Category: Speeches

  • Eric Pickles – 2013 Conservative Party Conference Speech

    ericpickles

    Below is the text of the speech made by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles, on 30th September 2013.

    Conference.

    It is always a delight to be working with our yellow chums inside Whitehall, but it’s great to be back at a Conservative Party conference.

    Conservatives share common beliefs – a smaller state, lower taxes, trusting the people and championing hardworking families.

    After three years in government, it is easy to forget the toxic legacy that Labour left behind.

    They mortgaged away our future.

    Labour allowed the benefits bill to double, creating a something-for-nothing culture.

    We have been cleaning up Labour’s mess ever since.

    But imagine if the last three years had not happened, and David Cameron had not walked through the doors of Downing Street.

    Imagine a parallel universe of a Lib-Lab Government clinging to power today.

    Labour would have quickly lost the confidence of the markets for failing to tackle the deficit.

    Mortgage rates would have soared, and after that, taxes too.

    The Chancellor, Ed Balls, would be extending his so-called “mansion tax” to ordinary family homes.

    Hitting your garden, your patio and your home improvements with soaring council tax.

    The Business Secretary – Unite’s Baron McCluskey of Mersey Docks – would be abolishing Margaret Thatcher’s trade union reforms and turning the clock back to the 1970s.

    The Deputy Prime Minister, the ever-cheerful Vince Cable, would still be urging an economic Plan B.

    The Equalities Minister, Harriet Harman would be making welfare benefits a Human Right, assisted by her new human rights czar from the Brazilian Workers Party.

    And the Home Secretary, Chris Huhne, the newly-elevated  Lord Huhne of Wormwood Scrubs, would be championing that great Liberal Democrat cause:

    Votes for prisoners!

    And in the dark, over-cast offices of Downing Street, candles would flicker during the 3-day-week electricity blackout

    The walls battle-scarred by the years of flying Nokias and smashed keyboards

    A dour Scotsman would be quietly cursing Tony Blair for his legacy of boom and bust.

    To his left, Damian McBride, his spin doctor, whispering sweet poisons into his ear.

    To his far left, Ed Miliband, his policy wonk, urging higher taxes, price controls and land grabs.

    In reality, Gordon may be absent. But they are the same old Labour Party.

    A vote for Labour still means:

    – More spending

    – More borrowing

    – More debt

    – More taxes

    – And a return to the culture of spin.

    I don’t know if you’ve been reading the McBride memoirs.

    It’s twenty quid for a signed copy. The unsigned ones are even more expensive

    So let me give you the condensed version.

    Yes – there is a Nasty Party.

    And it’s called the Labour Party!

    At the next election, there will be a clear choice.

    Between a modern Conservative Party or back to the future with Red Ed.

    Look at the records of both parties.

    Under the Labour Government, council tax more than doubled.

    We have worked with councils to freeze it, cutting bills in real terms.

    Under Labour, house building fell to the lowest rate since the 1920s.

    Under Conservatives, house building and first time buyers are back at their highest rate since Labour’s crash, thanks to schemes like Help to Buy.

    The economy is turning the corner.

    We have built over one-hundred-and-fifty thousand new affordable homes since the election, with more to come.

    And we are supporting new family-friendly tenancies in the private rented sector.

    Labour build nothing but resentment.

    Take Ed Miliband’s latest plan? To confiscate private land and build over the Green Belt.

    Resurrected eco towns: the zombie policy that will not die.

    It’s the same old Labour.

    Hardworking people are still paying the price for Labour.

    John Prescott told councils to hike up parking charges, cut the number of parking spaces and use parking fines to punish motorists.

    It’s no wonder that nine million parking fines are now issued every year.

    Shoppers drive to out-of-town superstores or just shop online, rather than face the high street.

    So we will make it easier for hardworking people to pop into the local shop to buy a newspaper or a pint of milk.

    We will empower local residents to challenge the excessive yellow lines and unreasonable fines.

    We will switch off the parking ‘cash cameras’ and spy cars.

    We are helping families with the cost of living, and supporting local shops.

    But it’s not only Labour that wastes taxpayers’ money and interferes in people’s lives.

    Increasingly the EU interferes in local communities.

    Take the EU programme, INTERREG. You have probably never heard of it.

    It replaces our national boundaries with pan-European regions.

    Such as the “TransManche” –merging the southern counties of England with the north of France.

    Last week, at a road show at the Jules Verne Circus in France, the Eurocrats celebrated this region.

    Over a hundred million pounds of taxpayers’ money has been wasted on vanity projects.

    And what gifts the new citizens of TransManche have received.

    A new Atlas, renaming the English Channel. It’s now called “Le Pond”.

    “Franco-British master-classes” in circus training.

    Giant puppets and cross-border contemporary dance.

    And to top the lot, a bold piece of 21st Century transport infrastructure.

    The Cross-Channel Cycle Lane.

    I struggle to see how Labour Ministers ever thought this was a good idea.

    Mind you, Tony Blair did think he could walk on water.

    These Euro projects are a symptom of a wider problem.

    In quangos and town halls across the land, public sector bureaucrats think ‘Euro funding’ is somehow ‘free money’.

    It’s not.

    Every cent of EU grant we get back was British taxpayers’ money in the first place.

    But there are strings attached.

    To get the money, grant recipients must praise the European Union.

    If they don’t, they are punished with fines.

    Even in this great city of Manchester, a grave injustice has been committed.

    Down the road is the People’s History Museum.

    The home of the Labour Party Archives,

    Containing papers from Kier Hardie, and a Frederick Pickles from Bradford – one of the earliest members of the Labour Party a century ago.

    Labour’s Museum took the EU cash, but failed to fly the EU flag.

    The punishment?

    A seven thousand pound fine.

    An outrage. But not a peep from the Labour Party.

    Where was Peter Mandelson when Labour needed him?

    But now the Commission wants to go further.

    Using Lisbon Treaty powers, it wants councils to stamp the EU flag on birth, marriage and death certificates.

    It’s optional say the Commission.

    We’ve heard that one before. Just look at the EU flag on your driving licence.

    Will branding Britons from cradle to grave with EU flags drive economic growth?

    No.

    Will fining local community groups help balance the EU budget?

    Non.

    Will barmy cycle lanes and the EU’s flying circus make us love Brussels more?

    Nein.

    Brussels says it needs ‘more Europe’ to save the Euro.

    As Ronald Reagan might have said …

    More EU government is not the solution to our problems.

    The EU is the problem.

    As David Cameron has said, it’s time to return powers to Britain and to let the people decide.

    Like Labour, the EU doesn’t care about wasting taxpayers’ money.

    But this Government has led from the front in the war on waste.

    In my department, we’ve cut our administration by a cool FIVE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-TWO MILLION POUNDS, from savings big and small.

    Our corporate credit card spending fell by three-quarters after we published every transaction online.

    We’ve cut back the consultants, the temps, the marketing budget.

    We’ve stopped translating documents into foreign languages.

    And shortly, to save NINE MILLION POUNDS A YEAR, my whole department is going to bunk in with Theresa at the Home Office.

    Conservative councils have also led the way in producing quality services at a much lower price.

    Sharing back-offices, better procurement and more joint working.

    But Labour councils continue to burn money – from their union pilgrims to their Town Hall Pravdas.

    Their councils make lazy choices – a “bleeding stump” strategy of axing the frontline, all so they can wave the red flag.

    Let one Labour authority speak for them all – Newham.

    This council, in one of the most deprived parts of our capital, has spent over one-hundred million pounds on a luxury headquarters, including thousands on designer light fittings.

    Three years on, it’s moving back to its old building. All that money wasted.

    By an historic accident, the council’s housing arm – Newham Homes – has houses in my constituency in Essex.

    Former Right to Buy tenants who bought their own home are being hit with leasehold repair charges of up to fifty thousand pounds.

    The local Conservative council charges a tenth of that for the same sort of maintenance.

    That’s where I met Florence Bourne.

    Florrie was a woman in her nineties, full of energy, full of fun and full of the joy of life that belied her years.

    She was proud to have brought up a happy family.

    When Mrs Thatcher gave her a chance she bought her own 2 bedroom flat over the top of the local parade of shops,

    Then Newham gave her a fifty thousand pound bill.

    A crushing sum for a proud woman who had never been in debt before.

    Right across the estate former tenants were billed for work that was not done, work that was poorly done, work that was overpriced.

    Most shocking of all work that was not necessary, including a replacement roof she didn’t need.

    We went to the Valuation Tribunal, and eventually they over-turned the bill.

    But too late for Florrie.

    The last time I saw her she looked every one of her ninety-three years, weighed down by the drilling, the banging, the dust, the mess, but above all the debt and the worry.

    She died a couple of weeks later still believing she owed fifty thousand pounds.

    Ninety-three is a good age, but I’m convinced she had a few more good years in her and I blame Newham for its lack of care.

    Newham: A council more concerned about the roof over its head rather than the roof over an elderly woman.

    This case highlights the scandal of leaseholders being ripped off by inefficient municipal landlords who kick those who took up the Right to Buy.

    We need to increase protection for former Right to Buy leaseholders like Florrie.

    But this story shows the true face of Labour when in power, locally and nationally.

    In May’s local elections, don’t let Labour do to your council what they did to our country

    Conference,

    Conservatives will always be on the side of those who work hard and do the right thing.

    We trust the people.

    We believe in a smaller state.

    We stand up for the ordinary guy in the face of state bureaucracy.

    And we believe in cutting taxes and charges, helping hardworking people with the cost of living.

    We promised change.

    We’ve delivered change.

    Conservative change for the better.

  • Eric Pickles – 2013 Speech to the National Conservative Convention

    ericpickles

    Below is the speech made by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles, to the 2013 National Conservative Convention on 19th March 2013.

    Conference chums,

    Nearly three years on and we are still clearing up the mess left by Labour.

    They certainly knew how to trash the economy.

    Labour left us with the biggest budget deficit in our peacetime history.

    They created a something for nothing culture.

    They allowed the benefit bill to double.

    Under Labour, more taxpayers’ money was spent on welfare than on defence, education and health combined.

    Having trashed our economy, the ones responsible –

    Ed Miliband and Ed Balls –

    like grumpy adolescents are in denial, refusing to apologise for the mess and the misery they left behind.

    We are taking bold action to turn Britain around.

    It means that all the tough decisions were left for us to take.

    Thanks to George Osborne’s action in reducing the deficit by a quarter so far, mortgage rates are at record lows – helping families with the cost of living.

    Local government accounts for a quarter of all public spending.

    Our Town Halls have done an excellent job in rising to that challenge.

    Take Tory Trafford.

    They’ve protected their libraries, whilst Labour in next-door Manchester is closing them.

    Take Conservative Cotswold.

    A district cutting council tax by five per cent and freezing service charges. Sharing a Chief Executive with West Oxfordshire.

    Take Conservative Lancashire.

    The county is cutting council tax by two per cent, funding 48 new Police and Community Support Officers, and cutting management and administration by £215 million.

    By contrast, it’s Labour councils that have used frontline services and the poor as battering rams against the government.

    Take Labour-run Newcastle.

    They announced they wanted to abolish every single penny of arts funding.

    They were soon rumbled for playing cheap political games.

    This is a council which wanted to abolish the arts, but spend a quarter of a million pounds a year on bankrolling a militia of trade union officials in their town hall.

    Labour councils charge high taxes.

    They fail to deliver value for money.

    And they pour taxpayers’ cash down the drain on bad spending.

    Come May, our message is clear:

    Don’t let Labour do your council what they’ve done to our country.

    Now, if you listen to Labour, you’d think that making savings in local councils meant the end of the world.

    Actually, councils are still spending 114 billion pounds a year.

    Like a doom-monger consulting his Mayan calendar, their Shadow Fire Minister has predicted deaths, arson and chaos.

    And in reality, you know what?

    Latest figures show fire deaths are down 19%.

    Fire incidents are down 37%.

    And arson is down 46%.

    Why?

    For starters, we are tackling the causes of fires through prevention, like our award-winning Fire Kills education campaign.

    We are telling people simply to check their smoke alarm when they turn forward their clocks next week.

    A practical way to save lives.

    And fire authorities can save more money from public service reform, through more joint working, better procurement, ending old fashioned practices and doing more for less.

    The Labour leader of Birmingham City Council has predicted “the end of local government as we know it”

    Well, after three years of savings in town halls across the country, you know what?

    Research by Ipsos MORI found that two-thirds of residents have not noticed any changes to the quality of council services.

    And according to the Local Government Association’s own polling, residents’ satisfaction with their council tax has increased.

    Three of out of four residents are happy with their council.

    The LGA found that people felt that councils had become more accountable and more responsive.

    Councils are demonstrating better value for money, and focusing on the issues of greatest importance to local people.

    Save more and get a better council.

    Despite the fact that Alistair Darling was planning £52 billion of cuts, Labour have opposed every single saving that my department is making.

    All they offer is weak leadership and failed old ideas.

    Whitehall could learn a lot from local government.

    There’s still far too much waste and inefficiency.

    As Ronald Reagan declared:

    “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”

    I hope my department has been a beacon to others on how we can protect the taxpayer pound.

    My department is making a 41 per cent cut in real terms on its running costs.

    That’s net savings of over half a billion pounds from administration alone.

    Cutting spending may be a challenge, but it is also an opportunity to work better.

    In Whitehall, my department is actively supporting small and medium firms.

    We have trebled the amount of contracts they receive, so they now receive a quarter of all our procurement spending.

    We have opened a “Pop Up Shop” on the ground floor of my department.

    We have sub-let our vacated space to Oftwat, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, even High Speed 2.

    We’re not fussy, we’ll take their money.

    The Pop Up Shop is just the start.

    Given our location in Victoria, our whole ground floor has great potential for retail – maybe a Pound-stretcher?

    Now, our building has a secret.

    A secret hidden by civil servants for years, in a way that would make MI5 proud.

    Within our basement,

    Hidden from public view,

    Next door to the emergency bunker,

    Just below the Harriet Harman Tranquillity Suite,

    Lies… A secret pub.

    Officially called the DETR Darts Bar.

    Known to others as… The Prezza Arms.

    Backed up by secret subsidies, it charges just £1.90 for a small bottle of Chardonnay.

    That’s what I call minimum pricing.

    Now we’re the department in charge of supporting community pubs.

    But there are eight licensed premises within 30 seconds of our front door, so why do we need a government pub?

    The bar has fond memories of Prezza.

    Mrs Pickles rest assured – I’ve not been frequenting it with civil servants.

    But sorry John. It’s a dinosaur. It’ a reminder of another age.

    So I’ve called time.

    The Prezza Arms has served its last Tia Maria.

    The public don’t want to see politicians guzzle cheap drink at their expense.

    The House of Commons and its Labour MPs should take note.

    The nationalised pub is a symptom of how the state over-reached itself under Labour.

    Well, along with our secret pub going, we’ve cut quangos like the Government Offices for the Regions, the Regional Assemblies and the Regional Development Agencies.

    Labour’s whole tier of regional government has been abolished.

    The Government Office for London has literally been razed to the ground.

    Is our great city of London now rudderless?

    No. We have local leadership from local councils and from Boris, London’s local mayor.

    I am not asking councils to do anything that we haven’t done ourselves

    According to the Institute for Government, my department has cut the most from its own Whitehall budget.

    Staff levels are down a third, but when we restructured, we did it quickly and we started at the top.

    We’ve kept our word:

    communities have new rights,

    councils have new powers.

    residents the power to stop council tax hikes.

    We have reversed the trend of decline.

    From this April; councils will raise 70 per cent of their income locally, and decide how to spend it locally.

    Councils which back local enterprise build more homes and support hard work will go far and be quids in.

    We are ending the begging bowl mentality, when councils fell over themselves to appear the most deprived, to go cap in hand to the man in Whitehall.

    Yet Labour councils are failing to seize the new opportunities that localism offers.

    The Mayor of Liverpool says “he fears the worst” and predicts riots.

    That’s not a confident message about why firms should invest in Liverpool.

    He’s running his council down and letting his residents down.

    To help councils, I’ve published best practice advice on how councils can reduce spending: 50 ways to save.

    Across the country, there is £2.4 billion of uncollected council tax.

    And you know the council with the worst record in the country?

    Liverpool.

    With £114 million of arrears – equivalent to £500 per home.

    They should take time out from scaremongering and get their own house in order.

    Councils are losing £2 billion a year on fraud.

    Procurement fraud alone costs almost £1 billion.

    Practical steps to stop being the victim will cut the cost of being in business.

    Did you know that reserves which have been increasing in recent years whilst Labour councils plead poverty?

    Councils should use their £16 billion of reserves creatively to invest to save.

    All government could save billions from combining services to remove duplication and overlap.

    If every council followed the sharing of back office services being championed by the Conservative Tri-Borough initiative in London, they could save £2 billion a year.

    These are big sums.

    But there are smaller savings which councils can make. Every penny adds up.

    Councils should scrap the trade union pilgrims who leech of the public sector.

    I’ve no problems with trade unions – but the taxpayer shouldn’t have to foot their bill.

    This subsidy of Trade Unions is called “facility time”.

    In my department, I can announce we are going to lead the way in Whitehall by facilitating it down to private sector levels.

    And we are going to abolish Check-off.

    No – not the Russian playwright whose plays are so gloomy that it’s like an evening with Vince Cable.

    I mean the bizarre Whitehall practice of the government departments collecting the union subscriptions on behalf of the unions’ barons for free.

    Well, the unions can now set up a direct debit like everyone else.

    Left-wing councils should scrap their council newspapers like Greenwich Time or Tower Hamlet’s East End Life.

    We don’t need municipal horoscopes, town hall TV listings or a weekly edition of Pravda-style propaganda from town hall rags.

    Nor do we need the likes of Labour councils paying lobbyists to lobby government. What a waste.

    And on lobbyists, let me say this.

    The practice of councillors taking money to lobby their own council is wrong.

    There will be zero tolerance of corruption on my watch.

    A blind eye was turned to back-handers to the police for too long under Labour.

    Well, councillors who take brown paper envelopes should expect to go to jail.

    And those who offer such brown paper envelopes should expect to join them.

    Her Majesty’s Prison Service welcomes crooked politicians with open arms.

    Conference,

    Conservatives are on the side people who work hard and want to get on.

    And that includes people who have come to our country with ambition and drive.

    From Beijing to Mumbai, parents with ambition insist their children learn English. We British should be the same.

    I’m proud to live in a country that Christians, and Jews, and Muslims, and Hindus, and Sikhs, and people of no faith, join together to celebrate their Britishness:

    – respect for the law

    – respect for free speech

    – respect for democracy

    And have the united desire to do better.

    But that can’t happen if we don’t nourish the one thing that unites us all – the English language.

    Without a common language community cohesion is undermined, creating economic and social isolation, fuelling, rumours lies and extremists.

    Councils that translate documents into multiple foreign languages are doing no one any favours.

    So I issued guidance last week to town halls reminding them that there is no requirement to translate literature or signs into foreign languages.

    As well as our culture, a big part of what defines our communities is local high streets, shopping parades and local corner shops too.

    So we have doubled small business rate relief and cut corporation tax.

    But there’s one area where we need to do far more for local shops.

    Parking.

    13 years of Labour’s war on the motorist have created an over-zealous culture of parking enforcement.

    Extending CCTV, not to catch criminals, but to catch you out the moment you park on a yellow line.

    A rigid state orthodoxy of persecuting motorists out of their cars, with no concern about its effect in killing off small shops.

    Officious parking wardens move in faster than a Liberal Democrat on the M11.

    This needs to change.

    Councils should allow more off-street parking spaces, to take pressure off the roads.

    They should end dodgy town hall contracts which reward and encourage the proliferation of fixed penalty notices.

    I believe we need to give people the good grace to pop into a local corner shop for 10 minutes, to buy a newspaper or a loaf of bread without risking a £70 fine.

    This is of course heresy to the left.

    Rather than cutting red tape, their answer to every problem is higher taxes.

    Rather than making it easier to park, Labour councils want to hike taxes on supermarkets, pushing up the cost of living.

    And Labour are eyeing up your home too.

    On top of stamp duty, income tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax and council tax, Labour want a new house tax.

    Does anyone believe a politician who says the tax will only be for the bigger, more expensive homes?

    Their new homes tax would let Ed Miliband send government snoopers into your house and tax your patio, conservatory and home improvement.

    Little Brother even wants to tax your children’s tree house.

    Rather than climbing new heights to tax people, we should be cutting taxes.

    And we’ve done that with council tax.

    Under Labour, council tax more than doubled.

    But over the last three years, thanks to our council tax freeze, we will have cut council tax by almost 10 per cent in real terms.

    Now, no-one likes paying council tax, but we’re making it easier to pay.

    Residents now have a new legal right to pay over 12 months if you wish.

    It’s a practical way to help families and pensioners with their cash flow.

    It will bring down families and pensioners’ monthly outgoings by around £24 for most of the year.

    And this on top of our council tax freeze which is saving families over £200 a year.

    Conference,

    We may be in Coalition with our yellow chums, but we are delivering Conservative policies and Conservative principles.

    A smaller state and one that is more accountable to local taxpayers.

    A freer state, standing up for the little guy in the face of state bureaucracy.

    And a lower tax state, helping families with the cost of living and putting more money back to your pocket.

    Labour offers no solution other than more spending, more borrowing and more debt.

    Only Conservatives, with David Cameron’s strong leadership, are dealing with the big challenges that our country faces.

    Clearing up the mess left by Labour, and turning our country around for the better.

  • Eric Pickles – 2013 Speech on Uniting our Communities

    ericpickles

    Below is the text of the speech made by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles, at the Institute of Civil Engineers in London on 15th January 2013.

    No-one in this country will ever forget 2012.

    Jubilee jamborees, street parties, music marathons.

    The special magic Olympian and Paralympian gold rush.

    We have not I think seen the like before compressed into a single year.

    When you look back, what strikes me is how those events were illuminated by millions of small intense sparks.

    Sparks of kindness and sparks of service.

    It was a year when volunteering went vogue.

    When the biggest army of volunteers for nearly 70 years made things go with a ‘zing’.

    And when the loudest cheer at the Olympic stadium went to the games makers.

    2012 was also the year when striving people who had struggled to be heard, finally found their voice.

    This was brought home to me by the story I heard about Nasrine from Keighley in Yorkshire – the place in which I was born and brought up.

    Nasrine came to Keighley a quarter of a century ago from Pakistan. She had always struggled to pick up the language.

    Things changed when a very thoughtful neighbour invited her to a mums and toddlers group at the local church.

    A group that happened to be supported by our Near Neighbours initiative.

    It proved to Nasrine to be the turning point.

    With the encouragement of her new friends, she plucked up the courage to enrol at a local college to learn English.

    She’s now fluent, nothing can stop her.

    She has even completed a food hygiene course, so she can give something back to the new friends that helped her.

    Nasrine’s victory, her intense spark of success, triumphing against the odds should be cheered to the rafters just as much as the achievements of magnificent Mo Farah.

    But her victory shows why we are determined to back local ambition.

    Each person is a vital part of their community.

    And when you improve the life of one person.

    You begin to improve the lives of those around them.

    We saw this time and time again last year.

    Take the organisation called the Big Lunch.

    This was about more than bringing millions together to enjoy a cuppa and a cake on a picnic table.

    Once a community picnic becomes a gathering of neighbours, once you can put a face to a name, you start to get things done as Peter from Northfleet in Kent discovered.

    By the time he had finished his meal, he’d gathered more than 90 signatures on a petition for a new zebra crossing near his local primary school.

    You break down barriers and good deed leads to another.

    It was the same with the Bandstand Marathon.

    We helped 200,000 people boogie to the beat.

    Now let’s face it from the great and the good to the rest of us we all like to boogie.

    But I loved the fact that local people went further.

    Ingeniously devising the ‘instrument amnesty’.

    So instead of getting rid of old banjos or accordions, unused instruments went to others who wanted to learn to play.

    The Jubilee Hour also offered a perfect demonstration of integration in action.

    Millions gave up 60 minutes, to mark 60 years worth of service by Her Majesty.

    Just like our Majesty, they often went above and beyond.

    Hardy folk down in Broadbottom cleared glass from a small river beach.

    Birmingham volunteers tidied up the gardens of a local care home.

    For many, what started out as an hour’s volunteering looks like turning into a life-time’s commitment.

    Members of the Military Preparation College have decided to volunteer about 10,000 hours annually to benefit local communities.

    And, while we’re on the subject of helping people to do things for themselves, we’re ensuring youngsters from all backgrounds match skills to their ambition.

    I visited Safeside, an education facility in Birmingham to see Youth United in action.

    A group of St John Ambulance volunteers teaching other young folk how to give CPR. In return gaining confidence and experience that would directly help them in the jobs market.

    It was a lifesaving course in more ways than one.

    When you bring together all these intense sparks of commitment and community, what you get is a glowing sense of pride, a real tangible sense of belonging in our country.

    The 2011 census said we are more and more becoming a cosmopolitan country.

    But 2012 demonstrated why we can celebrate the common threads that unite us.

    Last year we seized back the union flag from thugs and extremists.

    Not just from the loutish EDL, but the equally vile ‘poppy burners’.

    Both fanning the flames of hatred.

    Spreading fear.

    Clanging their discordant bell of division.

    In 2012 we won the argument.

    Where they sought to divide, we sought to unite.

    Where they tried to pull down the shutters, we put out the bunting.

    Where they seek to brick Britain in, we built Britain up.

    These extremists want Britain to return to a place and a time that never existed.

    And if it had, it would be a nasty, brutish and mean place.

    But I think we’ve shown their faces don’t fit.

    They are not welcome in modern Britain.

    Which will be a relief for taxpayers.

    For the past few years they have had to stump up the cost of policing the EDL’s malevolent marches.

    Just two of those demonstrations in Luton staggeringly cost almost £2.4 million.

    And left the local authority with very little change from £200,000.

    That’s money that could have been spent on community policing and solving crime.

    What’s more these demonstrations dealt a devastating blow to business and shops on the high street.

    Luton’s local shopping centre lost an estimated half a million pounds.

    And that doesn’t even take into consideration the losses to local stores, companies and taxi firms faced.

    Demonstrations in Bradford, my old much loved city, left businesses out of pocket to the tune of over a million pounds.

    It cost £650,000 to police 1,000 protesters.

    Now I don’t know about you but £650 per protester doesn’t sound like value for money to me.

    Now of course, it’s wonderful we live in a society where people feel able to protest.

    And the usual inconvenience is a small price to pay for such rights.

    But in times of austerity we simply cannot afford to subsidise this insignificant malignant minority.

    Holding thriving businesses hostage.

    Hostage to hate.

    When protests happens, week in week out, it numbs communities.

    Blights places people call home.

    Turns neighbourhoods into sinister arenas for conflict and hostility.

    You should be able to pop to the chemist, or be able to let your kids go shopping on the high street on a Saturday afternoon, without having checking the calendar to see if the EDL are on the march.

    Every community has a basic right to sleep soundly in their beds and to walk without fear on their streets.

    I’m glad to see those EDL numbers on the slide.

    Now, for some, our approach to integration is a little too simple.

    They want a Stalinist 5 year plan.

    They want to tell people what to do and what to think.

    They believe in focus groups, the graph, the bean bag, and the diversity questionnaire.

    Precisely the sort of box-ticking exercise that leads to more bureaucracy not more unity.

    Policy makers of the past preferred to fund ethnic groups to help ethnic groups, instead of supporting neighbours to meet neighbours.

    Yet the detractors have been bowled over by the success that we’ve had on the ground.

    It’s success based in the real world.

    Success founded on an understanding that integration occurs locally and can’t be imposed by Whitehall.

    Those who came to this country from the Jews of the East End to Leicester’s Ugandans, they did not abandon their heritage or culture.

    But they were able to make a success of their lives.

    They understood that what makes you British.

    Has nothing to do with the colour of your skin.

    The nature of your religion.

    It’s not where you come from.

    It’s where you’re going that matters.

    And that’s why they adopted the great things this country has to offer.

    Our great British liberties.

    Like respect for people’s right to free speech, even if you don’t agree with what’s being said.

    And respect for the law.

    It also comes out as things people consider most important about being British in today’s British Future’s poll.

    And our great communities also embraced those other intangible parts of our constitution.

    Of course, all those liberties that existed long before the Euro-judges were let loose on the issue.

    Our joint sense of tolerance, fair play, and respect for others.

    But it’s our willingness.

    Their ambition.

    Their determination.

    To come to the party.

    To grab success.

    To pick up a dictionary rather than relying on a translator.

    That made them a vital part of the British family.

    So, when it comes to integration, our priority is to make way.

    Remove the bureaucracy.

    Snap the shackles of the PC brigade.

    Let localism loose.

    Use people power so communities can do things for themselves.

    Our support for troubled families, community budgets, and neighbourhood planning are clear examples of this approach.

    The old Whitehall walls have come down.

    Local government fault lines have been erased.

    Instead we’re getting organisations together to tackle deep rooted social problems.

    We’re removing the dependence from the system and giving local people confidence to strengthen their communities.

    In 2012 we discovered, to quote the Chief Rabbi, “the music beneath the noise”.

    And in 2013 we won’t skip a beat of that music.

    We will keep breaking down the barriers that get in the way of people getting together.

    Language is our starting point.

    I began by talking about Nasrine, but she is not alone.

    Far too many have paid the price for another one of the old statist policies.

    The decision to pay for translation instead of trusting people to learn the language.

    It has been estimated that the public sector spends as much as £140 million a year translating documents into foreign languages.

    Now, it wasn’t that our predecessors were ill intentioned, don’t get me wrong there.

    Their hearts were in the right place.

    It was just their decisions were simply wrong.

    And that made matters worse.

    It entrenched division.

    Slamming shut the doors of opportunity.

    It led us to the incomprehensible situation where no one can speak English as their main language in 5% of our households.

    That’s terrible for community relations and bad news for the tax-payer.

    It was good to hear recently an apology for these poor policy choices.

    It’s just a pity it came 15 years too late.

    If we want people to get along it makes sense they speak English.

    People should be able to talk, and understand one and another in a nuanced way.

    I’m not expecting everyone to adopt the lyrical dexterity of Samuel Johnson or for that matter Boris Johnson.

    But this is about getting the best from all our citizens.

    Britain is a country built on aspiration.

    You work hard to get your first job, your first car, your first home.

    But the reality is you need English to succeed.

    You can’t really function as a good doctor, a good teacher, a good mechanic, or since we’re in the Institution for Civil Engineering, you can’t be a good engineer, if you can’t talk the language.

    Just as you can’t talk to your neighbour, read a bus timetable, or enjoy enormous joy of The Only Way is Essex.

    Worse still, our kids don’t have fluent English, are condemned to a very limited life.

    We don’t want people’s identity to disappear or cease being proud of their roots or background.

    We want them to stay in touch with their culture.

    We want them to be proud and ambitious.

    So learning English is an integral part of that process.

    That’s why, instead of millions lost in translation services, next year we’re ploughing millions into an English language service.

    Today I’m launching a competition that will allow local communities to tailor language services to suit the needs of their area.

    It will give people the power to improve their circumstances and climb the social ladder.

    But more than that it will benefit Britain.

    We all miss out, our country is the poorer, if people can’t speak our language.

    If they are unable to participate or make an economic contribution.

    English is the passport to prosperity all over the world.

    From Mumbai through to Beijing every ambitious parent is trying to get their children to learn English.

    We should want no less for our children here.

    And we need to ensure that intense spark of ambition is felt strongly right across the country.

    When need our great communities to succeed, for Britain to succeed.

    When they do well, our country is enriched culturally and economically.

    Ultimately, Britain can only compete in the global race if we realise the full potential of each and every person in our country.

    Another unintended consequence of the previous administration was the attitude to uncontrolled immigration.

    Besides they put a strain on our schools, our healthcare and welfare.

    Besides the social tension it created.

    Was that it stifled a real opportunity for us to develop home grown talent.

    British Asian cuisine is a classic example of this.

    We all know curry is the favourite item on the menu of people up and down the land.

    It warms the cockles of 2.5 million people every week.

    Bringing billions into our economy.

    It is also reminds us of the way we have taken a traditional dish and added our own unique British twist.

    Yet I can’t understand why many chefs were being imported from Bangladesh for this purpose.

    When what we should have done was train local people up to that level of cuisine.

    That’s why I’m as keen as korma on curry schools.

    That are helping us put some domestic glitz and glam back into the industry and enable us to develop a new generation of Master Chefs.

    New Atul Kochhars.

    To export to India and the rest of the world.

    A desire to improve social mobility for all our citizens, is a factor I identified as being integral to integration last year.

    But this is about more than curry schools.

    We’re also encouraging at least 50 more schools to take part in enterprise challenges.

    And winning hundreds more secondary school pupils to work placements in industry.

    We’re also moving forward on another element of our strategy – participation.

    Our faith communities are past masters of bringing people together.

    Alastair Campbell might carp, but we definitely do ‘God’.

    Faith provides a clear moral compass and a call to action that benefits society as a whole.

    At a time when Christians are under attack for their beliefs in different parts of the world, I am proud we have freedom of belief in Britain.

    But in recent year long-standing British liberties of freedom of religion have been undermined by the intolerance and aggressive secularism.

    Taking people to task for wearing a cross or a rosary .

    Beginning costly legal actions against council prayers – as if they had nothing better to do.

    We’re committed to the right of Christians and people of all beliefs to follow their faith openly, wear religious symbols and pray in public.

    That’s why I signed a Parliamentary Order last year to protect the freedom for communities to pray.

    I am delighted that the principle of wearing a religious symbol at work has today been upheld by the European Court. It’s a very long judgement our lawyers are ploughing through.

    Our Year of Service reminded us why faith still counts.

    Christians at Harvest festival, Muslims at Eid and Jews on Mitzvah Day, Sikhs on the martyrdom of Guru Arjan Dev all reaching across the divide – giving succour to the sick, support for the needy, to the poor of all faiths and to people of no faith.

    Faith galvanised our communities.

    That’s why we will soon be announcing our plans to build on the success of A Year of Service.

    Plans that make the most of the energy and the enthusiasm of all those who took part in faith-based volunteering last year.

    Alongside this I’ll be supporting a further 190 Near Neighbours projects to keep communities connecting.

    Participation stems from what last year I referred to as sharing common ground.

    Last year it was about celebration. Next year will be about commemoration.

    On the ceiling of this building’s Great Hall is a painted memorial to the war to end all wars.

    It is a reminder of the self-sacrifice of those who fought and died for this country in a conflict that began 99 years ago.

    They were made up of all creeds, colours and class, and came from all corners of the globe world.

    As I stood at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday last year, it occurred to me that this was the first time we stood in silence without a World War One veteran by our side.

    But we will continue to remember them.

    And this year our preparations to honour the fallen will pick up pace.

    Few people have a greater sense of responsibility than our brave armed forces and it’s been another of my priorities to build that sense of responsibility – particularly amongst our young people.

    That is why we’ve encouraged tens of thousands of youngsters to join the National Citizen Service, and that will continue.

    And we’re also helping hundreds of young people get involved in great activities like the Scouts and Industrial Cadets – helping break down barriers while having a bit of fun at the same time.

    Finally, if we’re to encourage people to get on board, we have got to be very clear we need to tell some people where to get off.

    As we did last year, we will continue to work to isolate extremism.

    Twenty years on from the death of Stephen Lawrence, we will continue to show racism the red card – working with 10,000 students in schools across the country to reject the extremist message.

    And a special interest group – led by Blackburn and Luton councils – are undertaking important work locally to tackle the fanatics.

    We’ll be watching out for their findings with great interest.

    Meanwhile, the money we’ve put into the Monitoring Anti-Muslim Attacks (MAMA) will lay the foundations for reporting and gathering data on anti-Muslim incidents.

    There can be no hiding place for the racists in our society.

    So in 2013 our mantra is simple; integration, integration, integration.

    We will continue reaching hard across the divide

    We will continue forging the friendships that strengthen our society and help everyone get on in life.

    But if I had one new year’s resolution for this year, it would be to make this year

    …like the title of the book I’ve just downloaded onto my Kindle:

    “A year of doing good”.

    Because it’s those intense sparks of ambition that will light the way for our country.

    Those intense sparks that will weld us together as a stronger nation in the years and the decades to come.

  • Eric Pickles – 2012 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    ericpickles

    The below speech was made by the Secretary of State for Communities, Eric Pickles, in October 2012.

    After two and a half years in Coalition, it still seems strange to be working with our yellow chums in government.

    I sit next to Vince Cable in Cabinet.

    He’s not as cheerful as he seems on telly.

    But I wasn’t always a Conservative.

    I was born into a Labour family.

    My great-grandfather was one of the founding members of the local Independent Labour Party.

    As a 14 year old, my birthday present was a book by Leon Trotsky.

    Aptly, ‘the Revolution Betrayed’.

    Not exactly Harry Potter.

    Trotsky rightly warned of the oppressive bureaucracy of the Soviets.

    But it was the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia that made me join the Conservative Party as a protest.

    Gradually I became a Conservative.

    A Tory that has a burning dislike of oppressive state bureaucracy.

    A Tory that knows that prosperity and fairness is best delivered through freedom.

    Now, I came from a humble background.

    And I am proud to be both a Member of Parliament and a member of David Cameron’s Cabinet.

    It was the Conservative Party that helped me get where I am today.

    And now, I want others to have a chance in life.

    There is nothing more fundamental than supporting home ownership.

    We have reinvigorated the Right to Buy, reversing Labour’s savage cuts.

    We are offering families up to seventy-five thousand pounds discount to buy their home…

    …Using the money from additional sales to build more affordable homes.

    The Right to Buy gives something back to families who worked hard, pay their rent and play by the rules.

    Across the country, Margaret Thatcher’s Right to Buy has given people a sense of pride and ownership in where they live.

    Sadly, many Labour councils are keeping their tenants in the dark about these new extended rights.

    Their council leaders have pledged to fight tooth and nail against the Right to Buy.

    A right can only be exercised if you know about it.

    So I can pledge my department will be talking direct to tenants to inform them of their Right to Buy.

    It’s a great policy to campaign on for May’s local elections.

    We should tell every tenant in every council estate – that we’re on their side.

    We are also tackling a great injustice – discrimination against our Armed Forces.

    Precisely because they have served overseas – servicemen and women don’t have a ‘local connection’ under housing rules.

    Amazingly foreign migrants have been given greater priority on housing waiting lists than those who fought for Queen and Country.

    So we have changed the rules to give Armed Forces first priority for our first-time buyer and shared ownership schemes.

    And we have given councils new freedoms to allocate social housing to those who have worked hard and given something back to society…

    …from the Armed Forces to community volunteers.

    And can you believe it?

    Some Labour councils are turning their back on our Armed Forces.

    Why?

    Because there could be some “equality issues” – well,

    I don’t mind discriminating in favour of our military heroes.

    Conference,

    I believe in lower taxes.

    Whereas Labour doubled council tax.

    We have worked with councils to freeze it for the last two years.

    And this year, we are again offering additional funding to help councils freeze their bills.

    And we’ve scrapped Labour’s plans for an expensive and intrusive council tax revaluation, and Labour’s plans for new taxes on your home improvements.

    We want to make it easier for families to improve their home and build a new conservatory.

    Labour want to tax it!

    We have also cut business rates for small firms, doubling their rate relief.

    Bit by bit, we are pulling back the burden of regulation imposed by Labour.

    Clamping down on loony health and safety,

    Stopping the gold-plating of Euro Directives and equality rules,

    Opening up more government contracts to small and medium firms.

    And we have scrapped Whitehall rules which forced up parking charges and made it impossible to park in town centres.

    Now, councils need to do their bit to help.

    And to encourage that, we are giving councils a financial stake in their high street.

    From April, councils will keep more of the money they raise in business rates.

    No longer will it all be snatched back by Whitehall.

    So councils will have a direct interest and motivation to see their local economy grow and develop.

    Conservative councils, I know, will seize this opportunity.

    They will reward enterprise and hard work.

    By cutting waste and bureaucracy, we’ve been able to cut council tax and business rates, and still pay off Labour’s deficit.

    I’m doing my bit in Whitehall.

    My department is reducing its running costs by five hundred and seventy million pounds.

    Yet despite the fact that Labour were planning big cuts in local government budgets, Labour have opposed every single saving we’ve made.

    All they offer is more borrowing and more taxes.

    They are simply not credible.

    I believe that more joint working, cutting fraud, clamping down on senior pay, greater transparency, and better procurement will help deliver sensible savings in council budgets, and protect frontline services.

    We practice what we preach.

    We’ve published every single item spent on the Government’s corporate credit cards, reducing our card spending by three quarters.

    It has exposed astonishing waste by Labour – wining, dining and jollies at your expense.

    Conference,

    Whereas arrogant Labour Ministers had a party at your expense, I’m proud of what this Government has done to support people’s street parties.

    The Royal Wedding, the Diamond Jubilee and the Olympics were great occasions of the nation coming together.

    This Government has backed British values,

    having pride in our nation and our flags,

    supporting our united identity and our common English language.

    We have stood up for the role of Christianity and faith in public life.

    And protected councils’ right to hold prayers at meetings, if they wish.

    Upholding values of tolerance and freedom of religion.

    They’re not human rights.

    They’re British rights.

    Rights that existed long before European Judges came into existence.

    And, at the same time, we will confront and challenge the minority of extremists who spread hate and division.

    We are stronger as a nation when we stand together.

    And – what a great thing it is – that kids in Birmingham, across colours and creeds, have been waving the Union flag this summer for British champions like Mo Farah.

    Born overseas, but now proud to be British.

    We Brits are increasingly proud to fly flags as an expression of our local and national identities.

    Now, flying a flag should be a pleasure, not a chore.

    Brussels has been trying to make it compulsory for public buildings to fly the EU flag all year round.

    Bless them – they thought it was a good idea.

    We have successfully fought off this ludicrous policy.

    We’ll fly flags – but of our own choosing.

    So I’ve cut the rules which has held back flag-flying of Britain’s local and military flags.

    Such as the great flag of Yorkshire and its White Rose.

    Now, I’m proud to have been born and bred in Yorkshire, but Essex is my home now.

    I have been transformed from a Yorkshire TYKE to an Essex TOWIE.

    My constituency is the location of the television programme The Only Way Is Essex.

    It’s fun TV and we all enjoy it.

    But there is another Essex Value that runs deep in the DNA of our Party:

    – if you work hard, you can go far.

    It’s a message well understood by Margaret Thatcher, John Major and by David Cameron.

    And it’s this:

    It doesn’t matter where you’re from, it’s where you’re going that counts.

    As Conservatives, we are at our best when we back that aspiration.

    We should reject the voices of the left who want to sneer at success, kick enterprise and punish the rewards that go with hard work.

    There are, of course, some families in our society who are caught in a culture of welfare dependency, criminality and low self-esteem.

    They have been let down.

    A cosy centre-left consensus saw this as ‘too difficult’ to tackle.

    They just kept paying the benefit and abandoned people in sink estates.

    We saw it during last year’s riots – opportunistic thugs – a Gucci generation looting flat-screen tellies and trendy trainers.

    And we see it with a generation who want nothing other than the next benefit cheque, and don’t care about their kids’ future.

    That is why we have launched a Troubled Families initiative – to tackle this head on.

    We are bringing all the different public agencies together.

    Dedicated workers to intervene and turn these families’ lives around.

    It’s not about social workers feeling their pain or respecting their “lifestyle choices”, it’s about tough love – very tough love.

    It’s not acceptable for parents to blow their benefits on booze or drugs.

    Or allow their kids to skip school and drift into crime.

    So we will work with families to provide the guidance and supervision that kids need.

    Every council has signed up to a scheme.

    By the end of the year, we have committed to be actively working with over forty-thousand families across England.

    By the end of this Parliament, we aim to have turned around one-hundred-and-twenty thousand troubled families.

    It won’t be easy.

    But we will help improve the lives of the most vulnerable, neglected and exploited in society.

    Conference,

    Just as we want to change things, we also want to protect the good things – especially the environment.

    So we’ve introduced a new protection for valuable green spaces and have given councils new powers to stop unwanted garden grabbing.

    Now, there’s been a lot of press speculation in recent weeks on the Green Belt.

    Protecting the character of the countryside is stamped deep into the heart of Conservativism.

    And I want to be absolutely clear – the Green Belt plays a vital role in stopping urban sprawl – and we will protect it.

    To maintain those environmental safeguards, we have to be tough on those who break them.

    We are helping councils tackle the rogue landlords who build “beds in sheds” – which house and exploit illegal immigrants.

    We have outlawed squatting in people’s homes. Invade someone’s house and you now go to jail.

    We’ve handed councils the powers to close down the protestors’ shanty towns that blighted the likes of Parliament Square and St Paul’s.

    Now, long-drawn out cases like Dale Farm have brought the legal system into disrepute.

    You know the story: in breach of planning law, travellers move in over a bank holiday weekend, and it takes years for councils to remove them.

    A small minority exploit Labour’s human rights and equality rules and have cost taxpayers millions of pounds.

    Such episodes give the whole travelling community a bad name and fuels community tensions.

    So I can announce today new powers for councils to literally stop those caravans in their tracks.

    New instant Stop Notices will allow councils to issue unlimited fines for those who ignore planning rules and defy the law.

    We will stand by those who play by the rules, and use the full force of the law against those who break them.

    Conference chums,

    In my Ministerial office, I’ve placed reminders of what it means to be a Conservative.

    A bust of Disraeli.

    A poster of the great Winston.

    A momento of the magnificent Margaret.

    But over my left shoulder is a photograph that often catches the eye of visitors.

    Ché Guevara.

    The Cuban Revolutionary.

    Smoking a very large Havana cigar.

    It’s there to remind me: that without constant vigilance – the cigar-chomping Commies will take over.

    Well, that isn’t going to happen on my watch.

    After more than two years in government, I’ve learnt that cigar-chomping Commies come in many guises.

    We may be in Coalition, but we are doing sound Conservative things, and we should be proud of what we’re doing.

    Proud of taking on the vested interests of oppressive bureaucracy,

    Proud of cutting back waste to pay off Labour’s overdraft,

    Proud of rewarding those who work hard,

    And proud to be at the front of a revolution.

    A very Conservative revolution that will allow Britain to deliver.

    Thank you.

  • Eric Pickles – 2011 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    ericpickles

    Below is the text of the speech made by the Communities and Local Government Secretary, Eric Pickles, to the 2011 Conservative Party conference.

    It’s now almost 18 months since David Cameron entered the doors of Number 10 together with our coalition chums to clean up Labour’s mess.

    Getting our nation’s finances back on the right track has been challenging.

    I’ve seen first hand the inefficiency and incompetence of Labour.

    Take FireControl – John Prescott’s plan to regionalise England’s fire service.

    His vanity project spiralled out of control, wasting half a billion pounds of taxpayers’ money.

    You won’t hear about that on money supermarket dot com

    And there’s nothing to show for it – apart from a series of empty bunkers, each kitted out with deluxe chrome coffee machines costing six grand a piece.

    Now that’s Labour’s idea of national resilience.

    Come hell or high water, Labour Ministers could still demand a Venti Skinny cappuccino.

    What a waste! You can get a big pack of Yorkshire Tea for a fiver…

    Now if my Coalition Mucker Chris Huhne tunes in today – that’s what I call a proper Tea Party, Chris.

    Or take the example of Labour blowing £5,000 on my department’s officials having a staff away day at a club.

    Not a working men’s club.

    Not a Pall Mall Gentlemen’s Club.

    No, a different kind of gentlemen’s club –

    A club which features Showgirl Sensation Amber Topaz and her exotic chum, Lady Beau Peep.

    I’ve never thought of the civil service as lost sheep,

    And I’m not sure why they flocked to that establishment.

    No more – I’ve cancelled these plush away days.

    Labour Ministers were at it too.

    With their corporate credit card – the so-called “Government Procurement Card” –

    Labour and their staff wined and dined at the finest restaurants at your expense.

    Boisdales.

    The Cinammon Club.

    The Wolseley.

    And in the very heart of Prezza-land, close to the mouth of the Humber… Mr Chu’s China Palace.

    Unlike Labour, I pay for my own Chicken Chow Mein.

    We are clamping down on the abuse of government credit cards and opening their spending up to public scrutiny.

    Transparency will help councils save billions through better procurement, joint working, and driving out waste.

    In comparison to Whitehall, local government has been the most efficient part of the public sector – especially Conservative councils.

    By dismantling Labour’s interfering, intrusive laws and regulations, we can do even more for less.

    In a radical extension of localism, we are giving councils a new general power of competence to champion their local communities.

    We’ve shredded Labour red tape.

    And I’m tackling the gold-plating of equality rules.

    Did you know… if you want to take out a copy of Mills and Boon from your local library…….In some places you’re asked to fill out a sex survey on your private life.

    No more. Councils won’t need to undertake these expensive and intrusive questionnaires.

    Use some common sense and respect people’s privacy.

    But in the game of Town Hall Top Trumps, there’s a non-job which beats even the Civic Sex Snooper.

    Taxpayer-funded full-time trade union officials.

    They cost the public sector – that’s taxpayers to you and me – a quarter of a billion pounds a year.

    That’s money taken away from frontline services.

    Guess what… You won’t find Labour criticising them.

    Silence from Ed Miliband. His Labour councillors voted to close libraries, but keep bankrolling union officials on the rates.

    And surprise, surprise.

    Not a dicky bird from Labour’s local government spokesperson, Jack Dromey.

    No wonder.

    Because that former union baron knows Labour is in hock to the unions.

    In my book, that’s not All Right Jack.

    If unions want to raise money for Labour do it in your own time, not on the rates.

    We’re going to call time on this last closed shop.

    As night follows day, Labour waste your money and put up taxes.

    Take council tax.

    They doubled it.

    We are freezing it.

    Not just for one year, but two years – as we promised in Opposition.

    And Labour councils charge higher council tax.

    Conservative councils charge less – and deliver even better.

    Had they remained in power, Labour would have hiked council taxes even more on middle England.

    Labour were actively planning a council tax revaluation –

    – to spy on your gardens,

    – your patios,

    – counting your bedrooms,

    – your conservatories,

    – your parking spaces,

    – even a room with a view.

    We’ve cancelled Labour’s expensive council tax revaluation.

    We’ve stopped soaring council tax bills for millions of homes.

    It’s not just about protecting middle England from higher taxes.

    I want to stop clipboard-wielding inspectors peering into your children’s bedroom or nosing about your bathroom.

    We will protect families’ civil liberties and privacy.

    It wasn’t just council tax hikes that Labour threatened.

    Labour would impose new bin taxes on your home too.

    Yet another tax for the privilege of your town hall collecting your bin.

    Labour love fining for minor breaches of petty bin rules.

    Handing out bigger fines than those given to convicted shoplifters.

    State officials secretly going through and filming your bins.

    Did you put a yoghurt pot in the wrong recycling bin?

    Did you put your bin out at the wrong hour?

    Watch out!

    Because nobody expects the Town Hall Binquisition.

    Well, it’s time to place Labour’s bin taxes and bin fines in the dustbin of history.

    But there’s more to do.

    In Opposition, we also made clear promises on the frequency of rubbish collections.

    Promises first announced to you at our Party Conference.

    Well, as you know – Conservatives keep our promises.

    The public deserve proper, decent frontline services for their council tax.

    So I can announce my department will be introducing a new fund to support weekly rubbish collections.

    Reversing Labour’s Whitehall policy of bin cuts.

    This will support those who want to improve their existing weekly collections.

    And it will support switching from fortnightly to better weekly collections.

    Helping councils work with families to go green and provide a comprehensive service every week.

    Labour oppose this scheme. No wonder, in Government they were drawing up plans to impose monthly bin collections.

    The choice is clear:

    – Conservatives standing up for families and frontline services.

    – Or Labour and their rubbish policies.

    Just as we are standing up for local families, so we will support local firms.

    I grew up living above a greengrocers, helping out every week.

    I know that business rates are the third biggest outgoing for local shops after rent and staff.

    So we have doubled small business rate relief for two years. And we’re making it easier to claim.

    We have scuppered Labour’s ports tax.

    And we are giving councils new powers to cut business rates, to support community pubs, post offices and local shops.

    We understand that local high streets are the lifeblood of the local economy, and the centre of what we call home.

    So are changing Tony Blair’s reckless all-you-can-drink licensing laws.

    We are giving councils more powers to tackle the anti-social behaviour that blights so many of our town centres late at night.

    And to help those affected by the disgraceful riots get back to business, we have created a twenty million pound High Street Support Scheme.

    Over their 13 years, Labour failed business.

    Their Regional Development Agencies were too distant from local firms, and squandered their budgets.

    In their place, our new Local Enterprise Partnerships now have councils working hand in hand with local business.

    We will allow councils to keep the money from business rates, giving them a direct stake in local enterprise.

    Helping them to help business grow.

    But this is also a radical devolution of local government finance, meaning councils raise the money they spend

    rather than being so dependent on Whitehall handouts.

    And in targeted growth areas, we have over twenty new Enterprise Zones.

    They will boost regeneration through simplified planning, tax breaks and super-fast broadband.

    We can help the economy by building more homes too.

    But under Labour, house building hit the lowest rate since the 1920s.

    For those who aren’t lucky enough to have the Bank of Mum and Dad, the first time buyer is now aged 37.

    So we are selling off the Government’s disused land and empty offices, and use it to build one hundred thousand more homes.

    And we’re bringing back Margaret Thatcher’s Right to Buy,

    And we’ll use the receipts to build more affordable homes.

    The planning system also has its role to play in building more homes and boosting local growth

    But it doesn’t have to be at the expense of the countryside or local democracy.

    Last week, Labour pledged to keep regional planning and regional quangos.

    They’re still wedded to regional government and Whitehall knows best.

    Labour’s Regional Spatial Strategies planned to bulldoze the Green Belt.

    Well, we will protect it.

    In the Localism Bill, we are abolishing Labour’s top-down targets and putting local people in charge.

    We have also given councils stronger powers to tackle ‘garden grabbing’.

    And we’re creating a brand new local protection for green spaces.

    This can safeguard the likes of playing fields, bowling greens and village greens.

    Now… You won’t be surprised to learn that me and Mrs Pickles are partial to the odd scone and a warm beverage in a National Trust Tea Room.

    But, the planning system needs to be improved.

    Labour churned out over 1,000 pages of central planning guidance.

    They made the planning regime the preserve of inspectors, pressure groups and planning lawyers.

    So we’re simplifying this guidance to 52 pages.

    We need a system which is quicker, and provides greater certainty for local firms and local residents.

    But it’s not a choice between countryside or concrete.

    Our countryside is one of the best things that makes Britain great, and we will protect it

    Our planning system must also have integrity.

    It must be seen to be fair to all.

    Labour undermined this.

    They created a system where special treatment was given to travellers.

    Whatever their intentions, this fuelled resentment and undermined community cohesion.

    We should support those who play by the rules.

    So we’re providing sixty million pounds to support councils build and improve official traveller pitches.

    We have given travellers on official sites stronger tenancy rights – the same as council tenants.

    Treating law-abiding people equally and fairly.

    But it’s not right to have planning rules which gave a green light to traveller camps being dumped in the Green Belt and open countryside.

    The Green Belt should be applied evenly and fairly.

    So we’re changing planning rules to give it more protection.

    We are also giving councils stronger enforcement powers to prevent unauthorised sites like Dale Farm from ever being established in the first place.

    You hear a lot about human rights these days.

    But rights and responsibilities cut both ways.

    It’s time to respect the family life of those who have to live next door to these illegal sites.

    It’s time to respect the property rights of law-abiding homeowners.

    We should take no lectures from far-left activists

    or penpushers parachuted in from some obscure United Nations agency.

    The Dale Farm saga has now spent 10 years before the courts.

    Justice delayed is justice denied.

    It’s time that planning law was enforced.

    It’s time to uphold the British rule of law.

    Conference, after 18 months, we’ve started to put our country back on track.

    In government, we are following the example of so many good Conservative councils:

    Doing more for less and delivering frontline services at value for money prices.

    But there is still more to be do.

    Our country does best when led by Conservatives.

    We do best for our country

    when we are true to our Conservative convictions.

    Respect the law, the right to private property and personal liberty.

    Scale back the waste of the state which forces up taxes and crowds out enterprise and innovation.

    And above all, a basic trust in the people.

    My friends, you can feel that power is shifting – back to you, back to your communities, back in the right direction.

    From the forces of officialdom to families.

    From Whitehall to councils.

    From quangos to neighbourhoods.

    The opportunity is yours.

    Together, we will shake off the shackles of Labour.

    And Britain will be great again.

  • Eric Pickles – 2009 Conference Speech

    ericpickles

    Below is the text of the speech made by Eric Pickles at the 2009 Conservative Party Conference in Manchester on 5th October 2009.

    My dear Chums – welcome to Manchester,

    Welcome to our Conference,

    And welcome to the start of the General Election.

    Since we met in Birmingham 12 months ago a lot has happened

    To our country,

    To the world economy,

    And to the challenges faced by our Party

    After a bruising political year, we remain ahead in the opinion polls.

    After June’s elections we have over ten thousand councillors

    …in the north

    AND

    In the south.

    More than the Liberal Democrats and Labour combined.

    We are the only political party to have an MEP in every region and every country that makes up the United Kingdom.

    And to confound all the pundits, we outpolled Labour in Wales – a feat last achieved when Lloyd George was a lad.

    To cap it off, just when Gordon Brown was sloping off on his holidays, we elected the youngest member of the House of Commons – Chloe Smith in Norwich North.

    Won’t it be a wonderful moment when Chloe takes her seat in parliament next week?

    Well done Chloe, and well done all of you who worked so hard on that campaign.

    Now there are some people who will tell you that because of these results, the General Election is in the bag.

    And all we have to do is sit back and enjoy the view.

    A bit like Neil Kinnock in Sheffield in ‘92

    Well take a tip from your Uncle Eric – that is just not the case.

    Be under no illusion, the General Election is not in the bag.

    We still have a mountain to climb.

    To form the next Government, we need to gain 117 seats – something not achieved by the Conservative Party since 1931.

    We need a swing greater than Margaret Thatcher’s in 1979.

    Because of the way parliamentary boundaries are drawn Labour still has an inbuilt advantage over the Conservatives.

    Now, there is a popular saying in politics that oppositions don’t win elections, governments lose them.

    That is not enough for me,

    And I know it’s not enough for you.

    And it is not enough for David Cameron

    We are not going to sit by and just watch the Labour Party implode

    We want to earn each and every vote.

    We don’t want to get people’s votes just because we are not the Labour Party

    We want to earn people’s votes

    Because we want a mandate for change.

    We will make bold announcements.

    By the end of this week, we will have clearly demonstrated to you, and to the rest of the country, that our Party, led by David Cameron has the answers to rebuild our broken economy, mend our broken society and put the trust back in politics.

    We will also lay down a clear set of tests by which a Conservative Government will be judged.

    A test firmly rooted in social justice.

    Measured in those communities that have been abandoned by Labour.

    Those run down estates,

    Those children in sink schools,

    The unemployed – particularly the long term unemployed.

    Those communities forgotten and neglected by Labour

    I know in my heart that David Cameron’s shadow cabinet team has got what it takes to tackle these challenges.

    Just ask yourself, who would do a better job?

    The decisive George Osborne or dithering Alistair Darling?

    The determined Theresa May or Yvette Cooper?

    The wise William Hague, or banana man David Milliband?

    The experience of Ken Clarke,

    or

    His Lordship Peter Mandelson First Secretary of State for …. well just About Everything

    Actually, you know Gordon Brown is in serious trouble when he recalls Peter Mandelson to the Cabinet – and 12 months later – he is still there!

    Of course, there were rumours last week that Peter might want to join a Conservative Government.

    He has even started using my catchphrase – he’s now calling journalists “chums”.

    Well at least that is what I think he had said, but my hearing is not what it was.

    Now Gordon Brown likes to talk about dividing lines – about the differences between us and Labour.

    We are not about dividing lines – we are about drawing people together – uniting people for the common good.

    Sure, there are differences.

    Unlike Labour, we will achieve our aims through social responsibility not state control.

    By giving power back to people and communities, not handing it over to unaccountable bureaucrats.

    They want remote Ministerial control from Whitehall.

    We want decentralisation, transparency and local people in charge.

    And we want accountability.

    So when Gordon Brown talks about fair votes, and changing the voting system

    We say yes!

    We will introduce fair votes and reduce the cost of politics in the process.

    We will make all constituencies equal in voting size ending the system that devalues the votes of some at the expense of others. And in the process we will reduce the number of MPs initially by 10%

    Furthermore, the first election under a Conservative Government will be fought on these new boundaries. We will deliver fair boundaries. Now that’s fair votes.

    So friends, this is going to be a decisive week in British politics.

    A week where we must prove that our whole party is ready for change.

    A week where we show we will not be deflected.

    We will not be distracted.

    And we will show we are united in our determination to bring change to the country as a whole.

    So I say to the Labour voter who feels let down by the once great party of the working man.

    – who feels angry at the abolition of the 10p tax hitting Britain’s poorest

    – cuts in the NHS,

    – who is not prepared to send our soldiers off to war without the proper equipment.

    I say join a truly progressive party who want to be judged by how we treat the poorest in society.

    To the Liberal Democrat voter worried about ID cards, social justice and climate change.

    I say vote for a party with Liberal Democracy firmly at its heart and that can deliver in Government

    And to all those union members worried about spiralling debt, job losses and the neglect of thousands of young people consigned to a life without a job and without a sense of purpose.

    I say to them vote for a party determined to get Britain working and to give our young people the life changing experience that only a job can bring.

    I make this appeal above the heads of party leaders, union officials and newspaper editors.

    Join us. Trust us with your vote. And help us change our country for the better.

    Trust us, and we will not let you down.

  • Claire Perry – 2015 Speech on Women in Railways

    Below is the text of the speech made by Claire Perry, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport, in London on 17 November 2015.

    Introduction

    Thank you for that introduction, Adeline (Ginn, Founder of Women in Rail).

    It’s a real pleasure to be here today, for what is becoming one of the most important events in the rail calendar.

    Since Women in Rail was established 3 years ago, it has shone new light on the rail sector.

    It has shown both the great opportunities that rail has for women.

    But it has also shown how the sector must change if it is to draw fully on women’s talent.

    I would like to say a little about each side of this story: the good, and the could-do-better.

    Rail renaissance

    To start with the good, we can say without contradiction today that Britain is experiencing a rail renaissance.

    In the 20 years since privatisation, customer numbers have more than doubled and rail freight has grown by 75%.

    Figures like these would be impressive in any industry.

    But for rail, they are a triumph.

    They are a triumph over the decades in which our railways were written off as the transport mode best left in the nineteenth century.

    And they are a triumph over the view that our railways had been rendered obsolete by the private car and the short haul flight.

    Now, with 20 years of growth behind us, we are making unprecedented investment in our networks as we create a world-class, state-of-the-art railway fit for the 21st century.

    Wherever you look, there’s growth and activity.

    The new Hitachi train plant has opened in the north-east.

    We’re getting on with electrifying the Transpennine, Great Western and Midland Mainlines.

    We have reopened Birmingham New Street and Manchester Victoria to a rapturous reception

    And looking ahead, we will open Crossrail and start HS2, before beginning a new round of investment projects that will take us up to 2025 and beyond.

    So these are great years for our railways and for everyone who is working to ensure their success.

    Room for improvement

    But it would be wrong for me to pretend to that I am wholly satisfied with the status quo.

    Because amid the successes the rail sector is facing two connected challenges.

    Skills challenge

    The first challenge is our need for more skilled rail workers of all kinds.

    More engineers, surveyors, construction workers, signallers and drivers.

    In all, we estimate that we need 10,000 new engineers to see through the improvements to the existing network.

    And we expect HS2 alone to create 25,000 jobs during construction and 3000 jobs when in operation.

    Yet as things stand today, parts of the rail industry are set to lose half their staff to retirement within the next 15 years.

    That’s unsustainable.

    So we are addressing this skills challenge through the establishment of new training institutions, our commitment to creating 3 million new apprentices, and by the appointment of Terry Morgan – Crossrail’s Chairman – to develop a transport skills strategy.

    But these are only part of the solution.

    We can’t hope to have the high performing rail industry that the country needs without first addressing the second great challenge facing the industry today: its dismal performance on gender equality.

    Insufficient progress on women in rail

    It’s not news to anyone in this room that the rail sector is not hiring or promoting sufficient numbers of women.

    We make up 51% of the population.

    47% of the national workforce.

    But only 15% of the rail workforce.

    The report published by Women in Rail today reveals that out of the 87,000 people working in rail, only 13,492 are women.

    Coincidentally, that is almost exactly the number of women who were working in rail in August 1914, at the dawn of the First World War.

    We can’t make precise comparisons between then and now.

    But it is significant that in absolute terms the number of women working in rail is no greater than it was 100 years ago.

    The result is that when it comes to gender equality the rail industry risks looking like the industry that time has left behind.

    And of those of us who do work in the rail sector, half work in the operational, customer-facing parts of the railway, such as catering, ticketing and station retail.

    I’m glad that women in customer-facing roles are leading the way for the rest of the sector.

    It means that we can look forward to a future in which, for customers, the face of the railway is as likely to be female as it is male.

    But it is wrong that only 19% of women in rail are in managerial roles.

    Or that women make up only 4% of rail engineers.

    Or that only 0.6% of women have progressed to director or executive level.

    For one thing, this lopsided distribution of women in rail does damage to equal pay.

    The starting salary for station assistants, part of the group in which women are disproportionately highly represented, starts at £12,500 a year, rising to around £17,000 after qualification.

    Meanwhile, Network Rail are currently advertising for engineers at salaries starting at just under £40,000 a year and rising far beyond that after promotion.

    So when women are prevented from taking the jobs they could at excel at just because they are women, they’re not just having their choices restricted.

    They are missing out economically.

    Of course, gender imbalance is a problem not just for women in rail.

    But for the rail industry itself, its customers, and everyone who depends on a thriving rail sector.

    Because as Women in Rail’s report reminds us, there’s good evidence that teams and boards that include women have richer skills and broader perspectives.

    As a result, they make better decisions.

    So as long as the rail industry fails to properly draw from the 50% of available talent represented by women, it is likely to be less innovative, less efficient and less productive than it ought to be.

    Other sectors learnt this lesson long ago.

    Among FTSE 100 firms, around a quarter of board members are women and there are no all-male boards left.

    Half of all solicitors and most GPs are female.

    And Mark Carne has spoken of the difference the visible presence of women has made to the oil and gas industry.

    Need for action in rail industry

    If other industries have made such progress, there is really no excuse for rail.

    There’s so much more to do.

    Shift patterns

    First, the industry should look at shift patterns.

    We know that working in rail can mean working unsociable hours.

    Trains run early-till-late and maintenance happens at night or on weekends.

    But for many women, particularly after having children, a rigid, inconsiderately-planned shift pattern just doesn’t work.

    It’s surely one reason that 22,000 qualified women have not returned to the engineering sector after a career- or maternity-break.

    It might take innovation, and a willingness to listen, but a few changes can make a big difference.

    Image of the industry

    Second, we need the industry to change how it presents itself.

    If, as the report says, our daughters are put off careers in rail by stereotypical images of burly men covered in coal dust, we need to use new, more accurate images.

    We need to explain the social value of the railway.

    How rail professionals improve the lives of millions of people.

    And how a rail engineer today is just as likely to go to work wielding a laptop as wielding a spanner.

    Value of engineering qualifications

    Finally, we need to teach girls the value of transport and engineering qualifications; how those skills are appreciated by employers across the economy.

    And how our rail renaissance can provide them with fantastic lifelong careers.

    Conclusion

    That’s why I am so pleased to support Women in Rail – for showing the rail industry what it misses when it misses out on women, and for inspiring women by showing them what a career in rail can offer.

    I am also grateful to every woman who has chosen a career in rail.

    You are building a better railway and a better industry.

    Women have proven before that they can keep our railways running and improving.

    100 years ago, we kept the railway running during the greatest challenge it had yet faced.

    We might have started the war with 13,000 women working in rail, but by its end there were 70,000.

    It shouldn’t take another World War to see change like that again.

    Thank you.

  • David Cameron – 2015 Press Conference at G20 Summit in Turkey

    davidcameron

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, at the G20 Summit in Turkey on 16 November 2015.

    Good morning and welcome. This has been an important summit.

    Five years ago, at the first G20 I attended as Prime Minister, the focus was on economic security.

    Today, the focus is national security.

    How we can work together.

    …to tackle the threat from terrorism…

    …to bring an end to the conflict in Syria…

    …and to deal with the long term threats to our security such as climate change.

    Let me say a few words on each.

    Terrorism

    First, terrorism.

    The horrific attacks in Paris on Friday night…

    …so soon after the Russian airline disaster, and following on from the Ankara bombings and the attacks in Tunisia and the attacks in Lebanon.

    …underline the threat we all face.

    A threat to our values and our way of life.

    …and a threat that we must defeat, together.

    Here at this summit, we have agreed to take further important steps.

    …to cut off the financing that terrorists rely upon…

    …to counter the extremist ideology and the terrorists’ propaganda.

    …and to better protect ourselves from the threat of foreign fighters, by sharing intelligence and stopping them from travelling.

    Importantly, for the first time ever, we have also agreed to work to strengthen global aviation security together.

    Almost 80% of all air travel worldwide is undertaken by citizens from G20 countries – so it is in our interest to take action to do all we can to keep it safe.

    We need robust and consistent standards of aviation security in every airport in the world.

    And we must provide technical and financial assistance to countries with particularly vulnerable locations.

    The UK will at least double its spending on aviation security this Parliament to ensure we can help tighten security worldwide.

    Syria

    On Syria, it is vital that we.

    …do more to help those in desperate humanitarian need.

    …that we find a political solution to the conflict.

    …and that we degrade and destroy ISIL.

    Britain is already the second largest contributor to the humanitarian crisis – providing £1.1 billion in vital life-saving assistance.

    Last week we committed a further £275 million to be spent here in Turkey, a country hosting over 2 million refugees.

    Today I can announce that, together with the leaders of Germany, Norway, Kuwait and the United Nations.

    …I will co-host a Syria donors conference in London early next year to raise significant new funding.

    But none of this is a substitute for the most urgent need of all – to find a political solution that brings peace to Syria and enables the millions of refugees to return home.

    This morning I held talks with President Putin and I urged him to work with the international community to support a transition in Syria, away from President Assad and his ruthless brutality.

    We need to find a way to work together to bring this fighting to an end and to focus on the aim we all share: destroying the evil death cult that is ISIL.

    That means continuing our efforts to degrade and destroy ISIL in Syria and Iraq.

    Together, coalition forces have damaged over 13,500 targets.

    We’ve helped local forces to regain 30% of ISIL territory in Iraq, retake Kobane and push ISIL back towards Raqqa.

    On Friday, Kurdish forces retook Sinjar.

    The UK is playing its part – training local forces, striking targets in Iraq and providing vital intelligence support.

    And seamless co-operation between the UK and the US is delivering results – as the strike against Emwazi showed last week.

    Global challenges

    Finally, we discussed longer term threats to global stability.

    In just 2 weeks’ time, we will gather in Paris to agree a global climate change deal.

    This time – unlike Kyoto – it will include the USA and China.

    Here at this summit, I urged leaders to keep up the ambition of limiting global warming by 2050 to less than 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels.

    Every country needs to put forward its own programme for reducing carbon emissions.

    And as G20 countries, we must also do more to provide the financing that is needed to help poorer countries around the world switch to greener forms of energy and adapt to the effects of climate change.

    Finally, we also agreed that we should do more to wipe out the corruption that chokes off development and to deal with anti-microbial resistance.

    If antibiotics stop working properly millions will die.

    We need to build on our successes this year – the new global goals for development and tackling Ebola where Sierra Leone was able to declare last week that it is Ebola-free – and focus on these new challenges.

    Thank you.

     

     

  • Robert Goodwill – 2015 Speech on Air Travel and Alcohol

    robertgoodwill

    Below is the text of the speech made by Robert Goodwill, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport, at the Hilton Metropole Hotel on the Edgware Road in London on 23 November 2015.

    Introduction

    Thank you.

    I would like to start by paying tribute to the response of the UK aviation industry to the tragic loss of 224 lives aboard the Russian Metrojet flight 9268.

    In difficult circumstances, over 16,000 British travellers and their belongings were safely repatriated.

    The government’s first priority is the safety and security of the British people, and so as in Sharm el-Sheikh we will act wherever we need to.

    Last week, the Prime Minister announced a doubling of our spending on global aviation security.

    We know that our airports will maintain their vigilance in the face of the continuing terrorist threat.

    Airports Commission

    Last time I spoke at an AOA gathering, it was the 30 of June; the eve of the publication of the final report of the Airports Commission.

    In my speech that day I maintained a disciplined and principled silence over the contents of the report, despite pleas from some in the audience that I lift the veil of secrecy just a little.

    But the truth was that there wasn’t much chance of a give-away, because I didn’t know what was in the report either.

    And for the avoidance of doubt all I will say on the matter today (23 November 2015) is that the Airports Commission report is being very carefully considered by the government.

    Disruptive behaviour on planes

    So I won’t be drawn on the taboo of airport capacity this afternoon.

    I will, however, address an altogether different taboo.

    Not as high-profile.

    But I believe a matter on which there is need for an open, public debate.

    And that is the problem of passengers who become disruptive on flights, particularly after drinking alcohol.

    Several airlines have recently written to government expressing their growing concern about the problem.

    I am pleased to say that AOA and BATA have already shown leadership in their desire to bring the industry together to find new solutions.

    But the growing concern in the industry — particularly among airlines — is understandable

    Over the summer, one airline reported over 360 incidents.

    The knock-on effects of flight disruption affect the whole industry, airports included.

    And an aeroplane is a unique environment.

    A confined space, filled with families and other travellers, and while in the air out of the reach of traditional law enforcement.

    There’s little chance that a drunken passenger could pose a threat to the plane itself, but some have tried.

    Last week, a passenger on a British Airways flight was reported as having attempted to force open an exit door while mid-Atlantic.

    She was restrained and arrested on landing, but the incident caused distress to her fellow passengers.

    And disruptive and even violent behaviour on planes doesn’t just put the air crew and passengers at risk.

    It also puts the individual themselves at risk.

    In the UK, arrested flyers are subject to UK legal processes and enjoy legal protections.

    But flyers into some other countries could be subject to very different laws and far lower levels of legal protection.

    Clearly, no one party — airlines, airports or government — can solve this problem alone.

    Yet within our own sphere of responsibility we can each act to reduce the risks.

    Airlines need to look at their approach to serving alcohol on board.

    Jet2 have begun a campaign they call Onboard Together, which seeks to educate passengers and empower their crew.

    The government must make sure that enforcement is effective.

    And we know that for a proportion of passengers, their holiday begins in the airport bar, whether they arrive at the airport at 7 in the evening or 7 in the morning.

    For some passengers, a delayed flight means that the first drink of the holiday quickly becomes the first 3, 4 or 5 drinks.

    And in at least one airport today, passengers are able to pull their own pints at their table.

    We don’t want to stop passengers enjoying themselves or prevent people from flying.

    But we do want people to put a break on before things get out of hand.

    Already, some airports are taking new steps.

    Glasgow and Manchester Airports are trialling the sale of duty free alcohol in sealed bags.

    And a couple of weeks ago I visited Edinburgh airport, where clear warnings about the risks of drunkenness are displayed on the airport’s bars and tables.

    Edinburgh has formed a partnership with the airport police who now maintain a visual presence around bar areas and give potential troublemakers a gentle word of caution.

    The police can be a great and willing help where a risk of drunkenness has been identified, and can work with airports to locate officers near boarding gates for flights that have proven problematic in the past, or for flights that have been delayed.

    Clearly, different airports will prefer different approaches.

    Often, working with airlines can be key.

    Perhaps to identify the most trouble-prone flights.

    Or even to identify passengers with a history of poor behaviour, as long as concerns about privacy and proportionality are addressed.

    So I hope we can agree on the need to keep talking about this — to each other, and to passengers.

    Our aim should be to ensure that flying is a safe and enjoyable experience for all travellers, and that flying doesn’t end badly for the careless few.

    Success of airports

    But I won’t end on a note of challenge.

    Because the truth is that the aviation industry is overwhelmingly succeeding in delivering a brilliant service.

    The proof is that there are now more people using your airports than ever before in history.

    In the 12 month period to March 2015, passenger numbers at UK airports reached record levels.

    And the signs are that the numbers are still growing.

    You are also making a huge contribution to Britain’s record employment levels.

    Around a quarter of a million people are directly employed in the aviation and aerospace industries, and many more are employed indirectly.

    The future is looking bright, too, as we are seeing massive investment in airports across the country.

    Bristol’s western terminal extension is under way and scheduled for completion by the summer.

    Over the next 5 years, Luton will invest £100 million in its terminals.

    Edinburgh will invest £125 million in its terminal, departure lounge, check-in and immigration facilities.

    Heathrow is improving Terminals 3 and 4, and both Gatwick and Manchester Airport are each investing £1 billion in their terminals.

    Conclusion

    So I am grateful to everyone who works to keep our airports running and improving.

    Through your enterprise, your commitment to customers, and the connections you give us to the rest of the world, you make an unparalleled contribution to Britain’s national prosperity.

    You have this government’s support, and we look forward to working with you in the months ahead.

    Thank you.

  • George Osborne – 2015 Spending Review and Autumn Statement

    gosborne

    Below is the text of the speech made by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, to the House of Commons on 25 November 2015.

    Mr Speaker, this Spending Review delivers on the commitment we made to the British people that we would put security first.

    To protect our economic security, by taking the difficult decisions to live within our means and bring down our debt.

    To protect our national security, by defending our country’s interests abroad and keeping our citizens safe at home.

    Economic and national security provide the foundations for everything we want to support. Opportunity for all.

    The aspirations of families.

    The strong country we want to build.

    Five years ago, when I presented our first Spending Review, our economy was in crisis and there was no money left.

    We were borrowing one pound in every four we spent. Our job then was to rescue Britain.

    Today, as we present this Spending Review, our job is to rebuild Britain. Build our finances. Build our defences. Build our society.

    So that Britain becomes the most prosperous and secure of all the major nations of the world.

    And so we leave to the next generation a stronger country than the one we inherited. That is what the government was elected to do – and today we set out the plan to deliver on that commitment.

    Mr Speaker, we have committed to running a surplus.

    Today, I can confirm that the four year public spending plans that I set out are forecast to deliver that surplus, so we don’t borrow forever and are ready for whatever storms lie ahead.

    We promised to bring our debts down.

    Today, the forecast I present shows that after the longest period of rising debt in our modern history – this year our debt will fall and keep falling in every year that follows. We promised to move Britain from being a high welfare, low wage economy to a lower welfare, higher wage economy.

    Today, I can tell the House that the £12 billion of welfare savings we committed to at the election, will be delivered in full – and delivered in a way that helps families as we make the transition to our new National Living Wage. We promised that we would strengthen our national defences, take the fight to our nation’s enemies and project our country’s influence abroad.

    Today, this Spending Review delivers the resources to ensure that Britain, unique in the world, will meet its twin obligations to spend 0.7% of its income on development and 2% on the defence of the realm.

    But this Spending Review not only ensures the economic and national security of our country, it builds on it.

    It sets out far-reaching changes to what the state does and how it does it; it reforms our public services so we truly extend opportunity to all;

    Whether it’s the way we educate our children;

    train our workforce;

    rehabilitate our prisoners;

    provide homes for our families;

    deliver care for our elderly and sick;

    or the way we hand back power to local communities.

    This is a big Spending Review by a government that does big things. It’s a long-term economic plan for our country’s future.

    Mr Speaker, nothing is possible without the foundations of a strong economy.

    So let me turn to the new forecasts provided by the independent Office for Budget Responsibility, and let me thank Robert Chote and his team for their work.

    Since the summer Budget new economic data has been published which confirm this: Since 2010, no economy in the G7 has grown faster than Britain.

    We’ve grown almost three times faster than Japan, twice as fast as France, faster than Germany and at the same rate as the United States.

    And that growth has not been fuelled by an irresponsible banking boom, like in the last decade.

    Business investment has grown more than twice as fast as consumption; exports have grown faster than imports and the North has grown faster than the South.

    For we’re determined that this will be an economic recovery for all, felt in all parts of our nation. That is already happening.

    In which areas of the country are we seeing the strongest jobs growth? Not just in our capital city. The Midlands is creating jobs three times faster than London and the South East.

    In the past year we have seen more people in work in the Northern Powerhouse than ever before.

    And where do we have the highest employment rate of any part of our country? In the South West.

    Our long term economic plan is working.

    But the OBR reminds us today of the huge challenges we still face at home and abroad. Our debts are too high and our deficit remains.

    Productivity is growing, but we still lag behind most of our competitors.

    And I can tell the House that in today’s forecast, the expectations for world growth and world trade have been revised down again.

    The weakness of the Eurozone remains a persistent problem; there are rising concerns about debt in emerging economies.

    These are yet more reasons why we are determined to take the necessary steps to protect our economic security.

    That brings me to the forecasts for our own GDP.

    Even with the weaker global picture, our economy this year is predicted to grow by 2.4%, growth is then revised up from the Budget forecast in the next two years, to 2.4% in 2016 and 2.5% in 2017.

    It then starts to return to its long term trend, with growth of 2.4% in 2018 and 2.3% in 2019 and 2020.

    And that growth, Mr Speaker, is more balanced than in the past; whole economy investment is set to grow faster in Britain than in any other major advanced economy – this year, the next year, and the year after that.

    Mr Speaker, when I presented my first Spending Review in 2010 and set this country on the path of living within its means, our opponents claimed that growth would be choked off, a million jobs would be lost and that inequality would rise.

    Every single one of those predictions have proved to be completely wrong.

    So too did the claim that Britain had to choose between sound public finances and great public services.

    It’s a false choice; if you are bold with your reforms you can have both.

    That’s why, while we’ve been reducing government spending, crime has fallen, a million more children are being educated in good and outstanding schools, and public satisfaction with our local government services has risen.

    That is the exact opposite of what our critics predicted.

    And yet now, the same people are making similar claims about this Spending Review, as we seek to move Britain out of deficit into surplus.

    And they are completely wrong again.

    The OBR has seen our public expenditure plans and analysed their effect on our economy. Their forecast today is that the economy will grow robustly every year, living standards will rise every year, and more than a million extra jobs will be created over the next five years.

    That’s because sound public finances are not the enemy of sustained growth – they are its precondition.

    Our economic plan puts the security of working people first, so we’re prepared for the inevitable storms that lie ahead.

    That’s why our Charter for Budget Responsibility commits us to reducing the debt to GDP ratio in each and every year of this parliament, reaching a surplus in the year 2019-20 – and keeping that surplus in normal times.

    I can confirm that the OBR has today certified that the economic plan we present delivers on our commitment.

    Mr Speaker, that brings me to the forecasts for debt and deficit.

    As usual, the OBR has had access to both published and unpublished data, and has made its own assessment of our public finances.

    Since the Summer Budget, housing associations in England have been reclassified by our independent Office for National Statistics and their borrowing and debts been brought onto the public balance sheet – and that change will be backdated to 2008.

    This is a statistical change and therefore the OBR has re-calculated its previous Budget forecast to include housing associations, so we can compare like with like.

    On that new measure, debt was forecast in July to be 83.6% of national income this year. Now, today, in this Autumn Statement, they forecast debt this year to be lower at 82.5%. It then falls every year, down to 81.7% next year, down to 79.9% in 2017-18, then down again to 77.3% and then 74.3%, reaching 71.3% in 2020-21.

    In every single year, the national debt as a share of national income is lower than when I presented the Budget four months ago.

    This improvement in the nation’s finances is due to two things.

    First, the OBR expects tax receipts to be stronger. A sign that our economy is healthier than thought.

    Second, debt interest payments are expected to be lower – reflecting the further fall in the rates we pay to our creditors.

    Combine the effects of better tax receipts and lower debt interest, and overall the OBR calculate it means a £27 billion improvement in our public finances over the forecast period, compared to where we were at the Budget.

    Mr Speaker, this improvement in the nation’s finances allows me to do the following.

    First, we will borrow £8 billion less than we forecast – making faster progress towards eliminating the deficit and paying down our debt. Fixing the roof when the sun is shining.

    Second, we will spend £12 billion more on capital investments – making faster progress to building the infrastructure our country needs.

    And third, the improved public finances allow us to reach the same goal of a surplus while cutting less in the early years. We can smooth the path to the same destination.

    And that means we can help on tax credits.

    I’ve been asked to help in the transition as Britain moves to the higher wage, lower welfare, lower tax society the country wants to see.

    I’ve had representations that these changes to tax credits should be phased in. I’ve listened to the concerns. I hear and understand them.

    And because I’ve been able to announce today an improvement in the public finances, the simplest thing to do is not to phase these changes in, but to avoid them altogether.

    Tax credits are being phased out anyway as we introduce universal credit.

    What that means is that the tax credit taper rate and thresholds remain unchanged.

    The disregard will be £2,500. I propose no further changes to the universal credit taper, or to the work allowances beyond those that passed through Parliament last week.

    The minimum income floor in Universal Credit will rise with the National Living Wage I set a lower welfare cap at the Budget.

    The House should know that helping with the transition obviously means that we will not be within that lower welfare cap in the first years.

    But the House should also know that thanks to our welfare reforms, we meet the cap in the later part of the Parliament.

    Indeed, on the figures published today, we will still achieve the £12bn per year of welfare savings we promised.

    That’s because of the permanent savings we have already made and further long term reforms we announce today.

    The rate of Housing Benefit in the social sector will be capped at the relevant local housing allowance – in other words, the same rate paid to those in the private rented sector who receive the same benefit.

    This will apply to new tenancies only.

    We’ll also stop paying housing benefit and pension credit payments to people who’ve left the country for more than a month.

    The welfare system should be fair to those who need it and fair to those who pay for it too. So improved public finances, and our continued commitment to reform, mean that we continue to be on target for a surplus.

    The House will want to know the level of that surplus. So let me give the OBR forecasts for the deficit and for borrowing.

    In 2010, the deficit we inherited was estimated to be 11.1% of national income.

    This year it is set to be almost a third of that, 3.9%.

    Next year it falls to less than a quarter of what we inherited, 2.5%.

    Then the deficit is down again to 1.2% in 2017-18, down to just 0.2% the year after that, before moving into a surplus of 0.5% of national income in 2019-20, rising to 0.6% the following year.

    Let me turn to the cash borrowing figures.

    With housing associations included, the OBR predicted at the time of the Budget that Britain would borrow £74.1 billion this year.

    Instead, they now forecast we will borrow less than that at £73.5 billion.

    Borrowing then falls to £49.9 billion next year.

    Borrowing then continues to fall, and falls to lower than was forecast at the Budget in every single year after that.

    To £24.8 billion in 2017-18; down to just £4.6 billion in 2018-19.

    In 2019-20, we reach a surplus.

    A surplus of £10.1 billion. That’s higher than was forecast at the Budget. Britain out of the red and into the black.

    In 2020-21 the surplus rises to £14.7 billion the year after that.

    So Mr Speaker, The deficit falls every year.

    The debt share is lower in every year than previously forecast.

    We’re borrowing £8 billion less than we expected overall.

    And we reach a bigger surplus.

    We’ve achieved this while at the same time helping working families as we move to the lower welfare, higher wage economy.

    And we have the economic security of knowing our country is paying its way in the world. Mr Speaker, that brings me to our plans for public expenditure and taxation.

    I want to thank my Right Honourable Friend the Chief Secretary, our Ministerial colleagues, and the brilliant officials who’ve assisted us, for the long hours and hard work they have put into developing these plans.

    We said £5 billion would come from the measures on tax avoidance, evasion and imbalances.

    Those measures were announced at the Budget.

    Today we go further with new penalties for the General Anti-Abuse Rule we introduced, action on disguised remuneration schemes and stamp duty avoidance, and we will stop abuse of the intangible fixed assets regime and capital allowances.

    We will also exclude energy generation from the venture capital schemes, to ensure that they remain well targeted at higher risk companies.

    HMRC is making savings of 18% in its own budget through efficiencies – in the digital age, we don’t need taxpayers to pay for paper processing, or 170 separate tax offices around the country.

    Instead, we’re reinvesting some of those savings with an extra £800 million in the fight against tax evasion – an investment with a return of almost ten times in additional tax collected.

    We’re going to build one of the most digitally advanced tax administrations in the world. So that every individual and every small business will have their own digital tax account by the end of the decade, in order to manage their tax online.

    From 2019, once those accounts are up and running, we’ll require capital gains tax to be paid within 30 days of completion of any disposal of residential property.

    Together these form part of the digital revolution we’re bringing to Whitehall with this Spending Review.

    The Government Digital Service will receive an additional £450m, but the core Cabinet Office budget will be cut by 26%, matching a 24% cut in the budget of the Treasury. And the cost of all Whitehall administration will be cut by £1.9bn.

    These form part of the £12bn of savings to government departments I am announcing today.

    In 2010, government spending took up 45% of national income.

    This was a figure we couldn’t sustain, because it was neither practical nor sensible to raise taxes high enough to pay for that, and we ended up with a massive structural deficit.

    Today the state accounts for just under 40% of national income, and it is set to reach 36.5% by the end of the Spending Review.

    The structural spending that this represents is at a level that a competitive, modern, developed economy can sustain.

    And it’s a level the British people are prepared to pay their taxes for.

    It is precisely because this Government believes in decent public services and a properly funded welfare state that we are insistent that they are sustainable and affordable.

    To simply argue all the time that public spending must always go up and never be cut is irresponsible, and lets down the people who rely on public services most.

    Equally, to fund the things we want the government to provide in the modern world, we have to be prepared to provide the resources.

    So Mr Speaker, I am setting the limits for total managed expenditure as follows. This year public spending will be £756bn.

    Then £773bn next year, £787bn the year after, then £801bn, before reaching £821bn in 2019-20, the year we’re forecast to eliminate the deficit and achieve the surplus.

    After that the forecast public spending rises broadly in line with the growth of the economy, and will be £857bn in 2020-21.

    Mr Speaker, the figures from the OBR show that over the next five years, welfare spending falls as a percentage of national income, while departmental capital investment is maintained and is higher at the end of the period.

    That is precisely the right switch for a country that is serious about investing in its long term economic success.

    Mr Speaker, people will want to know what the levels of public spending mean in practice, and the scale of the cuts we’re asking government departments to undertake.

    Over this Spending Review the day–to-day spending of government departments is set to fall by an average of 0.8% a year in real terms.

    That compares to an average fall of 2% over the last five years.

    So the savings we need are considerably smaller.

    This reflects the improvement in the public finances and the progress we’ve already made – indeed, the overall rate of annual cuts I set out in today’s Spending Review are less than half of those delivered over the last five years.

    So Britain spending a lower proportion of its money on welfare and a higher proportion on infrastructure.

    The Budget balanced, with cuts half what they were in the last Parliament.

    Making the savings we need – no less and no more.

    And providing the economic security to working people of a country with a surplus that lives within its means.

    This does not, of course, mean the decisions required to deliver these savings are easy. But nor should we lose sight of the fact that this Spending Review commits £4 trillion over the next five years.

    It’s a huge commitment of the hard-earned cash of British taxpayers, and all those who dedicate their lives to public service will want to make sure it is well spent. Our approach is not simply retrenchment, it is to reform and rebuild.

    These reforms will support our objectives for our country.

    First – to develop a modern, integrated, health and social care system that supports people at every stage of their lives.

    Second – to spread economic power and wealth through a devolution revolution and invest in our long term infrastructure.

    Third – to extend opportunity by tackling the big social failures that for too long have held people back in our country.

    Fourth – to reinforce our national security with the resources to protect us at home and project our values abroad.

    The resources allocated by this Spending Review are driven by these four goals.

    The first priority of this government is the first priority of the British people – our National Health Service.

    Health spending was cut in Wales. But we have been increasing spending on the NHS in England.

    In this Spending Review, we do so again.

    We will work with our health professionals to deliver the very best value for that money. That means £22 billion of efficiency savings across the service.

    It means a 25% cut in the Whitehall budget of the Department for Health.

    It means modernising the way we fund students of healthcare.

    Today there is a cap on student nurses; over half of all applicants are turned away, and it leaves hospitals relying on agencies and overseas staff.

    So we’ll replace direct funding with loans for new students – so we can abolish this self-defeating cap and create up to 10,000 new training places in this Parliament.

    Alongside these reforms we will give the NHS the money it needs.

    We made a commitment to a £10bn real increase in the health service budget.

    And we fully deliver that today, with the first £6bn delivered up-front next year.

    This fully funds the Five Year Forward View that the NHS itself put forward as the plan for its future.

    As the Chief Executive of NHS England, Simon Stevens, said: “the NHS has been heard and actively supported”.

    Let me explain what that means in cash.

    The NHS budget will rise from £101 billion today to £120bn by 2020-21.

    This is a half a trillion pound commitment to the NHS over this Parliament – the largest investment in the health service since its creation.

    So we have a clear plan for improving the NHS. We’ve fully funded it. And in return patients will see more than £5 billion of health research, in everything from genomes to anti-microbial resistance to a new Dementia Institute and a new, world class public health facility in Harlow, and more:

    800,000 more elective hospital admissions, 5 million more outpatient appointments, 2 million more diagnostic tests.

    New hospitals funded in Cambridge, in Sandwell and in Brighton.

    Cancer testing within four weeks.

    And a brilliant NHS available seven days a week.

    There is one part of our NHS that has been neglected for too long – and that’s mental health.

    I want to thank the All Party Group, led by my Right Honourable Friend for Sutton Coldfield, the Right Honourable Friend for North Norfolk and Alistair Campbell, for their work in this vital area.

    In the last Parliament we made a start by laying the foundations for equality of treatment, with the first ever waiting time standards for mental health.

    Today, we build on that with £600m additional funding – meaning that by 2020 significantly more people will have access to talking therapies, perinatal mental health services, and crisis care.

    All possible because we made a promise to the British people to give our NHS the funding it needed – and in this Spending Review we have delivered.

    Mr Speaker, the health service cannot function effectively without good social care.

    The truth we need to confront is this: many local authorities are not going to be able to meet growing social care needs unless they have new sources of funding.

    That, in the end, comes from the taxpayer.

    So in future those local authorities who are responsible for social care will be able to levy a new social care precept of up to 2% on council tax.

    The money raised will have to be spent exclusively on adult social care – and if all authorities make full use of it, it will bring almost £2 billion more into the care system.

    It’s part of the major reform we’re undertaking to integrate health and social care by the end of this decade.

    To help achieve that I am today increasing the Better Care Fund to support that integration, with local authorities able to access an extra £1.5bn by 2019-20.

    The steps taken in this Spending Review mean that by the end of the Parliament, social care spending will have risen in real terms.

    Mr Speaker, a civilised and prosperous society like ours should support its most vulnerable and elderly citizens.

    That includes a decent income in retirement. Over 5 million people have already been auto-enrolled into a pension thanks to our reforms in the last parliament.

    To help businesses with the administration of this important boost to our nation’s savings, we’ll align the next two phases of contribution rate increases with the tax years.

    The best way to afford generous pensioner benefits is to raise the pension age in line with life expectancy, as we are already set to do in this parliament.

    That allows us to maintain a triple lock on the value of the state pension, so never again do Britain’s pensioners receive a derisory increase of 75 pence.

    As a result of our commitment to those who’ve worked hard all their lives and contributed to our society, I can confirm that next year the basic State Pension will rise by £3.35 to £119.30 a week.

    That’s the biggest real terms increase to the basic State Pension in 15 years.

    Taking all of our increases together, over the last 5 years, pensioners will be £1,125 better off a year than they were when we came to office.

    We’re also undertaking the biggest change in the state pension for forty years to make it simpler and fairer, by introducing the new single tier pension for new pensioners from April next year.

    I am today setting the full rate for our new state pension at £155.65.

    That’s higher than the current means-tested benefit for the lowest income pensioners in our society – and another example of progressive government in action.

    And instead of cutting the Savings Credit, as in previous fiscal events, it will be instead frozen at its current level where income is unchanged.

    So the first objective of this Spending Review is to give unprecedented support to health, social care and our pensioners.

    The second is to spread economic power and wealth across our nation.

    In recent weeks, great metropolitan areas like Sheffield, Liverpool, the Tees Valley, the North East and the West Midlands have joined Greater Manchester in agreeing to create elected mayors in return for far-reaching new powers over transport, skills and the local economy.

    It is the most determined effort to change the geographical imbalance that has bedevilled the British economy for half a century.

    We are also today setting aside the £12 billion we promised for our Local Growth Fund and I am announcing the creation of 26 new or extended Enterprise Zones, including 15 zones in towns and rural areas from Carlisle to Dorset to Ipswich.

    But if we really want to shift power in our country, we have to give all local councils the tools to drive the growth of business in their area – and rewards that come when you do so. So I can confirm today that, as we set out last month, we will abolish the uniform business rate.

    By the end of the parliament local government will keep all of the revenue from business rates.

    We’ll give councils the power to cut rates and make their area more attractive to business.

    And elected mayors will be able to raise rates, provided they’re used to fund specific infrastructure projects supported by the local business community.

    Because the amount we raise in business rates is in total much greater than the amount we give to local councils through the local government grant, we will phase that grant out entirely over this Parliament.

    And we will also devolve additional responsibilities.

    The Temporary Accommodation Management Fee will no longer be paid through the benefits system – instead, councils will receive £10m a year more, upfront, so they can provide more help to homeless people.

    Alongside savings in the public health grant we’ll consult on transferring new powers and the responsibility for its funding, and elements of the administration of housing benefit. Local government is sitting on property worth quarter of a trillion pounds.

    So we’re going to let councils spend 100% of the receipts from the assets they sell to improve their local services.

    Councils increased their reserves by nearly £10 billion over the last Parliament. We’ll encourage them to draw on these reserves as they undertake reforms.

    Mr Speaker, this amounts to a big package of new powers, but also new responsibilities for local councils.

    It’s a revolution in the way we govern this country.

    And if you take into account both the fall in grant and the rise in council incomes, it means that by the end of this Parliament local government will be spending the same in cash terms as it does today.

    Mr Speaker, the devolved administrations of the United Kingdom will also have available to them unprecedented new powers to drive their economies.

    The conclusion last week of the political talks in Northern Ireland means additional spending power for the Executive to support the full implementation of the Stormont House Agreement.

    That opens the door to the devolution of corporation tax – which the parties have now confirmed they wish to set at the rate of 12.5%.

    That’s a huge prize for business in Northern Ireland and the onus is now on the Northern Ireland Executive to play their part and deliver sustainable budgets to allow us to move forward.

    So Northern Ireland’s block grant will be over £11 billion by 2019-20 – and funding for capital investment in new infrastructure will rise by over £600m over 5 years, ensuring Northern Ireland can invest in its long term future.

    For years Wales has asked for a funding floor to protect public spending there. Now, within months of coming to office, this Conservative Government is answering that call and providing that historic funding guarantee for Wales.

    I can announce today that we will introduce the new funding floor – and set it for this Parliament, at 115%. My Right Honourable Friend the Welsh Secretary and I also confirm that we will legislate so that the devolution of income tax can take place without a referendum.

    We’ll also help fund a new Cardiff City deal.

    So the Welsh block grant will reach almost £15 billion by 2019-20 – while the capital spending will rise by over £900m over 5 years.

    As Lord Smith confirmed earlier this month, the Scotland Bill meets the vow made by the parties of the union when the people of Scotland voted to remain in the United Kingdom.

    It must be underpinned by a fiscal framework that is fair to all taxpayers and we are ready now to reach an agreement – the ball is in the Scottish Government’s court.

    Let’s have a deal that’s fair to Scotland, fair to the UK and that’s built to last. We’re implementing the city deal with Glasgow, and negotiating deals for Aberdeen and Inverness too.

    Of course, if Scotland had voted for independence, they would have had their own Spending Review this autumn. With world oil prices falling, and revenues from the North Sea forecast by the OBR to be down 94%, we would have seen catastrophic cuts to Scottish public services.

    Thankfully, Scotland remains a strong part of a stronger United Kingdom. So the Scottish block grant will be over £30 billion in 2019-20 – while capital spending available will rise by £1.9 billion through to 2021.

    UK Government giving Scotland the resources to invest in its long term future. For the UK Government, the funding of the Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland Offices will all be protected in real terms.

    Mr Speaker, we’re devolving power across our country, and we’re also spending on the economic infrastructure that connects our nation.

    That’s something Britain hasn’t done enough of for a generation. Now, by making the difficult decisions to save on day to day costs in departments, we can invest in the new roads, railways, science, flood defences and energy Britain needs.

    We made a start in the last Parliament – and in the last week Britain topped the league table of the best places in the world to invest in infrastructure.

    In this Spending Review we go much further.

    The Department for Transport’s operational budget will fall by 37%.

    But transport capital spending will increase by 50% to a total of £61 billion – the biggest increase in a generation. That funds the largest road investment programme since the 1970s. For we are the builders.

    It means the construction of HS2 to link the Northern Powerhouse to the South can begin. The electrification of lines like the Trans-Pennine, Midland Main Line and Great Western can go ahead.

    We’ll fund our new Transport for the North to get it up and running.

    London will get an £11 billion investment in its transport infrastructure.

    And having met with my Honourable Friend for Folkestone and other Kent MPs, I will relieve the pressure on roads in Kent from Operation Stack with a new quarter of a billion pound investment in facilities there.

    We’re making the £300 million commitment to cycling we promised.

    And we will be spending over £5 billion on roads maintenance this Parliament, and thanks to the incessant lobbying of my Honourable Friend for Northampton North, Britain now has a permanent pothole fund.

    We’re investing in the transport we need; and in the flood defences too.

    DEFRA’s day to day budget falls by 15% in this Spending Review, but we’re committing over £2 billion to protect 300,000 homes from flooding.

    Our commitment to farming and the countryside is reflected in the protection of funding for our national parks and for our forests.

    We’re not making that mistake again and I can tell the House that in recognition of the higher costs they face, we will continue to provide £50 off the water bills of South West Water customers, for the rest of this Parliament.

    A promise made to the South West – and a promise kept.

    Investing in the long term economic infrastructure of our country is a goal of this Spending Review, and there is no more important infrastructure than energy.

    So we’re doubling our spending on energy research with a major commitment to small modular nuclear reactors.

    We’re also supporting the creation of the shale gas industry by ensuring that communities benefit from a Shale Wealth Fund, which could be worth up to £1bn.

    Support for low-carbon electricity and renewables will more than double.

    The development and sale of Ultra Low Emission Vehicles will continue to be supported – but in light of the slower than expected introduction of more rigorous EU emissions testing, we will delay the removal of the diesel supplement from company cars until 2021.

    We support the international efforts to tackle Climate Change, and to show our commitment to the Paris talks next week, we are increasing our support for climate finance by 50% over the next five years.

    DECC’s day to day resource budget will fall by 22%.

    We will reform the Renewable Heat Incentive to save £700 million.

    We’re going to permanently exempt our Energy Intensive Industries like steel and chemicals from the cost of environmental tariffs, so we keep their bills down, keep them competitive and keep them here.

    I can announce we’re introducing a cheaper domestic energy efficiency scheme that replaces ECO.

    Britain’s new energy scheme will save an average of £30 a year from the energy bills of 24 million households.

    Because the Government believes that going green should not cost the earth and we’re cutting other bills too. We’re going to bring forward reforms to the compensation culture around minor motor accident injuries.

    This will remove over £1bn from the cost of providing motor insurance. We expect the industry to pass on this saving, so motorists see an average saving of £40-50 per year off their insurance bills.

    Mr Speaker, this is a Government that backs all our businesses, large and small. We understand there is no growth and no jobs without a vibrant private sector and successful entrepreneurs. So this spending review delivers what businesses need.

    Businesses need competitive taxes.

    I’ve already announced a reduction in our corporation tax rate to 18%.

    Our overall review of business rates will report at the Budget, but I am today helping 600,000 of our smallest businesses by extending our small business rate relief scheme for another year.

    Businesses also need an active and sustained industrial strategy. That strategy launched in the last parliament continues in this one.

    We commit to the same level of support for our aerospace and automotive industries. Not just for the next five years but for the next decade.

    Spending on our new catapult centres will increase.

    And we’ll protect the cash support we give through Innovate UK – something we can afford to do by offering £165 million of new loans to companies instead of grants, as France has successfully done for years.

    It’s one of the savings that helps us reduce the BIS budget by 17%.

    In the modern world one of the best ways you can back business is by backing science. That’s why in the last Parliament, I protected the resource budget for science in cash terms. In this Parliament I’m protecting it in real terms so it rises to £4.7bn.

    That’s £500 million more by the end of the decade. Alongside £6.9bn in the capital budget too.

    We’re funding the new Royce Institute in Manchester, and new agri-tech centres in Shropshire, York, Bedfordshire and Edinburgh.

    And we’re going to commit £75 million to a transformation of the famous Cavendish laboratories in Cambridge, where Crick and Rutherford expanded our knowledge of the universe.

    To make sure we get the most from our investment in science, I’ve asked another of our Nobel Laureates Paul Nurse to conduct a review of the research councils.

    I want to thank him for the excellent report he has published this week – and we will implement its recommendations.

    Britain’s not just brilliant at science. It’s brilliant at culture too.

    One of the best investments we can make as a nation is in our extraordinary arts, museums, heritage, media and sport.

    £1 billion a year in grants adds a quarter of a trillion pounds to our economy – not a bad return. So deep cuts in the small budget of the Department of Culture, Media and Sport are a false economy.

    Its core administration budget will fall by 20%, but I am increasing the cash that will go to the Arts Council, our national museums and galleries.

    We’ll keep free museum entry – and look at a new tax credit to support their exhibitions and I will help UK Sport, which has been living on diminishing reserves, with a 29% increase in their budget – we’re going for gold in Rio and Tokyo.

    The Right Honourable Member for Hull West and Hessle has personally asked me to support his city’s year of culture – and I am happy to do so.

    The money for Hull is all part of a package for the Northern Powerhouse which includes funding the iconic new Factory Manchester and the Great Exhibition of the North. In Scotland, we will support the world famous Burrell Collection.

    While here in London we’ll help the British Museum, the Science Museum, and the V&A move their collections out of storage and on display.

    And we will fund the exciting plans for a major new home for the Royal College of Arts in Battersea.

    And we’re increasing the funding for the BBC World Service, so British values of freedom and free expression are heard around the world.

    And all of this can be achieved without raiding the Big Lottery Fund as some feared. It will continue to support the work of hundreds of small charities across Britain.

    So too will our £20 million a year of new support for social impact bonds.

    There are many great charities that work to support vulnerable women.

    And my Honourable Friend, the new Member for Colchester, has proposed to me a brilliant way to give them more help.

    300,000 people have signed a petition arguing that no VAT should be charged on sanitary products. We already charge the lowest 5% rate allowable under European law and we’re committed to getting the EU rules changed.

    Until that happens, I’m going to use the £15 million a year raised from the Tampon Tax to fund women’s health and support charities. The first £5 million will be distributed between the Eve Appeal, SafeLives and Women’s Aid, and The Haven – and I invite bids from other such good causes.

    It’s similar to the way we use LIBOR fines – and today I make further awards from them too. We’ll support a host of military charities, from Guide Dogs for Military Veterans to Care After Combat.

    We’ll renovate our military museums – from the Royal Marines and D-Day Museums in Portsmouth, to the National Army Museum, to Hooton Park aerodrome, and the former HQ of RAF Fighter Command at Bentley Priory.

    In the Budget I funded one campaign bunker, since then more have emerged and at the suggestion of my Right Honourable Friend for Mid Sussex, we support the fellowships awarded in the name of his grandfather by funding the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust.

    We will fund the brilliant Commonwealth War Graves Commission – so it can tend to over 6,000 graves of those who died fighting for our country since the Second World War and we’ll contribute to a memorial to those victims of terrorism who died on the bus in Tavistock Square ten years ago.

    It’s a reminder that we’ve always faced threats to our way of life, and have never allowed them to defeat us.

    We deliver security so we can spread opportunity, and that, Mr Speaker, is the third objective that drives this Spending Review.

    We showed in the last five years that sound public finances and bold public service reform can help the most disadvantaged in our society.

    That’s why inequality is down.

    Child poverty is down.

    The gender pay gap is at a record low.

    And the richest fifth now pay more in taxes than the rest of the country put together.

    Mr Speaker, in the next five years we will be even bolder in our social reform. It starts with education because that is the door to opportunity in our society.

    This Spending Review commits us to a comprehensive reform of the way it’s provided, from childcare to college.

    We start with the largest ever investment in free childcare – so working families get the help they need.

    From 2017, we will fund 30 hours of free childcare for working families with 3 and 4 year olds.

    We’ll support £10,000 of childcare costs tax-free.

    To make this affordable this extra support will now only be available to parents working more than 16 hours a week and with incomes of less than £100,000.

    We will maintain the free childcare we offer to the most disadvantaged 2 year olds. And to support nurseries delivering more free places for parents, we’ll increase the funding for the sector by £300 million.

    Taken together that’s a £6 billion childcare commitment to the working families of Britain. Next, schools.

    We build on our far-reaching reforms of the last Parliament that have seen school standards rise even as exams become more rigorous.

    We will maintain funding for free infant school meals, protect rates for the pupil premium, and increase the cash in the dedicated schools grant.

    We will maintain the current national base rate of funding for our 16-19 year old students for the whole Parliament.

    We’re going to open 500 new Free Schools and University Technical Colleges.

    Invest £23 billion in school buildings and 600,000 new school places.

    And to help all our children make the transition to adulthood – and learn about their responsibilities to society and not just their rights – we will expand the National Citizen Service.

    Today, 80,000 students go on National Citizen Service. By the end of the decade we will fund places for 300,000 students on this life-changing programme pioneered by my Right Honourable Friend the Prime Minister.

    Five years ago 200 schools were Academies. Today 5,000 schools are.

    Our goal is to complete this schools revolution – and help every secondary school become an Academy.

    And I can announce that we will let Sixth Form Colleges become Academies too – so they no longer have to pay VAT.

    We will make local authorities running schools a thing of the past. This will help save around £600m on the Education Services Grant.

    Mr Speaker, I can tell the House that as a result of this Spending Review, not only is the schools budget protected in real terms, but the total financial support for education, including childcare and our extended further and higher education loans, will increase by £10 billion.

    And that’s a real terms increase for education too.

    There is something else I can tell the House.

    We will phase out the arbitrary and unfair school funding system that has systematically underfunded schools in whole swathes of the country.

    Under the current arrangements, a child from a disadvantaged background in one school can receive half as much funding as a child in identical circumstances in another school.

    In its place, we will introduce a new national funding formula. I commend the many MPs from all parties who have campaigned for many years to see this day come.

    The formula will be start to be introduced from 2017 – and my Right Honourable Friend the Education Secretary will consult in the new year.

    Education continues in our further education colleges and universities and so do our reforms.

    We will not, as many predicted, cut core adult skills funding for FE colleges – we will instead protect it in cash terms.

    In the Budget I announced that we would replace unaffordable student maintenance grants with larger student loans.

    That saves us over £2bn a year in this Spending Review.

    And it means we can extend support to students who’ve never before had government help.

    Today I can announce that part-time students will be able to receive maintenance loans – helping some of our poorer students.

    We’ll also, for the first time, provide tuition fee loans for those studying higher skills in FE – and extend loans to all postgraduates too.

    Almost 250,000 extra students will benefit from all this new support I am announcing today and then there’s our apprenticeship programme – the flagship of our commitment to skills. In the last Parliament, we more than doubled the number of apprentices to 2 million.

    By 2020, we want to see 3 million apprentices.

    And to make sure they are high quality apprenticeships, we’ll increase the funding per place – and my Right Honourable Friend the Business Secretary will create a new business-led body to set standards.

    As a result, we will be spending twice as much on apprenticeships by 2020 compared to when we came to office.

    To ensure large businesses share the cost of training the workforce, I announced at the Budget that we will introduce a new apprenticeship levy from April 2017.

    Today I am setting the rate at 0.5% of an employer’s paybill.

    Every employer will receive a £15,000 allowance to offset against the levy – which means over 98% of all employers – and all businesses with paybills of less than £3 million – will pay no levy at all.

    Britain’s apprenticeship levy will raise £3bn a year. It will fund 3 million apprenticeships. With those paying it able to get out more than they put in.

    It’s a huge reform to raise the skills of the nation and address one of the enduring weaknesses of the British economy.

    Mr Speaker, education and skills are the foundation of opportunity in our country. Next we need to help people find work.

    The number claiming unemployment benefits has fallen to just 2.3%, the lowest rate since 1975.

    But we’re not satisfied that the job is done. We want to see full employment.

    So today we confirm we’ll extend the same support and conditionality we currently expect of those on JSA to over 1 million more benefit claimants.

    Those signing on will have to attend the job centre every week for the first three months. And we’ll increase in real terms the help we provide to people with disabilities to get into work.

    This can all be delivered within the 14% savings we make to the resource budget of the Department for Work and Pensions, including by reducing the size of their estate and co-locating job centres with local authority buildings.

    It’s the way to save money while improving the frontline service we offer people – and providing more support for those who are most vulnerable and in need of our help.

    Mr Speaker, you can’t say you’re fearlessly tackling the most difficult social problems if you turn a blind eye to what goes on in our prisons and criminal justice system.

    My Right Honourable Friend the Lord Chancellor has worked with the Lord Chief Justice and others to put forward a typically bold and radical plan to transform our courts so they are fit for the modern age.

    Under-used courts will be closed, and I can announce today the money saved will be used to fund a £700 million investment in new technology that will bring further and permanent long-term savings, and speed up the process of justice.

    Old Victorian prisons in our cities that are not suitable for rehabilitating prisoners will be sold.

    This will also bring long term savings and means we can spend over a billion pounds in this Parliament building 9 new modern prisons.

    Today, the transformation gets underway with the announcement the Justice Secretary has just made.

    I can tell the House that Holloway Prison – the biggest women’s jail in Western Europe – will close.

    In the future, women prisoners will serve their sentences in more humane conditions better designed to keep them away from crime.

    Mr Speaker, by selling these old prisons we will create more space for housing in our inner-cities. For another of the great social failures of our age has been the failure to build enough houses.

    In the end Spending Reviews like this come down to choices about what your priorities are.

    And I am clear: in this Spending Review, we choose to build.

    Above all, we choose to build the homes that people can buy. For there is a growing crisis of home ownership in our country. 15 years ago, around 60% of people under 35 owned their own home, next year it’s set to be just half of that.

    We made a start on tackling this in the last Parliament, and with schemes like our Help to Buy the number of first time buyers rose by nearly 60%. But we haven’t done nearly enough yet.

    So it’s time to do much more.

    Today, we set out our bold plan to back families who aspire to buy their own home.

    First, I am doubling the housing budget. Yes, doubling it to over £2 billion per year. We will deliver, with government help, 400,000 affordable new homes by the end of the decade.

    And affordable means not just affordable to rent, but affordable to buy.

    That’s the biggest house building programme by any government since the 1970s. Almost half of them will be our Starter Homes, sold at 20% off market value to young first time buyers.

    135,000 will be our brand new Help to Buy: Shared Ownership which we announce today. We’ll remove many of the restrictions on shared ownership – who can buy them, who can build them and who they can be sold on to.

    The second part of our housing plan delivers on our manifesto commitment to extend the Right to Buy to housing association tenants.

    I can tell the House this starts with a new pilot.

    From midnight tonight, tenants of 5 housing associations will be able to start the process of buying their own home.

    The third element of the plan involves accelerating housing supply.

    We are announcing further reforms to our planning system so it delivers more homes more quickly.

    We’re releasing public land suitable for 160,000 homes and re-designating unused commercial land for Starter Homes.

    We’ll extend loans for small builders, regenerate more run-down estates and invest over £300 million in delivering at Ebbsfleet the first garden city in nearly a century.

    Fourth, the government will help address the housing crisis in our capital city with a new scheme – London Help to Buy.

    Londoners with a 5% deposit will be able to get an interest-free loan worth up to 40% of the value of a newly-built home.

    My Honourable Friend for Richmond Park has been campaigning on affordable home ownership in London. Today we back him all the way.

    And the fifth part of our housing plan addresses the fact that more and more homes are being bought as buy-to-lets or second homes.

    Many of them are cash purchases that aren’t affected by the restrictions I introduced in the Budget on mortgage interest relief; and many of them are bought by those who aren’t resident in this country.

    Frankly, people buying a home to let should not be squeezing out families who can’t afford a home to buy.

    So I am introducing new rates of Stamp Duty that will be 3 per cent higher on the purchase of additional properties like buy-to-lets and second homes.

    It will be introduced from April next year and we’ll consult on the details so that corporate property development isn’t affected.

    This extra stamp duty raises almost a billion pounds by 2021 – and we’ll reinvest some of that money in local communities in London and places like Cornwall which are being priced out of home ownership.

    The funds we raise will help building the new homes. So this Spending Review delivers:

    A doubling of the housing budget.

    400,000 new homes; with extra support for London.

    Estates regenerated.

    Right to Buy rolled-out.

    Paid for by a tax on buy-to-lets and second homes.

    Delivered by a government committed to helping working people who want to buy their own home.

    For we are the builders.

    The fourth and final objective of this spending review is national security. On Monday, the Prime Minister set out to the House the Strategic Defence and Security Review.

    It commits Britain to spending 2% of our income on defence.

    And it details how these resources will be used to provide new equipment for our war-fighting military, new capabilities for our special forces, new defences for our cyberspace, and new investments in our remarkable intelligence agencies.

    By 2020-21 the Single Intelligence Account will rise from £2.1 billion to reach £2.8 billion, and the Defence budget will rise from £34bn today to £40bn.

    Britain also commits to spend 0.7% of our national income on overseas development – and we will re-orientate that budget, so we both meet our moral obligation to the world’s poorest and help those in the fragile and failing states on Europe’s borders.

    It is overwhelmingly in our national interest that we do so. So our total overseas aid budget will increase to £16.3 billion by 2020.

    Britain is unique in the world in making these twin commitments to funding both the hard power of military might and the soft power of international development.

    It enables us to protect ourselves, project our influence and promote our prosperity and we do so ably supported by my Right Honourable Friend the Foreign Secretary and our outstanding diplomatic service.

    To support them in their vital work, I am today protecting in real terms the budget of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. But security starts at home.

    Mr Speaker, our police are on the front line of the fight to keep us safe.

    In the last Parliament, we made savings in police budgets – but thanks to the reforms of my Right Honourable Friend the Home Secretary and the hard work of police officers, crime fell and the number of neighbourhood officers increased.

    That reform must continue in this Parliament.

    We need to invest in new state-of-the-art mobile communications for our emergency services, and introduce new technology at our borders and increase the counter-terrorism budget by 30%.

    We should allow elected Police and Crime Commissioners greater flexibility in raising local precepts in areas where they have been historically low.

    And further savings can be made in the police as different forces merge their back offices and share expertise. We will provide a new fund to help with this reform.

    Mr Speaker, I’ve had representations police budgets should be cut by up to 10%. But now is not the time for further police cuts.

    Now is the time to back our police and give them the tools do the job.

    I am today announcing there will be no cuts in the police budget at all. There will be real terms protection for police funding. The police protect us, and we’re going to protect the police.

    Five years ago, when I presented my first Spending Review, the country was on the brink of bankruptcy and our economy was in crisis.

    We took the difficult decisions then.

    And five years later I report on an economy growing faster than its competitors and public finances set to reach a surplus of £10 billion. Today we have set out the further decisions necessary to build this country’s future.

    Sometimes difficult, yes, but decisions that:

    Build the great public services families rely on.

    Build the infrastructure and the homes people need.

    Build stronger defences against those who threaten our way of life.

    And build the strong public finances on which all of these things depend.

    We were elected as a one nation government. Today we deliver the Spending Review of a one nation government:

    The guardians of economic security.

    The protectors of national security.

    The builders of our better future.

    The government; the mainstream representatives of the working people of Britain.