Tag: Press Release

  • PRESS RELEASE : County Devolution Deals – County Councils Network Response [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : County Devolution Deals – County Councils Network Response [November 2022]

    The press release issued by the County Councils Network on 17 November 2022.

    Today the Chancellor has unveiled his Autumn Statement, which contained the announcement that the devolution deal in Suffolk is complete, with those in Cornwall and Norfolk close to completion.

    When completed, these devolution deals will be the first of their kind, with these county authorities being the first to adopt directly elected leadership models of upper-tier councils, without a combined authority.

    Separately, the Government has laid an amendment to Clause 16 of the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill to ensure that the powers and functions that a new Combined County Authority (CCA) can only be those derived from upper-tier councils, or district councils where they choose to exercise powers jointly.

    Below, the CCN responds to today’s announcements.

    Cllr Martin Hill, Devolution Spokesperson of the County Councils Network, said:

    “The announcement today that the devolution deal is Suffolk is complete, with those in Cornwall and Norfolk close to completion is another milestone in the county devolution agenda. All three agreements could be genuinely transformative for their local areas, with the Suffolk devolution deal the first of its kind in putting forward a directly elected county leadership model.

    “In all of these areas, as well as the previously agreed deals with Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, and North Yorkshire, county authorities have shown flexibility and a willingness to meet government halfway in considering to adopt a mayor or a directly-elected leader. We know how transformative county devolution can be, and we are urging government to go further and faster – turbocharging devolution so at least two-thirds of County Councils Network members have begun discussions, at least, by 2025.

    “Separately, the government has laid an amendment to Levelling Up & Regeneration Bill to ensure that the powers and functions that a new Combined County Authority (CCA) can only be those derived from upper-tier councils, or district councils where they choose to exercise powers jointly.

    “Earlier this year, ministers reassured all parts of the sector that the intention behind Clause 16 was never to unilaterally strip any councils of their powers, and today’s amendment, which we will support, confirms there is no intention of using this new legislation to force reallocation of functions between tiers of local government.

    “It is imperative, however, that the government now progress the Bill as soon as possible and ensure that no further changes are made to the legislation on CCAs, including constitute membership. The upper-tier CCA provides a far more suitable governance model for complex county areas, with the ability for county and unitary authorities to work closely with district councils in their area.”

  • PRESS RELEASE : County Councils Network Response to the 2022 Autumn Statement

    PRESS RELEASE : County Councils Network Response to the 2022 Autumn Statement

    The press release issued by the County Councils Network on 17 November 2022.

    Today the Chancellor has unveiled his Autumn Statement, which confirmed that the government is to delay forthcoming adult social care reforms and will provide an uplift in funding for care services.
    This package includes £1bn grant funding for social care in 2023/24, and a further £1.7bn in 2024/25, in addition to postponing the social care reforms until October 2025, which is a two year delay.

    The breakdown of social care funding, which also incorporates re-prioritising funding set aside for the reforms and extra council tax flexibility, is below:

    £600 million will be distributed in 2023-24 and £1 billion in 2024-25 through the Better Care Fund to get people out of hospital on time into care settings, freeing up NHS beds for those that need them Autumn Statement 2022 27
    £1.3 billion in 2023-24 and £1.9 billion in 2024-25 will be distributed to local authorities through the Social Care Grant for adult and children’s social care
    £400 million in 2023-24 and £680 million in 2024-25 will be distributed through a grant ringfenced for adult social care which will also help to support discharge
    CCN had led calls for social care reforms to be delayed because of intense pressures on services – and for funding earmarked for the changes to be re-prioritised to frontline care services.

    Below, the CCN responds to today’s announcements.

    Cllr Tim Oliver, Chairman of the County Councils Network, said:

    “The County Councils Network has been clear that its member councils face unsustainable pressures: with inflation and demand adding £3.5bn to their costs, we have called on the government to postpone the forthcoming adult social care reforms so funding earmarked for those changes can be reinvested in into stabilising care services that are creaking at the seams, as well as further support for vital services.

    “Today’s confirmation that these reforms for adult social care will be delayed is a brave decision but completely the right one. We understand that many will be disappointed but postponing these reforms and reinvesting significant additional funding into frontline care services is strongly welcomed and will protect the most vulnerable in our society as well as buy councils vital time to stabilise the care system. This will go a long way to enable us to address existing pressures, commission more care packages, and ensure that the reforms are a success on day one of their introduction in 2025. The government must ensure that as much of this additional funding as possible is distributed directly to councils, who will work tirelessly with their health partners to speed up hospital discharge.

    We understand the financial climate the Chancellor has made today’s decisions in, and the outcome is better than envisioned a few weeks ago – with councils spared any further reductions over the next two years and seeing a rise in funding due to the additional resources for social care and extra flexibilities on council tax. We also strongly welcome the extension of the Household Support Fund for councils, which will allow our members to provide more support to families through the cost of living crisis.

    “However, while today’s announcements help meet inflationary and social care pressures, councils still face very difficult decisions over the next two years, with little resource available for local leaders to protect non-care services and deliver improvements to vital services. In addition, some county leaders may be reluctant to levy a 5% council tax increase during a cost-of-living crisis considering ratepayers in county areas currently pay the highest bills on average.

    “Looking ahead, a reduction in planned funding growth from 2025 could be extremely difficult for local services, which are already under immense pressure. Unless government addresses inflation next year, and the economy picks up before 2025, councils’ funding shortfall will grow year-on-year and become unsustainable.”

  • PRESS RELEASE : Only one in five of England’s largest councils are confident of setting a balanced budget next year [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Only one in five of England’s largest councils are confident of setting a balanced budget next year [November 2022]

    The press release issued by the County Councils Network on 11 November 2022.

    Only one in five of England’s largest councils are confident they can meet their legal obligation of setting a balanced budget next year, with a new survey revealing the extent of planned service reductions due to soaring inflationary pressures.
    Council leaders warn that ‘everything is on the table’ in reducing local services if the Chancellor does not spare councils from further cuts and provide more funding for local government in Thursday’s Autumn Statement as they grapple with £3.5bn of additional costs this year and next.

    The survey, carried out by the County Councils Network (CCN), finds that in order to make up the shortfall and stave off bankruptcy councils are likely to have to reduce economic growth projects, their spend on climate action, and reduce adult social care packages and support for young people. They are also likely to reduce other essential everyday services such as bus route subsidies, waste centres and streetlighting. This comes off the back of councils seeing a reduction in spend each year between 2010 and 2018.

    The survey, which received a 90% response rate, asked councils about the impact inflation and demand were having on their budgets over the next two years and reveals:

    • Only one in five (22%) of councils are confident of preventing financial insolvency next year if there is no additional support in the upcoming Autumn Statement. Councils are legally obliged to set a balanced budget, unlike the NHS, meaning they must use their reserves or cut services if spending exceeds their funding.
    • This is because councils are grappling with £3.5bn of additional costs this year and next due to inflation and rising demand; more than double the expected rise. Even if local authorities raised council tax by 3% and the Chancellor does not reduce their budgets further, those councils face a funding gap of £821m. In addition they face £700m of extra costs for their capital expenditure over this year and next, which is for one-off projects such as new buildings and roads.
    • At a time when economic growth and levelling-up is a key aim of the new government, councils say they will have little choice but to cut back on growth-related activity. Almost two-thirds (65%) of respondents said it was ‘likely or very likely’ that they will pause or cancel some economic growth and major road projects as well as routine road maintenance, whilst 81% said it was ‘likely or very likely’ they would have to pause or cancel projects such as building new leisure centres and bus or train station improvements. In addition, 78% said it was ‘likely or very likely’ they would have to scale back climate change action.
    • Services for the elderly, vulnerable people and children could be scaled back. In total, 72% of councils said it is ‘likely or very likely’ they would tighten eligibility for adult social care services, and 56% said they would likely have to reduce reablement and community-based adult social care services. In addition, 63% would scale back school transport services, with almost half – 44% – councils said it is ‘likely or very likely’ they would have to cut support packages to young people with special educational needs, with 45% reducing the number of children’s centres and youth services.
    • Highly valued everyday services would also see reductions, unless further funding is made available. In total, 75% of respondents said it was ‘likely or very likely’ they would cut some or all bus route subsidies which enables services to run on uncommercial routes. Almost two thirds – 63% – said it was ‘likely or very likely’ they would turn off an increased amount of streetlights or turn them off at certain periods in the night. Over half (56%) of councils also said they would likely reduce the number of libraries and (53%) household waste recycling centres or cut their opening hours

    The release of today’s questionnaire follows CCN publishing a document with the Society of County Treasurers and LG Futures last month, which projected councils’ funding pressures over the next 18 months due to inflation and demand. You can download it here.

    With inflation soaring this current year, significant shortfalls have opened up in every single county authority’s budget. To address this, CCN members are using their reserves this year but these can only be spent once and are viewed as a very short-term solution.

    The CCN says that many of its councils are facing a ‘cliff edge’ where even making substantive cuts to frontline and highly-valued services may not be enough to prevent them from issuing a Section 114 notice. For all of its member councils, difficult decisions over what services to reduce will have to be made with many likely to offer just the bare minimum in local services.

    The CCN has written to the Chancellor to outline the scale of the challenge facing its members, which calls on the Treasury to maintain existing 2021 Spending Review commitments for local government at the very minimum, and not propose any reductions. However, the councils say that the government needs to go further to support councils to cope with rising inflationary costs by increasing direct funding or reprioritising existing spending commitments.

    Cllr Sam Corcoran, Labour Vice-Chairman of the County Councils Network said:

    “The next two years are shaping up to be some of the most challenging for councils in recent memory. After a decade of austerity and with inflation soaring, if the Chancellor does not spare councils from further cuts and provide more funding for local authorities, everything is on the table when considering which vital services to cut.

    “This County Councils Network budget survey paints a clear picture of what will happen if we do not receive more funding to address inflationary and demand pressures. Councils will have little choice but to reduce vital everyday services and those for the most vulnerable in society, as well as economic growth projects and those aimed at tackling climate change. Reducing these all create a false economy that stores up problems for the future.

    “Even these decisions will not be enough, with less than one in five councils confident of setting a balanced budget next year without further support. This is why it is vital that the government recognise the value in supporting councils – with investment in local government allowing us to continue vital economic growth and climate action, supporting people to stay outside of hospital settings, and provide vital services people rely on every day.”

  • PRESS RELEASE : Mebyon Kernow demands housing justice and ban on Airbnbs [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Mebyon Kernow demands housing justice and ban on Airbnbs [November 2022]

    The press release issued by Mebyon Kernow on 21 November 2022.

    Mebyon Kernow members unanimously backed a call for an immediate ban on residential dwellings being allowed to become airbnbs at their National Conference, held at Heartlands in Pool on Saturday (19th November).

    In a wide-ranging debate about the housing emergency in Cornwall, party members expressed anger at the dysfunctional and out-of-control housing market, which is doing harm to so many people and their communities.

    The Conference even heard personal testimony from people who had recent experience of struggling to find accommodation, including a young person who had to live in temporary accommodation in a Travelodge for many months.

    Party members reaffirmed MK’s commitment to the prioritisation of proper local-needs housing over the delivery of open-market housing. They also pledged to continue to campaign for planning policies to control and reverse the spread of second homes.

    Delegates at the Conference also demanded planning controls on airbnbs and an immediate ban on residential dwellings being allowed to operate as such holiday accommodation, while also calling for rent controls and an end to evictions as has been brought forward in Scotland through the Cost of Living (Tenant Protection) Act which recently went through the Scottish Parliament.

    Delegates at the Conference also launched the “Towards a Cornish Parliament,” and hit out at the inadequate “county deal” about to be published by the UK Government.

    Speaking at the Conference, MK leader Cllr Dick Cole expressed disappointment at how central government was not doing enough to deal with the housing emergency and repeated MK demands for meaningful devolution.

    He said: “The proposed ‘county deal’ will not include any decent controls over housing and planning. There has been a housing crisis in Cornwall for decades, but it is now worse than it has ever been. Devolution is needed to provide Cornwall with the tools to achieve housing justice. We are restating our commitment to a new political system – a Cornish Parliament – with all aspects of housing and planning devolved to Cornwall, which we will believe will be better placed to deliver housing justice.”

  • PRESS RELEASE : Cornwall needs a Parliament, not inadequate “county deal” [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Cornwall needs a Parliament, not inadequate “county deal” [November 2022]

    The press release issued by Mebyon Kernow on 21 November 2022.

    With the UK Government about to publish its proposed “county deal” for Cornwall’s unitary authority, Mebyon Kernow members have hit out at the inadequate nature of the deal.

    Members of MK were gathered at Heartlands in Pool for MK’s 2022 National Conference on Saturday (19th November) and also launched a policy document, which makes the case for a Cornish Parliament.

    Speaking at the event, MK leader Cllr Dick Cole told delegates that the so-called “devolution” on offer from the UK Government is not devolution at all.

    Cllr Cole said: “To the Westminster parties, devolution is not the far-reaching shift of powers away from Westminster, that led to reconvening of the Scottish Parliament and the creation of a Welsh Parliament. To them, it is all about tweaks to local government.”

    He criticized London-based political parties for being unable to see Cornwall as anything other than a local government unit and viewing “devolution” as limited accommodations with Cornwall Council, adding it was actually a form of “business as usual,” rather than meaningful democratic change.

    Party members at the MK Conference:

    – Condemned the UK Government for refusing to treat Cornwall as one of the nations of the United Kingdom and seeking to impose an inadequate local government “county deal;”

    – Reaffirmed MK’s view that Cornwall merits devolution parity with Scotland and Wales, through the creation of a Cornish Parliament;

    – Mandated MK councillors on the unitary authority to argue for a Cornish Parliament during upcoming discussions on the “county deal,” and

    – Challenged other political parties to participate in a “national conversation” about meaningful devolution for Cornwall.

    In addition, MK members voted to oppose the proposed imposition of a “local government mayor” on Cornwall Council.

    The policy document “Towards a Cornish Parliament” will underpin MK’s ongoing campaign for greater self-government.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Mebyon Kernow launches “Towards a Cornish Parliament” [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Mebyon Kernow launches “Towards a Cornish Parliament” [November 2022]

    The press release issued by Mebyon Kernow on 19 November 2022.

    In a key debate at today’s National Conference, MK members demanded devolution parity for Cornwall with Scotland and Wales through the creation of a Cornish Parliament, and condemned the UK Government for refusing to treat Cornwall as one of the nations of the United Kingdom while seeking to impose an inadequate local government “county deal.” They also mandated MK’s councillors on the unitary authority to argue for a Cornish Parliament during upcoming discussions on the “county deal,” and challenged other political parties to participate in a “national conversation” about meaningful devolution for Cornwall.

    In addition, party members were pleased to launch their policy document “Towards a Cornish Parliament,” which sets out further detail about the new democratic settlement proposed by MK.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Zoe Fox is the new Mayor of Camborne [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Zoe Fox is the new Mayor of Camborne [November 2022]

    The press release issued by Mebyon Kernow on 12 November 2022.

    Mebyon Kernow is pleased to be able to report that councillor Zoe Fox was elected as the Mayor of Camborne at a meeting last week, following the recent resignation of the previous postholder. She has stepped from her position as Deputy Mayor.

    A long-standing member of the town council, she has been involved with a very large range of local bodies and has a very proud record of working really hard for Camborne and its people.

    Everyone at MK is delighted to see Zoe in this important role.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Iconic Welsh Leeks to be protected [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : Iconic Welsh Leeks to be protected [November 2022]

    The press release issued by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 29 November 2022.

    Welsh Leeks have become the latest addition to the UK Geographical Indication (GI) Scheme, which protects the name, authenticity and characteristics of regional products.

    Shoppers will be able to clearly see a logo on the label showing they are buying the real thing, and producers will benefit knowing that others cannot imitate them.

    The protection applies to all verified products sold in Great Britain as ‘Welsh Leeks’ and is expected to be a boost for the industry.

    Leeks have been a national symbol for Wales for centuries. Their protection is part of the UK GI scheme, which also protects renowned British produce such as Cornish clotted cream and Scotch Whisky and helps consumers know they are buying high quality, authentic products.

    As the newest addition to the UK GI scheme, protecting a product’s name, characteristics, authenticity, and origin, Welsh Leeks will be traceable from field to fork, tracked throughout their growing, harvesting and sale.

    There are now 92 UK produced GI products: 81 agricultural and food products, six wines and five spirit drinks.

    As well as their distinctive strong peppery taste and vibrant green colour Welsh Leeks are known to grow on harder, sometimes stony soil, including in coastal areas of Wales.

    Food and Farming Minister Mark Spencer said:

    Leeks have been intertwined with Welsh culture for centuries.

    But not only do they crop up again and again as national symbols throughout the nation’s rich history – they are a delicious part of the national cuisine across the whole country.

    By protecting them as a UK Geographical Indication, we can make sure shoppers know what they have on their plate, and producers are protected and can take full credit for their work.

    Parliamentary Undersecretary in the Wales Office, Dr James Davies, said:

    The farming and food sector are incredibly important in Wales, and we are rightly recognised for our high-quality produce.

    Shoppers will now be able to easily identify the iconic Welsh leek with its distinctive taste, giving Welsh leek producers an advantage, and helping them to expand and grow their businesses.

    NFU Cymru President Aled Jones said:

    We are thrilled that Welsh Leeks have been granted the GI status. The leek has long been synonymous with Wales and it is fitting that its distinctive look, taste and flavour have now been recognised and protected.

    In receiving this status, Welsh Leeks join a long list of products from Wales enjoying protected status. This recognition of the quality of the food we produce here in Wales will be very important as we look to grow markets for our products.

    Huw Thomas, CEO at Puffin Produce, who applied for Welsh Leeks to be designated as a GI, said:

    The Leek is an iconic emblem of Wales – we are incredibly proud to be able to grow Welsh Leeks and the GI status is hugely important to promote the quality and heritage behind this majestic crop.

    Welsh Leeks are found in numerous iconic Welsh recipes such as Cawl (soup) and in pork and leek sausages.

  • PRESS RELEASE : “Absolutely and utterly untrue” – Matt Wrack replies to misleading comments on FBU’s Covid role in Parliament [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : “Absolutely and utterly untrue” – Matt Wrack replies to misleading comments on FBU’s Covid role in Parliament [November 2022]

    The press release issued by the Fire Brigades Union on 14 November 2022.

    FBU general secretary Matt Wrack gave evidence to the Home Affairs select committee in Westminster last week.

    The select committee is made up of MPs. Matt gave evidence on a range of current issues in the fire and rescue service including pay and conditions, wildfires and climate change, Grenfell, and more.

    He gave evidence alongside HM Inspector of Fire & Rescue Services Roy Wilsher and National Fire Chiefs Council chair Mark Hardingham.

    The evidence session came in the context of an earlier evidence session of the committee, on 2 March this year. At that session then-HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services chief inspector Tom Winsor alleged that the FBU had obstructed the fire and rescue service assisting Covid efforts, specifically the vaccine rollout.

    The FBU then wrote to Diana Johnson (as reported in circular 2022HOC0128MW), chair of the Home Affairs select committee, to correct the record on this clear untruth, pointing out that an FBU circular in December 2020 clearly stated that “Firefighters are ready to assist the UK’s rollout of Covid-19 Vaccines after an agreement was reached between the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) and the fire and rescue service national employers…”. In the letter to Johnson the FBU also provided clarification on various other statements Winsor had made.

    In its letter the FBU asked to be called to reply in person at a further session of the committee. This session of the committee then took place.

    Covid

    Wrack made clear that the FBU and firefighters had not obstructed the Covid response as alleged by some, and in fact had been a significant aide to it. Describing the process that initially happened after Covid hit, Wrack said “We very rapidly took a decision that we would be keen to support wider efforts to engage in the Covid response. That took place very quickly – tripartite talks between our employers, national fire chiefs council and the FBU. We reached a whole series of agreements”.

    These agreements were praised as “groundbreaking” by then-National Fire Chiefs Council chair Roy Wilsher throughout the first wave of the pandemic, Wrack pointed out. The NFCC and later fire employers then unilaterally pulled out of the agreements during the second wave and made unfounded criticisms of the FBU.

    Wrack then described in some depth the impact that Covid had had on firefighters and the extent to which firefighters had done everything they could to help.

    “Firefighters as key workers, unlike millions of other people, were required to continue attending their workplace, with all the risks that that brought. And we have had members who have died of Covid, some of which we believe are linked to their attendance in the workplace. But additionally to that, we had members who volunteered to do a whole range of activities. So they were delivering PPE to care homes and other venues. They were delivering other items to vulnerable people in the community. They were driving ambulances. They were training people in the use of PPE.

    “And I think the one that possibly brings home in the most stark way what our members volunteered to do, in agreement with their union, was that we had specialist teams in at least two services moving the bodies of the deceased, and that included FBU officials.”

    He said it was “absolutely and utterly untrue” that the union had tried to obstruct Covid efforts and that suggestions otherwise in a previous evidence session of the committee had “caused a great deal of offence”.

    Pay

    Wrack told the select committee that “The question of pay is an urgent one. Pay has fallen in real terms for the last twelve years. A competent firefighter on the national rate of pay is at least some £4,000 a year worse off than if their pay had kept pace with CPI inflation. That is alarming”.

    He continued to describe the material impact financial struggles are having on FBU members, stating “We have firefighters using foodbanks. We have firefighters being referred by their union officials to foodbanks. We have at least one chief officer, of Avon, who publicly wrote that he is aware of firefighters using foodbanks. There is a growing cost of living crisis, as there is for millions of other people, very much in the fire and rescue service and it has been allowed to drift for more than a decade.”

    Even Mark Hardingham, head of the body representing Chief Fire Officers, concurred to an extent, stating that the level of pay was an issue when it came to recruitment and retention.

    Climate change

    Wrack stated that fire and rescue services were “extremely stretched” when it came to dealing with the effects of climate change. He stated that wildfires touching on London over the summer “should be a wake-up call for us all”. He said “We need to build in thinking about wildfires, floods and other extreme weather events. These incidents are often very large-scale and they are protracted. A major flood may last for days and indeed weeks. If you think about the resource implications of that, that’s something I don’t think is adequately addressed”.

    He emphasised the issue of firefighters being asked to go to large wildfires, floods and other extreme weather events far away for extended periods of time, not knowing “when they’ll get home”, and the impact of this on “families, commitments and so on… [and] that’s quite a regular occurrence”.

    He highlighted a moorland fire in Scotland which “over the days in which it burnt produced the same emissions as the entire rest of the Scottish economy during the same period”. He said that this “showed the scale of what we need to think about”.

    Wrack also highlighted an exchange he had following a significant wildfire, relaying that “a comment was made by a principle [fire service] manager who said ‘perhaps the community needs to be told not to be able to expect us to be able to tackle fires on that scale’. I found it quite shocking. I said, well actually if your fire service hadn’t been cut in half over the past 15 years perhaps you wouldn’t be making that point. I think communities have the right to expect that their fire services can put out fires. We need to build in the resilience to make sure we can deal with what can only be a growing threat”.

    Grenfell

    Asked about Grenfell and the ongoing aftermath Wrack said that the FBU was “taken aback” by the response by the Government on the question of personal evacuation plans for disabled people despite a Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendation. The government ruled it out on grounds including cost. Wrack said that “Along with people who are bereaved, survivors, residents, the local community, and campaigners on housing and disability rights, we had expected something on that issue”.

    Wrack also emphasised the extent to which fundamental change was needed when it came to being prepared for risks in the future. “In our view, there was a failing at a national level of this horizon-scanning and monitoring the changing risks. We have put that in our evidence [to the inquiry] about the risks of the external spread up a building as the result of a cladding system. We gave evidence on that issue here in the House of Commons more than 20 years ago. Frankly, it was ignored for the intervening 17 years”.

    He spoke about the concerns around the ideology that led to Grenfell still being present. “Our concern is that policy is still driven by a desire to deregulate [reduce and remove rules and restrictions]. For us, in terms of fire and housing policy, regulation is the difference between safety and non-safety, and, on this occasion, the difference between life and death. Sometimes there is too much lazy talk about the need to deregulate, and we have made that very clear throughout the inquiry”.

  • PRESS RELEASE : FBU Grenfell inquiry closing submission – “disaster is direct consequence of government policies” [November 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : FBU Grenfell inquiry closing submission – “disaster is direct consequence of government policies” [November 2022]

    The press release issued by the Fire Brigades Union on 9 November 2022.

    As the Grenfell Tower Inquiry draws to a close, the FBU’s lawyer has told the Inquiry that “the disaster was a direct consequence of a generation of government policies which combined to create a death trap for the residents of Grenfell Tower”.

    The comments came in the closing submissions for Phase 2, which covers the run-up to the night of the fire.

    Commenting, Matt Wrack, FBU general secretary, said:

    “The evidence that is coming out of this inquiry should outrage us all. Looking at the evidence from the last forty years it is clear what caused Grenfell. Political decisions have been made in service of a social and economic system driven by greed. Private interests have been allowed to take priority over the needs of ordinary citizens when it comes to building safety and fire safety. Rules have been removed or watered down in service of this political agenda. That’s what led to lethal cladding being put on Grenfell and that’s what led to the utterly tragic loss of 72 lives. Those who made and drove those political decisions need to be held to account as do those who took part in that deadly refurbishment.”

    Deregulation

    Deregulation is the removal of regulations or restrictions, and has been named as a key cause of the Grenfell Tower disaster by the Fire Brigades Union.

    Martin Seaward, speaking to the Inquiry on behalf of the union, said that whilst “the private sector companies involved in the refurbishment [of Grenfell] bear a heavy responsibility… it would be wholly wrong and provide no justice to victims to leave the blame there”.

    “They were encouraged to act by 40 years of political decisions in the service of an ideology [deregulation] based on the prioritisation of commercial interests and profit above all else, including public safety”.

    He said that “the real culprits of the disaster are those in power at the top, ie ministers following their deregulatory agenda to the detriment of fire safety, and the directors of industry on which they depended for sponsorship and party funding”.

    Seaward said that deregulation “has become synonymous with central government abandoning responsibility for… building regulations, building control, testing and certification, fire and rescue services and fire safety”. Deregulation policies “tragically came together on 14 June 2017 to create the worst residential fire since 2017” and these policies meant that Grenfell “was a disaster to waiting to happen”.

    Politics driving deregulation

    He described deregulation as part of a set of ideas that drives for a “largely unfettered” free market and a role for the state that “limited to… supporting the free market”, and “prioritises… entrepreneurial freedoms and private business interests”.

    He highlighted how ministers pursing this agenda had “deliberately and irresponsibly undermined” a “culture of health and safety”. Regulations were “repeatedly depicted as pointless, time-wasting administrative bureaucracy”.

    Already-deregulated legislation “has not been effectively enforced” with effective enforcement “instead progressively weakened by successive governments”.

    Refurbishment

    Seaward did however highlight the role of the individual organisations involved in the refurbishment of Grenfell.

    The refurbishment covered Grenfell in cladding that had a flammability which some have compared to petrol.

    He said that “the key players [in the refurbishment] amply demonstrate the widespread disregard of fire safety”. He pointed to cladding manufacturer dishonesty and manipulation here, and several agencies including the architects and the design and build contractor failing to complete the fire risk strategy.

    London Fire Brigade

    Seaward highlighted the structure of the Inquiry, which first involved a close analysis of the emergency response and then returning to discuss the run-up to the disaster in phase 2. He stated that the Inquiry “risks distracting from the real causes of the disaster and creating a scapegoat that would allow those truly responsible, including senior politicians and company directors, to evade responsibility”.

    He said that “Firefighters risked their lives going into the blazing inferno to try and rescue residents and extinguish the fire. They and the control staff did their duty professionally, bravely and to the best of their abilities in the face of a rapidly developing fire that was beyond anything any of them had ever experienced or trained for. They followed their procedures and applied their training as much as the extreme conditions allowed”.

    What’s next?

    After this set of submissions there will be a pause whilst the Inquiry prepares its final report, which is likely to be published next year.