Category: Speeches

  • Andrew Griffith – 2023 Speech at a FIX Trading Conference

    Andrew Griffith – 2023 Speech at a FIX Trading Conference

    The speech made by Andrew Griffith, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, on 9 March 2023.

    Introduction

    Good morning everyone and thank you for the invitation to speak to you today.

    I am also glad to see that Professor Hübner will be speaking afterwards, in a reflection of our shared commitment to the highest standards of global market regulation.

    And we couldn’t be in a better place to discuss these issues.

    No one is sure how the market got its name, but Old Billingsgate has been synonymous with fish since the 16th Century, and it was the century after that Parliament passed an act to make it a “free and open market for all sorts of fish whatsoever”.

    There was one exception: the sale of eels from Dutch fisherman.

    As London boomed, the city’s population began eating so many eels that the domestic stock couldn’t keep up.

    And over time, the Dutch had shown they were the only people who knew how to transport live eels in bulk. British ships couldn’t manage it. And so, the Dutch established a de facto monopoly on eel sales in London.

    There’s two pertinent points here.

    One, this venue, having dealt with slippery animals before is well suited to accommodating politicians.

    And two: some countries are better in certain sectors. The Dutch had the eel trade, and we have financial services.

    But jokes aside (because, of course, the Dutch do share with us a long-standing tradition in financial services) this sector is incredibly valuable to our country.

    This is an industry that contributes 12% of the UK’s total economic output and employs over 2.2 million people.

    It’s the UK’s largest net exporting industry and its largest taxpayer.

    So let me start by saying “thank you”. Thank you for taking risk, employing and developing your people and the valued contribution you make. I never forget that you have a choice where to locate or to raise or invest capital.

    Because it’s a competitive world out there and the UK must and will compete for every pound, dollar or euro of business.

    And it’s my job to make sure we put in place the support environment in which you can do so.

    Led by the Prime Minister, supported in lockstep by the Chancellor and me, this government firmly believes that financial services and private capital are at the heart of the solutions to the national and international challenges we face, from aging populations to protecting nature, from supporting left behind communities to conquering diseases.

    So, I want to assure you of the importance that the government places on this sector. Not just through my words today, but through our actions.

    Capital Markets

    In particular, one of the UK economy’s great strengths is its capital markets.

    The UK is blessed with capital markets that are among the deepest, most liquid and most competitive anywhere in the world.

    We are Europe’s leading hub for investment, and the second largest globally. We have the most international equities market and two of the world’s largest clearing houses.

    Our capital markets are relied upon by some of the world’s largest businesses – and, by the way, will be crucial in funding the global transition to clean, low carbon energy.

    It explains why, in 2021 alone, more than £17bn of new capital was raised for firms in the UK on the London Stock Exchange alone, a 15-year high, with over 120 deals completed.

    How do we account for this achievement?

    It’s through our fundamental strengths such as the rule of law, English language, a fortuitous time zone, and the fact that London is one of the world’s most diverse and liveable cities.

    It’s through the expertise of firms that base themselves here, whether that be in finance itself or all the services that support it, from legal to accounting.

    But this strength is also fostered through innovation, competition and high regulatory standards.

    The government of which I am a part has a clear vision: making UK regulation more proportionate and simpler… keeping it relevant for a modern world and enabling innovation.

    This government is focused on delivering this vision for the financial services sector. And when I say focussed on delivering, that’s exactly what I mean. My mantra is delivery, delivery, delivery.

    Capital Markets reforms

    So, building on the strengths of capital markets, we are pressing ahead with an ambitious programme of capital markets reforms.

    We are implementing the practitioner led reforms suggested by Lord Hill and Mark Austin – who have provided concrete steps to help us be more competitive.

    This includes completely overhauling the UK’s Prospectus Regime to widen participation in capital markets, improve the efficiency of fundraising for companies and improve the quality of information investors receive.

    We will do this by repealing the existing Prospectus Regulation and replacing it with a new regime tailored to the UK. Our new regime will be simpler, more agile, and more effective, and we have already published draft legislation to do that.

    We aren’t stopping there – we are also keen to accelerate the settlement of financial trades, and as part of the Edinburgh Reforms we announced the creation of an industry taskforce to see how we can do so, such as by moving to a ‘T+1’ standard.

    Faster settlement could reduce counterparty risk, increase efficiency and promote greater automation of back office processes.

    It will ensure that the UK continues to be a world leader in this area.

    The taskforce is being chaired by Charlie Geffen, who is bringing together the industry to recommend an approach that works for the UK.

    Separately, we have also set up the Digitisation Taskforce, which will drive forward the digitisation of all remaining paper share certificates in the UK.

    It will also set out how we can improve communications between different parts of the market, and how investors will be able to have far better interactions with the companies they invest in.

    This work is being led by Sir Douglas Flint and I am looking forward to receiving his interim report this spring.

    I know that some of those in the room are already involved in these initiatives. Thank you for your insight and I look forward to seeing your recommendations.

    We are also reforming our rulebook for wholesale markets through the Financial Services and Markets Bill.

    Those changes will boost liquidity by giving greater choice to firms on where and how to trade.

    To give you one example which I know is of particular interest to many of you.

    The Bill will allow the Treasury and the FCA to put a framework in place to facilitate the development of a consolidated tape by 2024.

    Transparent and timely data plays a key role in helping markets to function efficiently and the tape, by acting as one single source, will improve liquidity and lead to lower trading costs.

    This is particularly true for the fixed income markets, given how fragmentated the data currently is.

    And there’s more…

    In December, we announced that we are taking a closer look at retail disclosure and short selling.

    On retail disclosure, the government is committed to repealing the current PRIIPs regulation as a matter of priority and replacing it with an alternative framework that works for the UK.

    As for short selling, I see it as an important tool in financial markets. The UK should therefore have regulations that support it and do not place excessive burdens on market participants.

    Both of these areas are ripe for reform with the common theme of reducing red tape and making markets work better.

    Let me also share with you some news that I am announcing this morning.

    To ensure that the UK continues to be one of the best places for companies to list and trade, we need to ensure that investors have access to the information they need to make investment decisions.

    Companies need to feel confident that their investors will understand them, their goals and ambitions, and embark with them on their growth journey.

    This is why the volume and quality of research matters. That translates into more liquid markets and can help obtain higher valuations.

    I am therefore pleased to announce that another City expert … Hogan Lovells Partner and financial services regulatory expert Rachel Kent, will lead the Investment Research Review.

    The Review will gather evidence on the impact that the UK’s investment research offering has on both public and private markets, recognising the role that research plays throughout a company’s life cycle. While a lot broader in scope, Rachel will also look specifically at the impact of the MiFID unbundling rules when considering solutions.

    With her experience and knowledge of the sector, as well as the regulatory framework, I have every confidence that Rachel will do a fantastic job at convening the sector, looking at the evidence and finding solutions to improve the UK market for investment research, before delivering her recommendations in June.

    FSM Bill

    As previously mentioned, a key part of delivering our reform agenda is the Financial Services and Markets Bill, currently progressing through its final weeks in Parliament.

    Without getting into the weeds of the Bill, it will enable us to progress our ambitious plan to replace retained EU law with an approach that is tailored to the needs of UK markets.

    Central to this is the new duty on the FCA and PRA to facilitate the international competitiveness of the UK and its growth in the medium-to-long term.

    We will do this in a balanced, ordered way – and will only target policy change where there are clear benefits to the sector and the wider economy.

    Of course, as the regulators take on more responsibility for setting rules once we repeal retained EU law, it is right that their objectives reflect the critical role of the financial services sector in supporting the wider economy.

    Increased responsibility for the regulators must be balanced with clear accountability, appropriate democratic input, and transparent oversight.

    To that end, the Bill includes measures to increase the accountability of the regulators to Parliament, strengthen their relationship to the Treasury, make them publish more of their performance metrics and enhance their engagement with stakeholders – including many of you here today.

    A sector at the forefront of technology and innovation

    And in changing – or innovating – our regulation, we are simply in keeping with the innovative traditions of this sector.

    We are one of the world’s top two financial hubs and the world’s largest net exporter of financial services.

    Your capability to deploy capital behind innovation combined with our research strengths, makes the Prime Minister – the entire Government’s – aspiration to be a technology superpower by 2030 ambitious but highly achievable.

    The financial services sector is driving this agenda, and leading the change brought by technology and innovation.

    And the government is there to help you drive that change…

    We are creating a Financial Market Infrastructure Sandbox, which will help industry adopt and scale digital solutions that could radically change the way markets operate, and lead to markets that are more efficient, transparent and resilient.

    The first FMI Sandbox will be up and running this year. And as we learn from the outcomes of this flagship initiative, more can be established.

    We’re looking forward to watching firms grow in the sandbox, moving on from buckets and spades to world beating technological tools.

    We have recently published a wide-ranging consultation paper, setting out our proposals to establish a comprehensive framework for regulating cryptoasset activities in the UK, providing clarity for consumers and firms.

    By capitalising on the potential benefits offered by crypto – and the underlying technology – we are strengthening our position as a world-leader in fintech and unlocking further growth opportunities and innovation.

    And last month, the Treasury and the Bank of England issued a joint consultation on a potential digital pound in the UK.

    This is a major milestone in our work in this area, marking the end of the research and exploration phase and the beginning of the design phase of work.

    We are also taking forward other initiatives in the innovation space, such as the new Centre for Finance, Innovation and Technology – or CFIT -launched last week and backed by £5 million of Treasury seed funding. CFIT will champion the UK’s world-leading fintech sector, helping firms to create high-skilled jobs across the country and to achieve truly global scale.

    Concluding remarks

    Ladies and gentlemen, this is an exciting time.

    We face challenges, yes.

    But in confronting them we also find opportunity.

    Opportunity to do things differently…

    …to seize the moment…

    …to make our country the world’s most competitive location for financial services.

    It’s an ambitious, yet achievable agenda.

    It will require our joint enterprise and industry.

    But I know that together we can achieve great things. Thank you again for your welcome, and all that you do.

  • Daisy Cooper – 2023 Comments on the Personal Conduct of Steve Brine

    Daisy Cooper – 2023 Comments on the Personal Conduct of Steve Brine

    The comments made by Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrat MP for St Albans, on 9 March 2023.

    Yet another Conservative scandal…

    Steve Brine should immediately step down from the Health Select Committee, and the PM should launch an independent investigation into this damning evidence.

    Brine cannot be in post whilst these allegations hang over his head.

  • Anneliese Dodds – 2023 Comments on the Personal Conduct of Steve Brine

    Anneliese Dodds – 2023 Comments on the Personal Conduct of Steve Brine

    The comments made by Anneliese Dodds, the Chair of the Labour Party, on 9 March 2023.

    If Steve Brine has broken lobbying rules he must face the consequences. Rishi Sunak has been too weak to stand up to his party or his cabinet. Will he take the appropriate action in this case?

  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2023 Statement After Russian Military Attack (9 March 2023)

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2023 Statement After Russian Military Attack (9 March 2023)

    The statement made by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of Ukraine, on 9 March 2023.

    It’s been a difficult night. A massive rocket attack across the country. Kyiv, Kirovohrad, Dnipro, Odesa, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia regions. Attacks on critical infrastructure and residential buildings. Unfortunately, there are injured and dead. My condolences to the families.

    All services are working. The energy system is being restored. Restrictions were imposed in all regions.

    The enemy fired 81 missiles in an attempt to intimidate Ukrainians again, returning to their miserable tactics. The occupiers can only terrorise civilians. That’s all they can do. But it won’t help them. They won’t avoid responsibility for everything they have done.

    We thank the guardians of our skies and everyone who helps to overcome the consequences of the occupiers’ sneaking attacks.

  • Nancy Faeser – 2023 Letter Asking for Belarus to Be Removed from 2024 Euros

    Nancy Faeser – 2023 Letter Asking for Belarus to Be Removed from 2024 Euros

    Sections of the letter sent by Nancy Faeser, the German Minister of the Interior, to Aleksander Čeferin, the President of UEFA, on 16 September 2022.

    Not only Russia, which is waging a war of aggression in violation of international law, but also Belarus as an essential supporter of the Russian leadership should be excluded from all international football matches and tournaments.

    The suspension of Russian and Belarusian officials from the influential bodies of international sports federations as football must live up to its responsible role and show a united stance against this form of disregard for human rights. All those responsible must be deprived of every opportunity to participate in sport, exert influence or represent themselves in any other way.

  • Steve Barclay – 2023 Statement on the Spring Booster Programme and Evergreen Offer

    Steve Barclay – 2023 Statement on the Spring Booster Programme and Evergreen Offer

    The statement made by Steve Barclay, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 8 March 2023.

    Our Covid vaccination programme has saved tens of thousands of lives across the country and helped to ease pressure on the NHS during a challenging winter.

    It is important that we continue to ensure the most vulnerable are protected through a targeted seasonal vaccination offer for those most at risk, which is why I have accepted advice from the independent Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation on this year’s spring booster programme. This will top up the protection of those considered at highest clinical risk, spring booster vaccines will be offered to adults aged 75 years and over; residents in a care home for older adults and immunosuppressed individuals aged 5 years and over.

    The spring booster programme is due to end on 30 June and as we live with the virus without past restrictions on our freedoms, I am also announcing that the offer of a first or second dose of Covid vaccine will end at this time.

    Covid continues to infect thousands of people every week, so I strongly encourage anyone who has not yet taken up the offer of a first or second dose of vaccine to join the 42 million who have already come forward for both doses.

  • Gary Lineker – 2023 Comments Following Asylum Post

    Gary Lineker – 2023 Comments Following Asylum Post

    The comments made by Gary Lineker on Twitter on 8 March 2023.

    I have never known such love and support in my life than I’m getting this morning (England World Cup goals aside, possibly). I want to thank each and every one of you. It means a lot. I’ll continue to try and speak up for those poor souls that have no voice. Cheers all. ??

  • Chi Onwurah – 2023 Speech on the Science and Technology Framework

    Chi Onwurah – 2023 Speech on the Science and Technology Framework

    The speech made by Chi Onwurah, the Shadow Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, in the House of Commons on 7 March 2023.

    I welcome the Secretary of State to her place, and I thank her for the advance notice of her statement.

    I welcome the framework. It will take pride of place on my virtual bookshelf next to the Government’s innovation strategy, the R&D road map, the science plan, numerous grand challenges, industrial strategies, sector deals and two UKRI reorganisations. We have seen nine changes of Science Minister in five years. Britain is a world-leading science nation, and we deserve a framework with a longer shelf life than a lettuce, especially given the shortage of salad items under this Government.

    It is good to see the Government setting out the principles for identifying the scientific capabilities that we need to protect and grow, and the outcomes that we wish to see from science, as well as seeking to increase STEM skills in teaching and support for start-ups and spin-outs. On the eve of International Women’s Day, and as a chartered engineer, I enthusiastically welcome the ambition to diversify the science and technology workforce. Let us work together to make that ambition a reality.

    I have a number of questions for the Secretary of State. How do the five critical technologies in the framework relate to the 17 sensitive areas in the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and the five key growth industries in the autumn statement? When will each critical technology have the appropriate regulatory framework that she talked about? Science-driven industries critical to our future prosperity, such as space, autonomous vehicles, batteries and steel, are not even mentioned. Labour has committed to an industrial strategy council on a statutory footing. Do Government have an industrial strategy?

    The framework rightly says that procurement is key to innovation. Why, then, have the Government objected to our amendments to the Procurement Bill to ensure that procurement is not captured by cronyism? The Government committed to £22 billion of science funding by 2027. Will the Secretary of State say what the current funding commitment is now? How much of the £370 million mentioned in the framework is truly new? If it is new, how is she paying for it? The Government promised that science spend will double, but the framework talks of raising science spend outside the greater south-east by only 40%. That suggests that our regional centres of innovation will not benefit from this increased funding. Is that all she has to say about the importance of regional innovation? What of the clusters that the Science Minister talks up so much?

    Start-ups and scale-ups are key to sustainable green growth, but the £10 million uplift to the seed fund mentioned here would not meet the early-stage funding requirements of one future Google. Will the Government adopt the recommendations of Labour’s start-up and scale-up review to drive innovative growth across our country?

    The biggest question is what is not in the framework—Horizon Europe, the world’s biggest science programme. Did the Secretary of State really think that she could get through the statement without even mentioning it? Thanks to the Tories, our brightest and best UK scientists are still having to choose between the funding that they desperately need and the country that they love. British research and British business are feeling the chilling impact of not being part of the world’s greatest scientific collaboration. Can the Secretary of State confirm that now that the Windsor framework has been agreed, Horizon association will follow? Specifically, will the Chancellor’s Budget next week include association funding?

    Labour believes that innovation and science are critical to building strong and self-sufficient national and regional economies. We see a clear path from investing in scientific research to the jobs that people can raise a family on. With our ambitious national missions, Labour would stoke the innovation engine to drive high-skilled growth, access new and diverse talent pools and catalyse regions that have been left out of science investment. I fear that this framework is another wish list designed to be shelved or scrapped at the earliest convenience of a Government addicted to sticking-plaster policies. Only a Labour Government, with our long-term industrial strategy, will deliver the science sector and the jobs that our country needs.

    Michelle Donelan

    I thank the hon. Member for her comments, but in reality it is this Government who are here today delivering jobs and a better future for the British public. As I said in my statement, we are focusing not only on actions today, but on a strategic long-term approach to ensure that we are a science and technology superpower by 2030.

    The hon. Member said that there are more technologies than the five that we have identified. Of course there are. The ones we have identified are the key strategic ones, but there is a great deal of work that my ministerial team and I are doing. On funding, we are investing £20 billion by 2024-25, as we have said on the record. The £370 million that we announced yesterday is a new spending commitment that we had not previously outlined. On geographical spread across the nation, we have made a strategic commitment to ensure that 55% of the spend is outside the south-east.

    The framework that we have set out is just one part of the work that my Department is doing. Let us not forget that it was established just four weeks ago. In one month, we have not only published a comprehensive framework plan, but got on with key actions to drive the agenda forward. This Government mean business. We have worked very hard in the past few weeks to talk collaboratively with industry and with researchers.

    I am not going to take the Opposition’s word about what is wrong. Let us have a look at what experts and people on the ground have to say. Professor Sir Ian Boyd, president of the Royal Society of Biology, says:

    “Science and technology is already a central plank of modern life. Putting this centre-stage in government strategy is essential and welcome.”

    Professor Julia Black, president of the British Academy, says:

    “The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology’s announcements reaffirm the Government’s ambition to put the UK at the forefront of global research, development and innovation”.

    I could go on all day long, because our announcement has been wholeheartedly welcomed.

    The hon. Member asked about Horizon. This is an announcement about our framework—that is what is on the annunciator screen—and not about Horizon, but I will answer her question anyway. We have not changed our position on Horizon. For the past two years, we have tried to associate. It was in the original deal, and we welcome the comments from the EU. Of course, terms would have to be favourable for the UK—we have lost two years—and we would have to ensure value for money for the taxpayer. We cannot wait around for another two years, because we want to put our researchers first. That is why we have done the responsible and right thing and worked up a plan B, which stands ready should we need it, but our position on Horizon has not changed. We look forward to continuing our conversations with the EU.

  • Michelle Donelan – 2023 Statement on the Science and Technology Framework

    Michelle Donelan – 2023 Statement on the Science and Technology Framework

    The statement made by Michelle Donelan, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, in the House of Commons on 7 March 2023.

    The creation of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology marks a watershed moment for science, innovation and technology in the UK. We now have a Government Department that focuses on a single mission: to make the UK a science and technology superpower. Science and technology is absolutely critical to the UK’s future prosperity and security, and to the health and wellbeing of our citizens and our environment. That is why it is a central pillar of the integrated review. Countries that embrace science and technology will be prosperous and secure, home to the innovators and technology companies of the future. Those that don’t, won’t.

    My vision for DSIT starts from an extraordinary position. Last year, the UK joined only China and the US in having a technology sector worth over $1 trillion. Despite our relative size, Britain outperforms our closest competitors and we are a main challenger nation to the US and China in many areas. We have four of the world’s top 10 universities. Just eight of our university towns are home to more unicorns than the whole of France and Germany combined. However, when other countries are investing further and faster in science and tech, we must do the same. We have an incredibly unique and powerful platform from which to grow and innovate for the benefit of the British people, which is why I have said I plan to take a ruthlessly outcome-focused approach to this new Department.

    I will ensure that in both the short term and the long term, our work is based on improving people’s daily lives in ways they can feel and see around them. The Government’s vision for the future is an NHS that uses artificial intelligence to find, treat and reduce illnesses such as cancer and heart disease, so we have more time with our loved ones. We should have local transport services that allow us to travel faster, safer and cleaner than our parents did. The schools of the future should be powered by the kinds of technology that unlock hidden talents in every child, no matter where they live. As the “Department for the Future”, our focus will be on how science, technology and innovation can ensure the British people live longer, safer, healthier and happier lives.

    Such an important goal requires immediate action, which is why in my first few weeks as Technology Secretary I have been focused relentlessly on action and delivery. I see this as a once-in-a-generation opportunity to send a clear signal around the world that Britain plans to lead the way in science, innovation and technology. The key steps we have taken are as follows.

    Yesterday, we published the UK science and technology framework, which sets out our goals and vision for science and technology in an enduring framework that will see us through to 2030. It has been developed in close collaboration with the UK science and technology sector, and represents a commitment to scaling our ambitions and delivering the most critical action needed to secure strategic advantage through science and technology. The framework is the strategic anchor that Government policy will deliver against, and to which the Government will hold themselves accountable. It sets out 10 things that the Government must do to sustain strategic advantage in science and technology.

    First, we must identify the technologies most critical to the UK’s objectives. Secondly, we must signal the UK’s science and technology strengths and ambitions both at home and abroad to attract talent and investment and boost our global influence. Thirdly, we must boost private and public investment in research and development for economic growth and better productivity.

    Fourthly, we must build on the UK’s already amazing talent and skills base. Fifthly, we must finance innovative science and technology companies. Sixthly, we must use Government procurement to stimulate innovation in key sectors and technologies. Seventhly, we must take international opportunities to shape the global science and technology landscape through strategic international engagement, diplomacy and partnerships.

    Eighthly, we must ensure that science and technology objectives are supported by access to the best physical and digital infrastructure that will attract talent, investment and discoveries. Ninthly, we must leverage post-Brexit freedoms to create world-leading pro-innovation regulation and influence global technological standards. Tenthly, we must create a pro-innovation culture throughout the UK’s public sector to improve the way our public services run.

    We have also taken immediate steps. The delivery of this new framework will begin immediately with an initial raft of projects worth around £500 million, of which £370 million is new money. That will ensure that the UK has the skills and infrastructure to take a global lead in game-changing technologies. That includes £250 million of investment in three truly transformational technologies to build on the UK’s leadership in AI, quantum technologies and engineering biology. That funding will help a range of industries tackle the biggest global challenges such as climate change and healthcare and will form part of our commitment to the five key technologies, which include semiconductors and future telecommunications.

    We have also published Sir Paul Nurse’s “Independent Review of the UK’s Research, Development and Innovation Organisational Landscape”, with recommendations to make the most of the UK’s research organisations, testing different science funding models to support a range of innovative institutional models, such as focused research organisations, working with industry and partners to open up new funding opportunities. Up to £50 million will spur co-investment in science from the private sector and philanthropists, to drive the discoveries of the future, subject to business cases. The Government are already in talks with Schmidt Futures, a philanthropic initiative by Eric and Wendy Schmidt, about additional support of up to $20 million as part of that work.

    Some £117 million of existing funding will create hundreds of new PhDs for AI researchers, and £8 million will help to find the next generation of AI leaders around the world. A £50 million uplift to world-class labs funding will help research institutes and universities to improve facilities, so that UK researchers have access to the very best labs and equipment that they need to keep producing that world-class science. A £10 million uplift to the UK innovation and science seed fund, totalling £50 million, will boost the UK’s next technology and science start-ups, which could be the next Apple, Google or Tesla.

    We have outlined plans to set up an Exascale supercomputer facility—the most powerful compute capability, which could solve problems as complex as nuclear fusion, as well as a programme to provide dedicated compute capacity for important AI research, as part of our initial response to the future of compute review, which was also published yesterday. Some £9 million in Government funding will support the establishment of a quantum computing research centre in Daresbury in the north-west.

    On next steps, each of the 10 framework strands has a lead Department tasked with putting in place a clear action plan, to which they will be accountable during the year. Delivery against those plans will be overseen by the National Science and Technology Council, which will hold Departments to account and drive pace. Alongside the development of those ambitious plans and the framework, we have also set out our initial work under each of the 10 priorities, which will include our skills and talent base.

    On priority technologies, we will develop a pro-innovation approach to regulating AI, which will be detailed in our White Paper in the coming weeks. On R&D investment, we will respond to the Tickell review of research bureaucracy, and Sir Paul Nurse’s review of the research, development and innovation landscape. We will work with industry and partners to increase inward investment by the summer recess. On financing innovative science and technology companies, we will build on the strong track record of the British Business Bank to strengthen support for the UK’s science and technology companies.

    This ambitious plan will focus on getting actions out the door now, as well as a plan for the future. This Government are both reactive and, crucially, proactive when it comes to science and technology, to ensure that we can be a superpower by 2030.

  • Stuart McDonald – 2023 Speech on the Illegal Migration Bill

    Stuart McDonald – 2023 Speech on the Illegal Migration Bill

    The speech made by Stuart McDonald, the SNP spokesperson on Home Affairs, in the House of Commons on 7 March 2023.

    The SNP stands proudly behind the refugee convention and the European convention on human rights. We believe that all who seek asylum and refugee status deserve a fair hearing and we are 100% behind the clear statement from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees that there is no such thing as an illegal asylum seeker.

    Despite the dreary dog-whistle rhetoric, the Home Secretary’s Bill will not lay a solitary finger on people smugglers or people traffickers, but it will cause serious and devastating harm to those who have already endured incredible suffering. Afghans let down by the Government’s utterly failed relocation schemes will be locked up and offshored. People who have fled persecution in Syria, Eritrea or Iran will remain blocked from the asylum system. The policies that have seen hundreds of children go missing from hotels will be enshrined in her Bill. The world-leading modern slavery legislation piloted through by one of her predecessors is about to be ripped to pieces without a single shred of justification. That is what this appalling Bill looks set to deliver, and that is why we will oppose it every step of the way.

    If every country followed the Home Secretary’s example, the whole system of refugee protection around the world would fall to pieces. It is not just that system that will be trashed by this Bill, however, but the UK’s reputation as a place of sanctuary. She spoke about an overwhelmed asylum system, but the only thing that has overwhelmed the asylum system is the Conservative party’s incompetence and mismanagement. One of her own ministerial colleagues described the Rwanda plan as

    “ugly, likely to be counterproductive and of dubious legality”,

    and that beautifully encapsulates what is in this Bill.

    I have two questions for the Home Secretary. First, what happens if an Afghan arrival cannot be removed to Afghanistan, France, Rwanda or anywhere else? Will he or she eventually be admitted to the asylum system? If so, after how long? Secondly, when the Prime Minister meets President Macron, will he be telling him that the UK is prepared to leave the European convention on human rights?

    Suella Braverman

    A lot of passion and fury and fire—I only wish the Scottish Government would bring so much passion to their approach to accommodating asylum seekers, when Scotland currently takes one of the lowest numbers of asylum seekers in our United Kingdom. Our measures set out a comprehensive and coherent plan, combining fairness and compassion.