior figure has been appointed to this extremely important task.

  • Andrew Murrison – 2022 Statement on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    Andrew Murrison – 2022 Statement on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    The statement made by Andrew Murrison, the Minister for Defence People, Veterans and Service Families, in the House of Commons on 15 December 2022.

    I will make a statement on an independent inquiry related to Afghanistan. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence has commissioned an independent statutory inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005 to investigate and report on alleged unlawful activity by British armed forces during deliberate detention operations in Afghanistan in the period from mid-2010 to mid-2013, and the adequacy of subsequent investigations into such allegations.

    The decision has been informed by two ongoing judicial review cases known as Saifullah and Noorzai. The claimants in those cases assert that relevant allegations of unlawful activity were not properly investigated. The underlying events have been the subject of comprehensive service police criminal investigations, but the Ministry of Defence accepts that Operation Northmoor should have started earlier and that there may be further lessons to learn from the incidents, despite there being insufficient evidence for any prosecutions.

    My right hon. Friend has asked the right hon. Lord Justice Haddon-Cave to chair the inquiry, and Lord Justice Haddon-Cave has stepped down from his role as senior presiding judge for England and Wales to focus on this task. He has valuable experience: he chaired the Nimrod review into the loss of RAF Nimrod MR2 aircraft XV230 in Afghanistan in 2006 and served as the judge in charge of the terrorism list between 2017 and 2018.

    A copy of the terms of reference for this inquiry will be placed in the Library of the House. The inquiry will start work in earnest in early 2023 and will be fully resourced and supported so that it can carry out its work and report expeditiously. The Saifullah and Noorzai claimants have been consulted on the terms of reference but I will not comment further on ongoing court proceedings.

    The UK’s armed forces rightly hold themselves to the highest possible operational standards. Operations must be conducted within the clear boundaries of the law and credible allegations against our forces must always be investigated thoroughly. The service justice system is capable of investigating and prosecuting all criminal offences on operations overseas and here in the UK. Defence has worked hard over recent years to ensure that the processes in place to maintain justice in the armed forces are effective, and that allegations of criminal wrongdoing arising from any future operations are raised and investigated appropriately.

    It was a manifesto commitment of the Government to tackle the vexatious legal claims that have targeted our armed forces over recent years, but the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act 2021 was always designed to permit the investigation and follow-up of any serious allegations irrespective of time passed. We will of course ensure that all service personnel, veterans, and current and former civil servants who are asked to engage with the inquiry are given full legal and pastoral support.

    I hope that the whole House shares my pride in our armed forces. They are renowned throughout the world for their courage, integrity and professionalism. We are profoundly grateful for their service today, as we were while they were deployed at our behest in Afghanistan.

  • Margaret Greenwood – 2022 Comments on the Infected Blood Inquiry

    Margaret Greenwood – 2022 Comments on the Infected Blood Inquiry

    The comments made by Margaret Greenwood, the Labour MP for Wirral West, in the House of Commons on 15 December 2022.

    Margaret Greenwood (Wirral West) (Lab)

    One of my constituents has been deeply affected by this issue. She has endured, in her words,

    “a long, upsetting and depressing process.”

    The strain on her and her family has been enormous.

    The Hepatitis C Trust has warned that people affected by the infected blood scandal are falling through the gaps in the present frameworks for financial assistance and compensation, including those whose medical records have been lost and destroyed, which the Minister touched on—I would like him to expand on that—and people who were born abroad. What assessment have the Government made of the number of people who fit into that category, or when can we expect to receive such an assessment? What will he do to put things right?

    Jeremy Quin

    First, I absolutely sympathise with the hon. Lady’s constituent. However, I hope that, since 2017, with the statutory inquiry, the report and the payment of interim compensation, they have seen that we have got a direction of travel and that things are moving in the right direction. I know, given the weight of people’s loss, that that has taken too long, but we are working on it.

    I recognise that there are issues in regard to hepatitis C and in particular hepatitis B. In relation to hep B, Sir Robert said that Sir Brian needed to take further medical evidence. It is one of the areas where, because of the absolute complexity, we may need to wait for the Langstaff report before we can be specific, but are we aware of the issues? Yes, we are, and I am grateful that the hon. Lady has brought the matter to the House’s attention.