Author: admin

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Stronger Powers for the Financial Services Authority [January 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Stronger Powers for the Financial Services Authority [January 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 21 January 1998.

    The Financial Services Authority (FSA) is to be given extensive supervisory powers over Lloyd’s the Economic Secretary, Helen Liddell announced today.

    The FSA will have intervention and authorisation powers to ensure a greater independent element in the regulation of Lloyd’s.

    In response to a Parliamentary Question from Jackie Lawrence [Preseli Pembrokeshire], Mrs Liddell said:

    “In her statement of 23 July 1997, my right hon friend the President of the Board of Trade announced that the supervision of insurance business, including that carried on at Lloyd’s, would ultimately become a responsibility of the proposed Financial Services Authority (FSA).  Since then, I have been considering the options for the future regulatory arrangements for Lloyd’s in the context of the comprehensive reforms which we will implement in the forthcoming financial services reform bill.  As we have already made clear, we intend to publish a draft Bill for consultation in the Summer.

    “Holders of insurance policies underwritten at Lloyd’s should enjoy the benefits of  the same kind of supervisory regime as those with policies issued by other insurers.  I intend as part of the modernisation of the prudential supervision powers currently available to the Treasury under the Insurance Companies Act 1982, that the FSA will have much more extensive supervisory powers in relation to Lloyd’s.  I intend that these should include enhanced powers of intervention and a requirement for authorisation by the FSA of managing agents, who are responsible in practice for running underwriting syndicates.  I also intend that the FSA should have reserve power to undertake direct authorisation and supervision of Members of Lloyd’s, should that prove to be appropriate in due course.

    “Certain activities at Lloyd’s are similar to business which is currently regulated by the Financial Services Authority under the Financial Services Act 1986. Members’ agents advise Members of Lloyd’s about which syndicates they should participate in  and I intend that their activities should be subject to authorisation by the FSA.  In addition, the emerging secondary market in syndicate capacity  resembles markets subject to control under the 1986 Act.  I intend that the FSA should oversee the operation of the market under a regime similar to that currently in place for recognised investment exchanges.

    “These arrangements will continue to allow scope for a major role by the Council of Lloyd’s in ensuring that Lloyd’s continues be a well-regulated, successful and important part of the UK financial services industry. They will however provide, for the first time in many areas, a major element of external regulatory accountability.”

    In a speech to the Life Insurance Association tomorrow, Mrs Liddell will say:

    “Lloyd’s itself has recognised the need for a greater independent element in its regulation. It rightly believes that businesses which are well regulated – and are perceived to be so – will be in a better position to compete in global markets.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Helping children:A top priority for Government [January 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Helping children:A top priority for Government [January 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 21 January 1998.

    Preventing young children from becoming socially excluded is top of the agenda at a seminar being hosted by the Treasury today.

    The seminar, the first in a series of three, is part of a Cross Departmental Review which aims to consider whether the multiple causes of social exclusion affecting young children could be more effectively tackled at the family and community level.

    Representatives from Government, local authorities, universities and voluntary organisations will attend and speak at the event. The aim is to ensure that the best information is available to inform decisions.

    Tessa Jowell, chair of the Ministerial Committee said:

    “We want to help those young children, who are at present not getting the support and help from services they need in early childhood, who fall behind before they even get to school and never catch up.

    “We want services to be flexible and responsive to the needs of each child so everyone can get the best possible start in life.

    “If Government departments work together not only can we give best value to the child but we can also get value for money by cutting the costs of crime and unemployment which can so easily follow if children do not get help at an early age. “

    The Treasury is organising the event and leading the review in close collaboration with the Prime Minister’s Office, the Social Exclusion Unit and other Government Departments eg the Department for Education and Employment and the Department of Health.

    The first seminar will look, in particular, at which children are most at risk of becoming socially excluded. The second seminar in February will look at the effectiveness of different forms of early intervention to help children and how services can be delivered effectively.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Martyn’s Law to ensure stronger protections against terrorism in public places [December 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Martyn’s Law to ensure stronger protections against terrorism in public places [December 2022]

    The press release issued by the Home Office on 19 December 2022.

    • New laws to keep people safe will scale up preparedness for, and protection from, terrorist attacks.
    • Martyn’s Law will ensure better protection against the continued and evolving threat that the UK faces from terrorism.
    • Support, guidance and training will help embed best practice and drive-up standards across the UK.

    The UK’s resilience to terrorism is to be stepped up, as the Government announces details for the Protect Duty, now to be known as ‘Martyn’s Law’ in tribute of Martyn Hett, who was killed alongside 21 others in the Manchester Arena terrorist attack in 2017.

    Working closely with security partners, business and victims’ groups, including Figen Murray and the Martyn’s Law Campaign Team, and Survivors Against Terror, the new duty will require venues to take steps to improve public safety, with measures dependent on the size of the venue and the activity taking place.

    The threat picture is complex and ever evolving. Recent attacks demonstrate that terrorists may choose to target a broad range of locations. Martyn’s Law will ensure that security preparedness is delivered consistently across the UK, ensuring better protection of the public.

    Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, said:

    The way the city of Manchester came together as a community in the wake of the cowardly Manchester Arena attack, and the amazing work of campaigners like Figen Murray who have dedicated their lives to making us safer and promoting kindness and tolerance, is an inspiration to us all.

    I am committed to working with Figen to improve security measures at public venues and spaces and to delivering this vital legislation to honour Martyn’s memory and all of those affected by terrorism.

    Figen Murray, mother of Martyn Hett said:

    Martyn’s Law isn’t going to stop terrorism, but common-sense security, and making sure venues are doing all they can to keep people safe, could mean fewer suffer what myself and the families of Manchester have had to endure.

    I welcome the Government’s commitment to including smaller venues and working quickly on this legislation. It is vital we now take the necessary steps to protect ourselves and others wherever possible and I hope other countries learn from this ground-breaking legislation.

    Home Secretary, Suella Braverman said:

    Protecting the public from danger is a key responsibility of any government. The terrorist threat we face is diverse and continually evolving, which is why this legislation is so important.

    I would like to thank Figen Murray and the Martyn’s Law campaign for their support in the development of this vital reform.

    Their tireless efforts have helped inform our approach and the heart-breaking stories from survivors and their families are a constant reminder as to why we must deliver on this commitment to work together to improve public security.

    The plans have been developed following public consultation and extensive engagement across industry, charities, local authorities, security experts and with survivors. 70% of the thousands who responded to the consultation agreed that those responsible for publicly accessible locations should take measures to protect the public from potential attacks.

    Martyn’s Law will follow a tiered model linked to activity that takes place at a location and its capacity aimed to prevent undue burden on businesses.

    • A standard tier will apply to locations with a maximum capacity of over 100 which can undertake low-cost, simple yet effective activities to improve preparedness. This will include training, information sharing and completion of a preparedness plan to embed practices, such as locking doors to delay attackers progress or knowledge on lifesaving treatments that can be administered by staff whilst awaiting emergency services.
    • An enhanced tier will focus on high-capacity locations in recognition of the potential consequences of a successful attack. Locations with a capacity of over 800 people at any time, will additionally be required to undertake a risk assessment to inform the development and implementation of a thorough security plan. Subsequent measures could include developing a vigilance and security culture, implementation of physical measures like CCTV or new systems and processes to enable better consideration of security.

    The Government will establish an inspection and enforcement regime, promoting compliance and positive cultural change and issuing credible and fair sanctions for serious breaches.

    Dedicated statutory guidance and bespoke support will be provided by the Government to ensure those in scope can effectively discharge their responsibilities, with even small venues also able to benefit from this and take voluntary action. Expert advice, training and guidance is also already available on the online protective security hub, ProtectUK.

    Martyn’s Law will extend to and apply across the whole of the United Kingdom and the Government will publish draft legislation in the early Spring to ensure the law stands the test of time.

  • Alistair Darling – 1998 Speech to Ernst and Young Network Dinner

    Alistair Darling – 1998 Speech to Ernst and Young Network Dinner

    The speech made by Alistair Darling, the then Chief Secretary to the Treasury, on 14 January 1998.

    “OUR ECONOMIC APPROACH”

    Introduction

    UK Economy

    The world has been transformed over the last few years.  We live in a global economy.  We are moving towards a single global economy in many respects.  Industries typically span geographical and political boundaries.  No country can go it alone, in economic terms.  Our objective is to ensure Britain is equipped to rise to the challenge of the world’s new and fast changing economies.

    The key objective of our economic policy is to achieve high and stable levels of growth and employment, to allow everyone to share in higher living standards.

    The need for stability

    Over the past  forty years, our economy has had an unenviable history of boom and bust.  Stop-go has meant higher interest rates, less investment, fewer successful companies and lost jobs. It has been the inevitable result of a failure to take a long-term view, and to bow to short term pressures – political and economic.

    The economy we inherited in May was in danger of over-heating, with unsustainable growth in demand and a threat of inflation rising well above its target.  And despite five years of upswing, public borrowing was too high for the point in the economic cycle.  The national debt doubled in the six years from 1990.  And at this stage of the cycle the we should not be adding to that problem.  This year alone the taxpayer will pay out 25 billion Pounds in interest payments on debt – more than we spend on our schools.

    So we need to address the fundamental weaknesses in the economy. Instability, under-investment, the need to improve education and skills and the need for welfare reform – all of which have been neglected for too long.

    In the eight months since we took office we have begun to put in place the building blocks we need:

    • first, the need to achieve stability and to raise the  rate of sustainable growth;
    • second, to increase productivity; and
    • third the need to remove barriers to growth, invest in education and modernise the   welfare state, and tackle the need to expand markets.

    In the short time since the election, we have begun to lay the foundations to secure Britain’s long-term economic future.

    Openness and transparency

    Stability will of course depend, to a large extent, on markets having confidence in the commitment of Government to prudent and sound management of the economy.  So economic policy must be open and transparent.  Openness builds confidence and credibility. It is essential in today’s global economy.

    And in our fiscal and monetary policies, we have set out open and transparent frameworks that have clearly enhanced our credibility.

    The Government will now publish a Pre-Budget consultation document each year setting out the economic issues we face.  Operational independence for the Bank of England.  The new code for fiscal stability.  All these measures add to openness and transparency, and will enhance credibility in our determination to look to the long term.

    So the building blocks are there.  Firstly stability.

    Stability

    Long-term stability – in monetary and fiscal policies, low inflation and sound public finances – is an essential pre-condition for high levels of growth and employment.

    Monetary policy

    That is why one of our first acts in office was to establish a wholly new monetary policy framework for the UK.

    This framework gives operational independence to the Bank of England for setting interest rates to meet the Government’s inflation target, while enhancing accountability and ensuring policy is conducted in an open way.  We now have one of the most open procedures for making monetary policies decisions in the world.  Since the new monetary framework was announced, long-term interest rates have fallen by more than a full percentage point, partly reflecting a fall in inflation expectations.  Clear evidence that anti-inflation credibility has been enhanced.

    Fiscal policy

    As with our approach to monetary policy, so in fiscal policy we have established clear rules, a new discipline, openness and accountability.

    A key element of the new fiscal framework is the adoption of two strict fiscal rules:

    • first, the golden rule, that on average over the economic cycle, the government will borrow only to finance its investment;
    • and second that, as a proportion of national income, public debt will be held at a prudent and stable level on average over the cycle.

    Our tough approach to public borrowing, embodied in a five-year deficit reduction plan, means, from public sector borrowing of 7 per cent of GDP four years ago, we are now set  to cut the deficit to 1 1/4 per cent in the current financial year and just 1/2 per cent next year.

    And the new Code for Fiscal Stability will require the Government to produce estimates of the cyclically-adjusted fiscal position and long-term projections, so that past policy mistakes are not repeated.  We are determined not to repeat the mistakes of the late 1980s, where the signals were misread.  Over-optimistic assumptions led to an unsustainable boom, followed by one of the deepest recessions this country has ever seen.

    We will maintain strict discipline in public spending, rooting out waste and inefficiency as part of the Comprehensive Spending Review.  This review will not only achieve discipline in the public finance but it will also set our spending priorities for the rest of this Parliament and beyond.

    Together these tough fiscal rules, the deficit reduction plan and a root and branch review of public sector efficiency will ensure a break from the short-termism and expediency of the past.  And our fiscal policy will be more credible for being open and accountable and will ensure new long-term stability for the public finances.

    Productivity

    The second key challenge is to raise productivity.

    Government and industry must work together to remove systematically all barriers to raising productivity:  in product markets through encouraging competition and innovation;  in capital markets through measures to enhance growth and investment, not least for innovative small businesses;  and in the workplace through encouraging the creativity and flexibility of inventors, managers and workforces.  We need to rediscover our capacity to invent and see that there is profitable production.

    We are examining how, to improve productivity, we can help leading-edge businesses gain funds to develop new technologies; how we can improve Britain’s poor record of investment in research and development; and how we can make it easier for small businesses to draw on venture capital to create jobs and a more entrepreneurial culture.

    We have taken measures to tackle long-term under-investment in both capacity and skills, including a cut in corporation tax to its lowest ever level.  We are determined to increase investment in education – the key to our future.

    But we still need further structural reforms if we are to encourage a more dynamic economy through increased competition and through reforms in welfare and employment policy. We are committed to a wholesale modernisation of the welfare state.

    Employment

    And to achieve high and stable levels of growth and employment we must ensure that people are skilled and employable and making work pay.  Today sees further reports of skills shortages, which constrain our ability to expand.

    We are addressing the obstacles that prevent people taking up and benefiting from work:

    • the absence of marketable skills;
    • the failure of the tax and benefits system to make work worthwhile;
    • the poverty and unemployment traps that for far too many mean that work does not pay;
    • the lack of employment opportunities;
    • and the scarcity of affordable child care.

    Reform to both the tax and benefit system is needed as part of the modernisation of the welfare state, that has remained largely unreformed since its foundation in the 1940s.

    And the Government’s welfare to work initiative will get the young and long-term employed from welfare into work.

    Since May we have made a start by announcing a New Deal worth almost 4 billion Pounds,  providing jobs for young unemployed, the long-term unemployed, and to lone parents [and the long-term sick and disabled].

    Helping lone parents into work is one of the most effective long-term ways to tackle  family poverty.

    We are also introducing a plan to extend out-of-school childcare clubs to every community in Britain.  Funds will be available to set-up as many as 30,000 new out-of-school clubs, which will provide places for nearly 1 million children.

    Last week we launched the New Deal for the young and long-term unemployed. There will be 12 pathfinder projects to give those under the age of 25 and unemployed for more than 6 months the skills to get them back to work and give them the skills they need.

    All these measures are focussed on getting the young and long-term unemployed from welfare to work.  And they are all part of our strategy to meet the challenge of increasing employment opportunities for all.

    Europe

    Key to our economic approach is our European strategy.  In October the Chancellor declared for the principle of the single currency.  There is no constitutional bar to entry.

    But any decisions to join must be based on a hard headed assessment of the economic benefits of joining.  We must have satisfactory answers to these questions:

    • would joining EMU create better conditions for firms making long-term decisions to invest in Britain?;
    • how would our financial services be affected?;
    • would there be sufficient convergence between economies so Britain could live comfortably with Euro interest  rates?;
    • is our economy sufficiently flexible to deal with any emergent problems?;
    • and will joining Europe promote higher growth, stability and a lasting increase in jobs?

    On the basis of these fives tests, the Government has decided that it would not be in our economic interest to join in the first wave in 1999.  We need a settled period of convergence before we can make a decision on membership.

    So we will join a single currency when and if it is in our economic interest.  But we believe there are potentially clear benefits for business and that is why we have begun making extensive preparations, helping and advising business with the euro.

    Pay

    The Government is taking the long term view. Our strategy is based around building a stable framework for fiscal and monetary policy, encouraging investment in our economic infrastructure, the education and skills of our workforce and rebuilding the welfare state around the work ethic.

    The challenge is to steer a long-term course towards sustainable growth.  Where prosperity can increase year on year, where public finances can deliver the public services we want and need.

    We have put the policies in place to bring this about.  But if we are to succeed we must maintain the strict discipline necessary to put the public finances on a sound footing and keep them there.

    We are not going to repeat the mistakes of the past, where the economic signals were misunderstood and an unsustainable boom led to bust – with all the consequences that brought about.

    Central to this aim is the need to ensure that pay increases are affordable right across the board, from boardroom to the shop floor, in both the public and private sectors.  People have to understand that to bring about long-term stable growth, pay increases must be fair and affordable.

    For its part, the Government will be applying these principles to public sector pay.  We are determined to deliver long-term growth and prosperity.  It is essential, if we are to succeed in rebuilding this country and increasing prosperity for all the people in a sustainable way.

    Conclusion

    We are governing for the long term.  The building blocks are being put in place to bring the long term prosperity we all want to see.  This means we have to take tough decisions now.  But it is right that on pay, as with every other issue, we avoid measures that bring short term gain but long term pain.  This is the approach the British people expect of us.  It is what we promised at the election.  And we are delivering on our promises.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Pay increases must be affordable if we are to have long term prosperity – Alistair Darling [January 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Pay increases must be affordable if we are to have long term prosperity – Alistair Darling [January 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 14 January 1998.

    “Pay increases must be affordable right across the board, from boardroom to shop floor, in both the private and public sectors, if we are to bring about the long term stable growth and prosperity we all want to see”.

    That was the clear message from Alistair Darling, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, speaking tonight at an event organised by Ernst and Young.

    He added:

    “Since we took office we have begun to put in place the building blocks we need to bring about the long term prosperity we all want to see.

    Our strategy is based around building a stable framework for fiscal and monetary policy, encouraging investment in our economic infrastructure, the education and skills of our workforce and rebuilding the welfare state around the work ethic.

    This means we have to take tough decisions now. We are not going to repeat the mistakes of the past, where the economic signals were misunderstood and an unsustainable boom led to bust.

    Central to this aim is the need to make sure pay increases are fair and affordable, in both the public and private sectors.

    We are determined to deliver long term growth and prosperity.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Helen Liddell announces proposals to deliver cost-effective regulation [January 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Helen Liddell announces proposals to deliver cost-effective regulation [January 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 14 January 1998.

    The Financial Services Authority (FSA) must be cost effective in order to protect the consumers’ purse and the competitiveness of the UK financial services industry, and that goes hand in hand with providing effective protection for the consumer, the Economic Secretary Helen Liddell said today.

    Addressing the Law Society Commerce and Industry Group the Minister said that the FSA will be required to publish its proposed budget for consultation at the same time as it publishes its proposals for fees.She said:

    “Not only must the FSA use its resources effectively, it must also show the public and the industry that it is doing so.

    “After all, the costs of regulation are met by the firms under regulation. This means they are ultimately passed to consumers in the form of higher charges or lower  returns. Firms themselves need to know that the UK will remain a competitive place to do business.”

    The Minister also announced that where the FSA introduces a new rule or change to an existing one, it must consult the public and practitioners by publishing the proposals. Their proposals will include estimates of costs and benefits of the proposals and other options. Mrs Liddell said:

    “This statutory requirement to publish cost-benefit analysis will allow much more focussed consultation than sometimes happens now. Indeed firms will be able to challenge the FSA’s estimates if they believe they are inaccurate.”

    The Minister stressed this goes well beyond the current requirement upon the Self-Regulatory Organisations (SROs) to take account of the costs of compliance.

  • Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech Launching the New Deal

    Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech Launching the New Deal

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 5 January 1998.

    Today marks the start of a new deal for Britain’s young. A new beginning in the war against poverty, and the first step in the modernisation of the welfare state in Britain.

    It’s the Labour Government’s 1998 new year’s resolution for Britain – to help our long-term unemployed back to work and to give them the skills they need.

    Here today from Dundee and Tayside we launch the first of twelve pilot programmes offering jobs and training to every young person six months out of work.

    From April, every long term unemployed young man or woman under 25 will be offered the new deal options of work or training.

    A total of 3 billion pounds is being invested in jobs.

    It is not just the young who will benefit from the new deal.

    From June, employers will be offered a 75 pounds a week subsidy to take on the long-term unemployed.

    During 1998 lone parents with their youngest child at school will be offered help to find work.

    And from this year too disabled men and women, denied the right to work for too long – will be given new opportunities to work.

    The old deal – of paying people a few pounds in benefit and then forgetting about them – failed the unemployed and failed Britain.

    Today begins the long haul towards full employment in the years to come.

    From now on in Britain, young people will have new opportunities and a new contribution they can make under the new deal. Rights go hand in hand with responsibilities and for young people offered new responsibilities from today there will be no option of simply staying at home on full benefit doing nothing.

    So it is something for something, not something for nothing

    Young people are our future. Yet unemployment among the under- 25s is twice the national average.

    With new resources from the windfall levy we will invest in young people and in the skills the whole country needs them to have for the future.

    From today there are pilot programmes in every part of Britain, offering every young person unemployed for more than six months the chance of work.

    Already 9,000 employers have signed up in our pathfinder areas.

    Some of the top household name companies are making their contribution to the new deal.

    In the next few weeks, 1 million employers will be contacted and asked to consider taking part.

    The programme that starts today in 12 pathfinder areas will offer young people advice, help and training to enter the world of work. From April the programme will operate nationally.

    The scheme offers four routes into work and helps each young person pick the route that suits their needs – a job, full-time education, a job  in the voluntary sector or a role in the environmental task force.

    Tayside

    300 million pounds will be invested in scotland under the new deal here in Tayside there are more than 1,000 young people  who have been nemployed for more than six months. For them opportunity is available now. The pathfinder approach is to ensure that young people receive the help they need immediately.

    Every month, 100 more young people will be entering the programme.

    I have no doubt lessons will be learned from the pilot and we will be carefully evaluating the programme in Tayside and other pathfinder areas so that rough edges can be identified.

    Here in Dundee some of the biggest companies like NCR and Michelin have committed themselves to the new deal. Stagecoach and National Express, together with Scot-Rail and Travel-Dundee will be mounting travel concessions for young people in Tayside on the new deal and I am grateful to them for their involvement.

    This programme will succeed only if we involve all employers who are able to make a contribution.

    My appeal to employers is as businesses in the community who can see at first hand the impact of social division and a wasted generation of young people and who know that failure to tackle the problem now will hurt us all in the future.

    My appeals is to employers and managers with a reputation for motivating people who will immediately understand  how a job can make the difference between what young people are and what young people are capable of becoming.

    My appeal to employers is as leaders of the economy who know that however successful their own business is, the economy as a whole will never be at its best unless we unlock the potential of all our people.

    I want all of you to feel part of what I believe is a national crusade to clear for one and for all the social divisions that are entrenched in our society because of unemployment.

    And this is just the start. The Government believes in helping thousands more from welfare to work in the years to come as part of the long haul towards our goal of full employment.

    That is why we are prepared to extend the new deal from the under 25s to the over 25s and are prepared to invest more in the long term unemployed, lone parents and disabled men and women who want the right to work, to make this ambition a reality.

    And we will do more. The new deal is our first step towards a new welfare state. And I want men and women who have been unemployed and written off by many to be able to say they now have a new chance to make the best of themselves and to make a contribution, not just to their families, but to the progress of Britain.

  • Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech at the Central Organisation of Scottish Local Authorities

    Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech at the Central Organisation of Scottish Local Authorities

    Part of the speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, in Glasgow on 27 February 1998.

    Since I took over as Chancellor I have always said that a commitment to stability and prudence as well as work and; enterprise will be the watchwords of this Government.

    We will not make the mistakes of previous Labour Governments who failed to control spending and then had to cut back.

    And we will learn the lessons of the late eighties where the public finances and the economy’s ability to sustain growth were misjudged, plunging us into the longest recession since the war.

    So the Budget on 17 March will not be a Budget with quick fixes for the short term. The Budget will be an investment Budget for the long-term, laying the foundations to build a more dynamic and successful economy.

    We will not sacrifice our spending discipline and commitment to prudence – instead there will be consistency to ensure long-term prosperity.

    With a 400 billion Pounds national debt, 25 billion Pounds a year interest payments, a borrowing requirement of 23 billion Pounds last year and with the deficit continuing into next year, ensuring prudence in our public finances is our priority – not just in one year but in every year across the economic cycle.

    Just as there will be no return to boom-bust in the economy so there will be no return to soft options in public spending.

    We are all long termists now – the best guarantee for our future.And long term measures for enterprise and work – making work pay – will come top of my agenda.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK is a world leader on public private partnerships, says Geoffrey Robinson [February 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK is a world leader on public private partnerships, says Geoffrey Robinson [February 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 24 February 1998.

    The UK is leading the way in Europe and around the world in its partnership approach to using private finance capital and expertise in the provision of a wide range of public infrastructure services, Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson said today.

    Speaking to a Public Private Partnerships conference in London, Mr Robinson said that countries from Europe and from further afield such as Australia, Brazil, China, South Africa, Taiwan and United Arab Emirates were interested in what the UK government had achieved in developing public private partnerships.

    Mr Robinson said:

    “The British approach to gathering private and public sectors engaged in effective partnerships is the way forward into the next millennium. Many countries have already contacted the British government to share best practice and experience with contracts in areas as diverse as hospitals, schools, light rail schemes, IT systems and government accommodation.

    “The Government’s success in developing its initiative is breeding success both at home and abroad.  The British model is being taken up by many governments around the world.  They realise that the newly invigorated PFI is bearing fruit and want to learn from our experiences.

    “The development of PFI and PPPs abroad is providing an enormous additional market for those British companies already familiar with, and well versed with the concept.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Seven principles for jobs – G8 agrees new agenda [February 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Seven principles for jobs – G8 agrees new agenda [February 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 22 February 1998.

    G8 Agrees New Agenda

    A new international employment agenda to promote jobs and tackle unemployment and social exclusion has been agreed by the G8 countries at a Conference on Growth, Employability and Inclusion in London this weekend.

    Commenting on the Conference, UK Chancellor Gordon Brown said:

    “The G8 has set itself a new agenda based on seven principles for action. It is now important that the principles are turned into practice. I am delighted that the G8 backed my suggestion of presenting job Action Plans to the Birmingham Summit of Heads of State and Government in May.

    “A new employment agenda is vital given the background of intensified global competition and technological advances we all face as the 21st century approaches.”

    UK employment policies were also given strong endorsement at the Conference. Education and Employment Secretary, David Blunkett said:

    “G8 members share the priorities we have set for our domestic employment policy – promoting employability and adaptability and tackling skill shortages. For the first time at an international summit the key principle of lifelong learning was specifically endorsed. It is clear we have to deliver on education, skills and employment.

    “We all face the challenge of change. We need to improve the skills of everyone in the labour market and to bring those excluded from employment into the world of work.”

    Seven broad principles have been agreed to guide the action the G8 countries will take. These are:

    • sound macroeconomic policies;
    • structural reforms to labour, capital and product markets;
    • fostering entrepreneurship and an economic climate favourable to the growth of small and medium-sized firms;
    • enhancing employment, education and training including for the young, long-term unemployed, lone parents and the disabled;
    • reforming tax/benefit systems to provide work incentives to foster growth and employment and the successful transition from welfare to work;
    • encouraging lifelong learning; and
    • promoting equal opportunities and combatting discrimination.

    The Conference agreed the seven principles to guide employment policy and Heads of State and Government will be asked to endorse them at the Birmingham Summit in May.

    In conclusion, the Chancellor said:

    “We must ensure that the important messages of this Conference are heard by policy makers around the world and
    that we continue to share best practice.”

    The Chancellor said he would:

    • continue to use the UK’s chairmanship of the G8 and
      Presidency of the EU to advocate the new agenda on employment and economic reform;
    • write to the Heads of International Financial Institutions including the IMF and OECD to report on policy initiatives agreed at the Conference; and
    • carry out an examination of how help can be given to entrepreneurs and SMEs, and enhance access for small firms to venture capital.