Blog

  • Tim Loughton – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Tim Loughton – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tim Loughton on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many incidents his Department has recorded of drones operating over prison estates in the last year for which figures are available; what steps his Department took following each such incident; and if he will make a statement.

    Andrew Selous

    If an incident involving a drone occurs, prisons will invoke appropriate contingency plans and will work alongside the police and CPS to ensure those responsible are caught. NOMS are exploring research options with the Home Office Centre for Applied Science and Technology (CAST) on detection and mitigation technology for drones.

    There were 30 reported drone related incidents between 1 December 2014 and 30 November 2015. This includes drone finds and drone sightings by prison staff in and around public and private prisons in England and Wales.

    Individual prisons will invoke the appropriate contingency plan relevant to the circumstances of the incident involving a drone. This includes, for example, working with the police and CPS to ensure those responsible for an incident involving a drone are caught and, if appropriate, prosecuted.

    These figures have been drawn from live administrative data systems. Care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, but the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.

  • Andy Slaughter – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Andy Slaughter – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Andy Slaughter on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 10 December 2015 to Question 18875, in which prisons each of those mobile telephones and sim cards were detected in each of those years; and what the number of such detections was per prisoner in each of those years.

    Andrew Selous

    Mobile phones have no place in our prisons and we have invested in technology to prevent their use. But more needs to be done, and we will look at new ways of finding and blocking them. It is a criminal offence to possess a mobile phone or component part in a prison.

    The Chancellor announced in the spending review that we will invest in more safety improvements to stamp out the organisation of crime from within prisons, including funding for tackling illicit mobile phones and investing in body scanners.

    The table below provides the number of ‘‘finds’ of mobile phones and/or SIM cards reported by each prison between April 2010, when recording started, and December 2014. One ‘find’ may constitute a handset containing one SIM card or media card, a handset only, or a SIM card only.

    Table: Number of mobile phone and SIM card finds broken down by prison.

    ESTABLISHMENT

    2010*

    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2010*-2014 total

    ACKLINGTON

    63

    28

    91

    ALBANY

    0

    3

    4

    0

    7

    ALTCOURSE (C)

    790

    609

    534

    290

    689

    2912

    ASHFIELD(C)

    1

    2

    2

    0

    0

    5

    ASHWELL

    2

    7

    9

    ASKHAM GRANGE

    0

    0

    2

    1

    0

    3

    AYLESBURY

    278

    97

    29

    176

    130

    710

    BEDFORD

    27

    55

    29

    53

    28

    192

    BELMARSH

    15

    25

    9

    126

    180

    355

    BIRMINGHAM (C)

    248

    537

    302

    133

    140

    1360

    BLANTYRE HOUSE

    19

    12

    4

    3

    14

    52

    BLUNDESTON

    27

    1

    11

    6

    45

    BRINSFORD

    12

    76

    45

    182

    200

    515

    BRISTOL

    54

    33

    26

    32

    37

    182

    BRIXTON

    46

    67

    28

    23

    41

    205

    BRONZEFIELD(C)

    34

    12

    3

    13

    18

    80

    BUCKLEY HALL

    11

    22

    149

    111

    197

    490

    BULLINGDON

    42

    16

    6

    23

    51

    138

    BULLWOOD HALL

    1

    8

    15

    1

    25

    BURE

    5

    1

    0

    1

    0

    7

    CAMP HILL

    98

    52

    22

    1

    173

    CANTERBURY

    22

    10

    21

    7

    60

    CARDIFF

    19

    36

    7

    9

    14

    85

    CASTINGTON

    10

    11

    21

    CHANNINGS WOOD

    64

    63

    15

    39

    34

    215

    CHELMSFORD

    42

    38

    11

    4

    4

    99

    COLDINGLEY

    37

    52

    42

    106

    34

    271

    COOKHAM WOOD

    6

    1

    1

    1

    0

    9

    DARTMOOR

    27

    16

    2

    11

    42

    98

    DEERBOLT

    3

    15

    2

    4

    25

    49

    DONCASTER(C)

    15

    6

    24

    182

    419

    646

    DORCHESTER

    20

    14

    8

    5

    1

    48

    DOVEGATE (C)

    5

    24

    15

    30

    51

    125

    DOVER

    14

    21

    10

    5

    2

    52

    DOWNVIEW

    5

    5

    2

    1

    0

    13

    DRAKE HALL

    10

    2

    3

    0

    4

    19

    DURHAM

    24

    41

    23

    20

    0

    108

    EAST SUTTON PARK

    1

    5

    4

    6

    1

    17

    EASTWOOD PARK

    3

    9

    1

    6

    9

    28

    EDMUNDS HILL

    25

    22

    47

    ELMLEY

    45

    47

    53

    103

    308

    556

    ERLESTOKE

    62

    176

    137

    98

    83

    556

    EVERTHORPE

    50

    32

    26

    45

    19

    172

    EXETER

    14

    21

    15

    16

    7

    73

    FEATHERSTONE

    39

    29

    133

    42

    128

    371

    FELTHAM

    84

    65

    45

    22

    27

    243

    FORD

    61

    250

    200

    202

    270

    983

    FOREST BANK (C)

    122

    37

    105

    165

    258

    687

    FOSTON HALL

    0

    1

    2

    6

    2

    11

    FRANKLAND

    6

    2

    7

    0

    5

    20

    FULL SUTTON

    10

    4

    9

    2

    10

    35

    GARTH

    76

    32

    39

    33

    36

    216

    GARTREE

    14

    22

    65

    57

    20

    178

    GLEN PARVA

    2

    4

    8

    3

    4

    21

    GLOUCESTER

    1

    4

    3

    0

    8

    GRENDON

    17

    10

    3

    0

    1

    31

    GUYS MARSH

    77

    182

    175

    54

    75

    563

    HASLAR

    0

    0

    2

    0

    0

    2

    HATFIELD

    10

    58

    154

    96

    104

    422

    HAVERIGG

    107

    134

    291

    172

    95

    799

    HEWELL

    76

    289

    335

    166

    366

    1232

    HIGHDOWN

    23

    68

    49

    61

    164

    365

    HIGHPOINT

    80

    55

    180

    203

    214

    732

    HINDLEY

    1

    4

    6

    1

    9

    21

    HOLLESLEY BAY

    193

    129

    90

    120

    59

    591

    HOLLOWAY

    7

    7

    10

    5

    8

    37

    HOLME HOUSE

    18

    15

    5

    9

    105

    152

    HULL

    23

    25

    13

    2

    2

    65

    HUNTERCOMBE

    2

    36

    9

    26

    34

    107

    ISIS

    8

    52

    39

    18

    4

    121

    ISLE OF WIGHT

    0

    4

    4

    KENNET

    4

    5

    9

    8

    35

    61

    KINGSTON

    6

    0

    0

    0

    6

    KIRKHAM

    273

    390

    493

    488

    526

    2170

    KIRKLEVINGTON GRANGE

    13

    15

    19

    9

    19

    75

    LANCASTER CASTLE

    18

    18

    LANCASTER FARMS

    89

    79

    25

    117

    92

    402

    LATCHMERE HOUSE

    69

    40

    109

    LEEDS

    53

    59

    27

    8

    7

    154

    LEICESTER

    27

    26

    15

    9

    24

    101

    LEWES

    38

    46

    30

    51

    140

    305

    LEYHILL

    83

    27

    30

    49

    42

    231

    LINCOLN

    28

    33

    4

    1

    3

    69

    LINDHOLME

    164

    96

    145

    63

    70

    538

    LITTLEHEY

    13

    34

    4

    2

    7

    60

    LIVERPOOL

    138

    118

    88

    65

    15

    424

    LONG LARTIN

    12

    31

    77

    28

    34

    182

    LOW NEWTON

    0

    3

    0

    0

    1

    4

    LOWDHAM GRANGE (C)

    27

    10

    26

    24

    2

    89

    MAIDSTONE

    6

    34

    22

    26

    38

    126

    MANCHESTER

    41

    36

    23

    12

    8

    120

    MOORLAND

    111

    65

    13

    20

    52

    261

    MOORLAND OPEN

    10

    10

    MORTON HALL

    0

    4

    5

    2

    5

    16

    MOUNT

    86

    78

    182

    220

    111

    677

    NEW HALL

    2

    0

    1

    1

    0

    4

    NORTH SEA CAMP

    86

    63

    67

    61

    48

    325

    NORTHALLERTON

    0

    7

    3

    11

    21

    NORTHUMBERLAND (C)

    15

    109

    130

    170

    424

    NORWICH

    30

    15

    11

    18

    66

    140

    NOTTINGHAM

    11

    38

    17

    16

    136

    218

    OAKWOOD (C)

    0

    0

    33

    194

    181

    408

    ONLEY

    53

    68

    65

    85

    197

    468

    PARC (C)

    32

    79

    16

    16

    30

    173

    PARKHURST

    6

    8

    20

    16

    50

    PENTONVILLE

    207

    199

    124

    149

    282

    961

    PETERBOROUGH (C)

    141

    145

    60

    44

    51

    441

    PORTLAND

    24

    6

    11

    10

    0

    51

    PRESCOED

    0

    2

    4

    4

    9

    19

    PRESTON

    18

    15

    9

    12

    98

    152

    RANBY

    90

    124

    300

    229

    261

    1004

    READING

    12

    25

    7

    5

    49

    RISLEY

    72

    12

    37

    84

    30

    235

    ROCHESTER

    6

    10

    23

    60

    145

    244

    RYE HILL (C)

    42

    79

    70

    113

    71

    375

    SEND

    3

    12

    11

    13

    8

    47

    SHEPTON MALLET

    3

    7

    4

    1

    15

    SHREWSBURY

    3

    0

    0

    0

    3

    SPRING HILL

    12

    13

    34

    117

    104

    280

    STAFFORD

    12

    69

    14

    70

    7

    172

    STANDFORD HILL

    150

    186

    127

    270

    159

    892

    STOCKEN

    26

    12

    30

    11

    38

    117

    STOKE HEATH

    8

    28

    19

    44

    100

    199

    STYAL

    7

    7

    9

    13

    10

    46

    SUDBURY

    72

    120

    124

    134

    102

    552

    SWALESIDE

    100

    58

    107

    103

    241

    609

    SWANSEA

    2

    0

    1

    61

    2

    66

    SWINFEN HALL

    32

    44

    14

    10

    18

    118

    THAMESIDE (C)

    0

    0

    8

    98

    33

    139

    THORN CROSS

    74

    79

    84

    109

    141

    487

    USK

    2

    1

    1

    1

    3

    8

    VERNE

    67

    144

    161

    50

    3

    425

    WAKEFIELD

    1

    2

    3

    4

    4

    14

    WANDSWORTH

    157

    131

    119

    119

    163

    689

    WARREN HILL

    5

    10

    5

    0

    1

    21

    WAYLAND

    20

    30

    17

    15

    34

    116

    WEALSTUN

    57

    145

    155

    120

    330

    807

    WELLINGBOROUGH

    61

    195

    181

    1

    438

    WERRINGTON

    12

    4

    9

    6

    7

    38

    WETHERBY

    5

    3

    5

    1

    2

    16

    WHATTON

    9

    1

    0

    3

    5

    18

    WHITEMOOR

    18

    28

    17

    9

    1

    73

    WINCHESTER

    39

    3

    31

    21

    9

    103

    WOLDS

    104

    96

    44

    23

    54

    321

    WOODHILL

    4

    58

    74

    64

    74

    274

    WORMWOOD SCRUBS

    141

    267

    39

    128

    248

    823

    WYMOTT

    58

    50

    11

    34

    52

    205

    Subtotal

    6758

    7786

    7301

    7451

    9745

    *April to December only.

    (C) denotes a privately operated prison

    Note: The following prisons closed during the reporting period:

    HMP Ashwell – April 2011

    HMP Lancaster Castle – March 2011

    HMP Latchmere House – April 2012

    HMP Wellingborough – December 2012

    HMP Bullwood Hall – March 2013

    HMP Canterbury – March 2013

    HMP Gloucester – March 2013

    HMP Kingston – March 2013

    HMP Shepton Mallet – March 2013

    HMP Dorchester – January 2014

    HMP Shrewsbury – March 2013

    HMP Camp Hill – March 2013

    HMP Blundeston – January 2014

    HMP Northallerton – January 2014

    HMP Reading – January 2014

    HMYOI Moorland Open was renamed HMYOI Hatfield in the autumn of 2010

    HMPs Acklington and Castington became HMP Northumberland in October 2011

    HMP Edmunds Hill merged into HMP Highpoint in July 2012

    HMPs Albany and Parkhurst became HMP Isle of Wight in February 2013

    All figures in this answer have been drawn from live administrative data systems which may be amended at any time.Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data are not subject to audit.

    We do not collect data on the number of detections of mobile phones and SIM cards in a way that would enable us to provide a meaningful rate of detection per prisoner.

  • Andy Slaughter – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Andy Slaughter – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Andy Slaughter on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to reply to Question 15306, tabled by the hon. Member for Hammersmith on 16 November 2015.

    Caroline Dinenage

    I refer the honourable member to the answer which I gave in PQ 15306, answered on 17th February 2016.

  • Jake Berry – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Jake Berry – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Jake Berry on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many applications by grandparents for rights of access to their grandchildren there were in each year since 2010.

    Caroline Dinenage

    Under the Children Act 1989 the court may make a child arrangements order to determine with whom a child is to live or spend time. Prior to 22nd April 2014 such orders were called contact and residence orders. The Department collates figures on the numbers of applications made by grandparents for child arrangements orders and the figures for such applications since 2010 are shown below.

    Number of child arrangement (contact) order applications made by grandparents in England and Wales

    Year

    Applications by grandparents

    2011

    2403

    2012

    2574

    2013

    2755

    2014

    1624

    2015 – 3 quarters only

    1335

    Unlike parents, grandparents and other family members can only make an application for a child arrangements orders with the permission of the court. The requirement to apply for the court’s permission is not designed to be an obstacle to grandparents, or other close relatives, but to act as a filter to sift out those applications that are clearly not in the child’s best interests. Experience suggests that grandparents (or other interested relatives) would not usually experience difficulty in obtaining permission where their application is motivated by a genuine concern for the child.

    The Department does not collate figures on applications for a child arrangements order where the court’s permission has been sought. This information could only be obtained by manually checking each case file at disproportionate cost. Similarly, the Department does not collate figures centrally on family members named in a child arrangements order. Details of the numbers of child arrangements orders issued specifically for grandparents to see their grandchildren could only be obtained by checking each file at disproportionate cost.

  • Jake Berry – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Jake Berry – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Jake Berry on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many contact orders for grandparents to see their grandchildren were issued in each year since 2010.

    Caroline Dinenage

    Under the Children Act 1989 the court may make a child arrangements order to determine with whom a child is to live or spend time. Prior to 22nd April 2014 such orders were called contact and residence orders. The Department collates figures on the numbers of applications made by grandparents for child arrangements orders and the figures for such applications since 2010 are shown below.

    Number of child arrangement (contact) order applications made by grandparents in England and Wales

    Year

    Applications by grandparents

    2011

    2403

    2012

    2574

    2013

    2755

    2014

    1624

    2015 – 3 quarters only

    1335

    Unlike parents, grandparents and other family members can only make an application for a child arrangements orders with the permission of the court. The requirement to apply for the court’s permission is not designed to be an obstacle to grandparents, or other close relatives, but to act as a filter to sift out those applications that are clearly not in the child’s best interests. Experience suggests that grandparents (or other interested relatives) would not usually experience difficulty in obtaining permission where their application is motivated by a genuine concern for the child.

    The Department does not collate figures on applications for a child arrangements order where the court’s permission has been sought. This information could only be obtained by manually checking each case file at disproportionate cost. Similarly, the Department does not collate figures centrally on family members named in a child arrangements order. Details of the numbers of child arrangements orders issued specifically for grandparents to see their grandchildren could only be obtained by checking each file at disproportionate cost.

  • Jake Berry – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Jake Berry – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Jake Berry on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many applications by grandparents for permission to apply for a contact order to see their grandchildren were successful in each year since 2010.

    Caroline Dinenage

    Under the Children Act 1989 the court may make a child arrangements order to determine with whom a child is to live or spend time. Prior to 22nd April 2014 such orders were called contact and residence orders. The Department collates figures on the numbers of applications made by grandparents for child arrangements orders and the figures for such applications since 2010 are shown below.

    Number of child arrangement (contact) order applications made by grandparents in England and Wales

    Year

    Applications by grandparents

    2011

    2403

    2012

    2574

    2013

    2755

    2014

    1624

    2015 – 3 quarters only

    1335

    Unlike parents, grandparents and other family members can only make an application for a child arrangements orders with the permission of the court. The requirement to apply for the court’s permission is not designed to be an obstacle to grandparents, or other close relatives, but to act as a filter to sift out those applications that are clearly not in the child’s best interests. Experience suggests that grandparents (or other interested relatives) would not usually experience difficulty in obtaining permission where their application is motivated by a genuine concern for the child.

    The Department does not collate figures on applications for a child arrangements order where the court’s permission has been sought. This information could only be obtained by manually checking each case file at disproportionate cost. Similarly, the Department does not collate figures centrally on family members named in a child arrangements order. Details of the numbers of child arrangements orders issued specifically for grandparents to see their grandchildren could only be obtained by checking each file at disproportionate cost.

  • Karl Turner – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Karl Turner – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Karl Turner on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to paragraph 1.143 of the Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015, what the evidential basis is of the statement that a claimant culture exists in England and Wales in relation to whiplash claims.

    Dominic Raab

    The Government received and analysed data from numerous sources when formulating the announcement in the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement. The quoted figures were arrived at by combining published industry estimates along with data from government and other sources.

    Government data, compiled by the Compensation Recovery Unit at the Department for Work and Pensions, indicates that claims volumes remain at historically high levels, some 50% higher than in 2006. Over the same period accident rates have fallen by around 26%. This is clear evidence that the system is in need of further reform, which is why on 25 November, in his Autumn Statement, the Chancellor announced tough new measures to control costs and reduce the number of unnecessary whiplash claims.

    The Government will consult on the detail of the new reform package in due course and the consultation document will be accompanied by an impact assessment.

  • Karl Turner – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Karl Turner – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Karl Turner on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to paragraph 1.143 of the Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015, what steps his Department took to ensure accuracy of the £2 billion quoted as the cost to insurers of whiplash claims; and if his Department will conduct its own estimate of that cost.

    Dominic Raab

    The Government received and analysed data from numerous sources when formulating the announcement in the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement. The quoted figures were arrived at by combining published industry estimates along with data from government and other sources.

    Government data, compiled by the Compensation Recovery Unit at the Department for Work and Pensions, indicates that claims volumes remain at historically high levels, some 50% higher than in 2006. Over the same period accident rates have fallen by around 26%. This is clear evidence that the system is in need of further reform, which is why on 25 November, in his Autumn Statement, the Chancellor announced tough new measures to control costs and reduce the number of unnecessary whiplash claims.

    The Government will consult on the detail of the new reform package in due course and the consultation document will be accompanied by an impact assessment.

  • Jim Cunningham – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    Jim Cunningham – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Jim Cunningham on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, pursuant to the Answer of 15 December 2015 to Question 19180, how her Department calculates how to allocate refugee support funding to recipient countries; what information her Department holds on how the distribution of that funding is allocated by the recipient country; and if she will make a statement.

    Mr Nick Hurd

    The UK has allocated £559 million, of an overall £1.12 billion contribution to the Syria crisis response, to support refugees in the region and vulnerable host communities. This includes £304 million in Lebanon, £193 million in Jordan and the remainder across the region. The UK prioritises its assistance according to where needs are greatest and most unmet, guided by assessments including the UN appeals, and the capacity of the host country to absorb refugees.

    In line with the key humanitarian principles of neutrality and impartiality, we work with trusted humanitarian partners with experience of operating in fragile and conflict affected states, to ensure that aid is delivered to people on a needs basis. In 2015/16 DFID is working with 18 humanitarian partners in neighbouring countries. These include UN agencies, international organisations, NGOs and civil society organisations.

  • Virendra Sharma – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    Virendra Sharma – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Virendra Sharma on 2015-12-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what effect Sustainable Development Goal 3 has had on her Department’s aid strategy for UK; and what account she plans to take of that goal in forming the new UK aid strategy.

    Mr Nick Hurd

    DFID will continue to play a leading role in health globally supporting developing countries to meet the Global Goal 3. DFID’s work on health is also guided by the Government’s International Development manifesto commitments and the new UK Aid Strategy. This work will benefit millions of people, which will avoid needless deaths; and encourage healthier populations who are better able to contribute to their nation’s prosperity; and increase the ability of these countries to develop, which is in the UK’s national interest. We will also help build strong health systems that can sustain the gains.

    For example, the new Ross Fund announced in the UK Aid Strategy is a commitment to global public health that will fund work to tackle diseases of epidemic potential, such as Ebola, neglected tropical diseases, drug resistant infections, and malaria. This will directly contribute to the achievement of a number of the global goal health targets.