Tag: Matt Hancock

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    The statement made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 24 September 2020.

    As set out by the Prime Minister in Parliament on 22 September, the covid-19 infection rate is rising across the country. It is now vitally important that Government take decisive action to limit any further spread, and reduce the chance of more restrictive measures.

    I therefore wish to update you on the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (No. 2) (England) (Amendment) (No. 5) Regulations 2020 (“the No. 2 Amendment Regulations”), and the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place and on Public Transport) (England) (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations 2020 which both came into force on 24 September 2020.

    It is now a legal requirement for hospitality venues (including cafes, bars, pubs and restaurants) to close between the hours of 10 pm and 5 am. This rule also applies to social clubs, cinemas, theatres, concert halls, casinos, bowling alleys, amusement arcades (and other indoor leisure centres or facilities), funfairs, theme parks, and adventure parks and activities, and bingo halls. However, cinemas, theatres and concert halls will be able to remain open beyond 10 pm if the performance started before 10 pm. There are certain exemptions to these restrictions, including delivery services, drive-through, and service stations. In addition, a “table service only” policy means that customers must be seated to consume food and drink served on hospitality premises.

    If businesses do not adhere to these new requirements, they could face a fine of £1,000 increasing in intervals to £2,000 then £4,000 to a maximum of £10,000 for subsequent offences.

    The “rule of six” introduced on 14 September prohibits social gatherings of more than six people in England, apart from specific exemptions. These exemptions have been further limited to reduce the risk of covid-19 transmission. The amendments include: limiting attendance at support groups, weddings and wedding receptions to 15 people and removing the existing exemption for ​indoor team sports (except for indoor disabled sports and supervised under-18s sports), and significant life events (other than weddings, civil partnerships, and funerals).

    Fines for initial breaches of the rule of six gathering limit have been doubled to reflect the severity of non-compliance. This means fines will be doubled from £100 to £200, doubling again upon reoffence.

    Amendments to the face covering regulations introduce a requirement for the public to wear a face covering in retail, leisure and hospitality venues including restaurants, public houses and bars, except for when seated to eat or drink. We have also extended the requirement to wear a face covering to staff working in these settings unless ​they have a reasonable excuse, in areas which are open to the public and where they are likely to come into close contact with members of the public.

    The penalty for failing to wear a face covering where one is required or gathering in groups of more than six, will now increase from £100 to £200 on the first offence (reduced to £100 if paid within 14 days), rising to a maximum of £6,400 for repeat offenders with no reduction for early payment from the second fine.

    Publicly available Government guidance on gov.uk is being updated to ensure that it is consistent with the new regulations. Sector bodies will also produce updated guidance where relevant.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    The statement made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 25 September 2020.

    As the covid-19 incidence rate continues to rise across the country, a suite of local and national actions is required to break the trains of transmission and enable people to maintain a more normal way of life.

    The Government will act swiftly and decisively to limit further spread, reduce disruption and contain local outbreaks. The local action committee command structure has been reviewing the latest evidence, working with local leaders and the scientific community to assess the data and whether further evidence is required.

    The latest data shows a sharp increase in incidence rates per 100,000 population in Leeds, Blackpool, Wigan and Stockport, which are significantly above the national average.

    As a result, we are making regulations which take effect from Saturday 26 September and will impose restrictions on inter-household mixing in private dwellings and gardens in Leeds, Stockport, Wigan and Blackpool. This is in line with measures seen elsewhere in the country, such as Leicester and the West Midlands. People who live in these areas will not be allowed to gather in a private dwelling or garden with any other household unless in a support bubble. People from anywhere else will also not be allowed to gather with another household in a private dwelling or garden in these areas.

    We have also reviewed the position in Leicester, the Borough of Oadby and Wigston, Birmingham, Solihull, Sandwell, Wolverhampton, Bolton, Bradford, Kirklees, Calderdale and the remaining local authorities in Greater Manchester and have decided to maintain their position on the watchlist as areas of intervention, as well as the current restrictions in these areas.

    This will be difficult news for the people living in these areas, profoundly affecting their daily lives. These decisions are not taken lightly, and such measures will be kept under review and in place no longer than they are necessary. There are exemptions to these measures so people can still meet with those in their support bubble. There are other limited exemptions such as for work purposes or to provide care or assistance to a vulnerable person. Through the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (Protected Areas and Linked Childcare Households) (Amendment) Regulations 2020, people may create an exclusive childcare bubble for the purposes of informal childcare for children under 14, helping ease pressure on those living under local restrictions so they can get to work.

    The guidance on gov.uk covering these areas will also be amended to fully reflect these changes.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Launch of Covid-19 App

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Launch of Covid-19 App

    The comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 24 September 2020.

    We are at a tipping point in our efforts to control the spread of this virus. With infection rates rising we must use every tool at our disposal to prevent transmission, including the latest technology.

    We have worked extensively with tech companies, international partners, and privacy and medical experts – and learned from the trials – to develop an app that is secure, simple to use and will help keep our country safe.

    Today’s launch marks an important step forward in our fight against this invisible killer and I urge everyone who can to download and use the app to protect themselves and their loved ones.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Emergency Support from European Union Mobility Package

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Emergency Support from European Union Mobility Package

    The comments made by a spokesperson for Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State of Health and Social Care, on 18 September 2020.

    This will fund some of the costs associated with the transporting of equipment and items of personal protective equipment (PPE) to the UK from overseas.

    The successful bid for this grant ensures the UK continues to benefit from its own contributions to the EU under the Withdrawal Agreement.

    The EU mobility package is part of the Emergency Support Instrument (ESI). The ESI has an overall budget of €2.7 billion and was activated in April 2020.

    We continue to explore every opportunity for international cooperation to tackle the virus and save lives.

    The UK’s successful bid was £31,024,734 (€34,047,679).

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    The statement made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 1 September 2020.

    With your permission, and indeed your encouragement, Mr Speaker, I would like to make a statement on coronavirus. The latest figures demonstrate how much progress we are making in our fight against this invisible killer. There are currently 60 patients in mechanical ventilator beds with coronavirus—that is down from 3,300 at the peak—and the latest daily number for recorded deaths is two. However, although those figures are lower than before, we must remain vigilant. I said in July that a second wave was rolling across Europe and, sadly, we are now seeing an exponential rise in the number of cases in France and Spain—hospitalisations are rising there too. We must do everything in our power to protect against a second wave here in the UK, so I would like to update the House on the work we are doing to that end.

    To support the return of education, and to get our economy moving again, it is critical that we all play our part. The first line of defence is, and has always been, social distancing and personal hygiene. We will soon be launching a new campaign reminding people of how they can help to stop the spread of coronavirus: “Hands, face, space and get a test if you have symptoms.” Everyone has a part to play in following the social distancing rules and doing the basics. After all, this is a virus that thrives on social contact. I would like to thank the British public for everything they have done so far, but we must continue and we must maintain our resolve.

    The second line of defence is testing and contact tracing. We have now processed over 16 million tests in this country, and we are investing in new testing technologies, including a rapid test for coronavirus and other winter viruses that will help to provide on-the-spot results in under 90 minutes, helping us to break chains of transmission quickly. These tests do not require a trained health professional to operate them, so they can be rolled out in more non-clinical settings. We now have one of the most comprehensive systems of testing in the world, and we want to go much, much further.

    Next, we come to contact tracing. NHS Test and Trace is consistently reaching tens of thousands of people who need to isolate each week. As I mentioned in answer to a question earlier, the latest week’s data shows that 84.3% of contacts were reached and asked to self-isolate, where contact details were provided. Since its launch, we have reached over 300,000 people, who may have been unwittingly carrying the virus. Today, we also launch our new system of pay to isolate. We want to support people on low incomes in areas with a high incidence of covid-19 who need to self-isolate and are unable to work from home. Under the scheme, people who test positive for the virus will receive £130 for the 10-day period they have to stay at home. Other contacts, including, for instance, members of their household, who have to self-isolate for 14 days, will be entitled to a payment of £182. We have rolled out the scheme in Blackburn with Darwen, Pendle and Oldham, and we will look to expand it as we see how it operates on the ground.​

    The third line of defence is targeted local intervention. Over the summer, we have worked hard to integrate our national system with the local response, and the local action that we are taking is working. In Leicester, as the hon. Member for Leicester South (Jonathan Ashworth) knows well, as a local MP, in Luton and in parts of northern England, we have been able to release local interventions, because the case rate has come down. We also now publish significantly more local information, and I put in place a system for building local consensus with all elected officials, including colleagues across this House, wherever possible. Our goal is that local action should be as targeted as possible. This combination of social distancing, test and trace and local action is a system in which we all have a responsibility to act, and this gives us the tools to control the virus while protecting education, the economy and the things we hold dear.

    Meanwhile, work on a vaccine continues to progress. The best-case scenario remains a vaccine this year. While no vaccine technology is certain, since the House last met, vaccine trials have gone well. The Oxford vaccine continues to be the world leader, and we have now contracted with six different vaccine providers so that whichever comes off, we can get access in this country. While we give vaccine development all our support, we will insist on safety and efficacy.

    I can update the House on changes to legislation that I propose to bring forward in the coming weeks to ensure that a vaccine approved by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency can be deployed here, whether or not it has a European licence. The MHRA standards are equal to the highest in the world. Furthermore, on the development of the vaccine, which proceeds at pace, I will shortly ask the House to approve a broader range of qualified clinical personnel who can deploy the vaccine in order of clinical priority, as I mentioned in questions. As well as the potential vaccine, we also have a flu vaccination programme—the biggest flu vaccination programme in history—to roll out this year.

    Finally, Mr Speaker, in preparation for this winter, we are expanding A&E capacity. We have allocated billions more funding to the NHS. We have retained the Nightingale hospitals to ensure that the NHS is fully prepared, and we published last month updated guidance on the protection of social care. As well as this, last month, figures showed a record number of nurses in the NHS—over 13,000 more than last year—and record numbers of both doctors and nurses going into training. We are doing all we can to prevent a second peak to prepare the NHS for winter and to restore as much of life and the things we love as possible. As schools go back, we must all remain vigilant and throughout the crisis we all have a role to play.

    This is a war against an invisible enemy in which we are all on the same side. As we learn more and more about this unprecedented virus, so we constantly seek to improve our response to protect the health of the nation and the things we hold dear. I commend this statement to the House.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Speech on the Future of Public Health

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Speech on the Future of Public Health

    The speech made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 18 August 2020.

    One of America’s most renowned Surgeons General, Everett Koop, once said:

    Health care is vital to all of us, some of the time, but public health is vital to all of us all of the time.

    If the last 6 months have taught us anything, surely they have taught us that no-one is untouched.

    Public health is not narrow: public health comes from everything.

    The air we breathe, the food we eat, how we protect ourselves and our communities from threats from afar.

    The coronavirus pandemic has shone a light on our public health system, just as it has on so much of modern life.

    And we have learned a lot – about this virus – about what has worked and what needs to change.

    And about what we need, in order to be in the best possible position to fight COVID-19, to fight all infectious diseases, and prevent ill health now and long into the future.

    Our nation’s public health experts have delivered incredible work during this pandemic.

    Just as they did in the response to Ebola, novichok and countless small outbreaks of diseases like norovirus and meningitis that no one ever hears about because our public health teams quietly and efficiently do their job day in, day out.

    Over the past few months, we have seen some extraordinarily talented people working so hard to tackle coronavirus.

    Our public health scientists were one of the first to sequence the genome of COVID-19 at Porton Down and Colindale, who created a diagnostic test for coronavirus at blistering speed, and who, working alongside local directors of Public Health, have given us the boots on the ground to investigate and quash outbreaks at a local level.

    And the research, especially from Public Health England, has been some of the best that’s been done into this novel disease, about which we of course knew nothing, just a few short months ago.

    And I want to say this very directly to all of my colleagues in public health, colleagues at Public Health England, local directors of public health and their teams, contact tracers, diagnostics experts, epidemiologists, infection control teams, and every single person who has contributed to this national effort.

    You have been working round the clock since January.

    You have done exceptional work and I am so proud of the part you have played in tackling this pandemic.

    And with winter ahead, the life-saving work you are doing is more important than ever.

    The changes that I am announcing today are designed entirely to strengthen our response.

    To ensure that the system works, to help you do your vital work.

    We are making the change now because we must do everything we can to fulfil our responsibilities to the public. To strengthen public health in the UK.

    I take my responsibilities incredibly seriously to get this right. As Secretary of State, it is me who is accountable to Parliament for how the system operates.

    And I want to make sure that we have the best possible system, having learned everything we’ve learned during this crisis so far.

    The world has not seen a pandemic on this scale in modern times.

    And while we have some of the best public health science in the world, including of course, the world’s leading vaccine candidate and the world’s only scientifically proven treatment for COVID-19, we did not go into this crisis with the capacity for a response to a once-in-a-century scale event.

    For example, even though we have some of the best labs in the world, we couldn’t call upon the large private sector diagnostics industry that some other countries were able to.

    As a result, we’ve had to respond at an unprecedented rate.

    To build our testing capacity at scale, to build a contact tracing system of a size never envisioned before and to boost our analytical capability, through the Joint Biosecurity Centre.

    Alongside of course building the NHS capacity we needed, including through the Nightingale hospitals, again at a pace never seen before here, to make sure the NHS was never overwhelmed.

    And so, to give ourselves the best chance of beating this virus – and of spotting and tackling other external health threats, now and in the future, we need to bring together the science and scale into one coherent whole.

    So today I am announcing that we are forming a new organisation: the National Institute for Health Protection.

    The National Institute for Health Protection will have a single and relentless mission: protecting people from external threats to this country’s health.

    External threats like biological weapons, pandemics, and of course infectious diseases of all kinds.

    It will combine our world-class talent and science infrastructure with the growing response capability of NHS Test and Trace and the sophisticated analytical capability we are building in the Joint Biosecurity Centre.

    Of course, these institutions work incredibly closely together already today.

    But I want that integration to be seamless.

    Crucially, it will be a national Institute that works very much locally, working with local directors of public health and their teams, who are the unsung heroes of health protection.

    Their local insight and intelligence is a mission-critical part of our response.

    The National Institute for Health Protection will also work closely with the devolved administrations, taking on existing UK-wide responsibilities, and supporting all 4 Chief Medical Officers with access to the best scientific and analytical advice.

    By bringing these parts of the system together, we can get more than the sum of the parts.

    And the mission is for a purpose. So we have a stronger, more joined-up response to protect people and the communities in which they live.

    The NIHP will report directly to ministers, and support the clinical leadership of the Chief Medical Officers.

    It will be dedicated – dedicated – to the investigation and prevention of infectious diseases and external health threats.

    That will be its mission. It is conceived amid crisis but it will help maintain vigilance in the years to come.

    Prevention

    PHE of course have other incredibly important responsibilities – centred around health improvement – and these are absolutely vital too.

    As the Prime Minister made abundantly clear with the launch of our Obesity Strategy last month, we are passionately committed to health improvement – the prevention agenda.

    And of course the 2 are linked, protection and prevention: we’ve seen how conditions like obesity can increase the risk for those who have coronavirus.

    Levelling up health inequalities and preventing ill health is a vital and a broad agenda.

    It must be embedded right across government, across the NHS, in primary care, pharmacies, and in the work of every local authority.

    So we will use this moment to consult widely on how we embed health improvement more deeply across the board, and I’ll be saying more on this over the coming weeks.

    This will in turn allow the National Institute for Health Protection to focus, focus, focus on the science and the scale needed for pandemic response, that mission.

    We have been looking at best practice from all over the world. We want to build an institution that constantly strives to be the very best.

    Role of the NIHP

    Today, as I launch the new National Institute for Health Protection, I want to say 3 things that I believe are critical for this new institution to succeed.

    About response, resilience, and about culture too.

    Response

    First, the immediate task of the NIHP is to pull together in one place the operational capabilities for the COVID response.

    While we hold out bright hope for the success of brilliant scientists who are working day and night on a vaccine, no vaccine is guaranteed to succeed.

    So, each day we must strengthen our response:

    Drive up testing capacity, bring on new technologies, contact trace thousands to protect them and their communities, and analyse and understand this virus more and more and more.

    So we have no time to lose.

    To my brilliant colleagues at PHE, I want to thank you, each and every one of you, for the service you have provided and will continue to provide.

    In particular I want to thank Duncan Selbie, who has led PHE with distinction for the last 7 years, and his senior management team.

    I am delighted that Duncan will support PHE and the NIHP throughout this transition and continue his sterling work on behalf of the UK overseas.

    And I want to welcome Michael Brodie, who has a wealth of experience and a brilliant track record of delivery, who will step up as interim Chief Executive during the transition.

    From today, PHE, the JBC and NHS Test and Trace will operate under single leadership, reporting to Baroness Dido Harding, who will establish the NIHP, and undertake the global search for its future leadership.

    And I have no doubt that under Baroness Harding, we will found the NIHP as a thriving mission-driven organisation.

    We have a common mission. The greatest mission of any of our working lives.

    And we have no time to lose in building the institution of the future.

    Resilience and preparedness

    Next, while of course we must focus on immediate response, so too must we improve resilience and preparedness, not just for coronavirus but for the next threat that lies around the corner.

    We are living in an increasingly inter-connected world.

    The UN projects that by 2050, over two-thirds of the global population will live in increasingly large, dense urban centres.

    External threats to public health can emerge and spread quickly, and can reach our shores within days.

    My single biggest fear is a novel flu, or another major health alert, hitting us right now, in the middle of this battle against the coronavirus pandemic.

    Even once this crisis has passed – and it will pass – we need a disease control infrastructure that gives us the permanent standing capacity to respond as a nation, and the ability to scale up at pace.

    One of the lessons, I believe, from the crisis is that we need an institution whose only job is to look out with constant vigilance to prepare for and respond to external health threats like pandemics.

    So as well as bringing together our core pandemic response capabilities into one place, the NIHP will bring focus.

    It’s worth dwelling on this point for a moment.

    The question of how to protect a country from risks that are infrequent, yet devastating, is not restricted to infection control.

    Think of how we work to prevent terrorism, and protect financial stability, for instance.

    Just as with pandemic preparedness, there can be years between major threats materialising, especially when things go well.

    The public policy challenge is how to build a system that is resilient and stays alert for years on end – learning, preparing, ready.

    We can learn from abroad, from countries like South Korea, and from Germany’s Robert Koch Institute, where their health protection agencies had a huge primary focus on pandemic response.

    We will build the same focus here.

    So we will ensure the NIHP has the strongest possible function for intelligence, data analytics and surveillance, and a standing capacity to act fast at scale.

    So we can remain equal to any future threats.

    Culture

    The third thing I want to say is something about working culture.

    The National Institute for Health Protection will succeed by building an institution with the most revered expertise, in a culture that is open, outward-looking, non-hierarchical, and embraces the potential of its whole team.

    Getting this culture of rigour and speed, of expertise and inquisitiveness, of outward-looking confidence, is critical to success.

    Over centuries our country has contributed so much to global public health, and the life chances it brings.

    We’re the home of Edward Jenner, who arguably saved more lives than anyone else in human history, with his pioneering vaccine for smallpox.

    And John Snow, who just a few miles from here, used data in effectively one of the world’s first contact tracing exercises, using epidemiological methods to help the world understand how infectious diseases like cholera really spread.

    In fact John Snow’s insight, that published highly specific local data, helps people tackle a contagious disease, is as vital today as it was in 1854.

    We have incredible expertise in this country.

    We need to support that expertise to flourish, in a way that meets the fast-moving demands of public health in the 21st century.

    The creation of any new organisation provides a real opportunity to build and cement its culture.

    This new Institute will focus on what works, bringing in ideas and expertise from wherever it can be found.

    And it will support a culture of collaboration and change, shunning silos and unnecessary bureaucracy.

    It will work seamlessly to harness the capabilities of academia and groundbreaking and innovative private companies with whom we must work so closely to get the best result.

    It will work hand in glove with the NHS, and it will use the most modern, cutting-edge digital and data analytics tools at its core.

    These are the qualities that will allow us to deal not just with today’s threats, but tomorrow’s threats too.

    Conclusion

    The first responsibility of any government is the protection of its citizens.

    And threats to public health are among the most important of all.

    Because it is only if people feel safe and secure in the environment that they live in that they have the confidence to start a business, play an active part in their community, and enjoy all the incredible experiences that life has to offer.

    Threats like this coronavirus pandemic can emerge anywhere, and at any time.

    So we must be ready. Ready to beat this virus, and protect all of us, all of the time, over the years to come.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Speech on the Future of Healthcare

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Speech on the Future of Healthcare

    The speech made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 30 July 2020.

    Thank you very much.

    I want to start by taking you back to the tail-end of a long and very hot London summer many years ago.

    One night late at night, at a bakery in the City, a spark leapt out of an oven and ignited some nearby fuel.

    London’s largely timber-framed buildings were bone-dry at that time. Tightly packed together in the narrow, unplanned medieval streets.

    The year of course was 1666 and we all know what happened next.

    When a system is hit with a big external shock it can be utterly devastating.

    London lost a third of its buildings in the Great Fire, including its cathedral.

    100,000 people were made homeless.

    And the cost of rebuilding the city has been calculated in today’s money at 37 billion pounds.

    But that same devastating shock can force people to find new and better ways of doing things.

    The London Fire Brigade, the first insurance companies, building regulations that enforced access to running water, and of course Wren’s domed cathedral, the most ambitious public works project in the history of the city.

    All of these have their origins in the nation’s response to the Great Fire.

    And in that there is a lesson for us.

    Because once again we have been hit with a terrible shock. A small spark that quickly turned into a global crisis.

    Coronavirus has tested every single part of our infrastructure, giving us a new appreciation for what works and what doesn’t.

    And once again, brilliant ingenious people have risen to the occasion.

    Now it’s a long time since I’ve given this kind of speech.

    And a long time since I’ve been in front of an audience.

    And in these last few months, we’ve all been working every waking hour to lead the nation through the coronavirus crisis.

    I am fully aware of the pain and suffering that this virus has brought to so many people, and we pay tribute to everyone that we have sadly lost.

    Throughout this difficult time, we have protected the NHS, and in turn, helped protect us.

    And that was thanks to the heroic efforts of many, many people.

    This was a great achievement, in very difficult circumstances, but we know that we won’t have got everything right.

    And that there will be lessons that we need to learn from this pandemic.

    This includes what we’ve learnt both from our healthcare system and about it.

    And today I want to step back from the vital work in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    That work continues every day, as we strive to keep this virus under control.

    We can see a second wave emerging in Europe and we will do everything in our power to stop it reaching our shores.

    However, today, I want to talk about what we’ve learnt about the health and social care system in this country.

    How it worked during the crisis, and how it should work best in the future.

    So first, what have we learnt?

    Coronavirus has been a moment of exposure, of stark clarity.

    Like sheet lightning on a dark night, it has suddenly and dramatically revealed our healthcare landscape in a way that we’ve never quite seen it before.

    We’ve discovered things about our system that we could not have learned in normal times:

    how it performed under conditions of severe, sustained nationwide pressure

    the choices frontline professionals make if you give them greater freedom

    what rules and structures are essential to the effective delivery of health and social care

    and what are just a layer of bureaucratic barnacles that can be stripped away to streamline the vessel beneath

    If you think about it, in terms of mobilising the resources of the state, the pandemic has been as close as you can get to fighting a war without actually fighting a war.

    We achieved things that people never thought possible:

    like building the Nightingale Hospitals in 9 days

    or doubling ICU capacity to treat the most sick

    or treating half of patients in outpatients and primary care online

    At the same time, our brilliant scientists drove forward the first robust clinical trial to find an effective treatment for coronavirus.

    And they are currently leading the world in the search for a vaccine.

    Coronavirus has catalysed deep structural shifts in healthcare that were already underway:

    telemedicine

    data-driven decision-making

    and working as a system not as atomised institutions

    And just like a war it’s forced us to improvise new ways of doing things, some which will become permanent because they are better ways of doing things.

    So for instance, before coronavirus, there were plenty of theories about how to transform health and social care.

    In fact, the last 30 years is littered with top-down reorganisations and big-bang structural reforms, quangos and quasi-markets, and theories and pilots and reports and boards and commissions.

    But something important has changed.

    In the post-coronavirus world we don’t have to rely on theory.

    Because we now have hard evidence how people choose to operate, under crisis conditions, when there is a novel and acute need to deliver.

    We must learn from how the NHS and social care worked during the peak.

    Both about what we must change. And critically, because so many things went right, we’ve got to bottle the best.

    And this is in a way how I see my job and role as Secretary of State for Health and Social Care: not to impose some preconceived utopia that might look good on a management consultant’s slide deck but bears no relation to reality on the ground.

    My job is to make the system work for those who work in the system, and work hard to make the system work: to free up, empower and harness the mission-driven capability of team healthcare.

    So what do I mean by this? For an illustration of what I mean, come with me to Helsinki.

    In Finland, town planners visit a park immediately after snowfall because the footprints reveal the paths that people naturally take.

    The next summer, they go out and pave those paths.

    They don’t sit in an office and decide where to put the path.

    They watch where people go naturally and then they pave the way.

    We too must pave the paths that people want to travel.

    Because our healthcare system isn’t just complicated, it’s complex. It’s best led not by diktat but by mission.

    And we are now at a critical moment in that mission.

    We are carefully restoring our healthcare system. And as we do so, we must not fall back into bad old habits.

    Instead, we need to take what we’ve learned, and build back better, capturing a culture that’s open to collaboration and change.

    And I just want to dwell on this collaboration point. We saw collaboration like we’ve never seen before: between different organisations, different professions and between teams in different organisations.

    And we saw things change. I mean really change. I’ve lost count of the times someone said to me since: “what would have taken months took minutes.”

    In the heat of the crisis we saw a shared understanding:

    that accepted truths or ways of doing things had to be challenged if they didn’t help

    that the needs of the patient mattered more than the silos between institutions

    and, crucially, that we value the contribution from everyone on the team

    Now, throughout I’ve been talking to the people responsible for making the system work: from regulators to frontline staff, to leaders of trusts to local directors of public health.

    And I ask what they think are the things we need to ‘bottle’.

    In organisations as diverse as NICE, the Royal Colleges, the BMA, people come up with the same list:

    collaboration: we work better when we work together

    speed: it doesn’t have to take weeks and months to change anything, no matter how small

    and innovation: that’s it’s not about coming up with the idea, it’s about having the backing and the permission to make the change

    I couldn’t agree more.

    So today I want to start a conversation about how we can put these values into action.

    How we can capture a culture that lets our carers care.

    And scythes away the red tape, attitudes and ways of working that stand in the way.

    And to do this, I’d like to draw on 7 major, cultural lessons that I think we’ve all learnt over the past few months.

    Lesson 1: value our people

    The first is that we must value our people and trust them as professionals.

    Now, it’s easy to say we should value people. But there are some hard-edged changes needed to make IT happen in reality in the NHS and social care.

    Too often before the crisis, people were treated as numbers on a spreadsheet, when they’re the most important asset that we’ve got.

    And when I say people, I mean all of our people: care workers, porters, cleaners, clinicians and leaders.

    Everyone, of every background, in every part of our health and care system, has a contribution to make, and everyone needs to be supported to do their best possible work.

    Now some of you may have heard, I love the story of JFK visiting the NASA space centre. He saw a janitor carrying a broom and asked him what he was doing.

    “Mr President”, the janitor said proudly, “I’m helping put a man on the moon”.

    This is what it means to be a mission-led organisation.

    And we know what support for staff looks like in practical terms.

    Because as well as that great outpouring of emotional support from the British public, the crisis brought real, practical help for the frontline.

    Good food. Decent rest facilities. Someone to talk to about the most difficult experiences that frontline colleagues faced.

    It shouldn’t take a pandemic.

    All of this needs to become the norm for the NHS and social care: that we listen to our people and we look after them.

    Not just an emergency response to a crisis but all the time.

    I am determined to make it happen.

    We also learned that people do their best work when they’re trusted to get on with the job.

    Don’t just take my word for it. Look at Admiral Nelson, one of the most inspirational leaders of all time.

    When the British navy was heavily outnumbered at the Battle of Trafalgar, it was Nelson’s approach to leadership – the Nelson Touch – that proved to be decisive.

    He worked hard to build an agreed strategy that everyone knew and understood – and then he expected everyone to use their own initiative to put it into place.

    So, amidst the fog of war, while his adversaries were hamstrung, waiting for instructions from their admirals, transmitted by cumbersome flag signals, Nelson’s fleet knew what they needed to do, and they were trusted to work out how to do it.

    Admiral Villeneuve, whose fleet was defeated by Nelson, said it best:

    “To any other nation, the loss of Nelson would have been irreparable, but in the British fleet, every Captain was a Nelson”.

    This is the mentality that we need. I want an NHS and care system that is full of leaders. Leaders at all levels. This is the principle embedded in the People’s Plan released today.

    Everyone, at all levels, thinking like a leader and being encouraged to use their initiative and take ownership of their decisions.

    And that means getting rid of what stands in their way.

    I think it is vital to understand what happened when we made emergency changes so staff could focus on the crisis.

    Take the GMC and NMC, who:

    set up registers for extra healthcare professionals

    and gave professionals the flexibility to postpone their revalidation

    allowed students to continue their studies while at the same time contributing to frontline care

    and most audaciously of all, gave clinicians from areas far removed from respiratory illness, for instance dermatology, gave them the confidence to work in unfamiliar COVID wards.

    Or look at the CQC’s Emergency Support Framework.

    The CQC adapted their traditional inspection-based model of regulation to the new reality, using data and feedback to identify problems in real time.

    And where there was a problem, working with them to have ‘honest conversations’ and provide ongoing advice and support.

    Now when we made those changes the sky didn’t fall in. On the contrary.

    The NHS was protected. Patient safety was protected. And crucially frontline staff felt empowered.

    But empowerment is not just about giving people the freedom to make decisions.

    It’s also about requiring them to make those decisions.

    If you give people responsibility, they will act responsibly.

    So we cannot, we will not, revert back to before. The GMC, the NMC, the Royal Colleges, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, the CQC, NHSE, we are all together on this mission.

    The regulators and our NHS and care colleagues excelled during the pandemic, showing their ingenuity, their resilience and their versatility when it mattered.

    And over the coming weeks they will be building on the action they’ve already taken to put this agenda into practice – for the long term.

    Today the NHS published the latest part of its People Plan.

    And aligned to this vision of an empowered culture where leadership at all levels supports every single NHS employee to reach their potential.

    This is all about building that culture of trusting people to use their professional judgement, to do the right thing, instead of seeming, appearing to assume someone will do the wrong thing unless they have layers of management peering over their shoulder.

    Together we’ll build a system of distributed authority, where decisions are made as close as possible to where the information is, with everyone working right at the top of their skill set and qualifications.

    Where people feel empowered and encouraged to crack on with improvements, instead of having good ideas blocked by bureaucratic inertia.

    And in a world where multi-morbidity is increasing, where we encourage and celebrate generalist skills, as well as supporting those who want to specialise.

    Frankly, we employ some of the most compassionate, brilliant, intelligent, mission-driven people in the world in our health and social care system.

    Why stop them from doing their best? This has to change.

    Lesson 2: bust bureaucracy

    That brings me to the second lesson.

    Supporting a culture of collaboration and change by busting bureaucracy.

    Now, we shouldn’t beat ourselves up too much.

    The latest OECD data shows that we only spend 2p in the pound on administration in the NHS, compared to, for example, to 6p in France, and 8p in the USA.

    But the crisis proved that there’s more bureaucracy that our healthcare system can do better without.

    That barnacle-like encrustation of rules and regulations.

    And I can see people smiling and I know everybody is thinking about some particular, frustrating, illogical rule.

    It has been disempowering to many brilliant, highly motivated frontline staff who just want to get on with caring for patients.

    Now, first, a caveat. Healthcare is a risk-based business, and many of the rules exist for good reason.

    Of course they do. High-quality rules are the tramlines of high performance.

    We know that checklists save lives, we know that professional standards must be rigorous and exacting. Clear standards are necessary for a disparate system to function.

    In the crisis, we imposed some clear, high-level rules, around infection control, for example. And tech standards are vital for interoperability.

    Done best, high-level, mission-based standards support people to deliver within them.

    Done best, the centre sets clear tramlines, and holds the frontline transparently to account for delivery.

    Kennedy set NASA the goal of getting to the moon by the end of the sixties. He did not specify what alloys the rocket should be made out of.

    We need a framework that encourages local initiative in service of the overall goal.

    Again the pandemic forced us to decide which rules and processes were essential to the NHS mission and which were getting in the way of that mission.

    Sometimes it’s just an encrustation of decisions made over time, like the regulations which required thousands of pages of information from doctors who want to move here from Australia, which have been removed.

    Other times, it’s how the law is over interpreted with layers of gold-plating.

    Our information governance rules are a good example of the latter.

    Complex, confusing advice leads to over-cautious interpretation. For instance, without changing a jot of the law, early in the crisis NHSx issued radically simplified new guidance to support new ways of working.

    This guidance, information governance guidance, was on one page, and targeted at every single front line professional – not just at Information Governance experts.

    For example, we made it clear that it’s fine to use secure messaging services like WhatsApp to share information with colleagues or patients where the benefits outweigh the risks.

    And we made it easier to link the primary care records of millions to the latest data on coronavirus.

    Helping us to do the world’s largest analysis of coronavirus risk factors.

    This work normally would have taken years, but thanks to our new framework for processing data, it went from proposal to execution in just 42 days

    I can’t tell you how many people at all levels have begged me never to go back.

    And it worked because the emphasis was on enabling, on how people can safely share information rather than an emphasis on restricting.

    And now we’ll work to simplify that guidance yet further, to make it yet more empowering.

    Rest assured, this bureaucracy will not be coming back.

    In fact in the future, I want us to go even further.

    Lesson 3: better tech means better healthcare

    That means lesson 3, better tech means better healthcare. We want to double down on the huge advances we’ve made in technology within NHS and social care.

    Because it’s not really about technology, it’s about people.

    It’s the child with cystic fibrosis who can have his lung capacity measured at home with a spirometer and an app instead of having to go to hospital, with all the risks that entails.

    It’s the elderly care home resident, socially shielding for months, able to meet her new grandchild on an iPad.

    It’s the local GP, already time poor, not having to spend time donning and doffing PPE because she can do her care home check-in online.

    I know I’ve taken a bit of stick for making technology one of the central issues for the NHS.

    Before coronavirus, there was a view advanced by some people, would you believe it, which held that anyone over the age of 25 simply could not cope with anything other than a face-to-face to appointment.

    That video consultations, a technology by the way that’s been around for decades, was too modern and new-fangled for the NHS. Remember that?

    That apps had about as much relevance to present-day healthcare as nanobot surgery and missions to Mars.

    When it came to social care this attitude was even worse.

    Take away their fax machines, people told me, and care homes would collapse.

    Well all I can say is thank God we didn’t listen to the naysayers and that NHS Digital, NHSx and NHS teams right across the country, worked so hard on digital transformation.

    Imagine if we hadn’t put the investment into broadband infrastructure so 99% of surgeries could offer remote consultations, virtually overnight.

    Imagine if we hadn’t digitised prescriptions so people could get repeat prescriptions online.

    Or imagine the massive pressure on NHS 111 at the peak of the pandemic if we hadn’t developed it also as an online service.

    At a time when over 750,000 online assessments were carried out in just one day in mid-March.

    Now, of course sometimes developing new technology is hard, and you have to have an attitude of iteration and of flexibility. But none of that makes it any less valuable.

    So to promote collaboration and change, we need more transparency, better use of data, more interoperability, and the enthusiastic adoption of technological innovation that can improve care.

    This crisis has shown that patients and clinicians alike, not just the young, want to use technology.

    Just look at how many families, all different generations, kept their precious encounters going through parties on Skype and quizzes on Zoom.

    And when it comes to their healthcare, whether they’re digital natives or digital converts, they don’t want to have to sit around in a waiting room if that service can come to them at home.

    In the 4 weeks leading up to 12 of April this year, 71% of routine GP consultations were delivered remotely, with about 26% face to face.

    In the same period a year ago, this was reversed: 71% face to face and 25% remotely.

    Now of course there always has to be a system for people who can’t log on.

    But we shouldn’t patronise older people by saying they don’t do tech.

    The feedback from this transformation has been hugely positive.

    And especially valued by doctors in rural areas, who say how it could save long travel times for doctors and patients.

    So from now on, all consultations should be teleconsultations unless there’s a compelling clinical reason not to.

    Of course, if there’s an emergency, the NHS will be ready and waiting to see you in person – just as it always has been.

    But if they are able to, patients should get in contact first – via the web or by calling in advance.

    That way, care is easier to manage and the NHS can deliver a much better service.

    Not only will it make life quicker and easier for patients.

    But free up clinicians to concentrate on what really matters.

    The fourth lesson is about open borders

    This crisis showed that we were at our best when we were looking outwards, drawing on ideas and expertise wherever they may be found – and that means the private sector too.

    And that takes me onto the fourth lesson: the NHS needs open borders.

    Better joint working between local authorities and the NHS locally to embrace the solutions that work.

    They say there are no atheists in a lifeboat. Well, there are no ideologues in a pandemic.

    Take testing for example.

    If you’d have asked most people who’d taken a swab test whether they were part of pillar 1 or pillar 2 you’d have seen some fairly blank looks.

    People don’t care who has provided the test.

    They just want a test that’s easily accessible, that works and that they can have confidence in.

    And I want to thank the teams – public and private – who put themselves on the front line every day to swab people at risk.

    Restrict yourself to the false divide of public or private and you are only fishing for solutions in half of the pond.

    As part of our response to coronavirus, we were able to call up the logistical knowhow of Amazon, the production lines of Burberry, the car parks of IKEA, and literal boots on the ground from the British Army.

    The independent hospitals stepped forward and provided services to protect the NHS.

    And the NHS worked side-by-side with them all as part of this incredible national effort.

    One diverse, talented team, working towards a common goal.

    And we were all better off as a result.

    In the face of unprecedented challenges, our sense of enterprise and pragmatism is mission-critical to the success of our health and care system.

    It’s part of the spirit of collaboration and change that we must bottle for the future.

    Now we have made this huge step forward, we should never walk back.

    Lesson 5: no trust is an island

    Lesson 5 is that the system works best when it works as a system: collegiate, co-operative, collaborative.

    As opposed to a series of atomised, fortress-like, rather lonely institutions.

    The future of health and social care will be built by those striving to keep the population healthy, not just to fix the ones who are ill – just as is spelled out in our NHS Long Term Plan, and in our social care reforms.

    This can only be done by the delivery of healthcare based on the needs of the population, not the design of the institution.

    To deliver this type of care, systems will become the foundation stone of the future of the NHS and social care.

    We have already seen local areas in England embracing system-wide working.

    With more streamlined planning, bringing together clinical commissioning groups, providers and local authorities to plan services across an area.

    These plans will of course help reduce admin costs, but that’s only half of it.

    System working means better, less fragmented decision-making.

    This is how people work when they really need results.

    So we must work to break down the silos that exist between providers and trusts of all kinds.

    Primary care, community care, pharmacy, mental health and acute trusts, the barriers between these services are decades old.

    But they don’t work now.

    Not in a crisis. And not in an age where ever more patients have the kind of long-term, complex conditions which mean they can’t just be bandaged up and set on their way.

    The strict barrier between primary and secondary care goes right back to Lloyd George’s National Insurance Act of 1911.

    Now I’m a great admirer of David Lloyd George but what was right for 1911 is not right for the 2020s and beyond.

    The past few months have shown that there is another way.

    During coronavirus, when many secondary care appointments were cancelled for those with chronic complex conditions.

    Primary care clinicians were able to support them, using digital technology to take advice from consultants where needed.

    So the best possible care could still be delivered in the community.

    Pharmacies provided open-access support and care that is deeply embedded in the communities they serve.

    Pharmacies showed just how much more they can do.

    And this is the spirit that I want us to channel as we move out of this pandemic.

    Collaboration doesn’t just mean inside the NHS either.

    The NHS must be connected to the places they serve, coterminous with local authorities where the crisis has shown that councils and the NHS can work wonders when they work together.

    Look at what was achieved with rough sleepers by working across the system, from housing to the NHS to public health, to protect the most vulnerable.

    And then look at the acute response team. Take Thanet, a dedicated team of GPs, nurses, paramedics, AHPs and geriatricians that provide Thanet’s 61 care homes with assessments and advice on all aspects of old-age care.

    Now during the pandemic, that model came into its own, with 7-day support so care homes and district nurses always had someone they could call if they couldn’t get through to the local GP.

    Integration is not a silver bullet for all problems in healthcare, not by any means.

    But what is clear is that once you think about the delivery of health and care as a system in a place it changes the conversation.

    So money spent on a care package rather than in a hospital looks less like a loss to the hospital for example, and more like a better outcome for all.

    There’s a stronger imperative to treat people in the right settings.

    And data flows more easily.

    So together we will build our future health and care with the system by default.

    And this will include a financial and inspection approach that encourages and rewards collaboration.

    And as we do this, we need to look beyond healthcare, at everything that makes us healthier and happier.

    Recognising that access to a gym or a park can have just as great an impact on our wellbeing as a GP surgery or hospital.

    We must move away from thinking about spending as an NHS pound or a Council pound.

    But a Darlington pound or a Dudley pound.

    We need local authorities and the NHS to plan and budget together, to work together, and to be accountable together to local people.

    Lesson 6: accountability matters

    We also need this collaboration at a national level too.

    All of our national organisations have done exceptional life-saving work during this crisis.

    The NHS has withstood the worst global pandemic in a generation…

    PHE rolled out a diagnostic test faster than ever before in recent history.

    And we saw the strength of the Union coming to the fore, with a UK-wide approach helping us to expand testing capacity.

    Procure PPE for every corner of the UK.

    And of course search for a vaccine that can help us return to normal life.

    Just as we need a more joined-up, collegiate working on the ground, so to we need the same at the centre.

    We’re making progress already, with NHS England and NHS Improvement now operating as a single organisation.

    But our national healthcare institutions are too siloed, in many cases by law under the 2012 Act.

    Huge amounts of energy are wasted managing the legally imposed silos.

    That’s why the NHS itself has proposed adjustments to join up services both nationally and locally.

    Fortunately, there are many practical steps that we can now take.

    Take just one example: we have many bodies: DHSC, NHSD, NHSE&I, PHE and the CQC all making separate information requests from providers, often for the same information.

    It’s a huge burden, and Instead we should ask for information once, and use that across the system.

    This spirit of collaboration is so important, and nowhere is it more important than the relationship between health and social care.

    We’ve heard about GPs going the extra mile for care homes and telemedicine enabling care in the peak of the pandemic.

    The NHS has also given every care home a dedicated clinical lead and hospital trusts have provided thousands of infection control training sessions.

    One of the silver linings of this incredibly dark period has been the widespread appreciation for the care sector, and the brilliant work that our carers do.

    Now it’s time to set clear ambitions about the future of social care in this country and fix an issue that has been ducked for far too long.

    We should aspire for everyone to get the care they need at whatever stage of life they need it.

    Given in the place that best meets people’s needs, by carers who are properly recognised and rewarded.

    We already know that we need a fairer system for paying for care, that protects people from the exorbitant costs that require them to sell their home.

    And that we need to get more money overall into social care and fix the funding shortfall.

    Achieving this will involve bold reforms, not just about funding, but also effective structures for oversight and accountability.

    We will be saying more about this over the coming months but this is a top priority for me.

    So we can create an enduring model of care, focused on early intervention, prevention and technology.

    And keep people living independently for as long as is possible, supported by care that you or I would be happy about for our own daughter, father, or grandparent.

    Lesson 7: the nation’s health is bigger than just the NHS

    And now, my seventh and final lesson for today.

    Our NHS is a place where miracles are an everyday occurrence.

    But they cannot, must not, shoulder the whole burden of keeping the nation well.

    The nation’s health is so much bigger than just the NHS.

    The best evidence suggests that only about a quarter of what leads to a longer, healthier life is the result of what happens ina healthcare system.

    Prevention matters, as the pandemic has vividly shown.

    That sheet lightning revealed that your chances of dying with coronavirus are tragically markedly higher in a more deprived area, much higher for the obese, and much higher for people from an ethnic minority background.

    This should be a wake up call for us all.

    As a nation, we went into this crisis in worse health than some of our peers.

    Japan and South Korea for instance, have the lowest rates of obesity in the OECD.

    And this left us more vulnerable to the disease.

    This is not the only factor that explains our relatively high mortality rates during the pandemic. Far from it.

    But nor is it a factor that any responsible government could just ignore.

    The lightning strike of the pandemic exposed stark inequalities in the health of our nation.

    Between ethnic groups, between city and country, between occupations.

    The disproportionate impact of the virus upon black and minority ethnic people – including in the NHS and care workforce – has been particularly troubling.

    People are understandably angry about these disparities, and I feel a deep responsibility to get this right.

    Because the quest for equality isn’t just about jobs and housing.

    The Prime Minister’s mission is to level up. And there is no more important levelling up than levelling up your health.

    In this country there is a complex interaction between ethnicity, economic opportunity and healthy life expectancy that we need to urgently understand and unravel.

    That means asking difficult questions about the way in which our society is configured.

    About who gets to work from home and who does not.

    About how much easier it is to have a healthy life if you don’t have to worry about next month’s rent or next week’s food shop.

    There is a famous passage in ‘The Road to Wigan Pier’ where Orwell is talking about the diets of unemployed mineworkers, which in 1937 consisted of white bread, corned beef and sugary tea.

    “When you are unemployed,” Orwell said, and I quote:

    “which is to say when you are underfed, harassed, bored, and miserable, you don’t want to eat dull wholesome food. You want something a little bit ‘tasty’. There is always something cheaply pleasant to tempt you.’’

    And the structure of our economy and the make-up of our society have both changed hugely since the 1930s.

    But that insight of Orwell’s is borne out by modern epidemiology.

    It harder to stay healthy if you are poor.

    So, as much as levelling up on economic opportunity, we need to level up the nation’s health and care provision too.

    And this isn’t simply an aspiration. It is a moral imperative if we are to uphold the values of equality and fairness upon which the NHS was founded.

    But there’s no easy answers to any of this. The causes of ill health are complex and multifaceted. And our response must be too.

    We must understand who is most at risk of COVID and why, and I am working with Kemi Badenoch on urgent cross-government work on this.

    Longer term, we must be more proactive on public health.

    Earlier this week, we launched our new obesity strategy, which is full of measures to help people make healthier choices.

    Like mandating clearer calorie information in restaurants and takeaways, and banning the advertising of high-fat, sugar and salt products before 9pm on TV and online.

    But this is the beginning and not the end of our work.

    One of my main priorities is making sure more people stay out of hospital, as well as providing the best possible care when they come in. And the NHS has a vital part to play in that.

    Supporting people to make healthy choices. Using those teachable moments to help people to make the change. With employers, town hall planners and the food and drink industry all playing their full part too.

    And we must keep striving to add life to years as well as years to life. Not giving in to the defeatism that says you can’t have a healthy old age.

    So what do we need do?

    These for me, are the 7 big lessons of the crisis.

    But this is only the start of the conversation, and I want to hear what you think too.

    From frontline staff to regulators, from chief execs to caterers across health and social care.

    I want to discuss what works and what matters to you, as we implement our NHS Long Term Plan.

    And what we need to change to get there.

    We have already mapped out over 50 different reforms that we introduced due to coronavirus that we want to keep and drive forward.

    Where the question is not what to roll back but how to go forward. How we can build back better.

    And there are a few themes that I think are especially important.

    First, we need to push power out of the centre to closer to where care is delivered.

    Second, we need to tackle unnecessary bureaucracy.

    So I will be setting our health and care system a Bureaucracy Challenge.

    Challenging every new proposed regulation or process and asking if it makes sense given the realities of modern, integrated healthcare.

    This means inviting everyone who has to work under this bureaucracy, from the most eminent Royal College president to the most junior healthcare assistant, to tell us what they think should be scrapped or improved.

    Today we have launched an open call for evidence on this to invite views from health and social care colleagues on how we can bust bureaucracy.

    This is unapologetically based on the Red Tape Challenge that we issued to business after the global financial crisis and which helped spur a British jobs miracle.

    We don’t need a pilot to know how necessary this is in healthcare. We’ve just seen how empowering it can be and we must go further.

    Third, we need to drive forward the integration of health and social care.

    By pooling budgets and giving the NHS responsibility to support people out of hospital, we radically reduced the number of people getting care in hospital when they should have been at home.

    But there is so much more to do.

    All parts of the system need to pick up this agenda and drive it forward, with what Martin Luther King called the “fierce urgency of now”.

    And there’s one very urgent reason why we can’t go back: which is winter.

    Though I deliver this on a hot summers’ day, we know for sure that winter is coming.

    Unusually cold weather or a more virulent strain of flu would put real stress on the system.

    There is still a lot we don’t know about COVID-19, from the long-term health impacts on those who’ve recovered to how it interacts with the cold.

    And although we work in hope that a vaccine will appear, we may have to live with COVID for some to come.

    A health service that’s collaborative and open to change will be much better placed to withstand whatever headwinds will come.

    Conclusion

    So I hope that you will join me in this mission.

    At a time when the world around us is changing faster than ever before in human history.

    We mustn’t simply keep pace with the change, but once more show the world what can be done.

    We need a healthcare service that’s built on collaboration not competition, on trust in professionals and not box-ticking bureaucracy, and protects the most vulnerable and helps people live longer, healthier lives.

    And just as modern London rose from the ashes of the great fire, we protected the NHS in the peak of this epidemic.

    And out of its ravages, let us build a health and social care system of the future.

    Thank you very much indeed.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Blackburn

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Blackburn

    Text of the comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 24 July 2020.

    Blackburn with Darwen and Luton councils are doing excellent work with their local communities to address an increase in coronavirus cases and we continue to work collectively with them. Strong community engagement, major boosts in testing and increased support are already underway to manage outbreaks in these areas.

    The latest data shows the incidence of COVID-19 in these areas is higher than in other areas of the country, and we have today agreed to support both local authorities to pause the further easement of lockdown measures in these areas. This means indoor gyms, swimming pools and other sport and exercise facilities will not reopen in Luton or Blackburn with Darwen on 25 July.

    I appreciate this will be disappointing for many people and some businesses in the area but we are in complete agreement with local leaders that the priority must be to protect local residents by stopping the spread of this virus.

    I have every faith in the local leaders’ ability to help their areas return to normal as soon as possible and in local communities coming together during this time.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Leicester

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Leicester

    The text of the comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 16 July 2020.

    Mr Speaker, with permission, I would like to make a statement on our action against coronavirus and the decisions we’ve been taking throughout the day today to determine what we need in Leicester.

    We continue our determined fight against this invisible killer.

    The number of new cases yesterday was 642, lower than when lockdown began.

    And according to the latest figures, the number of deaths in all settings is down to 66.

    We are successfully turning the tide.

    And part of this success lies in our ability to take action locally, whenever we see it flare up.

    Often this is on a very small scale – swiftly and quietly – like in an individual farm or a factory.

    But when needed, we also act on a broader basis, as we have done in Leicester.

    And today I wanted to update the House on the situation in Leicester.

    At the end of June we made the decision to close schools and non-essential retail in the city, and not to introduce the relaxations that applied elsewhere from 4 July, like the reopening of pubs.

    This was not an easy decision, but it was one that we had to take.

    At that point, the 7-day infection rate in Leicester was 135 cases per 100,000 people, which was 3 times higher than the next highest city.

    And Leicester was accounting for 10% of all positive cases in the country.

    This decision was taken with the agreement of all local leaders.

    And I am grateful to the leader and officers of Leicestershire County Council, and to the officers of Leicester City Council, for their support and hard work.

    Since then, we’ve doubled testing.

    And through a monumental programme of communications and community engagement, we’ve been pushing our important messages.

    I committed to reviewing the measures in Leicester every 2 weeks.

    This morning I chaired a Gold meeting of the Local Action Committee to discuss the latest situation.

    And this afternoon, I held a further meeting with local leaders, Public Health England, the JBC, the local resilience forum, and my clinical advisers.

    The latest data show that the 7-day infection rate in Leicester is now 119 cases per 100,000 people, and that the percentage of people who have tested positive is now at 4.8%.

    These are positive indicators, especially in light of the huge increase in testing in the local area.

    But they still remain well above the national average, and the average for surrounding areas.

    Thanks to the incredible efforts of people of Leicester, who have followed the lockdown, even while others have had their freedom relaxed, we are now in a position to relax some, but not all, of the restrictions that were in place.

    So, from 24 July we’ll be removing the restrictions on schools and early years childcare and taking a more targeted approach to the restrictions on non-essential retail.

    Replacing the national decision to close non-essential retail with a local power to close them where necessary. This is all part of our more targeted approach.

    However, other restrictions, like those for travel and only having social gatherings of up to 6 people, for example, will remain in force.

    And measures introduced on 4 July, like re-opening the hospitality sector, will also not yet apply.

    The initial definition of the geography covered by the lockdown was a decision I delegated to Leicestershire County Council, and they made and published.

    The Leader of Leicestershire County Council, Nicholas Rushton, has advised me, based on the data and the best public health advice, that he recommends these restrictions now apply only to the Oadby and Wigston area of Leicestershire, as well as the City of Leicester itself.

    And I have accepted his advice.

    Some say that the local lockdown is unnecessary. I wish this were true.

    But sadly it remains vital for the health of everyone in Leicester, and the rest of the country, that these restrictions stay in place.

    We will review them again in a fortnight.

    I hope that this careful easing of restrictions will provide some comfort to people in Leicester and Leicestershire.

    And I’d say this directly to the people of Leicester and Leicestershire – I’d like to pay tribute to you all.

    Your perseverance and your hard work has brought real and tangible results.

    And you have shown respect for one another.

    I understand this hasn’t been easy.

    Strong representations have been made to me by my honourable friends, the members for Charnwood, Harborough and South Leicestershire and for the members opposite who represent the city of Leicester, on behalf of constituents who have been impacted, and constituents who wanted to see the lockdown lifted too.

    However, there is still a lot to do. And the public health messages remain critical.

    So please get a test if you have symptoms.

    Keep following the rules that are in place.

    Please do not lose your resolve.

    Because the sooner we get this virus under control, the sooner we can restore life in Leicester, and across the country, to normal.

    Mr Speaker, this statement also gives me the opportunity to inform the House of an issue relating to testing.

    We have identified some swabs that are not up to the usual high standard that we expect, and we will be carrying out further testing of this batch.

    As a precautionary measure and while we investigate further, we are requesting that the use of these Randox swab test kits are paused in all settings until further notice.

    This problem was brought to my attention yesterday afternoon. We contacted settings using these swabs last night, and published the pause notice immediately.

    Clinical advice is that there is no evidence of any harm.

    Those test results are not affected.

    There is no evidence of issues with any of our other tests swabs.

    And there is no impact on access to testing.

    Mr Speaker, our ability to take action on this local level is the keystone of our plan to defeat coronavirus.

    So we can keep this virus on the run and defeat it once and for all.

    I’m grateful to you for allowing me to make this statement at this time and I commend this statement to the House.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Review of Babies’ and Children’s Health

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Review of Babies’ and Children’s Health

    Text of the comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 15 July 2020.

    All parents aspire to provide their children with the best possible start in life and this government is committed to ensuring that no child is left behind.

    Everybody should have a solid foundation on which to build their health and this review will look to reduce the barriers and improve early childhood experiences.

    We are determined to level up the opportunities for children, no matter where they come from or grow up.