Tag: Ministry of Justice

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 19 June 2026.

The Ministry of Justice plans to make a series of changes to court and tribunal fees payable in HM Courts and Tribunals Service.

These changes will take place on 13 July 2026, subject to parliamentary approval. The purpose of the changes is to strengthen cost recovery, improve consistency in how and where fees are charged, and maintain fair access to justice for all.

The Help with Fees remissions scheme remains available for those with lower financial means who are unable to afford a court or tribunal fee.

The changes are:

• The introduction of an exemption to the court fee otherwise payable by local authorities applying to the family court under Section 18 of the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024 (more commonly known as ‘Jade’s Law’). This change will be in force from the date the provisions in the Act are commenced.
• Increases to fees in HM Courts and Tribunals Service to account for inflation. These include 170 fees which will increase by 2.6% in line with inflation for 2024/25 and 27 fees which will increase by an average of 34% (equivalent to £6.19) in line with accumulated inflation. Four fees will be reduced to reflect reductions in their underlying costs.
• An increase to the probate application fee to £526. This recovers the cost of an ever-improving service, and the new cost accounts for rising inflation as well as investment in delivering an efficient and modern service.
• Creating a separate, reduced fee for when someone requests copies of probate documents concurrently with their probate application, so that, instead of £16, the fee will only be £2. This will better reflect the cost of that service.
• An increase to 80 fees across the Residential Property Division of the Property Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal, including for leasehold cases, most residential property cases and park and mobile home cases. This is the second tranche of changes in a wider programme of reform to introduce a new fees framework to cases in the Property Chamber.
  • The new framework sets fees at one of five tiers, depending on case type and access to justice considerations. Most case types will attract fees of £200 for an application and £300 for a hearing, or fees of £114 for an application and £227 for a hearing.
  • A small set of case types have further reduced fees: £47 for applications to appeal a rent increase, with hearing fees waived; £23 for applications to determine a pitch fee, with hearing fees waived; and no fees at all for matters relating to urgent building safety matters.
  • These July changes apply this new framework to most cases in the Property Chamber. Fees for Electronic Communications Code and building safety cases will remain free of charge until early 2027.
  • This framework was extended to cases impacted by the Renters’ Rights Act (RRA) on 1 May 2026.

Inflationary increases to court and tribunal fees

Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
1.4a	Recovery of Land – High Court	£545	£559
1.4b	Recovery of Land – County Court	£404	£415
1.5CC	Any other remedy – County Court	£377	£387
1.5HC	Any other remedy – High Court	£646	£663
1.6	Filing proceedings against an unnamed party	£67	£69
1.8a	Permission to issue proceedings	£67	£69
1.8b	Assessment of costs	£67	£69
1.9a	Permission to apply	£174	£179
1.9b	On request to reconsider at a hearing a decision on permission	£438	£449
1.9c	Permission to proceed	£874	£897
1.9d	Permission to proceed (claim not started by an application for permission to apply for Judicial Review (JR)	£174	£179
1.9(ba)	Application for judicial review where fee 1.9(b) has been paid and permission is granted at a hearing	£436	£447
2.2	Appellants/respondents notice (High Court)	£294	£302
2.3a	Appellants/respondents notice (County court small claims)	£147	£151
2.3b	Appellants/respondents notice (County court other claims)	£171	£175
2.4(a)	General application (on notice) excluding s3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997& Court Fund Pay Out	£313	£321
2.4(b)	General application (on notice) excluding s3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 19976 & Court Fund Pay Out	£190	£195
2.5(a)	General application (by consent/without notice) excluding s3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 & Court Fund Pay Out	£123	£126
2.5(b)	General application (by consent/without notice) excluding Protection from Harassment Act 1997 & Court Fund Pay Out	£61	£63
2.7	Application to vary a judgment or suspend enforcement	£15	£16
3.1b	Petition for bankruptcy (presented by creditor/other person)	£343	£352
3.2	Petition for an administration order	£343	£352
3.3	Any other petition	£343	£352
3.4b	Copy of a certificate of discharge from bankruptcy	£11	£14
3.5	Insolvency – other application	£318	£326
3.8	Notice of intention to appoint administrator	£57	£58
3.11	Application within proceedings (by consent/without notice)	£30	£31
3.12	Application within proceedings (with notice)	£112	£115
4.1a	Copy of a document (10 pages or less)	£11	£14
4.2	Copy of a document in electronic form (for each copy)	£11	£14
5.1	Where the party filing the request is legally aided	£237	£296
5.3	Issue of default costs certificate – Civil	£80	£82
5.4	Appeal (detailed assessment proceedings) – civil	£283	£290
5.5	Request/application to set aside a default costs certificate	£148	£152
5.6	On a request or application for a fixed costs determination	£398	£408
6.1	On the filing of a request for detailed assessment in the Court of Protection	£99	£102
6.2	Appeal against a Court of Protection costs assessment decision	£79	£81
6.3	Request to set aside a default costs certificate in the Court of Protection	£74	£76
7.1	Sealing a writ of control/possession/delivery (High court)	£80	£82
7.2	Order requiring a judgment debtor or other person to attend court	£67	£69
7.3a	Third party debt order or the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution.	£135	£139
7.3b	Application for a charging order	£135	£139
7.4	Application for a judgment summons	£135	£139
7.5	Register a judgment or order, or for permission to enforce an arbitration award, or for a certificate or a certified copy of a judgment or order for use abroad	£80	£82
8.1	Issue warrant of control in any other cases	£94	£96
8.2	Request for attempt of execution of warrant at new address	£37	£38
8.3	Application to require judgment debtor to attend court	£67	£69
8.4a	Application for a third-party debt order	£135	£139
8.4b	Application for a charging order	£135	£139
8.5	Application for a judgment summons	£135	£139
8.6	Issue of a warrant of possession/warrant of delivery	£148	£152
8.7	Application for an attachment of earnings order – Civil	£135	£139
8.9	Application for enforcement of an award of a sum of money or any other decision made by any court, tribunal, body or person	£54	£55
8.10	Request for an order to recover a specified road traffic debt	£10	£11
8A.1	Service of a bailiff of an order to attend County Court for questioning	£135	£139
10.1	Bills of sale	£34	£35
10.2	Official certificate of the result of a search (for each name)	£54	£67
10.3	Search, in person, of court records (per 15 minutes)	£12	£15
10.4	Appointment of a High Court judge	£692	£710
10.5	Hearing before a High Court judge (per day or part day)	£692	£710
11.1	Issue of a warrant for the arrest of a ship or goods	£21	£22
12.1	Affidavit	£14	£15
12.2	For each exhibit referred to	£2	£3
13.1a	Application – permission to appeal/extension of time	£646	£663
13.1b	Permission to appeal is not required or has been granted	£1,466	£1,504
13.1c	Appellant/respondent filing an appeal questionnaire	£1,466	£1,504
13.2	On filing a respondents notice	£587	£602
13.3	On filing an application notice	£646	£663
15.1	Request for service by a bailiff of document (see order for exceptions)	£46	£47

Family Proceedings Fees Order 2008

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
1.1	Originating proceedings where no other fee is specified	£279	£286
1.2	Filing an application for a divorce, nullity or civil partnership dissolution	£612	£628
1.3	Application for matrimonial or civil partnership order	£415	£426
1.5	Amendment of application for matrimonial/civil partnership order	£59	£61
1.6	Answer to application for matrimonial/civil partnership order	£234	£240
1.7	Application for an order of assessment of costs	£57	£58
1.8	Application for parental order	£263	£270
2.1a	Parental responsibility (s4(1)(c) or (3), 4A(1)(b) or (3) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1b	Parental responsibility (s4ZA(1)(c) or (6) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1c	Guardians (s5(1) or 6(7) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1d	Section 8 orders (s10(1) or (2) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1e	Enforcement orders (s11J(2) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1f	Compensation for financial loss (section 110(2) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1g	Change of child’s surname or removal from jurisdiction while residence order in force (s13(1) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1h	Special guardianship orders (s14A (3) or (6)(a), 14C(3) or 14D(1) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1i	Secure accommodation order (s25 Children Act 1989) – England	£263	£270
2.1j	Change of child’s surname or removal from jurisdiction while care order in force (s33(7) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1k	Contact with child in care (s34(2), (3), (4) or (9) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1l	Education supervision order (s36(1) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1m	Variation or discharge of care and supervision orders (s39 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1n	Child assessment order (s43(1) Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1o	Emergency protection orders (s44, 45 and 46 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1p	Warrant to assist person exercising powers under emergency protection order (s48 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1q	Recovery order (s50 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1s	Warrant to assist person exercising powers to search for children or inspect premises (s102 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1t	Applications in respect of enforcement orders (paragraph 4(2), 6(2), 7(2) or 9(2) of Schedule A1 Children Act 1989)	£116	£119
2.1u	Amendment of enforcement order by reason of change of address (paragraph 5(2) of Schedule A1 Children Act 1989)	£79	£81
2.1v	Financial provision for children (paragraph 1(1) or (4), 2(1) or (5), 5(6), 6(5), (7) or (8), 8(2), 10(2), 11 or 14(1) of Schedule 1 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1w	Approval of court for child in care of local authority to live abroad (paragraph 19(1) of Schedule 2 Children Act 1989) – England	£263	£270
2.1x	Extension of supervision order (paragraph 6 of Schedule 3 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1y	Extension or discharge of education supervision order (paragraph 15(2) or 17(1) of Schedule 3 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1z	Appeals concerning foster parents (paragraph 8(1) of Sch 8 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.1ia	Secure accommodation order (s119 Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014)	£263	£270
2.1wa	Approval of court for child in care of local authority to live abroad (s124(1) Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014)	£263	£270
2.2	Application for proceedings (s31 of the Children Act 1989	£2,515	£2,580
2.3	Appeal relating to Children Act 1989 fees 2.1(a) to 2.1(s) (v) to (y) and 2.2	£245	£251
2.4	Appeal against a contribution order under Children Act 1989	£245	£251
2.5	Appeal against a contribution order – Wales	£245	£251
2.6(a)	Cancellation, variation or removal or imposition of condition of registration of child minder or day carer (England) (s72 Children Act 1989)	£263	£270
2.6(b)	Cancellation of registration of child minder or day carer (s34 of the Children and Families Measure Act (Wales)	£263	£270
2.7	Commencing child mind or day carer appeal (s34 Children and Families Measure Act (Wales) or s72 Children Act 1989 (England))	£245	£251
3.1	Application/permission to apply for adoption	£207	£212
3.2	Application for a placement order (under s22 of the Adoption and Children Act 2022)	£556	£570
3.3	Application to the High Court	£207	£212
4.1	Application for warning notice to be attached to a contact order	£56	£57
5.1	Application (without notice)	£60	£62
5.2	Application for decree nisi, conditional order, separation order (no fee if undefended)	£61	£63
5.3	Application (on notice) (unless otherwise listed)	£190	£195
5.4	Application for a financial order	£313	£321
6.1	Filing an appeal notice from a district judge, one or more lay justices, a justices’ clerk or an assistant to a justices’ clerk	£142	£146
7.1	Search of central index of decrees absolute/final orders	£65	£89
7.3	Search of index of decrees absolute/final orders	£45	£61
8.1a	Copy of a document (10 pages or less)	£11	£14
8.2	Copy of a document in electronic form (for each copy)	£11	£14
9.1	Where the party filing the request is legally aided	£94	£74
9.2d	Determination of costs, where costs claimed: Exceeds £100,000 but does not exceed £150,000	£1,365	£1,400
9.4	Appeal (detailed assessment proceedings) – family	£238	£244
9.5	Request/application to set aside a default costs certificate	£125	£128
10.2	Application for a maintenance order to be registered under the Maintenance Orders Act 1950 or 1958 Act	£57	£58
11.1	Application for an order for financial provision	£245	£251
12.1	Application to question a judgment debtor or other person	£61	£63
12.2	Application for a third-party debt order/appointment of a receiver	£88	£90
12.3	Application for a charging order	£43	£44
12.4	Application for a judgment summons	£83	£85
12.5	Application for an attachment of earnings order – Family	£38	£39
13.1	Application for enforcement of a judgment or order	£114	£117
13.3	Issue for a warrant of possession or a warrant of delivery	£135	£139
14.1	Sealing a writ of execution/possession/delivery	£68	£70
14.2	On a request or application to register a judgment or order; or for permission to enforce an arbitration award; or for a certified copy of a judgment or order for use abroad.	£68	£70
17.1	Taking an affidavit/affirmation/attestation upon honour	£12	£13
17.2	For each exhibit referred to and required to be marked	£2	£3

Magistrate Court Fees Order 2008

SI Ref ID	Description	Current	New
1.1	Application for Justice of the Peace to perform function not on court premises	£29	£30
2.1	Application to state a case for the opinion of the High Court	£156	£160
2.2	Appeal (deduction from earnings order)	£22	£23
2.3	Appeal – proceedings under Schedule 5 Licensing Act 2003	£70	£72
2.4	Appeal (no other fee specified)	£70	£72
3.4	Request for certificate/certified document (no other fee specified)	£23	£24
5.1a	Copy of a document (10 pages or less)	£11	£14
5.2	Copy of a document in electronic form (for each copy)	£11	£14
6.1	Request for licence/consent/authority (no other fee specified)	£31	£32
6.2	Application for renewal/variation of an existing licence	£31	£32
6.3	Application for the revocation of licence (no other fee specified)	£31	£32
7.1	On taking attestation of a constable or special constable	£12	£13
7.2	For every oath where no other fee is specified	£31	£32
8.1	Commencing proceedings where no other fee is specified	£284	£292
8.2a	Application for leave/permission to commence proceedings (no other fee specified)	£142	£146
8.2b	Proceedings where leave/permission has been granted	£142	£146
8.3	Contested hearing	£644	£661
9.1	Application for a warrant of entry	£22	£27
9.2	Application for any other warrant (no other fee specified)	£92	£94
10.1	Application for a warrant of commitment	£212	£215
10.2	Application for a warrant of commitment (Child Support Act 1991)	£46	£47

Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) Fees Order 2009

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
1	Permission to appeal under rule 21	£250	£257
2	Lodging a notice of reference under rule 28/ an appeal under rule 24	£313	£321
3	Absent owner application under Sch 2 Compulsory Purchase Act 1965	£624	£640
4	Applications to discharge/ modify a restrictive covenant	£999	£1,025
5a	Rights of light application rule 41 to s2 (d) Right of Light Act 1959- Definitive certificate	£775	£795
5b	Rights of light application rule 41 to s2 (d) Right of Light Act1959- Temporary & Definitive certificate	£761	£781
6	Interlocutory or consent order application	£125	£128
7	Interlocutory or consent order rule 50	£165	£162
11a	Hearing to determine entitlement to a restrictive covenant under s84(3A) Law of Property Act 1925	£624	£640
11b	Order without hearing(rule 46) – s84 (e) Land of Property Act 1925(e) discharge /modify restrictive covenant	£166	£161
11c	Substantive hearing of original Application to discharge /modify restrictive covenant	£1,249	£1,281
11d	Engrossing Mins of Order -s84 (e) Land of Property Act 1925 discharge /modify restrictive covenant	£41	£40
12	Hearing or preliminary hearing of reference /appeal (no amount awarded)	£624	£640

First-tier Tribunal (Gambling) Fees Order 2010

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
1.1	On filing an appeal under section 141 of the Gambling Act 2005 in relation to sections 65(2)(a) to (j) of the Act	£4,521	£4,639
1.11	Appeal under s141 of the Gambling Act 2005 – personal management office licence s127 of the Act	£1,816	£1,863
1.12	Appeal under s141 of the Gambling Act 2005 – personal operational function licence s127 of the Act	£908	£932
2	Appeal under s337(1) of the Gambling Act 2005 – order to void a bet s336(1) of the Act	£4,521	£4,639

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (JR) (E&W) Fees Order 2011

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
1.1	Application to request a reconsideration at a hearing of permission to apply for Judicial Review	£174	£179
1.1a	Proceed with JR – permission granted at oral hearing	£438	£449
1.2(a)	Permission for JR -where order permitting to proceed given and 1.1(a) has already been paid	£436	£448
1.2(b)	Permission for JR -where order permitting to proceed given	£874	£897
1.3	Permission for JR – where permission given to proceed with JR	£174	£179
2.1	General Application – On notice (where no other fee is specified)	£290	£298
2.2	General Application – By consent or without notice (where no other fee is specified)	£114	£117
2.3	Application for a summons or order for a witness to attend the Tribunal.	£57	£58
3.1a	Copy Documents – ten pages or less	£10	£14
3.2	Copy Document / Electronic copy – each copy.	£10	£14

Non- Contentious Probate Fees Order 2004

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
3.1	Duplicate/second grant for same deceased person	£21	£22
4	Applications for the entry or extension of a caveat	£3	£4
5	Application for a standing search	£3	£4
6	Deposit of wills	£23	£24
7	Inspection of will/other document retained by the registry	£23	£24

Court of Protection Fees Order 2007

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
4	Application to start proceedings or application for permission to start proceedings	£421	£432
5	Filling an appeal	£265	£272
6	Hearing fees	£259	£266
7.1	Copy of a document fee	£5	£8

The Enrolment of Deeds (Fees) Regulations 1994

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
2	Copy of change of name deed	£0.25	£0.50
3	Searches by staff on behalf of the applicant	£5	£11

First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Fees Order 2011

SI Ref	Description	Current	New
3(3)(a)	Appeal determined without a hearing	£80	£82
3(3)(b)	Appeal determined with a hearing	£140	£144

Increases to fees for existing fee-bearing case types in the Property Chamber

Application	Application fee	Hearing fee
Park and mobile homes
Form PH1 – For a written statement as to the terms of agreement	£114	£227
Form PH2 – For an implied terms order, express terms order or an unenforceable express term order	£114	£227
Form PH3 – Determination of any question arising under the Mobile Homes Act 1983	£114	£227
Form PH8 – To secure that a temporarily re-sited home is returned to the original pitch	£114	£227
Form PH9 or PH10 – Determination of a pitch fee	£23	£0
Form PH14 or 15 – Applications relating to site rules	£114	£227
Form PH21 – Revocation of a mobile home site licence where the manager is not a fit and proper person	£114	£227
All other applications	£200	£300
Right to buy appeals
Appeal of decision on Right to Buy application due to property being suitable for elderly people	£114	£227
Housing Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016
Applications brought by local authorities relating to demolition orders, Empty Dwelling Management Orders, Interim and Final Management Orders, and banning orders	£114	£227
All other applications	£200	£300
Leasehold management (apart from Ground Rents)
Application to challenge a leasehold management charge	£114	£227
Applications in relation to determination of liability for administrative charges	£114	£227
Applications to appeal a choice of insurer	£114	£227
Application to appoint a manager for a property	£114	£227
Application to limit or recover payment of landlord’s legal costs for a tribunal claim	£114	£227
Application in relation to liability for service charge	£114	£227
Application to vary a lease	£114	£227
All other leasehold management applications	£200	£300
Leasehold enfranchisement
Applications relating to leasehold enfranchisement	£114	£227
Tenants’ Association applications
Applications relating to tenants’ associations	£114	£227
Electrical Safety Standards
All applications	£200	£300
Right of entry for the Valuation Office Agency
All applications	£114	£227

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 12 June 2026.

The public will be better protected from crime under a major expansion of tough Texas-style courts which will see thousands of offenders monitored by judges.

• New £9 million funding to more than double number of problem-solving courts
• Repeat offenders to be strictly monitored by one judge or risk time in prison
• World-recognised approach has been shown to reduce reoffending by a third

A £9 million funding boost announced today (12 June) will help to more than double the number of Intensive Supervision Courts, an innovative approach to sentencing which aims to cut reoffending by tackling the root causes of crime.

The model recognises that factors like addiction and trauma can be the root causes of repeat offending. It forces low-level offenders to attend weekly sessions and regularly appear before the same judge who will track their behaviour, reserving prison spaces for the dangerous criminals who need them.

Those who fail to attend hearings, continue to misuse substances or refuse to engage in mandatory treatment courses will face tough consequences such as tagging or even time in prison for breaching strict conditions.

These problem-solving courts have reduced reoffending across the world, with countries using this model seeing a reduction in further arrests of one third compared to offenders serving standard sentences – ending the revolving door of prison and cutting crime. 

In Texas alone, the approach helped drive a significant reduction in the prison population and contributed to a 29 per cent drop in crime.  

The expansion will see the number of these pioneering courts rise from 5 to 11 sites across the country, with a specific focus on prolific offenders, women and those with substance misuse issues.

Deputy Prime Minister and Lord Chancellor, David Lammy said:

Prolific offending often goes hand in hand with addiction and trauma, and tackling that can help cut crime.  

These tough new courts ensure offenders are held to account while giving them the tools they need to turn their lives round for good, reducing reoffending and making our streets safer in the process.

Evidence shows offenders on probation are far more likely than the general public to experience addiction and mental health issues, which are proven to increase the likelihood of reoffending.

Further studies show how more than two thirds of women in custody report being victims of domestic abuse, a factor which is a known indicator of crimes. They also reveal how more than half of female offenders have sustained brain injuries while roughly the same percentage have drug addictions.  

Tackling these underlying issues and addressing the root causes of crime helps to prevent more victims and reduce the £18 billion overall cost of reoffending to the taxpayer.

Baroness Gillian Merron Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Women’s and Mental Health said:

We know that custody alone does little to rehabilitate offenders, particularly those whose crimes are driven by addiction or mental health issues.

This initiative will help them turn their lives around by unpacking these issues and giving them the support they need to turn their backs on crime for good.

Through this we can cut reoffending and make communities safer, while getting those often left behind back on their feet and contributing to society again.

The expansion builds on the success of four existing pilot courts in Birmingham, Bristol, Liverpool and Teesside which have seen hundreds of offenders receive tough supervision in a bid to help them leave behind a life of crime. A fifth court has been announced and is due to open in Liverpool later this year.

A recent evaluation of the pilot scheme showed two thirds of offenders did not breach their orders while those with significant addiction issues received a clean drug test two-thirds of the time, clear evidence that the model is working. 

Additionally, probation staff, the judiciary and local services like drug treatment providers have reported that offenders’ drug and alcohol use has reduced and those requiring help with their mental health were now receiving the right support to help cut their offending.

Dr Tom McNeil, CEO of The JABBS Foundation for Women and Girls 

Too many people are trapped in a revolving door of prison, at substantial cost to the taxpayer and public services. The system isn’t working for them, and it’s not working for society.

That’s why today’s announcement is a significant step in the right direction and follows the evidence on what works to divert women away from custody. In our work with partners across the justice system, we’ve seen first-hand the positive impact these courts have on tackling underlying issues.

Intensive Supervision Courts target prolific low-level offenders whose needs are better addressed in the community, helping to break the cycle of repeat offending. However, prison will continue to play an important role for serious offenders who pose the highest risk to the public.

The Government is increasing probation funding by up to £700 million extra by 2028/29, including the recruitment of at least 1,300 additional probation officers over the next year. This will help deliver tougher, more effective supervision of violent offenders and better protect the public.

This includes the biggest expansion of tagging in British history, with thousands more domestic abusers, thieves and burglars now subject to GPS and alcohol monitoring as part of a £100 million crackdown on crime.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 11 June 2026.

Up to 13,000 prison cell windows across England and Wales will be fitted with heavy-duty steel grilles to stop drones smuggling drugs, weapons and mobile phones into jails.

• New counter-drone measures  at  17 prisons at high risk from drones
• Up to 13,000 cell windows to be reinforced with grilles to thwart criminals smuggling illicit items
• Part of Government action to ensure prisons cut crime and protect the public    

Up to 13,000 prison cell windows across England and Wales will be fitted with heavy-duty steel grilles to stop drones smuggling drugs, weapons and mobile phones into jails.

The roll out, backed by £35m of government funding, will see physical security strengthened at 17 high-risk prisons vulnerable to drone activity. The funding will help to crackdown on criminal gangs exploiting jails with increasingly sophisticated drone operations.  

The investment includes installing thousands of grilles to cell windows by spring next year – providing a tough physical barrier to block the delivery of contraband which can wreak havoc behind bars.      

Many of the grilles will be manufactured by prisoners themselves - helping to cut costs and giving offenders skills for the job market so they can leave crime behind.   

It comes as crooks are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their approach with drone sightings around prisons increasing by 770% between 2019 and 2023, not only undermining rehabilitation efforts but threatening the safety of both staff and prisoners.    

Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, said:     

Drone smuggling fuels violence, debt and disorder in our prisons. It wrecks rehabilitation and puts lives at risk.

This new investment will further bolster prison defences against drones, building on our work with police to catch and prosecute the criminal gangs responsible. 

To the criminal gangs using drones to target our prisons, my message is clear: we are shutting down your routes, disrupting your operations and bringing offenders to justice. 

Today’s announcement builds on £40 million already invested by the Government to strengthen prison security, including £10 million specifically on counter-drone measures such as external netting and wires.    

A large-scale joint operation between the police and HMPPS has already resulted in over 200 arrests linked to drones smuggling contraband into our prisons.   

In March, a gang that used drones to smuggle drugs and mobile phones into prisons were sentenced to a combined 22 years’ imprisonment, thanks to an investigation by the Metropolitan Police in partnership with the Prison Service.    

National Police Chiefs’ Council Lead for Countering the Threat from Drones in Prisons, Steff Sharp said:   

We welcome this investment as it aligns with our continued pursuit of those using drones to smuggle weapons, drugs, phones and other contraband into prisons. These items fuel organised crime, impact local communities and increase the risk of violence towards staff and inmates within prison walls.

Counter drone activity is complex which is why we are committed to working closely with HMPPS and other partners to make sure this criminality is prevented, intercepted and offenders brought to justice.

Today’s investment supports wider Government efforts to develop counter-drone capabilities, including by learning from Ukrainian expertise developed on the battlefield and from innovators through a competition launched this year to tackle the illegal use of drones in prisons.   

More broadly the Government plans to build 14,000 extra places nationwide by 2031 – with 3,100 already added since July 2024 – to keep streets safer and ensure the country never runs out of prison space again.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 28 May 2026.

The Lord Chancellor has approved the further appointment without competition of Tim De Meyer as policing member of the Sentencing Council from 1 July 2026 until the earlier of the date of the appointment of his successor or 30 June 2027.

Ministers consulted the Commissioner for Public Appointments before making this appointment without competition. This is to ensure continuity of essential policing expertise on the Council while a full recruitment exercise is undertaken.

Biography

Tim De Meyer has 28 years of policing experience across a range of operational and strategic roles. He has served in the Metropolitan Police and Thames Valley Police. In 2023, he was appointed Chief Constable of Surrey Police. Since 2019, Tim has held the National Police Chiefs’ Council portfolio lead for Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act Disclosure, contributing to national policy and practice through the Criminal Justice Coordination Committee.

He has declared no political activity.

The Sentencing Council for England and Wales was established to promote greater transparency and consistency in sentencing, while maintaining the independence of the judiciary. The primary role of the council is to issue guidelines on sentencing, which the courts must follow unless it is in the interests of justice not to do so.

The appointment of non-judicial members of the Sentencing Council, is regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments and recruitment processes comply with the Cabinet Office Governance Code on Public Appointments.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 28 May 2026.

The Deputy Prime Minister, in his capacity as Secretary of State, has approved the re-appointment of Dr Jake Hard and Professor Seena Fazel as members of the Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody for a period of 3 years from 1 July 2026 for Dr Jake Hard, and 1 October 2026 for Professor Seena Fazel.  

Established in 2009, the Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody (IAPDC) forms part of the Ministerial Council on Deaths in Detention in England and Wales. The IAPDC provides expert advice and challenge to Ministers, departments, and agencies with the central aim of preventing deaths in detention.

This appointment is made by the Secretary of State for Justice in consultation with the Department of Health and Social Care and the Home Office, who co-sponsor and co-fund the IAPDC.

Appointments are regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments and recruitment processes comply with the Governance Code on Public Appointments.

Biographies

Professor Seena Fazel

Professor Fazel is the Professor of Forensic Psychiatry and Director of the Centre for Suicide Research at the University of Oxford. He is an honorary consultant forensic psychiatrist for Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust and works clinically in a community forensic mental health team. His main research interests are in relation to suicidal behaviour in prisoners, the mental health of prisoners, and risk assessment in criminal justice and mental health. 

Dr Jake Hard

Dr Hard is a GP with over 19 years’ experience of working in prison and is the Associate Clinical Director for the South West Prisons, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust. He was the Chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners Secure Environments Group from 2016 to 2022 and has published work with the IAPDC.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 22 May 2026.

The Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice has confirmed that Lynne Berry CBE is his preferred candidate for the role of Chair of the Judicial Appointments Commission.

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is the statutory body that identifies candidates for judicial roles in England and Wales. They also help fill positions for several specialist tribunals with UK-wide powers.  

Lynne Berry CBE has been selected as the preferred candidate for the role of JAC Chair following a rigorous assessment process conducted in accordance with the Governance Code on Public Appointments and the Judicial Appointments Commission Regulations 2013.

The role is subject to pre-appointment hearing by the Justice Select Committee. Pre-appointment scrutiny is an important part of the appointment process for some of the most significant public appointments made by Ministers. It is designed to provide an added level of scrutiny to the appointment process. Pre-appointment hearings are held in public and allow a Select Committee to take evidence before a candidate is appointed. Ministers consider the Committee’s views before deciding whether to proceed with the appointment.

Biography

Lynne Berry CBE is currently Chair of Governors and Pro-Chancellor at the University of Westminster, Chair of the Human Tissue Authority, and visiting Professor in Leadership at Bayes Business School, City St George’s, University of London. She has served as Chair or Senior Independent Director of many public sector and not-for-profit bodies and has held several Chief Executive posts in public bodies, including the Charity Commission, the Equal Opportunities Commission and the General Social Care Council, as well as in charities such as the Royal Voluntary Service and the Family Welfare Association.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 18 May 2026.

Children and young people will get earlier support to steer them away from crime under a major overhaul of the youth justice system unveiled by the Government today (Monday 18 May).

• Landmark reforms will intervene earlier and stop more young people falling into crime.
• Parents and carers to face tougher accountability when children offend.
• New youth intervention courts to tackle repeat offenders.
• Part of Government action to cut crime and create safer streets.

Published by the Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, a new Youth Justice White Paper provides the blueprint for earlier intervention, more targeted support, and tackling the root causes of youth crime to create safer communities and fewer victims.

The announcement comes as figures show eight out of ten prolific offenders committed their first crime as a child, while two-thirds of those released from custody reoffend within a year.

New measures announced today include piloting new Youth Intervention Courts, which will for the first time bring together judges, youth justice services and specialist support to tackle the drivers of offending and keep young people on track. The courts will also provide intensive supervision and tailored interventions, including health or educational requirements, while closely monitoring compliance to break cycles of repeat reoffending.

Parents and carers will also face greater responsibility for children who commit crime or cause anti-social behaviour, recognising the vital role families play in reducing reoffending. The Government will strengthen and expand Parenting Orders, which can compel parents or guardians to address their child’s behaviour – including attending counselling or guidance sessions – or face penalties such as fines.

The move comes after the use of Parenting Orders declined dramatically, from more than 1,000 in 2009/10 to just 33 in 2022/23.

There will also be a greater emphasis on addressing children who present the highest risk of committing the most serious and violent offences. Ministers will explore strengthening Youth Rehabilitation Orders with intensive supervision and surveillance, allowing electronic monitoring to track their whereabouts alongside robust rehabilitation activity to keep the public safe. However, the Government is clear custody will always remain essential for the most dangerous offenders.

Crucially, the reforms look to modernise the youth justice system, ensuring it keeps pace with new and emerging risks faced by today’s children including online harms, exploitation and rising vulnerability.

Further measures set out in the White Paper include:

• An extra £15.4 million per year investment in the Government’s flagship Turnaround programme to help a further 12,000 children at risk of entering the youth justice system, over the next three years. As of December 2024, just 7% of children who had completed Turnaround interventions had gone on to receive a sentence or caution.
• Fundamental reform of the youth out-of-court resolution framework, setting out our proposals in autumn 2026.
• Taking a fundamental look at the function and purpose of criminal courts for child defendants, reporting by August 2027.
• A commitment to end unnecessary custodial remand for children – slashing its use by 25% this Parliament to ensure children awaiting trial or sentencing are not held unless public protection requires it, backed by £5 million for robust community alternatives.
• Widening the range of tough community sentences available to the courts and reducing ineffective short custodial sentences – which combined with remand reforms could reduce the youth custodial population by 20%.
• Consulting on childhood criminal records reform by the end of the year. This will consider potentially ending lifelong disclosure requirements for childhood offences so people aren’t forever held back by mistakes made as children.
• Delivering on the commitment to create a new child criminal exploitation offence – going after the adults who prey on children and draw them into offending.

Deputy Prime Minister, David Lammy said:

Too many young people are being drawn into crime, with devastating consequences for victims, communities and their own futures.

These reforms lay the foundation to intervene far earlier, support families, and tackle the drivers of offending so fewer young people become trapped in cycles of crime, creating safer streets and fewer victims.

Minister for Sentencing and Youth Justice, Jake Richards, said:

Put simply, the youth justice system is not working – not for children, victims and communities blighted by crime.

These reforms will modernise the system, keep pace with emerging risks and ensure young offenders get the support they need to turn their lives around, while improving public safety.

The reforms announced today are backed by figures which show more than two-thirds of children released from custody reoffend within a year, but just over one-third of children sentenced to community sentences reoffended.

In addition, following sustained efforts across the system for many years, the number of children entering the youth justice system has fallen significantly. The result is a far more complex cohort of children, many victims of exploitation and with extensive offending histories including serious offences.

 The White Paper seeks to address this challenge head on – ensuring the youth justice system intervenes earlier, is firmer where necessary, and is consistently focussed on preventing harm.

Children’s Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza said:

As Children’s Commissioner, I have consistently been clear about the need to reform the youth justice system. We must build an approach that keeps children safe, diverts them from crime wherever possible, and prioritises meaningful behaviour change.

Education is central to this. It is the most powerful tool we have to prevent offending in the first place, and it remains vital for those in Young Offender Institutions who have already fallen through the cracks. I am therefore pleased to welcome the Youth Justice White Paper published today, and that I have been asked to undertake a review of the education children in YOIs receive, with the aim of improving outcomes and giving these children a better chance for the future.

Anti-knife crime campaigner and founder of Fazamnesty, Faron Paul, said:

Fazamnesty welcomes the Government’s proactive approach in the Youth Justice White Paper, which focuses on early intervention, prevention, and support for young people facing growing pressures and exploitation. Prevention is always better than cure. By working together with organisations like Fazamnesty and other community groups, we can help guide young people away from crime and create safer communities for everyone.

These reforms build on recent Government action to tackle the most serious issues affecting young people including knife crime and violence against women and girls.

Every child in England and Wales caught carrying a knife will now be given a mandatory specialised plan to stop them reoffending, part of the Government’s commitment to halve knife crime within a decade.

Meanwhile, the Government’s violence against women and girls strategy seeks to better protect girls from abuse and steer young boys away from harmful misogynistic influences.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 15 May 2026.

Measures will help separating families save cash and settle childcare issues more easily.

• Up to £500 for separating families to settle childcare and money matters without going to Court as Government scheme extended.
• New digital tools to make it easier for parents to find the right help at the right time.
• Part of government’s plan to support families and deliver faster, fairer justice.

Separating families will save hundreds of pounds, face less stress and be able to move on with their lives quicker thanks to crucial Government action.

Today (15 May), Justice Minister Baroness Levitt KC confirmed that the Family Mediation Voucher Scheme will be extended for another year – giving separating families £500 towards their mediation costs to help them solve issues around childcare and finances without going to court.

Made possible by over £7m a year in Government funding, the Family Mediation Voucher Scheme has already supported more than 54,000 parents since it launched in 2021.

The Government has also rolled out a series of new digital tools on GOV.UK, making it easier than ever for parents to find the right help at the right time. These include:

• The “Child Arrangement Planner” – a digital alternative dispute resolution service helping separating families agree practical arrangements for their children on GOV.UK.
• The “Get Help Finding a Child Arrangement Option” – a triage service which helps users identify the most suitable path to resolution based on their circumstances.
• A redesign of GOV.UK content for separating families, making it clearer and easier to use to encourage families to settle disputes outside of Court where appropriate.

The package is a key part of the government’s plan to help families save money and turn the page after separation by settling disputes more quickly and more easily outside of court.

Justice Minister Baroness Levitt KC said:

Separation is one of the hardest moments in any family’s life. The last thing parents need is a slow, costly court fight that drags out the pain, particularly for their children.

Our actions put families back in control. We are producing simple online tools and clear advice on GOV.UK which, taken together with the non-means tested £500 mediation voucher, will help parents to sort things out more quickly, with less stress and lower cost.

The changes build on the Government’s recent decision to expand Child Focused Courts – formerly known as Pathfinder Courts – across England and Wales. Child Focused Courts have been highly successful during their trial period in several areas. In particular, in some of the pilot areas, Family Court backlogs have halved and cases are being resolved up to seven and a half months faster,  sparing children and families prolonged uncertainty.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 7 May 2026.

The Lord Chancellor and Deputy Prime Minister, Lady Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals have reappointed Sir Richard Broadbent as Chair of the Board of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) for 1 year until 30 April 2027.

The HMCTS Board is responsible for overseeing the leadership and direction of HMCTS and plays a vital role in making sure the organisation effectively delivers the aims and objectives set by the Lord Chancellor, the Lady Chief Justice and the Senior President of Tribunals.

Biography

Sir Richard Broadbent was appointed Chair of the HMCTS Board on 1 May 2023.

He spent fifteen years working at senior levels in business, serving as Chairman of Arriva plc, Tesco plc, Deputy Chairman of Barclays plc and, in the public sector, as Chairman of HM Customs and Excise.

Prior to this, he spent fifteen years working in the City as a corporate adviser and subsequently a Managing Director at Schroders plc. He began his career in the Treasury and subsequently attended Stanford Business School as a Harkness Fellow.

He has also worked in academia, the third sector and manages a small business in farming.

The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 7 May 2026.

The Lord Chancellor has approved the appointments, for 3 years, of Sanaz Saifolahi, Jennifer McCarthy and Peace Egbulefu as members of the Tribunal Procedure Committee.

Sanaz Saifolahi’s tenure will start on 1 June 2026. The tenures of Jennifer McCarthy and Peace Egbulefu will commence on 3 July 2026.

Sanaz Saifolahi

Sanaz Saifolahi is a barrister specialising in immigration, asylum, human rights and public law. In addition, Ms Saifolahi also delivers training on all aspects of immigration and asylum law.

In 2024, Ms Saifolahi was appointed as a Legal Aid Review Panel Member for a 5-year term. In 2026, Ms Saifolahi was appointed by The Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service as a disciplinary panel member, also to sit as a Inns’ Conduct Committee panel member for a 3-year term. She has declared no political activity.

Jennifer McCarthy

Ms McCarthy is a specialist Employment Law Solicitor who has been representing clients on complex matters in the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal for over 25 years. She is also an accredited Mediator. She has declared no political activity.

Peace Egbulefu

Ms Egbulefu is a senior legal professional with over ten years’ experience working across disputes, civil and criminal procedure, and tribunal practice. She is a qualified Solicitor Advocate with experience across administrative law, procedural compliance, and complex multi-party proceedings, and brings active engagement with digitalisation and access to justice initiatives to the Committee. She has declared no political activity.

The TPC was established by the Tribunals, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA). It makes rules governing the practice and procedure in the First-tier Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal, and the Employment Tribunals.

These appointments are made under the TCEA and are regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. Recruitment processes comply with the Governance Code on Public Appointments.