Tag: Liz Truss

  • Liz Truss – 2021 Statement on Ghana-UK Trade Deal

    Liz Truss – 2021 Statement on Ghana-UK Trade Deal

    The statement made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, on 1 January 2021.

    Today we are pleased to announce that we have reached a consensus on the main elements of a new trade agreement. This provides the basis to replicate, the effects of the existing trade relationship between the UK and Ghana – a relationship which is underpinned by our strong people to people connections and has driven economic growth, created jobs, and inspired creativity and innovation in both our countries.

    The intention is for the Agreement to provide duty free and quota free access for Ghana and the same preferential tariff reductions for British exporters as provided by the arrangement that is currently in force. We intend over the next few weeks to finalise the text of the Agreement to reflect progress made in relation to rules of origin, cumulation arrangements, time bound commitments, provisions for development cooperation and commitments to human rights and good governance.

    We re-affirm our shared ambition to further strengthen our partnership in the future and to work with the West African partners to make progress towards a regional agreement.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on the UK and Turkey Trade Agreement

    Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on the UK and Turkey Trade Agreement

    The comments made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, on 29 December 2020.

    Today’s deal covers trade worth more than £18 billion, delivers vital certainty for business and supports thousands of jobs across the UK in the manufacturing, automotive and steel industries.

    It paves the way for a new, more ambitious deal with Turkey in the near future, and is part of our plan to put the UK at the centre of a network of modern agreements with dynamic economies. More trade and investment will drive economic growth across our United Kingdom and help us build back stronger from Covid.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Speech on Fairness (Before Redactions)

    Liz Truss – 2020 Speech on Fairness (Before Redactions)

    The speech made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, on 17 December 2020. The Government then reissued this speech with redactions.

    No matter your skin colour, sexuality, religion or anything else, the United Kingdom is one of the best places in the world to live.

    The British story has been driven from its earliest days by the desire for liberty, agency, and fairness.

    It is the notion that in Britain you will have the opportunity to succeed at whatever you wish to do professionally, that you can be whoever you want to be. Dress however you want to dress. Love whoever you wish to love and achieve your dreams.

    But we must be honest. Our story is not yet complete. Our equality journey is not yet finished.

    For too many people, particularly in places beyond the South East, opportunity is diminished.

    For years, successive governments have either pretended that all opportunity was equal or failed to come up with proper solutions, paying lip service to a problem that has festered for decades.

    It was this government that finally tore down this social taboo when we were elected to level-up the country and toppled the Red Wall turning it Blue.

    We were elected partly on the promise of fixing the scourge of geographic inequality, and ensuring equal opportunity for all. There are still too many cases where your destination in life is decided by where you started it. So today, I am outlining a new approach to equality in this country.

    This will be founded firmly on Conservative values.

    It will be about individual dignity and humanity, not quotas and targets, or equality of outcome.

    It will reject the approach taken by the Left, captured as they are by identity politics and loud lobby groups.

    It will focus fiercely on fixing geographic inequality, addressing the real problems people face in their everyday lives using evidence and data.

    If you were born in Wolverhampton or Darlington, you have been under-served by successive governments. No more.

    Things must change and things will change.

    This new approach to equality will run through the DNA of this government.

    The moral and practical case for equality

    For me, it is a moral and practical mission.

    Just as our forebears fought for change, we must fight for change again – challenging what is unfair and unjust today.

    It is not right that having a particular surname or accent can sometimes make it harder to get a job.

    It is appalling that pregnant women suffer discrimination at work. Or that women may be encouraged to dress in a certain way to get ahead.

    Or that some employers overlook the capabilities of people with disabilities.

    It is outrageous in the 21st century that LGBT people still face harassment in public spaces.

    As well as being a moral problem, it is shameful we are squandering so much talent.

    If women opened businesses at the same rate as men – we could add £250bn to the economy.

    If people of every ethnic group were fully represented across the labour market, that would mean an extra £24 billion of income a year.

    If businesses were fully accessible for disabled consumers, they could benefit from an estimated £274 billion a year in spending power.

    We can ill afford to waste this potential as we recover from Covid and build back better.

    Equality rooted in Conservative values

    Our new approach to equality will be based on the core principles of freedom, choice, opportunity, and individual humanity and dignity.

    We will move well beyond the narrow focus of protected characteristics and deliver real change that benefits people across our United Kingdom.

    We will do this in three ways.

    First, by delivering fairness through modernisation, increased choice and openness.

    Second, by concentrating on data and research, rather than on campaigning and listening to those with the loudest voices.

    And third, by taking our biggest and broadest look yet at the challenges we face, including the all too neglected scourge of geographic inequality.

    Now is the time to root the equality debate in the real concerns people face, like affording a home, getting to work, going out safely at night, ending discrimination in our offices, factories and shop floors, and improving our schools so every child has a good chance in life.

    It is our duty to deliver, because if right-thinking people do not lead the fight for fairness, then it will be led by those whose ideas don’t work.

    The failed ideas of the Left

    The ideas that have dominated the equality debate have been long in the making.

    As a comprehensive school student in Leeds in the 1980s, I was struck by the lip service that was paid to equality by the City Council while children from disadvantaged backgrounds were let down.

    While we were taught about racism and sexism, there was too little time spent making sure everyone could read and write.

    These ideas have their roots in post-modernist philosophy – pioneered by Foucault – that put societal power structures and labels ahead of individuals and their endeavours.

    In this school of thought, there is no space for evidence, as there is no objective view – truth and morality are all relative.

    Rather than promote policies that would have been a game-changer for the disenfranchised like better education and business opportunities, there was a preference for symbolic gestures.

    Even now, authorities rush to embrace symbols – for example, Birmingham City Council naming new streets “Diversity Grove” and “Equality Road” – as if that counts as real change.

    Underlying this is the soft bigotry of low expectations, where people from certain backgrounds are not expected to reach high standards.

    This diminishes their individual humanity, dignity and agency.

    And it hasn’t delivered the progress it promised.

    In addition, this focus on groups at the expense of individuals has led to harmful unintended consequences.

    Study after study has shown that unconscious bias training does not improve equality, and in fact can backfire by reinforcing stereotypes and exacerbating biases.

    That’s why this week we announced we will no longer be using it in government or civil service.

    By contrast, the Conservative Party has elected two female leaders, and has a Cabinet with the highest ever level of ethnic minority representation.

    We have done this not by positively discriminating, but by positively empowering people who want to go into politics and opening up our Party to people of all backgrounds. Because when you choose on the basis of protected characteristics, you end up excluding other people.

    1. Fairness, not favouritism

    Fairness, not favouritism, drives our approach to equality.

    Too often, the equality debate has been dominated by a small number of unrepresentative voices, and by those who believe people are defined by their protected characteristic, and not by their individual character.

    This school of thought says that if you are not from an ‘oppressed group’ then you are not entitled to an opinion, and that this debate is not for you.

    I wholeheartedly reject this approach.

    Equality is something everybody in the United Kingdom should care about and something all of us have a stake in.

    So, I am calling time on “pink bus” feminism, where women are left to fix sexism and campaign for childcare.

    Rather than virtue signalling, or campaigning, this government is focused on delivering a fairer and more transparent society that works for all and that delivers genuine equality of opportunity.

    The work of American academic Iris Bohnet shows that modernising and making organisations more transparent is the best way to tackle inequality.

    When things are opaque, it benefits those who know how to game the system.

    We know that when companies publish their wage ranges, it leads to more equal starting points for men and women.

    We know that automatic promotions based on performance help level up opportunities for women in the workplace, overcoming the barriers that make women less likely to put themselves forward for promotion.

    And we know that evidence-driven recruitment in a clear and open structure is more effective than using informal and ad hoc networks.

    On the other hand, techniques like unconscious bias training, quotas and diversity statements do nothing to make the workplace fundamentally fairer.

    By driving reforms that increase competition, boost transparency and improve choice, we can open up opportunities.

    This is the approach we will be taking across government.

    It is fundamentally important that the role of equality minister is held by someone who also has another cabinet job, as I do with trade.

    This ensures equality is not siloed, but is instead the responsibility of the whole government and all our elected representatives.

    For example, the Academies Act 2010 meant good free schools were established across England and more children had the opportunity of a great education. The 1980 Housing Act empowered over two million people to get on the housing ladder, and the independent taxation of women in 1988 gave wives control of their own money.

    All of these reforms promoted equality by giving people greater agency over their own lives and making systems more transparent.

    For example, we know that students from poorer backgrounds are more likely to achieve better grades than they were predicted, and they lose out in the current university admissions system which is based on predicted grades.

    That is why Gavin Williamson is right to base the university admissions system on the actual grades students achieve, making sure that students from lower income backgrounds have a fairer shot at university.

    In the workplace, we know that flexible working improves productivity and helps people to combine work with other responsibilities.

    That is why I will be working with Alok Sharma, the Business Secretary, to enable more flexible working – not just as a necessity amid the Covid crisis but to empower employees.

    The best way to reduce unfairness in our society is through opening up opportunities for all.

    This is the level playing field we should be talking about.

    And we are going to make sure that this level playing field is properly enforced.

    That is why I am appointing a new chair and a wide variety of commissioners to the Equality and Human Rights Commission to drive this agenda forward.

    I am proud we have Baroness Kishwer Falkner, David Goodhart, Jessica Butcher, Su-Mei Thompson and Lord Ribeiro, all of whom are committed to equality and ready to challenge dangerous groupthink.

    Under this new leadership, the EHRC will focus on enforcing fair treatment for all, rather than freelance campaigning.

    2. Facts, not fiction

    To make our society more equal, we need the equality debate to be led by facts not by fashion.

    Time and time again, we see politicians making their own evidence-free judgements.

    My superb colleague Kemi Badenoch is leading work on the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities, established by the Prime Minister.

    We should heed the warning from its chair, Dr Tony Sewell, who wrote last month that they have uncovered “a perception of racism that is often not supported by evidence” and that “wrong perceptions sow mistrust”.

    This does not mean we don’t recognise people’s stories about their individual lives or believe that their experiences of discrimination are not real. It means that we can and must have an equality agenda that is driven by evidence.

    Today I am announcing that the Equality Hub will embark on the Government’s biggest, broadest and most comprehensive equality data project yet, and it will closely coordinate with the work of CRED (Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities).

    Over the coming months, we will look across the UK to identify where people are held back and what the biggest barriers are.

    We will not limit our fight for fairness to the nine protected characteristics laid out in the 2010 Equality Act, which include sex, race and gender reassignment.

    While it is true people in these groups suffer discrimination, the focus on protected characteristics has led to a narrowing of the equality debate that overlooks socio-economic status and geographic inequality.

    This means some issues – particularly those facing white working-class children – are neglected.

    This project will broaden the drive for equality and get to the heart of the barriers people face. It will report its initial findings in the Summer.

    In addition to race, sex, disability and religion, it will also look at issues around geography, community and socio-economic background.

    It will deliver a new life-path analysis of equality from the perspective of the individual, not groups. Using longitudinal data sets will help us understand where the real problems lie.

    3. Geographic Inequality

    There is a deeper wage gap between London and the regions than between men and women, with an average full-time salary a third higher in the capital than the North East of England.

    There are lower employment rates, pay packets and life expectancy across the North than the South. At the same time, average median hourly earnings in the South West are only just over two thirds of those in London.

    That is why the equality agenda must be prosecuted with fierce determination and clarity of purpose up and down the country, not just in London boardrooms and Whitehall offices.

    Whether that is making the case for free schools in deprived areas or using data to help regional businesses attract investment.

    We will use the power of evidence to drive reform and give people access to the facts so they can push for change.

    We will drive this action from the North of England, where we will be moving the Equality Hub.

    And I am delighted to announce that we are also taking on sponsorship of the Social Mobility Commission, to give this agenda real teeth and coherence.

    The whole of government will be – and is – totally committed to this agenda. The Treasury is revising its Green Book so that it judges infrastructure investment fairly across the UK, no longer seeing – for example – faster broadband as a better investment in Surrey than South Lanarkshire.

    The Department for Education is going to extra lengths to create academies and free schools outside London. And in housing, we are working to increase opportunities for home ownership across the country.

    This is just the start. There is much more we will be doing to make our country fairer and give people agency over their own lives.

    This is not limited to the UK

    This fight for fairness goes beyond our shores.

    Next year, the United Kingdom will use its presidency of the G7 to ramp up its work worldwide with like-minded allies to champion freedom, human rights and the equality of opportunity.

    The UK is co-leading the new global Generation Equality Action Coalition on Gender Based Violence, and co-chairing the Equal Rights Coalition.

    In that role, we will be holding our International LGBT conference, on the theme of Safe to Be Me.

    We are working internationally to bring an end to child marriage and are supporting international programmes to end the abhorrent practice of Female Genital Mutilation.

    We need to make progress across the world and at home as a fairer world and a fairer Britain go hand in hand.

    Taking the right approach to deliver real change

    At this vital time in our country’s history, we must make sure everyone has a chance to succeed in modern Britain.

    That is why we cannot waste time on misguided, wrong-headed and ultimately destructive ideas that take agency away from people.

    Instead, we will drive an agenda that empowers people and actively challenges discrimination.

    We will use evidence to inform policy and drive change.

    And we will focus on increasing openness and transparency, fixing the system rather than the results.

    Together, we will build back a better society and lead the new fight for fairness.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on Singapore and Vietnam Deals

    Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on Singapore and Vietnam Deals

    The comments made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, on 10 December 2020.

    Both these agreements are vital for the UK’s future as an independent trading nation. Not only do they lock in billions of pounds worth of trade, they also pave the way for new digital partnerships and joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This will play to the UK’s strengths, as we become a hub for tech and digital trade with influence far beyond our shores, defining our role in the world for decades to come.

    This is an important part of our vision for a Global Britain that sits at the centre of a network of deals with dynamic nations across Asia Pacific and the Americas as a global hub for services and technology trade.

    International trade will help us to overcome the challenges of coronavirus and drive economic growth across our United Kingdom.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on UK and Canada Trade Deal

    Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on UK and Canada Trade Deal

    The comments made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, on 9 December 2020.

    This is a brilliant deal for Global Britain. It secures £20bn worth of trade with a friend and ally that shares our commitment to free enterprise, democracy and free trade. It provides certainty for car and food and drink exporters in particular, and paves the way for a more advanced deal that goes further and faster in modern areas like digital and data, women’s economic empowerment and the environment.

    The deal also takes us a step closer to joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a high standards agreement of 11 dynamic Pacific nations. Membership would deepen market access for our businesses, help turn us into a global hub for tech and services trade, and strengthen the global consensus for rules-based free trade.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on the UK and Egypt Deal

    Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on the UK and Egypt Deal

    The comments made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, on 5 December 2020.

    This agreement is a clear signal of the UK’s enduring commitment to our close bilateral relationship with Egypt and will help strengthen trade and investment ties in the future.

    It will help provide both British and Egyptian businesses with new opportunities and provide them with the certainty they need to keep trading.

    The UK remains committed to securing deals that support British jobs, deliver significant savings and help drive the post covid-19 recovery.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Speech on Digital Trade

    Liz Truss – 2020 Speech on Digital Trade

    The speech made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, at TheCityUK Conference on 16 November 2020.

    Good afternoon everybody. It’s a great pleasure to be here at TheCityUK conference today to talk about how we can make the UK a hub for digital and services in trade.

    Now we all recognise Covid is a very difficult time, not just for Britain but right all around the world. But the way we are going to recover from this crisis is through trade.

    And what is particularly important is trade in services, and trade in digital. We have seen how over the course of the pandemic there has been an acceleration of the use of technology, and of course Britain is incredibly well placed to benefit from the future growth in areas like digital, services, and technology.

    From robotics to fintechs, to computer games, to green finance, we are the second largest exporter in the world, totalling £318bn, and we export nearly as many services from Scotland and the North West of England as the entirety of France does.

    We are the top FDI destination in Europe, with more investment in technology than Germany and France put together, totalling more than £10bn. Our computer games industry is growing faster than ever, and in terms of “tech unicorns,” billion-dollar tech companies, we have more than any other country apart from the United States and China. Fintechs firms like Revolut, Monzo and Transferwise, so we really are leaders in the area of services and technology.

    What I think we can do with our own independent trading policy is we can help shape the future of the global rules in areas like digital, in areas like services, that haven’t seen the level of reform that they need to at the World Trade Organisation.

    We can work with like-minded partners, other countries that believe in free enterprise, democracy, and the global rules-based system, to actually promote those new areas like digital and data trade.

    We are prioritising our services in digital industry, alongside our other key interests like advanced manufacturing, and like the food and drink industry.

    In all of the trade negotiations we are currently engaged in we are looking for advanced services chapters with our negotiating partners in areas like data and digital, in areas like financial services, mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and mobility.

    Because we know that all of those specific chapters, specific areas, deliver real benefits not just for London and the South East, but right across the United Kingdom.

    We also have just announced our new Office for Investment, bringing together a crack team across Government, under the leadership of Lord Gerry Grimstone, which will deal with the bureaucratic barriers that investors face when they’re seeking to invest in the United Kingdom.

    We are also boosting our exports in areas like digital and services, we have just launched for example a digital and trade network across Asia Pacific to support companies out in that region, with people on the ground that understand the details of those businesses. And what is really important is that as we negotiate these new trade deals, we are drawing on the strong expertise of the industry that we have in the country.

    So this is why we’ve established new Trade Advisory Groups, and on them sit organisations like CityUK, and other professional services, financial services, and legal services organisations – making sure that as we negotiate the deals we are getting the specific advice, the technical advice, that is going to give us the best possible deal for the United Kingdom.

    We also make sure that leading professional service providers sit on our Strategic Trade Advisory Group, like KPMG. And we have also got the Board of Trade, which leads on our broader trade strategy and new ideas. We have got the founder and Chief Executive of Starling Bank, Anne Boden, on the Board of Trade, as well as the Lord Mayor of the City of London, because our trade policy is designed to benefit businesses across the UK. We can only make sure that it does that if we are involving and engaging you as we work on these trade negotiations.

    We do see an opportunity to lead the world in areas like digital and data trade, and services trade.

    Next year we will have the Presidency of the G7, and trade will be one of the key issues we are discussing. We will be looking at green trade; we will be looking at trade against pandemics; we will be looking at reforming the WTO to update the rules for the modern age; and we will also be looking at digital and data trade. And again, we will be involving organisations like TheCityUK in the work we’re doing to promote those initiatives.

    We launched the UK Global Tariff earlier this year, it is a simpler lower tariff than the common external tariff. What it also does is reduce tariffs on a hundred green products, an idea we are very keen to promote across the world to encourage other countries to adopt it.

    Because as we seek to move forward on the green agenda, as we are hosting COP26 next year, the UK has already become the first country in the world to make robust environmental disclosure standards mandatory, and we are doubling our international climate finance to £11.6bn.

    We believe that through a combination of technology, of trade, and of working together with other nations we can make a real difference.

    And in terms of our broader trade agenda, we have put in our manifesto our ambition to get 80% of the UK’s trade covered by Free Trade Agreements within three years. We want to build a cat’s cradle of trade deals across the Atlantic and Pacific, with the United Kingdom at its heart.

    Now this isn’t a typical cat’s cradle, we want one that’s supercharged by fibre optic cables and satellites, and we want it focused on our strengths which, alongside food and drink and advanced manufacturing, are digital and services.

    Miles very kindly mentioned the Japan deal that we have recently struck. This deal is important because it shows the type of trade policy that the United Kingdom wants to have post EU as an independent trading nation.

    It goes further than the existing deal in areas like digital and data, anti-data localisation, protecting the free-flow of data, but also protecting things like source code and net neutrality.

    It goes further in terms of professional services, of mobility of professionals between the United Kingdom and Japan.

    It goes further in areas like intellectual property protection, and it goes further in areas like protection of Geographical Indicators.

    What it does is allows greater innovation, it allows greater trade, particularly in technology. But it also makes sure that our financial services trade is underpinned by regulatory dialogue and again underpinned by advanced data and digital agreement.

    Our services are our biggest export to Japan, accounting for 51% of trade. I was very pleased that TheCityUK concluded that it raises the bar for trade agreements in services. I mentioned the temporary movement of high skilled professionals, but what we’ve also achieved in the Japan deal is measures affecting the supply of services, including technical standards and making sure they’re administered in a reasonable, objective, and impartial manner.

    It also paves the way for us to explore mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and British providers stand to benefit from most rules Japan may liberalise, such as the Foreign Lawyers Act. I believe that these provisions show the UK’s commitment to a liberal and transparent trading environment.

    And what we secured in the Japan deal is only the start. We are also in negotiations with the United States, we recently completed round 5. Again we are looking for an ambitious financial services chapter, with high regulatory standards and the agreement to facilitate cross border flows.

    Of course, we are working with both parties in the United States, there is a consensus that a trade deal with the United Kingdom is a good thing, and we are determined to make further progress.

    We are also working with our close allies, Australia and New Zealand, on gold standard deals that would go further in areas like services, in areas like digital data, and in areas like investment. And these agreements are important in themselves, for the economic benefit they bring, but they’re also important because they provide a bridge towards the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

    The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a very exciting agreement because it contains some very high-quality services chapters that will be of huge benefit to the United Kingdom.

    British companies have been doing £111bn worth of trade with members of this free trade zone, and we can do even more as a full member of the organisation. It would give us unprecedented and deep access to over 40% of the world’s Gross Domestic Product, which equates to over £27tn. And if you add the EU to that number, that’s £40tn.

    What I think is interesting about CPTPP is the ability to have a single set of rules operating across that area, which not only benefit our businesses, but also help to set the global environment in a world where the WTO hasn’t significantly updated its rule on some of these issues since 1995.

    We are also doing further work alongside Trans-Pacific Partnership accession with countries like India and Brazil to remove market access barriers in areas in both goods and services.

    One thing I did want to mention is the importance of digital and data and services in trade, and the fact we think it’s not fully being taken into account in the economic models we do at the moment. So this is where we have commissioned Tony Venables of Oxford University to look at the benefits in particular of digital and data, and services, chapters on trade agreements.

    A recent study of USMCA suggested that digital and data chapter actually had more effect on the economy than any other part of that agreement, and we suspect that’s the case for deals like Japan and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and we want to get more evidence about the specific benefits that digital and data provide.

    It has been great to have the opportunity to talk to TheCityUK about our ambitious plans to create a cat’s cradle of trade deals across the world, with advanced services and digital chapters.

    We believe that we can open up new opportunities to businesses abroad and attract more investment across our country.

    We have unparalleled opportunities ahead because we are prepared to be innovative, we are prepared to look at new ideas, we are open to these advanced digital and data agreements. And we believe that this can benefit domestic industry in the United Kingdom, but also attract more investment overseas.

    I think this year, of all years, we have seen that our services and digital and data trade is a key for the future prosperity of the United Kingdom. At the Department for International Trade we are absolutely determined to make sure that we continue to deliver on that, that we continue to open up new opportunities, and we continue to work with this industry that is so vital for the whole United Kingdom.

    Thank you.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on Hedgehogs

    Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on Hedgehogs

    The comments made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for the Environment, on 23 October 2020.

    Hedgehogs are one of our most treasured animals and play an important role in both this country’s heritage and natural environment.

    Glimpsing hedgehogs in my garden is one of my fondest childhood memories and inspired me to learn more about the world around me.

    I want to ensure children for generations to come can enjoy this special sight, but this can only happen if everyone does their bit to look out for these important creatures – that’s why we have developed these simple tips to help adults and children alike learn more about our precious wildlife and how we can all support it.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on Government Procurement Agreement

    Liz Truss – 2020 Comments on Government Procurement Agreement

    The comments made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for International Trade, on 7 October 2020.

    Today’s announcement will provide British businesses with the certainty they need to continue bidding for £1.3 trillion worth of government procurement contracts overseas, which will ultimately help deliver the growth and jobs we need to recover from the economic challenges of coronavirus.

    It is another significant step towards re-establishing Britain as a major force in global trade and a truly independent trading nation.

  • Liz Truss – 2020 Statement on the Gender Recognition Act 2004

    Liz Truss – 2020 Statement on the Gender Recognition Act 2004

    The statement made by Liz Truss, the Minister for Women and Equalities, in the House of Commons on 22 September 2020.

    Today, I am announcing the Government’s response to the consultation on the Gender Recognition Act 2004.

    As a Government, we are determined that everyone in the UK should be free to live their lives and fulfil their potential regardless of their sex, gender identity, race or disability.

    We are proud to have introduced same-sex marriage and passed the Turing law.

    We want transgender people to be free to live and to prosper in a modern Britain. We have looked carefully at the issues raised in the consultation, including potential changes to the Gender Recognition Act 2004.

    It is the Government’s view that the balance struck in this legislation is correct, in that there are proper checks and balances in the system and also support for people who want to change their legal sex.

    However, it is also clear that we need to improve the process and experience that transgender people have when applying for a gender recognition certificate—making it kinder and more straightforward. Our changes will address the main concerns that trans people themselves tell us they have about it.​

    In 2017, we conducted by far the largest survey ever of British LGBT people, with over 108,000 respondents, of whom 7,000 were trans. Of those who had completed their transition, around two in five said that they had a gender recognition certificate, a higher proportion than is often believed. The survey then asked those who had not applied what had prevented them from doing so. They were able to choose as many reasons as they wanted.

    Some 38% told us the process was too bureaucratic. So we will place the whole procedure online. Some 34% said the process was too expensive. This, too, we will address. We will reduce the fee from £140 to a nominal amount.

    We have also come to understand that gender recognition reform, though supported in the consultation undertaken by the last Government, is not the top priority for transgender people. Perhaps their most important concern is the state of trans healthcare. Trans people tell us that waiting lists at NHS gender clinics are too long. I agree, and I am deeply concerned at the distress it can cause. That is why we are opening at least three new gender clinics this year, which should see waiting lists cut by around 1,600 patients by 2022. The full benefit of the increases in clinical capacity that we have been able to secure will lead to greater patient choice, shorter waiting times, better geographical coverage and easier access. It will also make it easier to fulfil the medical requirements of obtaining a GRC.

    It is why we last year provided funding for the UK’s first national LGBT health adviser to help improve transgender people’s experience.

    Britain leads the world as a country where everybody is able to lead their life freely and treated with respect and that, for many years, transgender people have been widely accepted in British society: able to use facilities of their chosen gender; and able to participate fully in modern life.

    At the heart of this is the principle of individual liberty. Our philosophy is that a person’s character, their ideas, and their work ethic trumps the colour of their skin or their biological sex. We firmly believe that neither biology nor gender is destiny.

    The Equality Act 2010 clearly protects transgender people from discrimination. The same act allows service providers to restrict access to single sex spaces on the basis of biological sex if there is a clear justification.

    We want every individual, regardless of their sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity to have the confidence and the freedom to be themselves. We will continue with our international leadership by hosting our international LGBT conference to make sure LGBT people around the world are safe to be themselves.

    I am laying the analysis report of consultation responses as a Command Paper today and it will be published on gov.uk.

    The attachment can be viewed online at: http://www. parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions- answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/ 2020-09-22/HCWS462/.