Tag: Boris Johnson

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Joint Statement on Iran’s Nuclear Programme

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Joint Statement on Iran’s Nuclear Programme

    The statement made by Boris Johnson, President Macron, Chancellor Merkel and President Biden on 30 October 2021.

    We, the President of France, Chancellor of Germany, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and President of the United States, met in Rome today to discuss the risks posed to international security by Iran’s escalating nuclear program. We expressed our determination to ensure that Iran can never develop or acquire a nuclear weapon and shared our grave and growing concern that, while Iran halted negotiations on a return to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) since June, it has accelerated the pace of provocative nuclear steps, such as the production of highly enriched uranium and enriched uranium metal. Iran has no credible civilian need for either measure, but both are important to nuclear weapons programs.

    These steps have only been made more alarming by Iran’s simultaneously decreased cooperation and transparency with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). We agreed that continued Iranian nuclear advances and obstacles to the IAEA’s work will jeopardize the possibility of a return to the JCPOA.

    The current situation underscores the importance of a negotiated solution that provides for the return of Iran and the U.S. to full compliance with the JCPOA and provides the basis for continued diplomatic engagement to resolve remaining points of contention – both our concerns and Iran’s. In this spirit, we welcome President Biden’s clearly demonstrated commitment to return the U.S. to full compliance with the JCPOA and to stay in full compliance, so long as Iran does the same.

    We are convinced that it is possible to quickly reach and implement an understanding on return to full compliance and to ensure for the long term that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes.

    Return to JCPOA compliance will provide sanctions lifting with long-lasting implications for Iran’s economic growth. This will only be possible if Iran changes course. We call upon President Raisi to seize this opportunity and return to a good faith effort to conclude our negotiations as a matter of urgency. That is the only sure way to avoid a dangerous escalation, which is not in any country’s interest.

    We welcome our Gulf partners’ regional diplomatic efforts to deescalate tensions and note that return to the JCPOA would result both in sanctions lifting allowing for enhanced regional partnerships and a reduced risk of a nuclear crisis that would derail regional diplomacy. We also affirm our shared determination to address broader security concerns raised by Iran’s actions in the region.

    We are committed to continuing to work closely with the Russian Federation, the People’s Republic of China, and the European Union High Representative, as Coordinator, in resolving this critical issue.

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech in the House of Commons on David Amess

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech in the House of Commons on David Amess

    The speech made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 18 October 2021.

    I beg to move, That this House do now adjourn.

    The passing of 72 hours has done little to numb the shock and sadness we all felt when we heard of the tragic and senseless death of Sir David Amess. This House has lost a steadfast servant, we have lost a dear friend and colleague, and Julia and her children have lost a loving husband and devoted father. Nothing I or anyone else can say will lessen the pain, the grief, the anger they must feel at this darkest of times. We hold them in our hearts today. We mourn with them and we grieve alongside them.

    Sir David was taken from us in a contemptible act of violence, striking at the core of what it is to be a Member of this House, and violating the sanctity both of the church in which he was killed and the constituency surgery that is so essential to our representative democracy. But we will not allow the manner of Sir David’s death in any way to detract from his accomplishments as a politician or as a human being. Sir David was a patriot who believed passionately in this country, in its people, in its future. He was also one of the nicest, kindest and most gentle individuals ever to grace these Benches; a man who used his decades of experience to offer friendship and support to new Members of all parties, whose views often confounded expectation and defied easy stereotype, and who believed not just in pointing out what was wrong with society but in getting on and doing something about it.

    It was that determination to make this country a better place that inspired his outstanding record on behalf of the vulnerable and the voiceless. The master of the private Member’s Bill and 10-minute rule Bill, he passed legislation on subjects as diverse as animal welfare, fuel poverty and the registration of driving instructors. He was a prodigious campaigner for children with learning disabilities and for women with endometriosis, a condition on which he became an expert after meeting a woman at one of his constituency surgeries.

    Behind the famous and irresistible beam lay a seasoned campaigner of verve and grit, whether he was demanding freedom for the people of Iran or courting votes in the Westminster Dog of the Year contest, whether he was battling for Brexit or fighting his way to the front of the parliamentary pancake race. And as every Member of this House will know, and as you have just confirmed, Mr Speaker, he never once witnessed any achievement by any resident of Southend that could not somehow be cited in his bid to secure city status for that distinguished town. Highlights of that bulging folder included: a world record for playing the most triangles at once; a group of stilt-walkers travelling non-stop from the Essex coast to Downing Street; and a visiting foreign dignitary allegedly flouting protocol by saying he liked Southend more than Cleethorpes—a compelling case, Mr Speaker. As it is only a short time since Sir David last put that very case to me in this Chamber, I am happy to announce that Her Majesty has agreed that Southend will be accorded the city status it so clearly deserves. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear.”]

    That Sir David spent almost 40 years in this House but not one day in ministerial office tells everything about where his priorities lay. He was not a man in awe of this Chamber, nor a man who sought patronage or advancement; he simply wanted to serve the people of Essex, first in Basildon and then in Southend. It was in the act of serving his constituents that he was so cruelly killed. In his recent memoir, Sir David called surgeries a part of

    “the great British tradition of the people openly meeting their elected politicians”.

    Even after the murder of Jo Cox and the savage attacks on the right hon. Member for East Ham (Stephen Timms) and Nigel Jones, he refused to accept that he should be in any way deterred from speaking face to face with his constituents. So when he died, he was doing what he firmly believed was the most important part of any MP’s job: offering help to those in need.

    In the awful moments before we knew the full horror of the tragedy, a member of Sir David’s constituency association, her voice breaking with emotion, told an interviewer that

    “we need him…the country needs him”—

    and we do. This country needs people like Sir David, this House needs people like Sir David, and our politics needs people like Sir David: dedicated, passionate, firm in his beliefs but never anything less than respectful for those who thought differently. Those are the values he brought to a lifetime of public service. There can be few among us more justified than him in his deep faith in the resurrection and the life to come. And while his death leaves a vacuum that will not and can never be filled, we will cherish his memory, we will celebrate his legacy, and we will never allow those who commit acts of evil to triumph over the democracy and the Parliament that Sir David Amess loved so much.

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Statement on the Murder of David Amess

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Statement on the Murder of David Amess

    The statement made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 15 October 2021.

    David was a man who believed passionately in this country and in its future and we have lost today a fine public servant and a much loved friend and colleague and our thoughts are very much today with his wife, his children and his family.

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 6 October 2021.

    Isn’t it amazing to be here in person

    the first time we have met since you defied the sceptics by winning councils and communities that Conservatives have never won in before – such as Hartlepool

    in fact it’s the first time since the general election of 2019 when we finally sent the corduroyed communist cosmonaut into orbit where he belongs

    and why are we back today

    for a traditional Tory cheek by jowler?

    It is because for months we have had one of the most open economies and societies

    and on July 19 we decided to open every single

    theatre and every concert hall and night club in England

    and

    we knew that some people would still be anxious

    so we sent top government representatives to our sweatiest boites de nuit to show that anyone could dance

    perfectly safely

    and wasn’t he brilliant my friends?

    let’s hear it for Jon Bon Govi

    living proof that we, you all

    represent the most jiving hip happening and generally funkapolitan party in the world

    and how have we managed to open up

    ahead of so many of our friends?

    You know the answer, its

    because of the roll-out of that

    vaccine

    a UK phenomenon

    the magic potion invented in oxford university

    and bottled in wales

    distributed at incredible speed to vaccination centres everywhere

    I saw the army in action in Glasgow

    firing staple guns like carbines as they set up a huge vaccination centre

    and in Fermanagh I saw the needles go in like a collective sewing machine

    and they vaccinated so rapidly that we were able to

    do those crucial groups one to four

    the oldest and most vulnerable faster than any other major economy in the world

    and though the disease has sadly not gone away the impact on death rates has been astonishing

    and I urge you all to get your jabs because every day our vaccine defences are getting stronger and stronger

    and you, all of you, and everybody watching made this roll-out possible

    you each made each other safe

    so perhaps we should all thank each other

    go on – try a cautious fist bump

    because it’s ok now

    and we in turn thank the

    volunteers, the public health workers, the council workers

    the pharmacists

    but above all our untiring unbeatable unbelievable NHS

    and as a responsible conservative government we must recognise the sheer scale of their achievement

    but recognise also the scale of the challenge ahead

    The NHS
    When I was lying in St Thomas’s hospital last year l looked blearily out of my window at a hole in the ground

    between my ICU and another much older Victorian section

    and amid the rubble of brick they seemed to be digging a hole for something or indeed someone – possibly me

    but the NHS saved me

    and our wonderful nurses pulled my chestnuts out of Tartarean pit

    and the other day I went back on a visit

    and I saw that the hole had been filled in

    with three or four gleaming storeys

    of a new paediatrics unit

    and there you have the metaphor my friends for how to build back better now

    we have a huge hole

    in the public finances

    We spent £407 bn on covid support

    and our debt now stands at over two trillion pounds

    and waiting lists will almost certainly go up before they come down

    covid pushed out a great bow wave of cases

    people did not or could not seek help

    and that wave is now coming back

    a tide of anxiety washing into every A and E and every GP

    your hip replacement

    your mother’s surgery

    and this is the priority of the British people

    does anyone seriously imagine that we should not now be raising the funding to sort this out

    is that really the view of responsible conservatives?

    I can tell you something

    Margaret Thatcher would not have ignored this meteorite that has just crashed through the public finances

    she would have wagged her finger and said more borrowing now is just higher interest rates and even higher taxes later

    when this country was sick our NHS was the nurse

    frontline health care workers

    battled against a new disease

    selflessly

    risking their lives sacrificing their lives

    and it is right that this Party that has looked after the NHS for most of its history

    should be the one to rise to the challenge

    48 new hospitals

    50,000 more nurses

    50m more GP appointments

    40 new diagnostic centres

    and fixing those backlogs with real change

    because the pandemic not only put colossal pressure on the NHS

    it was a lightning flash illumination of a problem we have failed to address for decades

    Fixing Social Care
    In 1948 this country created the National Health Service but kept social care local

    and though that made sense in many ways generations of older people have found themselves

    lost in the gap

    when covid broke there were 100,000 beds in the NHS

    – and 30,000 occupied by people who could have been cared for elsewhere

    whether at home or in residential care

    and we all know that this problem of delayed discharge is one of the major reasons why

    it takes too long to get the hospital treatment that your family desperately need

    and people worry that they will be the one in ten

    to suffer from the potentially catastrophic cost of dementia

    wiping out everything they have

    and preventing them from passing on anything to their families

    and we Conservatives stand by those who have shared our values

    thrift and hard work

    and who face total destitution in this brutal lottery

    of old age

    in which treatment for cancer is funded by the state

    and care for alzheimers is not – or only partly

    and to fix these twin problems of the NHS and social care

    we aren’t just going to siphon billions of new taxes into crucial services

    without improving performance

    we will

    use new technology so that there is a single set of electronic records as patients pass between health and social care

    improving care

    and ensuring that cash goes to the frontline

    and not on needless bureaucracy

    When I stood on the steps of Downing Street I promised to fix this crisis

    and after decades of drift and dither

    this reforming government

    this can do government

    this government that got brexit done

    that is getting the vaccine rollout done

    is going to get social care done

    and we are dealing with the biggest underlying issues of our economy and society

    the problems that no government has had the guts to tackle before

    and I mean the long term structural weaknesses

    in the UK economy

    It is thanks to that vaccine roll-out that we now have the most open economy and the fastest growth in the G7

    we have unemployment two million lower than forecast

    We have demand surging

    and I am pleased to say that after years of stagnation – more than a decade – wages are going up

    faster than before the pandemic began

    and that matters deeply

    because we are embarking now on a change of direction that has been long overdue

    in the UK economy

    we are not going back to the same old broken model

    with low wages

    low growth

    low skills

    and low productivity

    all of it enabled and assisted by uncontrolled immigration

    and the answer to the present stresses and strains

    which are mainly a function of growth and economic revival

    is not to reach for that same old lever of uncontrolled immigration

    to keep wages low

    the answer is to control immigration

    to allow people of talent to come to this country

    but not to use immigration as an excuse for failure to invest

    in people, in skills

    and in the equipment the facilities the machinery they need to do their jobs

    the truckstops – to pick an example entirely at random – with basic facilities where you don’t have to urinate in the bushes

    and that is the direction in which this country is going now

    towards a high wage

    high skill

    high productivity

    and yes, thereby low tax economy

    that is what the people of this country need and deserve

    in which everyone can take pride in their work and in the quality of their work

    and yes it will take time

    and yes it will sometimes be difficult

    but that was the change that people voted for in 2016

    and that was the change they voted for again powerfully in 2019

    and to deliver that change we will get on with our job

    of uniting and levelling up across the UK

    the greatest project that any government can embark on

    We have one of the most imbalanced societies and lop-sided economies

    of all the richer countries

    it is not just that there is a gap between London and the South east and the rest of the country

    there are aching gaps within the regions themselves

    what monkey glands are they applying in Ribble Valley

    what royal jelly are they eating

    that they live seven years longer than the people of Blackpool

    only 33 miles away

    Why does half of York’s population boast a degree and only a quarter of Doncaster’s

    This is not just a question of social justice

    it is an appalling waste of potential

    and it is holding this country back

    because there is no reason why the inhabitants of one part of the country should be geographically fated to be poorer than others

    or why people should feel they have to move away from their loved ones, or communities to reach their potential

    When Thomas Gray stood in that country churchyard in 1750 and wrote his famous elegy

    as the curfew tolled the knell of parting day

    he lamented

    the wasted talents of those buried around him

    the flowers born to blush unseen

    the mute inglorious miltons who never wrote a poem

    because they never got to read

    the simple folk who died illiterate and innumerate

    and he knew that it was an injustice

    let me ask you, maybe you know

    where was he standing when he chewed his pensive quill ? Anybody know

    Correct, thank you, he was standing in Stoke poges

    my friends there may be underprivileged parts of this country but stoke poges is not now among them

    in fact it was only recently determined by the Daily Telegraph

    and if you can’t believe that, what can you believe my friends

    to be the 8th richest village in England

    since gray elegised, Buckinghamshire has levelled up to be among the most productive regions in the whole of Europe

    Stoke Poges may still of course have its problems

    but they are the overwhelmingly caused the sheer lust of other people to live in or near Stoke Poges

    overcrowded trains

    endless commutes

    too little time with the kids

    the constant anxiety that your immemorial view of chalk downland is going to be desecrated by ugly new homes

    and that is why levelling up works for the whole country

    and is the right and responsible policy, because it

    helps to take the pressure off parts of the overheating South East

    while simultaneously

    offering hope and opportunity to those areas that have felt left behind

    and let us be clear that there is a huge philosophical difference between us and labour

    because in their souls they don’t like levelling up

    they like levelling down they do

    they like decapitating the tall poppies and taxing the rich till the pips squeak

    they dislike academic competition latin I hear

    and in Islington – I kid you not I have seen it with my own eyes – they like kids to run races where nobody actually wins

    and I have to tell you I don’t believe that is a good preparation for life

    let alone for the Olympic games

    and if you insist on the economic theory behind levelling up

    it is contained in the insight of Wilfredo Pareto

    a 19th century Italian figre who floated from the cobwebbed attic of my memories

    that there are all kinds of improvements

    you can make to people’s lives he said

    without diminishing anyone else

    Rishi will I am sure confirm this

    and we call these pareto improvements

    and they are the means of levelling up

    and the idea in a nutshell it is that you will find talent genius flair imagination enthusiasm everywhere in this country all of them evenly distributed

    but opportunity is not

    and it is our mission as conservatives to promote opportunity

    with every tool we have

    and it is still a grim fact that in this country

    that some kids will grow up in neighbourhoods that are safer than others

    and some will be, as Priti was saying, some will be sucked into gangs

    and some will be at risk of stabbing and shooting

    and some will get themselves caught in the one way ratchet of the criminal justice system

    and many others will not

    that’s why levelling up means fighting crime

    putting more police out on the beat as we are

    and toughening sentences

    and rolling up the county lines drugs networks as we are

    1100 gone already

    and giving the police the powers they need

    to fight these dealers in death and misery that’s what we want to do

    – and what is Labour’s answer, by the way –

    to decriminalise hard drugs apparently

    to let the gangsters off with a caution

    an answer that is straight from the powder rooms of the North London dinner parties

    and nothing to do with the real needs of this country

    crime has been falling

    and not just by the way because we took the precaution of locking up the public for much of the last 18 months

    but because you have a conservative government that understands the broken windows theory of crime

    I read a learned article by some lawyer saying we should not bother about pet theft

    Well I say to Cruella de Vil QC – if you can steal a dog or a cat

    then there is frankly no limit to your depravity

    and you know those people gluing themselves to roads

    I don’t call them legitimate protestors

    like some Labour councillors do I, some Labour councillors actually glue themselves to roads

    I say they are a confounded nuisance who are blocking ambulances, stopping people go about their daily lives

    and I am glad Priti is taking new powers to insulate them snugly in prison where they belong

    what I found most incredible of all was the decision by Labour

    now led by lefty Islington lawyers

    to vote against tougher sentences for serious sexual and violent offenders

    and on behalf of the entire government I tell you

    we will not rest until we have increased the successful prosecutions for rape

    because too many lying bullying cowardly men are using the law’s delay

    to get away with violence against women

    and we cannot and we will not stand for it

    and I know that there are some who now tell us that we are ungenerous and unfeeling in our attempts to control our borders

    and I say – don’t give me that

    This is the government that stood up to China and announced that we would provide a haven for British overseas nationals in Hong Kong

    30,000 have already applied

    and I am really proud to be part of a Conservative government that will welcome 20,000 Afghans

    people who risked their lives to guide us and translate for us

    we are doing the right and responsible thing

    and speaking as the great grandson of a Turk who fled in fear of his life I know that this country is a beacon of light and hope for people around the world

    provided they come here legally

    provided we understand who they are and what they want to contribute

    and that is why we took back control of our borders

    and will pass the borders bill

    because we believe there must be a distinction between someone who comes here legally and someone who doesn’t

    and though I have every sympathy with people genuinely in fear of their lives

    I have no sympathy whatever

    with the people traffickers who take thousands of pounds

    to send children to sea in frail and dangerous craft

    and we must end this lethal trade

    we must break the gangsters’ business model

    and is it not a sublime irony that even in French politics there is now a leading centre right politician calling for a referendum on the EU

    Who is now calling for France to reprendre le controle??

    it’s good old Michel Barnier

    that’s what happens if you spend a year trying to argue with Lord Frost

    the greatest frost since the great frost of 1709

    and we will fight these gangs at home and abroad

    because their victims are invariably the poorest and the neediest

    and I will tell you what levelling up is

    a few years ago they started a school not far from the Olympic park

    a new school that anyone could send their kids to

    in an area that has for decades been one of the most disadvantaged in London

    that school is Brampton Manor academy and it now sends more kids to Oxbridge than Eton

    and if you want proof of what I mean by unleashing potential

    and by levelling up

    look at Brampton Manor

    and we can do it

    There is absolutely no reason why the kids of this country should lag behind

    or why so many should be unable to read and write or do basic mathematics at the age of 11

    and to level up

    – on top of the extra 14 bn we’re putting into education

    and on top of the increase that means every teacher starts with a salary of £30k

    we are announcing a levelling up premium of up to £3000 to send the best maths and science teachers to the places that need them most

    and above all we are investing in our skills, skills folks

    our universities are world beating, I owe everything to my tutors and they are one of the great glories of our economy

    but we all know that some of the most brilliant and imaginative and creative people in Britain

    and some of the best paid people in Britain

    did not go to university

    and to level up you need to give people the options

    the skills

    that are right for them

    and to make the most of those skills and knowledge

    and to level up you need urgently to

    plug all the other the gaps in our infrastructure that are still holding people and communities back

    As I’ve been saying over this wonderful conference to you

    when I became leader of this party, there were only, can you remember, what percentage of households had gigabit broadband when you were so kind as to make me leader? 7 percent, only 7 percent

    and by the new year that will be up to 68 per cent

    thanks to Rishi’s superdeduction the pace is now accelerating massively

    as companies thrust the fibre-optic vermicelli in the most hard to reach places

    it’s wonderful, for years SNP leader Ian Blackford has been telling the Commons that he is nothing but a humble crofter on the isle of Skye

    well now we have fibre optic broadband of very high quality that we can inspect the library or is it perhaps the billiard room of Ian Blackford’s croft

    and that is levelling up in action

    and my friends it is not good enough just to rely on zoom

    after decades of ducked decisions

    our national infrastructure is way behind some of our key competitors

    It is a disgrace that you still can’t swiftly cross the pennines by rail

    a disgrace that leeds is the largest city in Europe with no proper metro system

    a waste of human potential that so many places are not served by decent bus routes

    transport is one of the supreme leveller-uppers

    and we are making the big generational changes shirked by previous governments

    we will do Northern Powerhouse rail

    we will link up the cities of the midlands and the north

    we will restore those sinews of the union that have been allowed to atrophy

    the A1 north of Berwick and on into Scotland

    the A 75 in Scotland that is so vital for the links with northern Ireland and the rest of the country

    the north wales corridor

    and we will invest in our roads

    unblocking those coagulated roundabouts and steering-wheel-bending traffic lights

    putting on 4000 more clean green buses

    made in this country

    some of them running on hydrogen

    and as we come out of covid

    our towns and cities are again going to be buzzing with life

    because

    we know

    that a productive workforce

    needs that spur

    that only comes with face to face meetings

    and water cooler gossip

    if young people are to learn on the job in the way that they always have and must

    we will and must see people back in the office

    and that is why we are building back better with a once in an a century £640bn pound programme

    of investment

    and by making neighbourhoods safer

    by putting in the gigabit broadband

    by putting in the roads and the schools and the healthcare

    we will enable more and more young people everywhere

    to share the dream of home ownership

    the great ambition of the human race

    that the left always privately share but publicly disparage

    and we can do it

    Look at this country from the air
    Go on google maps

    you see how our landscape has been plotted and pieced and jigsawed together by centuries of bequests and litigation

    a vast testament to security of title

    trust in the law

    a confidence that is responsible for so much international investment

    you see how rich this country is growing

    the billions of loving and incremental improvements to homes and gardens

    you can see how beautiful it is

    vast untouched moorland

    and hills

    broadleaf forests

    we are going to re-wild parts of the country and consecrate a total of 30 per cent to nature

    we are planting tens of millions of trees

    otters are returning to rivers from which they have been absent for decades

    beavers that have not been seen on some rivers since tudor times

    massacred for their pelts

    are now back

    and if that isn’t conservatism, my friends I don’t know what is

    build back beaver

    ‍and though the beavers may sometimes build without local authority permission

    you can also see how much room there is

    to build the homes that young families need in this country

    not on green fields

    not just jammed in the south east

    but beautiful homes on brownfield sites

    in places where homes make sense
    Home ownership
    And this government is helping young people to afford a home

    It has been a scandal – a rebuke to all we stand for

    that over the last 20 years the dream of home ownership

    has receded

    and yet under this government we are turning the tide

    we have not only built more homes than at any time in the last 30 years

    we are helping young people on to the property ladder

    with our 95 per cent mortgages

    and there is no happiness like taking a set of keys

    and knowing that the place is yours

    and you can paint the front door any colour you like

    as it happens I am not allowed to paint my own front door, it has to be black

    but I certainly don’t have far to go to work

    and if you don’t have too far to go to work

    and the commute is not too dreadful

    and if

    the job suits your skills

    and your wifi is fast and reliable

    then I tell you something else

    that housing

    in the right place

    at an affordable price

    will add massively not just to your general joie de vivre

    but to your productivity

    and that is how we solve the national productivity puzzle

    by fixing the broken housing market

    by plugging in the gigabit

    by putting in decent safe bus routes and all other transport infrastructure

    and by investing in skills skills skills

    and that by the way is how we help to cut the cost of living for everyone

    because housing, energy, transport

    are now huge parts of our monthly bills

    and it is by fixing our broken housing market

    by sorting out our energy supply – more wind, more nuclear, becoming less dependent on hydrocarbons from abroad

    by putting in those transport links

    we will hold costs down and save you money

    and we will make this country an even more attractive destination for foreign direct investment

    We are already the number one

    – look at the Nissan investment in Sunderland

    or the Pfizer vaccine manufacturing centre that’s coming to Swindon

    and with these productivity gains we will turbo charge that advantage

    and help businesses to start and grow everywhere

    so let me come now to the punchline of my sermon on the vaccine

    It was not the government that made the wonder drug

    it wasn’t brewed in the alembicks of the department of health

    It was, of course it was Oxford University, but it was the private sector that made it possible

    behind those vaccines are

    companies and shareholders and, yes,

    bankers

    you need deep pools of liquidity that are to be found in the City of London

    it was capitalism that ensured that we had a vaccine in less than a year

    and the answer therefore is not to attack the wealth creators

    it is to encourage them because they are responsible for the aggregate increase in the country’s wealth

    that enables us to make those pareto improvements

    and to level up everywhere

    and to rub home my point

    it is not just that vaccination has saved more than 120,000 lives

    Vaccination has allowed us to meet like this

    and blessed us with such rapid growth

    with wages rising fastest for those on lowest incomes

    and that levelling up in action

    The vaccines have ensured that by a simple vowel mutation jabs jabs jabs

    become jobs jobs jobs

    the world’s most effective vaccines have saved our open society and free market economy

    and it is our open society and free market economy that have produced the world’s most effective vaccines

    and that is the symmetry in the lesson of the covid vaccines

    – science, innovation, capitalism –

    is vital now for the challenge we face

    the challenge the whole humanity faces

    is even more existential for our way of life

    in just a few weeks time this country will host the summit of our generation in Glasgow

    when the resolve of the world is put to the test

    can we keep alive the ambition of Paris – to stop the planet heating by more than 1.5 degrees

    government can’t do it alone

    and taxpayers certainly can’t do it alone

    the other day I took a boat out into the moray firth

    to see an aquatic forest of white turbines towering over the water like the redwoods of california

    and you have no idea of their size until you see them up close

    the deceptive speed of their wings

    twice the diameter of the London eye

    their tips slicing the air at more than 100 miles per hour

    and I met the young men and women

    apprentices

    who had moved straight across from the world of oil and gas

    and they had the same excitement at working amid winds and wave

    and being able to see whales and dolphins from the office window

    but they had the extra satisfaction that goes with knowing you are doing something to save the planet

    and get Britain to Net Zero by 2050

    and that is the symmetry represented by these giant windmills

    massive and innovative private sector investment

    and a government taking the tough decisions to make it possible

    that’s the difference between this radical and optimistic Conservatism

    and a tired old Labour

    did you see them last week, did you watch them last week in Brighton

    hopelessly divided I thought they looked

    their leader like a seriously rattled bus conductor

    pushed this way and that by, not that they have bus conductors any more unfortunately, like a seriously rattled bus conductor pushed this way and that by a corbynista mob of sellotape-spectacled sans-culottes

    or the skipper of a cruise liner that has been captured by Somali pirates

    desperately trying to negotiate a change of course

    and then changing his mind

    and remember Labour’s performance during the pandemic

    flapping with all the conviction of a damp tea towel

    They refused to say that schools were safe

    they would have kept us in the European medicines agency

    and slammed the brakes on the vaccine roll out

    the Labour leader attacked the vaccine task force for spending money on outreach to vaccine hesitant minority groups

    when it is hard to think of any better use of public money

    and let us try to forgive him on the basis that he probably didn’t know what he was talking about

    in previous national crises labour leaders have opted to minimise public anxiety and confusion by not trying to score cheap party political points

    one thinks of Attlee or even Michael foot in the falklands crisis

    sadly that was not the approach taken by captain hindsight

    attacking one week

    then rowing in behind when it seemed to be working

    the human weathervane

    the starmer chameleon

    and in his final act of absurd opportunism he decided to oppose step four of the roadmap in July

    that’s right folks

    if we had listened to captain hindsight we would still be in lockdown we wouldn’t have the fastest growth in the G7

    if Columbus had listened to captain hindsight he’d be famous for having discovered Tenerife

    and how utterly astonishing that in the last few weeks labour should actually have voted against new funding we’re putting frward for the NHS

    and we need to remember why and how we have been able to back people through this pandemic at all

    it was because we Conservatives fixed the economy

    we repaired the damage Labour left behind

    every labour government has left office with unemployment higher than when it came in

    every single one – ever since the party was invented

    and today we are going to fix this economy and build back better than ever before

    and just as we used our new freedoms to accelerate the vaccine rollout

    we are going to use our brexit freedoms to

    to do things differently

    we are doing the borders bill

    we have seen off the European superleague and protected grassroots football

    we are doing at least eight freeports

    superfertilised loam in which

    business will plant new jobs across the UK

    and now we are going further

    not only jettisoning the EU rules we don’t need any more

    but using new freedoms to

    improve the way we regulate in the great growth areas of the 21st century

    as we fulfil our ambition of becoming a science superpower

    gene editing

    data management

    AI

    Cyber quantum
    we are going to be ever more global in our outlook

    we have done 68 free trade deals including that great free trade deal with our friends in the EU that they all said was impossible

    and after decades of bewildering refusal we have persuaded the Americans to import prime British beef

    a market already worth £66 m

    build back burger I say

    ‍and you ask yourself how have the americans been able to survive without British beef for so long?

    and if you want a supreme example of global Britain in action

    of something daring and brilliant that would simply not have happened if we had remained in the EU

    I give you AUKUS – an idea so transparently right that Labour conference voted overwhelmingly against it

    and I know that there has been a certain raucus squaukus from the anti-aukus caucus

    But Aukus is simply a recognition of the reality that

    the world is tilting on its economic axis

    and our trade and relations with the Indo pacfific region are becoming ever more vital than ever before

    and that is why we have

    sent the amazing carrier strike group

    to the far east

    been performing manoeuvres with 40 friendly countries

    HMS Queen Elizabeth

    as long as the entire palace of Westminster

    and rather more compelling as an argument

    than many speeches made in the house of commons

    it has dozens of F35s on board

    and 66 thousand sausages aboard

    not because want to threaten or be adversarial to anyone

    either with the F35s or indeed the sausages

    but because we want to stick up for the rule of law that is so vital for freedom of navigation and free trade

    and that is what brings AUKUS together

    Australia, UK, US

    shared values

    a shared belief in democracy and human rights

    ‍and a shared belief in the equal dignity and worth of every human being

    very few countries could have pulled off the Kabul airlift – an astonishing feat by our brave armed forces

    even fewer have the same moral priorities

    No other government brokered a deal such as this government did with Astra Zeneca

    so that the Oxford vaccine has been distributed at cost around the world

    more than a billion low cost vaccines

    invented in Britain

    saving millions of lives

    we are led by our values

    by the things we stand for

    and we should never forget that people around the world admire this country for its history and its traditions

    they love the groovy new architecture and the fashion and the music and the chance of meeting Michael in the disco

    but they like the way it emerges organically from a vast inherited conglomerate of culture and tradition

    and we conservatives understand the need for both and

    how each nourishes the other

    and we attack and deny our history at our peril

    and when they began to attack Churchill as a racist I was minded to ignore them

    it is only 20 years ago since BBC audiences overwhelmingly voted him the greatest Briton of all time

    because he helped defeat a regime after all that was defined by one of the most vicious racisms

    the world has ever seen

    but as time has gone by it has become clear to me that

    this isn’t just a joke

    they really do want to re-write our national story

    starting with hereward the woke

    we really are at risk of a kind of know nothing cancel culture know nothing iconoclasm

    and so we Conservatives will defend our history and cultural inheritance

    not because we are proud of everything

    but because trying to edit it now is as dishonest as a celebrity trying furtively to change his entry in Wikipedia

    and its a betrayal of our children’s education

    churchill’s last words to his cabinet, actually his whole ministers but his cabinet were there

    were

    Never be separated from the americans

    pretty good advice I’m sure you’ll agree –

    ‍–

    and ended with the observation

    man is spirit

    He was right there.

    I believe that through history and accident this country has a unique spirit

    the spirit of the NHS nurses AND the entrepreneurs

    whose innovative flair means that there are three countries in the world that have produced more than 100 unicorns not a mythical beast

    tech companies worth more than a billion dollars each

    They are the US and China and the UK and those unicorns they are now dispersed around the United Kingdom in a way that is new to our country, that is the spirit of levelling up

    and we need the spirit of the NHS nurses and the entrepreneurs because each enables the other

    I mean

    the spirit of the footballers who took England into the final of a major knock out tournament for the first time in the lives of the vast majority of the people of this country

    probably, looking around at all you young thrusters, the majority of you in this room

    the indomitable spirit of Emma Raducanu

    her grace and her mental resilience when the game was going against her

    because that is what counts

    the spirit of our Olympians

    it is an incredible thing to come yet again in the top four

    a formidable effort for a country that has only 0.8 per cent of the world’s population

    in spite of the best efforts of some us jacob

    but when we come second in the Paralympics as well –

    that shows our values

    not only the achievement of those elite athletes

    but a country that is proud to be a trailblazer

    to judge people not by where they come from

    but by their spirit

    and by what is inside them

    That is the spirit that is the same across this country

    in every town and village and city that can be found

    that can be found in the hearts and minds of kids growing up everywhere

    and that is the spirit we are going to unleash

  • Anneliese Dodds – 2021 Comments on Boris Johnson Denying a Crisis

    Anneliese Dodds – 2021 Comments on Boris Johnson Denying a Crisis

    The comments made by Anneliese Dodds, the Chair of the Labour Party, on 5 October 2021.

    Boris Johnson is so out of touch that he can’t see a crisis when it’s staring him in the face.

    Try telling the teacher who couldn’t get into school because she couldn’t find petrol that there’s no crisis.

    Or the social care worker who will lose £1,000 a year when the Government cuts Universal Credit tomorrow, and worrying if he can afford to heat his house.

    The chaos millions of working people are currently facing hasn’t come about by chance. It’s a crisis made in Downing Street, and it’s the Prime Minister’s responsibility to sort it out.

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech at the UN General Assembly

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech at the UN General Assembly

    The speech made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 22 September 2021.

    Mr President, Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen.

    An inspection of the fossil record over the last 178 million years – since mammals first appeared – reveals that the average mammalian species exists for about a million years before it evolves into something else or vanishes into extinction.

    Of our allotted lifespan of a million, humanity has been around for about 200,000.

    In other words, we are still collectively a youngster.

    If you imagine that million years as the lifespan of an individual human being – about eighty years – then we are now sweet 16.

    We have come to that fateful age when we know roughly how to drive and we know how to unlock the drinks cabinet and to engage in all sorts of activity that is not only potentially embarrassing but also terminal.

    In the words of the Oxford philosopher Toby Ord “we are just old enough to get ourselves into serious trouble”.

    We still cling with part of our minds to the infantile belief that the world was made for our gratification and pleasure and we combine this narcissism with an assumption of our own immortality.

    We believe that someone else will clear up the mess we make, because that is what someone else has always done.

    We trash our habitats again and again with the inductive reasoning that we have got away with it so far, and therefore we will get away with it again.

    My friends the adolescence of humanity is coming to an end.

    We are approaching that critical turning point – in less than two months – when we must show that we are capable of learning, and maturing, and finally taking responsibility for the destruction we are inflicting, not just upon our planet but ourselves.

    It is time for humanity to grow up.

    It is time for us to listen to the warnings of the scientists – and look at Covid, if you want an example of gloomy scientists being proved right – and to understand who we are and what we are doing.

    The world – this precious blue sphere with its eggshell crust and wisp of an atmosphere – is not some indestructible toy, some bouncy plastic romper room against which we can hurl ourselves to our heart’s content.

    Daily, weekly, we are doing such irreversible damage that long before a million years are up, we will have made this beautiful planet effectively uninhabitable – not just for us but for many other species.

    And that is why the Glasgow COP26 summit is the turning point for humanity.

    We must limit the rise in temperatures – whose appalling effects were visible even this summer – to 1.5 degrees.

    We must come together in a collective coming of age.

    We must show we have the maturity and wisdom to act.

    And we can.

    Even in this feckless youth we have harnessed clean energy from wind and wave and sun.

    We have released energy from within the atom itself and from hydrogen, and we have found ways to store that energy in increasingly capacious batteries and even in molten salt.

    We have the tools for a green industrial revolution but time is desperately short.

    Two days ago, in New York we had a session in which we heard from the leaders of the nations most threatened by climate change: the Marshall Islands, the Maldives, Bangladesh and many others.

    And they spoke of the hurricanes and the flooding and the fires caused by the extreme meteorological conditions the world is already seeing.

    And the tragedy is that because of our past inaction, there are further rises in temperature that are already baked in – baked is the word.

    And if we keep on the current track then the temperatures will go up by 2.7 degrees or more by the end of the century.

    And never mind what that will do to the ice floes: we will see desertification, drought, crop failure, and mass movements of humanity on a scale not seen before, not because of some unforeseen natural event or disaster, but because of us, because of what we are doing now.

    And our grandchildren will know that we are the culprits and that we were warned and they will know that it was this generation that came centre stage to speak and act on behalf of posterity and that we missed our cue and they will ask what kind of people we were to be so selfish and so short-sighted.

    In just 40 days time we need the world to come to Glasgow to make the commitments necessary.

    And we are not talking about stopping the rise in temperatures – it is alas too late for that – but to restrain that growth, as I say, to 1.5 degrees.

    And that means we need to pledge collectively to achieve carbon neutrality – net zero – by the middle of the century.

    And that will be an amazing moment if we can do it because it will mean that for the first time in centuries humanity is no longer adding to the budget of carbon in the atmosphere, no longer thickening that invisible quilt that is warming the planet, and it is fantastic that we now have countries representing 70 per cent of the world’s GDP committed to this objective.

    But if we are to stave off these hikes in temperature we must go further and faster – we need all countries to step up and commit to very substantial reductions by 2030 – and I passionately believe that we can do it by making commitments in four areas – coal, cars, cash and trees.

    I am not one of those environmentalists who takes a moral pleasure in excoriating humanity for its excess.

    I don’t see the green movement as a pretext for a wholesale assault on capitalism.

    Far from it.

    The whole experience of the Covid pandemic is that the way to fix the problem is through science and innovation, the breakthroughs and the investment that are made possible by capitalism and by free markets, and it is through our Promethean faith in new green technology that we are cutting emissions in the UK.

    When I was a kid we produced almost 80 per cent of our electricity from coal; that is now down to two per cent or less and will be gone altogether by 2024.

    We have put in great forests of beautiful wind turbines on the drowned prairies of Doggerland beneath the North Sea.

    In fact we produce so much offshore wind that I am thinking of changing my name to Boreas Johnson in honour of the North Wind.

    And I know that we are ambitious in asking the developing world to end the use of coal power by 2040 and for the developed world to do so by 2030, but the experience of the UK shows that it can be done and I thank President Xi for what he has done to end China’s international financing of coal and I hope China will now go further and phase out the domestic use of coal as well, because the experience of the UK shows it can be done.

    And when I was elected mayor of London only 13 years ago, I was desperate to encourage more electric vehicles and we put in charging points around the city.

    And I am afraid that in those days they were not greatly patronised.

    But the market in EVs in the UK is now growing at an extraordinary pace – maybe two thirds every year – and Nissan is sufficiently confident to invest £1 billion in a new EV factory and a gigafactory for the batteries.

    And that is because we have set a hard deadline for the sale of new hydrocarbon ICEs of 2030 and again we call on the world to come together to drive this market so that by 2040 there are only zero emission vehicles on sale anywhere in the world.

    And you can make these cuts in pollution while driving jobs and growth: we have cut our greenhouse gas emissions by 44 per cent in the last 30 years while expanding our GDP by 78 per cent.

    And we will now go further by implementing one of the biggest nationally determined contributions – the NDC is the pledge we ask every country to make in cutting carbon – going down by 68 per cent by 2030, compared to where we were in 1990.

    We are making a huge bet on hydrogen, we are expanding nuclear, we are helping people to reduce their own household CO2.

    We are working towards Jet Zero – the first large carbon-free passenger plane.

    And we also recognise that this is not just about using technical fixes for CO2: we need to restore the natural balance, we need to halt and reverse the loss of trees and biodiversity by 2030, and that is why we in the UK are committed to beautifying the landscape, strengthening our protection against flooding, by planting millions more trees.

    We must also work towards the crucial Kunming summit in China and I call on all nations to follow the example of Imran Khan who has pledged to plant 10 billion trees in Pakistan alone.

    And we in the developed world must recognise our obligation to help.

    We started this industrial revolution in Britain: we were the first to send the great puffs of acrid smoke to the heavens on a scale to derange the natural order.

    And though we were setting in train a new era of technology that was itself to lead to a massive global reduction in poverty, emancipating billions around the world, we were also unwittingly beginning to quilt the great tea cosy of CO2 and so we understand when the developing world looks to us to help them and we take our responsibilities.

    And that’s why two years ago I committed that the UK would provide £11.6 billion to help the rest of the world to tackle climate change and in spite of all the pressures on finances caused by Covid, we have kept that promise to the letter.

    And I am so pleased and encouraged by some of the pledges we have heard here at UNGA, including from Denmark, and now a very substantial commitment from the US that brings us within touching distance of the $100 billion pledge.

    But we must go further, and we must be clear that government alone will not be able to do enough.

    We must work together so that the international financial institutions – the IMF, the World Bank – are working with governments around the world to leverage in the private sector, because it is the trillions of dollars of private sector cash that will enable developing nations – and the whole world – to make the changes necessary.

    It was the UK government that set the strike price for the private sector to come in and transform our country into the Saudi Arabia of wind, and only yesterday the UK’s first sovereign green bond raised £10 billion on the markets, from hard-headed investors who want to make money.

    And these investments will not only help the countries of the world to tackle climate change: they will produce millions and millions of high wage, high skill jobs, and today’s workforce and the next generation will have the extra satisfaction of knowing that they are not only doing something useful – such as providing clean energy – but helping to save the planet at the same time.

    And every day green start-ups are producing new ideas, from feeding seaweed to cows to restrain their traditional signs of digestive approval, to using AI and robotics to enhance food production.

    And it is these technological breakthroughs that will cut the cost for consumers, so that we have nothing to fear and everything to gain from this green industrial revolution.

    And when Kermit the frog sang It’s Not Easy Bein’ Green, I want you to know he was wrong – and he was also unnecessarily rude to Miss Piggy.

    We have the technology: we have the choice before us.

    Sophocles is often quoted as saying that there are many terrifying things in the world, but none is more terrifying than man, and it is certainly true that we are uniquely capable of our own destruction, and the destruction of everything around us.

    But what Sophocles actually said was that man is deinos and that means not just scary but awesome – and he was right.

    We are awesome in our power to change things and awesome in our power to save ourselves, and in the next 40 days we must choose what kind of awesome we are going to be.

    I hope that COP26 will be a 16th birthday for humanity in which we choose to grow up, to recognise the scale of the challenge we face, to do what posterity demands we must, and I invite you in November to celebrate what I hope will be a coming of age and to blow out the candles of a world on fire.

    See you in Glasgow.

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech to the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Speech to the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate

    The speech made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 17 September 2021.

    Thank you very much John, Secretary Kerry, and Secretary General Guterres, and thank you President Biden for your leadership and convening us all today with a little more than 1,000 hours to go, my friends, until I welcome you all to Glasgow to the COP26 summit.

    And as we just heard from Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina this is the most important period I think now in the history of the planet.

    Because COP simply must succeed.

    And that is only going to happen if, as we’ve heard from António, if people come to Glasgow armed with the commitments that will enable us to keep that increase of 1.5c within reach and take us to net zero sooner rather than later, and hopefully by the middle of the century. And we also need the cash that will allow the developing world to do the same.

    So President Biden makes a very good point when he talks about the action that we need to take on methane

    and I’m very pleased to say the UK will be among the very first to sign the Methane Pledge.

    Because it is a microcosm of the challenges we face.

    The International Energy Agency reckons the world already possesses the know-how and technology to avoid as much as three quarters of the current emissions of methane, that’s CH4, produced by the oil and gas industry.

    Over the last 30 years the UK has cut emissions of methane by something like 60 per cent.

    And there are good commercial uses for methane, you can use it to make fabrics, you can use it to make anti-freeze.

    So the world could slash its output of this powerful greenhouse gas tomorrow if we wanted to.

    But the trouble is that the G20 currently lacks both the ambition needed do so, and the offer of finance to developing nations that’s needed to follow suit.

    That, in a nutshell, is what we face with the whole climate conundrum.

    We know what’s going to happen if we fail to reach net zero. You heard Joe describe the consequences we’re already seeing on our planet today.

    We know how to fix it, we know how to get there, and we’re continuously generating ever-more innovative ways of doing that.

    From the biggest carbon capture facility opening this week in Iceland, to the Californian scientists feeding seaweed to cows so they belch less methane – that’s the cows obviously, not the scientists.

    And now what we need is the ambition and dedication required to bring it all together.

    So over the next 1,000 hours between now and everyone coming to COP26, we must do the work that will allow us to come to Glasgow bearing the ambitious NDCs – Nationally Determined Contributions – and rock-solid commitments on coal, cars and trees.

    And, as Joe has just said, we must get serious about filling the $100 billion pot that the developing world needs in order to do its bit.

    Because as Sheikh Hasina has pointed out, the developing nations are on the front line of climate change, they don’t lack the will, they don’t lack the technologies, to make a difference, they simply lack the resources.

    We in the G20 are blessed with both.

    So let’s show the leadership the world needs, let’s do our duty by others who are less fortunate than ourselves, and let’s use these 1,000 hours to set a course that will protect our planet, protect humanity, for a thousand years to come.

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Statement on Afghanistan

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Statement on Afghanistan

    The statement made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 6 September 2021.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I will update the House on the situation in Afghanistan and our enduring effort to provide sanctuary for those to whom we owe so much.

    Since the House last met, our armed forces, diplomats and civil servants have completed the biggest and fastest emergency evacuation in recent history, overcoming every possible challenge in the most harrowing conditions, bringing 15,000 people to safety in the UK and helping 36 other countries to airlift their own nationals. They faced the pressure of a remorseless deadline and witnessed a contemptible terrorist attack at the very gates of the airport, with two British nationals and 13 of our American allies among the dead. But they kept going, and in the space of a fortnight they evacuated our own nationals alongside Afghan friends of this country who guided, translated and served with our soldiers and officials, proving their courage and loyalty beyond doubt, sometimes in the heat of battle.

    The whole House will join me in commending the courage and ingenuity of everyone involved in the Kabul airlift, one of the most spectacular operations in our country’s post-war military history. This feat exemplified the spirit of all 150,000 British servicemen and women who deployed in Afghanistan over the last two decades, of whom 457 laid down their lives and many others suffered trauma and injury. Thanks to their efforts, no terrorist attack against this country or any of our western allies has been launched from Afghanistan for 20 years. They fulfilled the first duty of the British armed forces: to keep our people safe. They and their families should take pride in everything they did.

    Just as they kept us safe, so we shall do right by our veterans. In addition to the extra £3 million that we have invested in mental health support through NHS Op Courage, we are providing another £5 million to assist the military charities that do such magnificent work, with the aim of ensuring that no veteran’s request for help will go unanswered. The evacuation, Op Pitting, will now give way to Operation Warm Welcome, with an equal effort to help our Afghan friends to begin their new lives here in the United Kingdom, and recognising the strength of feeling across the House about the plight of individual Afghans.

    Years before this episode, we began to fulfil our obligation to those Afghans who had helped us, bringing 1,400 to the UK. Then, in April this year, we expanded our efforts by opening the Afghan relocations and assistance policy. Even before the onset of Operation Pitting, we had brought around 2,000 to the UK between June and August—and our obligation lives on. Let me say to anyone to whom we have made commitments and who is currently in Afghanistan: we are working urgently with our friends in the region to secure safe passage and, as soon as routes are available, we will do everything possible to help you to reach safety.

    Over and above this effort, the UK is formally launching a separate resettlement programme, providing a safe and legal route for up to 20,000 Afghans in the region over the coming years, with 5,000 in the first year. We are upholding Britain’s finest tradition of welcoming those in need. I emphasise that under this scheme we will of course work with the United Nations and aid agencies to identify those whom we should help, as we have done in respect of those who fled the war in Syria, but we will also include Afghans who have contributed to civil society or who face a particular risk from the Taliban, for example because of their role in standing up for democracy and human rights or because of their gender, sexuality or religion. All who come to our country through this safe and legal route will receive not a five-year visa, but indefinite leave to remain.

    Our support will include free English courses for adults, and 300 university scholarships. We will shortly be writing to local authorities and the devolved Administrations with details of funding for extra school places and long-term accommodation across the UK. I am grateful for everything that they are doing, and, of course, for the work of the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, my hon. Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins), who is the Minister for Afghan resettlement. I am delighted—but not surprised—that across our country, people have been fundraising for our Afghan friends, and we have received numerous offers of help from charities and ordinary families alike. Anyone who wishes to join that effort can do so through gov.uk.

    Our first duty is the security of the United Kingdom, and if the new regime in Kabul wants international recognition and access to the billions of dollars currently frozen in overseas accounts, we and our friends will hold them to their agreement to prevent Afghanistan from ever again becoming an incubator for terrorism. We will insist on safe passage for anyone who wishes to leave, and respect for the rights of women and girls. Our aim is to rally the strongest international consensus behind those principles, so that as far as possible the world speaks to the Taliban with one voice. To that end, I called an emergency meeting of the G7 leaders which made these aims the basis of our common approach, and the UK helped to secure a UN Resolution, passed by the Security Council last week, making the same demands. Later this month, at the UN General Assembly in New York, I will work with UN Secretary-General Guterres and other leaders to widen that consensus still further. We will judge the Taliban by their actions, not their words, and will use every economic, political and diplomatic lever to protect our own countries from harm and to help the Afghan people. We have already doubled the UK’s humanitarian and development assistance to £286 million this year, including funds to help people in the region.

    On Saturday, we shall mark the 20th anniversary of the reason why we went into Afghanistan in the first place: the terrorist attacks on the United States which claimed 2,977 lives, including those of 67 Britons. If anyone is still tempted to say that we have achieved nothing in that country in 20 years, tell them that our armed forces and those of our allies enabled 3.6 million girls to go to school; tell them that this country and the western world were protected from al-Qaeda in Afghanistan throughout that period; and tell them that we have just mounted the biggest humanitarian airlift in recent history. Eight times, the Royal Air Force rescued more than 400 people on board a single plane—the most who have ever travelled on an RAF aircraft in its 103-year history—helping thousands of people in fear for their lives, helping thousands to whom this country owes so much, and thereby revealing the fundamental values of the United Kingdom.

    There are very few countries that have the military capability to do what we have just done, and fewer still who would have felt the moral imperative to act in the same way. We can be proud of our armed forces for everything they have achieved, and for the legacy they leave behind. What they did was in the best traditions of this country. I commend this statement to the House.

    Keir Starmer

    I thank the Prime Minister for the advance copy of his statement.

    The heroes on the ground in Operation Pitting are the best of us: the ambassador stayed to process every case that he could, paratroopers lifted people from the crush, Afghan soldiers continued to serve alongside us to the end, and thousands of others risked their lives to help others to escape. They faced deadly violence and deliberately-engineered chaos with courage, calm and determination. Thanks to their remarkable efforts, thousands were evacuated, British nationals have returned safely to their families and Afghan friends are starting a new life here in Britain. Speaking directly to those who served in Operation Pitting, I say thank you: your service deserves recognition and honour and I hope that the Prime Minister will accept Labour’s proposal to scrap the 30-day continuous service rule so that medals can be awarded for your bravery.

    The entire Army, our armed forces and veterans deserve proper support for mental health. The new funding announced today is welcome, but it is unlikely to be enough. Previous funding was described as “scandalous” by the Select Committee, and the Office for Veterans’ Affairs is still being cut. All those involved deserved political leadership equal to their service, but they were let down. They were let down on strategy. The Prime Minister underestimated the strength of the Taliban. Despite intelligence warnings that “rapid Taliban advances” could lead to the collapse of the Afghan security forces, a return to power of the Taliban and our embassy shutting down amid reduced security, the Government continued to act on the assumption that there was no path to military victory for the Taliban. Complacent and wrong.

    Those involved were also let down by a lack of planning. Eighteen months passed between the Doha agreement and the fall of Kabul, yet as the Prime Minister now concedes, only 2,000 of the 8,000 people eligible for the Afghan relocations and assistance policy—ARAP—scheme have been brought to Britain. A strategic review was published to much fanfare, but it did not mention the Taliban, NATO withdrawal or the Doha agreement. And the Prime Minister convened a G7 meeting on Afghanistan only after Kabul was lost.

    Because of this lack of leadership, the Government have left behind many to whom we owe so much. In the last few weeks, MPs have had thousands of desperate calls from people trying to get to safety. Many remain in danger, including the Afghan guards who protected the British embassy. In my constituency—I am not alone; Members across the House will have had this—cases involve Afghans who applied for the ARAP scheme weeks and sometimes months ago and who were clearly eligible but were not processed quickly enough by this Government and did not make it to the planes. The stress levels for them and their families, and for all our teams and caseworkers, has been palpable in the last few weeks and months. A familiar and desperate story to many on both sides of the House.

    The Government do not even know how many UK nationals and Afghans eligible under the ARAP scheme have been left behind to the cruelty of the Taliban. A national disgrace. Even if they could identify who they had left behind, the Government do not have a plan to get everybody out. Kabul airport remains closed to international flights, safe passage has not been created to Afghanistan’s neighbours and, whatever the Prime Minister says today, there is no international agreement on the resettlement of Afghan refugees. We have a Prime Minister incapable of international leadership, just when we need it most. [Interruption.] I know that that is uncomfortable. The terrible attacks from ISIS-K highlight the new security threat, and the Government must act quickly to co-ordinate international partners to ensure that the Afghan Government’s collapse does not lead to a vacuum for terrorists to fill. There is also a desperate need for humanitarian support. A return to 2019 levels of aid spending is necessary, and where is the plan to ensure that it does not fall into the wrong hands?

    To those who have managed to escape Afghanistan and have arrived here in the UK, we say welcome: I know that you will give much to this country as you make it your new home. All you need is help and support. I am pleased that indefinite leave to remain will now be granted to all those who arrive by safe and legal routes. Local authorities across the country are trying to play their part, but they have been in the dark as to how many people they will be asked to support and what resources they will have to do so. We will look at the letter to which the Prime Minister referred and examine the details.

    History will tell the tale of Operation Pitting as one of immense bravery. We are proud of all those who contributed. Their story is made even more remarkable by the fact that, while they were saving lives, our political leadership was missing in action.

    The Prime Minister

    The right hon. and learned Gentleman did not put many questions to me. He made the general assertion that the Government had not been focusing on Afghanistan but, as far as I can remember, he did not even bother to turn up to the first of my three statements on Afghanistan in the House this year—I do not know where he was—such was his instinct and such was his understanding of the importance of the issue.

    Actually, the right hon. and learned Gentleman’s figures are quite wrong. Before April we helped 1,400 people to safety from Afghanistan and, under the ARAP scheme, between then and 14 August we helped a further 2,000. As he knows very well, between 14 and 28 August this country performed an absolutely astonishing feat, and of course we will do everything we can to help those who wish to have safe passage out of Afghanistan. That is why we will continue, with our international friends and partners, to apply whatever pressure we can on the Taliban, economic and diplomatic, to ensure they comply, as they have said they will.

    The right hon. and learned Gentleman should, in all candour, acknowledge the immensity of the achievement of this country’s armed forces in, for months, planning and preparing for Operation Pitting and then, contrary to what he just said, extracting almost double the number they originally prepared to extract. It was a quite astonishing military and logistical feat.

    One thing I welcome is the right hon. and learned Gentleman’s congratulations to the armed forces for what they did.

    Mr Tobias Ellwood (Bournemouth East) (Con)

    Veterans and families, and indeed the wider public, are asking what it was all for. Afghanistan is back in the hands of a dictatorship, terrorism is once again allowed to thrive, the people of Afghanistan now face humanitarian disaster and, more worryingly, the limits of UK and western influence have been exposed. With America now adopting a more isolationist foreign policy, we have passed the high water mark of western liberalism that began after the second world war. This is a dangerous geopolitical turning point.

    Does the Prime Minister agree there is now a void of leadership in the west and NATO? If Britain wants to fill that void, as we should, it will require a complete overhaul of Whitehall to upgrade our strategic thinking, our foreign policy output and our ability to lead.

    The Prime Minister

    My right hon. Friend deserves to be listened to with great respect on Afghanistan. From his service, he understands these issues deeply, but I must tell him that people listening to this debate across the country could be forgiven for not recognising that this country ceased military operations in Afghanistan in 2014. What we are doing now is making sure that we work with our friends and partners around the world to prevent Afghanistan from relapsing into a breeding ground for terror, to make sure that we use all the levers that we can to ensure that the rights of women and girls are respected, and to make sure that everybody who wants safe passage out of Afghanistan is allowed it. That is what we are going to do, and we will continue to show leadership in the G7, the P5, NATO and all the other forums in which this country leads the west.

    Ian Blackford (Ross, Skye and Lochaber) (SNP)

    May I thank all those who assisted in the evacuation from Afghanistan over the past few weeks? May I also thank the Prime Minister for the advance copy of his statement? Normally we have a Cabinet Minister sent to the House to cover for the Prime Minister, but today we have before us the Prime Minister desperately trying to cover for a Foreign Secretary who should have been sacked weeks ago. In Committee last week, the Foreign Secretary failed to answer even basic questions from my hon. Friend the Member for Glasgow South (Stewart Malcolm McDonald). I genuinely hope that the Prime Minister is better prepared today.

    There is barely an MP in this House who has not submitted urgent and sensitive information to the Foreign Office on UK and Afghan nationals desperate to find safe passage away from the Taliban. It is a disgrace that most of these urgent queries have been left unresolved and unanswered. It is a disgrace not for us, but for all those who have been left behind—UK and Afghan nationals who are now fearful and, in many cases, in hiding. Thousands of desperate people—people we have a debt of responsibility to—have been left with no clarity, no answers and no help. So let me ask the Prime Minister: what assessment has been made of the number of UK nationals left in Afghanistan, and what plans are there to assist them? How many Afghans who qualify under the ARAP scheme as interpreters or in other groups have been left behind? Will the Prime Minister apologise to those who have been left behind, left high and dry—those the UK has a responsibility to?

    Last night, in correspondence from Lord Ahmad, the Government gave the excuse that delays in evacuating all those with rights were because the Foreign Office had received more correspondence than during covid. But there is a fundamental difference: no one knew that covid was coming. The Government had 18 months to prepare an exit strategy in Afghanistan. So can the Prime Minister give a firm deadline for when the massive backlog of applications will be processed and provide a new target date for when safe passage will be offered to those UK and Afghan citizens?

    When Parliament was recalled, the Prime Minister publicly agreed to hold a four-nations summit on the UK’s responsibility to welcome refugees here. May I ask him to give us the date when that summit will take place? Finally, with all the talk of a Cabinet reshuffle, can the Prime Minister guarantee that the Foreign Secretary will finally be sacked in any reshuffle—or does he intend to reward incompetence?

    The Prime Minister

    I am always happy to meet representatives of the Scottish Government and other devolved Administrations, of course.

    The right hon. Gentleman asked some specific questions about the handling of requests from those still in Afghanistan and those who have been interceding on their behalf. I can tell him that by close of play today every single one of the emails from colleagues around this House will be answered—thousands and thousands have already been done. As for the question of how many ARAP candidates are remaining, I can tell him that the total number is 311, of whom 192 responded to the calls that were put out. I repeat that we will do absolutely everything we can to ensure that those people get the safe passage that they deserve, using the levers that I have described. But the contrast should be readily apparent to everybody in this country with the huge number—15,000 people—we were able to help just in the course of those few days in August. I think people will understand that it was a very considerable effort by our armed forces.

    Mr Speaker

    Just to help the House, let me say that we will be running this until around 4.45 pm. Not everybody is going to get in and people will be disappointed, but we are going to do our best, so let us help each other.

    Mrs Theresa May (Maidenhead) (Con)

    I join my right hon. Friend in commending all those involved with the Afghanistan airlift and all those of our armed forces who served in Afghanistan, 457 of whom, sadly, as we know, paid the ultimate sacrifice. We should all be proud of their achievements. Does he agree that as a result of NATO forces withdrawing from Afghanistan, the terrorist threat has increased? Will he confirm that all those involved in counter-terrorism work here in the UK will be given the necessary support to ensure that they can keep us safe?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my right hon. Friend for her question. I know how much work she has done in her career to protect this country and to counter terrorism. As yet, we have no direct information on any increase in the threat, but I assure my right hon. Friend and the House that every effort will be made to make sure that our counter-terrorist agents have the resources they need to keep us safe.

    Janet Daby (Lewisham East) (Lab)

    I have received hundreds of emails about Afghanistan from constituents, and I have British national constituents—a husband and his pregnant wife—in Afghanistan. What discussions have the Government had with Afghanistan’s neighbours about keeping borders open for those at risk under the Taliban and supporting refugees?

    The Prime Minister

    I am sure that many colleagues in the House will ask similar questions. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary has been talking to the Government in Pakistan and other regional countries about what we can do to assist them, as I have described. As the hon. Lady knows, in addition to the ARAP programme we have the Afghan settlement programme, which will run up to 20,000 over the next few years.

    Tom Tugendhat (Tonbridge and Malling) (Con)

    First, I pay tribute to the Prime Minister for his increased funding for mental health care for veterans. I am sure he will keep that sum under review, in case it should need to rise.

    Will the Prime Minister draw on the lesson that he has already learned from the appointment of the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, my hon. Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins), as a single point of contact in the UK, and seek to have a single point of contact for those in Afghanistan who may need to access either the route to exit or support from Her Majesty’s Government?

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend knows whereof he speaks. I have met people who have come from Afghanistan only recently who have helped us greatly in the past 20 years. As the House will understand, the key issues for them are where they are going to send their children to school and whether they can access the housing they need. I thank my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government for what he is doing. My hon. Friend is quite right that the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, my hon. Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle, is the single point of contact on which people should focus.

    Ed Davey (Kingston and Surbiton) (LD)

    We all saw the horrific carnage outside Kabul airport, where more than 180 people were killed. I join the Prime Minister in remembering all those victims, not least the two British nationals and the child of a British national. That airport atrocity was the work of the terrorist organisation ISIS-K. Everyone agrees that we must now work to prevent ISIS-K from becoming a threat to the British people, yet under this Prime Minister’s watch he has not only failed to agree a co-ordinated international strategy to take on ISIS-K but failed even to proscribe ISIS-K as a terrorist organisation, unlike other Five Eyes countries. Will the Prime Minister explain these failures on national security?

    The Prime Minister

    I am afraid the right hon. Gentleman is in error. ISIS-K—ISIS Khorasan Province—is a subset of Daesh. It is part of Daesh. As he knows very well, one of the bitter ironies of the situation is that the Taliban themselves are no friends to ISIS-K, and whatever Government there is in Kabul will need help to fight them.

    Jacob Young (Redcar) (Con)

    We are proving our immense generosity by supporting those in dire need in Afghanistan with safe passage to the UK, but our ability to do so is strained by the continuing uncontrolled illegal migration across the English channel. What more can the Government do to prevent it?

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend is completely right. The issue is that, very sadly, our friends across the channel in France are faced with a very difficult problem: large numbers of people who want to come to this country. We are doing everything we can to encourage the French to do the necessary and impede their passage. My right hon. Friend the Home Secretary is working round the clock to ensure that we not only encourage the French to stiffen their sinews and stop people making the journey but use every possible tactic available to us.

    John McDonnell (Hayes and Harlington) (Lab)

    May I raise a constituency matter with the Prime Minister? More than 800 local Afghani families have contacted me about their concerns over their relatives in Afghanistan. The thousands who are coming to this country are largely coming in through Heathrow and being quarantined in about seven hotels in my constituency. There is real anxiety, given the performance in the past on asylum seekers in hotels in my constituency, that those people could be trapped in those hotels for quite a long time to come. I would like the Prime Minister to arrange a meeting with myself and the relevant Minister or officials to discuss the plan to support those families—like everybody else, I welcome them, as do those in my community—but also the long-term relocation plan to make sure that they have all that they need to settle here for the future.

    The Prime Minister

    The right hon. Gentleman is right to draw attention to the issue. Some councils have responded magnificently, notably in the east midlands and elsewhere. I know that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government is putting substantial funding in place, but if the right hon. Gentleman wants a further meeting, I have no doubt that the relevant Minister will be only too happy to oblige.

    Siobhan Baillie (Stroud) (Con)

    I am working with incredible Stroud constituents who are dedicating their time to helping Afghan families under threat. These people are in hiding. The Taliban have been going door to door looking for them. Border options are dangerous and constantly changing. They are absolutely terrified. Will the Prime Minister help me to show those families that they should not lose hope and help us as MPs to provide timely and credible information about safe passage options?

    The Prime Minister

    Yes, of course. My hon. Friend is entirely right in what she says. That is why we are going to continue to put all the pressure that we can on the Taliban to ensure safe passage for the groups that I have described. We are joined in that by friends and partners around the world.

    Yvette Cooper (Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) (Lab)

    May I join the tributes to our armed forces who have worked so hard?

    There are still people being persecuted and hunted by the Taliban because they worked for the UK Government, but through contractors, not as direct employees. They have not had replies to their ARAP applications and the rumour circulating is that they may have to wait for the resettlement scheme, but also that many of the places on the resettlement scheme have already been allocated and that the scheme is almost full. Can the Prime Minister clarify the situation for those people, tell us whether some of the resettlement scheme places have been pre-allocated and if so how many, and say what will be done for those contractors as well as direct employees, to whom we owe an obligation?

    The Prime Minister

    The right hon. Lady raises an important question. I can tell her that the ARAP places have not been transferred and that they continue to be valid—people on the ARAP scheme continue to be eligible. Nor is it correct to say that the initial budget of 5,000 for the resettlement scheme has already been filled. That is not correct either.

    Dr Julian Lewis (New Forest East) (Con)

    The Council for At-Risk Academics has been rescuing scholars in danger from oppressive regimes since the Nazi period in 1933. The Home Office has been sent a list of 12 such scholars, some of whom are in hiding in Afghanistan and some in hiding in Pakistan for lack of documentation. Will the Home Office make their case a priority because in them lies any hope for the future of Afghanistan?

    The Prime Minister

    Yes, there are many difficult cases, but I thank my right hon. Friend for drawing attention to those particular individuals who are at risk. I will ensure that the relevant Foreign Office Minister is in touch with him about the specific cases that he raises.

    Rachael Maskell (York Central) (Lab/Co-op)

    We know that the humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan and the region is growing by the hour. A famine is expected and of course it will be difficult to get aid through. So what specific steps has the Prime Minister taken already to ensure that the famine is averted, but also that the region receives the international development aid that it requires to avert a further crisis?

    The Prime Minister

    Immediately that the crisis broke, I spoke to UN Secretary-General António Guterres about what the UN should be doing and what the UK was going to do to support. As the hon. Member knows, the UN continues to be in-country in Afghanistan and we have doubled our humanitarian support. We will be working with friends and partners at the UN General Assembly and beyond to ensure that we tackle the humanitarian crisis as well.

    Mr Andrew Mitchell (Sutton Coldfield) (Con)

    Certainly the last months have seen the shattering of many illusions. Does my right hon. Friend agree that, if we are tonight to help the people of Afghanistan, millions of whom are out in the open and will not be fed, we need to ensure that the whole international community focuses on doing so through the mechanism of the United Nations and probably through the traditional mechanism of a regional contact group, and that Britain—through its experience on these matters, its membership of the UN Security Council and its G7 chairmanship—is now in a pivotal position to help the people I mentioned?

    The Prime Minister

    My right hon. Friend is completely right to raise the contact group in addition to the other forums that I have described, and to pay particular note of the role of the UN; my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary has just talked to Jean Arnault, the UN Secretary-General’s special representative to Afghanistan. The contact group is a vital part of the way in which we should co-ordinate our efforts.

    Patricia Gibson (North Ayrshire and Arran) (SNP)

    Some 80% of the world’s heroin and opium supply originates in Afghanistan, providing the Taliban with more than half their income and causing untold misery across the world. What steps is the Prime Minister taking in partnership with UK allies to prevent the Taliban and the organised criminal gangs with which they work from flooding our communities with yet more heroin, given that they are now in control in Afghanistan and have fewer impediments than ever to growing more opium?

    The Prime Minister

    Sadly, the rate of production and export of opium from Afghanistan has been increasing in recent years. I think that the global output is actually now even higher than the figure the hon. Lady suggests. What is needed, of course, is to insist that the Taliban stop this and do not allow Afghanistan to continue to be a narco-state, but the way to fight heroin consumption in this country is to have a strong crime-fighting institution such as the National Crime Agency, and I was privileged to see the United Kingdom’s crime fighters doing fantastic work near Glasgow.

    Steve Double (St Austell and Newquay) (Con)

    The Prime Minister will be aware that, as a result of the NATO withdrawal from Afghanistan, there is great concern that the terrorist threat to this country has increased. Can he reassure the people of this country that we maintain not only the military capability, but the political will, to take whatever action is necessary against groups such as ISIS-K in order to keep this country safe?

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend makes an extremely important point. It is a question that a lot of people will have formed in their minds and which my right hon. Friend the Defence Secretary has answered before; of course we keep those options on the table and of course the Taliban are aware of that.

    Dame Meg Hillier (Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Lab/Co-op)

    There are many barriers facing people who are already in the immigration system. One is that some, including constituents of mine, have spouses and children whose original documents are with the Home Office and they only have photocopies. Another, of course, is the English language test. Are the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary proposing any movement on those issues in order to support people, particularly those already in the system, to get here as quickly as possible?

    The Prime Minister

    The hon. Lady should know that, of course, we try to help people coming from Afghanistan in the most expeditious way possible. This country cannot be faulted for the generosity of our offer on the resettlement programme and it certainly cannot be faulted for the sheer number of people we have already moved to this country.

    Mark Logan (Bolton North East) (Con)

    I welcome the Prime Minister’s statement. Aside from the G7 and traditional partners to which the Prime Minister referred, what role does he envisage Pakistan, Uzbekistan and in particular China playing in the geopolitics of the region of central Asia in the months and years ahead?

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend asks a very important question. I think the answer is that it is in the interests of every single one of the countries that he has mentioned to ensure that Afghanistan does not relapse into being a breeding ground for terror. That is not in China’s interests, in Uzbekistan’s interests or in Russia’s interests. Russia has abundant experience of the risks of Afghanistan. That is why it is so important that we work with friends and partners around the world—and, indeed, those who are not ordinarily classified as our friends—to achieve a common perspective on the pressure that we have got to apply to the Taliban.

    Helen Hayes (Dulwich and West Norwood) (Lab)

    Many of my constituents have family members in Afghanistan who could be eligible for asylum in the UK under more than one route—for example, by ARAP, under the Foreign Office special cases criteria, or under family reunion. Yet there is currently no co-ordination between Departments. My constituents are being passed from pillar to post. ARAP is refusing cases where there may be an alternative route, and the Foreign Secretary and the Home Secretary are not replying to their emails. When will the Prime Minister sort out this lack of co-ordination across his Government?

    The Prime Minister

    I must reject that in the strongest possible terms. The House has paid tribute, quite rightly, to the work of the armed services over the last few weeks and months, but it should also pay tribute to the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office’s rapid reaction team who went to Afghanistan, and to the Border Force officials who went out there, who worked hand in glove to help thousands of people come to this country in safety.

    Mr Mark Harper (Forest of Dean) (Con)

    In terms of protecting our country now that the risk from terrorists has undoubtedly increased, what is the Prime Minister’s assessment not just of the Taliban’s willingness to deal with terrorists operating in Afghanistan, but of their capability to deal with that terrorist threat, given what we saw from ISIS-K just a week or so ago?

    The Prime Minister

    My right hon. Friend is right to draw attention to the risks that the Taliban are themselves running, because they now possess the government of Afghanistan and it is their responsibility. They clearly face that threat from IS-K and indeed potentially other groups. Of course they will do everything, I imagine, to protect the public, but in the end we have to face the reality that the Taliban have now got the problem. We will do everything we can, of course, to ensure that we guard against future outbreaks of terrorism from that country, but it is in the interests of the new Government of Afghanistan to crack down on terrorism as much as anybody else.

    Liz Saville Roberts (Dwyfor Meirionnydd) (PC)

    Under the Nationality and Borders Bill, an Afghan woman who flees with her children and arrives in Britain by an irregular route will not be welcomed; she will be criminalised. Wales has declared our role in the world to be as a nation of sanctuary. Will the Prime Minister withdraw the Bill to enable us to fulfil our ambition and to make that warm welcome he spoke about?

    The Prime Minister

    No, I cannot accept what the right hon. Lady has said, because this country has been extremely generous—more generous than most countries around the world—not just in bringing people immediately from Afghanistan but in setting out a safe and legal route for 20,000 more to come. That is a big number and the route for those people is clear.

    Danny Kruger (Devizes) (Con)

    I am very pleased to hear about Operation Warm Welcome. Wiltshire, my county, is home to many thousands of British soldiers who have served with Afghan colleagues over the past 20 years. I hope the Prime Minister will join me in congratulating Wiltshire Council and the communities of Wiltshire, including the military communities, for the welcome that they are offering to the refugees. Will he assure the House that councils across the country will get the resources they need to support those evacuees?

    The Prime Minister

    Yes. I thank my hon. Friend. Of course I congratulate Wiltshire Council on what it is doing, as I congratulate all councils that are stepping up to the plate and helping Afghans to settle and to integrate at this time. I can tell him that Wiltshire Council and all other councils involved will get the support and funding they need.

    Richard Burgon (Leeds East) (Lab)

    Like other Members, my constituency office and I have been doing everything we can to help constituents trapped in Afghanistan and to help their relatives who need to get out urgently, but it is clear that the Government are failing to do all they can to help these vulnerable people and are disgracefully putting even more people’s lives at risk. More widely, President Biden has called for an end to

    “an era of major military operations to remake other countries”.

    Given the huge loss of life in the disastrous and tragic wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and elsewhere, is it not time that we do the same?

    The Prime Minister

    As I have just reminded the House, the UK ended its military operation in Afghanistan in 2014.

    Anthony Mangnall (Totnes) (Con)

    Can I ask the Prime Minister what engagement he and the Foreign Secretary have had with non-governmental organisations, which are the only western organisations that are still on the ground in Afghanistan, and what steps he will take to protect them? Can I also ask what parameters need to be met to see the embassy reopened? The British diplomatic network is one of the finest in the world—that is surely the way to be able to help those who have been left behind.

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend is entirely right to draw attention to the incredible work done by aid agencies and by NGOs. It is precisely to support those fantastic agencies that we have doubled our humanitarian aid to Afghanistan and the region to £286 million this year.

    Dan Jarvis (Barnsley Central) (Lab)

    Later today, I will be reunited with an Afghan special forces commander whom I had the privilege of serving alongside. He is mightily relieved to be here, but understandably deeply concerned about the hundreds of his men and their family members who, although approved for relocation to the UK, were left behind. What can I tell him is being done to ensure that those who are in limbo are afforded safe passage, protection and unimpeded access to the UK?

    The Prime Minister

    I pay tribute to the service of the hon. Gentleman and, in addition, to the service of the Afghan special forces. He is absolutely right to draw attention to what they did. I believe that the 333—the Triples—were incredibly important. We will do whatever we can, as I have said, to ensure that those who have not yet come out do get the safe passage they need.

    Johnny Mercer (Plymouth, Moor View) (Con)

    The Prime Minister just said from the Dispatch Box that no veterans’ call for help will go unanswered, and I totally support that ambition. In fact, that was a central aim with the establishment of the Office for Veterans’ Affairs when he started it, but he and I know that he has consistently failed to take the measures required to make that a reality for veterans in communities like mine. What is he going to do differently to make veterans feel this has changed, rather than just reading about it in the newspapers or hearing about it from Westminster?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my hon. Friend for the work he did as Minister for veterans’ affairs and for his service in Afghanistan. I believe that he gravely underestimates what this country has done. Just today, on veterans’ mental health, the House will have heard the further support we are offering. This is a Government who are absolutely determined to support our veterans, and that is why we passed the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act 2021 and will continue to take steps to protect the veterans of this country.

    Abena Oppong-Asare (Erith and Thamesmead) (Lab)

    I have cases involving more than 300 people who are still stranded in Afghanistan, and despite raising every case with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and the Home Office, I have yet to receive a substantial response—not one. My constituents are desperate for information on how to travel to third countries and when the full resettlement scheme will be launched. Will the Prime Minister meet me to discuss these urgent cases, and promise that every email will receive a proper response from the relevant Department?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank the hon. Lady. I expect that she speaks for many colleagues around the House who, like me, will have received messages from those who wish to leave Afghanistan. I repeat what I said earlier: every single email from colleagues is being responded to by close of play today.

    Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con)

    Like many Members, I have had emails from Afghans in this country worried about their people back in Afghanistan. The Home Office and the Foreign Office have managed to get some of those people relocated, but I had the extraordinary situation where I had a very detailed email about Afghans who were being persecuted and who had worked for the British. It was very detailed and they produced all the documentation. The following day, my constituent wrote to me and said, “I am really sorry. It is a complete lie. These people are Taliban, and I cannot go through with this masquerade.” I just wonder whether we should be on guard against getting such people into this country.

    The Prime Minister

    I am sure that my hon. Friend, like many in the House, will be relieved to know that from the very beginning of Operation Pitting, the ARAP scheme and all the subsequent schemes we have put in place, the very highest possible security checks have been instituted to make sure that people are who they say they are and that we receive to this country the people who genuinely deserve to come here.

    Stephen Farry (North Down) (Alliance)

    Will the Prime Minister clarify the situation that applies to Afghans who were in our asylum system in this country prior to the fall of Kabul? Will they too be given indefinite leave to remain? Surely there are no circumstances in which they will be forced to return of Afghanistan.

    The Prime Minister

    I am grateful to the hon. Member, who raises an important point. Many of those individuals will already be going through procedures in the courts, and we cannot interrupt them, so they will go on.

    Mr David Davis (Haltemprice and Howden) (Con)

    The whole House agreed with the Prime Minister when he celebrated the heroism of our troops, but that simply served to crystallise that this was not so much a defeat as a capitulation: an abandonment by the west of both people and principle. Does the Prime Minister believe that Tony Blair was right this morning when he said that western leadership was “naive” to believe that countries could be remade, or was it that our remaking of Afghanistan needed to last longer?

    The Prime Minister

    If Tony Blair was saying that it was naive to believe that countries could be remade and he was thinking of some of the things that he supported, I think he was spot on.

    Tony Lloyd (Rochdale) (Lab)

    The Prime Minister will know that after the calamitous collapse of the Government in Kabul and the disorderly retreat by western powers, there was rejoicing in parts of Mozambique, across the Sahel and, of course, in Somalia. Those are countries in which we have an interest because, if nothing else, they can be a source of terrorism here. What messages is he prepared to give about the UK working with partners to guarantee a proper, measured response that ensures we are not at risk of terrorism?

    The Prime Minister

    The hon. Gentleman is focusing on exactly the right question and the right response from the western world and, indeed, the global community. We need to work together to ensure that, as far as we possibly can, we condition the new Government and new authorities in Kabul to understand that Afghanistan cannot slide back into being a cesspit of terror. That is our effort today.

    Richard Drax (South Dorset) (Con)

    Many lessons will have been learned and relearned from Afghanistan—not least the need for boots on the ground. With the US becoming more isolated, will my right hon. Friend look again at the disastrous plan to reduce the Army by 10,000?

    The Prime Minister

    The Government are proud of what we have done since we came in to increase the size of our defence commitments by the biggest amount since the end of the cold war. On the hon. Gentleman’s point about Afghanistan, the reality is that even when there were 130,000 western troops in the country, it was not possible to subjugate the Taliban, and I am afraid that we are living with the lessons of that today.

    Caroline Lucas (Brighton, Pavilion) (Green)

    Last Friday, a young Afghan constituent told me through tears how his father—a British citizen—was turned away from the Baron hotel in Kabul on 28 August. He was trying to evacuate his other children, but he was refused permission to take two of them out of the country because they were aged 18 and 19. Can the Prime Minister imagine the pain of that family separation? All of them have stayed in Kabul, at huge risk to themselves. Will he look again at the family reunification rules and finally make it possible for families to stay together and not to have to face such a terrible choice?

    The Prime Minister

    The whole House will be full of sympathy to the family the hon. Member describes and the heartbreak they must have felt. I am sure there are many such cases in Kabul right now, but I think the record of this country in receiving people and being prepared to receive people in the future is very good. I ask her please to write to me or to the Home Secretary directly on the case of that particular family she is talking about.

    Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton North) (Con)

    Many constituents have understandably been in touch, desperately worried about family members in Afghanistan. They want to find out whether the Afghan citizens’ resettlement scheme will be an application or an allocation process, when it will open and what that process will look like.

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my right hon. Friend. We will be making sure that there is a process by which people can apply, but there is clearly a ceiling in the first year of 5,000 and then it goes up to 20,000 over the next few years.

    Joanna Cherry (Edinburgh South West) (SNP)

    Christians in Afghanistan are one of the many minorities facing persecution, and many have been forced to flee their homes. A church community in my constituency is working around the clock to support several Christian families to flee to Pakistan and to seek asylum at the embassy of a safe third country. They are not looking for asylum in the UK, but to get to Pakistan. What particular support will the right hon. Gentleman’s Government offer vulnerable Christians such as those whom the community in my constituency are working with, and to which Department should I direct my entreaties in the hope of actually getting an answer?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank the church community the hon. and learned Member describes for the work they are doing. On moving people to Pakistan, the Government are helping by increasing the funding available, much of which obviously already goes to Pakistan, and that is the purpose of the increase in the aid budget this year.

    Dr Liam Fox (North Somerset) (Con)

    Even if we believe that the whole Afghanistan withdrawal was a US-made policy that was ill judged and poorly executed, can I ask my right hon. Friend to reject those voices calling for the United Kingdom to pull back from the United States and seek alternative alliances elsewhere? Surely the right response is to stick closely to our US friends, and to remind them that in an era of globalisation our economic and security interests will be threatened beyond our borders, that the United States is a force for good in the world, and that greater isolationism can only put us all in greater danger.

    The Prime Minister

    We helped 36 countries to repatriate their nationals or those they had helped, but we could not have done it had it not been for the bravery of the US military and the commitment of the US military, and I passionately agree with what my right hon. Friend has just said about the fundamental importance of our alliance with the United States of America.

    Imran Hussain (Bradford East) (Lab)

    The Government leaving vulnerable Afghans and British nationals behind is unforgivable, but what is completely and utterly reprehensible is that the families of two of my constituents, including a seven-month-old child, were forcibly removed from flights and thrown out of Kabul airport on to the streets, the scene of the horrific suicide bombing hours before. I am absolutely furious, and I want to ask the Prime Minister how on earth this potentially fatal decision was allowed to happen, even after I had raised these matters with the Ministers sitting to his left and his right. How many others were ejected from the airport into harm’s way, and just what does he have to say to the families that the Government have now put in grave danger?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank the hon. Member very much for raising the case. I have to tell him that I am told we have no evidence of anybody being pulled off flights, but obviously I would ask him to raise the particular cases directly with my right hon. Friends beside me. But I can tell him that I think, when he looks at the overall record of the UK moving people out of Kabul and across the whole of Afghanistan, it was an astonishing feat.

    Sir Iain Duncan Smith (Chingford and Woodford Green) (Con)

    I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement. Has he noticed that the Chinese Government, since our departure from Afghanistan, have used Afghanistan to up their threats on Taiwan, with hundreds of overflights threatening the Taiwanese and telling them that, when the war comes, the US will not be there to support them? Could my right hon. Friend take this opportunity, from the Dispatch Box, to say to the Taiwanese and others that we fully support their right to democracy and self-determination and we will be there to support them no matter what the Chinese say, and could we persuade the Americans to do the same?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my right hon. Friend and am of course aware of the continuing issues between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. Indeed, I discussed that recently with the President of the United States, and it is one of the reasons why it is vital that this country continues to insist on the primacy of our relationship with the United States. The situation in Taiwan will continue to be difficult, and the only way forward is to continue to support American global leadership, and that is what we will do.

    Rosie Duffield (Canterbury) (Lab)

    As the Prime Minister knows, non-governmental organisations such as the excellent Kent Refugee Action Network provide vital support to those fleeing conflict—and, as he mentioned, that is via fundraising—but does he also acknowledge that the state has a duty of care regarding the mental health of traumatised refugees, including children? If he does, how can he assure the House that this will be possible given that the current average waiting time for young people to access a basic mental health assessment is two to three years?

    The Prime Minister

    The Government are absolutely determined to look after people coming from Afghanistan, and in particular to look after their mental health and address the trauma they might have suffered, and that is why we are investing massively in the services provided not just by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government but local government across the board.

    Miss Sarah Dines (Derbyshire Dales) (Con)

    What extra funds will be made available for local schools and councils like the Derbyshire Dales District Council, which urgently want to help but want to make sure that additional funds are available?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my hon. Friend and Derbyshire Dales District Council for stepping up. We will of course make sure that the funds are available, and she should make representations to the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, my hon. Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins).

    Chris Law (Dundee West) (SNP)

    The Prime Minister’s handling of the planned departure from Afghanistan is, for those of us who are old enough to remember, akin to one of the farcical characters in “Carry on up the Khyber”. The Foreign Secretary was on a beach as the Taliban advanced on Kabul, unknown numbers of British nationals remain left behind, and the Taliban, and most probably ISIS, have been allowed to plunder military hardware and intelligence. Does the Prime Minister accept any personal responsibility for the mess left in Afghanistan, and does he agree that any notion of global Britain is in complete crisis?

    The Prime Minister

    No, and the hon. Gentleman is wrong in every respect, including what he says about military hardware because that was decommissioned.

    Rehman Chishti (Gillingham and Rainham) (Con)

    The Prime Minister has said that we should judge the Taliban by their actions not their words. The Taliban in Afghanistan have said that they will confine themselves to operating within the rules of Islam. As somebody who comes from a Muslim background and whose father is an imam, and whose grandfather and uncles were imams, I am not an expert on Islam but have a good understanding of the faith. One way forward for the Prime Minister and Government might be this: the Prime Minister might use his kind offices to ask the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, with 57 member states, to request that Al-Azhar, a leading Islamic school of thought, set out what Islam means for women and religious minorities, as that might give us a way to judge what the Taliban are doing and what Islam stands for.

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend makes an interesting suggestion and I encourage it to be taken up. We need to ensure that the elements of the Taliban who are different, as I believe they are, from the Taliban of 1996-9 are encouraged and that we put the maximum pressure on them not to allow the more retrograde elements to have the upper hand. That is what this Government and others around the world are going to do.

    Hilary Benn (Leeds Central) (Lab)

    Many communities, the city of Leeds included, have always given a very warm welcome to refugees, but we know that the poorest parts of our country have consistently taken a much higher proportion of refugees and asylum seekers than the wealthier areas. Does the Prime Minister think that is fair, and if not, what does he intend to do about it?

    The Prime Minister

    I believe the whole country should pull together and everybody should step up to the plate. I know that there are councils across the country that will want to help and are helping. I thank the people of Leeds very much for what they have done, both now and historically, and I hope that councils around the UK will follow their example.

    Sir Bernard Jenkin (Harwich and North Essex) (Con)

    I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement, in which he referred to the fact that Saturday is the 20th anniversary of 9/11. Given that public confidence in the Government’s strategic thinking has taken quite a bashing from this episode, is it not now time for a cold, hard, strategic look at how well we have done over the last 20 years—what has gone well, the mistakes we have made, what we have learned and what should be done to implement those lessons? Will he undertake to ensure that that reflection takes place?

    The Prime Minister

    I think the best I can do is direct my hon. Friend once again to the integrated review, which I know that he has studied and I believe is now more relevant than ever.

    Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP)

    I thank the Prime Minister for his statement. Is he aware that there is a desire in industry to help provide refugees with housing and jobs? Two firms in my constituency, Willowbrook Foods and Mash Direct, are keen and willing to give jobs to the Afghans, and also have access to private housing. Goodness always shines through, and we should always remember that. What steps can the Prime Minister take, via the Treasury, to help the system incentivise firms that want to help those who served alongside British forces and whose lives are at risk for their commitment to freedom and democracy in Afghanistan?

    The Prime Minister

    The hon. Gentleman makes an incredibly important point. The labour market is full of vacancies at the moment, and there are obviously opportunities for hard-working people of talent and energy to come and make their lives across the whole of the UK. We will help them with training, with the English language and, as I have been saying, with what else they need.

    Julie Marson (Hertford and Stortford) (Con)

    In stark contrast with the Leader of the Opposition, whose definition of leadership seems to be silence followed by 20:20 hindsight, I commend the Prime Minister for his leadership in this crisis. I ask him to continue that, on behalf of the UK and the G7, for women and girls in Afghanistan—both for their education and their wider participation in Afghan society.

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my hon. Friend. The UK is pulling together with our German friends, our Italian friends, our French friends, our American friends—all our G7 colleagues and others—to forge a collective global view, as far as we possibly can, about how to deal with the new regime in Kabul. It is by working together that we will get the best results. The UK, as the whole House knows, is in pole position in all the key institutions, and we will continue to exercise that role.

    Jeremy Corbyn (Islington North) (Ind)

    I realise that the Government’s focus at the moment is on refugees and dealing with the immediate crisis, but does the Prime Minister not think that, with tens of thousands of Afghan dead, thousands of American dead and hundreds of British dead, it is time for a full inquiry into the whole process that led us into Afghanistan and the whole notion of a foreign policy in which we intervene all over the world, and that we should start to re-examine our place and our role in this world?

    The Prime Minister

    The right hon. Gentleman knows, because he has heard me say it before, that there was a full review after the end of the military operation in 2014—a review of what it achieved and of the legacy of those brave British men and women who served in Afghanistan. I think that was the right thing to do. As for the rest, I do not know whether he has read the integrated review from cover to cover, but I direct him to it.

    Andrew Bridgen (North West Leicestershire) (Con)

    Following our ignominious withdrawal from Afghanistan, where we were effectively dragged out on the coat-tails of our more powerful American allies, the world has changed and become a more dangerous place. Will my right hon. Friend share with the House his latest assessment of the so-called special relationship? Is it not time for another defence review?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my hon. Friend, whose trenchant views I often agree with, but I think in this case the special relationship—at Carbis Bay I called it the irreplaceable or the indestructible relationship; I cannot remember exactly what phrase I used—is a basic geopolitical fact. On the special relationship rests much of the security of the last 100 years. It will continue to be of cardinal importance to this country. That is a fact that is as understood in Washington as it is in this country.

    Peter Kyle (Hove) (Lab)

    The Prime Minister has turned his back on the EU, and Washington has turned its back on him. Since he stood on a platform of global Britain, can he tell us where Britain has more influence than we did before he became Prime Minister?

    The Prime Minister

    Virtually everywhere is the answer to that. [Interruption.] We have our own sanctions policy. We have been able to set up new embassies and legations around the world. We are opening up in the south Pacific and in Africa. We are doing free trade deals; I think a total of 63 so far. Who knows—there may even be another one this week.

    Saqib Bhatti (Meriden) (Con)

    As the Prime Minister will be aware, the majority of people who came to this country from Afghanistan came via Birmingham airport in my constituency. Will my right hon. Friend join me in commending the team at Birmingham airport, Solihull Council and third sector organisations such as Entraide at Three Trees Community Centre, who have welcomed nearly 1,000 people a day, sometimes including many, many children and young babies?

    The Prime Minister

    Yes. I had the opportunity to thank the troops the other day, but I want to thank everybody who has been involved: Border Force officials and everybody in the councils who has been on the frontline dealing with this crisis. They have done it with exceptional humanity and compassion.

    Chris Bryant (Rhondda) (Lab)

    I have sent 143 cases of Afghans who are connected to my constituency to the Foreign Secretary, the Defence Secretary and the Home Secretary—all three of them, because there are three different channels. May I urge the Prime Minister to reflect on the idea, suggested by countless colleagues on the Opposition Benches, that there should be a single triage point, a single person who deals with all these cases? Since I sent in those names, one has been shot, one has been raped and one has been tortured. People are desperate to try to get the best result for these people. I am sure that Ministers want to help, but at the moment it feels as if the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing.

    The Prime Minister

    I am sure that the whole House sympathises very much with what has happened to those individuals in Afghanistan that the hon. Gentleman describes. We are doing our level best to help people as fast as we can. I want the Government to focus on helping people with a single point of contact. That is why the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, my hon. Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins) is the person in question.

    Chris Clarkson (Heywood and Middleton) (Con)

    The men and women who serve in our armed forces are remarkable and make huge sacrifices, both personally and in their careers. Can my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister confirm that they will get the very best support and care when they return home, so that they know this nation is grateful for what they have done?

    The Prime Minister

    Yes. It is absolutely vital that those who have given so much and have served so bravely in Afghanistan, and indeed their families, should receive the lifelong support they deserve—and they will.

    Jessica Morden (Newport East) (Lab)

    My office and I have been trying for several years, through the Home Office, to reunite various Afghan interpreters who settled in Newport with their wives and families. Just hours before the withdrawal, their paperwork came through but they were not able to get through the crowds to flights. We understand that they are not eligible for ARAP. Does that mean that they are included in the resettlement scheme, and what happens now, given that the principle of them joining their husbands has been agreed?

    The Prime Minister

    I am very grateful to the hon. Lady. I am very sorry to hear what happened at Hamid Karzai International airport. I hope they will be successful under the resettlement scheme. If she would be kind enough to send details through to the Home Secretary, I would be very grateful.

    James Sunderland (Bracknell) (Con)

    It is very easy to apportion blame with the benefit of hindsight, but this is a really complex environment and the current situation is as much a failure of leadership in Afghanistan as anything else. While we may not want to engage with the Taliban, does the Prime Minister agree that we have no choice but to do so, perhaps with a forward presence in Kabul in the same way as our Chinese and Russian adversaries?

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend is very wise in what he says. I believe that it is inevitable for us to engage with the Taliban. Indeed, we have been: at the airport, British troops were working directly with their Taliban counterparts to ensure that the operation went through. That was an inevitability. We will of course look at further co-operation, but as I said to the House, we will judge the new regime in Kabul not by what they say, but by what they do.

    Mr Pat McFadden (Wolverhampton South East) (Lab)

    Our troops did a great job at Kabul airport, but the events of recent weeks have exposed the limitations of our ability to act outwith the umbrella of the United States, even if we wanted to choose a different path. What is the Prime Minister’s response to the exposure of those limitations?

    The Prime Minister

    I do not agree with what the right hon. Gentleman said. The particular case of Afghanistan was one in which America was very much engaged because of 9/11. It was America that supplied 98% of the air power—98% of the munitions dropped were from the US. It was overwhelmingly a US-led mission, but that does not mean that the UK cannot and will not co-operate with other friends and partners around the world. That is what we are going to continue to do.

    James Gray (North Wiltshire) (Con)

    On 167 occasions, all told, I stood with the people of what is now Royal Wootton Bassett to see 345 of our comrades repatriated to this country. On no occasion did I hear anybody say, “Why?” Nobody ever said, “These lives were wasted.” Nobody was ever ashamed of what had happened. On the contrary, they were proud of the fact that these young people had given their lives for the service of their country, for the benefit of the people of Afghanistan and for the security of the world. Does the Prime Minister not agree that that should now be the litmus test of how we judge what is happening in Afghanistan? We should be proud of all we have done.

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my hon. Friend; I believe he speaks for millions of people—quiet people—up and down this country.

    Ms Diane Abbott (Hackney North and Stoke Newington) (Lab)

    The Prime Minister will be aware that the entire House is united in offering our respect and congratulations to the people at the grassroots who made the evacuation of British passport holders and Afghans possible in recent weeks, but he must also be aware of how difficult it has been to get responses from Government Departments on behalf of our constituents who are terrified for their relatives and want to arrange safe passage for them. Will the Government give the House an undertaking that they will make sure that the relevant Departments have the resources and the people so that we can communicate with our constituents and give them some news at least?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank the right hon. Lady. She is repeating a point that has been made across the House by many colleagues this afternoon. The work so far has been extraordinary. I pay tribute to the speed with which British officials have done their best to respond, and every email, as I said, will be answered by tonight.

  • Boris Johnson – 2021 Statement on Afghanistan

    Boris Johnson – 2021 Statement on Afghanistan

    The statement made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 18 August 2021.

    I beg to move,

    That this House has considered the situation in Afghanistan.

    May I begin by thanking you, Mr Speaker, and all the parliamentary staff for enabling us to meet this morning? Before I turn to today’s debate, I am sure the House will want to join you, Mr Speaker, and me in sending our condolences to the family and friends of those killed in the appalling shooting in Plymouth last week. Investigations are of course continuing, but we will learn every possible lesson from this tragedy.

    I know that Members across the House share my concern about the situation in Afghanistan, the issues it raises for our own security and the fears of many remaining in that country, especially women and children. The sacrifice in Afghanistan is seared into our national consciousness, with 150,000 people serving there from across the length and breadth of the United Kingdom, including a number of Members in all parts of the House, whose voices will be particularly important today. So it is absolutely right that we should come together for this debate.

    Mr John Baron (Basildon and Billericay) (Con)

    As someone who opposed this nation-building intervention, I believe that it now brings its responsibilities. Will the Prime Minister assure me that, in addition to getting our nationals out safely, and in offering a generous welcome to the many refugees, all necessary resources will be given to those Afghans and others who helped the British Council in its work, including the promotion of women’s rights? Many are in fear of their lives—of retribution from the Taliban. The Afghan relocations and assistance policy scheme is slow-moving at the moment. Will he commit the necessary resource, because the window of opportunity is narrow and no one must be left behind.

    Mr Speaker

    We have got the point. May I remind Members that if you are going to intervene, you have got to be short. If you intervene more than twice, you will understand why you have gone down the list—if there was one. [Laughter.]

    The Prime Minister

    I thank my hon. Friend. I can assure him that, as I will be saying in just a few moments, we will be doing everything we can to support those who have helped the UK mission in Afghanistan and investing everything that we can to support the wider area around Afghanistan, and to do everything that we can to avert a humanitarian crisis.

    It is almost 20 years since the United States suffered the most catastrophic attack on its people since the second world war, in which 67 British citizens also lost their lives, at the hands of murderous terrorist groups incubated in Afghanistan. In response, NATO invoked article 5 of its treaty for the first and only time in its history, and the United Kingdom, among others, joined America in going into Afghanistan on a mission to extirpate al-Qaeda in that country, and to do whatever we could to stabilise Afghanistan, in spite of all the difficulties and challenges we knew that we would face. And we succeeded in that core mission.

    Mr Tobias Ellwood (Bournemouth East) (Con)

    Does the Prime Minister agree that we are ceding back the country to the very insurgency that we went in to defeat in the first place, and that the reputation of the west for support for democracies around the world has suffered? There are so many lessons to be learned from what happened over the last 20 years. Will he now agree to a formal independent inquiry into conduct in Afghanistan?

    The Prime Minister

    As I said in the House just a few weeks ago, there was an extensive defence review about the Afghan mission after the combat mission ended in 2014, and I believe that most of the key questions have already been extensively gone into. It is important that we in this House should today be able to scrutinise events as they unfold.

    As I was saying, we succeeded in that core mission, and the training camps in the mountain ranges of Afghanistan were destroyed. Al-Qaeda plots against this country were foiled because our serving men and women were there, and no successful terrorist attacks against the west have been mounted from Afghan soil for two decades.

    Mr Mark Harper (Forest of Dean) (Con)

    May I take the Prime Minister back to his remarks in the House on 8 July, when he referred to the assessment that he had made? There has clearly been a catastrophic failure of our intelligence, or our assessment of the intelligence, because of the speed with which this has caught us unawares. Can he set out for the House how we may assure ourselves that in future years no terrorist attacks put together in Afghanistan take place here in the United Kingdom?

    The Prime Minister

    I think it would be fair to say that the events in Afghanistan have unfolded faster, and the collapse has been faster, than I think even the Taliban themselves predicted. What is not true is to say that the UK Government were unprepared or did not foresee this, because it was certainly part of our planning. The very difficult logistical operation for the withdrawal of UK nationals has been under preparation for many months, and I can tell the House that the decision to commission the emergency handling centre at the airport—the commissioning of that centre—took place two weeks ago.

    Several hon. Members rose—

    The Prime Minister

    If I can just make a little more progress, I will certainly give way in a moment.

    Alongside this core mission, we worked for a better future for the people of Afghanistan. The heroism and tireless work of our armed forces contributed to national elections as well as to the promotion and protection of human rights and equalities in a way that many in Afghanistan had not previously known. Whereas 20 years ago, almost no girls went to school and women were banned from positions of governance, now 3.6 million girls have been in school this year alone and women hold over a quarter of the seats in the Afghan Parliament. But we must be honest and accept that huge difficulties were encountered at each turn, and some of this progress is fragile.

    Stephen Doughty (Cardiff South and Penarth) (Lab/Co-op)

    I pay tribute to our ambassador and the diplomatic team in Kabul and our armed forces on the ground, who have been evacuating people in extraordinary circumstances. One of the consequences of the rapidity of the collapse of Kabul is that many people have been left trapped, unable to access the airport and unable to evacuate, including many of those who should be coming to this country who served us bravely in that country and many women who are particularly at risk. Many of us across the House will have experienced chaos in the last 24 to 48 hours in communicating information through to the ground to get some of those people out of the country. Can the Prime Minister give us some assurances about how we can get that information through so that we can get those brave people out of there, including many whose lives are at risk right now in Kabul?

    The Prime Minister

    The hon. Gentleman raises exactly the right question. I spoke this morning to Ambassador Sir Laurie Bristow as well as to Brigadier Dan Blanchford, who is handling the evacuation. It would be fair to say that the situation has stabilised since the weekend, but it remains precarious and the UK officials on the ground are doing everything that they can to expedite the movement of people—those who need to come out, whether from the ARAP scheme or the eligible persons—to get from Kabul to the airport. At the moment, it would be fair to say that the Taliban are allowing that evacuation to go ahead, but the most important thing is that we get this done in as expeditious a fashion as we can, and that is what we are doing. I am grateful not just to the UK forces who are now out there helping to stabilise the airport, but also to the US forces.

    Several hon. Members rose—

    The Prime Minister

    Can I just make some progress? The combat phase of our mission ended in 2014, when we brought the vast majority of our troops home and handed over responsibility for security to the Afghans themselves, and we continued to support their efforts. Even at that stage, we should remember that conflict was continuous and that, in spite of the bravery and sacrifice of the Afghan army—we should never forget that 69,000 of those Afghan army troops gave their lives in this conflict—significant parts of the country remained contested or under Taliban control. So when, after two decades, the Americans prepared to take their long-predicted and well-trailed step of a final extraction of their forces, we looked at many options, including the potential for staying longer ourselves, finding new partners or even increasing our presence.

    Andrew Bridgen (North West Leicestershire) (Con)

    Will the Prime Minister share with the House what assessment UK intelligence services made of the relative fighting capacity currently of the Afghan army and the Taliban, and will he tell us what representations the UK Government made to our US allies with regards to their timetable for withdrawal from Afghanistan?

    The Prime Minister

    I am grateful to my hon. Friend. He asks for a commentary on the respective military potential for power of the Taliban and the Afghan forces. It is pretty clear from what has happened that the collapse of the Afghan forces has been much faster than expected. As for our NATO allies and allies around the world, when it came for us to look at the options that this country might have in view of the American decision to withdraw, we came up against this hard reality that since 2009, America has deployed 98% of all weapons released from NATO aircraft in Afghanistan and, at the peak of the operation, when there were 132,000 troops on the ground, 90,000 of them were American. The west could not continue this US-led mission—a mission conceived and executed in support and defence of America—without American logistics, without US air power and without American might.

    Mrs Theresa May (Maidenhead) (Con)

    I note the point that my right hon. Friend is making about the importance of American support for our efforts in Afghanistan and those of our allies, but will he please set out when he first spoke personally to Jens Stoltenberg, the Secretary-General of NATO, to discuss with him the possibility of putting together an alliance of other forces in order to replace American support in Afghanistan?

    The Prime Minister

    I am grateful to my right hon. Friend. I spoke to Secretary-General Stoltenberg only the other day about NATO’s continuing role in Afghanistan, but I really think that it is an illusion to believe that there is appetite among any of our partners for a continued military presence or for a military solution imposed by NATO in Afghanistan. That idea ended with the combat mission in 2014. I do not believe that today deploying tens of thousands of British troops to fight the Taliban is an option that, no matter how sincerely people may advocate it—and I appreciate their sincerity—would commend itself either to the British people or to this House. We must deal with the position as it now is, accepting what we have achieved and what we have not achieved.

    Dame Angela Eagle (Wallasey) (Lab)

    The Prime Minister seemed to be making an argument earlier that he had anticipated something similar to what went on, by having the rapid response force ready and waiting. Why, then, were he and the Foreign Secretary both on their holidays when this catastrophe happened?

    The Prime Minister

    The Government have been working around the clock to deal with the unfolding situation. We must deal with the world as it is, accepting what we have achieved and what we have not achieved. The UK will work with our international partners on a shared plan to support the people of Afghanistan and to contribute to regional stability. There will be five parts to this approach.

    James Gray (North Wiltshire) (Con)

    Will my right hon. Friend give way?

    The Prime Minister

    In just a minute.

    First, our immediate focus must be on helping those to whom we have direct obligations, by evacuating UK nationals together with those Afghans who have assisted our efforts over the past 20 years. I know that the whole House will join me in paying tribute to the bravery and commitment of our ambassador, Sir Laurie Bristow.

    Ian Paisley (North Antrim) (DUP)

    I thank the Prime Minister for giving way on that particular point. He will be aware that there are 228 missionaries in Afghanistan currently under sentence of death; those missionaries need to be taken out of Afghanistan. Of course, there are tens of thousands of others who are under sentence of death and fear for their lives. Will he assure the House that every effort will be made to bring back to safe haven people whose lives are under threat as a result of the catastrophe in foreign policy that has gone on in that country?

    The Prime Minister

    I thank the hon. Gentleman for raising the very needy case that he does. I am sure that colleagues across the House—literally every Member, I imagine—have received messages from people who know someone who needs to get out of Afghanistan. I can tell him that we are doing everything we can to help out of that country those people to whom we owe a debt of obligation. On that point, I repeat my thanks not just to Laurie Bristow, but also to the commander on the ground, Brigadier Dan Blanchford and the entire British team in Kabul.

    Several hon. Members rose—

    The Prime Minister

    I want to make some progress.

    I can tell the House that we have so far secured the safe return of 306 UK nationals and 2,052 Afghan nationals as part of our resettlement programme, with a further 2,000 Afghan applications completed and many more being processed. UK officials are working round the clock to keep the exit door open in the most difficult circumstances and are actively seeking those who we believe are eligible but as yet unregistered.

    Alan Brown (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) (SNP)

    Can the Prime Minister explain, then, how many people he thinks are eligible for relocation and are still to sign up? He says that the Government are doing “everything we can” to get these people out, so what does “everything we can” mean? How are they identifying these people and where they are, especially if they are already in hiding in fear of their lives?

    The Prime Minister

    That is why it is so important that we maintain a presence at Kabul airport and that is why we have been getting the message out that we want people to come through. As I said earlier, it is important for everybody to understand that in the days that we have ahead of us, which may be short, at the moment this is an environment in which the Taliban are permitting this evacuation to take place. These are interpreters, they are locally engaged staff and others who have risked their lives supporting our military efforts and seeking to secure new freedoms for their country. We are proud to bring these brave Afghans to our shores and we continue to appeal for more to come forward.

    Chris Bryant (Rhondda) (Lab)

    The Home Secretary announced this morning that the UK will take 20,000 refugees from Afghanistan but that only 5,000 will be able to come this year. What are the 15,000 meant to do? Hang around and wait to be executed?

    The Prime Minister

    That is the 5,000 on whom—we are spending £200 million to bring a further 5,000 on top; I think it will be 10,000 altogether that we bring in under the ARAP and other programmes. We will increase that number over the coming years to 20,000, as I said, but the bulk of the effort of this country will be directed and should be directed at supporting people in Afghanistan and in the region to prevent a worse humanitarian crisis. I tell the House that in that conviction I am supported very strongly both by President Macron of France and Chancellor Merkel of Germany.

    We are also doing everything possible to accelerate the visas for the—[Interruption.]

    Mr Speaker

    The hon. Member for Hyndburn (Sara Britcliffe) cannot be like a drone in the Chamber, completely above everybody all the way through. I ask her to stand up and down please, and not just hover.

    The Prime Minister

    I was telling the House that we are making sure that we bring back the 35 brilliant Chevening scholars so that they can come and study in our great universities. We are deploying an additional 800 British troops to support this evacuation operation and I can assure the House that we will continue the operation for as long as conditions at the airport allow.

    Stella Creasy (Walthamstow) (Lab/Co-op)

    As of last week, it was still Home Office policy that we would send people back to Kabul because we thought that it was safe. Will the Prime Minister also confirm that it is not just about people coming out of Afghanistan but about keeping people safe here, and that we will not send people back to this nightmare?

    The Prime Minister

    The hon. Lady is entirely right that we will not be sending people back to Afghanistan; nor, by the way, will we allow people to come from Afghanistan to this country in an indiscriminate way. We want to be generous, but we must make sure that we look after our own security. Over the coming weeks, we will redouble our efforts, working with others to protect the UK homeland and all our citizens and interests from any threat that may emanate from a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, from terrorism to the narcotics trade.

    Sara Britcliffe (Hyndburn) (Con)

    Does my right hon. Friend agree that we must do everything we can to support those who have supported us, like Royal Marine Pen Farthing and his Nowzad charity’s veterinary staff and their immediate families, who now need safe passage back to the UK?

    The Prime Minister

    Like many of us, I have been lobbied extensively about the excellent work done by Mr Pen Farthing. I am well aware of his cause and all the wonderful things that he has done for animals in Afghanistan. I can tell my hon. Friend that we will do everything that we can to help Mr Pen Farthing and others who face particular difficulties, as he does—as I say, without in any way jeopardising our own national security. These are concerns shared across the international community, from the region itself to all of the NATO alliance and, indeed, all five permanent members of the UN Security Council. I will chair a virtual meeting of the G7 in the coming days.

    Thirdly, we have an enduring commitment to all the Afghan people. Now more than ever we must reaffirm that commitment. Our efforts must focus on supporting the Afghan people in the region, particularly those fleeing conflict or the threat of violence. We therefore call on the United Nations to lead a new humanitarian effort in the region.

    Yvette Cooper (Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) (Lab)

    I thank the Prime Minister for giving way, and I welcome his commitment to support in the region, and also the Government’s commitment to a resettlement programme. The Home Secretary announced in 2019 that the UK would continue a resettlement scheme of 5,000 refugees a year after the Syrian scheme closed. Can the Prime Minister confirm that the announcement today of an Afghan resettlement scheme is in addition to that existing 5,000 resettlement commitment, as opposed to simply being a refocusing or displacement of that existing 5,000-a-year resettlement programme?

    The Prime Minister

    I am very grateful to the right hon. Lady, because I think that she has asked a question that has formed in many people’s minds about the 5,000. Yes, indeed, the 5,000 extra in the resettlement scheme are additional to those already announced. We will support those people in coming to this country. We will also support the wider international community delivering humanitarian projects in the region by doubling the amount of humanitarian and development assistance that we had previously committed to Afghanistan this year with new funding—[Interruption]—wait for it—taking this up to £286 million with immediate effect. We call on others to work together on a shared humanitarian effort, focusing on helping the most vulnerable in what will be formidably difficult circumstances.

    Shailesh Vara (North West Cambridgeshire) (Con)

    I am grateful to the Prime Minister for giving way; he is being very generous with his time. Over the past 20 years, some 50 NATO and partner nations have been involved in Afghanistan. I welcome the measures that have been proposed by the UK and other countries such as the US, Canada, France, Germany and so on, but there are still many countries that have been involved in Afghanistan in recent years which have still yet to step up to the plate and recognise their responsibility in helping these people at this desperate time. Will the Prime Minister inform the House what is being done to encourage these other countries to take up their responsibility and help these people in Afghanistan?

    The Prime Minister

    My hon. Friend makes an excellent point, and that is why the UK has chaired the UN Security Council, and asked with our French friends to put a motion together to get the world to focus on the humanitarian needs of Afghanistan. We will do the same thing in NATO, the G7 and other bodies in which we have a leadership role. We want all these countries to step up, as he rightly said, and focus on the most vulnerable in what will be formidably difficult circumstances.

    Several hon. Members rose—

    The Prime Minister

    I have given way, I think you will agree, Mr Speaker, quite lot this morning. Thanks to your generosity and that of the House, there is now ample time for debate until later this afternoon, and I think that many Members will be able to get their points across. I therefore intend, with your leave, Mr Speaker, to make some progress.

    Fourthly, while we must focus on the region itself, we will also create safe and legal routes for those Afghans most in need to come and settle here in the UK. In addition to those Afghans with whom we have worked directly, I can announce today that we are committing to relocating another 5,000 Afghans this year, with a new and bespoke resettlement scheme focusing on the most vulnerable, particularly women and children. We will keep this under review for future years, with the potential of accommodating up to 20,000 over the long term. Taken together—

    Several hon. Members rose—

    The Prime Minister

    I have been very generous with interventions—I think you will agree, Mr Speaker—and I have made my position clear.

    Taken together, we are committing almost half a billion pounds of humanitarian funding to support the Afghan people.

    Fifthly, we must also face the reality of a change of regime in Afghanistan. As president of the G7, the UK will work to unite the international community behind a clear plan for dealing with this regime in a unified and concerted way. Over the last three days, I have spoken with the NATO and UN secretaries-general and with President Biden, Chancellor Merkel, President Macron and Prime Minister Khan. We are clear, and we have agreed, that it would be a mistake for any country to recognise any new regime in Kabul prematurely or bilaterally. Instead, those countries that care about Afghanistan’s future should work towards common conditions about the conduct of the new regime before deciding together whether to recognise it, and on what terms.

    We will judge this regime based on the choices it makes and by its actions rather than by its words—on its attitude to terrorism, crime and narcotics, as well as humanitarian access and the right of girls to receive an education. Defending human rights will remain of the highest priority, and we will use every available political and diplomatic means to ensure that those human rights remain at the top of the international agenda.

    Our United Kingdom has a roll-call of honour that bears the names of 457 servicemen and women who gave their lives in some of the world’s harshest terrain, and many others who bear injuries to this day, fighting in what had become the epicentre of global terrorism. Even amid the heart-wrenching scenes we see today, I believe they should be proud of their achievements, and we should be deeply proud of them, because they conferred benefits that are lasting and ineradicable on millions of people in one of the poorest countries on earth, and they provided vital protection for two decades to this country and the rest of the world. They gave their all for our safety, and we owe it to them to give our all to prevent Afghanistan from once again becoming a breeding ground for terrorism.

    No matter how grim the lessons of past, the future is not yet written. At this bleak turning point, we must help the people of Afghanistan to choose the best of all their possible futures. In the UN, the G7 and NATO, with friends and partners around the world, that is the critical task on which this Government are now urgently engaged and will be engaged in the days to come.

  • House of Commons Committee on Standards – Report on Boris Johnson

    House of Commons Committee on Standards – Report on Boris Johnson

    The report issued by the House of Commons Committee on Standards on 8 July 2021.

    (in .pdf format)