Tag: Charity Commission

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 19 May 2026.

In a highly critical report published today (19 May 2026), the Charity Commission’s inquiry finds serious mismanagement at the Players Foundation (previously known as the Professional Footballers’ Association Charity, charity number: 1150458).

This included £1.9 million which was transferred from the charity’s bank account to a trade union, The Professional Footballers’ Association, without adequate explanation or governance.  

Additionally, the charity allowed the union to occupy its properties rent free, some for over a decade, resulting in significant financial loss to the charity. 

Both the £1.9 million, plus interest, and the outstanding rent plus interest (£627,000) were subsequently repaid to the charity during the inquiry once the Commission had raised concerns. 

The Chief Executive and Director of Finance at the connected union were also trustees of the charity. The Commission’s intervention ensured that their remuneration was transparently disclosed in the charity’s accounts as related party transactions, which was not previously the case. 

As a result of these and other findings relating to the charity’s relationship with the trade union, the regulator issued an Official Warning to the charity on 7 September 2022 for mismanagement that had taken place from its incorporation in 2013 to the beginning of 2019.

It also disqualified a trustee, Darren Wilson, from being a trustee or holding a position in a charity with a senior management function for four years. 

The charity and the union are now more clearly separate. 

Background 

The charity, which was formerly known as The Professional Footballers’ Association Charity, supports current and former professional footballers. 

In November 2018, the Commission opened a regulatory compliance case to explore concerns about the charity’s relationship with a connected trade union, The Professional Footballers’ Association, its management of conflicts of interest and the trustees’ ability to act in the charity’s best interests.  

Funding a trade union is not considered a charitable purpose in law. 

Following extensive engagement with the charity, the Commission’s serious concerns led to the opening of a statutory inquiry in December 2019.  

Key findings  

The inquiry uncovered a pattern of poor oversight and financial mismanagement that put charitable funds at risk over several years. It found that:  

• Through a longstanding but informal arrangement, the charity paid approximately 80% of the trade union’s annual operating costs – around £6 million annually, including £5 million on union staff salaries. In return, the union provided coaching and training to further the charity’s aims. This arrangement operated for years without any contractual agreement, proper review, or value-for-money assessment until the Commission raised concerns in April 2019.
• £1.9 million of funds the Football Association deposited in the charity’s bank account was transferred from the charity to the union in two separate transactions, without a clear explanation for the action. In the report, the Commission is highly critical of trustees’ failure to spot the huge reduction in funds during their reviews. The funds plus interest were only returned after the Commission raised concerns. Subsequently, an alternative explanation was provided by trustees, who suggested that the funds belonged to the union but were held by the charity pending confirmation of their donation to the charity by the union. The inquiry found that the changing explanation provided regarding the £1.9 million demonstrated poor financial management and controls at the charity.
• The charity owned several properties in Manchester and London and allowed the union and its trading subsidiary to occupy these rent-free for several years. When interest was included, this cost the charity over £627,000 in unpaid rent, which was subsequently repaid after the Charity Commission’s intervention.
• Multiple trustees held positions within both the charity and the trade union – two trustees held senior union salaried positions, whilst three others sat on the union’s Business Advisory Committee, which set salaries for union staff. This created inherent conflicts of interest, particularly as the charity funded union salaries to the sum of £5 million annually.
• The charity also failed to properly disclose related party transactions in its published accounts, reducing transparency for the public and regulators. Whilst trustees placed reliance on professional advisors, they failed to fulfil their fundamental duty to actively oversee and review the charity’s operations and relationships.

Regulatory action 

As a result of the inquiry’s findings, the Commission has taken the following action:  

• One trustee, Darren Wilson, has been disqualified from being a trustee or holding a senior management position in any charity for four years after the Commission found him responsible for misconduct and/or mismanagement in the administration of the charity. At the time of his trusteeship, he was also Director of Finance of the union. The inquiry found he had a greater culpability than the other trustees, due to his role as a qualified director of finance. The Commission took action to suspend Mr Wilson as a trustee until any disqualification took effect. Mr Wilson appealed against his suspension and disqualification, resulting in hearings over the course of several years, with the appeal. ultimately withdrawn in January 2025. The period of disqualification is ongoing and will end on 14 August 2027.
• The Commission issued an Official Warning in September 2022 to the charity for mismanagement during the period from when it was incorporated in 2013 to the beginning of 2019.
• Remedial actions have now been implemented at the charity, including proper separation from the union, appointment of new trustees, and establishment of a distinct identity for the charity. It has also adopted a new funding model, after the Football Association and Premier League stopped funding of the charity upon its separation from the union.

Angela Ascroft, Critical Case Lead at the Charity Commission said: 

In this case, the lines between the charity and Professional Footballers’ Association union were blurred beyond distinction, resulting in the multiple instances of conflict of interest and mismanagement at the charity.

Charity trustees have a duty to act in the best interests of their charity, but trustees at the Players Foundation fell dismally short of this expectation and, as a result, let down the players they were supposed to be helping. 

The Charity Commission’s extensive regulatory involvement led to the disqualification of trustee Darren Wilson. Since then, the Players Foundation is more separated from the union and can now focus on helping those it was set up to serve.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 13 January 2026.

The charity is based in Fareham and has charitable purposes including the advancement of the dramatic arts.  

The Commission engaged with the charity in May 2024 to assess a complaint about the charity’s activities.  

During the course of this engagement, further concerns came to the regulator’s attention relating to its accounting information, outstanding accounts and potential unmanaged conflicts of interest. As a result, the Commission has escalated its engagement with the charity to a statutory inquiry.  

The inquiry, which opened on 27 November 2025, will examine the administration, governance, and management of the charity and in particular: 

• the trustees’ compliance with their statutory accounting and reporting responsibilities 
• the financial controls and financial management of the charity 
• the trustees’ decision making including their management of potential conflicts of interest in relation to related party transactions 
• whether there has been any unauthorised private benefit to the trustees and/or connected parties 
• the trustees’ oversight and management of the charity’s relationships with connected entities. 

The Commission may extend the scope of the inquiry if additional regulatory issues emerge.   

It is the Commission’s policy, after it has concluded an inquiry, to publish a report detailing the issues examined, any action taken, and the inquiry’s outcomes.   

ENDS 

Notes for Editors: 

• The Charity Commission is the independent, non-ministerial government department that registers and regulates charities in England and Wales. Its ambition is to be an expert regulator that is fair, balanced, and independent so that charity can thrive. The Commission has a wide range of regulatory powers which it can use to support charities and protect charitable assets. Further information about the Charity Commission and its work is available at The Charity Commission – GOV.UK. 
• On 27 November 2025 the Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry into the charity under section 46 of the Charities Act 2011 as a result of its regulatory concerns that there is or has been misconduct and/ or mismanagement in the administration of the charity. 
• A statutory inquiry is a legal power enabling the Commission to formally investigate matters of regulatory concern within a charity and to use protective powers for the benefit of the charity and its beneficiaries, assets, or reputation.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 14 November 2025.

The Archbishops’ Council of the Church of England must rapidly accelerate the delivery of safeguarding improvements and close gaps in its approach to handling complaints, the charity regulator has warned.

The Charity Commission has set an expectation that the Archbishops’ Council should implement independent safeguarding structures as endorsed by the Church’s General Synod in February 2025 within 18 months from now – a year sooner than current plans indicate – and in the meantime, put robust interim measures in place to keep people safe.

The expectation is part of a Regulatory Action Plan issued to the Archbishops’ Council, a registered charity whose objects are to co-ordinate, promote, aid and further the work and mission of the Church of England. It follows the Commission engaging with the charity over whether its trustees are taking sufficient steps to address the safeguarding concerns and implement recommended changes raised in a number of safeguarding reviews.

Background

The Commission’s engagement with the Archbishops’ Council began towards the end of 2024, following the publication of an ‘Independent Learning Lessons Review’ into the case of John Smyth (the “Makin Review”). This followed other independent reviews in recent years, including the report by Sarah Wilkinson into the Church’s Independent Safeguarding Board, and the ‘Future of Church Safeguarding’ report by Professor Alexis Jay.

Public debate about the Church’s approach to safeguarding following publication of the Makin Review – and the Archbishop of Canterbury’s resignation over the issue – exacerbated regulatory concerns that progress towards safeguarding improvements identified in the various independent reports was not happening with sufficient pace.

The regulatory compliance case was informed by information provided by bishops and Diocesan Boards of Finance, as well as the Archbishops’ Council, at the Commission’s request.

While the Commission does not investigate individual allegations of abuse, it does have a responsibility to assess concerns about the extent to which trustees are taking necessary action and ensuring their charity has appropriate safeguarding policies and procedures in place. The Church of England’s National Safeguarding Team is a department of the Archbishops’ Council and develops proposals for safeguarding guidance, processes and procedures for consideration by the General Synod which the trustees of other Church charities are required to follow.

Findings

In summary, the Commission has found that:

• there is insufficient urgency and pace in implementing responses to past safeguarding reviews, and the current approach to doing so is fragmented and overly complex. For example, the Council’s current timescale of 2028 to pass the necessary legislation to implement independent safeguarding is too slow, representing a four year gap since the publication of the Jay Review
• currently the Church does not treat allegations of abuse from an adult not assessed to be “vulnerable” as a safeguarding allegation. The Commission’s guidance is clear that trustees must take reasonable steps to protect from harm all people who come into contact with their charity

Conclusions

The Commission found no evidence of mismanagement or misconduct by the trustees of the Archbishops’ Council, and recognises that the charity has made progress and delivered some improvements to the Church’s safeguarding in recent years. However, the Commission has made it clear that it expects the Archbishops’ Council to take all steps within its powers to implement outstanding safeguarding reforms at a much faster pace.

Where legislative changes will not address safeguarding risks quickly, the charity’s trustees should facilitate interim arrangements sufficient to address identified safeguarding risks until the legislative changes are in place. These should reflect the Commission’s guidance to trustees as well as Church policy and procedure.

Next steps

The Commission has issued a Regulatory Action Plan setting out steps the trustees need to take to address the Commission’s concerns. These include closing the gap on how allegations made by a non-vulnerable adult should be handled in different circumstances, and quicker delivery of the new structures for independent safeguarding which the General Synod “endorsed as the way forward in the short term” in February 2025.

The Commission notes the recent appointment of Dame Christine Ryan as executive chair of the Church’s Safeguarding Structures Programme Board to lead work on the structural changes agreed by the Synod.

The Commission now expects the Archbishops’ Council to identify any safeguarding risks that may require interim non-legislative measures to keep people safe and to put suitable measures in place. Reflecting this approach, the Archbishops’ Council has told the Commission it plans to establish an interim independent scrutiny body for Church safeguarding ahead of legislation.

The Commission understands the risks associated with acting in undue haste, and notes that the Archbishops’ Council’s trustees need to consider how to plan for future engagement with victims and survivors in a meaningful, sensitive and structured way so that it supports the timely delivery of change needed to keep people safe in the future.

The regulator is monitoring the Archbishops’ Council’s progress against the Regulatory Action Plan. Should it receive evidence that raises new regulatory concerns, it will assess this in line with its usual process.

Charity Commission Chief Executive, David Holdsworth, said:

It’s time for the Archbishops’ Council and the Church of England to move from review to reform, and from debate to delivery.

Everyone recognises that improving safeguarding is an ongoing journey, but in the Archbishops’ Council’s case the progress on that journey must be made in bigger, bolder steps, informed by the experience of victims and survivors.

The Commission will monitor the charity’s progress against our Regulatory Action Plan, and reserve all regulatory options for the future if sufficient progress is not made at pace.

Ends

Notes to Editors

1. The Charity Commission is the independent, non-ministerial government department that registers and regulates charities in England and Wales. Its role in safeguarding matters is set out in this policy document.
2. The Archbishops’ Council is a registered charity (1074857) established in 1999 to co-ordinate, promote, aid and further the work and mission of the Church of England. It does this by providing national support to the Church in dioceses and locally, working closely with the House of Bishops and other bodies of the Church. The Archbishops’ Council is one of the seven National Church Institutions.
3. The Commission’s safeguarding guidance sets out the steps trustees should take to protect people who come into contact with their charity from abuse or mistreatment.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 28 October 2025.

The Charity Commission is escalating its engagement with the Islamic Human Rights Commission Trust to a statutory inquiry.

The regulator has been engaging with the charity since May 2025 over concerns about its involvement in publications made and events organised by a non-charitable company which receives funding from Islamic Human Rights Commission Trust.

Complaints were also received in relation to the charity’s funding of an event where it is alleged that inflammatory statements were made. The Commission is investigating whether support of the event was in furtherance of the charity’s objects.

The Commission required the trustees to answer a range of questions to understand the charity’s involvement in these matters, and its wider relationship with the non-charitable company. After reviewing the trustees’ responses, notably in relation to the event, the regulator decided to launch a statutory inquiry to further investigate the regulatory concerns.

The inquiry will examine the trustees’ administration, management and governance of the charity and their compliance with legal duties and responsibilities. It will also review:

1. Islamic Human Rights Commission Trust’s activities, considering how these further the charity’s purposes and are in the charity’s best interests
2. The relationship between the charity and the non-charitable company, including:

• how this relationship benefits the charity and helps deliver on its purposes
• how the trustees are managing this relationship in the charity’s best interests
• what safeguards are in place to ensure the charity is adequately separate from the non-charitable company
• the steps the trustees have taken to separate the charity from the non-charitable company so that it is clear to the public that the two organisations are separate entities

The Commission may extend the scope of the inquiry if additional regulatory issues emerge.  The regulator has previously issued an Official Warning to the charity on 28 March 2023 in part about how it managed its relationship with the non-charitable company. The decision to escalate its case to an inquiry reflects the seriousness of the Commission’s concerns about the impact the unclear relationship between the charity and non-charitable company may have on public trust and confidence in the charity and charities more widely.

It is the Commission’s policy, after it has concluded an inquiry, to publish a report detailing the issues examined, any action taken, and the inquiry’s outcomes.

ENDS

Notes to editors

1. The Charity Commission is the independent, non-ministerial government department that registers and regulates charities in England and Wales. Its ambition is to be an expert regulator that is fair, balanced, and independent so that charity can thrive. This ambition will help to create and sustain an environment where charities further build public trust and ultimately fulfil their essential role in enhancing lives and strengthening society. Read further information about what the Commission does.
2. On 8 October 2025 the Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry into Islamic Human Rights Commission Trust under section 46 of the Charities Act 2011 as a result of its regulatory concerns that there is or has been misconduct and / or mismanagement in the administration of the charity.
3. Allegations of criminal offences are for the Police to investigate.
4. The Home Office is responsible for decisions on proscription on behalf of the UK Government.
5. The Commission publishes a range of guidance for trustees, including: Conflicts of interest and on Charities and terrorism.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 20 October 2025.

Former and current trustees at Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries International lacked oversight and control over charitable funds, a Charity Commission inquiry has found.

The charity operates through a large network of individual branches and works to promote Christianity. 

The Commission opened an inquiry after financial concerns were identified, including the alleged misappropriation of charity funds. 

Key findings  

The inquiry found that the charity’s trustees could not demonstrate that they had adequate oversight or control over more than 100 bank accounts operated by individual branches of the charity, with charity money at risk across the organisation’s extensive network. 

As a result of serious concerns regarding the trustees’ ability to carry out their duties effectively, the Commission appointed an interim manager in 2019 to work alongside the remaining trustees to implement essential financial controls.  

Many of the charity’s financial issues stemmed from its complex structure, which had grown from a handful of branches to over 90 locations nationwide, without the corresponding governance improvements.  

Branches operated autonomously, opening bank accounts without central oversight and failing to report income in a timely manner. This created substantial risks to charitable funds and resulted in inaccurate financial reporting. 

Additionally, branch offices were making significant financial decisions, including property purchases and lease agreements, without trustee knowledge or authorisation. 

This lack of oversight by trustees led to financial losses for the charity – for example, some branches occupied property without first obtaining the necessary planning permission and one of which was subject to costly legal action by a council. Further losses arose because of the former and current trustees’ failure to regularise employment contracts which resulted in payments to settle employment disputes.  

Regulatory action 

As a result of its findings, the Commission took action to freeze the charity’s assets to prevent further loss. 

An interim manager was appointed to implement robust financial controls at the charity and to improve its governance.  

The interim manager was discharged in September 2024. The interim manager appointment was lengthy due to the complexity of the reform needed at the charity and the delays caused by legal proceedings. 

Following the completion of this work, the Commission issued an order directing the charity to follow a regulatory action plan concerning governance and policy changes. The Commission is now satisfied that the trustees have complied with the action plan.   

Amy Spiller, Head of Investigations at the Charity Commission said: 

The rapid growth of a charity comes with correspondingly larger potential risks, as our inquiry clearly shows. 

In this case, the trustees’ fundamental failure to maintain financial controls meant donor funds were at serious risk across their entire network. 

Following the intervention of the Commission and the interim manager, the trustees were better able to implement essential reforms, meaning the charity can now operate effectively and focus on delivering its charitable objects.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 2 October 2025.

Charity Commission Chief Executive, David Holdsworth, said:

Our thoughts are with those directly affected, and the wider Jewish community, after this abhorrent attack on a holy day. This attack is all the more abhorrent as it targeted people of faith and those serving in a charity simply for attending their place of worship. Violence and hatred have no place in our communities and society. Violence can never be justified and can never be excused.

Charities are at the heart of communities across the country improving millions of lives daily. We as the regulator will robustly defend their right to do so and stand ready to support charities as they do what they do best – bring communities together, protect society’s most vulnerable and work to make our country and world a better place.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 1 September 2025.

The Charity Commission has announced the next 10 charities entering a class inquiry it opened in May 2025.

Earlier this year, the Charity Commission for England and Wales announced a statutory class inquiry into a group of charities where there is evidence that they have issued cheques which were then exchanged for cash.

Following an unannounced visit by HMRC to a company in Hackney, 105 charities were found to have cashed cheques with it to a value of £22 million between December 2021 and March 2023.

In May 2025 the Commission announced the inquiry and the details of first 10 charities entered into it.

The Commission has now extended this inquiry to include the following 10 charities:

• Ezer Viznitz Foundation (1161881)
• Satmar Nursery Trust (292614)
• Lehachyos (1170523)
• Dover Sholem Community Trust (1138710)
• Friends of Yeshiva Daas Sholem Shotz (1070789)
• Vyoel Moshe Charitable Trust (327054)
• The Z.S.V. Trust (1063860)
• United Talmudical Associates Ltd (291834)
• Forty Limited (1039036)
• Bnois Jerusalem Schools (312568)

Using powers available to the Commission during an inquiry, the regulator will determine the facts around how these charities have transferred funds. It will also investigate how trustees had oversight of what happened to funds exchanged for the cheques, and if this cash has been used properly to support what the charities were set up to do. The Commission will seek to establish how trustees determined that these financial transactions were in their charity’s best interests.

The regulator has issued an immediate order to temporarily stop any of the charities under inquiry from issuing cheques without its prior consent.

The scope of the inquiry may also be extended if additional regulatory issues emerge during the Commission’s investigation.

Notes to editors:

1. The Charity Commission is the independent, non-ministerial government department that registers and regulates charities in England and Wales. Its ambition is to be an expert regulator that is fair, balanced, and independent so that charity can thrive. This ambition will help to create and sustain an environment where charities further build public trust and ultimately fulfil their essential role in enhancing lives and strengthening society. Find out more: About us – The Charity Commission – GOV.UK
2. A statutory inquiry is a legal power enabling the Commission to formally investigate matters of regulatory concern within a charity, or class of charities and to use protective powers for the benefit of the charity and its beneficiaries, assets, or reputation. An inquiry will investigate and establish the facts of the case so that the Commission can determine the extent of any misconduct and/or mismanagement; the extent of the risk to the charity, its work, property, beneficiaries, employees or volunteers; and decide what action is needed to resolve the concerns.
3. The Commission published a press release on gov.uk to announce the first tranche of charities which entered the class inquiry.
4. The latest charities entered the inquiry in July and August 2025.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 28 August 2025.

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into two charities connected to the Guru Nanak Gurdwara, Wednesfield, which were set up for the advancement of the Sikh religion in the area.

Unregistered charity Guru Nanak Gurdwara (also known as the Nanak Sikh Temple, amongst other names) was established in 1980, while the Guru Nanak Gurdwara, Wednesfield was registered with the Charity Commission as a Charitable Incorporated Organisation (CIO) in 2024.

The Commission had previously opened a regulatory compliance case due to concerns raised by some of the Gurdwara’s congregation about the trustees’ oversight of the established, unregistered charity. Further concerns were raised by the formation and registration of a new CIO by some of those trustees.

Trustees of both charities have failed to comply with regulatory guidance and with information gathering Orders of the Commission related to these concerns.

The unregistered charity failed to comply with the Commission’s Order for it to apply to become a registered charity, as required by law, by 23 April 2025. However, it has since submitted a registration application to the Commission.

A failure to comply with an Order of the Charity Commission is misconduct and / or mismanagement in the administration of a charity.

The Commission escalated its engagement with both the CIO and the related, unregistered charity to a statutory inquiry in June 2025.

The inquiry will examine if the trustees are complying with their legal duties and responsibilities in respect of the administration, governance, and management of both charities with particular regard to:

• the conduct of the trustees and whether the charities are being managed in accordance with their governing documents
• whether there are appropriate controls in place to ensure the charities’ assets are protected
• the extent to which the trustees have complied with previously issued regulatory guidance and orders
• if there has been any misconduct and/or mismanagement by the trustees in the administration of the charities.

The Commission may extend the scope of the inquiry if additional regulatory issues emerge.

ENDS

Notes for Editors

1. The Charity Commission is the independent, non-ministerial government department that registers and regulates charities in England and Wales. Its ambition is to be an expert regulator that is fair, balanced, and independent so that charity can thrive. This ambition will help to create and sustain an environment where charities further build public trust and ultimately fulfil their essential role in enhancing lives and strengthening society.
2. On 20 June 2025, the Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry into both the CIO and the related unregistered charity, Guru Nanak Gurdwara, also known as the Nanak Sikh Temple, amongst other names.
3. The unregistered charity submitted a registration application to the Commission on 1 August 2025.
4. Under section 46 of the Charities Act 2011 a statutory inquiry is a legal power enabling the Commission to formally investigate matters of regulatory concern within a charity and to use protective powers for the benefit of the charity and its beneficiaries, assets, or reputation. An inquiry will investigate and establish the facts of the case so that the Commission can determine the extent of any misconduct and/or mismanagement; the extent of the risk to the charity, its work, property, beneficiaries, employees or volunteers; and decide what action is needed to resolve the concerns.
5. Failure to comply with an Order of the Commission is misconduct and / or mismanagement in the administration of a charity in accordance with section 76(1) of the Charities Act 2011.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 20 August 2025.

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into Darul-Uloom School London.

Darul-Uloom School London was registered with the Commission in 1995 and operates a school providing Islamic and national curriculum education to children and young people.

The regulator previously opened a separate statutory inquiry into the charity in 2018 after an altercation on the charity’s premises. That inquiry concluded in May 2022 and found serious mismanagement and misconduct in the administration of the charity. Two former trustees were disqualified.

During the course of that inquiry, the Commission became aware that one of the disqualified former trustees had made representations to the charity’s trustees asserting ownership of the land on which the school is based.

Following its enquiries, the Commission’s view is that there is evidence which shows that the land is held on trust by the charity, rather than being the personal property of any individual and has shared this view with both the charity’s trustees and the disqualified trustee.

However, despite the repeated deadlines given by the Commission for the trustees to resolve the issue, the trustees have failed to bring the matter of the land dispute to a conclusion. The regulator is concerned that these failures place the charity’s property at serious risk.

As a result, the Commission has escalated its engagement to a statutory inquiry.

The inquiry will evaluate the trustees’ administration, management, and governance of the charity. In particular, it will consider the conduct of the trustees and their compliance with legal duties and responsibilities as it relates to the land dispute.

The Commission may extend the scope of the inquiry if additional regulatory issues emerge.

The press release issued by the Charity Commission on 7 August 2025.

The Charity Commission has launched a statutory inquiry into Edmund Kell Unitarian Church and Elizabeth Kell Community Hall over financial and safeguarding concerns.

The charity, which serves the local community of Southampton, is an excepted charity meaning that it does not require registration with the Commission. As such, it is not listed on the Register of Charities.

The regulator started engaging with the charity in April 2025 after receiving an application from its trustees to change the charity’s structure. During this process, the regulator identified concerns around the charity’s governance and administration.

Following these concerns, the Commission conducted a review of the charity’s accounts and obtained information on its investment portfolio. This raised concerns that funds initially estimated as in the region of £290,000 may be unaccounted for. As a result, the regulator has now escalated its engagement to an inquiry which will seek to determine how these funds were used.

In addition, the Commission has regulatory concerns in relation to safeguarding at the charity and potentially unmanaged risks relating to a connected individual.

The inquiry will examine:

1. The trustees’ governance and management of the charity and the extent to which they have fulfilled their legal duties and responsibilities.
2. The extent to which the trustees have exercised adequate control and oversight over the charity’s financial management, including whether there has been any loss or misappropriation of the charity’s funds.
3. The sufficiency of the charity’s safeguarding arrangements.

The Commission may extend the scope of the inquiry if additional regulatory issues emerge.

It is the Commission’s policy, after it has concluded an inquiry, to publish a report detailing the issues examined, any action taken, and the inquiry’s outcomes.

ENDS

Notes to editors:

1. The Charity Commission is the independent, non-ministerial government department that registers and regulates charities in England and Wales. Its ambition is to be an expert regulator that is fair, balanced, and independent so that charity can thrive. This ambition will help to create and sustain an environment where charities further build public trust and ultimately fulfil their essential role in enhancing lives and strengthening society. Read further information about what the Commission does on gov.uk.
2. On 29 April 2025, the Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry into the charity under section 46 of the Charities Act 2011 (“the Act”) as a result of its regulatory concerns that there is or has been misconduct and/ or mismanagement in the administration of the charity.
3. A statutory inquiry is a legal power enabling the Commission to formally investigate matters of regulatory concern within a charity and to use protective powers for the benefit of the charity and its beneficiaries, assets, or reputation.
4. Some charities are ‘excepted’ from charity registration. Apart from not having to register or make annual returns, excepted charities must comply with charity law. Their trustees have the same responsibilities as trustees of any other charity. The Charity Commission regulates them just like registered charities and can use any of its powers if it needs to. An ‘excepted’ charity is different to ‘exempt’ charities, which are exempt from registration and regulation by the Commission. More information is available on gov.uk.