Category: Culture

  • Lisa Nandy – 2025 Speech at the National Day Official Ceremony at World Expo Osaka

    Lisa Nandy – 2025 Speech at the National Day Official Ceremony at World Expo Osaka

    The speech made by Lisa Nandy, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport on 22 May 2025.

    Your Imperial Highness, your excellency and esteemed guests. It is a great honour to be hosting the UK’s National Day celebrations here at Expo 2025 Osaka Kansai

    Let me start by offering my congratulations to the Government of Japan, the Expo Association and everyone involved in organising Expo 2025. In today’s world where many want to focus on differences and divisions, it is no mean feat to bring together over 150 countries with a shared goal of “designing future society for our lives.” I am very much looking forward to seeing more of this amazing Expo site in the course of today.

    Expo 2025 is very much about a global conversation, and within that global conversation, the UK and Japan have a particularly strong partnership. Our bilateral relationship is the strongest it has been in decades, underpinned by our common values, shared view of the world and our close people-to-people links. As His Majesty the Emperor said on his State Visit to the UK in June last year, we are ‘friends like no other’.

    The UK has a long history with Expos – going back to 1851 when the first ever EXPO was held in London – and a long history with Japan, from the arrival of William Adams/Miura-Anjin in 1600 to the Choshu 5 travelling to Britain in the mid-19th century to learn about the Industrial Revolution which was transforming my country and the world.

    The Japanese pioneers who travelled to Britain learnt much about our industrial prowess, bringing that technology back to Japan helping to transform Japan into the thriving, technologically advanced nation it is today. It is especially pertinent to reflect that one of those pioneers who ventured as far as Manchester went on to found the Osaka Chamber of Commerce, giving rise to Osaka’s tremendous growth. So our links are long and very relevant to this region. I am personally delighted as someone who was born in Manchester to see those links between Manchester and Osaka grow ever stronger.

    It was the sharing of technology and ideas which drove the UK-Japan relationship then, and still drives it now. And it is that belief in the power of ideas to build the future that lies at the heart of the UK pavilion at Expo. The UK’s theme at Expo 2025 is Come Build The Future. It is about the power of small ideas to come together, as children do with building blocks, to create something magical and potentially world-changing.

    We are a country of ideas that thrives on diversity, on a special mix of tradition and modernity. Our ancient universities drive world leading research, our whiskies and gins are still made to centuries old recipes, produced using cutting edge technology by a new generation of female distillers, our historic playhouses showcase the newest creative talents; and our small island is home to people from every country on the globe and has a capital city where over 300 languages are spoken.

    Today our National Day offers a snapshot of that, underlining the message of partnership: the Edinburgh Military Tattoo will perform with taiko drummers, later today the BBC Planet Earth Live III concert will be performed by the Osaka based Century orchestra with a renowned UK conductor, and musicians from across the four nations of the UK will connect with new Japanese audiences.

    I said earlier that the UK-Japan partnership is stronger than ever. This is evident from our ever-deepening economic and trade ties, through CPTPP, our collaboration on the green agenda, in defence, security, and digital technologies. But today I want to draw attention to the powerful cultural and people-to-people connections between our countries which underpin that partnership. I want to salute the power of the creative industries, of our story-tellers, to bring people together to entertain and delight, and to cross divides of language and culture.

    Later today, as part of our National Day, we are bringing the Japanese premiere of BBC’s Planet Earth III Live in concert to the Expo Hall. The BBC will be well known to all of you – it has an average global reach of 450 million people across the world, bringing both independent news you can trust and award-winning television – both drama and documentary. Their BBC Earth natural world documentaries have been seen by a quarter of a billion people and have inspired positive environmental change across the world. Planet Earth, by transforming abstract climate data into personal, emotional experiences, has motivated viewers to care and take action to help shape a sustainable future.  Again, well aligned with our UK pavilion theme and that of Expo 2025.

    For a partnership to flourish you need to bring not only ideas but also people together. That is why later today I shall be announcing a new form of UK-Japan partnership which focuses on that very idea of connection, of bringing people together. The UK and Japan have been connecting for hundreds of years. We want to make sure we continue to do that into the future too. We hope young – and old – visiting Expo 2025 and our pavilion will be inspired to connect globally and to seek out new ideas and new partners.

    To make progress towards the SDGs and tackle the global challenges we all face, we need to come together to share our ideas, to use them as the building blocks of a better future. The UK is committed to doing that, to doing that in partnership with others and is delighted to be here at Expo 2025 to take that partnership still further.

  • Stephanie Peacock – 2025 Speech at the Women and Girls in Sport Conference

    Stephanie Peacock – 2025 Speech at the Women and Girls in Sport Conference

    The speech made by Stephanie Peacock, the Sports Minister, at The Institution of Structural Engineers, Bastwick Street in London on 24 April 2025.

    Thank you all for being here and inviting me to speak to you today. I am sorry I can’t be with you in person.

    I want to talk to you today about the remarkable growth of women’s sport that we have witnessed in recent years, and what the Government is doing to build on this momentum.

    I would like to begin by sharing some statistics. In 2024, UK Women’s Sport attracted audiences of over 44.17 million, an increase of nearly 40% in just two years. Over 2.6 million people attended a women’s sport event in person in 2023, an increase of 23% from the previous year.

    Globally, Deloitte predicts that revenue generated by women’s elite sports will reach at least $2.35 billion, or £1.8 billion, in 2025, with revenues predicted to have risen by 240% in 4 years.

    This is, of course, good news for economic growth and for those playing women’s elite sport. But most importantly the impact that it will have on women and girls across the country will be profound.

    Inspiring women and girls across the country to take part in sport is hugely important to me as Sports Minister.

    Girls need to know from a young age that they belong in sport.  That is why we want to review and shape our education system to inspire girls from an early age to get active and build a lifelong love and affinity for sport.

    To achieve this goal, Government is driving progress across women’s sport: from investing in grassroots facilities to supporting national campaigns.

    It also means action on the elite end of sport, from hosting major events to supporting action to professionalise women’s sport.

    Bringing all of these elements together is our strategy for women and girl’s sport. Let me take you through each of those in turn.

    Firstly, we want more women and girls than ever to stay physically and mentally fit and healthy.

    In order to do this, we need to keep evolving and challenging the way we think of women in sporting environments in order to understand what challenges and motivates them.

    Sport England campaigns like This Girl Can has inspired nearly 4 million women to get active and 8 out of 10 women say that the campaign has boosted their confidence.

    We want women to have options and variety available to them within their local area.

    Getting this right starts with inclusion. Statistics show that for women on lower incomes from under-represented groups, the challenges and feelings of not being included are even greater.

    When we support women’s sport, we will support women and girls right across our communities – not just elite athletes however important they are

    Secondly, we know that in order to reach women and girls from all walks of life, equal access to high quality PE and school sports has a fundamental role to play.

    I have seen first hand the value of school sports in my own constituency in Barnsley South. It was great to visit High View Primary Centre Centre in Wombwell a few weeks ago to watch the FA’s annual Biggest Ever Football Session, and I have enjoyed seeing the impact that events such as the Daily Mile can have on local children across Barnsley.

    So, through our expert-led review of the curriculum, we are going to ensure that every child has the opportunity to engage in a broad range of subjects, including PE and sport.  I’ve been working closely with the Minister for Schools and with National Governing Bodies across a range of issues, and we are committed to ensuring that all children can access high-quality sport and physical activity across the school day.

    We also know that access to facilities, player welfare standards and suitable kit and equipment are all key parts of ensuring women and girls have the opportunity to excel.

    On 21 March, we announced an investment of £100 million to fund grassroots facilities throughout the UK. £98 million of this will support projects in 2025/26.

    This funding will support more women and girls to take part in the sports that they love, particularly by ensuring that funded sites across the UK provide priority slots for women and girls. Beyond this, in England there is funding specifically targeted at creating female-friendly facilities off the pitch, including changing rooms and toilets.

    As well as focusing on getting women and girls active at a grassroots level, progress in women’s sport requires a healthy professional system to fund participation and to create inspirational role models.

    This is why I am acting on the recommendations of Karen Carney’s independent Review of Women’s Football starting with a series of in depth discussions on the recommendations, and led by a taskforce I have convened to drive this forward.

    We want Karen’s excellent Review to lead to tangible change in women’s football, acting as a wider blueprint for all of women’s sport.

    Our work is already making a difference: we the Taskforce recently agreed on a series of concrete actions to improve player welfare in women’s football.

    I also want to address one of the major issues identified by Karen in the Review, which is the lack of research.  Only 6% of all sports science research today is dedicated solely to female athletes. Obviously this imbalance is a global challenge but I believe the UK is well positioned to take the lead in addressing, building on our reputation for world class research. This Government is determined to ensure that our sport science research continues to be world leading and tailored to the needs of our athletes.

    On a recent visit to Loughborough University’s Women in Sport Research and Innovation Hub, I saw first hand ground breaking innovation which will shape the future of women’s sport.

    This includes development in areas such as the menstrual cycle, the design of pregnancy and postpartum sportswear, sports nutrition, and innovation in sports bras.

    This vital work will help us accelerate the progress we have already made and ensure that research into women’s sport is tailored to female athletes.

    Finally, progress in women’s sport also means increasing visibility and inspiring a nation, by showcasing what our world leading female athletes can do.

    We know women and girls across the country are inspired by female role models.

    This summer, some fans will be watching the Lionesses on TV with their family, while others will be at the Women’s Rugby World Cup across England enjoying the atmosphere. Many more will be watching their favourite local teams and athletes from their home town.

    We want everyone to join us in marvelling at the incredible talent we have here in the UK.  We want to create the best women’s leagues in the world and we want to lead the way in helping women’s sport  to stand the test of time and be financially sustainable.

    This will mean that a girl growing up in my area of Barnsley will be able to watch us host major events like the Women’s Rugby World Cup, the Women’s T20 World Cup and the Tour de France Femmes, and be able to recreate moments with their friends at school.

    With our incredible track record for hosting these kinds of events, I know that they are going to be huge success stories that inspire everyone watching women’s sport right across the globe.

    We are also working hard to support the FA’s bid for the 2035 Women’s World Cup, a tournament with the potential to inspire yet another generation of women’s football fans.

    This is how we lead the way in women’s sport and create lasting legacies for generations to come.

    Before I end today, I want to directly address last week’s Supreme Court ruling, which I am sure is on the minds of many of you attending today. As a Government we have always been clear that when it comes to women’s sport, biology matters and we will continue to support sports to develop policies that protect fairness and safety, particularly when it is not possible to balance those factors with inclusion. Alongside this, sports need to come up with approaches to ensure everyone has the opportunity to take part somehow – and I know that sporting bodies will be considering this in light of the Supreme Court decision.

    As I finish speaking to you today, I recognise that we still have challenges to overcome when it comes to women’s sport. However, the future is also one of huge opportunities to drive women’s sport forward.

    Progress in women’s sport requires a clear vision.  From young girls learning about sport and movement in school through PE, to teenagers accessing facilities built with women and girls in mind, to adults having the right knowledge, kit and environment, to excel we want to support women and girls at every stage of their lives.

    We want women and girls across the UK to watch global events hosted at home, to be inspired by their role models and to have the opportunity to dream big.  Every girl deserves that chance.

    And to enable this, this Government is committed to improving access to sport in schools, to making provision of facilities more equal, to improving research, driving visibility and investing in women’s sport at every level.

    It is not enough to focus on one aspect alone.  We must drive progress across all of these areas as part of one cohesive women’s sport strategy.

    I look forward to working with you all to ensure all women and girls have the opportunities they deserve.

    Thank you.

  • Martin Rhodes – 2025 Parliamentary Question on the Glasgow 2026 Commonwealth Games

    Martin Rhodes – 2025 Parliamentary Question on the Glasgow 2026 Commonwealth Games

    The parliamentary question asked by Martin Rhodes, the Labour MP for Glasgow North, in the House of Commons on 3 April 2025.

    Martin Rhodes (Glasgow North) (Lab)

    What discussions she has had with the Glasgow 2026 Organising Company on the 2026 Commonwealth games.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Stephanie Peacock)

    My Department is in regular contact with the organising company, and I was pleased to meet recently with both the CEO and the chair to discuss progress on delivery, at a meeting in my Department and when I was delighted to attend the King’s baton relay launch at Buckingham Palace with His Majesty the King to mark 500 days until the games. The UK has been proud to host the Commonwealth games twice since 2014, and I am delighted that the UK Government have been able to get behind and support Glasgow 2026.

    Martin Rhodes

    I thank the Minister for her response. Does she agree that it is important that the games bring benefits to local communities? What discussions is she having with colleagues in the Scotland Office, the Scottish Government and Glasgow city council to ensure that local communities in Glasgow benefit from the games in 2026?

    Stephanie Peacock

    Of course, I agree with my hon. Friend that it is important that a successful games supports lasting benefits for the city and the region. As I said, I met with the CEO and chair two weeks ago. I was in Edinburgh to meet with my counterpart in the Scottish Government to discuss the games. My team is in close contact with the Scottish Government, the Scotland Office and other delivery partners to understand the games’ ambitions for these wider benefits. The organising company has already confirmed that the games will include £6 million of investment in existing sporting venues, as well as 3,000 trained volunteers and a cultural programme.

    Joe Robertson (Isle of Wight East) (Con)

    The Minister will know the springboard that hosting international events is for the economy, grassroots participation and sporting facilities in the UK. Under the last Government, we secured and hosted a number of major events, with a pipeline of events. What steps are this Government taking to ensure we have that pipeline of major events in the future?

    Stephanie Peacock

    The hon. Member is right to pay tribute to the economic contribution and the huge inspiration of these events. We have a number of exciting events coming up, whether that be rugby or cricket, and the Government are hugely supportive of major events.

  • John Whittingdale – 2025 Parliamentary Question on Use of AI in the Creative Industries

    John Whittingdale – 2025 Parliamentary Question on Use of AI in the Creative Industries

    The parliamentary question asked by John Whittingdale, the Conservative MP for Maldon, in the House of Commons on 3 April 2025.

    Sir John Whittingdale (Maldon) (Con)

    What discussions she has had with representatives of the creative industries on the use of AI.

    The Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Lisa Nandy)

    Our creative industries lead the world. This is the top priority for them, and I am clear that if it matters to them, it matters to us, and we are determined to get it right. Since I was appointed, I have discussed this with representatives across music, publishing, film, TV, fashion and gaming. The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology and I will shortly convene further roundtables to work with industry across artificial intelligence and the creative industries to strike the right balance and to grip this issue.

    Sir John Whittingdale

    The Secretary of State will be aware of suggestions that the Government may offer concessions around AI regulation in a deal to reduce US tariffs. Will she assure the creative and news media sectors that any negotiations will not include an offer to weaken our copyright framework, which would be opposed by creative industries both in the UK and in the US?

    Lisa Nandy

    Our creatives are second to none in the world, as I just said, and our copyright framework is an essential part of their success. We have been clear that if it does not work for creatives, it does not work for us and we will not do it. On negotiations with the United States, the Prime Minister has been clear that this is the start of the process, but we will always work in the national interest, and we are considering all steps as we look to the future.

  • Paul Waugh – 2025 Parliamentary Question on Rugby League

    Paul Waugh – 2025 Parliamentary Question on Rugby League

    The parliamentary question asked by Paul Waugh, the Labour MP for Rochdale, in the House of Commons on 3 April 2025.

    Paul Waugh (Rochdale) (Lab/Co-op)

    What steps her Department is taking to help promote rugby league.

    The Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Lisa Nandy)

    Mr Speaker, I take this opportunity to pay tribute to the work that rugby league clubs do across the country and to my own team, Wigan Warriors, who absolutely smashed Warrington Wolves in Las Vegas last month.

    Mr Speaker

    Are you still in the cup, by the way? [Laughter.]

    Lisa Nandy

    No comment. Rugby league clubs are at the heart of many communities, including my hon. Friend’s in Rochdale. I was delighted that, in the last financial year, Sport England awarded over £30,000 to his constituency to support grassroots rugby league.

    Paul Waugh

    Rochdale Hornets have had a winning start to their league season—a spicy performance no doubt linked to our new partnership with Nando’s restaurants. Mr Speaker, if you get a Rochdale Hornets season ticket, you can get 20% off in Rochdale Nando’s. Ours is a true community club with the work off the pitch as important as the results on it. Does the Secretary of State agree that we should be promoting rugby league as not just great entertainment, but a brilliant way to help our nation’s mental and physical health?

    Lisa Nandy

    I could not agree more. Rugby league clubs have the ability to reach where others cannot. This week, I was delighted to convene a roundtable with the Prime Minister to discuss the issues raised by the TV series “Adolescence”, and in particular the impact of mental health and isolation on young men. We are working with rugby league clubs to see what more we can do to support young men’s mental health in coalfield communities. I will be in a position to announce more to the House shortly.

  • Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at techUK Conference

    Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at techUK Conference

    The speech made by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on 10 March 2025.

    Normally, it takes half an hour to get blood samples from the Guy’s Hospital, in London Bridge, to the lab over the road at St Thomas’ for testing.

    Like anything in medicine, even that small delay can make a massive difference.

    Between a quick recovery and weeks – months, even – spent bed-bound on a hospital ward.

    The team at Guy’s are acutely aware of that fact. So – working with two innovative firms – Apian, a British start-up founded by NHS doctors, and Wing, a global drone delivery company – they decided to find a solution.

    Fed up with being stuck in traffic jams, they’re using drones to deliver blood samples for high-risk patients who suffer from bleeding disorders like haemophilia. Instead of half an hour, delivery takes just 2 minutes.

    Make no mistake. This will save lives.

    The Civil Aviation Authority’s decision to extend the trial today is brilliant news.

    Too often, though, pioneering projects like these can’t get off the ground in Britain. Or they flounder in the face of bureaucratic headwinds. Even for this trial, my officials were told that if a single noise complaint was made – the whole thing could be blown off course.

    A single noise complaint – and vulnerable people are left waiting for the care they desperately need.

    I think that tells you everything you need to know about what’s going wrong in Britain today.

    In the last decade, we’ve had a succession of strategies.

    Piecemeal plan after piecemeal plan.

    And yet what has changed?

    Growth is anaemic – at best.

    Most households are barely better off now than they were in 2010. Across the country, communities are clinging on to industries that are disappearing.

    Because no one has confronted the question of what comes next.

    You have to ask yourself – why?

    Why has government after government found it so difficult to design or deliver a coherent plan for our economy? I think part of the answer is a failure to imagine what a better future for our country could actually look like.

    That is a failure of optimism. An inability to believe in Britain’s potential.

    But – without a plan for realising that potential – it’s also a failure of pragmatism.

    What other conclusion can you come to? When the data centres we need to power our digital economy get blocked because they ruin the view from the M25?

    When life sciences firms are demanding millions of square feet in new lab space.

    But over half of applications for lab space in Oxford are snarled up in our archaic planning process.

    It doesn’t have to be this way.

    There is 10 times as much lab space in Boston as there is in Oxford, Cambridge and London combined.

    In San Francisco, it takes a couple of minutes to hail a self-driving taxi for you and your kids if you’re late for the school run.

    In many cities in China, a drone delivering your takeaway is an ordinary, unremarkable part of everyday life.

    While others have forged ahead, we risk being left behind.

    And – as ever – it’s working people who have paid the price.

    The stats are clear.

    Mario Draghi’s recent report into European competitiveness showed that the vast productivity gap between the EU and the US is almost entirely down to the growth of the tech sector.

    And Britain isn’t much better.

    That’s not because we have a shortage of brilliant businesses or innovative entrepreneurs.

    We’ve got the third largest tech sector in the world.

    Between 2019 and 2023, our digital sector grew over five times faster than the rest of the economy.

    But, for too long, government has failed to be a reliable partner for you.

    Our industrial strategy – ‘Invest 2035’ – will change that.

    It will set out a decade-long plan for our economy, squarely focused on the eight sectors with the greatest growth potential and anchored in a positive and pragmatic vision of what Britain’s future could look like.

    There is no possible version of that future which does not have technology at its heart.

    Just as there is no route to long-term growth, no solution to our productivity problem, without innovation.

    That’s why I will be bringing forward – for the very first time – a dedicated plan for our digital and technologies sector.

    That plan will be a partnership with you and with local leaders in regions with the highest growth potential.

    And it will be rooted in a firm belief that technology can be a force for good in working people’s lives.

    Whether that’s climate-resistant crops that will provide affordable food in the face of floods and droughts. Quantum scanners that will help us understand devastating diseases like dementia and epilepsy.

    Semiconductors like the ones I saw last week in South Wales, which are powering every part of modern life.

    New telecoms technologies that will allow people and businesses to access the internet anywhere in the UK – or protect our armed forces abroad.
    Drones that can save lives – or simply deliver a takeaway to your door.

    Too often, though, British businesses trying to bring technologies like these to market face a mountain of red tape.

    That’s bad for growth.

    And it’s bad for British people, who spend longer waiting for the products and services they want. I created the Regulatory Innovation Office (RIO) to change that, focusing on four of our fastest-growing, highest-impact sectors.

    Engineering biology. AI in healthcare. Space. And, of course, autonomous technology like drones.

    Today, we have announced that David Willetts will take on the role of Chair.

    David brings with him an unparalleled wealth of experience.

    He may have once sat on the other side of the House.

    But few people know the UK science and technology landscape better than him. That’s just as well – because he’s got his work cut out.

    David and Minister Vallance went to Guy’s last Friday.

    The stifling straightjacket of rules that the team faced before they could start the trial isn’t just keeping drones grounded.

    It’s everywhere you look.

    That’s why transparent, adaptable, pro-innovation regulation will be the central pillar of the digital and technologies sector plan.

    Today, I’ve set up a forum to get our regulators ready for the quantum revolution.

    Because I want them to give British businesses the confidence they need to embrace a technology that will transform every part of our lives. I’ve also launched new funding for engineering biology sandboxes which will help us accelerate regulatory reform for products like lab-grown organs for transplant or cell-cultivated meat.

    This approach is being replicated right across government – even in the places you’d expect it least.

    Right now, the humble banana – Britain’s favourite fruit – is at risk.

    Because almost all the bananas in the world are genetically identical clones, Panama disease could wipe them all out at once.

    So Tropic Biosciences – a UK start-up based in Norwich – have come up with an alternative.

    Their gene-edited, disease-resistant bananas offer hope for the future.

    Better still – they’ve also developed bananas that ripen, but don’t go brown.

    Those have already been licensed for consumption in the Philippines.

    But not yet in the UK.

    Soon, though, that might change.

    Bolstered by the reinstatement of the precision breeding working group, Ministers in Defra are working on enabling a route to market for precision bred crops, that will help us to cope in a new era of climate change and food insecurity.

    Britain must belong to the bold – not the blockers.

    Government must not be afraid to reform the way we regulate to favour innovation.

    Nor must we hesitate to embrace the unpredictable nature of research.

    One of the challenges of designing a plan for this sector is just how rapidly technology is changing. Imagine if you’d published a ten-year plan for AI the day before ChatGPT was released.

    You may as well rip it up and start again.

    Though we can see glimpses of our future in places like Guy’s Hospital, there’s much we cannot predict.

    We can be certain, though, that British science will have a pivotal role to play. To future proof our industrial strategy, we shouldn’t try and guess where research might end up before scientists have even started.

    Instead, we’ve got to be a stable partner that our researchers can rely on – working with them to tackle the challenges that will define the decade to come.

    R&D will be the anchor for this sector plan.

    Today, we’ve invested another £23 million in cutting edge telecoms research that will cement the UK’s leadership in advanced connectivity and support projects delivering real, tangible change for people and businesses across Britain.

    From using smart sensors to prevent damp and mould in social housing in Glasgow.

    To using 5G to help farmers in Sussex monitor their vineyards and maximise their yields.

    We’ve announced the winners of the Quantum Missions Pilot competition, too.

    The ten pioneers we’ve selected will now get to grips with the barriers that are preventing us from commercialising and adopting quantum technologies across the country.

    Every one of these investments sends a clear signal.

    That Britain isn’t just the place where tomorrow’s companies are born.

    But the place where they can scale and succeed.

    A place where the people who are deciding what the next decade looks like will be proud to call home. Because every pound these people on British soil has the potential not just to change working people’s lives, but to secure our nation’s position as a maker, not a taker, of tomorrow’s technology.

    That is why we published the AI Opportunities Plan.

    We cannot afford to simply sit back and wait for the AI revolution to shape us.

    We have got to step up and make sure that Britain is the place where the shape of that revolution gets decided.

    That will require working with companies to deliver the compute infrastructure that the researchers leading it will rely on.

    In the Action Plan, we committed to increasing the capacity of the AI Research Resource – our current network of cutting-edge super computers – by at least 20 times by 2030.

    Today, we are launching market engagement for the private partnerships we will need to meet that commitment. Details of how to take part are now online.

    If you want to work together to secure our stake in the future of this technology, I urge you to get in touch.

    So we will be bold on regulation. On R&D. On infrastructure.

    And I want businesses right across our economy to be bold, too. If we want British people to be the first to benefit from technologies like AI, we’ve got to empower companies large and small with the confidence to adopt them.

    When I talk about partnership, this is what I mean.

    Purposeful, long-term collaboration in pursuit of a common goal.

    So we’ve asked Angela MacLean and Dave Smith to work with you to overcome the barriers to tech adoption in every sector of the industrial strategy.

    But we’re also capitalising on our own position as a customer for our digital and technologies sector, using procurement to drive innovation and deliver a smaller, smarter state that offers better value for money for taxpayers. Everywhere you see, there is an imbalance of power in this country.

    Rules which favour the blockers, not the bold.

    It is that imbalance which has – for too long – made it impossible to imagine a better future for Britain.

    When regulation empowers the people complaining about the sound of drones – not the patients waiting for life saving care.

    When businesses lack the support they need to invest in risky R&D.

    And researchers can’t access the infrastructure they need to make breakthroughs that will make British people better off. When procurement favours the same old suspects.

    And firms struggle to adopt technologies that could keep them competitive in the decades to come.

    We don’t know what 2035 will look like.

    But we know that tech will have a pivotal – and positive – role to play.

    Engineering biology and AI.

    Semiconductors and cybersecurity.

    Quantum and telecoms.

    Every one of the technologies I have talked about today offers a chance to change working people’s lives for the better.

    But that will only happen if we have the courage to take that chance.

    And an understanding of the radical, far-reaching reform which will be required to do that.

    We cannot afford to be cautious.

    Together, we’ve got to shift the balance of power.

    Away from stagnation and old ideas. Towards innovation and opportunity.

    Away from the naysayers. Towards the can-doers.

    Away from the blockers standing in the way of growth. Towards you – the bold people building a new future for Britain.

    Thank you.

  • Lisa Nandy – 2025 Speech at the Jennie Lee Lecture

    Lisa Nandy – 2025 Speech at the Jennie Lee Lecture

    The speech made by Lisa Nandy, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport at the Royal Shakespeare Company on 20 February 2025.

    In 2019, as Britain tore itself apart over Brexit, against a backdrop of growing nationalism, anger and despair I sat down with the film director Danny Boyle to talk about the London 2012 Olympics Opening Ceremony.

    That moment was perhaps the only time in my lifetime that most of the nation united around an honest assessment of our history in all its light and dark, a celebration of the messy, complex, diverse nation we’ve become and a hopeful vision of the future.

    Where did that country go? I asked him. He replied: it’s still there, it’s just waiting for someone to give voice to it.

    13 years later and we have waited long enough. In that time our country has found multiple ways to divide ourselves from one another.

    We are a fractured nation where too many people are forced to grind for a living rather than strive for a better life.

    Recent governments have shown violent indifference to the social fabric – the local, regional and national institutions that connect us to one another, from the Oldham Coliseum to Northern Rock, whose foundation sustained the economic and cultural life of the people of the North East for generations.

    But this is not just an economic and social crisis, it is cultural too.

    We have lost the ability to understand one another.

    A crisis of trust and faith in government and each other has destroyed the consensus about what is truthfully and scientifically valid.

    Where is the common ground to be found on which a cohesive future can be forged? How can individuals make themselves heard and find self expression? Where is the connection to a sense of belonging to something larger than ourselves?

    I thought about that conversation with Danny Boyle last summer when we glimpsed one version of our future. As violent thugs set our streets ablaze, a silent majority repelled by the racism and violence still felt a deep sense of unrest. In a country where too many people have been written off and written out of our national story. Where imagination, creation and contribution is not seen or heard and has no outlet, only anger, anxiety and disorder on our streets.

    There is that future.

    Or there is us.

    That is why this country must always resist the temptation to see the arts as a luxury. The visual arts, music, film, theatre, opera, spoken word, poetry, literature and dance – are the building blocks of our cultural life, indispensable to the life of a nation, always, but especially now.

    So much has been taken from us in this dark divisive decade but above all our sense of self-confidence as a nation.

    But we are good at the arts. We export music, film and literature all over the world. We attract investment to every part of the UK from every part of the globe. We are the interpreters and the storytellers, with so many stories to tell that must be heard.

    And despite everything that has been thrown at us, wherever I go in Britain I feel as much ambition for family, community and country as ever before. In the end, for all the fracture, the truth remains that our best hope… is each other.

    This is the country that George Orwell said “lies beneath the surface”.

    And it must be heard. It is our intention that when we turn to face the nation again in four years time it will be one that is more self-confident and hopeful, not just comfortable in our diversity but a country that knows it is enriched by it, where everybody’s contribution is seen and valued and every single person can see themselves reflected in our national story.

    You might wonder, when so much is broken, when nothing is certain, so much is at stake, why I am asking more of you now.

    John F Kennedy once said we choose to go to the moon in this decade not because it is easy but because it is hard.

    That is I think what animated the leaders of the post war period who, in the hardest of circumstances knew they had to forge a new nation from the upheaval of war.

    And they reached for the stars.

    The Festival of Britain – which was literally built out of the devastation of war – on a bombed site on the South Bank, took its message to every town, city and village in the land and prioritised exhibitions that explored the possibilities of space and technology and allowed a devastated nation to gaze at the possibilities of the future.

    So many of our treasured cultural institutions that still endure to this day emerged from the devastation of that war.

    The first Edinburgh Festival took place just a year after the war when – deliberately – a Jewish conductor led the Vienna Philharmonic, a visible symbol of the power of arts to heal and unite.

    From the BBC to the British Film Institute, the arts have always helped us to understand the present and shape the future.

    People balked when John Maynard Keynes demanded that a portion of the funding for the reconstruction of blitzed towns and cities must be spent on theatres and galleries. But he persisted, arguing there could be “no better memorial of a war to save the freedom of spirit of an individual”.

    Yes it took visionary political leaders.

    But it also demanded artists and supporters of the arts who refused to be deterred by the economic woes of the country and funding in scarce supply, and without hesitation cast aside those many voices who believed the arts to be an indulgence.

    This was an extraordinary generation of artists and visionaries who understood their role was not to preserve the arts but to help interpret, shape and light the path to the future.

    Together they powered a truly national renaissance which paved the way for the woman we honour today – Jennie Lee – whose seminal arts white paper, the first Britain had ever had, was published 60 years ago this year.

    It stated unequivocally the Wilson government’s belief in the power of the arts to transform society and to transform lives.

    Perhaps because of her belief in the arts in and of itself, which led to her fierce insistence that arts must be for everyone, everywhere – and her willingness to both champion and challenge the arts – she was – as her biographer Patricia Hollis puts it  – the first, the best known and the most loved of all Britain’s Ministers for the Arts.

    When she was appointed so many people sneered at her insistence on arts for everyone everywhere..

    And yet she held firm.

    That is why we are not only determined – but impassioned – to celebrate her legacy and consider how her insistence that culture was at the centre of a flourishing nation can help us today.

    This is the first in what will be an annual lecture that gives a much needed platform to those voices who are willing to think and do differently and rise to this moment, to forge the future, written – as Benjamin Zephaniah said – in verses of fire.

    Because governments cannot do this alone. It takes a nation.

    And in that spirit, her spirit. I want to talk to you about why we need you now. What you can expect from us. And what we need from you.

    George Bernard Shaw once wrote:

    “Imagination is the beginning of creation.

    “you imagine what you desire,

    “you will what you imagine –

    “and at last you create what you will.”

    That belief that arts matter in and of themselves, central to the chance to live richer, larger lives, has animated every Labour Government in history and animates us still.

    As the Prime Minister said in September last year: “Everyone deserves the chance to be touched by art. Everyone deserves access to moments that light up their lives.

    “And every child deserves the chance to study the creative subjects that widen their horizons, provide skills employers do value, and prepares them for the future, the jobs and the world that they will inherit.”

    This was I think Jennie Lee’s central driving passion, that “all of our children should be given the kind of education that was the monopoly of the privileged few” – to the arts, sport, music and culture which help us grow as people and grow as a nation.

    But who now in Britain can claim that this is the case? Whether it is the running down of arts subjects, the narrowing of the curriculum and the labelling of arts subjects as mickey mouse –  enrichment funding in schools eroded at the stroke of the pen or the closure of much-needed community spaces as council funding has been slashed.

    Culture and creativity has been erased, from our classrooms and our communities.

    Is it any wonder that the number of students taking arts GSCEs has dropped by almost half since 2010?

    This is madness. At a time when the creative industries offer such potential for growth, good jobs and self expression in every part of our country  And a lack of skills acts as the single biggest brake on them…bar none, we have had politicians who use them as a tool in their ongoing, exhausting culture wars.

    Our Cabinet, the first entirely state educated Cabinet in British history, have never accepted the chance to live richer, larger lives belongs only to some of us and I promise you that we never ever will.

    That is why we wasted no time in launching a review of the curriculum, as part of our Plan for Change.

    To put arts, music and creativity back at the heart of the education system.

    Where they belong.

    And today I am delighted to announce the Arts Everywhere fund as a fitting legacy for Jennie Lee’s vision – over £270 million investment that will begin to fix the foundations of our arts venues, museums, libraries and heritage sector in communities across the country.

    We believe in them. And we will back them.

    Because as Abraham Lincoln once said, the dogmas of a quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present.

    Jennie Lee lived by this mantra. So will we.

    We are determined to escape the deadening debate about access or excellence which has haunted the arts ever since the formation of the early Arts Council.

    The arts is an ecosystem, which thrives when we support the excellence that exists and use it to level up.

    Like the RSC’s s “First Encounters” programme. Or the incredible Shakespeare North Playhouse in Knowsley where young people are first meeting with spoken word.

    When I watched young people from Knowsley growing in confidence, and dexterity, reimagining Shakespeare for this age and so, so at home in this amazing space it reminded me of my childhood.

    Because in so many ways I grew up in the theatre. My dad was on the board of the National, and as a child my sister and I would travel to London on the weekends we had with our dad to see some of the greatest actors and directors on earth – Helen Mirren, Alan Rickman, Tom Baker, Trevor Nunn and Sam Mendes. We saw Chekhov, Arthur Miller and Brecht reimagined by the National, the Donmar and the Royal Court.

    It was never, in our house, a zero-sum game. The thriving London scene was what inspired my parents and others to set up what was then the Corner House in Manchester, which is now known as HOME.

    It inspired my sister to go on to work at the Royal Exchange in Manchester where she and I spent some of the happiest years of our lives watching tragedy and farce, comedy and social protest.

    Because of this I love all of it – the sound, smell and feel of a theatre. I love how it makes me think differently about the world. And most of all I love the gift that our parents gave us, that we always believed these are places and spaces for us.

    I want every child in the country to have that feeling. Because Britain’s excellence in film, literature, theatre, TV, art, collections and exhibitions is a gift, it is part of our civic inheritance, that belongs to us all and as its custodians it is up to us to hand it down through the generations.

    Not to remain static, but to create a living breathing bridge between the present, the past and the future.

    My dad, an English literature professor, once told me that the most common mistakes students make – including me – he meant me actually – was to have your eye on the question, not on the text.

    So, with some considerable backchat in hand, I had a second go at an essay on Hamlet – why did Hamlet delay? – and came to the firm conclusion that he didn’t. That this is the wrong question. I say this not to start a debate on Hamlet, especially in this crowd, but to ask us to consider this:

    If the question is – how do we preserve and protect our arts institutions? Then access against excellence could perhaps make sense. I understand the argument, that to disperse excellence is somehow to diffuse it.

    But If the question is – how to give a fractured nation back its self confidence? Then this choice becomes a nonsense. So it is time to turn the exam question on its head and reject this false choice.

    Every person in this country matters. But while talent is everywhere, opportunity is not. This cannot continue. That is why our vision is not access or excellence but access to excellence. We will accept nothing less. This country needs nothing less. And thanks to organisations like the RSC we know it can be achieved.

    I was reflecting while I wrote this speech how at every moment of great upheaval it has been the arts that have helped us to understand the world, and shape the future.

    From fashion, which as Eric Hobsbawm once remarked, was so much better at anticipating the shape of things to come than historians or politicians, to the angry young men and women in the 1950s and 60s – that gave us plays like Look Back in Anger – to the quiet northern working class rebellion of films like Saturday Night Sunday Morning, This Sporting Life and Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner.

    Without the idea that excellence belongs to us all – this could never have happened. What was once considered working class, ethnic minority or regional – worse, in Jennie Lee’s time, it was called “the provinces” which she banned – thank God. These have become a central part of our national story.

    ….

    I think the arts is a political space. But the idea that politicians should impose a version of culture on the nation is utterly chilling.

    When we took office I said that the era of culture wars were over. It was taken to mean, in some circles, that I could order somehow magically from Whitehall that they would end.

    But I meant something else. I meant an end to the “mind forged manacles” that William Blake raged against and the “mind without fear” that Rabindranath Tagore dreamt of.

    [political content removed]

    Would this include the rich cultural heritage from the American South that the Beatles drew inspiration from, in a city that has been shaped by its role in welcoming visitors and immigrants from across the world? Would it accommodate Northern Soul, which my town in Wigan led the world in?

    We believe the proper role of government is not to impose culture, but to enable artists to hold a mirror up to society and to us. To help us understand the world we’re in and shape and define the nation.

    Who know that is the value that you alone can bring.

    I recently watched an astonishing performance of The Merchant of Venice, set in the East End of London in the 1930s. In it, Shylock has been transformed from villain to  victim at the hands of the Merchant, who has echoes of Oswald Mosely. I don’t want to spoil it – not least because my mum is watching it at the Lowry next week and would not forgive me- but it ends with a powerful depiction of the battle of Cable Street.

    Nobody could see that production and fail to understand the parallels with the modern day. No political speech I have heard in recent times has had the power, that power to challenge, interpret and provoke that sort of response. To remind us of the obligations we owe to one another.

    Other art forms can have – and have had – a similar impact. Just look at the ITV drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office. It told a story with far more emotional punch than any number of political speeches or newspaper columns.

    You could say the same of the harrowing paintings by the Scottish artist Peter Howson. His depiction of rape when he was the official war artist during the Bosnian War seared itself into people’s understanding of that conflict. It reminds me of the first time I saw a Caravaggio painting. The insistence that it becomes part of your narrative is one you never ever forget.

    That is why Jennie Lee believed her role was a permissive one. She repeated this mantra many times telling reporters that she wanted simply to make living room for artists to work in. The greatest art, she said, comes from the torment of the human spirit – adding – and you can’t legislate for that.

    I think if she were alive today she would look at the farce that is the moral puritanism which is killing off our arts and culture – for the regions and the artistic talent all over the country where the reach of funding and donors is not long enough – the protests against any or every sponsor of the arts, I believe, would have made her both angered and ashamed.

    In every social protest  – and I have taken part in plenty – you have to ask, who is your target? The idea that boycotting the sponsor of the Hay Festival harms the sponsor, not the festival is for the birds.

    And I have spent enough time at Hay, Glastonbury and elsewhere to know that these are the spaces – the only spaces – where precisely the moral voice and protest comes from. Boycotting sponsors, and killing these events off,  is the equivalent of gagging society. This self defeating virtue signalling is a feature of our times and we will stand against it with everything that we’ve got.

    Because I think we are the only [political context removed] force, right now, that believes that it is not for the government to dictate what should be heard.

    But there is one area where we will never be neutral and that is on who should be heard.

    Too much of our rich inheritance, heritage and culture is not seen. And when it is not, not only is the whole nation poorer but the country suffers.

    It is our firm belief that at the heart of Britain’s current malaise is the fact that too many people have been written off and written out of our national story. And, to borrow a line from my favourite George Eliot novel, Middlemarch, it means we cannot hear that ‘roar that lies on the other side of silence’.  What we need – to completely misquote George Elliot – is a keen vision and feeling of all ordinary human life.’ We’ve got to be able to hear it.

    And this is personal for me.

    I still remember how groundbreaking it was to watch Bend it Like Beckham – the first time I had seen a family like ours depicted on screen not for being Asian (or in my case mixed race) but because of a young girl’s love of football.

    And I was reminded of this year’s later when Maxine Peake starred in Queens of the Coal Age, her play about the women of the miners’ strike, which she put on at the Royal Exchange in Manchester.

    The trains were not running – as usual – but on one of my council estates the women who had lived and breathed this chapter of our history clubbed together, hired a coach and went off to see it. It was magical to see the reaction when they saw a story that had been so many times about their lives, finally with them in it.

    We are determined that this entire nation must see themselves at the centre of their own and our national story. That’s a challenge for our broadcasters and our film-makers.

    Show us the full panoply of the world we live in, including the many communities far distant from the commissioning room which is still far too often based in London.

    But it’s also a challenge for every branch of the arts, including the theatre, dance, music, painting and sculpture. Let’s show working-class communities too in the work that we do – and not just featuring in murder and gangland series.

    Part of how we discover that new national story is by breathing fresh life into local heritage and reviving culture in places where it is disappearing.

    Which is why we’re freeing up almost £5 million worth of funding for community organisations – groups who know their own area and what it needs far better than Whitehall. Groups determined to bring derelict and neglected old buildings back into good use. These are buildings that stand at the centre of our communities. They are visible symbols of pride, purpose and their contribution and their neglect provokes a strong emotional response to toxicity, decline and decay. We’re determined to put those communities back in charge of their own destiny again.

    And another important part of the construction is the review of the arts council, led by Baroness Margaret Hodge, who is with us today. When Jennie Lee set up regional arts associations the arts council welcomed their creation as good for the promotion of regional cultures and in the hope they would “create a rod for the arts council’s back”.

    They responded to local clamour, not culture imposed from London. Working with communities so they could tell their own story. That is my vision. And it’s the vision behind the Arts Everywhere Fund that we announced this morning.

    The Arts Council Review will be critical to fulfilling that vision and today we’re setting out two important parts of that work – publishing both the Terms of Reference and the members of the Advisory Group who will be working with Baroness Hodge, many of whom have made the effort to join us here today.

    We have found the Jennie Lee’s of our age, who will deliver a review that is shaped around communities and local areas, and will make sure that arts are for everyone, wherever they live and whatever their background. With excellence and access.

    But we need more from you. We need you to step up.

    Across the sporting world from Boxing to Rugby League clubs, they’re throwing their doors open to communities, especially young people, to help grip the challenges facing a nation. Opening up opportunities. Building new audiences. Creating the champions of the future. Lots done, but much more still to do.

    Every child and adult should also have the opportunity to access live theatre, dance and music – to believe that these spaces belong to them and are for them. We need you to throw open your doors. So many of you already deliver this against the odds. But the community spaces needed – whether community centres, theatres, libraries are too often closed to those who need them most.

    Too often we fall short of reflecting the full and varied history of the communities which support us. That’s why we have targeted the funding today to bring hope flickering back to life in community-led culture and arts – supported by us, your government, but driven by you and your communities.

    It’s one of the reasons we are tackling the secondary ticket market, which has priced too many fans out of live music gigs. It’s also why we are pushing for a voluntary levy on arena tickets to fund a sustainable grassroots music sector, including smaller music venues.

    But I also want new audiences to pour in through the doors – and I want theatres across the country to flourish as much as theatres in the West End.

    I also want everyone to be able to see some of our outstanding art, from Lowry and Constable to Anthony Gormley and Tracey Emin.

    Too much of the nation’s art is sitting in basements not out in the country where it belongs. I want all of our national and civic galleries to find new ways of getting that art out into communities.

    There are other challenges. There is too much fighting others to retain a grip on small pots of funding and too little asking “what do we owe to one another” and what can I do. Jennie Lee encouraged writers and actors into schools and poets into pubs.

    She set up subsidies so people, like the women from my council estate in Wigan, could travel to see great art and theatre. She persuaded Henry Moore to go and speak to children in a school in Castleford, in Yorkshire who were astonished when he turned up not with a lecture, but with lumps of clay.

    There are people who are doing this now. The brilliant fashion designer Paul Smith told me about a recent visit to his old primary school in Nottingham where he went armed with the material to design a new school tie with the kids. These are the most fashionable kids on the block.

    I know it’s been a tough decade. Funding for the arts has been slashed. Buildings are crumbling. And the pandemic hit the arts and heritage world hard.

    And I really believe that the Government has a role to play in helping free you up to do what you do best – enriching people’s lives and bringing communities together – so with targeted support like the new £85m Creative Foundations Fund that we’re launching today with the Arts Council we hope that we’ll be able to help you with what you do best.

    SOLT’s own research showed that, without support, 4 in 10 theatres they surveyed were at risk of closing or being too unsafe to use in five years’ time. So today we are answering that call. This fund is going to help theatres, galleries, and arts centres restore buildings in dire need of repairs.

    And on top of that support, we’re also getting behind our critical local, civic museums – places which are often cultural anchors in their village, town or city. They’re facing acute financial pressures and they need our backing. So our new Museum Renewal Fund will invest £20 million in these local assets – preserving them and ensuring they remain part of local identities, to keep benefitting local people of all ages. In my town of Wigan we have the fantastic Museum of Wigan Life and it tells the story of the contribution that the ordinary, extraordinary people in Wigan made to our country, powering us through the last century through dangerous, difficult, dirty work in the coal mines.  That story, that understanding of the contribution that Wigan made, I consider to be a part of the birthright and inheritance of my little boy growing up in that town today and we want every child growing up in a community to understand the history and heritage and contribution that their parents and grandparents made to this country and a belief that that future stretches ahead of them as well. Not to reopen the coal mines, but to make a contribution to this country and to see themselves reflected in our story.

    But for us to succeed we need more from you. This is not a moment for despair. This is our moment to ensure the arts remain central to the life of this nation for decades to come and in turn that this nation flourishes.

    If we get this right we can unlock funding that will allow the arts to flourish in every part of Britain, especially those that have been neglected for far too long, by creating good jobs and growth, and giving children everywhere the chance to get them.

    Our vision is not just to grow the economy, but to make sure it benefits people in our communities. So often where i’ve seen investments in the last decade and good jobs created, I go down the road to a local school and I see children who can see those jobs from the school playground, but could no more dream of getting to the moon than they could of getting those jobs. And we are determined that that’s going to change.

    This is what we’ve been doing with our creative education programmes (like the Museums and Schools Programme, the Heritage Schools Programme, Art & Design National Saturday Clubs and the BFI Film Academy.) These are programmes we are proud to support and ones I’m personally proud that my Department will be funding these programmes next year.

    Be in no doubt, we are determined to back the creative industries in a way no other government has done. I’m delighted that we have committed to the audiovisual, video games, theatre, orchestra and museums and galleries tax reliefs, as well as introducing the new independent film and VFX tax reliefs as well.

    You won’t hear any speeches from us denigrating the creative industries or lectures about ballerinas being forced to retrain.

    Yes, these are proper jobs. And yes, artists should be properly remunerated for their work.

    We know these industries are vital to our economic growth. They employ 1 in 14 people in the UK and are worth more than £125 billion a year to our economy.  We want them to grow. That is why they are a central plank of our industrial strategy.

    But I want to be equally clear that these industries only thrive if they are part of a great artistic ecosystem. Matilda, War Horse and Les Miserables are commercial successes, but they sprang from the public investment in theatre.

    James Graham has written outstanding screenplays for television including Sherwood, but his first major play was the outstanding This House at the National and his other National Theatre play Dear England is now set to be a TV series.

    You don’t get a successful commercial film sector without a successful subsidised theatre sector. Or a successful video games sector without artists, designers, creative techies, musicians and voiceover artists.

    So it’s the whole ecosystem that we have to strengthen and enhance. It’s all connected.

    The woman in whose name we’ve launched this lecture series would have relished that challenge. She used to say she had the best job in government

    “All the others deal with people’s sorrows… but I have been called the Minister of the Future.”

    That is why I relish this challenge and why working with those of you who will rise to meet this moment will be the privilege of my life.

    I wanted to leave with you with a moment that has stayed with me.

    A few weeks ago I was with Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, who has become a great friend. We were in his old constituency of Leigh, a town that borders Wigan. And we were talking about the flashes, which in our towns used to be open cast coalmines.

    They were regenerated by the last Labour government and they’ve now become these incredible spaces, with wildlife and green spaces with incredible lakes that are well used by local children.

    We had a lot to talk about and a lot to do. But as we looked out at the transformed landscape wondering how in one generation we had gone from scars on the landscape to this, he said, the lesson I’ve taken from this is that nature recovers more quickly than people.

    While this government, through our Plan for Change, has made it our mission to support a growing economy, so we can have a safe, healthy nation where people have opportunities not currently on offer – the recovery of our nation cannot be all bread and no roses. Our shared future depends critically on every one of us in this room rising to this moment.

    To give voice to the nation we are, and can be.

    To let hope and history rhyme.

    So let no one say it falls to anyone else. It falls to us.

  • Stephanie Peacock – 2025 Speech at the Beacon Philanthropy and Impact Forum

    Stephanie Peacock – 2025 Speech at the Beacon Philanthropy and Impact Forum

    The speech made by Stephanie Peacock, the Minister for Civil Society and Youth, at the Guildhall in London on 12 February 2025.

    Good morning everyone, thank you Neil for that really kind introduction and thoughtful speech – the challenge you outlined is an important one.

    It’s great to be here with you at the Beacon Philanthropy and Impact Forum today.

    I want to start by thanking The Beacon Collaborative for organising this event, and the Charities Aid Foundation for sponsoring it and the City of London for hosting at this beautiful building.

    You’re here today, and are part of organisations like Beacon Collaborative, and Charities Aid Foundation, because you believe in the power of organisations and people using their resources to deliver social impact.
    And it’s a belief this Government shares.

    The UK has a vibrant culture of service and generosity, and philanthropy is so often the outlet for that culture.

    Every week hundreds of thousands of people – in our villages, towns and cities – come together and do what they can to support others. They devote their time, their money or both, to improve the lives of people less fortunate than themselves.

    That is something we should never take for granted.

    Philanthropy sustains over 170,000 charities in the UK and thousands of others who are so small they’re not actually registered.

    And it does things Governments can’t do – reaching into communities, and applying local knowledge and insight.

    I see it all the time in my own area of Barnsley.

    I can tell you so many examples, organisations such as Barnsley Youth Choir, Barnsley Hospices and BIADS, a local dementia charity I am patron of, all rely on charitable donations and giving from the local community to sustain their vital work. As Neil said, they all have their own stories, as I know you all will.

    But you recognise, as I do, that more is possible.

    And forums like this are a vital opportunity for the sector to come together and look at how we take philanthropy in the UK to the next level.

    The instinct people have to help is always there.

    It’s the job of the Government, working with organisations like the ones you represent, to find new, creative ways to make it not only easier to give, but more rewarding.

    That is part of why we started a new chapter in the relationship between Government and civil society through a Civil Society Covenant.

    We launched the Covenant at No10 Downing Street with the Prime Minister in October, in order to reset the relationship between Government and Civil Society. To make it a partnership that is built on a foundation of trust and respect.

    And it reflects our view that our charities, social enterprises and community groups have a huge and vital role to play in helping us deliver on this Government’s missions.

    Civil society groups can help make our streets safer, they can create opportunities for our young people, and they can reduce the burden on the NHS by supporting people to live healthier lives.

    And philanthropists, social investors and impact investors will have an important role to play in the Covenant, when it’s fully established in the coming months.

    This Government also recognises the enormous contribution social investors, philanthropists and businesses can provide in the delivery of our Plan for Change.

    Our impact investment market, worth £76 billion, leads the way in Europe and really sets the standard, and it reflects the fact that people want to see a connection between their investment and real social impact on the ground.

    As the Minister responsible for the impact economy, encompassing both philanthropy and impact investment, I see not only the incredible work happening in this space, but the huge potential for growing the money invested in public good.

    That is why I’m proud we are building on the UK’s strong industry leadership in social impact investing and working in partnership with the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to establish the Government’s Social Impact Investment Advisory Group. And I was really pleased to speak to Darren Jones about this last night.

    We are committed to backing private investment that delivers positive social impact right across the country, and this newly announced Advisory Group will help achieve this.

    Philanthropy is a vital part of the impact economy.

    So I’d like to be clear with everyone here today on our three priorities for philanthropy.

    Firstly, the Government wants to help to connect philanthropic investment with the places that need it most.

    Secondly, we want to unlock extra philanthropic investment.

    Thirdly, we want to partner with civil society, communities, donors and businesses to celebrate a culture of giving.

    On our first priority, this Government has been clear since our first day in office that we are committed to putting local people, communities and places first.

    Supporting philanthropic growth across the country is a really important route to generating more private capital that can deliver public good.

    That’s why the Secretary of State has committed to setting out a place-based philanthropy strategy so we can create an environment where the benefits of philanthropy are felt in communities everywhere.

    I know this is an area that many of you are invested in or connected to.

    Made-in-Stoke, which I was really pleased to visit a few months ago, Blackpool Pride of Place and Islington Gives are brilliant examples of what can be achieved with a place-based approach. I know many representatives of these networks are here with us today.

    By creating a community of philanthropists who are invested in the future of a city or town and who want to contribute to its success, they are blazing a trail for others to follow. And Neil, you rightly referenced the impact of place in your remarks.

    In areas that need it most, these networks are delivering programmes supporting young people’s skills development, from sports activities to dance and ballet classes for children.

    We can learn a great deal from these models of giving – by people motivated by the idea of helping give back to the community that helped to shape them.

    My officials and I will continue to explore how this Government can best support the growth of these innovative initiatives.

    When it comes to the second priority of unlocking additional philanthropic investment, there are already some excellent examples of what philanthropy can deliver.

    Family Foundations such as the Reece’s Foundation in the North East are working to address some of the most complex problems in the region, supporting innovations like the National Geothermal Energy Centre whilst providing new opportunities for local people.

    But, as I said earlier, we need the right structures in place to make it as easy as possible for philanthropists to give more and would-be philanthropists to give for the first time.

    Gift Aid is a vital part of the already existing system, and it gives charities and donors important tax relief.

    And for businesses, payroll giving provides companies an easy way for employees to give in a tax-efficient way to the causes they care about.

    We want to raise awareness of just how straightforward that scheme is, and there couldn’t be a better time as February is Payroll Giving month, as I’m sure you all know.

    The final part of the equation is changing how we talk about and celebrate philanthropy.

    In 2023 we collectively gave £13.9 billion to charity. It’s a phenomenal amount of money and it’s testament to the generosity that exists across our country.

    But if you look deeper, you find that the number of donors is actually decreasing.

    Clearly there’s no one single reason why that would be the case, but I think it’s all of our responsibility to do our bit in championing and celebrating those who do donate.

    Last year I had the privilege of attending the Paris Olympics and Paralympics, seeing first hand some of our most exceptional athletes perform on the biggest stage of all.

    Over the last decades, philanthropists like Barrie Wells have supported the training success of athletes including Jessica Ennis-Hill, who started her career in Sheffield, just down the road from my constituency of Barnsley.

    After winning Gold at the 2012 Olympics in London, she went on to engage and inspire the next generation of young people through philanthropy funded workshops in the Athletes4Schools programme.

    Similarly, businesses continue to contribute to society, like Barclays, who support young people and create opportunities for all, through their community grass roots football grants.

    5,500 community groups have been supported across the UK with the aim of helping to reduce inequalities in football.

    If you look at a sector like the arts, that is one that’s always relied on a variety of funding sources.

    And that’s why, for over 20 years, DCMS has partnered with the Wolfson Foundation to deliver the DCMS/Wolfson Museums and Galleries Improvement Fund.

    But these are just some of the examples of what can be done when we work together to build things that deliver long term benefits.

    You share in our ambition to raise the amount donated and the number of people donating it, and I urge you all to talk loudly and proudly about some of the great work going on in the regions across the country.

    That just leaves me to thank you all, once again, for inviting me to join you all today.

    By working together we can fulfil the huge untapped potential that exists in the impact economy, in our civil society, and across our philanthropic landscape.

    There are no simple answers to how we do it but, by focussing on the areas I’ve set out today, I am certain we can meet the challenge head on.

    Together we can grasp the opportunity to improve people’s lives and give back to communities we all care deeply about.

  • Chris Bryant – 2025 Speech at LEAD Advertising Conference

    Chris Bryant – 2025 Speech at LEAD Advertising Conference

    The speech made by Chris Bryant, the Creative Industries Minister, in London on 6 February 2025.

    My name is Chris Bryant. I’m the Minister for lots of things. And Peter Mandelson, when I was first elected back in 2001 as the Member of Parliament for the Rhondda, I asked him for some advice. And he said he had lots of pieces of advice, but one of them was: “Never go to the same event two years in a row.” Because it means if you don’t go to the third year, everybody will condemn you for being a complete lazy so and so. But this is my second year in a row at this event. So I’ve broken Peter Mandelson’s advice.

    And the second piece of advice he gave me was: “The one word you can never use in advertising and in politics is the word trust.” Because the moment you start talking about trust in politics, people start thinking: “Oh, can I trust you?” And they nearly always come to the conclusion that they can’t.

    But in the end, advertising, I suppose, is fundamentally about trust. It’s about trying to persuade the public that you can trust a particular product or that you can trust a particular brand that is promoting a particular product, or that you can trust the person who is promoting the brand that is promoting the product, or that you can trust the space in which you’re watching or seeing this particular piece of advertising.

    Of course, to enable trust in all and to create great advertising, that requires all sorts of different things. First of all, imagination. And I think sometimes when I speak to some other parts of the creative industries, they think of advertising as the kind of workhorses of the creative industries. But I actually think that in many regards, you’re more imaginative than nearly all the other parts of creative industries put together. And sometimes, of course, you have to bring them all together.

    But the original idea for how to launch a product, or how to sell a product, how to promote it, how to keep it in the public mind, or how to completely change a view of a product or a brand, that’s a phenomenally imaginative process.

    I always think to myself: “How do you come up with a television or a cinema advert for perfume?” How on earth can you give the impression that this is a perfume that somebody would want to wear when you cannot smell it? Which is fundamentally what perfume is all about. And of course, you do that in advertising with so many different products. Sometimes you’re trying to encourage people to try products that they would never have touched before, either because they’re brand new products, or because they’re something that has never come into their way of life before or because their life has changed.

    That requires phenomenal imagination, but it also requires craft, serious craft, whether that’s using statistics and market analysis to be able to determine what is really going to work, how big a particular market is, or it’s that whole ecosystem of the whole of the creative industries, through from writers, actors and technicians, location scouts and everybody else that’s part of making a really good advert.

    That combination of imagination, craft and that whole ecosystem is what I think is so special in the United Kingdom. We’re at the moment working with Shriti Vadera and Peter Bazalgette on putting together our Industrial Strategy for the creative industries. We decided as a government that the creative industries are one of the eight key sectors in the UK that are potential growth sectors we want to build on.

    And putting that together, one of the key elements that we keep on arguing with the Treasury and the Department for Business and Trade and everybody else in government is that this is an ecosystem. You don’t get great British films without great British marketing of films. You don’t get great British films without actors who probably performed on the stage as well as in television and in movies. You don’t get great British actors without a commercial theatre that’s successful in the UK and also without a subsidised theatre in the UK.

    All of these things hang together, and it’s really important that we promote the whole of that sector. And that’s, of course, why we are the second largest exporter of advertising in the world. I remember when I first came across this statistic, I thought: “That can’t be right. It must just be the second largest in Europe.” But we are the second largest in the world and I think we could do a great deal more boasting about that.

    I don’t know whether there’s anybody in advertising who could promote the idea of advertising being a very significant part of our economy, worth £21 billion of GVA in 2023 and on track this year for £43 billion of spending. So in the words of Yazz: the only way is up.

    We are very keen on this being a cooperation between industry and government. So first of all, the single most important thing we know that we can do to enable this industry to grow in the UK is to provide political, fiscal and economic stability in the country, so that people can make long-term investments and know where they’re going.

    [political content redacted]

    And secondly, as I just said, we’re working on our Industrial Strategy for the creative industries. If there’s stuff that you still feel that you have you haven’t heard from us in this world, then please do get in touch.

    Thirdly, obviously, there’s a really important issue around skills. For me, this is a matter of passionate belief that you don’t get a good education unless you also get a good creative education. I want to praise Eton and Winchester and everybody else, because they’ll have a pottery class, they’ll have an art room, they’ll have a well equipped theatre, they’ll have a dance studio, they’ll have musical instruments. I just want that for every single child in this country, and that’s why I think it’s so important that we turn the corner on the curriculum in the UK.

    That’s what Bridget Phillipson as the Secretary of State for Education is very intent on doing. Trying to bring a creative education right back into the heart, so that it’s not just STEM, which is very important, but STEAM, including arts and creative education, is part of it.

    Secondly, we need to reform the Apprenticeship Levy. I know lots of people in the industry have said to me: “It just doesn’t work for us at the moment.” And that’s what we’re very focused on doing.

    The first thing we’ve already done is we’ve announced that from August this year, you won’t have to do a 12-month apprenticeship. You’ll be able to do six months and that’s so important for people who are working on a project base, and we need to provide a greater sense of portability between different employers as well, to be able to make that Apprenticeship Levy work across the creative sector.

    Indeed, there’s a perfectly good argument for saying, because of the ecosystem that I’ve been talking about, that the Apprenticeship Levy should enable you to go from different parts of the ecosystem to be able to perfect your craft.

    Now just a few specific things on the Online Advertising Taskforce. Online has provided new challenges and new opportunities. I’m really glad that the influencer working group has come up with its fourth version of a code of conduct, the first in the world. If anybody knows any influencers who could persuade more influencers to take up the influencers’ code of conduct, I’ll be really grateful.

    But that is a really important campaign, because it goes to this issue of trust. If it becomes a whole world when you simply can’t trust what you’re seeing in front of you as promoting a product, then that undermines the whole of the industry. So I think the more we can do in that field, the better.

    I’m really grateful for the work that’s being done on an AI working group. At the moment we’re engaged in a consultation on this and precisely how it works out in relation to copyright. I am absolutely clear that we as a country sell IP. It’s one of the key things that we sell. So making sure that we have a strong copyright system in the UK, that we maintain that, and maintain the ability of people to be remunerated and to control their rights, is a vital part of anything we do in this field.

    But of course, many of you will use AI in all sorts of different ways already, and my guess is in two or three years’ time, every single person will have an AI assistant of some kind on their laptop or on their phone. We need to make sure that we think that there’s a possibility for a win-win in this. If you haven’t looked at the consultation yet, please do. It closes on February 25.

    On less healthy food, some of you might be interested in this subject. Obviously the previous government legislated in relation to less healthy foods and advertising, and we did too in the statutory instrument that was brought forward just before Christmas. I’ve already had several meetings with the ASA. We are very keen on coming to a sensible solution. I think a bit of common sense in this space would be really, really useful. We discussed the matter. I’m saying to you what I said to the ASA the other day. Our priority is proportionate regulation and clear guidance for businesses operating in the sector. And as you would expect from us, we want to reduce the NHS backlog, and we want to support people to lead healthier lives. We want there to be incentives for brands to offer more healthy products. That only happens if we have a clear set of guidance that is proportionate and sensible. I can’t go any further than that, because I’ve got another meeting with all the organisations concerned next week.

    I want to end with my key point, which is that we are very serious about growing the creative industries in the UK. I heard somebody say: “Well, aren’t the arts and the creative industries a bit frou-frou?” I don’t know what that means, really, but I get the point, I suppose.

    But actually, if the UK had no creative industries, we would be a poorer, weaker, less happy, less stable society than we are. And I think that the creative industries not only have an economic role to play – a vastly significant one, one in 14 people in the UK works in the creative industries today and I guess it will be one in 10 in a few years’ time – but if we’re going to build that, we need you to tell us what are the barriers to growth in your sector.

    We need to make sure that there’s a steady stream of people through into these industries. I asked this question last year, and I’m going to ask it again, and I’m going to keep on asking every single year that I come here, which is: If you came to my constituency and asked a 13 year old: “What are you going to do when you grow up, or what careers are you thinking about?” They would probably know what it is to be a doctor and how they would start trying to be a doctor or a lawyer or a teacher, but they wouldn’t have the faintest idea how they would start the process of going into advertising or any of the other creative industries.

    So in four years’ time, I would like us to be in a place where every single child in the country has the creative industries, including advertising, as one of the possible future careers for them, and that they know how to approach that, so that your seats are taken in 10, 15, 20 years’ time by young people who might just as well come from Wigan, Gateshead, Newcastle, London, the Rhondda, Shetland. People with completely varied backgrounds and different experiences, so that they can bring their imagination and their storytelling to the great industry that is yours.

  • Chris Bryant – 2024 Speech at the Tourism Alliance Conference

    Chris Bryant – 2024 Speech at the Tourism Alliance Conference

    The speech made by Chris Bryant, the Tourism Minister, on 26 November 2024.

    I’m delighted to be the Tourism Minister.

    Mark Twain wrote in 1904 that “travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts”.

    I’m not actually sure about that. Most people are probably looking for something rather less highfalutin than having their prejudices and bigotries removed. A fortnight in the sun perhaps. A chance to chill out.

    But I have to confess I owe a great deal to travel. One of my father’s first jobs was working in a hotel in Salou on the Costa Brava in the 1950s – which is where he met my mother, when she was, as a BBC makeup artist, on holiday. So, quite literally, I reckon I owe my existence to the tourism industry.

    That’s just one of the many reasons that I am delighted to be the Tourism Minister. And I can already state that the tourism industry has broadened my mind. Just a day at the World Travel Market was enough to impress upon me the breadth and depth of this industry in the UK and around the world, and how much the tourism industry is respected.

    I know the transformational effect it can have on people’s lives. I’m passionate about how tourism supports other sectors in my portfolio and vice versa. People may come here for the heritage but then stay to immerse themselves in our creative industries. Or they might come here expressly for a concert, a gig or a show. Or to see a major art exhibition.

    Tourism can also promote opportunity for people – give them a chance to get on in life and make something for themselves. And it can create or rebuild a sense of pride in a place.

    Last week I responded to two debates in Parliament on the respective merits of Bedfordshire and Northumberland for the tourism industry.

    Local MPs queued up to list their local tourist attractions including castles, stately homes, canals, seaside resorts, museums and natural beauty spots. And we all know how important our own local attractions are to our local identity.

    Equally importantly, tourism is a key driver of economic growth, not only in the traditional hotspots but across the whole of the UK.

    The UK has always been a great destination for tourism. Canterbury was one of the greatest attractions for pilgrims who wanted to visit the site of the murder of Thomas Becket in the Middle Ages, as was the tomb of Edward the Confessor in Westminster Abbey. As we know from the poet Chaucer, pilgrims were not necessarily saints, but they certainly had money to spend.

    Modern pilgrimages include King’s Cross station for Harry Potter’s Platform 9¾, or Highclere Castle – the setting for Downton Abbey, or Framlingham Castle for Ed Sheeran’s Castle on the Hill, or Paddington for… Paddington.

    We need to make far more of these connections. Of course we want to boast of our great heritage. But we can’t rest on our laurels. Because the danger is that foreign visitors who have the world to choose from could all too easily say: “The UK never changes. It’ll still be there next year. Let’s go somewhere else this time.”

    But we want people to think the UK’s the place to go this year, today, now. And when they get here we want them to have such a fabulous time that they come again and again.

    However, we have to be honest about the challenges we face. Covid and Brexit have had significant effects on the sector, some of them predictable and some of them completely unpredictable. Staffing and skills shortages make growth a challenge. And inbound tourism is still not back at 2019 levels.

    Lots of us make day trips but don’t stay the night either because finances are tight or because they just can’t find the right kind of accommodation. Equally worrying is the fact that UK holidaymakers spend more overseas than at home.

    I know from speaking to the sector that the costs of running a business remain high and have risen sharply in recent years – especially when it comes to staffing and materials.

    I am proud that we managed to prevent the cliff edge on business rates relief that people had feared was coming in April by introducing the 40% rate in the Budget, but I recognise that costs are still high, margins are phenomenally tight and many are concerned about National Insurance Contributions.

    I am also conscious that skills and vacancies remain a challenge and that tourism jobs are sometimes viewed as something you have to do rather than a career you can have pride in.

    I want to support balanced careers and good wages to attract talent into the sector – and I will say more about that later on.

    It will take time to solve some of those issues. But that is no reason to shy away from having ambition for the sector.

    But here’s the thing. Our new government is determined to grow the UK economy. It’s our central mission. Everything else depends on it. So we must bring tourism back to the top table.

    After all, few sectors can compete with it. Listen to this: the global travel and tourism sector represented more than 9% of the world’s economy in 2023, and is forecast to grow 5.5% year on year for the next decade.

    I want the UK to be far more ambitious for growth. That means we in government need to do everything in our power to help the tourism industry grow and the industry, working with us, needs to do far more to attract overseas and domestic visitors with visits and holidays that are really best in class for value-for-money, for high-quality service, for end-to-end and wall-to wall-enjoyment.

    I am passionate about making the UK a top visitor destination that truly rivals our European counterparts.

    We are one of the most visited countries in the world – I want us to stay that way. We had 41 million visitors before the pandemic, 38 million last year – I want to reach 50 million by 2030.

    But we can only do that if we work together. We need a true partnership between the government and the sector to deliver such growth.

    Too many of my predecessors have seen tourism as a nice thing to have and not a priority. I don’t. I see it as an essential part of our economy, worth £74 billion and 4% of GVA with a huge potential for growth.  We are good at this in the UK and can be even better if we work together.

    I want us to have a holistic approach to tourism where we look at every element from a visitor’s arrival at the airport to buying a ticket for a music gig or finding a restaurant or catching a train to say York or Newcastle.

    Two points here. First, I defy anyone arriving at Gatwick Airport to work out which is the right train to catch to get swiftly to central London. It’s impossible. I’ve tried many times. Let alone do it with the right ticket before the train leaves the platform. Let’s get that sorted, so that people’s first experience of the UK isn’t a sense of chaotic confusion.

    And secondly, why on earth is it so difficult to get to Stratford upon Avon? Shakespeare is one of our icons. His birthplace and Anne Hathaway’s house are magnets for tourists, as is the Shakespeare Memorial Theatre. Yet the train service to Stratford is shockingly terrible. That’s something we need to put right.

    There’s a specific reason why the UK should make far more of tourism. We have a lot to offer.

    We are one of only two countries in the world who are net exporters of music and our bands are known around the world. I recently met the French Tourism Minister at the World Travel Market, who told me that her favourite band is The Cure and she really wanted to see them live in the UK. Is there any way I could help?

    My Italian counterpart wanted tickets for Oasis and when I spoke to my Saudi counterpart he was looking forward to a classical concert at the Wigmore Hall.

    Of course, lots of people come to Liverpool specifically to see the home of the Beatles or to sample some of the great new music coming out of the city. But the same is true of our film and TV sets.

    We also do theatre better than anyone. The variety of what’s on offer every single night is extraordinary. There’s something for every taste. In London this month you can see David Tennant and Cush Jumbo in Macbeth, Sigourney Weaver in The Tempest, or John Simm in A Christmas Carol. Or at least two dozen musicals, if not more.

    It’s not just London. Reverberation is at the Bristol Old Vic and The Little Mermaid is coming. Leeds has & Juliet. Manchester has Wicked and Tina. And often it’s much better value here in the UK than on Broadway or anywhere else in the world.

    The same is true of our phenomenal museums and galleries. Only in the UK can you see a collection that includes works by Titian, Raphael, Monet, Van Gogh and Goya entirely for free. Or see the greatest collection of major ancient Roman, Assyrian and Egyptian artefacts entirely for free at the British Museum.

    And then there’s the stately homes. Blenheim, Chatsworth, Petworth, Burleigh. And the castles, varying from Alnwick to Caerphilly, the one dripping in antiquities, the other shrouded in mist. We have more stately homes per square mile than any other country in the world.

    Which is to say nothing of the Lake District, the Cairngorms or the Jurassic Coastline.

    And let’s talk about food. Some of the world’s greatest chefs are British. British wines are winning prizes. But all too often we are a bit hesitant about our culinary offer.

    But answer me this. What other country in the world has the variety of puddings that we do? Sticky toffee pudding, Eton mess, treacle tart, Sussex pond pudding, Eve’s pudding, rhubarb crumble, Queen of puddings, summer pudding, Bakewell tart, jam roly-poly and, of course, spotted dick. I mean, the USA hasn’t even discovered that apple pie is ten times better with the introduction of the humble blackberry.

    And I would gently suggest that British cheeses beat every other country in the world including the French.

    The truth is that when it comes to tourism, we’ve got it all – and we’ve got it now.

    So my ambition is to get far more people to visit us and to spend more when they’re here.

    We can only do that if we enable or encourage visitors beyond London and the South East.

    We all know that London is great – one of the best cities in the world. If not the greatest city, as recently voted for the tenth year in a row.

    But too many visitors only go to London – in fact when asked by VisitBritain, 57% of visitors could not imagine what there was in the UK outside of London. Some might make it to Oxford or Bath, maybe Edinburgh.

    I want Manchester to rival LA. Both cities have incredible sports, media and creative sectors, and although the weather might be slightly more temperate in Los Angeles, Manchester definitely saw the best of David Beckham.

    I want Newcastle to be a place where you can see world-class art, dine in a top restaurant, and explore the beautiful surrounding countryside of Northumberland.

    We need to complement London and Edinburgh with stronger regional destinations – where people visit in their own right and stay and spend money because they know about the full range of attractions at those destinations. Yes, the heritage, but also the arts, the music, the pubs and the restaurants.

    I made this point in a debate last week but I will say it again: Framlingham Castle is now more famous for being the ‘Castle on the Hill’ in the Ed Sheeran song than it is for being the place that Queen Mary discovered she was about to be queen. I would argue less aspic, more spice.

    The Local Visitor Economy Partnerships have been doing some great work and I’d like to roll them out further. We can build on the Destination Development Pilots too.

    But we also need to make sure local people feel the benefits of tourism too, which is why we will be implementing a registration scheme for short-term lets as soon as possible, so that at least we know what is out there, and on how we could use data from the scheme to best effect to try to get the benefits of tourism without the downsides.

    We also need to up our skills and career structure in tourism and hospitality. We need to become a nation that really values its hospitality industry, that respects those who work in it and who boast of it around the world.

    Because for far too long we have thought of a job serving in a bar or restaurant or working in a hotel as a bit of a dead end – the kind of job you do when you’re just filling in.

    Other countries see this completely differently. They see a career in hospitality as fulfilling and immensely respectable. They have colleges, academies and universities that are devoted to the industry. They aspire to be the best in the world. That’s what I want us to do.

    That requires a mindset change. We have to enable the industry to work with the government to develop more career pathways. I want tourism to be more prominent in the Industrial Strategy that we are developing.

    We also have to reform the apprenticeship levy so that it works for small businesses and the creative industries in general. We are determined to do that.

    I want to work with the new organisation Skills England to address skills and vacancy challenges and change perceptions of tourism careers.

    I want us to showcase opportunities for young people, part-time workers, and those who are economically inactive.

    For example, you might remember the story of Maryna, a single mother who fled the war in Ukraine and found a job working in an Ibis hotel in Edinburgh, all because of an industry training programme.

    Or another example is an excellent project that DWP are doing in Plymouth, working with the Local Visitor Economy Partnership to match the economically inactive with the tourism sector, with excellent results for both sides.

    I am proud of these successes in the sector but completely acknowledge more work needs to be done to make tourism a respected, lifelong career.

    As I said earlier, lots of Britons go abroad for their holiday. It’s great that people are able to immerse themselves in the culture and heritage of other countries, but not only that, the outbound sector is worth a lot to our economy here in the UK.

    According to ABTA, the outbound industry has a direct contribution of £15.9 billion to the UK economy annually, and outbound tourism directly sustains 221,000 jobs in the UK.

    My predecessors perhaps often overlooked outbound tourism, and the end-to-end experience for travellers has suffered a bit in recent years.

    Brexit has meant longer waiting times for UK nationals at passport queues. There are some further challenges on the horizon with the rollout of the EU’s Entry-Exit system, their new electronic travel authorisation system ETIAS, and the ongoing problems we have in accessing eGates in overseas airports.

    I want to do something about that, as well as recognising the considerable footprint UK nationals leave on certain destinations. I want to work hand in glove with my European counterparts to make things work more smoothly, and to support them in managing the number of tourists they get.

    It is early days in the new government, but I am particularly happy that we have secured a permanent business rates relief at 40% for many businesses in the tourism sector.

    We are also working at pace on introducing a registration scheme for short-term lets, crucial for high-quality stays across the country but also to flexibly meet increased demand for accommodation during events like the Commonwealth Games.

    We will continue to support business events, a crucial part of the sector – less seasonal than leisure travellers and more dispersed outside London and the South East. That too contributed £33.6 billion in 2023 to the UK economy, with visitors spending more than double per night compared to leisure tourists.

    And the North East Destination Development Partnership aims to double the regional visitor economy through regenerative tourism. I want to see this replicated across the whole of the UK.

    The government cannot do this alone. We need collaboration to make this vision happen, hence the new Visitor Economy Advisory Council we are setting up.

    Today I am delighted to announce the launch of that new Visitor Economy Advisory Council, co-designing and delivering a growth strategy.

    I want the new council to have an inclusive membership to represent the whole visitor economy and visitor journey while also keeping it outcomes-focused. I’m less interested in endless meetings and more interested in immediate results.

    As part of the Visitor Economy Advisorry Council I want there to be a series of working groups with clear deliverables, and annual collective planning to keep us accountable and to respond to the evolving needs of the sector.

    This is a shared journey, and we can only achieve success by working together. I want to encourage collaboration across the sector to achieve our ambitious goals.

    I want to focus on continued partnership and support in the journey ahead. Thank you for your commitment to this industry, and thank you for being here today.

    I know these have been tough years over the last few years, and we want to make sure economic growth comes to this industry.

    And finally, I want to express my gratitude to all of you for your dedication. I am brimming with optimism for the future of the UK’s visitor economy and the positive changes on the horizon. Thank you.