Author: admin

  • PRESS RELEASE : Putin is losing on the battlefield – UK statement to the OSCE [October 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Putin is losing on the battlefield – UK statement to the OSCE [October 2022]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 12 October 2022.

    Ian Stubbs (UK delegation to the OSCE) stresses that, when Putin is losing on the battlefield, he takes the war to the Ukrainian people instead.

    Thank you Mr Chair.

    On 8 October, an explosion damaged the Kerch Strait Bridge. A crucial logistics route for Russia’s militarisation of illegally annexed Crimea, the bridge also plays a key role in moving heavy military vehicles & equipment as well as fuels, oils and lubricants to the southern front of Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. Accordingly, substantial damage to this bridge will almost certainly have a significant impact on Russia’s already strained ability to sustain its forces under pressure in southern Ukraine.

    In an address to his Security Council on 10 October, President Putin stated that the intense barrage of missile attacks he had unleashed across Ukraine was in retaliation for the attack on the Kerch Strait Bridge. He also threatened a harsh response to any further attacks on Russian territory.

    Mr Chair, I would like to be very clear on two points:

    Opened in 2018 by Putin himself, the construction of the Kerch Strait Bridge was a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is a bridge built by Russia on Ukraine’s territory.

    Putin’s attempt to portray Monday’s barrage of missile strikes as a show of strength in retaliation of the Kerch Bridge incident fools no one. When Putin is losing on the battlefield, he takes the war to the Ukrainian people instead.

    Mr Chair, the appalling wave of missiles strikes which took place on 10 October targeted civilian national infrastructure across Ukraine. It appears to have been the most extensive day of long-range strikes since the first days of Russia’s illegal invasion and the first time since June 2022 that the centre of Kyiv was targeted. Strikes on residential buildings, playgrounds, a pedestrian bridge and the National Philharmonic; as well as multiple power black outs and disruption to water supplies and communications remind us that once again Ukraine’s civilians are paying the terrible price for Russia’s barbaric actions.

    President Putin claimed that the strikes were carried out with precision long-range ground, naval and air launched weapons. Such weapons in Russia’s arsenal include Iskander, Kalibr, and the Kh-101, all of which claim accuracies of under 50m and some as low as 2m. So, there are only a few possibilities as to why so much civilian infrastructure was struck, either: Russia severely overestimates its precision strike capability; Russian military planners were grossly incompetent in their targeting; or the Russian military deliberately conducted premeditated attacks targeting residential buildings, cultural sites and areas where children may have been present.

    Russia took these actions in full knowledge of what would ensue: destruction, injuries and death. Such attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure are not only abhorrent; they are war crimes and a blatant violation of international law.

    Mr Chair, we and others have repeatedly called on Belarus to stop supporting Russian aggression, including allowing Russia to use Belarusian airspace to launch stand-off airstrikes and Iranian UAVs against Ukraine. Lukashenko’s announcement on Monday that a regional military group will deploy to Belarus’ borders in response to a contrived threat does nothing but further stoke instability in the region. Since 24 February, it has been overwhelmingly clear to the world from which side of the Belarusian/Ukrainian border the threat is emanating and it is not Ukraine.

    Mr Chair, the announced deployment of Russian and Belarusian forces into a joint military task force is yet another manufactured distraction from Putin’s faltering invasion: more defeats in the east; more defeats in the south; more Generals sacked; more demoralised troops; more discontent amongst the Russian population; and more critique from Russia’s elites.

    The miscalculations continue to mount. Putin and the Russian military leadership have consistently underestimated the will, determination and courage of the Ukrainian military and civilians to defend their homeland from a brutal and barbaric invader. They continue to fail to understand that every horrendous attack strengthens the Ukrainian resolve and that of its friends, like the UK, who remain steadfast in our support – for however long it takes – to ensure that the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the independence of Ukraine is fully restored.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Appointment of Suffragan Bishop of Beverley [12 October 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Appointment of Suffragan Bishop of Beverley [12 October 2022]

    The press release issued by Downing Street on 12 October 2022.

    Her Late Majesty The Queen approved the nomination of The Reverend Canon Stephen Race, Incumbent of the Benefice of Central Barnsley and Area Dean of Barnsley, in the Diocese of Leeds, to the Suffragan See of Beverley, in the Diocese of York, in succession to The Right Reverend Glyn Webster following his retirement.

    Background

    Stephen was educated at St Hild and St Bede College, Durham. He trained for ministry at St Stephen’s House, Oxford, and was ordained Priest in 2003.

    Stephen served his title at St Mary’s Wigton, in the Diocese of Carlisle, and in 2005 he was appointed Vicar of St John the Baptist, Dodworth, in the Diocese of Wakefield. He was additionally appointed Diocesan Director of Ordinands (DDO) in 2008 for the Diocese of Wakefield (and subsequently the Diocese of Leeds), having served as Assistant DDO from 2005.

    Stephen was appointed Priest-in-Charge of St Mary’s Barnsley in 2014, and additionally Priest-in-Charge of St Edward the Confessor Barnsley and St Thomas Gawber in 2017. Following this, he was licensed as Priest in Charge of St George’s Barnsley in 2018 and with the pastoral reorganisations completed, he was licensed as Incumbent of the Benefice of Central Barnsley in 2019. Stephen has served as Area Dean of Barnsley since 2009 and has been an Honorary Canon of Wakefield Cathedral since 2011.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Air and water quality advice now available to all farmers in England [October 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Air and water quality advice now available to all farmers in England [October 2022]

    The press release issued by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 12 October 2022.

    Farmers across England are now able to benefit from the advice of Catchment Sensitive Farming (CSF) advisers following the expansion of the programme.

    Local Catchment Sensitive Farming advisers provide confidential on-farm support and advice across the farming community to encourage uptake of new and existing agricultural schemes and help farmers comply with regulation to deliver environmental gains.

    Since 2006, 24,000 farms have benefited from CSF advice, helping farmers take more than 80,000 positive actions to reduce pollution. Reductions in agricultural pollutants include nitrogen levels, which are down 4%, phosphorus levels, which have decreased by 8%, and a 12% reduction in sediment.

    Jen Almond, Director of National Operations at Natural England, said:

    We are rolling out Catchment Sensitive Farming advice to all farmers in England to help them produce food in a way that protects our water, air and soil whilst minimising losses and maximising efficiencies.

    Our advisers provide valuable advice on agricultural transition schemes and grants, natural flood management, and how sustainable farming practices can deliver the greatest environmental gains across the whole country.

    CSF is led by Natural England, in partnership with Defra and the Environment Agency. Advisers offer a range of support including signposting to relevant sources of advice, offering one-to-one tailored advice, including a visit from an agricultural specialist, or running group training and on-farm events.

    Advice on rainwater harvesting is just one of the ways CSF advisers are supporting farmers. They can provide information on the grants available, potential cost savings and benefits to crop yields.

    A survey of farmers who had contact with a CSF adviser early this year found that 83% of farmers who had contact with their CSF Adviser agreed they were a person whose advice they could trust.

    CSF also works in partnership with a range of organisations including water companies, local authorities, trade bodies and environmental organisations. Their work has included part-funding advisers and tools to reach more farmers, enabling them to increase the resilience of their farm businesses whilst achieving the greatest environmental gains.

  • PRESS RELEASE : New National Science and Technology Council established [October 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : New National Science and Technology Council established [October 2022]

    The press release issued by the Cabinet Office on 12 October 2022.

    A new National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) has been established with responsibility for driving an ambitious UK science and technology strategy.

    The NSTC will double down its efforts to create a UK science and technology system that will be a sustained engine for future economic growth, prosperity and security.

    The NSTC will be chaired by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster as deputy chair. It will deliver a plan to harness science and technology to support economic growth and the UK’s position on the geopolitical stage, sending a clear signal to the sector about the government’s priorities in this area.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Bank of England widens gilt purchase operations to include index-linked gilts [October 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Bank of England widens gilt purchase operations to include index-linked gilts [October 2022]

    The press release issued by the Bank of England on 11 October 2022.

    The Bank continues to monitor developments in financial markets very closely in light of the significant asset repricing of recent weeks. It has also been working with the UK authorities to address risks to the resilience of Liability Driven Investment (LDI) funds arising from volatility in the long-dated government bond (gilt) market.

    On 28 September, the Bank announced that, in line with its financial stability objective, it would make temporary and targeted purchases of gilts to help restore market functioning and reduce any risks from contagion to credit conditions for UK households and businesses.

    As previously announced, the Bank plans to end these operations and cease all gilt purchases on Friday 14 October.

    On 10 October, the Bank announced additional measures to support market functioning and an orderly end to its gilt purchase scheme. These included the launch of a Temporary Expanded Collateral Repo Facility (TECRF) through which banks would be able to help to ease liquidity pressures facing their client LDI funds through liquidity insurance operations, and the expansion of the scale of its remaining gilt purchase auctions.

    The purpose of these operations is to enable LDI funds to address risks to their resilience from volatility in the long-dated gilt market. LDI funds have made substantial progress in doing so over the past week. However, the beginning of this week has seen a further significant repricing of UK government debt, particularly index-linked gilts. Dysfunction in this market, and the prospect of self-reinforcing ‘fire sale’ dynamics pose a material risk to UK financial stability.

    Therefore the Bank is announcing today that it will widen the scope of its daily gilt purchase operations also to include purchases of index-linked gilts. This enhancement to our operations will be in effect from 11 October 2022 until 14 October 2022 alongside the Bank’s existing daily conventional gilt purchase auctions.

    These additional operations will act as a further backstop to restore orderly market conditions by temporarily absorbing selling of index-linked gilts in excess of market intermediation capacity. As with the conventional gilt purchase operations, these additional index-linked gilt purchases will be time-limited and fully indemnified by HM Treasury. The Bank has also consulted with the Debt Management Office.

    As announced on 10 October, the Bank stands ready to purchase up to £10bn of gilts each day, of which up to £5bn will be allocated to long-dated conventional gilts and up to £5bn to index-linked gilts. The pricing of this additional operation will reflect its nature as a backstop and that this is not a monetary policy instrument. The total size of these auctions will be kept under review. All purchases will be unwound in a smooth and orderly fashion once risks to market functioning are judged to have subsided.

    The Bank will temporarily pause its CBPS sales operations this week. Confirmation of these restarting will be included as part of the Bank’s regular operational announcements.

    The Bank will publish a Market Notice confirming operational details of the Bank’s index-linked gilt purchases.

  • Advertising Standards Authority – 2022 Ruling on Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

    Advertising Standards Authority – 2022 Ruling on Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

    The ruling issued by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) on 12 October 2022.

    Ad description

    Seven newspaper advertorials for the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities:

    a. The first newspaper advertorial, seen on 13 March 2022, featured on the Grimsby Telegraph website, www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk, and had the headline “Levelling Up! What is it and what does it mean for Grimsby?”. Underneath that, text stated, “By Millie Reeves Commercial Writer”. On the far right-hand side, a grey box with the word “ADVERTORIAL” was featured. Directly underneath that, “MOST READ” was stated and a number of links to other Grimsby Telegraph articles were included below that text.

    At the bottom of the article, an infographic was featured which included the HM Government logo.

    b. The second newspaper advertorial, seen 13 March 2022, featured on the Derby Telegraph website, www.derbytelegraph.co.uk, and had the headline “Levelling Up! What is it and what does it mean for Derby?”. The ad had the same layout as ad (a).

    c. The third newspaper advertorial, seen 13 March 2022, featured on the Birmingham Mail website, www.birminghammail.co.uk, and had the headline “Levelling Up! What is it and what does it mean for the West Midlands?”. The ad had the same layout as ad (a).

    d. The fourth newspaper advertorial, seen 13 March 2022, featured on the CornwallLive website, www.cornwalllive.com, and had the headline “Levelling Up! What is it and what does it mean for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly?”. The ad had the same layout as ad (a).

    e. The fifth newspaper advertorial, seen 13 March 2022, featured on the Leicestershire Mercury website, www.leicestermercury.co.uk, and had the headline “Levelling Up! What is it and what does it mean for Loughborough?”. The ad had the same layout as ad (a).

    f. The sixth newspaper advertorial, seen 13 March 2022, featured on the Newcastle Chronicle website, www.chroniclelive.co.uk, and had the headline “Levelling Up! What is it and what does it mean for Newcastle?”. The ad had the same layout as ad (a).

    g. The seventh newspaper advertorial, seen 13 March 2022, featured on the Wales Online website, www.walesonline.co.uk, and had the headline “Levelling Up! What is it and what does it mean for Wales?”. The ad had the same layout as ad (a).

    Issue

    Lisa Nandy MP and Alex Norris MP challenged whether the ads were obviously identifiable as marketing communications.

    Response

    The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities said they believed the advertorial labelling was both visible and prominent. They explained that block capitals were used in the word “ADVERTORIAL” and that it was set within a frame.

    They clarified that the labelling was in Reach Plc’s house style and common practice across all of their titles. They said publishers were responsible for ensuring content was correctly labelled and followed guidelines. They explained that the labelling differed across both print and digital and they believed publishers were best placed to understand what resonated best with their readers. They also highlighted that many of the articles featured an infographic which included the Levelling Up and HM Government logo.

    Reach Plc said they considered all of the ads to be obviously identifiable as marketing communications for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. They explained that all of the ads were shown in the “Partner Stories” section of the website. The ads featured a grey box with the label “ADVERTORIAL” prominently placed on the top right-hand side. They emphasised that the label travelled down as the reader scrolled down the page. However, they later confirmed that this technical feature was not in place at the time of the campaign, and therefore, would not have been seen by readers of the ads.

    They re-iterated that all of the articles featured an infographic which included the HM Government logo, and that the final sentence stated, “To find out more about Levelling Up and how the plans will improve your area, as well as how you can get involved with decision making, please go to gov.uk/levellingup”. In addition, they said that the use of “Commercial Writer” in the by-line would make readers aware that the article was commercial content.

    Reach said that, to view the ads, the reader would have had to follow one of three journeys, namely: via a Facebook ad which they believed was labelled in accordance with Facebook guidelines; a labelled Google Display Network ad; or from the homepage on the website in which the image for the article was labelled “ADVERTORIAL” in the top left-hand corner, in font which they believed to be commensurate with font used on the rest of the homepage. They said that meant the advertorials were obviously identifiable as marketing communications.

    Assessment Upheld

    The CAP Code stated that marketing communications must be obviously identifiable as such. Any visual or contextual signposts need to be sufficiently prominent and clear prior to engagement with the content.

    The ASA understood that the ads would generally be accessed either via the homepage of the newspaper’s website or by readers who had interacted with a Facebook or Google ad, which included statements such as “What is Levelling Up? Find out where investments are being made in Derby and your local area”. Whilst those ads were labelled, we noted that the statements did not reference the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and it was not clear from the text that the subsequent article would also be an ad. We noted that on the homepage, the image for the ad was labelled “ADVERTORIAL” in the top-left corner. However, we considered that the font used for the label was small, particularly compared with other text used on the webpage, and as such it was not sufficiently clear that the linked article was an ad. Additionally, readers might arrive at the ad via another route. It was therefore necessary for the ads to be obviously identifiable as ads.

    We considered the desktop versions of the ads, which were labelled with the text “ADVERTORIAL” placed within a grey tile, which we understood was the standard desktop format for all of Reach’s publications. We noted that the advertorial label was placed to the far right-hand side of each website above links to other articles from the newspaper, with a line dividing that part of the page from the advertorial.

    Therefore, we considered, within the context of the full-page ads, that it was not clear that the heading related to the ads and that readers were likely to overlook this text. That was reinforced with the by-line that stated “By Millie Reeves Commercial Writer” which was placed directly underneath the headline. We also did not agree with Reach that the average reader would understand from the term “Commercial Writer” that the article was an ad. We considered readers would see this and understand that, in the absence of prominent ad labelling, the article was a piece of editorial content.

    Whilst we recognised that Reach said the advertorial label remained visible as readers scrolled down the webpage, we did not see evidence of that when we viewed the ads, and they later confirmed that this feature was not available at the time when the ads were live. Nevertheless, if the label did move as the user scrolled, its position would remain far-right aligned, which we considered meant that it would continue to be overlooked by readers.

    We acknowledged that the advertorials featured an infographic which included a HM Government logo. However, we considered that readers were likely to understand that the infographic itself was derived from a government source and used in the context of an editorial article, rather than draw the conclusion that its presence meant the article was an ad for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities.

    We therefore concluded that the ads were not obviously identifiable as marketing communications. The ads breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules and (Recognition of marketing communications).

    Action

    The ads must not appear again in their current form. We told the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and Reach Plc to ensure that all future marketing communications were prominently and clearly identifiable as such.

  • Terence Burns – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Baron Burns)

    Terence Burns – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Baron Burns)

    The speech made by Terence Burns, Baron Burns, in the House of Lords on 10 October 2022.

    My Lords, the financial statement has not gone down well. I will leave it to others to address many of the details of why it went wrong, and my noble friend Lord Macpherson has done that with great clarity. I will say a few words about some of the issues facing the new Government in designing the proposed medium-term fiscal plan.

    The first and most important task is to make sure that we get through the period of abnormally high energy prices without serious adverse consequences. I agree with others that the energy price cap scheme has substantial support. Capping prices has the advantage of containing some of the increase in RPI inflation we would have seen and it can be done quickly. It has an in-built mechanism to adjust the amount of subsidy to the future pattern of energy prices.

    Of course, the scheme is not without problems: it dampens the incentive for households to economise on their use of energy and it is not well targeted. But the reality is that it is difficult to target vulnerable households at short notice, as the tax and benefits system is based around individuals rather than households. However, because the scheme is poorly targeted, it could be expensive—indeed, very expensive. Along with others, I must say that I find it very difficult to understand why the Government have resisted a windfall profits tax. Energy companies are experiencing a windfall and we should try to recover some of that.

    At this difficult time, it is essential that fiscal policy supports the Bank of England in bringing down the rate of inflation. The Government have made it clear that they regard bringing down inflation as a job for the Bank of England. I share the view that the Bank of England is not without blame around some aspects of the present circumstances, and it has been slow to recognise the emerging inflationary pressures and to increase interest rates. But my worry is that its task of bringing down inflation will be made considerably more difficult if the Government’s fiscal policy is pulling in the opposite direction.

    The proposed tax reductions next April remain a high-risk strategy until we know the size of the bill for the energy price cap scheme, so it is vital that the Government’s forthcoming medium-term fiscal plan gives dual weight to the OBR’s report on public finances and the need to support monetary policy in the job of bringing down inflation. This lesson was learned the hard way in the 1970s and it was an important driver of the MTFS introduced by the Thatcher Government in 1980.

    I fully support the principle that supply-side measures play a critical role in any policy to improve growth rates, but in the circumstances I hope that they will be concentrated on those measures that do not make the task of dealing with inflation more difficult. In my view, the harm from unfunded tax cuts at this point is very likely to exceed any supply-side benefit. I do not know of any convincing argument that unfunded tax cuts ultimately pay for themselves, other than in very special circumstances of high marginal tax rates.

    In these circumstances, public expenditure cuts will be difficult to find. My noble friend Lord Macpherson talked about this, and I shared his experience for many years. They could also be potentially damaging if they target those who are suffering most from the rise in energy costs and inflation in general.

    This is not to question the longer-term ambition of simplifying the tax system. However, we should recognise that supply-side measures will take time; they require careful analysis and implementation. I witnessed many attempts to introduce supply-side measures. Many of them fell into considerable problems as they moved on because they were exploited by people for whom they were never intended.

    Growth has been affected in all advanced countries by the combination of the financial crisis of 2008, the pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, so this is a general problem and is not unique to the UK. Higher public indebtedness and higher tax ratios are largely a consequence of dealing with these adverse shocks. I am afraid that the consequences for growth will take some time to work through.

  • Christopher Fox – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Baron Fox)

    Christopher Fox – 2022 Speech on the Growth Plan (Baron Fox)

    The speech made by Christopher Fox, Baron Fox, in the House of Lords on 10 October 2022.

    My Lords, I too welcome the Minister to her new position.

    The current Prime Minister says that she is focusing on growth and, seemingly, she believes that almost the entire rest of the world are enemies of growth, yet her view on who the culprits are is not really supported by the track record of the government incumbents. For example, how does it help when we had a BEIS Secretary, now our Chancellor, turn his back on the industrial strategies that were effective growth partnerships with the Government? How does it help when the badly botched Brexit deal has created so much extra red tape that many businesses have stopped exporting altogether? How does it help when the Tories create duplicate regulations such as UK REACH, which has caused billions of pounds of extra costs for our chemicals industry? How does it help, when all sectors are facing chronic shortages of people and skills, to have a Home Secretary who is quoted as saying that there are too many immigrants in low-skilled jobs? She should have said that because training has been so badly neglected, there are too few British people in high-skilled jobs. High skills boost productivity.

    However, the most effective enemy of growth is instability. In just over three years, we have had three Conservative Prime Ministers. Each enters No. 10 decrying and overturning the efforts of her or his predecessor. It is very difficult for businesses to justify investing with these political shifting sands.

    Last month’s fiscal statement has created yet new levels of instability. To summarise the external view, I will quote the highly respected former US Secretary of the Treasury, Larry Summers:

    “The UK did not have room for a massive ineffectual fiscal expansion. The uncontained energy subsidies were themselves substantially problematic and did not leave room for large, permanent tax cuts. That called the credibility of the government into substantial question.”

    As we saw, once this credibility was called into question, all hell broke loose. Just one consequence of that is the cost of business financing, which has increased materially.

    These rising rates come against a backdrop of near-record levels of SME debt. The banking trade body, UK Finance, puts borrowing by small businesses at over £200 billion. About half of that debt is loaned on floating rates, which means that the cost of servicing is rising every day. With the number of company insolvencies in England and Wales already at a 13-year high, it bodes very badly.

    As the Budget debate unfolded and the debacle became clear, the Prime Minister sought to distance herself by focusing on the previously announced energy cost measures. As we heard from my noble friend Lord Newby, despite their flaws, this principle is broadly welcome—but remember that domestic energy costs remain at least twice those of last year. That is what we should be thinking about when we think about benefits.

    However, the business scheme has a major flaw to which I would like the Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, to respond to specifically at the end. Based on the terms of the scheme laid out by the Government, only businesses that signed a fixed agreement after 1 April 2022 and those on variable rates will benefit, so businesses with energy agreements signed before this date do not get a subsidy to their unit prices. I ask the Minister to write to me with the Treasury estimate of the number of UK companies missing out on the subsidy due to this cut-off and its estimated impact. I ask him to undertake at the Dispatch Box today that the Government will review this cut-off.

    In conclusion, when it comes to diagnosing the cause of our country’s problems, the Conservative Party needs to look in the mirror. The enemies of growth are politicians whose ideology drives out realism, Cabinet Ministers for whom blind faith eliminates proven expertise and a party for whom policy purity transcends common sense.

  • Matt Hancock – 2012 Speech to the Association of Colleges Annual Conference

    Matt Hancock – 2012 Speech to the Association of Colleges Annual Conference

    The speech made by Matt Hancock, the then Minister of Skills, in Birmingham on 20 November 2012.

    Two months ago, in this hall, the Prime Minister gave a speech about the need for Britain to compete in the global race.

    He talked about how every one needs to reach their personal best. And how we must not leave anyone behind. He reminded us that our young people must be equipped to compete. Not just with our European neighbours, but with ambitious, innovative, and determined countries all over the world.

    This is a very specific challenge for everyone in this room. And it is that challenge that I want to talk about today.

    Over these past months, I have been hugely impressed by the go-getting and dynamic leadership of the best FE and sixth- form Colleges. I know that you are among the most innovative and responsive of any delivery arm of Government. I know that in this room there is the capacity to do so much more.

    I have a very clear view about what my main role has to be as Minister of Skills. It is not to complain or be a constantly niggling critic. Instead, I want to be the unequivocal champion of Further Education.

    I’m quite unusual in politics.

    When my school didn’t offer the A levels I wanted, I went along to West Cheshire College instead. You were there for me when I needed you. So I will celebrate, eulogise, proclaim and publicise the triumphs in Colleges every day across our land, not just because it is my job to do so, but because I know the value of what you do from my own personal experience.

    But I wouldn’t be doing my job if I didn’t also tell it straight when I think things need to change.

    Now I don’t want any change for change’s sake. But I know you sense a deep unfairness. You feel it in your hearts. I feel it too. It’s a sense of injustice that you deserve a better press, deserve the same recognition as schools and universities.

    Well let me say this – I passionately believe that can happen.

    There is no reason set in stone why technical education should not be seen as on a par with or even more virtuous than university, like it is in Holland or Germany.

    But I also believe this: there is only one way to make that happen. The route to recognition is for every college to be as good as the most outstanding college is today. It will come only when teaching in FE is uniformly high quality. Only when every college is as enterprising as the Gazelle group. When every college reaches for the stars.

    Outstanding education is the route to outstanding acclaim. I want to see every college an outstanding college. I want to see all teaching as inspiring as the best. I will work with you, support you, stand up for you, and yes, challenge you in that goal. And together we can get there.

    For the public at large, the most trusted sign of excellence in education is a positive Ofsted report. School inspection has existed in England since the year Queen Victoria came to the throne. And I am at one with Sir Michael Wilshaw when he reminds us that “Satisfactory is not satisfactory as it’s not good”.

    Ofsted is challenging. I know that. It’s meant to be. But the response must surely be: to raise standards. To improve teaching. To perspire. To aspire. To inspire. And I am at your side.

    I have seen for myself what our best Colleges can achieve:

    • working with engineers in Sheffield to train world class nuclear technicians
    • developing inspiring Peter Jones Enterprise Academies
    • joining employers and universities to sponsor new innovative Studio Schools, UTCs, and Academies.

    I have seen for myself at the Skills Show here in Birmingham the amazing talent on display, honed and thriving through competition.

    When I see excellence I want to spread it. When I see innovation, I want to learn from it. When I see barriers to progress, I want to break them down.

    Over the past two years, under reforms pioneered by my brilliant predecessor, you have taken hold of the freedoms and flexibilities you now have. From next year, a reformed funding system will, I hope, have given you yet more flexibility in how to provide outstanding education.

    But we all know there is more to do. So I want to outline plans in four priority areas where i see the need for further reform.

    • apprenticeships
    • traineeships
    • qualifications
    • standards.

    Let me briefly take each in turn.

    Apprenticeships

    First, apprenticeships.

    Since 2010, over a million Apprenticeships have been started, half a million of them in the last year. And while this increase in quantity is very welcome, we must ensure they are higher quality, more rigorous, and focused on what employers need. I hope that employers come forward with innovative proposals for higher quality Apprenticeships in the second round of the Employer Ownership Pilot we launched yesterday. And Doug Richard will before Christmas say how we can go further, in a report I hope we can embrace.

    Traineeships

    Second, as we raise the standard of Apprenticeships, that will leave a gap. Around the country I have been impressed by the work of many Colleges to give young people the skills they need to get and hold down a job, with Work Pairings, and joint ventures with the Youth Contract and JobCentrePlus. But we must do more.

    So we will bring forward a new traineeship, combining a rigorous core of work preparation, work experience, Maths, and english, with a great deal of flexibility around everything else. I want this to support the best of what’s available, help raise the participation age, and give a clear sense of progression into an Apprenticeship.

    Alongside Traineeships, we must also improve the way our skills system and our benefits system interact. How can we justify a system in which we pay people, so long as they don’t train, rather than support people so long as they do? It’s bad for the economy, it’s unfair on young people, and it has got to stop.

    Qualifications

    Third, high quality education needs stretching and valuable qualifications.

    The QCF is here to stay as an organising framework post-19, but we must be more rigorous about what’s on it, and about what we in Government are prepared to spend scarce resources on. For vocational education to be valued and held in high esteem we must be uncompromising about the value added of vocational education.

    Today we are publishing a revised list of approved vocational qualifications for 14-16 year olds, covering courses taught from next September.

    We are also supporting the work of the Royal Academy of Engineers on new engineering qualifications that will both fit the new system and be stretching and rigorous. I’d like to see more august, employer-led bodies like the Royal Academy step up and design the qualifications employers need. And as you know, as well as reforming qualifications at 16, are we are working on plans for colleges directly recruiting pupils aged 14 and 15 to be directly funded.

    But whatever the age of the learner, I share with Alison Wolf the view that we must encourage the use of the most rigorous and valuable vocational qualifications. And I also share her view that far too little genuinely occupational education takes place among 16-18 year olds.

    We all know that the route for academic kids is straightforward. But those who choose not to take the academic route too often are encouraged into a general applied qualification, instead of properly considering the value of an Apprenticeship or a rigorous occupational qualification.

    So in the coming weeks we will publish a consultation on how to identify the highest value vocational qualifications for 16 to 18 year olds, just as we have done for 14-16 year olds.

    In it we will also consider what more we can do to encourage the take up of Apprenticeships and occupational – as opposed to general applied – qualifications. And of course we must consider what this means for adult qualifications too.

    For vocational qualifications to be seen to be stretching and strong, they must be stretching and strong, and that’s what I hope to achieve.

    Standards

    Finally, standards.

    I have already set out proposals for a guild, led by you, to build up inspirational teaching and a stronger sense of professionalism and pride.

    Today I am setting out plans for high quality colleges to achieve a Chartered Status for Colleges.

    And of course raising standards means tackling poor provision too. We need to be firmer in tackling educational and financial failure, and turning underperforming colleges around.

    And so students and employers alike can see performance for themselves, I can confirm that, from this year, we will introduce common standards and measures of performance between schools and colleges. Both will be expected to meet minimum standards.

    A levels and vocational qualifications are different, so they will be judged separately from each other. But each will be judged in the same way for all institutions. We said we’d introduce a level playing field, and we will.

    And there is one area where Britain should lead the world, but where sinfully we have allowed ourselves to fall behind. Here in these islands, we invented the English language that now dominates the globe. It is the global language: of trade, of culture, of diplomacy, and of the arts. And our history is littered with many of the advances in mathematics too.

    Yet too many of our young people cannot read or write, or add up properly. This is a scandal and it must change.

    We are reforming schools, and exams at 16, to make this happen. That great revolution will take a generation.

    But we don’t have a generation. And it often falls to you to pick up the pieces.

    So to show the value we attach to English and Maths, and to make sure you’ve got the resources to deliver, today I’m announcing we are doubling the amount we pay for adult English and Maths functional skills, and for English and Maths within an Apprenticeship. English and Maths are the foundation of learning and we must succeed.

    Conclusion

    These four priorities: traineeship, apprenticeships, standards, and qualification reform, they are all aimed four-square at raising the value, the esteem, and the regard of further education and skills.

    Recognising only the best vocational qualifications. Increasing support for English and Maths. Stronger Apprenticeships. And new traineeships to help young people into a job.

    I will do what it takes so every one can play their part.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, I am a young man, and honoured to be your Minister. And while this job is hard, it is hugely motivating too. For I am passionate about giving everyone in our country the best possible start. I am passionate about what you do for your students every single day.

    We have not been dealt an easy hand of plenty. And I can’t pretend the road ahead is not tough.

    But I know that the innovation, dedication, and inspiration in this room can get us to our goal. And along that road, I am at your side, every step of the way.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Creating a military ethos in academies and free schools [November 2012]

    PRESS RELEASE : Creating a military ethos in academies and free schools [November 2012]

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 15 November 2012.

    There are a variety of ways in which an academy or free school can promote a military ethos including:

    We are also looking for parties interested in opening a new school with a military ethos. For help and advice about completing a free school application visit the New Schools Network website.