Category: Speeches

  • David Lloyd George – 1917 Speech on Supreme War Council

    davidlloydgeorge

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Lloyd George, the then Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 14 November 1917.

    The best way for me to answer this question is to read to the House the actual terms of the agreement between the French, Italian, and British Governments for the creation of a Supreme War Council for the Allies.

    1. With a view to the better co-ordination of military action on the Western Front, a Supreme War Council is created, composed of the Prime Minister and a Member of the Government of each of the Great Powers whose Armies are fighting on that front. The extension of the scope of the Council to other fronts is reserved for discussion with the other Great Powers.

    2. The Supreme War Council has for its mission to watch over the general conduct of the War. It prepares recommendations for the decision of the Governments, and keeps itself informed of their execution, and reports thereon to the respective Governments.

    3. The General Staffs and Military Commands of the Armies of each Power charged with the conduct of military operations remain responsible to their respective Governments.

    4. The general War plans drawn up by the competent military authorities are submitted to the Supreme War Council, which, under the high authority of the Governments, ensures their concordance, and submits, if need be, any necessary changes.

    5. Each Power delegates to the Supreme War Council one permanent Military Representative, whose exclusive function is to act as technical adviser to the Council.

    6. The Military Representatives receive from the Government and the competent military authorities of their country all the proposals, information and documents relating to the conduct of the War.

    7. The Military Representatives watch day by day the situation of the Forces, and the means of all kinds of which the Allied Armies and the Enemy Armies dispose.

    8. The Supreme War Council meets normally at Versailles, where the permanent Military Representatives and their Staffs are established. They may meet at other places as may be agreed upon, according to the circumstances. The meetings of the Supreme War Council will take place at least once a month.
    From the foregoing it will be clear that the Council will have no executive power, and that the final decisions in matters of strategy and as to the distribution anti movements of the various Armies in the field will rest with the several Governments of the Allies. There will be, therefore, no Operations Department attached to the Council. The permanent Military Representatives will derive from the existing Intelligence Departments of the Allies all the information necessary in order to enable them to submit advice to the Supreme Allied Council. The object of the Allies has been to set up a central body charged with the duty of continuously surveying the field of operations as a whole and, by the light of information derived from all fronts and from all Governments and Staffs, of co-ordinating the plans prepared by the different General Staffs, and, if necessary, of making proposals of their own for the better conduct of the War. Should the House desire an opportunity of discussing this important subject and my Paris speech, the Government would propose set aside Monday next for the purpose.

  • David Lloyd George – 1917 Speech on Russia

    davidlloydgeorge

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Lloyd George, the then Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 19 March 1917.

    The incidents in connection with what I believe will prove to be one of the landmarks in the history of the world have followed each other with such dramatic suddenness that it has not hitherto been possible, and it is not possible to-day, to give to the House of Commons a detailed account of what has actually occurred.
    There has for some time been deep discontent in Russia, of which there have been several manifestations, due to the inefficiency of the Government in the conduct of the War. On Friday, the 9th, some riots, due to the scarcity of food, occurred in the streets of Petrograd. This was, however, the occasion rather than the cause of the Revolution which immediately followed.

    The soldiers who were commanded to take action against the rioters refused to obey orders, and gave their support to a committee, of which the President of the Duma was the head, which had been suddenly formed for the purpose of preserving order, and the control of the Government passed largely into the hands of this committee. Subsequently a strong Provisional Government was formed, of which Prince Lwoff is the head, and the Proclamation of this Government, as well as that of the Czar announcing his abdication for himself and his son, and that of the Grand Duke Michael, have appeared in the Press, and also the refusal of the latter, while placing his services at the disposal of the new Government, to accept the Throne unless called to it by the voice of the people, expressed in a constituent assembly. So far as our information goes, the Revolution has been brought about with very little bloodshed, and the new Government is receiving the support both of the country as a whole and of the Army and Navy. Our information, however, does not enable us to say that all danger is over, but it is satisfactory to know that the new Government has been formed for the express purpose of carrying on the War with increased vigour.

    I have only to add, on behalf of the Government, that they believe that the Russian people will find that liberty is compatible with order, even in revolutionary times, and that free peoples are the best defenders of their own honour and safety.

  • Gregory Barker – 2012 Speech at RHPP Communities Scheme Launch

    gregbarker

    Below is the text of the speech made by Gregory Barker, the then Minister of State for Climate Change, on 24 July 2012.

    Good morning and thank you for coming today, I have great pleasure in announcing the third and final element of this year’s Renewable Heat Premium Payment – the Communities Scheme. Before launching into the detail of this new scheme, lets discuss why I believe renewable heat is so important and why we need to take action now.

    The UK Building Stock and Targets

    Under the EU Renewable Energy Directive, the UK has a legally-binding commitment to generate 15% of its energy from renewable sources by 2020. An incredible 47% of the UK’s carbon dioxide emissions are attributable to heat generation.

    Looking ahead, the DECC Carbon Plan sets out the Coalition Government’s aim to reduce emissions from heat in buildings from 124 Megatons to zero by 2050. To achieve these extraordinary targets, heating used in buildings will need to come from renewable technologies such as air-source or ground-source heat pumps. The RHPP is really the first step on the road to achieve this.

    I don’t under estimate the challenge and this is an important first step. Throughout this decade, Government is really focussing its attention on working with industry to prepare the market. We are committed to renewable heating, driving innovation and supporting the UK industry to build supply chains – with the goal to bring down costs ahead of large scale roll-out. Creating British jobs, British firms and British expertise.

    Phase 1: RHPP Success

    So what has happened so far.

    Under Phase 1 of the RHPP, which ran from August last year to the end of March this year over 6000 homes received help. These houses were previously on costly, high carbon fuels for heating and have now had their systems replaced with low or zero carbon renewable heating.

    Phase 2: Building on success

    Now let’s move to Phase 2, which is building on the successes of Phase 1. Under the RHPP, we are continuing to provide one-off grants to householders across Great Britain to help with the cost of installing renewable heating technologies. Since we reopened in March, we have issued a further 1,187 household vouchers – all helping to install renewable heating technologies in people’s homes.

    Social landlords competition

    In May this year, I launched the second social landlords competition. We received 72 applications and I can announce that all were successful in this competition at a value of just over £5million. A full list of winners will be published on the DECC website today.

    The value of the applications received was just over £5 million -this is approximately half the £10million we have set aside for social landlords. We would have, of course, liked to have seen more applications, but I am still very encouraged that these applications are seeking to install a significantly higher number of heating systems – three times more than seen in the first competition for the same financial contribution from DECC.

    We are now considering our next steps – Should we have another competition or not? If we do decide to do so, we will announce something very soon. I am very interested to hear views from the room today through the Q&A.

    I am already convinced that low carbon heating systems have a role to play in social housing. Social landlords do not have to take my word for it, they can see for themselves. Tenants have told us that their new heating systems are saving them money and are easier to run.

    Communities Scheme

    Now let me turn to the Communities Scheme – the reason we are here today. The Coalition pledged to “support community ownership of renewable energy schemes” and we have said on many occasions that local people are best placed to decide what is best for their communities. Schemes such as LEAF have enabled communities to act on this and be at the forefront, playing their part in effectively delivering these priorities at a local level.

    Communities have much to gain aside from the evident carbon benefits and energy bills savings. It has been shown that communities working together on low carbon energy projects enhance trust between local people and local organisations. This is a strong foundation to build future local capacity and further collective action.

    I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Community Board for their help in developing this new Scheme. I am also extremely pleased to see so many of you have joined us here today and are interested to know more about this new initiative.

    This new RHPP Scheme draws on the successes of the Local Energy Assessment Fund (LEAF), which closed in March 2012 and which some of you, I’m sure will already be familiar.

    LEAF supported communities across England and Wales to play an active role in the development of a low carbon society where the energy supply is both secure and affordable.

    There was widespread interest from around 600 communities, and 236 of them received funding from the £10million pot. The funds supported work by community groups and there were many inspirational examples of communities getting together, assessing local energy efficiency and renewable energy needs and produce local solutions tailored to their unique needs. We will be running an in-depth evaluation of learning from LEAF over the coming months.

    Can I take this moment to give you a bit of detail about the Scheme. The objective is to facilitate the installation of renewable heat systems into privately-owned homes in England, Scotland and Wales.

    It will work by supporting those who are currently unlikely to be able to benefit from the RHPP household voucher scheme, through additional Government funding and by encouraging community groups to negotiate bulk buying discounts. We would particularly like to focus on properties and communities which are off-gas, where bills and emissions are higher.

    After this event and until the beginning of September, community groups will be able to register their interest with the Energy Saving Trust. Those projects that pass an initial assessment will progress to the development phase. Here, communities will be supported to develop their ideas into project proposal bids. These bids will be independently assessed and winners announced later in the year.

    Innovation: Heat Strategy, the Green Deal & RHI

    The RHPP Scheme is a piece in a wider jigsaw and we are working hard to deliver other key initiatives such as the Green Deal and the Renewable Heat Incentive. In recognition of this I was pleased to announce last month that we will be launching a Community Energy Strategy Document to bring together DECC’s strands of work on communities, which will be published in 2013.

    The Green Deal launches this autumn helps people pay for home improvements like insulation through savings on their energy bills. It will help people to make energy-saving improvements to their homes to keep them warm and cosy. At the same time, it’ll reduce the amount of gas and electricity householders need and keep their heating bills down. ECO, a subsidy from energy suppliers, will provide extra help for those most in need and for properties that are harder to treat.

    We know more and more families are being hit by the rising cost of gas and electricity. But our inefficient homes are using a lot more of it than they need to – more than half of our homes don’t have sufficient insulation.

    The Green Deal is designed to address these problems, but in a truly revolutionary way. It places consumers at the centre of energy efficiency policy. It isn’t about stop start Government driven and owned programme of works. It is about consumers driving demand, and a competitive market responding.

    And as the market grows and develops, homeowners, landlords and tenants will get access to a whole range of home improvements to increase the energy efficiency of homes.

    The energy efficiency measures in the Green Deal also help to boost the effectiveness of many renewable heat technologies, such as air and ground source heat pumps. Having an energy efficient home is also a prerequisite for installing renewable hear technologies.

    The RHI non-domestic scheme already incentivises community groups and social landlords to connect several households together to create local community heat networks and to supply renewable heat to community buildings such as schools and village halls.

    We are on track to meet the RHI delivery timetable and we are publishing our longer term proposals for budget management, as well as proposals on biomass sustainability and air quality. I am also pleased to confirm that we are on track to launch the Domestic RHI consultation this September.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion it is clear to me that communities and a decentralised approach to energy generation is at the heart of any real long-term solution to climate change and the reduction of our carbon emissions. But I would like to go further. I’ve seen the way these local schemes bring neighbourhoods closer together. I’ve seen them build greater community cohesion. I’ve seen them catalyse new local projects that embed sustainability and resource efficiency and drive greater sense of responsibility. Decentralised energy efficiency is a great thing. Not just a means to an end. I hope that communities of all shapes and sizes will get on board and take advantage of all this scheme has to offer.

  • David Cameron – 2012 Speech at LGBT Reception

    davidcameron

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, at an LGBT reception on 25 July 2012.

    I just wanted to say three things to you tonight. First of all, this party is really a celebration of the immense contribution that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people make in every part of our country, in the arts, in media, in sport, in business, in finance – that’s what tonight is about and I want to thank you for the immense contribution that you make to our country.

    The second thing I wanted to say – there are a number of anniversaries – it’s the 40th anniversary of the first Pride march in London, the 40th anniversary of the foundation of the Jewish Gay Equality Group and I think it’s worth remembering the journey that politics has been on in terms of gay equality over the last forty years – the decriminalisation of homosexuality, the lowering of the age of consent to 18, the equalisation of the age of consent that the Blair government achieved, the introduction of civil partnerships – backed by my party and I just want to say I am absolutely determined that this Coalition government will follow in that tradition by legislating for gay marriage in this parliament. I make that point not only as someone who believes in equality but as someone who believes passionately in marriage. I think marriage is a great institution – I think it helps people to commit, it helps people to say that they’re going to care and love for another person. It helps people to put aside their selfish interests and think of the union that they’re forming. It’s something I feel passionately about and I think if it’s good enough for straight people like me, it’s good enough for everybody and that’s why we should have gay marriage and we will legislate for it.

    And I know there’s going to be some big arguments, there will be arguments obviously within political parties including my own, there will be arguments with many of the public that take a different view, although it is worth noting that opinion polls consistently show that the public support the case for equality and obviously there’ll be arguments within the Churches as well and I can say how great it is to see some Church men and women here tonight supporting this cause.

    I run an institution – the Conservative Party – which for many many years got itself on the wrong side of this argument, it locked people out who were naturally Conservative from supporting it and so I think I can make that point to the Church, gently. Of course this is very, very complicated and difficult issue for all the different Churches, but I passionately believe that all institutions need to wake up to the case for equality, and the Church shouldn’t be locking out people who are gay, or are bisexual or are transgender from being full members of that Church, because many people with deeply held Christian views, are also gay. And just as the Conservative Party, as an institution, made a mistake in locking people out so I think the Churches can be in danger of doing the same thing.

    The third point I wanted to make is, changing laws is important, legislating is important. But what is equally important – arguably now what is more important – is actually going to be changing culture; whether it’s on the football field, or in the rugby dressing room. Changing the culture whether it’s in the school playground, changing the culture in the workplace, changing the culture everywhere so that people can genuinely feel we live in an equal, fair and tolerant country. And changing the culture is much more difficult than changing the law, changing culture is much more subtle and difficult. But the promise I can make you is that this coalition government is committed to both changing the law and also working to help change the culture and the Conservative party absolutely backs that. This is something I personally feel very passionately about.

  • George Osborne – 2012 Speech at Global Investment Conference

    gosborne

    Below is the text of the speech made by George Osborne, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, at the Global Investment Conference on 26 July 2012.

    Welcome to this session – and a particularly warm welcome to my distinguished colleagues, Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the IMF, and Angel Gurria, Secretary General of the OCED.

    I thank you both for taking the time to join us on the eve of the London Olympic Games.

    The Olympic Games celebrate human endeavour and peaceful competition between the nations of the earth.

    This Global Investment Conference celebrates human innovation and industry, and show-cases Britain as a home for investment in a fiercely competitive world economy.

    You’ve heard from the Prime Minister and many colleagues of mine in Government already.

    I hope the message you are receiving is loud and clear:

    Britain is open for business.

    Indeed, we assert that there is no major western economy that is more open, more welcoming of foreign investment, less protectionist and more pro-free trade than the United Kingdom.

    Across all political parties, in all parts of the country, we welcome overseas companies with open arms.

    In the last few months, we’ve encouraged Chinese investment in our capital’s water system, Hong Kong investment in our telecoms and gas network, Indian investment in our car-making and steel, and today, Malaysian investment in a prime property site here in London.

    In the very difficult global economic environment – and with our own disappointing GDP numbers – we as a Government have to work even harder to attract more of this investment.

    We have a relentless focus on the economy.

    And our message, our sales pitch, if you like, to investors has three components:

    – We’re dealing with our debts

    – We’re creating the most pro-business tax regime in the developed world

    – And we’re making the long-term structural reforms to secure a more productive future.

    Let me take each briefly in turn.

    First, in our continent reeling from a sovereign debt crisis, the UK is a country which demonstrated to the world that is has a credible plan to deal with its debts.

    In the last 2 years, we have cut our deficit by 25 per cent.

    When this Government entered office, the UK’s cost of borrowing was the same as Spain’s and Italy’s.

    Today, their cost of borrowing is more than six per cent and ours is one and a half per cent.

    That market confidence and those ultra-low interest rates are precious assets – hard won and easily squandered.

    And it is precisely that market confidence and fiscal credibility that allows our independent monetary authority, the Bank of England, to operate a more active monetary policy.

    – Expanding the Quantitative Easing programme.

    – Launching with the Treasury the new Funding for Lending Scheme operational next week that will reduce bank funding costs to reduce loan rates and mortgage costs.

    – And it is the same fiscal credibility that means we can use our balance sheet to offer billions of pounds worth of guarantees to new infrastructure projects and export opportunities.

    You will hear those arguing that we should abandon our plan and spend and borrow our way out of debt.

    You hear that argument again today.

    These are the siren voices luring Britain onto the rock.

    We won’t go there.

    A credible plan to deal with our debts is an anchor of stability and a prerequisite of recovery.

    We have that credible plan – and we’re sticking to it.

    That gives confidence to investors looking at the UK.

    So too should our pro-business reforms to the tax system.

    I challenge anyone in the audience to name another major western economy that is:

    – Reducing its corporation tax as aggressively as we are: from 28% to 22%.

    – Or cutting its top rate of income tax to attract wealth creators.

    – Or introducing new generous tax regimes for patents, and research, and creative industry.

    – Or creating a new regime for the headquarters of global firms, so that companies are now moving to Britain instead of moving away.

    – This is the most pro-business tax reform in any developed economy today.

    And the final sales pitch is this.

    We are also tackling the deep-rooted problems that undermine the competitiveness of many western economies, including ours.

    In the last 2 years, we’ve undertaken major reforms of planning, higher education, schools and welfare that will equip Britain for the future.

    It’s involved tough decisions, raising pension ages, reducing public sector costs, taking on vested groups.

    But we’ve done it.

    And despite disappointing GDP numbers, we are determined to continue to tackle the deep rooted problems our economy faces.

    The deficit is down by a quarter.

    Inflation has halved.

    Employment is up.

    Exports are rising – and Britain’s businesses are now exporting more to the rest of the world than to Europe.

    A sign of openness to the opportunities from emerging as well as established economies across the world.

    And we know we have more to do.

    Our motivation is simple.

    It was spelt out by the Prime Minister this morning.

    We’re in Government at a time of great change in the world economy.

    Great change, and of course, great uncertainty.

    And we think that some western countries will adapt well to that change, cope with that uncertainty well.

    And others not adapt so well.

    We have a relentless focus to ensure that Britain adapts to the changing world and thrives in it.

    These Olympic Games are a showcase of Britain at its best.

    This Conference is a sign of our nation’s commitment to welcome the world’s investors.

    Britain is open for business.

  • David Cameron – 2012 Speech at Global Investment Conference

    davidcameron

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, on 26 July 2012.

    Welcome to London, welcome to the greatest show on earth. Everything is ready, the stadia are ready and everything is looking good. We have even, at least for the business summit, managed to lay on the weather.

    Over the next two weeks the world’s greatest athletes will compete right here. Records will be broken, new champions will be crowned, history will be made. But I believe the legacy of these Olympics can be about many more things as well as great sport. For instance, the legacy should also be about great business too. At a time when it is global business partnerships, new investments and, vitally, start-up ventures that will help get the world back to growth, nothing symbolises the opportunity of partnership and collaboration more than the Olympics.

    Forging those partnerships and those investments is why we are all here today. So, yes, of course I want medals for Britain, and there will be no more passionate supporter of Team GB than me, but I have got another job to do this summer and a big part of that job is to get behind British business and do everything I can to help secure the trade and investment that will help get the world back to sustained, global growth.

    I am absolutely delighted to welcome you to the British Business Embassy. This is the biggest business summit any British government has ever hosted and I think it is also the biggest Olympic business summit in history.

    At this Conference alone we have more than 200 business leaders from 36 countries representing quite literally some of the greatest companies on the planet. And that is just the beginning. Over the next fortnight we are going to have 4,000 business leaders attending sector conferences on everything from energy to life sciences, aerospace to education and the creative industries.

    They will take part in country-specific days on China and Brazil, the previous and the next hosts of the Olympics and two of the most exciting and fast-growing countries in the world. And also I hope people will get stuck into venture capital events that will help to secure the vital resources needed to commercialise new inventions and, of course, exciting new start-up businesses.

    In order to make it in these difficult times, I think there is also a very tough and uncompromising message that all of us – politicians perhaps particularly – have to take on. And it is this: countries all around the world have to face up to some very hard truths and to take some difficult decisions. The global competitive race has never been faster; some countries will make it, some will not. The challenge is particularly great right here in our European neighbourhood.

    Since the financial crash the world economy has grown by 20 per cent, but Europe has hardly grown at all. The countries that make it will be those that step up to meet the big long-term challenges. Getting your debts under control; ensuring you have a welfare system that you can afford; making sure you have a great pensions system for older people, but making sure you have liabilities you can manage; building an education system that is going to produce some of the best graduates in the world; making your economy as competitive as it possibly can be; ensuring you are linked up to the fastest growing parts of the world and that your trade is delivering as many jobs as possible.

    By meeting these key challenges, I am absolutely determined that Britain will be one of the success stories of the next few decades. I want to take some of these key points in turn.

    The first thing you need as investors is confidence in the long-term stability of the economy that you are investing in. You need to know that the public finances are under control and that your businesses aren’t suddenly going to be crippled by uncertainty or by high interest rates.

    The coalition government that I lead in Britain inherited the worst deficit this country has had since the Second World War. But we have acted decisively to put in place a credible and steady plan to restore confidence in our public finances.

    That meant taking some very tough decisions. Increasing the state pension age, reforming public sector pensions – which has actually cut their long-term cost in half – and taking forward sweeping, long-term reforms of welfare.

    We have taken a series of bold decisions to sort out our public finances and to earn credibility in the markets. As a result, in just two years we have cut the deficit we inherited by more than one quarter and our market interest rates are less than 2%.

    My message today is clear and unequivocal. Be in no doubt: we will go on and finish the job, we will deal with the deficit, we will keep UK interest rates low and we will continue to take the tough decisions that are necessary for business leaders and investors to have confidence in the long-term future of the British economy.

    Getting our debts under control is clearly essential for growth. Fiscal discipline and growth are not alternatives – you need one to get the other – but sound finances alone are not sufficient. If Britain is going to be a success, we need a competitive economy. So we are absolutely focused on doing everything to support enterprise and make Britain the best the best place in the world in which to start or grow a business.

    We have listened to what business wants and we are delivering on it. Business said, ‘We want competitive tax rates’, so we are creating the most competitive corporate tax regime in the G20 and the lowest rates of corporation tax in the G7.

    Business said, ‘We want a simplified planning system’. Why? So companies can expand and invest more easily and grow and create the jobs that will put people into work. We have taken 1,000 pages of planning documentation and reduced it to just 52.

    Business wants tax credits for research and development so they can develop the high end products that future countries like ours need. We have got them.

    Business wants a radical patent box so that if you develop a patent in Britain and manufacture here you pay only 10% tax. Again, we have got that too. Companies like GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and international companies like Qualcomm have already announced new investments as a direct result of this.

    We have also listened to entrepreneurs. We are radically reducing the time it takes to start up a business, so instead of filling in endless forms you can now get online, set up a business and register for taxes – and see the taxes that you have paid and that you owe – all in one place.

    Last year, despite the tough economic climate, the number of new business start-ups was one of the highest in our history. We have created a 50% tax break for the first £150,000 invested in a start-up and more than doubled the limit on the amount of tax deductable funds that can be invested in a single company in a year.

    And in this Olympic year we are making an extraordinary – and, I think, unprecedented – offer. If you sell assets in this tax year and invest the proceeds in one of the businesses in our seed investment scheme, you will not pay a penny of capital gains tax on the assets that you have sold. Not this year, not next year, not any year. That is, I think, an incredibly pro-enterprise policy.

    We are supporting the rebalancing of our economy with bold new infrastructure investments. In a world in which too much investment has been high risk and short-term, there should be huge potential for a different approach.

    We are pioneering a new investment scheme, the Green Investment Bank, to bring in private sector funds to make the most of the green infrastructure that we will require. This is the first green investment bank in any advanced country, anywhere in the world. It starts with £3 billion of taxpayers’ money to get those projects going.

    We are making the biggest investment in our rail network since the Victorian era, retaining our status as a key global hub for air travel and expanding access to broadband, including through super-connected cities where citywide access to ultra fast 80 megabit broadband will give Britain twenty of the fastest and best connected cities anywhere in the world.

    And we are also – vital for all the countries that want to ‘make it,’ as I have put it – sorting out our financial system. Our financial system is a huge strength for our country, but we do need proper regulation. So we are going to have it properly regulated by the Bank of England with banks made to hold enough capital to keep them safe and a regime so that if they do fail, they can do so without the taxpayer picking up the bill. That resolution regime is already now in place.

    We are putting into law the ring-fencing of retail banking and its separation from investment banking, and introducing the most transparent rules on pay and bonuses of any major financial centre anywhere in the world.

    And we are building on the Kay report earlier this week, promoting greater trust and confidence by cultivating a change in corporate culture to focus management teams and investors on longer-term, sustainable value creation rather than merely short-term profit chasing.

    So we are making our economy more competitive but we are also taking a totally different approach to trade. I went into the Foreign Office on day one of being Prime Minister and I said to them, ‘You are, of course, the Queen’s diplomats, but you are also the sales force for Britain and for British industry’.

    We have set an ambition of doubling our exports to £1 trillion by 2020. That would get us in line with Germany and match their record level of exports last year. I believe it is absolutely achievable.

    Britain is already now exporting more goods to rest of the world than we are to the European Union, and if we could increase the number of small and medium sized firms in the UK that sell overseas at all from one fifth to a quarter that would add £30 billion to our economy, create 100,000 jobs and pretty much wipe out our trade deficit altogether.

    That is the power of trade to drive growth and it’s the same story the world over. That is why I have made advancing trade a personal priority. At the G20 in Mexico, I fought hard to advance a trade deal between the US and the EU, because when two continents that account for more than half of the world’s total trade liberalise their trade, the benefits to growth could be felt all over the planet.

    I discussed EU bilateral trade with the Brazilian president yesterday – she is here for the Games – and will do the same with the Russian president next week when he is here. We will be at the judo, so it may be a bit off-putting, but nonetheless, I know my major priority is to get those trade deals to get that investment and not to concentrate on what’s happening on the mat.

    I’ll keep up the pressure on the EU to conclude those new trade agreements with India, Canada and Singapore and to launch trade negotiations with Japan. I’ll continue to champion a free trade area in Africa, which could play such a vital role in lifting Africa further out of poverty. And I will make trade a core priority when Britain hosts the G8 here in the United Kingdom next year.

    I know some people think it is sort of grubby to mix money and diplomacy. Frankly, I couldn’t disagree more. This is about jobs. In the last year alone we’ve increased the number of British jobs created by trade and investment by a quarter. That means nearly 150 jobs created or safeguarded every single day. But for Britain to be a success, we need to do even better than that. So I will go on loading up aeroplanes with businesspeople and taking them to the great markets of the world. Already I’ve done that with India, China, Russia, Turkey, South Africa, Nigeria, Mexico, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia, and I’m delighted at the news today about one of the big deals we were pursuing when I was in Malaysia.

    Battersea Power Station is one of the iconic landmarks of the London skyline. Any fans of Pink Floyd in the audience will know it from the cover of the Animals album. That ages some of you, I know, but I expect there are a few Pink Floyd fans here. This site sits on 40 acres of land that is ripe for development, right by the River Thames, here in one of the most dynamic cities anywhere in the world. It is quite simply one of the most exciting opportunities for investment in Europe. So, we very much welcome the plans for an £8 billion development that will create 20,000 jobs, with 13,000 permanent jobs at the end, and it will protect those famous towers too.

    This all follows from the announcement yesterday of a further £2 billion investment into the UK energy sector by our long-term partner and good friends at Hutchison Whampoa. I hope these are just the first in a long line of deals that I hope we can do, with further billions of pounds of deals expected to be announced this summer, creating and safeguarding jobs across the UK.

    I’m passionate about what Britain can offer. We have a time-zone where you can trade with Asia in the morning and America in the afternoon. We have the English language, the language of finance and business, and increasingly – as I find in the European Union – of politics too. I sometimes say the single language is going a little bit better than the single currency, but it’s very important that we safeguard and promote both.

    We have the easiest access to the European market where 500 million consumers are generating €12 trillion in economic activity. We have some of the best universities in the world. We have products and services that people need. Here in the room, we have got British companies like WPP, the world’s largest advertising agency; Vodafone, the world’s most international mobile phone company; and ARM, the British company based in Cambridge that provides technology used in 90% of smart phones.

    There are British firms – and I have checked this out – exporting tea to China, vodka to Poland and cheese to France. There’s even a firm I found in Anglesey that sells canoes to the Eskimos. This year Britain has become a net exporter of cars for the first time in 35 years. That is the sort of badge that you think once you’ve lost, you will never get back. People in the 1970s and 80s I think wouldn’t have dreamed that 30 years on, with Honda, with Nissan, with Jaguar, we would be back as a net exporter of vehicles to the rest of the world, and we are. Jaguar Land Rover yesterday announced 1,100 new jobs in the West Midlands. Some of these companies are selling so fast into China they can hardly produce the cars fast enough.

    But it’s not just our car industry that’s strong. If you want modern medicines, we’ve got world leading pharmaceutical businesses. If you want energy technology, we are the home of some of the world’s leading energy companies: pioneers in exploring green technology, but also oil and gas recovery in some of the most difficult parts of the world.

    If you want a holiday here, you can even now think that the sun does occasionally shine, and we’ve got an extraordinarily vibrant tourist industry. And while you’re at it, of course, you fly in to Britain on the wings of an Airbus plane, designed in Bristol, made in North Wales, and powered by Rolls Royce engines, of course made in Derby.

    So, this is – I hope you can see – a personal mission for me. I mean it when I say to all those here: if there are barriers in your way preventing you from investing, tell me. If there are things the British government can do to help you invest, let me know. If there’s an opportunity you think we are not sufficiently seizing, get on to me about it. My office, or Stephen Green and all of the team at UKTI will help, and I will gladly speak personally with any of you who have a deal or an opportunity that will mean jobs and growth for Britain.

    My message today is very simple: Britain is back open for business and we are committed to supporting global growth with open trade between our nations. So invest in Britain, partner with Britain. Not just to invest in this country, but because I believe this will increasingly be seen as the place, as the hub, from which your company can grow and expand. So let’s make this Olympic year a great year for your business, here in Britain. Thank you.

    Question

    Mr Prime Minister, you talked about incentives for small business, and so much of the high tech industry is about creating that entrepreneurial environment and blowing away the road blocks, but a lot of it has to do with immigration policy and the duration of engineers and simulating concepts there. Could you say a little bit further on your policy regarding start-ups?

    Prime Minister

    First of all, a very warm welcome to Cisco Systems and congratulations on your acquisition of NDS, a great technology business here in Britain – really pleased to see that happen. Britain had an immigration system that I think was really not serving the country well. We had an enormous amount of unskilled migrant labour coming to Britain at the same time as having five or six million people living in Britain on out-of-work benefits.

    So the government has quite a mission of reforming welfare to get people off those benefits and into work, and proper control of immigration. But we do want to be an open, vibrant economy that welcomes the best and brightest to our shores. I think the offer we make, particularly to students, is pretty hard to match, and it’s very simple, so don’t believe all the myths.

    The offer is this: if you have the ability to speak the English language and a place at a British university, there is no limit on the number of people that can come. And having come and studied, there are opportunities to take part in a graduate job after you have left university. So you’ll read about immigration control in Britain – and it’s right we have proper immigration control – but there’s no limit on the number of students that can come and study and then work in the UK.

    We have also introduced some very growth-friendly immigration policies like the entrepreneurs visa, which is a special category of people. If they’ve got great entrepreneurial skills, or want to come to Britain and take advantage of some of those tax changes I have said, there is a special category, and it is very important that people understand that. There’ll be experts here from UKTI. If anyone’s got questions about immigration or visas, then please get on to them, because I don’t want that in any way to get in the way of the growth story here in the UK.

    Question

    I have been an investor here, and recently we have invested in the auto sector in Leeds. One of the suggestions I would make: if the uncertainty of taxation on the global wealth can be clarified, it will help quite a lot to bring in more investments in this country.

    Prime Minister

    Very good point. This is the – first of all, thank you for all of your investments in the UK over many years. In terms of the taxation of global wealth, there are two points I would make. First of all, obviously as well as cutting our corporation tax rates down to the lowest levels in the G7 – and you have seen a series of cuts, even though we have had to make tough spending choices with the 22% target at the end of this parliament – we are also changing the taxation for headquarters companies and we are seeing a number of headquarters companies now thinking of either coming back to Britain or coming to Britain for the first time.

    On the taxation of global wealth, obviously we do have this system in Britain of non-domiciled taxpayers, so people who don’t pay tax on their worldwide income in the UK because they’re domiciled somewhere else for tax purposes. We now charge people for having that tax status, but if they have that tax status they’re not taxed on their worldwide income, and I think that does encourage those people to make their homes, their businesses and their bases here in Britain, and that will continue.

    Question

    I wonder if you could give a commitment, Prime Minister, that you will be working with the devolved administrations of the UK on issues like economic development? And certainly, as you mentioned, on education in terms of qualifications and indeed the training of young people, including apprenticeships?

    Prime Minister

    Yes, absolutely. I mean, it’s great that the devolved countries – including the Welsh Assembly government – are here. I’d say to all international investors, you know, look at the whole of the United Kingdom. There are huge investment opportunities in Scotland, in Wales, in Northern Ireland. We have devolution in Britain, but we work together as a team when it comes to promoting investment in Britain, and frankly I think we can probably do more with the Welsh Assembly government and UKTI together to jointly promote what we have.

    In terms of the points you make, absolutely happy to work on all of those subjects with you. I think all of the countries of the United Kingdom have got to realise that getting education right is a huge challenge. If I had a challenge to the Welsh government, it would be that we are doing a lot in England to raise standards in schools and make sure we’re really creating a competitive and very much results-focused school system. I think we need to do that in Wales too.

    And in our universities, obviously we’ve had to make tough choices. We now have a fees-based system and this was a difficult decision the UK government made for English universities, but the strength of it is that one of the big challenges the whole world’s going to face is: who’s got the best universities? Who’s producing the brightest graduates? And frankly there’s only two places the money can come from: you can get it from taxpayers, or you can get it from graduates. We are now getting it from graduates, and that means the universities know they’re not going to have to wait in the queue behind healthcare and behind pensions and the rest of it. We’ve got well-funded universities guaranteed into the future, and I think that for businesses that’s a very, very positive message.

    Perhaps one last question, and then I’ve got to go off to the Olympic Park to welcome the foreign press.

    Question

    Good morning, Prime Minister. We’re just a little bit curious about the aviation policy of the coalition government in the United Kingdom. I know there are a number of options that have been presented to you, whether it’s the third runway at Heathrow or the expansion of the regional airports, and of course there’s the estuary project. Recently, you decided to postpone that review, or rather the results of the review. As a foreign carrier – and Emirates is quite a big one into Heathrow and other points in the United Kingdom – we’re particularly interested to see just where we’re going on this, or perhaps rather where the government’s going. Thank you.

    Prime Minister

    Well, be in no doubt, by the end of the year we will have both this review underway and the call for evidence about all the future options underway, and I think that’s vitally important. Both the coalition parties made a pledge not to have a third runway, and that’s a pledge that we made and that we will keep.

    But I do understand it’s vitally important that we maintain the sort of hub status that Britain has. There are lots of different options that can be looked at, but frankly I think we’ve discovered something in the last couple of weeks that I think business travellers and investors would welcome even more, which is if you really tool up and put the effort into running a good service at Heathrow you can reduce the border queues right down. And I don’t know what everyone’s experience was here – I won’t chance a show of hands – but my wife said when she came in from a business trip from Italy, she didn’t even have time to put her hand into her bag to get the passport out before it was being checked.

    So if you put the effort in, if you make sure there’s a real customer service ethos at our major airports, I think we can improve the welcome that we give people while having very important security checks.

    And we mustn’t underestimate that for one moment. You know, one of the most important things about this Olympic Games is, yes, of course, an enormous festival of sport, huge legacy, great opportunities for business deals, as I’ve spoken about, but actually making sure they’re safe and secure is vitally important, and our borders really matter for that.

    So I think we can deliver on making Britain have hub status, making it easy to get into and out of to trade with the rest of the world. Heathrow is still one of the busiest airports in the world, some people talk about Heathrow as if somehow it’s now sliding down the ratings. It’s a massively successful, busy and connected airport, but I think we’ve learnt something already this week about a real focus on customer service. We can do it better. Let’s do it better all the time, and not just during the Olympic Games.

    Can I thank you all again very much for coming. Thank you. I want to make a particular welcome to so many of the international bodies that are here: Angel Gurria from the OECD, Christine Lagarde from the IMF, Mario Draghi from the European Central Bank. You’re incredibly busy people, there are huge challenges on your time and resources. It’s great to have you taking part, and Mervyn King from the Bank of England as well. So thank you all very much for coming.

    I hope this is a great moment to come together, do some great deals, think of some great investments. Britain is there for you and we’ll give you a very enthusiastic welcome. Thank you very much indeed.

  • Chloe Smith – 2012 Speech to the Oil and Gas Fabricators Conference

    chloesmith

    Below is the text of the speech made by Chloe Smith, the then Economic Secretary to the Treasury, to the Oil and Gas Fabricators Conference on 27 July 2012.

    Introduction

    Good evening, and thank you for inviting me to speak to you today.

    Even as we move towards a lower carbon economy, no one should be in any doubt as to the continued importance of oil and gas, which still provide nearly three quarters of the UK’s primary energy needs.

    Oil and gas is one of the UK’s greatest industrial success stories, supporting a third of a million jobs, and successfully extracting the equivalent of 41 billion barrels of oil to date.

    The supply chain – and fabricators such as yourselves in particular – plays an especially crucial role in making the oil and gas industry what it is today.

    Highly skilled supply companies have developed a global reputation of excellence – which I was pleased to see recognised in an Economist article only last week.

    I myself have seen this work in Aberdeen.

    And I am particularly pleased to be in Norwich to discuss how we can help the sector continue to flourish, as the Southern North Sea and this region play a considerable part in that success as a centre of excellence for offshore activity and expertise.

    In conversations with companies operating in the North Sea, it always strikes me that this is a truly global market – not only in terms of the commodities that are sold, but also in terms of competition for capital and jobs.

    Companies can choose to invest in the UK or in Canada, Brazil or Nigeria.

    A trained engineering graduate can begin their career in the Southern North Sea or in Norway, the Gulf of Mexico or Australia.

    We recognise that, as the UK Continental Shelf matures, and other basins compete for the skills and investment it needs, Government and industry need to work together to adapt accordingly.

    Let’s be frank – we need to ensure we extract the full benefit from the oil and gas that remain under the shelf.

    The UKCS has many advantages:

    – a superb hydrocarbon system;

    – a wealth of seismic and production data;

    – superb infrastructure; and

    – oil companies that lead the world in skills and capability.

    It is important that we play to these strengths and exploit them fully.

    So I want to take a few moments today to talk to you about how we do that – working with industry to ensure that, through investment, innovation and the tax system, we can secure the greatest benefit for the UK that our rich natural resources can offer.

    State of the sector

    I am pleased to see that 2012 is already shaping up to be a successful year.

    DECC expects a substantial increase in offshore field approvals over last year, on top of the many other discoveries already being worked on; and applications for the 27th licensing round are the largest since offshore licensing began almost 50 years ago – 35 more than the previous record.

    And I was very pleased to see Oil & Gas UK’s most recent Business Confidence Index show a significant rise in confidence in the first quarter of 2012.

    I am keen for the industry to maintain this momentum, by making the most of the many opportunities still available.

    Fiscal measures

    We recognise that the Government has a crucial role to play in ensuring that the regulatory and fiscal regimes help to deliver the best possible future for the UKCS.

    And today I want to focus on some of the recent decisions we have taken that highlight the Government’s commitment to delivering a fiscal regime that encourages investment and innovation – as well as ensuring a fair return for UK taxpayers.

    We have been engaging constructively with companies at an individual and industry-wide level on tax issues that could promote confidence and facilitate further investment in the basin.

    And at this year’s Budget we announced a package of measures to secure billions of pounds of additional investment in the UKCS.

    … Adopting a contractual approach to offer long term certainty on decommissioning relief, delivering billions of pounds of extra investment;

    … A new £3 billion allowance for deep fields with sizeable reserves, targeted at the west of Shetland

    … A significant expansion of the value and size threshold for the small field allowance

    … As a signal of our intent, we brought in legislation giving Government the power to introduce a brown field allowance.

    … And only yesterday the Chancellor announced further support for the gas industry alongside wider measures on the UK’s energy market as a whole.

    This included a new allowance aimed at securing investment in large shallow water gas fields in the North Sea. This is likely to benefit investment in this area – the Southern North Sea – in particular, and I am pleased that this has been welcomed by the industry.

    Taken together, the changes we have made to the field allowance regime aim to encourage investment in commercially marginal fields – ensuring that, as a country and for you as an industry, we continue to make the most of the rich resources available to us.

    The positive effects of these changes will be felt across the industry, including throughout the supply chain.

    These changes also follow from excellent engagement between Government and industry.

    Earlier this month I chaired the second meeting of the Fiscal Forum in Aberdeen – a Forum we established to provide a regular, structured basis for the ongoing discussions on the key tax issues facing the industry, complementing the excellent work done by DECC’s PILOT group.

    I warmly welcome the constructive engagement we have seen from all sections of the industry attending.

    And I know that there is important work still to be done. Earlier this month, I was pleased to launch our consultation on Decommissioning Relief Deeds, and I look forward to hearing industry’s views on the issues we raise there.

    Following the introduction of the necessary legislation, and in recognition of the importance of ongoing investment in older fields, discussions are also ongoing between Government and companies on a potential brown field allowance.

    It is through this kind of co-operation that we can ensure that Government and Industry can deliver together for the UK – not just on the fiscal regime, although that is clearly a key part of our thinking, but also through ensuring the sector has the access to the skills and technology it needs to reach its full potential.

    Technological challenges

    The best overall outcome from the basin will require innovation and advances to existing technologies.

    We have made changes to the tax regime to encourage innovation, including improving the viability and generosity of R&D tax credits, and we need to continue to look beyond fiscal policy at the support Government can offer.

    My Ministerial colleagues in DECC are tackling the challenges of maintaining our infrastructure through PILOT, and I know the workgroup is due to report back to them in the Autumn.

    And DECC are also working to deliver an “Innovation Demand Chain” event at the beginning of November to share challenges and connect operators with developers.

    Skills

    But the success of the sector is reliant not just on the best technology, but also on the best people.

    The strong supply chain we have brings quality, highly paid jobs in an exciting industry – whether in the UKCS, or any other hydrocarbon-producing country, where our expertise is highly prized.

    The subsea sector in particular has been very successful in recent years and is forecast to continue growing at around 8 per cent this year.

    With the potential to create an additional 10,000 jobs in the next two years in that part of the industry alone, it is imperative we have the training to get the right people with the right skills in the right place.

    In recognition of this, the Government – particularly my colleagues at BIS and at DECC – has established close working relationships with OPITO, Cogent and Skills Development Scotland to address the skills challenge.

    Together, we are ensuring the opportunities and rewarding prospects of the industry are promoted to young people, as well as the jobs for highly skilled and qualified individuals looking for employment or changing career from other industries.

    Summary

    I have set out today what we are doing to help the industry continue to benefit the whole of the UK through making the most of the energy resources we enjoy.

    Without the fabrication industry, we would never have experienced the energy revolution we did, alongside the wealth and economic stimulus that oil and gas has given us.

    We need to continue to work in partnership – government and industry – to ensure that that continues: getting regulation right; getting the tax regime right; and developing and applying the right skills and technology.

    From what I can see of the programme of papers, it is clear that you are continuing that tradition, and long may it continue.

    Thank you.

  • William Hague – 2012 Olympic Truce Speech

    williamhague

    Below is the text of the speech made by William Hague, the then Foreign Secretary, on 27 July 2012.

    It is a great pleasure and a proud moment for us in the country to welcome all our friends from around the world to London including our friends from the International Olympic Committee who are here with us today on the eve of the Olympic and Paralympic Games; and a particular honour to speak alongside UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon. We’ve had some extremely good discussions this afternoon.

    The Games are a time of celebration and hope, and the Olympic Truce itself is a source of optimism and inspiration in a troubled world.

    We are proud that we set the first world record of these Olympic Games in October last year, when we managed to get all 193 Member States of the United Nations to co-sponsor our Olympic Truce Resolution – and that is the first time this has ever been possible.

    Since then, it has been our ambition to inspire and unite people in countries around the world with the ideals of the Truce and all this stands for. I will say a few words in a moment about how our Embassies and diplomats around the world have used the Truce to promote peace and conflict resolution around the world.

    But first, we should remember all those who are enduring the horrors of war: who are displaced, who are refugees, the child soldiers forced to fight against their will, those with their livelihoods and dreams destroyed, the families torn apart and the victims of rape. We should all remember all those valiant people in governments and civil society striving to rebuild societies emerging from conflict, or to stand up for human rights and freedom.

    War, I think we can agree is a scar on the conscience of humanity. It is because of the terrible cost of conflict that we believe that nations gathered in New York today have a duty to come together and agree a robust, legally-binding and ambitious Arms Trade Treaty. Our common interest in reducing conflict should be far greater than any differences that divide us. After six years of preparations and four weeks of intensive negotiations, we call for each nation around the table to make every effort possible to reach a historic agreement today which would, for the first time, regulate the global arms trade. It is time for governments of the world to fulfil their responsibilities and agree a strong Arms Trade Treaty.

    I also want to send a clear warning to the Syria regime as it masses its forces against the beleaguered city of Aleppo.

    This utterly unacceptable escalation of the conflict could lead to a devastating loss of civilian life and a humanitarian disaster. It will add to the misery being endured by the Syrian people, and plunge the country further into catastrophic civil war.

    The Assad regime must call off this assault. I call on all countries around the world, including all the Permanent Members of the Security Council, to join us in condemning these actions and to insist on a political process to end the violence in Syria. All those countries with influence on the Syrian regime should bring it to bear now. No nation should stand silent while people in Aleppo are threatened with a potential massacre.

    Throughout these Games the British Government will not relent for an instant in efforts to bring about an end to the conflict and increase the pressure on the Assad regime. This dire situation illustrates very strongly why the people of Syria needed the Security Council Resolution we proposed last week. The regime should be in no doubt that the world is watching its actions, including any intention to use chemical or biological weapons and that those responsible for the crimes being committed will one day be held to account.

    In a world that can sometimes seem bleak in the face of such atrocities, sport has the power to bring people together and remind them of their common humanity.

    All of us who have travelled overseas to conflict zones around the world will have marvelled at and admired the spirit, energy and tenacity with which people turn to sport.

    At Christmas in 1914, British and German troops abandoned their trenches and entered No-Man’s Land. They exchanged small gifts, and someone brought a football with them. Despite the enmity between their nations for that day they were men playing a game of football far from home.

    The Olympic Truce itself dates back to the 8th Century BC, when it was used to enable spectators and participants to travel safely to and from the Games.

    Today, the Truce, embodied in a United Nations resolution, calls on UN Member States of to promote those ideals at all levels in their societies, as well as internationally.

    Our Prime Minister described this Olympic Truce as a ‘historic opportunity, and we wanted to ensure that we made the most of it.

    On top of our Government’s financial and political commitment to conflict prevention and poverty reduction, we decided to mobilise the ideals of the Olympic Truce; development, participation education, to bring a diverse range of people together.

    Here in the United Kingdom, LOCOG have managed to bring the ideals of the Olympic Truce to more than 20,000 schools though their ambitious ‘Get Set’ programme.

    Internationally we sought ways to use our diplomatic network – one of the largest in the world – to bring people together from all parts of society including governments, international organisations, opposing parties, ex combatants, women, people with disabilities, politicians, the young and the old.

    In Thailand we organised a media development course for key reporters and commentators on the violence in Southern Thailand, encouraging more objective journalism, which can be consumed widely without fear of fuelling further discontent.
    In Sarajevo we worked with the Nansen Dialogue centre to bring together students from different communities to create short documentaries. The film they created about the Olympic Truce was played during the Sarajevo Film Festival in July.

    In Sri Lanka, our High Commission hosted a sports day, inspired by the Paralympics, for disabled soldiers, disabled ex-LTTE combatants and disabled civilians; bringing together former adversaries.

    And in the Philippines, alongside local representatives, we organised a coaching and football tournament to bring together Christian and Muslim communities.

    These are just a few examples of our work, and I am grateful to all of our diplomats and staff around the world who have played a part in these projects, and to all our friends and partners who have worked with us including British parliamentarians including Lord Bates who brilliantly over a few months walked from Olympia in Greece to London to raise awareness of the Olympic Truce.

    In June I also announced a major new UK initiative on preventing sexual violence in conflict. This will be a focus of our G8 Presidency next year. We must shatter the culture of impunity for those who use rape as a weapon of war.

    Of course it would be naive to expect all people, everywhere in the World to forget their grievances and lay enmity aside for a couple of months every two or four years.

    But if there is one thing that we can take from the Olympic motto, ‘Citius, Altius, Fortius’ – Higher, Faster, Stronger – is that in foreign policy we must always strive to build on the achievements of the past, whether it is to extend human rights and freedom, protect our global environment, or support peace in conflict-ravaged countries.

    I hope that Russia, Brazil and South Korea, as the future stewards of the Olympic Truce, also go on to use the spirit of the Olympics to bring communities together, and perhaps, during one Olympics in the future, we can be a world genuinely at peace.

  • George Osborne – 2016 Speech at Davos

    gosborne

    Below is the text of the speech made by George Osborne, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, at Davos on 22 January 2016.

    It’s great to be here again speaking to British business leaders.

    I’m glad to see so many familiar faces.

    It takes me back to the last time I spoke at this lunch, four years ago.

    I spoke then of the sombre mood at Davos, and of the great challenges facing both the British and European economy.

    Back then we were still struggling to recover from the financial crash that brought us to the brink, and the great recession that did so much damage.

    As a new Chancellor, I had set out a clear economic plan for us to follow. We would tackle the crisis in our public finances.

    We would cut business taxes and boost enterprise.

    We would take the difficult long term steps to ensure a lasting private sector recovery rather than pump up the public sector balance sheet still further and risk catastrophe.

    I described it as “a hard road to a better future.”

    But by the time I spoke here to you, the enemies of that plan and our long term solution were circling.

    There was talk of a double dip recession.

    Our unemployment rate had just hit its peak of 8.5%. Real wages were falling.

    The clamour for plan B – and a return to spending and borrowing – was growing.

    But you – the British business community – never wavered. You kept faith with our plan – plan A.

    You understood there was no easy shortcut to the work Britain had to do. You kept your nerve and so did we.

    And I want to thank you all for the role you have played over these years – for your support and commitment to the difficult choices we’ve taken to turn Britain around.

    And the results have been there for all to see.

    Britain has been one of the fastest growing advanced economies in the world these past few years.

    This week we saw our unemployment fall again to almost 5%.

    And now we’ve got the highest employment rate in our history.

    Real wages are growing.

    The deficit as a share of GDP is down to nearly a third of what it was with solid public finance data this morning.

    On the back of this, business investment is forecast to grow at 7.4% this year – the fastest growth since before the crisis.

    That shows your confidence in the UK economy.

    I’m proud of these economic achievements.

    And I think you should all be proud too.

    Because much of the success of our economy is down to you – you’re the job creators, the innovators, the providers of opportunity.

    And thanks to you, the UK has been a bright spot in the world economy.

    We have been a chink of light cutting through the global gloom.

    But that gloomy backdrop means we cannot rest or become complacent.

    Some seem to think the job is done and we can afford to let up.

    The new year is only three weeks old, and already I’m facing calls to abandon our public spending controls and borrow freely.

    That would be precisely the wrong response.

    We need to continue to implement our long term economic plan. We need to keep cool heads as the market heats up.

    Now, as much as ever, we need to go on putting our own house in order.

    For as I’ve said, we face a dangerous cocktail of risks from the global economy. Everyone here in Davos is discussing China’s slowdown, and plunging oil prices.

    And here’s a sobering fact:

    2016 has been the worst start to a year for the financial markets in my lifetime.

    And I’m not so young anymore.

    Oil is now around $30 a barrel.

    Let’s be clear: cheaper energy is helpful to many of you here – and to British families.

    But the speed of the drop has hit oil-producing emerging economies hard.

    And Iran – OPEC’s second biggest member – is now bringing on more supply.

    Long term that is good news, but we could all do with a little less of this volatility in our lives.

    Meanwhile, as corporate earnings seasons kicks off in the US, there are reports it could be a weak one.

    With some people already querying the US rate rise.

    It adds up to a hazardous mix.

    But my message today is one of confidence: we can meet these risks and overcome them, if we stick to our plan.

    We are all here to talk about the future – for your businesses, for our countries. So I wanted explain what the best antidote for the dangerous cocktail is.

    To offer concrete proposals on how the global economy needs to change.

    And explain how we plan to reform Britain’s economy too.

    The Chinese are fond of their proverbs and they have a good saying.

    They say that “talk does not cook rice.”

    It is simple, it is true, and it is particularly relevant now.

    There’s a lot of transition taking place – transition that is difficult and turbulent, yes; but transition that is fundamentally positive too.

    We know that China is transitioning from investment to consumption.

    We know that global oil markets are in transition, with new suppliers like Iran and new technologies like shale.

    We know that interest rates in the US are in transition.

    And we know there are big forces at work as the demographics of many Western nations change, altering the balance between investment and savings.

    These are the shifting tectonic plates of the global economy.

    So since we all know they are shifting, we should also know that those shifts create tremors.

    The question is: how large will those tremors be?

    And the question for all of us here is: do we just talk about this transition – or do we take the action, and show the political will, to adjust to this transition and make it as smooth as possible?

    You will hear, here at Davos, any number of political leaders promise reform.

    What we need to see are the results.

    We need to see every shoulder at the wheel.

    Every country acting as one in search of growth.

    We need China to keep reforming. To deliver on the commitments in the Fifth Plenum to allow markets to play a greater role as it consistently says it wants.

    We need Japan to stick to all three arrows of its bold plan. To deliver not just stimulus but the structural change to deliver the sustainably higher growth rates it so badly needs.

    In countries like Russia and Brazil we need greater efforts to diversify, away from state owned companies and to increase investment, particularly in infrastructure.

    And in our continent of Europe I’m tired of seeing yet more action plans for completing the single market and yet more calls for free trade deals. I want to see those plans put into effect.

    That is part of the reform we are now seeking in the EU.

    Our global institutions can play their part too – and up their ambition.

    The theme of Davos this year is the digital economy.

    And we should give our global institutions a reboot.

    Take trade.

    Opening up markets with trade deals can help all your businesses grow, helping every economy you operate in.

    I welcome the recent trade agreements in Nairobi, but it is simply unacceptable that the Doha Round of trade talks that were kicked off in 2001 have still not been concluded.

    It is no easy task but the World Trade Organisation has a strong leader. Let’s get behind him.

    Or take the IMF.

    The IMF tells us reforming the supply side of economies by backing competition can boost growth.

    So I want the Fund to hold countries feet to the fire – tell us when we are not doing enough to reform.

    Christine Lagarde has shown real leadership and guided the IMF through a very difficult period with integrity and intelligence.

    I was the Finance Minister who proposed her for the job 5 years ago.

    Yesterday I nominated her again, for a second term, so she can complete the job.

    And we will need more from the G20 too.

    China will lead this year and the focus – on trade, and on competitive reforms – dovetail with what we need from the WTO and the IMF.

    Working together across these institutions we should make it a year of action.

    For as that Chinese saying goes, talk does not cook rice.

    And in turbulent times we need action to deliver economic security at home. At its heart are sound public finances.

    When we came to office in 2010 the deficit was over 10% of GDP. £1 in every £4 the country spent had to be borrowed.

    We’ve dramatically reduced that deficit – but it remains too high. So does our debt.

    The Budget last summer and the Spending Review that followed took further difficult decisions so that we turn that deficit into a surplus.

    I said at the time that we needed that surplus as the precaution against tough times ahead. People said it wasn’t necessary, we should run a deficit forever.

    I think events at the start of this new year have borne out our judgement. They serve as a salutary reminder that we need to do everything we can to fix our public finances and build our resistance for whatever lies ahead.

    Reducing government spending is easy to talk about; but hard to deliver.

    Every government budget has its pressure groups who will go on our TV and radio to defend every pound we spend. But we have persevered in the patient work of saving money and reducing borrowing.

    In the UK we are seeing what independent observers like the OBR describe as the most sustained reduction in government consumption in over 100 years.

    Indeed, it’s the biggest fiscal consolidation any G7 economy has achieved in modern history.

    You, the business community, have consistently backed us as we’ve taken these difficult decisions – because you know that there`s no security unless a country lives within its means.

    Just as we’ve put the public purse on a stable footing we’ve radically reformed financial stability too.

    People ask me about whether we’re keeping an eye on levels of private debt. Yes we are.

    Indeed, I created the new Financial Policy Committee in the Bank of England precisely to spot those kind of risks.

    The Committee has already taken action to limit bubbles in the housing market, and require our banks to hold more capital.

    It’s looking at Buy-to-Let mortgages and it’s made it very clear it will take further action if needed.

    For economic security is a foundation that every working person and every company operating in our country gains from.

    Sound public finances, a sound financial system.

    These don’t happen by accident.

    They’re not a consequence of speeches… They require hard decisions, persistence and action. And we are delivering it.

    Of course, stability is essential, but it is not by itself enough.

    After all, graveyards are pretty stable places.

    We need a dynamic economy.

    We need major reforms to improve our productivity, which is the key to sustained rises in living standards.

    We start with education and skills.

    It’s been a perennial British weakness. Lots of governments have talked about it as a priority.

    But changing schools, demanding excellence and driving up standards is easier said than done.

    The vested interests gather. The unions circle the wagon around the status quo.

    But we’ve challenged that status quo – and I think people will look back on the far-reaching reforms we’ve made to schools under Michael Gove and Nicky Morgan as one of the most important economic and social reforms any post-war government has undertaken.

    Five years ago 200 schools were academies; today over 5000 are.

    Our reforms mean 1.4 million more pupils are being taught in good or outstanding schools.

    Our reforms mean millions of new apprenticeships, giving young people the chance to learn a trade.

    And despite all the protests, we raised student loans and now our universities are flourishing, many rank among the best in the world, and more kids from low income backgrounds are going to college than ever before.

    Now under the leadership of my friend and colleague Sajid Javid we’re pushing forward with more apprenticeships funded by a levy, more improvements in schools and university reforms – again bitterly opposed – but absolutely right.

    Not just talking about excellence, but delivering it.

    As well as investing in people we must invest in hard infrastructure

    In Victorian times we led the world in rail.

    The first inter-city railway in the world was British, the fastest steam locomotive in history was British.

    But then we fell back.

    Now I want us to get back the cutting edge, building new high speed lines.

    Again, we faced opposition. Everyone is in favour of infrastructure in general until you propose something specific. But now the budgets for HS2 are set, the legislation is going through Parliament and construction will soon begin.

    We’re also backing the largest road investment programme since the 1970s, building new nuclear power and investing in renewable energy too.

    And we’re now trying to instil long term thinking in all our infrastructure planning – taking it out of the day-to-day political fight.

    Crossrail took 20 years to get off the ground because a political consensus couldn’t be found.

    It was the first project I was asked to cancel, and the first project I gave the green light to – and now this awe-inspiring underground railway is taking shape.

    I’m not going to stand by and let British people travel for longer to work, or pay more for their utilities just because we struggle to get political consensus for the big decisions.

    That’s precisely why I wanted to set up the National Infrastructure Commission – it’s why I reached out for the very best person to help me set it up in Andrew Adonis.

    And now I’m looking forward to reading their first report before the Budget on how we can improve transport in the north and in London and every region across the country.

    We are also committed to creating a competitive economy. Now again, we know, competition doesn’t always happen if you leave it to the market alone.

    That’s why in November we published a new plan to break up monopolies and back new entrants.

    Why shouldn’t customers choose their water provider? Why can’t more pharmacies deliver drugs online? Why can’t supermarkets offer legal services? Of course, there will be protests from those whose businesses are shielded by existing regulation.

    We need action to let competition flourish, back the new company that doesn’t always have a seat at events like this, and put the customers first.

    And we need to improve connectivity.

    We start from a decent base: British households are pretty savvy when it comes to the internet.

    The average Briton spends £1500 online each year with the internet contributing more than 10% of our GDP – higher than anywhere else in the G20.

    We are the top destination in Europe for Foreign Direct Investment and the leading FinTech hub in Europe.

    These are encouraging signs. Because a digital economy is a productive one

    But here’s another statistic for you: just a 10% increase in the UK’s digital density could add £40 billion to GDP by 2020.

    Those are the sort of gains we must grab

    That’s why we will be publishing our far-reaching Digital Strategy this year, setting out what we will do to ensure that the benefits of digital are felt throughout the economy.

    And we must go on building stronger and deeper links with the rest of the world.

    That’s why events like this are important Because yes, it is true that growth in emerging markets has slowed recently, down from 7.5% a year in 2010 to 4% a year in 2015.

    But even with this slower pace of growth, the emerging economies are still expected to have accounted for 70% of all the growth in the world in 2015.

    We don’t deliver sustained growth by becoming insular and isolated.

    We’ll protect ourselves by reaching out to the world and broadening our links.

    By looking to each and every trading opportunity.

    So that we are doing business with many countries, and many sectors. That`s why we are determined to pursue reform of the EU and achieve a better relationship for Britain with our European partners, as David Cameron explained yesterday.

    That’s why, earlier this week I welcomed Indian Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in Downing Street and we reaffirmed the strength of our economic relationship, jointly announcing the upcoming issuance of the first-ever Indian offshore Rupee bond in London – cementing our future as the world’s centre of finance.

    And it’s why I hosted the first ever UK – Brazil Economic and Financial Dialogue in London at the end of last year.

    These relationships help to boost trade for British businesses – exports from the UK to the emerging economies have increased by 16.5% since 2010. And let me just say a few more words about China.

    We want China to rebalance.

    All of the troubling statistics – slowing energy use, low metals demand—are signs of the same thing, a shift to a consumption based economy.

    So my main message on China is that we won’t rubberneck and fret about each new bump on the road.

    We’re in it for the long haul.

    We are going to support China on the difficult route of economic reform that it is following.

    We want to be China’s best partner in the West.

    Some say the stock market volatility in China means we’re wrong to strengthen our economic ties.

    But those critics can’t look beyond the next days’ headlines.

    China is an economic colossus, it is the second biggest economy on the planet. It’s a huge part of our world’s future.

    Any economy that size you want to trade with, whether it is growing at 7%, 6% or 5%.

    Even at this growth rate, China will add an economy equivalent to the size of Germany’s to world output by the end of this decade. So we strengthen our links across the world.

    But we will only thrive as an outward looking nation that wants to trade with the world if we have a pro-business government.

    So my aim, and what I’m working to achieve, is making Britain the best place to be a global firm.

    For five years we’ve unashamedly backed business, large and small.

    You asked us to set a permanent level for the Annual Investment Allowance; we did that and made it bigger too. At £200,000: it’s at its highest ever permanent level.

    You asked us to reform R&D tax relief, so we made it more generous.

    You asked us to deal with the punitive 50% income tax rate because it was destroying enterprise – and though it was not popular, I cut it.

    But the business tax reform I am most proud of is the reform we’ve made to corporation tax.

    When I became Chancellor it stood at 28% – and as a result, Britain did not stand out as a low tax destination for business. Today it does.

    In Budget after Budget I’ve cut the rate – from 28% to 20%. The lowest in the G20.

    I could stop there. Let other countries catch up. Or we could press on and press home our advantage.

    The future favours the bold. So I’m cutting corporation tax again, to 19% and then to 18% by the end of the decade.

    Let us forge ahead and let others follow our dust tracks.

    Overall the business tax cuts we’ve announced since 2010 will be worth nearly £100 billion to business this decade.

    To repeat, that is £100 billion of support.

    At times when we’ve had to make many other difficult decisions on the public finances I hope those facts make my priorities clear.

    And I want to assure you of another thing.

    That these choices are born from deeply held views I hold about enterprise and free markets.

    I`ll be frank with you: There aren’t many votes in cutting taxes for business.

    And so we don’t pander to business to win your votes.

    We support firms like yours because we honestly believe that the business community shows some of the best British values.

    Of self-reliance, of building for the future.

    Of innovating to solve problems, and of open and fair competition.

    That is what the UK is about.

    That`s what this government is about.

    That is what your businesses do. And without your success there are no jobs, no resources for public services, no future.

    We’ve all come a long way together since I spoke to you at this lunch four years ago.

    There were bumps on the way, but we stuck to the course. Now, as markets around the world heat up, we in Britain will keep a cool head.

    Because we have further to go to achieve our aim – and become the most prosperous major economy in the world by 2030s.

    My door is always open to you.

    I will need your ideas to achieve that goal.

    And I’m looking forward to working with you all in the years to come to make it happen.

    For, as the team who’ve provided this meal today know: talk, my friends, does not cook rice.

  • Andrew Jones – 2016 Speech on Low Emission Vehicles

    andrewjones

    Below is the text of the speech made by Andrew Jones, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport, at the Lancaster Hotel in London on 21 January 2016.

    Introduction

    I am really grateful for the chance to speak today.

    And thank you to Chargemaster for hosting today’s conference.

    It’s great to hear about your work and ideas for the future.

    There’s a real buzz around the electric vehicle market nowadays.

    And I mean that figuratively, as well as literally.

    The shift we are seeing reminds me of the spread of the internet in the 1990s.

    The internet started small, as a niche interest, but then it snowballed, and now it’s hard to imagine being without it.

    I think we are seeing a similar picture emerging for ultra low emission vehicles in Britain today.

    ULEV sales are not just growing rapidly.

    They are rocketing.

    Plug-in vehicle registrations reached a record high in 2015, as 28,188 new ULEVs arrived on UK roads, more than the past 5 years’ totals rolled into one.

    The UK now has the most comprehensive rapid chargepoint network in Europe, and home-grown companies such as Chargemaster are making the UK’s ULEV industry a private sector success story.

    Ambition

    That’s a success story the government wants to see continue.

    And that’s why in the last Spending Review we increased our support for the British ULEV market to £600 million over the next 5 years.

    Since 2011, more than 50,000 plug in grant claims have been made, and our new grants will ensure a further 100,000 people will get financial support when purchasing ULEVs.

    And we are continuing the highly valued home charge scheme under which home-owners can receive a grant for most of the cost of installing a home chargepoint.

    And we are working with local authorities to increase numbers of on-street chargers for owners who don’t have off-street parking.

    By 2050, we want virtually every car and van on the road to be zero emission.

    Councils in the capital and across the country have similar objectives, and we will shortly announce the winners of a £40 million Go Ultra Low Cities scheme.

    The successful local authorities have clear plans for their own city-wide ultra-low emission vehicle revolutions, and will receive funding to achieve those plans.

    The rationale for this kind of local funding is clear.

    It’s often in the local area that the benefits of ULEV vehicles are most plainly felt — as contributing to cleaner air, healthier lungs and lower noise pollution.

    But this transformation won’t be limited to the areas covered by our Go Ultra Low Cities scheme.

    ULEVs are an opportunity — and an increasing necessity — for everywhere in the country.

    Anyone who was in London yesterday will have seen the pall of smog over the city.

    Installing the right ULEV infrastructure in London is challenging.

    After our Plugged in Places funding there are more than 1500 chargepoints in London.

    But greater progress is possible, and necessary.

    So I am pleased that Transport for London have high ambitions for their ULEV delivery plan, which is moving towards implementation.

    Challenge

    What is so important about the charging network is that growth in ULEVs can only continue if the public’s confidence in their ability to charge is maintained.

    The vehicles on display here offer everything a driver could want.

    They look fantastic, and drive well.

    There are now more than 29 models on sale in the UK — enough to suit all needs, and the choice is increasing all the time.

    Some cars be fully charged in as little as 20 minutes — not much more than the time it takes to drop the kids off at school.

    So chargepoint technology is improving and reliability is getting better and better.

    But drivers need to know that the chargepoint network in their area is comprehensive, expanding, and well-maintained; so that they can drive with confidence to the supermarket, the high street, or the local primary school.

    And there’s lots that local authorities can do to improve their chargepoint network.

    Such as requiring new building developments to include chargepoints, providing dedicated parking bays for local ULEV car clubs or allowing preferential access for ULEVs in low emissions zones.

    And when drivers have invested in a ULEV, they need the right information so they can set out with confidence; to know where their nearest chargepoint is, and that it’s in good working order.

    Good information doesn’t help just existing drivers, it also helps newcomers take their first plunge into the ULEV market.

    Through measures such as these, local authorities have a strong hand in encouraging the uptake of ULEV vehicles, and I’m really keen to see them play that hand well.

    Conclusion

    The internet only really snowballed when internet users, providers, website retailers and investors came together in sufficient numbers to create a tipping point

    We’re reaching that tipping point with the ULEV market.

    But the closer we can work together — across government, manufacturers, chargepoint hosts and network operators.

    The quicker we can transform our neighbourhoods.

    And deliver the cleaner air and quieter streets we need.

    That collaboration is our task in 2016.

    And we are making a great start at today’s conference.

    Thank you.