Tag: Rachel Reeves

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Speech on the State of the Economy

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Speech on the State of the Economy

    The speech made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 16 June 2021.

    Five years ago, my friend and colleague Jo Cox was murdered. There is not a day goes by when I do not think of her, and I know that on both sides of the House she is missed dearly.

    All the way through this pandemic we have said that the economic and health responses must go together. That means keeping support in place for as long as the public health measures demand it. When the public health restrictions are extended, as they were by the Prime Minister on Monday, the economic support should be extended too; otherwise we risk falling at the final hurdle. Having spent billions of pounds supporting the economy, it would be tragic to see thousands of businesses go to the wall just because the Government withdrew support a few weeks too soon. We are not calling for forever support, but for economic support that matches the timetable for opening up that the Government have set. That is the right thing for business, for workers, and for our economy too.

    Let us be clear about why we are here today: the Government’s delay in putting India on to the red list has allowed a dangerous new variant to enter our country. That is why we have the highest covid infection rate per person across the whole of Europe—all because the Prime Minister wanted his VIP trip to India. It was vain and short-sighted and has been devastating for public health. As well as the health impact, our assessment, using Office for National Statistics data, tells us that the delay in reopening will cost the UK economy £4.7 billion. That is money that is not being spent in British businesses at a crucial time in our recovery. That £4.7 billion would have been used by businesses to pay commercial rents, to pay people’s wages, to invest, to take on new staff, and to pay taxes into the Treasury as well.

    Of course I welcome what the Chief Secretary has to say today on commercial evictions, but the truth is that if the Chancellor believed that this economic package was enough, he would be here announcing it himself. Whatever this is, it is not doing “whatever it takes” to support British businesses and our economy. Given that the Government have moved the goalposts, let me ask the Chief Secretary why Ministers have not delayed the employer contributions to furlough, due to start on 1 July. Employers are being asked to pay more when they cannot even properly open for business.

    The vast majority of the 1.8 million people still on furlough are in the very sectors most affected by the ongoing restrictions: hospitality, live events and travel. On 1 July, loans to those businesses start having to be repaid. The self-employed and those excluded from financial support will be worried about their futures. Grants are ending, business rate bills are arriving and furlough is tapering off—all immediately after the Government have announced an extension to restrictions. How on earth can the Treasury justify turning off support and sending businesses new tax bills when the Government are saying that those businesses cannot even open?

    On Monday, the Prime Minister told the country that we need to learn to live with the virus. Where is the much-needed plan that would enable us to do that? Where is the plan for greater ventilation in workplaces, including public buildings and schools? Where is the plan to shift contact tracing to a local level, where we know it works best—not in a centralised, Serco-led call centre? Where is the proper support for people needing to self-isolate? Those are all essential measures to save lives and livelihoods, and to avoid the stop-start approach that has characterised the Government’s response to the pandemic.

    Given the WhatsApp messages from the Prime Minister about his own Health Secretary that have been revealed today—Madam Deputy Speaker, I will use more diplomatic language than the Prime Minister could manage—how can we have confidence in Government Ministers when the Prime Minister thinks that the person in charge of the pandemic response is “hopeless”?

    Mr Toby Perkins (Chesterfield) (Lab)

    Not just “hopeless”.

    Rachel Reeves

    Not just “hopeless”. People have given up so much over the last year. We have pulled together and shown the best of our country. People have done everything that was asked of them and much, much more. We should not be in this position today. Businesses and workers do not deserve to have the rug pulled from under their feet at the eleventh hour. We want to see businesses make it through the pandemic and thrive again, because they are an important part of what makes our country so great and they are essential for our economic recovery. We need them and they need us today. That is why the economic support we have should match the health restrictions that are still in place, and that is what the Government have failed to deliver today.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on G7 Deal on Multinational Taxation

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on G7 Deal on Multinational Taxation

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 5 June 2021.

    It’s encouraging to see these first moves towards a global pact on tax avoidance.

    But this government has spent the last few weeks actively watering down what was initially intended to be an ambitious 21% rate of global minimum corporate tax.

    That would have brought £131 million extra a week to Britain for our NHS and other public services, while also stopping our high streets being aggressively undercut.

    This government must now show leadership, push for a 21% rate in negotiations, and use the money to fund our schools and our NHS.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Taxation of Multinationals

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Taxation of Multinationals

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 3 June 2021.

    This week is a chance for the Government to back British business and help our public services rebuild out of the pandemic.

    Boris Johnson is gifting the biggest multinationals £131 million a week. Labour says let’s fund our NHS instead.

    Now that we’re out of the EU we have even more reason to show global leadership in cracking down on tax avoidance.

    Yet this government seems set on weakening a deal that would bring billions back to Britain and stop our high streets being undercut by the likes of Amazon, Google and other big multinationals.

    If the Government is serious about seeing our high streets thrive, they must make sure the businesses on them – whether it’s on Armley Town Street in my constituency, or Market Square in the Chancellor’s – have a level playing field.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Global Minimum Rate of Corporation Tax

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Global Minimum Rate of Corporation Tax

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 23 May 2021.

    The Conservatives have a choice: they can join Labour in tackling large-scale tax avoidance or they can allow billions of pounds to leave Britain.

    This global pact will bring in extra tax benefitting Britain, while stopping huge multinationals and online giants from undercutting our businesses.

    By making sure they pay their fair share in Britain, we can level the playing field for our brilliant businesses, and build an economic recovery with thriving industries, strong public services and good, secure jobs for all.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on CBI’s Seize the Moment Report

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on CBI’s Seize the Moment Report

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 24 May 2021.

    British businesses played a crucial role during the pandemic, and they are vital as we shape a fair economic recovery, and look to create the decent jobs that help people and places prosper.

    Today’s report rightly underlines that we face a once-in-a-generation opportunity to shape the UK economy for a new future.

    Labour will work with businesses to unleash people’s potential and help tackle the shared challenges we face as a society.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Government Letting Workers Down

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Government Letting Workers Down

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 11 May 2021.

    To meet the challenges facing us as a country the Government must plan for the future.

    Our economic foundations were not strong enough going into the pandemic and as we thankfully emerge from it, people deserve something better than before.

    We need a transformation of our economy, so all workers have not only the skills they need, but fair pay for a fair day’s work, and greater security and opportunities for the future.

    That’s got to be a major test of this Queen’s Speech and one the Government looks set to fail.

    Labour would deliver a fair recovery, by valuing those who have kept our country moving, helping British industries to thrive and by creating good quality jobs in every community as we decarbonise our economy.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on the Independent Adviser for Ministerial Interests

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on the Independent Adviser for Ministerial Interests

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, on 28 April 2021.

    In our country, the police don’t require the permission of a thief to investigate a burglary.

    The Prime Minister can’t be judge and jury on his Ministers’ – or indeed his own – behaviour.

    The Prime Minister shouldn’t be able to block investigations into his Ministers or himself when breaking the Ministerial Code.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Ministers with Covid Contract Links

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Ministers with Covid Contract Links

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, on 26 April 2021.

    Under the increasing spread of Tory sleaze, knowing how exposed some of our frontline staff were during the height of the pandemic without proper PPE, but also that Tory friends and donors were being awarded £2 billion worth of contracts creates increasingly serious questions for government.

    The government have long rejected Labour’s call for basic transparency by publishing the VIP fast lane, but this cannot go on given new revelations of corruption risk, and of companies without proper certification being allowed to jump the queue.

    As we are still missing an Independent Advisor on Ministerial Standards, and a Register of Ministers’ Interests, the government must require Ministers to publish openly and with full transparency, communications between them and those businesses who have won contracts since the pandemic begun and emergency procurement was introduced.

    Otherwise it’s increasingly clear that it is one set of rules for Ministers and their close friends, and another for everyone else.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on the Independent Advisor on Ministerial Standards Becoming Independent

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on the Independent Advisor on Ministerial Standards Becoming Independent

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, on 26 April 2021.

    “There must be no bullying and no harassment, no leaking, no misuse of taxpayer money, and no actual or perceived conflicts of interest.”

    These words are from the Prime Minister’s foreword to the Ministerial Code.

    I don’t know if he believed them then, but he is trampling on them today.

    The Prime Minister is now corrupting the standards of public life expected in high office.

    As he tries to cover up payments for the luxury refurbishment of his Downing Street flat, possibly breaking the law through undeclared loans.

    As for leaks, we are now seeing the pipes burst with the sewage of allegations.

    The fish rots from the head down.

    There is a reason why there is no Independent Advisor on Ministerial Standards.

    There is a reason why the Government won’t publish the long overdue list of Ministerial Interests.

    The Prime Minister hasn’t wanted them.

    This is a Prime Minister who would rather “let the bodies pile high” than act on scientific advice.

    They are not bodies. They are people and loved ones, and they are missed.

    When will the Government publish the Register of Minsters’ Financial Interests?

    Who paid the invoices for the Prime Minister’s flat refurbishment in the first place, and when were those funds repaid?

    When will the vacancy for the Independent Advisor on Ministerial Standards be filled and will they be given powers to trigger independent investigations?

    And, finally, will the minister apologise for the stomach churning comments that have come out today, and urgently announce a public inquiry into the Government’s handling of the pandemic?

    This is all about conduct, character and decency.

    Our country deserves so much better than this.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Downing Street Refurbisment

    Rachel Reeves – 2021 Comments on Downing Street Refurbisment

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, on 24 April 2021.

    The Ministerial Code clearly states ‘Ministers should be as open as possible with Parliament and the public’. This has not happened.

    Given we know it only takes a text message from a friend to get the full attention at the top of your government, many people will wonder what personal goodwill could be generated by a secret donation to the redecoration of your living quarters.

    Any external financial aid to a Prime Minister’s lifestyle must of course be fully declared at the time and as the Ministerial Code makes clear, real and perceived conflicts of interest must be avoided.

    I believe there needs to be a full investigation given the gravity of the new accusations from your former Chief Adviser and the serious implications of other irregularities of this concerning episode.