Category: Defence

  • John Healey – 2022 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    John Healey – 2022 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by John Healey, the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, on 27 September 2022.

    Conference, it’s always an honour to address you.

    Thank you for staying the full course today.

    Thank you for the massive welcome you gave the choir and speakers from Ukraine.

    Thank you for your contributions throughout this debate.

    You showed Labour’s total condemnation of Russia; and Labour’s total solidarity with Ukraine.

    You showed we share the same values – democracy, freedom, human rights, respect for international law.

    When Putin invaded Ukraine, Labour – like the British people – wanted faster, tougher sanctions. Faster, more compassionate treatment for Ukrainian refugees. Faster, stronger UK backing for war crimes investigators.

    But on Britain’s military help to Ukraine, and on reinforcing NATO allies, the Government has had – and will continue to have – our full Labour support.

    Conference, we will win a Labour Government.

    So, let’s make clear to President Putin, there will be a change to Labour but there will be no change in Britain’s resolve to confront Russia’s aggression and stand with Ukraine to confound Russia’s attempts to divide NATO, hold Europe hostage over energy and flood our society with disinformation.

    And I say this, conference: those who call ‘stop the war’ more loudly than ‘win the war’ are playing into Putin’s hands.

    A ceasefire cedes new territory to Russia. Risks Russia regrouping their forces; deepening their occupation; legitimising their regime of torture, rape and execution.

    We are not fighting. We don’t decide when it ends. Only Ukraine can make this call. Our duty will be to support Ukraine in negotiations, just as we are now in the fighting.

    Britain’s military have responded magnificently to support Ukraine. And we pay tribute to the serving men and women of our Armed Forces.

    We are the party of public service. Theirs is the ultimate public service.

    They defend the country, at home and abroad.

    Yet over 12 Tory years, they’ve seen their pay cut, numbers cut, family support cut.

    Satisfaction with Service life itself has plunged below half.

    We must renew the nation’s contract with those who serve. We will put the Armed Forces Covenant fully into law. We will make Britain the best country to be a veteran. The Tories won’t; Labour will.

    And over 12 years, the Tories leave Britain weaker in the world.

    They have weakened Britain’s global influence by breaking international law, antagonising our European allies, slashing development aid and failing to stand up for human rights.

    They have cut our full time Armed Forces by over 40 000, axed one in five of the Navy’s surface ships; and taken 200 planes out of RAF service in the last five years alone.

    They have got the big calls wrong. They failed to see and plan for a Taliban take-over in Afghanistan or a Russian invasion of Ukraine. Even as threats to Britain increase, they plan to cut the Army by a further 10 000 troops.

    And they’ve overseen a broken procurement system, wasting over £15 billion through bad MoD management.

    The NLAW anti-tank missiles have been vital to Ukraine. This is day 216 of Putin’s war. Yet there’s still no MoD contract signed, still no production to restock for Ukraine and for our own Army.

    The Tories are failing British troops, and British taxpayers.

    When a country is facing threats or forced to fight, its Armed Forces depend on the strength its industry and resilience of its people.

    Attlee and Bevin understood this in the late 1930s. And yes, so did Nye Bevan.

    As the Party of working people and trade unions, we know when done well spending on defence strengthens our UK economy and our UK sovereignty.

    So, in government, we will make it fundamental that British defence investment is directed first to British business, with a higher bar set for any decisions to buy abroad.

    The first test is the Navy’s new fleet support ships. The Tories want to build them abroad, in cut-price shipyards with non-union labour.

    Conference, I say to you today:

    Under Labour, these ships will be built in Britain by British workers.

    Under Labour, trade unions will be industrial partners.

    Under Labour, defence spending will help lead our mission to buy, make and sell more in Britain.

    Conference, let us draw one more lesson from Ukraine.

    Ukraine is winning because its people – people of diverse faith, age, ethnicity and language – have a national story of hope to unify them.

    To be a democratic country at peace with its neighbours, free to determine its own future. A people with security, prosperity and respect.

    These are Labour’s hopes for the British people.

    Our surest defence for Britain is to build a country where security, prosperity and respect are guaranteed to all.

    A country worth defending and determined to defend itself.

    A country whose citizens can say proudly: in the face of the most severe threats, we stood with Ukraine, we stood with our allies, we stood with each other.

  • James Heappey – 2022 Comments on Death of Sapper Connor Liam Morrison

    James Heappey – 2022 Comments on Death of Sapper Connor Liam Morrison

    The comments made by James Heappey, the Minister for the Armed Forces, on 26 September 2022.

    It is with deep sadness that I heard of the death of Sapper Connor Liam Morrison of 23 Parachute Engineer Regiment. It’s clear from his colleagues that he had a passion for the British Army, made an instant positive impact on all those he served with, and always put the needs of his fellow soldiers above his own; a role model to all. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and loved ones at this terrible time.

  • Alec Shelbrooke – 2022 Speech at the Defence Vehicle Display

    Alec Shelbrooke – 2022 Speech at the Defence Vehicle Display

    The speech made by Alec Shelbrooke, the Defence Procurement Minister, at Millbrook Proving Ground on 21 September 2022.

    It’s my pleasure to welcome you all to this year’s Defence Vehicle Display.

    Especially as this is not just my first DVD but my first official engagement as a defence minister.

    It is an excellent venue to showcase our finest vehicles and equipment.

    I’m not entirely new to Defence, having spent six years as the UK representative to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and latterly Chairman of the Defence and Security Committee on the assembly.

    So, I am well aware of your many successes as well as some of the challenges you face.

    But the truth is, for all of us here today, this event comes at a time of great change.

    The passing of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has brought with it not merely a sense of deep loss for the wonderful monarch that led by example for more than 70 years.

    But also, a sense of uncertainty, as the values she came to embody – kindness, tolerance, and a belief in democracy – now seem at risk across the world.

    Indeed, even as we speak, Ukrainians are bravely pushing back the invading Russian force, and as we discover the atrocious war crimes committed by the Russians, our resolve must remain resolute.

    If we are to protect our values and safeguard the international order in this new era, we need to strengthen Defence.

    That’s why last year our Integrated Review and Defence Command Paper began transforming our forces to make them more resilient, more persistent and more agile.

    Our Armed Forces are now being instilled with a campaigning mindset, that enables them to be ever present wherever we are needed around the world.

    A mindset epitomised by our new self-sufficient Brigade Combat teams and Ranger Regiments.

    But those documents were also clear that we couldn’t achieve our aims without the very best capability.

    You only need to look to Ukraine and the incredible gains they’ve made in recent weeks to see the difference the most advanced kit can make on the ground.

    I am proud that the UK has played a key role, foremost among European nations, in supporting those efforts, whether it’s our armoured Wolfhounds or Stormer vehicles fitted with anti-air missile launchers.

    And that kind of cutting-edge capability is what we’re all here for today.

    Take a stroll around the exhibition and you will see some of the finest examples of equipment in the land domain on display.

    Not least our Boxers – the cornerstone of our Armoured Brigade Combat Teams – able to swiftly cover long distances no matter the environment nor the weather. And I am pleased to see so many of our partner nations on the Boxer programme here today.

    As well as Boxer, you will find everything from our Challenger 3 main battle tanks in the Off-Road Area, to the latest drones and four-legged robots from our Future Capability Group, and much more besides.

    Whilst we are still learning the lessons from Ukraine, it is clear that we cannot take anything for granted.

    In the coming years, it is vital we continue to build on these successes in order to stay ahead of the curve.

    That’s why we launched the Defence and Security Industrial Strategy, which provided the foundations for a step-change in relations between government, industry and academia.

    What’s crucial about DSIS is the way it finally recognised industry as a strategic capability in its own right.

    The purpose of the Land Industrial Strategy, which was published earlier this year, was to take those partnerships to the next level.

    We’ve seen the success already of our Defence BattleLab in Dorset, which is uniting industry and academia with the facilities they need to test-drive innovative kit.

    And today you will hear about how the Army are taking a major step forward in shaping investment over the next three years in new integrated protection systems for our land forces.

    This funding marks an exciting opportunity for industry to work with our Defence Science and Technology Laboratory to make our vehicles so much stronger and more resilient.

    Whether it’s improved sensors and compact energy storage or new counter munition systems and directed energy weapons.

    This isn’t just a great chance to transform our Army but to drive growth in the economy at the same time.

    The land industrial base already supports around 20,000 jobs across the UK, while our ground combat system exports comprise 7% of total defence exports – which is almost £6 billion over the past 10 years.

    But as more and more nations increase their investment in Defence, there will be more and more opportunities arising to sell kit to trusted allies and increase our share of that £45 billion-plus ground combat systems market.

    This will bring investment back so that we can then reinvest in the continued strengthening of our forces.

    I began by talking about the end of an era. But I firmly believe that if we work together we can not only preserve the mighty values that were the hallmarks of Queen Elizabeth II, but seize the moment to turn this age of challenges into an age of opportunity.

    Speaking of new eras, I’m delighted to hand over to Lieutenant General Sharon Nesmith, newly appointed Deputy Chief of the General Staff.

    Sharon’s appointment comes at a crucial time for Defence and I’m looking forward to hearing her thoughts as someone else who is adjusting to a new role.

    I’m also looking forward to hearing the Director General for Land plans for how DE&S will equip and support our armed forces now and in the future.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, thank you.

  • James Heappey – 2022 Comments on Death of Navin Thapa Magar

    James Heappey – 2022 Comments on Death of Navin Thapa Magar

    The comments made by James Heappey, the Defence Minister, on 14 September 2022. There is also a press release from the Ministry of Defence.

    It is with deep sadness that I heard of the death of Corporal Navin Thapa Magar of the First Battalion, The Royal Gurkha Rifles, in Brunei. It’s clear from his colleagues that he was a dedicated, professional soldier held in the highest regard and a shining example of what the British Armed Forces stand for. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and loved ones at this terrible time.

  • Stewart Malcolm McDonald – 2022 Speech on Ukraine (September 2022)

    Stewart Malcolm McDonald – 2022 Speech on Ukraine (September 2022)

    The speech made by Stewart Malcolm McDonald, the SNP spokesperson on defence, in the House of Commons on 5 September 2022.

    I thank the Secretary of State for the update that he has given the House. Like many, we have been watching over the summer period as Ukrainian forces take back their territory. In one sense, although we would rather none of this were happening, it is heartening to see that weapons being supplied by this country are being used so successfully on the battlefield. Let us be clear about what that represents and what arming Ukraine’s armed forces represents: it is, by definition, an act against fascism and war to support those who are the victims of a campaign of genocide.

    It is also heartening to hear of the training by UK armed forces and partnered armed forces that is taking place. I think my office is in the process of organising an opportunity for me and the leader of the SNP here, my right hon. Friend the Member for Ross, Skye and Lochaber (Ian Blackford), to witness it at first hand.

    One thing that definitely worries me—we are starting to see it happen across Europe—is that the unity that we have all maintained over the past six months or so is starting to crack as winter arrives. We saw that in the massive demonstrations at the weekend in Prague and, I think I am right in saying, in Cologne. That is something that we must—absolutely must—stand against.

    The single best way to end this war is for the Kremlin to recall every single Russian troop on Ukrainian soil. All the calls to end the sanctions now, as though that would somehow help to end the conflict in Ukraine, are a falsehood, but that takes us to another important aspect of the war, which is the information war. As winter bites, as bills go up, as the effects of the conflict start to appear in people’s bank accounts, and as an obvious information war from Russia takes place in that respect, can the Secretary of State assure the House, or outline to the House—this is similar to what the shadow Secretary of State asked—how he will ensure that we are fully equipped to withstand that information war? Standing with Ukrainians is the right thing to do, and that is something we need to communicate well.

  • Julian Lewis – 2022 Comments on Continuing Support for Ukraine

    Julian Lewis – 2022 Comments on Continuing Support for Ukraine

    The comments made by Julian Lewis, the Conservative MP for New Forest East, in the House of Commons on 5 September 2022.

    Julian Lewis

    Although the commitment to 3% of GDP on defence is welcome, 2030 is further away in time than the entire duration of the second world war. It would be nice to see that commitment, which the Select Committee on Defence originally called for about six years ago, implemented a little sooner than the new Prime Minister plans. Can the Defence Secretary confirm that the extra expenditure on replenishing the arms supplies that we are giving to Ukraine is being met with extra funds from the Treasury reserve? What steps are we taking to ensure that the Russian people get the same message about the failure of Putin’s campaign that the rest of the world can clearly see?

    Mr Wallace

    On the latter point, in one sense it is sad, because it is people’s lives, but in Russia they cannot ignore the long and continued train of bodies to their loved ones and families. It was not missed by Soviets in the Afghan conflict. The terms “boys in zinc” and “load 200”, which are now in the Russian vocabulary, refer to the planes that brought back the dead bodies: zinc was what they used to wrap them. That is clearly before people in Russia. It is not helped by the misleading, dishonest and manipulative state information that tries to say that these people died fighting Nazis. The only people who are displaying a fascist tendency in Ukraine are the Russian regime; it is not in any way being extolled by the Ukrainians defending their soil. But we obviously do our best.

    On the increase to defence funding, some of that £2.3 billion is replacing gifted equipment from our own stocks; that is already being done. We were able to release the GMLRS M270 because we received some others from another country, which we are refurbishing. We will continue to keep pace and make sure that we do not sacrifice too many of our own stocks. At some stages, there are also opportunities when our stocks come out of life or approach their sell-by date and are perfect for gifting, because they will be used. We have already planned to replace them. Some of the NLAW orders are actually quite old, because we knew anyhow that they were coming out of date; they were a 2003 weapon, so we had already started that process. I think it is NLAWs, but I can happily write to my right hon. Friend about the exact weapon system.

  • John Healey – 2022 Speech on Ukraine (September 2022)

    John Healey – 2022 Speech on Ukraine (September 2022)

    The speech made by John Healey, the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, in the House of Commons on 5 September 2022.

    I welcome this statement on day one after the recess and on day 194 of Russia’s brutal illegal invasion of Ukraine. I thank the Defence Secretary for the regular briefings he has given during this period to those in all parts of the House and on all sides. On behalf of Members on all sides, may I say that we trust that he will remain in his post in the new Truss Cabinet?

    I say on behalf of my party that we now stand ready to work with the new Prime Minister to maintain the UK’s united support for Ukraine and united determination to stand up against Russian aggression. President Putin expected Ukraine to fall within six days. Six months on, the massively brave Ukrainian resistance, military and civilian alike, is stronger now than it was in February, and all the Government’s moves to provide military, economic, diplomatic and humanitarian help to Ukraine will continue to have Labour’s fullest backing.

    We strongly support the UK’s training programme for new Ukrainian army recruits, which the Labour leader and I saw for ourselves on Salisbury plain. I am humbled by the fact that those brave new recruits whom we met last month are now on the frontline, fighting in Donbas. I thank the Defence Secretary and Brigadier Justin Stenhouse for organising our visit. Will this training under Operation Interflex be extended beyond the initial commitment of 10,000 troops and beyond the basic soldiering skills currently covered?

    We also welcome the extra long-range missiles and unmanned air systems announced over the summer. What is the strategy behind our military assistance? Is it designed to help Ukrainians hold current ground or take back more territory from Russian forces? What action has been taken to replenish our domestic stockpiles? How many new contracts have been signed? Has the production of replacement NLAWs—next generation anti-tank and anti-armour weapons—now finally started?

    The war is entering a critical new stage, with Russia unable to deploy the overwhelming force needed for a decisive breakthrough and Ukraine well on the way to sapping the will of the Russian army to fight, hitting ammunition dumps, command posts and airfields deep into Russian-held territory. With the Russian military leadership under increasing military pressure, does the Defence Secretary agree that we are approaching another turning point, where Putin is likely to step up efforts to persuade the west to lean on Ukraine to agree to a ceasefire and negotiations? What are the Government doing to counter such activities?

    What are the Government doing to explain to the public that the energy crisis and supply disruptions are not a result of Russia’s war, but an essential part of Russia’s war? Russia is fighting on the economic battlefield, not just the military battlefield. What action will the new Prime Minister take to help the country with escalating energy costs, rapidly rising food costs and the highest rate of inflation in this country for 40 years?

    On the subject of the new Prime Minister, before the Tory leadership campaign, the Defence Secretary and Defence Ministers said that the invasion of Ukraine proved the integrated review right. They said:

    “if more money were made available, there are other things that we would do more immediately than regrow the size of the Army.”—[Official Report, 18 July 2022; Vol. 718, c. 688.]

    Then, towards the end of the leadership campaign, the Defence Secretary wrote of the new Prime Minister:

    “I welcome her plans to update the integrated review, reconsider the shape of our forces, and increase defence spending.”

    I welcome his conversion to the arguments that Labour has been making for well over a year, but what does he believe now needs updating in the integrated review? Will he halt his plans for Army cuts? Will the £1.7 billion cut in day-to-day MOD spending now be replaced?

    Finally, very few people believed Ukraine would still be fighting Russia’s invasion six months on. We now know that Russia’s aggression will go on a lot longer. Will the Government set aside individual announcements and instead set out a grand strategy of long-term military, economic and diplomatic support, so that we can help ensure Putin’s invasion really does end in failure?

  • Ben Wallace – 2022 Statement on Ukraine (September 2022)

    Ben Wallace – 2022 Statement on Ukraine (September 2022)

    The statement made by Ben Wallace, the Secretary of State for Defence, in the House of Commons on 5 September 2022.

    It is good to be back after the summer recess, and it is good to see you in your place, Mr Speaker.

    I want to update Members about progress in Ukraine and UK support to date since the House rose for the recess. On 29 August, Ukraine embarked on a counter-offensive in the south of the country, around the city of Kherson on the west bank of the Dnipro river. As part of the shaping fires, Ukraine has inflicted serious damage on a range of river crossings with the aim of restricting Russian logistical support. That has had considerable success. I can report to the House that the Ukrainian forces have made real progress, assaulting on three axes, and especially on the advance to the south of the city of Kryvyi Rih. The grinding fight in the Donbas continues, but with Russia making few substantive gains in the east over the past two months. Since June, Ukraine has struck more than 350 Russian command posts, ammo dumps, supply depots, and other high-value targets far back from the frontline. Many of those have been with longer-range weaponry supplied by international partners, including the United Kingdom.

    As of today, the Ukrainian army is engaging with Russian forces using both artillery and brigade-level operations. It is making real gains, but understandably, as we have seen elsewhere in this conflict, the fighting is close and hard, and Ukraine is suffering losses associated with an attacking force. My thoughts, and the Government’s thoughts, are obviously with the men and women of the brave Ukrainian forces who are fighting to uphold our values as well as theirs, and to defend their land. However, Russia continues to lose significant equipment and personnel. It is estimated that to date more than 25,000 Russian soldiers have lost their lives, and that, in all, more than 80,000 have been killed, have been casualties, have been captured, or constitute the reported tens of thousands of deserters. This will have a long-lasting impact on Russia’s army and its future combat effectiveness. Russia has yet to achieve any of its strategic objectives, and we are now on day 194 of what was expected to be a month-long campaign.

    I know that Members will be worried by reports about the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which is the biggest nuclear power station in Europe. On Friday 1 September, the United Nations International Atomic Energy Authority visited the plant accompanied by Russian media. No other international media were allowed to attend. Under the IAEA, an inspection was carried out, and the agency has left a team behind. It has already drawn attention to the violation of the plant’s “physical integrity”, and the United Nations remains gravely concerned about the dangerous situation in and around the plant. We will continue to monitor it, and ensure that we engage with Ukrainian partners to ensure that no one’s safety is put at risk.

    Earlier in the month, Turkey, Russia and the United Nations came to an agreement on grain exports from Ukraine; the so called “Black sea initiative” was put in place. This has now seen over 2 million tonnes of grain exported, with another 100 ships waiting to embark with grain from Ukraine’s ports. I want to place on record the Government’s thanks to both the United Nations and the Turkish authorities for facilitating this—it was no mean feat. We have offered the Turkish military any support they require; to date, the Turkish Government have not requested any support, but we stand ready to do that. The United Kingdom continues to gift military aid to the Ukrainian armed forces to help resist the illegal invasion. Since the end of July, when this House rose, we have gifted a further three M270 guided multiple-launch rocket system platforms, and accompanying missiles. We are now working on an additional package of support. The total funding committed to this support is £2.3 billion.

    In June, I recognised that training is as important as military hardware, which is why we embarked on establishing a network of training camps in the UK to train 10,000 Ukrainians. That was accompanied by specialist armed training across a number of countries in Europe. So far, we have trained 4,700, and I am delighted that over the summer we were joined by forces from Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Lithuania, Canada, Holland and New Zealand; they are all now in place alongside British military personnel delivering that training. The training cycle is now in its third iteration and, after lessons learned, we have now extended it to a five-week syllabus. We are already seeing this make a difference to the combat effectiveness of Ukraine, and we are evolving the course and feedback to make sure that the experiences do exactly what the Ukrainians need.

    Support for Ukraine goes beyond the here and now. Being able to plan for the medium and long term requires international funding. So at the beginning of August, at the invitation of our Danish friends in the Danish Government, I co-chaired with them a conference in Copenhagen. So far, we have amassed pledges of up to €420 million of support, including through an international fund for Ukraine. We are working through the governance of the fund with our international partners and we hope to add to it when I present more details this week to the Ukraine defence contact group convened by the United States in Germany on Thursday. The fund will be used hopefully to support a range of measures, including ammunition production, to ensure that there is a sustainable supply over the long term in Ukraine.

    I would like to place on record my appreciation of the Prime Minister’s enduring support for Ukraine throughout the process, without which a lot would not have been possible. I am grateful, too, for all the support of all the parties in this House for the action we have taken. That allows us to lead on the world stage with determination and a focus on all the things that are right about Ukraine’s defence from an illegal invasion and on the fact that we share such common values of freedom, and respect for sovereignty and the international rule of law. I hope all of us in this House do so—I know from experience that we do so. This Government’s commitment to Ukraine remains unwavering and enduring, and I commend this statement to the House.

  • Jeremy Quin – 2022 Bearskins Clarification Statement

    Jeremy Quin – 2022 Bearskins Clarification Statement

    The statement made by Jeremy Quin, the Minister for Defence Procurement, in the House of Commons on 5 September 2022.

    On 11 July in a debate in Westminster Hall on bearskins, I referred to data on potential faux fur products that had previously been shared with the Department, but I also stated that the Ministry of Defence had not received recent results data. Whilst my statement was in line with advice I had received, further work has revealed that this was not correct, and I wish to correct the record.

    In May 2022 a letter was sent to the Prime Minister by PETA, copying Defence Ministers, enclosing a report against two of the five initial criteria that faux fur would have to meet in order for further work to be done to consider it as a replacement for the guardsmen’s caps. This was passed to officials in the Ministry of Defence, who responded on 15 June 2022 requesting that the report should be sent by the organisation that had conducted the tests direct to our partner, Leidos. We understand an email containing the report was sent but was blocked by Leidos’s spam filters and deleted. Subsequent to the debate, the email was re-sent, copying the MOD. After the MOD forwarded a copy to Leidos it was safely received.

    To date, the Ministry of Defence has not seen a set of verifiable data that demonstrates a single sample of faux fur meets the five criteria. We are aware of testing that was carried out in December 2020 by an accredited testing house against three of the criteria, although the material only passed one of those tests: water penetration. As I have explained, we are also aware of further testing, conducted in April 2022. The MOD does not believe from the information we have seen that the organisation that conducted those tests is accredited by either the UK Accreditation Service or the International Laboratory Accreditation Co-operation. In order to consider taking any proposed product forward, we need test results that have been conducted by an independent and accredited testing house.

    Consequently, we have not to date seen evidence that a suitable faux fur product exists to be considered as an alternative.

    Currently, the foot guards’ ceremonial caps are sourced exclusively from Canada, which is a regulated market and a declared party to the convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora. A CITES permit is required for the export of pelts from Canada to the United Kingdom. Canadian and international laws provide strict trade regulations to protect against unlawful trade in black bears, both within Canada and internationally. No bears are hunted to order for the Ministry of Defence; pelts are a product of legal and licensed hunting authorised in Canada by provincial and territorial Governments with the goal of long-term population sustainability.

  • Boris Johnson – 2022 Letter to Veterans of the UK’s Nuclear Testing Programme

    Boris Johnson – 2022 Letter to Veterans of the UK’s Nuclear Testing Programme

    The letter sent by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 5 September 2022.

    (in .pdf format)