The press release issued by the Office for Equality and Opportunity on 19 May 2026.
UK to serve as host nation for the European International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia (IDAHOT+) Forum in London in May 2027.
London is set to become the global stage for progress on LGBT+ rights, with the UK announced as next host of the European International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia (IDAHOT+) Forum in 2027.
Lord Collins of Highbury, government spokesperson for equalities, is in Copenhagen for this year’s forum and is scheduled to formally accept the UK as next year’s host nation.
The UK announces a funding package of £21 million to advance global LGBT+ rights through civil society partnerships.
For the first time, the UK, in partnership with the Council of Europe, will serve as the host nation for the European IDAHOT+ Forum in London in May 2027. The forum will convene governments, civil society organisations, policymakers, and advocates from across Europe, turning London into a focal point for international co-operation and progress on LGBT+ equality.
Breaking down barriers to opportunity is a key priority for this government, and hosting the forum in London will strengthen the UK’s position as a leading international voice for equality, inclusion, and opportunity for all across Europe and beyond.
The UK has been a consistent and active participant in the European IDAHOT+ Forum since the forum’s inception in 2013, reflecting a long-standing commitment to advancing LGBT+ equality. Representatives from the UK government, including the Minister for Equalities, are attending this year’s forum in Copenhagen, Denmark.
In addition to being selected as next year’s host nation, the government has today announced funding to advance international LGBT+ equality. By combining this funding with diplomatic action, the programme aims to establish human-rights-compliant legal frameworks and resilient local movements globally to ensure that LGBT+ people everywhere can live lives that are equal, safe, and free.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) Minister for Multilateral and Human Rights, Chris Elmore MP, said:
This investment reaffirms the UK’s commitment to defending the human rights and freedoms of all people, including those who are LGBT+.
We will continue to work in partnership – using our diplomatic influence and development expertise – to help ensure that everyone, everywhere can live their lives without fear of violence, persecution or discrimination.
Lord Collins of Highbury, government spokesperson for equalities, said:
As I attend this year’s forum in Copenhagen, I welcome the growing momentum behind LGBT+ equality. The UK is proud to build on that momentum by unveiling a new funding package to support civil society partnerships and advance LGBT+ equality worldwide.
Alongside this new funding, hosting next year’s European IDAHOT+ Forum represents a major opportunity for the UK. It will bring together the continent’s expertise, lived experience, and leadership to drive action at scale and reflects our commitment to international leadership on LGBT+ equality.
We look forward to welcoming our international partners to next year’s event in London.
The government has made substantial progress in improving the welfare and safety of LGBT+ individuals across the UK. This has been demonstrated through making anti-LGBT+ hate crimes an aggravated offence under the Crime and Policing Act, providing £0.5 million funding for specialist LGBT+ domestic abuse services, and continuing work to implement a full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices.
Notes to editors
The European IDAHOT+ Forum is one of the major European annual events that brings together member states of the Council of Europe, government representatives, policy makers, experts, and academics, as well as representatives from national and international organisations. As the main state-organised European LGBT+ conference, it primarily aims to promote co-operation between governments but also between governments and civil society organisations.
The UK’s £21 million funding commitment is designed to address the root causes of violence, persecution and exclusion faced by LGBT+ people globally. This approach aligns with the UK Strategic Framework on International LGBT+ Rights (2026 to 2029). The amount is £21 million over 3 years (2026 to 2029) – £19.5 million ODA (official development assistance), and £1.5 million non‑ODA.
The press release issued by the Home Office on 19 May 2026.
The Home Office has announced £100 million to fight child sex offences and protect victims and survivors, including £38 million for Operation Beaconport.
A historic £100 million will drive a crackdown on child sexual abuse, including tracking down vile grooming gang members, protecting victims and bringing offenders to justice. Perpetrators who thought they got away with horrific grooming gang offences will be held to account as closed cases are reopened.
Operation Beaconport will receive a tenfold cash injection, building on the £4 million the operation received when it launched last autumn. £38 million has been set aside for the National Crime Agency (NCA) and operational partners to reopen and investigate cases and put more offenders behind bars. It is focused on furthering critical work to protect victims wherever abuse takes place – in our communities, families, online and institutions.
Police forces in England and Wales will also have greater access to pioneering artificial intelligence (AI) technology to weed out and bring predators to justice more rapidly. To support this, the Tackling Organised Exploitation Programme, led by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), will receive £9.3 million this year.
This includes a suite of advanced, AI-enabled intelligence tools, ensuring all forces, regardless of size or local resources, can use cutting-edge technology to pursue offenders faster and better safeguard victims.
This enables officers to analyse large datasets, translate foreign-language material in seconds, and identify patterns and relationships between suspects. By reducing manual processes and unifying access to proven tools, the programme focuses on accelerating investigations and creates a more consistent, intelligence-led national response.
£11.7 million will also back the Undercover Child Abuse Online Network, which targets predators in the darkest corners of the internet and stops abuse before it happens. The network tracks and identifies offenders, intervenes early and drives arrests and prosecutions. Their work helped safeguard 1,748 children between April 2024 and 2025, with 1,797 arrests also made.
Today’s funding sits alongside the Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs, which seeks to root out past failures wherever they occurred. It is laser‑focused on grooming gangs and will explicitly examine the role of ethnicity, religion and culture of the offenders and the response of institutions.
Shabana Mahmood, Home Secretary, said:
The grooming gangs scandal is one of the darkest moments in our country’s history – where the most vulnerable people were abused and exploited at the hands of evil child rapists.
There will be no hiding place for the predatory monsters who committed unimaginable crimes of child sexual abuse and exploitation. We will track down these vile rapists and put them behind bars.
Last year, the police delivered record levels of enforcement – with 10,693 prosecutions and 8,681 convictions for child sexual offences. This investment increase means forces can take this vital work even further, reach more victims and stop more offenders in their tracks.
A further £8.9 million will go towards a key part of the NCA’s work targeting the highest-risk offenders like Jamie Beckett who was sentenced to 23 years after he sexually abused 7 vulnerable children by offering cash for medical appointments in exchange for indecent images.
NCA investigators were able to bring him to justice through an investigation which traced complex digital and financial trails. Increased NCA funding will enable even faster and stronger investigations to bring more high‑harm predators like Beckett to justice.
NCA Director of Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Investigations Jav Oomer said:
We welcome the continued Home Office funding to support the NCA’s vital work in tackling the highest harm offenders, whether they operate in our communities or online, and will use the full force of our capabilities to protect children.
We continue to see the increasing complexity and severity of CSA offending, with offenders becoming more technologically sophisticated, but also producing more severe and more sadistic material.
NCA co-ordinated efforts across UK policing result in almost 1,000 arrests and 1,200 children being safeguarded each and every month.
Adult survivors who, as children, experienced sexual abuse will also be supported through £3.2 million of funding to help rebuild their lives through the National Support for Adult Survivors.
The grooming gangs scandal is one of the darkest moments in this country’s history, where the most vulnerable were abused at the hands of evil child rapists and let down by a system meant to protect them.
That is why part of the Operation Beaconport funding will strengthen how police forces investigate these crimes, ensuring a consistent response wherever abuse is reported and better, trauma‑informed support for victims.
The remaining spend will be spread across a series of vital work through law enforcement and partner agencies to address child sexual exploitation and violence against women and girls.
Chief Constable Becky Riggs, National Police Chiefs’ Council Lead for Child Protection and Abuse Investigation said:
Protecting children and young people and supporting all victims and survivors of abuse and exploitation must be at the heart of everything we do. This investment is a significant step forward in ensuring that anyone who has experienced these crimes is met with a response that is compassionate, consistent and trauma informed.
No single agency can tackle child abuse and exploitation alone. The strength of this approach lies in the way policing and law enforcement are working together with partners across government and specialist services to build a truly whole-system response.
By bringing together expertise, intelligence, and support services, we are better equipped to prevent harm, safeguard victims and survivors, and pursue those responsible for these crimes in all their forms.
The additional investment in advanced technology, through the Tackling Organised Exploitation Programme, will transform the pace at which we can identify and disrupt offenders. By enabling us to analyse large volumes of digital material more quickly and effectively, we can act faster to protect those at risk and bring perpetrators to justice sooner.
Above all, this funding helps ensure that all victims and survivors are seen, heard, and supported – whether their experiences are recent or non‑recent, online or offline. It strengthens our collective ability to respond with care, consistency, and determination, as we continue to improve how we disrupt these devastating crimes.
Gabrielle Shaw, Chief Executive, National Association for People Abused in Childhood, said:
This funding is a positive and necessary step towards improving the national response to child sexual abuse and exploitation. Meaningful investment in preventing abuse and supporting survivors is essential if victims and survivors are to receive the protection, care and justice they deserve.
As a thematic co-lead for victim and survivor engagement within the CSE taskforce, NAPAC is heartened by the collaborative approach that government, policing and the third sector are taking to deliver better outcomes for survivors. There is still a long way to go, but progress is being made at a national level.
The speech made by Yvette Cooper, the Foreign Secretary, in London on 19 May 2026.
Thank you very much. It is a great pleasure to be able to welcome everyone at here, in London, for the Global Partnerships Conference, and a huge pleasure, especially to be able to co-host this conference with South Africa, just as our two countries worked together last year on the replenishment of the Global Fund, helping to secure over £11 billion pounds in pledges to fight aids, tuberculosis, and malaria. And it is a pleasure, too, to co-host with the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation and British International Investment – the pioneering organisations that have done so much to advance the priorities that we all share.
This conference was designed to be a bit different from the normal international ministerial events that we hold. And so, I just wanted to start by acknowledging the incredible range of depth of experience, of expertise in this room and around this conference centre. From civil society, youth activists, major investors, philanthropists, tech entrepreneurs, experience of development past and ideas and interests for the future. The collective wisdom and insight that we need to harness together in the face of the most unprecedented global challenges. And I know that there’s many individuals, organisations, in this conference, who have long standing commitments to lifting people, communities, and countries out of poverty. And we’ve seen huge progress as a result of that incredible dedication. Over one and a half billion people, worldwide, lifted out of extreme poverty in recent decades. Healthy life expectancy around the world increased by over five years in just a decade. Over 100 million more children going to school, and nations benefitting from stronger job creation and growth. And as the British Foreign Secretary, I’m proud that the UK has played its part in that story of transformation, working with partner governments, and with many of you here today. And as we look forward now, as many of those same values that have underpinned that progress are enduring. Our sense of our shared humanity, that fundamental moral purpose to stand up against global disease and hunger, and to support those trapped in crises caused by conflict or climate change. And the deep distress we share, and injustice, and unfair inequalities that hold people back.
But we are here today because we know that change is needed. Because we know we need to do things differently. At a time when our world is more volatile, more contested, more unstable, than ever, and when our multilateral system is under strain. And we meet against the backdrop of the Strait of Hormuz crisis. A strait of water through which 90 ships a day used to pass but for the last three months, it’s been more like five. Heating oil for Asia, stuck in the Strait, fertilisers for Africa, stuck in the Strait, 20,000 seafarers, 800 ships just stuck in the Strait. The price effects felt on the other side of the world. The global economy is being held hostage and the global South is paying the biggest price. It’s affecting the planting season, too. The agricultural clock is ticking, and damage is already being done that will affect crop yields and food prices well into next year. As the World Food Programme has warned, some 45 million people in the global South are at risk of being pushed into acute hunger this year. The world risks sleepwalking into a global food crisis. And we cannot risk tens of millions of people going hungry because Iran has hijacked an international shipping lane.
And so that is why we need to act together in our response. The World Bank, the IMF, other institutions have an unparallelled ability to deliver emergency finance at a scale that’s needed to cushion the immediate impacts of the crisis. And with others, the UK has been using our voice and shareholder role to press for a step change in response, coordinated across the global financial system. We need faster coordinated action, multilateral development banks operating as a coherent whole, not just in parallel, aligned programming, quicker disbursement, specific support. to fertiliser markets, working closely with UN agencies. And with the World Food Programme, we’re already helping preposition food supplies, because we have to get ahead of the risks, not wait for the suffering to unfold before us.
But aid can’t operate alone. And that’s why Britain has led diplomatic efforts to press for the immediate reopening of the Strait, convening partners to defend the principle of the law of the sea, and why we’re preparing alongside France, a multilateral maritime mission to reassure shipping and get to trade moving when an agreement is in place, and supporting the negotiations, to fully reopen the Strait, free from restrictions and tolls, to get the global economy moving again. But the Hormuz crisis holds up a mirror to our wider challenges. This shows the importance of acting early and in partnership to mobilise support. The importance of political and policy responses to tackle the causes of crises, not just to mitigate their impacts. The importance of the rule of law. In this case, freedom of navigation, for prosperity and development, not just for order and stability. And the urgent need to address the underlying weaknesses in our economic resilience and our precarious food and energy security.
For us in the UK, that means, first and foremost, accelerating the clean energy transition. Instead of the fossil fuel roller coaster, the security independence. An economy of British owned renewable energy. Because renewable energy can’t get stuck in the Strait of Hormuz and can’t be hijacked by hostile states. This is a choice we are making for ourselves, but it is also true for many other countries as well. And so, in responding to this crisis, we should be turbocharging that shift, and it’s why I’m so pleased that we can announce today the BII’s investment, the British International Investment, additional investment, to deliver over £4.6 billion of climate investment in emerging markets to support the green transition, and to build energy security, too.
The reason that this matters is because the Strait of Hormuz is no outlier. Coming so soon after the energy price shock, the grain supply threats when Russia invaded Ukraine, or the supply chain crisis in COVID. This reflects a new era of geopolitics and geoeconomics, an era of global great power competition and global volatility, but also concurrent crises, from conflict, climate, from communicable disease. Where our interconnected world that has helped lift nations out of poverty and drive growth is turned against us to become a source of great vulnerability. At a time when violent conflict is on the rise around the world and greater than any time since the Second World War. And we’ve seen new levels and patterns of displacement and migration, tied also often to climate change as extreme weather and record temperatures destroy livelihoods. And also the new uncertainties from the pace of technological change. As AI, frontier technologies offer profound potential to give us new solutions around healthcare, around development, around economic growth. But also real risks of compounding global injustice and insecurity unless we respond. And, of course, a multilateral system in need of reform. At a time when development budgets in many donor countries, including here in the UK, are under financial strain or facing reductions.
So, in the face of these challenges, bold new approaches are needed, and we need to be honest that as well as keeping up with changing times, we need to address some of the deficiencies in some of the traditional ways we’ve done development in the past. The external blueprints, the paternalism, the policies that increased dependency rather than building resilience, and the reflex to act for others, rather than getting firmly behind local needs and priorities. So, as part of the UK’s response, we’ve held honest exchanges with partners about what we should do differently. And heard clearly the need and the demand for greater voice and agencies, for countries and communities to shape decisions that affect them, including global institutions and the global financial system.
As Mia Motley, the farsighted Prime Minister of Barbados has put it, seats at the table of decision making, where we can be seen, heard, become active agents in our own cause and lead our own development. And that lies behind the shifts that my friend and fellow minister, Baroness Jenny Chapman, has been leading in our UK development approach, as she will set out to you earlier this morning. Moving from donor to investor, from grants to expertise, putting partnership, and the focus on local needs at the centre of what we do, and putting those shifts hardwired into this conference today and tomorrow. Because the framing is about partnerships. Collective action on common challenges, on mutual respect, learning, and accountability. And a joint document that is not about traditional aid pledges, but about focussing on mobilising finance technology and new coalitions. And I want to pay tribute to Jenny and the FCDO team for bringing this event together.
So let me just then highlight three areas of what this looks like. On development finance, shifting the centre of gravity from traditional measures around public funding towards mobilising much wider investments and different forms of capital investment and support. For example, developing local capital markets to attract and allocate finance effectively, as we’ve done in Ethiopia, through support to their first public stock exchange, so that Ethiopian companies can tap into new funding. With UK Insurance sector, pioneering new private partnerships, that can help countries respond more quickly and effectively to natural disasters. And working through the most impactful bits of the multilateral system, such as the World Bank’s International Development Association, where every pound we invest unlocks four pounds of additional finance. Whilst backing calls for the reforms of the global financial system, including by tackling unsustainable debt, through expanding the common framework, and making it meet countries’ needs more quickly. We’re backing through Africa’s institutions to raise far more funding at scale. With our 650-million-pound contribution to the African development fund, helping leverage in up to 1.6 billion in grants and concessional loans, including issuing bonds on the London Stock Exchange for the first time. And moving from into also providing expertise, such as the tax advice that has helped Ghana, generate, an additional 100 million in revenue to invest in its own education and health priorities, far more than a traditional UK aid programme could have provided.
The second shift is to make sure we focus. our humanitarian and grant aid on the countries and the communities that need support most. Conflict is now one of the biggest drivers of extreme poverty across the world. Already over half of extreme poverty is concentrated in conflict affected, fragile states. And so, alongside our aid allocations to areas like Sudan and Lebanon, Palestine, were prioritising conflict resolution in each of those areas too. A focus that also supports our interest because conflicts that rage unresolved radiate instability across regions and continents. And it’s in our collective interest to support global health too. When we see the Ebola outbreak spread in and around the DRC, flagged by the WHO as being of clear international concern. And we also need a reset of the whole humanitarian system, as proposed, by UN Humanitarian Chief, Tom Fletcher, and organisations like the International Rescue Committee, rigorous prioritisation and shifting the power and resources to local partners that really understand the local contexts and needs. And UN reform, too, to help the UN play its indispensable role, to be more efficient, or effective and coherent, refocused on the core priorities and results in line with the UN 80 reform initiative.
But finally, I want to mention a further focus. that is about our values and also our shared interests. Because amidst the plethora of global emergencies, we can risk neglecting one that blights the safety and prosperity, equality, and freedom of half the world, including here in the UK. And that’s why the UK government has made tackling violence against women and girls a national mission. setting an unprecedented mission, a push to harm violence against women and girls in the UK in a decade. But we believe it also needs to be a global focus. Because at a time when one in every three women and girls, worldwide, will experience physical or sexual violence, these are not simply the statistics, but life scarred and generations that can bear those scars. And having heard firsthand on the Sudan-Chad border earlier this year, in Adre, some of the most harrowing stories of rape and sexual violence. We know that that kind of violence can pass through and scar whole generations and communities for years to come. And so tomorrow, here at this conference, we will say more about our upcoming international campaign, and the new coalition we seek to build involving multiple countries here at this conference.
So, in closing, let me thank you for being here and for all the discussions and the conversations about this event. This part of London is no stranger to being the basis for international cooperation. We’re holding this conference just a couple of miles from Greenwich’s Royal Observatory, from which the world agreed how to measure time. And that agreement, to create a single primary meridian, unlocked cooperation on trade or commerce, on global interactions. And here today, in a different time, on different terms, as an international community, with states, company, civil society, all represented, we’re discussing, again, the cooperation on the critical issues that will shape the coming decades, signing our jointly endorsed, Global Partnerships Compact. And I hope this shared endeavour that will carry us forward, whether it’s at the Hamburg Sustainability Conference, the multilateral events, or into the UK’s G20 presidency next year. Let me finish where I started, with the potential interest of all of those here, from so many different countries and backgrounds, to bring those partnerships across the world and across our communities together. For a world free from poverty, on a liveable planet, because we know it’s the partnerships that we build across the world, that make each and every one of us stronger at home.
The press release issued by the Department for Transport on 19 May 2026.
Transport Secretary sets out new HS2 costs and timelines after a full review, taking control of the project to cut waste, speed up delivery and save billions.
Transport Secretary announces new delivery timeframes and costs for HS2 after years of mismanagement
new plans could save billions in cost and years in construction time while delivering services at same speed as Japanese bullet trains
construction milestones hit ahead of schedule and back office roles slashed under reset, as analysis reveals it could cost as much to cancel the project as to complete it
The Transport Secretary today (19 May 2026) declared an end to an ‘era of neglect’ on High Speed Two (HS2) as she set out plans to reset the project, delivering the railway as quickly as possible and at the lowest reasonable cost.
Following years of mismanagement, the Transport Secretary has convened the team that delivered the Elizabeth Line and set out new costs and timeframes for the project, including efforts to cut construction costs and get passengers on trains sooner.
The government announced today the project is now expected to cost between £87.7 and £102.7 billion, with two thirds of the increase due to works being missed from the scope of the original project plan, underestimation by previous governments, inefficient delivery – and the remaining third due to inflation.
The government has also confirmed HS2 will run at 320 km/h (200 mph), aligning with speeds across Europe and Japanese Bullet trains. In previous plans, HS2 trains were set to run at 360 km/h (225 mph) but with no existing track to test trains at that speed in Great Britain, adding to spiralling costs and build time.
The change in speed could deliver savings of up to £2.5 billion and at least a year in delivery time, so communities can start to benefit sooner.
The first trains are now expected to start between Old Oak Common in west London and Birmingham Curzon Street between 2036 and 2039. An estimate of the full scheme from London Euston to Curzon Street and a connection to the West Coast Main Line, is between 2040 and 2043.
HS2 Ltd Mark Wild’s ongoing reset has borne fruit – with 6 major construction milestones reached earlier than planned in the last year – as well as eliminating 300 bureaucratic roles, and scrutinising contracts to ensure taxpayers get value for money.
The government is committed to delivering HS2 in full between Birmingham and London, with a new assessment revealing it could cost as much to cancel the project as it would to complete it, while delivering none of the benefits.
Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, said:
Taxpayers, passengers and communities along the route have been let down by years of mismanagement on HS2.
I share their anger about the waste and mess, but I am proud that this government has worked with HS2’s new senior team to get this project off life support and on the road to recovery.
We will get the job done but we will also take every opportunity to save time and money in the process, getting a grip on delivery, controlling costs, and stripping out the complexity that’s plagued the project in the past.
We can and must build big infrastructure projects in Britain. But we also need competent people in charge of them. This is the same team that delivered the Elizabeth Line. We have done it before, we will do it again.
Delivering HS2 will mean more trains on the West Coast Main Line corridor, and more reliable and faster journeys, saving passengers around 30 minutes between London and Birmingham compared with current services, and doubling peak long-distance, fast rail capacity between the capital and West Midlands.
HS2 will deliver houses, jobs and growth. Recent forecasts show it is already contributing £20 billion to the economy over the next decade around its station sites and depot in the West Midlands and west London, plus 63,000 new homes and over 49,000 new jobs in these areas.
Commercial development at Euston is estimated to add £41 billion to the economy over the next 3 decades and support 34,000 new jobs, with high-tech tunnelling machines now working under Londoners’ feet to make HS2 to Euston a reality. Over 6,100 contracts have been awarded to UK businesses, with more than half of these to small and medium-size enterprises.
CEO Mark Wild and Chair Mike Brown have started to turn HS2 Ltd around and have delivered 6 major construction milestones ahead of schedule over the last 12 months, including:
the sliding of a road bridge for the A46 over the HS2 line of route in April 2025
the installation of beams and overbridges near Calvert in Buckinghamshire in August 2025
the completion of boring the 3.5-mile Bromford tunnel in Birmingham in October 2025
Mark Wild, Chief Executive of HS2 Ltd, said:
I recognise this will be unwelcome news for local communities and taxpayers, and I share in their disappointment that it will take longer and cost more to bring HS2 into service.
Resetting HS2 was the only way to regain control of the project. We have turned a corner in the last 12 months with significantly improved levels of productivity, helping us to deliver major milestones ahead of schedule. We’re also progressing with plans to bring HS2 into line with other high-speed railways in Europe – further reducing the project’s complexity without compromising on benefits.
Better journeys, more capacity on the network, and economic growth are all vital to the country’s future prosperity, and that’s exactly what we will deliver. Driven by the hard work of 31,000 people on the ground, HS2 is finally getting back on track.
The HS2 reset is fully funded within the Department for Transport’s current Spending Review settlement, with no additional borrowing. Funding beyond 2029-30 will be set at future Spending Reviews and will be underpinned by the government’s non-negotiable fiscal rules.
The statement made by Heidi Alexander, the Secretary of State for Transport, in the House of Commons on 19 May 2026.
Overview
Today, alongside my oral statement in the House, I am publishing this government’s latest report to Parliament on High Speed Two (HS2).
Over the past year, Mark Wild and HS2 Ltd have worked closely with my department and other partners in government to assess the remaining scope of work, and to estimate thoroughly how long it will take and how much it will cost to complete the project. The government has accepted his advice on the revised cost and schedule for completing HS2, and I am now sharing these figures publicly.
The expected cost of delivering HS2 is now in the range of £ 87.7 – 102.7 billion. This is expressed in a mixed price base, including the cash outturn of works to date and the costs of future work excluding inflation. This represents £ 70.9 – 82.2 billion in an equivalent 2019 mixed price base – a stark increase on the previous cost range of £35 – 45 billion (2019 prices) set under the previous government.
These ranges cover the cost of the whole programme, stretching from London Euston to Birmingham Curzon Street and to the connection to the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre Junction, which will enable HS2 services to continue to the Northwest and Scotland. This includes the indicative expected cost of delivering HS2 to Euston, some of which we intend to fund through private finance and other sources.
Regarding schedule, the delivery of HS2’s opening stage is now expected between May 2036 and October 2039. This will see the first trains running between Old Oak Common in west London and Birmingham Curzon Street. We estimate that the full scheme, including both Euston to the south and Handsacre Junction to the north, will open between May 2040 and December 2043.
Two thirds of this expected cost increase are a combination of necessary works that were missed from the scope of the original project plan, under-estimation and inefficient delivery. These are issues that were within the control of HS2 Ltd, some of its suppliers, and previous governments, and these lessons are being applied following the James Stewart Review.
A third of the cost increase is linked to inflation, which has significantly impacted the British economy over the past five years. The cost estimate for the programme was updated in the past to account for inflation, but not regularly enough. To reflect inflation more accurately in the future, including any impacts arising from the current conflict in the Middle East, we will update the price base every two years in line with future Spending Reviews.
As I set out in my interim Parliamentary Report in March, I asked HS2 Ltd CEO Mark Wild to present the government with options to reduce the complexity and over-specification of HS2 in order to bring down costs and delivery timelines. HS2 Ltd, in collaboration with my department, has reported on the initial outcomes of this work, and following robust assurance and consideration at a Ministerial Task Force, I have accepted the recommendation to bring HS2 into line with proven leading European high-speed operating standards, including operating HS2 at up to 320 kilometres per hour (kph), as it supports our endeavour to bring HS2 into operation safely at the lowest reasonable cost.
HS2’s initial work on speed specification suggests that by aligning with other top railways in Europe we could potentially save between £1 billion and £2.5 billion over the life of the delivery programme, by reducing testing and commissioning time, opening earlier and with reduced costs compared to existing plans. The main savings come from avoiding the risks associated with certifying a railway at a speed not operated anywhere in the world.
This is an initial assessment that will mature further as the work is refined into a full programme baseline, but HS2 Ltd, and my department, are confident this will make it more likely that HS2 is delivered at the lowest reasonable cost. This change provides an opportunity to reduce the risks involved in delivering HS2 by aligning the speed and systems used with tried-and-tested operations in the UK and Europe – simplifying the remaining work to be delivered. The reduction in top speed will be modest and brings HS2 in line with the fastest high-speed services already operating in Europe, relying on proven technology and systems. Initial assessments indicate that journey times from London to Birmingham will increase by 3 minutes, and will still be 30 minutes faster than the current service, whilst delivering the capacity we need and supporting future economic growth along the line, and around the stations.
Mark Wild has set his organisation the challenging ambition of delivering the programme at a cost of £ 93.2 billion and an initial opening date of late 2037 for trains running between Old Oak Common and Birmingham Curzon Street. This ambition deliberately sits within the lower half of the ranges to drive better and more efficient delivery. We support it, which gives him a clear mandate to drive down costs and improve productivity.
As the reset progresses and a full delivery baseline is developed, I recognise that additional information might result in HS2 Ltd reporting above this ambition in the future. If that is the case, the ambition will remain useful to incentivise better productivity within the ranges I have published today.
Past estimates of both cost and schedule have proven clearly inaccurate. Given the need to rebuild public trust, it was essential that we learn lessons from past failures and take the time to develop a robust set of figures, as recommended by James Stewart in his review commissioned by this government. The new estimates and their methodologies have been thoroughly assessed and scrutinised, including by a panel of experts who have successfully delivered railways internationally and domestically, like the Elizabeth Line. An Accounting Officer Assessment was produced alongside the new ranges.
However, these estimates do not disguise the fact that HS2 Ltd has already spent close to the original budget. The reset work also makes clear that progress on finishing the civil engineering for the entire line of route is at least four years behind the original schedule, and that the time required to test and commission HS2 to ensure a reliable and safe service was underestimated by another three years. The number of years left to complete the programme is roughly the same as when construction started in 2020, and it is likely we will need to spend the same amount as has already been spent to date.
It is now imperative that we proceed with the final stages of the HS2 reset so that the programme is brought under control and delivered sensibly going forward.
Despite the significant challenges, the programme is at peak delivery, with 31,000 people and thousands of UK businesses working hard to deliver HS2. Delivery progress continues to be made, with the contract for HS2’s rolling stock depot at Washwood Heath, in Birmingham, awarded to a joint venture of Taylor Woodrow Infrastructure Ltd and Aureos Rail Ltd. We are starting to see results from reset: HS2 is now being built faster and more efficiently, with six major construction milestones reached earlier than planned last financial year, and with early signs looking positive for this year’s milestones. Work will continue over the coming year, with the final stages of the reset expected to conclude in the first half of 2027. Under new leadership, HS2 Ltd is putting construction back in logical order, strengthening commercial controls, restructuring the organisation, and rebuilding the partnership with government.
When faced with such a difficult inheritance, I could have chosen to cancel the project and remediate the construction undertaken so far. The costs of doing so are considerable and could cost as much as completing HS2, and would result in no lasting benefit, abandoning ambitions for better national transport across our railway network and potentially leaving communities across our country blighted by unused infrastructure – something I am simply not prepared to do. Communities affected by HS2 do not want to live near half-finished structures that serve no useful purpose without a railway. The economic growth that HS2 is already driving in the West Midlands, and at Old Oak Common, through new housing development, job creation and local regeneration, would be significantly impacted. Instead, this government is committed to doing the responsible thing: facing the challenge head-on so that we can leave the country’s infrastructure in a better condition than when we started.
Increasing the capacity and performance of the current network will drive economic growth. The southern section of the West Coast Main Line is congested and this limits the number of trains that can reliably run, and the number of passengers who can travel. Despite large urban centres, labour productivity in the West Midlands and the North West lags behind the national average. Faster trains will transform this, and extend these benefits to North Wales and Scotland too. This government has been clear on its mission to transform infrastructure across the country, and we are pursuing reforms that will improve our ability to deliver projects. Completing the project remains vital for economic growth and the capacity of our rail network.
The same will be true of our plans for Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR), which will deliver a turn up and go railway across the city regions of the Northern Growth Corridor – better connecting Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Bradford, Sheffield, and York, with faster and more regular services to Newcastle, Chester and Hull. Development work is underway and we will maintain our focus on applying the lessons from the successful delivery of the Transpennine upgrade, and from HS2, ensuring that we improve our delivery of major rail projects across the country. We also announced our long-term intent for a full new rail line connecting Birmingham and Manchester, which informed our decision on NPR. This will not be a revival of HS2 and no decisions have been taken on the specification or timetable for delivery. In the meantime, we will retain land the government has already purchased between the West Midlands and Crewe.
These new estimates, alongside cost and schedule ambitions to incentivise better delivery, provide a robust foundation for completing the final stages of the reset. Looking ahead, our focus will remain on delivering the railway safely, as soon as possible, and at the lowest reasonable cost.
Wider reset
A key focus of the HS2 reset work has been to put the building blocks of the programme back in the right order. HS2 Ltd has assessed what it will take to finish the civils works on the line of route and stations, to deliver the rail systems, and to deploy the rolling stock, test the railway and drive reliability before starting passenger services.
Over the coming year, HS2 Ltd will be developing a new Baseline for the programme to provide a clear scope of work and path to delivery. It will also form the basis for performance monitoring and reporting by the department to ensure that the project is robustly managed once the reset is complete. I have instructed my officials to update the programme’s business case to ensure that we reflect the changes in HS2’s delivery.
In the meantime, with better contract management, clearer accountability and stronger project controls, the reset is enabling us to put taxpayers’ money to better use and deliver more construction in year for less expenditure than previously. In the 2025/26 financial year, HS2 Ltd delivered over 10% more progress on construction than planned with the same amount of money.
Taking earthworks as an example, over 2025/26, HS2 Ltd moved 25.0 million cubic metres compared to a plan of 20.8 million, an improvement of 20%. Construction costs are tracking below forecast and delivery performance improved over the past year, with six major milestones on tunnels and roads completed ahead of in-year schedule. These included the sliding of a road bridge for the A46 over the HS2 route in April 2025, the installation of precast beams and overbridges over Station Road near Calvert in August 2025, and the second breakthrough on the Bromford tunnel in Birmingham in October 2025. The north portal structure at the Chiltern tunnel was completed in 12 months, several months faster than the south portal, thanks to lessons learned and innovative construction methods. The excavation of the 8.4-mile Northolt tunnel, the second longest on HS2, was completed on schedule in June 2025 despite complex ground conditions.
These improvements have been supported by HS2 Ltd introducing an improved programme control framework. Teams are using new tools and mechanisms, allowing them to better track planned works against actual progress and delivery on the ground, and enabling better problem identification and reporting of progress. Weekly performance reviews enable construction teams to identify problems quickly and resolve issues before they escalate, creating a more responsive and accountable approach. This has taken place while key health and safety indicators have also improved.
HS2 Ltd’s new management team inherited a challenging commercial position. Prior to the reset, commercial capabilities and the management of HS2’s construction contracts were not effective. HS2 Ltd’s ability to settle commercial matters progressively and contemporaneously had deteriorated and become insufficient over recent years. Consequently, large backlogs had been allowed to develop in relation to cost verification, cost finalisation and contract change.
HS2 Ltd has since concentrated on strengthening its commercial controls. New commercial roles have been created to focus on cost verification and contract management, to scrutinise every payment application, to challenge contractor claims, and to manage contracts in taxpayers’ interests. These improvements must be fully embedded in the company, and endure beyond completion of the reset, to the conclusion of the programme.
HS2 Ltd is also engaging with its key supply chain partners to review contracts, close out historic payments only where appropriate and justified, and seek opportunities to incentivise improved performance. This work will be critical to stabilising costs and enabling us to make the spend on HS2 as efficient as possible. I will update on progress in my next report.
HS2 Ltd was set up to deliver a multiphase programme and grew accordingly; this multiphase programme no longer exists. Consequently, HS2 Ltd is being transformed into a lean and accountable delivery body focused on safe delivery between London and the West Midlands at the lowest reasonable cost. Given the overlap of alignment with elements of HS2’s former Phase 2, HS2 Ltd was already developing infrastructure for Northern Powerhouse Rail between Liverpool and Manchester. To make best use of taxpayers’ money and avoid additional costs through alternative arrangements, this work will continue and is being brigaded into a separate business unit, pending longer-term decisions about delivery responsibility for this scheme. The high-level plan we recently announced for Northern Powerhouse Rail remains unaffected by the new cost and schedule ranges for HS2.
HS2 Ltd did not have the right skills, structure or culture to deliver a programme of this scale successfully. Major steps are being taken to restructure the organisation to control and deliver HS2 more effectively, including:
reshaping the corporate centre, reducing headcount by cutting 300 corporate roles and rebalancing the organisation to better support delivery teams
redirecting resources to boost frontline delivery capacity by 40%, with 168 additional roles focused on cost management, oversight and decision-making
bringing in skilled and experienced professionals across commercial, technical, assurance, controls, and finance functions to fill critical capability gaps
As a result, there has also been significant restructuring of the leadership team at HS2 Ltd. This includes appointing a new Director of Business Delivery to reshape the organisation and a Chief Commercial Officer to provide additional commercial leadership, a gap identified in James Stewart’s review. Looking ahead, the department is also working closely with DfT Operator and Network Rail to strengthen the voice of the future operator into the delivery programme and deliver HS2 as part of an integrated railway.
The reset has begun bearing fruit, and I expect continued progress through the financial year as work progresses on completing the delivery baseline, implementing the new commercial strategy and reshaping HS2 Ltd.
The government accepted all 89 of James Stewart’s recommendations in June last year, and since then good progress has been made in implementing them, with both the department and HS2 Ltd on track to implement the remaining recommendations by the end of the programme reset, recognising that delivering the principles of the review will be an enduring endeavour for the lifetime of the programme. I am pleased that James has agreed to join the HS2 Shareholder Board to help ensure that the principles of his review are delivered in full.
The review found that multiple layers of assurance cause duplication and delays, driven by a lack of trust. The department has worked with HS2 Ltd and government partners to implement streamlined governance. This includes using the new Mega Projects Decision Panel to replace existing approval processes and oversee the HS2 reset process, alongside the Ministerial Task Force that this government reinstated. To support effective decision-making, the department has also implemented an integrated approach to assurance, bringing cross-government partners and external experts together to scrutinise the reset and utilising experts to assure the approach. Improvements to culture and trust are being put in place across the two organisations.
The review also highlighted weaknesses in HS2 Ltd’s corporate governance. The appointment of Mike Brown as Chair of HS2 Ltd and his subsequent strengthening of the Board are significant steps in addressing this. The HS2 Ltd Board’s roles and responsibilities have been clarified, with strengthened arrangements for compliance and organisational capability; enhancing delivery expertise within the Board and the company; and ensuring robust oversight through the Board’s sub-committees.
Learning is being embedded across current and future projects through:
independent assurance reviews of major projects, including Euston, Heathrow, Northern Powerhouse Rail, East West Rail, and the A66 Northern Trans-Pennine
resetting the department’s programme of work to improve project delivery
dissemination of learning across the department, its arm’s-length bodies, and wider government
monitoring progress on wider government recommendations in partnership with the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority
Following the publication of the review in June 2025, the Prime Minister asked the Cabinet Secretary to consider the Civil Service and the wider public sector’s stewardship of the HS2 programme, and whether further investigation was warranted. The Cabinet Secretary commissioned Sir Stephen Lovegrove, former National Security Adviser, to undertake a review focusing on accountability, governance and capability. The review has been published today; the government will respond to its recommendations after thorough consideration of the findings.
Oversight
We have continued to strengthen oversight structures to drive performance and accountability. We established a new Shareholder Board, chaired by the Permanent Secretary and with independent membership, to provide more effective oversight. This Board has met six times over the last year. A monthly Programme Performance Board has been established to ensure and oversee the effective delivery of HS2 against agreed schedule, cost and scope.
Alongside regular bilateral meetings between government ministers, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury and I have attended all meetings of the Ministerial Task Force to deliver effective oversight. Since my report in July 2025, it has met four times to review progress on both delivery and the reset; to agree HS2 Ltd’s commercial strategy; to agree the updated schedule and cost ranges for the delivery of HS2; and to consider the early findings of the work on HS2 speed specification.
On his appointment, I tasked Mike Brown with reviewing the capacity and capability of the HS2 Ltd Board and its effectiveness. On his recommendation, I have appointed six new Non-Executive Directors which will bolster senior leadership capability in infrastructure delivery, health and safety, business transformation and commercial relationships.
While better governance alone is not enough to bring performance back on track, effective oversight, clear accountability and purpose-driven structures will be essential in improving management of the programme’s delivery.
Expenditure
To the end of March 2026, £44.2 billion (nominal prices) had been spent on the HS2 programme. This is provided in more detail in the financial annex, based on data provided by HS2 Ltd.
Spend to date information covers the period up to the end of March 2026. Unless stated otherwise, all figures are presented in nominal prices.
At the 2025 Spending Review, the government allocated a £25.3 billion capital settlement for HS2 Ltd from Financial Years 2026/27 to 2029/30 in order to progress delivery of HS2 from the West Midlands to London Euston. The HS2 programme reset work is underpinned by this settlement, and the annual funding allocations remain unchanged.
Euston
We have made significant progress in developing affordable, integrated plans for the Euston Campus, with all partners confirming their support for an overall spatial plan. The HS2 station will include 6 platforms, supporting all foreseeable Phase 1 services. Space will also be provided for additional platforms should they be required to support a future expansion of the network. In addition, the redevelopment of the existing Euston Station will deliver a new station concourse that will accommodate current and future passenger demand on the West Coast Main Line, while replacing life-expired station assets in a cost-effective manner.
We are working at pace with our Master Development Partner, Lendlease, on a Masterplan for Euston, with an emphasis on economic growth and delivering much needed housing, and will set out a plan in due course. We are also exploring models for development across the wider Euston area with local partners.
In April 2026, the Euston Delivery Company assumed the leadership role for the Euston campus and became the single directing mind for the Euston programme, delivering a cross-campus approach to the next stage of design work. Initially, the Euston Delivery Company will sit as a business unit within the department as we build its capability. We expect the company to be stood up as a public body in the Autumn.
With our significant public commitment to funding HS2 into Euston, we believe that the additional investment required to build the new HS2 station at Euston is an exciting opportunity for private investors. As referenced in the government’s 10-Year Infrastructure Strategy, the department is exploring the use of a public-private partnership to design, build, finance and maintain this HS2 station. We are continuing to advance this work, in close collaboration with HM Treasury and the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority.
In February 2026, the department launched the first stage of preliminary market engagement which sought to raise industry awareness of the project and the department’s emerging plans, assess potential market appetite and identify priority issues for the market at an early stage, to support refinement of the proposed commercial and procurement approach. Confirmation of using a public-private partnership model will be subject to achieving appropriate risk transfer and delivering value for money for taxpayers. We will also continue to explore the most effective ways to capture the value created by development unlocked through transport infrastructure and recycle it to repay public investment, including through a tax increment financing-style mechanism at Euston.
The updated cost range for HS2 published today includes an early estimate of the cost of delivering the HS2 and London Underground elements of the Euston programme, some of which we intend to fund through private finance and other sources. While at an earlier stage of maturity than the wider HS2 reset, these costs will be reviewed and refined as work progresses, and further updates will be provided as part of regular parliamentary reporting. An updated budget for Euston will be subject to further development of design and schedule. The redevelopment of the existing Euston Station concourse area is subject to separate funding via the Rail Network Enhancements Pipeline.
Progress has been made on ‘meanwhile uses’ to reduce the impact on the local community. In July 2025, the new Euston Community Hub opened in the former Maria Fidelis school and has since had over 7,000 visitors. The Hub, located at the heart of Euston, provides a dynamic space for community sector organisations and public service providers to carry out various programmes and community-led activities, initiatives and engagement. It will also serve as a central information point for residents and passengers, providing regular updates and engagement opportunities about plans to redevelop Euston. September 2025 also saw the opening of the Construction Skills Yard, where local people can gain experience of being on site, get trained on machinery in a realistic environment, and use the site facilities. The new training hub, which expands the existing Euston Skills Centre is being used to deliver skills courses and create more opportunities for residents to access local jobs in the construction industry, and on the Euston station works.
Benefits
Economic growth and housing
HS2 will provide people with more choice about where to work, and where to study. Economic growth will also be driven by increased leisure travel, as it becomes quicker and easier for people to visit friends or explore different parts of the UK.
By bringing businesses closer together, HS2 will make it easier to share knowledge and enable them to access more workers in different locations. As a result, HS2 will attract new businesses to local areas, in turn driving increased investment and economic activity.
The economic benefits of HS2 are already being seen with the programme’s four new stations acting as catalysts for significant local growth and regeneration. HS2 estimate this will support the generation of over 63,000 new homes, 49,000 new jobs and an economic uplift of £20 billion in the West Midlands and west London over the next 10 years. HS2 is supporting the early development we are already seeing in Birmingham and the West Midlands, helping to catalyse investment in exciting new areas such as the Sports Quarter.
HS2 will also have a significant impact around Euston station. Euston is one of the largest development opportunities in central London and its potential is enhanced by the connectivity HS2 will provide. Recent estimates from the London Borough of Camden suggest that by 2053 a mix of new homes and commercial development could deliver an economic uplift of around £41 billion and support the creation of 34,000 new jobs.
Alongside the reset, HS2 Ltd is exploring opportunities for early release of land at key locations: Old Oak Common, Interchange, Curzon Street and Washwood Heath, enabling some land holdings to be brought into use while the railway is being built. This work aims to unlock potential for new homes, retail and commercial development.
This approach means we can deliver regeneration benefits as early as possible, creating lasting economic value alongside railway construction rather than waiting until completion of the railway. Each site represents a significant opportunity to boost local economies and support this government’s growth agenda. We are working closely with local authorities, communities, stakeholders, developers and investors throughout this process to help realise these opportunities.
HS2’s economic benefits will extend beyond the new stations, as HS2 services will extend and provide better journeys to the Northwest and Scotland, with faster journeys also possible through onward connections to areas including North Wales. The delivery of this new railway will also release capacity to meet increasing demand for regional, local and freight services between London and the West Midlands, further supporting growth in the local communities along that route.
Skills and innovation
People are at the heart of HS2 and its benefits, as the programme continues to support around 31,000 jobs.
I am proud of the impact HS2 is already having on the lives of people being brought into the workforce. So far, 5,771 previously unemployed people have been brought into work since Phase 1 Royal Assent.
We are also making great progress on supporting apprentices and have achieved a significant milestone this year with 2,136 apprenticeships created since 2017, breaking the 2,000 target that had been set for the programme. These apprenticeships will have a lasting impact on the individuals who have completed their programmes and help to develop a skilled and modern workforce, leaving a lasting skills legacy for the construction industry.
Innovation also remains central to HS2’s delivery. As part of the programme reset, HS2 Ltd is working with some of the UK’s leading tech specialists – bringing in expertise from beyond the rail sector – to tackle key challenges, including improving value for money, boosting site productivity, and enhancing safety management. Through its partnership with Connected Places Catapult, the HS2 Innovation Accelerator has supported start-ups and tech innovators since 2020, delivering cost savings, funding and investment of over £250 million, creating hundreds of new jobs in science and tech and attracting investment into SMEs.
Community impacts, land and property
Community engagement
Due to the delays to delivery, the impacts of construction will be felt by communities along the line of route for longer. HS2 Ltd continues to inform and involve communities who are impacted by construction and the uncertainty caused by the project reset. Between April 2025 and March 2026, over 21,000 residents were engaged at over 3,000 meetings and events. A further 29,406 enquiries were received via the HS2 Ltd Helpdesk, which operates 24 hours a day.
During the same period, HS2 Ltd received 1,405 complaints, the vast majority of which continue to relate to the impacts of construction, including concerns about traffic and transport disruption and noise and vibration impacts. HS2 Ltd is committed to resolving complaints promptly. Of the 1,405 complaints received, HS2 Ltd resolved 100% of urgent complaints within 2 working days and resolved 98% of all other complaints within 20 working days or less.
Local funds
One of the ways in which HS2 currently offers mitigation, benefits and compensation for line-of-route communities affected by construction is through the £40 million Community and Environment Fund and the Business and Local Economy Fund. This fund will continue to be available throughout the prolonged construction period. As at April 2026, over £22.3 million has been invested in communities and businesses that have been demonstrably disrupted by the construction of HS2, delivering 405 projects that will leave an enduring legacy.
Land, property and remediation
This government has recognised the need to make faster progress in settling outstanding property compensation claims, which in the past were taking far too long to reach final settlement. HS2 Ltd has now significantly increased the rate at which claims on Phase 1 are being settled, but we have made clear to the company that further improvement is needed.
In January, the government confirmed its intention to retain existing land holdings previously acquired for HS2 between the West Midlands and Crewe, in line with its intention to ultimately deliver a new rail line between Birmingham and Manchester.
HS2 Ltd is speaking to property owners whose land has been acquired in order to progress outstanding claims. HS2 Ltd and the supply chain have begun to engage with landowners of temporarily acquired land alongside local authorities to agree necessary remediation plans. We anticipate the remediation programme will conclude by the end of 2027.
The powers to compulsory purchase land on the former HS2 Phase 2a route expired on 11 February 2026. The government has the option to seek to extend these powers in the future, if required; we will set out our future intentions on land powers, consents and safeguarding in due course.
Along the Phase 1 route, HS2 Ltd has identified a number of surplus properties for potential disposal and has begun to market these. We have already sold a small number of Phase 1 properties as part of a pilot project and anticipate selling an increasing number over the coming years as continued progress in building the railway means we are able to release properties back to the market.
Following the lifting of safeguarding between the West Midlands and Leeds that I announced in my report in July 2025, the department has commenced a programme to sell land and property that is no longer required on the former Phase 2 route, starting with 558 properties on the former Phase 2b Eastern Leg.
A delivery agent has been appointed to lead on delivering the programme and we expect open market sales to begin later in 2026. HS2 Ltd will continue to manage properties on behalf of the department.
The disposal process will comply with the Crichel Down Rules, giving former owners, or their successors, whose properties were acquired under statutory blight or compulsory purchase, an opportunity to reacquire their former property at its current market value.
This programme will be phased over several years and carried out carefully to minimise disruption to local communities, protect local property markets, and ensure value for money for taxpayers.
Wider rail network
One of the lessons we are learning from HS2 is the need to approach the infrastructure needs of the rail network as a unified system, rather than a collection of separate projects. The government’s ultimate intention to deliver a full new rail line between Birmingham and Manchester will help to maximise the national benefits of both HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail and safeguard future growth for the long term, by ensuring that the West Coast Main Line corridor offers sufficient capacity and good connectivity. Further work will be carried out in collaboration with local partners on what will be delivered and when, but we expect the delivery timelines for this line to follow the completion of HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail.
As the department prepares to establish Great British Railways (GBR) and continues to bring passenger services back under public ownership, we are considering options for how HS2 services and infrastructure will be integrated. GBR will improve services for passengers and freight users, transition the rail network towards greater financial sustainability, and unlock barriers to the delivery of future schemes. As such, I am clear HS2 needs to be delivered and operated in a way that supports these objectives.
The planned approach to HS2’s operations must align with GBR’s operating model as it develops. The HS2 service will need to align with and complement the wider rail network. Decisions on the operational model for HS2 and its interaction with GBR are being carefully considered. It is likely that transitional states will be required in order to de-risk the process and protect our ability to deliver the HS2 project and services during this period.
Financial annex
Total estimated cost range
HS2 is forecast to cost £87.7 – £102.7 billion. This is expressed in a mixed price base, including the costs of both works to date and future work excluding inflation.
As committed to Parliament in my previous report, the cost ranges provided also express spend after Q3 2019 in 2019 values excluding projected inflation. This approach ensures that costs can be reconciled against figures previously communicated to Parliament and the public.
HS2 programme ranges
£ billion
Low
High
Q3 2025
87.7
102.7
Q3 2019
70.9
82.2
Notes
Q3 2025 ranges
[1] Spend up to September 2025 is expressed in nominal to reflect the cash spent on the programme (£40.9 billion). This approach is consistent with the government’s Parliamentary reporting and HS2 Ltd’s management of costs since Notice to Proceed in 2020, in which spend prior to Q3 2019 was treated in nominal.
[2] The remaining costs-to-go are presented in the prices of the day (Q3 2025) excluding forecast general and construction inflation. When the price base of the programme is reset every two years in line with future Spending Reviews, the lower and upper bound of the ranges will increase commensurately with inflation actually incurred over this period.
[3] The ranges include the full cost of delivering HS2 to Euston, some of which we intend to fund through private finance and other sources such as tax increment financing.
Q3 2019 ranges
[4] Note the Notice to Proceed Funding Envelope was constructed by uprating expenditure between 2015 and Q3 2019 to Q3 2019 prices.
Overall nominal cost
[5] Indicatively, the provisional cash estimate based on the lower and upper bound for the overall cost of the HS2 programme is £94.3 billion – £112.4 billion in cash terms, including projected inflation forecast using HS2 Ltd’s bespoke inflation indices.
Historic and forecast expenditure
The information on HS2’s overall spend to date and budget is now being provided in nominal (cash) terms following a commitment made by the department to the Public Accounts Committee to express the costs of the programme in a more up-to-date price base and better capture the inflation incurred since 2019. The government will provide further details on the 2026 to 2027 position in cash terms as part of the standard Main Estimates report to Parliament.
This is expressed in nominal prices, including land and property.
The press release issued by the Home Office on 19 May 2026.
Organised crime gangs will be hit with raids, shop closures, and cash seizures in a £30 million crackdown on dodgy high street shops.
Organised crime gangs operating across Britain’s high streets will be hit with a major police offensive in a new nationwide crackdown on dodgy shops.
Rogue barber shops, vape stores, mini-marts and sweet shops linked to organised crime will face raids, closures and cash seizures under a new £30 million crackdown targeting money laundering, tax evasion, and illegal working over 3 years.
£20 million of funding will go towards an enhanced law enforcement response, including establishing a new multi-agency co-ordination cell based out of the National Crime Agency (NCA).
Police officers will also be uplifted across forces in hotspot regions. Altogether, 75 new police officers will be recruited across the NCA, Greater Manchester Police, West Midlands Police and a joint Kent Police and Essex Police Unit, to build intelligence at a national level and increase the number of dedicated officers tackling organised crime on the ground.
Trading Standards will also be backed with £6 million in new funding to bolster the response to sham businesses in at-risk local authorities. New officer training will be rolled out to identify suspicious businesses, strengthen business compliance, and boost enforcement.
A new High Street Organised Crime Unit has also been established to bring together government departments, policing partners, and Trading Standards. Together, the additional funding and new unit builds on strong enforcement action such as Operation Machinize, to boost the national and local response to targeting criminal networks operating in plain sight on Britain’s high streets.
Overseen by the Security Minister, Dan Jarvis, the unit will be responsible for identifying what more is needed – from stronger powers to better co-ordination – to stop this criminal activity from happening in the first place.
A rapid review of local responders’ powers is underway to explore how these can be strengthened, starting with a consultation on extending the duration of closure orders, where appropriate, to shut criminal businesses down for longer.
Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said:
Criminal gangs have exploited our high streets to launder their dirty money and undercut honest businesses.
We are hitting back with a nationwide crackdown to shut these fronts down, seize dirty cash and drive organised crime off our high streets and put bosses behind bars.
It comes as the NCA estimate at least £12 billion of criminal cash is generated in the UK each year, with £1 billion laundered through high street businesses like mini-marts, barber shops, vape stores and sweet shops. Some businesses are also connected to the sale of fake goods, tax evasion, illegal working, and illegal drug supply.
Thousands of businesses are expected to be raided, hundreds of arrests made and millions in cash seized as a national intensification campaign will be put on permanent footing annually to drive co-ordinated enforcement across the country.
Sal Melki, Deputy Director of Illicit Finance at the National Crime Agency, said:
For the past 18 months, the NCA, in conjunction with policing partners, has led Operation Machinize, the largest operation against economic crime on our high streets. By bringing together policing, HMRC, Immigration Enforcement, Trading Standards, and other partners in a co-ordinated approach, over 950 people have been arrested and over £10 million worth of criminal value seized.
This criminal activity makes our communities less safe and less prosperous. It undermines legitimate business, deprives public services of tax revenues, and fuels a range of predicate offences such as the drugs trade, illicit goods, trafficking, and organised immigration crime.
We will not stop and having the support of the High Street Organised Crime Unit to grow the Machinize partnership will enable us to target and disrupt more high harm offenders. The HSOCU will be key to a whole of government response, where enforcement action is backed up with the laws, policies and powers required at all levels to get this criminal element out of our high streets.
Lord Bichard, Chair, National Trading Standards, said:
Organised high street crime, including the illegal sale of tobacco and counterfeit goods, is damaging communities across the country. These criminal networks undercut honest businesses, draw money away from local economies and expose consumers to unregulated and potentially unsafe products. They are also often linked to wider offending, including money laundering, exploitation, and violence.
The creation of a new High Street Organised Crime Unit will help drive a co-ordinated national response while strengthening local enforcement capability through additional support and funding for Trading Standards, police and partner agencies on the ground, who will work together to disrupt organised offenders, protect the public and support honest businesses that play by the rules.
The latest Operation Machinize in November saw 2,734 premises visited and raided, 924 individuals arrested, over £13 million of suspected criminal proceeds seized or restrained, and more than £2.7 million worth of illicit commodities destroyed. It builds on the £300 million in criminal assets recovered by law enforcement last year, with money invested back to the front lines to support agencies leading the fight against crime.
The new National Police Service will go further by bringing together the National Crime Agency, Counter Terrorism Policing, and regional organised crime units’ capabilities to strengthen the response to serious and organised crime.
Deputy Commissioner Nik Adams, City of London Police and National Police Chiefs’ Council Lead for Financial Investigation and Asset Recovery, said:
Our high streets should be places where legitimate businesses can grow, not places where organised criminals hide behind shopfronts.
This task force will harness the efforts of the National Crime Agency, national economic crime leads, local community policing, specialist officers and partners to target the businesses being used to launder criminal money, recover criminal assets and protect legitimate traders.
Operation Machinize has shown that the most effective response comes when neighbourhood officers, financial investigators and national agencies work as one team. Local officers understand their communities and can identify suspicious activity, while financial investigators, the City of London Police as national lead force, and the NCA help connect that activity to the organised crime groups and the money flows behind it.
The message to organised criminals is clear. If criminal cash is being pushed through high street businesses, policing and our partners will act. Through the High Street Organised Crime Unit, we will use intelligence, asset recovery and financial investigation to turn local disruption into lasting national impact.
Helen Dickinson, Chief Executive of the British Retail Consortium, said:
The new High Street Organised Crime Unit will be welcome news for people across the country. Illegitimate businesses and retail theft are major issues and too often linked to criminal gang activity. Stolen goods are commonly funnelled through illicit supply chains and resold through unscrupulous businesses, helping fund further criminality. This harms businesses, puts colleagues at risk, and pushes up prices for honest shoppers.
Tackling it requires prioritisation from police and government, and co-ordination and intelligence sharing between retailers, law enforcement, and local partners. We look forward to working together to deliver real progress.
Association of Convenience Stores Chief Executive Ed Woodall said:
Local shops tell us that rogue traders on high streets are causing massive damage to their businesses and the wider community, so we strongly welcome this Government action to back responsible retailers and crack down on the organised crime gangs that are fuelling the illicit trade.
John Herriman, Chief Executive of the Chartered Trading Standards Institute, (CTSI), said:
CTSI welcomes the introduction of the High Street Organised Crime Unit, which will bring together partner agencies – including Trading Standards – to tackle organised criminality on our high streets. The proliferation of so called “dodgy shops” puts consumers at significant risk and undermines the legitimate businesses who drive economic growth across the UK. The new unit will bring a much-needed focus to help clamp down on a blight on our high streets and communities.
The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 19 May 2026.
UK National Statement for the 2026 World Heath Assembly as delivered by the UK’s Permanent Representative to the WTO and UN, Kumar Iyer.
Thank you President, dear friends,
At this very moment, World Health Organization staff are saving lives on the frontlines of crises, responding to public health challenges like Ebola, and are often working in the world’s most dangerous and demanding conditions.
Whether in Ukraine, Sudan or Palestine, their work embodies what this organisation stands for: science, solidarity, and service. It also serves as a powerful reminder of our shared responsibility to protect everyone, and the essential civilian infrastructure that makes that care possible.
I reiterate that the United Kingdom unequivocally condemns all attacks on civilian infrastructure.
It is precisely because of these realities that the World Health Organization remains indispensable. At a time of profound and intersecting global challenges, its leadership, grounded in science, technical expertise, and evidence-based action has never been more important. We saw the power of that global technical expertise and collaboration in the response to the Hantavirus outbreak.
The WHO’s role in convening countries, setting global standards, and providing impartial advice is fundamental to strong health systems worldwide, and the UK is proud to support it.
To meet the demands of today’s crises and those ahead, the WHO must continue to uphold the highest standards of technical excellence. In that spirit, like others, we call for Taiwan to have meaningful access to all relevant technical WHO meetings and to observe the World Health Assembly, as it did from 2009 to 2016.
The United Kingdom is committed to translating science and innovation into real-world impact, including through our 66 WHO Collaborating Centres. We also commend Member States working to agree an effective and equitable Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing Annex to the Pandemic Agreement.
We must now act with urgency on antimicrobial resistance, one of the most serious threats to global health, and on the destructive power of nicotine, where the UK is taking bold steps to create our first smoke-free generation through our Tobacco and Vapes Act.
The United Kingdom remains steadfast in our commitment to multilateralism. Together, we can strengthen an effective global health system that delivers for those who depend on it most.
The press release issued by the Environment Agency on 19 May 2026.
The Environment Agency has secured a third conviction in relation to a major illegal waste site in Kingsteighton, South Devon, where thousands of tonnes of waste were dumped on a floodplain.
DTM Grab Hire Ltd has been ordered to pay £16,664 for its part in depositing the waste at the illegal site which was shut down by the Environment Agency in 2022.
The Environment Agency has now prosecuted the landowner of the site and two waste carriers as part of the investigation.
Plymouth Magistrates Court heard that DTM Grab Hire Ltd deposited 3,490 tonnes of soil, stones and road planings at the illegal site between 3 January 2021 and 11 September 2021.
Following Thursday’s hearing, the company was fined £13,653, told to pay the Environment Agency’s costs of £2,821 and a victim surcharge, after pleading guilty to the illegal deposit of controlled waste.
The landowner of the site in question, Christopher Garrett, was prosecuted in 2024 after repeatedly ignoring warnings from the Environment Agency.
Another waste carrier, David Gorton, was fined last month for his contribution to the deposit of waste on the site.
Thousands of tonnes of mixed construction and demolition waste was found at the premises.
It is estimated it would cost at least £2.5 million to remediate the site, which sits on a flood plain.
The deposits of waste would have significantly increased the flood risk in the area.
Registered waste carriers have a duty of care to ensure that they know where they are sending their waste and take steps to ensure that their waste is handled by legal sites.
An Environment Agency spokesperson said:
We have now successfully prosecuted the landowner of this illegal site, plus two waste carriers who contributed to the deposit of soil and stone.
Waste regulations are in place to protect people and the environment, and it is essential that all companies follow the rules.
We will take enforcement action against anyone who transports, disposes or stores waste illegally.
Anyone who suspects illegal waste activity can report it anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.
The prosecution comes as the government yesterday announced major reforms to tighten the waste carriers regime, including stricter background checks and tougher sentences for those illegally dumping waste.
Between 3 January 2021 and 11 September 2021 on Land at Little Lindridge Farm, Kingsteignton, Newton Abbot, Devon you, DTM Grab Hire Ltd, deposited waste not under or to the extent authorised by an environmental permit, namely the deposit of excavation spoil consisting of soil, stones and road planings. Contrary to regulations 12(1)(a) and 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.
The speech made by Mel Stride, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the House of Commons on 18 May 2026.
This King’s Speech is an empty vessel, which is a surprise, because only last week the Prime Minister was telling anybody who cared to listen that the Government would be leaning into economic growth in a more radical way, and would eschew managerial incrementalism, yet we have heard nothing other than managerial incrementalism, at best, from the right hon. Lady just now. [Interruption.] Of course, I meant the right hon. Gentleman. If only the Chancellor were here, Mr Speaker, I would be right about everything.
The Prime Minister also said that Labour would tread more lightly on our lives. Well, we have seen what that has meant in the last few weeks. The Chancellor said that it would all be growth, growth, growth. The Secretary of State trots out and trumpets the latest uplift—a very modest one—in the International Monetary Fund’s forecast, but he neglects to mention that although it is forecasting 1% growth today, it forecast 1.3% back in January.
The Secretary of State also neglects to mention that the increase in growth in the first quarter of this year is on the back of risible growth performance in Q4 of last year. The situation in Q4 was exacerbated, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England, by the Chancellor’s making every possible tax rise; that had a material impact—it depressed the economy. Some of the growth is simply a bounce back from the mistakes made at the end of last year.
The Secretary of State refused to answer the question from my hon. Friend the Member for Rutland and Stamford (Alicia Kearns) about what happened to GDP per capita, so let me tell him that it has been utterly anaemic throughout this Government’s period in office. He also failed to mention that the notes to the IMF’s comments on upgrading the growth forecast for this year point to domestic uncertainty possibly weighing down on consumer spending and investment decisions. I wonder what “domestic uncertainty” could possibly be referring to. As to our record, I remind the Secretary of State that on the day of the general election, the previous Conservative Government had inflation bang on target at 2%. It is now 50% more than that. We also had the fastest growth in the G7, employment at near record levels, and near record low levels of unemployment, and we had 13 consecutive months of real wage growth.
Max Wilkinson (Cheltenham) (LD) On the subject of mistakes made and growth, does the shadow Chancellor accept that the Brexit that he and his party left us has knocked between 4% and 8% off our GDP?
Sir Mel Stride As I will come on to argue, our problems actually rest a little closer to home, rather than having anything to do with our relationship with the European Union.
The Labour party promised stability. It also—Members should try not to laugh too loudly—said that it would create the most pro-business Government in the history of our country. None of that has come to pass. It is not just the Prime Minister who is the problem; if this Prime Minister is replaced, whoever goes on to lead the Labour party will not do any better, because Labour had no plan at all for improving our economy. It had a plan for winning an election—keep as low a profile as possible, hold the Ming vase and tiptoe across the shiny floor towards that loveless landslide—but no plan for the people of our country. The Labour Government are in hock to their Back Benchers. Every time they try to do something that requires some backbone, they are stopped by their Back Benchers.
The record of this Government is appalling, and not just on growth. I notice that the Secretary of State did not mention unemployment once, and he certainly did not mention youth unemployment. Under this Government, we are seeing the highest unemployment in five years, and youth unemployment is nudging up towards 20%. Under the previous Labour Government, youth unemployment increased by more than 40%; under the previous Conservative Government, it reduced by more than 40%.
Sir Ashley Fox (Bridgwater) (Con) Is it not shameful that the Government are having to subsidise employers who take on young people, when it is the Government’s actions—their imposing higher national insurance charges, a higher minimum wage, and a higher burden through the Employment Rights Act 2025—that caused the problem in the first place?
Sir Mel Stride My hon. Friend is entirely right. It is like trying to apply the accelerator while having the brake on fully. That is what this Government are doing. That is the total illogicality of their approach.
Inflation is up on where it was under the Conservatives. It is about the highest in the G7; it certainly was last year. As we lean into the challenges of oil and gas price spikes, that is a weak position to be in. Most economists will make that point. The Labour Government will have borrowed a full quarter of a trillion pounds more across this Parliament than would have been borrowed under the plans that they inherited. It is no wonder that our borrowing costs are the highest in the G7—higher than those of Greece, and higher, even, than those of Morocco. Why? We know why: it is just what socialists do. Socialists believe that you can tax your way to prosperity, but I tell the Secretary of State: you cannot.
The £25 billion of additional tax on businesses—national insurance increases—has crucified business in this country. The burden has fallen predominantly on young people, because there was not just an increase in the rate, but a reduction to the threshold at which the tax cuts in, meaning that young people have borne the brunt of that tax increase. The sectors that rely predominantly on first-time jobbers and on young, part-time and female workers have been crucified, including the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors, in which more than 100,000 jobs have been destroyed by this Government.
Alison Griffiths (Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) (Con) On Friday, I opened the new Premier Inn in my constituency—a project that was passed under the last Conservative Government—but many businesses in my constituency are failing because of increased costs and regulation. Does my right hon. Friend agree that this is an absolute travesty for our country?
Sir Mel Stride My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I have had the great pleasure of visiting her constituency to speak to businesses, and that is exactly what they complain of. The Government made no effort, in the King’s Speech, to get on top of the benefits bill. There was a reference to the Timms review of the personal independence payment, but we know that in the review’s terms of reference, there is an explicit statement that it is not about controlling the welfare bill. There will be no savings as a consequence of the Timms review. That is not good enough. We have got to be about getting people off benefits and back into work.
Tom Tugendhat Does my right hon. Friend not agree that we are seeing not only young people let down, but the deeply immoral act of people being kept on welfare? In five or 10 years’ time, people will have been on welfare for so long that they will not have any options. They will effectively have been left slaves of a state that has no concern for them. Nobody in this Chamber will have any power over how the welfare state will behave then, and those people will have no options. It will be the fault of this House and this Government for having kept those people there, and having imprisoned them.
Sir Mel Stride That is entirely right. The Conservatives know that work matters, and getting people off benefits matters. People’s mental health is improved by going to work, and by having the social interaction, routine and sense of pride and self-worth that comes with work. That is why the level of unemployment and the failure of this Government to tackle benefits is so appalling.
Dawn Butler (Brent East) (Lab) I used to work in the employment service, and Thatcher encouraged us not to sign people on, and to instead put them on the sick. The Conservatives created a whole generation of people on the sick, just to manipulate the numbers. How do you like those apples?
Sir Mel Stride All these flashbacks to the 1980s are a slightly desperate attempt to get away from the 2020s, I think.
The other thing that socialists love to do is borrow, borrow, borrow, and spend, spend, spend until they have run out of other people’s money. That is precisely what this Government have done. The Secretary of State mentioned the fiscal rules, but of course he failed to mention that in the run-up to the election, the Chancellor said that she would abide by our fiscal rules, and then promptly changed them, so that she could borrow more, flipping the definition of “debt” from public sector net debt to public sector financial liabilities. That allowed her to take her foot off the brake and borrow and spend even more.
Charlie Maynard (Witney) (LD) Flashing back to the 1980s, would the right hon. Member like to remind us when the Conservatives last balanced a budget?
Sir Mel Stride The current account went into a slight surplus just around 2015-16. [Interruption.] It did, actually. That was on the back of our inheriting a £160 billion deficit in 2010, which was over 10% of GDP—another example of the disasters of a Labour Government.
The Secretary of State rightly spoke of artificial intelligence and the opportunities that it presents, but what we know of artificial intelligence is that it will have a profound and very uncertain effect on the labour market. We need a flexible skills offer to deal with that, and flexible labour markets, but through the Employment Rights Act, the Government are making the labour market more rigid, and that will hurt younger people in particular, who do not have a track record in employment, so do not be surprised if youth unemployment continues to hover around 16% or 17% as a consequence of the actions of this Government.
When it comes to leaning into these challenges, we know that there is no plan. This Government are not going to do anything. They are just involved in internecine introspection—a civil war, now—within the Labour party. They said that they would tread lightly on our lives; in fact, they are now stampeding all over them. The rivals to the Prime Minister will be looking to double-down on the ruinous policies that I have just set out.
We have seen the real effects of this in recent days. On Friday, after the former Member for Makerfield said that he would step down in order to ease the passage of Andy Burnham to this place, what happened to gilt yields? They spiked up 18 basis points. I have done a little bit of research, and I can tell the House that, if sustained through the forecast period, that would mean over £5 billion of additional debt servicing costs. That is about £300 for every working family in this country. That is the effect of Andy Burnham, and he has not even arrived here yet.
We are on the edge of a precipice economically, leaning into a very turbulent time. These are the policies of the madhouse, yet we are told not to worry. The hon. Member for Liverpool Wavertree (Paula Barker), who I believe is an outrider for Andy Burnham, said of the bond markets that they would just have to “fall into line”. Andy Burnham himself said in the New Statesman:
“We’ve got to go beyond this thing”—
Paula Barker (Liverpool Wavertree) (Lab) Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?
Sir Mel Stride I will in a moment.
Paula Barker On a point of order, Mr Speaker. My understanding is that if an hon. Member wishes to mention another hon. Member in the Chamber, they are supposed to give advance notice of that. I have received no such notice.
Mr Speaker That is not the case. A Member should be informed if they are not here, but the hon. Lady is sitting here, quite rightly, and I am sure that the shadow Chancellor is ready to give way immediately.
Sir Mel Stride I am always ready to give way, Mr Speaker, and to take your direction.
Paula Barker Thank you, Mr Speaker, and I thank the shadow Minister for giving way. I agree that what I said might not have been the most eloquent of answers. However, I would say that people in this country are fed up of the bond markets dabbling in the democracy of our country.
Sir Mel Stride That is a rather unfortunate example of doubling down or continuing to dig, if I may say so. Also, the hon. Lady’s comments pale in comparison with Andy Burnham’s comments in the New Statesman, where he said:
“We’ve got to go beyond this thing of being in hock to the bond markets”.
He also suggested that defence spending should lie outside the fiscal rules, as if spending and borrowing to defend our country were a different form of borrowing from any other borrowing that this Government might entertain. He is not so much the king of the north; he is more like King Canute, sitting in his chair on the sand, dressed in his football kit, trying to push back the tide of the bond markets and saying things like, “You’ve got to fall in line” as the waters lap at his ankles and we all ultimately get swept away. It is ludicrous.
The King’s Speech included a holiday tax that will increase the cost of the most budget holidays in this country, clobbering people who have saved up hard and just want to make some memories with their children. We also have the nationalisation of steel, which seems to be just some kind of political sop to the left on the Labour Benches.
The Government are also going to put a stop to new oil and gas exploration. This is lunacy, when we are importing gas from Norway that is extracted from the same basin. We are also importing liquefied natural gas, formerly from Qatar and now predominantly from the United States, which has four times the carbon footprint compared with if we had extracted it ourselves using our own resources. All that energy security blown, all those jobs destroyed and all that tax revenue forgone, simply because of the ideological madness of the Labour party.
Harriet Cross The shadow Chancellor is completely right to reflect on the plight of the oil and gas sector under this Labour Government: 1,000 jobs are being lost in the sector every single month, which is affecting all our constituents, not just those in the north-east of Scotland. Does he share my dismay that a Labour Government do not take that more seriously?
Sir Mel Stride I do indeed. I have been up to Aberdeen, met my hon. Friend and heard at first hand about the economic effect this is having. It is utter madness. If we have an opportunity in government, we will put that right.
I have already mentioned benefits. There was nothing of any substance about welfare in this King’s Speech. There was nothing about the defence investment plan. Where is it? It was promised back in September.
Then we have the regulating for growth Bill—an oxymoron if ever there was one. “Regulating for growth” says all we need to know about this Labour Government. They know nothing about the economy, nothing about job creation and nothing about businesses.
Jim Shannon Will the shadow Minister give way?
Sir Mel Stride Briefly.
Jim Shannon I thank the shadow Minister for what he is saying. Does he share my concern, and the concerns of probably many in this House, that small and medium-sized businesses will suffer more than most? The figures for Northern Ireland indicate that between 85% and 89% of the job creators there are small businesses. Northern Ireland needs something special from this Government. Does he see something special coming, or are we just wondering what is going to happen?
Sir Mel Stride I am afraid that what I see coming is what is already baked in: business rates going through the roof. In some cases, small businesses on our high streets are facing 140% increases in the amount they have to pay in business rates.
Conservative Members believe in enterprise, opportunity, aspiration and markets. We believe in risk takers, in people who work hard, and in people who get up early in the morning and do the right thing—go out and create wealth, create jobs and grow our economy. Because of that, at our last conference we set out £47 billion-worth of savings, predominantly—£23 billion—on the welfare budget. With that we could do two wonderful things: first, we could start to bear down on the deficit and get on top of the debt, which is out of control under this Government; and secondly, we could get taxes down, particularly on the productive parts of the economy. We therefore announced the abolition of stamp duty and a tax cut for young people.
There is more in our alternative King’s Speech: a Bill to back our high streets and cut business rates for a quarter of a million of our high street businesses; a get Britain working Bill to reverse the damage done by the Employment Rights Act; a reducing bureaucracy Bill to remove the mountain of environmental, social and governance regulations; a save British industry Bill to get rid of the Climate Change Act 2008 and abolish the zero emission vehicle mandate; a cheap energy Bill to get rid of renewables subsidies and bring down bills for households and businesses; a getting Britain drilling Bill to reinvigorate our North sea oil and gas industry, creating jobs and boosting our exports; and a welfare reform Bill to get the benefits bill under control and restore the two-child cap. That is the serious plan that our economy needs. That is the plan to back our businesses and deliver growth. That is a Conservative plan for a better Britain.
The speech made by Matthew Pennycook, the Housing Minister, in Leeds on 19 May 2026.
[This is the version issued by the Ministry of Housing with two small sections of political content redacted]
Thank you for that kind introduction and good morning, ladies and gentlemen – it is a pleasure to join you here in Leeds.
Since its launch four years ago, UKREiiF has gone from strength to strength.
It is now a catalyst for significant investment and growth, generating economic activity in every part of the country including this growing and fast, dynamic city, and the wider West Yorkshire region.
As a domestic forum for discussion, networking and deal making between investors, developers and local authorities looking to shape the future of our towns, cities and regions, it is now unrivalled.
And for those looking to attract global capital, and, dare I say it, government ministers whose diaries don’t always lend themselves to intense four-day events in the Mediterranean, it arguably now surpasses its overseas rivals.
I want to thank everyone involved in organising this annual event, including the City Council and various partners, for all they have done to make it the success that it is.
I’m here at UKREiiF today to discuss what more can be done to secure investment; drive regeneration; and accelerate development in every part of the country.
To exchange views about how together, we can tackle the housing crisis, support economic growth and ensure that the real estate, property and infrastructure sectors flourish.
And I come with a simple message: this [Political content removed] government arrived in office with a bold and comprehensive plan to build the homes and infrastructure the country needs.
We are faithfully executing that plan.
It is beginning to bear fruit.
And while the headwinds are undoubtedly growing stronger, we are going to stay the course and finish the job.
Uninformed critics will no doubt decry my reference to stronger headwinds as an attempt to deflect blame for early falls in housing delivery that I can assure all of you were fully expected and anticipated in opposition.
But everyone in this room will know that the very real challenges that the sector has experienced over recent years – rising interest rates, significant increases in building materials costs, and dampened buyer demand – have been exacerbated by the global turbulence of recent months.
I want you to know that the Secretary of State and I are acutely aware of the more uncertain environment in which you are now operating.
We also appreciate that your present challenges follow a series of housing market downturns, the scars of which your cash reserves, supply chains and project pipelines still bear.
Where compatible with our objectives as a government, we remain committed to doing everything we can to reduce development risks and associated transaction costs so that you can get on and build.
But it is only together that we can successfully navigate these tumultuous times, working in partnership to create a housing system that is more resilient to economic shocks of the kind produced by the conflict in the Gulf.
The case for fundamentally transforming the housing system that we inherited is unarguable.
By any metric, it has been an abject failure.
As I’ve argued many times, in many different parts of the country: the crisis of housing availability, affordability and quality that that system has produced is blighting lives and hampering economic growth and productivity.
That is why, as a government, we set ourselves the task of reforming this failing system root and branch.
Over recent days, I’ve listened with some amusement to colleagues claim that we arrived in government underprepared and lacking clarity of vision and direction.
When it comes to housing and planning, nothing could be further from the truth.
We used every waking moment in opposition to develop a bold and comprehensive plan – one that over the past twenty-two and a half months has allowed us to undertake the most rapid, holistic and radical overhaul of the housing and planning system in decades.
Within six months of taking office, you will know that we published a revised National Planning Policy Framework.
Through it, we restored and raised mandatory housing targets; strengthened brownfield land policy; and introduced a modernised, strategic approach to Green Belt land designation and release.
The Office for Budget Responsibility have estimated that these changes alone will boost GDP by £6.8 billion by 2029/30 and will lead to the highest level of housebuilding in 40 years.
In December last year, we built on those initial revisions, publishing for consultation a wholly restructured Framework.
This modified NPPF incorporates new clear and rules-based national policies for both plan and decision-making and includes new policies such as a permanent presumption in favour of suitably located development and a “default yes” for suitable proposals that develop land around rail stations.
In the same month, our landmark Planning and Infrastructure Act received Royal Assent.
This Act is already enabling us to speed up and streamline the delivery of new homes and critical infrastructure, not least by allowing the dismissal of legal challenges to DCOs that are ‘totally without merit’.
Once we have switched on the Act in its entirety, including overhauling the consenting process for critical infrastructure; our new Nature Restoration Fund; new mechanisms for cross-boundary strategic planning; and the modernisation of planning committees, we estimate that this single piece of legislation could boost GDP by up to £7.5 billion over the next decade.
Having received the final report of the independent New Towns Taskforce in September last year, we launched a public consultation in March on our proposed New Towns Programme.
The large-scale new communities that this will create will make a significant contribution to meeting housing need across England and support economic growth by releasing the productive potential of our constrained towns and cities.
The programme is an integral part of our plans to boost innovation, quality and competition in housebuilding.
Given the critical importance of boosting the supply of social and affordable housing for meeting housing need, sustaining the wider development pipeline and supporting timely build out, we have delivered the biggest boost to grant funding in a generation through our £39 billion Social and Affordable Homes Programme and we’ve given Registered Providers the regulatory certainty and stability they need to quickly ramp up investment in existing and new stock.
And that is not all.
On arriving in office, we quickly established a New Homes Accelerator that has helped remove blockages and speed up the building of over 130,000 homes across England…
We have created a new, permanent National Housing Bank backed by £16 billion of new financial capacity…
We are putting in place a new plan-making system and taking concerted action to drive up local plan coverage…
We are progressing a range of policy and regulatory easements to help small and medium sized housebuilders thrive and grow and thereby diversify our housebuilding market…
We have allocated almost £100 million of investment to support local planning authorities with capacity and capability…
We have invested over £600 million in training tens of thousands of new construction workers.
We’re reforming the Building Safety Regulator established by the previous government to improve its operations and processes.
I could easily go on ladies and gentlemen.
My point in reeling off this long list is a simple one: no government in living memory has done more to tackle the country’s housing and infrastructure deficit than the one I am proud to be a member of.
While much has been done, there obviously remains much more to do as we strive to hit our incredibly stretching target of 1.5 million new homes in this Parliament.
We do need to finalise a range of legislative and policy measures.
We have to publish a final, revised NPPF, and we will do so this summer.
We have to bring into force our new National Scheme of Delegation, and we will lay the required regulations in the coming weeks.
We have to consult on the first of our Environmental Delivery Plans concerning nutrient pollution and we will do so in the coming months.
We must reform the role of statutory consultees in the planning system, and we will announce the outcome of our consultation on this matter before the summer recess.
Yet, the focus of my Department has now turned very firmly towards ensuring the new system delivers.
Among other things that means a renewed emphasis on removing ‘grit’ from the planning process to ensure that the application journey is as fast and easy as possible, and it also means a greater focus on what more we can do to support consented sites that are struggling.
Our New Homes Accelerator will play a crucial role in this effort.
It has already unblocked and accelerated the delivery of scores of large sites that were encountering significant delays or obstacles – providing planning advice, technical assistance, and brokering across government, including with stat cons.
To take just two examples:
At Hampden Fields in Buckinghamshire, engagement with the Environment Agency through the NHA enabled all flood risk activity permits to be promptly issued and the first homes are now being occupied.
At Langley in the West Midlands, the NHA provided funding for technical support for site design that will enable the project to deliver homes more efficiently.
Across the country, the NHA is currently supporting 28 sites, and we’ve expanded the scope of the sites that it can now support.
New sites, like Northwest Sittingbourne in Kent and Benthall Grange in Shropshire, are continuously being added and the NHA online portals remain permanently open for any projects that might require support.
Homes England, as the government’s principal housing delivery arm, also has a critical role to play in accelerating development and ramping up housing supply.
Under the leadership of Pat Ritchie and Amy Rees, it is delivering.
In the last financial year, the Agency supported the completion of over 40,000 homes and leveraged £22.6 billion of private sector investment.
Under its new regional operating model, it is working more closely than ever with local leaders to support housing delivery including Richard and our partners in the West Midlands who will launch the Birmingham East Mayoral Development Corporation at this event later this morning.
The Agency is also integral to the delivery of important initiatives such as our Small Sites Aggregator and building on the pilots in Bristol, Lewisham, and Sheffield, I am pleased today to confirm its national rollout.
The initiative will unlock dormant, unviable small brownfield sites and through the forging of new partnerships between the public and private sector will attract investment to use them to build 10,000 social rent homes a year.
And to further support communities build new homes and drive innovation, I can announce today that we are working with 23 ambitious local authorities to co-develop a pattern book of standard house designs which we intend to publish by the end of the year.
These designs will help unlock economies of scale to support investment in MMC, remove barriers for SME developers, and help local authorities deliver homes on small sites they own.
Ladies and gentlemen let me finish by saying this…
As a government, we have been clear that we refuse to accept the stagnation and decline that we were bequeathed.
As a country we enjoy world leading expertise in engineering, construction, planning, design, finance and project management.
We have a well known tendency to downplay our strengths but the quality of some of our placemaking is second to none.
We have it in our power, in other words, to lead the world when it comes to urban development and regeneration.
And yet our full potential remains unfulfilled.
When it comes to housing and infrastructure, unlike [Political content removed], we have been prepared to will the means as well as the ends and to bear the opprobrium of those content with a failing status quo.
But getting Britain building again is not in the gift of ministers alone. Much as I wish it were otherwise.
It requires every part of industry to play its part.
Now we know things are incredibly tough right now.
We want you to be frank with us about the challenges you face, and what might be done to help you overcome them.
If you share our objectives, we want to support you in any way we can.
But we also need your help because it is only together that we can ensure that our country enjoys high and sustainable rates of housebuilding and world class infrastructure provision in the years ahead.
And I very much look forward to continuing to work with you all in pursuit of that aim.
![PRESS RELEASE : UK to host European IDAHOT+ Forum 2027 [May 2026]](https://www.ukpol.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ukpol-130x90-3-150x150.jpg)
![PRESS RELEASE : Record funding to tackle grooming gangs and child sex abuse [May 2026]](https://www.ukpol.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/homeoffice-150x150.webp)
![PRESS RELEASE : Transport Secretary ends ‘era of neglect’ on HS2 with thorough reset [May 2026]](https://www.ukpol.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/transportlogo-150x150.png)
![PRESS RELEASE : UK National Statement for the 79th World Heath Assembly [May 2026]](https://www.ukpol.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/newfco-150x150.png)
![PRESS RELEASE : Third waste carrier convicted in Environment Agency operation [May 2026]](https://www.ukpol.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/environmentagency.png)
