Tag: Shabana Mahmood

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2024 Statement on Prison Capacity

    Shabana Mahmood – 2024 Statement on Prison Capacity

    The statement made by Shabana Mahmood, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, in the House of Commons on 18 July 2024.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I will make a statement about prison capacity in England and Wales.

    As you know, Mr Speaker, I wanted to make this announcement first in this House. However, given the scale of the emergency facing our prisons, I was forced to set out these measures before Parliament returned.

    Since this Government took office two weeks ago, it has become clear that our prisons are in crisis and are at the point of collapse. The male prison estate has been running at over 99% capacity for the last 18 months. We now know that my predecessor warned No. 10 Downing Street but, rather than address this crisis, the former Prime Minister called an election, leaving a ticking time bomb. If that bomb were to go off—if our prisons were to run out of space—the courts would grind to a halt, suspects could not be held in custody and police officers would be unable to make arrests, leaving criminals free to act without consequence. In short, if we fail to act now, we face the prospect of a total breakdown of law and order.

    Rather than act, the last Prime Minister allowed us to edge ever closer to catastrophe. Last week, there were around 700 spaces remaining in the male prison estate. With 300 places left, we reach critical capacity. At that point, the smallest change could trigger the chain of events I just set out. With the prison population rising, it is now clear that by September this year, our prisons will overflow. That means there is now only one way to avert disaster.

    As the House knows, most of those serving standard determinate sentences leave prison at the halfway point, serving the rest of their sentence in the community. The Government now have no option but to introduce a temporary change in the law. Yesterday, we laid a statutory instrument in draft. Subject to the agreement of both Houses, those serving eligible standard determinate sentences will leave prison after serving 40%, rather than 50%, of their sentence in custody, and will serve the rest on licence. Our impact assessment estimates that around 5,500 offenders will be released in September and October. From that time until we are able to reverse this emergency measure, 40% will be the new point of automatic release for eligible standard determinate sentences.

    The Government do not take this decision lightly, but to disguise reality and delay any further, as the last Government did, is unconscionable. We are clear that this is the safest way forward. In the words of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, these steps are “the least worst option”. He went on to say that

    “the worst possible thing would be for the system to block”,

    and that any alternative to these measures would be “dangerous for the public”.

    I understand that some may feel worried by this decision, but I can assure the House that we are taking every precaution available to us. There will be important exclusions. Sentences for the most dangerous crimes—for sexual and serious violent offences—will not change. That will also be the case for a series of offences linked to domestic violence, including stalking, controlling or coercive behaviour and non-fatal strangulation, as well as those related to national security.

    We will also implement stringent protections. First, this change will not take effect until early September, giving the probation service time to prepare. Secondly, all offenders released will be subject to strict licence conditions, to ensure they can be managed safely in the community. Thirdly, offenders can be ordered to wear electronic tags, and curfews will be imposed where appropriate. Finally, if offenders breach the conditions of their licence, they can be returned to prison immediately.

    Let me be clear: this is an emergency measure, not a permanent change. This Government are clear that criminals must be punished. We do not intend to allow the 40% release point to stand in perpetuity. That is why I will review these measures again, in 18 months’ time, when the situation in our prisons will have stabilised. Throughout, this Government will be transparent. We will publish data on the number of offenders released on a quarterly basis, and we will publish an annual prison capacity statement, legislating to make this a statutory requirement.

    When we implement this change, we will stop the end of custody supervised licence scheme introduced by the last Government, which operated under a veil of secrecy. From the Opposition Benches, I was forced to demand more information about who was being released and what crimes they had committed. This Government have now released that data, showing that over 10,000 offenders were released early, often with very little warning to probation officers, placing them under enormous strain. This was only ever a short-term fix. It was one of a series of decisions this Government believe must be examined more fully, which is why we are announcing a review into how this capacity crisis was allowed to happen and why the necessary decisions were not taken at critical moments.

    The measures I have set out today are not a silver bullet. The capacity crisis will not disappear immediately, and these measures will take time to take effect. But when they do, they will give us the time to address the prisons crisis, not just today but for years to come. This includes accelerating the prison building programme to ensure we have the cells we need. Later this year, we will publish a ten-year capacity strategy. That strategy will outline the steps that the Government will take to acquire land for new prison sites, and will classify prisons as being of national importance, placing decision making in Ministers’ hands. The Government are also committed to longer-term reform and cutting reoffending.

    Too often, our prisons create better criminals, not better citizens, and nearly 80% of offending is reoffending, all at immense cost to communities and the taxpayer. As Lord Chancellor, my priority is to drive down that number. To do that, the Government will strengthen probation, starting with the recruitment of at least 1,000 new trainee probation officers by the end of March 2025. We will work with prisons to improve offenders’ access to learning and other training, as well as bringing together prison governors, local employers and the voluntary sector to get ex-offenders into work. We know that if an offender has a job within a year of release, they are less likely to reoffend. It is only by driving down reoffending that we will find a sustainable solution to the prisons crisis.

    In a speech last week, I called the previous occupants of Downing Street “the guilty men”. I did not use that analogy flippantly. I believe that they placed the country in grave danger. Their legacy is a prison system in crisis, moments from catastrophic disaster. It was only by pure luck, and the heroic efforts of prison and probation staff, that disaster did not strike while they were in office. The legacy of this Government will be different. We will see a prison system brought under control; a probation service that keeps the public safe; enough prison places to meet our needs; and prisons, probation and other services working together to break the cycle of reoffending and so cut crime.

    I never thought that I would have to announce the measures that I have set out today, but the scale of this emergency has forced this Government to act now, rather than delay any longer. This Government will always put the country and its safety first. I commend this statement to the House.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2024 Swearing in Speech as Lord Chancellor

    Shabana Mahmood – 2024 Swearing in Speech as Lord Chancellor

    The speech made by Shabana Mahmood, the Lord Chancellor, on 16 July 2024.

    My Lords, Ladies, friends, colleagues.

    Lady Chief Justice, thank you for that welcome.

    May I also take the opportunity to welcome Richard Hermer KC as he takes his oath today as Attorney General.

    Mr Attorney, your deep expertise will be of enormous value to the Government…

    And I know already that we will be allies to one another in our roles.

    So too Sarah Sackman, who takes her oath as Solicitor General today.

    Madam Solicitor, it took me 14 years from becoming a Member of Parliament, to serving in government.

    You’ve done it in 5 days.

    That is a fitting tribute to the talent and dedication you have shown to upholding the rule of law throughout your career.

    I look forward to working closely with you in the months and years ahead.

    I must say what an honour it is to take my own oath as Lord Chancellor today.

    There once was a little girl in Small Heath, one of the poorest areas of Birmingham…

    Who worked behind the till in her parents’ corner shop.

    Yes, she took great inspiration from Kavanagh QC, that brilliant barrister with working class roots…

    But she never dared to dream she would be sitting before you all today…

    Counted among the holders of this ancient role.

    So believe me, I know: along with some fairly idiosyncratic outfits, comes great responsibility.

    I hold this office in the very highest regard.

    I do so not just as a former barrister, but as the child of immigrants.

    My parents weren’t steeped in Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus and the Bill of Rights – as I would one day be.

    But they did have a strong sense, arriving here in the UK from rural Kashmir, that this country was different:

    That there are rules, some written and some not, that we abide by:

    Queues must be observed, near religiously…

    Weather must be discussed, pretty compulsively…

    But also, more seriously, there are institutions, like our courts, that are incorruptible…

    And that, in this country, no-one is above the law, not even the government, and none are below it either.

    To have so many of my family here today, stretching the limits of my guestlist quota, means a great deal to me.

    And while I have the chance:

    Mum, Dad, can I just say: jazakallah khair, thank you.

    Instilled as a child, my respect for the rule of law grew stronger as I grew older:

    First, studying law at university…

    Then, in practice.

    And it was never felt more keenly than when appearing before a member of our fiercely independent judiciary…

    I can now confirm that the same tingle of nerves never goes away…

    Even when you’re the Lord Chancellor appearing alongside the Lady Chief Justice.

    I’d also like to thank the man who set me on my way in the law, to whom I will forever be indebted:

    My pupil master – William Audland KC – who is squeezed between members of my very large, extended family in the gallery today.

    I understand it’s customary for a new Lord Chancellor to draw parallels with an eminent predecessor when they take their oath…

    I had a good old look around for a Lord Chancellor who looks or sounds like me, but drew something of a blank.

    That’s right, folks. There wasn’t a single Brummie.

    There was one who leapt out though, whose example I hope to follow:

    Frederick Elwyn-Jones.

    We share a few things in common:

    Our Inn of Court – Gray’s.

    Our political party – Labour.

    As a barrister he had a passion for human rights, and was a prosecutor at Nuremberg.

    I – and this government – will follow his example in defending the international rule of law and upholding human rights.

    And we will certainly not be seeking to extricate ourselves from the landmark human rights convention drawn up in the aftermath of that war.

    Elwyn-Jones served as Lord Chancellor for 5 years between 1974 and 1979.

    By recent standards, that counts as an eternity.

    I certainly hope to emulate his longevity.

    It is said that he was the first Welsh speaking Lord Chancellor for centuries.

    I wonder what he would’ve made of the first Lord Chancellor to speak Urdu.

    I’ve carried the weight of many identities in this career…

    It is a privilege, but also a burden…

    I am always aware that, for the good of those who come afterwards, getting this wrong – I usually use less temperate language – isn’t an option.

    But getting it right can open doors.

    When I walked into the Ministry of Justice for the first time…

    10 days ago, though it feels like 10 months…

    I walked past the portraits of my recent predecessors:

    The good, the bad and the ugly.

    They all looked alike, and not much like me.

    So, at the very least, I hope my appointment shows the next little girl…

    In Small Heath, or wherever she may be…

    That, in this country, even the oldest offices in the land are within reach of us all.

    The responsibilities of this ancient office are as real today as they ever were.

    The rule of law is more than an ideal.

    It is more than a vague concept, employed only by academic lawyers…

    It is the most enduring of British values.

    We are a nation that believes in due process…

    We are a nation where the law has the final word, not the mob…

    And we are a nation where our disputes, however fierce, are resolved by debate and argument.

    For politicians of all stripes, the law looms large.

    As parliamentarians, we are not only advocates for our constituents, we are legislators…

    Charged with making and shaping the laws our society will live by.

    But it is our independent courts who must then interpret and enforce those laws, with no hint of political interference.

    And I take seriously my oath to defend your independence…

    You are the guardians of the rule of law and at the heart of our legal prestige.

    It is a job that requires deep expertise, knowledge and integrity…

    As you make decisions on some of the most difficult ethical and technical issues of our time…

    You must be free to make them without political pressure and undue influence.

    You must never be subjected to the kinds of attacks that we saw in recent years…

    When newspaper headlines branded those who uphold the law: “enemies of the people”.

    I will be a champion for the rule of law, and our judiciary, inside Cabinet and in our government, at home and abroad.

    I will say ‘no’ where ‘no’ is warranted…

    Even if, at times, I frustrate my ministerial colleagues in doing so.

    After all, that frustration is not a failure of our system, but an essential feature of it.

    The final part of my oath places a duty on me to ensure the provision of resources for the courts…

    Which is where safeguarding access to justice truly begins.

    I must first take the opportunity to acknowledge the complete dedication shown by those who work in our courts and tribunals…

    And how hard you have worked to recover from the effects of the pandemic.

    I know the challenges faced in our courts, and across the justice system, are very deep indeed.

    I hope you saw last week, in the emergency measures that we have taken to address the prisons crisis…

    That I will do what it takes to ensure justice can be done in this country.

    But I know there is so much more that must be addressed:

    Justice delayed is all too often justice denied…

    And this has proved particularly true of women and girls who are the victims of violence and abuse.

    So we must work hard across the justice system to ensure cases are heard sooner and justice is done in a timely way.

    We must also continue the modernisation of our courts and tribunals – criminal, civil and family.

    And we need legal aid that is fit for the needs of the modern world.

    I don’t pretend that any of these have easy answers…

    Nor that everything will be solved quickly.

    But I can say that I will fight for our justice system…

    And that I intend to be in that fight for the long haul.

    Chapter 4 Verse 135 of the Quran reads:

    O ye who believe!

    Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah…

    Even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin…

    And whether it be (against) rich or poor:

    For Allah can best protect both.

    This is the fundamental articulation of how we, as Muslims, view justice in how we deal with the world.

    It places justice above all else.

    Upholding justice is the ideal that has guided my life.

    It ties together both where my family came from, and the great nation we chose to call home.

    And so I will fight for it, every day…

    With the fierceness of many generations of small but mighty Kashmiri women…

    Inherited from my mother.

    And I will pursue the hard work of rebuilding our justice system…

    With the dogged determination I inherited from my dad…

    Who came to this country to make a new life for his family – and never took “no” for an answer.

    To swear this oath today is the greatest honour of my life.

    But, more even than that, it is the greatest of responsibilities.

    I will work tirelessly to discharge its duties and to defend justice.

    Thank you.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2023 Speech on the Budget

    Shabana Mahmood – 2023 Speech on the Budget

    The speech made by Shabana Mahmood, the Labour MP for Birmingham Ladywood, in the House of Commons on 20 March 2023.

    It is a pleasure to speak in the debate today, but, while I do not wish to be unkind, it was a little less of a pleasure to listen to the Secretary of State open the debate. I notice that she is leaving the Chamber. Listening to her assertions about economic growth and the record of this Government, I had to wonder what planet she was on.

    The reality is that, despite the assertions made from the Dispatch Box by the Secretary of State today and the Chancellor last week, the OBR has downgraded the UK’s long-term growth forecasts, with downgrades in all of the last three years of the forecast period. The OECD has confirmed that we will be the weakest economy in the G7 this year, no other G20 economy other than Russia is forecast to shrink this year, and our economy is still smaller than it was prior to the pandemic.

    All that has a huge impact on the finances of families in Birmingham, Ladywood and all over the country. The hit to living standards over the past two years is the largest since comparable records began. Wages are lower in real terms than 13 years ago and real weekly wages are expected to remain below their 2008 levels until at least 2026. I believe that a little more humility was needed at the Dispatch Box today, because the measures taken by this Government over the past 13 years—in particular since the so-called kamikaze Budget last November—have car-crashed the finances of families and households all over our country, with no end in sight.

    Given how deeply the cost of living crisis is hitting families all over our country and given the headline rates of economic growth, it is shocking that the only permanent tax cut the Government announced was the £1 billion tax cut for the richest 1% of earners. The pension changes announced by the Chancellor last week mean that for higher earners with a pension pot of £2 million, that tax cut is worth almost £250,000.

    That measure is supposed to be about getting people back to work—older doctors in particular. Labour agrees that targeted measures are needed to deal with the NHS crisis and to make sure that doctors are not leaving the profession in the numbers they currently are, but the way the Government have gone about making these changes will cost them £70,000 for every single person returning to the labour market—and that is if the Government even manage to hit the number of people they say will return to the labour market as a result. There have been warnings, including from a former Pensions Minister in the coalition Government, that some people will retire early as a result of those measures, so in fact some people will now leave the labour market who were not originally planning on it.

    Labour’s priority would have been to take targeted measures to help doctors, given the acute crisis in the NHS labour market, not the golden

    “sledgehammer to crack a very small nut”,

    as the IFS calls it, announced by this Government. It is the wrong priority at the wrong time.

    The burden of tax must be shared fairly; making a permanent tax change that benefits the 1% with the biggest pension pots is unfair and wrong and, in government, we will reverse it. I also wonder why the Government are still leaving more than £10 billion on the table with the windfall tax. If they closed down the holes and had a proper windfall tax, we could bring in billions of pounds more, which could help ordinary families if that money was put towards easing the pressure of the cost of living crisis.

    We heard a lot about the people’s priorities from the Dispatch Box today. The people’s priorities are easing the cost of living crisis and measures that pay for that easing by asking those with the broadest shoulders to pay more and those profiting from the war in Ukraine to give that money back to the taxpayer so that we can help families in our countries. That is what was needed and that is what the Government have singularly failed to deliver.

    If I may say something about the west midlands, I noted with interest the trailblazer devolution deals announced for both the Greater Manchester area and the West Midlands Combined Authority. That particular deal is welcome, although I worry about the very asymmetric way the Government have approached devolution in our country. We need a nationwide approach to an economic devolution settlement that has some coherence to it, not a “Hunger Games”-style system where areas fight it out over relatively small pots of money, while other areas that are already a little further ahead get more powers and more money. While the deal is welcome to west midlands MPs such as myself, I do not think it is an approach that helps people all over our country.

    While I very much hope that both that deal and the levelling-up zone in the East Birmingham-North Solihull corridor are a success, they must ultimately be judged by whether they turn around the deep-scarring problem of high unemployment in Birmingham, which in the last decade or so has shown no signs of coming down. My constituency has the highest rate of unemployment in the country; Birmingham, Perry Barr is second, Birmingham, Hodge Hill is third, Birmingham, Erdington is fourth, Birmingham, Hall Green is sixth, Birmingham, Yardley is ninth and Birmingham, Northfield is 13th. The trailblazer deal, with all the powers within it and the greater financial devolution it entails, has to result in a step change. It must be a game changer on unemployment rates across Birmingham and the wider west midlands area if it is to be judged a success.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office

    Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Shabana Mahmood on 2016-02-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what information his Department holds on the number of Palestinian children imprisoned in (a) Palestine and (b) Israel in 2015.

    Mr Tobias Ellwood

    The Foreign and Commonwealth Office does not hold information on this issue. However, according to the Israeli Non-Government Office (NGO) Military Court Watch, 422 Palestinian children were held in Israeli military detention as of 31 December, 2015. According to figures provided by the Israeli Prison Service, 148 children are being held inside detention facilities inside of Israel and 274 children are being held in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. According to the Palestinian human rights NGO, Addameer, there are no children being detained as Palestinian prisoners.

    We are concerned about the treatment of Palestinian children in Israeli prisons. We funded an independent report on Children in Military Custody.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Shabana Mahmood on 2016-05-26.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will estimate how many and what proportion of British citizens identified as violent extremists were radicalised by (a) extremist material on the internet, (b) contact with extremists through e-mail or social media, (c) contact with extremists through family connections, (d) contact with extremists through street gangs, (e) contact with extremists through prisons and (f) contact with extremists in Islamic out-of education settings.

    Karen Bradley

    Research shows that there is no single pathway into terrorism or extremism, nor is any one influence likely to be solely responsible for an individual?s radicalisation. It is a unique process for each individual, and the drivers are varied. However, analysis of case studies indicate that certain background factors, when combined with radicalising influences and an ideological opening, and in the absence of protective factors (such as supportive family or friends) can result in an individual being vulnerable to radicalisation.

    The Prevent strategy safeguards vulnerable individuals by building resilience to extremist ideologies, countering the ideology that terrorists espouse, and removing access to terrorist propaganda online. We work in partnership with families and communities to support and safeguard vulnerable individuals. We are working with internet industry partners to remove more terrorist material, and are supporting civil society groups to deliver counter-narrative campaigns.

    Our Channel programme provides support for those most at risk of radicalisation. It is voluntary and confidential, and support is only provided following careful assessment by experts.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Shabana Mahmood on 2016-02-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the level of funding was for coroners in the coroner areas of (a) Birmingham and Solihull, (b) the Black Country and (c) Coventry in (i) 2009-10 and (ii) 2015-16; and what assessment he has made of the implications for such funding of trends in the number of cases dealt with by coroners between those two years.

    Caroline Dinenage

    The Ministry of Justice does not have operational responsibility for coroner services, as they are funded and run by local authorities. The level of funding for the Birmingham and Solihull, Black Country and Coventry coroner services is a matter for the relevant local authorities and the Ministry of Justice holds no information on this.

    Statistics for deaths reported to coroners, including deaths in state detention and those subject to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards, are published annually at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/coroners-and-burials-statistics.

    We do not have information on the number of deaths in state detention reported to coroners in 2010 as this information has only been gathered centrally since 2012. The statistics for 2015 will be published in due course.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Shabana Mahmood on 2016-05-26.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which teams in her Department work on counter-extremism strategy and policy; how many staff are employed in each of those teams; what the grade is of each of those staff; what the budget is for each team; and what the budget is for external expert consultancy services for each of those teams.

    Karen Bradley

    In May 2015 the Home Secretary established the Office for Counter-Extremism, which works on counter-extremism strategy and policy. As of May 2016 the office has 51 staff of the following grades: 7 at SCS PB2, SCS PB1 and Grade 6; 10 at Grade 7; 14 at SEO; 10 at HEO; 10 at EO.

    The 16/17 budget for the Office for Counter-Extremism is £22.5 million, with a maximum of £2.57 million available for external expert consultancy services.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Shabana Mahmood on 2016-02-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many pathologists qualified to conduct postmortems there were in (a) 2010 and (b) 2015.

    Ben Gummer

    The Department does not hold this information.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Shabana Mahmood on 2016-06-06.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of the number of GPs who have left the NHS since 1 January 2016.

    Alistair Burt

    The Department has not made any estimate of the number of general practitioners (GPs) who have left the National Health Service since 1 January 2016.

    The Health and Social Care Information Centre’s (HSCIC) General and Personal Medical Services: England 2005-2015, Provisional Experimental workforce statistics published on 27 April showed that as at September 2015, there were 1,288 more full-time equivalent GPs working and training in the National Health Service than in September 2010. The HSCIC will be publishing these workforce statistics bi-annually, with data as at 31 March 2016 due for publication in September.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Shabana Mahmood – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Shabana Mahmood on 2016-02-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many referrals were made to coroners in England which relate to people who have died in state detention in (a) 2010 and (b) 2015.

    Caroline Dinenage

    The Ministry of Justice does not have operational responsibility for coroner services, as they are funded and run by local authorities. The level of funding for the Birmingham and Solihull, Black Country and Coventry coroner services is a matter for the relevant local authorities and the Ministry of Justice holds no information on this.

    Statistics for deaths reported to coroners, including deaths in state detention and those subject to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards, are published annually at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/coroners-and-burials-statistics.

    We do not have information on the number of deaths in state detention reported to coroners in 2010 as this information has only been gathered centrally since 2012. The statistics for 2015 will be published in due course.