Author: admin

  • Jim Shannon – 2022 Comments on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    Jim Shannon – 2022 Comments on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    The comments made by Jim Shannon, the DUP MP for Strangford, in the House of Commons on 15 December 2022.

    Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Eleanor Laing)

    And finally—as I have already said twice this morning—Jim Shannon.

    Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP)

    I do not mind being last in any debate; I am just very pleased to be given the opportunity to ask a question. The Minister, I think, has genuinely tried to answer the questions sensitively. With that in mind, will he outline the steps that are in place to offer support to any personnel under investigation, as similar proceedings that I and other Members in the Chamber are aware of in Northern Ireland have seen many innocent soldiers turning to addiction as a result of trauma and stress—I am aware of those cases personally. Will he confirm that innocent until proven guilty remains the standard for any investigation?

    Dr Murrison

    There are structures within the Army in particular to deal with the pastoral care of individuals who may be facing allegations. The Army operational legacy branch, for example, will be standing by to assist in this particular area. I reiterate the commitment that I gave earlier: anybody who is wrapped up in this business will be given everything that they need—legal and pastoral—to get them through this. We will stand by them. We owe them that, and I will make sure that that happens. I hope that that gives the hon. Gentleman the assurances that he needs.

  • Kevin Brennan – 2022 Comments on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    Kevin Brennan – 2022 Comments on Independent Inquiry into Afghanistan

    The comments made by Kevin Brennan, the Labour MP for Cardiff West, in the House of Commons on 15 December 2022.

    Kevin Brennan (Cardiff West) (Lab)

    Just over a century ago, my father’s house—my father was a child of about the same age as some of the children who were shot during some of the incidents under investigation—was raided by British auxiliaries in the west of Ireland in a quite violent incident. I shall never forget that my grandmother, relating that story to me as a child, was eternally grateful to the British Army officer who intervened and stopped violence being perpetrated. It has always struck me that culture and leadership within our armed forces is key to our standing and reputation in the world. Does the Minister agree that principal among the outcomes from this inquiry should be clear co-operation from the leadership of our armed forces in making sure that it gets to the truth?

    Dr Murrison

    The hon. Gentleman has hit the nail on the head. There is that commitment right at the very top of our armed forces that we should get this right and that we should learn any lessons that need to be learned. I can give him that commitment. I entirely understand the point that he has made and the experience that he relates.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Treasury Publishes Principles to Govern Scotland and Wales Public Spending Following Devolution [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Treasury Publishes Principles to Govern Scotland and Wales Public Spending Following Devolution [December 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 8 December 1997.

    The Treasury today published the principles which will govern changes to the Block budgets for the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales after devolution. The Government set out its position clearly in the White Papers and what is published today follows on from that.  Chief Secretary, Alistair Darling, said:

    “The paper published today follows the principles which the Government set out in the devolution White Papers.

    “The Government’s decision to publish these principles now shows our commitment to openness.  The Block arrangements and’ Barnett’ formula have operated for almost 20 years, but the principles underpinning them have never been spelt out in public before.

    “We are publishing these principles now to inform debate during the passage of the Scotland and Wales Bills.”


    PRINCIPLES TO GOVERN DETERMINATION OF THE BLOCK BUDGETS FOR THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT AND NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES

    1.  The Government set out its position on the Block and formula arrangements in its White Papers on Scottish and Welsh devolution published in July (Cm 3658 and Cm 3718 respectively).  The Scottish White Paper, Scotland’s Parliament, said:

    “In practice these arrangements, based on the Block and formula, have produced fair settlements for Scotland in annual public expenditure rounds and have allowed the Secretary of State for Scotland to determine his spending decisions in accordance with Scottish needs and priorities.  They have largely removed the need for annual negotiation between the Scottish Office and the Treasury.  The Government have therefore concluded that the financial framework for the Scottish Parliament should be based on these existing arrangements with, in future, the Scottish Parliament determining Scottish spending priorities.”

    The Wales White Paper, A Voice for Wales, said:

    “The Government proposes that the financial arrangements for the Assembly will largely replicate the existing system.

    Annual changes to the Welsh Block will be calculated by the population-based formula used at the moment.  These arrangements based on the Block and formula have worked in practice, producing fair settlements for Wales in annual public expenditure rounds.”

    2.  The Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales will therefore have block budgets, which they will be free to allocate in response to local priorities among the functions under their control and for which they will be accountable to local people.  This note outlines the principles set out in the White Papers and describes how they will govern changes made to these block budgets under devolution.

    Settling Scotland’s and Wales’ shares of UK public expenditure: the “Barnett” formula

    Existing position

    3.  All UK tax revenues are pooled.  Decisions about the allocation of UK public expenditure are made in the light of the Government’s judgement of relative priorities and relative needs.  Changes to the shares of public expenditure available to the Secretaries of State for Scotland and Wales are determined by a formula linked to changes in provision for equivalent spending programmes in England.

    4.  This formula, which has operated for almost 20 years, is known as the “Barnett” formula.  It provides that, in settling new plans for public expenditure, Scotland and Wales should receive a share of the planned cash changes in provision for equivalent public services in England which is proportionate to their population. In other words, Scotland’s and Wales’ shares of changes in relevant planned spending in England are the same proportions as their populations represent of England’s population.  The formula applies only to changes in spending plans, not to the underlying baselines which remain unaffected.  The formula also applies only to changes in the block budgets: expenditure on agriculture in Scotland and Wales, and expenditure on nationalised industries in Scotland, is outside the block budgets at present and is settled separately.

    After devolution

    5.  These arrangements will continue under devolution, with only minor adjustments.  Changes to the block budgets for which the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales will become responsible will continue to be determined by a formula linked to changes in provision for the equivalent spending programmes in England.  The formula will continue to be based on relative populations.  The spending for which the devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales will assume responsibility is set out in the annexes to this note.

    6.  The Government intends that these population shares will be re-calculated annually on the basis of the latest population estimates for England, Scotland and Wales published each year by the Office of National Statistics.  The population ratios will next be updated for the purpose of determining changes in the Scottish and Welsh block budgets for 1999-2000.

    7.  The Government intends that this population-based formula will apply to changes in almost all the expenditure under the control of the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales.  It will not apply to changes in agriculture programmes 100% funded by the EU.   The Government will also want to consider whether this approach or another formula is appropriate in relation to provision for Council Tax Benefit and Housing Benefit which will both come within the Scottish Block for the first time after devolution; Housing Benefit is already within the Welsh Block, but, as in Scotland, Council Tax Benefit will come within the Block for the first time.  Adjustments to the Scottish and Welsh block budgets not determined by the Barnett formula

    8.  There are a number of circumstances in which the block budgets under the control of the Secretary of State for Scotland and Wales are open to adjustment other than on the basis of the Barnett formula.  These exceptions will continue to apply under devolution.
    Adjustments may be made where:

    a.  the UK Government decides to make a uniform general adjustment to public expenditure programmes;

    b.  action taken by the Scottish or Welsh administrations in a devolved area has knock-on costs for the UK Government or vice versa.  The block budgets may be adjusted downwards to for costs incurred by the UK Government as a result of the actions of the devolved administrations, or upwards to compensate the devolved administrations for costs which they incur as a result of actions by the UK Government and are not allowed for through the operation of the Barnett formula.  The block budgets will not however be adjusted upwards by reason of additional costs incurred as a result of actions by the UK Government which the UK Government is expecting English departments with parallel responsibilities to absorb within existing spending plans;

    c.  the devolved administrations receive capital receipts as a result of a privatisation or major change in the role of the public sectors in Scotland or Wales.  In these circumstances, the block budgets may be adjusted downwards in the year in which the receipts occur to reflect the continuing interest in these receipts of UK taxpayers as a whole who financed the underlying capital assets in the past.  Proceeds from the sales of other capital assets under the control of the Scottish Parliament or National Assembly for Wales will be available to be re-cycled within Scotland or Wales;

    d.  the devolved administrations receive significant trading surpluses from the commercial exploitation of publicly-funded  assets: the UK Government may take these surpluses into account settling block budgets;

    e.  local authority self-financed expenditure grows more rapidly than equivalent expenditure in England over a period and in such a way as to threaten targets set for public expenditure as part of the management of the UK economy.  In such circumstances it will be open to the UK Government to take the excess into account in  considering the level of the block budgets.

    9.  These principles concern the determination of changes to the block budgets under the control of the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales,  not the level of Westminster grant to support these budgets.  The latter may also be affected by changes in the level of self-financed items of expenditure – local authority capital expenditure funded by borrowing, for example – which currently count towards the lock Budgets.

    In-year changes to the block budgets for Scotland and Wales

    10. The arrangements outlined above apply to changes in the plans for expenditure in future years in Scotland and Wales.  These paragraphs deal with changes in-year to the budgets arrived at under the arrangements outlined above and in particular with access to the UK Reserve for the devolved Scottish and Welsh administrations.

    11. The general presumption, as at present, is that the Scottish and Welsh administrations will contain in-year pressures on their budgets by re-allocating priorities within their Blocks, not through access to the UK Reserve. Access to the Reserve may however be considered at the discretion of the UK Government in exceptional circumstances and specifically where:

    a.  the Government is making available additional provision in-year for equivalent services in England in order to cope with exceptional circumstances affecting  the UK as a whole unforeseen at the time spending plans for the year concerned were settled; and

    b.  Scotland or Wales face exceptional and unforeseen domestic costs – arising, for example, from a natural disaster – which cannot be reasonably absorbed within the planned block budgets without major dislocation to existing services.

    Revising these principles

    12. As noted above, the formula will be updated annually to take account of population changes and from to time to take account of other technical changes.  Any more substantial revision would need to be preceded by an in-depth study of relative spending requirements and would be the subject of full consultation between the devolved administrations and the UK Government.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : New Euro Preparations Unit to Help Business [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : New Euro Preparations Unit to Help Business [December 1997]

    The press release issued by the Treasury on 5 December 1997.

    Business readiness for trading in the single currency after 1 January 1999 will be boosted by a new Euro Preparations Unit (EPU) within the Treasury, Chancellor Gordon Brown announced today.

    Announcing the setting up of the EPU, which will also involve the Department of Trade and Industry, he said :

    “Both Government and business must prepare intensively for EMU. The changes affecting British business within its largest export market are just thirteen months away. Together, we must be ready to take advantage of the opportunities and prepare for the challenges which lie ahead.

    “The Government is committed to help business prepare to compete successfully against other firms using the euro from January 1999. We will also be working with business on what must be done to prepare for the option of joining the single currency  ourselves in the next Parliament.

    “To achieve these aims we need resources dedicated to the task. The new Euro Preparations Unit I am announcing today marks a significant step forwards towards providing the assistance business requires.”

    Building on work already in progress, the EPU is intended to be fully operational early in the New Year. The Unit will include around 15 members drawn from the Treasury, DTI and other Government Departments and business.

    Reporting in first instance to Lord Simon,  it will support the existing Standing Committee on preparations for EMU and stimulate and steer business and public authority  preparations.

  • Alistair Darling – 1997 Speech to the Proshare Annual Awards Dinner

    Alistair Darling – 1997 Speech to the Proshare Annual Awards Dinner

    The speech made by Alistair Darling, the then Chief Secretary to the Treasury, on 3 December 1997.

    Introduction

    1.   This is the fourth Proshare award ceremony that I have attended.

    2.   I am under no illusions about my fate.  The day that I entered the Treasury my attention was drawn to the rogues gallery – the portraits of my predecessors dating back to the early 1960s, when the ancient office of Chief Secretary was established.

    3.   An examination of the photographs revealed that my five immediate predecessors had all lost their seats at the election two days earlier.

    4.   In its short five years existence, Proshare has been enormously successful.  I have always thought that the 1980s rhetoric of the “shareholding democracy” was misplaced.  It was a political slogan.  It wasn’t real.  Indeed it was counter productive rhetoric.

    5.   The fact is that more and more people do shares directly or indirectly.  That’s all to the good.  People should know the relationship between the Stock Market and their shares. And individual shareholding has worked for many but it isn’t for everyone.  Lets be realistic about it.

    6.   But the more people understand share holding the better.   We want to encourage people to save and to invest.  And Proshare has played a vital part in promoting that wider understanding.

    7.   And of course, the best and most successful businesses are those where everyone in the enterprise from boardroom to the shop floor is fully engaged in its success.  Everyone should have a stake in the enterprise in which they are engaged.  It brings out the best in people.

    8.   And encouraging employee share ownership is a important part of that – nearly 2 million employees now belong to one of  the approved schemes.  We want to see employee share ownership expand.  Shareholding should encourage participation and responsibility.

    9.   And Proshare has been active promoting wider understanding of share holding and financial services  generally.  This award ceremony helps that process.

    10.  Indeed Proshare is something of a pioneer in promoting the use of plain English – helping demistify the world of finance.

    Share holding and saving

    11.  We want to encourage saving which is why yesterday we launched the new Individual Savings Account.

    12.  We believe that everyone should have the opportunity to provide for themselves – whether they are saving for their future, for their retirement or simply for a rainy day.

    13.  ISAs are aimed at encouraging everyone to save.  They will be simple, flexible and accessible – something everyone wants and will get.

    14.  Our objective is to develop a tax system for savings which benefits the many and not just the few. Half the population don’t save. So everyone should have the opportunity to save in a tax-favoured environment, however small the amounts they are able to put aside.

    15.  As we promised in our manifesto, the ISA builds on the experience of PEPs and TESSAs. That is why investments in ISAs will be tax-free – up to 50,000 – and 100,000 Pounds for couples.

    16.  We spend 1.3 billion Pounds on tax relief under the present system – rising to 1.7 billion Pounds in 2001-02.   Much of this goes to those who can already afford to save significant amounts and to tie their savings up for long periods of time.  That isn’t an efficient use of public money.  Our objective is to bring in new savers.

    17.  Far better and fairer to use the existing provision to bring the benefits of ISAs to a much wider population of savers – possibly encouraging 6 million new savers.  That is right in principle and it is fair.

    18.  Two weeks ago we published our consultation paper on stakeholder pensions.  The consultation document we published yesterday on ISAs builds upon this.  More and more people want to make provision for themselves and we want to encourage them
    to do that.

    Supervision and regulation

    19.  And if we are to encourage saving we need a regulatory environment that commands the support and respect of the industry and public alike.

    20.  We promised reform at the election.  Four days after the election we gave operational independence to the Bank of England.  And three weeks later we set out how we would deliver the radical overhaul to the regulatory system we promised.

    21.  And, just over a month ago the new Financial Services Authority was launched.  It will take over the work of  nine existing regulators.

    22.  In the global economy where markets are changing every day, where innovation and diversity are an essential part, the need for a new regulator that has power and flexibility is essential.

    23.  For the first time the regulator will have statutory objectives clearly set out.  And the authority will to promote a greater understanding of the benefits and risks associated with financial products.  The draft financial services Bill, updating and replacing the various pieces of legislation covering financial services, will be published next year for
    consultation.

    24.  If we want to encourage people to save and invest we have to make sure they have the information they need.To have confidence in the regulatory system.  That’s good for them and its good for business.  Good regulation should be complimentary to the business process.

    The savings culture

    25.  We want to build the savings culture. That is good for individuals. It is good for businesses and is therefore good for the country as a whole.

    26.  But of course the Government has also to foster  the right economic climate to enable businesses and individuals to plan for the long term.

    The Government’s economic approach

    27.  The world has been transformed over the last few years.  We live in a global economy.  Industries typically span geographical and political boundaries.  No country can go it alone.  Our objective is to ensure Britain is equipped to rise to the challenge of the world’s new and fast changing economies.

    28.  We are determined that this country, the first industrial nation, should be ready and equipped to seize the opportunities and a new global economy where its skills creativity and adaptability will mark us out.  And there is a new confidence in Britain today.

    29.  It’s not the job of the Government to pick winners or to second guess management.

    30.  But Government must address the fundamental weaknesses  that have held us back for too long.  Economic instability. Boom and bust. Underinvestment.  Productivity up to 20% below that of our competitors. Unemployment and the waste of talent of too many people.

    The Government’s economic objectives

    31.  In the six months since we took office, we have begun to  put in place the building blocks we need.  To raise the rate of sustainable growth to increase the prosperity of the country, so that everyone can share in higher living standards and greater job opportunities.

    32.  First, monetary stability and low inflation – the essential precondition for growth.  Good for business, for savers, for those on fixed incomes.

    33.  We have given operational independence to the Bank of England to set interest rates to achieve the Government’s target for inflation.  We have put in place the most open and accountable set of procedures in the world.  And already long term interest rates have fallen.

    34.  Second, fiscal stability.  The Chancellor in his Budget in July put in place a deficit reduction plan, cutting the huge burden of debt left by the last Government.  We spend 25 billion Pounds a year servicing public debt.  More than we spend on schools.  And at this stage in the cycle we should not be adding to the country’s debt.

    35. Thirdly, the Comprehensive Spending Review which I announced earlier this year will conduct a root and branch examination of the 320 billion Pounds the Government spends:  5000 Pounds for every man, woman and child.  It will ensure affordable and sustainable public finances and which will set the spending priorities of this Government, for the rest of this Parliament and beyond.

    36.  And fourthly, removing barriers to growth.  We must expand our economic capacity and create the right climate for high levels of investment.  That is why we have reformed the corporation tax system, removing the distortions that hinder long term, high quality investment.

    37. In the last Budget we cut corporation tax to the lowest level ever.  And we intend to cut the main rate again when ACT is abolished in 1999.  This further enhances our position as the country with the lowest rate of corporation tax of any major industrialised country and one of the lowest tax burdens on business.

    38. And modernising the welfare state, getting more people back into work.  Investing in skills and training.  Removing the inflationary pressures that have undermined growth in the past. We have taken the tough decisions.  Putting the funding of higher education on a sustainable footing for example.  All for the long term good of the country.

    39.  So the building blocks are there.  Stability, sound public finances, removing barriers to growth and a commitment to open markets.

    40.  This Government is outward looking.  We have to be and that has driven our policy in Europe as elsewhere.

    41.  We are determined to open markets and engage constructively in Europe.  Both the Chancellor and the Prime Minister have made it clear that we are determined to put in place the necessary preparations which will allow Britain to decide to join EMU if economic conditions justify it.

    42.    We’re one of the most open economies in the world – trading 25 per cent of our GDP compared with America’s 10 per cent.  And nearly 60 per cent of our exports are to mainland Europe and an astonishingly high level of international investment into Europe – 30 per cent of it – comes to the UK.

    43.    In less than 14 months from now the German business selling products to France and the Netherlands will be able to do so without exchange rate risk, with lower transaction costs and with more transparent prices, something that in itself will be a big challenge to a British competitor hoping to supply the same order.

    44.    So EMU will lead to fiercer competition for trade and for future investment across Europe.  And the time to prepare is now long overdue.

    45.  We are working with business to prepare for the introduction of the Euro in 1999.  The Euro will affect each and every one of us.

    Preparing for the future

    46.    In Europe and at home are objectives to obtain long-term stability.  Stability in policy making.  Stability in the economy.

    47.    Our pre-Budget report last week marks another innovation.   It sets out the major economic issues facing the UK in the run-up to the Budget in the Spring and beyond.

    48.    In the modern economy, demand for more openness and transparency than in the past.  Openness builds confidence in the Government’s ability and determination to maintain economic stability.

    49.    And we set out clear choices for the country.  There is the opportunity now for sustainable growth.  Growth that will create job opportunities and generate the wealth this country needs.

    Conclusion

    50.  Tonight sees awards for individuals and business on whose success we all depend. Government’s job is to compliment business effort.  To prepare the country for the future. To maintain economic stability.  To ensure a skilled and adaptable workforce.To open markets in Europe and elsewhere.

    51.    But no Government can ever take the place of individual flair.  It is that innovation and enterprise that we celebrate tonight.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : We Want to Build the Savings Culture – Alistair Darling [December 2022]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : We Want to Build the Savings Culture – Alistair Darling [December 2022]

    The press release issued by the Treasury on 3 December 1997.

    “We want to encourage people to save and invest. We want to build the savings culture. That is good for individuals. It is good for businesses and it is therefore good for the country as a whole,” the Chief Secretary Alistair Darling said at the Proshare Annual Awards dinner in London tonight.

    Highlighting the new Individual Savings Account he said:

    “Everyone should have the opportunity to provide for themselves – whether they are saving for their future, for their retirement or simply for a rainy day.

    ISAs are aimed at encouraging everyone to save. They will be simple, flexible and accessible – something everyone wants and will get.

    Our objective is to develop a tax system for savings which benefits the many and not just the few. Half the adult population don’t save. So everyone should have the opportunity to save in a tax-favoured environment, however small the amounts they are able to put aside.

    As we promised in our manifesto the ISA builds on the experience of PEPs and TESSAs. That is why investments in ISAs will be tax-free.

    We spend 1.3 billion Pounds on tax relief under the present system – rising to 1.7 billion Pounds in 2001-02. Much of this goes to those who can already afford to save significant amounts and to tie their savings up for long periods of time. That isn’t an efficient use of public money. Our objective is to bring in new savers.

    Far better and fairer to use the existing provision to bring the benefits of ISAs to a much wider population of savers – possibly encouraging 6 million new savers. That is right in principle and it is fair.”

    On investment, he added:

    “We must expand our economic capacity and create the right climate for high levels of investment. That is why we have reformed the corporation tax system, removing the distortions that hinder long term, high quality investment. In the last Budget we cut
    corporation tax to the lowest level ever. And we intend to cut the main rate again when ACT is abolished in 1999. This further enhances our position as the country with the lowest rate of corporation tax of any major industrialised country and one of the lowest tax burdens on business.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK Backs Korea IMF Programme [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK Backs Korea IMF Programme [December 1997]

    The press release issued by the Treasury on 3 December 1997.

    The UK Government fully supports the programme of economic and financial reform announced today by Korea in agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Chancellor Gordon Brown said today.

    The Chancellor said :

    “The UK Government fully supports the IMF programme which has been agreed by  Korea. This programme will involve approximately $21 billion of IMF finance, along with financing from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

    “In addition, the UK, together with a number of other countries, has agreed to consider the provision of further financial support for Korea.  This will be made available only  if unanticipated circumstances create the need to supplement resources provided by the International Financial Institutions, while Korea remains in compliance with the IMF arrangements. The UK is willing to consider a contribution of up to $1.25 billion.

    “Agreement with the IMF on Korea’s programme of reform marks an important step in restoring confidence in Asia, and in helping safeguard the stability of the world financial system.

    “As a major IMF shareholder, the UK believes that acting with the support of the IMF is the right way for the Korean authorities to have handled their financial situation. And as a major World Bank shareholder we support its crucial role in restructuring the
    financial sector of the Korean economy.

    “As an open economy, the UK benefits from substantial trade and investment flows with Asia and the rest of the world. Global financial stability is crucial if we are to deliver sustained economic prosperity and job creation at home.

    “We have a strong national interest in working with our international partners and the IMF to help Korea reform its economy and overcome its present financial difficulties. I welcome today’s announcement.”

  • Gordon Brown – 1997 Speech at the Centrepoint Annual General Meeting

    Gordon Brown – 1997 Speech at the Centrepoint Annual General Meeting

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, at the Centrepoint Annual General Meeting on 2 December 1997.

    Let me say what a privilege it is to be at this annual general meeting, to be here to discuss with you some of the great social and economic challenges we face together in Britain today.

    And I want to start by congratulating you, the staff and supporters of centrepoint, on this the twenty eighth anniversary of centrepoint – on all the work you do, the service you offer, the time and hours you give up and the dedication and commitment you show.

    If ever there was a confirmation that community involvement and social commitment is alive and well and thriving in London and in Britain, it is the work of centrepoint and all its sister projects to combat not only homelessness, but hopelessness.

    This year, tragically, centrepoint has lost a loved, respected and deeply committed patron – Diana, Princess of Wales.

    And I want to assure you that the committee to commemorate and continue her work that we are setting in being today and the charity advisory group that will be announced later will have a membership that reflects her life and her work as the people’s Princess.

    And our task will not only be to provide a lasting memorial to her work. It will also be to look at how, in very practical ways, we can help the work that she started continue and flourish.

    And I want to assure you at centrepoint also of the support of thousands of people, of all political persuasions and none, right across the social and political spectrum for your work. And I want to pay tribute to your sponsors who through their generosity, enable you to improve the lives of so many of our young people – their continuing support is vital, and I would encourage others too, to make a difference by giving their support.

    And in particular I want to congratulate you on the expansion of the work of entrepoint over the years

    The scale of your work is now such that with centrepoint’s 500 bed spaces, you help 3000 young people a year, half of them from ethnic minorities, a third of them under eighteen, and nearly half who have slept rough.

    the refuge for runaway children under sixteen;
    the emergency direct access shelter for teenagers;
    off the streets shelters for young rough sleepers;
    the young women’s hostels, one helping pregnant women and children;
    the intake house;
    Baffy house;
    Centrepoint kings cross;
    streets ahead, the recruitment agency linking the homeless to employers;

    And I would like to wish Centrepoint every success in running the admiralty arch winter shelter which will provide 60 bed spaces for young people.

    From work to provide immediate relief and emergency help to tackling the multiple causes of homeless and poverty

    And of course the network of foyers, starting in London, linking training to housing provision, now flourishing round the country – soon to provide 4,000 places, with a target of 16,000 by 2001-2002.

    And I am delighted to meet again young people here today from Centrepoint Camberwell foyer some of which I met back in may .

    You find unemployment homelessness and poverty an offence against standards of decency. So do I. And we must together tackle the problem

    What people remember of the in the 1930s is unemployed men Standing on street corners.

    What people identify with the eighties are youngsters begging and sleeping rough in our city streets.

    If the 1980s are remembered for social exclusion I want the 90s to be remembered for inclusion – when individuals, the voluntary sector, and government worked together with shared purpose for a common endeavour.

    Your aim is to tackle the causes of homelessness, worklessness and poverty, a blight on every community in the country and on a society that calls itself civilised .

    Homelessness and poverty not only means deprivation and isolation, it means: hopes crushed, aspirations stifled, potential wasted, indignities and miseries visited upon the poor.

    For 28 years you have been working as a voluntary group mobilising support.

    I can tell you today that tackling homelessness and poverty is no longer solely the ambition of voluntary organisations like you.

    It is now the ambition of the country’s government .

    And your values – to support the vulnerable and build a society in which everyone has a contribution to make – are now the values shared by this government.

    And let me say what that change means at a personal level.

    For years as a labour opposition, I and my colleagues were angered by the injustices we saw, but we were powerless to take the action in government that we knew was needed.

    Now we can take action and we recognise the responsibility that places upon us. But we will only achieve success if we work together.

    So I want today to discuss with you how our economic approach in government ties in with the work you are doing, and to explain how the common theme of empowering individuals through providing opportunity lies not only at the heart of your approach to tackling homelessness, but our analysis of the economic challenge our country faces.

    Of course our energies must ensure relief where there is suffering. But our ambition is not limited to bricks and mortar; it is to enable young men and women bridge the gap between what they are and what they have it in themselves to become. So we must
    not only deal with the consequences of poverty, we must tackle its causes.

    So I want to discuss with you how the government’s economic approach, for which I have responsibility, is aimed at tackling the root causes of homelessness and poverty in our country, and our shared task in doing so.

    Let me start with what I believe is common ground.

    Poverty diminishes not only an individual but the society which tolerates it. We are indeed our brothers and sisters keeper, and we must not walk by on the other side.

    So we start from the recognition that everybody needs decent and affordable accommodation and that no young person should have to sleep rough in Britain. Something close to the heart of centrepoint’s aim it is to ensure that no young person is at risk because they do not have a safe place to stay.

    that is why we have made a start with the phased release of capital receipts from council house sales: an additional 900 million pounds – over the next two years – which will increase the stock of housing for rent. And we encourage the foyer movement to seek assistance from local authorities which have access to more funds via the capital receipts initiative.

    and we have refocused the rough sleepers initiative to provide 20 million pounds for 13 rough sleeper projects outside central London. With 1 million pounds of pump priming funding over the next 18 months to support new rough sleeping strategies in six other areas. And 8.1 million pounds in the spring, specially targeted at single homelessness, particularly amongst the young;

    and we want to encourage more partnerships to help tackle homelessness and follow the example of crash – the construction industry group which encourages firms to provide materials for winter shelters provided through the rough sleepers initiative.

    But this is not enough. Only by tackling the cause of homelessness and poverty – in unemployment, the lack of opportunity and skills for employment – can we build a better future for the long term.

    So our anti-poverty strategy for this country, starts from the importance of providing opportunities for work.

    Its founding principle is that we must tackle the causes of poverty, not simply deal with its consequences.

    It is built around a new deal programme that offers new opportunities directly to young people.

    It rests on rights and responsibilities going hand in hand – rights to work: responsibilities to work – rights and responsibilities of government and people together, so that together we tackle the problems we face.

    So work is central to our anti-poverty strategy.

    And last night, in downing street, I met teenagers from Newham to hear from them what they thought had to be done to improve prospects for young people. They said jobs.

    The true scale of poverty, published in the last few days by the treasury, is a terrible indictment of the past and a call to action for the future. Despite an official rate of under 6 per cent unemployment 3 1/2 million households in Britain have no one in work.

    And in Britain today there are nearly 400,000 young people out of work – where there really should be no young person wasting their talent, doing nothing.

    And our strategy is built on recognising that poverty is caused from the workplace outwards – lack of job opportunities, inadequate skills, inadequate income to make proper provision for accidents, retirement and sickness. And the measures we propose include not just benefits reform, but tax changes, new learning and education measures and the introduction of a national minimum wage.

    In this way a new anti-poverty strategy for Britain is now being implemented.

    So what are our proposals?

    First everyone in need of work should have the opportunity to work – young people, lone parents, and disabled men and women who want to work.

    And for young people we are creating a new deal – four options:

    a job with an employer;
    work with a voluntary organisation;
    work on the environmental task force;
    and, for those without basic qualifications, full time education or training.

    From January these options will be available in 12 pathfinder areas to young people who have been unemployed over six months. And from April, the programme will go nationwide – available in every community in Britain.

    Our new deal recognises that some young people will require more intensive support to ensure that they are able to take up one of the four options on the programme and have a chance of benefiting fully from it.

    And I am very glad that foyers, who are already doing excellent work with young people throughout the country, are bidding for provision of elements of the new deal gateway. And I would also like to encourage foyers to bid as providers for the education and training element of the new deal.

    So we want to work in conjunction with Centrepoint, the foyers and other organisations to maximise the help given to our young people.

    And I am very pleased that the Camberwell foyer has been closely involved in designing the gateway to the new deal programme in the Lambeth pathfinder area, and I expect them to be heavily involved in delivering the programme too.

    So I believe it was right to tax the privatised utilities to raise the 5 billion pounds to help a generation of people – today excluded from the chance of prosperity – to have new opportunities.

    And I am pleased that some of the country’s best known businesses are now agreeing to take part in the new deal project:

    Allied Domecq, who have said they will offer at least a 1000 opportunities;

    Tescos, who have guaranteed an interview for all new deal clients who apply to work in their new stores.

    Ford, who have agreed to raise substantially the number of training places they provide for unskilled young people;

    Nat West, who have agreed that their small business advisers will promote the new deal to employers.

    And other companies are coming up with ways they can support the new deal – BAA, Radisson Hotel Group, Lloyds-TSB, Dixons, Marks and Spencer, Sainsbury’s, Unipart, Amersham International, Northern Foods, Grand Metropolitan, GEC, Rover, Jaguar, Peugeot, The Prudential, Tarmac – along with many others.

    But I want to emphasise that the new deal is just the first part of this government’s mission to create a more just and fair society – starting with jobs and the chance to gain work skills – but continuing by modernising a welfare state that too often stifles talent and denies opportunities to men and women.

    Our goal is not just to take people off the streets for a few months, but to make the unemployed fully employable and to rebuild the welfare state around the work ethic.

    So second we must ensure work is worthwhile and it pays.

    650,000 people in Britain face a poverty trap where the lion’s share of every extra pound earned goes in tax.

    So there is no solution to poverty that does not involve a fundamental restructuring of the tax and benefit system.

    That is why our pre-Budget statement proposed an integrated tax and benefit plan involving action at every level.

    To maximise the rewards from work, a 10p starting rate of tax and a reform of benefit tapers will be introduced when it is prudent to do so.

    To ensure that work pays for families with children, we propose a working families tax credit, backed up by affordable child care.

    And to ensure the rewards of these reforms flow directly to the employee, we are committed to a statutory national minimum wage.

    To improve rewards from work, to simplify administrative burdens on employers, and to encourage them to take on more people, we are considering the scope for bringing the national insurance structure for the low paid more closely into line with income tax.

    And to ensure parents can work, our national childcare strategy.

    But everyone who seeks to advance through employment and education must be able to make the most of their talents and potential. We will also create a new ladder of opportunity that will allow the many, by their own efforts, to benefit from opportunities once open only to a few.

    The relationship between skills, employment and wages is clear – half the unemployed under 35 have no qualifications worth their name, 75 per cent of those unemployed for five years or more have no skills.

    That is why we need to invest in our poorest communities with resources for education. It is why we put an emphasis on nursery education early on. It is why we want more young people to stay at school and more to go to college and university. It is why we place emphasis on lifelong learning with every employee entitled to an individual learning account and a university of industry which uses modern communications, satellite, cable and interactive technologies. To give educational opportunities to men and women in their homes and workplace.

    That is why in the pre-budget report we also announced our skills initiative – pilot projects nationwide under which any employer who takes on and trains a young or long-term unemployed person and keeps them on, can now receive up-front three quarters of their new deal allocation thus giving immediate help with training costs – in the case of young people about 1700 pounds and for the long-term unemployed, 1500 pounds.

    So we tackle homelessness, but we also tackle the causes of homelessness – and offer new opportunities in education, for jobs and for making work pay. Full employment is not, for us, a slogan; it is about providing employment opportunity for all.

    It will take time to right the wrongs. But let me say: not only have we made a start by working together, but we will do more year on year.

    But with 3 1/2 million households out of work, we do not deny the scale of the task we face, and the circumstances in which we came to power. I know more than anyone the cost the country has had to pay for 18 years of avoiding the problems, so I wont pretend solutions will be instant it will take time and none of our decisions will be easy.

    We have had to and will continue to have to make hard decisions about where our resources are to go. Our priority is to put the money that we have available into new job training and child care opportunities for lone parents rather than just on benefit. While we could have given even more tax relief to those who have already accumulated considerable savings, our priority is to put some of the 1 1/2 billion pounds resources we are spending on encouraging savings to do more to help those who do not at the moment save – up to 6 million new savers. Our priority is to encourage more people to attend college and university by sharing the costs of higher education, rather than continue to limit higher education to an elite of the country’s young people. And our priority is to put money into the new deal for the young through the cash we raised from a windfall tax on the privatised utilities.

    Difficult choices, but necessary choices. For we are starting out on a long journey with a route map and a clear destination – to make Britain a country where everyone, no matter their circumstances today, from wherever they come or whatever they have done, whoever they are – everyone has opportunity to make the most of their potential. That is my aim. And I believe that working together that can be our achievement: a new Britain where everyone has a contribution to make.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Membership of Diana, Princess of Wales, Memorial Committee [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Membership of Diana, Princess of Wales, Memorial Committee [December 1997]

    The press release issued by the Treasury on 3 December 1997.

    The membership and terms of reference of the committee which will consider possible memorials to Diana, Princess of Wales, was announced today by the Chancellor, Gordon Brown.

    The Chancellor, who is to chair the Committee, said:

    “Diana, Princess of Wales was greatly loved, and I consider it an honour to have been asked by the Prime Minister to chair this important committee. The  public have responded magnificently to my request for proposals for commemorating the work of the  Princess of Wales.  Every one of the 7,000 proposals so far has been carefully read and every one will be taken into account.”

    NOTES FOR EDITORS

    The Prime Minister asked the Chancellor to chair a committee To consider possible memorials to Diana, Princess of Wales.   The Chancellor’s new committee is to be made up of:

    • the Lord Chamberlain, Lord Airlie, representing the
      Royal Household;
    • Lady Sarah McCorquodale, representing Earl Spencer
      (who will also attend meetings when he is in the
      country) and the Princess’s family;
    • Lord Attenborough;
    • Mr Paul Burrell;
    • Baroness Chalker;
    • Diane Louise Jordan;
    • Mr Anthony Julius;
    • The Hon Rosa Monckton;
    • Jane Tewson.

    Its terms of reference are:

    “To advise HM Government as to how the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, can best be commemorated, complementing the work of the Diana, Princess of Wales, Memorial  Fund. In taking forward this work, the Committee will take into account the views of   members of the public, and have regard to the charities and causes which the Princess supported.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Treasury and Bank of England Open Up the Books [December 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Treasury and Bank of England Open Up the Books [December 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 2 December 1997.

    The first edition of a new quarterly report providing greater detail of the UK’s holdings of foreign currency and gold was published jointly today by the Treasury and the Bank of England.

    The report shows for the first time the size of the UK’s forward foreign exchange position and the currency composition of the UK’s foreign currency assets.

    On publication of the report the Economic Secretary, Helen Liddell said:

    “This report is another key step in the Government’s drive towards greater transparency in economic policy making.

    “Greater openness improves the quality of economic decisions, strengthens their legitimacy and credibility, and reduces the likelihood of unpredictable and counterproductive reactions in financial markets.”

    The report shows that the level of the Government’s reserves, including the forward book was $42.3 billion at end-September, an underlying increase of $50 million on end-June. Net forward holdings of foreign currency were $1.24 billion at end-September.

    The level of the Bank of England’s holdings of foreign currency and gold was $1.98 billion at end-September.