Tag: Press Release

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : IMF hails Government´s “Excellent Start” [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : IMF hails Government´s “Excellent Start” [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 22 July 1997.

    The new government has made an excellent start.” That is the opening remark of the International Monetary Fund after its annual Mission to review Britain’s economy.  They say:

    “The new government has made an excellent start.  It has set a high standard for its economic policies, aiming to maintain stability and foster long term growth while seeking fairness and developing human potential.  And it has taken decisive steps  toward these goals by making the Bank of England independent, introducing a budget that makes rapid strides toward sound public finances, and initiating Welfare-to-Work and other programmes to enhance employability.

    The Chancellor Gordon Brown, welcoming the conclusions of the IMF’s Mission, said:

    “This is a ringing endorsement of the Government’s economic policies from  the world’s most respected international monetary body

    The IMF continued:

    “These [economic] policies are timely, as the environment is becoming challenging.  ….  With output now close to potential and the associated risks of rekindling inflation, the economy faces a period of increased uncertainty.

    “Encouragingly, the fiscal and monetary policies now in place should alleviate these tensions significantly. In particular, we judge the July budget to be more to the point in this regard than sometimes supposed. ….it is difficult to criticize the magnitude of the overall up-front fiscal correction. Firm implementation, particularly through observance of the control totals for spending this year and next, should boost credibility, slow the upswing, and set the public finances on a sound medium-term track.

    “The recent series of monetary tightening moves was overdue and, despite the help from the budget, the current situation will keep policy makers on their toes. ….All in all, with the economy possibly moving well beyond potential further action will likely be required, although with substantial fiscal and monetary tightening in the pipeline interest rates may not need to rise as far as markets expect.

    “Turning to medium term issues, the government’s objectives of promoting stability and encouraging investment in physical and human capital in the context of a fair society are the common thread of a broad range of initiatives.

    “The government’s positive approach to European issues is welcome: the United Kingdom’s perspectives can provide constructive input in EU discussions.  Likewise, the recent opening of a  thorough national debate on economic aspects of EMU was overdue.

    Notes for Editors

    1. As part of its normal surveillance work, the IMF makes a regular yearly assessment of the UK economy along with other Member States. The full text of the IMF’s Concluding Statement following its United Kingdom – 1997 Article IV Consultation is below.

    2. IMF surveillance of every member economy is carried out primarily through annual discussions between Fund staff and member governments and central banks, called Article IV consultations. The resulting reports are discussed at the IMF’s Executive Board. The Board also conducts multilateral surveillance through regular discussions of developments in the world economy and key exchange rates.  A report on the world economy is published twice a year. (“World Economic Outlook”, IMF, April 1997 is the latest).


    United Kingdom 1997 Article IV Consultation Concluding Statement of the Mission

    1. The new government has made an excellent start. It has set a high standard for its economic policies, aiming to maintain stability and foster long-term growth while seeking fairness and developing human potential. And it has taken decisive steps toward these goals by making the Bank of England independent, introducing a budget that makes rapid strides toward sound public finances, and initiating Welfare-to-Work and other programs to enhance employability.

    2. These policies are timely, as the environment is becoming challenging. Behind the impressive macroeconomic performance strong growth, declining unemployment, and low inflation there now loom imbalances rooted in powerful divergent forces: surging domestic demand, which may accelerate further as “windfalls” boost consumption; and the incipient weakness of the tradable goods sector resulting from the strength of sterling. With output now close to potential and the associated risks of rekindling inflation, the economy faces a period of increased uncertainty.

    3. Encouragingly, the fiscal and monetary policies now in place should alleviate these tensions significantly. In particular, we judge the July budget to be more to the point in this regard than sometimes supposed. The fiscal position (as measured by the economically more meaningful financial deficit) is set to improve this year by a full 2 1/2 percent of GDP, of which we expect the immediate policy-induced impact on demand to be about half. While the budget measures could have been tilted more heavily against current consumer spending (particularly in view of earlier cuts in income tax), it is difficult to criticize the magnitude of the overall up-front fiscal correction. Firm implementation, particularly through observance of the control totals for spending this year and next, should boost credibility, slow the upswing, and set the public finances on a sound medium-term track.

    4. The recent series of monetary tightening moves was overdue and, despite the help from the budget, the current situation will keep policy makers on their toes. Looking forward, the strength of sterling complicates the task: as it appears unsustainable and, according to market expectations, temporary the extent to which it will help slow the economy is uncertain. All in all, with the economy possibly moving well beyond potential further action will likely be required, although with substantial fiscal and monetary tightening in the pipeline interest rates may not need to rise as far as markets expect.

    5. The new monetary policy framework appropriately makes the Bank of England fully accountable for achieving the inflation target and maintains transparency. However, accountability should not detract from due emphasis on the inherently forward-looking nature of inflation targeting. It would be helpful in this context for the framework to reincorporate explicitly the two year policy horizon. This would recognize the lags with which policies take effect and reflect prevailing practice.

    6. Turning to medium-term issues, the government’s objectives of promoting stability and encouraging investment in physical and human capital in the context of a fair society are the common thread of a broad range of initiatives. As the government fleshes out its policies, there will be a need for careful coordination to ensure that policy interactions are taken fully into account. In particular:

    • We welcome the emphasis on labor market flexibility (both at home and abroad) and the associated initiatives to increase employability while reforming taxes and benefits so as to strengthen work incentives. The Welfare-to-Work program seeks to address structural unemployment head on, but skillful implementation will be required if its ambitious objectives are to be realized. We are more doubtful about the national minimum wage a blunt instrument for achieving a fairer income distribution and a two-edged sword for rewarding work if set too high. At a minimum, as the experience of other countries shows, lower rates should be specified for youths to alleviate adverse employment effects.
    • Higher investment will require higher national savings, in which public saving plays a key role. While the golden rule is a step in this direction, it only addresses the financing of public investment. It would be desirable in our view for the government to aim for a more ambitious objective–balance over the cycle– that would release additional resources for private investment. Indeed, the government’s projections for the public finances show balance being achieved in the medium term. The government can also contribute by shifting its own spending priorities toward investment decisions on which will be improved by the move to resource accounting.
    • Boosting national savings also calls for action on the tax system. The measures taken with regard to advance corporation tax credits, and the intention to review areas such as corporate and capital gains taxes, pensions, and savings accounts are welcome. An integrated approach is important to ensure that overall distortions are reduced and incentives for aggregate saving are enhanced. Savings could also be fostered by broadening the taxation of consumption. In this regard, while we are aware that successive governments have foresworn significant broadening of the VAT base, this is an issue that warrants serious economic debate, all the more so given the hard choices that lie ahead in reconciling spending priorities.
    • This reconciliation will be facilitated by the Comprehensive Spending Reviews, and the envisaged high level coordination should ensure their effectiveness. The government’s willingness to consider radical approaches in areas such as social security will be important to ensure consistency between overall fiscal objectives and commitments to raise spending in priority areas such as health and education.
    • Plans to integrate financial oversight promise to focus accountability and thereby strengthen supervision. Their design needs to ensure that the Bank of England can continue to fulfill its financial and monetary stability mandates after it sheds its front-line supervisory role.

    7. The government’s positive approach to European issues is welcome: the United Kingdom’s perspectives can provide constructive input in EU discussions. Likewise, the recent opening of a thorough national debate on economic aspects of EMU was overdue.

    8. The government’s pledge to start to reverse the decline in the United Kingdom’s aid spending and its support for the goal of reducing world poverty are welcome. Consistent with this goal, the United Kingdom is urged, together with other major countries, to administer policies on military sales to developing and transition countries in a way that avoids encouraging unproductive expenditures and heightening security tensions.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK offers international role model for financial regulation [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : UK offers international role model for financial regulation [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 21 July 1997.

    The UK commitment to effective international regulatory cooperation and better international business and trading links, particularly with major developing economies such as China, was emphasised by Economic Secretary Helen Liddell today.

    Meeting representatives of the Chinese Government, financial regulators, business and financial institutions visiting the Treasury during a regulatory familiarisation programme visit, Mrs Liddell commented:

    “The UK financial services industry is immensely important. The City of London is a unique asset. We  all want it to prosper.

    “London’s strengths as an international financial centre are due to a regulatory environment in which firms and investors can do business with confidence. UK financial markets are the most open in the world. Overseas firms and investment exchanges are warmly welcomed here.

    “We intend to ensure a regulator fit for the 21st century – a world leading regulator. We are putting in place a policy framework to support the future development of the industry and of the economy, and to encourage more overseas companies to invest here. This will be a role model for financial institutions and regulators around the world.

    “I am pleased to welcome visitors from across the Chinese financial and business community to  London to see how we  intend to achieve that and the progress already underway.

    “We are building on good economic and financial relations with China. The Chancellor’s Scheme for China will enable up to 100 financial services executives from China to receive first hand experience in UK firms, and agreement on a joint Financial Dialogue  will  be on the agenda when he meets the Chinese Minister of Finance later this year.

    “As well as better training and communication, countries wishing to participate in growing international markets must continue to take practical steps to protect investors and businesses. We must tackle problems of cross-border fraud and market abuse, and reduce opportunities to exploit national boundaries and differing legal systems. I am delighted that China is now a member of the International Organisation of Security Commissions (IOSCO), playing a full and active role in keeping with her rapidly expanding financial markets.

    “Last year the UK Treasury, Security and Investments Board (SIB) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission agreed a Memorandum of Understanding to exchange regulatory information and pave the way for Chinese firms to list on the London Stock Exchange. This was China’s first cooperation agreement with a European country and is already bearing fruit, with two Chinese companies already listed here. I hope more will join them and come to London to raise capital.

    “London offers a wide range of experience in issuing equity and in advising on models for public-private partnerships.Privatisation was not an easy step for the UK to take and it will not be easy for China. But it is a necessary one. Handled properly and with the right advice correctly applied, it can bring benefits to consumers through better and cheaper services; give companies freedom to plan and invest; and enable Government to concentrate on other priorities.

    “Today’s meeting is a further practical step towards achieving our joint goals of shared regulatory values put into practice through effective financial institutions, and  increasing mutually prosperous and rewarding relations between our markets and the companies which form them. It is very welcome.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown on the Pros and Cons of EMU [July 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown on the Pros and Cons of EMU [July 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 17 July 1997.

    In order to promote a better informed and reasoned debate about Economic and Monetary Union, the Chancellor Gordon Brown has today published a report by David Currie on the pros and cons of EMU.

    The report, a summary of a paper published by the Economist Intelligence Unit, should not be interpreted as setting out the Government’s views on a single currency, rather it is an excellent survey of the issues.

    Speaking to the Royal Institute for International Affairs in London, Gordon Brown said:

    “The Government’s concern about the single currency has always been that Britain should only join if the economic decisions are right, not on the basis of a timetable that has been set politically.

    To make the right decision for Britain, we need an open and intelligent debate on the single currency. British business will be affected whether Britain joins the first wave or not.

    To help launch a more constructive and informed debate, David Currie has produced a summary of his survey which the Treasury is publishing today.

    To help businesses, I shall be publishing next week a guide to the practical implications of EMU. In addition, I shall be setting up an Advisory Group to bring together business
    representatives to talk with the Government about the practical implications of the single currency.

    My overriding aim is to help British business make the most of opportunities in Europe, whether or not the UK joins.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : City heavyweight to head Treasury´s PFI Taskforce [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : City heavyweight to head Treasury´s PFI Taskforce [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 14 July 1997.

    Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson today appointed Adrian Montague, Co-Head of Global Project Finance at Dresdner Kleinwort Benson, as Chief Executive of the Treasury’s PFI Taskforce.

    Mr Montague (49) will join the Treasury on 15 August. The Taskforce, established within the Treasury following the recent review of private finance by Malcolm Bates will be the focal point for PFI and other Public/Private Partnerships.

    Mr Montague will report directly to the Paymaster.  His responsibilities will include signing off the commercial viability of all significant projects entering procurement for the next two years.

    Commenting on today’s appointment, Mr Robinson said:

    “I am delighted to welcome a Chief Executive of Adrian’s undoubted pedigree.  He faces a great challenge at an exciting time and I will give him all the help he needs. I am grateful to Dresdner Kleinwort Benson for their co-operation in releasing him.

    “The commitment of this Government to realising the full potential from effective Public/Private Partnerships is second to none.  We took action to reinvigorate PFI within weeks of taking office.  First, we scrapped the nonsense of universal testing.  Now legislative changes and the Bates review are putting business on a firm long-term footing.”

    On hearing the news that Mr Montague had been chosen, Malcolm Bates said:

    “It is excellent that the Government has moved so swiftly to create exactly the sort of Taskforce I had in mind. Adrian Montague fits the bill perfectly as Chief Executive of Projects.  The Policy team working alongside him has already begun its work.”

    Welcoming his new challenge, Adrian Montague said:

    “My first step is to attract a top quality Taskforce. This will help me deliver my ambition of making the Taskforce a hallmark of excellence and a guarantee of delivery.  I want to create close relationships with departments in order to develop a good flow of strong and well-structured projects.”

    Lord Walker, Chairman of Kleinwort Benson Group plc. added:

    “PFI is an important part of our worldwide project finance business and we welcome the steps the Government has taken to improve the delivery of projects.  We are proud that Adrian has been appointed to this pivotal role in PFI and wish him every possible  success.  Knowing him, I am sure he will achieve his objectives.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Statement on the 1997 Community Budget – European community finances [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Statement on the 1997 Community Budget – European community finances [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 11 July 1997.

    The Government today publishes its Annual Statement on the European Community Budget, entitled “European Community Finances”.  The Statement gives details of the 1997 Community Budget, including:

    • the adoption of the 1997 Budget at 82,370 million ecu (60,727 million Pounds) of payments in 1997, or 1.17% of Community GNP (well within the Own Resources ceiling of 1.24%);
    • a limit on commitments to future expenditure entered into in 1997 of 89,142 million ecu (65,719 million Pounds); and
    • information about the UK’s contributions to, and receipts from, the Community Budget.

    As in previous years, the Statement outlines developments in EC financial management and in countering fraud against the Community budget.  The key issues are:-

    the acceptance by the InterGovernmental Conference of a number of UK proposals for the Amsterdam Treaty aimed at improved financial management, particularly on the powers of the European Court of Auditors;

    criticism by the Council and the European Parliament of the failure of Community  expenditure to meet the standards of propriety set by the European Court of Auditors; and

    further evidence from the Commission and an Inquiry by the European Parliament of the implication of organised criminal gangs in fraud against Community income, particularly through the transit system for temporary suspension of customs duties.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Pension companies fail to deliver compensation [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Pension companies fail to deliver compensation [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 9 July 1997.

    Figures published today by the Economic Secretary, Helen Liddell, reveal that performance by the 24 pension companies compensating those missold pensions is slower than expected.

    This is the first set of figures, to be published on a monthly basis, to show how firms are progressing compensation cases for victims of personal pensions misselling.

    The figures show that only two companies have managed to compensate over 10 per cent of their cases and two companies failed to compensate in less than one per cent of their cases.

    Publishing the figures, in response to a Parliamentary Question from Stephen Timms [East Ham], Mrs Liddell said:

    “The volume of cases cleared is extremely disappointing. All the firms in the table have a great deal more work to do. Some appear hardly to have begun.

    “It is now imperative that all firms – not just these 24 – which have sold personal pension should make serious efforts to improve the performance in completing their caseloads. This is not only in the interests of their customers but also of their own reputations with the general public.

    “I will decide once I have seen some further figures to measure progress what further action may be called for.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor takes jobs crusade to Europe [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor takes jobs crusade to Europe [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 8 July 1997.

    Action needed to tackle Europe’s jobs crisis will be on the agenda when the Chancellor, Gordon Brown, flies to Luxembourg for talks tomorrow with the President of the European Council, Prime Minister Jean Claude Juncker.

    Heads of State at Amsterdam agreed that there should be a Special European Conference on employment during the Luxembourg Presidency, provisionally scheduled for 22 November.  This  follows the Chancellor’s  Get Europe Back to Work’ initiative launched in May.

    The Chancellor said:

    “There is now a genuine momentum building up to get Europe back to work. The back-to-back Presidencies of Luxembourg and the UK offer a real opportunity to push forward the new European jobs agenda.

    “At  yesterday’s Finance Minister’s meeting, Prime Minister Juncker called for Member States to offer contributions and suggestions on employment for our September  Informal Meeting.  That should kick-start the process.

    “We will look for real progress at the summit in November. It will then fall to the British Government to carry this important work forward.

    “Luxembourg holds the EU Presidency at a crucial time for the people of Europe.  I am delighted to have the opportunity to visit Luxembourg tomorrow for wide-ranging talks with Prime Minister Juncker who will be the key player in the coming
    months.”

    The Chancellor’s talks with Prime Minister Juncker will also cover other items on the agenda for the Luxembourg Presidency including Agenda 2000 (forthcoming proposals from the Commission on enlargement, policy reform and future financing).

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Publication of the 1997 Summer Finance Bill and availability of the explanatory notes [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Publication of the 1997 Summer Finance Bill and availability of the explanatory notes [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 8 July 1997.

    PART 1

    THE WINDFALL TAX

    Clause 1 Schedule 1: imposes the charge to the windfall tax, at 23 per cent, on companies which, on Budget Day, were benefitting from a windfall from the flotation of an undertaking whose privatisation involved the imposition of economic regulation.  The schedule defines the amount of a company’s windfall as the difference between its value, calculated by reference to its profits after tax in a period of up to four years following privatisation and the value placed on the company at the time of its flotation.  (*REV 1)

    Clause 2: defines the companies charged to windfall tax as companies, or demerged successors of companies, which received property, rights and liabilities of a public corporation by statutory transfer, were subsequently privatised by flotation and were regulated at the time of flotation (or had a subsidiary regulated) under certain privatising statutes. (*REV 1)

    Clause 3 and Schedule 2: provide for the administration and collection of the windfall tax.  (*REV 1)

    Clause 4: adds the windfall tax to the categories of items which may be taken into account or left out of accounting drawing up profit and loss accounts for any period ending on or after Budget day for the purposes of the income tax relief for profit-related
    pay.  (*REV 1)

    Clause 5: provides definitions of terms used in Part I of the Finance Bill, which is concerned with the windfall tax.

     


    PART II

    VALUE ADDED TAX AND EXCISE DUTIES

    Value added tax

    Clause 6: reduces the VAT rate for supplies of fuel and power for domestic, charity non-business and small business use from 8 per cent to 5 per cent, with effect from 1 September 1997.  (*C&E 2)

    Alcoholic liquor duties

    Clause 7: increases the rate of excise duty charged on spirits with effect from 1 January 1998.  (*C&E 7)

    Clause 8: increases the rate of excise duty charged on beer, with effect from 1 January 1998.  (*C&E 7)

    Clause 9: increases the rate of excise duty charged on all wine and made-wine with effect from 1 January 1998.  (*C&E 7)

    Clause 10: increases the rates of excise duty charged on standard, strong and sparkling cider, with effect from 1 January 1998.  (*C&E7)

    Hydrocarbon oil duties

    Clause 11: increases the rates of excise duties on most hydrocarbon oils, with effect from 6pm on 2 July 1997.  (*C&E 3)

    Tobacco products duty

    Clause 12: increases the rates of excise duties on most tobacco products, but not hand rolling tobacco, with effect from 1 December 1997.  (*C&E 5)

    Vehicle excise and registration

    Clause 13: raises the rate of vehicle excise duty for licences taken out after 15 November 1997.  (*DETR 1)

    Clause 14: amends the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994 to enable the Secretary of State to charge vehicle fleet operators and motor manufacturers for the cost of setting up electronic links with the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, and for the cost of processing licensing applications made via electronic links. (*DETR 1)

     


    PART III

    INCOME TAX AND CORPORATION TAX

    Reliefs for interest and private medical insurance

    Clause 15: sets the rate of mortgage interest relief, on loans for home purchase, at 10 per cent from 1998-99 (reduced from 15 per cent in 1997-98).  The clause will have effect from 6 April 1998. (*REV 10)

    Clause 16: sets the limit on loans qualifying for mortgage interest relief at 30,000 Pounds for 1998-99.  The clause will have effect from 6 April 1998.  (*REV 10)

    Clause 17: provides for the withdrawal of tax relief on premiums paid on annual contracts for private medical insurance (PMI) for the over 60s.  Subject to two exceptions, payments on policies taken out, or renewed, on or after 2 July will not qualify for relief.  The two exceptions apply to certain contracts made before 1 August 1997, where arrangements for the contract had been made before 2 July 1997, but where the contract itself was not finally in place before that date.  Existing annual contracts, and those which fall within the scope of the exceptions, will benefit from relief until the end of the contract although premiums must be paid on or before 5 April 1999 in order to qualify for tax relief.  (*REV 5)

    Corporation tax

    Clause 18: reduces the main and small companies’ rates of corporation tax for the financial year 1997 (the year beginning 1 April 1997).  The main rate is reduced from 33 per cent to 31 per cent.  The small companies’ rate is reduced from 23 per cent to 21 per cent.  The clause also allows tax to be repaid, assessments to be discharged or other adjustments to be made to give effect to the reductions.  (*REV 2)

    Distributions, tax credits etc on and after 2nd July 1997

    Clause 19: removes the entitlement of a pension fund to any payment of a tax credit in respect of dividends and other company distributions made after 1 July 1997.

    Although pension funds will still be entitled to a tax credit on distributions, and will be able to set off the credit against any tax on the distribution to which the credit relates, new rules will prevent effective payment of the credit being obtained through set off against other tax liabilities. (*REV 2)

    Clause 20: removes the entitlement of a company to claim to treat dividends and other distributions from a UK company as if they were part of its profits, and therefore to obtain payment of the associated tax credit, when losses or other reliefs are set against them.

    No such claims can be made for accounting periods beginning on or after 2 July 1997, and claims in respect of periods straddling the 2 July will be restricted. The provisions under which such claims can be “unwound” in later accounting periods will cease to have effect. (*REV 2)

    Clause 21: provides for amendments to be made to the treatment of non-qualifying distributions (that is, distributions that do not carry tax credits) received by the estate of a deceased person in the course of administration.  From 2 July 1997 payments to beneficiaries of the estate, funded out of such distributions, will be treated as a payment made under deduction of non-repayable tax at the lower rate.  This will ensure the beneficiaries are taxed on the payment from the estate in the same way as if they received the distribution direct.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 22: withdraws the entitlement to tax credit on dividends and other company distributions made on or after 2 July 1997 on assets in a premiums trust fund at Lloyd’s.  It also provides for dividends and other distributions made on or after 2 July 1997 on
    assets forming part of an ancillary trust fund of a corporate member or employed in its business to be included in the Case I profits.

    Clause 23: introduces Schedule 3 which removes an insurance company’s entitlement to payment of tax credits relating to its pension business in respect of dividends and other company distributions made after 1 July.  It also rationalises existing rules about including dividends and other distributions when calculating the profit or loss an insurance company makes from its life assurance business (or any part of its life assurance business) so that all such payments made after 1 July are included in all circumstances.  (*REV 2)

    Distributions, tax credits, etc: avoidance

    Clause 24:  provides that where shares in UK companies are held as trading assets, not as investments, any dividends on those shares will be treated for tax purposes as part of the holder’s trading profits.  The clause extends the current tax treatment of share buy-backs and certain special dividends on UK shares to all dividends on UK shares held as trading assets.  These include dividends on certain fixed rate preference shares, which were previously exempt in some circumstances.  (*REV 7)

    Clause 25: makes amendments to the Taxes Acts needed as the result of the removal by the previous clause of references to fixed rate preference shares.  (*REV 7)

    Clause 26: modifies the anti-avoidance rules designed to counteract dividend stripping (the buying of a share just before a dividend is due and selling it on as soon as the dividend is received).  Since dividends on UK shares held as trading assets will now be taxed as part of the trading profits, these anti-avoidance measures are no longer needed for such dividends.  The clause also extends the exemption from the anti-avoidance measures for the purchase and sale of overseas shares where dividends are taxed, under existing rules, as part of the buyer’s trading profits.  (*REV 7)

    Clause 27: provides for amendments to be made to the treatment of payments made to companies by trusts.  From 2 July 1997 some payments will not be chargeable to corporation tax, nor will companies be able to claim repayment or set off of the income tax treated as deducted from such payments.  This will prevent companies obtaining via trusts payments of tax credits to which they would not be entitled if they invested directly in UK equities.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 28: provides for a restriction on the payment or set off of tax credits attached to UK dividend income paid or after 2 July 1997 where arrangements exist for the recipient to pass on all or part of the resulting benefit to someone who could not benefit had he or she received the UK dividend income.  Arrangements will only be covered by the restriction if at least one of the parties enters into them for an unallowed purpose.  Broadly, that means a purpose other than a business or commercial purpose.  The clause is thus intended to prevent tax avoidance by which a person obtains the benefit of tax credits to which he or she would not be entitled if invested direct in UK equities. (*REV 2)

    Clause 29: provides that, subject to certain exceptions, where a qualifying distribution is made by a UK resident company on or after 2 July 1997 but before 6 April 1999 is received by an unauthorised unit trust, the distribution will be treated for tax purposes as a foreign income dividend in the hands of the trust. The treatment does not apply for unauthorised unit trusts which are court common investment funds or dedicated to investment by charities and other bodies which qualify for income tax exemption on the same basis as charities.  The effect of the measure is that the unauthorised unit trusts to which it applies will have no entitlement to the tax credit associated with the distribution, and will not be treated as having paid any income tax on the amount of the distribution.  The purpose of the provision is to prevent pension funds circumventing the provisions in Clause 19 by investing in UK equities through the medium of unauthorised unit trusts.  (*REV 2)

    Distributions, tax credits etc. in and after 1999-00

    Clause 30: provides for changes to be made to the treatment of dividends and other company distributions with effect from 6 April 1999, the year of assessment 1999/2000.

    The clause reduces the amount of the tax credit accompanying any dividend or other distribution from a UK company made on or after 6 April 1999 from 20 per cent of the aggregate of the distribution and the tax credit to 10 per cent of that aggregate.  It also
    removes from the legislation substantially all remaining entitlements to have tax credits paid, bringing taxpayers generally into line with the treatment of pension providers – from 2 July 1997 – provided for by clause 19 of the Bill.

    The reduction of the rate of tax credit is matched by a reduction in the rate of charge for individuals and others in clause 31 of the Bill.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 31: provides that the rates of charge to income tax on dividends and similar income will be reduced with effect from 6 April 1999, the year of assessment 1999-2000.

    With effect from the 6 April 1999 the rate of income tax on such income will be reduced to 10 per cent, while the rate charged on those who are liable at the higher rate will be reduced to 32.5 per cent.  The change in rates is part of the general change made to the rate of tax credit, which is reduced to 10 per cent from the same date by clause 30 of the Bill.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 32: provides for amendments to be made to the treatment of distributions received by discretionary and accumulation trustees.  From 6 April 1999 distributions will be taxed at a new rate of 25 per cent instead of at the rate applicable to trusts (currently 34 per cent).   This will compensate trustees for the reduction from 20 per cent to 10  per cent in the rate of tax credits.  The clause also inserts a new section into the Taxes Acts to ensure that company share buybacks, and other similar distributions,
    received by trustees are taxed at the new 25 per cent rate after 6 April 1999.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 33: provides for amendments to be made to the treatment of distributions received by the estate of a deceased person in the course of administration.  From 6 April 1999 payments to beneficiaries of the estate, will be funded out of distribution income, will be treated as made under deduction of non-repayable tax at the Schedule F ordinary rate.  The beneficiaries will be taxed on the payment from the estate in the same way as if they received the distribution income direct.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 34: introduces Schedule 4 to the Bill which makes consequential amendments to the Taxes Acts arising from the changes to the rate of tax credit and taxation of distributions made by clauses 30 to 33 of the Bill.  The amendments all apply by reference to the 6 April 1999, the year of assessment 1999/2000, when those changes to the tax credit rate and taxation of distributions take effect.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 35: provides compensation  payments to charities from 6 April 1999, for the loss of the  tax credit from dividends. The payments will be made on a sliding scale for a period of five years. (* REV 2)

    Clause 36: and Schedule 6 provide for the abolition of the foreign income dividend scheme, as part of the changes to the treatment of distributions taking effect for distributions made on or after 6 April 1999.  Under the proposals no company will be able to elect for a dividend to be a foreign income dividend from that date, and any provisions under which a distribution is deemed to be a foreign income dividend also cease to have effect from the same date. (*REV 2)

    Gilt-edged securities

    Clause 37: enables anyone receiving gilt interest on or after 6 April 1998 to receive the interest without deduction of tax.  As a result, the existing arrangements enabling gilt interest to be paid gross to certain categories of gilt holder will no longer be needed, so the clause ends these arrangements from that date. (*REV 12)

    Clause 38: makes changes to the rules about deduction of tax from gilt interest that are needed as a consequence of the changes made by the previous clause.

    Relief for losses etc

    Clause 39: amends the provisions under which a company may claim to carry-back trading losses to set against the profits of an earlier period. The amended rules apply to trading losses incurred in accounting periods ending on or after 2 July 1997. Under the amended rules a loss may, in general, be carried back only to an accounting period falling wholly or partly within 12 months of the start of the period in which the loss was incurred. Losses made in periods which straddle 2 July will be apportioned, with the new and previous rules being applied appropriately.

    The clause provides for the 12 month period to be extended to three years in two circumstances. Firstly, where the trading loss arose in the 12 months immediately before the company ceased to trade. Secondly, where the losses result from the special allowances given for the costs of decommissioning North Sea oil and gas installations.(*REV 2)

    Clause 40: amends the provisions under which a company may claim to carry-back deficits arising on loan relationships and financial instruments, or resulting from foreign exchange movements, to set against the profits of an earlier period. The amended rules, which mirror those for trading losses introduced by clause 31, apply to deficits arising in accounting periods ending on or after 2 July 1997. Under the amended rules, any accounting period to which the deficit is carried back must fall wholly or partly within the 12 months before the beginning of the period in which the deficit arose.

    Deficits for periods which straddle 2 July will be apportioned. The new rules will apply to that part of the deficit which relates to the period ending on or after 2 July 1997; the previous rules, which allowed a carry-back of up to three years, will apply to the
    remainder.  (*REV 2)

    Clause 41 and Schedule 7: provide for amendments to be made to the group relief rules. These rules currently limit the relief where the claimant and surrendering companies have different but overlapping accounting periods by reference to the length of the period common to both. However, groups can circumvent the limit by making claims to, or surrenders from, more than one company, allowing group relief to be effectively carried back to earlier accounting periods.

    The new rules will prevent the carry back of group relief in two ways. Firstly, the aggregate amount which can be claimed by a company for a particular accounting period from companies whose accounting periods correspond but do not wholly coincide with its accounting period will be restricted to the amount of its profits for the overlapping period. Secondly, the new legislation restricts the aggregate amount which can be surrendered by a company, when accounting periods do not coincide, to the amount of its losses or excess reliefs for that overlap period. This new regime will apply to all members of groups and consortia for periods after 2 July 1997.  (*REV 7)

    Capital allowances for small and medium sized businesses

    Clause 42: provides for first year allowances to be given to small and medium-sized businesses for expenditure on machinery and plant in the 12 months ending 1 July 1998 at double the normal rate of writing-down allowance, that is 50 per cent in general or 12 per cent where, exceptionally, the long life asset rules apply. (*REV 3)

    Capital allowances and finance leases

    Clause 43: sets out which businesses qualify for the new first year allowance  introduced by clause 42.  These are broadly companies and businesses carried on by individuals, either as sole traders or in partnership, which are small or medium-sized under the criteria in the Companies Act.  (*REV 3)

    Clause 44: restricts the capital allowances available to lessors on machinery and plant leased out under a finance lease for the chargeable period in which the expenditure is incurred rateably from the date it is incurred eg if expenditure is incurred 3 months before the end of the period, the writing down allowance is restricted to 3/12 ths of the annual rate. It will apply to expenditure incurred on or after 2 July 1997 other than expenditure under a contract made before that date and incurred within 12 months after that date.  (*REV 7)

    Clause 45:  restricts the capital allowances available to lessors on machinery and plant bought under a hire purchase agreement and leased out under a finance lease so as to prevent allowances from being given on expenditure before it has been incurred. It will
    apply to expenditure incurred on or after 2 July 1997 other than expenditure under a contract made before that date and incurred within 12 months after that date.( *REV 7)

    Clause 46: restricts the capital allowances available to lessors on machinery and plant which is sold and leased back under a finance lease to the notional written down value of the machinery and plant for the seller.  It also prevents any allowances from being given to the lessor in such cases if the lessor has substantially divested himself of any risk that the lessee will not meet his obligations under the lease. It will have effect where the sale giving rise to the sale and leaseback takes place on or after 2 July 1997 other than a sale under a contract made before that date which takes place within 12 months after that date.  (*REV 7)

    Clause 47: defines the term “finance lease” used in clauses 44, 45 and 46 to have the same meaning as in UK accounting practice. It will apply to all cases affected by the changes introduced by those clauses.  (*REV 7)

    Films

    Clause 48: provides for 100% write-off for production and acquisition expenditure on British qualifying films completed after Budget day and costing 15 million Pounds or less to make.  The clause provides for the relief to be time limited to costs incurred during the three years from Budget day and to apply to production or acquisition costs of films completed after Budget day.  The measure is intended to stimulate the production of British films and promote growth, employment, investment and opportunities in the film industry.  (*REV 11).


    PART IV

    MISCELLANEOUS AND SUPPLEMENTAL

    Stamp duty

    Clause 49: introduces new rates of stamp duty for transfers of land, buildings and certain other property (except shares) where the price exceeds 250,000 Pounds.  There is no change in the current exemption threshold of 60,000 Pounds, nor in the 1 per cent on transfers of over 60,000 Pounds and not exceeding 250,000 Pounds.  The changes apply to instruments executed on or after 8 July, except for instruments in pursuance of contracts made on or before 2 July.  There will be a new rate of 1 1/2 per cent where the price is more than 250,000 Pounds but does not exceed 500,000 Pounds and a new rate of 2 per cent where the price exceeds 500,000 Pounds.  The new rates will be charged on the full price of the property, in the same way as the 1 per cent rate applies now.  (*REV 9)

    Provisional collection of taxes

    Clause 50: amends the rules in the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act 1968 for giving immediate (but temporary) statutory effect to tax and duty changes on the passing of a resolution by the House of Commons.  The amendments will allow any Budget resolution passed in February or March to remain effective until the following 5 August.
    The clause also makes a consequential amendment to the advance corporation tax legislation.

    *REV 1, *C&E 1, etc refers to the Budget Day Press Notices.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Economic Secretary welcomes IMF support for Thailand [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Economic Secretary welcomes IMF support for Thailand [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 21 August 1997.

    The UK today backed the economic programme being implemented by the Thai authorities, which the IMF today agreed to support with exceptionally large access to IMF financial resources.

    Welcoming the IMF programme, Economic Secretary Helen Liddell said:

    “As a major shareholder of the IMF, we believe    that acting with the support of the IMF in this way is the right way for the Thai authorities    to have handled their financial situation.  The IMF’s Emergency Financing Mechanism was set up to deal with just this sort of eventuality and we fully support its use on this occasion.

    “The Government will continue to monitor developments in the Thai economy with a keen interest and will continue to give our full support through the IMF and World Bank so long as the programme is adhered to.

    “Agreement on IMF support for this economic programme in Thailand is aimed at promoting greater financial stability throughout Asia, a region in which the UK has considerable economic and financial interests.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : City heavyweight takes his seat as head of new Treasury PFI taskforce [August 1997]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : City heavyweight takes his seat as head of new Treasury PFI taskforce [August 1997]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 18 August 1997.

    Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson today welcomed the arrival of Adrian Montague (formerly Co-Head of Global Project Finance at Dresdner Kleinwort Benson) as Chief Executive of the new Treasury Private Finance Taskforce.

    The Taskforce is being established within the Treasury following the recent review of private finance by Malcolm Bates.  The Taskforce will be a driving force, in conjunction with spending departments, in bringing about PFI and other Public/Private Partnerships.

    Mr Montague will report directly to the Paymaster.  His responsibilities will include signing off the commercial viability of all significant projects entering procurement for the next two years.

    Welcoming Mr Montague to his new office, Mr Robinson said:

    “I am delighted to welcome a Chief Executive of Adrian’s outstanding talents.  He faces a great challenge at an exciting time and I will give him all the help he needs.

    “The commitment of this Government to realising the full potential from effective Public/Private Partnerships is second to none.  We took action to reinvigorate PFI within weeks of taking office and are now bringing into effect the principal agent for putting PFI on a firm long-term footing.”

    Taking up his new challenge, Adrian Montague said:

    “This is a unique opportunity for me to make a real contribution to the delivery of high quality services to the public.  My first step is to attract a top-quality Taskforce.  This will help deliver my ambition of making  the Taskforce an effective catalyst to promote the changes we need to make a success of PFI.

    “I want to create close relationships with government departments, agencies and local authorities in order to develop a good flow of strong and well-structured projects.  I look forward to working with my new public sector colleagues to produce value for money for the taxpayer and good opportunities for business.”