Category: Economy

  • Jeremy Hunt – 2022 Financial Statement in the House of Commons

    Jeremy Hunt – 2022 Financial Statement in the House of Commons

    The financial statement made by Jeremy Hunt, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the House of Commons on 16 November 2022.

    Introduction

    Mr Speaker,

    In the face of unprecedented global headwinds, families, pensioners, businesses, teachers, nurses and many others are worried about the future.

    So today we deliver a plan to tackle the cost-of-living crisis and rebuild our economy.

    Our priorities are stability, growth, and public services.

    We also protect the vulnerable because to be British is to be compassionate and this is a compassionate government.

    We are not alone facing these problems but today our plan reflects British values as we respond to an international crisis.

    We are honest about the challenges and fair in our solutions.

    Yes, we take difficult decisions to tackle inflation and keep mortgage rises down.

    But our plan also leads to a shallower downturn; lower energy bills; higher long-term growth; and a stronger NHS and education system.

    Stability

    Three priorities then today: stability, growth and public services.

    I start with stability.

    High inflation is the enemy of stability.

    It means higher mortgage rates, more expensive food and fuel bills, businesses failing and unemployment rising.

    It erodes savings, causes industrial unrest, and cuts funding for public services.

    It hurts the poorest the most and eats away at the trust upon which a strong society is built.

    The Office for Budget Responsibility confirms global factors are the primary cause of current inflation.

    Most countries are still dealing with the fallout from a once-in-a-century pandemic.

    The furlough scheme, the vaccine rollout, and the response of the NHS did our country proud – but they all have to be paid for.

    The lasting impact on supply chains has made goods more expensive and fueled inflation.

    This has been worsened by a Made in Russia energy crisis.

    Putin’s war in Ukraine has caused wholesale gas and electricity prices to rise to eight times their historic average.

    Inflation is high here – but higher in Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy.

    Interest rates have risen here – but faster in the US, Canada and New Zealand.

    Growth forecasts have fallen here – but fallen further in Germany.

    The International Monetary Fund expect one third of the world’s economy will be in recession this year or next.

    So the Bank of England, which has done an outstanding job since its independence, now has my wholehearted support in its mission to defeat inflation and I today confirm we will not change its remit.

    But we need fiscal and monetary policy to work together – and that means the government and the Bank working in lockstep.

    It means, in particular, giving the world confidence in our ability to pay our debts.

    British families make sacrifices every day to live within their means and so too must their government because the United Kingdom will always pay its way.

    I understand the motivation of my predecessor’s mini-budget and he was correct to identify growth as a priority.

    But unfunded tax cuts are as risky as unfunded spending which is why we reversed the planned measures quickly.

    As a result, government borrowing has fallen.

    The pound has strengthened.

    And the OBR says today that the lower interest rates generated by the government’s actions are already benefitting our economy and sound public finances.

    But credibility cannot be taken for granted and yesterday’s inflation figures show we must continue a relentless fight to bring it down, including a rock solid commitment to rebuild the public finances.

    Richard Hughes and his team at the OBR today lay out starkly the impact of global headwinds on the UK economy and I am enormously grateful to him and his team for their thorough work.

    The OBR forecast the UK’s inflation rate to be 9.1% this year and 7.4% next year.

    They confirm that our actions today help inflation to fall sharply from the middle of next year.

    They also judge that the UK, like other countries, is now in recession.

    Overall this year, the economy is still forecast to grow by 4.2%.

    GDP then falls in 2023 by 1.4%, before rising by 1.3%, 2.6%, and 2.7% in the following three years.

    The OBR says higher energy prices explain the majority of the downward revision in cumulative growth since March.

    They also expect a rise in unemployment from 3.6% today to 4.9% in 2024 before falling to 4.1%.

    Today’s decisions mean that over the next five years, borrowing is more than halved.

    This year, we are forecast to borrow 7.1% of GDP or £177 billion; next year, 5.5% of GDP or £140 billion; then by 2027-28, it falls to 2.4% of GDP or £69 billion.

    As a result, underlying debt as a percentage of GDP starts to fall from a peak of 97.6% of GDP in 2025-26 to 97.3% in 2027-28.

    I also confirm two new fiscal rules: the first is that underlying debt must fall as a percentage of GDP by the fifth year of a rolling five-year period.

    The second, that public sector borrowing, over the same period, must be below 3% of GDP.

    The plan I’m announcing today meets both rules.

    Today’s statement delivers a consolidation of £55 billion and means inflation and interest rates end up significantly lower.

    We achieve this in a balanced way.

    In the short term, as growth slows and unemployment rises, we will use fiscal policy to support the economy.

    The OBR confirm that because of our plans, the recession is shallower, and inflation is reduced. Unemployment is also lower with about 70,000 jobs protected as a result of our decisions today.

    Then, once growth returns, we increase the pace of consolidation to get debt falling.

    This further reduces the pressure on the Bank to raise interest rates because as Conservatives we do not leave our debts to the next generation.

    So, Mr Speaker, this is a balanced path to stability: tackling the inflation to reduce the cost of living and protect pensioner savings whilst supporting the economy on a path to sustainable growth.

    But it means taking difficult decisions.

    Anyone who says there are easy answers is not being straight with the British people: some argue for spending cuts, but that would not be compatible with high quality public services.

    Others say savings should be found by increasing taxes but Conservatives know that high tax economies damage enterprise and erode freedom.

    We want low taxes and sound money. But sound money has to come first because inflation eats away at the pound in people’s pockets even more insidiously than taxes.

    So, with just under half of the £55 billion consolidation coming from tax, and just over half from spending, this is a balanced plan for stability.

    Tax

    I turn first to our decisions on tax. I have tried to be fair by following two broad principles: firstly, we ask those with more to contribute more; and secondly, we avoid the tax rises that most damage growth.

    Although my decisions today do lead to a substantial tax increase, we have not raised headline rates of taxation, and tax as a percentage of GDP will increase by just 1% over the next five years.

    I start with personal taxes.

    Asking more from those who have more means that the first difficult decision I take on tax is to reduce the threshold at which the 45p rate becomes payable from £150,000 to £125,140.

    Those earning £150,000 or more will pay just over £1200 more in tax every year.

    We are also taking difficult decisions on tax-free allowances.

    I am maintaining at current levels the income tax personal allowance, higher rate threshold, main national insurance thresholds and the inheritance tax thresholds for a further two years taking us to April 2028.

    Even after that, we will still have the most generous set of tax-free allowances of any G7 country.

    I am also reforming allowances on unearned income.

    The dividend allowance will be cut from £2,000 to £1,000 next year and then to £500 from April 2024.

    The Annual Exempt Amount for capital gains tax will be cut from £12,300 to £6,000 next year and then to £3,000 from April 2024.

    These changes still leave us with more generous allowances overall than countries like Germany, Ireland, France, and Canada.

    And, because the OBR forecasts half of all new vehicles will be electric by 2025…

    …to make our motoring tax system fairer I have decided that from April 2025 electric vehicles will no longer be exempt from Vehicle Excise Duty.

    Company car tax rates will remain lower for electric vehicles and I have listened to industry bodies and will limit rate increases to 1ppt a year for three years from 2025.

    The OBR expects housing activity to slow over the next two years, so the stamp duty cuts announced in the mini-budget will remain in place but only until 31st March 2025.

    After that, I will sunset the measure, creating an incentive to support the housing market…

    …and all the jobs associated with it…

    …by boosting transactions during the period the economy most needs it.

    I now turn to business taxes.

    While I have decided to freeze the Employers NICs threshold until April 2028, we will retain the Employment Allowance at its new, higher level of £5,000. 40% of all businesses will still pay no NICs at all.

    The VAT registration threshold is already more than twice as high as the EU and OECD averages. I will maintain it at that level until March 2026.

    My RHF the PM successfully negotiated a landmark international tax deal to make sure multinational corporations – including big tech companies – pay the right tax in the countries where they operate.

    I will implement these reforms, making sure the UK gets our fair share.

    Alongside further measures to tackle tax avoidance and evasion, this will raise an additional £2.8 billion by 2027-28.

    I have also heard concerning reports of abuse and fraud in R&D tax relief for SMEs.

    So I have decided today to cut the deduction rate for the SME scheme to 86% and the credit rate to 10% but increase the rate of the separate R&D expenditure credit from 13% to 20%.

    Despite raising revenue, the OBR have confirmed that these measures have no detrimental impact on the level of R&D investment in the economy.

    Ahead of the next Budget, we will work with industry to understand what further support R&D intensive SMEs may require.

    Next, windfall taxes. I have no objection to windfall taxes if they are genuinely about windfall profits caused by unexpected increases in energy prices.

    But any such tax should be temporary, not deter investment and recognise the cyclical nature of energy businesses.

    Taking account of this, I have decided that from January 1st until March 2028 we will increase the Energy Profits Levy from 25% to 35%.

    The structure of our energy market also creates windfall profits for low-carbon electricity generation so, from January 1st, we have also decided to introduce a new, temporary 45% levy on electricity generators.

    Together these taxes raise £14 billion next year.

    Finally, I turn to business rates.

    It is an important principle that bills should accurately reflect market values so we will proceed with the revaluation of business properties from April 2023.

    But I will soften the blow on businesses with a nearly £14 billion tax cut over the next five years. Nearly two thirds of properties will not pay a penny more next year and thousands of pubs, restaurants and small high street shops will benefit.

    This will include a new government funded Transitional Relief scheme as called for by the CBI, the British Retail Consortium, the Federation of Small Businesses, and others, benefitting around 700,000 businesses.

    Our plan for the cost of living delivers lower inflation, lower mortgage rates, a shallower downturn, and lower unemployment.

    But it also involves public spending discipline, so I turn next to how we protect public services through a challenging period.

    Public Spending

    The Prime Minister’s vision for this country has at its heart a strong NHS and world-class education.

    We know that a strong economy depends on strong public services so will protect them as much as we can as we deliver our plan for stability and growth.

    We have to take difficult decisions on the public finances.

    So we are going to grow public spending – but we’re going to grow it more slowly than the growth of the economy.

    For the remaining two years of this Spending Review, we will protect the increases in departmental budgets we have already set out in cash terms.

    And we will then grow resource spending at 1% a year in real terms, in the three years that follow.

    Although departments will have to make efficiencies to deal with inflationary pressures in the next two years, this decision means overall spending in public services will continue to rise, in real terms, for the next five years.

    Before I turn to our plans for schools and the NHS, I start with two other areas of spending.

    DWP

    The Department for Work and Pensions has a critical role in supporting people into work.

    I am proud to live in a country with one of the most comprehensive safety nets anywhere in the world…

    …but also concerned that we have seen a sharp increase in economically inactive working age adults of 630,000 since the start of the pandemic.

    Employment levels have yet to return to pre-pandemic levels which is bad for businesses who cannot fill vacancies and bad for people missing out on the opportunity to do well for themselves and their families.

    So the PM has asked the Work and Pensions Secretary to thoroughly review issues holding back workforce participation due to conclude early in the new year.

    Alongside this, I am also committed to helping people already in-work to raise their incomes, progress in work, and become financially independent.

    That is why we will ask over 600,000 more people on Universal Credit to meet with a work coach so that they can get the support they need to increase their hours or earnings.

    I have also decided to move back the managed transition of people from Employment and Support Allowance onto Universal Credit to 2028…

    …and will invest an extra £280m in DWP to crack down on benefit fraud and error over the next two years.

    The Government’s review of the state pension age will be published in early 2023.

    Defence and international commitments

    Our security at home depends on our security overseas, so I turn next to defence and other international commitments.

    The privilege of being this country’s Foreign Secretary showed me first hand the enormous respect in which this country is held because the United Kingdom is and has always been a force for good in the world.

    Nothing sums that up more than the courage of our armed forces, men and women who risk their lives every day in defence of our territory and our belief in freedom.

    Alongside them, I salute the citizens of another country right on the frontline of that fight – the brave people of Ukraine.

    The United Kingdom has given them military support worth £2.3 billion since the start of Putin’s invasion…

    …the second highest contribution in the world after the United States…

    …which demonstrates that our commitment to democracy and open societies remains steadfast.

    In that context, the Prime Minister and I both recognise the need to increase defence spending.

    But before we make that commitment it is necessary to revise and update the Integrated Review, written as it was before the Ukraine invasion.

    I have asked for that vital work to be completed ahead of the next budget and today confirm we will continue to maintain the defence budget at least 2% of GDP to be consistent with our NATO commitment.

    Another important international commitment is to overseas aid.

    The OBR’s forecasts show a significant shock to public finances so it will not be possible to return to the 0.7% target until the fiscal situation allows.

    We remain fully committed to the target and the plans I have set out today assume that ODA spending will remain around 0.5% for the forecast period.

    As a percentage of GNI, we were the third highest donor in the G7 last year and I am proud that our aid commitment has saved thousands of lives around the world.

    I look forward to working closely with my RHF the Member for Sutton Coldfield, now rightly back in his place in Cabinet, to make sure we continue to play a leadership role in tackling global poverty.

    The United Kingdom has also been a global leader on climate change, cutting emissions by more than any other G20 country.

    But with the existential vulnerability we face now would be the wrong time to step back from our international climate responsibilities…

    …so I can confirm that despite the economic pressures we face, we remain fully committed to the historic Glasgow Climate Pact agreed at COP26 including a 68% reduction in our emissions by 2030.

    Education

    I turn to education. Being pro-education is being pro-growth.

    But providing our children with a good education is not just an economic mission, it’s a moral mission – one to which my RHF the Prime Minister has always been deeply committed.

    Thanks to the efforts of successive education ministers, particularly my RHFs from Surrey Heath and Bognor Regis, we have risen 9 places in the global league tables for maths and reading since 2015.

    I still, however, have concerns that not all school leavers get the skills they need for a modern economy.

    Our current Education Secretary left school at 16 to become an apprentice, and knows first hand why good skills matter.

    There are many important initiatives in place but as Chancellor I want to know the answer to one simple question: will every young person leave the education system with the skills they would get in Japan, Germany or Switzerland?

    So I have appointed Sir Michael Barber to advise me and my RHF the Education Secretary on the implementation of our skills reforms programme.

    But as we raise the skill levels of our school leavers, I want to ensure that even in an economic crisis, the improvement in school standards continues to accelerate.

    Some have suggested putting VAT on independent school fees as a way of increasing core funding for schools, which would raise around £1.7 billion.

    But according to certain estimates this would result in up to 90,000 children from the independent sector switching to state schools, giving with one hand and taking away with another.

    So instead of being ideological I am going to be practical.

    Because this government wants school standards continue to rise for every single child, we’re going to do more than protect the schools budget – we’re going to increase it.

    I can announce today that next year and the year after, we will invest an extra £2.3 billion per year in our schools.

    Our message to heads and teachers and classroom assistants today is thank you for your brilliant work, we need it to continue…

    …and in difficult economic circumstances, we are investing more in the public service that defines all of our futures.

    Health and Social care

    Mr Speaker, the service we depend on more than any other is the NHS.

    As a former Health Secretary, I know how hard people are working on the frontline and how much they are struggling after the pandemic.

    The biggest issues are workforce shortages and pressures in the social care sector so today I address them both.

    On staff shortages, the former Chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee put forward the case for a long-term workforce plan.

    I have listened carefully to his proposals and believe they have merit.

    So the Department of Health and Social Care and the NHS will publish…

    …an independently-verified plan for the number of doctors, nurses and other professionals we will need in 5, 10 and 15 years’ time…

    …taking full account of the need for better retention and productivity improvements.

    I have also listened to extensive representations about the challenges facing the social care sector.

    It did a heroic job looking after children, disabled adults, and older people during the pandemic.

    Its 1.6 million employees work incredibly hard. But even outside the pandemic, the increasing number of over 80s is putting massive pressure on their services.

    I also heard the very real concerns from local authorities about their ability to deliver the Dilnot reforms immediately…

    …so will delay the implementation of this important reform for two years, allocating the funding to allow local authorities to provide more care packages.

    I also want the social care system to help free up some of the 13,500 hospital beds that are occupied by those who should be at home.

    I have therefore decided to allocate for adult social care additional grant funding of £1 billion next year and £1.7 billion the year after.

    Combined with the savings from the delayed Dilnot reforms and more council tax flexibilities, this means an increase in funding available for the social care sector of up to £2.8 billion next year and £4.7 billion the year after.

    How we look after our most vulnerable citizens is not just a practical issue but speaks to our values as a society…

    …so today’s increase in funding will allow the social care system to help deliver an estimated 200,000 more care packages over the next two years…

    …the biggest increase under any government of any colour in history.

    The NHS budget has been increased to record levels to deal with the pandemic and today I am asking it to join all public services in tackling waste and inefficiency.

    We want Scandinavian quality alongside Singaporean efficiency, both better outcomes for citizens and better value for taxpayers.

    That does not mean asking people on the frontline, often exhausted and burned out, to work harder, which would not be fair.

    But it does mean asking challenging questions about how to reform all our public services for the better.

    With respect to the NHS I have asked former Health Secretary and Chair of the Norfolk and Waveney Integrated Care System Patricia Hewitt…

    …to help me and the Health Secretary achieve that by advising us on how to make sure the new Integrated Care Boards operates efficiently with appropriate autonomy and accountability.

    I have also had discussions with NHS England about the inflationary pressures on their budget.

    I recognize that efficiency savings alone will not be enough to deliver the services we all need.

    So because of difficult decisions taken elsewhere today I will increase the NHS budget, in each of the next two years, by an extra £3.3 billion.

    The Chief Executive of the NHS, Amanda Pritchard, has said this should provide sufficient funding for the NHS to fulfil its key priorities and shows the government is serious about its commitment to prioritise the NHS.

    That is why today we commit to a record £8 billion package for our health and social care system – a government putting the NHS first.

    And, Mr Speaker, the NHS and schools in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland face equivalent pressures so the Barnett consequentials of today’s decisions mean…

    …an extra £1.5 billion for the Scottish Government; £1.2 billion for the Welsh Government, and £650m for the Northern Ireland Executive.

    Mr Speaker, our support for public services means that despite needing to find £55 billion in savings and tax rises, we are protecting the amount going into public services in real terms over the five-year period.

    But if we are going to sustain our public services and avoid a doom loop of ever higher taxes and ever lower dynamism, we need economic growth.

    So today I also outline our three priorities for growth.

    Growth

    Mr Speaker,

    You cannot borrow your way to growth. Sound money is the rock on which long term prosperity rests – but it is not enough on its own.

    Our plan is designed to build a high wage, high skill economy that leads to long-term prosperity. In his Mais lecture, My RHF friend the Prime Minister identified the keys to doing this – people, capital and ideas.

    Today’s increase in the education budget demonstrates our commitment to people and skills and I now outline three further growth priorities – energy, infrastructure and innovation.

    Energy

    Cheap, low carbon, reliable energy must sit at the heart of any modern economy.

    But Putin’s weaponisation of international gas prices has helped drive the cost of our national energy consumption right up.

    This year we will be spending an extra £150 billion on energy compared to pre-pandemic levels, equivalent to paying for an entire second NHS through our energy bills.

    In 2019, a third of global emissions came from the energy supply so unless we radically change our approach we will both bankrupt our economy and harm our planet.

    Over the long term, there is only one way to stop ourselves being at the mercy of international gas prices: energy independence combined with energy efficiency.

    Energy independence, so neither Putin or anyone else can use energy to blackmail us; and energy efficiency to reduce demand and climate impact as much as possible.

    Britain is a global leader in renewable energy.

    Last year nearly 40% of our electricity came from offshore wind, solar and other renewable sources.

    Since 2010, our renewable energy production grew faster than any other large country in Europe.

    We need to go further, with a major acceleration of home-grown technologies like offshore wind, carbon capture and storage, and, above all, nuclear.

    This will deliver new jobs, industries and export opportunities and secure the clean, affordable energy we need to power our future economy and reach Net Zero..

    So I can today announce that the government will proceed with the new plant at Sizewell C.

    Subject to final government approvals, the contracts for the initial investment will be signed with relevant parties, including EDF, in the coming weeks.

    This will create 10,000 highly skilled jobs and provide reliable, low-carbon, power to the equivalent of 6 million homes for over 50 years.

    Our £700 million investment is the first state backing for a nuclear project in over 30 years and represents the biggest step in our journey to energy independence.

    But energy efficiency is just as important.

    So today, we set our country a new ambition: by 2030, we want to reduce energy consumption from buildings and industry by 15%.

    Reducing demand by this much means, in today’s prices, a £28 billion saving from our national energy bill or £450 off the average household bill.

    This must be a shared mission with families and businesses playing their part – but so will the government.

    In this Parliament, we’re already planning to invest, in energy efficiency, a total of £6.6 billion.

    Today, I’m announcing new funding, from 2025, of a further £6 billion – doubling our annual investment to deliver this new national ambition.

    Our commitment to the British people is, over time, to remove this single biggest driver of inflation and volatility facing British businesses and consumers.

    My RHF the Business and Energy Secretary will publish further details on our energy independence plans and launch a new Energy Efficiency Taskforce shortly.

    Infrastructure

    Mr Speaker,

    If a modern economy needs secure, clean and affordable energy – it also needs good roads, rail, broadband and 5G infrastructure.

    Such connections allow wealth and opportunity to spread which is why infrastructure is our second growth priority.

    Thanks to decisions by this government, right now workers right across the country are building or maintaining thousands of miles of roads and railways; installing mobile masts and broadband cables to connect the remotest parts of rural Britain; building and repairing hospitals; and constructing new wind turbines in the North Sea.

    When looking for cuts, capital is sometimes seen as an easy option.

    But doing so limits not our budgets but our future.

    So today I can announce that I am not cutting a penny from our capital budgets in the next two years and maintaining them at that level in cash terms for the following three years.

    This means that although we are not growing our capital budget as planned, it will still increase from £63 billion four years ago to £114 billion next year and £115 billion the year after – and remain at that level..

    Smart countries build on their long-term commitments rather than discard them.

    So today I confirm that because of this decision, alongside Sizewell C, we will deliver the core Northern Powerhouse Rail. HS2 to Manchester. East West Rail. The new hospitals programme. And gigabit broadband rollout.

    All these and more will be funded as promised, with over £600 billion of investment over the next five years to connect our country and grow our economy.

    Our national mission is to level up economic opportunity across the country.

    And that too, needs investment in infrastructure.

    So I will proceed with round 2 of the levelling up fund, at least matching the £1.7 billion value of Round One.

    We will also drive growth across the UK by working with the Scottish Government on the feasibility study for the A75, supporting the Advanced Technology Research Centre in Wales, and funding a trade and investment event in Northern Ireland next year.

    But to unlock growth right across the country, we need to make it easier for local leaders to make things happen without banging on a Whitehall door.

    Our brilliant mayors have shown the power of civic entrepreneurship.

    But we need more of this inspirational local leadership.

    So today I can announce a new devolution deal that will bring an elected Mayor to Suffolk, and deals to bring Mayors to Cornwall, Norfolk and an area in the North-East to follow shortly.

    We are making progress towards trailblazer devolution deals with the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and West Midlands Combined Authority, and soon over half of England will be covered by devolution deals.

    Taken together, that £600 billion investment over the next five years means the largest investment in public works for forty years.

    Our children and grandchildren can be confident that this Conservative government is investing in their future.

    Innovation

    Energy and infrastructure…and now our third growth priority – innovation.

    We have a national genius for innovation.

    Britain is the land of Newton, Darwin, Fleming, Faraday, Franklin, Gilbert and Berners Lee.

    The home of three of the world’s top 10 universities.

    The country with the largest life sciences largest technology sectors in Europe.

    Thanks to successive Conservative governments, we remain a science superpower and I salute the work of former Chancellor George Osborne, my RHF from Tunbridge Wells and my HF the Science Minister and Member for Mid Norfolk for laying the vital foundations to make this possible.

    21st century economies will be defined by new developments in artificial intelligence, quantum technologies and robotics.

    But we need to be better at turning world class innovation into world class companies.

    So as a former entrepreneur, I had to get it in somewhere… I want to combine our technology and science brilliance with our formidable financial services to turn Britain into the world’s next Silicon Valley.

    We learned from the success of Nigel Lawson’s Big Bang in 1986 that smart regulatory reform can spur investment from all over the world.

    So today, using our Brexit freedoms, I confirm the next step in our supply side transformation.

    By the end of next year, we will decide and announce changes to EU regulations in our five growth industries: digital technology, life sciences, green industries, financial services and advanced manufacturing.

    And I have asked the Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance who did such a brilliant job in the pandemic, to lead new work on how we should change regulation to better support safe and fast introduction of new emerging technologies.

    The second lesson of Nigel Lawson’s Big Bang is that the most important driver of global success is not tax subsidies but competition.

    So we will legislate to give the Digital Markets Unit new powers to challenge monopolies and increase the competitive pressure to innovate.

    To further spur competition, I have listened to requests from businesses and today I’m removing import tariffs on over 100 goods used by UK businesses in their production processes, from car seat parts to bicycle frames.

    I will also change our approach to investment zones which will now focus on leveraging our research strengths, to help build clusters for our new growth industries.

    My RHF the Levelling Up Secretary will work with Mayors, Devolved Administrations and local partners to achieve that with the first decisions announced ahead of the Spring budget.

    I have also heard some speculation that we might cut the research and development budget today.

    I believe that would be a profound mistake.

    In 2017, we announced a target to invest 2.4% of our GDP in R & D and the latest ONS data suggests the UK is close to meeting that target.

    I want to go further, so today I protect our entire research budget and confirm that we will increase public funding for R&D to £20 billion by 2024-5 as part of our mission to make the United Kingdom a science superpower.

    And finally Nigel Lawson’s Big Bang inspires us today – but nearly 40 years on we must stay true to its mission to make the UK the world’s most innovative and competitive global financial centre.

    So to further support investment across our economy, I can also announce we are publishing our decision on Solvency II, which will unlock tens of billions of pounds of investment for our growth-enhancing industries.

    Three priorities for growth, then. Energy security, investment in infrastructure and a plan to turn the United Kingdom into the world’s next Silicon Valley.

    Transforming British intellectual genius into British commercial success.

    But alongside British genius we must also remember another great national quality, British compassion.

    The final part of our plan protects the most vulnerable. It is to that I now turn.

    Protecting the Most Vulnerable

    Strong public finances are not just to make accountants happy.

    It is because we took difficult decisions in 2010 that we could afford record funding increases for the NHS, the landmark furlough scheme, and now the Energy Price Guarantee.

    Today the discipline we have shown means we can provide targeted support to help our most vulnerable citizens with the cost of living.

    Energy Support

    One of the biggest worries for families is energy bills, and I pay credit to my predecessor the Rt Hon Member for Spelthorne and the former Prime Minister the Rt Hon Member for South West Norfolk for their leadership in this area.

    This winter, we will stick with the plan to spend £55 billion to help households and businesses with their energy bills – one of the largest support plans in Europe.

    From April, we will continue the Energy Price Guarantee for a further 12 months at a higher level of £3000 per year for the average household.

    With prices forecast to remain elevated through next year, this will still mean an average of £500 support for every household in the country.

    At the same time, for the most vulnerable we will introduce additional cost of living payments next year, of £900 to households on means-tested benefits; £300 to pensioner households; and £150 for individuals on disability benefit.

    We will also provide an additional £1 billion of funding to enable a further twelve-month extension to the Household Support Fund, helping Local Authorities to assist those who might otherwise fall through the cracks.

    And for those households who use alternative fuels such as heating oil and LPG to heat their homes, I am today doubling the amount of support from £100 to £200, which will be delivered as soon as possible this winter.

    Before the end of this year, we will also bring forward a new targeted approach to support businesses from next April.

    Vulnerable people and pensioners

    I want to go further to support people most exposed to high inflation.

    Around four million families live in the social rented sector – almost one fifth of households in England.

    Their rents are set at one per cent above the September inflation rate which means that on current plans they are set to see rent hikes next year of up to 11%.

    For many, that would clearly be unaffordable so today I can announce that this government will cap the increase in social rents at a maximum of 7% in 2023-24.

    Compared to current plans, that is a saving for the average tenant of £200 next year.

    This government introduced the National Living Wage which has been a giant step to eliminating low pay.

    So today I am accepting the recommendation of the Low Pay Commission to increase it next year by 9.7%.

    That means, from April 2023, the hourly rate will be £10.42 which represents an annual pay rise worth over £1600 to a full-time worker.

    It is expected to benefit over two million of the lowest paid workers in the country and keeps us on track for our target to reach two thirds of median earnings by 2024.

    And it is the largest cash increase in the UK’s National Living Wage ever.

    Mr Speaker, there have also been some representations to keep the uplift to working age and disability benefits below the level of inflation given the financial constraints we face.

    But that would not be consistent with our commitment to protect the most vulnerable so today I also commit to uprate such benefits by inflation with an increase of 10.1%.

    That is an expensive commitment costing £11 billion.

    But it means 10 million working age families will see a much-needed increase next year.

    On average, a family on Universal Credit will benefit next year by around £600.

    And to increase the number of households who can benefit from this decision I will also exceptionally increase the benefit cap with inflation next year.

    Finally, Mr Speaker, I have talked a lot today about British values – of compassion, hard work, dignity, fairness.

    There is no more British value than our commitment to protect and honour those who built the country we live in.

    To support the poorest pensioners, I have decided to increase pension credit by 10.1% which is worth up to £1470 for a couple and £960 for a single pensioner in our most vulnerable households.

    But the cost of living crisis is harming not just poor pensioners but all pensioners so because we have taken difficult decisions elsewhere in this statement, I can today announce that we will fulfil our pledge to the country to protect the pensions Triple Lock.

    So, in April, the state pension will increase in line with inflation, an £870 increase which represents the biggest ever cash increase in the state pension.

    To the millions of pensioners who will benefit from this measure I say – now and always, this government is on your side.

    Conclusion

    Mr Speaker,

    There is a global energy crisis, a global inflation crisis and a global economic crisis.

    But the British people are tough, inventive and resourceful.

    We have risen to bigger challenges before.

    We aren’t immune to these headwinds but with this plan for stability, growth and public services, we will face into the storm.

    There may be a recession Made in Russia but there is a recovery Made in Britain.

    And we commitment to our plan today with British resilience and British compassion.

    Because of the difficult decisions we take in our plan…

    We strengthen our public finances…

    …bring down inflation.

    …and protect jobs.

    We build the first state backed nuclear power station for 30 years.

    And continue the biggest programme of capital investment for 40 years.

    We protect standards in schools.

    ….cut NHS waiting times.

    …fund social care.

    …cap energy bills.

    …support those on benefits.

    We protect workers with the biggest ever increase in the National Living Wage…

    …and our pensioners on the triple lock with the biggest ever increase in the state pension.

    It is a balanced plan for stability, a plan for growth and a plan for public services.

    It shows that you don’t need to choose either a strong economy or good public services…

    … I commend this statement to the House.

  • Jeremy Hunt – 2022 Autumn Financial Statement

    Jeremy Hunt – 2022 Autumn Financial Statement

    The full economic statement issued by HM Treasury on 17 November 2022.

    Autumn Statement (in .pdf format)

  • Rishi Sunak – 2017 Speech on the Budget

    Rishi Sunak – 2017 Speech on the Budget

    The speech made by Rishi Sunak, the Conservative MP for Richmond, in the House of Commons on 9 March 2017.

    It is a privilege to speak in this debate. In all the excitement from Fleet Street, it would be easy to forget who yesterday’s Budget is really about, so I will share with the House how many of my constituents will feel about it. Whether it is the schoolboy with a first-rate technical education who will now have the chance of a better job and a solid wage, the small business owner who knows that when she speaks up her Government listen, or the mother who knows there is a Conservative Chancellor at the helm making the difficult decisions so that her children have well-funded public services and a country that lives within its means, for the hard-working people of North Yorkshire this is a Budget that delivers where they need it most.

    Norman Lamb

    How does that schoolboy or schoolgirl feel about an 8% cut in funding per student by 2020 under this Government?

    Rishi Sunak

    I am not sure that I recognise the right hon. Gentleman’s figure. The schools budget has been protected, and the Government are rightly consulting on the iniquity in the current funding system which means that constituents in my rural area are worse off to the tune of hundreds of pounds per pupil compared with very similar pupils in other parts of the country. I am delighted that the Government are addressing those iniquities in their consultation.

    Seema Malhotra

    Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

    Rishi Sunak

    If the hon. Lady does not mind, I will make some progress and come back to her.

    I begin with small businesses. My predecessor, Lord Hague, has a well-documented enthusiasm for beer, so it will come as no surprise to Members that pubs are a cornerstone of my rural constituency’s economy. Following in his footsteps is difficult enough, but it is impossible for me to visit a pub in my constituency without seeing a picture on the wall of William pulling a pint with the landlord. Not only is my constituency home to more than 200 pubs, but I am proud to say that it hosts the Campaign for Real Ale’s 2017 pub of the year: the community-owned George & Dragon in Hudswell. I was delighted to be in Hudswell just last Friday when the landlord Stu Miller, his family and team received their award in the loud company of everybody from the village.

    In recent months I, like many other hon. Members, raised concerns that the revaluation of business rates risks penalising such small, enterprising businesses. I am delighted to say that this was the Budget of a Chancellor who, like any good barman, listens to our concerns. For the landlords who run them, the jobs that depend on them and the communities that enjoy them, this Budget’s £1,000 business rate discount will make a real difference to many pubs at a time when money is still tight.

    But pubs are not the only rural businesses that the Budget will help. Auction marts and livery yards across North Yorkshire have seen particularly steep rises in their business rates because the idiosyncrasies of such companies are not well understood by officials and because the last revaluation coincided with the disastrous foot and mouth epidemic. Such idiosyncrasies are more than even the most ingenious civil servant could be expected to foresee. Auction marts, livery yards and riding schools are particularly important to the fabric of our rural community, so I thank the Chancellor for the extremely welcome creation of the new £300 million discretionary business rates fund, which will put decision making back in the hands of communities and allow businesses in constituencies such as mine to benefit from the local knowledge of councils in ensuring a smooth transition to the new schedule.

    Stephen Doughty

    The hon. Gentleman was talking about pubs, and he will know that I am a keen pub goer. Indeed, I was in a pub in his constituency the other day, enjoying a pint with my cousins. What does he have to say to customers in pubs, who are going to face a 3% increase in the price of a pint?

    Rishi Sunak

    What I say to customers and to the hon. Gentleman is that I am sure that the Minister doing the wind-up will be able to say how much better off customers are from having benefited from several years of freezes in beer duty that would otherwise have been put in place. I am sure they would also like to hear that this Government will be consulting on new duty rates for white cider and still wine to see what more could be done to help customers who drink those alcoholic beverages. Lastly, let me say that I would welcome him back to my constituency any time and will be happy to share a pint with him next time he is there.

    Seema Malhotra

    I have not yet been to a pub in the hon. Gentleman’s constituency, but I recognise the benefits for pubs in my constituency. May I extend the question about customers in pubs, many of whom may be self-employed? Have they reflected with him on their concerns about the proposed rise in national insurance?

    Rishi Sunak

    I thank the hon. Lady for raising that issue. If she will allow me, I will deal with that exact point later in my speech.

    The last measure in support of local businesses that I wish to highlight is the £690 million fund available for local authorities to address urban congestion. Congestion is not something one would ordinarily associate with the rural idyll of North Yorkshire’s villages and market towns, but the residents and community of Northallerton are relentlessly frustrated by the level crossing near our vibrant and diverse high street, as its impact on local business is substantial. I have convened meetings of local authorities and Network Rail to discuss plans to alleviate the congestion, and I very much hope the Chancellor’s new fund can help us.

    As the Chancellor so rightly pointed out in his Budget speech, supporting our businesses is a means to an end, not an end in itself. If our children are to benefit from the more than 2 million new jobs created since 2010, they will need the right skills. The 2.4 million apprenticeships created in the last Parliament are a momentous achievement, but we must also recognise that although most of us think of apprentices as young people, 16 to 19-year-olds—school leavers—account for less than 10% of the increase in new apprentices. That means that too many school leavers are still sticking with an inappropriate classroom education rather than a first-class technical one. The Chancellor’s announcement of new T-levels is a crucial step in redressing the balance and closing for good the gap between the classroom and the factory floor, for which our economy has paid a high price for too long. I therefore welcome the new half a billion pound investment in increasing training hours, the streamlining of technical qualifications, the provision of high-quality work placements and the introduction of maintenance loans. Taken together, that is a powerful package to help to ensure parity of esteem between technical and academic education.

    Yet I also urge Ministers to continue to look carefully at my campaign, supported in the recent industrial strategy, to create a UCAS-style system for apprenticeships. This branded, one-stop-shop portal would not only end the classroom divide between those applying to university and those applying for apprenticeships, but, by bringing everything together in one place, help businesses to connect more easily with young apprentices in schools.

    Turning to national insurance, I, like many Conservative Members, have always believed in low taxes as a spur to economic growth, but when a Government inherit a deficit of £100 billion the greatest priority must be returning to sound finances and doing so in a way that is fair. I believe it is right that those who benefit from public services make an appropriate contribution to paying for them, and that is what this Budget’s changes to national insurance will ensure. Sixty per cent. of self-employed workers—those earning less than £16,000—will see a decrease in their national insurance contributions as a result of the removal of the regressive class 2 band. Workers earning up to almost £33,000 will be no worse off when these changes are taken together with the increases to the personal allowance, and for those earning more the average increase in contributions will be a few hundred pounds. It is right to ask: is this fair? I believe that it is.

    Historically, different rates of national insurance for the self-employed and the employed reflected significantly different benefits and access to public benefits, but that difference is no longer there. Indeed, changes to the state pension, which is partly funded by national insurance, mean that self-employed workers now benefit from an extra £1,800 annually in pension—this is something they would need to save up to £50,000 for to receive in the private sector. Similarly, self-employed couples starting a family can now benefit from almost £5,000 in tax-free childcare support.

    In this House, I always hear calls for investment in public services, such as this Budget has provided for in social care, but those investments need to be paid for. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs has estimated that it is losing about £5 billion a year from the increasing trend of self-employment, so it is right that we make small changes to ensure that everybody contributes to the public services and benefits we value. It is important to recognise that even after these changes the tax system will still recognise the particular issues faced by self-employed workers and will favour them in its tax rates and treatment. They will benefit from a lower rate of national insurance than employees; they will still not bear the cost of employers’ national insurance, which is levied at a substantial 13.8%; they will still have the ability to offset losses and gains over years; and they will still benefit from a more generous treatment of tax-deductable expenses. I am also encouraged that in the longer term the Government are committed to looking at the whole issue of the increasing trend towards self-employment, and to ensuring that we reflect those changes in the economy in our tax system and ensure that everybody is treated fairly. This small change is thus necessary to protect the things we value, and it is fair and proportionate.

    In conclusion, we have all learned to be a little cautious of economic forecasts, but if the Office for Budget Responsibility is right, the first students to sit their T-levels will do so in a country with 1 million new jobs, double today’s productivity growth and, for the first time in two decades, national debt falling as a percentage of GDP. This Budget, like the ones that came before it, is building a country where our businesses will not have to pay for the profligacy of the past and our children can look forward to a bright future. Nothing could be more important than that, so I commend this Budget to the House.

  • Kwasi Kwarteng – 2022 Comments on His Period as Chancellor of the Exchequer

    Kwasi Kwarteng – 2022 Comments on His Period as Chancellor of the Exchequer

    The comments made by Kwasi Kwarteng, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, in an interview with Tom Newton Dunn on TalkTV on 10 November 2022.

    INTERVIEWER

    [What went wrong?]

    KWASI KWARTENG

    I think we tried to do too much too quickly, too much too fast. And of course, there’ll be a budget in April. So I think that was her vision, her drive was 100% the right thing, but I think we need a better tactical plan to deliver what she wanted.

    INTERVIEWER

    [Why did you do everything so fast?]

    KWASI KWARTENG

    I think the Prime Minister was very much of the view that we needed to seize the opportunity, we needed to hit the ground running and she’s very dynamic, very forceful. That’s a great strength, but I think you had to have a measured approach, especially doing the things that were radical and bold.

    INTERVIEWER

    [Wasn’t it obvious you were going to frighten the markets?]

    KWASI KWARTENG

    There were lots of things going on. I mean, it wasn’t simply the breakneck speed which you’ve talked about, it so happened that the dollar was a record low, sterling at a record low, the Yen was at a 50 year low, the Euro was at a 20 year low and the Eurozone has only been around for 20 years. Interest rates are rising sharply across the world, there was a global picture as well, but I fully admit that the mini budget did surprise the markets and that’s something that we have to we have to accept.

    INTERVIEWER

    [Who controlled that pace?]

    KWASI KWARTENG

    I bear some responsibility for it. I think it was a good idea to try and set our parameters quickly and I think the Prime Minister was very much of the view that we needed to, but I think I think it was too quick.

    INTERVIEWER

    [Did you tell the Prime Minister to slow down?]

    KWASI KWARTENG

    I said actually after the budget that because we were going very fast. Even after the mini budget, we were going breakneck speed and I said, you know, we should slow down.

    INTERVIEWER

    [What did she say?]

    KWASI KWARTENG

    I said you’ll have two months if you go on like this and that’s I’m afraid what happened.

     

  • Andrew Hauser – 2022 Speech on How Central Bank Balance Sheets can Support Monetary and Financial Stability

    Andrew Hauser – 2022 Speech on How Central Bank Balance Sheets can Support Monetary and Financial Stability

    The speech made by Andrew Hauser, the Executive Director for Markets at the Bank of England, on 4 November 2022.

    Speech (in .pdf format)

  • Jeremy Hunt – 2022 Letter to Andrew Bailey on Measures to Restore Gilt Market Functioning

    Jeremy Hunt – 2022 Letter to Andrew Bailey on Measures to Restore Gilt Market Functioning

    The letter sent by Jeremy Hunt, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, to Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, on 4 November 2022.

    Letter (in .pdf format)

  • Andrew Bailey – 2022 Letter to Jeremy Hunt on Measures to Restore Gilt Market Functioning

    Andrew Bailey – 2022 Letter to Jeremy Hunt on Measures to Restore Gilt Market Functioning

    The letter sent by Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, to Jeremy Hunt, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 4 November 2022.

    Letter (in .pdf format)

  • Andrew Bowie – 2022 Comments on the Trade Surplus Left by John Major’s Government

    Andrew Bowie – 2022 Comments on the Trade Surplus Left by John Major’s Government

    The comments made by Andrew Bowie, the Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, on Twitter on 3 November 2022.

    Labour inherited a trade surplus of £4.6b in 1997, and left the country with a trade deficit of £35.1b in 2010.

    This Government won’t take any lessons from the Labour party and is determined to drive up trade, not just with the EU but worldwide.

  • James Bethell – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Lord Bethell)

    James Bethell – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Lord Bethell)

    The speech made by James Bethell, Lord Bethell, in the House of Lords on 10 October 2022.

    My Lords, I join many others in welcoming the return of my noble friend the Minister to the Front Bench; I thoroughly support her sentiments, which she put very well, about the critical importance of growth. I put on the record that no one in the UK Government has ever talked of trickle-down economics—I checked and it is just not the case.

    I want to emphasise the significant contribution that public health improvements can make to the wealth of the nation and to achieving the important 2.5% growth goal referred to by my noble friend the Minister. My noble friend Lord Wolfson said that the growth Statement was slightly short of supply-side suggestions, and I agree with him. I am speaking to persuade noble Lords that investment in public health can not only save millions of lives from preventable disease and epidemics but allows us to live longer, accomplish more and contribute more to the economy. Public health also helps reduce inequalities by ensuring that people are not needlessly prevented from fulfilling their potential or contributing to the economy because of illness, disease or premature death.

    However, the public health of the nation is not contributing enough to the wealth of the nation; quite the opposite. There is a great exodus from the workforce due to ill health. In a report published today, the Health Foundation noted that economic inactivity in the UK has increased by 700,000 people since before the pandemic; that includes 300,000 people aged 50 to 69 years who are at greater risk of never returning to work. This increase in poor health and economic inactivity restricts our labour supply and our economic growth. The recent OBR report estimates that this contributes £2.9 billion to welfare bills, and I think it probably undercooks that number.

    The country’s poor health is also driving up costs for the NHS. Even though it consumes 40% of public expenditure, it is overwhelmed with demand and its costs are growing. Late-stage acute healthcare is the wrong part of the economy to be growing. We should be investing in prevention, not cure. That is the way to grow the economy. If we do not, we are failing to take advantage of the technological revolution that can use genomics, big data, artificial intelligence, modern vaccines and the latest diagnostics to help assess health risks, identify disease and get people on the road to recovery more quickly than ever before.

    It was disappointing that the Chancellor did not refer to health in his plan for growth and a shame that my noble friend the Minister did not do so either. I ask the Minister responding to please reflect on the significant link between health and wealth in his comments. In particular, I urge the Treasury to appoint a commission—armed with an economic slide rule rather than a scientist’s microscope—to look at the nation’s health, much as Nick Stern looked at climate change, as an economic threat rather than a scientific phenomenon, so that we can hammer out a plan to get out of the economic cul-de-sac of an increasingly unhealthy population.

  • Edward Razzall – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Lord Razzall)

    Edward Razzall – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Lord Razzall)

    The speech made by Edward Razzall, Lord Razzall, in the House of Lords on 10 October 2022.

    My Lords, I can answer the noble Lord’s question as to why a number of us are questioning this after 12 years of Tory government. After 12 years of Tory government, the UK economy is currently a basket case. First, our growth is forecast to be the worst in the G20 apart from Russia over the next 12 months. Secondly, we are the only G7 country whose economy has not recovered to pre-pandemic levels. Thirdly, our productivity is significantly worse than that of our major competitors. Fourthly, we have the damaging effects of Brexit.

    What are the Government doing about it? We have learned a number of things from their recent announcements and comments from government hangers-on. First, apparently it is all Putin’s fault. If that is so, why are we doing worse than all our major competitors? Secondly, it was apparently perfectly satisfactory to make a significant fiscal statement without the usual verification of numbers by the OBR, so why were the Government surprised by the gilt market reaction? What is worse, we now know that the Chancellor had a draft report from the OBR on his desk on his first day in the office. He refused to publish it, presumably because it did not support his numbers, and now he has been forced to bring forward his fiscal statement and the OBR report, noticeably on Halloween day. Thirdly, apparently the Government will generate growth through tax cuts, as the noble Lord, Lord Howard, indicated. But however you describe it—Reaganomics, the Laffer curve or Donald Trump in 2017—there is no evidence that it works. As the noble and learned Lord, Lord Clarke, who is sadly not in his place, memorably said last week, it is the sort of thing tried by South American banana republics and it does not work.

    I will not spend my time intruding on the private grief of the Government’s incompetence in the handling of the recent announcements—others have and will—but will confine myself to a number of questions to the Minister. First, will he explain why the Government are so set against a windfall tax on oil companies to help fund the extra borrowing necessary to protect householders from energy price rises? These excess profits are entirely a windfall and had no connection with management activity. All that will now happen, presumably, is that huge dividends will be paid to shareholders—mostly institutions resident outside the United Kingdom.

    Secondly, do the Government accept that during the period after 1949, when growth averaged 2.5%, 2% of that came from productivity gains and 0.5% from increasing immigration? If the Government want growth, will they confirm that the latter will be acceptable to the Home Secretary?

    Thirdly, if, as the Prime Minister says, all government policy should be to generate growth, there are a number of things that the Government could do to alleviate the damaging effects of Brexit. Will they take the advice of the noble Lord, Lord Frost, to negotiate improvements with the EU? For example, will they negotiate to help the shellfish producers who can no longer sell into Europe? Will they help the creative industries by helping the musicians who find it impossible to tour in Europe, therefore depriving us of substantial export revenue? Will they negotiate to help the many SMEs who have stopped selling to Europe because of pointless bureaucracy?

    The economy is a disaster. Brexit has proved a disaster. The Government are a shambles. Surely it is time for this Government to go.