Category: Health

  • Wes Streeting – 2024 Statement on Saving the NHS

    Wes Streeting – 2024 Statement on Saving the NHS

    The statement made by Wes Streeting, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 5 July 2024.

    When we said during the election campaign, that the NHS was going through the biggest crisis in its history, we meant it.

    When we said that patients are being failed on a daily basis, it wasn’t political rhetoric, but the daily reality faced by millions.

    Previous governments have not been willing to admit these simple facts. But in order to cure an illness, you must first diagnose it.

    This government will be honest about the challenges facing our country, and serious about tackling them.

    From today, the policy of this department is that the NHS is broken.

    That is the experience of patients who are not receiving the care they deserve, and of the staff working in the NHS who can see that – despite giving their best – this is not good enough.

    When I was diagnosed with kidney cancer, the NHS saved my life.

    Today, I can begin to repay that debt, by saving our NHS.

    I have just spoken over the phone with the BMA junior doctors committee, and I can announce that talks to end their industrial action will begin next week.

    We promised during the campaign that we would begin negotiations as a matter of urgency, and that is what we are doing.

    This government has received a mandate from millions of voters for change and reform of the NHS, so it can be there for us when we need it once again.

    It will take time – we never pretended that the NHS could be fixed overnight.

    And it will take a team effort. It will be the mission of my department, every member of this government, and the 1.4 million people who work in the NHS, to turn our health service around.

    We have done this before. When we were last in office, we worked hand in hand with NHS staff to deliver the shortest waits and highest patient satisfaction in history. We did it before, and together, we will do it again.

    That work starts today.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Statement on the Infected Blood Inquiry report

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Statement on the Infected Blood Inquiry report

    The statement made by Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 21 May 2024.

    Yesterday we heard the harrowing conclusion of Sir Brian Langstaff’s inquiry on infected blood. The report lays bare the many failings of successive governments, including historic failings in my own department. As the Secretary of State, I apologise unreservedly for the actions which have hurt and harmed so many people, culminating in the damning conclusions of the report.

    “Instances of the destruction of records and withholding of information are shocking and unacceptable. This should not have happened and must never happen again. We will study the report to make sure the lessons of Sir Brian’s Inquiry are learned and that these mistakes can never be repeated.

    “I give my sincere thanks to all of the victims, families and campaigners for sharing their pain and for their fortitude in pursuing the truth over many decades, as well as to Sir Brian for his meticulous and comprehensive analysis. I am working with the NHS Business Services Authority to ensure that all those eligible receive a second interim payment of £210,000 as soon as possible.

    “This terrible history of failures, experiments, disbelief, and cover ups has stolen the lives of victims and their families; instead of birthdays, careers, freedoms and joy, the victims’ lives are measured in pain, mental anguish, the crushing burden of stigma and the agony of wondering what could have been. Never again.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech on Birth Trauma

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech on Birth Trauma

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 13 May 2024.

    Good evening everyone.

    It is an absolute privilege to be speaking to you all this evening as we mark the launch of the first ever birth trauma inquiry report.

    And I’d like to start by thanking my dear friend Theo [Theo Clarke MP] for her strength in speaking out about her own experiences and in so doing, creating this incredible workstream whereby other women are being invited to give their experiences and to be listened to.

    I mean, Theo is, to my mind the exemplar of a Parliamentary powerhouse, and it’s been an absolute pleasure working with you, but also I genuinely think the work that you have achieved will have very, very long-term and positive benefits for women across England.

    The reaction that you have received from women shows just how critical this work is.

    You have given a voice to those who may never have shared the pain and the suffering that they have been through, or when they have spoken up, they have not been listened to.

    And so, thanks to you and to the brave women in this room, but also the many, many brave women who have contributed to this report, or who have shared their stories today with media outlets, as it has rightly got such media attention.

    But thanks to those brave women, things are changing and you are shining a bright light on the struggles that too many women face, and you are putting birth trauma at the heart of our national conversation, and ensuring that other mums do not have to suffer in silence.

    And I’d also really like to thank the wider APPG, co-chaired by Theo but also by Rosie [Rosie Duffield MP], and both of whom have really demonstrated, along with APPG colleagues, just how cross-party working can work to the very best for us as a country.

    And so thank you to every single Parliamentarian involved in the APPG.

    And in that spirit, I am determined to make care for new mums and mums to be faster, simpler and fairer because the birth of a child should be among the happiest moments in our lives.

    That said, of course, for the overwhelming majority of families it is.

    Each week around 10,000 babies are born in England on the NHS and most of them are born safely and with mothers and families reporting a good experience of the care they receive.

    But we want that for every woman and every family.

    And as this inquiry demonstrates so starkly, there is far too much unacceptable variation across the country in the service that women receive.

    Some mums endure simply unacceptable care and live with the consequences of that trauma for the rest of their lives.

    Now I’ve been open about my own experiences with the NHS.

    The NHS is genuinely one of the reasons I came into politics.

    I was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 3 and I’ve seen the very best of the NHS, but I’ve also seen some of its darker corners and that includes in my own experience when I was pregnant.

    As you can imagine the clinicians in the room will understand a type 1 diabetic being pregnant brings its own complications. And I had wonderful, wonderful care in many, many instances. But I also had examples where I wouldn’t wish other women to go through the same, including – and I’ve spoken about this – I was rushed into hospital earlier than anyone had planned, and I was put on a ward, heavily pregnant, not quite knowing what the future was holding for me or my baby.

    And, I was on the ward where women who had just experienced extremely traumatic, dare I say it, dangerous births were being rushed from theatre on to the ward where I was.

    Now clearly their experiences were far, far worse and far more traumatic than my own.

    But you can imagine how frightening actually that experience was for a first-time mum to be, with the concerns that I was having to live with at the time.

    So just that, as an example, I know everybody was trying to do their best at that point, but I desperately want to ensure that women who are expecting and who need additional support don’t find themselves in similar or even worse situations as I did.

    And I want to make sure that no woman goes through a physical and mental trauma, and while giving birth, that could have been prevented.

    Now I know that at the Women’s Health Summit in January, Dame Lesley Regan and I talked about – and forgive me, gentlemen – we talked about the NHS being a system that was created by men, for men.

    And that struck a chord with many women, particularly those who know Lesley and know she is another female powerhouse. And the truth is that women have suffered in pain that would simply not be tolerated in any other part of the hospital.

    Women have tried to raise concerns about unacceptable care, but they’re being told it’s all just natural.

    And it is that, if you like, silencing, that really should not be the reality that women face in the 21st century.

    We can and we will do better.

    Now, being made Health Secretary in November, I have been impatient to make progress.

    And that is why in January I held the Women’s Health Summit, where I made birth trauma one of the top priorities for the second year of the Women’s Health Strategy.

    And I want to make this year not just the year that we listen, but that we act and that this is happening now.

    We are rolling out new maternal mental health services for new mums, which are already available in all but 3 local health systems.

    We are, believe you me, paying close attention to those final 3 areas to make sure they finalise their plans at pace this year.

    On physical injuries too, we are rolling out improved perinatal pelvic health services, including guidance to better support women who experience serious tears and to prevent these from happening in the first place.

    We’re halfway through. We plan to get to full coverage by the end of the financial year. And these services will be supported by our announcement at the Spring Budget of an extra £35 million more for more midwives and better training for when things go wrong.

    On top of the extra £186 million a year we are already investing into maternity services and safety compared to 3 years ago.

    And thanks to Theo, we have also introduced stand-alone GP appointments 6 to 8 weeks after giving birth to ask those crucial questions about whether mum is okay while keeping separate checks for her baby, because we know a happy, healthy mum means a happy, healthy baby.

    And this is supported by new guidance to prompt direct questions about their birth experience, even if there is nothing in her notes to suggest that the birth was traumatic.

    I want to embed a culture that listens to women right from the start of their pregnancy, and so I’m delighted that NHS England are co-producing new decision-making tools with new mums to help guide through choices on how they give birth, what interventions could happen and what pain relief they should be offered.

    These will be made available in a range of languages and formats to make sure that they can be tailored to different settings and to different local populations, because the ethnic disparities that Kim [Dr Kim Thomas] and Theo have highlighted have to be tackled, and we are determined to do that.

    Theo’s speech in Parliament spoke to the lasting impact that birth trauma can have on the whole family. And of course, dads and partners are very much part of that. And so I’m extremely grateful to Theo’s husband for making that point.

    But also we have listened in government and Maria Caulfield, my minister, who is responsible for men’s health along with a great many other things, will be chairing the next session of the Men’s Health Task and Finish Group in June to focus on dads’ mental health and trauma so that we can better understand how to support partners.

    And I’m delighted to announce that the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) will commission new research into the economic impact of birth trauma, including how this affects women returning to work.

    That’s a really important idea and a really important commitment.

    I know there is so much work to do to deliver on the detailed findings of this report and I, together with NHS England, fully support the APPG’s call to develop a comprehensive cross-government national strategy for maternal care.

    I’m very grateful to the NHS for the progress that has been made so far on the 3-year delivery plan for maternity and neonatal services, but I want to go further and a comprehensive national strategy will help us to keep driving that work forward while making sure everyone across government and the health service are crystal clear about what we need in maternity services to focus on.

    And I also want to be clearer to mums and those looking after them, what their rights and expectations should be, so that everybody can be clear about the standard of care that mums deserve.

    So watch this space.

    Now in conclusion, this is the first time in the NHS’s 75-year history that I, as the Secretary of State, but also the chief executive of NHS England, are both mums.

    We get it.

    And for this, this is not just professional, it is personal.

    Both Amanda [Pritchard] and I take our responsibilities to all of you incredibly seriously and I have to say more soon on how I plan to make this area of our health system faster, simpler and fairer.

    So I want to finish by thanking you, each and every one of you that has been involved in this report, for everything you have done to kickstart the national conversation about birth, trauma and how women should be listened to and their concerns acted upon.

    And I really look forward to continuing this conversation with you in the months ahead.

    Thank you so much.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech at the Nuffield Trust Summit

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech at the Nuffield Trust Summit

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Health and Social Care Secretary, on 7 March 2024.

    Good morning everyone, what an absolute pleasure it is to be here at the Nuffield Trust.

    This is one of the landmark moments in the calendar of a Secretary of State for Health.

    I know that I am about to be scrutinised – and indeed cross examined – by some of the country’s leading experts in healthcare.

    So, believe you me, this makes Jeremy’s outing at the Budget yesterday feel very easy in comparison.

    But can I thank the Nuffield Trust for inviting me to speak to you today – it is a great honour.

    But it is also a privilege.

    Because the National Health Service is, genuinely, one of the reasons I came into politics.

    And today, having the privilege of speaking to you – those who work in healthcare, but also who are very, very conscious of its future, of the challenges we face today, but also our determination to prepare it for the years and decades to come, I would like to have a little bit of intellectual freedom to look at its future in a different light.

    Our national conversation around healthcare has tended to focus on older people, who are living longer, and with more health conditions.

    And later this afternoon the Chief Medical Officer – the wonderful Chris Whitty – will outline how we’re supporting them to live more independently, and with more years in good health, and rightly so.

    But I think there is a set of voices that is not heard often enough – the voices of young people.

    Young people not only pay for the NHS of today, but they will also use the NHS of tomorrow.

    And we know that high costs of living and rising rents are making it difficult for our young people to make those long-term decisions that are so important to us all, such as buying a house or starting a family.

    We cannot therefore expect them to foot the bill for an infinite increase in healthcare spending.

    The Chancellor’s Budget yesterday rightly recognised that we cannot continue to have a larger tax burden falling on a smaller number of working people.

    For me, the path we must take is obvious.

    We must build a more productive state, not a bigger one.

    And research proves this point.

    Today there are 3.3 workers to support every pensioner.

    In less than 50 years, there will be fewer than 2 workers to support every pensioner.

    So, we need to stop the next generation being dragged into a tax and spend black hole – where they put more in to get less out.

    Because this is a recipe not just for them losing faith in the institutions that we hold so dear, but also I worry for losing faith in capitalism, and losing faith in our democracy.

    But the decisions we took in yesterday’s Budget will make a meaningful difference.

    We took decisions that will reduce long-term demand, and improve productivity – not just throughout the NHS, but across the economy.

    Because the two go hand in hand.

    A strong economy helps pay for the NHS.

    And a strong NHS supports a growing economy.

    So today, I want to share our plan to achieve both of these things through productivity and accountability.

    But before I do that, there is of course one topic that is fundamental to my plan to reform the NHS to make it faster, simper, and fairer – and that is prevention.

    In the coming weeks, I will set out further thoughts on this very important topic.

    But I hope you’ll forgive me, following yesterday’s incredibly significant announcement at the budget, I wanted to focus today on productivity and how it can make meaningful changes to the NHS that we all want to see.

    Now, to productivity.

    I know that you’ve heard about this already.

    And indeed, Thea Stein has observed that NHS staff and clinicians don’t get out of bed in the morning thinking about how they could be more productive.

    I get that.

    They are motivated by doing the very best they possibly can for patients. And that is the way it should be.

    So when I talk about productivity, this is not about telling staff they need to work harder.

    It is about giving them the tools – and the time – to give patients the best care they can.

    Now, we know the NHS can be productive.

    From 2010 to the start of the pandemic in 2020, productivity growth in the NHS outstripped the wider economy by more than 1 per cent a year.

    But since then, it has gone into reverse.

    The causes are complex.

    The pandemic has clearly increased demands on staff, and spending on agency staff has risen as a result.

    Our Long-Term Workforce Plan, the first in NHS history, will get this spending in check – reducing it by as much as £10 billion over time.

    And we should also be frank about the significant problems and pressures that industrial action has caused across the system…

    …including, sadly, the 1.4 million appointments and operations that have been cancelled since strikes began in December 2022.

    Nonetheless, a reasonable and fair deal can be struck, and I’m really pleased that unions are recommending our new offer to NHS consultants.

    Should their members accept this deal – and I hope they will – we will all be able to move forward with providing patients with the care they need and see waiting lists fall.

    But the Budget will deliver savings for everyone who works in the NHS.

    The 2p cut in National Insurance will grow the average nurse’s pay packet by more than £500 a year.

    This is on top of the National Insurance cut that we’ve already delivered this year, that taken together will benefit the average worker by more than £900.

    But the Budget went further.

    As well as helping the NHS meet the pressures it will face in the coming years with an additional £2.5 billion, it set out our determination to return to the productivity we all know the NHS has – and can – deliver by funding a £3.4bn capital investment plan to invest in technology.

    The productivity plan, along with the Long-Term Workforce Plan, will see productivity grow by 2 per cent per year.

    Meeting and exceeding the growth we saw in the last decade, and unlocking £35 billion of savings by the end of this decade.

    We will digitise operating theatres, opening up an extra 200,000 operating slots a year.

    We will set up a new NHS staff app, making it easier to roster electronically and ending the use of expensive off-framework agencies.

    We will update IT systems, giving our doctors and nurses millions of hours back to spend with patients; rather than on hospital computer screens or computers on trolleys.

    We will support every hospital to use electronic patient records, making the NHS the world’s largest digitally integrated healthcare system.

    And we will improve the NHS app so patients can use it to confirm and modify all appointments.

    This will increase choice, reduce the number of missed appointments by half a million every year, and make the NHS app the front door for prevention as well as for cure – somewhere patients can book vaccinations and access all their preventative tests in one place.

    This productivity plan will make life simpler for staff and cut waiting lists for patients.

    And it is our responsibility – and I would go as far to say, it is our duty – to prepare the NHS for the future.

    This is why we want to seize the opportunities of AI for the benefit of our health.

    It has already revolutionised stroke care across the NHS – halving the time it takes to treat people and tripling the number who recover to reach functional independence.

    Now, we will use AI to potentially cut in half the form filling by doctors and nurses. And upgrade over one hundred MRI scanners across England, so that more than 130,000 patients a year can receive their results faster.

    This will allow them to start treatment sooner, free up clinicians to spend more time with patients who need them most, and save taxpayers money.

    And so that’s what I mean when I say that technology can make our NHS faster, simpler, and fairer.

    As well as improving performance across primary, secondary and community care, technology can also strengthen social care – keeping people out of hospital and helping them live well at home.

    This is what the Accelerating Reform Fund is all about.

    It provides local authorities with £40 million of government funding to invest in the most innovative new technology to help look after older people.

    Whether that’s through introducing new digital tools to boost recruitment and retention, or increasing social prescribing, which can reduce costs and help people build connections with their communities.

    Our Long-Term Workforce Plan set out that NHS productivity growth of between 1.5 and 2 per cent was possible.

    And thanks to the productivity plan we announced yesterday, Amanda Pritchard has committed to delivering 2 per cent.

    It will be challenging, but if we work together, we can get this done.

    Today, I also want to send a clear message about accountability.

    Trusts, ICBs, regional boards, and NHS England are responsible for billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money.

    It’s not our money, it’s not government’s money.

    It is the money that all our nurses, porters, receptionists, as well as shop workers, waiting staff, and the self-employed have earned and then paid to government from their wages.

    It is therefore our duty to ensure that this money is spent as well as possible.

    Poor performance cannot be tolerated, and good performance must be rewarded.

    To achieve this, by the summer, NHS England will start reporting against new productivity metrics, not only at the national level, but also across integrated care boards and trusts.

    And I want us to go further – because I’ve listened to you – by introducing new incentives to reward providers that hit productivity targets.

    So, I want to see providers retain the surpluses they generate through productivity improvement, and reinvest them in frontline services to support the clinicians who made these savings possible.

    Now of course, accountability extends beyond productivity to all of the work that the NHS does.

    I have been very honest about my own experiences of the NHS.

    I have received great care, but I have also seen some of the darker corners of our health system.

    And technology and the data it will produce, can be used by the public, as well as professionals to shine a light on poor performance.

    Care will not just be scrutinised by committees of MPs in dusty, ancient committee rooms in the Palace of Westminster, it will also be scrutinised by the public on their phones.

    This is what digital natives expect in every other area of their lives, and healthcare should not lag behind.

    Now we’re already making progress.

    People can find out how their local trust is performing with a few taps on a screen.

    Quite rightly, the pubic expect to receive the best care, and that care should not be prescribed by where they happen to live.

    And I say this of course as a proud Lincolnshire MP, which is a very different healthcare proposition from central London or central Birmingham.

    Postcodes can still determine the speed and quality of care.

    This is seen starkly in waiting lists.

    The long hangover of the pandemic must be tackled and waiting lists must be cut.

    Yet half of the NHS’s longest waits are concentrated in just 15 trusts.

    And in those trusts, the longest waits are centred on particular specialities, such as gynaecology or orthopaedics.

    Now, we are giving patients who have waited longest the choice to transfer to another provider.

    But that cannot be the only solution.

    And so, my ministers and I are working with NHS England to support those trusts to improve, but also to hold them to account.

    In urgent and emergency care, it’s a similar story.

    In January, just 15 trusts made up over half of the hours lost to ambulance handover delays, and just 13 trusts met the interim target to deal with 76 per cent of urgent and emergency patients within four hours.

    This can – and must – change.

    We have a range of tools to help trusts. From support from NHSE, to lending resources and people as well as peer support.

    Because we all recognise that is often the best way to drive up standards.

    And there should be rewards for success.

    That’s why NHS England will once again offer additional capital funding to Trusts who exceed their emergency targets.

    And if I may, I have been concerned when I hear of a few, only a few, ICB leaders who apparently do not consider it part of their job to speak to local Members of Parliament, people who represent local communities, or to explain their funding decisions.

    As someone who is – I promise you – very accountable to the public, we have to recognise that as public services are funded by the public, for the public, that attitude is not acceptable and must change.

    Now, as part of my focus on spending taxpayers’ money well, I am bringing commercial expertise into the Department of Health and Social Care to help drive results for us as a department.

    Steve Rowe, the former CEO of Marks and Spencer, has led a lot of work within the department to streamline our processes.

    And today, I’m delighted to announce that Steve is joining the department as one of our Non-Executive Directors, with a remit to accelerate delivery, and ensure the productivity plan, which is fully funded, improves care throughout England.

    Conclusion

    Now, I started my speech with young people – and the pressures they face – but also the need to meet the future with confidence.

    We can do this.

    We are standing on the cusp of a medical revolution, here technology, personalised therapies, and better data can transform outcomes for a generation who are more health conscious than any that came before them.

    The NHS, and indeed we, must seize this opportunity and look to the future – not restrict ourselves to what has always been done.

    In fact, it needs to have, to borrow a phrase, an M&S moment.

    This much-loved British brand, a stalwart of our high street for decades, realised change was needed, and embraced modernity.

    Pivoting towards the next generation, winning them over, and securing its long-term future.

    This is what the NHS needs to do to make sure it’s there for the next 75 years, just as it has been there for us.

    And as I’ve seen on visits to hospitals, GPs, dentists, and pharmacies up and down the country, the people working in the NHS have the drive, the dedication, and the determination to build a brighter future, and therefore support a stronger economy for the next generation.

    In conclusion, this is because this isn’t just any health service, it’s our National Health Service.

    Thank you all very much.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech to the Women’s Health Strategy

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech to the Women’s Health Strategy

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Health and Social Care Secretary, on 17 January 2024.

    Thank you so very much everyone.

    Can I just say, I’ve been looking forward to today.

    Because, apologies gents, but I view this as a sort of feminist’s Christmas.

    So, it is a genuine pleasure to be here with you all. I know there are incredible leaders here in what we are trying to achieve in women’s health.

    There are women in this room who are midwives, nurses, doctors, healthcare professionals and leaders.

    There are women who do amazing work through charities.

    There are women who campaign on issues.

    And, of course, there are women here who have told their stories, in public, so that others know that they are not alone.

    And to all of you, I say thank you.

    You are making our NHS a better service for us all.

    And I also want to promise you that I get it.

    Because women’s health and maternity care is one of my top priorities as Health Secretary.

    Because we are more than half the population, and our healthcare matters. Not just to us as individuals, but to our families and wider society.

    Now, as Maria rightly said, we have already come a long way, and transformed many lives by driving forward the Women’s Health Strategy we launched some 18 months ago.

    But together, we can go further still.

    I want to reform our NHS and care system to make it faster, simpler and fairer for all of us – and that includes women.

    Because for me this is personal.

    The NHS diagnosed me with type 1 diabetes at the age of 3.

    So, I have seen the very best of the NHS.

    But I have also seen some of its darker corners.

    One of those darker corners was when I was pregnant.

    As the clinicians in the room will understand, pregnancy with type 1 diabetes can be a very medicalised process. And there came a point in the pregnancy when it became clear that the baby was going to have to be delivered early.

    And so, I was rushed into hospital – and the hospital that looked after me amazingly well simply did not, at that point, have the facilities to look after someone who was both very early in pregnancy, but also with complications.

    And so they put me in a ward with women who had just given birth – literally rushed from theatre – who had had very traumatic experiences.

    And you will understand how deeply worrying – and dare I say it, frightening – it was to be lying in that ward with women who had gone through, frankly, a hellish experience. Who were in agony, who were needing very urgent medical treatment.

    And for me to be there ready to have my baby.

    Looking back, I know that everybody was doing their best.

    But I desperately want to ensure that women who are expecting, and who find themselves needing a bit of extra help are not in that situation, and they’re not facing the fear that I faced.

    So, I absolutely get it.

    And it is very much personal for me.

    But I want to set out some of the policies this year that will help light the way to better health and happiness for women.

    And I’m going to start with a number.

    Two hundred and ninety three.

    From the independent research published last week, that is the number of women who died in pregnancy or within 42 days of the end of pregnancy in the 3 years between 2020 and 2022.

    That number means that 293 families are grieving the profound loss of a mother – who will also be someone’s daughter, partner, wife, sister or friend.

    And their babies who have lived – their loss is indescribable.

    They will never know the warmth of their mother’s cuddle.

    The tinkle of her laughter.

    Or the limitless love that we have for our children.

    Not all of these deaths are linked to poor maternity care, but many will be.

    And this must stop.

    Important, and frankly stark, reviews into maternity services have identified how, why and where mistakes happen and harm is done.

    And in response, NHS England has set out a large programme of work to tackle this through its maternity and neonatal services plan.

    This includes the establishment of 14 maternal medicine networks across England. Which will ensure that women with medical conditions that pre-date, or develop during pregnancy, from cardiac disease to diabetes, all receive the specialist care they need.

    Fairer access to services must be achieved, and underperforming trusts must shape up.

    To achieve this, a Maternity Safety Support Programme is giving underperforming trusts assistance before serious safety issues arise.

    And I will give these and other measures my full backing to support families, and to end preventable maternal and baby deaths.

    Because the birth of a child should be among the happiest moments of our lives.

    And for the overwhelming majority of families, of course – it is.

    We want this for every woman, and every family.

    But this commitment also requires a laser-like focus on birth trauma.

    Some mums endure simply unacceptable care and live with the consequences of that trauma for the rest of their lives.

    Some have told their stories to the media – harrowing experiences of tears, prolapses, operations and agony.

    They’ve done this because they want to shine a light on the impact of such experiences.

    Some of those amazing mums are here today in the audience.

    You deserve our thanks, our admiration and our applause.

    And the importance of women speaking up for other women is demonstrated through the work of my colleague, Theo Clarke, the MP for Stafford.

    Theo suffered a horribly traumatic birth. And when she regained her strength, and returned to work, she called a debate in the House of Commons on birth trauma.

    This was the first debate on birth trauma in the centuries that we have had a Parliament, and this shows some of the journey we still have to travel.

    And when you spoke, Theo, women around the country heard you and responded – sharing their stories too.

    Theo is now leading an inquiry into birth trauma on behalf of Parliament, with the backing of the Birth Trauma Association, and I encourage any mother who has been through a traumatic birth to share their story with this inquiry.

    But I am impatient, and I want to see progress quickly.

    We recognise that pregnancy and birth can take an enormous mental and emotional toll, particularly if a woman has to deal with physical illness too.

    This was demonstrated in the case of a young woman who passed away when extreme pregnancy sickness left her unable to eat, drink or complete daily tasks.

    Thanks to the advocacy of her MP, Sara Britcliffe, and others, specialist maternal mental health services will be available to women in every part of England by March.

    So, thank you Sara, and thank you to all the women who have campaigned for that.

    And we want to take care of the physical injuries caused in traumatic childbirths, which is why we are rolling out comprehensive physical care for those who experience serious tears during childbirth by March as well.

    But sometimes, a simple and thoughtful question is what is needed.

    “Are you ok, Mum?”

    This year, every woman who gives birth will be offered a comprehensive check-up with their GP within 8 weeks, focused solely on her mental and physical health – in other words, asking her whether she’s ok.

    Now, the baby girls born to these amazing women in our NHS will of course grow up into young women.

    For most girls and women, starting our periods is a part of life.

    It’s an extra thing we have to think about. It’s annoying at times, it’s sometimes painful, but it isn’t life-impacting.

    For some girls and women, however, their periods are a time of severe pain and exhaustion which they come to dread because of the impact it has on their lives.

    Painful periods and conditions such as endometriosis can stop girls and women from living their lives to the full – preventing them from going to school or to work, playing sport, from meeting their friends, or even starting a family.

    We are going to hear from Emma Cox later about her work to educate us all about endometriosis.

    But she and I have already met, when in my previous role, I was Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

    Now. in that role, I was responsible for the UK’s tax system. And it tended to involve rather dry discussions about the interpretation of tax law.

    So, after I’d settled in, I decided to bring a little more human into the Treasury – which is a very imposing institution.

    And it turns out that the Treasury can do human.

    Because last year, at the 2 fiscal events, the Chancellor announced the removal of VAT on period pants.

    And also asked the Office for National Statistics to investigate the impact of endometriosis on women’s employment, so that we can find solutions to ensure that we are helping them to live to their full potential.

    This is a groundbreaking piece of work and is part of the government’s commitment to ensuring women can lead full and fulfilling careers.

    And to mark that announcement, I invited Emma and women living with endometriosis into Number 11 Downing Street, so their voices were heard at the very centre of government.

    A few months later as Health Secretary, I am proud that we will build better guidance on endometriosis for healthcare professionals, so they can offer women the right treatment at the right time.

    But periods and pregnancy go together.

    We should also be able to control when and if we fall pregnant.

    We have therefore made contraception more accessible through our Pharmacy First programme.

    From December, oral contraception is now available on more high streets, using our pharmacists to their full potential – making it faster, simpler and fairer for women to access this healthcare.

    We will also roll out long-lasting contraception through women’s health hubs – which brings me onto our next priority.

    We will expand women’s health hubs so that every integrated care system has at least one hub up and running.

    So that women across England will be able to benefit from faster, simpler and fairer comprehensive care for menstrual problems, menopause, conditions such as endometriosis and contraception.

    We will also make sure hubs provide care that meets more women’s needs.

    Whether that’s making it quicker and easier to access long-acting reversible contraception, like coils and implants.

    Or setting up information sessions and consultations to help women understand their menopause.

    Or facilitating smooth and speedy referrals to specialist hospital treatment whenever it’s needed.

    Women’s health hubs benefit women and they benefit our NHS.

    They boost efficiency, they reduce unnecessary hospital referrals and they end the obstacle course of appointments women face to find the care they need.

    This is why we support them, and this is why we are expanding them.

    I have already said that I want to reform our NHS and social care system to be faster, simpler and fairer.

    And that point about fairness is shown shockingly in maternity.

    Black women are almost 3 times more likely to die while giving birth, or shortly after, than white women.

    Women of Asian ethnic backgrounds are 1.67 times more likely to die while giving birth, or shortly after, than white women.

    In modern Britain, this is absolutely unacceptable.

    And I want to thank the Women and Equalities Select Committee for carrying out an inquiry and amplifying this issue.

    We are serious about ending maternity disparities. And I have confidence that we will do this.

    Not only because of the intensive work in the NHS that I have set out, but also because of our unique status on the international stage.

    The world is on the cusp of a healthcare revolution.

    Researchers are discovering answers to the largest and most intractable healthcare issues facing all developed economies.

    The UK is at the front of this race.

    We are genuinely a world leader in life sciences.

    We have the largest life sciences industry in Europe, and businesses around the world are moving to the UK because of the tax and investment regimes we have built over the last decade to encourage them.

    And I am delighted to welcome pioneers in femtech here today.

    But we want to go further and faster.

    So, I am delighted to announce the launch of the first ever Research Challenge, worth £50 million, to tackle maternity disparities from the National Institute for Health and Care Research, the research arm of the Department of Health and Social Care.

    This spring, the call will go out to research teams for their ideas.

    By autumn, they will be innovating together, finding ways to give mums a helping hand before, during and after pregnancy.

    And I am hugely optimistic about what this can achieve. And this is just one of the projects we are funding to improve women’s health.

    Recently, I met 2 inspiring women who have been diagnosed with an aggressive and very difficult to diagnose form of breast cancer.

    Lobular breast cancer accounts for 15% of breast cancers, yet far more research is needed into its symptoms and treatments.

    Thanks to their campaigning, and the support of their MPs Jeremy Quin and Dehenna Davison, we will encourage more research into lobular breast cancer and other under-researched women’s health issues. As well as conditions that affect women and men differently, such as heart attacks.

    So that the symptoms we suffer from are recognised as symptoms that are perhaps different to the symptoms men would suffer from.

    It is precisely because we have such an established system of healthcare and research, with committed workforces and plans for how to meet these challenges, that I am confident about the future.

    We are making long-term decisions to support, strengthen and safeguard the health and wellbeing of women up and down the country.

    And my ministerial colleague and friend, Maria, has done so much to bring about real change for women. From new women’s health hubs to HRT for less than £20 a year.

    She does this while still practising as a nurse.

    So, an enormous thank you to Maria.

    Thank you for everything you do as an MP, and as a minister, and as a nurse.

    But there is another woman I would like to thank as well, our Women’s Health Ambassador, Dame Lesley Regan.

    I know Dame Lesley is raring to do even more than she has already achieved.

    And so, I am very pleased to confirm that we are reappointing Dame Lesley as our Women’s Health Ambassador for another 2 years.

    Thank you, Dame Lesley.

    So, this is our 5-point plan for women’s health.

    Maternity care that every mother can have faith in.

    Better care for menstrual problems.

    More women’s health hubs offering more treatments.

    Improving fairness and tackling inequalities and disparities.

    And more research into the health needs of women.

    In my very first speech as Health and Social Care Secretary, I said I was an optimist.

    And I remain an optimist.

    I’m optimistic about Britain’s long-term future, I’m optimistic about our NHS, and I’m optimistic about what the Women’s Health Strategy can achieve in 2024.

    By working together, we can build an NHS that is faster, simpler, and fairer for women across the country.

    And build a future that is brighter for our children and grandchildren.

    I want to thank you all for helping us achieve this – thank you very much.

  • Steve Barclay – 2023 Speech at the IHPN Annual Summit and Dinner

    Steve Barclay – 2023 Speech at the IHPN Annual Summit and Dinner

    The speech made by Steve Barclay, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 31 October 2023.

    Our focus at the Department of Health and Social care is to diagnose and treat conditions quicker.

    Because this makes patient outcomes better, but it’s also much cheaper to deliver.

    That’s the sweet spot that we’re focused on hitting.

    One where patients and taxpayers are both better off.

    This approach underpins everything we as a department are doing.

    From our pharmacy first rollout through to the lung cancer screening programme.

    And it’s why, David [David Hare, Chief Executive of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network (IHPN)], I strongly support working with the independent sector.

    You collectively have a key role to play in diagnosing and treating conditions, and delivering the improved patient outcomes we all want to see.

    We are speeding up the diagnosis of major diseases.

    As a result of more referrals and screening, the percentage of cancer patients presenting in emergencies fell by more than 15% between 2010 and 2022.

    And we must keep driving these rates down.

    A University College London study found patients diagnosed in emergencies are half as likely to survive 12 months than those diagnosed through non-emergency routes, like GPs.

    And this isn’t just about cancer, around 8 in 10 heart failures are diagnosed in emergency departments.

    So, we need to get these numbers down to help save lives.

    And to do so, we need to turbocharge testing and diagnostics.

    That’s why, as an example, we’re rolling out more blood pressure checks than ever before.

    But this is far from the only challenge that our health system faces.

    The pandemic left behind – as colleagues in the room are well aware – very large backlogs, not least in elective care.

    But while we often focus on the challenges of COVID, it also showed us opportunities, the way to do things differently.

    The NHS worked effectively with the independent sector to maximise capacity and to tackle a common challenge.

    Many people in this room contributed to this effort.

    And the government – and people across the country – are grateful for how you cleared your schedules to provide NHS care to patients most in need.

    Now, this partnership must be sustained if we are to tackle those COVID backlogs.

    That’s why we launched, last year, the Elective Recovery Taskforce.

    It united the public and independent sectors with a clear goal: using every bit of available capacity to cut waiting lists.

    And David, I want to recognise the contribution the IHPN made to the taskforce.

    And I was delighted your leadership throughout the pandemic was recognised with an MBE.

    As the taskforce rightly concluded, one way of better using available capacity is delivering meaningful patient choice.

    We know three-quarters of patients are willing to travel to get care quicker.

    And we know improving choice can reduce waiting times by up to 3 months.

    That’s why we’ve committed to giving patients a choice of 5 providers at GP referrals, including those from the independent sector.

    Allowing patients to choose where they’re treated based on what matters most to them.

    That may be shorter waiting time.

    It may be seeing a particular doctor.

    Or it may be receiving care closer to home.

    [Political content removed]

    So from today, patients in England who have been waiting more than 40 weeks for treatment will have the right to request to be seen elsewhere.

    And that’s an opportunity opened up to around 400,000 patients who will be eligible.

    Hospitals will contact them to see how far they’re willing to travel.

    And if they request to move, integrated care boards must make every effort to find hospitals with shorter waiting lists.

    Not just within the NHS, but also across the independent sector.

    If they find shorter waiting lists, integrated care boards must give patients the choice to transfer for faster care.

    And these reforms have the Prime Minister’s personal backing.

    They will help more patients exercise their right to choose, and through that, help cut waiting lists.

    But our elective taskforce wasn’t just about driving reform from the centre, it also focused on empowering integrated care boards themselves and independent providers to cut waiting lists at a local level.

    The taskforce assessed different ways of doing so at 2 ICBs.

    Both of which delivered results.

    Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland saw an increase in independent sector activity of more than 70%.

    And by July, just 15 patients across Birmingham and Solihull were waiting more than 18 months for treatments.

    This shows how effectively ICBs and the independent sector can work together to cut waiting lists at a local level.

    And I know how critical independent oversight of choice, as it is now rolled out, is to giving confidence to investors.

    That’s why, working with David and colleagues, the taskforce recommended an independently chaired panel to promote genuine choice and fair procurement.

    And today, I can confirm the panel will be up and running by January.

    Now, the Elective Recovery Taskforce has achieved a lot.

    But perhaps its greatest success has been turbocharging the rollout of community diagnostic centres, or CDCs – the one-stop shops where patients receive tests for conditions like cancer and heart disease.

    In his 2020 review, Mike Richards set out his vision for CDCs – a radical investment and reform of diagnostic services, putting care at the heart of communities.

    Governments of all stripes have been criticised for prioritising investment in acutes over community services.

    But we’ve made community diagnostic centres a reality.

    One hundred and twenty seven CDCs are already open.

    Many are on high streets, in car parks, or even outside football stadiums.

    Giving patients care closer to home.

    Increasing NHS capacity.

    Reducing pressure on hospitals.

    And getting patients lifesaving diagnostics faster.

    Community diagnostic centres are the biggest investment in MRI and CT scanning capacity in the NHS’s history.

    And over the course of the programme, we will have increased our stock of scanners by almost a third.

    The independent sector has, of course, been key to this success.

    Thirteen CDCs will be run by independent providers, 8 are already operational, and 22 CDCs on the NHS estate use the independent sector’s diagnostics capabilities.

    The independent sector’s investments in CDCs has saved an estimated £110 million from the NHS capital budget.

    Money we put straight back into a further 7 community diagnostic centres.

    Giving patients better care, and delivering better value for money for the taxpayer.

    And today, I’m delighted to announce we’ll have opened 160 community diagnostic centres by March – hitting our target a year early.

    We’ve moved the opening dates for 40 CDCs, bringing them forward into this year.

    Our decision to do that was criticised at the time.

    But getting these CDCs open is why we’ve beaten our target.

    It’s why more patients will receive potentially lifesaving checks sooner.

    And I will never forget the reason that matters.

    When I was with the Prime Minister, in of all places, an Asda car park in Nottingham – talking to a guy, Terrence, at a lung cancer screening truck there.

    He was a heavy smoker.

    And he said to me he would never have gone to hospital to be checked.

    He would have been too worried to do so.

    But because it was in the car park of the Asda store, he had a lung cancer screening check.

    It had been positive, and diagnosed him at a much earlier stage.

    He said, “I’d have never gotten checked going to hospital, but the scanner has been so easy to get it done.”

    And we want more people across the country to do what Terrence did, and to get the tests they need as quickly as possible.

    That’s why today, I’m pleased to announce 3 of the final locations for our community diagnostic centres.

    Sites at Queen Mary’s Hospital in Sidcup, in Halifax, and in Bognor Regis, all of which will open this December – each one providing tens of thousands of vital checks every year.

    Last month, NHS England also confirmed the approval of 4 more community diagnostic centres – 2 in Wiltshire run by the independent sector, one in Thanet, and one in Cheshire.

    And we’re committed to transparency as well as delivery.

    I think the public has a right to know when their local CDCs will open.

    And more importantly, once they’ve opened, how they’re performing.

    That’s why we’re introducing an online dashboard to make this information easily accessible, alongside details of new hospital builds and upgrades.

    And it’s why, before the end of the year, we’re committed to publishing data on the number of MRI and CT scanners that are operational across the independent sector and the NHS.

    Community diagnostic centres have shown us how the public and independent sectors can deliver together.

    And across the health system, there are many more challenges we can overcome.

    Take training.

    To deliver the huge training expansion the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan commits to – doubling medical training places, almost doubling adult nursing places – we need the independent sector to give its strongest support.

    You carry out collectively a huge volume of procedures, and this in turn creates many training opportunities.

    And your role in training will continue to be an important part of our wider partnership in the years ahead.

    It’s not only the Long Term Workforce Plan that’s key to building that sustainable NHS; it also important that we maximise efficiency, and invest in the latest technology.

    AI – on which the Prime Minister is chairing a global summit today – is a key part of that.

    By the end of this year, every stroke network in England will have AI technology that can examine brain scans an hour faster.

    And this matters.

    Saving an hour can cut a stroke patient’s risk of suffering long-term consequences by as much as two-thirds.

    So again, this isn’t theory around AI.

    This is something that will be deployed in every one of our stroke centres by December, saving an hour on diagnosis and having real-terms benefits on patients’ outcomes.

    And as we announced yesterday, almost half of NHS acute trusts have won a share of £21 million that we’re investing in AI.

    This will accelerate the analysis of X-rays and CT scans for suspected lung cancer patients.

    And studies into these technologies have shown the very real promise they offer.

    Let me give you an example.

    One carried out at Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust suggests AI can process scans in less than 8 seconds, reducing radiologists’ workloads by 28% and reducing waiting times for suspected lung cancer patients by more than 70%.

    And as the Prime Minister announced last week, we’re investing a further £100 million to use AI to unlock treatments for diseases that are incurable today.

    Be that the novel treatments for dementia, or the vaccines for cancer.

    So, AI isn’t a silver bullet, but I’m determined to explore how it can get patients the care they need faster.

    So, in conclusion, our priorities are very clear.

    To diagnose patients faster.

    To give them more choice and control.

    To embrace technology and innovation.

    To deliver training for the long term.

    And by working in partnership, David, with your colleagues in the independent sector, we can deliver all of these things.

    So, together, let’s build an NHS that puts the patient first.

    Thank you very much.

  • Wes Streeting – 2023 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    Wes Streeting – 2023 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by Wes Streeting, the Shadow Health Secretary, in Liverpool on 11 October 2023.

    Nathaniel, it is truly an honour to have you with us here in Liverpool.

    When you came to see me in my advice surgery that Friday afternoon, I was moved by your spirit and your courage.

    Your determination to follow your great passions of music and education in the face of your terrible diagnosis blew me away.

    But I also felt a deep sense of injustice that I feel now.

    The injustice that the NHS didn’t reach you in time.

    The injustice that delay meant the difference between life and death.

    As a cancer survivor, it shakes me to my core.

    I owe my life to the NHS because it was there for me when I needed it.

    Not many people find themselves in a position to repay that kind of debt to the NHS.

    But I can.

    And I am determined to make sure that the NHS doesn’t fail people like Nathaniel anymore.

    It starts with gripping the crisis in front of us.

    7.7 million people waiting.

    The longest waiting lists ever.

    And the audacity of the fifth Conservative Prime Minister in 13 years blaming NHS staff for the Tories’ abysmal failure.

    Rishi Sunak – how dare you?

    There is a window of opportunity for negotiations before the next round of strikes takes place.

    A serious Prime Minister would take it.

    But this is his government in a nutshell

    – problems are there to be exploited, rather than solved.

    Meanwhile, patients are left waiting.

    That’s why a Labour government will take immediate action to cut waiting lists.

    We’ll provide an extra £1.1bn to help the NHS beat the backlog, with extra clinics at evenings and weekends

    – providing two million more appointments each year.

    Faster treatment for patients.

    Extra pay for staff.

    The first step to cut waiting lists and beat the Tory backlog.

    Paid for by abolishing the non-dom tax status, because patients need treatment more than the wealthiest need a tax break.

    We’ve also got to deal with the immediate crisis in NHS dentistry.

    Things are so bad that the number one cause of hospital admissions among children is tooth decay.

    People are pulling their own teeth out with pliers because they can’t get an NHS dentist.

    This is Dickensian.

    DIY dentistry.

    In 21st century Britain.

    That’s why Labour will deliver 700,000 extra appointments each year, get more dentists into the communities that need them most, and make sure that everyone who needs an NHS dentist can get one.

    But tackling the immediate crisis isn’t enough.

    It’s our mission to get the NHS back on its feet and fit for the future.

    Achieving our mission will take time, investment, and reform.

    Reform is even more important than investment.

    Because pouring ever-increasing amounts of money into a system that isn’t working is wasteful in every sense.

    A waste of money we don’t have.

    A waste of time that is running out.

    A waste of potential, because the NHS has so much going for it.

    Labour will never abandon the founding principles of the NHS as a publicly funded public service, free at the point of use.

    I make the case for reform not in opposition to those principles but in defence of them.

    I’m blunt about the fact that the NHS is no longer the envy of the world, not to undermine it, but to reassure people that we’ve noticed.

    I argue that our NHS must modernise or die, not as a threat but a choice.

    The crisis really is that existential.

    When I look at leading health systems across the world, the fundamental problem with the NHS becomes obvious.

    We have an NHS that gets to people too late.

    A hospital-based system geared towards late diagnosis and treatment, delivering poorer outcomes at greater cost.

    An analogue system in a digital age.

    A sickness service, not a health service.

    With too many lives hampered by preventable illness.

    And too many lives lost to the biggest killers.

    So be in no doubt about the scale of the challenge.

    Not just because as waiting lists rise, public confidence falls.

    But because in the longer term the challenge of rising chronic disease, combined with our ageing society, threatens to bankrupt the NHS.

    The Tories answer is all sticking plasters in the short term but an abandonment of the NHS in the longer term.

    As we saw in Manchester last week, the Conservative Party dances to the tune of Nigel Farage now.

    And the more they move to the right, the greater their threat to our NHS becomes.

    So it falls to us, the Party that founded the NHS 75 years ago, to rescue, rebuild and renew the health service today.

    Labour’s reform agenda will turn the NHS on its head.

    – From hospital to community.

    – Analogue to digital.

    – Sickness to prevention.

    A neighbourhood health service as much as a National Health Service, pioneering cutting edge treatment and technology, preventing ill-health, not just treating it.

    And what gives me hope are the people working with and for the NHS today, who are leading the way to that better future.

    There is nothing wrong with the NHS that can’t be cured by what’s right with the NHS.

    In Sussex, GPs work together providing specialist and urgent care in the community, allowing patients to see their regular family doctor, and giving them greater control over their own care.

    They’re preventing 4,000 patients from having to go to hospital every year.

    Primary care will be at the heart of Labour’s plan for the NHS – we’ll train thousands more GPs and cut the red tape that ties up their time.

    Labour will bring back the family doctor.

    Faced with the appalling effects of the pandemic on children’s mental health, schools in Bury are working with the NHS to deliver support.

    The number of children requiring mental health services has been cut in half.

    Every child struggling with their mental health should get the help they need.

    Labour will put mental health support in every school and hubs in every community, paid for by abolishing tax breaks for private schools.

    Politics is about choices. Labour chooses to give every child the best start in life, not just the privileged few.

    There is no solution to the crisis in the NHS that doesn’t include a plan for social care.

    We will grip the immediate crisis in social care, starting with the workforce, and I’ll have the best ally I could hope for

    – the former care worker turned Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner.

    Together, Ange and I will deliver a New Deal for Care Workers.

    A workforce plan to address recruitment and retention, the professional status these remarkable people deserve, and the first ever Fair Pay Agreement for care professionals.

    The first step on our ten-year plan for a National Care Service.

    One of the biggest opportunities we have is the revolution taking place in medical science and technology.

    That revolution is happening here in Britain.

    We’re a world leader in life sciences.

    Home to some of the smartest tech entrepreneurs.

    Take Moorfields Eye Hospital, where artificial intelligence identifies signs of disease on scans, with an accuracy equal to world-leading experts.

    They spot conditions earlier and prioritise patients with the most serious diseases before irreversible damage sets in.

    The next Labour government will arm the NHS with state-of-the-art equipment and new technology to cut waiting times Our ‘Fit For The Future Fund’ will double the number of scanners in the NHS, so patients are diagnosed earlier, and treated faster.

    More than that – breakthroughs in genomics and AI mean that we’ll soon be able to predict and prevent illness in the first place.

    If we combine the care of the NHS, with the ingenuity of our country’s leading scientific minds, the NHS could once again be the envy of the world.

    At the heart of Keir’s mission driven approach is this idea:

    Transformation of the National Health Service must go hand in hand with a transformation of the health of the nation.

    A child born in Britain today should live to see the 22nd century.

    I want them to be part of the healthiest generation that ever lived.

    That’s Labour’s ambition for children.

    And we will bring it to life by taking tough action against those who are cutting our children’s lives short.

    We will ban junk food ads targeted at children.

    Bridget’s breakfast clubs will provide every primary school pupil with a healthy, nutritious start to the day, making sure they have hungry minds, not hungry bellies.

    We’ll introduce supervised toothbrushing to keep kids’ teeth clean and keep them out of hospital.

    And to those in the vaping industry, who have sought to addict a generation of children to nicotine with flavours like rainbow burst and cotton candy ice, you have been warned,

    – a Labour government will come down on you like a ton of bricks.

    Back in January, I proposed going even further by outlawing the sale of cigarettes to the next generation altogether.

    Tory MPs said it was “nanny state”,

    “an attack on ordinary people and their culture”,

    They accused me of “health fascism”.

    Unfortunately for them,

    Labour is winning the battle of ideas, and where Labour leads Rishi Sunak follows.

    We’ll vote through the ban on selling cigarettes to kids, so that young people are even less likely to smoke than they are to vote Tory.

    Conference, those are just the first steps of what is needed.

    Our reforms will be fundamental and deep.

    They have to be if the NHS is to be there for us in the next 75 years, as it has in the last 75 years.

    The choice at the general election is clear.

    We can see the future with the Tories unfolding before our eyes.

    A two-tier health service, where those who can afford it go private and those who can’t are left behind.

    Our NHS reduced to a poor service for poor people.

    Our country viewed as the sick man of Europe.

    Labour has a different vision for our future.

    Where no one fears ill-health or old age.

    Where people have power, choice and control over their own health and care.

    Where the place you’re born or the wealth you’re born into don’t determine how long you’ll live.

    Where patients benefit from the brightest minds developing cutting edge treatments.

    And where children born in Britain today become the healthiest generation that ever lived.

    That’s Labour’s ambition for our country.

    To those who say that we’re all the same and that voting never changes anything, tell them:

    13 years of Conservative government have delivered the longest waiting lists and lowest patient satisfaction on record.

    13 years of Labour government delivered the shortest waiting times and the highest patient satisfaction in history.

    That’s the Labour difference.

    And when they ask what does Labour stand for, tell them:

    Two million more appointments a year to cut waiting lists.

    700,000 more appointments with NHS dentists.

    Mental health support in every school.

    Mental health hubs in every community.

    Double the number of scanners.

    The biggest expansion of NHS staff in history.

    More doctors, more nurses, more midwives.

    An NHS that’s there for you when you need it.

    Back on its feet and fit for the future.

    So let’s go out there and give Britain its hope back.

    Let’s give Britain its NHS back.

    Together, with Keir, let’s give Britain its future back.

  • Steve Barclay – 2023 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Steve Barclay – 2023 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Steve Barclay, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in Manchester on 3 October 2023.

    Thank you, Luke.

    As Health and Social Care Secretary, what drives me is getting people the care they need, more quickly.

    Boosting capacity, expanding our workforce and embracing technology that will help tackle waiting lists.

    But today, I also want to tell you about the long-term decisions that we are taking to support the NHS; to give patients more control and choice and to take on those – like militant union leaders and Labour MPs supporting them on the picket line – who want to block these changes.

    We’re taking immediate action to tackle challenges in the NHS and in Social Care.

    Putting 800 new ambulances on the road.

    Delivering 5,000 permanent hospital beds.

    And creating 10,000 hospital-at-home places for patients to receive care in their own home.

    And we’re making the biggest ever increase in social care funding with a record uplift in the autumn statement last year.

    But Conference, as a Conservative what matters to me most is not inputs – it is the outcomes for patients.

    We are making significant progress with the help of new technology.

    Take strokes.

    We are using AI to speed up brain scans – meaning thousands of patients have fully recovered who may not have.

    And by the end of the year, this technology will be available in all stroke units in England.

    We are also upgrading the NHS to offer patients a choice of up to five different healthcare providers – including independent providers – following a GP referral which the Patients Association say can reduce waits by up to three months.

    Bu I also know that it can sometimes take too long to roll out new innovations nationally, even when they have been proven to work in local pilots.

    So today, conference, I am announcing the creation of a new £30-million fund to speed up the adoption of tech in the NHS.

    This will enable clinicians to adopt proven technology that can improve patient care.

    These could include new tools to detect cancer sooner, to help people receive treatment in their own home or increase productivity to tackle waiting lists.

    Projects will be delivered in this financial year – getting benefits to patients as quickly as possible.

    We’re focused on getting the very latest technology into the hands of doctors and nurses so they can benefit you when you need it.

    And that’s the mission I share with my fantastic Ministerial team – with Will Quince, Helen Whately, Maria Caulfield, Neil O’Brien and Lord Markham.

    All supported by our brilliant PPSs Gareth Bacon and Duncan Baker, and our fabulous whips Faye Jones and Lord Evans.

    But, Conference, I want to be clear: We want to give patients more choice and control over their care and we can only do that with long-term thinking.

    Take our Long-Term Workforce Plan. The largest expansion in training in the history of the NHS.

    The first time in the history of the NHS that a government has been willing to set out a plan for the next 15 years for recruiting and training doctors, nurses, paramedics and other vital staff.

    And to show we are already delivering on that plan, I’m delighted to announce today that we are making additional medical school places available at universities for next September.

    Most of these places will be targeted towards three new medical schools at the Universities of Worcester, Chester and Brunel.

    With further places for two universities here in the Northwest – the University of Central Lancashire and Edge Hill.

    This is alongside our new pilot for medical degree apprenticeships.

    A new route into medicine for young people yearning to train to become a doctor but who want to take a vocational route, because our party is the party of real opportunity for anyone, no matter where you come from.

    And conference – our plan is not just about more staff.

    It is about using this powerful moment for reform using our Brexit freedoms.

    Shorter degrees.

    New roles.

    And more ways onto the NHS career ladder.

    Better for patients and the taxpayer.

    Now conference, my own background in the private sector taught me that organisations run more efficiently when you look to outcomes, not the inputs.

    Being focused on the end point means you cut down on waste.

    That’s why I brought in Steve Rowe, the former Chief Executive of Marks and Spencer – to scrutinise our Departmental spending.

    With a budget of £190 billion, there are always opportunities to get more resources from the backroom to the front line.

    When I was appointed, I put in an immediate recruitment freeze in place, which has reduced the department’s headcount by a sixth and we are closing half of the department’s offices.

    That’s less money on the back-office and more money on frontline.

    To deliver the long-term change the NHS needs, we need a relentless focus on patient outcomes and that means prioritising frontline resources.

    It does not mean spending huge sums of taxpayer’s money on diversity consultants or hiring bloated internal diversity and inclusion teams.

    And it does not mean ignoring patient’s voices – especially women’s voices when it comes to the importance of biological sex in healthcare.

    If we do not get this right now, the long-term consequences could be very serious for the protection of women and future generations.

    And Conference, I know as Conservatives, we know what a woman is and I know the vast majority of hardworking NHS staff and patients do too.

    That is why I ordered a reversal of unacceptable changes to the NHS website that erased references to women for conditions such as cervical cancer and stopped the NHS from ordering staff to declare pronouns to each new patient.

    And that is why today, I am going further; by announcing that we will change the NHS constitution following a consultation later this year to make sure we respect the privacy, dignity and safety of all patients recognise the importance of different biological needs and protect the rights of women.

    Now, Conference, if all of that seems like simple common sense, that’s because it is.

    And yet every step of the way we have faced opposition from the usual suspects when we are trying to do the best for patients.

    You probably saw some of them on your way in this morning.

    The militant BMA leadership – whose strikes have resulted in countless cancelled appointments and pose a serious threat to the NHS’s recovery from the pandemic.

    Their Consultants and Junior Doctors Committee are relentlessly demanding massive pay rises.

    Even if that means diverting resources from patients. And despite junior doctors having already received a pay rise of up to 10.3%.

    But it doesn’t end there.

    They are even threatening to take the Government to court over our plans to let patients see their own test results on their own phones, rather than taking up a GP appointment.

    This clearly shows that the BMA leadership is not on the side of change, and they are not on the side of patients.

    And then there’s Labour.

    Keir Starmer’s MPs continue to join the BMA on the picket line.

    You only have to look at Starmer’s own plans for the NHS to see that Labour will always bottle it and take the easy way out.

    When his own proposals on workforce were published, there was nothing on reform whatsoever. No shorter courses. No new roles. Just more of the same.

    His Shadow Health team won’t back our rollout of new obesity drugs on the NHS via primary care.

    Game changing new treatments that can give people struggling to lose weight a real helping hand.

    Labour don’t want to embrace innovation.

    Instead, the left like to lecture people on what they eat and drink.

    Look at Labour run London.

    Sadiq Khan has banned Wimbledon adverts on the underground.

    Why?

    Because photos of strawberries and cream breach health advertising rules set by City Hall.

    And in Wales, Labour has banned meal deals that include a sandwich with a bag of crisps at a time when families are concerned about the cost of living.

    Now, Keir Starmer says that Wales is the ‘blueprint for what Labour can do in England’.

    But their record on health makes for grim reading.

    As a result of Labour’s short-term thinking, patients in Wales are twice as likely to be waiting for treatment than in England.

    No wonder that the number of patients in Wales escaping to seek treatment in England has increased by 40% in two years.

    So, the next time you hear Labour telling people that they have easy answers to the challenges our health system faces remind them that Labour is letting people down in Wales.

    Now Conference, it is only by taking on those who resist change that we can make sure the NHS is there for us and our loves ones in the future.

    So, let’s stand up to a militant BMA leadership that does not accept the need for reform.

    Let’s challenges the ideologues who silence the voice of women.

    And let’s be very clear that we won’t take lectures from a Labour Party that has utterly failed patients in Wales.

    Conference, we will achieve it by coming together as Conservatives.

    Showing our values, our vision, our drive will deliver an NHS that gives people more choice, more control and, above all, puts patients first.

  • Helen Whately – 2023 Speech at the NHS Confederation Conference

    Helen Whately – 2023 Speech at the NHS Confederation Conference

    The speech made by Helen Whately, the Health Minister, on 27 September 2023.

    Thank you, Layla [Dr Layla McCay] and thank you all for being here.

    I wanted to be here, even with this broken ankle, because the NHS Confederation is a very important organisation and it is a great opportunity to meet lots of you here today.

    But the topic of today’s conference – health beyond the hospital – to me, that is the clincher.

    It’s something I have been wanting to talk about since the Prime Minister appointed me. But I rarely get the chance, in public, because it’s not what most people ask me about.

    For instance, if I’ve got the joy of the notorious morning media round, notorious among ministers that is, I’ll likely be asked about acute hospital performance, A&E waits, and possibly discharge into social care, because of how that affects hospitals.

    It often feels like the acute hospital is like the sun in the NHS solar system with everything else spinning round it. But it doesn’t have to be that way, and I suspect many of you are here because you don’t believe it should be that way.

    I scarcely need to remind you of the context for this conversation. Firstly, the fact that more people are living longer with multiple health conditions. Over half of people over 55 have at least one long term condition, and that goes up to 80% of people aged over 80. And more people are living to a much greater age when they are also likely to be frail.

    There are a bit under 2 million people aged over 85. And over half of people over 85 are affected by frailty. In a couple of decades that number – people over 85 – will double.

    I don’t need to tell this audience about the challenges of an ageing population for our health system. But, as the Prime Minister said last week, governments must reckon with reality.

    This reality means we need to do healthcare differently, for the sake of individuals and for the sake of the system as a whole.

    We should start with what people want. If any of you have heard me speaking about hospital visiting, you will know that my mum has been pretty unwell this year. Even so, my mum doesn’t want to go in and out of hospital. In fact, she has to be practically dead before she agrees to going. She’s not alone in that.

    We probably all know someone who is, or has been, through this – bouncing in and out of hospital. We know that it is miserable.

    What most people want is to be able to stay at home, and have their healthcare on hand, from clinicians who understand them and what they need. Giving them control over what’s going on, and without being wheeled into an emergency department time after time.

    Then looking at our health system, we know our emergency departments are struggling with the number of people turning up. They’ve got really good at triage and developing new models like having GPs on site and same day emergency care. But it’s really hard to get care right in an emergency department for someone who’s frail with really complex care needs – and for those people, once they are in hospital, it can be so much harder for them to get home.

    Now here there is some good news: what people want and what would help our stretched acute hospitals is the same.

    Now I won’t be simplistic – ministers are always looking for the silver bullet, but I have been in this job long enough to know that there is no such thing. There is no one magic thing, but what there is, is a cluster of things that make a difference.

    Several of these were brought together in the Urgent and Emergency Care Recovery Plan, and are already well on their way to being offered in every area – like consistent urgent community response services, which do a great job of keeping people out of hospital when there’s a crisis.

    Like virtual wards, or hospitals at home, which mean people can get the hospital-level care they need in their own home, avoiding admission or allowing earlier discharge. Like the ‘Enhanced Health in Care Homes’ model.

    And scaling up intermediate care for patients following hospital discharge, to which end NHS England has just published the intermediate care framework. Among other things, this guides systems on demand and capacity planning to make sure that the amount of step-down care commissioned in each area will be enough to meet the needs of patients, particularly as demand increases during the winter months.

    But there’s a particular approach which I want to focus on today, which to me is the next big thing we have to do. That is to put in place really good, proactive, community-based, multidisciplinary, proactive, anticipatory care.

    Many of you will have heard of the Jean Bishop Centre in Hull, but for those of you who haven’t, I’ll give you a whistle-stop introduction.

    It’s named after, obviously, Jean Bishop. For 30 years Jean paced the streets of Hull, rattling her tin, and urging passers-by to donate to charity. She borrowed a stripy outfit from Age UK and quickly became known as Hull’s ‘bee lady’ – a local legend.

    She went out in all seasons – sunshine or rain, for anyone who knows Hull. This remarkable woman raised more than £125,000 for charity. She passed away 2 years ago, but her legacy lives on: Hull’s Jean Bishop Integrated Care Centre opened in 2018.

    Now people talk a lot about integrated care. This is it in action. The centre’s team includes geriatricians, advanced nurse practitioners, GPs, pharmacists, therapists and social workers, all under one roof.

    GPs across Hull identify patients at risk of severe frailty and refer them for a comprehensive assessment. They’ll see whoever they need to see in that multidisciplinary team. And they’ll get a tailored care plan shared with them, their GP and the hospital. A plan that reflects what they want – to help them manage their own care and stay healthy.

    The centre offers the same service to care home residents too. And it works. Between 2019 and 2022, for patients aged over 80, emergency hospital admissions fell by more than 13% and A&E attendance for patients in care homes fell by almost a fifth.

    And they are not the only ones doing this. For example, the ‘Age Well Team’ in Northamptonshire, with a proactive care model and a multi-disciplinary team, have seen a 5% drop in unplanned hospital admissions.

    Another example – one that means a lot to me because it’s just on my doorstep in Kent – is the proactive integrated care provided by the Estuary View practice in Whitstable, which was one of the vanguards that informed the inclusion of integrated community health services and expanded neighbourhood teams in the NHS Long Term Plan.

    I imagine those of you here today also have some great examples in your areas, which I’d like to learn about.

    So what now? Well, I meet with James Sanderson, who you heard from just before the break, every couple of weeks, and pretty much every time we meet, I ask him about this.

    Over the last few months, James and colleagues at NHS England – working with organisations like Age UK and the British Geriatrics Society, drawing from best practice across the country and the world – have been developing the proactive care framework, focused on frailty. Which will set out the combination of things that good proactive care involves – the effective use of data, holistic assessments, personalised care, multidisciplinary working, co-ordinated care and targeted support for individual patients and their carers.

    The framework is coming soon to help systems put this into practice, and then the job will be to make it happen.

    Now, making stuff happen can’t just be by ministerial decree – me saying it is not enough. Making things happen involves thousands of people who work in the NHS thinking, and doing, something differently. And in my experience, just telling people to do something doesn’t work – at least, not very well. We need people across the NHS to believe in this, to want to do it, and then to have the support to be able to do it.

    And what I would love from you, and I recognise I am preaching to the converted here today, is to do what you can to make this happen. Because if I know anything, the answers to the problems are out there, not up here.

    Before I sit down and take your questions, on my part, I can give you this assurance. People often talk about the NHS like it’s the National Hospital Service, not the National Health Service. And when the chips are down, the focus tends to be the hospitals and what’s going on in them. But I don’t let that happen on my watch.

    I’m always the one who says, ‘Hold on – what about the rest of the system?’

    If I go back to my solar system analogy earlier, the sun at the centre actually should be the person, the individual, whose health this is all about. Hospitals, community health services, mental health services, social care providers and so on – these are all important parts of the system.

    And the future of healthcare is as much about what happens out of the hospital, as what happens in it.

  • Wes Streeting – 2023 Speech on the Countess of Chester Hospital Inquiry

    Wes Streeting – 2023 Speech on the Countess of Chester Hospital Inquiry

    The speech made by Wes Streeting, the Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 4 September 2023.

    I strongly echo the sentiments of the Secretary of State and thank him for advance sight of his statement. I welcome the appointment of Lady Justice Thirlwall to lead the inquiry into the crimes committed by Lucy Letby, and I strongly welcome his appointment today of Baroness Lampard to lead the statutory review in Essex. I look forward to receiving further updates from the Secretary of State as soon as possible.

    Turning to the case of Lucy Letby, there are simply no words to describe the evil of the crimes that she committed. They are impossible to fathom. Although she has now been convicted and sentenced to a whole-life order, the truth is that no punishment could possibly fit the severity of the crimes she committed. With Cheshire police’s investigation having expanded to cover her entire clinical career, we may not yet know the extent of her crimes. What we do know is that her victims should be starting a new school term today. Our thoughts are with the families who have suffered the worst of traumas, whose pain and suffering we could not possibly imagine, and who will never forget the children cruelly taken from them. We hope that the sentencing helped to bring them some closure, even though the cowardly killer dared not face them in court.

    I wish to pay tribute to the heroes of this story: the doctors who fought to sound the alarm in the face of hard-headed, stubborn refusal. This murderer should have been stopped months before she was finally suspended. Were it not for the persistent courage of the staff who finally forced the hospital to call in Cheshire police, more babies would have been put at risk. I am sure the whole House will want to join me in recognising Dr Stephen Brearey and Dr Ravi Jayaram, whose bravery has almost certainly saved lives.

    Blowing the whistle on wrongdoing is never easy, which is why it should not be taken lightly. Indeed, we can judge the health of an institution by the way that it treats its whistleblowers. The refusal to listen, to approach the unexplained deaths of infants with an open mind and to properly investigate the matter when the evidence appeared to be so clear is simply unforgivable. The insult of ordering concerned medics to write letters of apology to this serial killer demonstrates the total lack of seriousness with which their allegations were treated.

    I welcome the fact that the Secretary of State has changed the terms of the inquiry and put it on a statutory footing. There must be no hiding place for those responsible for such serious shortcomings. It is welcome that the inquiry will have the full force of the law behind it, as it seeks to paint the full picture of what went wrong at the Countess of Chester Hospital, and it is right that the wishes of the families affected have been listened to. I welcome the fact that they will be involved in the drawing up of the terms of reference.

    I ask the Secretary of State, people right across Government and people who hope to be in government to make sure that, in future, in awful cases such as this, families and victims are consulted at the outset. Can he assure the House that the families will continue to be involved in decisions as the inquiry undertakes its work?

    Mr Speaker, no stone can be left unturned in the search for the lessons that must be learned, but it is already clear that there were deep issues with the culture and leadership at the Countess of Chester Hospital. This is not the first time that whistleblowers working in the NHS have been ignored, when listening to their warnings could have saved lives. Despite several reviews, there is no one who thinks that the system of accountability, of professional standards and of regulation of NHS managers and leaders is good enough.

    Why were senior leaders at the Countess of Chester Hospital still employed in senior positions in the NHS right up to the point that Lucy Letby was found guilty of murder? The absence of serious regulation means that a revolving door of individuals with a record of poor performance or misconduct can continue to work in the health service. Does the Secretary of State agree that that is simply unacceptable in a public service that takes people’s lives into its hands?

    The lack of consistent standards is also hampering efforts to improve the quality of management. I am sure the Secretary of State will agree that good management is absolutely vital for staff wellbeing, clinical outcomes, efficient services and, most of all, patient safety. The case for change has been made previously. Sir Robert Francis, who led the inquiry into the deaths at Mid Staffs, argued in 2017 that NHS managers should be subject to professional regulation. In 2019, the Kark review, commissioned by the Secretary of State, called for a regulator to maintain a register of NHS executives, with

    “the power to disbar managers for serious misconduct”.

    In 2022, the Messenger review commissioned by the right hon. Member for Bromsgrove (Sajid Javid) recommended a single set of core leadership and management standards for managers, with training and development provided to help them meet these standards. We must act to prevent further tragedies, so I welcome the Secretary of State’s announcement that his Department is reconsidering Kark’s recommendation 5. Labour is calling for the disbarring of senior managers found guilty of serious misconduct, so I can guarantee him our support if he brings that proposal forward.

    The Secretary of State should go further. Will he now begin the process of bringing in a regulatory system for NHS management, alongside standards and quality training? Surely we owe it to the families and the staff who were let down by a leadership team at the Countess of Chester Hospital that was simply not fit for purpose.

    Finally, I know that I speak for the whole House when I say that the parents of Child A, Child C, Child D, Child E, Child G, Child I, Child O and Child P are constantly in our thoughts, as are the many other families who worry whether their children have also been victims of Lucy Letby. We owe it to them to do what we can to prevent anything like this from ever happening again. As the Government seek to do that, they will have our full support.

    Steve Barclay

    I thank the hon. Gentleman for the content of his response and the manner in which he delivered it. I think it underscores the unity of this House in our condemnation of these crimes, and our focus on putting the families at the centre of getting answers to the questions that arise from this case. I join him in paying tribute to those consultants who spoke up to trigger the police investigation and to prevent further harm to babies. I note the further work that the police are doing in this case, and also pay tribute to the police team, which I had the privilege of meeting. They have worked incredibly hard in very difficult circumstances in the course of this investigation.

    As the hon. Gentleman said, the families are absolutely central to the approach that we are taking. That is why I felt that it was very important to discuss with them the relative merits of different types of inquiry, but their response was very clear in terms of their preference for a statutory inquiry. I have certainly surfaced to Lady Justice Thirlwall some of the comments from the families in terms of the potential to phase it. Of course, those will be issues for the judge to determine.

    On the hon. Gentleman’s concerns around the revolving door, clearly a number of measures have already been taken, but I share his desire to ensure that there is accountability for decisions. As Members will know, I have been vocal about that in previous roles, and it is central to many of the families’ questions on wider regulation within the NHS.

    The hon. Gentleman mentioned the importance of good management. I am extremely interested in how, through this review and the steps we can take ahead of it, we give further support to managers within the NHS and to non-exec directors. The Government accepted in full the seven recommendations of the Messenger review. The Kark review was largely accepted. There was the issue of recommendation 5, which is why it is right that we look again at that in the light of the further evidence.

    It is clear that a significant amount of work has already gone in. A number of figures, including Aidan Fowler and Henrietta Hughes, have focused on safeguarding patient safety, but in the wake of this case we need to look again at where we can go further, which the statutory inquiry will do with the full weight of the law. I am keen, however, that we also consider what further, quicker measures can be taken. Indeed, I have been in regular contact with NHS England to take that work forward.