Tag: Philip Davies

  • Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2015-10-13.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of the work required to collect the revenue paid into the EU budget in each year since 1985.

    Mr David Gauke

    HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) does not calculate separately the cost of collecting revenues paid over to the EU each year. Revenues paid over to the EU are funded through paying over a proportion of the customs duties and general taxation that are collected by HMRC.

  • Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2015-10-13.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of the work required to collect the revenue paid into the EU budget each year.

    Mr David Gauke

    HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) does not calculate separately the cost of collecting revenues paid over to the EU each year. Revenues paid over to the EU are funded through paying over a proportion of the customs duties and general taxation that are collected by HMRC.

  • Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2015-10-13.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what arrangements his Department has to ensure that financial grants made by his Department to Action on Smoking and Health are not used to fund activities intended to influence (a) Parliament, Government or political parties, (b) the awarding or renewal of Government contracts and grants and (c) legislative or regulatory action.

    Jane Ellison

    The conditions applicable to grants awarded to Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) are set out in the grant award letters.

    ASH’s compliance with the conditions of the grant is assessed at the grant monitoring meetings held between the Deputy Director of tobacco control and representatives from ASH as well as in the final full year grant monitoring and governance reports.

  • Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2014-06-26.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the names are of all prisoners who have absconded from prison and currently not been returned; and if he will specify in each such case (a) the offence each absconder originally committed and (b) the length of custodial sentence they were serving when they absconded.

    Simon Hughes

    I apologise for the delay in replying. The table below provides details of index offence and length of sentence of those absconders who are unlawfully at large having absconded between April 2004 and March 2014 (the most recent period that statistics are available). Information prior to April 2004 could only be collated by performing manual checks across different databases and could only be achieved at disproportionate cost.

    In order to disclose the names of absconders who are unlawfully at large, it is necessary to make appropriate checks to ensure that disclosure will not jeopardise ongoing Police operations to recapture the offender, will not place any one else in danger and to ensure that any victim has been informed of both the abscond and release of the name. These checks are still on-going and I will write shortly as soon as the information has been prepared.

    The number of absconds has reduced by 80% over the last 10 years.

    Table1: Index offence and sentence length of absconders unlawfully at large from April 2004 to March 2014, as at 30 September 2014

    OFFENCE

    SENTENCE

    SUPPLYING DRUGS

    3 YRS

    GOING EQUIPPED TO CHEAT

    2YRS

    GOING EQUIPPED TO CHEAT

    2YRS

    POSSESS DRUGS WITH INTENT

    6YRS

    AGGRAVATED BURGLARY

    4YRS 6MTHS

    FALSE INSTRUMENTS

    6MTHS

    BURGLARY

    18MTHS

    DEATH BY RECKLESS DRIVING

    4YRS

    IMPORT/EXPORT DRUG

    19YRS

    CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT THEFT

    3YRS 6MTHS

    IMPORT/EXPORT DRUG

    9YRS

    THEFT

    8MTHS

    CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD

    7YRS

    IMPORT/EXPORT DRUG

    12YRS

    IMPORT/EXPORT DRUG

    7YRS

    POSSESS FIREARM WITH INTENT

    78MTHS

    IMPORT/EXPORT DRUG

    12YRS

    POSSESS OFFENSIVE WEAPON

    23MTHS

    BLACKMAIL

    3YRS

    POSSESS DRUGS WITH INTENT

    3YRS 6MTHS

    IMPORT/EXPORT DRUG

    10YRS

    CUSTOMS EVASION (DRUGS RELATED)

    7YRS

    FINES

    6MTHS

    DECEPTION

    30MTHS

    IMPORT/EXPORT DRUG

    5YRS

    CUSTOMS EVASION (DRUGS RELATED)

    8YRS

    ASSISTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

    54MTHS

    DECEPTION

    9MTHS

    TRESPASS WITH INTENT

    15MTHS

    CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT THEFT

    3YRS

    THEFT

    15MTHS

    CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT THEFT

    2YRS

    DECEPTION

    26MTHS

    POSSESS OFFENSIVE WEAPON

    5YRS

    ASSISTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

    6YRS

    DECEPTION

    12MTHS

    CONSPIRACY TO SUPPLY DRUGS

    6YRS

    POSSESS DRUGS WITH INTENT

    6YRS

    FALSE INSTRUMENTS

    12MTHS

    MANSLAUGHTER

    5YRS

    THEFT

    Unknown

    CONSPIRACY TO IMPORT DRUGS

    8YRS

    ROBBERY

    LIFE

    FALSE INSTRUMENTS

    18MTHS

    DECEPTION

    30MTHS

    THEFT

    4YRS

    CONTEMPT OF COURT

    15MTHS

    BURGLARY

    6MTHS

    SUPPLYING DRUGS

    42MTHS

    GBH

    2YRS

    FRAUD

    5YRS

    FRAUD

    DETAINEE

    CONSPIRACY TO SUPPLY DRUG

    40MTHS

    POSSESS FIREARM WITH INTENT

    LIFE

    BURGLARY

    112DAYS

    POSSESS DRUGS WITH INTENT

    7YRS

    GOING EQUIPPED TO STEAL

    6MTHS

    THEFT

    2YRS

    EXCESS ALCOHOL

    112DAYS

    CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD

    6YRS

    ROBBERY

    ISPP

    POSSESS DRUGS WITH INTENT

    3YRS

    ROBBERY

    6Y

    CONPIRACY TO COMMIT BURGLARY

    3 YRS 3 MTHS

    POSSESS FIREARM WITH INTENT

    LIFE

    BURGLARY

    3YRS

    ARSON

    ISPP

    RAPE

    LIFE

    ROBBERY

    9YRS

    WOUNDING WITH INTENT

    6YRS 8MTHS

    ROBBERY

    3YRS

    GBH

    8YRS

    ROBBERY

    ISPP

    BURGLARY

    32MTHS

    BURGLARY

    2Y 6MTHS

    POSSESSION OF A FIREARM WITH INTENT

    ISPP

    CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT BURGLARY

    64MTHS

    Note: Table shows absconds of prisoners and excludes absconds of immigration detainees from NOMS operated establishments and those operated as Immigration Removal Centres by NOMS under contract to the Home Office.

    These figures have been drawn from live administrative data systems which may be amended at any time. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.

  • Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2015-01-15.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners had reached the state pension age (a) on the latest date and (b) during the most recent year for which information is available.

    Andrew Selous

    The number of prisoners of state pensionable age on 30 September 2014 was 2221. In the year to 30 September 2014, 262 prisoners reached state pensionable age.

    Further information can be found in the National Offender Management Service Offender Equalities Annual Report 2013/14 the link to which is below.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380129/noms-offender-equalities-annual-report-2013-14.pdf

  • Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2015-09-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, for what reasons his Department sought the deemed consent arrangements for grants from HM Treasury under Section 64 of the Health and Public Act 1968; and what the job titles are of the officials in his Department that were involved in those discussions.

    Jane Ellison

    The Department agreed deemed consent arrangements with HM Treasury to reduce the administrative burden, recognising that newer grant giving legislation did not require similar approvals, and to streamline the grants making process, whilst maintaining the same level of oversight and scrutiny of cases. The decision was made with the agreement of the Director of Group Finance and the Deputy Director – Voluntary Sector Grants.

  • Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2014-06-26.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people are currently employed in prisons to calculate the release date of prisoners.

    Jeremy Wright

    The number of staff employed in prisons specifically for the purpose of calculating release dates for prisoners is not held on central systems. To obtain the information would involve collecting data from every establishment, which would entail disproportionate cost.

  • Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2015-01-15.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners are currently serving sentences in the UK that were (a) handed down by the International Criminal Court or (b) heard at the Hague.

    Andrew Selous

    One prisoner convicted and sentenced at The Hague by the Special Court for Sierra Leone is serving his sentence in the United Kingdom. There are no prisoners serving sentences in the UK which were handed down by the International Criminal Court.

  • Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Philip Davies – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2015-09-16.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 27 July 2015 to Question 7826, what his definition is of a contentious grant; and whether any grants have come into this category since October 2014.

    Greg Hands

    The principles and guidance for government departments set out in Managing Public Money explain that departments need Treasury consent before undertaking expenditure. Specific Treasury approval is required for any spending outside delegated authorities or which set precedents, are novel, contentious or could cause repercussions elsewhere in the public sector. Managing Public Money does not seek to define these terms beyond their normal meaning, but does include the Treasury’s expectation (in respect of certain payments) that the responsible accounting officers would feel able to justify proposed payments in parliament if challenged.

    The scheme described in response to Question 7826 was established in line with these principles.The Treasury was not asked to give specific approval to any of the grants made since 2014 under section 64 of the Health and Public Health Act 1968 mentioned in the Hon. Member’s previous question.

  • Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many DNA profiles of current prisoners have not been added to the DNA database.

    Karen Bradley

    The information requested is not held.