Tag: Ian Murray

  • Ian Murray – 2024 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    Ian Murray – 2024 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by Ian Murray, the Secretary of State for Scotland, on 23 September 2024.

    Conference – it is a privilege to be here in Liverpool as just one of Scottish Labour’s 37 Members of Parliament.

    Let me just say that again – 37 Scottish Labour MPs.

    Conference,  they are all fantastic and they will do wonderful things in their communities

    Each of them will do wonderful things in their communities and for Scotland. Thank you to each and every one of them.

    Dare I say I’m as happy as Larry. Although, as some of you may have heard, he isn’t always happy to see me.

    In his final campaign visit to Scotland, the Prime Minister, first time saying that as well reiterated what he first said back in 2020, that “the route to a Labour government runs through Scotland”.

    By voting Labour, Scottish voters kicked out the Tories and put Scotland at the heart of government. It is the privilege of my political life to serve in Keir Starmer’s cabinet, working alongside the brilliant Kirsty McNeil as Scotland Office minister and Melanie Ward as PPS.

    We’ve got Martin McCluskey in the Whips office, Douglas Alexander serving as Trade Minister, and of course Energy Minister Michael Shanks, whose seismic by-election victory in Rutherglen a year ago kick-started our most successful general election campaign in a generation.

    But conference – none of this was inevitable. There is nothing in the political rule book which says a failing government must give way to the opposition.

    We won in Scotland because we planned and executed a winning strategy – which promised what the Scottish people demanded- change. It began with Keir Starmer changing our party to put it back in the service of working people.

    And it was powered by the energy, enthusiasm and maybe a wee bit of dancing of Anas Sarwar. Our campaign was implemented meticulously by a world class team of Scottish Labour staff and activists, led by our fantastic Scottish General Secretary, John Paul. John Paul thank you to you and your team.

    As co-chair of the Scottish campaign, along with that indefatigable legendary Dam of Dumbarton, Jackie Ballie, I was so proud to see that hard work pay off. Jackie   Thank you for everything you did.

    Conference – we should be proud of our success. It took us 14 years to get rid of one of Scotland’s two failing governments but the real hard work started the day after the election to get rid of the other one.

    There are only five hundred and ninety-two days until Scots return to the polls.  Or 591 sleeps as my daughter would say.

    And as wonderful as July’s result was, we can take nothing for granted.

    Those who voted for Labour in Scotland on the 4th of July voted for change because they had been let down badly by their two governments.

    They did not ‘come home’ to Labour.

    They chose us in the hope and expectation that we will deliver for them.

    And that is what we must, and are determined, to do.

    We know it will not be easy but there is a real sense of this Labour purpose to the tough choices that will need to be made to fix the foundations. By fixing those foundations we can build that brighter future for every part of our country.

    And as the Prime Minister, the Chancellor just before lunch and Anas Sarwar have said repeatedly  there will be no return to austerity.  And I want to say that again – there will be no return to austerity.

    My team and I in the Scotland Office will play our part. Supported by the most dedicated and professional team of civil servants, we have reset the relationship with the Scottish Government.

    There are many, many, many things on which Labour and the SNP will never agree, but grown-up politics means two governments working together. It’s what most Scots expect and what we will deliver.

    But Conference, I will also not shy away from calling out the tragic failure of the SNP. 860,000 of our fellow Scots stuck on NHS waiting lists. 10,000 of our children with no home to call their own.

    The worst attainment gap between the richest and the poorest pupils on record. Tax decisions this year that cost more than they raised, with working people paying more but getting less, while the SNP make £500m cuts to services, all to pay for their financial incompetence.

    The Scottish people deserve better – and my department The Scotland Office has a crucial role in changing things now.

    The Scotland Office has four priorities to help deliver our governments’ missions.

    Economic growth. Green energy. Brand Scotland. And of course Tackling Poverty.

    I want to see the Scotland Office working directly with the Scottish government and local governments in Scotland to drive growth in every community.

    Powering that growth will be GB Energy to create jobs, drive down bills and ensure our existing world class energy workforce can lead and benefit from these new industries of the future.

    GB Energy will be owned by the public, and, Conference I can exclusively announce today, headquartered in Scotland.

    We will also drive growth by promoting Brand Scotland. From shipbuilding, science and salmon to scotch, culture and services, we’re the best in the world, and by selling Scotland to the world we can unlock jobs and all of that investment.

    Gordon Brown once spoke of prudence with a purpose.

    And all that work to grow our economy, to go green, and promote our brand, has a purpose too – to tackle the scourge of poverty.

    To raise wages, protect and invest in public services and ensure everyone in life has the security of good work and the opportunity to succeed.

    Conference, lifting people out of poverty is what Labour Governments do. It’s in our DNA. We’ve done it before and we’ll do it again.

    The financial inheritance we knew about will be challenging, compounded by the £22 billion black hole we didn’t know about – another act of astonishing economic vandalism from the Tories that they’ve just walked away from with no responsibility.

    But the economic inheritance we face isn’t just fiscal. It is also structural. It is also industrial. The foundations of Scotland’s industrial economy are incredibly fragile. We have seen that in the last month.

    None of this is a coincidence. It is a consequence of more than a decade without an industrial strategy for Scotland.

    Scotland has a strongly industrial past – and it will have a bright industrial future which guarantees jobs and wealth for families for generations and generations to come if we get the transition to net zero right.

    Our plan is a good one. Rooted in Labour values and with a clear purpose.

    It is a plan which will begin to deliver the change Scotland, remember that phrase – and set the conditions for success in 592 days’ time – when the people of Scotland will have the chance to vote for change.

    To elect a Labour government in Scotland which works hand in glove with Keir Starmer’s government; and make my friend Anas Sarwar our next First Minister.

    Conference, change in Scotland began on the 4th of July. The opportunity to deliver lasting change is in all our hands. Let’s take that opportunity and let’s deliver it.

  • Ian Murray – 2024 Statement on Being Appointed Scottish Secretary

    Ian Murray – 2024 Statement on Being Appointed Scottish Secretary

    The statement made by Ian Murray on 5 July 2024 after he became the Scottish Secretary.

    It is a real privilege to have been asked to serve in Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s first Cabinet as Secretary of State for Scotland.  My absolute priority in the role will be to deliver the change and renewal that Scotland needs – to drive economic growth, create jobs and reduce poverty.

    As we rebuild our country, I look forward to Scotland standing foursquare with the other UK nations. I will make sure that the Scotland Office is a strong voice for Scotland within the UK Government.

    New funding will help tackle poverty in Scotland by creating jobs and unlocking opportunities across the country, especially in our most deprived communities.

    The Scotland Office will lead on promoting ‘Brand Scotland’ around the globe. Selling our world class produce, products and services to the world.

    I am also determined to reset the relationship between the UK and Scottish Governments. Focusing on co-operation and joint working will mean we can deliver better results for people in Scotland.

  • Ian Murray – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    Ian Murray – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2015-11-10.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, what discussions he had with women’s organisations in Scotland prior to his proposal to devolve responsibility for abortion legislation to the Scottish Parliament.

    David Mundell

    The Smith Commission considered the issue of the devolution of abortion carefully and was ‘strongly of the view to recommend the devolution of abortion’ and regarded it as an ‘anomalous health reservation.’ The Smith Agreement said that ‘further serious consideration should be given to its devolution and a process should be established immediately to consider the matter further.’ That process took place between the UK and Scottish Governments and resulted in an amendment to the Scotland Bill to devolve responsibility for abortion law to the Scottish Parliament. Since laying that amendment the Government has been engaging with interested parties about how the process of devolution will work and it will be for the Scottish Government to set out what approach it will take once responsibility for abortion law rests with the Scottish Parliament. The 1967 Act will continue to apply in Scotland unless and until the Scottish Parliament chooses to legislate in this area, and the First Minister recently confirmed that the Scottish Government have no plans to do so.

  • Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2016-03-01.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, what recent discussions he has had with Ministers in the Scottish Government on the recent report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Uneven Growth: Tackling City Decline and its ranking of Dundee as seventh highest on its index of relative decline.

    David Mundell

    I am aware of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation report and the issues it raises. The Government is committed to growing the economy across the UK and empowering Cities to realise their potential.

    Last week my Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Lord Dunlop, participated in a Jobs Summit in Dundee along with the Scottish Government, Dundee City Council and others aimed at boosting employment in the area and regenerating one of our finest Scottish cities. Following the summit we have committed to work with interested parties to drive forward investment in Dundee.

  • Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2016-04-08.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of people in Scotland who reach state pension age in 2016-17 will receive less than the full flat rate of the new state pension.

    Justin Tomlinson

    The Department cannot model the impact of the new State Pension at a regional or country specific level. Results for the whole of Great Britain can be found at:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/491845/impact-of-new-state-pension-longer-term-reserach.pdf

  • Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2016-05-26.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what measures are in place to ensure that local communities are involved and considered in discussions on the dispersal of asylum seekers to (a) current dispersal areas, (b) new dispersal areas and (c) Scotland.

    James Brokenshire

    The Home Office maintains an active partnership with local governments across the UK, including those in Scotland, and funds Strategic Migration Partnerships to plan for the most appropriate dispersal of asylum seekers. The partnerships consider the impact on communities and local services so that adjustments to dispersal patterns can be made where appropriate.

    Free access to NHS healthcare is provided to asylum seekers. Asylum Health Teams are commissioned by NHS England and Scotland to provide healthcare and screening. Strategic Migration Partnerships work with Care Commissioning Groups to plan for the health care needs of asylum seekers in their regions.

    All children are entitled to free primary and secondary education. To enable access to education, internal checks are in place to triage applications involving children of school age for priority dispersal into permanent accommodation. Strategic Migration Partnerships discuss education provision as part of their local authority engagement. Asylum seekers are able to access legal advice via the Legal Aid system and are provided details of local solicitors as part of their induction into their dispersal region.

    Local authorities are consulted before asylum seekers are placed in their area, so that the potential impact on communities and local services is fully considered. During discussions on widening dispersal in Scotland we are and will continue to ensure that Local Authority leads and partners on health and education, as well as the Scottish Government and the Scottish Law Society, are involved to address any concerns and to ensure the close and successful partnership working in Glasgow is replicated elsewhere.

  • Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2016-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the timetable for work to commence on building the new Type 26 Frigate on the recruitment and training of apprentices in the affected shipyards.

    Mr Philip Dunne

    I refer the hon. Member to the oral answer I gave during Defence questions in the House on 27 June 2016 to the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Margaret Ferrier).

    The Government have already invested £1.6 billion in the Type 26 programme. We will only enter into a contract once we are confident of the delivery schedule and the ability of the contractors to meet that schedule on a cost effective basis.

  • Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2016-10-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the implications for its policies of the decision by the Department of Health to remove electrical socket inserts from all premises where NHS care is delivered; and whether her Department plans to issue similar guidance.

    Edward Timpson

    The Department for Education has never required the use of socket covers in schools. All socket outlets in teaching areas of schools are designed to BS1363 and have built in safety shutters.

    The Department of Health guidance followed recent advice from electrical engineers that in some circumstances socket covers can compromise the safe operation of socket outlets and advises against their use.

  • Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Scotland Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2016-01-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, pursuant to the Statement of 11 January 2016 on the Smith Commission Agreement, HCWS458, what the (a) dates, (b) minutes and (c) outcomes was of any discussions or meeting held since 28 November 2014 on issues relating to asylum seekers with (i) Home Office Ministers and (ii) Ministers or Officials of the Scottish Government.

    David Mundell

    In the period since the Smith Commission, the UK and Scottish Governments have had regular meetings to discuss issues relating to asylum seekers. These have included discussions on the non-legislative proposals from the Commission, and a demonstration for Scottish Government officials of the asylum process at the Home Office in Glasgow. This cross-government work with the Scottish Government on asylum issues is on-going.

  • Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Ian Murray – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Murray on 2016-03-02.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, (a) when, (b) where and (c) for how long the powers under section 101 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 to designate reception zones have been used to date; and how many asylum seekers designated under section 95 of that Act have been so supported.

    James Brokenshire

    The Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 introduced the policy of national dispersal, designed to share the impact of asylum seekers across the whole of the UK. Asylum seekers are housed across the UK under voluntary agreements between national government and local authorities that have been in place since 2000. The powers under Section 101 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 have not been used to date.