Author: admin

  • CONSTITUENCY ARCHIVE : Rothwell Constituency

    Part of the constituency archive.


    ROTHWELL

    14 Dec 1918 – William Lunn (1 Nov 1872 – 17 May 1942) aged 69

    7 Aug 1942 – Thomas Judson Brooks (7 Jul 1880 – 15 Feb 1958) aged 77

    CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1950

  • CONSTITUENCY ARCHIVE : Rotherhithe Constituency

    Part of the constituency archive.


    ROTHERHITHE

    26 Nov 1885 – Charles Edward Hamilton,later [1892] 1st baronet (28 May 1845 – 15 Nov 1928) aged 83

    Jul 1892 – John Cumming MacDona (1836 – 4 May 1907) aged 70

    17 Jan 1906 – Hubert William Culling Carr-Gomm (20 Jan 1877 – 21 Jan 1939) aged 62

    14 Dec 1918 – John Rolleston Lort-Williams [kt 1936] (14 Sep 1881 – 9 Jun 1966) aged 84

    6 Dec 1923 – Benjamin Smith [kt 1945] (29 Jan 1878 – 5 May 1964) aged 86

    27 Oct 1931 – Norah Cecil Runge (1884 – 6 Jun 1978) aged 93

    14 Nov 1935 – Benjamin Smith [kt 1945] (29 Jan 1878 – 5 May 1964) aged 86

    19 Nov 1946 – Robert Joseph Mellish,later [1985] Baron Mellish [L] (3 Mar 1913 – 9 May 1998) aged 85

    CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1950

  • CONSTITUENCY ARCHIVE : Roscommon South Constituency

    Part of the constituency archive.


    ROSCOMMON SOUTH

    5 Dec 1885 – Andrew Commins (1832 – 7 Jan 1916) aged 83

    Jul 1892 – Luke Patrick Hayden (1850 – 23 Jun 1897) aged 46

    15 Jul 1897 – John Patrick Hayden (25 Apr 1863 – 3 Jul 1954) aged 91

    14 Dec 1918 – Henry James [Harry] Boland (27 Apr 1887 – 1 Aug 1922) aged 35

    CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1922

  • CONSTITUENCY ARCHIVE : Jarrow Constituency

    Part of the constituency archive.


    JARROW

    28 Nov 1885 – Charles Mark Palmer,later [1886] 1st baronet (3 Nov 1822 – 3 Jun 1907) aged 84

    3 Jul 1907 – Peter Francis Curran (28 Mar 1860 – 14 Feb 1910) aged 49

    28 Jan 1910 – Godfrey Mark Palmer (4 Aug 1878 – 12 Jun 1933) aged 54

    15 Nov 1922 – Robert John Wilson (14 Jul 1865 – 5 Nov 1946) aged 81

    27 Oct 1931 – William George Pearson (1882 – 4 Oct 1963) aged 81

    14 Nov 1935 – Ellen Cecily Wilkinson (8 Oct 1891 – 6 Feb 1947) aged 55

    7 May 1947 – Ernest Fernyhough (24 Dec 1908 – 16 Aug 1993) aged 84

    3 May 1979 – Donald Dixon,later [1997] Baron Dixon [L] (6 Mar 1929 – 19 Feb 2017) aged 87

    1 May 1997 – Stephen Hepburn (6 Dec 1959 – )

    12 Dec 2019 – Kate Osborne (18 Jun 1966 – )

  • CONSTITUENCY ARCHIVE : Cardiff South Constituency

    Part of the constituency archive.


    CARDIFF SOUTH

    14 Dec 1918 – James Herbert Cory,later [1919] 1st baronet (7 Feb 1857 – 7 Feb 1933) aged 76

    6 Dec 1923 – Arthur Henderson,later [1966] Baron Rowley [L] (27 Aug 1893 – 28 Aug 1968) aged 75

    29 Oct 1924 – Henry Arthur Evans [kt 1944] (24 Sep 1898 – 25 Sep 1958) aged 60

    30 May 1929 – Arthur Henderson,later [1966] Baron Rowley [L] (27 Aug 1893 – 28 Aug 1968) aged 75

    27 Oct 1931 – Henry Arthur Evans [kt 1944] (24 Sep 1898 – 25 Sep 1958) aged 60

    26 Jul 1945 – Leonard James Callaghan,later [1987] Baron Callaghan of Cardiff [L] (27 Mar 1912 – 26 Mar 2005) aged 92

    CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1950

  • Tulip Siddiq – 2021 Comments on Sutton Trust Research

    Tulip Siddiq – 2021 Comments on Sutton Trust Research

    The comments made by Tulip Siddiq, the Shadow Minister for Children and Early Years, on 19 August 2021.

    The Conservatives are holding children back, with policies that are widening the gap in learning between three and four year olds from the richest and poorest families.

    Access to early years education can determine a child’s life chances, yet the Government is locking the poorest children out of the system. Thousands of nurseries and childminders have closed under a decade of Conservative government.

    Labour’s Children’s Recovery Plan would help close this gap in learning by giving every child new opportunities to learn, play and develop with extra investment in early education. It’s time the Conservatives match this ambition for every child’s future.

  • David Lammy – 2021 Comments on 32% Fall in Prosecutions

    David Lammy – 2021 Comments on 32% Fall in Prosecutions

    The comments made by David Lammy, the Shadow Justice Secretary, on 19 August 2021.

    These figures once again show a government failing victims of crime.

    Victims of rape, domestic abuse and serious crime are being left to wait years for justice due to a decade of court closures and an ineffective response to the pandemic.

    Time and time again Labour called for the Government to implement measures which would allow our courts to continue to function. They failed to act and it’s victims who are suffering.

  • Yvette Cooper – 2021 Speech on Afghanistan

    Yvette Cooper – 2021 Speech on Afghanistan

    The speech made by Yvette Cooper, the Labour MP for Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford, in the House of Commons on 18 August 2021.

    We have heard many sobering words in this debate already. I pay particular tribute to the words from our colleagues who have themselves served in Afghanistan, to all their colleagues over many years and to all those in our armed forces, particularly those who have lost their lives, including two brave soldiers from Castleford, Rifleman James Backhouse and Bombardier Craig Hopson. I also pay tribute to those who have worked in our aid agencies and for partner organisations to support development and education projects and to try to rebuild a future for Afghanistan, and to all those who have rightly worked so hard and made it possible for families to live in some semblance of security and for girls—children—to be able to go to school for many years.

    That is what makes it so disturbing, shameful and distressing to watch the events in Afghanistan right now: people who worked with us and helped us now hiding, their lives at risk; women and girls forced to hide in their homes simply because they are women and girls; hard-line extremists and terrorists back in charge, creating a security risk across the globe; and no evident strategy from the US, the UK and our allies, but what instead looks like just a chaotic retreat. We have a responsibility to respond, so I want to focus particularly on some of the practical things that should and can be done now to address the humanitarian crisis that we face.

    First, I turn to those who have put their lives at risk by working with us. I welcome the Afghan relocation and assistance policy, but it is too narrow. It refers to directly employed staff. For the last 20 years, much of the work of the UK Government, including aid work and nation rebuilding work, has been through contracts with UK agencies and organisations. The Taliban do not recognise the complexities of a contracting-out process, so many of those lives are also at risk.

    Some organisations have been in touch with their staff and former employees. One has told me that a woman who worked on the UK aid programme for three years and is now in hiding in Kabul has said this weekend:

    “only 3 weeks ago one of my neighbours told me that when they come he would tell them who I am and who my family is. A couple of days ago, a strange man told me in the streets, ‘I know where you work and who you are.’

    I fear seeing my kids tortured in front of my eyes or having my skin peeled off while I am alive. We remain locked inside, fearful of even looking out of the window—every time the door knocks fear goes through my whole body and I fear they are coming for me.”

    Another, who provided secure accommodation for UK embassy staff and British aid workers, has said:

    “Taliban fighters arrived at my father’s home this week asking for me by name. I just left my home city three days before and my father told the Taliban I had gone abroad for medical treatment. The fighters still forced their way into the house and searched every room.”

    We have obligations to these people.

    Emma Hardy

    I am sure that my right hon. Friend, along with many other Members across the House, have been contacted by people desperately worried about loved ones in Afghanistan. One of my constituents has contacted me, saying that his pregnant wife is in Afghanistan now. The Taliban have taken out the communication signals, so he is unable to contact her. He did not put in an application for her to come to this country because of the English language requirement on the application form. Surely now is the time to relax that rule temporarily to allow these people to come to our country.

    Yvette Cooper

    My hon. Friend makes a powerful point. This is the kind of flexibility that the UK Government could adopt right now. We need such measures for those who have families at risk, but we also need urgently to review and broaden the scope of the relocation scheme. The Home Secretary said in interviews this morning that those who have worked for NGOs that delivered UK aid programmes would also be included. I say to the Foreign Secretary that that is not happening on the ground right now; it is not reflected in the guidance that the Government are operating at the moment or in the application process, and people are being turned down as we speak. People have been turned down this weekend, even though they are at risk and have worked on UK-funded programmes. I urge the Government urgently to look at the relocation scheme. People cannot wait for the resettlement scheme to be in place.

    Let me say something about that too. I welcome the Government’s commitment to a resettlement scheme. The Prime Minister confirmed to me earlier that the pledge to help 5,000 people this year is in addition to the commitment made in 2019 to resettle 5,000 people a year from across the world, not instead of it. That existing resettlement scheme is not fully reinstated after covid and it urgently needs to be, but the fact that that infrastructure, those systems and that funding is in place should make it possible for us very urgently to put in place an Afghan relocation scheme, and to accelerate and be more ambitious than the announcement that the Home Secretary made this morning. Again, I urge the Government to work urgently with the agencies on the ground, which can identify straightaway the people who are at most at risk, and to recognise the position of those who are currently here, whose applications for asylum may have been turned down before circumstances escalated. Please can those cases be urgently reviewed rather than refused on out-of-date grounds? Finally, I urge the Government to do more to support refugees in the region, because we know more people will flee.

    We have a responsibility not to turn our backs. The situation may be bleak and the circumstances difficult, but we have a duty not to disengage.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2021 Speech on Afghanistan

    Dan Jarvis – 2021 Speech on Afghanistan

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Labour MP for Barnsley Central, in the House of Commons on 18 August 2021.

    It is a great pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Plymouth, Moor View (Johnny Mercer), as it is the right hon. Member for Bournemouth East (Mr Ellwood) and the hon. Member for Tonbridge and Malling (Tom Tugendhat). They all spoke with great eloquence.

    Like many hon. Members, I am wracked with a profound sadness at the catastrophe that has unfolded in Afghanistan. Above all, it is an unspeakable tragedy for the people of that country, who, after generations of conflict, now live under a terrible cloud of fear and repression. Who could fail to be moved by the agonising scenes from Kabul airport just this week? How desperate must someone have to be to want to cling on to the side of a moving aircraft? These past 20 years have been a struggle for peace. We tried to break the cycle of war, and to give hope to women and girls. We tried to give the Afghans a different life—one of hope and opportunity—but the catastrophic failure of international political leadership and the brutality of the Taliban have snatched all of that away from them. The new Administration in Kabul should know that they will be judged not by their words, but by their actions. The world is watching.

    I want to reflect on the service and sacrifice of our brave servicemen and women, who have showed outstanding professionalism and courage throughout. As the hon. Member for Plymouth, Moor View said just a moment ago, recent developments have hit them hard, and they are grappling with the question of whether all the effort and sacrifice was really worth it. They are again grieving for fallen comrades who did not come home. Whatever the outcome in Afghanistan, those men and women, and their families, should be proud of their service, and we must be proud of them.

    Many of us who served in Afghanistan have a deep bond of affection for the Afghan people, and I had the honour of serving alongside them in Helmand. We trained together, fought together and, in some cases, died together. They were our brothers in arms. I shudder to think where those men are now. Many will be dead, and I know others now consider themselves to be dead men walking. Where were we in their hour of need? We were nowhere. That is shameful, and it will have a very long-lasting impact on Britain’s reputation right around the world.

    Mr David Davis (Haltemprice and Howden) (Con)

    The hon. Gentleman—a fellow litigant—is absolutely right in his description of the Afghan armed forces. Will he add that many of them are more heroic and better soldiers than they are given credit for around the world?

    Dan Jarvis

    I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman, as always, and I completely agree with the point he made. It was particularly distasteful and dishonouring of President Biden to make reference to the lack of courage and commitment from those Afghan soldiers, who have served with such bravery and distinction.

    We have to be pragmatic, and at this difficult point we must think about what our next move will be. We should understand that the character of our country is defined, for better or for worse, by moments such as this. We should also understand that we face a moral and humanitarian crisis of enormous proportions, and the response from the international community and the British Government needs to meet the magnitude of the moment. We must step up the statecraft and engage with international allies and alliances, and with regional partners. Although it is a particularly bitter pill to have to swallow, we must engage diplomatically with the new regime in Kabul. It is in our cold-headed national interest to do so, because right now our armed forces are deployed on an operation to recover UK nationals and other entitled personnel. It is in their interests that we engage to try to ensure the safe passage of those who want to leave.

    We also know that many, many more will want to get out, and with our allies we need to work to establish safe routes to get them to safety. We must show compassion and genuine generosity to refugees, while accelerating and expanding the ARAP scheme to support those who supported us.

    We also need to defend the hard-won progress of the past 20 years or so—girls in school and women in Parliament and the judiciary. We must ensure that Afghanistan does not slide back to where it was pre-9/11. Then, when the dust settles, we need to look at what went wrong and learn the lessons of this failure: why, despite all the effort, could we not build an Afghan state free of corruption, with the legitimacy and competence to balance the competing forces in that country, and what does that now mean for our foreign and defence policy in this country?

    Regardless of all that, we must remain engaged; we must show leadership; we must use whatever influence we have to try to make things better. That is in our own national interest, it is in line with our values, and it is the right thing to do. We owe it to the people of Afghanistan and we owe it to ourselves.

  • Johnny Mercer – 2021 Speech on Afghanistan

    Johnny Mercer – 2021 Speech on Afghanistan

    The speech made by Johnny Mercer, the Conservative MP for Plymouth Moor View, in the House of Commons on 18 August 2021.

    I want to make three broad points about what has gone on over the past week. I want to talk about this place’s responsibility towards those who serve, and our Afghan friends and partners. I also want to speak, if I can, for veterans of the conflict to whom I have spoken over the past week.

    When it comes to responsibility, I urge Ministers to be very careful about talking exclusively about the Americans. We are very clear, and it is well understood, that the US is, or was, the framework nation in Afghanistan, but people who join the military from council estates in Plymouth, Newcastle, Stoke or Birmingham do not serve the American flag; they serve the British flag. They are proud to do so, and they do it at the behest of Ministers in this place. It dishonours their service simply to say, “The Americans have left—we are leaving.” We do not spend £40 billion a year on a tier 1 military for it to be unable to go out the door without the Americans, and the taxpayer does not expect that. I urge Ministers to take responsibility for the decisions that they make, particularly when talking with the families.

    I wish to talk about our Afghan friends and partners. I am pleased with the announcement today on refugees; it is a good start. People can talk numbers; they can say that they want more or that they want fewer, but the reality is—this is basic maths—that we will not get out of Afghanistan all those whom we promised to get out. We can say that we want more, or that we want fewer, but that is the reality. The truth is as well that we have to be honest in this place. For many, many years, people have campaigned against this relocation scheme and the previous intimidation scheme and said that it was not good enough. Decisions made by Ministers in this House have made this situation harder, so, although I welcome this change today and our onward progression, let us not kid ourselves about what has happened in the past and let us treat with a little more respect those who, with no self-interest, campaign for these people.

    Finally, I want to speak to veterans and for veterans. Over the past few days, it has become clear to me that we are dealing with new feelings—Help for Heroes put out something on this yesterday. We are not trained to lose and we are not trained to deal with the way that Ministers are choosing to be defeated by the Taliban. Was it all for nothing? Of course, it was not for nothing, and we must get away from that narrative. Whether we like this or not it is a fact that, for a period of time, Afghans—the average age in Afghanistan is 18 years old—will have experienced the freedom and privileges that we enjoy here, and no one will ever take that away from them, which is incredibly important. What are we here to do if it is not to be good, honourable people, to fight for the oppressed, to keep our families safe and to live to a higher calling? Our veterans did this over many years in some of the hardest conditions and against as dark an enemy as this nation has ever faced. We often look to our forefathers for inspiration. They emulated them. They did them proud, not in scale but in the same amphitheatre, They can be forever proud of what they did when the nation called. I say to them, “You played your role, but you cannot control what is happening now—remember that. What folk like me saw you do—the courage, the sacrifice and the humanity—will never die and it has defined us as human beings. You did that and nobody will ever take that away. I will never forget you. Every day the sun comes up, I will make sure that this place and this country do not forget you and your sacrifice on the altar of this nation’s continuing freedom.”

    The Government must now step up and support this group of bereaved families and veterans. We will see a bow wave of mental health challenges. We are not trained to cope with the feelings that we have now. I have done everything that I possibly could to support all the brilliant staff at the Ministry of Defence, the Office for Veterans’ Affairs, and the NHS, which works tirelessly supporting veterans up and down this country, but I must say to the House with a heavy heart that the Prime Minister has consistently failed to honour what he said that he would do when he was trying to become Prime Minister. He must not wriggle out of his commitments on this issue. He knows that the Office for Veterans’ Affairs is nothing like it was designed to be: the paltry £5 million funding was slashed after less than a year, there was a lack of staff, and there was not even an office from which to work. Even today, the brilliant staff at the Office for Veterans’ Affairs simply cannot cope with the scale of the demand. While his predecessors may get away with a certain degree of ignorance in this space, I am afraid that the Prime Minister has no excuse on this issue; it is a political choice. The ambivalence needs to end, and he needs to step up and listen to the charities and to the veterans, not to those whom he chooses to employ around him who do not believe veterans’ issues are worth the political capital required. The nation cares, and we will make this Government care. The scale of the challenge of dealing with this Afghan generation is only just beginning. I pay tribute to everybody who has spoken up in this debate, but particularly to those who do not have a vested interest in Afghanistan and can see the inherent injustice of what is happening now. Thank you, Mr Speaker, for recalling the House today.