Category: Health

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Keynote Speech on the NHS

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Keynote Speech on the NHS

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, at the King’s Fund on 12 September 2024.

    [NB, this is the redacted speech issued by 10 Downing Street with political comment removed]

    As you have heard today, Lord Darzi has published his independent report on the state of our NHS.

    It is an incredibly comprehensive analysis. Some of you will have seen it, there are copies available, please read it.

    A raw and honest assessment. That is what we asked for.

    And that is why I wanted to come here to the King’s Fund.

    Home to many of our country’s leading healthcare experts.

    Because your contributions are going to be vital.

    As we get this precious institution back on its feet,

    And build an NHS that is truly fit for the future.

    And look, our starting point couldn’t be further from that goal.

    Public satisfaction in the NHS has fallen…

    [Please note political content redacted here.]

    To an all-time low today.

    Think of the impact that has on staff who are putting in so much day in day out, knowing that confidence is at an all-time low.

    And that is because, as everybody in the country knows, the last government broke the NHS.

    But until this morning, we didn’t know the full scale of the damage, which is laid bare in the report.

    Even Lord Darzi, with all his years of experience.

    Is shocked by what he discovered.

    It is unforgiveable.

    And people have every right to be angry.

    It’s not just because the NHS is so personal to all of us.

    Or because when people can’t get the care they need…

    They’re off work sick, with huge costs for our economy.

    It’s because some of these failings are literally life and death.

    Take the waiting times in A&E…

    More than 100,000 infants waited more than 6 hours last year…

    And nearly a tenth of all patients are now waiting for 12 hours or more…

    That’s not just a source of fear and anxiety…

    It’s leading to thousands of avoidable deaths….

    And that phrase avoidable deaths should always be chilling.

    That’s people’s loved ones who could have been saved.

    Doctors and nurses whose whole vocation is to save them…

    Hampered from doing so.

    It’s devastating. Heartbreaking. Infuriating…

    And that’s just scratching the surface.

    High-risk heart attack patients waiting too long for urgent treatment.

    Cancer diagnosis patients waiting too long….

    With cancer death rates higher than other countries

    And when it comes to getting help for mental health …

    …. 345,000 are waiting over a year.

    That’s roughly the entire population of Leicester.

    [Please note political content redacted here.]

    Covid hit our NHS harder than healthcare systems in other countries.

    The NHS delayed, cancelled, or postponed far more routine care during the pandemic than any comparable health system.

    And why?

    Because our NHS went into the pandemic in a much more fragile state.

    Fewer doctor, fewer nurses and fewer beds than most other high income health systems

    [Please note political content redacted here.]

    What Lord Darzi describes as a “calamity without international precedent”.

    A “scorched earth” approach to health reform, the effects of which are still felt to this day.

    And at the same time, they inflicted what the report describes as:

    “the most austere decade since the NHS was founded”

    Crumbling buildings.

    Decrepit portacabins.

    Mental health patients in Victorian-era cells infested with vermin.

    When we say they broke the NHS…

    That’s not performative politics.

    Just look at it.

    The 2010s were a lost decade for our NHS.

    [Please note political content redacted here.]

    And it’s not just the state of our National Health Service in crisis.

    It’s also the state of our national health.

    We’re becoming a sicker society.

    Spending more of our lives in ill-health than ten years ago.

    There are 2.8 million people economically inactive because of long-term sickness.

    As today’s report makes clear –

    “The NHS is not contributing to national prosperity as it could.”

    But perhaps Lord Darzi’s most damning finding is about the declining physical and mental health of our children.

    Fewer children getting vaccinated…

    While those from the most deprived backgrounds…

    Are twice as likely to be obese by reception age.

    And much of this is a direct result of wider social injustices..

    Poor quality housing

    Lower incomes,

    Insecure employment.

    All of it, not just damaging the health of our nation…

    It’s piling up the pressures on our NHS.

    That’s the report.

    But look, I haven’t come here just to set out this appalling inheritance. Though it is really important that we know it and properly understand it in detail.

    Getting people back to health and work would not only reduce the costs on the NHS.

    It would help drive economic growth – and fund public services.

    My government was elected on a mandate for change so I’m also here to talk about how together we fix it.

    I feel very deeply the profound responsibility for this.

    And indeed, the opportunity of this moment.

    The NHS may be broken, but it’s not beaten.

    As the report says, the NHS may be in a “critical condition”.

    But “its vital signs are strong”.

    And we need is the courage to deliver long-term reform.

    Major surgery not sticking plasters.

    We’ve got to face up to the challenges….

    Look at our ageing society.

    And the higher burden of disease.

    Look, the NHS is at a fork in the road.

    And we have a choice about how it should meet these rising demands.

    Don’t act and leave it to die.

    Raise taxes on working people.

    Or reform to secure its future.

    Working people can’t afford to pay more.

    So it’s reform or die.

    So let me be clear from the outset, what reform does not mean.

    First, it does not mean abandoning those founding ideals.

    Of a public service, publicly funded, free at the point of use.

    That basic principle of dignity.

    Inspired of course by Bevan,

    That when you fall ill,

    You should never have to worry about the bill.

    That is as true today as when the NHS was founded 76 years ago.

    And I believe that so deeply.

    As some of you will know, my mum and my sister both worked for the NHS.

    My wife works for the NHS.

    The NHS cared for my Mum throughout what was a very

    But “its vital signs are strong”.

    long illness…

    The NHS runs through my family like a stick of rock.

    And you know, this isn’t just about emotion.

    It’s about hard facts too.

    The NHS is uniquely placed for the opportunities of big data and predictive and preventative medicine.

    So the problem isn’t that the NHS is the wrong model.

    It’s the right model.

    It’s just not taking advantage of the opportunities in front of it.

    And that’s what needs to change.

    Second, reform does not mean just putting more money in.

    Of course, even in difficult financial circumstances.

    My government will always make the investments in our NHS that are needed.  Always.

    But we have to fix the plumbing before turning on the taps.

    So hear me when I say this.

    No more money without reform.

    I am not prepared to see even more of your money spent

    On agency staff who cost £5,000 a shift

    On appointment letters, which arrive after the appointment,

    Or on paying for people to be stuck in hospital

    Just because they can’t get the care they need in the community.

    Tonight, there will be 12,000 patients in that very position.

    That’s enough to fill 28 hospitals.

    So we can’t go on like this.

    As Lord Darzi has said –

    NHS staff are “working harder than ever”

    But “productivity has fallen.”

    Because patients can’t be discharged,

    And clinicians are spending their time trying to find more beds.

    Rather than treating more patients.

    That isn’t just solved by more money – it’s solved by reform.

    And third, reform does not mean trying to fix everything from Whitehall. It really doesn’t.

    When Lord Darzi says the vital signs of the NHS are strong.

    He’s talking about the talents and passion of our NHS workforce.  That’s what he’s talking about.

    The breadth and depth of clinical talent.

    The extraordinary compassion and care of our NHS staff.

    If we are going to build an NHS that is fit for the future…

    Then I tell you, we are going to do it with our NHS staff.

    And indeed, with our patients too.

    We are going to change it together.

    Now, that starts with the first steps,

    40,000 extra appointments every week.

    But we’ve got to do the hard yards of long-term reform.

    So this government is working at pace

    To build a Ten-Year Plan.

    Something so different from anything that has gone before.

    This plan will be framed around three big shifts,

    Three fundamental reforms,

    Which are rooted in what Lord Darzi has set out today.

    First, moving from an analogue to a digital NHS.

    Already we can see glimpses of the extraordinary potential of technology,

    Like the world’s first ever non-invasive, knifeless surgery for Kidney cancer… Just imagine that.

    Pioneered by Leeds Teaching Hospitals.

    Or the precision cancer scanners…

    I saw just yesterday.

    Or simply for transforming how we manage a condition.

    We went to Kingsmill Hospital earlier this year and met a 12-year old called Molly.

    She used a smartphone to monitor her glucose levels…

    Instead of being forced to repeatedly prick her fingers.

    It made such a difference to her daily life and gave great reassurance to her mum who could remotely check on the settings and the findings.

    We’ve got to make these opportunities available to everyone.

    We’ve got to use technology to empower patients and give them much greater control over their healthcare.

    Take an innovation like the NHS app.

    This could be a whole digital front door to the NHS.

    Appointments, self-referral, reminders for check-ups and screenings.

    Patients in control of their own data,

    Healthcare so much more transparent,

    So you always know your options,

    And the standards that you should expect.

    And you know, earlier this year I went to Alder Hey Hospital. Many of you will know it, it’s a fantastic hospital, where they carry out heart surgery on infants, which is really humbling to see.

    I met the parents of a two-year old who had extremely complicated heart surgery. A tiny infant, an incredible surgery.

    I asked them about their child’s history and condition, how did he come to be here, what’s the story behind it,

    And as they told me, I could see them welling up as they went through the history, conditions, all the background through all of that over and over again.

    They really struggled to tell the story and they have to do this every single time.

    Because the records weren’t held electronically.

    We’ve got to have fully digital patient records.

    So that crucial information is there for you.

    Wherever you go in our NHS.

    And while I’m on technology

    We’re also going to throw the full weight of the British Government behind our world leading life sciences.

    Second, we’ve got to shift more care from hospitals to communities.

    Now The King’s Fund has long called for this.

    Successive governments have repeatedly promised it.

    But what’s happened?

    The opposite.

    The share of the NHS budget spent on hospitals has actuallyincreased.

    Now this Ten-Year plan has to be the moment we change this.

    The moment we begin to turn our National Health Service

    into a Neighbourhood Health Service.

    That means more tests, scans, healthcare offered on high streets and town centres.

    Improved GP access.

    Bringing back the family doctor.

    Offering digital consultations for those who want them,

    Then they told me that every time they went to a different hospital, they had to go virtual wards.

    And more patients can be safely looked after in their own homes.

    Where we can deal with problems early,

    Before people are off work sick and before they need to go to hospital.

    And we’ve got to make good on the integration of health and social care.

    So we can discharge those 28 hospitals worth of patients.

    Saving money.

    Reducing the strain on our NHS,

    And giving people better treatment.

    And third in terms of the shifts, we’ve got to be much bolder in moving from sickness to prevention.

    Now we’ve already announced NHS health checks in workplaces.

    Blood pressure checks at dentists and opticians.

    And that is just the beginning.

    Planning for ten years means we can make long-term investments in new technologies

    That will help catch and prevent problems earlier.

    And there are some areas in particular

    Where we’ve just got to be more ambitious.

    Like children’s mental health.

    Or children’s dentistry.

    You know, one of the most shocking things that I saw, I’ve ever seen…

    This was actually when I was at was at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital again.

    As I mentioned earlier, I went to the ward where they do heart operations.

    The single biggest cause of children going into that hospital…

    Between the ages of 6 and 10…

    Was to have their rotting teeth taken out. I couldn’t believe it. I was genuinely shocked.

    All politicians say they are shocked too often, but I was honestly shocked, the single biggest cause of going into hospital of children between 6 and 10 is having their teeth taken out.

    Can you think of anything more soul-destroying?

    For those children what a price to pay.

    And for that brilliant NHS team who want to use their talents to save lives.

    Instead spending their time taking out rotting teeth.

    Something that could be so easily prevented.

    And look, I know some prevention measures will be controversial.

    I’m prepared to be bold even in the face of loud opposition.

    So no, some of our changes won’t be universally popular.  We know that.

    But I will do the right thing – for our NHS, our economy, and our children.

    Now, the task before us is the work of our generation.

    We’ve already hit the ground running.

    Negotiating an offer to end the strikes

    [Please note political content redacted here.]

    Strikes that were costing us all a fortune.

    And we inherited 1,000 trainee GPs who were set to graduate into unemployment…

    Instead we hired them.

    But only fundamental reform and a plan for the long-term can turn around the NHS and build a healthy society.

    It won’t be easy, it won’t be or quick.

    It will take a ten-year plan.

    Not the work of just one Parliament.

    But I know we can do it.

    Because we’ve done reform before.

    [Please note political content redacted here.]

    To deliver better outcomes for patients and better value for taxpayers.

    [Please note political content redacted here.]

    My Government has a huge mandate for change.

    We are mission-driven.

    And I think the themes of this conference today are fitting for this moment.

    Challenge. Change. And hope.

    Because the challenge is clear before us.

    The change could amount to the biggest reimagining of our NHS since its birth.

    And the hope, well that’s what’s really exciting and galvanising about this moment.

    Because if we get this right,

    People can look back and say –

    This was the generation that took the NHS from the worst crisis in its history.

    Got it back on its feet and made it fit for the future.

  • Andrew Gwynne – 2024 Statement on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immunisation Programmes

    Andrew Gwynne – 2024 Statement on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immunisation Programmes

    The statement made by Andrew Gwynne, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 18 July 2024.

    I am today confirming that the new immunisation programme to protect infants, with a vaccine during pregnancy, and older adults against respiratory syncytial virus will start this September.

    RSV is a common respiratory virus that usually causes mild cold-like symptoms but can cause severe illness, especially for young infants and older adults. There is a significant burden of RSV illness in the UK population which greatly impacts NHS services during the winter months. RSV accounts for over 30,000 hospital admissions for children under five and is estimated to cause around 9,000 admissions among adults over the age of 75 each year. The programme could free up thousands of hospital bed days and help to prevent hundreds of deaths each year.

    In June 2023, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation advised that an RSV immunisation programme that is cost-effective should be developed to protect both infants and older adults. From September, a routine programme will begin in England for those turning 75 and for pregnant women, who will be offered vaccination from 28 weeks of pregnancy until full term to protect their baby during the first months of life when they are most vulnerable to RSV. A one-off campaign will also run from September 2024 until 31 August 2025 for all older adults aged 75 to 79 years old on 1 September 2024.

    The UK Health Security Agency is now working rapidly with the NHS to ensure we are ready, in September, to deliver the UK’s first RSV vaccination programme. The programme will save lives and protect people most at risk. We are delighted that the RSV vaccination programme will begin soon across all four UK nations.

    His Majesty’s Government are encouraging eligible members of the population to come forward for their vaccination when they have been invited to do so by the NHS, to protect those most vulnerable to RSV illness and to reduce NHS winter pressures.

    Older adults will be invited to come forward when they turn 75 and will be able to book their vaccination appointment with their GP.

    Older adults aged 75 to 79 years old on 1 September 2024 will be invited to receive their RSV vaccination with their GP in a timely manner to ensure as many people as possible are protected this winter.

    Those that are at least 28 weeks pregnant should speak to their maternity service or GP surgery to get the vaccine to protect their baby.

  • NHS England – 2024 Statement on IT Outages

    NHS England – 2024 Statement on IT Outages

    The statement made by NHS England on 19 July 2024.

    The NHS is aware of a global IT outage and an issue with EMIS, an appointment and patient record system, which is causing disruption in the majority of GP practices.

    The NHS has long-standing measures in place to manage the disruption, including using paper patient records and handwritten prescriptions, and the usual phone systems to contact your GP.

    There is currently no known impact on 999 or emergency services, so people should use these services as they usually would.

    Patients should attend appointments unless told otherwise. Only contact your GP if it’s urgent, and otherwise please use 111 online or call 111.

  • Karin Smyth – 2024 Speech on Health Services in Rural Areas

    Karin Smyth – 2024 Speech on Health Services in Rural Areas

    The speech made by Karin Smyth, the Minister of State at the Department of Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 17 July 2024.

    It is a privilege to be the first Minister of this new Labour Government to respond to an Adjournment debate. I am grateful to the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross (Jamie Stone) for raising this important matter and, indeed, for his kind words.

    I hope we can begin this Parliament as we mean to go on, by being candid about the formidable challenges that the NHS faces. As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said on his first day in the job, the NHS is broken, and it will be the task of this Government to build a new NHS for the future. That means the NHS in our rural and coastal areas no less than the NHS in our towns and cities. I agree with the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) on that point.

    Facing these hard truths does not take away from the heroic efforts of the people working in health and care, who have done their utmost in incredibly difficult circumstances. We all owe them, on behalf of our constituents, a debt of unending gratitude.

    Instead, we want to focus our attention on what needs to be done, including early action to improve access to primary care, dentistry and dental health services in particular. We await the conclusions of a thorough investigation undertaken by the distinguished surgeon Lord Darzi to properly understand the scale of the problem. The Government will then begin work on an ambitious programme of action—a 10-year plan to put the NHS back on its feet. It is a privilege to be part of a Labour Government who are committed to fixing the NHS and making it fit for the future.

    As the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross said, the Department’s responsibility stretches only to the NHS in England. Healthcare is devolved in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and it will continue to be so.

    I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on being first out of the traps to secure this debate on behalf of his constituents. As a committed advocate for his constituents in one of the most rural parts of Scotland, he has a deep understanding of matters affecting rural communities, as we have heard this evening. He also has a deep understanding of care, about which I have often heard him speak in this Chamber. It is good to see him back again doing just that.

    I cannot speak in detail about the NHS in Scotland, of course, but I can speak about many of the common issues affecting access to care that are relevant to rural constituencies in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. I know how rural the hon. Gentleman’s constituency is, and I know the particular challenges that creates in accessing GPs, dentists and emergency care, and in accessing women’s health and maternity services—an issue he has been passionately raising for so long. Maternity services are a problem across the United Kingdom, but I accept the examples he outlined.

    Few places in England are as remote as the hon. Gentleman’s constituency, but I am very aware of similar issues affecting more rural areas near my Bristol South constituency. We have heard from the hon. Members for Glastonbury and Somerton (Sarah Dyke) and for St Ives (Andrew George) about morale and the difficulties we face in the south-west.

    I hope that, in the years ahead, we can share and learn from one another across all of our borders. In many rural areas, the challenge of improving access to services is compounded by travel times and by the recruitment and retention of staff. We must recognise the importance of designing services that reflect an area’s particular circumstances, which is a growing challenge. As the chief medical officer has pointed out in his reports, people are moving out of towns and cities to coastal, semi-rural and rural areas as they age. At the time that people are most likely to need care, they are increasingly living in the places where it is most difficult to provide that care.

    In England, integrated care systems will have a key role to play in designing services that meet the needs of local people. To do this, they will need to work with clinicians and local communities at place or neighbourhood level. We know that excellent primary care is an essential foundation for improving access, tackling the root causes of poor health and tackling problems early so that people remain in better health for longer, and hopefully do not need to access secondary and tertiary care at the same level. That is why Labour has pledged, as part of our health mission, to train thousands more GPs and bring back the family doctor, and that applies to all the nations.

    We are also doing more to use the transformative power of technology. There is enormous potential in ideas such as virtual wards, which allow care to be delivered in people’s own homes. Such models of care can have disproportionate benefit in areas where rurality is a barrier to care.

    Equally, we are committed to seeing the NHS app reach its full potential under the new Government. We understand that some people will need support to use that technology and we are aware of the challenges of rural broadband, but we are committed to making the benefits accessible to all.

    Andrew George

    The Minister has committed the new Labour Government to address those issues, but will she specifically address the matter of the two coroners’ reports into avoidable excess deaths as a result of very long waits for emergency services in Cornwall? They were never addressed by the previous Conservative Government. The reports were about not just the hours spent waiting—sometimes elderly, frail people were on the floors for 10 or more hours—but the fact that sometimes 20 or more ambulances greeted patients when they arrived at the emergency department. Two coroners’ reports were sent to the then Secretary of State, but there was never an adequate response. I very much hope the new Labour Government will review the failings of the previous Government and address those very serious concerns, which affect many other rural areas.

    Karin Smyth

    I am aware of the issues facing the south-west and, when in Opposition, I spoke in the local media about some of the ambulance challenges. I am not aware of those reports, but if the hon. Gentleman writes to me with the details, I will happily look into the issue and get back to him.

    We also recognise the additional cost of providing services in rural areas, for example in travel and staff time. That is why the funding formula used by NHS England to allocate funds to integrated care boards includes an element to better reflect needs in some rural, coastal and remote areas.

    The NHS faces significant challenges. It needs fundamental reform. The Prime Minister is personally committed to resetting the UK Government’s relationship with devolved Governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. I echo the Prime Minister’s words today about our commitment to rural constituencies across the entire country and I hope we can work with hon. Members from across the House, including the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross.

    Jim Shannon

    I welcome the Minister’s clear commitment to England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland—and particularly to Northern Ireland. Let me declare an interest: I am a member of the Ulster Farmers Union. I know that the Ulster Farmers Union back home, in conjunction with the NFU here, has been trying to work with the health service and with all those with responsibility in this area on the issue of suicides. Farmers mostly work on their own and suffer from anxiety and depression. They face pressures from finance and pressures from the bureaucracy that exists in farming. I know the Minister is compassionate and understanding—I mean that honestly. When it comes to addressing that issue, does she think that it must be done in conjunction with the farmers unions? Trying to work together to make things better must be a step in the right direction.

    Karin Smyth

    As ever, the hon. Gentleman makes a valid point. I shall certainly ask my colleagues in the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs about that. His point is extremely well made. I know his constituency in Northern Ireland very well. Let me say that we are very committed to working with hon. Members across the House to share ideas. The hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross has put forward more ideas about how that can happen. I do not promise to implement all of those things, but I will certainly look at them. We want to work very closely across all jurisdictions so that we can make progress for all our constituents to improve the health outcomes across the four nations of the United Kingdom.

  • Jamie Stone – 2024 Speech on Health Services in Rural Areas

    Jamie Stone – 2024 Speech on Health Services in Rural Areas

    The speech made by Jamie Stone, the Liberal Democrat MP for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, in the House of Commons on 17 July 2024.

    Let me get my specs on properly, Madam Deputy Speaker. They have a wonky leg that sticks out sideways.

    I must say at the outset that I have heard some excellent maiden speeches today. It is a bit worrying to hear such good maiden speeches, because it makes one feel somewhat mundane in comparison. Let me also welcome the Minister to her place: it is a pleasure to see her sitting opposite me.

    This Adjournment debate is the first of the new Parliament, and I am grateful to the Speaker for granting it. It concerns a topic that is important not only to my constituents in the highlands, but to constituents in every rural area in the country. I thank the Minister for her attendance, and look forward to hearing what she has to say. I hope that the debate sets the tone for how a Government and an Opposition can work together to meet the needs of every citizen of the United Kingdom, no matter where they live.

    I recently had the great honour of being re-elected to represent Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, which is now the largest constituency in the United Kingdom. It measures a staggering 11,798 sq km, more than half the size of Wales. We are here tonight to discuss the adequacy of healthcare services in rural areas, and for fear of being predictable I am afraid to say that the health services in the highlands are not even faintly adequate. I recognise, of course, that health is devolved, but 17 years of centralisation have wreaked havoc on my part of the world. Health services have been stripped back and gutted, leaving my constituents with access to far too few local services.

    Let me begin with general practices. In Scotland, we have seen changes in vaccination services because, in an effort to reduce GPs’ workload, GP contract Scotland removed their vaccination capabilities. That is of huge concern to crofters in my constituency who might cut themselves on a piece of barbed wire and need a tetanus vaccination as quickly as possible. The same goes for anyone in need of shingles, flu, covid or travel vaccines. They must travel a staggering 70 miles or more to the nearest A&E, where they will face further waits owing to backlogs resulting from heavy workloads.

    Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP)

    I want to keep the tradition alive, Madam Deputy Speaker. This is my first intervention during an Adjournment debate in the new Parliament.

    I commend the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross (Jamie Stone) for raising an issue that is very important to me and to my constituency. I also congratulate him on his excellent victory in the polls: he has done exceptionally well. I hail from a rural constituency where my own doctor has to service a huge number of people, and the inadequacy of help for rural constituents is abundantly clear to me. Does the hon. Member not agree that the current postcode lottery must end, and that access to GPs, physiotherapists, nutritionists and mental health services for farming and other rural communities must be at least on a par with those in cities and large towns? Why should those in rural communities be second-class citizens in their own country?

    Jamie Stone

    The hon. Member makes his point with his customary charm. It is no wonder that he is so well liked in this place, because he always speaks for his constituents.

    I have talked about the delays in vaccinations, which also applies to the lifesaving vaccinations that babies must have. The Scottish Government take a one-size-fits-all approach that, frankly, does not work in remote rural areas such as mine. The retention and recruitment of GPs and other healthcare workers is crucial, but poor wages and terms and conditions, and a lack of proper travel reimbursement, all lead to a general impression that the game is simply not worth the candle. That is why we are missing key workers and doctors, and why we are paying through the nose for locum and temporary staff. Madam Deputy Speaker, can you believe that NHS Highland has spent £21 million on locum staffing in the past year? That is almost 3% of its entire budget—an eye-watering sum. Could that money not have been spent much better, for example on care homes, hospitals or pain clinics that have been forced to close?

    Sarah Dyke (Glastonbury and Somerton) (LD)

    I apologise for coming a bit late to this debate. Primary care is asked to do more in rural areas than in urban settings, piling pressure on GPs, pharmacists and dentists, yet they struggle to recruit staff, as my hon. Friend said. A dental practice in Street, in my constituency, has been without an NHS dentist on its books for 18 months, despite its best efforts. Does my hon. Friend agree that we must explore ways in which we can incentivise healthcare professionals to practise in rural areas?

    Jamie Stone

    I absolutely endorse that. I am glad that I said in my opening remarks that my experience in a very remote part of Scotland applies to other parts of the United Kingdom. What we have just heard proves that this is the case.

    NHS Scotland has halted all new builds and repairs to health centres across the entire country, which is another problem for healthcare. I have said already how big my constituency is. Just by commuting or doing house visits, healthcare staff will rack up 3,500 miles easily, because the distances are so great. At that point, their reimbursement per mile is more than halved, which does not encourage people to get involved. It is, in fact, discrimination against healthcare professionals who live in rural communities. Training is overwhelmingly based in urban areas, and there is very little incentive to get people to come and work in rural areas. Other factors, such as a lack of housing and job opportunities, feed into this problem.

    There is another issue I want to raise: the lack of women’s health provision, which is pretty severe. In my maiden speech in 2017 I spoke about the need to restore maternity services to Caithness. Seven years later, that is more important than ever. Caithness general hospital used to have a consultant-led maternity service, which meant that expectant mothers could have their babies locally in the far north of Scotland. It was downgraded when I was my constituency’s Member of the Scottish Parliament. At that time, I had more influence and I got it restored. Since then, however, the maternity services have been downgraded again, and there appears to be no movement from the Scottish Government to reverse that. I wish that some Members from the party of the Scottish Government were present today.

    Let me give an example of what this situation means: pregnant mothers have to make a 200-mile round trip in the car to deliver their babies. Imagine a trip like that in the middle of winter, and on rickety-rackety roads in the highlands. In 2019, a pair of twins were born—one was born in Golspie, and the other was born 50 miles away, in Inverness. It is a miracle that those children survived, and that neither a mother nor a child has perished. I have been calling for a safety audit all along, but there has never been one. We know perfectly well what the result would be: the arrangements would be deemed unsafe, if not a breach of human rights.

    It is not just about maternity services; women’s health has been removed from the far north. A routine trip to see a gynaecologist and get a diagnosis for a life-threatening ovarian cyst, or for endometriosis, means travelling the same huge distance—if a woman is lucky enough to get an appointment before her condition has progressed too far for her safety. I wonder what we can do to encourage healthcare professionals to relocate to remote areas, because the health and wellbeing of their wives and daughters must surely be a factor when they consider moving.

    For children growing up in the far north, it is no better. The waiting list for child and adolescent mental health assessments is three years. For neurodevelopmental screenings—for the diagnosis of dyslexia, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and so on—it is four years. That is the majority of their time at school. One family I spoke to during the election had waited 13 years for a diagnosis. That is a disaster. Dentistry has already been mentioned, and we know that intervention is crucial for long-term dental health

    Andrew George (St Ives) (LD)

    I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way, and I apologise to him for being caught out by the early start of this Adjournment debate. Does he agree that it would be really helpful if the new Government achieved a quick win to raise morale in rural areas where services have been so depleted for so long? This applies in west Cornwall, for example, where we cannot call on services from the north or south or west very easily. In those areas, as in others, we have a dentistry desert and the NHS and care services are experiencing their biggest crisis in their history. What we need, for example, is for the West Cornwall hospital to re-establish the urgent treatment centre overnight. Those kinds of quick wins could achieve the lifting of morale within the service and start moving things forward and upward from where they are at present.

    Jamie Stone

    My hon. Friend makes a good point, and I shall touch upon his sentiments in my closing remarks.

    As many in the Chamber know—perhaps new Members do not—I myself am a carer: I am a carer for my wife. So I am very happy that my party has put carers at the top of our agenda. My party leader has spoken about being a carer himself. We desperately need reform, and I believe that the carers allowance should be introduced at a higher rate. In a way, I am declaring an interest here, in that I am an unpaid carer, but we have to look at this. I was recently informed of a constituent who was moved from one care home to another one 123 miles away in the highlands. That is a three-and-a-bit-hour journey each way for the loved ones to go and visit that old man. We can see why this is not great for morale.

    I am from the highlands. I love my native highlands and I care passionately about where I come from, but I think that we need urgent intervention. This is my ask of the Minister. I recognise the nobility of the intent to address these problems at UK level, and I look forward to working with the Government in these endeavours, but the fact is that there is not the delivery under devolution that there should be. I am sorry that no Scottish National party Members are here. I am a committed devolutionist. I was part of the Scottish Constitutional Convention and my name is on the claim of right for Scotland, yet I find it incredibly disappointing that the outcomes are a lot worse than they were.

    When I was in government in the Scottish Parliament, in coalition with the Labour party, we saw progress between 1999 and 2007, when the SNP came in. Now we see that things have gone backwards. This was the main issue on the doorsteps in Scotland, so I hope that the Labour Government can work hard at improving things. I ask them in a cordial way to do everything that can be done to improve the relationship with the Scottish Government, and perhaps encourage the Scottish Government to look at best practice in the rest of the UK and adopt that. I am not talking about hypothecation or about unrolling devolution, but by working together perhaps we can achieve something.

    Also, it would be great if we could encourage NHS England to work closely with NHS Scotland, because it is complete and utter nonsense that people who could cross the border and get treatment have been prevented from doing so by bureaucracy, sometimes by politics of the not-so-clever sort, or by the computer systems not matching. That is nonsense. If someone living in the south of Scotland can get their operation done in Newcastle, let us just go for it.

    I look forward to a Labour Government giving extra money to the health service, and I am sure they will. We will be looking closely at how that happens. There will, of course, be Barnett consequentials that will put that money into the devolved Welsh Assembly, the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly. I hope that the UK Government will look closely at where those Barnett consequentials go. Will they go where we would hope they would go—namely, to improve the health service, to shorten waiting lists, to sort out the nonsense, and to give the standard of health service that my constituents and I believe everyone in rural parts of the UK is crying out for?

  • Wes Streeting – 2024 Statement on Saving the NHS

    Wes Streeting – 2024 Statement on Saving the NHS

    The statement made by Wes Streeting, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 5 July 2024.

    When we said during the election campaign, that the NHS was going through the biggest crisis in its history, we meant it.

    When we said that patients are being failed on a daily basis, it wasn’t political rhetoric, but the daily reality faced by millions.

    Previous governments have not been willing to admit these simple facts. But in order to cure an illness, you must first diagnose it.

    This government will be honest about the challenges facing our country, and serious about tackling them.

    From today, the policy of this department is that the NHS is broken.

    That is the experience of patients who are not receiving the care they deserve, and of the staff working in the NHS who can see that – despite giving their best – this is not good enough.

    When I was diagnosed with kidney cancer, the NHS saved my life.

    Today, I can begin to repay that debt, by saving our NHS.

    I have just spoken over the phone with the BMA junior doctors committee, and I can announce that talks to end their industrial action will begin next week.

    We promised during the campaign that we would begin negotiations as a matter of urgency, and that is what we are doing.

    This government has received a mandate from millions of voters for change and reform of the NHS, so it can be there for us when we need it once again.

    It will take time – we never pretended that the NHS could be fixed overnight.

    And it will take a team effort. It will be the mission of my department, every member of this government, and the 1.4 million people who work in the NHS, to turn our health service around.

    We have done this before. When we were last in office, we worked hand in hand with NHS staff to deliver the shortest waits and highest patient satisfaction in history. We did it before, and together, we will do it again.

    That work starts today.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Statement on the Infected Blood Inquiry report

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Statement on the Infected Blood Inquiry report

    The statement made by Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 21 May 2024.

    Yesterday we heard the harrowing conclusion of Sir Brian Langstaff’s inquiry on infected blood. The report lays bare the many failings of successive governments, including historic failings in my own department. As the Secretary of State, I apologise unreservedly for the actions which have hurt and harmed so many people, culminating in the damning conclusions of the report.

    “Instances of the destruction of records and withholding of information are shocking and unacceptable. This should not have happened and must never happen again. We will study the report to make sure the lessons of Sir Brian’s Inquiry are learned and that these mistakes can never be repeated.

    “I give my sincere thanks to all of the victims, families and campaigners for sharing their pain and for their fortitude in pursuing the truth over many decades, as well as to Sir Brian for his meticulous and comprehensive analysis. I am working with the NHS Business Services Authority to ensure that all those eligible receive a second interim payment of £210,000 as soon as possible.

    “This terrible history of failures, experiments, disbelief, and cover ups has stolen the lives of victims and their families; instead of birthdays, careers, freedoms and joy, the victims’ lives are measured in pain, mental anguish, the crushing burden of stigma and the agony of wondering what could have been. Never again.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech on Birth Trauma

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech on Birth Trauma

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 13 May 2024.

    Good evening everyone.

    It is an absolute privilege to be speaking to you all this evening as we mark the launch of the first ever birth trauma inquiry report.

    And I’d like to start by thanking my dear friend Theo [Theo Clarke MP] for her strength in speaking out about her own experiences and in so doing, creating this incredible workstream whereby other women are being invited to give their experiences and to be listened to.

    I mean, Theo is, to my mind the exemplar of a Parliamentary powerhouse, and it’s been an absolute pleasure working with you, but also I genuinely think the work that you have achieved will have very, very long-term and positive benefits for women across England.

    The reaction that you have received from women shows just how critical this work is.

    You have given a voice to those who may never have shared the pain and the suffering that they have been through, or when they have spoken up, they have not been listened to.

    And so, thanks to you and to the brave women in this room, but also the many, many brave women who have contributed to this report, or who have shared their stories today with media outlets, as it has rightly got such media attention.

    But thanks to those brave women, things are changing and you are shining a bright light on the struggles that too many women face, and you are putting birth trauma at the heart of our national conversation, and ensuring that other mums do not have to suffer in silence.

    And I’d also really like to thank the wider APPG, co-chaired by Theo but also by Rosie [Rosie Duffield MP], and both of whom have really demonstrated, along with APPG colleagues, just how cross-party working can work to the very best for us as a country.

    And so thank you to every single Parliamentarian involved in the APPG.

    And in that spirit, I am determined to make care for new mums and mums to be faster, simpler and fairer because the birth of a child should be among the happiest moments in our lives.

    That said, of course, for the overwhelming majority of families it is.

    Each week around 10,000 babies are born in England on the NHS and most of them are born safely and with mothers and families reporting a good experience of the care they receive.

    But we want that for every woman and every family.

    And as this inquiry demonstrates so starkly, there is far too much unacceptable variation across the country in the service that women receive.

    Some mums endure simply unacceptable care and live with the consequences of that trauma for the rest of their lives.

    Now I’ve been open about my own experiences with the NHS.

    The NHS is genuinely one of the reasons I came into politics.

    I was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 3 and I’ve seen the very best of the NHS, but I’ve also seen some of its darker corners and that includes in my own experience when I was pregnant.

    As you can imagine the clinicians in the room will understand a type 1 diabetic being pregnant brings its own complications. And I had wonderful, wonderful care in many, many instances. But I also had examples where I wouldn’t wish other women to go through the same, including – and I’ve spoken about this – I was rushed into hospital earlier than anyone had planned, and I was put on a ward, heavily pregnant, not quite knowing what the future was holding for me or my baby.

    And, I was on the ward where women who had just experienced extremely traumatic, dare I say it, dangerous births were being rushed from theatre on to the ward where I was.

    Now clearly their experiences were far, far worse and far more traumatic than my own.

    But you can imagine how frightening actually that experience was for a first-time mum to be, with the concerns that I was having to live with at the time.

    So just that, as an example, I know everybody was trying to do their best at that point, but I desperately want to ensure that women who are expecting and who need additional support don’t find themselves in similar or even worse situations as I did.

    And I want to make sure that no woman goes through a physical and mental trauma, and while giving birth, that could have been prevented.

    Now I know that at the Women’s Health Summit in January, Dame Lesley Regan and I talked about – and forgive me, gentlemen – we talked about the NHS being a system that was created by men, for men.

    And that struck a chord with many women, particularly those who know Lesley and know she is another female powerhouse. And the truth is that women have suffered in pain that would simply not be tolerated in any other part of the hospital.

    Women have tried to raise concerns about unacceptable care, but they’re being told it’s all just natural.

    And it is that, if you like, silencing, that really should not be the reality that women face in the 21st century.

    We can and we will do better.

    Now, being made Health Secretary in November, I have been impatient to make progress.

    And that is why in January I held the Women’s Health Summit, where I made birth trauma one of the top priorities for the second year of the Women’s Health Strategy.

    And I want to make this year not just the year that we listen, but that we act and that this is happening now.

    We are rolling out new maternal mental health services for new mums, which are already available in all but 3 local health systems.

    We are, believe you me, paying close attention to those final 3 areas to make sure they finalise their plans at pace this year.

    On physical injuries too, we are rolling out improved perinatal pelvic health services, including guidance to better support women who experience serious tears and to prevent these from happening in the first place.

    We’re halfway through. We plan to get to full coverage by the end of the financial year. And these services will be supported by our announcement at the Spring Budget of an extra £35 million more for more midwives and better training for when things go wrong.

    On top of the extra £186 million a year we are already investing into maternity services and safety compared to 3 years ago.

    And thanks to Theo, we have also introduced stand-alone GP appointments 6 to 8 weeks after giving birth to ask those crucial questions about whether mum is okay while keeping separate checks for her baby, because we know a happy, healthy mum means a happy, healthy baby.

    And this is supported by new guidance to prompt direct questions about their birth experience, even if there is nothing in her notes to suggest that the birth was traumatic.

    I want to embed a culture that listens to women right from the start of their pregnancy, and so I’m delighted that NHS England are co-producing new decision-making tools with new mums to help guide through choices on how they give birth, what interventions could happen and what pain relief they should be offered.

    These will be made available in a range of languages and formats to make sure that they can be tailored to different settings and to different local populations, because the ethnic disparities that Kim [Dr Kim Thomas] and Theo have highlighted have to be tackled, and we are determined to do that.

    Theo’s speech in Parliament spoke to the lasting impact that birth trauma can have on the whole family. And of course, dads and partners are very much part of that. And so I’m extremely grateful to Theo’s husband for making that point.

    But also we have listened in government and Maria Caulfield, my minister, who is responsible for men’s health along with a great many other things, will be chairing the next session of the Men’s Health Task and Finish Group in June to focus on dads’ mental health and trauma so that we can better understand how to support partners.

    And I’m delighted to announce that the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) will commission new research into the economic impact of birth trauma, including how this affects women returning to work.

    That’s a really important idea and a really important commitment.

    I know there is so much work to do to deliver on the detailed findings of this report and I, together with NHS England, fully support the APPG’s call to develop a comprehensive cross-government national strategy for maternal care.

    I’m very grateful to the NHS for the progress that has been made so far on the 3-year delivery plan for maternity and neonatal services, but I want to go further and a comprehensive national strategy will help us to keep driving that work forward while making sure everyone across government and the health service are crystal clear about what we need in maternity services to focus on.

    And I also want to be clearer to mums and those looking after them, what their rights and expectations should be, so that everybody can be clear about the standard of care that mums deserve.

    So watch this space.

    Now in conclusion, this is the first time in the NHS’s 75-year history that I, as the Secretary of State, but also the chief executive of NHS England, are both mums.

    We get it.

    And for this, this is not just professional, it is personal.

    Both Amanda [Pritchard] and I take our responsibilities to all of you incredibly seriously and I have to say more soon on how I plan to make this area of our health system faster, simpler and fairer.

    So I want to finish by thanking you, each and every one of you that has been involved in this report, for everything you have done to kickstart the national conversation about birth, trauma and how women should be listened to and their concerns acted upon.

    And I really look forward to continuing this conversation with you in the months ahead.

    Thank you so much.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech at the Nuffield Trust Summit

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech at the Nuffield Trust Summit

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Health and Social Care Secretary, on 7 March 2024.

    Good morning everyone, what an absolute pleasure it is to be here at the Nuffield Trust.

    This is one of the landmark moments in the calendar of a Secretary of State for Health.

    I know that I am about to be scrutinised – and indeed cross examined – by some of the country’s leading experts in healthcare.

    So, believe you me, this makes Jeremy’s outing at the Budget yesterday feel very easy in comparison.

    But can I thank the Nuffield Trust for inviting me to speak to you today – it is a great honour.

    But it is also a privilege.

    Because the National Health Service is, genuinely, one of the reasons I came into politics.

    And today, having the privilege of speaking to you – those who work in healthcare, but also who are very, very conscious of its future, of the challenges we face today, but also our determination to prepare it for the years and decades to come, I would like to have a little bit of intellectual freedom to look at its future in a different light.

    Our national conversation around healthcare has tended to focus on older people, who are living longer, and with more health conditions.

    And later this afternoon the Chief Medical Officer – the wonderful Chris Whitty – will outline how we’re supporting them to live more independently, and with more years in good health, and rightly so.

    But I think there is a set of voices that is not heard often enough – the voices of young people.

    Young people not only pay for the NHS of today, but they will also use the NHS of tomorrow.

    And we know that high costs of living and rising rents are making it difficult for our young people to make those long-term decisions that are so important to us all, such as buying a house or starting a family.

    We cannot therefore expect them to foot the bill for an infinite increase in healthcare spending.

    The Chancellor’s Budget yesterday rightly recognised that we cannot continue to have a larger tax burden falling on a smaller number of working people.

    For me, the path we must take is obvious.

    We must build a more productive state, not a bigger one.

    And research proves this point.

    Today there are 3.3 workers to support every pensioner.

    In less than 50 years, there will be fewer than 2 workers to support every pensioner.

    So, we need to stop the next generation being dragged into a tax and spend black hole – where they put more in to get less out.

    Because this is a recipe not just for them losing faith in the institutions that we hold so dear, but also I worry for losing faith in capitalism, and losing faith in our democracy.

    But the decisions we took in yesterday’s Budget will make a meaningful difference.

    We took decisions that will reduce long-term demand, and improve productivity – not just throughout the NHS, but across the economy.

    Because the two go hand in hand.

    A strong economy helps pay for the NHS.

    And a strong NHS supports a growing economy.

    So today, I want to share our plan to achieve both of these things through productivity and accountability.

    But before I do that, there is of course one topic that is fundamental to my plan to reform the NHS to make it faster, simper, and fairer – and that is prevention.

    In the coming weeks, I will set out further thoughts on this very important topic.

    But I hope you’ll forgive me, following yesterday’s incredibly significant announcement at the budget, I wanted to focus today on productivity and how it can make meaningful changes to the NHS that we all want to see.

    Now, to productivity.

    I know that you’ve heard about this already.

    And indeed, Thea Stein has observed that NHS staff and clinicians don’t get out of bed in the morning thinking about how they could be more productive.

    I get that.

    They are motivated by doing the very best they possibly can for patients. And that is the way it should be.

    So when I talk about productivity, this is not about telling staff they need to work harder.

    It is about giving them the tools – and the time – to give patients the best care they can.

    Now, we know the NHS can be productive.

    From 2010 to the start of the pandemic in 2020, productivity growth in the NHS outstripped the wider economy by more than 1 per cent a year.

    But since then, it has gone into reverse.

    The causes are complex.

    The pandemic has clearly increased demands on staff, and spending on agency staff has risen as a result.

    Our Long-Term Workforce Plan, the first in NHS history, will get this spending in check – reducing it by as much as £10 billion over time.

    And we should also be frank about the significant problems and pressures that industrial action has caused across the system…

    …including, sadly, the 1.4 million appointments and operations that have been cancelled since strikes began in December 2022.

    Nonetheless, a reasonable and fair deal can be struck, and I’m really pleased that unions are recommending our new offer to NHS consultants.

    Should their members accept this deal – and I hope they will – we will all be able to move forward with providing patients with the care they need and see waiting lists fall.

    But the Budget will deliver savings for everyone who works in the NHS.

    The 2p cut in National Insurance will grow the average nurse’s pay packet by more than £500 a year.

    This is on top of the National Insurance cut that we’ve already delivered this year, that taken together will benefit the average worker by more than £900.

    But the Budget went further.

    As well as helping the NHS meet the pressures it will face in the coming years with an additional £2.5 billion, it set out our determination to return to the productivity we all know the NHS has – and can – deliver by funding a £3.4bn capital investment plan to invest in technology.

    The productivity plan, along with the Long-Term Workforce Plan, will see productivity grow by 2 per cent per year.

    Meeting and exceeding the growth we saw in the last decade, and unlocking £35 billion of savings by the end of this decade.

    We will digitise operating theatres, opening up an extra 200,000 operating slots a year.

    We will set up a new NHS staff app, making it easier to roster electronically and ending the use of expensive off-framework agencies.

    We will update IT systems, giving our doctors and nurses millions of hours back to spend with patients; rather than on hospital computer screens or computers on trolleys.

    We will support every hospital to use electronic patient records, making the NHS the world’s largest digitally integrated healthcare system.

    And we will improve the NHS app so patients can use it to confirm and modify all appointments.

    This will increase choice, reduce the number of missed appointments by half a million every year, and make the NHS app the front door for prevention as well as for cure – somewhere patients can book vaccinations and access all their preventative tests in one place.

    This productivity plan will make life simpler for staff and cut waiting lists for patients.

    And it is our responsibility – and I would go as far to say, it is our duty – to prepare the NHS for the future.

    This is why we want to seize the opportunities of AI for the benefit of our health.

    It has already revolutionised stroke care across the NHS – halving the time it takes to treat people and tripling the number who recover to reach functional independence.

    Now, we will use AI to potentially cut in half the form filling by doctors and nurses. And upgrade over one hundred MRI scanners across England, so that more than 130,000 patients a year can receive their results faster.

    This will allow them to start treatment sooner, free up clinicians to spend more time with patients who need them most, and save taxpayers money.

    And so that’s what I mean when I say that technology can make our NHS faster, simpler, and fairer.

    As well as improving performance across primary, secondary and community care, technology can also strengthen social care – keeping people out of hospital and helping them live well at home.

    This is what the Accelerating Reform Fund is all about.

    It provides local authorities with £40 million of government funding to invest in the most innovative new technology to help look after older people.

    Whether that’s through introducing new digital tools to boost recruitment and retention, or increasing social prescribing, which can reduce costs and help people build connections with their communities.

    Our Long-Term Workforce Plan set out that NHS productivity growth of between 1.5 and 2 per cent was possible.

    And thanks to the productivity plan we announced yesterday, Amanda Pritchard has committed to delivering 2 per cent.

    It will be challenging, but if we work together, we can get this done.

    Today, I also want to send a clear message about accountability.

    Trusts, ICBs, regional boards, and NHS England are responsible for billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money.

    It’s not our money, it’s not government’s money.

    It is the money that all our nurses, porters, receptionists, as well as shop workers, waiting staff, and the self-employed have earned and then paid to government from their wages.

    It is therefore our duty to ensure that this money is spent as well as possible.

    Poor performance cannot be tolerated, and good performance must be rewarded.

    To achieve this, by the summer, NHS England will start reporting against new productivity metrics, not only at the national level, but also across integrated care boards and trusts.

    And I want us to go further – because I’ve listened to you – by introducing new incentives to reward providers that hit productivity targets.

    So, I want to see providers retain the surpluses they generate through productivity improvement, and reinvest them in frontline services to support the clinicians who made these savings possible.

    Now of course, accountability extends beyond productivity to all of the work that the NHS does.

    I have been very honest about my own experiences of the NHS.

    I have received great care, but I have also seen some of the darker corners of our health system.

    And technology and the data it will produce, can be used by the public, as well as professionals to shine a light on poor performance.

    Care will not just be scrutinised by committees of MPs in dusty, ancient committee rooms in the Palace of Westminster, it will also be scrutinised by the public on their phones.

    This is what digital natives expect in every other area of their lives, and healthcare should not lag behind.

    Now we’re already making progress.

    People can find out how their local trust is performing with a few taps on a screen.

    Quite rightly, the pubic expect to receive the best care, and that care should not be prescribed by where they happen to live.

    And I say this of course as a proud Lincolnshire MP, which is a very different healthcare proposition from central London or central Birmingham.

    Postcodes can still determine the speed and quality of care.

    This is seen starkly in waiting lists.

    The long hangover of the pandemic must be tackled and waiting lists must be cut.

    Yet half of the NHS’s longest waits are concentrated in just 15 trusts.

    And in those trusts, the longest waits are centred on particular specialities, such as gynaecology or orthopaedics.

    Now, we are giving patients who have waited longest the choice to transfer to another provider.

    But that cannot be the only solution.

    And so, my ministers and I are working with NHS England to support those trusts to improve, but also to hold them to account.

    In urgent and emergency care, it’s a similar story.

    In January, just 15 trusts made up over half of the hours lost to ambulance handover delays, and just 13 trusts met the interim target to deal with 76 per cent of urgent and emergency patients within four hours.

    This can – and must – change.

    We have a range of tools to help trusts. From support from NHSE, to lending resources and people as well as peer support.

    Because we all recognise that is often the best way to drive up standards.

    And there should be rewards for success.

    That’s why NHS England will once again offer additional capital funding to Trusts who exceed their emergency targets.

    And if I may, I have been concerned when I hear of a few, only a few, ICB leaders who apparently do not consider it part of their job to speak to local Members of Parliament, people who represent local communities, or to explain their funding decisions.

    As someone who is – I promise you – very accountable to the public, we have to recognise that as public services are funded by the public, for the public, that attitude is not acceptable and must change.

    Now, as part of my focus on spending taxpayers’ money well, I am bringing commercial expertise into the Department of Health and Social Care to help drive results for us as a department.

    Steve Rowe, the former CEO of Marks and Spencer, has led a lot of work within the department to streamline our processes.

    And today, I’m delighted to announce that Steve is joining the department as one of our Non-Executive Directors, with a remit to accelerate delivery, and ensure the productivity plan, which is fully funded, improves care throughout England.

    Conclusion

    Now, I started my speech with young people – and the pressures they face – but also the need to meet the future with confidence.

    We can do this.

    We are standing on the cusp of a medical revolution, here technology, personalised therapies, and better data can transform outcomes for a generation who are more health conscious than any that came before them.

    The NHS, and indeed we, must seize this opportunity and look to the future – not restrict ourselves to what has always been done.

    In fact, it needs to have, to borrow a phrase, an M&S moment.

    This much-loved British brand, a stalwart of our high street for decades, realised change was needed, and embraced modernity.

    Pivoting towards the next generation, winning them over, and securing its long-term future.

    This is what the NHS needs to do to make sure it’s there for the next 75 years, just as it has been there for us.

    And as I’ve seen on visits to hospitals, GPs, dentists, and pharmacies up and down the country, the people working in the NHS have the drive, the dedication, and the determination to build a brighter future, and therefore support a stronger economy for the next generation.

    In conclusion, this is because this isn’t just any health service, it’s our National Health Service.

    Thank you all very much.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech to the Women’s Health Strategy

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech to the Women’s Health Strategy

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Health and Social Care Secretary, on 17 January 2024.

    Thank you so very much everyone.

    Can I just say, I’ve been looking forward to today.

    Because, apologies gents, but I view this as a sort of feminist’s Christmas.

    So, it is a genuine pleasure to be here with you all. I know there are incredible leaders here in what we are trying to achieve in women’s health.

    There are women in this room who are midwives, nurses, doctors, healthcare professionals and leaders.

    There are women who do amazing work through charities.

    There are women who campaign on issues.

    And, of course, there are women here who have told their stories, in public, so that others know that they are not alone.

    And to all of you, I say thank you.

    You are making our NHS a better service for us all.

    And I also want to promise you that I get it.

    Because women’s health and maternity care is one of my top priorities as Health Secretary.

    Because we are more than half the population, and our healthcare matters. Not just to us as individuals, but to our families and wider society.

    Now, as Maria rightly said, we have already come a long way, and transformed many lives by driving forward the Women’s Health Strategy we launched some 18 months ago.

    But together, we can go further still.

    I want to reform our NHS and care system to make it faster, simpler and fairer for all of us – and that includes women.

    Because for me this is personal.

    The NHS diagnosed me with type 1 diabetes at the age of 3.

    So, I have seen the very best of the NHS.

    But I have also seen some of its darker corners.

    One of those darker corners was when I was pregnant.

    As the clinicians in the room will understand, pregnancy with type 1 diabetes can be a very medicalised process. And there came a point in the pregnancy when it became clear that the baby was going to have to be delivered early.

    And so, I was rushed into hospital – and the hospital that looked after me amazingly well simply did not, at that point, have the facilities to look after someone who was both very early in pregnancy, but also with complications.

    And so they put me in a ward with women who had just given birth – literally rushed from theatre – who had had very traumatic experiences.

    And you will understand how deeply worrying – and dare I say it, frightening – it was to be lying in that ward with women who had gone through, frankly, a hellish experience. Who were in agony, who were needing very urgent medical treatment.

    And for me to be there ready to have my baby.

    Looking back, I know that everybody was doing their best.

    But I desperately want to ensure that women who are expecting, and who find themselves needing a bit of extra help are not in that situation, and they’re not facing the fear that I faced.

    So, I absolutely get it.

    And it is very much personal for me.

    But I want to set out some of the policies this year that will help light the way to better health and happiness for women.

    And I’m going to start with a number.

    Two hundred and ninety three.

    From the independent research published last week, that is the number of women who died in pregnancy or within 42 days of the end of pregnancy in the 3 years between 2020 and 2022.

    That number means that 293 families are grieving the profound loss of a mother – who will also be someone’s daughter, partner, wife, sister or friend.

    And their babies who have lived – their loss is indescribable.

    They will never know the warmth of their mother’s cuddle.

    The tinkle of her laughter.

    Or the limitless love that we have for our children.

    Not all of these deaths are linked to poor maternity care, but many will be.

    And this must stop.

    Important, and frankly stark, reviews into maternity services have identified how, why and where mistakes happen and harm is done.

    And in response, NHS England has set out a large programme of work to tackle this through its maternity and neonatal services plan.

    This includes the establishment of 14 maternal medicine networks across England. Which will ensure that women with medical conditions that pre-date, or develop during pregnancy, from cardiac disease to diabetes, all receive the specialist care they need.

    Fairer access to services must be achieved, and underperforming trusts must shape up.

    To achieve this, a Maternity Safety Support Programme is giving underperforming trusts assistance before serious safety issues arise.

    And I will give these and other measures my full backing to support families, and to end preventable maternal and baby deaths.

    Because the birth of a child should be among the happiest moments of our lives.

    And for the overwhelming majority of families, of course – it is.

    We want this for every woman, and every family.

    But this commitment also requires a laser-like focus on birth trauma.

    Some mums endure simply unacceptable care and live with the consequences of that trauma for the rest of their lives.

    Some have told their stories to the media – harrowing experiences of tears, prolapses, operations and agony.

    They’ve done this because they want to shine a light on the impact of such experiences.

    Some of those amazing mums are here today in the audience.

    You deserve our thanks, our admiration and our applause.

    And the importance of women speaking up for other women is demonstrated through the work of my colleague, Theo Clarke, the MP for Stafford.

    Theo suffered a horribly traumatic birth. And when she regained her strength, and returned to work, she called a debate in the House of Commons on birth trauma.

    This was the first debate on birth trauma in the centuries that we have had a Parliament, and this shows some of the journey we still have to travel.

    And when you spoke, Theo, women around the country heard you and responded – sharing their stories too.

    Theo is now leading an inquiry into birth trauma on behalf of Parliament, with the backing of the Birth Trauma Association, and I encourage any mother who has been through a traumatic birth to share their story with this inquiry.

    But I am impatient, and I want to see progress quickly.

    We recognise that pregnancy and birth can take an enormous mental and emotional toll, particularly if a woman has to deal with physical illness too.

    This was demonstrated in the case of a young woman who passed away when extreme pregnancy sickness left her unable to eat, drink or complete daily tasks.

    Thanks to the advocacy of her MP, Sara Britcliffe, and others, specialist maternal mental health services will be available to women in every part of England by March.

    So, thank you Sara, and thank you to all the women who have campaigned for that.

    And we want to take care of the physical injuries caused in traumatic childbirths, which is why we are rolling out comprehensive physical care for those who experience serious tears during childbirth by March as well.

    But sometimes, a simple and thoughtful question is what is needed.

    “Are you ok, Mum?”

    This year, every woman who gives birth will be offered a comprehensive check-up with their GP within 8 weeks, focused solely on her mental and physical health – in other words, asking her whether she’s ok.

    Now, the baby girls born to these amazing women in our NHS will of course grow up into young women.

    For most girls and women, starting our periods is a part of life.

    It’s an extra thing we have to think about. It’s annoying at times, it’s sometimes painful, but it isn’t life-impacting.

    For some girls and women, however, their periods are a time of severe pain and exhaustion which they come to dread because of the impact it has on their lives.

    Painful periods and conditions such as endometriosis can stop girls and women from living their lives to the full – preventing them from going to school or to work, playing sport, from meeting their friends, or even starting a family.

    We are going to hear from Emma Cox later about her work to educate us all about endometriosis.

    But she and I have already met, when in my previous role, I was Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

    Now. in that role, I was responsible for the UK’s tax system. And it tended to involve rather dry discussions about the interpretation of tax law.

    So, after I’d settled in, I decided to bring a little more human into the Treasury – which is a very imposing institution.

    And it turns out that the Treasury can do human.

    Because last year, at the 2 fiscal events, the Chancellor announced the removal of VAT on period pants.

    And also asked the Office for National Statistics to investigate the impact of endometriosis on women’s employment, so that we can find solutions to ensure that we are helping them to live to their full potential.

    This is a groundbreaking piece of work and is part of the government’s commitment to ensuring women can lead full and fulfilling careers.

    And to mark that announcement, I invited Emma and women living with endometriosis into Number 11 Downing Street, so their voices were heard at the very centre of government.

    A few months later as Health Secretary, I am proud that we will build better guidance on endometriosis for healthcare professionals, so they can offer women the right treatment at the right time.

    But periods and pregnancy go together.

    We should also be able to control when and if we fall pregnant.

    We have therefore made contraception more accessible through our Pharmacy First programme.

    From December, oral contraception is now available on more high streets, using our pharmacists to their full potential – making it faster, simpler and fairer for women to access this healthcare.

    We will also roll out long-lasting contraception through women’s health hubs – which brings me onto our next priority.

    We will expand women’s health hubs so that every integrated care system has at least one hub up and running.

    So that women across England will be able to benefit from faster, simpler and fairer comprehensive care for menstrual problems, menopause, conditions such as endometriosis and contraception.

    We will also make sure hubs provide care that meets more women’s needs.

    Whether that’s making it quicker and easier to access long-acting reversible contraception, like coils and implants.

    Or setting up information sessions and consultations to help women understand their menopause.

    Or facilitating smooth and speedy referrals to specialist hospital treatment whenever it’s needed.

    Women’s health hubs benefit women and they benefit our NHS.

    They boost efficiency, they reduce unnecessary hospital referrals and they end the obstacle course of appointments women face to find the care they need.

    This is why we support them, and this is why we are expanding them.

    I have already said that I want to reform our NHS and social care system to be faster, simpler and fairer.

    And that point about fairness is shown shockingly in maternity.

    Black women are almost 3 times more likely to die while giving birth, or shortly after, than white women.

    Women of Asian ethnic backgrounds are 1.67 times more likely to die while giving birth, or shortly after, than white women.

    In modern Britain, this is absolutely unacceptable.

    And I want to thank the Women and Equalities Select Committee for carrying out an inquiry and amplifying this issue.

    We are serious about ending maternity disparities. And I have confidence that we will do this.

    Not only because of the intensive work in the NHS that I have set out, but also because of our unique status on the international stage.

    The world is on the cusp of a healthcare revolution.

    Researchers are discovering answers to the largest and most intractable healthcare issues facing all developed economies.

    The UK is at the front of this race.

    We are genuinely a world leader in life sciences.

    We have the largest life sciences industry in Europe, and businesses around the world are moving to the UK because of the tax and investment regimes we have built over the last decade to encourage them.

    And I am delighted to welcome pioneers in femtech here today.

    But we want to go further and faster.

    So, I am delighted to announce the launch of the first ever Research Challenge, worth £50 million, to tackle maternity disparities from the National Institute for Health and Care Research, the research arm of the Department of Health and Social Care.

    This spring, the call will go out to research teams for their ideas.

    By autumn, they will be innovating together, finding ways to give mums a helping hand before, during and after pregnancy.

    And I am hugely optimistic about what this can achieve. And this is just one of the projects we are funding to improve women’s health.

    Recently, I met 2 inspiring women who have been diagnosed with an aggressive and very difficult to diagnose form of breast cancer.

    Lobular breast cancer accounts for 15% of breast cancers, yet far more research is needed into its symptoms and treatments.

    Thanks to their campaigning, and the support of their MPs Jeremy Quin and Dehenna Davison, we will encourage more research into lobular breast cancer and other under-researched women’s health issues. As well as conditions that affect women and men differently, such as heart attacks.

    So that the symptoms we suffer from are recognised as symptoms that are perhaps different to the symptoms men would suffer from.

    It is precisely because we have such an established system of healthcare and research, with committed workforces and plans for how to meet these challenges, that I am confident about the future.

    We are making long-term decisions to support, strengthen and safeguard the health and wellbeing of women up and down the country.

    And my ministerial colleague and friend, Maria, has done so much to bring about real change for women. From new women’s health hubs to HRT for less than £20 a year.

    She does this while still practising as a nurse.

    So, an enormous thank you to Maria.

    Thank you for everything you do as an MP, and as a minister, and as a nurse.

    But there is another woman I would like to thank as well, our Women’s Health Ambassador, Dame Lesley Regan.

    I know Dame Lesley is raring to do even more than she has already achieved.

    And so, I am very pleased to confirm that we are reappointing Dame Lesley as our Women’s Health Ambassador for another 2 years.

    Thank you, Dame Lesley.

    So, this is our 5-point plan for women’s health.

    Maternity care that every mother can have faith in.

    Better care for menstrual problems.

    More women’s health hubs offering more treatments.

    Improving fairness and tackling inequalities and disparities.

    And more research into the health needs of women.

    In my very first speech as Health and Social Care Secretary, I said I was an optimist.

    And I remain an optimist.

    I’m optimistic about Britain’s long-term future, I’m optimistic about our NHS, and I’m optimistic about what the Women’s Health Strategy can achieve in 2024.

    By working together, we can build an NHS that is faster, simpler, and fairer for women across the country.

    And build a future that is brighter for our children and grandchildren.

    I want to thank you all for helping us achieve this – thank you very much.