Tag: Henry Smith

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many catheter associated urinary tract infection related deaths there were in the last three years.

    Jane Ellison

    This information is not available in the format requested.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people were admitted to hospital as an emergency case with acute retention of urine due to a blocked Foley catheter in the last three years.

    Jane Ellison

    The requested information is not available centrally as Hospital Episode Statistics cannot identify blocked catheters or the type of catheter in use.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what discussions he has had with NHS England regarding the (a) commissioning of continence services and (b) guidelines for continence services.

    Jane Ellison

    My Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State meets representatives from NHS England on a regular basis to discuss a wide range of issues, including the commissioning of local NHS services.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Attorney General

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Attorney General

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-09-16.

    To ask the Attorney General, what steps his Department is taking to improve public understanding of the legal framework applicable to social media.

    Jeremy Wright

    Judging by the number of referrals from members of the public to my office there is clearly some awareness of the legal framework applicable to social media but I have sought to increase this awareness by, for example, issuing online warnings on social media, including Twitter, in appropriate cases.

    In relation to the commission of criminal offences by social media users, the Crown Prosecution Service has also issued detailed guidelines to prosecutors on handling cases involving communications sent via social media.

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what comparative assessment his Department has made of the level of broadband coverage in (a) the UK and (b) other major European nations.

    Mr Edward Vaizey

    Ofcom’s European Broadband Scorecard (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/bbresearch/scorecard-14) stated in figure 8 that the percentages of households in areas served by broadband were:

    Standard broadband

    Mobile broadband

    Superfast broadband

    United Kingdom

    95-100%

    95-100%

    70-75%

    France

    95-100%

    95-100%

    20-25%

    Germany

    95-100%

    90-95%

    65-70%

    Spain

    95-100%

    95-100%

    60-65%

    Italy

    95-100%

    95-100%

    10-15%

    Ofcom also publishes comparative information in its International Communications Market Report (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr13/international/)

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-06-24.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his Department is taking to ensure a suitable commemoration of the First World War; and if he will support the Royal Sussex Regiment Association’s efforts for a memorial to be erected in Priez, France.

    Mrs Helen Grant

    The Government will mark the centenary of the First World War with an appropriate programme of national events, cultural activities, educational initiatives and community projects across 2014-18. It is fitting that organisations such as the Royal Sussex Regiment Association are seeking to commemorate the centenary in ways which are meaningful for them.

  • Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    Henry Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2015-02-10.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what plans his Department has to devolve greater responsibilities to democratically elected county councils and county unitary authorities.

    Kris Hopkins

    The Government has always believed that local decision-making plays an essential role in building stronger local economies and communities and is open to discussions over possible offers from areas that are interested in greater devolution of powers. This basic principle of localism underpins the Government’s approach and is why programmes such as Growth Deals and Growing Places Fund have been made available to all local areas in England through Local Enterprise Partnerships.

    I also refer my hon. Friend to the Government’s publication, "The implications of devolution for England” (CM 8969) which outlines the views of both Coalition parties on the scope for greater decentralisation in England.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/implications-of-devolution-for-england

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Energy and Climate Change

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-03-25.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what (a) direct and (b) indirect bilateral funding arrangements his Department has with governmental or non-governmental projects and bodies in Argentina.

    Gregory Barker

    The Department does not at present provide bilateral funding to Argentina.

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-04-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will establish an Aircraft Noise Ombudsman; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr Robert Goodwill

    The Government is currently considering the recommendations made by the Airports Commission, including the recommendation to create an independent noise authority. The Government will respond to the Interim Report as soon as possible.

  • Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Henry Smith – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Henry Smith on 2014-06-04.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for what scientific purposes she has licensed procedures on animals that were likely to cause severe suffering since 2010; and what steps the Government is taking to reduce the number of animals experiencing severe suffering in scientific procedures.

    Norman Baker

    The information asked for is not held centrally and could only be obtained at
    disproportionate cost.

    The Government only authorises procedures on animals after rigorous checks.
    Under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 there is a statutory
    requirement for scrutiny by, in the first instance, the Animal Welfare Ethical
    Review Body at the Establishment where the work will be performed, and then an
    assessment is made by the Home Office Inspectorate. In addition, projects are
    referred to the Animals in Science Committee for scrutiny where they propose
    the use of non-human primates in severe protocols and other projects that ministers
    consider require further consideration.

    One of the key factors in the assessment of licence applications is the
    harm-benefit analysis, which has been part of our assessment process since
    1986. The parameters considered in this analysis are described in Appendix I of
    the Operational Guidance to the 1986 Act. A harm-benefit analysis determines
    whether the proposed harms to the animals are justified by the likely benefits to be
    delivered from the project. Inspectors give advice on minimising harms during
    their assessment of project licence applications. Licensees have a legal
    responsibility to ensure that work is undertaken on animals in the least severe
    manner possible whilst delivering their scientific objectives. This year we
    are undertaking a review of the harm-benefit analysis process, with advice from
    the Animals in Science Committee, to determine if there are further refinements
    we can make to the process.

    I am committed to working to reduce the number of animals used in scientific
    procedures. The Coalition Commitment delivery plan "Working to reduce the use
    of animals in research" was published in February 2014. In particular, the Home
    Office Inspectorate is working with the Royal Society for the Prevention of
    Cruelty to Animals on methods of refinement of the most severe models to avoid
    or reduce animal suffering. This has included careful consideration of models
    of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, seizures, rheumatoid arthritis
    and sepsis. Inspectors are actively promulgating the recommendations from each
    of these reports.

    In addition, the Home Office has published advisory notes on recording and
    reporting actual severity, as required by the transposed European Directive
    from 2013. From data collected we will provide clarity on the burden of harm
    and, over time, should give an indication of the effectiveness of refinement
    methods, particularly for the most severe procedures.

    It is imporant to note that procedures classified as severe represent only a
    small percentage of total procedures.