Tag: Parliamentary Question

  • Tim Farron – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    Tim Farron – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tim Farron on 2014-04-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, how many tenancy relations officers are currently employed by each local authority.

    Kris Hopkins

    This information in not centrally held.

  • Biography information for Robert Halfon – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Biography information for Robert Halfon – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Biography information for Robert Halfon on Health.

    1

    Norman Lamb

    The Care Act will require local authorities to ensure all assessors are appropriately trained to carry out assessments. This builds on the statutory guidance Implementing Fulfilling and Rewarding Lives which followed the 2010 Adult Autism Strategy for England, and which required autism awareness training to be available to all staff working in health and social care and specialist training for those in key roles that have a direct impact on access to services for adults with autism. The Department is currently consulting on the regulations and statutory guidance that will support the implementation of the Care Act, and we will remind local authorities through this of this requirement in Implementing Fulfilling and Rewarding Lives.

    Due to the complexities of assessing people who are deafblind, regulations under the Care Act will require their assessments to be carried out by a specialist assessor. One of the questions in the consultation document is whether specialist assessors should be required to carry out the assessment of people with other conditions, such as autism, and to explain why this should be the case. Based on the evidence we receive through the consultation we will consider if this requirement should be extended to other conditions.

  • Lucy Powell – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Lucy Powell – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Lucy Powell on 2014-04-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 10 April 2014, Official Report, column 414W, on pre-school education, who the 43 early years providers are who have been granted full or partial exemptions from the learning and development requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage framework.

    Elizabeth Truss

    Local authorities have a statutory duty to secure free early years provision for eligible children in their area. Local authorities determine which providers should receive early education funding in accordance with statutory guidance issued by the Department for Education. Since September 2013, local authorities have been expected to base their decision on whether to fund providers to deliver early education places solely on a provider’s most recent Ofsted judgement.

    Exemptions to the learning and development requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) can only be made in one of two circumstances:

    1. When the provider is a good or outstanding independent school.
    2. When the provision is governed by established principles relating to learning and development and those cannot be reconciled with an element or elements of EYFS, for example in Steiner schools.

    Exempt providers remain subject to inspection and any independent school which subsequently falls below ‘good’ loses their exemption. The first exemption was introduced in 2012. The second exemption was in place under the previous Government.

    The Answer of 10 April 2014 (Official Report, col 414W, on pre-school education) explained that Departmental records showed there were 43 early years providers with full or partial exemptions from the learning and development requirements of the EYFS, that were in receipt of local authority funding for early education at the time the exemption was granted to the provider.

    34 of these are still in receipt of local authority funding for early education. A further five providers with a full or partial exemption are now in receipt of early education funding but were not at the point their exemption was granted. One further provider has received an exemption since the previous PQ was answered and is in receipt of early education funding. Of these 40 providers, 33 are exempt under the exemption in place under the previous Government, only 7 are exempt under the exemption introduced in 2012. These 40 providers are listed below.

    Providers who were in receipt of local authority funding for early education at
    the time their exemption was granted and continue to receive such funding:

    Reasons for Exemption

    1. Apple Star Early Years (Community Interest Company), Reading

    Steiner – established principle route

    2. AZBUKA Russian Nursery, London

    Language – established principle route

    3. Beechtree Steiner Kindergarten, Leeds

    Steiner – established principle route

    4. Botton Village School, North Yorkshire

    Steiner – established principle route

    5. Brighton Steiner School

    Steiner – established principle route

    6. Bromsgrove (Pre-Prep and Nursery) School, Worcestershire

    Independent – Good

    7. Buttercups Little Kindergarten, Cambridgeshire

    Steiner – established principle route

    8. Calder Valley Steiner School, Calderdale

    Steiner – established principle route

    9. Cambridge Steiner School Kindergarten

    Steiner – established principle route

    10. Children of One End Street, Gloucestershire

    Steiner – established principle route

    11. Children’s Garden, Exeter

    Steiner – established principle route

    12. Children’s Garden, Richmond

    Steiner – established principle route

    13. Children’s Garden, University of East London

    Steiner – established principle route

    14. Cobnuts Steiner Kindergarten, Kent

    Steiner – established principle route

    15. Elmfield Rudolf Steiner School, Dudley

    Steiner – established principle route

    16. Falkner House, London

    Independent – Outstanding

    17. Greenwich Steiner School

    Steiner – established principle route

    18. Hoathly Hill Kindergarten, West Sussex

    Steiner – established principle route

    19. Kingsley School, Bideford

    Independent – Good

    20. Lancaster Steiner School

    Steiner – established principle route

    21. Laurel Farm Kindergarten, Bath

    Steiner – established principle route

    22. Michael Hall School Kindergarten, East Sussex

    Steiner – established principle route

    23. Michael House a Steiner Waldorf School, Heanor

    Steiner – established principle route

    24. North London Rudolph Steiner School

    Steiner – established principle route

    25. Rowan Tree Kindergarten, Bristol

    Steiner – established principle route

    26. Rudolph Steiner School, Kings Langley

    Steiner – established principle route

    27. St Albans Steiner Kindergarten

    Steiner – established principle route

    28. St Michael Steiner School, London

    Steiner – established principle route

    29. St Paul’s Steiner School, London

    Steiner – established principle route

    30. Sunlands Kindergarten, Gloucestershire

    Steiner – established principle route

    31. The Ryleys School, Cheshire

    Independent – Outstanding

    32. Waldorf Steiner of South West London

    Steiner – established principle route

    33. Willow Tree Steiner School, Bristol

    Steiner – established principle route

    34. York Steiner School

    Steiner – established principle route

    The following five providers are now in receipt of early education funding,
    but were not at the point their exemption was granted:

    Reasons for Exemption

    1. Elysia Children’s Garden

    Steiner – established principle route

    2. James Allen’s Preparatory School, London

    Independent – Outstanding

    3. Oswestry School (Bellan House), Shropshire

    Independent – Outstanding

    4. The Linden Kindergarten, Gloucestershire

    Steiner – established principle route

    5. Wynstones School, Gloucestershire

    Steiner – established principle route

    One further provider has received an exemption since the previous
    PQ was answered and is in receipt of early education funding:

    Reasons for Exemption

    1. Finton House, London

    Independent – Outstanding

  • Biography information for Caroline Lucas – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Biography information for Caroline Lucas – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Biography information for Caroline Lucas on Home Office.

    1

    Karen Bradley

    To date 50 refugees have arrived in the UK under the Syrian Vulnerable Persons
    Relocation scheme (VPR). We will continue to bring groups here on a regular
    basis, and envisage that several hundred people will be helped over the next three
    years. The VPR scheme does not form part of the UN quota but runs in parallel
    with the United Nations High Commission for Refugees’ (UNHCR) own Syria
    Humanitarian Admission Programme. The Government has been clear that this is a
    crisis of international proportions and needs a fitting response from the
    international community. The UNHCR is best placed to comment on the policies of
    other countries regarding Syrian refugees. With 2.9 million refugees now in Syria’s
    neighbouring countries, we continue to believe that prioritising humanitarian aid is
    the best way to ensure that the UK’s help has the greatest impact.

  • Cathy Jamieson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    Cathy Jamieson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Cathy Jamieson on 2014-04-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, what progress the Government has made on implementation of the Scottish rate of income tax; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr Alistair Carmichael

    The UK and Scottish Governments continue to work closely together on the implementation of the Scotland Act 2012 which significantly increases the Scottish Parliament’s financial powers.

    The Government’s second annual report on the Act was laid in Parliament yesterday and provides a full update on implementation of the fiscal powers.

  • Biography information for Iain McKenzie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Biography information for Iain McKenzie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Biography information for Iain McKenzie on Business, Innovation and Skills.

    1

    Jenny Willott

    The Government is committed to increasing compliance with minimum wage legislation and effective enforcement of it. Everyone who is entitled to the minimum wage should receive it. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs have 173 staff dedicated to the enforcement of the National Minimum Wage.

    The Government is already taking tougher action on employers that break minimum wage law. We have made it simpler to name and shame employers that don’t pay the national minimum wage and increased the financial penalty that employers pay for breaking the law.

  • Adam Afriyie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Adam Afriyie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Adam Afriyie on 2014-04-28.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what recent steps he has taken to support elderly first-time entrepreneurs.

    Matthew Hancock

    People of all ages and experiences are setting up and growing businesses all the time. We continue to work hard to provide the right support to make life easier for them all.

    www.gov.uk is the home for Government services and information online. One of the tools available is the ‘Business Finance and Support Finder;’ a source of government backed support and finance for business. The website www.greatbusiness.gov.uk also provides support and advice for anyone trying to grow a business as well as for entrepreneurs starting out.

    In addition to on-line support, the Business Support Helpline is available to provide a quick response on queries about starting a business, or a personalised and in-depth advice service for more complex needs. For those looking for start-up finance and advice there are Start-Up Loans: 7 loans worth a total of £37,000 have been drawn down in Windsor since the scheme began in 2012.

  • Biography information for Lord Coaker – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Biography information for Lord Coaker – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Biography information for Lord Coaker on Defence.

    1

    Anna Soubry

    I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 16 June 2014, (Official Report, column 364W) to the hon. Member for Stretford and Urmston (Kate Green).

    Reservists are treated exactly the same as regulars in terms of operational training and support while mobilised, including access to the same welfare support and medical treatment through the Defence Medical Services (DMS). They are retained in service and will receive treatment and rehabilitation until they are medically assessed as having reached a steady state of fitness, at which point they will be demobilised. If they have continuing healthcare needs following demobilisation, they will be taken through a transition from military to NHS care. Reservists who are medically discharged as a result of injuries sustained during deployment are also entitled to resettlement training and to the same range of services available to regular veterans. Where service is the only or main cause of injury or illness, members or former members of the reserve forces may qualify for awards under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS).

    The level and quality of post-operational support provided to injured mobilised reservists is exactly the same as that provided to regulars, with full access to all the facilities and expertise provided under the Army Recovery Capability, and it is a level of support of which the Army and the Ministry of Defence are extremely proud.

    Following the Reserves 2020 White Paper, which proposed improvements to occupational health provision to ensure consistent access to these services for all reservists, the MOD committed to extending DMS occupational health provision to non-mobilised reservists. Rehabilitation services are also being extended to members of the reserve forces who are injured during reserve training. This is in addition to the procedure in place since 2006, whereby reservists can obtain DMS mental health treatment through the Veterans and Reserves Mental Health Programme. Implementation of the new measures started in April 2014.

  • David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by David Hanson on 2014-04-28.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much tax relief was provided for mortgage interest payments by buy-to-let residential property investors at the (a) basic income tax marginal rate, (b) higher income tax marginal rate and (c) additional income tax marginal rate in (i) 2010-11, (ii) 2011-12 and (iii) 2012-13.

    Mr David Gauke

    The information is not available. HMRC’s administrative systems do not separately identify mortgage interest payments against residential property from other financial costs incurred across all types of property businesses (both residential and non-residential). Moreover property income is grouped with other income in the calculation of tax liabilities, and consequently the amounts of specific deductions effective against each rate of tax is not precisely defined.

  • Biography information for Sharon Hodgson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Biography information for Sharon Hodgson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Biography information for Sharon Hodgson on Justice.

    1

    Simon Hughes

    I have not discussed the legal status of Islamic marriages with any of the organisations listed.

    There are no plans to change the law to recognise in English law Muslim marriages and divorces which do not conform to the Marriage Act 1949.