Category: Health

  • Sajid Javid – 2021 Statement on Covid-19

    Sajid Javid – 2021 Statement on Covid-19

    The statement made by Sajid Javid, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 20 October 2021.

    The Prime Minister’s announcement of the formation of the antivirals taskforce in April 2021 brought new impetus to the search for potential antiviral treatments for UK covid-19 patients.

    Effective treatments for covid-19 will be vital to manage the risk of infection, as we learn to live with the virus. Covid-19 treatments are especially important for people who cannot take a vaccine for medical reasons or for whom vaccines may be less effective, such as those who are immunocompromised.

    Antivirals may help reduce the development of severe covid-19 and its transmission by targeting the virus at an early stage, preventing progression to more severe disease by blocking virus replication.

    The antivirals taskforce, under the leadership of Eddie Gray, has worked at speed to identify and evaluate potential antiviral candidates that meet the criteria set out by the Prime Minister: oral antivirals which can be taken at home following a positive covid-19 test and are available for deployment this autumn and winter.

    Commercial negotiations have concluded for the first antiviral candidates, with two supply agreements now signed to ensure that they are available for UK patients. We have secured 480,000 patient courses of Molnupiravir from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) along with 250,000 patient courses of PF-07321332 from Pfizer. Payment will only be made, and product delivered following UK market authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

    Molnupiravir and PF-07321332 are both oral antivirals which can be taken at home to target the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but with different mechanisms of action. Molnupiravir is a ribonucleoside analogue which inhibits viral RNA replication. PF-07321332 is a protease inhibitor which prevents virus replication by selectively binding to viral proteases preventing the cleavage of proteins which are necessary to produce infectious virus particles.

    Should these antivirals receive appropriate MHRA approvals, the UK Government intention is to deploy these treatments to NHS patients via a national study which will allow us to collect further data on how these treatments work in vaccinated patients. The antivirals taskforce is working across the health and care system in the UK, including NHS England and NHS Improvement, UK Health Security Agency, and our partners in the devolved Administrations to plan the deployment of antiviral treatments as more data is available. Our deployment plans will prioritise the most clinically vulnerable to covid-19. The Department of Health and Social Care will publish a further update in due course.

  • Sajid Javid – 2021 Statement on Blood Donor Selection Criteria

    Sajid Javid – 2021 Statement on Blood Donor Selection Criteria

    The statement made by Sajid Javid, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 18 October 2021.

    I would like to inform the House about changes that the Government will be making to the blood donor selection criteria. This announcement forms part of the wider steps the Government have taken to make blood donation more equitable.

    In 2019, the Government commissioned the ‘For the Assessment of Individualised Risk’ (FAIR) steering group to consider whether changes could be made to the blood donor selection criteria to ensure it was as effective and inclusive as possible.

    On 14 June 2021, in response to the FAIR steering group’s work, the Government implemented changes that enable men who have sex with men in long-term relationships to give blood. These changes put in place a gender-neutral selection policy, where deferrals are now based on higher risk behaviours associated with acquiring infections.

    Following further work by the FAIR steering group, I can announce that the Government will be making an additional change to the blood donor selection criteria, which will increase inclusivity without compromising the safety of donated blood.

    As part of its work, the FAIR steering group reviewed the effectiveness of the question prospective donors are asked about whether they have recently had sex with a partner who may ever have had sex in an area where HIV is endemic—including most of sub-Saharan Africa. In reviewing the evidence, the steering group considered the other questions that are already on the pre-donation questionnaire that help to identify high-risk donors and the associated deferrals already in place, as well as the effect of routine screening of all donations for HIV and other blood-borne viruses. The FAIR steering group concluded that the question could be removed without impacting the safety of the blood supply. Furthermore, they determined that removing the question would help to improve inclusivity and equity for Black African donors. This is especially important due to the ongoing need for more Black African donors who can have rarer blood types, which will help to improve and save lives in the UK.

    The Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) reviewed the steering group’s findings and agreed that the removal of this question poses no additional safety risks to the blood supply and recommended the change was made to the pre-donation selection criteria.

    The Government have now reviewed the evidence presented by the FAIR steering group together with SaBTO’s advice and has accepted this recommendation. This means that the question asking whether donors had recently had sex with a partner who may ever have had sex in an area where HIV is endemic will be removed from the blood donor selection criteria. This is a progressive and welcome step forward, reducing limitations for people to donate blood and creating a fairer system for blood donation.

    The Department of Health and Social Care is working with NHS Blood and Transplant to implement this change. We will have monitoring mechanisms in place to ensure the safety of donors and patients, including continued monitoring of both acute and chronic infections in new and regular donors. The changes will be reviewed in 12 months.

  • Sajid Javid – 2021 Article on Healthcare

    Sajid Javid – 2021 Article on Healthcare

    The article written by Sajid Javid, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, published by the Daily Mail and issued by the Government on 14 October 2021.

    Like many Asian parents, my mum always wanted me to be a GP.

    When I told her I’d been made Health and Social Care Secretary, she said: “Well, you didn’t quite make it to GP, but at least you’re working in healthcare!”

    In truth, she was only half joking. There’s a reason why people such as my mum have such high regard for GPs: their powerful blend of expertise and empathy has made generations of communities happier and healthier.

    So I want to say a huge thank you to GPs and their teams across the country for their commitment to patients during the most challenging of times.

    I may not have become a GP, but I do want to make it easier for them to do their vital work. Equally, I am committed to making sure patients can see their GP in the way they choose and have a better experience when they do. The Mail has run an important campaign on this issue.

    Working closely with the NHS, we’ve made a plan for GPs and patients to do just that: it will mean more appointments in the ways people want.

    While I’m determined to get us closer to pre-pandemic levels of face-to-face appointments, it is, of course, true that online and telephone consultations are more convenient for many people.

    There’s no question that telephone and video calls will be a part of the future of general practice. But it cannot be the whole future.

    With winter just around the corner, I know GPs are under real pressure: the demand for appointments is high and so is their workload.

    So today, I’m announcing a fresh £250 million investment in general practice to boost capacity ahead of the winter, opening up more appointments.

    With this money, we will expect GPs to provide clear plans for how they will improve access and deliver more face-to-face appointments, such as offering appointments on evenings and weekends.

    By and large, people understand why it’s been a difficult time for our GPs: coronavirus (COVID-19) pressures, concerns about infection and reduced space in waiting rooms have often made the process of getting an appointment more difficult.

    While I understand the frustration, violence and abuse towards GPs and their teams will never be tolerated.

    GPs and their teams need to feel safe at work, and the NHS is making £5 million available for practices to improve their security measures as part of our plan.

    Another way we’re going to ensure more time is spent with patients is by spreading the workload.

    I want every practice to use the NHS Community Pharmacy Consultation Service, so our brilliant community pharmacists can do more in terms of prescribing.

    I’m asking my department to work with the NHS and look at a ‘Pharmacy First’ scheme for England, so pharmacists can provide treatment for specific conditions such as sore throats, without patients having to go to their GP – building on pilot schemes in England and much as they already do in Scotland.

    We also need to measure GPs against clearer standards. The vast majority of GPs are doing brilliant work but, where GPs are not, we have to fix it: it’s simply not fair for their patients to suffer in silence.

    The challenges in general practice are far from over, but I have every confidence we can meet the difficulties ahead by working together to achieve our common goal – delivering for patients.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Comments on NHS Waiting List Statistics

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Comments on NHS Waiting List Statistics

    The comments made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Health and Social Care Secretary, on 14 October 2021.

    The NHS is in crisis. Waiting lists are at record levels with more and more patients forced to pay for operations.

    GP numbers have gone down, and it’s no wonder Sajid Javid has run away from defending his latest policy announcement in front of doctors – his promise is already unravelling.

    The money announced today will mean about £33,000 extra per practice; nowhere near enough to deliver the change needed for patients. In 2019 the Tories pledged to deliver 6,000 extra GPs, and ahead of a tough winter, patients are asking why they have broken that promise.

  • Sajid Javid – 2021 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Sajid Javid – 2021 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Sajid Javid, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 5 October 2021.

    Thank you for that welcome – it’s great to be back together in Manchester.

    When we were last here I talked about how proud my mother was.

    To see me go from living in a small flat above the shop, to living above Downing Street. But I can tell you that she’s even prouder now.

    Like many Asian mothers, she always wanted me to be a doctor… When I told her about this job, she said: “well you didn’t quite make it to GP, but at least you’re working in healthcare!”

    It really is an honour to serve my country again, and to be entrusted with such a critical task at this essential moment. I’ve been in this job for 100 days and I can tell you it’s my toughest job yet. But I’ve been inspired each and every day, by the commitment and dedication, of all those on the frontlines of health and social care.

    The porters, the paramedics, the drivers, the doctors, the nurses, the care workers, the cleaners, the scientists, the vaccinators.

    It’s because of their efforts, and so many others like them… thousands of lives, and millions of livelihoods, have been saved.

    They’ve brought new meaning to the words “public service”. So to all those across the nation who stood up and served their country in this time of peril, we stand, and salute you.

    My priorities are simple:

    Covid.

    Recovery.

    Reform.

    Covid – getting us, and keeping us, out of the pandemic.

    Recovery – tackling the huge backlog of appointments it has caused.

    And reform of our health and social care systems for the long-term.

    Today, I’m going to look forward.

    We can all be here at this conference, and talk about the future, because of the success of the vaccine programme – an amazing example of what public-private collaboration can do.

    Of course, we cannot afford a single dose of complacency.

    This virus has shown itself to be unpredictable.

    But so far our vaccine wall of defence has held firm – and we will keep strengthening it… brick by brick, jab by jab…

    With one of the only national booster programmes in the world.

    We took the difficult decision before the summer, to put our faith in that vaccine wall. Before that was possible, as a country we sacrificed our freedoms and way of life to protect the elderly and vulnerable. But as Conservatives we will never see state control as the default.
    We know the impact that lockdowns have… on jobs, life chances, education, mental health, and everything else.

    And just as we know “government money” is taxpayers’ money… …we know that freedoms ultimately belong to citizens. Because we will always be the party of freeing things up, not locking things down.

    The challenge for us now is this: getting past the peak of the pandemic… won’t mean that we’re suddenly immune from all its effects on our society and our economy.

    When I came in, I said that I was not just the Covid Secretary, but the Health & Social Care Secretary.

    There was no doubt about the biggest item spilling out of my in-tray: an NHS waiting list that will get worse before it gets better… projected to grow as high as 13 million.

    No government, no health secretary, no society can accept that. That’s why we have prioritised elective recovery – check-ups, scans, surgeries… with the biggest catch-up fund in the history of the NHS.

    And we are already delivering… including rolling out surgical hubs, and 40 new Community Diagnostic Centres right across the country.

    As we recover, we must recognise that not everyone, or everywhere, has been affected in the same way.

    The pandemic has been described as a “great leveller”.

    That’s just not true.

    Health disparities in our society – whether regional, racial or socioeconomic – have only deepened under Covid.

    That’s why one of my first visits as Health Secretary was to Blackpool.

    One of the nurses told me that you can trace back entrenched health problems there for over a century.

    Do you know what the gap in healthy life expectancy is, between Blackpool and Richmond upon Thames?

    Almost 20 years.

    It’s time to level up on health.

    The state was needed in this pandemic more than anytime in peacetime.

    But government shouldn’t own all risks and responsibilities in life.

    We as citizens have to take some responsibility for our health too.

    We shouldn’t always go first to the state.

    What kind of society would that be?

    Health – and social care – begins at home.

    Family first, then community, then the state.

    If you do need support… we live in a compassionate, developed country that can afford to help with that.

    There are few higher callings than to care for another person.

    Some of you know that I got up to some antics as a student I got thrown out of party conference, for campaigning against the ERM.

    I was a cool kid.

    What you might not know about my time as a student, back in Exeter, is that every Saturday I would visit a care home as a volunteer
    to keep the residents company. Especially a great lady called Margaret, who I became very fond of. That experience left a real impression on me – of the importance of dignity in our later years, and of the dedication of care workers.

    Now as we all approach our later years… we can plan with confidence that we and our families will be protected from catastrophic costs. This has been a long-term challenge that has been ducked for far too long. And I’m proud to work for a Prime Minister willing to finally take it on.

    So our values as a party, a government, and a country – are clear. Time and again, we choose to prioritise the health of our citizens.
    We have absolutely nothing to prove on that. But it’s also true that if you value something, or someone… you want them to be the best they can be. The NHS may have the best principle behind it, staffed by some of the best people our country has to offer. But that of course doesn’t mean that as an organisation, it is the best at everything.

    It wouldn’t help anyone to pretend otherwise.

    Our undeniable commitment to the NHS is what should drive us to make it as effective as it can be.

    Because ultimately it is our national health service, and is only as good as the service it provides our citizens.

    The public rightly and proudly expect a service that is free at the point of use.

    But they also expect that service to deliver for them – wherever they live in the country.

    They expect to be able to see their GP, in the way that they choose.

    And to have a relationship with their service that goes beyond picking up the pieces when things go wrong.

    In the past, some governments chose cash, others chose reform.

    That’s a false choice.

    You can’t have one without the other. So yes, we will continue to prioritise funding for the NHS in the wake of this global pandemic.

    But I also promise you this:

    2022 will be a year of renewal and reform.

    At a time like this, business as usual cannot be good enough. I’ve worked with some of the largest organisations in the world… and two factors stand out on whether they succeed:

    Leadership, and innovation.

    I want the NHS to embrace innovation and to build a truly modern, digitised system.

    That’s the only way we can drive down that backlog, and build a sustainable service for the future.

    Of course there are some bright spots… but there is a lot of levelling-up to do within the NHS.

    That’s not just about tech – it’s about management, and a focus on outcomes not just inputs.

    And so to help with that mission, I have asked retired General, Sir Gordon Messenger, to lead a review of leadership and management in health and social care. This will be the most far-reaching review since Roy Griffith’s report to Margaret Thatcher in 1983.

    It will shine a light on the outstanding leaders who drive efficiency and innovation, and see how we can replicate that leadership throughout the country. No reform is easy, otherwise it would’ve been done already.

    But if we get it right, no – when we get it right… we won’t build back the way things were.

    We’ll build a future where our health and social care systems are integrated more seamlessly together.

    Where British life sciences lead the world on new treatments.

    Where we have not only the best surgeons, but robots performing live-saving surgeries.

    And where we don’t just treat diseases and ill health, but prevent far more of them from happening.

    This last year will be remembered for decades to come, perhaps even for centuries. People locked in their homes. Closed schools and empty streets. Intensive care units struggling to cope.

    We are emerging now, taking the first steps in a new era. As we go from Covid, to recovery, to reform. This is a time for head and heart. Of compassion but also firmness of purpose.

    Let’s be sure that in generations to come people say they fought the virus, won the peace, and owned the future.

    Let’s make this the era of recovery.

    Let’s make this the era of reform.

    Let’s make this the era in which we truly build back better.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Comments on Sajid Javid’s Conference Speech

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Comments on Sajid Javid’s Conference Speech

    The comments made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Health and Social Care Secretary, on 5 October 2021.

    This was an empty speech that will hugely disappoint the many thousands of patients who are anxious and scared, those waiting longer for cancer treatment or surgery, those waiting for a doctor’s appointment and those increasingly forced to pay for surgery.

    Tory MPs have imposed a punishing, unfair tax rise on working people yet Ministers have no plan to rebuild and reform health care to bring waiting times down and deliver the quality care people deserve.

  • Sajid Javid – 2021 Comments on Health and Social Care Leadership

    Sajid Javid – 2021 Comments on Health and Social Care Leadership

    The comments made by Sajid Javid, the Health and Social Care Secretary, on 3 October 2021.

    I am determined to make sure the NHS and social care delivers for the people of this country for years to come and leadership is so important to that mission.

    We are committed to providing the resources health and social care needs but that must come with change for the better.

    This review will shine a light on the outstanding leaders in health and social care to drive efficiency and innovation. It will help make sure individuals and families get the care and treatment they need, wherever they are in the country, as we build back better.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 28 September 2021.

    I start by simply saying, thank you.

    Thank you to those who gave so much and so selflessly. Our national heroes: NHS and care staff. Thank you for your commitment, courage, compassion and care.

    Friends let us rise and say thank you to our nurses, health visitors, midwives, and doctors. Thank you to our health care assistants, care workers, paramedics, cleaners, porters and vaccinators.

    Thank you to all our NHS and care staff.

    As you cared for us, we will care for you with the training, recruitment, wellbeing support and the fair pay rise you deserve.

    And we give you this commitment too: never again should we allow fatal delays to PPE to leave nurses wearing bin bags. Never again should workers be denied the sick pay that is their right. Never again should care homes be left unprotected as a virus rages. So we demand a public inquiry, so that mistakes like this – never again.

    I also want to thank you in this room and in our communities. I want to thank our councillors and our trade unions too. You ran the mutual aid groups, volunteered at the food banks, helped the vulnerable shielding. You gave your time, you offered your energies and at those moments when everything seemed so frighteningly bleak, you kept hope alive. So today, we say thank you to you as well.

    I’m honoured to be here as your Shadow Health and Social Care Secretary and I’m pleased and privileged to work with the very best shadow ministerial team: Rosena Allin-Khan, Liz Kendall, Justin Madders, Alex Norris. In the Lords: Glenys Thornton, Gillian Merron and Margaret Wheeler. Fighting to halt the Tory NHS Bill, fighting to bring services back in house, fighting to reinstate a universal public NHS.

    An understaffed NHS has been pushed to the brink, no one is pretending the NHS hasn’t been impacted by 18 months of covid. But let’s not pretend – pre covid – the NHS wasn’t impacted by ten years of the Tories. We entered the pandemic with the longest financial squeeze in NHS history, 17,000 beds closed, hospitals crumbling, public health services cut, GP numbers down, services privatised, nurse training cut, children’s mental health budgets raided, thousands waiting longer for cancer treatment, the 18 week target not met for 5 years, the A&E target not met for 6 years.

    So the NHS is in crisis not simply because of covid. The NHS is in crisis because of the Conservatives. And it has the devastating consequence of forcing more and more people in pain and desperation to take out loans and crowdfunding on the internet to pay for an operation because the wait too much to bear.

    £12,000 for a hip replacement,
    £9,000 for a knee replacement,
    £3,000 for a hernia.

    A two-tier health system, privatisation by the backdoor. That’s the Tory threat to our NHS. That’s what we’re fighting against to rebuild our NHS.

    Access to health should not depend upon wealth, that’s why this party created a National Health Service free at the point of use as a right for everyone irrespective of wealth.

    In place of fear, we offered hope and we do so again.

    A Keir Starmer Labour Government will bring waiting times down again. We’ll transform cancer care and ensure a doctors’ appointment when you need one. But the challenges facing the NHS today dwarf anything it’s faced in its history.

    Society is aging, long term chronic illness more prevalent, infectious disease hasn’t gone away and climate change is the biggest health threat we face – there is no healthy future without a green future.

    Our mission is more than a health service that just cures the sick. Our commitment is to help people stay well from the moment they enter this world to their very final breaths. There is a saying: “Health is made at home. Hospitals are for repairs.” It captures a fundamental truth: that health is created in our communities and depends upon the conditions in which we live.

    If covid has taught us anything, surely it’s that poverty makes people ill and the ill are often trapped in poverty. It was the poorest most likely to be admitted to hospital with covid. It was the poorest twice as likely to die from covid.

    After a decade of the Tories life expectancy has gone backwards.

    I say to these Tories: don’t lecture us about levelling up when you’ve spent ten years smashing down.

    So because we know blood pressure, cholesterol and smoking hits the worst off hardest leading to cancers, heart failure or stroke we’ll drive up access to health checks and rather than cutting smoking cessation services – we’ll protect them.

    Place of birth should not determine length of life and to change that, we start with children. A child born into poverty is too often condemned to a life of ill health. More likely to be admitted to hospital, more likely to leave school obese, more likely to suffer mental ill health.

    Surely it is a scandal that we fail so many children so often even before their life’s journey has begun. So we’ll put in place the biggest children’s health and wellbeing strategy ever seen. We’ll ensure no child is denied the mental health care they need. We’ll strengthen health visiting and improve maternity care. We’ll take bold action on childhood obesity and nutrition.

    Drawing inspiration from Marcus Rashford we’ll ensure the poorest young children receive fresh fruit, vegetables and vitamins as we attack child hunger. A hungry child cannot be a healthy child.

    Keeping people well means confronting something that casts a shadow over so many families: dementia. It can start with forgetting little things, silly things, the keys, glasses, perhaps the day of the week. There comes a moment when you see your loved one in difficulty trying to remember the steps involved in something so simple like making a cup of tea.

    Dementia cruelly changes the person you love and you assume there will be proper help. But so often there’s not. It’s a struggle to access a memory clinic just to get a diagnosis. And when that diagnosis comes you’re often left abandoned to battle a complex, demoralising system only to be told – as 3,000 are every day – you or your loved one doesn’t qualify for care.

    This social care system is broken. It sees the frail and confused trapped in hospital beds with nowhere to go. It sees short inadequate 15 minute visits and for adults with severe autism and learning disabilities it can mean being locked up in a room with a foam mattress and food shoved through a hatch in a door.

    That’s an affront to a civilised society, that’s shameful. We’re going to end it.

    So we will fix social care with a plan as far reaching as Nye Bevan’s plan for the NHS. With personalised care to help people stay at home. Care will be seamless, delivered hand in hand with the NHS. We’ll end zero hours contracts and pay our care workers at least the living wage – the fair pay they truly deserve.

    This is about more than the care system. One in three people born this year will develop dementia. It has no cure. But throughout the history of the NHS, the genius of medical science has discovered advances whose reach may exceed our grasp today but soon become the routine treatments of tomorrow.

    Let us glimpse the possibilities of the future.

    A Labour government will double current funding for dementia research to play our part in finding a cure. Just as Labour led the world in creating a National Health Service in the twentieth century, we offer hope and will lead again to build a national care service in the twenty first.

    We offer hope for the best quality health care for all in a public NHS. Hope for nurses, care workers and NHS staff as we repay their dedication. Hope to end the inequalities that covid exposed, hope for every child to have the healthiest start in life.

    Our commitment shows it, our history proves it. With health the foundation from cradle to grave. The hope of a stronger future together.

    Now, friends, let’s build it.

  • Michael Ellis – 2021 Statement on Infected Blood Compensation

    Michael Ellis – 2021 Statement on Infected Blood Compensation

    The statement made by Michael Ellis, the Paymaster General, in the House of Commons on 23 September 2021.

    On 20 May my predecessor, my right hon. Friend the Member for Portsmouth North (Penny Mordaunt), announced the appointment of Sir Robert Francis QC to carry out an independent study to look at options for a framework for compensation for victims of infected blood. The study will make recommendations for compensation, before the infected blood inquiry reports. Terms of reference of the study were to be finalised following consultation between Sir Robert and those infected and affected. The consultation period concluded in August, and Sir Robert wrote to my predecessor with his recommendations.

    Sir Robert’s consultation received a positive response from the infected and affected community. A total of 447 formal responses were submitted (including from many of the legal representatives of infected and affected core participants of the inquiry), along with over 150 further representations, primarily personal accounts from the infected and affected on how this tragedy has affected their lives. These accounts were of great assistance to Sir Robert in reviewing the draft terms of reference. Sir Robert wishes to express his gratitude to the many individuals who contributed to the consultation, in many cases having to relive the awful experiences they have suffered over so many years, and I would like to echo his gratitude.

    Sir Robert’s recommendations identify the key issues that the study should consider. They offer assurance to the infected and affected communities that the matters of most concern to them will be considered by the study. I am therefore happy to accept Sir Robert’s recommendations in full, and I am today publishing the following terms of reference without amendment:

    Rationale for compensation

    To consider the rationale for compensation as a matter of general principle and in relation to any particular classes of compensation, recognising that it is not for the study to pre-empt the determination by the infected blood inquiry as to what, if any, rationale is supported by the evidence it has received;

    Independent advice to the Government

    Give independent advice to the Government regarding the design of a workable and fair framework for compensation for individuals infected and affected across the UK to achieve parity between those eligible for compensation regardless of where in the UK the relevant treatment occurred or place of residence. While the study is to take into account differences in current practice and/or law in the devolved Administrations, it is not asked to consider whether delivery of that framework should be managed centrally or individually by the devolved Administrations;

    Scope of compensation

    To consider the scope of eligibility for such compensation (including the appropriateness or otherwise of any conditions such as “cut-off” dates), and whether it should be extended beyond infected individuals and their partners, to include for example affected parents and children, the wider affected family (e.g. siblings), and significant non-family carers and others affected, either because of the impact of caring responsibilities or the effects of bereavement or some other impact; to include consideration of former and new partnerships/marriages; and whether the estate of any individual who has died should be eligible for compensation;

    Categories of injury and loss

    To consider the injuries, loss and detriments that compensation should address, in relation to the past, present and future, including:

    (a) the physical impact and consequences of infections (including the effect of any treatment, and potential future adverse effects);

    (b) infections that cleared naturally; and the risk of any significant or long-term side effects of treatment (such as liver damage, increased risk of cancer) even if they are yet to materialise;

    (c) the mental health, social and financial impacts (including access to financial services)—both actual and in terms of loss of opportunities—suffered by both the infected and affected; and

    (d) other types of loss if appropriate;

    Types of award and method of assessment

    To consider:

    (a) the extent to which any framework should offer compensation on the basis of an individualised assessment and/or fixed sums or a combination of these (including consideration of the position of an individual who was both infected, and affected by another individual’s infection);

    (b) whether awards should be by way of final lump sums, periodical payments or both;

    (c) whether an individual should be required to prove matters (if so what types of matters, by what means, and to what standard);

    (d) whether there should be any limitation by way of time or other bar on entitlement or claim, and whether any existing time bars should be maintained;

    (e) the extent to which compensation should be limited to matters currently recognised by the law (taking into account any differences in the law across the UK) on damages and evidence as recoverable for the purposes of compensation, or, if not, the basis on which broader matters should be taken into account;

    Measures for compensation

    To consider the measures for compensation, looking at other national schemes (for example, the compensation tribunal established in the Republic of Ireland) to examine their merits or otherwise, and experiences, both as to form (i.e. administration/process) and the substance of compensation;

    Relationship with current schemes

    To consider the relationship between a compensation framework and other receipts and payments by individuals, including: (a) the pre-existing financial support schemes; (b) legal claims; (c) welfare benefits and tax;

    Options for administering the scheme

    To consider options for administering the scheme (including but not limited to what bodies, organisations or tribunals might need to be established to facilitate such administration); what principles, aims or criteria etc might underpin the development of an appropriate scheme; and any ancillary matters which should be considered such as interim payments, publicity of the scheme, outreach to potential claimants, and support;

    Other issues

    To consider other issues that, in the course of his investigations, Sir Robert considers relevant; and

    Reporting to Government by February 2022

    To submit to the Government its report and recommendations as quickly as possible and no later than the end of February 2022, to provide the Government with advice on potential options for compensation framework design.

    Sir Robert and his team will now begin the more detailed conversations and analysis to look into the detail of the issues raised by the infected and affected community. This will allow him to produce a set of comprehensive recommendations to the complex issues involved.

    I, like my predecessor, am deeply committed to ensuring that Sir Brian Langstaff’s independent public inquiry has all the resources it needs to complete its work; in Sir Brian’s words, “as quickly as thoroughness permits”. The infected blood scandal continues to claim the lives of infected people, and those directly affected have waited too long for answers, and for justice.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Comments on NHS Waiting Lists

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2021 Comments on NHS Waiting Lists

    The comments made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 9 September 2021.

    The numbers of patients waiting longer than 18 weeks continues to grow and means more people left languishing in pain and distress for treatment.

    This week Ministers unveiled a punishing tax rise on working people yet utterly failed to offer any credible plan, or answer basic questions about a time frame for bringing this record waits down.

    The last Labour government had a detailed plan that brought waiting times down from 18 months to 18 weeks. It is a scandal that patients wait so long under the Tories.