Tag: Rachel Reeves

  • Rachel Reeves – 2023 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    Rachel Reeves – 2023 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, in Liverpool on 9 October 2023.

    Conference.

    It is a privilege to stand here, as your Shadow Chancellor.

    Today, I make this commitment to you, and to the country:

    Out of the wreckage of Tory misrule, Labour will restore our economic stability;

    We will lift living standards.

    Make work pay.

    Rebuild our public services.

    Invest in homegrown industries in every corner of our country.

    And together, we will get Britain its future back.

    This is a momentous week.

    For too long, we have gathered in these halls with the power to talk, but not the power to do.

    Thirteen years of opposition to remind us of that eternal political truth:

    That it is only through power that we can put our principles into action.

    Under Keir Starmer’s leadership, that opportunity is at last within our grasp.

    But only if we allow no complacency.

    Only if we fight for every single vote.

    Only if we work, every day to show we are the party with the discipline, with the determination and with the vision to rebuild Britain.

    Labour’s task is to restore hope to our politics.

    The hope that lets us face the future with confidence.

    With a new era of economic security.

    Because there is no hope without security.

    You cannot dream big if you cannot sleep in peace at night.

    The peace that comes from knowing you have enough to put aside for a rainy day.

    And the knowledge that, when you need them, strong public services will be there for you and your family.

    The strength that allows a society to withstand global shocks.

    Because it is from those strong foundations of security, that hope can spring.

    Conference, the choice at the next election is this:

    Five more years of the Tory chaos and uncertainty, which has left working people worse off or a changed Labour Party offering stability, investment and economic security, so working people are better off.

    It falls to us to show that Labour is ready to serve, ready to lead and ready to rebuild Britain.

    In chess you learn to think several moves ahead.

    But even I couldn’t have predicted the mayhem we have seen, week after week, year after year, from this Conservative government.

    First austerity.

    Then Brexit without a plan.

    And then their kamikaze budget.

    Growth – weak.

    Wages – flat.

    Taxes – up.

    The price of energy – up.

    The price of the family food shop – up.

    And mortgage bills, up hundreds of pounds every single month.

    Never forget – this time last year, in their clamour to cut taxes for those at the top, the Conservatives caused market chaos, crashed the economy, and left working people to pay the price.

    That is why you cannot trust the Tories with our economy ever again.

    What did we see from the Tories last week in Manchester?

    A government bereft of ambition for Britain.

    So ready for opposition, that they are behaving like they are already there.

    Looking inwards, not out to the country.

    Queueing to cheer the extremists rather than kicking them out of their party.

    And telling us what we already know:

    Liz Truss might be out of Downing Street but she is still leading the Conservative Party.

    The one sensible thing they came up with was their phased smoking ban, which we support.

    However, I do fear for the Conservative Party.

    With such a shortage of fag packets, what on earth are they going to write their next policy on?

    And what about the Prime Minister?

    Rishi Sunak had the chance to denounce the politics and policies of Liz Truss.

    To make clear that he would never repeat her mistakes.

    But he didn’t.

    If he’s too weak to stand up to them one year in – what chance do you give him five years in?

    Be in no doubt: the biggest risk to Britain’s economy is five more years of the Conservative Party.

    In contrast, Labour’s defining economic mission is to restore growth to Britain.

    But it is no use simply claiming we want economic growth without new ideas for how we can achieve it.

    That starts with understanding the world as it is today.

    A world that has been reshaped by new technologies, by the pandemic by war, by great power rivalries and by the climate crisis.

    In short: globalisation, as we once knew it, is dead.

    Disruption to supply chains that span the globe has revealed the perils of prizing only the fastest and the cheapest.

    And our ability to make the things essential to our national security has been depleted.

    Great gaps have been allowed to open up between different parts of the country.

    And we have, time and time again, been buffeted by global forces.

    In this new age of insecurity, it is no longer enough – if it ever was – for government to turn a blind eye to where things are made and who is making them.

    To run an economy based only on the contribution of only a few people, a few industries, and a few parts of the country.

    A changed world demands a new business model for Britain.

    It is an approach that I call ‘securonomics’.

    That means government putting economic security first.

    Security for family finances.

    And security for our national economy.

    It means we must rebuild our ability to do, make and sell here in Britain so we are less exposed to global shocks.

    Governments around the world have come to understand, as our government cannot, that wealth does not trickle down from a few at the top, but rests on the contribution of the many.

    On the skill and dedication of those who work in our everyday economy:

    Careworkers, postal workers, supermarket workers and on entrepreneurs, innovators and scientists.

    Growth from the bottom up and the middle out.

    An economy rebuilt in the interests of working people.

    Because from security, comes hope.

    Labour will commit itself to rebuilding that security.

    To restoring that hope.

    Labour is ready to serve.

    Ready to lead.

    Ready to rebuild Britain.

    Conference, I do not underestimate the scale of the task ahead of us, nor the problems we would inherit in government.

    They demand hard work, determination, and tough decisions.

    The exhaustion of Conservative ideas does not give us the freedom to push through programmes detached from our present economic reality.

    Or to take for granted the people we seek to represent.

    Change will be achieved only on the basis of iron discipline.

    Working people rightly expect nothing less.

    Because when you play fast and loose with public finances, you put at risk family finances.

    When the prices of food and energy and housing soar, it is working people who pay that price.

    Like the mum I met in Scarborough earlier this year.

    A mental health nurse, who had moved back home with her mum for five years with her young family, to save for a deposit to buy a home of her own.

    Only to find, when she was about to fulfil that dream, after all that sacrifice, that the mortgage costs she would face had outstripped her income.

    And she had no way of meeting them.

    This is one of thousands upon thousands of similar stories.

    Stories I hear wherever I go.

    Of people who have worked hard, done all the right things;

    But whose dreams have been dashed by the choices of this Conservative government.

    People who we must not, and will not, let down.

    So, a Labour government will not waiver from iron-clad fiscal rules;

    Nor play the Tory game of undermining our economic institutions.

    The last Labour government granted operational independence to the Bank of England.

    I started my career as an economist at the Bank, and I saw the lasting contribution that made to Britain’s economic success first hand.

    So, we will protect the independence of the Bank, the Office for Budget Responsibility and our civil service.

    And, as Chancellor, I will put forward a new Charter for Budget Responsibility, a new fiscal lock.

    Guaranteeing in law that any government making significant and permanent tax and spending changes will be subject to an independent forecast from the OBR.

    Never again will we allow a repeat of the devastation Liz Truss and the Tory Party have inflicted on family finances.

    Never again will a Prime Minister or Chancellor be allowed to rush through plans that are uncosted, unscrutinised, and wholly detached from economic reality.

    But let me address directly those who say that to make hard choices is to make the same choices as the Tory party.

    To them I say:

    Economic responsibility does not detract from advances for working people.

    It is the foundation upon which progress is built.

    Hard choices, but Labour choices.

    The choice to back our high streets and small businesses by requiring online tech giants to pay their fair share.

    The choice to levy a proper windfall tax on the huge profits the energy giants are making, so that working people do not bear the brunt of a crisis they did not create.

    The choice to abolish the non-dom tax status and put that money into our national health service.

    Because conference, if you make your home in Britain, then you should pay your taxes here too. And with Labour, you will.

    And another choice.

    In my first budget as Chancellor I will end the tax loophole which exempts private schools from VAT and business rates and we will put that money into helping the 93% of children in our state schools.

    And if Rishi Sunak wants a fight over this.

    If the party that has herded children into portacabins while school roofs crumble, wants a fight about who has the most aspiration for our children then I say: Bring. It. On.

    We are ready to serve.

    Ready to lead.

    Read to rebuild Britain.

    I didn’t come into politics to raise taxes on working people.

    Indeed, I want them to be lower.

    But the Tories have piled twenty-five tax rises on the shoulders of working people and businesses, while allowing the wealthiest to avoid taxes, keeping loopholes open, and letting government waste spiral.

    Taxpayers’ money should be spent with the same care with which we spend our own money.

    I remember my mum would sit at the kitchen table, with her bank statements and her receipts.

    We weren’t badly off, but we didn’t have money to spare.

    To my mum, every penny mattered.

    I learned that same lesson at the Bank of England:

    Responsibility must always come first.

    But for too long, Tory governments have allowed money to be wasted and taxpayers defrauded.

    So, Labour will wage a war against fraud, waste and inefficiency.

    Today I can announce three further fronts in Labour’s war on waste.

    First, we will crack down on Tory ministers’ private jet habit.

    What is Rishi Sunak so scared of up there in his private jet?

    Meeting a voter?

    We will enforce the ministerial code on the use of private planes and save millions of pounds for taxpayers in the process.

    Second, we will slash government consultancy spending, which has almost quadrupled in just six years.

    Consultants can play an important role, but taxpayers must get value for money.

    So, we will introduce tough new rules.

    If a government department wants to bring in consultants, they must demonstrate the value for money case.

    And if they cannot, then that request will be denied.

    We will aim to cut consultancy spending in half over the next Parliament.

    And third, we will go after those who profited from the carnival of waste during the pandemic.

    Today, the cost to the taxpayer of covid fraud is estimated at £7.2 billion.

    With every single one of those cheques signed by Rishi Sunak as Chancellor.

    And yet just 2% of all fraudulent covid grants have been recovered.

    So, I can announce today that we will appoint a Covid Corruption Commissioner.

    Supported by a hit squad of investigators, equipped with the powers they need and the mandate to do whatever it takes.

    To chase down those who have ripped off the taxpayer, take them to court, and claw back every penny of taxpayer’s money that they can.

    That money belongs in our NHS.

    It belongs in our schools.

    It belongs in our police.

    And conference, we want our money back.

    We are ready to serve.

    We are ready to lead.

    We are ready to rebuild Britain.

    Labour will tax fairly and spend wisely.

    But conference, I must tell you:

    You cannot tax and spend your way to growth.

    The lifeblood of a growing economy is business investment.

    It is investment that allows businesses to expand, create jobs, and compete with international rivals, with new plants, factories and research labs coming to Britain – not Germany, France or America.

    But today, we lag well behind our peers for private sector investment as a share of GDP, with tens of billions of pounds less spent on new machinery and infrastructure.

    Is that because British people aren’t as hard-working?

    Or as creative?

    Or as enterprising?

    No.

    British businesses – from life sciences to the creative industries, from digital to financial services – can and do lead the world.

    But they have been held back by the chaos and instability of this government.

    So Labour will aim to restore investment as a share of GDP to the level it was under the last Labour government, to bring us in line with our peers.

    Adding an additional £50 billion to our GDP every single year.

    Worth £1,700 for every household in Britain.

    But we know too that asking business to do all the heavy lifting, while government steps back, is not an option.

    As our competitors understand, there is a role for government in encouraging and de-risking investment in new and growing industries.

    So, we will provide catalytic investment through a new National Wealth Fund.

    Financial responsibility means knowing when not to spend.

    But it also means making sure that when you invest, you get bang for your buck.

    So we will set that new National Wealth Fund a target:

    For every pound of investment we put in, we will leverage in three times as much private investment.

    And conference, be in no doubt:

    No matter what political games the Tories are willing to play over our energy transition.

    No matter how willing they are to ignore the warnings of businesses, investors and trade unions.

    No matter how many times they put short-term political calculation over the security and prosperity of the British people;

    Labour will make the long-term decision – and invest in British industry;

    Driving down bills and creating new jobs;

    Jobs for plumbers, builders and electricians;

    Jobs for scientists, designers and engineers;

    In green hydrogen and carbon capture and storage, in Grangemouth, Middlesbrough, Swansea and Hull;

    In steel in Sheffield, Scunthorpe and Port Talbot;

    In offshore wind in Fife, Plymouth and Newport;

    Making electric car batteries in Coventry, Sunderland and Blyth.

    And jobs retrofitting homes in Keighley, Rochester, Warrington, and in every village, every town and every city across our country.

    Ready to serve.

    Ready to lead.

    Ready to rebuild Britain.

    And conference:

    If we want to spur investment, restore economic security, and revive growth, then we must get Britain building again.

    The Tories would have you believe we can’t build anything in Britain anymore.

    In fact, the single biggest obstacle to building infrastructure, to investment and to growth in this country is the Conservative Party itself.

    Just look at the fate of HS2.

    A major transport project lost, another promise broken;

    Because the government could not keep costs under control.

    By the time the government even recognised they had a problem, the project was already £30 billion over budget.

    The question must be:

    How was it ever allowed to get to that point?

    If I were in the Treasury, I would have been on the phone to the Chief Executive of HS2 non-stop;

    Demanding answers – and solutions – on behalf of taxpayers, businesses, and commuters.

    But with this government, it has become a pattern.

    When it comes to getting things built and projects delivered, Britain has become the sick man of Europe;

    With HS2 coming in at ten times the cost of the French equivalent.

    And that is why our Shadow Transport Secretary Louise Haigh will commission an independent expert inquiry into HS2 to learn lessons for the future.

    Because many more major government capital projects running over time, over budget and in danger of going undelivered.

    It is incumbent on government to make sure major projects are delivered on time and on budget.

    I will not tolerate taxpayers’ money being treated with the disrespect we have seen over recent years.

    I will not turn a blind eye to dither, delay and incompetence.

    I will hold those responsible to account.

    And I will demand action when they are not delivering value for money.

    So I have tasked Darren Jones, the Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury;

    To work closely with industry experts;

    And to examine, line by line, every ongoing major capital project;

    To make sure that, on day one of a Labour government, we are ready to get Britain building again.

    If the Tories won’t build;

    If the Tories can’t build;

    Then we will.

    We will take on our antiquated planning system.

    Since 2012, decision times for national infrastructure have increased by 65%, now taking four years.

    With Labour, that will change.

    So today I am announcing our plans to get Britain building.

    A once in a generation set of reforms, to accelerate the building of critical infrastructure for energy, transport and housing.

    To fast-track battery factories, life sciences and 5G infrastructure – the things we need to succeed in the decades to come.

    And to tackle the litigation which devours time and money before we even see shovels in the ground.

    And to make sure that when a local community hosts national infrastructure, they will feel the benefits;

    Including through lower energy bills.

    Conference, it is time we had a government that matched the ambition that people have for their families and communities.

    A government siding with the builders not the blockers.

    A government that will get Britain building again.

    And with Labour we will.

    Let me give you one example:

    Our energy grid.

    Today, new developments are being forced to wait up to 15 years – until the late 2030s – to connect to the grid.

    £200bn worth of projects stuck in limbo.

    So today, working closely with Ed Miliband, I can announce Labour’s plans to rewire Britain:

    Securing the supply chain we need for lower bills.

    And to build faster and cheaper, opening up new grid construction to competitive tendering.

    And because the British people should own a stake in their energy system, the publicly owned Great British Energy will look to bid into that competition.

    220,000 new jobs.

    Lower bills, for good.

    And energy security for Britain.

    And there is more.

    We will invest in expanding local authorities’ planning capacity, to speed up decisions.

    And here is how we will pay for it:

    Rocketing interest rates have dealt a hammer blow to the dream of millions of people who want to own their own home, when already that dream was far too remote for far too many people.

    It is not right that, while so many people are struggling, many homes are bought by overseas buyers, who may own a property but leave it vacant;

    Driving up prices, while families and young people are desperate to get onto the housing ladder.

    So because, one year ago, Keir Starmer set out the ambition for the next Labour government to make 70 percent of British households homeowners;

    Because a house should be a home not an asset;

    And because, conference, it is time we built the homes our young people need;

    We will raise the stamp duty surcharge on overseas buyers to get Britain building.

    Conference:

    Labour is the party of builders not blockers;

    Labour is the party of economic growth;

    And it is now beyond doubt:

    It is Labour that is the party of homeownership.

    Working people need the skills to succeed in the modern economy and the security to utilise them.

    From security, hope.

    The parents struggling to balance caring responsibilities and work;

    The key worker struggling to pay the rent;

    The would-be entrepreneur struggling to access the finance to turn brilliant ideas into commercial reality;

    A productive economy cannot be built on such fragile foundations.

    Because there is now a mountain of economic evidence;

    That higher wages and greater job security have real benefits for business.

    And there is also a mountain of human evidence:

    Of too many children growing up in poverty;

    Too many parents skipping meals;

    Too many people waiting by the phone to find out whether they’ve got work that day or not.

    So, as Angela Rayner set out yesterday;

    The next Labour government will offer a new deal for working people:

    Zero hour contracts, banned;

    Fire and rehire, gone;

    Sick pay, strengthened;

    And basic rights from day one.

    And conference:

    It was the last Labour government which finally delivered on the promise of Keir Hardie to implement a national minimum wage.

    The fight against poverty pay has been at the heart of our movement from the beginning.

    And so the next Labour government will go further:

    Not a rebrand of the minimum wage, like the Tories;

    A minimum wage taking account of the real cost of living and finally we will have a genuine living wage.

    The post of Chancellor of the Exchequer has existed for eight hundred years.

    In that time – not one single woman has held that post.

    Conference, when we next meet, I intend to address this hall as Britain’s first female Chancellor of the Exchequer.

    To do so would be the privilege of my lifetime.

    But more important than that, it would come with a great weight of responsibility.

    The responsibility to show our daughters – to show my daughter – that they should not place any limits on their ambitions.

    And the responsibility too, like Labour women before, to drive progress for women.

    Still, half a century after the Equal Pay Act, women in Britain earn on average 15% less than men.

    On current trends it may take until 2044 for that gap to disappear.

    Women cannot afford to wait that long.

    And nor should we have to.

    The work of women has been undervalued for too long.

    That is why I have asked Frances O’Grady to examine how we can go further and faster so that the next Labour government makes the next great strides towards ending the gender pay gap once and for all.

    Ready to serve.

    Ready to lead.

    And ready to rebuild Britain.

    We have changed this party so that we may have the chance to change our country.

    Labour will fight this next election on the economy.

    Every day we will expose what the Conservatives have done to our country.

    Because the questions people should ask themselves ahead of the next election are simple:

    Do you and your family feel better off than you did thirteen years ago?

    Do our hospitals, our schools and our police work better than thirteen years ago?

    Frankly, is there anything in Britain that works better than when the Conservatives came into office thirteen years ago?

    If you do feel Britain is better off after thirteen years;

    If you think our country is as good as it can be;

    If, after all this, you want to leave your future, your children’s future, our country’s future in the hands of the Conservative Party;

    Then I may not be able to persuade you.

    But if, like me, you think Britain can do better;

    That Britain can be better off;

    If you, like me, believe that it is time to put security first and reject the risk of five more years of chaos and decline, then join us.

    Join us in our mission to rebuild Britain.

    Join us in our mission to give Britain its future back.

    Creating new jobs;

    Driving down bills;

    Reviving our high streets.

    Rescuing our public services;

    More teachers in our schools;

    More police on our streets;

    More doctors and nurses in our hospitals.

    Lifting families from poverty.

    Achieving energy security.

    And bringing growth back to Britain.

    We are here:

    Ready to serve.

    Ready to lead.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2023 Speech on the Budget

    Rachel Reeves – 2023 Speech on the Budget

    The speech made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the House of Commons on 16 March 2023.

    The reality of yesterday’s Budget is clear: long-term growth downgraded, household incomes falling, public services on their knees. Families are facing the biggest hit to living standards since records began. The only surprise was a huge handout to the richest 1% of pension savers. Yet again, working people and businesses—the key to our economic success—have been put at the bottom of the pile.

    The questions people will be asking themselves after 13 years of Conservative Government are these. Am I and my family better off? Are our school, hospitals and transport systems working any better than 13 years ago? Frankly, is anything in Britain working better today than it did when the Conservatives came into office? The answer to those questions is a resounding no.

    Labour believes that the tax burden must be shared fairly. That is why I have announced today that Labour will reverse the changes to tax-free pension allowances. It is the wrong priority, at the wrong time, for the wrong people. Instead, we would create a targeted scheme to encourage doctors to work overtime and not to retire early. That could be done at a fraction of the cost, as the British Medical Association has said.

    The Government’s policy to give tax cuts to the wealthiest 1% is unravelling before our eyes. Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, says that even on the “optimistic” Office for Budget Responsibility costings, it will cost an eye-watering £100,000 per job retained. The Resolution Foundation said:

    “The beneficiaries from these reforms stand to gain large amounts, and they are heavily concentrated among the very rich”.

    It added that

    “this giveaway could lead to inheritance tax ‘abuse’”.

    Pensions expert John Ralfe has said that

    “this is not about supporting a hard-pressed NHS, it is really a tax giveaway…for the very highest earners.”

    Labour recognises the mess that the Government have got into with our NHS workforce planning, and we have called for changes to doctors’ pensions, but we will oppose this untargeted scheme for the wealthiest and we will put this measure to a vote in Parliament next week. I defy Conservative Members to vote in favour of a policy that they know will do absolutely nothing to lift the living standards of their constituents.

    Last autumn we saw the Chancellor of the day announce reckless tax cuts to help the richest, too. Why does this keep happening? The reason why the Tories get the wrong answers is that they have the wrong priorities for our country and the wrong analysis of the economy. Wealth does not just trickle down from the top; it comes from the efforts of millions of working people and thousands of businesses. That is Labour’s approach to growth.

    Theresa Villiers (Chipping Barnet) (Con)

    The right hon. Lady denounces the abolition of the lifetime allowance, but it was actually something that never applied under Labour at all. If Labour is so concerned about its loss, why did it not introduce it in the first place?

    Rachel Reeves

    Gordon Brown introduced a lifetime allowance for pensions savings, as I am sure the right hon. Lady remembers. However, the point here is about priorities. For all our constituents, there is an average tax increase per household of £650, starting next month with the freezing of the tax thresholds and the increase in council tax. Yet yesterday, the only permanent tax cut provided in the Budget was for people who already have pensions savings of more than £1 million. I just do not believe that that is the priority for our constituents, and I think hon. Members right across the House, if they think about it, know that too.

    Mr Deputy Speaker—is that what I call you?

    Mr Deputy Speaker (Sir Roger Gale)

    Yes.

    Rachel Reeves

    It is wonderful to see you in your place. We were told that this was a “Budget for growth”, but the documents published with this Budget confirm that the UK economy will shrink this year. The Chancellor expects us to cheer at the news that the economy will shrink a little bit less than he previously thought. Is that really what “good” looks like for the British economy?

    The Office for Budget Responsibility also confirmed that we will have the weakest growth in the G7 this year and next year, and it saw growth downgraded for each of the last three years of the forecast period. All the while, the UK is the only G7 economy that is still smaller than it was before the global pandemic.

    Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Slough) (Lab)

    This Budget will not do a great deal for my Slough constituents who are really struggling to make ends meet and pay their bills, apart from a big tax cut for the very richest in our society. My constituents will have the highest tax burden and the biggest drop in disposable income since the second world war inflicted on them. Does my right hon. Friend agree that this Budget will not actually help to solve the cost of living crisis?

    Rachel Reeves

    I have spent time in my hon. Friend’s Slough constituency talking to working people and businesses. On the most recent couple of visits there, I do not remember anyone saying, “The big priority for families and businesses in Slough is a tax cut for the 1%.” Instead, they were saying, “Let’s have a targeted scheme for the NHS, as Labour has called for, instead of this blanket approach for the top 1%.”

    The Government have, to be fair, given us some growth: growth in stealth taxes, growth in mortgage costs and growth in NHS waiting lists. There is no plan for the future, just a Tory legacy of pain. It will take a Labour Government to spark and sustain growth, lift people’s living standards in every part of the country, meet the challenges of the future and achieve the change that our country desperately needs.

    When I meet people in industry, I hear frustration from employers who cannot get and retain the staff that they need. It is a feeling the Tories know all too well, with three Prime Ministers in one year, and the current Chancellor the fourth in that role since just last summer. Yet somehow, it is the same Tory Government. It is a bit like Trigger’s broom in “Only Fools and Horses”, with its 17 new heads and 14 new handles, only much less useful.

    After his five months as Chancellor, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Jeremy Hunt) might feel that he should qualify for a Conservative party long-service award. In fact, of the past three Chancellors, he is the first to deliver a Budget, although the last Chancellor did last long enough to deliver a mini-Budget that crashed our economy—an extreme experiment in ultra-Tory ideology, using Britain’s economy and people’s livelihoods as their laboratory. It must never happen again.

    Alex Cunningham (Stockton North) (Lab)

    Our country has some amazing assets and amazing opportunities to invest in the green industries of the future, but we see a lacklustre plan from the Tory Government to exploit them. Does my right hon. Friend agree that this Government of gimmicks have all but given up on leading the way and creating jobs and opportunities as we decarbonise our economy and, in reality, want to import everything from abroad? Surely it is time that they nicked our plan.

    Rachel Reeves

    I know that in my hon. Friend’s constituency, there are huge opportunities for the jobs and industries of the future—for example, in carbon capture and storage and in green hydrogen.

    I will not be churlish: I must admit that there were some good ideas in the Budget yesterday—the ones that my colleagues and I have announced in the last few months, which we are happy to support. There was a fairer deal for people on prepayment meters who are paying a premium—we called for this last August. There was also preventing a fuel duty increase, a plan to help the over-50s back into work and better childcare provision for working parents. They were all called for by Labour and are now backed by the Tories. The truth is, however, that after 13 years of Tory Government, people will rightly ask, “Is that it? Is that really all they think it takes to reverse 13 years of low growth, falling living standards and crumbling public services?”

    Of course, we welcome the freeze in energy prices—after all, we proposed it—but politics is about priorities. Labour first called for a windfall tax to help people with their bills 14 months ago. We were clear that keeping energy prices down was our top priority, and that it was wrong for oil and gas giants to profit from the windfalls of war at everyone else’s expense. Yet again, however, the Chancellor chose yesterday to leave billions of pounds of windfall profits on the table, which could be supporting families and businesses during this cost of living crisis. It is a question of who pays, and the Government are turning to the public and saying, “You.”

    There seems to be a disconnect between what I heard from the Chancellor yesterday and the experiences of my constituents and many people across the country. The Tories claim that their plan is working, but the Resolution Foundation says that the typical household will be £1,100 worse off as a result of the Government’s policies over the period of just this Parliament. Is that really what success looks like to them?

    The reality is that people are still weighed down by a prolonged cost of living crisis that is taking its toll. Debt advice organisations have faced a tidal wave of demand from people, but incredibly, the jobs of thousands of debt advisers are at risk. Let me be clear: more people are struggling not because they have forgotten how to budget, but because Tory Budgets are simply not working for them.

    One of the biggest costs people face is their monthly mortgage or rent. The Chancellor said yesterday that the impact of the mini-Budget had disappeared—seriously? He should tell that to the family facing a £2,000 hike in their mortgage payment, as confirmed by the Office for Budget Responsibility yesterday. That means less money to spend on the local high street, meals out with the family or an annual holiday. That is the lasting damage that the Conservatives have done to the living standards of working people. The last thing that the country needed in the middle of a cost of living crisis was a Tory mortgage penalty.

    Despite all the damage that the Tories have done, I am optimistic about the future for our country. I have had the privilege of seeing great innovation across Britain, from the development of battery operated trains at Hitachi in County Durham to hydrogen-powered engines at JCB in Staffordshire and pioneering research at Rolls-Royce into carbon neutral aviation. I know the potential that we have as a country. That is what Labour’s green prosperity plan is all about. It is a plan to decarbonise our economy, drive down bills and let British businesses and workers compete in the global race for the jobs and industries of the future.

    Iain Stewart (Milton Keynes South) (Con)

    The right hon. Lady rightly points to the great innovation, research and development that is happening in British companies. Does she not agree that the measures that the Chancellor announced to help to discount research and development will be a major boost to such industries?

    Rachel Reeves

    The problem is that last autumn, the Chancellor announced a scrapping of the R&D schemes, but then brought back something this week that we are supposed to cheer about. The plan that Labour has set out will rely on Government and business working and investing together.

    As President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act galvanises green energy in the United States and Governments from Europe to Asia and Australia respond, it is not enough here in Britain to cling to old ideas and old methods while other countries steal ahead in the global race. Our growth plans will be alongside a modern industrial strategy, reform of business rates, changes to the apprenticeship levy and measures to fix the broken Brexit deal in order to increase the order books for British industry. There is so much more that the Government could be doing to boost growth, create good jobs and get Britain’s economy firing on all cylinders, but I heard so little of that in the Chancellor’s Budget yesterday.

    The verdict is in. The Federation of Small Businesses says that the Budget leaves “many feeling short-changed” and that

    “the Government’s lack of support for small firms in critical areas is glaring.”

    It says that

    “trickledown economics here simply does not work.”

    The British Chambers of Commerce highlights that, yet again, the Government

    “failed to reform business rates”,

    and the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders says:

    “There is little that enables the UK to compete with massive packages of support to power a green transition that are available elsewhere.”

    The Institute for Fiscal Studies describes capital expensing as “temporary tweaks”, concluding that:

    “There’s no stability, no certainty, and no sense of a wider plan.”

    As for working people, the TUC points out that:

    “Real wages will not return to 2008 levels until 2026”

    and that

    “workers across the economy will have looked at this Budget and thought ‘was that it?’”.

    This is a Government who are struggling to paper over the cracks after their 13 years of neglect and shoddy workmanship. The roof is leaking, the windows are rotten and the foundations are suffering from subsidence. The Tories are totally incapable of building the country and economy that we need.

    Alex Cunningham

    I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for giving way a second time, even though she would rather not. I wonder whether she has seen the comments from the Federation of Small Businesses, which said that, on investment in the labour market, the measures that small businesses were looking for are missing, and that the measures are well wide of the mark and irrelevant to the 5.5 million-strong small businesses in our communities.

    Rachel Reeves

    Small businesses are the backbone of our economy, and the words from the Federation of Small Businesses should have a chilling effect on those on the Government Front Bench.

    Beyond the economy, growth rates and living standards, if we want any further evidence of the Government’s failure, just look at our public services. Public services play a crucial role in achieving a strong economy and a good society. They adapted during the pandemic and were critical to our response in the fight against covid, with people taking personal risks to keep others safe and supported. Thirteen years of Conservative Government has weakened our public services and devalued the people working in them. Labour would make choices in the national interest.

    Yet again, the Budget failed to abolish non-dom tax status. As we know, non-doms have no bigger champion than in Downing Street, but Labour believes that those who make Britain their home should pay their taxes here. The non-dom rules are costing us £3 billion every year. Ending that tax exemption could fund the biggest expansion of the NHS workforce in a generation.

    It is not just our NHS that has suffered. We have lost all kinds of community assets over the last 13 years, from libraries to Sure Start centres and youth clubs. Let us take one example: since 2010, 382 swimming pools have closed in England under the Tories. Yesterday, the Chancellor announced a £63 million package to keep the remaining ones open, but, at the same time, the Prime Minister has upgraded the local electricity network to heat his own swimming pool. I wonder whether he will be inviting the local kids who have lost their swimming pools to come and use his facilities.

    This Government have no plan to clean up the mess they have made over 13 years. Each and every time they promise to solve a problem, they fail and the country pays the price. We need a Budget for growth, yet growth has been downgraded. We needed to raise living standards, yet household incomes are falling at their fastest rate since records began. We needed a proper windfall tax on the energy giants, but instead they continue to enjoy the windfalls of war. We needed a Budget for home ownership, yet mortgage costs have risen because of the Tories’ kamikaze mini-Budget last year. We needed a Budget with a plan to invest in our NHS workforce, but the Prime Minister and Chancellor chose to defend the non-doms instead.

    The Tories have had their chance and they have blown it; they are out of ideas and they are out of time. We need a general election and a Labour Government to give our country its future back.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2023 Speech at the Fabian Society New Year Conference

    Rachel Reeves – 2023 Speech at the Fabian Society New Year Conference

    The speech made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 21 January 2023.

    Friends, what a pleasure it is to be with you all again.

    This might come as a surprise, but I can’t help but feel it’s been a slow start to the political year.

    After the procession in and out of No.11 last year, it’s already the 21st January and I’ve still only faced one Chancellor.

    Last year I faced four in six months.

    If Jeremy Hunt lasts until the budget, he’ll be the longest serving Chancellor since the current Prime Minister.

    Now I have been a Fabian almost as long as I have been a member of the Labour Party.

    As Secretary of the Young Fabians, I remember meeting in the old offices on Dartmouth Street, and feeling a real connection to our history; every time Labour has won power and achieved meaningful change.

    Take one of my heroes: Beatrice Webb.

    As a social investigator, reforming campaigner, and an economist too, Webb spent a lifetime fighting to build an economy that worked for ordinary people, in the knowledge that this was not just a moral cause, but a route to a stronger, more prosperous country.

    As our economy, our society and our politics have changed, so our solutions must change too.

    This morning I want to tell you about how the next Labour government will bring that Fabian spirit to bear on the challenges ahead.

    As we look ahead to the next General Election, the questions the British public will be asking are simple:

    Are me and my family better off than thirteen years ago?

    Do our hospitals, our schools and our police work better than they did thirteen years ago?

    Frankly, does anything work better than when the Conservatives came into office?

    And if the answers to these questions are no – then you know it is time for a change.

    The Conservatives have brought our public services to breaking point.

    Three years ago they clapped our nurses; but with our NHS on the brink, their solution is to sack them for taking industrial action.

    They crashed the economy, landed homeowners across the country with eye-watering increases to their mortgages, and now they want to tell us all that last year was just a bad dream.

    And they have presided over more than a decade of stagnant living standards.

    Thirteen wasted years.

    Never again let the Conservatives claim to be the party of sound economic management.

    Never again let them claim to be the party of aspiration.

    And never trust the Tories with our public services.

    And to add insult to injury, this week they showed us the depth of their commitment to their own levelling-up rhetoric.

    The Prime Minister gave the game away last year, when he bragged about fiddling funding formulas to divert cash from the North to Tunbridge Wells.

    And then what did we get this week, when the results of this round of the Levelling Up Fund were announced?

    Money funnelled into Tory-held seats.

    £19 million for the Prime Minister’s own constituency.

    But nothing for the entire city of Leeds.

    Ministers have broken promises and they have wasted councils’ time.

    It’s not that the Tories have failed in their efforts to level up the country.

    They haven’t even bothered.

    And worst of all it is clear that they never intended to either.

    Friends, it is time for change.

    It is time for a Labour government.

    While the causes of the cost of living crisis are largely global.

    But our unique exposure to global events – to pandemic, war and economic crisis – has been the result of the choices of Conservative governments.

    Our present crisis is just one chapter in a longer story: more than a decade of weak growth, productivity and pay, and of the eroding of Britain’s economic resilience.

    The effects of Putin’s war have reverberated around the world, and we will not waver in our support for Ukraine.

    But it wasn’t Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that caused home insulation rates to collapse.

    It wasn’t Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that caused a decade of inaction on nuclear and renewable energy.

    And it wasn’t Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that closed our gas storage facilities here in Britain.

    Those are the consequences of a thirteen-year Tory experiment, in unilateral energy disarmament.

    And we are all paying the price.

    We desperately need a plan to repair Britain’s economic and energy security, and bring energy bills down; a plan to end our reliance on fossil fuels.

    But we also need a plan, for the weeks and months ahead.

    Because while the Prime Minister buries his head in the sand, for ordinary people the cost of living crisis hasn’t gone away.

    That is why we have called on the government to rule out any rise in fuel duty in the upcoming budget.

    Because it cannot be right, in the midst of a cost of living crisis, that nurses driving from shift to shift, supermarket workers doing the night shift and the millions of people around the country without access to decent public transport should be left to face the biggest ever hike in petrol prices.

    And today I can tell you more about the immediate action we would take to address the consequences of this crisis.

    Millions of households are still looking to a 40 percent increase in their energy bills, in April.

    On a week when temperatures fell below zero, I know many families and pensioners will be feeling the pressure particularly acutely.

    At the same time, energy companies continue to enjoy record profits.

    Over the last year, North Sea oil and gas profits have tripled.

    That cannot be right.

    So today, I can announce what a Labour government would do.

    We would hold to that most basic of principles: that those who have profited from the windfalls of war should shoulder their share of the cost, so ordinary people do not have to bear the brunt of a crisis that they did not cause.

    We will extend the windfall tax, closing the fossil fuel investment loophole and taxing oil and gas profits at the same rate as Norway.

    By backdating this from the start of 2022, when oil and gas giants were already making historically large profits, we can raise more than £13bn.

    A Labour government would pass those savings onto families immediately, to keep energy bills down this year.

    Our plan will save a typical household up to £500 on their energy bills from April, compared to the government’s plan, by keeping the energy price guarantee at its current level of £2,500, rather than letting it rise to £3,000.

    But let me be clear: this is a maximum.

    If wholesale prices fall further, the cap must come down too.

    And it is a scandal that those with the least are often forced to pay the most for their energy.

    So we would eliminate the premium paid by households on prepayment meters.

    And the forced installation of prepayment meters all too often lead to the most vulnerable households going without heating entirely.

    So Labour are calling on government to bring in a moratorium on that practice.

    Let me say to those companies that are doing this:

    It is wrong.

    It punishes the most vulnerable households.

    And under Labour, it will not happen.

    That is what a Labour government would do.

    That is a plan for today’s crisis.

    But as Keir said earlier this month:

    Sticking plaster politics is not enough.

    We cannot persist with walking into a crisis unprepared, and at the last minute producing hugely expensive fixes to get us through, while the underlying problems – those weakened foundations – remain untouched.

    We will take urgent action to help millions of households through the ongoing energy crisis – because we must.

    And Labour will act to keep energy prices down for good.

    That is why Labour has a plan to reach one hundred percent clean power by 2030, and retrofit millions of homes.

    These policies could save a typical household up to £1,400, generating savings not just for one year, but for every year to come.

    A response to today’s crisis and a plan to prevent tomorrow’s crisis.

    That is what a Labour government will do.

    Climate transition is a moral responsibility – we all know that.

    It is an economic necessity.

    Because the costs of action today are far less than the costs of action tomorrow.

    And it is an opportunity.

    Because whatever ideologues on left and right might tell you, we do not have to choose between going green and going for growth.

    In the 2020s and 2030s, the two go hand-in-hand.

    To some on the right, climate change is nothing more than a cost or even a con.

    Some on the left meanwhile will claim that the only way to tackle the climate crisis is nothing short of a command economy, or the overthrowing of capitalism itself.

    And then there are those on the fringes of the green movement who shudder at the very prospect of economic growth.

    I reject all those assessments, and their ideological cul-de-sacs.

    More innovation, more investment and more enterprise will be crucial to our green transition.

    And there is a global race on for the jobs and industries that will power that transition.

    We do not to have choose between letting the planet burn, or accepting a future of diminishing living standards in a poorer country.

    If these were the extent of our ambitions, we might as well give up now.

    Climate transition isn’t about putting a lick of green paint on a stagnant and insecure economy;

    It’s about new jobs and new industries, lower bills and higher living standards, and economic growth.

    Pro-worker; pro-business; and pro-climate.

    We know some country is going to lead in offshore wind, in green hydrogen, in carbon capture and storage, and in so much more.

    Why not Britain?

    From Rolls Royce, developing carbon neutral aviation in Derby, to Tred in Leeds, which has launched the UK’s first green debit card, to Fife Renewables Innovation Centre, housing businesses at the frontier of the clean energy revolution – the potential is there.

    But in too many places and too many industries, it is going unrealised.

    Meanwhile the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act has galvanized green energy in the United States.

    And at the World Economic Forum this week, Ursula von der Leyen announced plans for an EU Net-Zero Industry Act to allow European nations to compete.

    But our government is sat carping from the sidelines.

    Grant Shapps, the Business Secretary, says these measures are ‘dangerous’.

    But I’ll tell him what’s dangerous: doing nothing.

    The choice is simple: we can sit by while our peers steam ahead in the global race for the jobs and industries of the future; or we can use all the powers at our disposal to let British businesses and working people compete in that race.

    That is why our Green Prosperity Plan forms the very centrepiece of Labour’s economic policy.

    That is the choice Labour will make.

    That is what a Labour government will do.

    This morning I can tell you more about a core part of our Green Prosperity Plan:

    Our world-leading pledge, to be the first major economy to have 100% zero-carbon power by 2030.

    We don’t make that pledge lightly.

    It will take choices; hard choices, that a Labour Government will make in the national interest.

    Take just one example: our planning system.

    A system now defined by delay.

    It currently takes up to 13 years to develop a new offshore wind farm.

    Up to 4 of those years are spent fighting through the planning system.

    The Hornsey 1 wind farm off the Yorkshire coast was commissioned under the last Labour Government, but didn’t come online until 2019.

    Its cheap, clean power that now supplies a million homes couldn’t be provided until years of bird data and other planning requirements had been collected and assessed.

    ​​Since 2017, not a single offshore wind farm has been recommended for approval by the Planning Inspectorate; in every case they have had to be overruled by the Secretary of State.

    But it adds further delay when that same Secretary of State lets that approval decision sit on their desk for almost 2 years, as they did with Hornsey 3, which will be the world’s biggest wind farm when it’s finally completed later this decade.

    Those delays are depriving a further 3.2 million homes from that cheap, clean power.

    And that’s before you consider the years offshore wind farms have to wait for a connection from the National Grid, so that that power can get from the North Sea to people’s homes and businesses.

    This backlog has now got so bad that projects from the latest leasing round last year have been told they will not get a grid connection until 2033 – over a decade later.

    Meanwhile, what are the Tories doing?

    Reforming the planning system?

    Sorting out the grid backlogs?

    Not a bit of it.

    They’re using these critical months and years to argue about whether they should continue to ban onshore wind completely, or simply set up a special, uniquely-restrictive planning regime for it instead.

    With Labour, that won’t stand.

    If we’re going to double onshore wind capacity, triple solar, and quadruple offshore wind, all within the next 7 years, we will need to reform that planning system.

    We’d ensure net zero is embedded through it and our whole energy system; bring planning restrictions for onshore wind in line with other infrastructure; impose tough new targets to get planning decisions on renewables down from years to just months; reform the grid system to cut the delays and get on with delivering more clean power capacity to turbocharge the transition; and ensure these decisions are prioritised so that agencies can meet them.

    We’ll look at how to ensure that communities that host infrastructure in the national interest feel its benefits; end the farce of planning decisions languishing on Ministers desks and crack down on Whitehall blocking developments; and require Local Authorities to proactively identify land for renewable energy opportunities and improve access to data.

    That’s just one example.

    But we will remove those barriers, wherever they are.

    That is what a Labour government will do.

    That work is ongoing, led by Ed Miliband, and there will be much more for us to announce ahead of the next election.

    Now, the Prime Minister made clear the depth of his own commitment to net zero this week, when he chose to fly by RAF jet from Teesside to Blackpool.

    I understand the air stewards had to do the seatbelt demonstration a few times before it really sank in.

    When you look back on the next Labour government, I ask you to judge us on this:

    Are energy bills down – for good?

    Is Britain more secure from the effects of global fluctuations in the energy market?

    Are we on course for net zero?

    Have we created hundreds of thousands of jobs in Britain, in new and growing industries, in our ports, our steel towns and across our industrial heartlands?

    I will campaign with everything I’ve got to see that Labour government elected.

    I will give all I’ve got to be your next Chancellor.

    And I make this pledge to you:

    That I will be Britain’s first green Chancellor.

    Our Green Prosperity Plan forms one part of a wider approach.

    The Tories may bury their heads in the sand, but around the world, economic common sense has moved on.

    Inequality does harm economic growth.

    Markets alone cannot deliver the strategic investment we need.

    And as well as the success of industries at the frontier, the state of our everyday economy – of care, retail, and more – is crucial to sustainable growth.

    To fail to learn these lessons, is to follow the path of managed decline.

    The alternative is what the US Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, calls ‘modern supply side economics’.

    It is based on the knowledge that strong and inclusive economic growth cannot be achieved without active government creating the foundations for a dynamic private sector to build on.

    It is time for a British ‘modern supply side’ approach.

    Let me explain what I mean.

    It starts with the acceptance that neither of the big ideas which defined British economic policy over much of the last eighty years are adequate for today’s challenges.

    Because although we would be in a far better place today had the Tories 10 years ago paid more heed to Keynes’ insights, Keynesian pump-priming on the demand side does not hold the answers to stagflation, and supply-side problems require supply-side solutions.

    That was true in the 1970s, and it remains so today.

    But the old supply side economics was based on a misplaced faith, that deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthiest would stimulate economic growth and their benefits would ‘trickle down’ to everybody else.

    Not only did that approach widen inequality between places and people.

    It had diminishing returns for growth and productivity.

    The Truss experiment was the last gasp of a failed economic philosophy.

    A modern supply side approach means government taking on a more strategic role, to expand the productive capacity and the resilience of our economy:

    First, by providing catalytic investment and strategic partnership with business, through our Green Prosperity Plan, through our modern industrial strategy, and through the work of our start-up review.

    Second, by boosting our labour supply – by supporting strong public services and helping people back into work.

    And third, by repairing our economic resilience, extending economic security with a real Living Wage and our New Deal for Working People – led by the work of Angela Rayner – and reducing our dependence on fragile international supply chains with our plans to buy, make and sell more in Britain.

    Together these plans comprise a modern supply-side economics; a new approach, for economic growth felt in every part of Britain.

    That is what a Labour government will do.

    The success of this approach will require honesty about the limits of what national government can achieve alone.

    First, because we cannot achieve our ambitions with the pull of a lever in Whitehall, and so we will give local, regional and national leaders the powers they need to support thriving local economies.

    And second, because any government serious about growth and improving the supply-side capacity of our economy needs to fix the mess that is this government’s Brexit deal and forge a closer trading relationship with the European Union.

    Our agriculture and our food industries rely on trade right across Europe, but we have a deal which doesn’t even include a veterinary agreement.

    We are pioneers in creative industries, but we have a deal which ties them in knots over visas.

    We are the second largest exporter of services in the world, but we have a deal that doesn’t include the mutual recognition of professional qualifications.

    And we have the best universities in Europe, but we have a deal which cuts us out of the Horizon research initiative.

    So we will fix the holes in the government’s patchwork Brexit deal.

    And instead of picking needless fights with our largest trading partner, we will work together with our neighbours and allies, to get a deal that works for the British economy.

    That is what it means to stand up for the national interest.

    And one final thing:

    Modern supply side economics recognises that a strong economy rests on strong public services.

    So be in no doubt: there can be no return to austerity.

    It has left our country poorer, our public services at breaking point, and our public finances in tatters.

    Labour will make sure public services have the investment they need;

    And reform, too – to meet the challenges of an ageing society; to equip young people with the skills for a new economy; and seize opportunities presented by advances in artificial intelligence and robotics.

    Good public services must be paid for.

    Labour will not waver in our commitment to fiscal responsibility.

    I have been clear about the absolute importance of ensuring every line of our next manifesto is fully costed.

    So let me tell you what a Labour government will do.

    We will end the tax break which exempts private schools from paying VAT and business rates.

    Because friends, private schools are many things, but they are not charities.

    We will put that money where it belongs, into all our children’s futures: into our state schools.

    And we will end the non-dom tax status.

    Because if you make Britain your home, you should pay your taxes here too.

    And under Labour you will.

    We will put that money into one of the largest workforce expansions in the history of our NHS.

    More doctors; more nurses; more midwives; more health workers.

    That is what a Labour government will do.

    I know that, in the months to come, many of you will play your part in making our shared ambitions a reality.

    Together, we will change Britain again – in that Fabian spirit.

    We will rescue our public services from Tory neglect.

    Restore economic security to working people.

    Support British businesses to lead in the global race.

    And build that fairer, greener Britain.

    That is what a Labour government will do.

    And friends, be in no doubt:

    That government is coming soon.

    Thank you.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Rachel Reeves – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Rachel Reeves on 2015-11-26.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the potential effect on the income of a family with one earner and two children that starts a claim for universal credit and is not migrating from a legacy benefit of the proposed reforms to universal credit in the Summer Budget 2015 in (a) 2016-17, (b) 2017-18, (c) 2018-19 and (d) 2019-10.

    Priti Patel

    The information requested is not collated centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost

  • Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Rachel Reeves on 2016-01-13.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the amount of income accruing to the Exchequer annually if ISA returns became taxable on pots greater than (a) £250,000, (b) £500,000 and (c) £1 million.

    Harriett Baldwin

    HM Revenue and Customs publishes detailed statistics relating to Individual Savings Accounts on Gov.uk. Links given below:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/487119/Dec15_expenditure_reliefs_Final.xlsx.pdf)

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/423438/Table_9.10_2012-13_for_publication.pdf).

  • Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Rachel Reeves on 2016-05-18.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how much new funding has been given to SMEs across the West Yorkshire Combined Authority to develop their workforces since the publication of the Long-Term Economic Plan for Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire in February 2015.

    Anna Soubry

    The Leeds City Region Skills Service has, to date, supported 620 businesses, with 3,300 pieces of training completed and 1,595 more underway. The value of this support to SMEs is £2.12m.

    In 2016/17 the Skills Service is expected to support skills diagnostics for 800 businesses, help 1,100 SMEs to offer apprenticeships and upskill 5,600 employees.

    Grants between £500 and £50,000 are available to match business investments in workforce training.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Rachel Reeves on 2016-06-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when new eligibility criteria for free school meals under universal credit will be (a) published and (b) implemented.

    Mr Sam Gyimah

    We will continue to ensure that children from the poorest families benefit from a free school meal. My Department is continuing to work closely with the Department for Work and Pensions to consider eligibility criteria for free school meals following the introduction of Universal Credit. In the meantime, any child in a family in receipt of Universal Credit will continue to be entitled to free school meals.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Rachel Reeves on 2016-09-02.

    To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how many of her Department’s staff are in receipt of support for private school fees for children whose parents are stationed (a) in the UK and (b) overseas.

    Rory Stewart

    This information is not readily available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost to the taxpayer.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Rachel Reeves – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Rachel Reeves on 2015-11-26.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the potential effect on the income of a family with one earner and three children that starts a new claim for universal credit and is not migrating from a legacy benefit of the proposed reforms to universal credit in the Summer Budget 2015 in (a) 2016-17, (b) 2017-18, (c) 2018-19 and (d) 2019-10.

    Priti Patel

    The information requested is not collated centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost

  • Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Rachel Reeves – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Rachel Reeves on 2016-01-13.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the value and proportion of tax relief provided on ISA investments across the income distribution.

    Harriett Baldwin

    HM Revenue and Customs publishes detailed statistics relating to Individual Savings Accounts on Gov.uk. Links given below:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/487119/Dec15_expenditure_reliefs_Final.xlsx.pdf)

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/423438/Table_9.10_2012-13_for_publication.pdf).