Tag: John McDonnell

  • John McDonnell – 2015 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    John McDonnell GB Labour MP Hayes and Harlington
    John McDonnell

    Below is the text of the speech made by John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, to the Labour Party Conference held in Brighton on 28 September 2015.

    John McDonnell, Hayes and Harlington, ex officio.

    I warn you this is not my usual rant, they get me into trouble and I’ve promised Jeremy to behave myself.

    Jeremy and I sat down at the beginning of his campaign for the Labour leadership to discuss what they call the strap line for his campaign leaflets and posters.

    We came up with the strapline you see now.

    Straight talking, honest politics.

    It just embodied for me what Jeremy Corbyn is all about.

    So in the spirit of straight talking, honest politics.

    Here’s some straight talking.

    At the heart of Jeremy’s campaign, upon which he received such a huge mandate, was the rejection of austerity politics.

    But austerity is just a word almost meaningless to many people.

    What does it actually mean?

    Well, for Michael O’Sullivan austerity was more than a word.

    Michael suffered from severe mental illness.

    He was certified by his GP as unable to work but despite the evidence submitted by 3 doctors, he was assessed by the company given the contract for the work capability assessment as fit for work.

    Michael killed himself after his benefits were removed.

    The coroner concluded his death was a direct result of the decision in his case.

    I don’t believe Michael’s case stands alone.

    I am grateful to Michael’s family for allowing me to mention him today.

    I send them, I am sure on behalf of all us here, our heartfelt sympathy and condolences.

    But also I want them to know that this party, when we return to Government, will end this brutal treatment of disabled people.

    Austerity is also not just a word for the 100,000 children in homeless families who tonight will be going to bed not in a home of their own but in a bed and breakfast or temporary accommodation.

    On behalf of this party I give those children my solemn promise that when we return to government we will build you all a decent and secure home in which to live.

    Austerity is not just a word for the women and families across the country being hit hardest by cuts to public services.

    Women still face an average 19.1 per cent pay gap at work.

    Labour will tackle the pay gap, oppose the cuts to our public services and end discrimination in our society.

    Whenever we cite examples of what austerity really means the Conservatives always argue that no matter what the social cost of their austerity policies, they are necessary to rescue our economy.

    Let’s be clear.

    Austerity is not an economic necessity, it’s a political choice.

    The leadership of the Conservative Party made a conscious decision six years ago that the very richest would be protected and it wouldn’t be those who caused the economic crisis, who would pay for it.

    Although they said they were one nation Tories, they’ve demonstrated time and time again, they don’t represent one nation, they represent the 1 per cent.

    When we challenge their austerity programme, the Conservatives accuse us of being deficit deniers.

    Let me make this absolutely clear.

    Of course we accept that there is a deficit but we will take no lessons from a chancellor who promised to wipe out the deficit in one Parliament but didn’t get through half.

    Who promised to pay down the debt but has increased it by 50 per cent.

    I tell you straight from here on in Labour will always ensure that this country lives within its means.

    We will tackle the deficit but this is the dividing line between Labour and Conservative.

    Unlike them, we will not tackle the deficit on the backs of middle and low earners and especially by attacking the poorest in our society.

    We have always prided ourselves on being a fair and compassionate people in this country and we are.

    We will tackle the deficit fairly and we can do it.

    Here’s how.

    We will dynamically grow our economy.

    We will strategically invest in the key industries and sectors that will deliver the sustainable long term economic growth this country needs.

    Economic growth that will reach all sections, all regions and all nations of our country.

    And I meant it.

    I was devastated by Labour’s losses in Scotland.

    The SNP has now voted against the living wage, against capping rent levels and just last week voted against fair taxes in Scotland to spend on schools.

    So here is my message to the people of Scotland:

    Labour is now the only anti-austerity party.

    Now’s the time to come home.

    We will halt the Conservative tax cuts to the wealthy paid for by cuts to families income.

    Three weeks ago we saw one of the starkest examples of the difference between us and the Conservatives.

    The Conservatives cut tax credits to working families to pay for a multi billion pound cut in inheritance tax.

    Families who had done everything asked of them.

    Working hard but dependent on tax credits to make up for low pay.

    They will have £1300 taken from them to pay for a tax cut to the wealthiest 4 per cent of the population.

    The Conservatives argued that they’d introduced a so called living wage to make up for the tax credit cut.

    But we all know that it was neither a living wage nor according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies did it make up for the amount families lost.

    I tell you now, when we return to office, we will introduce a real living wage.

    Labour’s plan to balance the books will be aggressive.

    We will force people like Starbucks, Vodafone, Amazon and Google and all the others to pay their fair share of taxes.

    Let me tell you also, there will be cuts to tackle the deficit but our cuts will not be the number of police officers on our streets or nurses in our hospitals or teachers in our classrooms.

    They will be cuts to the corporate welfare system.

    There will be cuts to subsidies paid to companies that take the money and fail to provide the jobs.

    Cuts to the use of taxpayers’ money subsidising poverty paying bosses.

    Cuts to the billion pound tax breaks given to buy to let landlords for repairing their properties, whether they undertake the repairs or not.

    And cuts to the housing benefit bill when we build the homes we need and control exorbitant rents.

    Where money needs to be raised it will be raised from fairer, more progressive taxation. We will be lifting the burden from middle and low-income earners paying for a crisis they did not cause.

    If we inherit a deficit in 2020, fiscal policy will be used to pay down the debt and lower the deficit but at a speed that does not put into jeopardy sustainable economic growth.

    We’ll use active monetary policy to stimulate demand where necessary.

    We’ll also turn the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills into a powerful economic development department, in charge of public investment, infrastructure planning and setting new standards at work for all employees.

    This is a radical departure not just from neoliberalism but from the way past administrations tried to run the economy.

    Why?

    Well we just don’t think the current model can deliver.

    We don’t think that destroying industries and then subsidising a low pay economy through the tax system is a good idea.

    But our radicalism, it comes with a burden.

    We need to prove to the British people we can run the economy better than the rich elite that runs it now.

    That’s why today I have established an Economic Advisory Committee to advise us on the development and implementation of our economic strategy.

    We will draw on the unchallengeable expertise of some of the world’s leading economic thinkers including Joseph Stiglitz, Thomas Piketty, Professor Mariana Mazzucato, Simon Wren Lewis, Ann Pettifor and former member of the Bank of England Monetary Committee, David Blanchflower and many, many others drawn in for their specialist knowledge.

    I give you this undertaking that every policy we propose and every economic instrument we consider for use will be rigorously tested to its extreme before we introduce it in government.

    And we will demand that the Office of Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England put their resources at our disposal to test, test and test again to demonstrate our plans are workable and affordable.

    These bodies are paid for by taxpayers and therefore should be accessible to all parties represented in Parliament.

    In government we will establish and abide by that convention.

    The foundation stones of our economic policy are prosperity and social justice.

    We will create what Mariana Mazzucato describes as the entrepreneurial state.

    A strategic state works in partnership with businesses, entrepreneurs and workers to stimulate growth.

    Government’s role is to provide the opportunity for massive advances in technology, skills and organisational change that will drive up productivity, create new innovative products and new markets.

    That requires patient long term finance for investment in research from a effectively resourced and empowered national investment bank.

    A successful and fair economy cannot be created without the full involvement of its workforce.

    That’s why restoring trade union rights and extending them to ensure workers are involved in determining the future of their companies is critical to securing the skills, development and innovation to compete in a globalised economy.

    We will promote modern alternative public, co-operative, worker controlled and genuinely mutual forms of ownership.

    At this stage let me say that I found the Conservatives rant against Jeremy’s proposal to bring rail back into public ownership ironic when George Osborne was touring China selling off to the Chinese State Bank any British asset he could lay his hands on.

    It seems the state nationalising our assets is ok with the Tories as long as it’s the Chinese state or in the case of our railways the Dutch or French.

    Institutional change has to reflect our policy change.

    I want us to stand back and review the major institutions that are charged with managing our economy to check that they are fit for purpose and how they can be made more effective.

    As a start I have invited Lord Bob Kerslake, former head of the civil service, to bring together a team to review the operation of the Treasury itself.

    I will also be setting up a review of the Bank of England.

    Let me be clear that we will guarantee the independence of the Bank of England.

    It is time though to open a debate on the Bank’s mandate that was set by Parliament 18 years ago.

    The mandate focuses on inflation, and even there the Bank regularly fails to meet its target.

    We will launch a debate on expanding that mandate to include new objectives for its Monetary Policy Committee including growth, employment and earnings.

    We will review the operation and resourcing of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs to ensure that HMRC is capable of addressing tax evasion and avoidance and modernising our tax collection system.

    This is how we will prepare for the future and the day we return to government.

    Let me now return to today’s economy because to be frank, I am fearful for the present.

    George Osborne fought the last election on the myth that the slowest economic recovery from recession in a century has been some sort of economic success.
    In reality the Tories presided over the longest fall in workers’ pay since Queen Victoria sat on the throne.

    A recovery based upon rising house prices, growing consumer credit, and inadequate reform of the financial sector.

    An imbalanced economy overwhelmingly reliant on insecure jobs in the service sector.

    Our balance of payments deficit, which is the gap between what we earn from the rest of the world and what we pay to the rest of the world, is at the highest levels it’s been since modern records began.

    I worry that the same pre-crash warning signs are reappearing.

    The UK economy is in recovery despite the Chancellor’s policies and not because of them.

    You know the narrative George Osborne wanted to present of us this week.

    Deficit deniers risking the security of the nation etc.

    It was so obvious you could write it yourself blindfolded.

    He has brought forward his grandiose fiscal charter not as serious policy making but as a political stunt.

    A trap for us to fall into.

    We are not playing those games any more.

    Let me explain the significance of what we are doing today.

    We are embarking on the immense task of changing the economic discourse in this country.

    Step by step:

    First we are throwing off that ridiculous charge that we are deficit deniers.

    Second we are saying tackling the deficit is important but we are rejecting austerity as the means to do it.

    Third we are setting out an alternative based upon dynamically growing our economy, ending the tax cuts for the rich and addressing the scourge of tax evasion and avoidance.

    Fourth having cleared that debris from our path we are opening up a national discussion on the reality of the roles of deficits, surpluses, long-term investment, debt and monetary policy.

    Fifth we will develop a coherent, concrete alternative that grows a green, sustainable, prosperous economy for all.

    We are moving on the economic debate in this country from puerile knockabout to an adult conversation.

    I believe the British people are fed up of being patronised and talked down to by politicians with little more than silly slogans and misleading analogies.

    This is an immense task.

    That’s why we need to draw upon all the talents outside and inside the party.
    I admit that I was disappointed that after Jeremy’s election some refused to serve.

    In the spirit of solidarity upon which our movement was founded I say come back and help us succeed.

    We are in an era of new politics.

    People will be encouraged to express their views in constructive debate.

    Don’t mistake debate for division.

    Don’t mistake democracy for disunity.

    This is the new politics.

    Many still don’t understand its potential.

    As socialists we will display our competence with our compassion.

    Idealists yes but ours is a pragmatic idealism to get things done, to transform our society.

    We remain inspired by the belief and hope that another world is possible.

    This is our opportunity to prove it.

    Let’s seize it.

    Solidarity.

  • John McDonnell – Speech to the 2009 PCS Conference Speech

    Below is the text of the speech made by John McDonnell to the Public and Commercial Services Union in 2009.

    Look, thanks, look I’ve got to be brief today, sorry about this, I can’t hang about, I’ve got to get back home, there’s a bloke coming round to do the moat, put up the pergola and tarmac the tennis courts.

    I couldn’t get here the other day for Mark’s rally because I was dealing with the bill on prostitution in parliament, and I’ve learnt a lot, so when I heard that someone had claimed for floating their duck, I thought it was rhyming slang for some bizarre sexual practice.

    You just can’t make this up can you? I was here two-years ago, can you remember? It was the day that I hadn’t got nominated to stand as leader of the Labour party.

    I couldn’t get the nominations, one of the MPs told me that ‘I’d seen your manifesto and I’ve seen your proposal for public expenditure and I can’t nominate you, ‘cos we can’t trust you with the public finances’. You can’t trust this lot with the bloody tea money, let alone the public finances. Unbelievable isn’t it.

    There is a deep sense of irony that when all this scandal on the expenses was beginning to break, parliament, MPs were voting through the welfare reform bill.

    A welfare reform bill where people lose benefits, not for fiddling their benefits, not for fiddling at all but just because they simply don’t turn up for an interview.

    A welfare reform bill, where we are forcing the long term unemployed to work, under workfair proposals where they will work for one pound seventy three an hour, contrast that with the £400 a month that some of the MPs have been spending, two-thousand pounds on plasma television screens, tens of thousands of pounds on mortgages which didn’t even exist.

    Obscene? Of course it is. And no wonder people are pissed off quite honestly, no wonder. I’m angry as well ‘cos they bring us all down, they bring us all down.

    You know the solution isn’t just about sacking the speaker, or a few corrupt, bent politicians, it’s just as the solution to the economic crisis isn’t just about getting rid of a few bankers.

    The solution for this political crisis isn’t just about getting rid of a few MP’s, this is a systemic crisis, it’s a systemic failure.

    And the political and economic crisis are not isolated, they’re two sides of the same corrupt, incompetent, unfair, and un-democratic system in which we live. An economic system which has created grotesque inequalities of wealth.

    A society where 3 million children still live in poverty, whilst the rich pay less in proportion of their taxes than their own cleaners.

    But also it’s a political system which has created vast inequalities of power, why, and we know, we see it everyday, a government permeated by big business.

    Number 10 populated by advisors who have come from big business, lucrative jobs, or are going to lucrative jobs in big business.

    Where we witness the farce of welfare reform, designed for this government by a venture capitalist, someone clearly expert in poverty and it’s experience.

    Where former ministers who have awarded contracts to companies within months of standing down as ministers are employed as consultants by those companies and raking in anything in some instances from 50 and in some instances a 100 thousand pound a year.

    And to be frank with you, where MPs will vote for what ever is put in front of them. What for? Just to be offered the chance of being a bag carrier to a bag carrier.

    And this week, the reason I was in parliament yesterday is a classic example, we had before us a change in the standing orders of parliament, not as enlightening as the last debate I have to say, it was bringing forward a change in standing orders which would allow parliament to debate the new planning policies that the government is bringing forward on, nuclear power, on expansion of airports, on the major infrastructure projects that will design the future of our environment for generations.

    And the government gave us the opportunity to allow us to debate those proposals. So I moved a simple amendment, that when we’ve debated them, can we have a vote. Labour MPs voted against even having a vote. We are voting ourselves virtually into irrelevancy, out of existence.

    And yes, there are issues of morality, but I don’t think we should loose sight of the real morality that’s at stake in government and politics today.

    Yes, be angry at the thousands of pounds that are spent on moats and mortgages and expensive meals. But I tell you, be angrier at the expenditure on immoral wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, and elsewhere, where thousands have died.

    And yes, be angry at the expenditure of tax payers money on their extravagant lifestyles, but be even angrier at the extravagance of spending seventy-three billion pounds on trident when there are 3 million children, and 2 million pensioners still living in poverty.

    And yes, be shocked at how much they consume, the food, the allowances, the TV’s and all the rest, but be more shocked that despite all we know now about climate change, despite all that we know, they are still promoting policies like airport expansion that will consume our planet.

    And yes, be angry, at what they are spending on their second homes, but I tell you, be bloody angrier that after twelve years of a Labour government that hasn’t spent the money to house the 80,000 homeless families that we have in our country.

    Be angry at that. And you know, when they wanted to keep their allowances private, I was angry at the privatisation of the jobs that we’ve seen over the last twelve years. The cuts in a 100,000 workers of this union.

    But I say to you now, let’s not waste that anger, lets not waste it. Don’t waste that demand to change, otherwise this anger would be futile.

    And if it’s diverted solely into stringing up a few MPs, enjoyable as that may be, if it is just diverted into that and the Tories are allowed to use it opportunistically to get them into power, or worse still if the revulsion of political practices of Labour and other MPs delivers people into the hands of the BNP, or even UKIP, that anger and that revulsion will be wasted.

    I think our task, and the task of this union now is to link up with all those others who are angry as well.

    Link up with all those others who want change, to channel the anger that people feel, to channel this exasperation into a demand for change, but real change this time.

    We don’t want just a new parliament. That’s not what we are about. We want a new society. A society that’s based on rights. The rights at work, the right to a decent wage, the right to decent working conditions. The right to be safe at work, and yes to have a say and to be represented and yes, in many instances, to have that say through public and common ownership of our services.

    A society that’s based upon rights at home. A right to a decent home. A right to a decent and clean environment, treatment when our children or members of our family are sick. Free education at all levels. A right to be free from poverty and a society which is fifth richest country in the world.

    And yes, rights in our communities. Community institutions which have the power and resources at local level to tackle the problems that we experience. The need for homes, the need for safe areas, the need for a clean and green environment.

    And yes, a local democracy that isn’t just about marking a ballot paper once every four years, but where we can all have a say and continual basis to change our society.

    But it is also about the rights to control the destiny of our country. To own and democratically control our financial institutions so we can plan the future of our economy so that we no longer suffer the risk, the scourge of approaching 3 million unemployed.

    To own and control our public services which are the foundations of any civilised society.

    Ending the rip-offs and the privatisations. And yes, the right to a parliament elected that is truly representative of our country of all classes.

    A government not appointed by patronage through the prime minister but elected by MPs and ministers elected directly by MPs.

    And I say yes, as a Labour party member, a party which is not a degenerate bureaucracy, but a party where members take back the power to select their candidates to determine their policies and their programs and elect the party’s officers. And yes maybe just occasionally to elect the leader of the party in a democratic ballot.

    This is just the start of this debate. The crisis can be exploited and will be exploited by the Tories and the fascists or we can harness the powerful surge of anger and revulsion amongst the people to determine that new society that we want. How do we go forward?

    Well there’s various discussions and proposals. Some like Compass and the Guardian and others are calling for an immediate debate.

    But that debate they want to contain within the political elite.

    The political class, the very people who have corrupted our system so far. They are looking for some form of self-interested rotation within that elite. That sort of discussion, I think, is absolutely meaningless and ineffectual.

    These are the very people who gave us Blair, supported Brown and now deifying Alan Johnson. All of them voted for the same wars, the same privatisations, the same attacks on our civil liberties and yes are now voting for policies that will cut our jobs, our services and yes even attack the poor on benefits.

    And its interesting isn’t it. That there’s a consensus almost across all of them, all the political parties now. It’s a consensus that the economic crisis will be paid for by us, not them. Paid for by cuts in services, cuts in jobs, more unemployment, cuts in wages, and yes, and then they come for your pension.

    We need now new voices. We need new political formations which reflect the breadth of the challenge to the status quo and to these vested interests. The government is talked about, and the prime minister is talked about convening conventions about parliamentary reform.

    My view is that this change will only come about, not through parliament, not through MP’s, not through prime ministers but through us, through the people themselves, and I think PCS has a fundamental role working with others. We set up the trade union co-ordinating group to work with other unions.

    Why don’t we invite other unions with us, to convene our own conventions? Invite other trade unionists from all unions, but also organisations that are campaigning in every policy field for the same changes we demand.

    Why don’t we link up with all those others who are demanding fundamental change, the campaigners on climate change, the groups demanding decent incomes, decent pensions, the families who have got no homes, the asylum seekers, the most oppressed within our society, the cleaners on poverty wages that we mentioned earlier today in the debate.

    The teachers, the public sector workers, the ones who are facing the cuts in privatisation, the people at the sharp end. They are the ones who should determine the new society that we want to create.

    And it will mean new structures, new alliances, new formations, new methods for mobilising the demand for change. That’s what we need.

    And you know it isn’t just about electoral politics. I tell you wherever necessary, wherever it is needed, it may mean direct action if parliament fails to give us a choice we have to relocate democracy from parliament onto the picket line and onto the streets.

    If it comes to it, we have to seize the power again that the MPs themselves have so distorted. We can’t be spectators as party leaders and media commentators try to prop up this system which is so degenerate.

    It’s time for us to seize the moment. Its time for us to seize the moment for change, and it takes courage, it takes courage to stand against the stream.

    But if we don’t unite, if we don’t call upon others, if we don’t unite with all of those who are angry like us, all those who are coming under attack, all those who are entering into struggle already, if we don’t do that, they’ll simply reform the system, tidy up the expenses, give themselves all a wage rise, stuff their pockets yet again and carry on as before.

    That’s not acceptable to our members, it shouldn’t be acceptable to us, so the demand we want now is change led by the people.

    It’s about restoring democracy to the people themselves, it’s about getting rid of this degenerate bureaucratic system that we have, and restoring the rights that people demand.

    Real rights to a decent home, a decent environment, a decent job, a decent education, a decent health service and security in the long term.

    We as a union have always demonstrated that we are capable of leading that demand for change. From this conference, let’s put out that call to all those other unions and all those other organisations that want change like us to unite with us for this creation, not of a new parliament, but of new politics and a new society. That’s the challenge, let’s seize it. Solidarity.