Category: Education

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Comments on Vulnerable Teenagers

    Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Comments on Vulnerable Teenagers

    The comments made by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, on 2 July 2026.

    This is one of the defining challenges of this government. Fixing it is crucial to the prosperity of our country: we cannot afford to let a generation of young people drift away from opportunity and more fulfilled lives.

    Accurate, timely tracking is not a box-ticking exercise, it’s the difference between a young person getting support early or falling through the cracks entirely. While local authorities do incredibly difficult work, often against real constraints, it’s not consistent enough.

    We’re supporting councils to intervene early to help, as part of our new deal for young people, to ensure they realise their potential through worthwhile training and stable careers.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Comments on Pay Deal for Teachers

    Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Comments on Pay Deal for Teachers

    The comments made by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, on 1 July 2026.

    Our brilliant school and college teachers go above and beyond every day, and I’m determined that dedication is not just recognised, but rewarded.

    This multi-year deal, backed by significant additional investment, shows the immense value we place in our teachers, while giving schools and colleges certainty over pay and their budgets.

    It’s also right that classroom teachers are not seeing executive pay rise faster than their own – or set at excessive levels in the first place – so tighter controls will mean unjustifiable exec salaries become a thing of the past, helping level the playing field for school staff and drive every pound towards classrooms.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Sir John Major

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Sir John Major

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 28 June 2026.

    Sir John Major makes the essential point. Parents who send children to private school save the state money.

    Labour’s tax on them has failed. Now the state has 2,000 fewer teachers than when Conservatives left office.

    So we will reverse this futile, vindictive policy.

  • Josh MacAlister – 2026 Statement on Higher Education and Student Outcomes

    Josh MacAlister – 2026 Statement on Higher Education and Student Outcomes

    The statement made by Josh MacAlister, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education, in the House of Commons on 25 June 2026.

    Our higher education sector has a world-leading reputation. The evidence shows that most graduates are significantly better off as a result of undertaking higher education, but we are determined to ensure that everyone can be confident of a good experience and strong outcomes from their investment in higher education.

    We came into Government with a manifesto commitment to raising teaching standards in higher education. The post-16 education and skills White Paper last autumn placed quality at the heart of our vision for the sector.

    We acted quickly to support financial sustainability for providers through the tuition fee increase. We are improving support for access and participation, re-introducing maintenance grants and supporting better pathways through the system. However, there is more work to be done to ensure consistent high quality across the sector. Too many courses are not delivering the outcomes students deserve.

    New analysis published today by the Institute for Fiscal Studies shows that 25% of students do not see a positive return from their studies, with negative returns concentrated in certain subjects. I have today written to all higher education providers to outline further reforms to tackle the issues exposed by today’s IFS analysis and elsewhere, so that we can help all students benefit from everything our higher education system has to offer.

    We will legislate to limit the growth of some courses that lead to poor earnings returns at some providers, when parliamentary time allows. This will not be a blanket cap on student numbers, but a focused measure to support the sector to prioritise provision where it delivers good value for students and the taxpayer. We will engage a wide range of stakeholders to inform the development of these options.

    We also expect providers to include clear information about destinations and outcomes on their own websites, so that students can make choices that work for them. We are working with the Office for Students, UCAS (the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) and sector partners to make it easier for students to access the information available on Discover Uni, in time for the next cohort of students to consider their options in spring 2027.

    Alongside this, our “Pathways to Priority Occupations” report, also published today, will support students to make informed choices about their courses. We are exploring how artificial intelligence can further strengthen the information available to them.

    Finally, there must be robust standards to protect students and taxpayers from abuse. We intend to consult in the autumn on new minimum English language requirements for student finance, to provide greater confidence that recipients are able to benefit from their course. We will design this carefully, in collaboration with the higher education sector.

    Together, these actions will help ensure that all students can benefit from the opportunities that higher education provides.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Comments on Kemi Badenoch Referring to her as a Gestapo Office

    Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Comments on Kemi Badenoch Referring to her as a Gestapo Office

    The comments made by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, on 16 June 2026.

    The Gestapo marched hundreds of thousands of innocent people to their deaths.

    I’ve ended private schools’ tax breaks to invest in state schools.

    No responsible leader makes vile comparisons like this. Kemi Badenoch is not fit to be Prime Minister.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Speech at the RISE Inclusion Conference

    Bridget Phillipson – 2026 Speech at the RISE Inclusion Conference

    The speech made by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, on 9 March 2026.

    Today I want to start by telling you about a child with an inspiring story. 

    His name is Joshua – and he’s a happy boy from Brighton. 

    At age five Joshua was diagnosed with Autism. 

    In his own words, it’s a part of him, but not what defines him. 

    Now his first experience of school wasn’t great. 

    The school wasn’t set up to meet his needs – and so he could only manage 10 minutes in the classroom a day. 

    Too noisy. 

    Too many people. 

    He had to leave the school because it just wasn’t working him – his education was suffering and he wasn’t achieving all he could. 

    That’s when he started at West Blatchington Primary, part of The Pioneer Academy trust – and his path in life changed. 

    Joshua benefitted straight away from the school’s on site SEND unit. 

    He learned how to manage his feelings and build friendships – so that soon he was ready to join his classmates in the mainstream class. 

    He went from barely coming in to being in school all day, every day. 

    Joshua achieved and he thrived – in school and out. He became a Beaver, then a Cub, then a Scout. He’s made lots of friends. 

    And now he’s sharing his story with children across the south east and raising awareness of autism – giving assemblies in 14 different schools. 

    He even gave the keynote speech at the Croydon Inclusion Conference and at the Brighton and Hove Inclusion Conference too. 

    Joshua proudly tells people that he ‘smashed’ his SATs and is now doing well at a mainstream secondary school. 

    He shows what can happen when we get it right for children with SEND. 

    For his primary school’s celebration of 30 years of their SEND unit, Joshua wrote a message of thanks: 

    “West Blatch changed my life and for that I’m eternally grateful.” 

    That’s what we do this for. 

    You’ll have your own stories of success… the children in your schools who you were able to support and who did well. 

    That feeling of having made a difference, there’s nothing like it. 

    The young people like Joshua, living better lives because you were there for them at a crucial time.  

    Thank you, for everything you do for the children of this country. 

    But you’ll know that the system just isn’t set up to meet the needs of most children like Joshua.  

    I’ve spent the last year speaking to teachers about this. 

    And they tell me that the stories of success are despite, not because of, the system we have. 

    Leaders tell me that the system doesn’t deliver success as standard for children with SEND… it usually only comes when your heroic staff go above and beyond. 

    I’ve spoken to parents and carers too. Mams and dads are fed up… 

    not of you and your staff… 

    they know how hard you work, they see your dedication… 

    rather they are fed up of the faceless, soulless system that governs what their child gets and how… 

    support that is not delivered freely but must be fought at every step of the way…  

    support that responds in the first instance not to need but to paperwork. 

    I know it’s a system that frustrates you just as much. 

    You’ll know that parents have had enough of seeing their child underachieve… 

    not through a lack of effort…  

    not through a lack of talent… 

    not through a lack of hard work from staff. 

    But because children with SEND suffer from a system of late support, inconsistent support… 

    support that only exists far away, so that at weekends and during the holidays they have no friends to play with back home. 

    Where is the connection to community in that? 

    Where is the sense that all children belong in our society… when the system sends so many of them away? 

    Children with SEND are being failed because the system we have inherited is not set up for them to succeed in their local school. 

    Not yet anyway. 

    But it will be. 

    I know that for too long, so much has been asked of you – by government, by parents and by society.  

    At times you have become a fourth emergency service, stepping up when wider services fail. 

    And I want to thank you and your staff for that, for going above and beyond, again and again. 

    You do it because you care, because you can’t and won’t just look the other way. 

    But you shouldn’t have to fill all these gaps… 

    and I’m determined that you won’t be doing it alone. 

    Under this government we are rebuilding childhood and family services. 

    Our Best Start Family Hubs give parents all the support they need for their child’s early years – and now including support for SEND. 

    We’ve delivered the 30-hours a week of government-funded childcare and begun to turn around the children’s social care system. 

    We’re expanding free school meals, rolling out free breakfast clubs, ending the two-child limit… fighting the disgrace of child poverty. 

    And by 2030, I am deeply proud that this government will have lifted more than half a million children out of relative poverty… and that we will see the largest ever reduction in child poverty in a single parliament. 

    I know change won’t come in full overnight, of course… 

    but over time you’ll see fewer children arriving for their first day of school in nappies… 

    you’ll spend less time supporting children to catch up thanks to early intervention in crucial areas like language… 

    and you’ll no longer be under pressure to run a foodbank as well as a school. 

    This is about providing the right support at the right time, so that when children reach your classroom, they are ready and raring to go. 

    Two weeks ago, building on those strong foundations, I launched this government’s schools white paper, setting a new vision for education in this country… 

    A future in which children grow up together, go to their local school together, achieve and thrive together. 

    A future of high standards and inclusion. 

    A future in which all children with SEND get the rights they deserve… 

    the right to be included in their local schools… 

    the right to enjoy exactly the same high standards and expectations that we have for other children. 

    And, colleagues, we get there through inclusive mainstream. 

    More children educated at a great local school…  

    with their friends, close to their family, a core part of their local community. 

    And to those who say that inclusion in our schools will come at the cost of high standards… 

    I say: you are wrong. The evidence proves it. 

    My department has looked at English and maths GCSE results for children with SEND. 

    And those children do better in mainstream schools than specialist schools. 

    Don’t just take our word for it. 

    Research from the European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education shows that children with SEND in mainstream schools have a better chance of getting a job when they leave. 

    Inclusive mainstream can offer children with SEND the precious opportunity to go on to live a rich and fulfilling adult life. 

    And research also shows that, when they learn alongside their peers… 

    children both with and without SEND tend to do better, both academically and socially. 

    Because inclusion and high standards…  

    it’s not one or the other, it’s both. 

    These are the changes in our schools that I want to work hand-in-hand with you to deliver. 

    A new system of support as standard, layered to meet different needs. 

    Universal for all. 

    And where needs are greater, targeted support through Individual Support Plans. 

    Then specialist provision for children who need it. 

    I ask you to work with us and with your families to run this new system. 

    Establish an inclusion base for children with more complex needs. 

    Draw up an inclusion strategy, show how you’re going to make inclusion a defining strength of your school. 

    Join together with local schools in groups to pool ideas and resources, spreading what works… because the only way we succeed is together, partners in our shared moral mission to make education work for every child. 

    The spirit of collaboration – parents and teachers and support staff, schools and other schools, local services coming together alongside Government. 

    You will be at the centre of this generational change for our children and our country. 

    Your talent. Your dedication. Your expertise. 

    And to see these changes through, I’m backing you… 

    the Chancellor is backing you… 

    with £1.6 billion for an inclusive mainstream fund so you can build inclusion into school life… 

    £3.7 billion to develop inclusion bases, improve accessibility and create new special school places… 

    £200 million to train your staff to deliver for children with SEND. 

    The new Experts at Hand service – in time, a bank of professional support for children… 

    occupational therapists, educational psychologists, speech and language therapists… 

    freed up to support students, not fill out forms… 

    ready to go when need arises, not only after a battle is fought. 

    And our RISE service is here to support you. 

    Our RISE inclusive mainstream offer has already been delivering webinars and setting up national networks for support bases. 

    And we’ll work to grow our offer of support, to guide you through these new reforms, especially by sharing and spreading good practice. 

    You are not alone in this. It’s a shared endeavour. 

    Schools will sit at the centre of a system of support that stretches through childhood and beyond. 

    And I will give you the resources you need to make your schools places of inclusion and excellence for all. 

    But I won’t leave this to chance.  

    Inclusion is no longer a nice-to-have. 

    It’s an essential marker of school performance, and Ofsted have changed their inspections to recognise it.  

    For the first time, inclusion has its own dedicated judgement when Ofsted inspect nurseries, schools and colleges. 

    We’ll highlight what works and multiply it so that all children can benefit. 

    But this isn’t the end of the conversation. We’ve launched a consultation – and I urge you all to get in touch and tell us what you think… have your say on how these reforms should be designed and delivered in practice. 

    We’re asking everyone with a stake to make their voices heard, in service of all the children in our schools. 

    Those children deserve a school system that moves to meet their needs, a system that knows inclusion is a strength, not a weakness. 

    Because the best schools are not those that shut themselves away, offering excellence only to a narrow band of children. 

    The best schools open themselves up to their communities, they offer excellence to all, and they are stronger for it.  

    I want to work with you to spread that into every school in the country, so that every child can benefit… so that Joshua’s experience is no longer the exception, but the norm.  

    Before us we have a once-in-a-generation chance for change. 

    So let’s come together now – members of our shared moral mission – and build a school system that works for each and every child. 

    Thank you.

  • Sarah Edwards – 2026 Speech on School Minibus Safety

    Sarah Edwards – 2026 Speech on School Minibus Safety

    The speech made by Sarah Edwards, the Labour MP for Tamworth, in the House of Commons on 12 February 2026.

    It is good to see so many hon. and right hon. Members present to take part in this important debate on school minibus safety. No family should ever have to question whether their child will return home safely from a school activity. For my constituents Liz and Steve Fitzgerald, that unthinkable fear became a devastating reality. In November 1993, a minibus carrying 14 children was involved in a catastrophic crash on the M40 near Hagley. Twelve children and their teacher lost their lives, and among them was Liz and Steve’s beloved daughter, Claire.

    I first met Liz and Steve while campaigning in my by-election in 2023. They bravely shared their story with me and invited me to support their ongoing campaign to make school minibuses safer, so that no child would ever be put at risk while travelling to or from school activities. Since then, I have stood with them in their tireless efforts to improve safety, not just for the children who travel in these vehicles, but for the teachers and staff who are asked to drive them. More than 30 years have now passed since that tragedy, and while important improvements have been made in areas such as seatbelt provision and vehicle construction standards, the underlying regulatory framework that allows teachers to drive minibuses without full professional training remains largely unchanged.

    Children’s safety should not be up for debate. This is about reducing risks that we already know can be prevented. It is about asking whether the legal framework that governs the transport of pupils to and from school activities truly matches the weight of that responsibility. Every time a child steps on to a school minibus, parents place their trust in the system that stands behind it. That system must be strong, consistent and—above all—capable of keeping every child safe. At the moment, many of us believe that that system falls short.

    The system that governs school minibuses is built around section 19 permits, introduced under the Transport Act 1985. These permits allow not-for-profit organisations, including schools, to run minibuses without holding a full public service vehicle operator’s licence. Under that system, drivers must meet certain basic licensing conditions, but they are not required to hold a full passenger carrying vehicle licence. Nor are they required by law to undertake accredited professional training.

    The official guidance, which dates from 2013, states that drivers must be suitably trained and correctly licensed. It even recognises that driving a minibus requires additional skills, and is simply not the same as driving a large car. However, it is guidance, so it is advisory, and there are no checks by the Department for Education or Ofsted on its implementation or use. Schools are encouraged to consider specialist training, but they are not required to do so. At the moment, the guidance is not strong enough to guarantee children’s safety. That is why, alongside Liz and Steve Fitzgerald, and the NASUWT, I have been calling for stronger, clearer regulations to make sure that every child can travel safely, and that teachers and staff are properly trained and supported to carry out that responsibility.

    It is also important to understand how and why the framework came about. Section 19 and 22 did not emerge from a careful review of child passenger safety. They were shaped largely by European market rules designed to regulate competition. In other words, the system that we rely on today was driven more by economic considerations than by the safety of schoolchildren. That historical origin has left us with a fragmented and confusing framework.

    Private schools that are not charities are treated as commercial operators, and they must hold a full operator’s licence, meet strict financial and safety requirements, appoint a qualified transport manager, and employ fully licensed, professionally trained drivers with regulated hours. That comprehensive legal framework is designed to protect children and ensure accountability. By contrast, many state schools transport children daily under section 19 permits without the same safeguards. They operate largely on guidance rather than law, with no mandatory professional training or oversight. In practice, teachers may drive minibuses at the end of a full teaching day without the protections required of commercial drivers.

    That raises simple but troubling questions. Why should a child’s safety depend on the type of school they attend? Why should children in private schools travel under a full safety regime, while children in state schools rely on discretion and good will? I criticise not independent schools, which are complying with the law, but the two-tier system that affords different levels of protection to children—that is unfair and unacceptable.

    The inconsistency goes further. Across the UK, standards vary by nation. In Northern Ireland, for example, driving a school minibus without a full D1 licence can be a disciplinary offence. Children’s safety should not depend on postcode, school type or geography. Every child deserves the same standards, protections and assurance that those responsible for their transport are properly trained and accountable.

    The Government recently stated before the Transport Committee that they do not wish to relax D1 licence requirements for community minibus drivers, citing road safety concerns. Around one in five candidates fails the D1 test, even after extensive training. That failure rate is a clear indication of the level of skill and competence required to operate such vehicles safely.

    Leigh Ingham (Stafford) (Lab)

    I am concerned that under the current system, someone could fail their test to drive a minibus in a professional setting and it would not stop them from driving one in a school setting, which does not require a D1 licence. Why is that licence not required to drive children to and from school activities? It fundamentally does not make sense. Does my hon. Friend agree?

    Sarah Edwards

    That is precisely my concern. It does not make sense at all given that failure means an inability to drive safely. We should surely apply the same standards or higher when children are involved.

    Under the current school system, a teacher over the age of 21 who holds only a standard category B car licence and has just two years’ driving experience can legally drive a minibus carrying children, without holding a full passenger carrying vehicle licence and without undertaking any mandatory accredited training—so, too, can the individual who has failed their D1 driving test. This creates a stark and troubling inconsistency in the Government’s own stated aims.

    In every other context, professional passenger transport is treated as high risk, with rigorous training, testing and regulation designed to protect passengers. Yet the law allows schoolchildren—the most vulnerable passengers, some might argue—to be transported under a system that relies on guidance rather than on statutory safeguards. We must ask ourselves: if the Government recognise the dangers and the skill required to drive a minibus in every other setting, why do they not apply the same standards to those entrusted with the lives of children? The safety of our school pupils should not be left to chance or good will.

    Current guidance recognises the dangers of driver fatigue and advises against long journeys after a day of work, but those are only recommendations. In practice, teachers are often expected to drive minibuses at the end of long teaching days. They are responsible for driving larger, more complex vehicles while supervising pupils at the same time. In some cases, they are the only adult on board. That presents serious risks in the event of a breakdown, an emergency or a behavioural incident. This is not about blaming teachers—they are dedicated professionals—but the system places enormous responsibility on them without the professional safeguards that exist in other areas of passenger transport. It is no surprise that growing numbers of teachers are choosing not to drive minibuses, citing stress and concerns about personal liability.

    There is also clear confusion and inconsistency in the system. Guidance on section 19 permits has been interpreted in different ways, and some local authorities and academy trusts apply their own requirements that differ from national guidance. That uncertainty does not make children safer. The NASUWT teaching union has described the current regime as “not fit for purpose”, and a 2024 survey found inconsistent compliance with legal requirements and guidance across many schools. In some cases, management is aware of the shortcomings. In others, problems arise because guidance is unclear and training is lacking. Vehicle faults and poor maintenance have been identified, leaving teachers unknowingly responsible for the vehicle’s roadworthiness. The same survey found that 24% of teachers felt pressured to drive a minibus despite feeling unqualified to do so. Although NASUWT guidance is available to teachers, the union ultimately advises staff not to drive minibuses at all, due to the legal, safety and personal liability risks involved.

    Concerns have also been raised about the use of lightweight minibuses, which are basically converted vans fitted with seats. Many of these vehicles weigh less than 3.5 tonnes, which allows schools to bypass the training and licensing requirements that would otherwise apply to those who obtained their category B car licence after 1997. In effect, these vehicles have become a cheaper workaround for schools, but that cost saving comes with significant safety compromises: these lightweight minibuses often lack essential features such as side impact protection or full airbag coverage, leaving children and staff more vulnerable in the event of a collision. In practice, gross vehicle weight limits are not always routinely checked before journeys begin. Many teachers are unaware that once they take a vehicle on to the road, they are legally responsible for not only their driving but ensuring that the vehicle is roadworthy and compliant with regulations.

    This combination of under-equipped vehicles, insufficient oversight and limited professional training creates a serious safety risk. Teachers can find themselves responsible for dozens of children in a vehicle that is not designed to carry them safely, with no back-up if something goes wrong. The risk is not theoretical; it is a real and present danger that must be addressed. We should not accept a system where cost, convenience or outdated loopholes determine the level of protection that children receive. Every child, in every school, should be transported in a vehicle that meets robust safety standards, driven by someone who is properly trained, and supported by a clear and enforceable legal framework.

    The so-called short distance exemption further complicates matters. Section 19 permits assume that journeys will normally take place within a 10-mile radius, except in rural areas, but many schools, including church schools and large multi-academy trusts operating across several counties, regularly travel well beyond that distance for sports fixtures and other activities. When what is meant to be exceptional becomes routine, it is reasonable to ask whether the legal framework is still fit for purpose.

    At the same time, parents are often unaware of the regulatory distinctions that underpin school transport. Traditional written consent forms once gave parents a clear understanding of arrangements. Increasing reliance on digital systems means that many parents simply assume that robust, uniform standards are already in place. How many parents have been informed prior to a trip and asked whether they were happy for their child to be driven in a minibus by a teacher or staff member who could not demonstrate the level of training required for professional minibus operators?

    Everything that we have heard and considered today makes it clear that the current system is failing both children and staff. We are allowing a two-tier approach to safety, where the protection that a child receives depends on the type of school that they attend. That cannot continue.

    Sarah Edwards

    I met Ministers from the Department for Transport in May 2025 and from the Department for Education more recently, but the suggested changes are yet to be made. The issue was not mentioned in the Government’s road safety strategy. I have already raised that concern with the Minister, and I am raising it in the House today to provide the detail and substance behind those concerns for the official record.

    The road safety strategy sets out excellent ambitions for the protection of road users and cites issues around appropriate licences, which I applaud. I know the Minister is rightly proud of the strategy as a piece of work. I raise the issue of the continued use of permits for school minibus driving precisely because it cuts across the sentiment of the strategy, and I am disappointed that terms like “community transport” or “school minibuses” do not appear in the document at present, despite these inconsistencies being known to Departments.

    I ask the Minister to take action about the following suggestions that I will set out. All schools, whether state-funded or independent, must be held to the same safety standards, with best practice an absolute minimum. Section 19 permits for schools should be replaced with statutory regulations, moving from guidance-based advice to enforceable legal standards, and aligning all school minibus operations with road safety priorities rather than simply community exemptions.

    The Department for Education should have a list of all associated minibuses that schools use and operate, regardless of whether they are a local authority or an academy trust school. This information should be jointly shared with the Department for Transport, because at present no such information exists, nor does the ability to extract minibus accident data from generic passenger vehicle data, meaning that minibuses are treated in the same way as buses or coaches in Government data. That makes further analysis of the issue difficult.

    The professionalisation of school minibus driving must be mandated. All drivers should hold a passenger carrying vehicle licence or D1 qualification in order to operate a school minibus. Every school fleet should be overseen by a transport manager, and drivers must undergo checks on eyesight, health and driving records.

    The use of lightweight minibuses must be phased out or banned. Children should travel in vehicles built to proper safety standards, not those chosen to save costs. A national inspection and enforcement regime must be introduced. DVSA inspections should cover all school transport, not just commercial operators, with vehicles and drivers tracked in a centralised, transparent system.

    Legal grey areas must be clarified. Government guidance should remove ambiguity around terms such as “volunteer”, “hire or reward” and “non-commercial”, and the guidance must be court-tested and enforceable.

    Teacher wellbeing and safety must be protected. Driving duties should not fall to teachers after a full working day. Minibus driving should be recognised as a specialised responsibility in schools, not an informal task. We also believe that transport safety should be included in Ofsted inspections, and the long-term impact of accidents on both pupils and staff, including mental health and trauma, must be taken seriously.

    In closing, these are not abstract or minor reforms. They are essential steps to ensure that every child can travel safely to and from school activities, and that the adults entrusted with that responsibility are fully supported, trained and accountable. I think of Liz and Steve Fitzgerald, and the courage it has taken them to turn their personal tragedy into a tireless campaign for safer school transport. Their determination reminds us all why reform cannot wait, because sadly during the time that we have been campaigning together and meeting Ministers, other such tragedies have occurred.

    I urge the Government to take steps to close the ambiguity and to further their aims for road safety for all who use them. Our children deserve nothing less than a system that guarantees their safety, values the teachers who transport them and removes the inequalities and risks that underpin the current framework. It is time for decisive action. I thank the Minister for coming here today and I commend this debate to the House.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2025 Speech to the RISE Attainment Conference

    Bridget Phillipson – 2025 Speech to the RISE Attainment Conference

    The speech made by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, on 7 October 2025.

    Hello everyone. Thanks so much for being here, thanks so much for coming.  

    And thank you to everyone who has worked so hard to put today together. 

    It’s great to be here in the south west, with leaders from schools and trusts, to talk about the children of this region.  

    Their learning, their futures, and their life chances. 

    And I hope you’ll find today is an opportunity to come together, to take stock and to think carefully about what more we can do for the young people in your classrooms. 

    I know so many of you already deliver so much, helping them to achieve and thrive. 

    So I want to say a huge thank you. 

    You and your staff transform lives. I visit schools and I see it in the children, I hear it from the parents, I feel it on results day. 

    The difference that all of you here in this room all make. 

    That’s why you – leaders, teachers – are at the centre of the change this government wants to achieve. 

    The road to national renewal runs through our schools. 

    Now, thanks to your hard work, schools have come a long way in this country.  

    And you deliver a fantastic education for most children. 

    But we all know that journey of improvement must continue. That’s why you’re all here today, it’s why you work so hard, and for that, I am incredibly grateful. 

    You understand the importance of what you do, and the need to keep raising standards for all.  

    And closing the gaps as well. 

    Because there are still groups of children for whom school just isn’t working. And these aren’t random, we know that the gaps are systemic.  

    Children with special educational needs and disabilities. 

    Children from disadvantaged communities.  

    And white working-class children too. 

    Just one in five achieves a strong pass in their English and Maths GCSEs. 

    Statistics like this are important. But anyone who has spent any time in our schools will know this already. 

    And will want to work with us to put it right. 

    Through our schools white paper, together we will build a schools system that works for each and every child.  

    One that sets each and every child up to achieve. 

    One that breaks the link between background and success, once and for all. 

    Together we must spread excellence from one school to another.  

    Because the world-leading practice I want to see in every school is already shining in many of our schools already. 

    So progress can and must come from within the system. 

    Improvement of schools, by schools, for our children. 

    That’s why much of today is being led by you.  

    Sharing what works for children in your schools. 

    So that it can work for children in all of our schools. 

    I have high expectations for every child, as I’m sure you do too, therefore I have high expectations for every school.  

    But to get this right we need to look at the moments where children fall behind. Like the transition from primary to secondary school. 

    And so we need a transformative shift in how key stage three is valued and managed. As always, the answers are already there in some schools.  

    Take Wilsthorpe School in Derbyshire. Because while the midlands might be at the other end of the M5, some solutions, I think, are universal. 

    Like the use of good data. And Wilsthorpe’s approach is rooted in it. 

    They look at the patterns of poor attendance in primary – and use that to inform their transition plans for new year 7s. 

    But the head, Derek Hobbs, like a lot of heads, knows that strong transitions are built on strong partnerships with parents.  

    Plans are shared with parents early – and they combine face-to-face chats with ways for families to reach out online. 

    Parents even get a direct line of contact with form teachers in year 7, to smooth what can be quite a difficult move from year 6. 

    The school has made parents evenings feel like community events. 

    Members of the scouts and air cadets come along. Representatives of local health services are often there too. 

    Again, their approach is built on solid data, this time to predict at an early stage which parents may well be hard to reach.  

    Because it tends to be these families that need the most support if their child is to do well. 

    And you know what – the hard work is paying off. 

    Suspensions are low. Exclusions are low.  

    And attendance is high – especially in year 7. 

    Attainment 8, strong and improving. 

    And Progress 8, strong and improving – including for disadvantaged children. 

    That, as we know, is the prize on offer.  

    To deliver better life chances for children. 

    And we will support you to reach those high expectations. 

    That’s what our new RISE teams are all about.  

    Drawing on the excellence that exists in some schools, and spreading it to all schools.  

    Leaders across the country are already tapping into that spirit of collaboration. 

    Like Lee Kane, the head of Astor School in Dover. 

    I want to talk about Astor because it’s one of schools on the frontlines of my vision for education. 

    On average across the country, in a class of 30, 7 children are on free school meals.  

    At Astor it’s 18. 

    The school serves the 4th most deprived community in Kent. These are the children who have the most to gain from a great education.  

    And these are the children that our RISE programme is helping Lee to reach. 

    Astor is receiving targeted support and has partnered with the high-performing Mulberry Schools Trust.  

    Drawing on advice from their RISE Advisor, Maria Dawes, and from leaders at Mulberry, Lee can introduce new initiatives and improve existing ones. 

    Like on attendance. Coming out of covid, just as in so many schools, Astor was struggling with high absence rates.  

    One young person hadn’t attended school for more than 2 years.  

    I won’t use her real name, but let’s call her Sarah for today. 

    Sarah just couldn’t imagine herself coming back to school. But Lee knew the damage not being in school was doing to her life chances, and the life chances of other children not turning up. 

    So Lee set up a new attendance unit, right there in the school.  

    Staff visited Sarah at home, encouraged her to come into the school in the summer, when it was calm and quiet.  

    They worked with Sarah to design the unit – so that she would feel at home.  

    When the new term started, they eased Sarah back into the swing of attendance. 

    Slowly, step by step, until she was attending every day. Attendance is the foundation of attainment – and so it proved for this young woman. 

    Despite all she’d missed, she passed both her English and maths GCSEs.  

    I think about where Sarah would be now if Astor hadn’t acted. She would probably still be at home every day, without her English and Maths GCSEs, but crucially, her hopes for the future slowly slipping away. 

    But the school put her on a different path. And now she knows that education can work for her, that success can belong to her.  

    And I can’t wait to hear about what she goes on to achieve next. 

    That’s the power of what’s on offer here. The chance to support and scale what works. 

    To draw on the excellence that already exists. And put it to work in service of the children in all of your schools. 

    Astor is beginning its improvement journey. And there is so much more still to do to see all pupils in the school achieve and thrive. 

    But through the RISE team we are providing the support and challenge to drive forward that improvement.  

    So Lee’s message is to grab the opportunity with both hands. To be brave, to think big. Knowing that we’re here to support you. 

    That’s how we will raise standards in all our schools. But you’ll all know that the roots of achievement and attainment run deep. 

    So our actions must match that, especially if we want to reach our most disadvantaged children, 

    And to break the sad spiral of poor attainment. Because there are communities now who believe that school just isn’t for people like them.  

    Parents who feel school had nothing to offer them when they were growing up. 

    And now pass on that deep suspicion to their children. 

    New findings from the Independent Inquiry into White Working Class Educational Outcomes paints a very sorry picture of disengagement. 

    And shortly, you’ll hear from the inquiry’s secretariat, Public First. 

    But I should say now that the findings are stark. 

    White working-class children are less likely to enjoy school. 

    Less likely to feel successful at school. 

    Less likely to feel that they belong at school. 

    And the links between belonging and achievement are profound – and they run both ways. 

    But let us be absolutely clear: they are not alternative choices. It’s not a question of one or the other. 

    The only real choice, quite frankly, is both, or neither. 

    Because children who don’t like school, who don’t believe they belong in the classroom, who suspect the system is against them. 

    They are not children who are set up to achieve top marks. 

    And if you’re failing your exams, it’s hard to enjoy school, it’s hard to feel like you belong. And so that cycle continues. 

    But we must break that cycle and set up these children up for success. 

    That is why our Schools White Paper will drive a generational reset in the contract between white working class families and our schools, giving every child the opportunities they deserve in life. 

    For that we must give them an education that is academically challenging. 

    Strong on standards.  

    Rich in opportunity. 

    Rooted in strong relationships.  

    Filled with purpose and belonging. 

    That’s the recipe for children who enjoy school, who feel they belong in school, and who succeed at school. 

    But like any recipe, it can’t be just one of those things, working alone. 

    It must be all of those things, working together. 

    And you are the chefs – the expert leaders who can bring it all together. 

    Using all the tools at your disposal to raise standards – cutting edge data, our new RISE support, our new writing framework. 

    But the journey starts long before children reach your classrooms. 

    Through support for families in our new Best Start Family Hubs. 

    Through our 30 hours a week of government funded childcare for working parents.  

    And then our Best Start breakfast clubs in primary schools. 

    Building achievement and belonging right from the early years, so they arrive in your secondary schools raring to go. 

    And in your classrooms, they will be taught a curriculum that is rich and broad – that delivers the strong foundations of learning, but also opens up the wonders of art, music, and sport.  

    Enrichment too. Because we know that children with access to enrichment at school, tend to be the children who do well in their exams. 

    And in the end, the way that children truly connect with their education is through great teachers.  

    Now, when I think back to my school days, when I think of the happy memories. It was all about the teachers I had along the way. 

    The ones who helped me succeed are the ones who made me feel like I belonged. 

    That’s why I am determined to help you recruit and retain more great teachers in your schools.  

    And to encourage more people to get into the profession, what’s why we have set out today the new initial teacher training incentive. 

    I want more great teachers in our schools, working their magic. 

    And it really is magic – what they do, what you do. 

    Don’t ever let anyone tell you otherwise. 

    And I certainly won’t let anyone tell me otherwise. 

    You have the wonderful power to transform lives. 

    To give to children the knowledge and skills they need to succeed, not just in work, but in life too. 

    Thank you.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2025 Speech at the North East Chamber of Commerce

    Bridget Phillipson – 2025 Speech at the North East Chamber of Commerce

    The speech made by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, in Sunderland on 3 October 2025.

    This is an organisation that has stood the test of time. Because 1815 is not only the year the Battle of Waterloo was won.

    Perhaps more importantly even than that, it was the year that the Chamber was established.

    So I want to thank the Chamber for centuries of work giving the businesses of this region a voice.

    And I have to say, it’s always so nice to be here, back home in the North East. I grew up not far from here, just several miles down the Wear to Washington.

    That’s the community I’m from. Where I was born, where I went to school, where I made my first friends.

    I have spoken about how during that time there were ups and downs where I grew up. There was deprivation and there was crime in our community.

    But there was kindness too. And resolve to make the most of things.

    And I saw those sharp contrasts when I came back home to the North East after university.

    I worked in the women’s refuge here when I was in my early 20s.

    And in those years I saw some of the worst things you could ever see, the impact of the worst violence and abuse.

    But I also saw the best of our community too.

    I saw resilience, strength.

    I witnessed so many women rebuild their lives with dignity and determination.

    And it was a real honour to be able to help them do it.

    So when I think about home, I think about community.

    I reflect on what that word means for all of us.

    Not just as a proud native of the North East, but as a proud member of this government.

    Because what we want to see as this government is to grow strong communities across the North East and across this country.

    Communities filled with optimism and opportunity.

    But how do we do that? What does a community need?

    You won’t be surprised to hear me as Education Secretary say that every good community needs a brilliant school.

    A brilliant college. An engaged university not too far away.

    But it also has to provide proper support for families too. Our government funded childcare entitlement. Our school-based nurseries.

    Our Best Start Family Hubs.

    But a strong community full of opportunity needs more than that.

    It needs great employers, it needs all of you here, in this room.

    Because all of you in this room are drivers of growth and opportunity.

    In manufacturing. Logistics. Hospitality. Tourism. Tech. Energy.

    Education. Finance. Construction. Defence. Social enterprise. Healthcare, you name it.

    Here in this room we have the diversity of enterprise that makes our region great.

    And you are crucial to two of this government’s missions – growth for the British economy, and opportunity for the British people.

    So I want to say a big thank you for the role you all play in your local communities.

    And I want to thank you for working so closely with the North East Combined Authority in that endeavour.

    Our mayor Kim McGuiness is doing a fantastic job creating opportunities for young people.

    And I know so much of this region’s good work runs through the local skills improvement plans.

    Because to play your vital role as good businesses in the communities that you serve you need a skills system fit for purpose, a system that works for all of  you.

    One that is both comprehensive and cohesive.

    One that focuses on actual skills needs – both locally and nationally.

    Because I know that there is nothing more frustrating for you than being ready to expand, ready to contribute to the success of your communities, but not being able to find the right people with the right skills.

    And trust me, that’s frustrating for us as government too.

    And for young people – who have big dreams, who want to work hard, to get on, but who can’t find the right pathway –  for them, that’s not just a frustration.

    It’s crushing.

    That’s the thing, skills are the route to prosperity for employees and for employers.

    A skills system that works for young people is a skills system that works for business.

    And that’s the vision for our upcoming post-16 education and skills white paper.

    To build a system that drives growth through the industrial strategy.

    That’s not the work of one department, but the work of the whole government.

    To open up opportunity in all of our communities.

    And there are opportunities to be seized.

    Evidence from Skills England shows why that’s so important.

    By 2030 we’ll need 900,000 new jobs in priority sectors.

    Like digital, clean energy, advanced manufacturing.

    900,000 opportunities for your businesses to expand.

    900,000 opportunities for our people to get on.

    But to grab those opportunities we need change. We need a rebalancing of what it is we value.

    Our universities, including here in the region, are truly world-leading, a brilliant source of national pride. But for too long, our further education colleges have had to exist in their shadow.

    So it’s time we recognised the value of our colleges too.

    And, just as we are driving up standards in our schools, it’s time to drive up standards in our colleges as well.

    We’ll work with our brilliant FE staff, to harness their passion, to unlock their expertise, and to set in motion a skills revolution in our colleges.

    Universities are the right route for many of our young people.

    And we’ve got to make sure that all who want to go to university have the means to follow that dream.

    That’s why in my speech this week at Labour Party Conference I announced that we will introduce new targeted maintenance grants for students who need them most.

    Available for students pursuing higher level study at college or university on courses aligned with the government’s missions and the industrial strategy, because we value the technicians as well as the engineers, because what matters is not the building you study in, but the skills that you hone, because university is a fantastic option for many of our young people, but it’s not all of our young people, and they need strong roots too.

    That’s why in his conference speech the Prime Minister announced we’ll move away from the target, around 50% of young people to go to university.

    Instead, Keir set a new ambition, fit for this country’s future, fit for the modern world, for two-thirds of young people to reach higher-level study.

    Whether that’s at university. Whether that’s in a college.

    Or whether that’s through an apprenticeship.

    I’m serious about skills. The Prime Minister is serious about skills. And this government is serious about skills.

    And that requires a prestigious, world-class further education system.

    Raising standards. Bolstering teaching quality. Empowering our high-performing FE leaders.

    And so we’re backing our FE colleges with more funding.

    Investing nearly £800 million extra next year.

    Supporting an extra 20,000 16-19-year-olds with the skills that they need to get on.

    And we’re going further.

    We’re transforming FE colleges into specialist Technical Excellence Colleges.

    And they’ll focus on key sectors to support our industrial strategy.

    Back in August I went to Derby College to announce the selection of 10 Construction Technical Excellence Colleges, covering the whole of England.

    And we’re investing £100 million to get this right and deliver high-quality construction skills for our young people.

    And I’m delighted that the Construction Technical Excellence College for the North East is right here at the City of Sunderland College.

    And we worked hand in hand with the North East Combined Authority to get this right.

    In fact, the college’s brand-new Housing Innovation and Construction Skills Academy is just right over the way from here. You might be able to see it if you shuffle down.

    It’ll be a centre of excellence, partnering with FE colleges, universities and employers like you across the region.

    And now we’re launching another 14 Technical Excellence Colleges in three more sectors for 2026 right across the country – on top of the five we announced as part of the Defence Industrial Strategy.

    That’s one route for young people to get the skills that your businesses need and that we all need.

    Another is apprenticeships.

    I know that they haven’t always offered the flexibility you need, they haven’t always reflected the realities of the modern world.

    When the right skills can be gained in under a year, for example. Or when learners aren’t starting from zero.

    That’s why last month we reduced the minimum duration to 8 months, to make apprenticeships work better for learners and better for you.

    Also tearing away the red tape on English and maths, to open up opportunities for adult learners.

    And for young people in targeted sectors we’ve introduced foundation apprenticeships – to give them a route into good careers in critical sectors.

    But I know that sometimes supporting someone starting out in their career who needs extra support can be expensive for employers.

    So we’ve backed the new foundation apprenticeships with support for employers of up to £2,000 for every foundation apprentice that you take on.

    And It’s a similar story for T Level placements.

    They’re an essential part of these really high quality top-quality qualifications.

    But that doesn’t mean they’re cost free for you.

    So we’ve brought in a new Employer Support Fund.

    £6.3 million this year to support you with the costs of hosting a T Level industry placement.

    Alongside this action on apprenticeships and T Levels sit our skills packages across government.

    £625 million investment in construction skills.

    £182 million for defence.

    £172 million for engineering.

    And £187 million for digital.

    Skills aren’t just a lever to pull, they’re the cornerstone of our plans to get growth moving in every community.

    But they’re no good in isolation. For that growth to be felt by local families, they have to be centred in local businesses, and we need to take a step back.

    Because new skills are no use to the new dad who can’t go back to work because childcare is too expensive.

    A new qualification is no use to the mam who can’t get up her hours in the office because school drop off is too late.

    That’s why we’re rolling out 30 hours  of government-funded childcare for working parents, until their child reaches school.

    And it’s why we’re racing ahead with free breakfast clubs for every primary school in the country.

    To give parents the choice and freedom to work the hours that suit them.

    But it’s more than that. We’re growing a network of up to a thousand Best Start Family Hubs.

    The best of Sure Start, reimagined for the future – bringing together all of the help and advice that our  families need.

    This is at the root of how we will  eradicate the stain of child poverty in our region – and across the country.

    Parents with the right support, with the right skills to find the work that’s best for them.

    Ending child poverty is the moral mission of this government.

    Giving parents the power and the choices they need to build a better life for themselves and their families is my promise.

    And some might wonder what’s the relevance for business in all of that.

    But they’re wrong.

    As leaders you know the value of strong and supportive communities.

    The value of healthy and happy members of your team.

    That’s why we’ve been working with business on our Make Work Pay initiative.

    To drive up working conditions.

    To share best practice.

    To boost innovation.

    Because the best businesses are proud to be trusted sources of good, secure jobs in their local communities.

    And that’s my ask of you as I wrap up.  

    To partner with us to revitalise our communities.

    To take on that young apprentice with plenty of talent but who’s still got plenty left to learn.

    Welcome that T-Level placement student who otherwise wouldn’t get the practical experience they need.

    Engage in T Level Week later this month and share your success stories.

    Invest in your workforce, not just for today but for tomorrow too.

    And work with us in government. Work with Skills England. local colleges, your local university. Work with the team delivering the Local Skills Improvement Plan for your area.

    You do all this already, because you know there is such strength in our community here in the region, but only when we work together.

    So, please, keep doing it. And I’ll keep on working in partnership with you.

    Because you are at the centre of what this government wants to achieve.

    Our skills white paper is coming – and in partnership with you it will deliver the step change in skills that our country needs.

    But that’s not the end game.

    Because ultimately skills are a means to an end.

    A means to many ends, in fact.

    Driving growth.

    Ending child poverty.

    Breaking the link between background and success.

    Security and prosperity, for businesses and workers alike.

    Strong and healthy communities.

    Opportunity for all.

    Skills are the passport that take us from we are now to where we want to be.

    As businesses, as communities, and as a country.

    And that’s a journey I want us all to take together.

    Thank you very much.

  • Jacqui Smith – 2025 Speech at the SKOPE Skills Summit

    Jacqui Smith – 2025 Speech at the SKOPE Skills Summit

    The speech made by Jacqui Smith, the Skills Minister, at Keble College, Oxford University on 4 July 2025.

    Introduction

    Good morning.

    Thank you for inviting me today.

    I am delighted to see the exciting work on skills education being led by SKOPE’s research on joined-up tertiary education systems.  It is being discussed across the sector.

    And I include government in that, as part of our commitment to evidence-based policymaking.

    It’s a pleasure to be back in Oxford, where I studied all those years ago.

    I was at Hertford, 5 minutes down the road, a college with a proud tradition of inclusion. I was a beneficiary of the Hertford Scheme to encourage state school pupils to apply.

    I hardly dared hope on a snowy December day in 1980 that I could be the first person from my Worcestershire comprehensive to study here.

    It was Hertford, with its pioneering approach to outreach, that gave me the confidence to apply.

    Starting in 1965, it dramatically raised the college’s academic standards and performance.

    In fact, at one point, the university threatened to disassociate Hertford for unfairly ‘poaching’ the best students!

    But many colleges set up similar schemes to emulate its success, before admissions were finally standardised in 1984.

    Why am I telling you this?

    Because it shows that breaking down barriers to opportunity is the key to success.

    For Oxford to succeed, it must welcome-in the best talent, from across the whole population.

    Challenging Oxford

    Oxford recently released their state school admissions data for 2024.

    And the results were poor.

    66.2% – the lowest entry rate since 2019.

    I want to be clear, speaking at an Oxford college today, that this is unacceptable.

    The university must do better.

    The independent sector educates around 6% of school children in the UK.

    But they make-up 33.8% of Oxford entrants.

    Do you really think you’re finding the cream of the crop, if a third of your students come from 6% of the population?

    It’s absurd.

    Arcane, even.

    And it can’t continue.

    It’s because I care about Oxford and I understand the difference that it can make to people’s lives that I’m challenging you to do better.  But it certainly isn’t only Oxford that has much further to go in ensuring access.

    For example, it is shocking how few care leavers attend university, let alone this one!

    Just 14% enter higher education, and they are more than twice as likely to drop-out.

    University entry is supposed to be a meritocracy.

    But there’s still an awful lot of untapped talent out there.

    People with the potential to soar in higher education.

    Universities have got to go further.

    Play a stronger role in expanding access, and improve outcomes for disadvantaged students.

    And this must include more support for care leavers, some of the most vulnerable people in our society.

    I welcome Oxford’s recent commitment, along with other Russell Group universities, to do more for students who grew-up in care.

    And to increase your admissions transparency, and use of contextual admissions.

    I look forward to seeing some tangible outcomes from this pledge.

    I’m not looking for tinkering at the edges. A leg-up here, a bursary there.

    As a Labour government, we want Big Picture change.

    This is about individual opportunity, but it matters across government,

    from education, to health, to the economy. Just yesterday, Wes and Bridget have set out how we’re asking universities to do more to support our mission to break down the barriers to opportunity.  We’re looking at better transparency over university admissions, starting with publishing data on medical schools’ admission of those from lower socio-economic backgrounds.

    We must strive to ensure, from early years all the way through to higher education, that background never equals destiny.

    And that’s where our Post-16 Education and Skills Strategy comes in.

    The Post-16 Education and Skills Strategy

    We will publish the strategy soon.

    It will include our vision for a world-leading skills system.

    One that takes a whole-system, mission-driven approach to breaking down barriers to opportunity to unleash growth.

    This means:

    • A more focused skills system, underpinned by Skills England’s national view of skills needs.
    • Clear, high-quality qualifications that ensure every learner has a clear route to further study or work.
    • Firm foundations, putting the system on a financially stable footing that supports strategic specialisation.

    And finally,

    • A new culture of ‘skills first’ where it is everyone’s responsibility – individuals, employers, and the state – to ensure workers reskill and upskill throughout their lives.

    This will boost personal and national prosperity, and reduce reliance on migration to fill skills gaps.

    What do we need to do to achieve this?

    First, there needs to be a renewed partnership between government and business.

    This means both local and central government working with business to identify skills gaps and develop solutions.

    We’ve heard the calls for more flexibility in the skills offer by introducing foundation and short apprenticeships.

    Now we’re going further with new short courses from April 2026, funded through the Growth and Skills Levy, in areas such as digital, artificial intelligence and engineering.

    These support priority sectors named in our Industrial Strategy, like the Creative Industries and Advanced Manufacturing.

    Because we recognise the importance of key sectors to delivering our Industrial Strategy and our Plan for Change.

    That’s why we’ve adopted a sector-based approach to address key skills needs.

    We started with our construction skills package, worth £625 million.

    To train up to 60,000 extra construction workers – crucial for delivering on our pledge to build 1.5 million new homes.

    We announced a further three further packages in the Industrial Strategy:

    • An Engineering package worth over £100 million, to support the pipeline of engineers into priority sectors like Advanced Manufacturing,
    • Clean Energy Industries, and Digital Technology.
    • A Defence package that is foundational for national security and economic growth,
      including establishing Defence Technical Excellence Colleges.
    • And a Digital package, including £187 million investment for digital and AI skills,
      and a commitment to train 7.5 million UK workers in essential AI skills
      by 2030, through a new industry partnership with major tech players.

    Raising the prestige of Further Education

    We understand that the economy needs both technical skills and academic disciplines in order to grow.

    It’s not a zero sum game – because both have so much to offer our people and our economy.

    And, dare I say it, much to learn from each other!

    Further education needs to emerge from the shadow of Higher Education as an equal partner.

    That means positive prominence in careers advice.

    And public recognition that’s long overdue.

    Technical education needs to be a respected alternative to academic pathways.

    And Technical Excellence Colleges will be at the heart of this.

    Only when there is parity, will we secure high-quality post-16 routes for all learners, rather than the lucky few.

    For learners from 16-19, we will be guided by the independent  Curriculum and Assessment Review, set to publish this autumn.

    High esteem follows high-quality teaching and student outcomes.

    We will provide funding to recruit and retain high-quality Further Education teachers, especially for courses delivering scarce skills to priority sectors.

    And this is backed by funding secured at the recent Spending Review.

    We are investing £1.2 billion a year more in skills by 2028-29, alongside over £2 billion of capital investment in skills to support the condition and capacity of the estate.

    Strengthening Higher Education’s role within the skills system I said earlier that Further Education needs to be an equal partner of Higher Education. Since we came into Government in July, we’ve ended the culture of talking down universities, and dismissing the opportunities higher education provides.

    We’re doing quite the opposite, working with you to:

    • drive up standards;
    • maintain our position as a world-class beacon of excellence;
    • build on a proud history of innovation and brilliance in higher education.

    But as the world changes, so must our higher education system.

    We cannot allow the town and gown divide to widen, and for universities and their communities to drift.

    We need collaboration, partnership, and mutual respect.

    Higher Education needs to reach out and play a bigger role in the skills system.

    Because ‘high-quality post-16 routes for all learners’ doesn’t necessarily mean they must choose between HE and FE.

    Our analysis shows the majority of the future skills we’ll need will be at higher levels.

    This means technical students will need access to cutting-edge facilities and courses, as they build their qualifications.

    So the artificial barriers between Further and Higher Education must come down – in a coordinated, effective way.

    And this will be facilitated by the Lifelong Learning Entitlement.

    The Lifelong Learning Entitlement

    The ability to learn across our working lives is no longer just admirable, or valuable. It’s essential.

    People aren’t just working for longer.

    They are changing roles and careers more frequently.

    And the skills needed for those roles are also evolving rapidly.

    Yet despite all this change, the student finance system still largely operates on the assumption that learning only happens early in life.

    To break down the barriers to opportunity, we must support learning at every stage of life.

    This is exactly what the Lifelong Learning Entitlement – or LLE – will do, offering choice, flexibility and opportunity to adults across their working lives.

    From January 2027, the LLE will replace the student finance system.

    It will continue to fund students entering higher education to take traditional degrees.

    But it will also fund new, flexible modular pathways, widening student finance to a broader range of courses and learners.

    That includes those returning to education later in life, who may be working whilst studying. Providing flexibility around personal commitments like caring responsibilities.

    What does means in practice?

    I want you to imagine Sarah, a full-time receptionist and mother who decides she wants a career change. However, Sarah is concerned about committing to studying full-time, as her family is still growing, and she is struggling to take out time to pursue retraining in computer science.

    Through the LLE and the funding of individual modules, Sarah will be able to study one module at a time, to build up her credits over time, alongside her work and family commitments.

    The LLE will not just change the type of provision on offer.

    It also has the potential to transform how employers work with providers to train and recruit staff, allowing modular top-up to build or update their skills.

    We’re already seeing this play out through our modular acceleration programme.

    We want education providers to innovate in how they respond to the new model, so that lifelong upskilling becomes accessible and unremarkable.

    At the same time, employers must be active partners in LLE provision, co-designing flexible courses that create accessible pathways into the workforce.

    We will shortly set-out the final policy design of the LLE, so FE and HE providers can plan for this transformational change.

    Improving local join-up

    The final thing we must do to widen opportunity and build growth is better local join-up. This means strategic collaboration between local education providers, employers, research hubs and health services.

    We set the scene at the end of last year with our ‘Get Britain Working’ and ‘English Devolution’ White Papers.

    These described how mayors and Local Growth Plans will play a key role in shaping their regional skills systems. Local Get Britain Working plans will drive joined-up action to reduce economic inactivity, and take forward our Youth Guarantee.

    This is key for ensuring young people in difficult circumstances are supported to achieve good qualifications and good employment.

    The skills system is at its most effective when detailed local understanding is matched with insight from local employers and training providers.

    Many young adults face complex barriers to engaging with skills courses; an estimated 1 in 8 young people are NEET – not in education, employment or training.

    Improving the accessibility of training will be crucial to reducing the number of NEETs,.

    But to bring them into the fold, you have to understand local barriers as well as national, systemic issues.

    Further Education colleges often do this well by working with many local partners. They are big participants in Local Skills Improvement Plans (or LSIPs).

    These collaborations identify and respond to gaps in skills provision, giving employers a more strategic role in the system.

    I believe in LSIPs because they facilitate partnership

    Early evidence shows Plans are already having an impact, raising the number of learners training in priority sectors – with more employers telling us that local skills provision meets their needs.

    But we must go further to join-up local systems to drive opportunity and growth.

    Which bring me back to universities.

    Discussions on LSIPs should involve all local providers, and all levels of education – including up to Doctorate level!

    If your university offers a course that relates to your local skills offer, or local employers, you have something to contribute to these discussions.

    And to the outcomes of local students studying beyond your campus, in neighbouring colleges.

    And let’s not forget the role of research and innovation.

    Universities are renowned for delivering solutions to global challenges.

    But this also happens at a local level, as seen with the Oxford Local Policy Lab.

    HE also brings new ideas to market, through start-ups and partnerships with industry.

    Whichever way you look at it, Higher Education has a huge role in driving local growth and opportunity.

    You need to be part of this conversation.

    Universities involved in local growth

    And this is not just some government aspiration!

    There are plenty of examples of institutions stepping-up to play their part.

    The London South Bank University group acts as an anchor institution within the local education community. It brings together FE colleges, sixth form colleges and employers – particularly the NHS – to ensure a truly collaborative approach to education, training and skills provision.

    You’ll hear later from Professor Kathryn Mitchell, Vice Chancellor of Derby University.

    They work closely with FE colleges and local employers, particularly Rolls Royce to ensure clear links between education and the labour market.

    And in the North East, organisations like Sunderland Software City are leading the tech industry to match local education and training provision with regional requirements.

    It’s great to see – and shows just what university participation in inclusive growth can do for the local economy and community.

    Conclusion

    I know I’m not alone here in admiring this, and wanting change.

    Many people in this room who are working to make Further and Higher Education better – to better serve our people and our nation.

    I’d like to thank you for your innovation and dedication to this – which can sometimes be uphill work!

    I’m grateful to SKOPE, who’ve worked with my officials to share their expertise in developing our Post-16 Education and Skills Strategy.

    And to the Nuffield Foundation for helping to fund SKOPE’s research.

    The strategy is just the beginning, by the way!

    The different parts of the system will need to work together to meet its vision.

    To bring about a fairer society, where everyone has the chance to gain good qualifications, get a good job, support their family, and contribute to their community and our economy.

    Let’s make it happen!

    Thank you.