Tag: Press Release

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor launches UK action plan to create lasting jobs in Europe [June 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor launches UK action plan to create lasting jobs in Europe [June 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 4 June 1997.

    CHANCELLOR LAUNCHES UK ACTION PLAN TO CREATE LASTING JOBS IN EUROPE

    A new UK initiative to cut unemployment across Europe was launched today by Chancellor Gordon Brown.  Mr Brown has sent his proposed Action Plan to his Finance Minister colleagues in the EU.  He will raise it at the Economic and Finance Council in Luxembourg on Monday.

    Mr Brown commented: “Europe needs to create real and lasting jobs for all of its people.  We must act now to complete the single market and ensure that for those countries that join, EMU works on the basis of sustainable convergence.

    “As I said last week in describing the G8 jobs initiative, employability is the key to a cohesive  society which offers opportunity to all its citizens.  Better education and higher skills, combined with reduced burdens on business, are the way to guarantee the high and stable levels of growth and employment which are the core goals of our economic policy.

    “This is the new economic agenda.  It enables us to benefit from flexible labour markets, while ensuring that everyone can share in the rewards of a more dynamic economy.

    “We intend to make this a key theme of our Presidency of the G8 and of the European Union.

    “This approach is just as essential in Europe.  Something must be done urgently to increase the job creating potential of the European Union’s economies.  A new focus on creating lasting jobs is needed.  We need to increase the flexibility of Europe’s work force, look at how to combine an efficient welfare state with a dynamic job creating economy and remove the bureaucratic barriers keeping people from jobs.

    “My action plan for Europe involves the ECOFIN Council focusing on how to use best practice to cut unemployment across the community; seeks to extend and complete the single market so that its job creating force can be renewed, and focuses on how the small business sector can create more jobs in the context of the single market and EMU.

    “I intend to discuss these priorities with my ECOFIN colleagues in Luxembourg on Monday.

    “These are practical proposals.  We will be looking for concrete results by the end of the British Presidency of the European Union in a year’s time.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Measures are put in place for the country´s long-term economic future [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Measures are put in place for the country´s long-term economic future [July 1997]

    The historic press release issued by HM Treasury on 31 July 1997.

    Key measures to improve the long-term performance of the UK economy became law today as the Finance (No2) Act 1997 received Royal Assent, reflecting the Government’s pledge to put its Manifesto promises into action.

    Commenting on the completion of the legislation required to implement the Summer Budget’s measures, Financial Secretary Dawn Primarolo said:

    ” We said we would introduce measures for long-term stability – and we have, with a 5 year deficit reduction plan.

    We said we would introduce measures to encourage investment – and we have.

    We said we would introduce a windfall tax to fund a comprehensive scheme to get people off welfare and into work – and we have.

    We said we would reduce VAT on fuel to 5% – and we have.

    And we have done so much more, including providing extra money for our priority areas of schools and the health service.

    This is a Government which keeps its promises. We are determined to equip the country properly for the future by putting in place the long-term framework for stability, investment and employment that it needs.”

    NOTES TO EDITORS

    The Summer Budget was on the 2 July 1997. The Finance Bill was published in draft on Friday 4 July. The Finance Bill was published on Tuesday 8 July. 2nd Reading of the Bill was on Thursday 10 July. Committee of the Whole House took place on 15-16 July. Standing Committee was from 17-23 July in 9 sittings.Report stage and Third Reading was on 28-29 July. The Bill went to the Lords on 31 July and was also enacted on that day.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor welcomes co-operation towards single financial regulator [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor welcomes co-operation towards single financial regulator [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 31 July 1997.

    A blueprint for the new single financial regulator, submitted by the Securities and Investment Board (SIB), was welcomed today by the Chancellor Gordon Brown.

    Writing to Sir Andrew Large, the outgoing Chairman of the SIB, the Chancellor said:

    “I have been especially impressed by the positive contribution which has been made by all the regulatory bodies. This spirit of co-operation and common purpose will stand us in excellent stead as the plans for the single regulator are implemented.”

    The Chancellor said that the plan set out a sound basis for implementation by the new Chairman, Howard Davies. He also underlined the importance of maintaining the regulatory standards during the transition to the new arrangements.

    In the letter he also took the opportunity to thank Sir Andrew Large for his five years of service as the Chairman of the SIB. The Chancellor said that, since the announcement on 20 May of the creation of the SIB, enormous progress had already been made.

    The Chancellor reiterated his aim of publishing a draft financial services bill for consultation next Summer.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Refurbishment of Treasury building [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Refurbishment of Treasury building [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 31 July 1997.

    Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson today announced that negotiations with Exchequer Partnership plc over the refurbishment of the Treasury building have been terminated. Following a review of options, Ministers will now decide what work on the building is needed and how it should be taken forward.

    In a written answer to a Parliamentary Question by Stephen Timms MP (East Ham), Mr Robinson said:

    “At a time when all Departments are undertaking comprehensive spending reviews and are subject to extremely tight expenditure controls, my Rt Hon Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer was unwilling to embark on a major construction project of this scale, which would have involved substantial expenditure and significant financial risks for the other Government occupants of the building in terms of the disposal of property elsewhere.  The plans to refurbish the main Treasury building under the Private Finance Initiative represented good value for money in their own terms, but Ministers judged they had to have regard for wider considerations.

    “My Rt Hon Friend the Chancellor has therefore decided to terminate negotiations with our private sector partner, Exchequer Partnership plc”.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Another step in the right direction for PFI [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Another step in the right direction for PFI [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 28 July 1997.

    Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson today welcomed a new Step-by-Step Guide to PFI.  The guidance is the first to be published since the recent review of the Private Finance Initiative by Malcolm Bates and a swift response to his recommendation that such a guide needed early publication.

    Mr Robinson said;

    “The hardest part of any project is knowing where to start.  For anyone from the public or private sector setting out on a PFI project, this guide provides answers to the basic questions.  It will save time and effort by helping make sure that projects are properly thought out from the start.

    “The guide will prove to be a useful tool.  It describes each stage of the process, indicates what appraisal needs to be done and what decisions need to be taken.  A sound project requires a robust business analysis.  The business case will develop with the project but to smooth out and speed up the process it is important to know what to do at each stage.

    “With the review,  we laid the foundations on which the public and private sectors can build long-term relationships. The publication of this guide is evidence of our commitment to seeing the recommendations through and build value for money partnerships with the private sector which will benefit us all.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Alistair Darling details comprehensive spending review [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Alistair Darling details comprehensive spending review [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 24 July 1997.

    ALISTAIR DARLING DETAILS COMPREHENSIVE SPENDING REVIEW

    The terms of reference for the departmental and cross departmental reviews that comprise  the Comprehensive Spending Review have been announced today by the Chief Secretary, Alistair Darling, in answer to a Parliamentary Question.  The terms of reference of the individual reviews have been placed in the Library of the House of Commons.  Copies are available from individual departments.  The terms of reference for the strategic defence review, which will be the Ministry of Defence’s contribution to the Review, have already been announced to Parliament.

    Mr Darling commented that:

    “The Comprehensive Spending Review aims to allow the Government to bring public spending  programmes into line with its priorities and objectives.  It will be truly comprehensive, embracing all items of public expenditure. It will also be focussed on the long term, looking at the shape of public spending to the end of the century and beyond.

    Ministers have agreed that they will examine each and every item in his or her department, to consider whether it meets the public interest, whether it contributes to the achievement of the Government’s objectives, whether it is the most effective way of achieving those objectives, and whether there is scope for improving efficiency and effectiveness. This will include a thorough look at whether the best use is being made of public assets, with a view to disposing of those which are surplus and which could be used more productively elsewhere and making more use of public/private partnerships.

    The Review will be thorough.  As well as looking at departments’ spending it will also address issues that stretch across departmental boundaries.  There will be several self-standing cross departmental reviews, including reviews of the criminal justice system, the local government finance system, the countryside and rural policy and housing.  In addition, each department will examine jointly with other departments those areas where important issues cut across departmental boundaries, such as aid and trade provision, science and simplifying government.

    This will be a far-reaching look at what the Government spends peoples money on.  It will ensure that public spending promotes opportunity and employment, investment and fairness. Its conclusions will be the basis for spending plans for the future that  reflect our priorities and meet the country’s needs.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor publishes business guide to single currency [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor publishes business guide to single currency [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 24 July 1997.

    “In or out, British businesses will be affected”

    The single currency will have far-reaching effects whether or not the United Kingdom joins and Chancellor Gordon Brown today urged businesses in towns and cities across the country to examine how, in or out, a single currency will affect them.
    Publishing a new Treasury guide – “EMU, Practical Information for Business” – the Chancellor also announced he was setting up an advisory group of private sector representatives to provide a two-way exchange between Government and business about the practical effects of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU).

    Urging local businesses to get informed by picking up a free copy of the new guide from local outlets, Mr Brown said:

    “Local businesses in towns and cities all over Britain need to realise that the single currency is not something that will affect only big business or high-flying London financiers.  Whether or not the United Kingdom joins, it will affect us all. This new Treasury booklet is the first step in telling local businesses how it will affect them.

    “It describes what the single currency will mean for financial systems and accounts, computer systems and cash-handling procedures and warns businesses to think about the effects of the single currency on their strategies for pricing, marketing, relations with other firms and raising finance.

    “Many businesses, including small and medium-sized companies and retailers, will need to think about these issues so we are making free copies of the booklet easily available over the summer to businesses locally through trade associations, government offices and libraries.  The booklet is exactly the sort of thing that businesses have been asking for and will be followed by detailed factsheets on specific issues.

    “I have also written to the heads of about twenty organisations representing different sectors of the economy. They will be asked to nominate an individual to join an advisory group to discuss the practical implications of the single currency.

    “The group will allow the Government to provide information to businesses more easily and for businesses to tell the Government how they would like to see practical issues handled.  It will help the Government represent British business interests more effectively in negotiations with other countries about technical aspects of the single currency.

    “The Government`s position on EMU has not changed.  While nothing has been ruled out, there are formidable obstacles to the United Kingdom joining on 1 January 1999.  Our aim is to help British companies make the most of opportunities in Europe.  This means being ready for the single currency whether or not we join.  That is what the new guide, the factsheets and the advisory group will be helping them do”.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : IMF hails Government´s “Excellent Start” [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : IMF hails Government´s “Excellent Start” [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 22 July 1997.

    The new government has made an excellent start.” That is the opening remark of the International Monetary Fund after its annual Mission to review Britain’s economy.  They say:

    “The new government has made an excellent start.  It has set a high standard for its economic policies, aiming to maintain stability and foster long term growth while seeking fairness and developing human potential.  And it has taken decisive steps  toward these goals by making the Bank of England independent, introducing a budget that makes rapid strides toward sound public finances, and initiating Welfare-to-Work and other programmes to enhance employability.

    The Chancellor Gordon Brown, welcoming the conclusions of the IMF’s Mission, said:

    “This is a ringing endorsement of the Government’s economic policies from  the world’s most respected international monetary body

    The IMF continued:

    “These [economic] policies are timely, as the environment is becoming challenging.  ….  With output now close to potential and the associated risks of rekindling inflation, the economy faces a period of increased uncertainty.

    “Encouragingly, the fiscal and monetary policies now in place should alleviate these tensions significantly. In particular, we judge the July budget to be more to the point in this regard than sometimes supposed. ….it is difficult to criticize the magnitude of the overall up-front fiscal correction. Firm implementation, particularly through observance of the control totals for spending this year and next, should boost credibility, slow the upswing, and set the public finances on a sound medium-term track.

    “The recent series of monetary tightening moves was overdue and, despite the help from the budget, the current situation will keep policy makers on their toes. ….All in all, with the economy possibly moving well beyond potential further action will likely be required, although with substantial fiscal and monetary tightening in the pipeline interest rates may not need to rise as far as markets expect.

    “Turning to medium term issues, the government’s objectives of promoting stability and encouraging investment in physical and human capital in the context of a fair society are the common thread of a broad range of initiatives.

    “The government’s positive approach to European issues is welcome: the United Kingdom’s perspectives can provide constructive input in EU discussions.  Likewise, the recent opening of a  thorough national debate on economic aspects of EMU was overdue.

    Notes for Editors

    1. As part of its normal surveillance work, the IMF makes a regular yearly assessment of the UK economy along with other Member States. The full text of the IMF’s Concluding Statement following its United Kingdom – 1997 Article IV Consultation is below.

    2. IMF surveillance of every member economy is carried out primarily through annual discussions between Fund staff and member governments and central banks, called Article IV consultations. The resulting reports are discussed at the IMF’s Executive Board. The Board also conducts multilateral surveillance through regular discussions of developments in the world economy and key exchange rates.  A report on the world economy is published twice a year. (“World Economic Outlook”, IMF, April 1997 is the latest).


    United Kingdom 1997 Article IV Consultation Concluding Statement of the Mission

    1. The new government has made an excellent start. It has set a high standard for its economic policies, aiming to maintain stability and foster long-term growth while seeking fairness and developing human potential. And it has taken decisive steps toward these goals by making the Bank of England independent, introducing a budget that makes rapid strides toward sound public finances, and initiating Welfare-to-Work and other programs to enhance employability.

    2. These policies are timely, as the environment is becoming challenging. Behind the impressive macroeconomic performance strong growth, declining unemployment, and low inflation there now loom imbalances rooted in powerful divergent forces: surging domestic demand, which may accelerate further as “windfalls” boost consumption; and the incipient weakness of the tradable goods sector resulting from the strength of sterling. With output now close to potential and the associated risks of rekindling inflation, the economy faces a period of increased uncertainty.

    3. Encouragingly, the fiscal and monetary policies now in place should alleviate these tensions significantly. In particular, we judge the July budget to be more to the point in this regard than sometimes supposed. The fiscal position (as measured by the economically more meaningful financial deficit) is set to improve this year by a full 2 1/2 percent of GDP, of which we expect the immediate policy-induced impact on demand to be about half. While the budget measures could have been tilted more heavily against current consumer spending (particularly in view of earlier cuts in income tax), it is difficult to criticize the magnitude of the overall up-front fiscal correction. Firm implementation, particularly through observance of the control totals for spending this year and next, should boost credibility, slow the upswing, and set the public finances on a sound medium-term track.

    4. The recent series of monetary tightening moves was overdue and, despite the help from the budget, the current situation will keep policy makers on their toes. Looking forward, the strength of sterling complicates the task: as it appears unsustainable and, according to market expectations, temporary the extent to which it will help slow the economy is uncertain. All in all, with the economy possibly moving well beyond potential further action will likely be required, although with substantial fiscal and monetary tightening in the pipeline interest rates may not need to rise as far as markets expect.

    5. The new monetary policy framework appropriately makes the Bank of England fully accountable for achieving the inflation target and maintains transparency. However, accountability should not detract from due emphasis on the inherently forward-looking nature of inflation targeting. It would be helpful in this context for the framework to reincorporate explicitly the two year policy horizon. This would recognize the lags with which policies take effect and reflect prevailing practice.

    6. Turning to medium-term issues, the government’s objectives of promoting stability and encouraging investment in physical and human capital in the context of a fair society are the common thread of a broad range of initiatives. As the government fleshes out its policies, there will be a need for careful coordination to ensure that policy interactions are taken fully into account. In particular:

    • We welcome the emphasis on labor market flexibility (both at home and abroad) and the associated initiatives to increase employability while reforming taxes and benefits so as to strengthen work incentives. The Welfare-to-Work program seeks to address structural unemployment head on, but skillful implementation will be required if its ambitious objectives are to be realized. We are more doubtful about the national minimum wage a blunt instrument for achieving a fairer income distribution and a two-edged sword for rewarding work if set too high. At a minimum, as the experience of other countries shows, lower rates should be specified for youths to alleviate adverse employment effects.
    • Higher investment will require higher national savings, in which public saving plays a key role. While the golden rule is a step in this direction, it only addresses the financing of public investment. It would be desirable in our view for the government to aim for a more ambitious objective–balance over the cycle– that would release additional resources for private investment. Indeed, the government’s projections for the public finances show balance being achieved in the medium term. The government can also contribute by shifting its own spending priorities toward investment decisions on which will be improved by the move to resource accounting.
    • Boosting national savings also calls for action on the tax system. The measures taken with regard to advance corporation tax credits, and the intention to review areas such as corporate and capital gains taxes, pensions, and savings accounts are welcome. An integrated approach is important to ensure that overall distortions are reduced and incentives for aggregate saving are enhanced. Savings could also be fostered by broadening the taxation of consumption. In this regard, while we are aware that successive governments have foresworn significant broadening of the VAT base, this is an issue that warrants serious economic debate, all the more so given the hard choices that lie ahead in reconciling spending priorities.
    • This reconciliation will be facilitated by the Comprehensive Spending Reviews, and the envisaged high level coordination should ensure their effectiveness. The government’s willingness to consider radical approaches in areas such as social security will be important to ensure consistency between overall fiscal objectives and commitments to raise spending in priority areas such as health and education.
    • Plans to integrate financial oversight promise to focus accountability and thereby strengthen supervision. Their design needs to ensure that the Bank of England can continue to fulfill its financial and monetary stability mandates after it sheds its front-line supervisory role.

    7. The government’s positive approach to European issues is welcome: the United Kingdom’s perspectives can provide constructive input in EU discussions. Likewise, the recent opening of a thorough national debate on economic aspects of EMU was overdue.

    8. The government’s pledge to start to reverse the decline in the United Kingdom’s aid spending and its support for the goal of reducing world poverty are welcome. Consistent with this goal, the United Kingdom is urged, together with other major countries, to administer policies on military sales to developing and transition countries in a way that avoids encouraging unproductive expenditures and heightening security tensions.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK offers international role model for financial regulation [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK offers international role model for financial regulation [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 21 July 1997.

    The UK commitment to effective international regulatory cooperation and better international business and trading links, particularly with major developing economies such as China, was emphasised by Economic Secretary Helen Liddell today.

    Meeting representatives of the Chinese Government, financial regulators, business and financial institutions visiting the Treasury during a regulatory familiarisation programme visit, Mrs Liddell commented:

    “The UK financial services industry is immensely important. The City of London is a unique asset. We  all want it to prosper.

    “London’s strengths as an international financial centre are due to a regulatory environment in which firms and investors can do business with confidence. UK financial markets are the most open in the world. Overseas firms and investment exchanges are warmly welcomed here.

    “We intend to ensure a regulator fit for the 21st century – a world leading regulator. We are putting in place a policy framework to support the future development of the industry and of the economy, and to encourage more overseas companies to invest here. This will be a role model for financial institutions and regulators around the world.

    “I am pleased to welcome visitors from across the Chinese financial and business community to  London to see how we  intend to achieve that and the progress already underway.

    “We are building on good economic and financial relations with China. The Chancellor’s Scheme for China will enable up to 100 financial services executives from China to receive first hand experience in UK firms, and agreement on a joint Financial Dialogue  will  be on the agenda when he meets the Chinese Minister of Finance later this year.

    “As well as better training and communication, countries wishing to participate in growing international markets must continue to take practical steps to protect investors and businesses. We must tackle problems of cross-border fraud and market abuse, and reduce opportunities to exploit national boundaries and differing legal systems. I am delighted that China is now a member of the International Organisation of Security Commissions (IOSCO), playing a full and active role in keeping with her rapidly expanding financial markets.

    “Last year the UK Treasury, Security and Investments Board (SIB) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission agreed a Memorandum of Understanding to exchange regulatory information and pave the way for Chinese firms to list on the London Stock Exchange. This was China’s first cooperation agreement with a European country and is already bearing fruit, with two Chinese companies already listed here. I hope more will join them and come to London to raise capital.

    “London offers a wide range of experience in issuing equity and in advising on models for public-private partnerships.Privatisation was not an easy step for the UK to take and it will not be easy for China. But it is a necessary one. Handled properly and with the right advice correctly applied, it can bring benefits to consumers through better and cheaper services; give companies freedom to plan and invest; and enable Government to concentrate on other priorities.

    “Today’s meeting is a further practical step towards achieving our joint goals of shared regulatory values put into practice through effective financial institutions, and  increasing mutually prosperous and rewarding relations between our markets and the companies which form them. It is very welcome.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown on the Pros and Cons of EMU [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown on the Pros and Cons of EMU [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 17 July 1997.

    In order to promote a better informed and reasoned debate about Economic and Monetary Union, the Chancellor Gordon Brown has today published a report by David Currie on the pros and cons of EMU.

    The report, a summary of a paper published by the Economist Intelligence Unit, should not be interpreted as setting out the Government’s views on a single currency, rather it is an excellent survey of the issues.

    Speaking to the Royal Institute for International Affairs in London, Gordon Brown said:

    “The Government’s concern about the single currency has always been that Britain should only join if the economic decisions are right, not on the basis of a timetable that has been set politically.

    To make the right decision for Britain, we need an open and intelligent debate on the single currency. British business will be affected whether Britain joins the first wave or not.

    To help launch a more constructive and informed debate, David Currie has produced a summary of his survey which the Treasury is publishing today.

    To help businesses, I shall be publishing next week a guide to the practical implications of EMU. In addition, I shall be setting up an Advisory Group to bring together business
    representatives to talk with the Government about the practical implications of the single currency.

    My overriding aim is to help British business make the most of opportunities in Europe, whether or not the UK joins.”