Tag: 2025

  • Peter Kyle – 2025 Mansion House Speech

    Peter Kyle – 2025 Mansion House Speech

    The speech made by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology at the Mansion House in London on 3 September 2025.

    I want to talk about a society and economy where AI benefits every person and community in the country.

    Where there is opportunity for anyone, no matter their background. Where our huge potential for wealth creation isn’t centred in the capital but is distributed where talent lies – which is everywhere people are.

    And where we finally become a country that celebrates entrepreneurial zeal, and those can who move from innovation to commercialisation, and thrive in a modern Britain.

    To get there, the question I’m seeking to answer in government isn’t ‘do we want to be a country that adopts AI or not’…because AI is going to happen. We know it is.

    That’s true for every country from Britain to North Korea.

    The better question is: do we want to use all the power and agency we have, as a government to shape how it unfolds?

    This will be my focus tonight.

    And what better setting than here, in Mansion House.

    The place where the future of this country has so often been debated, and yes, defined.

    Almost 70 years ago, in April 1956, this room was the setting of a major Cold War summit.

    Where Nikita Khrushchev came, after Stalin’s death, with a delegation from the USSR.

    On the way here he stopped by Claridge’s. Clearly nothing is too good for the workers.

    Before coming for dinner here, with Clement Attlee and Anthony Eden.

    Mansion House was done up, looking its finest.

    The Lord Mayor gave a speech.

    And the team put on a delicious spread, as always.

    It was a huge effort.

    But we know now, looking back at history…the charm offensive didn’t really work.

    Khrushchev returned to the USSR as resolved as he ever had been to lead, through technology.

    Racing to be first to the space rocket, the microchip, the bomb.

    Thankfully, those Cold War days are behind us.

    But on the world stage, the tech competition remains as fierce as ever.

    Only this time, the defining competitive advantage of this century – I believe…is going to be AI.

    Artificial intelligence will shape our economies, our security, and our place in the world.

    Those who wield it in their national interest – who invest in the right skills and hardware, while they have the chance…will be the economic superpowers of the future.

    Look at the US, and China.

    Or the Gulf states, vying to compete.

    Time and again, we see that a nation’s sovereign interest rests on its technological edge.

    It’s the lesson Khrushchev almost learned – but not quite.

    You see, in the years after his Mansion House visit, Khrushchev set about increasing the USSR’s tech capacity.

    As part of the plan, he wanted to have his own Soviet Silicon Valley.

    He ordered the creation of a new city, on the outskirts of Moscow: Zelenograd.

    The city had its own cinema, billboards, homes and offices. And a massive statue of Lenin.

    And the whole place was designed for engineers, racing to design microchips.

    The idea was simple: copy what worked in America, but do it faster.

    The Soviets got their hands on a prototype for a US microchip, the SN-51.

    Alexander Shokin, the official in charge, summoned the engineers of Zelenograd into his office, and he ordered them:

    “Copy it, one-for-one” – without a single deviation.

    This, ultimately, was their big mistake.

    The Soviets chose to imitate rather than innovate.

    At a time when the pace of change in chips was impossible to keep up with, without their own domestic research capacity.

    American speed proved too difficult for the Soviets to match.

    Individual US entrepreneurialism outpaced Soviet central control.

    And Silicon Valley won the chip race.

    Today, history is repeating itself in the development of AI and the new technological revolution.

    And the UK must think like the US, not act like the USSR.

    The computing power needed to train leading AI systems has doubled roughly every 6 months for the last decade.

    If we don’t keep up – with a domestic AI ecosystem of our own, on British shores, we’ll always be beholden to others, following where they point us.

    Buying off-the-shelf, from overseas.

    That’s a precedent I am not willing to set when it comes to our military tech, the integrity of our NHS, and data protection.

    Or when the prize is a huge competitive edge for our economy.

    Fortunately, we’re starting from a good place.

    We currently rank third for AI, after the US and China. We have 4 of the world’s top ten universities. The lowest corporation tax in the G7. And more venture capital investment than anywhere else in Europe.

    Only this year, the chief executive of NVIDIA, Jensen Huang, said the UK is in a ‘Goldilocks’ moment for AI.

    Because we are country not burdened by over-regulation, or a lack of ambition.

    Britain is striking the right balance.

    I remember, before this government came to office, I spent ages asking businesses what they needed from us.

    You certainly weren’t shy in telling us.

    Take AI seriously. Regulatory reform. Make sure we don’t fall short on talent.

    And ever since, we’ve been getting on with it.

    It started in January, with the AI Opportunities Action Plan.

    It outlined the 50 steps we are taking to grow the economy, and create scores of new jobs as part of the government’s modern industrial strategy.

    An early priority for me was skills.

    In June, we launched our TechFirst programme – backed by £187 million in funding which will bring digital and AI learning directly into the classroom and reach every secondary school pupil in the country.

    Next, we looked at the workforce. Forming a skills partnership with firms like Barclays, Amazon, BT, and Google.

    Together, committing to train 7.5 million people in AI – a fifth of the country’s workers.

    It’s fantastic to see how so many of you have risen to that challenge.

    After that, we looked at hardware.

    If we wanted to compete, we knew we had to improve our physical machinery.

    The raw processing power we have on offer, here in the UK, to churn through the mountains of data that will be required.

    The Compute Roadmap I set out in July charts that course.

    And I recently launched Isambard – our new supercomputer, the most powerful in the country.

    A machine that will be able to process an unthinkable amount of information, in seconds.

    We have another one, Dawn, in a lab in Cambridge.

    And I’ve announced the creation of a national supercomputer that will be based in Edinburgh.

    All told we’re on track to increase our compute capacity 20-fold between now and the end of the decade.

    We have our plan for the National Data Library.

    AI is pretty straightforward in its basic form. It is chips. It is data. It is software.

    We talk about chips a lot. We talk about software a lot. But we need to talk much, much more about the data that fuels it.

    AI is only as good as the data it uses, and Britain has the best data in the world.

    We will be safely harnessing it to power scientific and medical discovery, to drive our understanding of the human condition, and as potentially the biggest engine for the commercialisation of innovation in our country’s history.

    And we’re not slowing down any time soon.

    Our next big priority is our AI Growth Zones.

    These will be dedicated hubs of AI development.

    The first will be just 60 miles away, in Culham.

    And we’re getting spades in the ground for sites in Wales and in Scotland.

    Each has the potential for a full campus – bringing together companies, researchers, and investors.

    These efforts have been met by a wave of commitment from the private sector.

    With £14 billion in investment announced by firms like Vantage Data Centres, NScale, and Kyndryl.

    A brilliant British company, Synthesia, has announced they are expanding their London office just a few weeks ago.

    And global firms like Cohere, Open AI, and Anthropic have followed suit – choosing our capital as their home from home.

    That is a vote of confidence not just in our tech sector, but in the UK’s future.

    So this evening, I’m proud to publish the next 2 parts of our plan.

    The first is a roadmap for a new British AI assurance industry.

    Backed by a fund worth £11 million.

    In the next few years, AI assurance will bloom into a unique profession, worth up to £18.8 billion to our economy, based on a growing pool of independent experts with the skills to verify that new AI innovations are secure, and trustworthy.

    We hope it will give firms the tools they need to build trust with both customers and markets, especially smaller teams, who lack the in-house expertise to do this work themselves.

    Applications for that fund will be opening in the Spring – please do keep an eye out.

    Lastly, we’re looking very closely at regulation.

    I know this is a crucial issue for many of you. So I want to make it plain:

    British companies shouldn’t have to wait months for approvals, whilst competitors overseas race ahead. If AI can speed things up, even a little, then we will do everything we can to make that a reality.

    As part of this effort, today we announced our new AI regulator capability fund.

    Designed to support 5 UK regulators – from Ofgem, to the Civil Aviation Authority with up to £2.7 million in funding, to help them both use and regulate AI better.

    Whether it’s a new AI assistant. Analysing huge datasets. Or streamlining approvals.

    This is our challenge to regulators:

    Use every tool at your disposal to get new products to market quickly, without sacrificing safety.

    In aviation, for example, this might mean getting faster at clearing the skies for new drone technologies.

    Or, for the Office for Nuclear Regulation, we’re investing more than a quarter of a million pounds in a project that will enable the nuclear industry to test new AI tools in nuclear plants.

    Including things like making us more efficient at handling high risk nuclear waste.

    I want to personally thank the team at our Regulatory Innovation Office, set up last year, for being so forward-looking on this. I’m immensely proud of the work that it’s already doing.

    So that’s where we are today.

    A little over a year after I first set foot in the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology, I don’t think a single person in this room could say, hand on heart, that we haven’t got stuck in.

    And it’s starting to pay off.

    In our first 12 months of in government we’ve attracted more than £44 billion worth of investment into the British AI sector. The average deal last year was worth £5.9 million.

    And we have doubled the number of AI firms in Yorkshire, Wales, the Midlands, and the North West compared to just 3 years ago.

    We have learned the lesson of history: countries can only prosper if they get the big calls right; if they decide to go beyond the expected and embrace the future; to innovate not imitate; refusing to be constrained by the problems of today by taking on the challenges of tomorrow.

    In these uncertain times, I am certain that’s what it takes to get a global competitive edge.

    So, if there is anyone here who still doubts our commitment.

    My message to you is simple:

    Britain is preparing for the challenge of the new technological revolution.

    We want you to keep investing here, keep building here. List here. Scale here.

    And if you invest in Britain, you will share in that competitive edge.

    I look forward to working with you all as, together, we create the security and opportunity society people are counting on us to deliver.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer virtual meeting with the Coalition of the Willing [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer virtual meeting with the Coalition of the Willing [September 2025]

    The press release issued by 10 Downing Street on 4 September 2025.

    The Prime Minister addressed a virtual call of the Coalition of the Willing from Glasgow this morning.

    The Prime Minister began by sharing his condolences with Portugal on behalf of the United Kingdom following the tragic crash in Lisbon last night.

    Turning the situation in Ukraine, the Prime Minister said Putin could not be trusted as he continued to delay peace talks and simultaneously carry out egregious attacks on Ukraine.

    That was further underlined by the indiscriminate attacks in Kyiv last week, causing significant damage to the British Council and EU delegation buildings, he added.

    Discussing the latest military planning for the Coalition of the Willing, the Prime Minister emphasised that the group had an unbreakable pledge to Ukraine, with President Trump’s backing, and it was clear they now needed to go even further to apply pressure on Putin to secure a cessation of hostilities.

    The Prime Minister also welcomed announcements from Coalition of the Willing partners to supply long range missiles to Ukraine to further bolster the country’s supplies.

    He also thanked military planners and Chiefs of Defence for their ongoing and rapid work to ensure a force could deploy in the event of a ceasefire.

    The leaders looked forward to speaking again soon.

  • PRESS RELEASE : IFR regime to shut out rogue owners and promote sound investment in football [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : IFR regime to shut out rogue owners and promote sound investment in football [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on 4 September 2025.

    The Independent Football Regulator (IFR) has today set out plans to raise the bar on owners and directors of football clubs, as it launches its proposed Owners, Directors and Senior Executives (ODSE) test.

    • IFR publishes plans for new Owners, Directors and Senior Executives regime
    • Test will raise standards and give powers to take action when owners or directors fail to meet new requirements
    • ODSE proposals published alongside information gathering, enforcement and sanctions guidance

    The new regime will assess the honesty, integrity and financial soundness of those who want to own or run a football club, ensuring they have the necessary skills and experience to do so. It will promote responsible ownership and protect the financial health of the 116 regulated football clubs, and is the first element of the new IFR regime to be consulted on.

    The rules that will determine whether prospective owners, directors and senior executives are fit and proper have been significantly tightened, while the criteria used to protect against illicit finance and criminal funding entering football have also been widened.

    Incumbent owners, directors and senior executives will not need to apply for approval. Good owners, running clubs effectively, will experience minimal impact. However, if the IFR has concerns about the suitability of an incumbent, it will be able to take action.

    Under the new rules, the IFR will be able to go further and undertake greater due diligence and checks compared to those currently run by competition organisers. For example, the IFR will be able to consider domestic and international cases in applying its test and be able to check with banks where funds may be held, as well as with law enforcement agencies and other regulatory bodies.

    At the same time, the IFR is also consulting on how it will use its powers to determine a prospective owner or director’s ability to finance their purchase of a club as well as their intent and strategy.

    The ODSE proposals are part of a series of key consultations being launched today, which also include proposals on the IFR’s Information Gathering, Enforcement and Sanctions powers. These powers will be essential to allowing the IFR to enforce its rules efficiently and uphold standards across the game.

    The law gives the IFR the power to hold clubs and individuals to account as and when needed — from financial penalties, and public censure, to requiring an owner to divest from a club. These powers will be used proportionately, in accordance with the IFR’s statutory duties, and with an understanding of the importance of owner investment and risk-taking in English football.

    The IFR will work collaboratively with clubs to prevent issues occurring. Powers will be used if necessary, to incentivise clubs and individuals to comply and to make sure the IFR can act swiftly and fairly when rules are not followed.

    Members of the public, fan groups, clubs, competition organisers and related businesses are all invited to participate in the consultation and share their views, which will run until Monday 6 October.

    The IFR will publish its response to these consultations later this year, with the regime expected to go live as soon as possible.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Homes England signs Strategic Place Partnership with York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority to accelerate placemaking in the region [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Homes England signs Strategic Place Partnership with York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority to accelerate placemaking in the region [September 2025]

    The press release issued by Homes England on 3 September 2025.

    New partnership seeks to scale up existing collaborative working to unlock significant housing and regeneration plans for the area.

    Homes England, the government’s housing and regeneration agency, and York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority (YNYCA) have today signed a Strategic Place Partnership (SPP) to catalyse the delivery of the region’s ambitious housing and regeneration goals.

    The partnership formalises the alignment of YNYCA’s strategic priorities with the broad range of Homes England’s tools, including funding, capacity and expertise. Teams from YNYCA and Homes England will work together to unlock significant housing and regeneration plans in the area, boosting local placemaking ambitions through partnership working.

    As well as bringing forward a new way of working for housing delivery in the region, the SPP will build on the collaboration already happening on projects like York Central, one of the country’s largest city centre regeneration sites with the potential for up to 2,500 new homes.

    The partnership will be underpinned by the development of a shared business plan aligned to local priorities and focused on a range of developments across the area including Maltkiln and Elvington Garden Village.

    Through the SPP, Homes England will work collaboratively with YNYCA to boost the availability of new and affordable homes for York and North Yorkshire residents.

    Homes England now has nine Strategic Place Partnerships in place with Mayoral Strategic Authorities across England.

    Pat Ritchie CBE, Chair of Homes England, said:

    Our Strategic Place Partnership with the York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority signals our commitment to working with, and for, local leaders to drive real growth in their communities.

    In York, for example, we are already working with partners including Network Rail, the City of York Council and the National Railway Museum to drive forward the transformation of York Central, one of the UK’s largest brownfield sites, into new homes, cultural spaces and infrastructure.

    David Skaith, Mayor of York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority, said:

    Across York and North Yorkshire, we are in the midst of a housing crisis, with some of the most expensive homes in the UK. With over 10,000 households on housing waiting lists in our region, we must act now.

    We need to build the right homes in the right places, ensuring people in all our towns, cities and villages can stay and live in our region.

    Bringing together Homes England, our councils and key organisations through the York and North Yorkshire Strategic Place Partnership will help us all deliver on our shared vision to get building.

    As we work towards the government’s target of 1.5 million new homes this parliament, partnerships like this will be crucial in ensuring we deliver the right homes in the right places, in this case by supporting both urban regeneration and rural advancement across York and North Yorkshire.

    Notes to editors:

    1. The strengthened relationship between Homes England and the Mayoral Combined Authority follows the publication of the government’s English Devolution White Paper in December 2024, which details the plan to empower local leaders and deepen devolution across England.
    2. The white paper highlights Homes England’s work on SPPs and the important part they play in devolution.
  • Angela Rayner – 2025 Statement on Stamp Duty on Second Flat

    Angela Rayner – 2025 Statement on Stamp Duty on Second Flat

    The statement made by Angela Rayner on 3 September 2025.

    Following the substantial scrutiny surrounding my living arrangements, I wanted to set out the facts as openly and transparently as I can.

    Until now, an undertaking in a court order prevented me from disclosing information about certain aspects of my personal life. In the interests of public transparency, I applied to the court and I was last night released from this undertaking.

    Family life can be complicated, and it is no secret that, like many families across the country, my domestic arrangements reflect these complexities. Throughout my career, I have always tried to be the best mum to my children, while managing the demanding realities of public service.

    There has been a lot of speculation in recent days about my domestic arrangements and in particular the home I share with my ex-husband and my family. While I do not find it easy to publicly discuss personal and sometimes distressing family matters, I have always taken my responsibility as an MP and deputy prime minister seriously and tried to be as open as possible while protecting my family. To address the allegations made against me I have now taken the difficult decision to explain why my arrangements are as they are.

    In 2023 my ex-husband and I divorced. As parents who have been through divorce will understand, the top priority for both of us during that process was the wellbeing of our children and helping them navigate this change. To provide maximum stability during this transition, we agreed to a nesting arrangement where the children remain in the family home full-time while we alternate living there. We also wanted to ensure that our child, who has special educational needs, was provided for as part of the divorce settlement.

    A court-instructed trust was established in 2020 following a deeply personal and distressing incident involving my son as a premature baby. He was left with life-long disabilities, and the trust was established to manage the award on his behalf – a standard practice in circumstances like ours.

    To ensure he continued to have stability in the family home, which had been adapted for his needs, we agreed that our interest in the family home would be transferred to this court-instructed trust of which he is the sole beneficiary.

    Some of the interest in our family home was transferred to the trust in 2023. In January 2025, I sold the remaining interest in the property to my son’s trust. This will give him the security of knowing the home is his, allowing him to continue to live in the home he feels safe in and grew up in. We transferred the property because it was in the best interests of our child. I acted as any parent would.

    The sale of the property in Ashton-under-Lyne to the trust has not altered my family life. It remains my family home, as it has been for over a decade. It contains the majority of my possessions and it is where I am registered for most official and financial purposes ranging from credit cards to the dentist to the electoral roll. But most importantly, it is where my children live and have gone to school and now college, and where I regularly live while caring for them.

    After I sold my stake to the trust, I bought a property in Hove in May 2025. Like many people, I used the lump sum from selling my stake in my Ashton home, which was the only property I owned and where my savings were, for the deposit on my new one. I obtained a mortgage to finance the rest. When purchasing the property my understanding, on advice from lawyers,
    was that my circumstances meant I was liable for the standard rate of stamp duty.

    However, given the recent allegations in the press I have subsequently sought further advice from a leading tax counsel to review that position and to ensure I am fully compliant with all tax provisions. I have now been advised that although I did not own any other property at the time of the purchase, the application of complex deeming provisions which relate to my son’s trust gives rise to additional stamp duty liabilities. I acknowledge that due to my reliance on advice from lawyers which did not properly take account of these provisions, I did not pay the appropriate stamp duty at the time of the purchase. I am working with expert lawyers and with HMRC to resolve the matter and pay what is due.

    The arrangements I have set out reflect the reality that family life is rarely straightforward, particularly when dealing with disability, divorce and the complexities of ensuring your children’s long-term security. Every decision I have made has been guided by what I believe to be in my children’s best interests.

    I deeply regret the error that has been made. I am committed to resolving this matter fully and providing the transparency that public service demands. It is for that reason I have today referred myself to the independent adviser on ministerial standards, and will provide him with my fullest cooperation and access to all the information he requires.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Ban on selling high-caffeine energy drinks to boost kids’ health [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Ban on selling high-caffeine energy drinks to boost kids’ health [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Department of Health and Social Care on 2 September 2025.

    The government will consult on banning the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks to under 16s due to negative impacts on children’s physical and mental health.

    • Government to ban sale of high-caffeine energy drinks to under-16s
    • Evidence links the drinks to negative impacts on children’s physical and mental health, sleep quality, and educational outcomes
    • Move backed by parents and teachers and will deliver significant long term health benefits as part of government’s Plan for Change

    Children will be protected from the harm caused by high-caffeine energy drinks under new proposals to ban their sale to under-16s.

    Plans set out today will help boost kids’ health by stopping retailers from selling the drinks to children in a move that could prevent obesity in up to 40,000 children and deliver health benefits worth tens of millions of pounds.

    Around 100,000 children consume at least one high caffeine energy drink every day. There is growing evidence linking these drinks to harmful effects on children, including disrupted sleep, increased anxiety, poor concentration and reduced educational outcomes.

    Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:

    How can we expect children to do well at school if they have the equivalent of four cans of cola in their system on a daily basis?

    Energy drinks might seem harmless, but the sleep, concentration and wellbeing of today’s kids are all being impacted, while high sugar versions damage their teeth and contribute to obesity.

    As part of our Plan for Change and shift from treatment to prevention, we’re acting on the concerns of parents and teachers and tackling the root causes of poor health and educational attainment head on.

    By preventing shops from selling these drinks to kids, we’re helping build the foundations for healthier and happier generations to come.

    Research highlights that up to one third of children aged 13 to 16 years, and nearly a quarter of children aged 11 to 12 years consume one or more of these drinks each week, so early intervention is crucial if we are to deliver on our pledge to create the healthiest generation of children ever.

    This is backed by parents, teachers and teaching unions who report on pupils being unable to concentrate and focus and even negatively affecting grades and academic performance. Evidence also shows that children from more deprived communities are more likely to consume these products – further contributing to health inequalities across the country.

    Acting now to improve children’s wellbeing will not only help give them the best start in life and prevent them from a lifetime of poor health but also deliver tens of millions of pounds of health benefits as well as future savings for the NHS and increased economic productivity.

    Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said:

    Through our Plan for Change, we are determined to give every child the opportunities they deserve and the best start in life.

    This government inherited a scourge of poor classroom behaviour that undermines the learning of too many children – partly driven by the harmful effects of caffeine loaded drinks – and today’s announcement is another step forward in addressing that legacy.

    It goes hand-in-hand with our work to address the root causes of poor behaviour with targeted support to hundreds of struggling schools, access to a specialist mental health professional in every school and updated school food standards so children have access to healthy food and drink options during the school day.

    The proposal would make it illegal to sell high-caffeine energy drinks containing more than 150mg of caffeine per litre to anyone aged under 16 years across all retailers, including online, in shops, restaurants, cafes and vending machines. The proposals would not affect lower-caffeine soft drinks nor tea and coffee.

    Many major retailers already voluntarily restrict sales, but research suggests some smaller convenience stores continue selling to children, highlighting the need for a consistent approach that protects our children and is fairer for industry.

    A consultation launched today on delivery of the ban will run for twelve weeks gathering evidence from health experts, education leaders, retailers, manufacturers, local enforcement authorities and the public.

    Every child deserves the best possible start in life which is why we are also rolling out supervised tooth brushing for three to five-year-olds, , supporting free breakfast clubs and taking action to help families raise the healthiest generation of children ever.

    And we have just announced the largest ever expansion with 30 hours government-funded childcare saving hard-pressed parents £7,500.

    Carrera, a Bite Back activist from Milton Keynes, said:

    Energy drinks have become the social currency of the playground — cheap, brightly packaged, and easier to buy than water. They’re aggressively marketed to us, especially online, despite serious health risks.

    We feel pressured to drink them, especially during exam season, when stress is high and healthier options are hard to find. This ban is a step in the right direction — but bold action on marketing and access must follow.

    Lauren Morley from Worthing, East Sussex is parent to a six-year-old. She also works directly with young people and schools on nutrition and mental health. She is a parent ambassador with Sustain. She said:

    As a parent of a 6-year-old and an educator with 13 years’ experience, I’ve seen the harm these drinks cause. In schools, I’ve witnessed panic attacks, anxiety and poor focus, often after students consume multiple cans instead of breakfast.

    My concern grows as my child gets older. When young people stop drinking them, we see their wellbeing, concentration, and mood noticeably improve. I welcome the Department of Health and Social Care’s consultation on restricting high caffeine energy drink sales to children.

    Rounaq Nayak is a father to two children, living in Bristol. He works as a lecturer and is a parent ambassador with Sustain. He said:

    As a parent, I welcome the government’s announcement on restricting high caffeine energy drink sales to children. I’ve seen how marketing and peer influence make these drinks seem appealing – from my youngest wanting to copy older kids to my eldest believing they make you ‘faster’ at sport. Clear regulation, alongside education in schools and for parents, is essential to protect children’s health and ensure companies are held accountable for how these products are promoted.

    Charlotte Harrison, Senior Safeguarding Consultant, said:

    As a safeguarding consultant and former teacher, I am delighted about, and strongly support, this consultation on a proposed ban of high-caffeine energy drink sales to under-16s. I have seen first-hand the damaging impact these drinks have on young people; there is no doubt that they negatively impact children’s health, behaviour, and learning, as well as contributing to long-term issues like obesity.

    Protecting our young people from harmful substances is a vital part of safeguarding, and this consultation is a crucial step toward creating healthier, more supportive environments for our children to thrive in both education and life. I urge everyone to support this consultation to protect the future wellbeing of our children.

    Stuart, Assistant Head Teacher of a Sixth Form, said:

    As a teacher, I see first-hand the damage energy drinks do to students – from poor focus in class to poor nutrition and overall, well being. We do what we can to keep them out of classrooms and school in general, but without a ban, it’s an uphill battle.

    These drinks are not for young people – and I’m delighted the government is finally catching up with clear rules and legislation to support young people to make healthier choices.

    Professor Amelia Lake, Professor of Public Health Nutrition, Teesside University and Deputy Director of Fuse the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health said:

    Our research has shown the significant mental and physical health consequences of children drinking energy drinks. We have reviewed evidence from around the world and have shown that these drinks have no place in the diets of children.

    Other countries have age-restricted sales of energy drinks, Norway has recently announced their restrictions starting in 2026. I welcome this consultation, it will be a step forward in prioritising the health and wellbeing of our young population.

    Barbara Crowther of the Children’s Food Campaign at Sustain, an alliance of over 100 food, farming and health organisations, said:

    High caffeine energy drinks already carry warning labels saying ‘not suitable for children’, so it’s absolutely right for the government to limit them from being sold to children too.

    They are branded and marketed to appeal to young people through sports and influencers and far too easily purchased by children in shops, cafes and vending machines. Parents, teachers and health professionals have all called for this policy, so let’s get involved with the consultation and support children’s health.

    Katharine Jenner, Director, Obesity Health Alliance, said:

    High-caffeine energy drinks have no place in children’s hands. We fully support the government’s proposal to ban sales of high-caffeine energy drinks to under-16s. This is a common-sense, evidence-based step to protect children’s physical, mental, and dental health.

    Age-of-sale policies like this have a proven record of reducing access to products that are not suitable for children, and will help create an environment that supports healthier choices for future generations.

    Sarah Muckle, Policy Lead for Children and Young People at the Association of Directors of Public Health and Director of Public Health for Essex, said:

    Our children and young people deserve the opportunity to grow up in an environment which nurtures their potential, provides them with easy access to healthy food, drink and activities, and helps them thrive.

    Energy drinks, which are currently made incredibly attractive and affordable to children through targeted advertising and marketing campaigns funded by the industry, are associated with a wide range of physical and mental health issues and so we are very pleased to see the Government acting on its promise to protect children’s health in this way.

    A ban will not only make a huge difference to individual children’s health but will also have the knock-on consequence of enabling our children and young people to take a more active role in their education and their communities – something that will benefit everyone.

    Professor Tracy Daszkiewicz, President of the Faculty of Public Health, said:

    Mounting evidence shows us that high-caffeine energy drinks are damaging the health of children across the UK, particularly those from deprived communities who are already at higher risk of obesity and other health issues.

    We welcome this public health intervention to limit access to these drinks and help support the physical and mental wellbeing of our young people.

    Andrea Martinez-Inchausti, Assistant Director of Food at the British Retail Consortium, said:

    BRC members banned the sale of certain energy drinks to under 16s many years ago, so we welcome this announcement as it will ensure a level playing field across all businesses who sell energy drinks. But most importantly, it will protect young consumers.

    Pepe Di’Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said:

    We welcome this consultation. There is clear evidence that high-caffeine energy drinks are not only a health risk to children but that these products also affect behaviour and concentration.

    They are banned in many schools but their wider availability means they can be consumed outside of school time with a knock-on effect in class. Restricting the sale of these drinks could be a relatively simple way of supporting learning and wellbeing.

    Paul Whiteman, General Secretary, National Association of Head Teachers, said:

    NAHT supports this proactive move to ban the sale of these drinks to under 16s. A healthy diet for children and young people is vital and these drinks, which are high in caffeine and in sugar, are not consistent with that. Evidence is also growing to support concerns school staff have over connections between these drinks and reduced concentration in the classroom. Anything which addresses this and helps pupils to focus on their learning has to be welcome.

    Professor Steve Turner, President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said:

    Paediatricians are very clear that children or teenagers do not need energy drinks. Young people get their energy from sleep, a healthy balanced diet, regular exercise and meaningful connection with family and friends. There’s no evidence that caffeine or other stimulants in these products offer any nutritional or developmental benefit, in fact growing research points to serious risks for behaviour and mental health. Banning the sale of these products to under-16s is the next logical step in making the diet of our nation’s children more healthy.

    Rebecca Tobi, Senior Business and Investor Engagement Manager, The Food Foundation, said:

    Caffeine is a very potent stimulant, as many adults know all too well, so it’s very welcome to see the government moving forward with their commitment to ban the sale of energy drinks to children. Caffeine and energy drinks should have no place in children’s diets, yet remain heavily marketed to children. As well as needing to ban sales of high caffeine drinks across all places where children can buy them, government and businesses should also look to ensure these drinks aren’t constantly promoted to children – for example on gaming platforms.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton takes over as Chief of Defence Staff [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton takes over as Chief of Defence Staff [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 2 September 2025.

    Outgoing Chief of Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin handed over today (2nd September) to his successor, Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton.

    Sir Richard’s appointment was announced in June 2025, succeeding Admiral Radakin, who completed his four-year term, following his appointment in 2021.

    Admiral Radakin’s tenure included him playing a pivotal role in responding to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, rallying NATO support, playing a key role in this year’s Strategic Defence Review and leading the military through the ceremonial response to the death of HM Queen Elizabeth II.

    As CDS, ACM Knighton serves as the professional head of the UK’s Armed Forces, military strategic commander, and principal military adviser to the Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Defence.

    Under defence Reform, the Chief of the Defence Staff, for the first time since this role was created, now commands the service chiefs and is the head of the newly established Military Strategic Headquarters, responsible for force design and war planning across an integrated force.

    Sir Richard steps up from his previous role as Chief of the Air Staff, bringing extensive experience in strategic planning and overseeing Royal Air Force operations worldwide to his new position as Defence Chief.

    Sir Richard’s appointment comes in the same year that the Prime Minister announced an increase in defence spending to 2.6% of GDP from April 2027, with an ambition to reach 3% in the next parliament.

    In June, Defence Secretary John Healey MP welcomed the appointment, saying:

    As Chief of the Air Staff, Sir Rich Knighton has led the RAF with distinction through a period of intense demand, with NATO operations, deployments to the Middle East and activity across the world. As Chief of the Defence Staff, he will play a critical role in delivering the transformation set out in the Strategic Defence Review. And together, we will put the men and women of our Armed Forces at the heart of our defence plans.

    Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton said:

    It is an honour to begin my role as Chief of the Defence Staff today. I will work tirelessly to combat the threats the UK faces whilst fulfilling the integral role the Armed Forces play in protecting our personnel, our allies and operations worldwide.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Tens of thousands more to be tagged under biggest ever expansion [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Tens of thousands more to be tagged under biggest ever expansion [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 2 September 2025.

    More people will be tagged and monitored as part of the Government’s Plan for Change as the Sentencing Bill is published.

    • Up to 22,000 more offenders and defendants tagged each year as part of the Government’s Plan for Change
    • £100m extra investment and new expectation all prisoners will be tagged when leaving jail
    • Sentencing Bill will also end automatic release for badly behaved offenders

    Tens of thousands more criminals will be tagged and monitored over the next three years as part of the Government’s Plan for Change to make streets safer.

    It is the biggest expansion of tagging since the adoption of curfew tags in 1999 with an extra £100 million being invested into electronic monitoring – an increase of 30%.

    The Government is also introducing, for the first time, a presumption that all prison leavers will be tagged on release as part of intensive supervision with the Probation Service keeping a closer eye on offenders’ behaviour. This means, unless Probation Staff specifically decide not to, any offender leaving prison will be tagged.

    A new pilot launching next month will also see offenders tagged before leaving the prison gates, rather than days later as is currently the case ahead of a planned wider rollout to end the surveillance gap in the crucial time after release.

    It comes as legislation to end the prison crisis inherited by the Government and prevent the collapse of the justice system is introduced to Parliament today (2 September).

    Alongside the construction of 14,000 more prison places, the Sentencing Bill delivers urgent reform to a system on the brink. Together, this will ensure the country never runs out of prison cells, there is always space inside jails for dangerous offenders, and punishment cuts crime.

    Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said:

    Last year, the criminal justice system was on the verge of collapse. Since being elected, the Government has worked rapidly to repair the damage, starting with investing £7 billion in 14,000 more prison places as part of our Plan for Change.

    A historic increase in tagging and record investment into probation will make our streets safer.

    And this Sentencing Bill will ensure that our prisons never run out of space again, we can always lock up dangerous offenders, and that punishment cuts crime rather than creating better criminals.

    The Sentencing Bill follows on from the Independent Sentencing Review led by David Gauke published in May.

    The Government has already announced it will introduce a new “earned progression model” that will see prisoners who break the rules spend longer than the minimum of 33 or 50 percent in prison, ending automatic release for badly behaved offenders. It was inspired by changes in Texas where crime has since fallen to levels last seen in the 1960s.

    To enforce this, the Government is toughening the prison punishment regime, so prisoners face up to three months extra in jail for violence or being found with illicit items like phones. Multiple incidents will see punishments added consecutively with constantly violent prisoners potentially spending their whole sentence behind bars as a result.

    Offenders released from prison will enter a period of “intensive supervision” tailored to their risk and the type of crime they committed. Probation officers will maintain discretion to tag offenders based on their risk to the public and their victim. Those subject to Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements will remain in this “intensive supervision” stage for the duration of their sentence. Others will progress into a licence phase, with strict conditions on their behaviour remaining.

    This “earned progression model” will apply to prisoners serving standard determinate sentences only. Some offenders on standard determinate sentences will spend at least one-third of their sentence behind bars. Those serving standard determinate sentences for more serious offences will serve at least half in prison. Dangerous offenders will be unaffected with those serving extended determinate sentences or life sentences continuing to spend as much time behind bars as they do now.

    The Government is also ramping up deportations of foreign criminals, freeing up vital space in our prisons and keeping the public safe – with deportations 14 percent higher since July 2024. This Bill will drive this work further with measures to see immediate deportation after sentencing for foreign criminals, rather than having their bed and board in prison covered by taxpayers as currently.

    The Bill also introduces a presumption that prison sentences of a year or less will be replaced with tougher sentences in the community that better punish offenders and stop them reoffending. Currently, 62 percent of those receiving a prison sentence of under 12 months reoffended within a year, which is higher than similar offenders given sentences in the community.

    Offenders who pose a significant risk of harm to an individual or who have breached a court order – including breach of a previous suspended sentence order – will be exempt from this change, meaning judges always have the power to send dangerous offenders or prolific law breakers to prison.

    For those offenders who will be punished outside of prison, the Government is toughening up community sentences with a series of new measures:

    • Punishments that restrict offenders’ freedom in the community. Judges will be handed new powers to bar criminals from pubs, concerts and sports matches, curtailing offenders’ freedoms as punishment.
    • Tough unpaid work orders that force offenders to give back to society. Develop new ways in which offenders can undertake tough, unpaid work. This includes working with local authorities to determine how offenders could give back to their communities, whether by removing graffiti or cleaning up rubbish. Publishing the names and photos of those subject to an unpaid work requirement will demonstrate to the public that justice is being delivered and increase the visibility and transparency of community payback.
    • Financial penalties that force offenders to pay back for their crimes. Work to deliver new “income reduction orders” which will see judges able to order offenders to forfeit some of their income as a form of punishment during their sentence.

    The Government will follow the most recent evidence on how to use punishment to reduce reoffending and cut crime. This includes expanding the use of “intensive supervision courts”, which target the root causes of offending amongst prolific offenders. Despite significant addiction issues at the start of the sentence, offenders tested negative for drugs over two thirds of the time. Across the world, particularly in Texas and across America, this approach has driven down reoffending rates. Early signs from four pilot sites in England are positive, and the Government has announced it will expand to more sites.

    The Sentencing Bill also introduces measures to better support victims of crime, including:

    • New “restriction zones” – welcomed last month by victims’ campaigners Diana Parkes CBE and Hetti Barkworth-Nanton CBE, co-founders of The Joanna Simpson Foundation, and Doreen Soulsby – which will restrict offenders to a certain area, allowing victims to travel without fear of seeing them.
    •  A judicial finding of domestic abuse in sentencing which will allow criminal justice agencies to identify domestic abusers, ensure they are better monitored, and the right measures are in place to protect victims.

    Chief Executive Officer of We Are Survivors, Duncan Craig OBE, said:

    I very much welcome the presentation of the Sentencing Bill today and whilst there will be much debate and scrutiny to come, we’re certainly moving towards a new and modern response to dealing with those that cause harm.

    As a victim/survivor, I have long been frustrated with the binary and repetitive way we think and respond to victims and offenders. Whilst victims must be a priority in our response, it’s vital we take action to reduce the number of future victims which means reducing offending in the first place.

    We have to have a grown-up conversation about offending behaviours, ensure we better understand the cause of offending, and design responses to offending that supports opportunities for people to change. We have to have a paradigm shift to reduce the creation of victims and equally reduce the number of offenders. It is too important not to.

    To support the implementation of the Sentencing Review, the Government is investing an extra up to £700 million in the Probation Service by 2028/29 – an increase of around 45 per cent on top of the current budget.

    The probation workforce is also being bolstered, with the number of probation officers already up seven per cent in the last 12 months.

    In addition to the 1,000 trainee probation officers recruited last year, the Government has commitment to recruit a further 1,300 by March next year. This will increase capacity whilst new technology will lighten the administrative burden and free up time for staff to focus on managing offenders and keeping the public safe.

    Further information

  • PRESS RELEASE : £5 million of government funding for 26 innovative rail projects to boost passenger experience [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : £5 million of government funding for 26 innovative rail projects to boost passenger experience [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Department for Transport on 2 September 2025.

    Winning projects focus on improving safety on rail platforms and enhancing passenger safety across the UK.

    • First-of-a-Kind competition winners will deliver innovative projects aimed at increasing safety, reducing bridge strikes and incorporating AI technology
    • previous winners’ projects are already being used across the railways, improving efficiency, safety and reliability
    • £5 million government funding demonstrates commitment to boosting passenger experience, encouraging more people to choose rail and driving economic growth

    Twenty-six cutting-edge projects aimed at improving passenger experience on the railway have launched, supported by a multi-million pound funding package by the Department for Transport (DfT).

    In partnership with Innovate UK, working closely with Network Rail and train operators, the First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) competition offers grant funding for innovative projects to be tested on the railway, to give them a better chance at being bought by train operators, freight companies and Network Rail.

    Given the Transport Secretary’s clear direction to put passengers at the heart of every journey, this year’s winning projects focus on improving safety at the platforms, passenger safety and reducing incidents of vehicles hitting railway bridges. Through working closely with Network Rail and train operators, these innovations will help to improve rail services and infrastructure where it’s needed most.

    Among the winning projects is IntelliPan Network, which will reduce delays for passengers by using AI to detect faults on overhead lines, eliminating dangerous, service-disrupting dewirements.

    Another successful project, SafeRide 5G, will empower passengers to report incidents using their own devices safely and privately via onboard wifi, boosting response times and removing key barriers to reporting, improving passenger safety.

    Twenty-six successful projects will be supported with £5 million in funding from DfT, demonstrating the government’s commitment to trialling innovative technology to modernise our railway and boost the passenger experience. These projects will help to deliver better services for passengers, encouraging more people to take the train and supporting growth as part of the government’s Plan for Change.

    Rail Minister, Lord Peter Hendy, said:

    The winners of this competition are taking cutting-edge technology to address some of the biggest challenges facing the rail industry, making a railway that works better for the people and goods using it.

    These innovations are putting safety, reliability and passenger experience first, like IntelliPan Network using AI to detect faults on overhead lines, reducing disruption caused by dangerous dewirements.

    Through this funding, we are building a platform on which innovation can thrive, giving new technologies a chance to succeed and driving economic growth as part of the Plan for Change.

    Previous competition winners are already being used widely across the railways, like the Portable Track Geometry Measurement System, which provides immediate track information to engineers to speed up the lifting of speed restrictions or line closures, getting passengers to their destinations quicker.

    Mike Biddle, Executive Director for Net Zero at Innovate UK, said:

    The innovations receiving support through this competition will contribute to a more accessible, safer, and efficient railway system throughout the UK. The competition highlights the importance of collaboration with industry partners and focuses on delivering high-maturity demonstrations, ensuring seamless integration into the existing railway infrastructure.

    Delivered by Innovate UK, the UK’s innovation agency, on behalf of the Department for Transport, the FOAK rail programme seeks to identify and support outstanding, innovative solutions. Funded organisations will showcase the creativity and impact of their ideas through live demonstrations.

    The 26 successful projects have today (2 September 2025) started work on the new technologies, with testing to take place over the coming months. See the full list of winners.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Secretary of State announces the appointment of new Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Secretary of State announces the appointment of new Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Northern Ireland Office on 2 September 2025.

    The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, the Right Honourable Hilary Benn MP, has announced the appointment of Mr David MacAnulty and Mr Donald Leeson as Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland with effect from 1 October 2025.

    Background

    Civil Service Commissioners are appointed under the Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973 by the King, on recommendation from the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. Their function is to regulate appointments to the Northern Ireland Civil Service and under the terms of the Civil Service Commissioners (Northern Ireland) Order 1999, the Commissioners also have the power to consider, and determine, appeals to them by civil servants under the Northern Ireland Civil Service Code of Ethics.

    Further information on the work of the Commissioners is available at:

    https://www.nicscommissioners.org/

    Terms of appointment

    • These positions are part-time for a period of five years ending on 30 September 2030.
    • The positions receive a daily fee of £300.
    • The positions are not pensionable.

    Biographies

    Mr MacAnulty is an Inspector of Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland. He formerly held the role of Prosecutor within the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland.

    Mr Leeson currently holds the position of Non-Executive Director at the NI Transport Holding Company (Translink) and Chair of the Board of Trustees. HR Consultant and Accreditation Assessor with Diversity Mark. He formerly held the position of Chief Executive of the Labour Relations Agency NI and also held the position of Director of Corporate Services.

    Political Activity

    All appointments are made on merit and with regards to the statutory requirements. Political activity plays no part in the selection process. However, in accordance with the original Nolan recommendations, there is a requirement for appointees’ political activity in defined categories to be made public.

    Both individuals have declared that they have not been politically active in the last five years.

    Regulation

    Appointments to the Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland are not regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments.

    Statutory Requirements

    Appointments to the Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland are made under the provisions of section 36 (1) of the Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973.