Tag: Henry Smith

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-07-15.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much funding Crawley constituency will receive through the pupil premium in the financial year 2014-15.

    Mr David Laws

    Schools and academies in Crawley constituency have been allocated £4.026 million through the pupil premium for financial year 2014-15.

    This includes funding through the deprivation, service child and children adopted from care elements, but excludes the looked-after children element as this is not available at a parliamentary constituency level.

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-07-15.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps (a) his Department and (b) NHS England plan to take to reduce premature mortality from respiratory disease.

    Jane Ellison

    The NHS Outcomes Framework 2014-15 sets out the Department’s priority areas for the National Health Service and includes reducing deaths from respiratory disease as a key indicator. In addition to this, the Mandate sets out the requirements for NHS England to improve outcomes in a range of areas, including preventing premature deaths from the biggest killers (including respiratory) and supporting people with long term physical and mental health conditions.

    Living Well for Longer: National Support for Local Action to Reduce Premature Mortality, launched in April, sets out what the health and care system will do to achieve the Government’s ambition to be amongst the best in Europe at reducing levels of premature mortality. It brings together in one place the national actions taken by the Department of Health and wider Government, NHS England and Public Health England, in prevention, early diagnosis and treatment, focusing on the five big killers, including lung disease, and shows how they will support local leadership and interventions.

    The Department has supported a number of initiatives to help improve outcomes for people with respiratory disease. In July 2011, it published an outcomes strategy for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma in England, which sets out six high-level objectives to improve outcomes in these areas through high quality prevention, detection, treatment and care services. The Department has also supported the publication of a good practice guides on services for adults with asthma, which was published in 2012.

    The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has published Quality Standards for COPD and for asthma setting out the markers of high-quality, cost-effective care and the implementation of these will also raise the standard of care people with these conditions receive.

    The Department has collaborated with the National Review of Asthma Deaths which is examined the circumstances surrounding deaths from asthma from 1 February 2012 to 30 January 2013 and reported on its findings in May of this year. Lessons learnt about the factors that contribute to asthma deaths will inform the NHS about what constitutes good care, and encourage the development of appropriate services for people with asthma.

    Public Health England recently ran a local pilot campaign in Oldham and Rochdale to raise awareness amongst the public about the importance of visiting their general practitioner with symptoms of breathlessness.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-10-09.

    To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what steps her Department is taking to help tackle homophobic bullying in schools.

    Caroline Dinenage

    Tackling all forms of bullying is a top priority for this Government. All schools are required by law to have a behaviour policy with measures to prevent all forms of bullying. The Government has taken a number of steps to help schools address bullying, including by providing advice on how to prevent and tackle bullying and how schools should support children who are bullied.

    We are providing £1.3 million this year to anti-bullying charities to tackle all forms of bullying, on top of the £4 million provided in 2013-2015. We have also launched a specific programme in 2015-2016 to prevent and tackle homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying in schools. £2 million has been awarded to projects to work with schools through classroom-based activities, use of positive role models and specific training for teachers to understand and address this issue effectively. We will share the learning from these projects more widely, so all schools have the tools and knowledge to take appropriate action.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many catheter associated urinary tract infection related deaths there were in the last three years.

    Jane Ellison

    This information is not available in the format requested.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people were admitted to hospital as an emergency case with acute retention of urine due to a blocked Foley catheter in the last three years.

    Jane Ellison

    The requested information is not available centrally as Hospital Episode Statistics cannot identify blocked catheters or the type of catheter in use.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what discussions he has had with NHS England regarding the (a) commissioning of continence services and (b) guidelines for continence services.

    Jane Ellison

    My Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State meets representatives from NHS England on a regular basis to discuss a wide range of issues, including the commissioning of local NHS services.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Attorney General

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Attorney General

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-16.

    To ask the Attorney General, what steps his Department is taking to improve public understanding of the legal framework applicable to social media.

    Jeremy Wright

    Judging by the number of referrals from members of the public to my office there is clearly some awareness of the legal framework applicable to social media but I have sought to increase this awareness by, for example, issuing online warnings on social media, including Twitter, in appropriate cases.

    In relation to the commission of criminal offences by social media users, the Crown Prosecution Service has also issued detailed guidelines to prosecutors on handling cases involving communications sent via social media.

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-03-25.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what (a) direct and (b) indirect bilateral funding arrangements his Department has with governmental or non-governmental projects and bodies in Argentina.

    Gregory Barker

    The Department does not at present provide bilateral funding to Argentina.

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-04-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will establish an Aircraft Noise Ombudsman; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr Robert Goodwill

    The Government is currently considering the recommendations made by the Airports Commission, including the recommendation to create an independent noise authority. The Government will respond to the Interim Report as soon as possible.

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-06-04.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for what scientific purposes she has licensed procedures on animals that were likely to cause severe suffering since 2010; and what steps the Government is taking to reduce the number of animals experiencing severe suffering in scientific procedures.

    Norman Baker

    The information asked for is not held centrally and could only be obtained at
    disproportionate cost.

    The Government only authorises procedures on animals after rigorous checks.
    Under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 there is a statutory
    requirement for scrutiny by, in the first instance, the Animal Welfare Ethical
    Review Body at the Establishment where the work will be performed, and then an
    assessment is made by the Home Office Inspectorate. In addition, projects are
    referred to the Animals in Science Committee for scrutiny where they propose
    the use of non-human primates in severe protocols and other projects that ministers
    consider require further consideration.

    One of the key factors in the assessment of licence applications is the
    harm-benefit analysis, which has been part of our assessment process since
    1986. The parameters considered in this analysis are described in Appendix I of
    the Operational Guidance to the 1986 Act. A harm-benefit analysis determines
    whether the proposed harms to the animals are justified by the likely benefits to be
    delivered from the project. Inspectors give advice on minimising harms during
    their assessment of project licence applications. Licensees have a legal
    responsibility to ensure that work is undertaken on animals in the least severe
    manner possible whilst delivering their scientific objectives. This year we
    are undertaking a review of the harm-benefit analysis process, with advice from
    the Animals in Science Committee, to determine if there are further refinements
    we can make to the process.

    I am committed to working to reduce the number of animals used in scientific
    procedures. The Coalition Commitment delivery plan "Working to reduce the use
    of animals in research" was published in February 2014. In particular, the Home
    Office Inspectorate is working with the Royal Society for the Prevention of
    Cruelty to Animals on methods of refinement of the most severe models to avoid
    or reduce animal suffering. This has included careful consideration of models
    of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, seizures, rheumatoid arthritis
    and sepsis. Inspectors are actively promulgating the recommendations from each
    of these reports.

    In addition, the Home Office has published advisory notes on recording and
    reporting actual severity, as required by the transposed European Directive
    from 2013. From data collected we will provide clarity on the burden of harm
    and, over time, should give an indication of the effectiveness of refinement
    methods, particularly for the most severe procedures.

    It is imporant to note that procedures classified as severe represent only a
    small percentage of total procedures.